The atheist views mankind as an accidental end product of biological evolution-a natural creature that is not morally responsible to anyone higher than himself. He believes that those "higher" attributes of humanness such as language, love, intellect, philosophy, and religion came into being because they somehow give mankind greater advantage in the battle for the survival of the fittest.
This view of man as nothing more than a highly evolved animal has led to perversions of law and justice as well as horrendous human atrocities during the world wars in the last century and in regional conflicts that continue to this day.
Again, I'm certain that most people on this forum don't care what religion you are. Nerds seem to be more tolerant.
OH YAY RELIGION THREAD.
I like the implication that Hitler was evil because he was atheist despite the fact that he was, you know, not atheist.
It doesn't work on the internet because everyone wants to just unload their religious based baggage onto the topic rather then really taking part in a discussion.
Then you get people who don't really understand what is going on and think that the topic is just about unleashing as much text partially related to the topic at hand. (Nonsense posters... Who are very much alive on Bay12games)
Then you get people who are offended at the two people above who unleash their wraph (note: This is a System group as they are capable of offending those within this group of people thus sustaining it infinitum.)
With just these three, the list has around 6 points, any religion based topic is doomed to fail. The problem is that the internet cannot handle Controvercy very well.
The idea that something so incredibly bias could make it into a science textbook, something that should be full of rational thinking, is bizarre. Even more so that its not even bias against religion, at least then you could trust the physics to be accurate. Who knows how much you can trust this thing?
I have nothing against religion but when they try to brainwash people into believing a wrong version of science, that's unacceptable.
Please post more, I would love to see what blatant contradictions this book contains.
It doesn't work on the internet because everyone wants to just unload their religious based baggage onto the topic rather then really taking part in a discussion.
Then you get people who don't really understand what is going on and think that the topic is just about unleashing as much text partially related to the topic at hand. (Nonsense posters... Who are very much alive on Bay12games)
Then you get people who are offended at the two people above who unleash their wraph (note: This is a System group as they are capable of offending those within this group of people thus sustaining it infinitum.)
With just these three, the list has around 6 points, any religion based topic is doomed to fail. The problem is that the internet cannot handle Controvercy very well.
This view of man as nothing more than a highly evolved animal has led to perversions of law and justice as well as horrendous human atrocities during the world wars in the last century and in regional conflicts that continue to this day.
If anything, Athiests can be trusted most of all to be moral because their judgement is never clouded by religion. You don't need the fear of god to have a conscience.
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v306/dasleah/happy_nazis.jpg)Those Nazi's are pwnzor, could they be any more awesome?
If anything, Athiests can be trusted most of all to be moral because their judgement is never clouded by religion. You don't need the fear of god to have a conscience.
So I got my physics course, which, much to my dismay, my mother ordered from Bob Jones Univeristy. In case you didn't know, it's a christian school.
Seriously, it's a religion for braindead sheeple. Just look at them
Well, at least we made it to page two before the overt Christian-bashing began
completely unnecessary post
Then Puck came in, which provoked Zai.