Bay 12 Games Forum

Finally... => Forum Games and Roleplaying => Topic started by: Orange Wizard on September 18, 2014, 06:04:18 pm

Title: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Orange Wizard on September 18, 2014, 06:04:18 pm
APERTA MUNDI
What is this?
This is my silly idea for a D&D campaign, in which there is no campaign. My plan is to create a world in which the players can explore freely. There will still be stories, and quests, and the like, but none will be "the" story of the campaign. Kind of like Morrowind's early game, but with fewer dark elves.

This thread is for any kind of OOC discussion, banter, or questions. I will put up the IC thread once characters are completed.
The IC thread is here (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=143968).

Non-specific Setting Introduction
There are going to be a few changes from a traditional D&D game.
The first is the technology level, which is about a thousand years less developed than most games.
Metal casting doesn't exist. Most forms of steel do not exist, either. This makes it very hard to create a solid sheet of strong metal without magic.
This means that for the overwhelming majority of people, plate armour doesn't exist. A very skilled blacksmith might be able to put together a breastplate, but those will be expensive, few, and far between.
Swords, too, are affected. It's very difficult to forge a sword much longer than a metre without proper equipment, and this means that greatswords, bastard swords, and any other kind of weird foreign sword is pretty much unheard of. Longswords are usually reserved for nobility. Spears, shortswords, and axes are the most commonly found weapons.

Arcane magic is very rare, but generally looked upon with indifference. Magic itself isn't uncommon - clergy in the Church of Pelor are fond of making elaborate displays and sometimes even doing something. Only a very small portion of the population possess any kind of innate magical ability (think sorcerers), and those with the dedication to teach themselves magic usually join the Church and become some kind of cleric or priest.
Druids are uncommon, and good luck surviving in the wilds long enough to find one.
Psionics are usually associated with elves, and elves are usually only found on the other side of the world.

To the players
All of the player-slots are full, so recruitment is now closed.

The campaign will start at level one in a human-populated area. Gnomes and halflings are not uncommon, but usually stick to edges of society. Dwarves rarely leave their mountains, elves look upon other races with contempt. Orcs (especially half-orcs), goblins, and similar races are the butt of many racist jokes, and generally reviled by society.
Your choice of race and class is completely up to you. Stats are to be assigned using the 28-point-buy system. I will collect your sheets (or rather, links to the sheets) here for reference.

Character Sheets



Spoiler: Original OP (click to show/hide)
Title: Re: D&D "Open World" Campaign: Gathering Interest
Post by: Tawa on September 18, 2014, 06:06:34 pm
Sure, why the hell not.

In.

Voting 3.5.

In fact, I'm such a super freak that I already had a sheet (http://www.myth-weavers.com/sheet.html#id=22978) (sans backstory and items) built in anticipation of an upcoming game.
Title: Re: D&D "Open World" Campaign: Gathering Interest
Post by: Orange Wizard on September 18, 2014, 06:35:21 pm
You wasted a feat on martial weapon proficiency? My inner minmaxer is raging.
Title: Re: D&D "Open World" Campaign: Gathering Interest
Post by: Tawa on September 18, 2014, 06:35:44 pm
Yes.

Tee hee.

I plan to take an actually decent array of spells, so I need something to prevent me from being pseudo-Batman. Wasting my first feat on Martial Weapon Proficiency was my plan.

It may have also had something to do with my character' image, but that's irrelevant.

Not to mention that when I play D&D, I play the character I want to at all costs.
Title: Re: D&D "Open World" Campaign: Gathering Interest
Post by: Kansa on September 18, 2014, 06:36:15 pm
Post to Watch

I really don't mind the system.
Title: Re: D&D "Open World" Campaign: Gathering Interest
Post by: Arcvasti on September 18, 2014, 06:39:00 pm
PTW

Might want to play this, but might not be able to.
Title: Re: D&D "Open World" Campaign: Gathering Interest
Post by: Tawa on September 18, 2014, 06:39:30 pm
Why not?
Title: Re: D&D "Open World" Campaign: Gathering Interest
Post by: My Name is Immaterial on September 18, 2014, 07:09:53 pm
In. Sounds like a very intriguing concept. Excited to see where it goes!
Title: Re: D&D "Open World" Campaign: Gathering Interest
Post by: Worldmaster27 on September 18, 2014, 07:35:38 pm
ptw
Title: Re: D&D "Open World" Campaign: Gathering Interest
Post by: tryrar on September 18, 2014, 08:15:15 pm
in. I call dibs on cleric
Title: Re: D&D "Open World" Campaign: Gathering Interest
Post by: Iituem on September 18, 2014, 08:20:36 pm
Surely, why not?  If it's 3.5 I might play one of the NPC classes, just to screw with people.  Expert/Aristocrat ahoy!

