Go back and look at my queston as posted. I quoted you there, and was typing of it.
First of all, please don't be difficult for the sake of being difficult. I was confused about your point and asked you for clarification. No reason not to answer.
Secondly.
And beyond that, you can't say for certain whether or not particles are moving on their own, or being guided by a divine hand, until you have a *perfect* understanding of particle physics, free of random chance. Even then, you could say God was responsible for setting them in motion in the first place.
Ideas I see in this quote:
1: Particles are moving on their own
2: They're being guided by a divine hand
3: We'll someday have perfect understanding of particle physics
4: Particle physics is inherently free of random chance.
5: God set them in motion.
6: The possibility that 2 or 5 is true means neuroscience can't disprove that prayer responses come from god.
Pick two.
I'm sure I do believe things you don't, but I try to make sure anything I do believe is backed up by evidence. I don't believe "There is no god" - I just don't believe in any god, since no evidence has been presented for any of them.
I'd just like to point out that "I don't believe there's no god, but I don't believe in a god" is about the most confusing sentence possible.
Well, then we're back to where we were before- you have beliefs about the godless universe than I don't have about god-having one, and thus, unless one of us lacks internal consistency or has evidence against us, we're on equal footing. It's just a matter of what your default is.