May I have an IC spot?
Your OP is broken.Y u so mean ZU
Watching.May I have an IC spot?
I think you're too green to be an IC.
Ooh, in! I'm trying for the sprint too, let's see how well they juggle!
I was doing 3 at once near the end of the last BM. I went -insane-. I felt like I couldn't keep up with any of them. Then everything clicked, and I could. (or else I did go insane, and didn't keep up with any of them, and still don't realize :P)*cheers*
I was doing 3 at once near the end of the last BM. I went -insane-. I felt like I couldn't keep up with any of them. Then everything clicked, and I could. (or else I did go insane, and didn't keep up with any of them, and still don't realize :P)*cheers*
Yep! Sanity (sound judgement) is directly proportional to how your mindset allows! Clickety click click! :P
Now I only need to worry about three more: a player, and two ICs.
I'm probably nitpicking here but do you (everyone) want your roles to be hand-tailored to your personal needs or are you happy with whatever the roles are in the OP?
I'm probably nitpicking here but do you (everyone) want your roles to be hand-tailored to your personal needs or are you happy with whatever the roles are in the OP?
I'll be watching this.
I've considered joining about 3 of these games before, but my scheduling just doesn't work well with it.I'll be watching this.
You should join! Assuming you're a beginner. We still don't have enough players.
I'll be watching this.
You should join! Assuming you're a beginner. We still don't have enough players.
I guess I'm being silly x3I'm probably nitpicking here but do you (everyone) want your roles to be hand-tailored to your personal needs or are you happy with whatever the roles are in the OP?
Huh? What are you offering us? What do you mean by 'hand-tailored'robes... err, roles?
In Replacement
Sure... But I'm currently Sprinting, and you aren't... So unless you are playing a game atm, I'm not going to take it ;).
(I think you are playing paranormal though right?)
Now to wait for that one IC..Unless Deathsword would like to trade places with anyone :PThen you'd be missing a scum IC. (I also like being scum IC)
That we do, dear lucky cat.It was a superstition made by sexist "witch hunters" who tried to claim that witches owned black cats so they could use it as an excuse to burn women.
Black cats are only regarded as unlucky in western cultures so far as I've heard.
...
*Tiruin is more on Eastern culture. :3
Japan regards black cats are good luck.
Lets just make a random IC, and just go!That would sort of ruin the point.
..I didn't like the witch hunts they had then. Ignorance was abundant.as opposed to the witch hunts they have now because they're are absolutely brilliant?
..I didn't like the witch hunts they had then. Ignorance was abundant.as opposed to the witch hunts they have now because they're are absolutely brilliant?
Making Imp an IC may be necessary.
It's ultimately the moderator's discretion who she decides to have as an IC.I did not know this.
It is not actually I would think. Don't be in too much of a rush. Though I know for a fact that someone around here's pretty eager to start. I'm not gonna point fingers or anything but he loves Revolvers and is often confused for Nenjin. Just be patient and everything will come together....*reads name*
Conversing with Imp is always fun.
*ahem*
Wait no more for I love questions!
How do you choose what you're going to ask someone? Is it just random or are there other factors that come in to play?
Also, when is it the best time to focus in on one person? For example, when you have a gut feeling/your a cop and know they're scum or when you have a fair amount of "evidence" against them? Or I guess what I'm really asking is IS there a best time?
Wait no more for I love questions!
How do you choose what you're going to ask someone? Is it just random or are there other factors that come in to play?
Also, when is it the best time to focus in on one person? For example, when you have a gut feeling/your a cop and know they're scum or when you have a fair amount of "evidence" against them? Or I guess what I'm really asking is IS there a best time?
Oooh, ohh! I'm maybethea future IC someday, so I'll offer a perspective too:
There isn't really a 'best time' for questions or narrow or broad focus, but timing can matter, it's situational.
Never forget your goal. If you're Town, you want to find the Scum, and everything you do in play is ideally going to somehow help you find them, from the questions you ask to the timing you use to the specific wording you pick - or not. Depends on you, and if that's not your style, then you'll need to find and develop your own.
If you're Scum, then you need to appear to be Town and appear to want to find the Scum, but you need to do so in a way that helps ensure that the fewest possible Scum are voted for - note that may mean scumhunting your Scumbuddy and helping Town lynch that player, even on Day 1. That's called bussing - and is not an ideal tactic - unless in your exact circumstances it is the ideal tactic.
As to what questions to pick to ask who - I recommend you read over a few of the finished BM games, maybe just read the first few pages after start of play for now from a handful. See what others asked as their opening questions or whatever else people started with, see how well or poorly that seemed to work. When I played my first BM I'd not yet read any games. As I started to play, I started to read 3 previous BMs, only to the approximate point I was at in the one I was playing. As the game progressed, I read a little more. When things seemed harder or weird, I started looking at other finished games, non-BM games, and checked out what had happened in those games around the point mine was at.
General question advice is 'ask questions related to Mafia in some way', 'follow up on the answers if you see anything to follow up on', and 'ask both the types of questions you don't know the answer to, and the sort of questions that you think you -do- know the answer to'. Like what did someone mean when they said something (quote it when you ask). Ask someone what they think something means that someone else answered or asked.
As you talk to people, you're likely to notice things that make more or less sense to you, see things that seem off or weird. Ask people about them. Give people chances to explain themselves (that was perhaps my biggest fault in my first game, I -leapt- to lynch people I thought were Scummy. Those people -were- Scummy! But they were not actually Scum. More communication might have helped straighten that out and avoid a mislynch). Question, question more, keep questioning. When things make sense and feel right, maybe they are. When things seem off and wrong and you're finding inconsistencies, maybe they are.
Consider paying attention to what everyone is doing as best as you can. You might find very interesting things in the questions and answers that are not directed at you, and you can and potentially should ask about that interaction as well.
One potentially cautionary note - you may (or may not) want to consider not asking about someone else's question until after it's been answered (or some time has passed and it's clear that it won't be answered anytime soon). There's more than one school of thought on that one, but some people feel that 'jumping in' like that changes how the question's target is likely to answer, and may take pressure off of Scum (Scum may have been thinking 'OMG I got asked a really hard to answer question, what do I do!' then see your question and think 'Oh, that's just a really weird question. Thank goodness that guy got involved, now do I want to attack that guy for jumping in or attack the guy that asked me the question for asking such a weird question?' or something along those lines). Others feel there's little or nothing wrong with asking about what someone else asks immediately - the interaction as a whole, what gets reacted to, and what appears not to be reacted to, tells a useful story and 'jumping in' has a place and a value, at least sometimes.
Wait no more for I love questions!1 - If someone has done something that looks odd, ask them about it. If you don't have a lead on a person, ask them about something else that has happened in the game so far. A tactic that I often use (which ties in with #2 below) is to make a (mostly) baseless accusation against someone and see how they react to it. If they get defensive, press them on it hard. If not, move on.
How do you choose what you're going to ask someone? Is it just random or are there other factors that come in to play?
Also, when is it the best time to focus in on one person? For example, when you have a gut feeling/your a cop and know they're scum or when you have a fair amount of "evidence" against them? Or I guess what I'm really asking is IS there a best time?
Out, sudden chaos and upheaval in my life; I'd be letting this game down if I tried to stay in.u__u
If/when things clear up, if it's still going on, I'll come back and offer my services as a replacement. Until then, best to not even consider me a replacement.
In for the last spot, this seems like it will be fun never done this before.
Given that the ICs are playing, we're looking at a 6:2 ratio here.I'm neutral. Another mafia game I'm in is just about to start, so I don't really want to be in two at once. At the same time, I wouldn't mind participating.
Why don't you join in...
However, I'm up for running it early if 1/2 +1 of the majority agrees.
Shall I mention the aforementioned benefits of playing in this game? :PI'm too busy to play at the moment. Plus, I'm a terrible influence on people. I'd have to tell people NOT to do what I do. I play Town like scum, and I play scum like an even more scummy version of scum.
I think they're pretty obvious.
1. It's a stickied thread!
2. Beginner's Game!
3. Helping the new players is much better than playing with Mafia Regulars!
4. BMs are FUN!
5. You'll help me test out my writing skills! :D
6. We can start this game by January!
7. You will bring Joy to seven other people, at least.
8. People can start plotting and scheming.
9. We can kick off D1 and test out those newfangled time mechanics.
10. You'll be helping a lot of people!
I'm too busy to play at the moment. Plus, I'm a terrible influence on people. I'd have to tell people NOT to do what I do. I play Town like scum, and I play scum like an even more scummy version of scum.Actually, this is one way of learning. You show how a player plays, and leave the analysis to them--then guide them along. It's like both analyzing yourself and leaving the consequences to an uncontrolled variable. :P
Alright, I'll join your little game of diplomancy.You'll be put in the replacement list as the only slot open is for a playing IC. :(
As a beginner correct? I don't recall seeing you around these parts. Then again I'm pretty poor at it at any rate.Yeah, I've never played this before, so I'm a beginner.
I mean, I get the point of an IC, but you don't need two. You can run this with zero.I'd...rather run this with people who are willing instead of leaving the spot blank for dust to settle. So I'd rather place makeinu in the last IC slot if nobody has any qualms with it due to the lacking numbers, and replace his player slot with mastahcheese.
It's... a little challenging.Ah. That's not good. It really is unfortunate that both mafia games had a delay of around a month and then started at the same time.
Yeah, confirming.
Yeah, confirming.
QFT.
Could I get a spoilspec?Enjoy your popcorn. :)
Awww, he gets popcorn? *pokes at bowl of gruel*You're a mighty wizard. :v
Something I find helpful to do when you get your role PM whether it is a power role or not is to sit down and think for several minutes. How should you proceed? Obviously for regular town this is an easy question to answer, but as a Medic or a Cop it might help think of who would be the best person to target each night. Just think on that once you get your role. Also, since Tiriun is trying to improve her writing it might be a good idea to actually send a PM back explaining what you liked or did not like about the flavor...Thanks so much for this.
Wow, not only did Limerick mafia and this start on the same day, they started within three minutes of each other. Yikes.
Puff: Now that you've played as Scum and Town, which do you find more fun?
Puff was scum in the last Beginner's Mafia (not BM Sprint)QuotePuff: Now that you've played as Scum and Town, which do you find more fun?
Wait... where was Puff scum? I missed that one... :-\
Oooh, though... I will ask the same question of you, Persus. And, do you think we'll see anywhere near as easy a victory as in Paranormal 23?
•makeinu - Thanks for ICing! What advice would you give to a new player who's never played before?
•Persus13 - You were scum in the last BM sprint game, along with Tiruin. What did you think was the most important part of your strategy in not being targeted? Also, you failed to answer makeinu's question.Appearing as town as possible, and avoiding drawing attention while making sure that no one would think I was scum.
•Elephant Parade - You're playing in two games at once, if you have conflicting roles in the two, would a scumtell in one possibly be an indicator in the other? How well can you separate your frame of thought for them?Hmm. I don't know what the answer would be for the first one. Maybe, I guess? For the second one, I will probably try to focus on each in separate blocks of time; i.e., only paying attention to one for one hour and the other one for the next hour. This might help me a bit, but it'll probably still be confusing. I'm tempted to ask for a replacement in one or the other.
And I fail to understand how I failed to answer Makeinu's question.I just read back, and I see you did, sorry, I didn't see that the first time.
So for an actual, in-game question: makeinu: It is MYLO, and both scum are still alive. There are 2 votes on a lurker, and the other 3 haven't voted yet, including the lurker. How do you proceed?
Do you not have anything to question others on? Any observations on the players who've posted so far?Not yet, no. I got up about an hour ago, and have spent very little time on this or the other mafia game.
Wow, not only did Limerick mafia and this start on the same day, they started within three minutes of each other. Yikes.
*begins quietly chanting* compartmentalize, compartmentalize, compartmentalize...
Charming, but not really relevant. I'd like to point out to everyone that this sort've joking is fine to a point. Keep focused on the game though and make sure every post counts
[[IC advice]][/quote]•makeinu - Thanks for ICing! What advice would you give to a new player who's never played before?
Well, in-training, but thank you!
*dons IC hat*
[[makeinu proceeds to discuss how mastahcheese has done so far and then discusses meta-gaming]]
I notice you’ve only really devoted any time towards Persus and Mastahcheese. Is there a reason you’re ignoring everyone else? Is there a reason you’re only focusing on these two?
•Sinlessmoon - You're a cop on day 2, the person you examined the night before was the doctor, and they're lurking. Do you try to get them to be more active to keep them alive? How would you go about doing this without starting a bandwagon on them?
Misconception there buddy. I'm sorry, but Cop sees alignment. Still I'm also interested in knowing the answer.
Alright, here’s my question to you: Of the players you have questioned do you have a follow up plan in mind? Asking everyone questions is really good. But how do you proceed from here?
Since it’s so early in the day I don’t really have much else to say but I do have a bit of a blanket question for EVERYONE:
What is your experience with mafia? Also, which role would you most want to have and why?
[/list]
Since it’s so early in the day I don’t really have much else to say but I do have a bit of a blanket question for EVERYONE:
What is your experience with mafia? Also, which role would you most want to have and why?
•MyOwnWorstEnemy - You're scum, and it's day 2. You failed to kill anyone during the night because of a doctor's interference. How would you attempt to discern who the doctor is?
What is your experience with mafia? Also, which role would you most want to have and why?
•Sinlessmoon - You're a cop on day 2, the person you examined the night before was the doctor, and they're lurking. Do you try to get them to be more active to keep them alive? How would you go about doing this without starting a bandwagon on them?In addition, here is Nerjin's blanket question to all of us.
What is your experience with mafia? Also, which role would you most want to have and why?
What is your experience with mafia? Also, which role would you most want to have and why?
•Jembot - You're the doctor, and after seeing someone scumhunting in a very powerful and effective way, you protect them, and nobody dies in the night. Do you now support their decisions and try to back them up? How would you go about this without it seeming like buddying?
Puff: Now that you've played as Scum and Town, which do you find more fun?
•Pufferfish - What do you think was your biggest mistake in the last BM sprint game, where Persus and Tiruin won as scum? If you could go back, how would you have fixed it?
MastahI'm only playing this one, and yes, this is my first game.blasterCheese:
This is your first game? What do you think you're going to like the most?
All:
Okay, exactly how many of you are playing in both games?
@Tiruin: I'm playing in both games, but I'm trying for a replacement in one or the other.
Because absent-mindedness leads to typos.@Tiruin: I'm playing in both games, but I'm trying for a replacement in one or the other.
Why do you think I'm Tiruin?
I thought I'd play one last one. I feel like I'm still learning the game. I don't actually know how I'll use past knowledge in this game. I make this stuff up as I go along, except when I'm scum.I personally find being scum more fun. I find it more fun to be devious and try and get other people lynched. Playing town can also be very maddening, like D2 of Paranormal when 4 people thought I was scum, and only one was Mafia.
And I doubt I'll play a game as easy as Paranormal again. In addition, Mafia tend to win more BM games.
Yeah, being town can be maddening. Granted some game types are EXTREMELY frustrating. It's best to just recall that everyone is just trying to have fun.
Do you really think you need a BM? I've seen you in other games. Anyways, here's a quick question for you: How do you intend to use your past experience in mafia for this game?
Persus:Yep I'm in Limerick. I like to play as scum more than town. I still enjoy town though.
I forget, are you in Limerick? Also, How about you? What's your favorite side of the field?
•Pufferfish - What do you think was your biggest mistake in the last BM sprint game, where Persus and Tiruin won as scum? If you could go back, how would you have fixed it?
Uh. That's actually a really tough question. I probably would have not lynched anyone first turn and convinced all not to. Or, of course, -not- rolecheck the dead player. :P
All:
Okay, exactly how many of you are playing in both games?
Since EP may have subbed out of here...No you didn-
I'll IN As Replacement...
(WHICH I DID EARLIER TIRUIN. GOSH!)
Persus13: You're a doctor and it's day one. How do you decide who to protect?
makeinu: You're a cop and you know that a certain person, for whom everyone is voting, is town. Do you try to defend the person and role claim or just let it happen and stick to the shadows?
Jembot: You're scum. Your partner is radiating scumminess. Do you bus him or try to frame another person to save them?Overall, I would probably not bus, as most people would expect the scum partner to bus in that situation, so bussing doesn't make me look any more town. I would try to look for inconsistencies in anyone else's actions and try to highlight those, or attempt to find a lurker and convince people that they are scum. If their were no inconsistencies or lurkers, I would probably bus if there was already a bandwagon on him, as that isn't really what you would expect scum to do in that situation.
Pufferfish: It's down to three people: you, a fellow townie, and a scum. The scum has convinced your fellow townie that you are scum. What do you do?
Superblackcat: Everyone's suddenly turning on a person you don't have a case on. What do you do?
mastahcheese: You're a cop and find out someone's scum. What's your next move?Hmm, it depends, really.
Shouldn't you also accuse the third person to jump on it?Superblackcat: Everyone's suddenly turning on a person you don't have a case on. What do you do?I vote the second one to jump on the bandwagon.
So for an actual, in-game question: makeinu: It is MYLO, and both scum are still alive. There are 2 votes on a lurker, and the other 3 haven't voted yet, including the lurker. How do you proceed?
-snip-
For the record, I watched that exact situation develop in a game I ran once. The scum had successfully set up another player in a solid frame-job and eliminated them, then at MyLo placed one vote on a Townie that had suspicion built up against them from previous days, and waited. Once a second vote came, down came the hammer and the win.
Shouldn't you also accuse the third person to jump on it?Superblackcat: Everyone's suddenly turning on a person you don't have a case on. What do you do?I vote the second one to jump on the bandwagon.
I'll take a quote from earlier to state why.So for an actual, in-game question: makeinu: It is MYLO, and both scum are still alive. There are 2 votes on a lurker, and the other 3 haven't voted yet, including the lurker. How do you proceed?
-snip-
For the record, I watched that exact situation develop in a game I ran once. The scum had successfully set up another player in a solid frame-job and eliminated them, then at MyLo placed one vote on a Townie that had suspicion built up against them from previous days, and waited. Once a second vote came, down came the hammer and the win.
It seems to me that it'd be more logical to accuse the third person to jump the wagon, as the scum team could easily just wait for a townie to take the second spot, and accuse them the very next day, under your suggestion.
Superblackcat: After a townie lynch, the first and third person to vote for them begin to place accusations on the second, what do you do?
Ah, I apologize. I missed this mail. I will attempt to keep up with what's going on. I haven't been around the forums lately, I'll try my best to view the forums with some regularity.
Pufferfish: It's down to three people: you, a fellow townie, and a scum. The scum has convinced your fellow townie that you are scum. What do you do?
Role claim the FUCK out of myself.
Unless the scum has. A counterclaim would look... Weird. I would be all like "but no."
In essence, everything I could to turn the vote against scummy scum. Like a townie should.
You know what was nice? Not my day at work. I'm entirely drained... I won't be able to post today I'm afraid.
I don't really pay attention to meta.
QuoteSuperblackcat: After a townie lynch, the first and third person to vote for them begin to place accusations on the second, what do you do?For the second question: I start to become suspicious of all three, but more so of the third person than the second.
Superblackcat:
How do you feel about replacing in for Elephant Parade?
Do you still feel that a BM serves to teach you anything?QuoteSuperblackcat: After a townie lynch, the first and third person to vote for them begin to place accusations on the second, what do you do?For the second question: I start to become suspicious of all three, but more so of the third person than the second.
Why would you be suspicious of the second person in that scenario, but not the first?
Because scum does not like drawing attention to themselves... Voting first/last draws attention. Sheeping 2nd or 3rd usually draws way less attention, that's why I become suspicious of the 2nd or 3rd.
Makeinu: How's your Sinlessmoon vote going. Why are you voting him now given that that strategy utterly failed last game in terms of getting him to play?
Sort of towards Persus13 and Superblackcat, but mostly just my opinion. You also have to take into account the fact that scum might very well vote first or last just because they wouldn't normally do so. But that's just WIFOM, in general.Because scum does not like drawing attention to themselves... Voting first/last draws attention. Sheeping 2nd or 3rd usually draws way less attention, that's why I become suspicious of the 2nd or 3rd.That's true, but sometime scum can care more about getting a townie lynched than about drawing attention.
makeinu: First off, you failed to ask me a question, I'm not saying this is scummy, I just feel left out.
But mainly what I want to say is that I don't think voting him is really going to make a difference, but I can't make the argument that we shouldn't vote him because of, you know, the lurking bit. I don't want to see yet another day 1 town lynch due once again to a lack of participation (if he's actually scum, though, that will blow my mind, along with being a terrible scum tactic) but it's your vote, in any case.
I'm not the only one, I just like having questions to answer.makeinu: First off, you failed to ask me a question, I'm not saying this is scummy, I just feel left out.
I don't think you're the only one I haven't asked a question of, but I'm too lazy to double-check right now.
But mainly what I want to say is that I don't think voting him is really going to make a difference, but I can't make the argument that we shouldn't vote him because of, you know, the lurking bit. I don't want to see yet another day 1 town lynch due once again to a lack of participation (if he's actually scum, though, that will blow my mind, along with being a terrible scum tactic) but it's your vote, in any case.I'd say that a mis-lynch is better than a no-lynch, so I'll have to join you on that one.
There are two primary schools of thought on D1 and the lynch.
-snip-
Which view do you subscribe to?
You promised questions to others Mastahcheese, what are your reads? Day is getting along a bit too far to be dallying. Who do you suspect most?Yeah, I've been failing a good bit at the follow-up questions, I realize that now. I'll work on that.
Sinlessmoon - Hasn't said a word. I dislike the "D1 policy lurker lynch" as a general principle, but it's wasting out time. I say Lurker.So despite disliking lynching lurkers, you're two top scum picks are lurkers?
Jembot - Hasn't said a whole lot. Hasn't made much of an attempt to ask questions, either. I say slightly scum/absentee.
Mastahcheese:I don't dislike lynching lurkers, I dislike the fact that there seems to be a trend in the games I've read where there's always a lurker on day 1 who ends up flipping town. But you can't not lynch them on the chance that they are actually scum trying to go under the radar.•Sinlessmoon - Hasn't said a word. I dislike the "D1 policy lurker lynch" as a general principle, but it's wasting out time. I say Lurker.So despite disliking lynching lurkers, you're two top scum picks are lurkers?
•Jembot - Hasn't said a whole lot. Hasn't made much of an attempt to ask questions, either. I say slightly scum/absentee.
•
MyOwnWorstEnemy: One person was pressing very hard one another for scummy behavior, but the presser ends up getting killed in the night, and flips cop. What's your next plan of action?
MOWE: What are your thoughts on No lynch D1 or a policy lurker lynch D1?
Makeinu Why such an interest to what I think about scum hunting? Trying to improve your game? ;P
Makeinu, So if you are scum, and given my reasoning, how do you think you will vote? How much wifom would you use off of my reasoning?