Edit:  In fact... Carter McHenries (http://www.myth-weavers.com/sheetview.php?sheetid=1016334) is a travelling metalworker, a blacksmith and locksmith who knows a thing or two about alchemy as well.  He's a crafter, not a fighter, but he has a mighty fine sense for locks and mechanics, and given time and materials he can prepare the party for anything.
Title: Re: D&D "Open World" Campaign: Gathering Interest
Post by: Karkov on September 18, 2014, 08:36:28 pm
If it's 3.5, will you allow the Book of Vile Evil?  There's something dastardly in there that I might want to exploit use.
Title: Re: D&D "Open World" Campaign: Gathering Interest
Post by: Orange Wizard on September 18, 2014, 08:43:10 pm
If it's 3.5, will you allow the Book of Vile Evil?  There's something dastardly in there that I might want to exploit use.
I'm allowing all sourcebooks unless something becomes ridiculously OP or game-breaking, and then I'll disallow it. I'll probably regret this later, but whatever.

IN if there's still room and the time's good. I'll try to offer ideas, too if you want.
Plenty of room. You're the third person to give a definitive "IN" so far. Arcvasti would make four, but he seems unsure.

...

As for setting, the general flavour is dark ages Britain. Because it's not done much.
This means things like no gunpowder, big swords, or plate armour, because metal casting didn't exist at that point.
Title: Re: D&D "Open World" Campaign: Gathering Interest
Post by: Arcvasti on September 18, 2014, 08:44:31 pm
IN [Will input sheet by this Saturday, probably earlier]

Out of curiousity, what format are we using? PBP, IIRC, Maptools or something else entirely?
Title: Re: D&D "Open World" Campaign: Gathering Interest
Post by: Orange Wizard on September 18, 2014, 08:48:03 pm
Probably PbP, unless people want something else.

Space for one more player. I'll grab some lunch and then make the proper thread and a proper introduction.
Title: Re: D&D "Open World" Campaign: Gathering Interest
Post by: Karkov on September 18, 2014, 08:49:06 pm
If it's 3.5, will you allow the Book of Vile Evil?  There's something dastardly in there that I might want to exploit use.
I'm allowing all sourcebooks unless something becomes ridiculously OP or game-breaking, and then I'll disallow it. I'll probably regret this later, but whatever.
You have quite possibly doomed yourself with muscle wizards.
Title: Re: D&D "Open World" Campaign: Gathering Interest
Post by: tryrar on September 18, 2014, 08:51:26 pm
Hmm, so are we talking about just one god then? I'm asking because I have yet to get a Radiant Servant of Pelor in a game that lasts any length of time.
\
Speaking of, is this a 1st level game, or what level we starting at?
Title: Re: D&D "Open World" Campaign: Gathering Interest
Post by: Iituem on September 18, 2014, 09:03:25 pm
In with Carter McHenries (http://www.myth-weavers.com/sheetview.php?sheetid=1016334); a travelling metalworker, a blacksmith and locksmith who knows a thing or two about alchemy as well.  He's a crafter, not a fighter, but he has a mighty fine sense for locks and mechanics, and given time and materials he can prepare the party for anything.
Title: Re: D&D "Open World" Campaign: Gathering Interest
Post by: Orange Wizard on September 18, 2014, 09:24:44 pm
Please don't do character sheets just yet. I'd like to get an introductory thing written first.
Also, I think we have enough players now. I'll accept more if someone drops out, though.

The game will start at first level. I'll say that there are a near-infinite number of gods, but power is based on worship, so only a few are actually "present" so to speak.

By 'dark age Britain' do you mean technologically or similar politically and such?

I find the ones based heavily on RL aren't as good. Still good, just not AS good.
Not heavily based, but a similar technological level and general appearance. I also need a source of names that are not of the ridiculous fantasy or really boring (e.g. Stonebridge) types.
Title: Re: D&D "Open World" Campaign: Gathering Interest
Post by: My Name is Immaterial on September 18, 2014, 09:33:29 pm
Can we import Greyhawk gods for ease of play?
Title: Re: D&D "Open World" Campaign: Waiting for the DM to Eat His Lunch
Post by: Nerjin on September 18, 2014, 09:46:58 pm
You gotta be god damned kidding me. I've been waiting for some time for a 3.5 game to go up because and when one finally does? I'm at bloody work. Son of a bitch... Still, I'll be watching.
Title: Re: D&D "Open World" Campaign: Waiting for the DM to Eat His Lunch
Post by: Tawa on September 18, 2014, 10:07:52 pm
:(

II, could you handle 8 of us?

