1
General Discussion / Re: LGBTQ+ Thread
« on: May 18, 2023, 11:11:27 am »
The thread title has made me realize that I am now the person who pronounces it "El Jibbitty"
May 9, 2024: The May '24 Report is up.
News: April 23, 2024: Dwarf Fortress 50.13 has been released.
News: February 4, 2021: Dwarf Fortress Talk #28 has been posted.
News: November 21, 2018: A new Threetoe story has been posted.
Forum Guidelines
I didn't get an answer in the Steam thread, but this doesn't add baby graphics for any of the layered creatures like dwarves or goblins, right? The beta branch files didn't look like they had any new graphics or raws changes to support that.It doesn't. Layered baby graphics is more work and would have delayed things.
Not sure this is the right place to ask as this thread seems pretty dead, but is there any news on progress of the native Linux Steam version?Putnam is actively working on the port. There's been a bunch of unforseen issues, but she's working through them.
More cataclysm dark days aheadHi I'm gay.Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Eh, in this case a caricature found my last home address before I moved and posted it to a harassment site because they were malding over me banning them for bigotry.A game that has included such things as Dwarf DayCare and industrial scale mermaid bone farming sounds about right for them.Rule of thumb (with nail clipped by Occam’s razor): if it does not make sense and looks like a caricature, it probably is a caricature.
For srs though, what? The game is a free download. If they want to have their trans-free experience (is there even trans anything in the base game?) they can just mod it that way, it’s not difficult, even for a community of low IQ fuds.
For example: “world’s most hilarious fake account”.
HRT can help with that.Limited age acceleration and reversal has been achieved in mice and may be possible in all other critters.Honestly, I'd be happy with just being able to live to my natural old age in good condition instead of steadily deteriorating.
Any article links out of curiosity?
Fuck no, I want my hair back
We agree that it was explicitly stated in the rules "before" he posted? (and not added afterwards)The frog is kind of funny sometimes but in basically 100% of conversations I've seen like this it eventually turns out the guy complaining about overzealous moderation was being way worse than he wants people to think.The full scenario was I commented about my dwarves doing something silly and posted an angry pepe - actually fairly sure it was my first post in the DF discussion channel as I just went there to report a bug earlier - then some mod DM'd me a warning you can't post pepes in the server, I said I couldn't see anything in the rules about pepe, but he pointed it out under the heading "personal attacks and harassment" that I skimmed because, like, why would it be there lol. And so I found it is in fact against the rules, as they state because it's associated with hate groups. I told him what I thought of such a rule and that I wouldn't follow it and if that's a problem he should just ban me now. Is that me being way worse than I wanted people to think?
Badness aside, you literally told him to ban you, so why are you here crying about it.
Her, but yes. (It was me. I swung the hammer)
in that case it is fair game. (even if i would prefere if the "banned thing list" would be something legally decided as it would make it clearer to everyone where to look up and what list to refere to to know if / what is allowed)
Is "winnie the pooh" banned too, or is he allowed? (i ask as i've already heard of him being banned)