Argghhh Read over the last two posts... >: CI have questions, but I just realized I stayed up until 4:30 in the morning playing X-COM, so I'll be back!
mastah, any questions, please ask!
The main reason that I haven't done much so far is simply lack of time, had a big new years. I've got a bit more spare time now, so I'm going to get out there and scum hunt.
Makeinu- It's day one, and you have narrowed your lynching choices down to 2. One has been acting very scummy, but the other has only posted once. Do you lynch the likely scum, or policy lunch the lurker? Why?
THe game is not ruined. It's simply spoiled slightly by truancy.
Scum, more often than not, will give the correct reasoning, as opposed to their reasoning. This draws less attention, and scum tries to think how to make it so no one notices them, or dislike their answer. Townies care a lot less, and are much more happy to come out and say what they think. Many times, I've seen players go ballistic about what someone said. When that's what they think. It's not a scum tell, in fact, much more of a town tell.I think that calling it a "town tell" might be a bit of a stretch, as I've heard that some people literally don't even check their inbox until the 1st night begins, so they have perfect ignorance of their own alignment. If they are scum, even they don't know it, if they have a role, they are completely unaware of it. Some people can gracefully ignore who they are, and just be themselves, as paradoxical as it sounds. I'll even use what Persus pointed out against me, saying that I dislike lynching lurkers, when me two biggest leads seem to be lurkers. Does that make me scummy? Am I a hypocrite? Or is it simply a misunderstanding? Actually, what do you think I am? What read do you get on me, now that I'm thinking of it?
This happened in two BM games so far. Towards d3 and d4 they seemed more scummy, but by then I was dead. >.>Ok, answer me this, why do you think they acted more scummy later on? Were they slipping up? Did their words start to not add up anymore? Did they get over-confident? What was it?
Squill in the earlier BM, and Persus in BM Sprint. Both of them did this. Both of them were scum.
A big part that I disagree with is the emphasis on 'reasoning'. I don't think we are trying to reason who is scum, we are looking for anomalies, things that aren't human-like. Things that appear weird, or appear weird not appearing weird. This show us scum, because of the amount of pretending a scum person has to do, they start to create an anomaly. For example... On d2 of sprint, I saw an anomaly, Scum would have stacked votes by now, considering top vote was only 2 players, if who we were voting were scum. But instead, nothing happened. I commented on it, I was absolutely correct, but I didn't act on it, and lost.What this seems to me is that you value someone's "gut" feeling about someone, more so than evidence, at least in the absence of verifiable evidence. If all I have going for someone is my gut feeling, is that as valid as having some sort of "proof" of a scum tell?
Ok, then, I'll ask the question for Superblackcat again. Why such an interest to what Superblackcat thinks about scum hunting?Makeinu Why such an interest to what I think about scum hunting? Trying to improve your game? ;PHa ha, no.
With that argument, you could make the claim that a scum-tell is in fact a town-tell due to the fact that real scum would never slip up like that. In that case, we shouldn't be hunting for people who slip up, we should hunt for people who don't, under the concept that they wouldn't allow themselves that slip. What's your opinion of this analysis?Makeinu, So if you are scum, and given my reasoning, how do you think you will vote? How much wifom would you use off of my reasoning?-snip-
Turns out, people don't like robots that become too human, because they're close, but not close enough. We react the same way to physical and mental deficits, subconsciously. That's what happens when scum try to come off as Town, instead of just playing the game as they would if they were Town. They seem off because they are off.
Mastahcheese- You are town and are at L-1, but haven't really done anything particularly scummy. Do you claim or do anything townish, or just hope someone else does something scummy to take attention off you?Saying I'm town is meaningless. Honestly, I would probably just let myself get killed, but make sure to question the heck out of people's motives before I go. Being vanilla town means that you don't have to survive, sometimes the information gleamed from your death can be used to give the rest of the town a chance. I wouldn't be there anymore, but my impact would be lasting. Which is more important to you? Self preservation, to hunt scum yourself, or knowledge that can be used by your fellow townsmen?
Superblackcat:Scum, more often than not, will give the correct reasoning, as opposed to their reasoning. This draws less attention, and scum tries to think how to make it so no one notices them, or dislike their answer. Townies care a lot less, and are much more happy to come out and say what they think. Many times, I've seen players go ballistic about what someone said. When that's what they think. It's not a scum tell, in fact, much more of a town tell.I think that calling it a "town tell" might be a bit of a stretch, as I've heard that some people literally don't even check their inbox until the 1st night begins, so they have perfect ignorance of their own alignment. If they are scum, even they don't know it, if they have a role, they are completely unaware of it. Some people can gracefully ignore who they are, and just be themselves, as paradoxical as it sounds. I'll even use what Persus pointed out against me, saying that I dislike lynching lurkers, when me two biggest leads seem to be lurkers. Does that make me scummy? Am I a hypocrite? Or is it simply a misunderstanding? Actually, what do you think I am? What read do you get on me, now that I'm thinking of it?This happened in two BM games so far. Towards d3 and d4 they seemed more scummy, but by then I was dead. >.>Ok, answer me this, why do you think they acted more scummy later on? Were they slipping up? Did their words start to not add up anymore? Did they get over-confident? What was it?
Squill in the earlier BM, and Persus in BM Sprint. Both of them did this. Both of them were scum.
makeinu:Ok, then, I'll ask the question for Superblackcat again. Why such an interest to what Superblackcat thinks about scum hunting?Makeinu Why such an interest to what I think about scum hunting? Trying to improve your game? ;PHa ha, no.
With that argument, you could make the claim that a scum-tell is in fact a town-tell due to the fact that real scum would never slip up like that. In that case, we shouldn't be hunting for people who slip up, we should hunt for people who don't, under the concept that they wouldn't allow themselves that slip. What's your opinion of this analysis?Makeinu, So if you are scum, and given my reasoning, how do you think you will vote? How much wifom would you use off of my reasoning?-snip-
Turns out, people don't like robots that become too human, because they're close, but not close enough. We react the same way to physical and mental deficits, subconsciously. That's what happens when scum try to come off as Town, instead of just playing the game as they would if they were Town. They seem off because they are off.
Why? Because you don't have any questions of your own to ask?Why should I not ask a question that you failed to answer? If it's sitting right in front of me, completely untouched, does that mean I should take it up myself?
-snip-
So, stop thinking so hard. Just pick a glass and drink the damn wine, because both glasses are poisoned, and the other guy's immune.
And ask your own questions. ;)
Why should I not ask a question that you failed to answer?
QuoteSuperblackcat: After a townie lynch, the first and third person to vote for them begin to place accusations on the second, what do you do?For the second question: I start to become suspicious of all three, but more so of the third person than the second.
Why would you be suspicious of the second person in that scenario, but not the first?
Because scum does not like drawing attention to themselves... Voting first/last draws attention. Sheeping 2nd or 3rd usually draws way less attention, that's why I become suspicious of the 2nd or 3rd.
To my mind, that scenario screams of scum railroading on voter 2. It's a perfect setup scenario, because of thinking like yours here.
Then how come you didn't mention this before answering my repeat of it?Why should I not ask a question that you failed to answer?I fail to see how I failed to answer his question.
Of course, I also apparently fail to see what prompted that question in the first place, except that I questioned why he would go along with the assertion that #2 must be scum in this scenario:You don't need a prompt, you ask questions to find scum. That's all the prompt you need, and nothing more is needed. Period.
And I stand by my reasoning there. Assuming that the first vote is attention-getting and therefore Town is faulty logic and lazy scum-hunting. The players holding scum roles are people too, and people don't do what you expect them to.You've already outlined exactly how scum should act, according to you, ironically, in your own words, like you say they won't do. You've basically been displaying actions as the polar opposite of how you say scum should act.
Persus won the game, but he was scummy because the voting action wasn't correct in the last 10 minutes...Actually, I had the correct voting action for scum as I was voting a town player. And I had been consistently voting the two people I had said I believed to be scum (one was my scumbuddy) and got the town one lynched. I think you're blowing the failure of scum to stack bigger than it is. Tiruin and I were focusing on appearing town in that game more than assuring a quick win (it didn't help that I was at school when the day ended). In another game I played, two scum players voted a third scum player at the beginning of the day, and that scum player was eventually lynched. And the scum could've won that day if they had lynched a townie. The scum won two days later because the two players who bussed their teammate lost a lot of suspicion from that, and because a town player sided with a fourth scum player who got counterclaimed, resulting in both getting lynched. The whole point of this is that many times scum will care more about looking town than going for a win. Scum can always play for time, if necessary, in order to appear less suspicious.
Persus- You are scum, and someone claims cop and calls you scum. What do you do?It depends on the situation. One thing I'd try to do is distance myself from the other scum players. Then, depending on the setup and how the vote lies, I either counterclaim him or say that since I'm town, he must be wrong somehow, and look for things that are scummy about him.
But it's a little late in the game (literally) to be bringing general RVS questions to the table. Re-read the thread.Why are you telling him not to RVS? Last I checked no one really had any scum picks and no one has appeared to be acting scummy. I'd say that now is fine to RVS. I did a similar thing with Jembot and MOWE. Why didn't you have a problem with that?
Some players have very obvious scum-tells as part of their meta (see, Nerjin, it does play some value, even if it's a terrible thing to assume your fellow combatants are stupid). One player I know refuses to lie. She's horrible scum, feels guilty about it, because the whole thing violates her entire ethos. One game she was an investigator, she got an entire role-claim, in private, and refused to share it with those she actually had cleared and trusted because she promised she'd keep it secret.You keep bringing this up a lot. So this one player was really bad at being scum, as you yourself say, not everyone's like that and no one here is. So why do you keep bringing this one example up?
If you find someone who is scummier than Sinless, who would you rather lynch?Mastahcheese:I don't dislike lynching lurkers, I dislike the fact that there seems to be a trend in the games I've read where there's always a lurker on day 1 who ends up flipping town. But you can't not lynch them on the chance that they are actually scum trying to go under the radar.•Sinlessmoon - Hasn't said a word. I dislike the "D1 policy lurker lynch" as a general principle, but it's wasting out time. I say Lurker.So despite disliking lynching lurkers, you're two top scum picks are lurkers?
•Jembot - Hasn't said a whole lot. Hasn't made much of an attempt to ask questions, either. I say slightly scum/absentee.
•
That said, it's a necessary evil, and I dislike necessary evils, particularly when you could get more out of an active player.
I don't think Sinlessmoon is scum, but that's not a chance we can afford to make.
As for Jembot, I don't think he's lurking, as he's participating, just not very much. And even with the very slow pace of the game as it is right now, I tend to find myself barely noticing them. It feels like it's just enough to not be active-lurking, not so low that it draws suspicion, but not enough to be easily remembered. I've seen no attempt from them at trying to scumhunt, even with the most basic of attempts. They've been a very reactive force, and not an active one. I just get a scum vibe from them in general.
What's your case on Makeinu besides the fact that he's acting the opposite of what you would expect?And I stand by my reasoning there. Assuming that the first vote is attention-getting and therefore Town is faulty logic and lazy scum-hunting. The players holding scum roles are people too, and people don't do what you expect them to.You've already outlined exactly how scum should act, according to you, ironically, in your own words, like you say they won't do. You've basically been displaying actions as the polar opposite of how you say scum should act.
You say that scum act like robots, being too perfect and careful, so you make sure to fill your posts with your own writing style, and pump it up with your little smiley face to make you seem friendly.
Quite frankly, you seem to be radiating scummyness to me right now.
If you find someone who is scummier than Sinless, who would you rather lynch?Well, I think my new vote on makeinu speaks for itself at this point.
What's your case on Makeinu besides the fact that he's acting the opposite of what you would expect?He's telling us to do stuff that would make un ineffective scumhunters, he told me not to use other people's questions, you even got on him yourself on his comments about RVS at this stage.
Then how come you didn't mention this before answering my repeat of it?Why should I not ask a question that you failed to answer?I fail to see how I failed to answer his question.
If you had answered the question in the first place, then you shouldn't have tried to criticize me for repeating it, you should have pointed me to the original answer, but you didn't, because they wasn't an original answer, and you knew that.
And I stand by my reasoning there. Assuming that the first vote is attention-getting and therefore Town is faulty logic and lazy scum-hunting. The players holding scum roles are people too, and people don't do what you expect them to.You've already outlined exactly how scum should act, according to you, ironically, in your own words, like you say they won't do. You've basically been displaying actions as the polar opposite of how you say scum should act.
You say that scum act like robots, being too perfect and careful, so you make sure to fill your posts with your own writing style, and pump it up with your little smiley face to make you seem friendly.
Makeinu:But it's a little late in the game (literally) to be bringing general RVS questions to the table. Re-read the thread.Why are you telling him not to RVS? Last I checked no one really had any scum picks and no one has appeared to be acting scummy. I'd say that now is fine to RVS. I did a similar thing with Jembot and MOWE. Why didn't you have a problem with that?
You keep bringing this up a lot. So this one player was really bad at being scum, as you yourself say, not everyone's like that and no one here is. So why do you keep bringing this one example up?
And who in their right mind would tell someone to not think hard in Mafia? He's trying to criticize people for what are very common techniques, and that's not right.
Don't try to change the subject back to the original question.Then how come you didn't mention this before answering my repeat of it?Why should I not ask a question that you failed to answer?I fail to see how I failed to answer his question.
If you had answered the question in the first place, then you shouldn't have tried to criticize me for repeating it, you should have pointed me to the original answer, but you didn't, because they wasn't an original answer, and you knew that.
Incorrect. My answer to his question was what prompted his question, namely that I called him out for lazy thinking in writing off he first lynch vote as automatically Town because it draws attention, without discounting the third, hammer, vote as Town because it actually draws more attention.
Which, the more I think of it, the lazier and more poorly thought out it seems.
Superblackcat, in that scenario, why exactly is #3 a scum vote when it's the most attention getting vote of the three? That violates your own logic in suspecting #2. Explain.
Makeinu:But it's a little late in the game (literally) to be bringing general RVS questions to the table. Re-read the thread.Why are you telling him not to RVS? Last I checked no one really had any scum picks and no one has appeared to be acting scummy. I'd say that now is fine to RVS. I did a similar thing with Jembot and MOWE. Why didn't you have a problem with that?
I'm asking him to be more specific. There's enough out there that there's no reason at this late in the day to be asking general, vague, questions of everyone.
Why such an interest to what I think about scum hunting?
Trying to improve your game? ;PHa ha, no.
It doesn't matter if you think an answer is needed or not, you should have answered it anyway! If the answer to the question is obvious, then why did they ask it?Why such an interest to what I think about scum hunting?needs no answer, for one, because why the hell wouldn't I have an interest in his scum-hunting? That's what we're here to do!
And for two, was already answered by the question I asked him, namely, AGAIN, that he was being lazy in dismissing the first vote in the scenario posited to him.How does calling someone lazy answer their question?
To my mind, that scenario screams of scum railroading on voter 2. It's a perfect setup scenario, because of thinking like yours here.Because scum does not like drawing attention to themselves... Voting first/last draws attention. Sheeping 2nd or 3rd usually draws way less attention, that's why I become suspicious of the 2nd or 3rd.Why would you be suspicious of the second person in that scenario, but not the first?QuoteSuperblackcat: After a townie lynch, the first and third person to vote for them begin to place accusations on the second, what do you do?For the second question: I start to become suspicious of all three, but more so of the third person than the second.
Persus:True
Given that we were winning a vote on scum with 2 votes, and there were to scums left.. Would you have changed your vote? (especially on LYLO)
That is inherently impossible. Therefore, whoever we voted could NOT have been scum.
That's what I'm talking about... you felt safe that town was lynched, thus you stopped focusing on the game as much, and did your school and stuff. But if you weren't pretty sure you were going to win... you would always have this nagging feeling to come back to the thread and check if something changed or not.THat's not what I meant. I meant that day ended in that game three hours after I left for school, where the firewall prevents access to Bay12.
QUOTE IT GODDAMN IT MAKEINU!
Makeinu: please quote?
MOWE- You are Vig, and it is night 1. You have no real reads on anybody. Do you take a shot in the dark, or kill nobody that night?
Why hello there everyone! I've been pretty busy, so in order to make up for that suspicious behavior; you can ask me any question you would like.I recommend reading through the thread. There's been plenty of questions for you.
-snips-This is at least the second, maybe third time I've asked [1], and no, saying that "it was obvious that's what was meant" doesn't count, they clearly wanted you to be specific.
[1]Why didn't you say so to begin with? [2]Why was this so hard to get out of you that it took this whole time to hear it? [also 1]If the answer was "duh" then why didn't you say it? Leaving a question unanswered is unacceptable.
-snippity-
[3]How does calling someone lazy answer their question?
I'm seriously asking this. Because I fail to see how it does.
I have no idea what you were talking about... the post before that...I think he's been referring to way back about the question of the third and first person who voted for a lynch turn on the second, and your answer in regards to it, but I'm not sure as to the exact part of the argument, as there are now many parts and he won't specify.
I really hope you try asking some questions of your own, as well. Perhaps after reading through you'd like to list your thoughts on everyone's behavior?Why hello there everyone! I've been pretty busy, so in order to make up for that suspicious behavior; you can ask me any question you would like.I recommend reading through the thread. There's been plenty of questions for you.
Sinlessmoon: I was really hoping for some more participation from you, also please quote when you can, I can see from the dot in the list that you must have copy-pasted my question, but quotes are preferred.
I'm sure that there is much more than just my question that needed your attention, please find those when you can, I'll give you the benefit of a doubt right now and assume you're short on time when you wrote that, but we could really use more participation from you.
Everyone voting: Please don't put your votes In Spoilers. While I see everything (ie check everyone's plans and laugh evilly as a general rule), other people who may be skimming//Short on time may miss that vote--and thus, may misinterpret why it is 'hidden', to speak neutrally.
Very active. Like any good IC, you spend time helping others. Your first show of aggression was toward someone who hadn’t posted yet. Because you're an IC, I'll assume that this was an attempt to pressure Sinlessmoon into playing.
Also, I’m curious as to why he jumped in on the question I asked Nerjin.
You were so curious about his answer, yet never commented when he did answer. Why is this? And if you were so curious as to how your opinion matched up to his, please enlighten me on your opinion.
makeinu:
Would you like to answer my questions, now?
-snips-This is at least the second, maybe third time I've asked [1], and no, saying that "it was obvious that's what was meant" doesn't count, they clearly wanted you to be specific.
[1]Why didn't you say so to begin with? [2]Why was this so hard to get out of you that it took this whole time to hear it? [also 1]If the answer was "duh" then why didn't you say it? Leaving a question unanswered is unacceptable.
-snippity-
[3]How does calling someone lazy answer their question?
I'm seriously asking this. Because I fail to see how it does.
Superblackcat:I have no idea what you were talking about... the post before that...I think he's been referring to way back about the question of the third and first person who voted for a lynch turn on the second, and your answer in regards to it, but I'm not sure as to the exact part of the argument, as there are now many parts and he won't specify.
I think this is it, or at least part of it.To my mind, that scenario screams of scum railroading on voter 2. It's a perfect setup scenario, because of thinking like yours here.Because scum does not like drawing attention to themselves... Voting first/last draws attention. Sheeping 2nd or 3rd usually draws way less attention, that's why I become suspicious of the 2nd or 3rd.Why would you be suspicious of the second person in that scenario, but not the first?QuoteSuperblackcat: After a townie lynch, the first and third person to vote for them begin to place accusations on the second, what do you do?For the second question: I start to become suspicious of all three, but more so of the third person than the second.
To my mind, that scenario screams of scum railroading on voter 2. It's a perfect setup scenario, because of thinking like yours here.Because scum does not like drawing attention to themselves... Voting first/last draws attention. Sheeping 2nd or 3rd usually draws way less attention, that's why I become suspicious of the 2nd or 3rd.Why would you be suspicious of the second person in that scenario, but not the first?QuoteSuperblackcat: After a townie lynch, the first and third person to vote for them begin to place accusations on the second, what do you do?For the second question: I start to become suspicious of all three, but more so of the third person than the second.
To my mind, that scenario screams of scum railroading on voter 2. It's a perfect setup scenario, because of thinking like yours here.Because scum does not like drawing attention to themselves... Voting first/last draws attention. Sheeping 2nd or 3rd usually draws way less attention, that's why I become suspicious of the 2nd or 3rd.Why would you be suspicious of the second person in that scenario, but not the first?QuoteSuperblackcat: After a townie lynch, the first and third person to vote for them begin to place accusations on the second, what do you do?For the second question: I start to become suspicious of all three, but more so of the third person than the second.
You stated that you consider first and last votes on a lynch target to be attention-getting votes, which scum will avoid doing because they don't want to draw attention to themselves, yet, in that scenario, you specifically go along with the persons placing both the first and last votes, your suspicion-drawing votes, and jump on the middle child as suspicious, while ignoring both that first vote!
It seems to me that you're just jumping on the idea of second and third votes as "sheeping", or band-wagoning (I presume you to mean, since sheeping carries rather a different distinction to me), and ignoring your own claims as to what makes a vote suspicious.
Either your internal logic is faulty, or you're slipping, trying to keep your scum-hunting straight and failing.
That makes me suspicious, Superblackcat. And that is why I ignored that question. So that you would press it. And you didn't, which only serves to reinforce my suspicions.
Sinlessmoon, you're off my hook for now, but this lurking had better stop. Please, start bringing the 'A' game.
Sinlessmoon, you're off my hook for now, but this lurking had better stop. Please, start bringing the 'A' game.*points at OP*
Please be active. The greatest killer of beginner games is poor activity.*caps the orange marker*
Sinlessmoon, you're off my hook for now, but this lurking had better stop. Please, start bringing the 'A' game.*points at OP*QuotePlease be active. The greatest killer of beginner games is poor activity.*caps the orange marker*
My work is finished.
...
Now to return to that votecount. >:I
Superblackcat: After a townie lynch, the first and third person to vote for them begin to place accusations on the second, what do you do?
I start to become suspicious of all three, but more so of the third person than the second.
Why would you be suspicious of the second person in that scenario, but not the first?
Because scum does not like drawing attention to themselves... Voting first/last draws attention. Sheeping 2nd or 3rd usually draws way less attention, that's why I become suspicious of the 2nd or 3rd.
To my mind, that scenario screams of scum railroading on voter 2. It's a perfect setup scenario, because of thinking like yours here.
You stated that you consider first and last votes on a lynch target to be attention-getting votes, which scum will avoid doing because they don't want to draw attention to themselves, yet, in that scenario, you specifically go along with the persons placing both the first and last votes, your suspicion-drawing votes, and jump on the middle child as suspicious, while ignoring both that first vote!
It seems to me that you're just jumping on the idea of second and third votes as "sheeping", or band-wagoning (I presume you to mean, since sheeping carries rather a different distinction to me), and ignoring your own claims as to what makes a vote suspicious.