I shot for ten on my first try and sustained 7 relatively well for a while, barring the eternal bear battle.

Considering how often we'll be split up with your open world concept, 8 could be a viable number.
Title: Re: D&D "Open World" Campaign: Waiting for the DM to Eat His Lunch
Post by: Arcvasti on September 18, 2014, 10:09:05 pm
I shot for ten on my first try and sustained 7 relatively well for a while, barring the eternal bear battle.

I read that as "eternal beer battle".
Title: Re: D&D "Open World" Campaign: Waiting for the DM to Eat His Lunch
Post by: Nerjin on September 18, 2014, 10:24:06 pm
Lanius the Red the Orcish Dragon Shaman (http://www.myth-weavers.com/sheet.html#id=29264) is willing to go to the wait-list. I'll edit him when I see more of the world and such that I need to make more specific decisions.
Title: Re: D&D "Open World" Campaign: Waiting for the DM to Eat His Lunch
Post by: Arcvasti on September 18, 2014, 10:27:50 pm
Ooooh, Dragon Shaman. Always wanted to see how that class works out.
Title: Re: D&D "Open World" Campaign: Waiting for the DM to Eat His Lunch
Post by: Nerjin on September 18, 2014, 10:29:32 pm
I was rather taken with it myself. though this is my first.
Title: Re: D&D "Open World" Campaign: Waiting for the DM to Eat His Lunch
Post by: Orange Wizard on September 18, 2014, 11:17:48 pm
Nerjin can join because he seems excited. However, I'm not confident in my ability to manage any more than this.

Anyway, I will revamp the OP with game-related information, and then you guys can do the character sheet thing.
Title: Re: D&D "Open World" Campaign: Waiting for the DM to Eat His Lunch
Post by: Arcvasti on September 18, 2014, 11:18:56 pm
Cool. I need to sleep right now, but hopefully by tomorrow night I'll have my sheet in.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: My Name is Immaterial on September 19, 2014, 01:47:01 am
I see your updated OP and I raise you a few questions:
Will feat retraining be a thing later?
Are Flaws (http://www.d20srd.org/srd/variant/buildingCharacters/characterFlaws.htm) okay?
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Orange Wizard on September 19, 2014, 03:14:53 am
Flaws are fine.

I'll allow feat retraining, I guess. If you find someone/something to learn the new feat from, and are not actively using the old feat, then it should be fine.

E: Also, now is the time for people to post their sheets. Then we can begin!
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: BlitzDungeoneer on September 19, 2014, 04:03:14 am
PTW, yo.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Orange Wizard on September 19, 2014, 05:59:25 am
Dragon shamans are in the Player's Handbook II if I remember correctly.

HP is determined by your class' hit die, which for dragon shamans I think is a d10. At first level (which is where we're starting) that means you get 10 hitpoints (max roll on a d10) plus your Constitution bonus, which you should aim to have as high as possible for playing a dragon shaman.
At each level after first, you gain a number of hitpoints equal to a roll on the hit die plus your Constitution modifier.

Can we import Greyhawk gods for ease of play?
I also missed this earlier, but yeah, that's fine.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Nerjin on September 19, 2014, 09:02:48 am
Argh, I'm not sure which fraggin' class to go for >.<

EDIT: When were Dragon Shamans brought into D&D? I can't fin anything in 3.5e that has them.

Bard is always fun. Though I could also suggest you just do something you think is fun. I doubt there needs to be a ton of min-maxing.

EDIT: Guy playing Lanius the red, check through your character sheet. No steel. You presently have a steel shield.