Either your internal logic is faulty, or you're slipping, trying to keep your scum-hunting straight and failing.
That makes me suspicious, Superblackcat. And that is why I ignored that question. So that you would press it. And you didn't, which only serves to reinforce my suspicions.
Why didn't I follow up on my question? Because it wasn't a question to start with, it was sarcastic, and a poke at you. You didn't answer, mastah follows up on you... and you just push everything away at me like it was a plan? Good try.
I assumed there were more than 3 people voting btw.
Also you give me no information... you gave me - 2nd person votes, 1st and 3rd jumps... So I give you.. "I become suspicious of all 3, but more of the 3rd than 2nd."... I'll add (Than 1st) too.
Superblackcat: After a townie lynch, the first and third person to vote for them begin to place accusations on the second, what do you do?
This is because no one on this forums plays like how I play. Or I haven't met any of them yet...
3rd more than the 1st because hammer is more useful than starter... And they both draw the same amount of attention. Maybe the hammer a bit more since it's more recent.
But I really don't like how you deflected it as 'It was always my plan'. That's bullshit. You don't do that in mafia, you do that in war.
Let's break this down more, then. Since the quote pyramid is apparently confusing you.
The original question posed to you:QuoteSuperblackcat: After a townie lynch, the first and third person to vote for them begin to place accusations on the second, what do you do?
Your initial reply:I start to become suspicious of all three, but more so of the third person than the second.
My original question to you:Why would you be suspicious of the second person in that scenario, but not the first?
And I still want to understand why, in that case, you completely disregard any suspicion for the first person to vote the townie lynch and jump on suspicion of the second more than anything else, despite your own logic that the first vote in that scenario is, by definition, the most suspicious! Because it draws the most attention.Because scum does not like drawing attention to themselves... Voting first/last draws attention. Sheeping 2nd or 3rd usually draws way less attention, that's why I become suspicious of the 2nd or 3rd.
Giving credence to my counter-claim:To my mind, that scenario screams of scum railroading on voter 2. It's a perfect setup scenario, because of thinking like yours here.
Which you never even address.
And then you deflect my concerns:You stated that you consider first and last votes on a lynch target to be attention-getting votes, which scum will avoid doing because they don't want to draw attention to themselves, yet, in that scenario, you specifically go along with the persons placing both the first and last votes, your suspicion-drawing votes, and jump on the middle child as suspicious, while ignoring both that first vote!
It seems to me that you're just jumping on the idea of second and third votes as "sheeping", or band-wagoning (I presume you to mean, since sheeping carries rather a different distinction to me), and ignoring your own claims as to what makes a vote suspicious.
Either your internal logic is faulty, or you're slipping, trying to keep your scum-hunting straight and failing.
That makes me suspicious, Superblackcat. And that is why I ignored that question. So that you would press it. And you didn't, which only serves to reinforce my suspicions.
By saying:Why didn't I follow up on my question? Because it wasn't a question to start with, it was sarcastic, and a poke at you. You didn't answer, mastah follows up on you... and you just push everything away at me like it was a plan? Good try.
You didn't mean it. It wasn't a real question.
It was a good try, because it worked. It revealed that you aren't really scum-hunting here.QuoteI assumed there were more than 3 people voting btw.
That, and that alone, I will concede. However,QuoteAlso you give me no information... you gave me - 2nd person votes, 1st and 3rd jumps... So I give you.. "I become suspicious of all 3, but more of the 3rd than 2nd."... I'll add (Than 1st) too.
This is important, so listen carefully. The original question was not mine! AND you got the whole scenario wrong. Repeating:QuoteSuperblackcat: After a townie lynch, the first and third person to vote for them begin to place accusations on the second, what do you do?
Tell me, does that read even remotely like what you wrote about the scenario just above here?QuoteThis is because no one on this forums plays like how I play. Or I haven't met any of them yet...
People on epicmafia apparently play by not reading the thread, from what I'm gathering, because this is a pattern with you. Your meta, if you will. You consistently don't read the thread and have no idea who is saying what.
Tell me, is that natural? Or is it something you only do when you're scum?Quote3rd more than the 1st because hammer is more useful than starter... And they both draw the same amount of attention. Maybe the hammer a bit more since it's more recent.
Waitwaitwait... You can't keep your story straight in one post!! You assume that more than three were voting, but the third vote is suspicious because hammer, but your main suspicion is on the second for "sheeping" (by which I still assume you mean band-wagonning)??QuoteBut I really don't like how you deflected it as 'It was always my plan'. That's bullshit. You don't do that in mafia, you do that in war.
All conflict is the same. The same techniques apply no matter the paradigm. Read Sun-Tzu.
QuoteQuote from: Superblackcat on Today at 12:31:56 amYou didn't mean it. It wasn't a real question.
Why didn't I follow up on my question? Because it wasn't a question to start with, it was sarcastic, and a poke at you. You didn't answer, mastah follows up on you... and you just push everything away at me like it was a plan? Good try.
It was a good try, because it worked. It revealed that you aren't really scum-hunting here.
<snip>
Btw, if you bothered to go to epicmafia.com, you'd realize it's not a forum...
So, in my mind, scum does NOT like to start votes, they like to finish votes... Because other people will start votes.
1) You don't use the time to plan out a battle, like war in mafia. You don't, or I've never seen you, or anyone, else go like. "I'm going to attack this person with this, if the deflect, X, if they whatever, Y." Never.
If this is your new playstyle... great? But I'm keeping an eye on you.
2) You don't post like this. This isn't you.
Makeinu, Please, Don't put Lurker's as a scumtell, at least not yet. Look for actual scum. Anyone can see lurkiness, but killing someone for lurkiness, especially with a ML, is dumb.
Makeinu, I'm happy to ML...
I'm not happy to use it on a lurker. WHy? Because we don't get any information. EVEN IF WE ARE RIGHT.
Sinlessmoon: You're still lurking, but at least you've bothered to show up this time. Are you going to play, or shall we seek a replacement? Or policy lynch because the day is close to over? I won't go the "last time" route with you, because that's drawing meta into it, and I'd rather not do that.But, as I say to Jembot, this looks like you want others to find suspicion for you instead of on you.
I apologise for by lurking thus far, I've been on holidays but I get back tomorrow arvo, at that point I will post a wall of text with all my suspicions thus farI'll be waiting for that wall of text.
As I pointed out to Persus in Limerick, by what do you judge me here?Actually, makeinu, I for one would perhaps like to see that quoted, as I am not following Limerick. I'm doing my part to stick to this game, and this game only.
-snip-
I could quote that, if you'd like,
-snip-
Persus: I never, honestly, took SBC's question as real, [1] though I did wonder what exactly his point was. When mastahcheese pressed it, I saw an opportunity to squeeze them both with a response and see what came out. [2] I'm pleased with what I saw. Though, [3] in SBC's case, it was like getting blood from a stone.[1] Then you should have pressed it, if you have a question you ask your freaking question! Your business of being passive, waiting for the other person to respond, is a scum-tactic. Activity is scum hunting, being passive and calling it what would amount to "town-hunting" is not what town should do, it sounds exactly like a deflection.
You read that as deflection. I read that as strategy. Three moves ahead. [4] Finding Town is just as important as finding scum, hopefully to ensure the wrong person isn't lynched. Surely you understand the value in that?
Makeinu, Please, Don't put Lurker's as a scumtell, at least not yet. Look for actual scum. Anyone can see lurkiness, but killing someone for lurkiness, especially with a ML, is dumb.
And here I thought it was Bay12 meta that even a mislynch on D1 was useful. And so far most of what I see is lurkiness.A mislynch, is never as valuable as a scum lynch.
No, I'm still here. Just keeping an eye on the proceedings since I don't really know in what fashion I should be taking part in. :PDon't just watch, participate.
This is one of my first full mafia games that I can spend time on, which means I'm not really sure how I should structure my posts in order to create long posts with any form of significance.
makeinu:As I pointed out to Persus in Limerick, by what do you judge me here?Actually, makeinu, I for one would perhaps like to see that quoted, as I am not following Limerick. I'm doing my part to stick to this game, and this game only.
-snip-
I could quote that, if you'd like,
-snip-
Persus: I never, honestly, took SBC's question as real, [1] though I did wonder what exactly his point was. When mastahcheese pressed it, I saw an opportunity to squeeze them both with a response and see what came out. [2] I'm pleased with what I saw. Though, [3] in SBC's case, it was like getting blood from a stone.[1] Then you should have pressed it, if you have a question you ask your freaking question! Your business of being passive, waiting for the other person to respond, is a scum-tactic. Activity is scum hunting, being passive and calling it what would amount to "town-hunting" is not what town should do, it sounds exactly like a deflection.
You read that as deflection. I read that as strategy. Three moves ahead. [4] Finding Town is just as important as finding scum, hopefully to ensure the wrong person isn't lynched. Surely you understand the value in that?
[2] Could you please elaborate on this, if you would? What exactly are you seeing here?
[3] From my perspective, it seemed to me that it was more of SBC drawing blood out of you. You repeatedly failed to quote, up to the point where I actually went back to the proper place, and then you didn't even quote from me, but rather made mention to what I had quoted above. I fail to see how this was so painful for you, as, if I remember correctly, you even got on SBC, and told them to calm down, and that ALL-CAPS gets you nowhere.
[4] While I can't argue the importance of knowing who is town, don't you think you should put just a little but more effort on finding scum, rather than "town-hunting" and wasting our time on you?
Makeinu, Please, Don't put Lurker's as a scumtell, at least not yet. Look for actual scum. Anyone can see lurkiness, but killing someone for lurkiness, especially with a ML, is dumb.And here I thought it was Bay12 meta that even a mislynch on D1 was useful. And so far most of what I see is lurkiness.A mislynch, is never as valuable as a scum lynch.
I said to ML, but not on lurkers! READ >:c
Note, too, I NEVER said that a mis-lynch was more valuable than a scum lynch. That rates a "Duh!", thank you, and I'll also thank you not to put words in my mouth.I could mention your very defensive, almost to the point of passive-aggressive tone, but I think it's been mentioned enough already.
Now, I've listed my top scum reads (I'm borderline on SBC still, as he always seems sort of scummy to me).
Where's yours?
This game is giving me disappointment after disappointment about the sheer lack of participation, and it's not just one or two people, most of the people in this game should be a lot more active. There's only about 3-4 of us regularly posting, and it's saddening.
This game is giving me disappointment after disappointment about the sheer lack of participation, and it's not just one or two people, most of the people in this game should be a lot more active. There's only about 3-4 of us regularly posting, and it's saddening.[Disclaimer: This rant is oriented more towards those who don't care about telling anything beforehand and disappearing--or just plain missing without trying. It is a case of lacking voluntariness, dispelled by due diligence.
Aaaaaand, that would be because of the Lynch All Lurkers policy lynch. But dismissing that as an option gives scum the option to lurk to victory.
Got a scum-buddy that's lurking? Is that why you won't do it here?
I'd say active lurking is 10x more of an scumtell...Please state why I'm active-lurking when you throw out that accusation. I fail to see how two of the people you listed constitute as active lurking as Nerjin has repeatedly cited work issues for sparse posts. Jembot and Sinless are just plain lurking, although Jembot has cited reasons why he can't play as much.
and you too Persus[/color]
SBC: I find your theory...different. From what you've been arguing thus far, it seems like you're main thing is those uo look the most innocent are probably the guilty ones. Correct me if I'm wrong, but that's what I see. That is sort of my way of thinking as well. I'm somewhat suspicious of you, but I don't think you're scum. Yet.If this is what SBC's arguing, I'd definitely agree with him, sometimes. The goal of scum is to stay unnoticed and seem innocent. This doesn't always work.
Makeinu: Town hunting? No sir. Scum hunt town (in a way) and town hunt scum, finding town in the process. This stinks of scum.Hunting someone and deciding their town is a perfectly legitimate strategy. I'll agree with you that makeinu seems scummy, but when you're becoming the third vote on a player you need better reasoning than this. Quoting generally helps your case too, unless you're making a false case.
I'd agree with you that Mastahcheese seems to be good town. But keep in the back of you mind the possibility that he could be very good scum.
Mastahcheese: All you've done is hunt and push. You seem like the perfect townie. I've found no fault in your reasoning thus far. I'd say town.
Persus: Fairly active compared to most. I find this suspicious. It's almost like you're trying to be here while staying unnoticed. This being said, I have seen no strong indication that your scum.I'm glad your suspicious of active players, but activity tends to be a null tell. If you are accusing me of active-lurking, which it seems like you are trying to say judging by your second sentence, then like SBC, I'd like you to back that up with quotes before you accuse me of being scum.
Sinless.... Be here.
Sinlessmoon: lurker. But not scummy. You seem to have a valid excuse. Fear is a powerful thing.
Persus: I remind you I'm posting from my phone virtually all of the time. Quoting posts of any length is very hard. I feel makeinu is scummy based on what sounded to me like consciously trying to find town members instead of scum. Also, how he just decides to say he avoided SBC's question to see if he'd push the issue seems rather scummy.Oh, my bad, I forgot that you used a phone. In that case, I recommend linking to posts if you can and wish to point out something for future reference.
Also, I understand SBC's strategy isn't the best and doesn't always work. I just find myself thinking this way.And I'd definitely agree with that. The only game I've been scum so far I won partly because I made myself look as town as possible. However, sometimes a scummy person that everyone's going after is actually scum, something I learned for myself fairly recently.
I also understand hat mastahcheese is either really good town or really good scum, which I avoided saying, perhaps in a moment of stupidity, to lull them into a false sense of security so they might make a mistake. It seems I watch too many crime shows. :P
As for you, did you miss the part where I said "I have no strong indication that you're scum"? If I'm going to accuse you, I'm going to have a better reason than "I think you're active-lurking."I saw that, I just thought the fact that you were accusing me of being active seemed inconsistent with your comment on Mastahcheese being active and good town.
Why so defensive?I attack other people's attacks all the time. This one just happened to be directed at me.
Indeed, just because I happen to not be active in the thread, doesn't mean I'm not watching the thread intently. People like to believe that just because If I'm inactive, I am scum; In truth though, I could very well be not scum. Someone who is scum is more likely to be active, trying to throw blame on someone in order to get them lynched. Eh Makeinu?While it's true that scum tend to be fairly active (I'm more interested and invested in a game when I'm scum, for example), scum's goal is often not to get noticed. Sometimes this means lurking. Lurkers are also annoying to have around as lack of activity can kill a game or make a scum win easier. It also causes town to have less information about that player.
Granted, my only excuse is lacking net--while overshadowed by the speed, I'm also at fault here for not updating as a primary priority, instead preferring RL.Just for the record, I personally really like reading the flavor you've been adding to the game. It makes it a much better read.
However, if the game continues to be such, I'm more inclined to copy that state: No flavor, just blank nothingness. I had thought that chat will bloom and blossom; this is DAY ONE, and MOST BMs are double this page length! Normally, I'd just post down the votecount.
But I agree. Heavy prods incoming.
Blugherfluggle... Gotta love busy times. Sorry folks, I'll be doing another 'read-stravaganza' sometime before the day [actual day, not game-day] ends. Thankfully you guys have finally started posting more so I'll have more to say.Hopefully your schedule starts to improve, I'll look forward to your reply.
@mastahcheese: My only internet access at home is my phone. Hopefully that states your curiosity. I'll give my reads now, but it's going to be shorter than my previous attempt.Yes, it does sate my curiosity. Thank you for that.
-snip-
It's not the wall I promised, but it's here.
Also, I understand SBC's strategy isn't the best and doesn't always work. I just find myself thinking this way.It may not be the best, and it may not always work, but I also can't think of a strategy that couldn't also be described in this way. I think a fair mix of strategies is best, and so while SBC's strategy is... unusual for forum mafia, I have to give it its merits where due.
Don't worry about strategies, just go in guns blazing if that's what it takes. If you make a mistake, you can learn from it. But you can't learn nearly as much from watching others as you can from trying things yourself. Get yourself out of your comfort zone. Remember, it's more fun to be active then passive (at least for me) and it's more fun for other people as well when you're active. I'd love to question you and see how you react, but you're not giving me anything to question. If you mess up, that's part of the game, just get out here and join our party.I am here, attempting to figure out what to say is a pretty hard thing as I'm not fully aware of how to use strategies. :P
Sinless.... Be here.
Indeed, just because I happen to not be active in the thread, doesn't mean I'm not watching the thread intently. People like to believe that just because If I'm inactive, I am scum; In truth though, [1] I could very well be not scum. [2] Someone who is scum is more likely to be active, trying to throw blame on someone in order to get them lynched. Eh Makeinu?See, now I have a little something to work with.
This makes me wonder, what are your views on jumping in to other people's scumhunting? There seems to be offending viewpoints on the subject, and I want to know what your stance on the matter is.Why so defensive?I attack other people's attacks all the time. This one just happened to be directed at me.
I'd agree with you that Mastahcheese seems to be good town. But keep in the back of you mind the possibility that he could be very good scum.
Mastahcheese: All you've done is hunt and push. You seem like the perfect townie. I've found no fault in your reasoning thus far. I'd say town.
I also understand hat mastahcheese is either really good town or really good scum, [1] which I avoided saying, perhaps in a moment of stupidity, to lull them into a false sense of security so they might make a mistake. [2] It seems I watch too many crime shows. :PWow, for my first game ever I wasn't expecting complements. Whether I'm town or scum, at least I'd be considered "good" at it. Thank you guys.
Indeed, just because I happen to not be active in the thread, doesn't mean I'm not watching the thread intently. People like to believe that just because If I'm inactive, I am scum; In truth though, I could very well be not scum. Someone who is scum is more likely to be active, trying to throw blame on someone in order to get them lynched. Eh Makeinu?While it's true that scum tend to be fairly active (I'm more interested and invested in a game when I'm scum, for example), scum's goal is often not to get noticed. Sometimes this means lurking. Lurkers are also annoying to have around as lack of activity can kill a game or make a scum win easier. It also causes town to have less information about that player.
Anyway, if you had to vote this second, who would it be on?
Don't worry about strategies, just go in guns blazing if that's what it takes. If you make a mistake, you can learn from it. But you can't learn nearly as much from watching others as you can from trying things yourself. Get yourself out of your comfort zone. Remember, it's more fun to be active then passive (at least for me) and it's more fun for other people as well when you're active. I'd love to question you and see how you react, but you're not giving me anything to question. If you mess up, that's part of the game, just get out here and join our party.
Indeed, just because I happen to not be active in the thread, doesn't mean I'm not watching the thread intently. People like to believe that just because If I'm inactive, I am scum; In truth though, [1] I could very well be not scum. [2] Someone who is scum is more likely to be active, trying to throw blame on someone in order to get them lynched. Eh Makeinu?See, now I have a little something to work with.
I'll ignore the parts about being inactive, as I've stated my view on it above.
[1] What do you mean, "could very well be not scum"? Are you scum or not?
[2] I'll agree that scum should do this, but sometimes they don't. That's why lurkers can be so dangerous.
I prefer not to mess up though. :P But you're right, that's why I have been putting a lot more effort into my posts. I'm definitely still not where I want to be in terms of being able to play forum Mafia well, but hey; I'm trying right?Yes, I can see you are trying, and thank you for that. And while I can completely understand the "not wanting to mess up" bit, you can learn a lot from them.
Thank you for clarifying that. And thank you for not denying that.[1] What do you mean, "could very well be not scum"? Are you scum or not?I am not scum, I was simply referring to the fact that people seem to believe that if someone is inactive, they are scum. The reason why I was saying that was to give credit to the possibility that lurkers could in fact be scum, instead of outright denying that possibility.
I'd rather scum be active, I can see why lurkers could be dangerous, but on one hand; they might just be busy. I was lurking just because I wasn't really sure of how to initiate myself. Now however, you can see that I'm not lurking and creating informative posts. (Relatively. :P )You're definitely doing better. Hopefully you'll feel more inclined to initiate actions as you feel more comfortable.
So far, the two players on my watch list are Makeinu, and Superblackcat. Both seem equally suspicious in the way they seem to be incredibly pro-lynch.They do seem to both be pro-lynch, but SBC at least may the point that they prefer lynching for information, rather than just for the heck of it, making a case that at least we can gain some ammunition from it to fuel an investigation. Like going back to the "not wanting to mess up" part, let's say we do mis-lynch. Yes, we've lost a member of the town, and someone who could have helped scum-hunt, but at least we can use the information we can gleam from it to try to discover why the mis-lynch happened, and to not do so again.
Sinless: I'll tell you why we seem pro-lynch...That's one of the best arguments for lynching I've seen.
Right now. We are 7/2. That's 7 total players, and 2 mafia.
This... This right now, is the one and only time where we have a ML. Meaning we can lynch someone without immediate consequence.
If we don't lynch today.
Unless JK manages to protect, we will be down to 6/2. That's 6 total people and 2 mafia. At this point, it is a MYLO, meaning you will lose if you mislynch. Anything after that will either be a mylo, lylo, or town loss.
If we do lynch today
We will be down to 5/2, that is 5 players and 2 mafia. That is where the above ^ would end up, but with an extra day. This is Lylo, Lynch or Lose. If you don't lynch correctly you lose.
Argghh forgot about you Persus:That's a good definition of active lurking. I may use that.
I said it, first as a poke to get more substance out of you, but second, and more important. I don't remember really anything you've said. That means that what you've said doesn't stick. Usually, that's one of my measures for active lurking. What the person says doesn't have an enough of an impact on the game for myself to remember it off the top of my head.
Persus13:Do it, especially later on. Sometimes this is called chainsaw defending or coming to the defense of someone else. However, if I have an issue with someone's argument, I'll attack it, because scum will sometimes have weak or bad attacks. I know that when I was scum, one problem I had was making up attacks on people because I knew they were town. I found one scum D1 this way in the last Mafia game I played.This makes me wonder, what are your views on jumping in to other people's scumhunting? There seems to be offending viewpoints on the subject, and I want to know what your stance on the matter is.Why so defensive?I attack other people's attacks all the time. This one just happened to be directed at me.
That better not be sarcastic! >:cIt isn't, that's one of the neatest summaries I've seen.
Do we get a lurker tracker for this game Tir Tir!?..I dunno~ :v
Sinless: I'll tell you why we seem pro-lynch...That's one of the best arguments for lynching I've seen.
Right now. We are 7/2. That's 7 total players, and 2 mafia.
This... This right now, is the one and only time where we have a ML. Meaning we can lynch someone without immediate consequence.
If we don't lynch today.
Unless JK manages to protect, we will be down to 6/2. That's 6 total people and 2 mafia. At this point, it is a MYLO, meaning you will lose if you mislynch. Anything after that will either be a mylo, lylo, or town loss.
If we do lynch today
We will be down to 5/2, that is 5 players and 2 mafia. That is where the above ^ would end up, but with an extra day. This is Lylo, Lynch or Lose. If you don't lynch correctly you lose.
I have to agree with this, that is the best explanation I've seen.That better not be sarcastic! >:cIt isn't, that's one of the neatest summaries I've seen.
I also agree with this definition of active lurking.Argghh forgot about you Persus:That's a good definition of active lurking. I may use that.
I said it, first as a poke to get more substance out of you, but second, and more important. I don't remember really anything you've said. That means that what you've said doesn't stick. Usually, that's one of my measures for active lurking. What the person says doesn't have an enough of an impact on the game for myself to remember it off the top of my head.
That's good to know. I was also unaware that that was called Chainsaw Defending.This makes me wonder, what are your views on jumping in to other people's scumhunting? There seems to be offending viewpoints on the subject, and I want to know what your stance on the matter is.Do it, especially later on. Sometimes this is called chainsaw defending or coming to the defense of someone else. However, if I have an issue with someone's argument, I'll attack it, because scum will sometimes have weak or bad attacks. I know that when I was scum, one problem I had was making up attacks on people because I knew they were town. I found one scum D1 this way in the last Mafia game I played.
Praise be, for zombie urist's LurkerTracker (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=126856.msg4296424#msg4296424)!
http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~azhou/projects/LT/zt.py?topic=133728&start=114&msg=0&sort=user&numlabel=0Sometimes I wonder if anything I say ever gets through to anyone.
(http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~azhou/projects/LT/zt.py?topic=133728&start=114&msg=0&sort=user&numlabel=0)
This shoulda werk
It gets through to me.Praise be, for zombie urist's LurkerTracker (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=126856.msg4296424#msg4296424)!http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~azhou/projects/LT/zt.py?topic=133728&start=114&msg=0&sort=user&numlabel=0Sometimes I wonder if anything I say ever gets through to anyone.
(http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~azhou/projects/LT/zt.py?topic=133728&start=114&msg=0&sort=user&numlabel=0)
This shoulda werk
MOWE:SBC: I find your theory...different. From what you've been arguing thus far, it seems like you're main thing is those uo look the most innocent are probably the guilty ones. Correct me if I'm wrong, but that's what I see. That is sort of my way of thinking as well. I'm somewhat suspicious of you, but I don't think you're scum. Yet.If this is what SBC's arguing, I'd definitely agree with him, sometimes. The goal of scum is to stay unnoticed and seem innocent. This doesn't always work.
Makeinu: Town hunting? No sir. Scum hunt town (in a way) and town hunt scum, finding town in the process. This stinks of scum.Hunting someone and deciding their town is a perfectly legitimate strategy.
I'd agree with you that Mastahcheese seems to be good town. But keep in the back of you mind the possibility that he could be very good scum.
Mastahcheese: All you've done is hunt and push. You seem like the perfect townie. I've found no fault in your reasoning thus far. I'd say town.
Sinlessmoon: lurker. But not scummy. You seem to have a valid excuse. Fear is a powerful thing.
Indeed, just because I happen to not be active in the thread, doesn't mean I'm not watching the thread intently. People like to believe that just because If I'm inactive, I am scum; In truth though, I could very well be not scum. Someone who is scum is more likely to be active, trying to throw blame on someone in order to get them lynched. Eh Makeinu?
While it's true that scum tend to be fairly active (I'm more interested and invested in a game when I'm scum, for example), scum's goal is often not to get noticed. Sometimes this means lurking. Lurkers are also annoying to have around as lack of activity can kill a game or make a scum win easier. It also causes town to have less information about that player.
Anyway, if you had to vote this second, who would it be on?
While true, it would be much more likely (in my opinion) that scum would be really active. Lurking on the other hand seems counter-intuitive to the scums goal which would be to get other players lynched. Although this comes from a guy who's only real forum mafia game is this one... Well, lets just say that take it with a large helping of salt. :P
Also, to who I would vote on? Makeinu would be that person, he seems overly suspicious and seems to be very pro-lynch towards everyone. I just don't trust him.
So far, the two players on my watch list are Makeinu, and Superblackcat. Both seem equally suspicious in the way they seem to be incredibly pro-lynch.
Persus: My experience of scum here is horrid
Fake claiming as a third party, and then getting killed for claiming as that third party. Because it's dangerous.
Also, if you're going to try deflection like that *points at bolded section* at least back it up with an actual vote. FoS just looks weak, if you don't trust me that much.
Btw, multiple town-claiming, I speak from experience, normally is looked upon as scummy.
So far, the two players on my watch list are Makeinu, and Superblackcat. Both seem equally suspicious in the way they seem to be incredibly pro-lynch.Pro-lynch. SBC really did make a great case for why it's the best idea, but I'll also refer you back to this from the OP:
Sinless, depending on the situation, there are certainly... benefits to NLing.I'll agree with this. In this game, there are one, possibly two town power roles, so Nights are more beneficial to scum than town. However, some games have lots of town power roles that do various stuff, so that may be more beneficial for town.
The most obvious one is the Town PRs, such as the cop. They get two nights worth of investigating vs one. So I can't tell you if you want to NL or not, you have to make the decision, but I can give you the two sides, and let you decide.
That being said, I'm still ardent on my Makeinu vote.
As for fear, I for one am still terrified of messing up and looking like an idiot. Losing isn't a problem for me. Losing is just as valuable as winning, and sometimes more valuable. But the thought of looking like an idiot and making everyone think I'm an idiot on my very first mafia game scares me. ((Any advice for me? Aside from just getting out there anyway, which I've been trying to do.))I can understand that fear, I really can. But honestly, don't worry about it, (I know you still will, but bear with me) this is Beginner's Mafia. This is what this was designed for, to get people who have never played the game before to try it. You don't have to worry about looking like an idiot because this isn't some kind of Call of Duty game or other such nonsense where people will sigh loudly into their headsets and call you a "noob", this is a place of learning and education. So get out there and learn, and I think you'll find that you won't do that bad at all. If you make mistakes, then hey, it's not like it hasn't happened twenty times before, to each and every person here. Everyone had to begin somewhere, and I like to think that we're in one of the most understanding communities out there, so we'll understand. Don't worry, you're doing fine.
Mess up all you want. That's why I'm here.Don't forget pufferfish, wherever they are. They played at least one game before this one.So I can feel superiorSo I can help new people. Same with Makeinu, Persus, and Nerjin. Anyone who's played before will try to help you.
NOOOOOOOOOOBBBBBBBB!
Alright, done.
Mess up all you want. That's why I'm here.So I can feel superiorSo I can help new people. Same with Makeinu, Persus, and Nerjin. Anyone who's played before will try to help you.
makeinu
The Court has set the stage, and you play the role of the Shade. Taking the role of a being of shadow, you resemble the aspect of knowledge, information and intellect deep within the weave of society. The role of the simple Shade is always under that of another color, giving variety to the different aspects of the visible spectrum, and a direct relative to the caste of Light, though always on a darker level than your origin.
You are of the Mafia Faction! You have access to the shared Nightkill of your faction. You may scheme and discuss privately with your allieshere(http://Nyan~)
Wincondition: You win when the TOWN faction has equal or less players than your faction!
Ah well, brought this on myself.After game, ya silly cat! :3
Longer explanation (as IC-in-training) later, if Tiruin will let me ;)
Praise be: for the JKer!Yeah, I actually had to reread that twice, because I was like "wait, who died? I think we're all here..." before realizing that we must have had an excellent doctor.
Alright, I was waiting for him to flip town... My heart was about to blow.You weren't the only one. I was also flipping out over who was going to get killed in the night.
Well... The JK had a 50/50 chance. He might have blocked mafia, or protected mafia kill.Oh, I thought we were using a doctor, I forgot we were using jailkeeper. Hmm.
That being said. DO NOT OUT YET. Wait for the day to be more on its way. Even then, use your own judgement.
•Persus13 - I feel like you've been a little more... reactive at times, but you've jumped on opportunities well, so I can tell you're definitely paying attention for logic lapses. I'm reading you as town, for now.I tend to be pretty reactive, yeah. It's partly because I hate RVS.
I agree with this.Well... The JK had a 50/50 chance. He might have blocked mafia, or protected mafia kill.Oh, I thought we were using a doctor, I forgot we were using jailkeeper. Hmm.
That being said. DO NOT OUT YET. Wait for the day to be more on its way. Even then, use your own judgement.
And yes, DON'T OUT. That would be a very bad idea right now.
MOWE, why did you vote Makeinu yesterday?
Persus: Fairly active compared to most. I find this suspicious. It's almost like you're trying to be here while staying unnoticed. This being said, I have seen no strong indication that your scum.
As for you, did you miss the part where I said "I have no strong indication that you're scum"? If I'm going to accuse you, I'm going to have a better reason than "I think you're active-lurking."
Unvote, your vote was the most likely to be a busvote.Ninja'd by the man himself, so I'm going to vote Jembot and tell him to please be active instead.
Nerjin, please don't lurk. We currently have no information from you, other than that both you and makeinu voted Sinlessmoon about the same time.
Makeinu: You're voting SBC for playing differences, missing things, and for lazy scumhunting.
Only the lazy scumhunting thing is something I see as a scumtell, and SBC's "question" did seem like a sly poke at you more than anything else. the fact you've been deflecting mastahcheese's concerns and didn't really answer the question yet claim you thought it was a real question don't really help your case.
I'd rather scum be active, I can see why lurkers could be dangerous, but on one hand; they might just be busy. I was lurking just because I wasn't really sure of how to initiate myself. Now however, you can see that I'm not lurking and creating an informative posts. (Relatively. :P )
I fixed that for you. Most of your posts have been very passive or saying that “I’m reading the threat” as I stated before. But you’re starting to improve so I won’t hold it against you too much. How about some more good posts?
So far, the two players on my watch list are Makeinu, and Superblackcat. Both seem equally suspicious in the way they seem to be incredibly pro-lynch.As god damn well they should be! Lynching is, once again, TOWN’S ONLY POWER IN THIS GAME! Without a lynch we lose while we let mafia pick us off one by one.
Still not active enough for my liking. He’s active-lurking right now with one pretty decent post. I implore you to keep posting stuff like that.
•Sinlessmoon - You're doing better about being active, hopefully the new day will inspire you to draw conclusions and ask questions. Can't get a good read yet. Kinda feeling a town vibe, though.
Oooh, though... I will ask the same question of you, Persus. And, do you think we'll see anywhere near as easy a victory as in Paranormal 23?This question... When read under the knowledge of Makeinu being scum, the working seems almost... chummy.
[1] Addendum: Since it is now Day 2 it might be a good idea to go back and see who voted whom and why. I would also recommend at least skimming the entirety of day 1 again to see if something sticks out.[1] Working on this as I'm writing this.
-snip-
[2] That right there was beautiful. I didnt even catch it until after the lynch. Good job on that one.
-snip-
[3] Done and somewhat done. I have some more stuff to say about the second but Im going to wait until the person is dead before I say that stuff.
-snip-
[4] Pretty damn good for a first timer. Are you sure youve not played other places before? That being said dont let it go to your head. Im getting a pretty good town-read from you.
Most untrusted: Persus. Seriously. He voted me, claimed I bussed makeinu, and then switched his vote twice for whatever reason. He seems to be flailing about and that bothers me.So, your suspicious of a guy that voted you, then unvoted when you gave a good answer? Here's the thing, your vote on Makeinu was one of the last and came at a time when it seemed like scum would have most likely have voted their buddy to get some town cred. So I pressure voted you and asked you your reasons behind your vote. If you were scum, you might have gotten scared and messed up, or changed the reason why you voted because it was a lie. I unvoted you because you gave a good answer, and also to pursue my top targets, which were the three major lurkers at that moment. This is called pressure voting, and it's a scumhunting strategy that I recommend you should use as well.
I think I'll go ahead and say this.I'd prefer it if you could link to some posts, particularly the stuff related to you and makeinu being suspicious of Sinlessmoon.
The very first time I got suspicious of Makeinu was before I started pressing him, but actually when I drew suspicion on Sinlessmoon for lurking, and he instantly voted for him. Which sounds to me like he was hoping for an easy lurker-lynch.
So based on that, I'm fairly certain the Sinlessmoon is town.
He also attempted multiple times to press attention to SBC, so I'm fairly sure that SBC is town.
*After me looking back through*
He also pressured us to go after Jembot quite a bit. Like, quite a lot more than I remembered. Now I'm kind of thinking that Jembot would have been another of Makeinu's lurk-lynch targets.
Trusted: MastahThat's all you got? No reasons or anything? And why are you so suspicious of Sinlessmoon? The fact that makeinu tried to get him lynched says a lot to me about whether or not he's town. You're currently voting Jembot, do you have any reason to think he's scum?
Untrusted: Sin.
I'd prefer it if you could link to some posts, particularly the stuff related to you and makeinu being suspicious of Sinlessmoon.Ah, yes.
Sinlessmoon: Your profile shows you as having been last active at 03:15:59 pm today, after this game started at 10:40:09 am, and you have yet to make your first reply. Please explain yourself.
So as to make you not need to go back to find my earlier question, I'll put it here, as well.•Sinlessmoon - You're a cop on day 2, the person you examined the night before was the doctor, and they're lurking. Do you try to get them to be more active to keep them alive? How would you go about doing this without starting a bandwagon on them?In addition, here is Nerjin's blanket question to all of us.What is your experience with mafia? Also, which role would you most want to have and why?
I have checked Jembot and Pufferfish as well, but they both fail to show activity after the game's start, so I can wait.
Oi! Sinlessmoon!!Re-reading, He actually did make a post to someone else's question a while before he posted this, so it wasn't immediate but he was the first to vote him.
Think you might play this time? We'd love to have you.
A quick step-in here for all of you about lurking: Life happens. It is sort of rude to assume someone's lurking the day the game starts. I, for one, feel that lurking begins at around the time that they haven't posted for two Days.
Normally, I agree with that, Nerjin, and I was schooled on that by Jim Groovester in Paranormal 23. However, Sinlessmoon is pulling the same behavior as from that same game here.
If he doesn't want to play, that's fine. But signing up, then not showing up while actively posting elsewhere is not cool. Especially in a BM, where the loss of one player to non-participation is very costly.
Sinlessmoon:
Hi again. Do you feel like playing today?
Makeinu: How's your Sinlessmoon vote going. Why are you voting him now given that that strategy utterly failed last game in terms of getting him to play?
Like shit, obviously, in terms of getting him to play... but I lack a better target for my vote right now, and we don't have another replacement lined up. Unless Imp can join, that is. So, policy lynch at this point.
Trusted: MastahThat's all you got? No reasons or anything? And why are you so suspicious of Sinlessmoon? The fact that makeinu tried to get him lynched says a lot to me about whether or not he's town. You're currently voting Jembot, do you have any reason to think he's scum?
Untrusted: Sin.
Also, did you have to Persus? Why couldn't you let him poke at it!Because I felt like poking at it. I like people to actually scumhunt besides just listing who they suspect.
Tiruin, If by Monday, none of them reply (Jem and Puffer) can we get replacements?I..err, asked Imp--she's totally fine with replacing in, however I am waiting until Monday 9pm, GMT +8 to ensure the force-replacement. I will give Imp free reign to check on who she wants to replace (Jem/Puffin).
Also I hit writer's block. >:IShould I get the spiders?
I apologise for by lurking thus far, I've been on holidays but I get back tomorrow arvo, at that point I will post a wall of text with all my suspicions thus farThat never materialized.
A quick step-in here for all of you about lurking: Life happens. It is sort of rude to assume someone's lurking the day the game starts. I, for one, feel that lurking begins at around the time that they haven't posted for two Days.
At least you’re playing the game. Your focus on Sinless is a bit of a waste of time though. Please try to go towards some more players.
You are a liability to town. If you get lynched then you deserve it Sinlessmoon. Either get in here and play or ask for a replacement!
I bolded the last bit. See how he says "the Town", not "we" or some other term for an association that you're a part of.The main reason that I haven't done much so far is simply lack of time, had a big new years. I've got a bit more spare time now, so I'm going to get out there and scum hunt.
Being busy is fine. Life has a way of doing that. You don't need to tell us you're "going to get out there and scum hunt" now that it's slowed down for you. That's expected. But it's a little late in the game (literally) to be bringing general RVS questions to the table. Re-read the thread.
Who are your top scum leads? Town? What has given you pause yet?QuoteMakeinu- It's day one, and you have narrowed your lynching choices down to 2. One has been acting very scummy, but the other has only posted once. Do you lynch the likely scum, or policy lunch the lurker? Why?
Scum lynch. Always scum lynch.
Policy lynch for lurkers is a last-ditch, I've-got-nothing-else, tactic. Yes, lurking looks scummy, already been over that, but lurking isn't by itself a scum-tell.
You need to bringing more to the game, here. The Town needs you.
We have 2 MLes in case you guys didn't realize, Lets just vote and go with it.Look at the facts, the only lynch case put forward D1 was against Makeinu. No one put forward an alternative. In a normal game there's normally at least two lynch cases D1. My opinion is that if Makeinu had an active scum partner, they would have pushed another case and tried to get someone else lynched, because scum getting lynched D1 is something the scum team doesn't want to happen and can't really afford.
Also, Persus, that post makes you seem to drawing attention away from active people...
You.
We have 2 MLes in case you guys didn't realize, Lets just vote and go with it.So you're saying that I'm trying to draw people's attention away from me by pointing towards lurkers. And since only people against town want to draw attention away from themselves, your also implying I'm scum. So why the FOS? Why not just a vote? And since you seem to think this, why aren't you asking questions about it?
Also, Persus, that post makes you seem to drawing attention away from active people...
You.
Here's an alternate theory that illustrates the concept of WIFOM:I'll agree with you that that's a likely alternate scenario, and I've considered it, but all the active players have seemed fairly town to me.
Perhaps, bear with me here, one of the people who pressed a case on Makeinu saw that there were several lurkers. They thought to themselves "Hm... Perhaps I can secure my position as 'town' if I bus Makeinu. Obviously none of the lurkers are gonna pop in with anything other than 'Oh yeah Makeinu is scum. Why not?' and thus they talked with Makeinu, drummed up a case, and used that as a reasoning to vote him."
It's not a perfect alternate theory because I have to get going here in a few moments but it is something you might want to think about.
Yeah, I've run out of leads. I'm fairly convinced that all the active players are town, so I've really got nothing.
BUT, I think I may have found some evidence to possibly rule out Jembot.I bolded the last bit. See how he says "the Town", not "we" or some other term for an association that you're a part of.The main reason that I haven't done much so far is simply lack of time, had a big new years. I've got a bit more spare time now, so I'm going to get out there and scum hunt.
Being busy is fine. Life has a way of doing that. You don't need to tell us you're "going to get out there and scum hunt" now that it's slowed down for you. That's expected. But it's a little late in the game (literally) to be bringing general RVS questions to the table. Re-read the thread.
Who are your top scum leads? Town? What has given you pause yet?QuoteMakeinu- It's day one, and you have narrowed your lynching choices down to 2. One has been acting very scummy, but the other has only posted once. Do you lynch the likely scum, or policy lunch the lurker? Why?
Scum lynch. Always scum lynch.
Policy lynch for lurkers is a last-ditch, I've-got-nothing-else, tactic. Yes, lurking looks scummy, already been over that, but lurking isn't by itself a scum-tell.
You need to bringing more to the game, here. The Town needs you.
Maybe a minor slip, which would indicate that he knew Jembot was Town.
I'm sorry, but that's all I've really got. My only leads are lurking, so there isn't much I can do. I've been pouring through the last day, looking for clues, but I've run out of leads to pursue.
The final lurker of the day is Nerjin, our wonderful IC.
Nerjin has posted 8 times, and has voted once, on Sinlessmoon, which was lead by makeinu. To me, this raises suspicions slightly, even more so when I saw this:A quick step-in here for all of you about lurking: Life happens. It is sort of rude to assume someone's lurking the day the game starts. I, for one, feel that lurking begins at around the time that they haven't posted for two Days.
I don't know about you all, but to me that seems suspicious. So when did Nerjin vote Sinlessmoon? In this post:
First, he tells Makeinu:At least you’re playing the game. Your focus on Sinless is a bit of a waste of time though. Please try to go towards some more players.
Then he says to Sinlessmoon that:You are a liability to town. If you get lynched then you deserve it Sinlessmoon. Either get in here and play or ask for a replacement!
I'm sorry, but that's just hypocritical. Trying to lynch lurkers early D1 is lazy and not cool in my personal opinion. Force a replacement first, then if that fails, go for a lynch ins my personal opinion. While this is to some extent my personal dislike of Lurker Hunters, I think Nerjin deserves my vote.
Makeinu was just about confirmed.What do you mean by this?
I haven't seen him before... and he may just have thrown his partner under the bus.How does the first part matter? And is it relevant in any way to the second part?
In my opinion, Nerjin seemed to be trying to tell makeinu that spending time trying to get Sinlessmoon to play was useless. I think its still possible to vote a lurker and still focus on the active players, where you'll most likely get more valuable information. Makeinu posted several times trying to get Sinlessmoon to play, and I just think Nerjin found this to be a waste of time. Nerjin didn't seem to linger on Sinlessmoon, which may be because he wasn't here, but that's what I think he meant.Good point, after rereading that, I think I'm agreeing with you.
Makeinu was just about confirmed.What do you mean by this?I haven't seen him before... and he may just have thrown his partner under the bus.How does the first part matter? And is it relevant in any way to the second part?In my opinion, Nerjin seemed to be trying to tell makeinu that spending time trying to get Sinlessmoon to play was useless. I think its still possible to vote a lurker and still focus on the active players, where you'll most likely get more valuable information. Makeinu posted several times trying to get Sinlessmoon to play, and I just think Nerjin found this to be a waste of time. Nerjin didn't seem to linger on Sinlessmoon, which may be because he wasn't here, but that's what I think he meant.Good point, after rereading that, I think I'm agreeing with you.
WELCOME IMP AND WOLF!
WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT THE PEOPLE YOU MOVED IN, AND THE GAME THUS FAR.
Alright, you two. The people you guys replaced were about 5 seconds from being lynched. My decision on that has yet to change.I'll be wanting to se your answers too.
4maskwolf and Imp:
What are your initial thoughts from Makeinu's flip as scum?
What are your reads on everybody thus far?
Who do you find most suspicious right now? Why?
Well. I'm slightly suspiscious of MOWE, he wasn't really active, and when he did come, Makeinu was just about confirmed.
I haven't seen him before... and he may just have thrown his partner under the bus.
Infact, any of the active people could have done that, but more likely Persus and MOWE, since me and mastah did it before it was 'popular' :P
Alright, you two. The people you guys replaced were about 5 seconds from being lynched. My decision on that has yet to change.
4maskwolf and Imp:
What are your initial thoughts from Makeinu's flip as scum?
What are your reads on everybody thus far?
Who do you find most suspicious right now? Why?
What are your initial thoughts from Makeinu's flip as scum?
What are your reads on everybody thus far?
Who do you find most suspicious right now? Why?
Wolf:
As I've stated in earlier posts, I was afraid of looking like an idiot. I've only been a member of this forum for like two months. I don't know anyone and it's scary as hell. But with the encouragement of the other players, I'm not so afraid anymore. If I end up looking like a total ass, well at least we all get a laugh and I learn from it.
Sinlessmoon:
I haven't heard much from you recently. What are your thoughts on Makeinu's flip? Who do you think is Makeinu's buddy? You planning on going on he offensive at all this game?
Also, did you have to Persus? Why couldn't you let him poke at it!
Because I felt like poking at it. I like people to actually scumhunt besides just listing who they suspect.
We have 2 MLes in case you guys didn't realize, Lets just vote and go with it.
Also, Persus, that post makes you seem to drawing attention away from active people...
You.
I'm voting Jembot to get him to come backand
Sin is here, but he's not participating. And right now, with the activity, it is perfect for that kind of lurker play.
Also, did you have to Persus? Why couldn't you let him poke at it!
Obviously, both the ICs are scum!
BURN THEM!
Nerjin: So you say you read through our posts? Did you actually read through our posts? Since I voted him for that. Yes. But if you didn't see, I stayed on him for multiple reasons, that kept compounding as the game went on.
I think all of the active players are town.
Alright, I think we've ruled out active people by now, or at least I have.
To me, the lack of another case means that one of the four lurkers was Makeinu's scumbuddy.
Another thing to take note of is the fact that with one mafioso dead, the other one will be incapable of bussing anyone else. Without a more thorough analysis, I don't know what to make of this, perhaps you all could figure something out.
Imp
My lack of a greeting was due to the fact that my hard drive got fried on my computer, so I was posting from my iPod touch. I've been posting the longer updates from school computers, but I should get my computer back today or tomorrow and be able to take a more active role.
What about you? You seemed QUITE eager to post as much as possible, despite obstacles.
Just remember, I will be watching all of you.
I'm bothered by 4maskwolf's opening comment. Glad he said some form of 'I am here', but that's essentially all he said.
2. I'm posting this before having read through absolutely everything, but I get the impression that mastahcheese is town: his questions seemed rather pointed and he was the first one to be highly active on the thread. Imp, I have my eye on you, and MOWE, because he came in at the last minute and suddenly became active.Interesting point. It's very similar to one previously stated by SBC.
As for that, I thought Makeinu would be scum; just one of those things that nags at the back of your head, and he seemed very eager to draw suspicion onto other players. I'm thinking I might go on the offensive soon, consider casting my vote on some suspicious people.Good to hear. Offensive town play is usually better than defensive town play.
Cat:Him is Sinlessmoon, and It was the post where SBC responded to a question about who he trusted the least and most with four words:Also, did you have to Persus? Why couldn't you let him poke at it!Because I felt like poking at it. I like people to actually scumhunt besides just listing who they suspect.
Which him and what it are you referring to here?
Trusted: MastahSince he didn't back his assertions up at all, I went after him for it.
Untrusted: Sin.
Persus13 thought you meant his question to you, about your reasons for your unexplained suspicions, and you don't appear to have followed up with either Persus or Sinlessmoon after this point, though your next post:And if you knew the answer to your question, why was the question relevant?
MOWE, Persus13, and mastahcheeseI am NOT ruling out active players solely because they're active, I'm ruling out the active players because for the most part I have town reads from them (I'm slightly suspicious of MOWE and SBC seems to be playing badly), but because the absence of an alternative to the Makeinu lynch makes the lurkers scummy.I think all of the active players are town.Alright, I think we've ruled out active people by now, or at least I have.To me, the lack of another case means that one of the four lurkers was Makeinu's scumbuddy.
How certain are each of you that the most active players are ruled out as Scum? I completely agree with voting, and focusing, on the most scummy player(s), but in what you say, all three of you sound like you are done with everyone except a narrow pool of suspects, all of whom have been less responsive or completely silent throughout most of the game.
I do understand ruling people out - I don't have very much to say to those I view as highly likely to be Town, those whose play and logic makes great sense to me and who is reacting very reasonably. I watch that person and I'm done, as long as their behavior keeps making sense to me. That's me - and I haven't seen specifically Persus, the only one of you three I actually have played with before, do this before. In fact, I haven't seen anyone else but myself do this before. But all three of you appear very comfortable with it this time, so I'd like each of you to explain why you feel comfortable that you're done with each other.I'm not sure I understand this paragraph.
This is my first chance to be a replacement that actually replaced in, and I'm replacing someone who was almost silent in a game with around a 40-50% low activity rate. And I am, life permitting, highly active.Good to hear, and judging by your Wall of Text, you're back to top form.
Persus13 thought you meant his question to you, about your reasons for your unexplained suspicions, and you don't appear to have followed up with either Persus or Sinlessmoon after this point, though your next post:And if you knew the answer to your question, why was the question relevant?
I do understand ruling people out - I don't have very much to say to those I view as highly likely to be Town, those whose play and logic makes great sense to me and who is reacting very reasonably. I watch that person and I'm done, as long as their behavior keeps making sense to me. That's me - and I haven't seen specifically Persus, the only one of you three I actually have played with before, do this before. In fact, I haven't seen anyone else but myself do this before. But all three of you appear very comfortable with it this time, so I'd like each of you to explain why you feel comfortable that you're done with each other.I'm not sure I understand this paragraph.
2. I'm posting this before having read through absolutely everything, but I get the impression that mastahcheese is town: his questions seemed rather pointed and he was the first one to be highly active on the thread. Imp, I have my eye on you, and MOWE, because he came in at the last minute and suddenly became active.Interesting point. It's very similar to one previously stated by SBC.
Also, what is your previous experience with Mafia?
MOWE, Persus13, and mastahcheeseI think all of the active players are town.Alright, I think we've ruled out active people by now, or at least I have.To me, the lack of another case means that one of the four lurkers was Makeinu's scumbuddy.How certain are each of you that the most active players are ruled out as Scum? I completely agree with voting, and focusing, on the most scummy player(s), but in what you say, all three of you sound like you are done with everyone except a narrow pool of suspects, all of whom have been less responsive or completely silent throughout most of the game.
I do understand ruling people out - I don't have very much to say to those I view as highly likely to be Town, those whose play and logic makes great sense to me and who is reacting very reasonably. I watch that person and I'm done, as long as their behavior keeps making sense to me. That's me - and I haven't seen specifically Persus, the only one of you three I actually have played with before, do this before. In fact, I haven't seen anyone else but myself do this before. But all three of you appear very comfortable with it this time, so I'd like each of you to explain why you feel comfortable that you're done with each other.
Sinlessmoon Exams already? Ouch. For me the semester barely has started. How much time do you believe you'll have for this game; do you intend to replace or will you be able to interact with us fairly frequently?
MOWE, Persus13, and mastahcheeseI think all of the active players are town.Alright, I think we've ruled out active people by now, or at least I have.To me, the lack of another case means that one of the four lurkers was Makeinu's scumbuddy.
How certain are each of you that the most active players are ruled out as Scum? I completely agree with voting, and focusing, on the most scummy player(s), but in what you say, all three of you sound like you are done with everyone except a narrow pool of suspects, all of whom have been less responsive or completely silent throughout most of the game.
I do understand ruling people out - I don't have very much to say to those I view as highly likely to be Town, those whose play and logic makes great sense to me and who is reacting very reasonably. I watch that person and I'm done, as long as their behavior keeps making sense to me. That's me - and I haven't seen specifically Persus, the only one of you three I actually have played with before, do this before. In fact, I haven't seen anyone else but myself do this before. But all three of you appear very comfortable with it this time, so I'd like each of you to explain why you feel comfortable that you're done with each other.
Imp:MOWE, Persus13, and mastahcheeseI think all of the active players are town.Alright, I think we've ruled out active people by now, or at least I have.To me, the lack of another case means that one of the four lurkers was Makeinu's scumbuddy.
How certain are each of you that the most active players are ruled out as Scum? I completely agree with voting, and focusing, on the most scummy player(s), but in what you say, all three of you sound like you are done with everyone except a narrow pool of suspects, all of whom have been less responsive or completely silent throughout most of the game.
I do understand ruling people out - I don't have very much to say to those I view as highly likely to be Town, those whose play and logic makes great sense to me and who is reacting very reasonably. I watch that person and I'm done, as long as their behavior keeps making sense to me. That's me - and I haven't seen specifically Persus, the only one of you three I actually have played with before, do this before. In fact, I haven't seen anyone else but myself do this before. But all three of you appear very comfortable with it this time, so I'd like each of you to explain why you feel comfortable that you're done with each other.
I couldn't find anything extremely scummy about any of the active players. I'm most suspicious of Persus because of how he seemed to struggle with his focus near the beginning. However, I couldn't find anything particularly scummy about him. I could see the sense in mastahcheese's argument that Pufferfish was the scummiest player because he wasn't there and was the only chronic lurker that makeinu didn't attack for lurking. I haven't completely ruled out the active players, but at the time, this was the only lead I had.
Nerjin, in most of your posts, you're making a reasonable appraisal of each player's style and actions. They are nice summaries, and you include a tidbit or two of personal advice, some praise or scolding, and very rarely a non-rhetorical/non 'where are you' question for someone.
Ironically, this is pretty useful for a game of beginners, but it was while I read it here in the first beginner's game I've seen it in, that I realized you're not just doing this because it's a beginner game. This is -you-, your new playstyle as of the recent BYOR. So I tried to read into it, to taste your intention and goals - and it feels to me like you are only trying to honestly evaluate play. Not leaning towards catching Scum, not leaning towards expressing yourself, everything I feel from your words and intention as I read your posts is the honest desire to present an accurate assessment of how others are playing.
What I really do not feel is anything other than an attempt to evaluate and give feedback. This is giving me an astonishingly null read of you! While it's neat to have a referee calling out the plays, commentating, and in a sense awarding points; a summary of what you think of everyone is quite important to share but that's more often done at a day's end, after direct and often personal interaction, not primarily observation and reaction without that direct interaction.
Is this style something you're still experimenting with and figuring out how to use? Would you recommend it to others? How much of it feels like Scumhunting to you, and how much reporting observations and providing feedback? Or is reporting and feedback a major part of Scumhunting? Can you suggest how your style could be read to interpret it for intent and alignment? It really looks like a wall to me this game.
Cat:Also, did you have to Persus? Why couldn't you let him poke at it!Because I felt like poking at it. I like people to actually scumhunt besides just listing who they suspect.
Which him and what it are you referring to here?
Persus13 thought you meant his question to you, about your reasons for your unexplained suspicions, and you don't appear to have followed up with either Persus or Sinlessmoon after this point, though your next post:We have 2 MLes in case you guys didn't realize, Lets just vote and go with it.
Also, Persus, that post makes you seem to drawing attention away from active people...
You.
You previously said:I'm voting Jembot to get him to come backandSin is here, but he's not participating. And right now, with the activity, it is perfect for that kind of lurker play.
Also, did you have to Persus? Why couldn't you let him poke at it!
If those are both about Sin, then you're pretty much paying attention to less actives too.
Before that, you... is this a joke?Obviously, both the ICs are scum!
BURN THEM!
but despite challenging Nerjin the post before:Nerjin: So you say you read through our posts? Did you actually read through our posts? Since I voted him for that. Yes. But if you didn't see, I stayed on him for multiple reasons, that kept compounding as the game went on.
You tell Nerjin he's wrong and challenge him for not reading (or understanding you).
Now, Nerjin doesn't react to this, at least he hasn't yet, though he has posted since - his next two posts explain weekend time and visits WIFOM and alternate theories. This is interesting, he broke his defensive style, but he didn't do it to Scumhunt, he did it primarily to teach small quick lessons (with a mention about where his time is going, quite legitimate that he doesn't have weekend time for the game right now)
But Nerjin doesn't touch Superblackcat's challenge, at least yet. And Cat doesn't revisit this either, at least yet.
Why not, Cat?
And Cat, what's wrong with Persus13 presenting a case against the lurkers? How does that case draw attention away from the actives, there's not enough attention to go around and consider everyone? How was Persus's presentation of his thoughts worse than your more veiled statements of suspicion and use of vote that came before it, worse than mastahcheese's consideration of the lurkers, and that of MOWE who posted after your question? Why'd you not follow up on your challenge to Persus, or challenge the others on the same issue?
MOWE, Persus13, and mastahcheeseI think all of the active players are town.Alright, I think we've ruled out active people by now, or at least I have.To me, the lack of another case means that one of the four lurkers was Makeinu's scumbuddy.
How certain are each of you that the most active players are ruled out as Scum? I completely agree with voting, and focusing, on the most scummy player(s), but in what you say, all three of you sound like you are done with everyone except a narrow pool of suspects, all of whom have been less responsive or completely silent throughout most of the game.
I do understand ruling people out - I don't have very much to say to those I view as highly likely to be Town, those whose play and logic makes great sense to me and who is reacting very reasonably. I watch that person and I'm done, as long as their behavior keeps making sense to me. That's me - and I haven't seen specifically Persus, the only one of you three I actually have played with before, do this before. In fact, I haven't seen anyone else but myself do this before. But all three of you appear very comfortable with it this time, so I'd like each of you to explain why you feel comfortable that you're done with each other.
4maskwolfAnother thing to take note of is the fact that with one mafioso dead, the other one will be incapable of bussing anyone else. Without a more thorough analysis, I don't know what to make of this, perhaps you all could figure something out.
It's fine that you haven't thoroughly analyzed this, but please explain what general significance you think that the remaining Scum being unable to bus anyone else has?Imp
My lack of a greeting was due to the fact that my hard drive got fried on my computer, so I was posting from my iPod touch. I've been posting the longer updates from school computers, but I should get my computer back today or tomorrow and be able to take a more active role.
What about you? You seemed QUITE eager to post as much as possible, despite obstacles.
Lack of a greeting....Just remember, I will be watching all of you.
Then what's that, if not a greeting? Telling us you're here, implying that you intend to play - but not actually doing anything other than saying hi in a creative way. That's what I challenged you about...I'm bothered by 4maskwolf's opening comment. Glad he said some form of 'I am here', but that's essentially all he said.
Good to know why you only 'touched base' as it were. But if that wasn't a greeting to you - what was it?
As for myself, I am indeed QUITE eager to play. Life's getting in the way, but I'm still very new to Mafia; my first game of any sort of Mafia was BM43, the one that preceded this one (not the Sprint). I've only played 4 games before this one. Play requires posting; day 2 is getting late. This is my first chance to be a replacement that actually replaced in, and I'm replacing someone who was almost silent in a game with around a 40-50% low activity rate. And I am, life permitting, highly active.
Heck, my first game people were naming my posts (because of their length, not quality, alas. Maybe the other, someday) and even timing the game as before and after certain of my posts. I'm not -trying- for that, mind you. But 'eager' is a great description of me, yes.
However I couldn't care less about how frequently or rarely I post - so long as I get to play with the greatest depth and intensity possible, and the frequency is enough to get the job done - there's Scum to catch, and I don't expect one to catch itself. I very much want to be part of the process - I'm here to play and play the very, very best I can, and I'm quite annoyed that life's demands are interfering with my playtime here!
Sinlessmoon Exams already? Ouch. For me the semester barely has started. How much time do you believe you'll have for this game; do you intend to replace or will you be able to interact with us fairly frequently?
Before that, you... is this a joke?I'm pretty sure this was a joke, SBC seems to be rather light-hearted, and it was actually a rather innocent jest that got me to crack down on Makeinu, after all, so I'm fine with it.Obviously, both the ICs are scum!
BURN THEM!
MOWE, Persus13, and mastahcheeseI'm fairly certain. I'll go ahead and give my reasons for them.I think all of the active players are town.Alright, I think we've ruled out active people by now, or at least I have.To me, the lack of another case means that one of the four lurkers was Makeinu's scumbuddy.How certain are each of you that the most active players are ruled out as Scum? I completely agree with voting, and focusing, on the most scummy player(s), but in what you say, all three of you sound like you are done with everyone except a narrow pool of suspects, all of whom have been less responsive or completely silent throughout most of the game.
I do understand ruling people out - I don't have very much to say to those I view as highly likely to be Town, those whose play and logic makes great sense to me and who is reacting very reasonably. I watch that person and I'm done, as long as their behavior keeps making sense to me. That's me - and I haven't seen specifically Persus, the only one of you three I actually have played with before, do this before. In fact, I haven't seen anyone else but myself do this before. But all three of you appear very comfortable with it this time, so I'd like each of you to explain why you feel comfortable that you're done with each other.I'm not sure if it's just in the way that you word this, but I'm having a lot of trouble reading and interpreting this.
[1] How would you know if he was focused on that? It sure seemed that way, but if I, myself, were in that position, I'd care less about saving myself and more about keeping Town from finding my scumbuddy. Particularly, if you look toward the end of the day, he didn't really post all that much anymore. It was like he just gave up. By the end, he had just accepted it, he didn't go down kicking and screaming like you'd expect.I couldn't find anything extremely scummy about any of the active players. I'm most suspicious of Persus because of how he seemed to struggle with his focus near the beginning. However, I couldn't find anything particularly scummy about him. I could see the sense in mastahcheese's argument that Pufferfish was the scummiest player because he wasn't there and was the only chronic lurker that makeinu didn't attack for lurking. I haven't completely ruled out the active players, but at the time, this was the only lead I had.
My only retort to that is that [1] Makeinu was rather focused on saving his own hide from being skinned (which he failed at), so [2] he was less likely to notice all of the lurkers. [3] Also, if he was already going down, why would he draw attention to a fellow Mafioso in such a blatant way?
Imp:I was defending myself, and honestly mostly from you. And mastahcheese, I'm not questioning you for reasons I already stated: that I am fairly certain you are innocent.Before that, you... is this a joke?I'm pretty sure this was a joke, SBC seems to be rather light-hearted, and it was actually a rather innocent jest that got me to crack down on Makeinu, after all, so I'm fine with it.Obviously, both the ICs are scum!
BURN THEM!MOWE, Persus13, and mastahcheeseI'm fairly certain. I'll go ahead and give my reasons for them.I think all of the active players are town.Alright, I think we've ruled out active people by now, or at least I have.To me, the lack of another case means that one of the four lurkers was Makeinu's scumbuddy.How certain are each of you that the most active players are ruled out as Scum? I completely agree with voting, and focusing, on the most scummy player(s), but in what you say, all three of you sound like you are done with everyone except a narrow pool of suspects, all of whom have been less responsive or completely silent throughout most of the game.
•Superblackcat - SBC was technically the first person to vote Makeinu. He did a lot of work on tunneling him, and getting him to slip up and give not just himself, but others great openings to attack. He and Makeinu were at odds almost the entire game.
•Sinlessmoon - Makeinu attempted to throw SLM under the gallows more than anyone ought to try for a simple policy lynch. And not just once, but multiple times attempted to redirect the subject towards that. I don't think he'd have tried that hard for a D1 bus attempt.
•Imp - You replaced Jembot. There are two things currently going for you on my radar. 1, Makeinu's attempts to throw suspicion at Jembot, and the possible slip I mentioned earlier.
•Persus13 - Persus is doing a pretty good job of hunting and being aggressive. At first, I thought they were a little reactive, but the ferocity of which they attack openings and opportunities convince me otherwise. Particularly the new posts since you two have replaced in have given me hope.
•4maskwolf - You replaced Pufferfish, who I'm still convinced is the most probable scum. Your recent answers haven't been much to persuade me otherwise, as I actually opened up a tab to reply to some of what you've said earlier, and realized that you didn't really leave me with much to question.
•MyOwnWorstEnemy - Lacking confidence, but I can see it coming through now. MOWE has made some good arguments and reasoning's, and I trust their logic.
•Nerjin - I don't know what to say about Nerjin. But I don't get the "scum" vibe from him. I said way back toward the start of the game that's been more interested in being a teacher, rather than a leader.
Sort of put my whole reads in that, but I doubt you'll mind.I do understand ruling people out - I don't have very much to say to those I view as highly likely to be Town, those whose play and logic makes great sense to me and who is reacting very reasonably. I watch that person and I'm done, as long as their behavior keeps making sense to me. That's me - and I haven't seen specifically Persus, the only one of you three I actually have played with before, do this before. In fact, I haven't seen anyone else but myself do this before. But all three of you appear very comfortable with it this time, so I'd like each of you to explain why you feel comfortable that you're done with each other.I'm not sure if it's just in the way that you word this, but I'm having a lot of trouble reading and interpreting this.
Overall, it's hard for me to read through your posts because you're very wordy with your responses.
This isn't a bad thing, it just takes me a re-read or two.
4maskwolf:[1] How would you know if he was focused on that? It sure seemed that way, but if I, myself, were in that position, I'd care less about saving myself and more about keeping Town from finding my scumbuddy. Particularly, if you look toward the end of the day, he didn't really post all that much anymore. It was like he just gave up. By the end, he had just accepted it, he didn't go down kicking and screaming like you'd expect.I couldn't find anything extremely scummy about any of the active players. I'm most suspicious of Persus because of how he seemed to struggle with his focus near the beginning. However, I couldn't find anything particularly scummy about him. I could see the sense in mastahcheese's argument that Pufferfish was the scummiest player because he wasn't there and was the only chronic lurker that makeinu didn't attack for lurking. I haven't completely ruled out the active players, but at the time, this was the only lead I had.
My only retort to that is that [1] Makeinu was rather focused on saving his own hide from being skinned (which he failed at), so [2] he was less likely to notice all of the lurkers. [3] Also, if he was already going down, why would he draw attention to a fellow Mafioso in such a blatant way?
[2] I'd like to argue this point. Quite a lot, in fact. He pointed attention to Sinlessmoon numerous times, he pointed attention to Jembot on multiple occasions, he pointed Nerjin on several posts. I seem to remember him also going after MOWE and possibly even Persus at times. In fact, I'd beg to argue that he was the most aware of lurkers then entire game.
[3] It wasn't blatant. In fact, it seemed to me that he actually might have put that one reference in there so that your argument could be made. He didn't point out Pufferfish because he was his buddy, and it started to dawn on him that he'd been singling out lurkers the whole time, and forgot him, so pointed it out that one time just to seem like he didn't forget him.
And MOWE wasn't even making any form of attack, why are you suddenly defending Makeinu?
I was defending myself, and honestly mostly from you. And mastahcheese, I'm not questioning you for reasons I already stated: that I am fairly certain you are innocent.How were you defending yourself from me when I haven't actually attacked you yet? I had a hold-over vote on you that I simply kept due to a lack of new evidence that would make me unvote. And as I said earlier, it didn't even seem like MOWE was attacking at all. Yet you say you are defending yourself. From what?
As for the whole Makinu-pufferfish thing: Makinu was a rather experienced player, an IC in training, as he was called in the OP. I find it doubtful that he would forget to policy-lynch his own scumbuddy, which would be a fairly basic mistake to make. Either I overestimate his ability or you underestimate it.
Oh, and Nerjin, we haven't heard from you since Imp and I came into the game. Does this effect your game plan at all, and did anything we have done force you to reevaluate the people in question.I'm unbelievably tempted to call this deflection. But I'll leave that to someone else to decide.
To everyone: beware the tunnel vision effect.Oh, trust me, I know. The last person to tell me that flipped scum.
God dang it.
Unvote
This isn't the first time puffer lurked as a cop, either.
I feel inclined to believe you, for some reason.
I need to go re-read everything, now. Though I'm sure some would say not to claim, thank you for doing so.
Sinlessmoon Exams already? Ouch. For me the semester barely has started. How much time do you believe you'll have for this game; do you intend to replace or will you be able to interact with us fairly frequently?
Yeah, my semester is just ending for me. I don't think I'll replace, but I definitely won't have time for large posts. I will however come and check in on things frequently.
Sinlessmoon:
I haven't heard much from you recently. What are your thoughts on Makeinu's flip? Who do you think is Makeinu's buddy? You planning on going on he offensive at all this game?
Yeah, I haven't had much time recently, what with exams coming up. Gotta crack down on some assignments!
As for that, I thought Makeinu would be scum; just one of those things that nags at the back of your head, and he seemed very eager to draw suspicion onto other players. I'm thinking I might go on the offensive soon, consider casting my vote on some suspicious people.
QuoteSo far, the two players on my watch list are Makeinu, and Superblackcat. Both seem equally suspicious in the way they seem to be incredibly pro-lynch.As god damn well they should be! Lynching is, once again, TOWN’S ONLY POWER IN THIS GAME! Without a lynch we lose while we let mafia pick us off one by one.
I'm going to go ahead and partially agree with this. Yes; lynching is the only power that the town have, but they shouldn't just throw it around, Its like waving a loaded gun and hoping that when you shoot its the not the imposter that is trying to convince you that they are the real person.
You saw that Makeinu the person that was so pro-lynch turned out to be mafia, the problem with the Town's only weapon... It can be easily used against them.
My only retort to that is that Makeinu was rather focused on saving his own hide from being skinned (which he failed at), so he was less likely to notice all of the lurkers. Also, if he was already going down, why would he draw attention to a fellow Mafioso in such a blatant way?
Exactly. As strange as my behaviour has been this game, it's all been about teaching. Believe it or not.
Imp, On the lack of follow-ups, is that I rarely have the time to take notes, and I usually don't exactly remember what I say. In fact, thanks for reminding me :P.
I wasn't really asking him a question. I was just... I dunno, joking around? Telling him that I don't actually just jump in and post 4 words on a regular basis, and this was trying to get a reaction?
The way Persus said it, sounded like. "Active people are pretty much comfirmed town IMO, I'm active btw. Lets lynch these lurkers." I understand his reasoning, but that seems to be trying to not get found out himself.
Also, I really don't think that both ICs would be... scum. Just from the standpoint of a BM game, even given that Tiruin rolled for it, I would think she would reroll, because none of the new player gets as much help/ scum experience. And there is no point for the scum IC really. But that's all meta gaming.
I would like Nerjin to answer it. Please and thank you.
Also, 4maskwolf: That's were you come in. Persus will be especially keeping an eye on you two, since you two replaced in. If you guys slip up! Ho ho ho, Merry Christmas, and may that ditch be comfortable!
I'm fairly certain. I'll go ahead and give my reasons for them.
Sort of put my whole reads in that, but I doubt you'll mind.
I do understand ruling people out - I don't have very much to say to those I view as highly likely to be Town, those whose play and logic makes great sense to me and who is reacting very reasonably. I watch that person and I'm done, as long as their behavior keeps making sense to me. That's me - and I haven't seen specifically Persus, the only one of you three I actually have played with before, do this before. In fact, I haven't seen anyone else but myself do this before. But all three of you appear very comfortable with it this time, so I'd like each of you to explain why you feel comfortable that you're done with each other.I'm not sure if it's just in the way that you word this, but I'm having a lot of trouble reading and interpreting this.
Overall, it's hard for me to read through your posts because you're very wordy with your responses.
This isn't a bad thing, it just takes me a re-read or two.
I was defending myself
Just remember, I will be watching all of you.
My lack of a greeting
And Imp, after reading your responses to me I realized that I had misinterpreted your statement. Yes, it was a greeting. The reason I had not posted MORE of a greeting was the fact that my computer's hard drive failed.
My previous experience on these forums is lacking, but I've played mafia in person quite often, under various guises.
My previous experience on these forums is lacking, but I've played mafia in person quite often, under various guises.
Perhaps I am trying to overanalyze, but it's my first game.
While I have ruled out MastahCheese as a suspect, I don't follow how you managed to rule out the others and decide to pin the blame on lurkers. Yes, lurking is a minor scumtell: however, there were, as you said, four lurkers, and only one mafioso. It isn't possible that all of the lurkers were mafia, so how did you select the individual ones to single out and eliminate?
Imp: if you had to pick one person who you believed was scum, right now, who would you choose?
How were you defending yourself from me when I haven't actually attacked you yet? I had a hold-over vote on you that I simply kept due to a lack of new evidence that would make me unvote. And as I said earlier, it didn't even seem like MOWE was attacking at all. Yet you say you are defending yourself. From what?
Alright then, MastahCheese. As you say. Seeing as how I appear to be on the lynching block, go May as well share what I know.
I am the cop.
My logic in claiming was thus:Your logic is flawed. Especially in 'The next scenario'. Wow, especially in the next scenario.
There are two main scenarios that could be the case: I am cop, or I'm running a really gutsy mafia ploy.
Let us examine these two scenarios: the first is that I am cop. One possible conclusion is that I get lynched anyway, flipping town. This confirms Mastahcheese as innocent, reducing the pool of possible mafiosos. The second scenario is where I don't get lynched. I would almost certainly be night killed, as the jailkeepeer wouldn't use his ability on me because it would prevent me from using my own ability. The third option, the counter-claim, leads to a town victory. Either I get lynched, which is an obvious scum tell on the other claimant, or they get lynched, and game over.
The next scenario is where I am mafia. In the case of a lynch, game over, everyone goes home, town victory. In the case of someone else being lynched, the game goes, at best for me, as follows: I night-kill someone, leaving five town (one got lynched) and me. The next day, I claim to have found the culprit, and they lynch him. Another night kill, leaving town with a three to one majority and an obvious scum. Town victory. The same goes for the counter-claim, except it is even quicker.
Imp: if you had to pick one person who you believed was scum, right now, who would you choose?
This is true. I'll let you on a little secret. I'm a fish. A bloodfish who sucks on blood and nummy nummy iron. Iron is tasty, especially when it's blood. I go with the flow and swim with the tides. I cast my luck and roll with the dice~Also, I really don't think that both ICs would be... scum. Just from the standpoint of a BM game, even given that Tiruin rolled for it, I would think she would reroll, because none of the new player gets as much help/ scum experience. And there is no point for the scum IC really. But that's all meta gaming.
I would like Nerjin to answer it. Please and thank you.
It's happened before. Here's the link, in the history of games here it's happened once before: http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=108236.msg3228150#msg3228150
The IC who were both Scum played a very strong game; Scum won very handily, which commonly happens even when both IC are Town.
Would Tiruin reroll if she got that result for Scum? She's not supposed to.
Tiruin: Does Nerjin need a prod? Also, would you permit both IC to have Scum roles in your BM game?*pokes Nerjin*
To Imp:
At least you are questioning my motives, as opposed to Mashtahcheese, who accepted what I said.
As you very correctly pointed out, if I roleclaimed to save my life I effectively committed suicide. That is why it was not a life-saver roleclaim. Part of my goal was to free myself up from answering questions so that I could scumhunt, the other part was getting the known information out there. As I saw, and still see, it, had I stayed silent I would have been lynched.
At least you are questioning my motives, as opposed to Mashtahcheese, who accepted what I said.
The choice to claim cop was more thought out than you think.
That I believe. You've been focused on being a cop, or presenting yourself as a cop, from your first post in this game.
If you want to vote me, Imp, feel free. However, I have a few questions for you specifically:
1. How do YOU respond under pressure.
2. Why is Sinlessmoon your second lynch choice? Is it reason or just a gut instinct.
3. You very nearly signed up as IC for this game and have played in many mafia games. Where do you see the line between a "beginner mistake" and a scum tell?
Where do you see the line between a "beginner mistake" and a scum tell?
talk to them, ask them questions, follow those questions up, interact, observe, consider, and in the end, guess based on the probability you believe you see.
Where do you see the line between a "beginner mistake" and a scum tell?
I've played mafia in person quite often, under various guises.
The cop claim, is quite dumb, and should not have happened.
However, this gives mafia, assuming we don't lynch correctly, to create wifom. If they do lynch 'cop', well, no wifom really, but if they don't, we start to think, maybe he isn't cop. Etc. Etc. But at the same time, he could still be cop.
IF ANYONE ELSE IS COP, THEY SHOULD OUT NOW!
Nerjin: poor decision making and massive doses of irritation. Call it lies if you will, I'm likely to be lynched anyway. Might as well vote for myself.
I now defer to the judgement of my betters.
Nerjin: poor decision making and massive doses of irritation. Call it lies if you will, I'm likely to be lynched anyway. Might as well vote for myself.
I now defer to the judgement of my betters.
Alright let me teach you something real quick. This is a claim to emotion. Sometimes claims to emotion work well. Other times they scream of desperation and will get you lynched. BUT that's not what I'm here to teach, here's the specific thing I want to tell you: If you say things like this in a real game people WILL vote you. If you don't care about your role in the game no one else will. Unfortunately for you the cop-claim seems more like "I'm trying to deflect" more than anything else and this just seems to confirm it 4mask
Sorry for not being aorund as much as I should. I've started up college again and the first week has been a bit... harsh.
Look I'll say this: I'm not picking on you. If anyone else claimed Cop I would have said the same thing. Especially under the circumstances and considering what you said afterward. It's not you. It might just be a newb mistake but... Something feeels off about it.Glad to hear I'm not the only one.
Look I'll say this: I'm not picking on you. If anyone else claimed Cop I would have said the same thing. Especially under the circumstances and considering what you said afterward. It's not you. It might just be a newb mistake but... Something feeels off about it.
4mask
Bye.
I'm just going to give a stark reflection on what caused me to claim. If and when I am lynched or nk'd, should I flip town, you will know this to be true. Also, Nerjin, as IC could you give me some advice on what to do next time:
I enter the game a sub, only to find that my predecessor was a lurker who the previously lynched mafia member had failed to out as such, drawing undue suspicion upon himself. I find myself in possession of a power town role, but with two lynch votes out of four people voting and two lurkers, who later poked their noses back into the game.
My initial plan was to do my best to scumhunt until my power found the scum, then claim and go for the lynch. However, shortly thereafter I find myself, or at least perceive myself to be, under extremely close scrutiny by the other replacement, without a solid knowledge of how to assuage concerns and counter-question. This, combined with a tendency to jump to conclusions, results in at least one other person noting that I am at the same level of suspicion.
Now, I find myself growing slightly irritated. The fact that I was irritated was entirely my own fault, but it appeared to me that I was destined to be lynched. As such, I decide to reveal my role and clear the name of the one person who I know to be innocent.
Advice for next time?
Now, is anyone going to back me on the shorten so that I can leave and stop being railed against?
I'm just going to give a stark reflection on what caused me to claim. If and when I am lynched or nk'd, should I flip town, you will know this to be true. Also, Nerjin, as IC could you give me some advice on what to do next time:
Certainly. That's what I'm here for, even if I've not done it well.QuoteI enter the game a sub, only to find that my predecessor was a lurker who the previously lynched mafia member had failed to out as such, drawing undue suspicion upon himself. I find myself in possession of a power town role, but with two lynch votes out of four people voting and two lurkers, who later poked their noses back into the game.
My initial plan was to do my best to scumhunt until my power found the scum, then claim and go for the lynch. However, shortly thereafter I find myself, or at least perceive myself to be, under extremely close scrutiny by the other replacement, without a solid knowledge of how to assuage concerns and counter-question. This, combined with a tendency to jump to conclusions, results in at least one other person noting that I am at the same level of suspicion.
Now, I find myself growing slightly irritated. The fact that I was irritated was entirely my own fault, but it appeared to me that I was destined to be lynched. As such, I decide to reveal my role and clear the name of the one person who I know to be innocent.
Advice for next time?
Hm, well trying to appeal to emotions won't get you anywhere. All that does is say that you can't defend yourself logically. I'll say that you should avoid that in the future [don't get down on yourself over it though. I did a LOT worse in my first game.] Sometimes you just need to get lynched as town. You'll mess up and get yourself killed BUT if you are town [I am going to give advice as though you are even if I don't believe it since you're asking for my view of how to deal with this AS town] you just need to act like town. It's really that simple, get out there and search for what you can. Find inconsistencies. As a cop you've done the BEST thing one can do as a cop [though VERY prematurely] in this situation: You cleared someone's name.
As the Mafiaso is dead that means that Mastah HAS to be town. There is literally now ay for him to be anything else.
In short: I'd reccomend you simply scum-hunt until the end and:
[quote
Oh, and Persus interrupted me. I vote for a shorten on the day, to get this over with. We have four votes for me, more than enough for a lynch.
Now, is anyone going to back me on the shorten so that I can leave and stop being railed against?
The... Oh, never mind that role appears to have been removed. Blugh... I was thinking that Mafioso meant that he was capable of fooling cop investigations. But since that role is out my point still stands that if you come out Cop we have at least one confirmed town.
shorten
Shorten
ShortenAm i missing something?
Now, is anyone going to back me on the shorten so that I can leave and stop being railed against?
Mastahcheese: What is your verdict? Back to lynching me, or decided that I'm telling the truth?I'm really glad you claimed, I am. I was really looking forward to see who would press the hardest to kill you. And now I know. Thank you.
Extend
I'm watching you 4mask.
All joking aside, I'm pretty sure after the cop claim everyone is watching me.As they should be, the only reason I unvoted you is because I wanted to see if I could catch a scum with your net.
As it stands, there is only one technical vote for a shorten, per the rules. But very well.All joking aside, I'm pretty sure after the cop claim everyone is watching me.As they should be, the only reason I unvoted you is because I wanted to see if I could catch a scum with your net.
Also, all you'd need to do is say "extend" and we'll have more time. I'd suggest you do so, if you like for all this to not be wasted.
Imp, you seemed really freaking eager to jump on that. I'm glad. Everyone else is saying it's "fishy" and questioning it.
But not you.
You were sure the moment he said it that he must have been scum.
His move reeks of being the perfect target. And I see your attack on it as being the scummiest by far. Anyone would lynch a claim like that. Absolutely anyone. You wouldn't even need to make a case on it because everyone already knows. And the fact that you've labeled him as the most likely scum, without even pointing your own lynching finger to him, proves to me that you honestly felt so secure in this that you didn't even have to pull the trigger yourself.
4mask
Bye.
Shorten
Imp, Mastahcheese is saying the thought I have been trying to formulate for a while now. The moment I posted the first claim, you immediately started scumhunting me, without outright lynch voting. The fact that I have made a total ass of myself notwithstanding, you were the only one to outright go on the offensive after that.
However, I am not willing to go as far as Mastahcheese. If you were sure I was scum, I didn't notice it. however, you spent a good deal of time parsing words in my posts, and flipped you opinion on my post of "my apologies for not posting a greeting". One post you said that I had done a greeting, why did I say that, and the next post you put the same quote up again and say that it was more accurate than a post that clarified what I meant, in line with your previous post's question.
And actually, I've been trying to build a case against imp, I just don't know what questions to ask.
MOWE
You are the one with the oldest and most legitimate claim against me. How do you feel about the fact that three have joined you? Would you call it bandwagoning or a legitimate claim?
Guys, Day end was 4 hours ago. Tiruin probably hasn't posted yet because of net issues. I'll answer your questions tomorrow MOWE.
super black cat
One minute you were trying to get Nerjin to "stop he wifom", but you turned around and called for a lynch on me without any given explanation. Why?
When telling me I was still under suspicion, you used almost the exact same words that I did in my introductory post. Why? Are you trying to soft claim cop? Because a hard claim would be an immediate win.
Guys, Day end was 4 hours ago. Tiruin probably hasn't posted yet because of net issues.
If I read his post correctly it was only over two hours ago as I am now speaking. I don't know if me or Persus got it wrong.First of, Tiruin is a she. Secondly, there's a countdown clock linked in the description. Day ended about 11 hours ago.
Extension requests: 3
Shorten requests: 2
3 votes needed to extend the day
5 votes needed to shorten the day
There are two possible extension remaining today.
Extensions/shortens can be opposed by declaring the opposite (1 shorten cancels 1 extend request and vice versa), or stating directly: opposition (Oppose Shorten/Extend, I oppose this notion!, My Oppose goes to this), and they count against the total number of votes for an extension/shorten. Extensions count as opposition to shortens and vice versa.
Makeinu is right about the rules. Also, I saw Tiruin recently on the RTD boards, so she may update this soon.Yes, my net somehow revived at about <half an hour ago!
Also I should really make an edition to the OP that shortens/extends should be bolded or else uncounted. Blargh.
- Votes for extension/shorten are done in boldface. Extend, Extension, Extend it up yo, Shorten it out y'all are acceptable ways to vote for an extension/shorten
Guys, Day end was 4 hours ago. Tiruin probably hasn't posted yet because of net issues. I'll answer your questions tomorrow MOWE.Is true.
The Court has set the stage, and you play the one of the roles of the Light. Taking the role of the Aspect, you resemble the notion of thought, balance, rationality, morality and holism deep within the weave of society. The role of the omnipresent eye is subjective, having different meanings to different cultures, but always interpreted as a character of scrutiny, judgement and wisdom. Your role takes the importance of those around you and interprets their value, both to the world and to the self.
As intangible as you are, your essence flows throughout each and every being in the world, both sentient and static. You give sight to all, and see all, however you do not intervene unless the very foundations of the world are at stake. The hypothetical goes: Why should the people be helped, if the people-various and different as they are- can help themselves?
You are of the Town Faction and have the power to Inspect another member in play to get their Alignment.
Wincondition: You win when all members of the Mafia faction have been eliminated.
OH. We're on manilla time. Okay.I used the capital of my country instead of where I live. :P
All I saw was the GMT and calc'd it from there.
The Court has set the stage, and you play one of the roles of the Light. Taking the role of a being of Color, you resemble the aspect of vibrance, variance and symbolism deep within the weave of society. The role of the simple Color is always related to the meaning given to the environment, giving an interpretation to the different aspects of the tangible world. Your role is simple, utilizing only the mind in your play, but nevertheless important.
Inexperience is one characteristic that often shows, yet as an aspect of Earth, you should take heed to observe first before acting. Those around you may have ulterior motives, yet this does not stop one such as you in your path for knowledge. The pantheon of Light is forgiving, yet you should remember to stand by your beliefs, or be open-minded for correction. As they say, a rolling stone gathers no moss, and an idle stone is open to the elements.
You are of the Town Faction.
Wincondition: You win when all members of the Mafia faction have been eliminated.
I'm told that I'm allowed one "bah" post, so here it goes.>_>
While I freely admit that the cop claim was a horrible idea, I can only say "I told you so". Had you people believed me, there may have been a no-lynch, resulting in one fewer town dead.
That said, you all did the right thing, looking back on it, so I don't hold it against you. The cop claim, particularly in that context, was a bad choice and a possible scumtell.
GO TOWN! BEAT MAFIA!
Mastahcheese being killed proves my theory. There was no NK before because no one was there to carry it out. I highly doubt there is a jailkeeper at this point because I'm sure they would have protected mastahcheese. He was still our strongest member so either there is no jailkeeper, or they messed up big time. Imp and Nerjin, what are your views on this theory? Why do you think things worked out the way they have?That doesn't necessarily prove your theory, it just gives more evidence indicating that possibility of it. And that doesn't necessarily rule out the existence of the jailkeeper. If I was the jailkeeper and there was no Night Kill and one scum left one night, I'd block that same person the next night.
Just a little tip to scum: Lack of active players makes it easier to win. BUT it makes the game boring, bland, and unforgettable. Yeah, lurking your way to victory will make it, y'know, easy but you'll feel much better about your victory if you win against people who are actually doing something.
That being said: Everyone should reread [at the very least skim] Days 1 and 2.
Mastahcheese being killed proves my theory. There was no NK before because no one was there to carry it out. I highly doubt there is a jailkeeper at this point because I'm sure they would have protected mastahcheese. He was still our strongest member so either there is no jailkeeper, or they messed up big time. Imp and Nerjin, what are your views on this theory? Why do you think things worked out the way they have?
Persus13, Nerjin: please explain your use of shorten in this situation. Why was getting 4maskwolf lynched as quickly as possible and ending all further chances for information to be gained this day, from anyone more important thanending this day asapgetting more information then to you?
Imp: Who are top scum suspicions?
Yeah, my semester is just ending for me. I don't think I'll replace, but I definitely won't have time for large posts. I will however come and check in on things frequently.
Persus, could you answer my left over question from D2 too, please? I realized that I asked it weirdly, so struckthrough and clarified it:When I voted to shorten it seemed like everyone had made up their minds on what to do that day, and ending the day seemed fine to me. I was wrong, but after that I had a lot of work to do, and didn't realize the situation had changed until day had already ended. I made a bad mistake, and now I'm regretting it.Persus13, Nerjin: please explain your use of shorten in this situation. Why was getting 4maskwolf lynched as quickly as possible and ending all further chances for information to be gained this day, from anyone more important thanending this day asapgetting more information then to you?
Just a little tip to scum: Lack of active players makes it easier to win. BUT it makes the game boring, bland, and unforgettable. Yeah, lurking your way to victory will make it, y'know, easy but you'll feel much better about your victory if you win against people who are actually doing something.
That being said: Everyone should reread [at the very least skim] Days 1 and 2.
Nerjin, I have a theory. When the game opened, both our ICs found out they were Scum. Both our ICs, being really nice people who wanted to help their newbies learn how to play but not wanting to wipe the floor with them, kind of 'panicked', said to each other in Scumchat, 'No way are we doing this to our newbies for real', and both decided to do the IC role right but play 'wrong', act Scummy to help teach the newbies what Scummy looks like. You decided to do one sort of wrongness, the other IC did a different sort.The thing about a theory is that it needs evidence to support it. I don't see any evidence for it, and personally I see Nerjin as town.
Maybe his pick for scum is lurking. Like you know, Sinlessmoon.Just a little tip to scum: Lack of active players makes it easier to win. BUT it makes the game boring, bland, and unforgettable. Yeah, lurking your way to victory will make it, y'know, easy but you'll feel much better about your victory if you win against people who are actually doing something.
That being said: Everyone should reread [at the very least skim] Days 1 and 2.
Are you giving advice to us, but 'backwards'? Because if you're Town, you're part of the problem that you're talking about. Except for your interaction with 4maskwolf's claim near the end of D2 you did almost nothing D2. And now you're doing almost nothing again.
Feeling even guiltier about being IC and Scum? Is it bothering you when you do talk to us, because you are showing us what it looks like when a Scum is "lurking your way to victory will make it, y'know, easy"?Imp, why are you ripping into Nerjin while citing little evidence besides your pet theory? And why would Scum Nerjin do that? Playing against scum playing for real is the only way to discover them.
MyOwnWorstEnemyMastahcheese being killed proves my theory. There was no NK before because no one was there to carry it out. I highly doubt there is a jailkeeper at this point because I'm sure they would have protected mastahcheese. He was still our strongest member so either there is no jailkeeper, or they messed up big time. Imp and Nerjin, what are your views on this theory? Why do you think things worked out the way they have?
I don't know why there wasn't a N1 kill. 4maskwolf claimed that Pufferfish inspected Mastahcheese N1 which suggests that highly inactive posters may indeed do night actions. I know my last game with Sinlessmoon (the recent Paranormal), Sinlessmoon was a seriously inactive poster, even less active than here - but he used his night action.
My first BM, Superblackcat was Jailkeeper and I was arguably the strongest player, though there was no Cop to verify me Town. Superblackcat never once protected me (and I was never picked for the night kill), though I didn't know that until game was over and night actions were posted. It's easy to know what I would do if I were Jailkeeper, and easy to discuss reasonable play choices, but hard to say what each player is actually going to decide to do in the heat of the moment. People can try to second guess others' second guesses and all kinds of weird things can happen.
[...]
Nerjin, I have a theory. When the game opened, both our ICs found out they were Scum. Both our ICs, being really nice people who wanted to help their newbies learn how to play but not wanting to wipe the floor with them, kind of 'panicked', said to each other in Scumchat, 'No way are we doing this to our newbies for real', and both decided to do the IC role right but play 'wrong', act Scummy to help teach the newbies what Scummy looks like. You decided to do one sort of wrongness, the other IC did a different sort.The thing about a theory is that it needs evidence to support it. I don't see any evidence for it, and personally I see Nerjin as town.
Mastahcheese being killed proves my theory. There was no NK before because no one was there to carry it out. I highly doubt there is a jailkeeper at this point because I'm sure they would have protected mastahcheese. He was still our strongest member so either there is no jailkeeper, or they messed up big time. Imp and Nerjin, what are your views on this theory? Why do you think things worked out the way they have?That doesn't necessarily prove your theory, it just gives more evidence indicating that possibility of it. And that doesn't necessarily rule out the existence of the jailkeeper. If I was the jailkeeper and there was no Night Kill and one scum left one night, I'd block that same person the next night.
Fair enough. But especially after said strong town member who had been completely against someone who flipped scum and had been for the entire time, one could most likely be assured that they're town, and a strong and active one at that. I'm sure even us beginners understand that's someone worth protecting. AND with no NK, wouldn't the jail keeper be assured that they protected the right person and keep it up?
ExtendNo read on today? No nothing?
Tiruin: Do people need prods from the prodgod?The Nerjin and the Sinless have been prodded (and were prodded before, but the message is not in my outbox so they're prodded again!) I am unsure whether both were sent though. :S
Tiruin: I just noticed that you kept me down as voting for wolf. Is the post where I unvoted invalid? If so, would you like for me to go back and get rid of it?Well you could copy and paste it right now into this day's posts, as I said all posts after Imp's are declared void and unneeded. :)
Nerjin, I have a theory. When the game opened, both our ICs found out they were Scum. Both our ICs, being really nice people who wanted to help their newbies learn how to play but not wanting to wipe the floor with them, kind of 'panicked', said to each other in Scumchat, 'No way are we doing this to our newbies for real', and both decided to do the IC role right but play 'wrong', act Scummy to help teach the newbies what Scummy looks like. You decided to do one sort of wrongness, the other IC did a different sort.
Is that why you are talking about inactivity, but being inactive?
MyOwnWorstEnemyFair enough. But especially after said strong town member who had been completely against someone who flipped scum and had been for the entire time, one could most likely be assured that they're town, and a strong and active one at that. I'm sure even us beginners understand that's someone worth protecting. AND with no NK, wouldn't the jail keeper be assured that they protected the right person and keep it up?
Maybe. A Jailkeeper can stop a kill two ways, by targeting Scum or the Scum's target. Either is the right person that first night, but the Scum can pick a different target each night, so the Jailkeeper may or may not be able to prevent later kills by holding their target (if they picked the Scum's target, not the Scum). However, with just one Scum alive a Jailkeeper is confirming people as being Town, at least to themself, if they target someone and there's still a night kill - whoever was protected could not have done the kill. We already know that if we have a Jailkeeper, that Jailkeeper did not target either 4maskwolf (4mask was able to inspect) or Mastahcheese (Mastah was able to be inspected) N1. Maybe that Jailkeeper did pick the same target night 2 as they had picked night 1, but this failed to prevent the N2 kill (this would suggest that the Jailkeeper's target N1 was the Scum target N1, or that there was no Scum target N1, and since there was a night kill, the protected person could not have done it - that protected person is Town, though only the Jailkeeper knows this is proven).
You seem rather interested in the Jailkeeper and if we have one or not. What benefit do you think discussing the possible Jailkeeper's actions has for Town and/or the Jailkeeper himself, if we have one?
4maskwolf - MyOwnWorstEnemy, Superblackcat, Nerjin, Persus13
Alright. So, each of you give me why you continued to vote him, when it was pretty obvious there was no other Cop claims.
MOWE
You are the one with the oldest and most legitimate claim against me. How do you feel about the fact that three have joined you? Would you call it bandwagoning or a legitimate claim?
I don't think I'm the person with the oldest claim against you personally... am I? I'm not sure if you mean you or Pufferfish. My issue was with Pufferfish and I left the vote on you for pressure. Before you claimed, I was actually debating whether or not to take the vote off. But with other's reactions to your claim as well and other evidence, I think I'll unvote now.
Nerjin: So you say you read through our posts? Did you actually read through our posts? Since I voted him for that. Yes. But if you didn't see, I stayed on him for multiple reasons, that kept compounding as the game went on.
What are your thought on Makeinu flipping scum? Who were your top suspects prior to N1? Who are they now?
Is this style something you're still experimenting with and figuring out how to use? Would you recommend it to others? How much of it feels like Scumhunting to you, and how much reporting observations and providing feedback? Or is reporting and feedback a major part of Scumhunting? Can you suggest how your style could be read to interpret it for intent and alignment? It really looks like a wall to me this game.
Oh, and Nerjin, we haven't heard from you since Imp and I came into the game. Does this effect your game plan at all, and did anything we have done force you to reevaluate the people in question.
Persus13, Nerjin: please explain your use of shorten in this situation. Why was getting 4maskwolf lynched as quickly as possible and ending all further chances for information to be gained this day, from anyone more important than ending this day asap to you?
Nerjin, you have a few questions waiting for your attention. Some are from me, but there's more than just those. Do you think you'll be answering them anytime soon?
Extend
Nerjin, I have a theory. When the game opened, both our ICs found out they were Scum. Both our ICs, being really nice people who wanted to help their newbies learn how to play but not wanting to wipe the floor with them, kind of 'panicked', said to each other in Scumchat, 'No way are we doing this to our newbies for real', and both decided to do the IC role right but play 'wrong', act Scummy to help teach the newbies what Scummy looks like. You decided to do one sort of wrongness, the other IC did a different sort.
Is that why you are talking about inactivity, but being inactive?Just a little tip to scum: Lack of active players makes it easier to win. BUT it makes the game boring, bland, and unforgettable. Yeah, lurking your way to victory will make it, y'know, easy but you'll feel much better about your victory if you win against people who are actually doing something.
That being said: Everyone should reread [at the very least skim] Days 1 and 2.
Are you giving advice to us, but 'backwards'? Because if you're Town, you're part of the problem that you're talking about. Except for your interaction with 4maskwolf's claim near the end of D2 you did almost nothing D2. And now you're doing almost nothing again.
Almost nothing except good IC advice, oh, and telling us that "[the Scum] will feel much better about winning if [the Scum] wins against people who are actually doing something."
Feeling even guiltier about being IC and Scum? Is it bothering you when you do talk to us, because you are showing us what it looks like when a Scum is "lurking your way to victory will make it, y'know, easy"?
Does this theory hit home to you? Do you think it's a reasonable theory? Do you think it's true?
Nerjin, what are your views on this theory? Why do you think things worked out the way they have?
Why have you been ignoring these questions for so long? You appear to be completely cherry picking what you do and don't react to, and you are ignoring a lot of the game after 4maskwolf and I entered play. Why?
Nerjin, what are your views on this theory? Why do you think things worked out the way they have?
Your theory that scum didn't kill night 1 due to internet restrictions they may have had? It has its merits I suppose but isn't really relevant in any way I can see. Either we have a JK or we don't We shouldn't be looking for a JK or a cop [had ours still been alive]. We are town. We shouldn't care who our power roles are. Instead we should focus on finding the people who want to find our power roles. That is to say, Scum.
MOWE:
In fact, Mastahcheese was confirmed town, since 4maskwolf was a confirmed cop who said he inspected mastahcheese and he came up town.
also, can you please give a link? I wasn't aware that I had a question from you I hadn't answered.
Woohoo! I am done my exams, I will try and post something soon now that I have a bunch of free time.Glad to hear it.
Alright. So, each of you give me why you continued to vote him, when it was pretty obvious there was no other Cop claims.
But we really can't do anything right now but to wait for people to trickle back... or for this game to die.
There is three people still here right now. And I don't feel a real scum feel from any of you.
PersusQuoteAlright. So, each of you give me why you continued to vote him, when it was pretty obvious there was no other Cop claims.
PersusI've already responded to this question at least once, today, and continuing to ask won't change it. I was suspicious of 4mask because of how he seemed to be quoting another player's case, and he claimed cop strangely, when there wasn't a lot of pressure on him, which seemed like he was panicky scum. He went about it wrong and seemed more like scum claiming cop than a real cop.QuoteAlright. So, each of you give me why you continued to vote him, when it was pretty obvious there was no other Cop claims.
Now, why aren't you scumhunting? Why are you just asking people for their reasons for their actions, and doing NOTHING ELSE?
But you didn't notice the lack of a CC?It's possible for there not to be a cop in this set up. I regret what I did yesterday, and I especially feel bad that I didn't take into account 4mask being fairly new to being Mafia. However, I also think you are drawing your net a little too narrow. Make sure to pay attention to the other players.
(I believe one of you guys are scum)
When does day end?Weekends make people busy.
And Why has no one posted in the past 24 hours? Seriously, we can only win by being active. And I have questions posed to several people who haven't responded.
The only two votes today so far have been me on Imp, and Imp on Nerjin. Anyone have thoughts?
Actually, no. The previous post has the same timer. And it's still ticking. >_>Now I'm confused. I'm saying that after I had posted my question about when day ended, and before you had posted I went back to click on the countdown timer on the then last update post you had made, which answered my day end question.
Nobody does listen to me. Thank you nobody.
I'm here Persus, But there isn't any thing to be said.Really? If there isn't anything to be said, then why don't change that. This entire game, I've seen very little scumhunting from you, and instead you've just been sitting passively in a corner and occasionally asking questions. You asked me and Nerjin why we voted 4maskwolf, hen you could go back to D2 and read what we said then yourself. You seem like you are active lurking, and I don't like that. And as a matter of fact, there is something to be said, as you could answer this question I posed to you:
Extend and hopefully more people will come.
Now, why aren't you scumhunting? Why are you just asking people for their reasons for their actions, and doing NOTHING ELSE?
And Why has no one posted in the past 24 hours? Seriously, we can only win by being active. And I have questions posed to several people who haven't responded.
Now, why aren't you scumhunting? Why are you just asking people for their reasons for their actions, and doing NOTHING ELSE?
MOWE How do you think we should proceed from here?Well... I think it's a good idea to go back and reread through the thread. Look back on people's actions, reasons, and cases, and see what the relationship they'd had with those who have been lynched or killed were like. We seem to be running out of leads as of late, so I think we need to remedy that.
Trying to catch people in a lie or with faulty logic seems like a decent scumhunting technique to me, especially with nothing else to go on.QuoteNow, why aren't you scumhunting? Why are you just asking people for their reasons for their actions, and doing NOTHING ELSE?First of all, That in a way, is part of my scumhunting. Secondly, I don't have a base to jump off of. And I've been busy.
Persus Why aren't you scumhunting?????
Persus:Yes, but restricting your opinion of who you think is scum to two people and questioning them but not following up is not my idea of scumhunting. He's been much more active in Limerick as well.Trying to catch people in a lie or with faulty logic seems like a decent scumhunting technique to me, especially with nothing else to go on.QuoteNow, why aren't you scumhunting? Why are you just asking people for their reasons for their actions, and doing NOTHING ELSE?First of all, That in a way, is part of my scumhunting. Secondly, I don't have a base to jump off of. And I've been busy.
Persus Why aren't you scumhunting?????
I'm mainly waiting on Imp to respond to me, and I'm trying to get other people active. I'm attacking your strategy for finding scum, and also, what's your case against Nerjin?
Nerjin Why did you not vote Makeinu, but vote Sinless? What was the reasoning behind that?
Imp Could we have a thought of how well you think we played the first two days, since you watched us as a spectator? (So before you joined).
MOWE How do you think we should proceed from here?
Is this your IC advice? Or your scumhunting techniques?It looks like both, Superblackcat. It looks like both.
Cuz whichever one it is, It's really bad.
MOWE: I noticed you haven't voted yet today. thoughts on town, scum, players, anything? What's your plan if we mislynch today and go into Lylo tomorrow?
Persus: First of all, Nerjin, as an IC, has been one of the most inactive people here, while he keeps bugging us about activity.Perhaps he's busy, and while he has been inactive, he isn't the only one. He may be a hypocrite, but he is obviously trying to play.
He is the only voting person of both days, that did not vote Makeinu, and did vote 4mask. His play this game is really crappy, and given how he is IC, he should be better, as well as the fact that He has not heeded any of his own advice...You know what I like? Evidence. Your evidence of his voting patterns is good, but stating he has consistently failed to follow his own advice is a generalization I can only think of one example of, which is him being inactive. My other problem with this is your failure to look far more deeply into voting. Did you consider the possibility that one of the makeinu votes was a bus? Did you consider that a sly scum would side with the town player who claimed cop in order to get townie points? Did you go back and look to see why Nerjin voted Sinlessmoon and when? Did you see that Mastahcheese, who's been considered essentially confirmed town, voted Sinlessmoon at the exact same time Nerjin did, only Nerjin didn't seem to be around for day end, and Mastahcheese was.
ExtendMOWE: I noticed you haven't voted yet today. thoughts on town, scum, players, anything? What's your plan if we mislynch today and go into Lylo tomorrow?
I have not voted today because I had no idea who to vote for. Two of our players aren't really here, I've always been suspicious of you, and the only reason I haven't been voting SBC is because he fought with makeinu most of the first day. ALTHOUGH I'm staring to suspect that we've all been played. What if SBC and makeinu planned this? Sure one of them would get lynched, but then the other would not be high on our list of suspects. Neither of them really seemed to have a good case against the other. Now, SBC seems to have grown comfortable in his safe spot, asking questions that amount to nothing and attacking an IC that, I will admit, has an odd way of teaching, but has still done his job. He got us playing in the first damn place. As for MYLO, I hope it doesn't come to that, but if so, I'm going to be damn sure of who I'm voting for. If we mislynch again today, I'm not entirely sure how I would proceed. Perhaps rereading everything for the hundredth time and go from there.
Waddya say, Superblackcat?
ExtendMOWE: I noticed you haven't voted yet today. thoughts on town, scum, players, anything? What's your plan if we mislynch today and go into Lylo tomorrow?
I have not voted today because I had no idea who to vote for. Two of our players aren't really here, I've always been suspicious of you, and the only reason I haven't been voting SBC is because he fought with makeinu most of the first day. ALTHOUGH I'm staring to suspect that we've all been played. What if SBC and makeinu planned this? Sure one of them would get lynched, but then the other would not be high on our list of suspects. Neither of them really seemed to have a good case against the other. Now, SBC seems to have grown comfortable in his safe spot, asking questions that amount to nothing and attacking an IC that, I will admit, has an odd way of teaching, but has still done his job. He got us playing in the first damn place. As for MYLO, I hope it doesn't come to that, but if so, I'm going to be damn sure of who I'm voting for. If we mislynch again today, I'm not entirely sure how I would proceed. Perhaps rereading everything for the hundredth time and go from there.
Waddya say, Superblackcat?
ExtendAre you a mindreader? Because you are thinking many of the things I've been wondering about too.MOWE: I noticed you haven't voted yet today. thoughts on town, scum, players, anything? What's your plan if we mislynch today and go into Lylo tomorrow?
I have not voted today because I had no idea who to vote for. Two of our players aren't really here, I've always been suspicious of you, and the only reason I haven't been voting SBC is because he fought with makeinu most of the first day. ALTHOUGH I'm staring to suspect that we've all been played. What if SBC and makeinu planned this? Sure one of them would get lynched, but then the other would not be high on our list of suspects. Neither of them really seemed to have a good case against the other. Now, SBC seems to have grown comfortable in his safe spot, asking questions that amount to nothing and attacking an IC that, I will admit, has an odd way of teaching, but has still done his job. He got us playing in the first damn place. As for MYLO, I hope it doesn't come to that, but if so, I'm going to be damn sure of who I'm voting for. If we mislynch again today, I'm not entirely sure how I would proceed. Perhaps rereading everything for the hundredth time and go from there.
Waddya say, Superblackcat?
-Concerning Nerjin-I have to agree as the presiding voice. There is a fine line between reactionary posting, and insulting the person that the reaction is blurred.
ExtendMOWE: I noticed you haven't voted yet today. thoughts on town, scum, players, anything? What's your plan if we mislynch today and go into Lylo tomorrow?
I have not voted today because I had no idea who to vote for. Two of our players aren't really here, I've always been suspicious of you, and the only reason I haven't been voting SBC is because he fought with makeinu most of the first day. ALTHOUGH I'm staring to suspect that we've all been played. What if SBC and makeinu planned this? Sure one of them would get lynched, but then the other would not be high on our list of suspects. Neither of them really seemed to have a good case against the other. Now, SBC seems to have grown comfortable in his safe spot, asking questions that amount to nothing and attacking an IC that, I will admit, has an odd way of teaching, but has still done his job. He got us playing in the first damn place. As for MYLO, I hope it doesn't come to that, but if so, I'm going to be damn sure of who I'm voting for. If we mislynch again today, I'm not entirely sure how I would proceed. Perhaps rereading everything for the hundredth time and go from there.
Waddya say, Superblackcat?
Well I've been saying for some time that the only reason I'm not voting for SBC is that he spent most of D1 bickering with makeinu. Then it occurred to me that this would be possible. Although I must ask: why did you quote me three times and why haven't you said anything before?
Also, SBC...Spoiler: Extremely Angry Rant Eminent (click to show/hide)
@Everyone else: Forgive me, but I'm not sitting by and letting this happen. This is complete bullshit.
Persus: First of all, Nerjin, as an IC, has been one of the most inactive people here, while he keeps bugging us about activity.Perhaps he's busy, and while he has been inactive, he isn't the only one. He may be a hypocrite, but he is obviously trying to play.He is the only voting person of both days, that did not vote Makeinu, and did vote 4mask. His play this game is really crappy, and given how he is IC, he should be better, as well as the fact that He has not heeded any of his own advice...You know what I like? Evidence. Your evidence of his voting patterns is good, but stating he has consistently failed to follow his own advice is a generalization I can only think of one example of, which is him being inactive. My other problem with this is your failure to look far more deeply into voting. Did you consider the possibility that one of the makeinu votes was a bus? Did you consider that a sly scum would side with the town player who claimed cop in order to get townie points? Did you go back and look to see why Nerjin voted Sinlessmoon and when? Did you see that Mastahcheese, who's been considered essentially confirmed town, voted Sinlessmoon at the exact same time Nerjin did, only Nerjin didn't seem to be around for day end, and Mastahcheese was.
You just ticked of some of my pet peeves. I have a high opinion of scum players, so I rarely go after lurkers. Because good scum know the easiest way to hide from the town is by being in the middle of the hunters, and going after the easy scumlike town to get them killed. So I try not to focus on the easy targets, like lurkers, and on who is hunting them. Like Makeinu. Like you and Imp.
And here's another annoyance I have. Not only are you joining a bandwagon, you only started scumhunting after I pressed you. And I'm sorry, but it felt like scum pretending to hunt scum. You made no effort to increase information. You asked a leading question about Nerjin that made him look like scum and didn't present any evidence against it until pressed.
Feeling even guiltier about being IC and Scum? Is it bothering you when you do talk to us, because you are showing us what it looks like when a Scum is "lurking your way to victory will make it, y'know, easy"?Imp, why are you ripping into Nerjin while citing little evidence besides your pet theory? And why would Scum Nerjin do that? Playing against scum playing for real is the only way to discover them.
As for 'ignoring' questions I kept forgetting to actually answer them.
Is this style something you're still experimenting with and figuring out how to use? Would you recommend it to others? How much of it feels like Scumhunting to you, and how much reporting observations and providing feedback? Or is reporting and feedback a major part of Scumhunting? Can you suggest how your style could be read to interpret it for intent and alignment? It really looks like a wall to me this game.
Persus13, Nerjin: please explain your use of shorten in this situation. Why was getting 4maskwolf lynched as quickly as possible and ending all further chances for information to be gained this day, from anyone more important than ending this day asap to you?
Nerjin, you have a few questions waiting for your attention. Some are from me, but there's more than just those. Do you think you'll be answering them anytime soon?
Just a little tip to scum: Lack of active players makes it easier to win. BUT it makes the game boring, bland, and unforgettable. Yeah, lurking your way to victory will make it, y'know, easy but you'll feel much better about your victory if you win against people who are actually doing something.
That being said: Everyone should reread [at the very least skim] Days 1 and 2.
Nerjin, any chance when you reread D1 and D2, that you get around to the D2 questions you completely have ignored all of D2? Mine but not just mine, and this isn't the first reminder I've made. When you get around to those questions, I'd also like you to answer this one too:
Why have you been ignoring these questions for so long? You appear to be completely cherry picking what you do and don't react to, and you are ignoring a lot of the game after 4maskwolf and I entered play. Why?
Nerjin, I have a theory. When the game opened, both our ICs found out they were Scum. Both our ICs, being really nice people who wanted to help their newbies learn how to play but not wanting to wipe the floor with them, kind of 'panicked', said to each other in Scumchat, 'No way are we doing this to our newbies for real', and both decided to do the IC role right but play 'wrong', act Scummy to help teach the newbies what Scummy looks like. You decided to do one sort of wrongness, the other IC did a different sort.The thing about a theory is that it needs evidence to support it. I don't see any evidence for it, and personally I see Nerjin as town.
Persus:
What about Nerjin makes you think he's town? He hasn't really played much. Although I'm not sure I buy into Imp's theory, it's certainly possible. I don't think it would be good for any of us if they both went in guns blazing, so this may very well be true. But it's just a theory. Just like my JK theory. Speaking of which...
Is this your IC advice? Or your scumhunting techniques?
Cuz whichever one it is, It's really bad.
I frankly just dislike [Nerjin's] game immensely as well as see him jump in, talk about nothing (Oh wait, he calls these IC advice) participates nada in the game, then be gone for a long time, comes back when there is pressure, almost like he is active lurking, says some of that bullshit IC advice, and leaves.
Imp says things
Extend.Boop!
I'm quite mad at myself, for not dropping the vote yesterday against 4mask, when there was obviously no... other cop claims.
But lets take a look at the people who did vote 4mask.
4maskwolf - MyOwnWorstEnemy, Superblackcat, Nerjin, Persus13
Alright. So, each of you give me why you continued to vote him, when it was pretty obvious there was no other Cop claims.
But you didn't notice the lack of a CC?
I'm not voting 4mask unless someone else outs as cop. If you are the real cop, we win instant if you out. Otherwise, I don't see why Nerjin would bother to vote 4mask.
4mask
Bye.
but first allow me to propose an alternate hypothesis: 4mask got mafia and I don't know what he was thinking at all because I got town. Vanilla town to be specific.
Now, let's say I'm an IC who prefers teaching people directly and letting them feel things out on their own, stepping in as needed.
...
I think to myself 'I'm not really needed here...
So this has ceased being a BM to me in terms of gameplay and just a very basic game of mafia. I think to myself 'Eh... I'm not really needed. I'll keep an eye out.'
...
I'll try to say stuff where needed but I feel like I'm a redundant factor here. I'm just a player with fancier sig-text.
come on imp, you're better than this baseless attack.
I'd say Imp due to her flailing accusational attempt to start a bandwagon. I don't want to say she's scum though because I honestly think she's better than that.
Alright, let's reply to this in full now since I have basically unlimited time. Since you are Imp and are, therefore, a player I greatly respect as a pretty competent player I have only this to say: I'm very disappointed in what you're doing here.
Imp is a player who, though almost needlessly verbose, is quite competent despite her relative newness. Thus I'm holding her to a higher standard. This attack and vote [obviously a pressure vote] had absolutely ZERO evidence behind it other than 'This sounds like a plausible situation people might jump at if I phrase it properly.'
A pure attack of opportunity that she probably developed within ten minutes of posting it. It DOES sound like something that might happen. EXCEPT that it would be a GROSS violation of my IC duties. Despite my other shortcomings I follow the spirit of ICing very seriously. I am here to teach. I have done just that.
Let me be totally frank with you Imp your theory is trash as is your reason for voting me. I'm curious about something: Why did you put it forward and vote me on absolutely NO evidence?
Alright, let's reply to this in full now since I have basically unlimited time.
I'm curious about something: Why did you put it forward and vote me on absolutely NO evidence?
As for 'ignoring' questions I kept forgetting to actually answer them.
Superblackcat:I'm quite mad at myself, for not dropping the vote yesterday against 4mask, when there was obviously no... other cop claims.
But lets take a look at the people who did vote 4mask.
4maskwolf - MyOwnWorstEnemy, Superblackcat, Nerjin, Persus13
Alright. So, each of you give me why you continued to vote him, when it was pretty obvious there was no other Cop claims.But you didn't notice the lack of a CC?
Superblackcat, would you explain why you voted for 4maskwolf, and why you voted when you did?I'm not voting 4mask unless someone else outs as cop. If you are the real cop, we win instant if you out. Otherwise, I don't see why Nerjin would bother to vote 4mask.4mask
Bye.
Those two posts are about 50 minutes apart. I know what happened in the posts made during that time, but not what was going on in your decisions or why your choice changed so much. Explain your reasoning?
Well I've been saying for some time that the only reason I'm not voting for SBC is that he spent most of D1 bickering with makeinu. Then it occurred to me that this would be possible. Although I must ask: why did you quote me three times and why haven't you said anything before?I quoted you three times because my computer was being slow and your quote wasn't showing up when I hit Insert Quote, so I hit again twice. And then I forgot to check and see how many times your quotes showed up. Also, I've only seriously considered SBC being scum today.
Persus:Confirmed town? No. Likely town? Absolutely. I focused on the lurkers then, because all of the active players seemed town on an individual basis. Like then, I'm trying to hunt those I find scummy.
He isn't the only one, sure Imp and Sinlessmoon are inactive, but I expect him to be active, because he is an IC.
Also, Persus, I projected this to you when you said something along the lines of "All active people are more or less confirmed town."
I think you may be right, and there is a high chance of this, for the reason's you've stated. But within the active people, you are the most scummy. Because, oh shit, you are the only left ;).Evidence please?
Ah. I see. I was just making sure there wasn't some sort of meaning behind it. My computer seems to like doing that as well.Well I've been saying for some time that the only reason I'm not voting for SBC is that he spent most of D1 bickering with makeinu. Then it occurred to me that this would be possible. Although I must ask: why did you quote me three times and why haven't you said anything before?I quoted you three times because my computer was being slow and your quote wasn't showing up when I hit Insert Quote, so I hit again twice. And then I forgot to check and see how many times your quotes showed up. Also, I've only seriously considered SBC being scum today.
Boop!I can promise you won't see any more aggression from me. In hindsight, I probably should have waited to give my thoughts on SBC's actions. I'd had a... stressful day and that transferred to the post.
Though for personal note, I was worried about the...aggression being shown.
Well I've been saying for some time that the only reason I'm not voting for SBC is that he spent most of D1 bickering with makeinu. Then it occurred to me that this would be possible. Although I must ask: why did you quote me three times and why haven't you said anything before?I quoted you three times because my computer was being slow and your quote wasn't showing up when I hit Insert Quote, so I hit again twice. And then I forgot to check and see how many times your quotes showed up. Also, I've only seriously considered SBC being scum today.
SBC:
I've responded to your question about voting 4maskwolf, and so has MOWE, but I haven't seen your response to why you voted 4maskwolf. PPE: SO why do you not like it when people give up?Persus:Confirmed town? No. Likely town? Absolutely. I focused on the lurkers then, because all of the active players seemed town on an individual basis. Like then, I'm trying to hunt those I find scummy.
He isn't the only one, sure Imp and Sinlessmoon are inactive, but I expect him to be active, because he is an IC.
Also, Persus, I projected this to you when you said something along the lines of "All active people are more or less confirmed town."I think you may be right, and there is a high chance of this, for the reason's you've stated. But within the active people, you are the most scummy. Because, oh shit, you are the only left ;).Evidence please?
Imp: I am currently leaning slight town on Nerjin, as while he's been lurking, it seems that part of that is Real life stuff, and when he's made an effort to play, he has been playing like town.
He kept continually wifom-ing, voting himself, asking everyone to shorten it up and of the such... I didn't like it. That's why I voted him. I'm not sure why I kept my vote on him for so long though. It just... kind of happened, by the time day ended, I realized that I shouldn't be voting him.
Imp: I am currently leaning slight town on Nerjin, as while he's been lurking, it seems that part of that is Real life stuff, and when he's made an effort to play, he has been playing like town.
I can promise you won't see any more aggression from me.
Imp Could we have a thought of how well you think we played the first two days, since you watched us as a spectator? (So before you joined).
Sorry about not posting, I'll try getting around to posting something tomorrow. :)
I mean it this time!
And I should've asked everyone to explicitly state that they were not cop. The part that I hate myself was that I can't even say that I thought there was no cop, because I didn't think that ;-;.
Tiruin: Does anyone need a prod? I'm thinking there's 2 people haven't posted in the last 24 hours, one of them 24 hours +. If I fall asleep again as I try to write this can you come prod me awake please? I don't want to be one of the people who need a prod :( I sure hope this post will remain coherent.Not of the moment! Day ends Thursday, and hilariously--Holiday for me on Friday! >__>
When Nerjin's been playing instead of giving IC advice, he's done a decent job playing as town. My only problem with him is that he's lurking a lot, which I think is more attributable to real life stuff than anything else.Another reason I have for not suspecting Nerjin is partly because I have not found anything scummy about him and have only received town tells. Other players like you, SBC, and Sinlessmoon are either giving me nulls or scum tells, and I'm concerned about that.
I can promise you won't see any more aggression from me.
Fuck... Day's over lads. No posting til our gracious host comes back.Did you miss the fact we got an extension? And that Tiruin's last post 10 hours or so ago said we had 27 hours left? Or her countdown timer currently says we have less than 17 hours left until day end?
Fuck... Day's over lads. No posting til our gracious host comes back.Did you miss the fact we got an extension? And that Tiruin's last post 10 hours or so ago said we had 27 hours left? Or her countdown timer currently says we have less than 17 hours left until day end?
And Why has no one posted in the past 24 hours?
I'm here Persus, But there isn't any thing to be said.
Really? If there isn't anything to be said, then why don't change that. This entire game, I've seen very little scumhunting from you, and instead you've just been sitting passively in a corner and occasionally asking questions. You asked me and Nerjin why we voted 4maskwolf, hen you could go back to D2 and read what we said then yourself. You seem like you are active lurking, and I don't like that. And as a matter of fact, there is something to be said, as you could answer this question I posed to you:Now, why aren't you scumhunting? Why are you just asking people for their reasons for their actions, and doing NOTHING ELSE?
QuoteNow, why aren't you scumhunting? Why are you just asking people for their reasons for their actions, and doing NOTHING ELSE?
First of all, That in a way, is part of my scumhunting. Secondly, I don't have a base to jump off of. And I've been busy.
Sinlessmoon, You here? Who do you think is scum? and Why?
Persus Why aren't you scumhunting?
Nerjin Why did you not vote Makeinu, but vote Sinless? What was the reasoning behind that?
Imp Could we have a thought of how well you think we played the first two days, since you watched us as a spectator? (So before you joined).
MOWE How do you think we should proceed from here?
Fuck... Day's over lads. No posting til our gracious host comes back.
If you're going to post useless questions please do so on your own time.
The Court has set the stage, and you play one of the roles of the Light. Taking the role of a being of Color, you resemble the aspect of vibrance, variance and symbolism deep within the weave of society. The role of the simple Color is always related to the meaning given to the environment, giving an interpretation to the different aspects of the tangible world. Your role is simple, utilizing only the mind in your play, but nevertheless important.
A sense of frivolity hits you as you take the stage. Are you going to act, or are you going to wait and observe? As a being of the Physical aspect, you concern yourself with your own survival, yet look onto the rest for a greater victory--you may fall, granted, yet the others alongside you may forward your goals despite their differences. You were advised to keep an open eye, both to your front, and your back, but to never dwell on the voice of absurdity and insanity--for here dwells a horrid judgement.
You are of the Town Faction.
Wincondition: You win when all members of the Mafia faction have been eliminated.
14 minutes and 54 seconds late! :oImp:
Wait, day's over. Shoot.
The Court has set the stage, and you play the role of Purity. Taking the role of the Luminescent, you resemble the notion of discovery, insight, stability, curiosity, value and preservation deep within the weave of society. The role of the dual entity is subjective, having different meanings to different cultures, but always interpreted as a character of sanity (sound judgement), coherence, integrity and solidarity. Your role interprets those around you without bias, and forms the bonds between sentience and non-sentience, giving sight to where sight is needed.
The concept of Purity is subjective within the sentient races, though this is mostly ascribed towards those who have done no moral wrong, or deed--or who have realized their own wrongs and rid themselves of them, through asking forgiveness from the victim. What matters now, is that your motions be fluid, yet precise. Your thoughts should not err, or err as much as the divine.
You are of the Town Faction and have the power to Guard another member in play to prevent them from acting, and being acted upon.
Wincondition: You win when all members of the Mafia faction have been eliminated.
Sinlessmoon: I dunno if I'm going to keep this vote to day end or not. But gods man, there is no way I'm going to accept being in Lylo with your inactivity and I can't even imagine or believe you're going to act any different or better the next Day then you have. You haven't voted all game, hardly post anything more than 'I should post more' posts. Good thing at worst we're in Mylo tomorrow, not Lylo; there's a chance even if you're Town you won't doom us all but you haven't interacted enough for me to classify your alignment at all.
I can see you sitting back and letting us chew at each other and just hiding from the fallout with occasional rare posts of excuses. That's you with a power role, I know that from Paranormal, but I don't see you being any different as Scum - and I don't see you giving any more information before day end either.
Prove me wrong, please.
Worst case scenario I get so busy I can't connect again before day end; a vote for you doesn't seem to be one I'm likely to regret even if I don't get 20 spare minutes to rub together and spend reading any new posts and making my final judgment on someone who seems more likely Scum than you.
Sinlessmoon:Sorry about not posting, I'll try getting around to posting something tomorrow. :)
I mean it this time!
Wait. Did you just tell us that you didn't mean it the other umpteen times you said you were going to post more? Are you baiting us? Are you trolling us? I'm too tired to explore this further, but I could lose my cool with your attitude really easy.
I'm not talking to you again until I've had more sleep, jerk. I sure hope you're Scum with that attitude, cause that's like, playing against your team if you're Town. And the only player I've ever seen be an arse about it was Scum, though granted, he was way, way more rude than you.
Baaah! Alright! Lets get back into this!Sinlessmoon: I dunno if I'm going to keep this vote to day end or not. But gods man, there is no way I'm going to accept being in Lylo with your inactivity and I can't even imagine or believe you're going to act any different or better the next Day then you have. You haven't voted all game, hardly post anything more than 'I should post more' posts. Good thing at worst we're in Mylo tomorrow, not Lylo; there's a chance even if you're Town you won't doom us all but you haven't interacted enough for me to classify your alignment at all.
I can see you sitting back and letting us chew at each other and just hiding from the fallout with occasional rare posts of excuses. That's you with a power role, I know that from Paranormal, but I don't see you being any different as Scum - and I don't see you giving any more information before day end either.
Prove me wrong, please.
Worst case scenario I get so busy I can't connect again before day end; a vote for you doesn't seem to be one I'm likely to regret even if I don't get 20 spare minutes to rub together and spend reading any new posts and making my final judgment on someone who seems more likely Scum than you.
Sometimes I'm busy. I did say that I would post but for the a lot of the times I forget, that's what I get for having a shoddy memory. I definitely know I should be posting more and I'm sorry that I'm not because there isn't any excuse for it. Real life comes before forum games for me though.QuoteSinlessmoon:Sorry about not posting, I'll try getting around to posting something tomorrow. :)
I mean it this time!
Wait. Did you just tell us that you didn't mean it the other umpteen times you said you were going to post more? Are you baiting us? Are you trolling us? I'm too tired to explore this further, but I could lose my cool with your attitude really easy.
I'm not talking to you again until I've had more sleep, jerk. I sure hope you're Scum with that attitude, cause that's like, playing against your team if you're Town. And the only player I've ever seen be an arse about it was Scum, though granted, he was way, way more rude than you.
Not trolling, or baiting. Just haven't been on the Bay12 forums in awhile. Definitely less than I wanted. I apologize to everyone that's had a problem with me for being away so much.
That's nice... and this added... What exactly? You basically just said "I'm sorry I haven't been on guys." again.
No! No! Did you not listen to me!? MOWE? Moon? Imp? No-Lynch is the best possible option here! It lowers town's chances of fucking this all up to hell!
Look at it mathmatically! Right now town has a 1/4 chance of hitting scum. If we miss we LOSE!
BUT if we no-lynch, mafia'll kill someone and then it'll be a 1/3 chance of hitting scum! We can improve our odds if we just no-lynch today! Get your god damn votes off of Imp and No-lynch!
MoWE:
What do you think of the other players? What are your thoughts on them?
Sinless: As Imp has said, you've never voted and have just basically apologized most of the game. Are you finally going to act different today? Because you're just hindering town's progress at this point.
Nerjin: I'm a bit suspicions of him wanting a no-lynch so badly. As I've said, I see the logic behind what he says, but I don't like the idea of giving the scum a free kill. I still think he's town, but my suspicions are growing.
Sinless: As Imp has said, you've never voted and have just basically apologized most of the game. Are you finally going to act different today? Because you're just hindering town's progress at this point.
I sure hope so, because I've been really wanting to get into this, life just unfortunately comes in the way. :-\
Also, because what Nerjin said is true.
No-lynch
The Court has set the stage, and you play one of the roles of the Ambivalence. Taking the role of a being of Presence, you resemble the aspect of relativity, speculation and being deep within the weave of society. The role of the obtuse void is always related to the meaning given to the environment, giving an interpretation to the different aspects of the tangible world. Your role is complex, with many varying deviations in its concept.You sit in your chair, sipping a cup of tea. A clock echoes in the distance. You look and see Nobody there. It is time to sleep.
You are of the Suspicion Faction.
Wincondition: You win when everyone loses.
The Court has set the stage, and you play one of the roles of the Light. Taking the role of a being of Color, you resemble the aspect of vibrance, variance and symbolism deep within the weave of society. The role of the simple Color is always related to the meaning given to the environment, giving an interpretation to the different aspects of the tangible world. Your role is simple, utilizing only the mind in your play, but nevertheless important.
A Crimson flame blooms within you, and you feel the Arts resonate with your being as you take the stage. The persona of Fire will be but one primary element to the Court, and has been of symbolic value ever since the dawn of sentience.
You are of the Town Faction.
Wincondition: You win when all members of the Mafia faction have been eliminated.
Just saying Tiruin that the whole point of this was to help improve your flavor right? Why not post it? We're not going to boo or hiss at you, promise. We want to help, but we can't do that if you're not posting it. Come on, kiddo, let us help you.I..I have a thing with this...It's hard to...explain. Yeah. :-\
"There's only two ways this can end. And in both of them... you die."(Is this a Duke Nukem reference?)
Should I finish this if Tiruin doesn't appear by monday? Imp would be lynched with a single vote if the day were to end right now.I would be okay with that. And the day was supposed to end several days ago. But I hope TIruin will be able to appear before then.
Tiny tip: Start celebrating, Nerjin and co.
[PS: It's post-game right now, just that I haven't released the everything. No, Deathsword-don't tell. :I]There is a 33,33% chance that mafia won.
Guess Tiruin is having real life trouble again. I'll wrap this up later today.Coincidence, huh. x__x
You can write just fine Tiruin. I really enjoyed the flavor you posted, and I wish there could have been more of it.Guess Tiruin is having real life trouble again. I'll wrap this up later today.Coincidence, huh. x__x
I'll get up the everything by later. Tomorrow. Hopefully.
Sorry.
Yes, MOWE is Town, Nerjin is Town. Imp is scum and I really hope she's doing OK IRL.
And I'll..just not post the flavor. I can't write.
And I'll..just not post the flavor. I can't write.
Nice job MOWE. For your first Mafia game, you did well.
And I'll..just not post the flavor. I can't write.Who in the world said you couldn't write? I loved what little flavor you gave us.
SO, does anyone want to go back to what I said right before I was killed? Huh, anyone? Want to go and check that out, now?I'm too lazy to, could you link it?
Also, Tiruin, you write beautifully.
EXTEND.
God dang it, wolf, get that vote off of yourself. You're being just plain stupid right now. And I'm not saying this to be mean, but the way you're getting yourself killed is only going to waste one of our days, and give the remaining scum an actual Night Kill.
Get ahold of yourself.
Imp, you seemed really freaking eager to jump on that. I'm glad. Everyone else is saying it's "fishy" and questioning it.
But not you.
You were sure the moment he said it that he must have been scum.
His move reeks of being the perfect target. And I see your attack on it as being the scummiest by far. Anyone would lynch a claim like that. Absolutely anyone. You wouldn't even need to make a case on it because everyone already knows. And the fact that you've labeled him as the most likely scum, without even pointing your own lynching finger to him, proves to me that you honestly felt so secure in this that you didn't even have to pull the trigger yourself.
Oh, this is offtopic, but thanks for, when I said it was hard to read what you post because you're too long-winded, you respond by making it longer. Thank you for listening.Mastahcheese: What is your verdict? Back to lynching me, or decided that I'm telling the truth?I'm really glad you claimed, I am. I was really looking forward to see who would press the hardest to kill you. And now I know. Thank you.
I've...a free day tomorrow. If everyone's ok with me posting the...flavor, then that'd be fine.The only incompetence on this forum was displayed by Jembot, and that was because he wasn't t here and didn't nk anyone. There was no incompetence from you.
...sorry for my incompetence.
As for actions...Spoiler: Seperus Straven//Persus13 --- Town Jailkeeper (click to show/hide)Spoiler: 4-Masked Man//4maskwolf//Pufferfish -- Town Cop (click to show/hide)Spoiler: Dancers of the Void and Spirit// Imp/Jembot; makeinu (click to show/hide)
Scumchat (http://www.quicktopic.com/50/H/tS5QUetjpQyi)
Deadchat (http://www.quicktopic.com/50/H/QsrBUmdE6ypTy)
I've...a free day tomorrow. If everyone's ok with me posting the...flavor, then that'd be fine.Tiruin, you write some of the best flavour text for mafia games I've seen to date. There is no incompetence.
...sorry for my incompetence.
^ THIS TIMES OVER NINE THOUSANDI've...a free day tomorrow. If everyone's ok with me posting the...flavor, then that'd be fine.Tiruin, you write some of the best flavour text for mafia games I've seen to date. There is no incompetence.
...sorry for my incompetence.
I've...a free day tomorrow. If everyone's ok with me posting the...flavor, then that'd be fine.
...sorry for my incompetence.
Imp: Can only think of how she was unlucky enough to hit Sinless. Honestly hitting me or MOWE would have won the game.On this: In the scumchat, I told her to go after Sinless... but I said and meant it during the day. Problem is, she only appeared with night came around, so she took it to mean that she should NK Sinless. I only noticed too late. I was actually going to tell her to go after you, Nerjin, for the NK, but PC stuff happened.
Mowe: Did very well for her first game. Plus she has nice hair.But... but you're always complaining about my hair...
Tiruin: You, my friend, have no reason to feel incompetent or hate your writing. As a very picky, overly critical reader, trust me when I say you're a damn good writer.This +10000000000.
To be entirely honest, I thought Persus were the cop up until wolf claimed. When I was accusing him of active-lurking, I stopped because of this. I was going to say I thought he were either scum or the cop, but just before posting decided it would draw attention to him and/or make me look like scum. And I'm surprised no one hounded me about makeinu. I knew from the moment he flipped scum that it looked like I bussed him. I'm really surprised I survived that.I think the main reason you survived is that we all basically said that it was really obvious, in that event, and decided it was too unlikely. WIFOM working in your favor, for once.