I'm aware. I made Lanius a week or so ago. The OP was changed really early in the morning. As I said, Lanius will be edited when I get home.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: My Name is Immaterial on September 19, 2014, 11:54:50 am
I've decided that I would like to play a roguelike character, bent on raising a criminal empire. I'm still heming and hawing about which class to play though.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Tawa on September 19, 2014, 12:01:23 pm
Bard, mayhaps? Skillmonkeying, magic, combat prowess, and buffing all look like good traits for a criminal mastermind.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: tryrar on September 19, 2014, 12:03:22 pm
Malkor (http://www.myth-weavers.com/sheetview.php?sheetid=952248)
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Remuthra on September 19, 2014, 12:24:07 pm
This still need players? I could go for something maneuverable.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: tryrar on September 19, 2014, 12:32:31 pm
No, but you can get on the waitlist
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: My Name is Immaterial on September 19, 2014, 01:27:54 pm
II: The Bardic Knack ACF requires 1 actual rank to use skills that need to be trained. I took the Jack of All Trades feat, would that fulfill the requirement?
Spoiler: Jack of All Trades (click to show/hide)
Spoiler: Bardic Knack (click to show/hide)
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Tawa on September 19, 2014, 02:00:44 pm
Guys?

I think I broke it. (http://www.myth-weavers.com/sheet.html#id=22978)

Might try a Beguiler or something, but for now, that's my character.

Will backstory when I make character decision.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: tryrar on September 19, 2014, 02:04:39 pm
ummm, 22 int at level 1. HOW????
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: My Name is Immaterial on September 19, 2014, 02:04:58 pm
What? How did you get 22 INT? Grey elves get +2 INT, and you can't have more than a base of 18 at character creation.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Tawa on September 19, 2014, 02:05:40 pm
Old.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Karkov on September 19, 2014, 02:06:45 pm
I thought age affected wisdom, not intelligence.  Huh.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Tawa on September 19, 2014, 02:10:11 pm
No, they stack.

Wait, I did mess up. I forgot that I get -3 to physicals, total, instead of -2.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Karkov on September 19, 2014, 02:20:05 pm
Yeah, I pitched a stupid minmaxed character that would have broken the campaign over his knee to II, which he shot down.  It's supposed to be RP and I didn't want to ruin the intention of the campaign before it ever began.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: My Name is Immaterial on September 19, 2014, 02:29:16 pm
Hmm. I'm trying to figure out what race I want to be. I started with Human, but I can't find a good place to put that feat.
I then checked out the +Cha races: Star elf, Hellbred (Spirit), Spellscale and Lesser Aasimar. They didn't work very well: Elves live on the other side of the world, I'd rather not be a demon or a dragon, and Lesser Aasimar are pretty powerful, something I'm trying to avoid in this game.
I could be a gnome but I'm not feeling it right now.

Any recommendations?
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Tawa on September 19, 2014, 02:32:39 pm
A big thing with wizards is that solo wizards can suck if you're making them right, because wizards do a lot of spells that make fighters stronger or use melee'ers as the punchline.

Besides, I plan to take a single Rogue level, then take a bunch of Arcane Trickster levels, and spells like Mirror Image and Blur; then, I avoid the other half of minmaxing (featsy fun) by taking skill trick feats (http://dndtools.eu/feats/categories/skill-trick/) like wallrunning and Extreme Leaping to make Veneficus Agent Smith.

THE MATRIX: WIZARD EDITION is far from ultimate minmaxing, to my knowledge.

Either way, I'm going to put most of my time into developing him as a character instead of pwn'ing everything that moves. Veneficus has very secretive motives for crossing the world.

Unless my ego gets the better of me and I go full Henderson, in which case I give you the rights to internet-punch me.

@Immaterial: Maybe you could take a template? Magic-blooded is good if you don't mind Wisdom loss.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Karkov on September 19, 2014, 02:34:28 pm
Hrm... Warforged would be out, wouldn't they?  Since nobody's even concocted Plate Armor, an entire being made of metal wouldn't make sense...

What about an immigrant half-elf?  Father was an elf and mother was a human, mother decided to return to her own people when she found out she was pregnant (or whatever back story you want)?  Half-elves aren't game-breakingly powerful from what I can recall, and it's basically a human with a few extra privileges.

FAKE-EDIT: Taw, if you start breaking the game, I might have to give II a character sheet that will surprise you to no end.

DOUBLE-FAKE-EDIT: gorram ninjas
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Tawa on September 19, 2014, 02:52:19 pm
FAKE-EDIT: Taw, if you start breaking the game, I might have to give II a character sheet that will surprise you to no end.
Nah man, I'm just using a sufficiently powerful character to try to achieve his sufficiently enigmatic and nigh-impossible to get goal.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: My Name is Immaterial on September 19, 2014, 03:33:33 pm
@Immaterial: Maybe you could take a template? Magic-blooded is good if you don't mind Wisdom loss.
That doesn't solve the problem of a base race.
You WILL be in the mood for gnomes! (https://imgur.com/r/gametales/Dy20IAe)
Hmmmmmmmmmm... A criminal mastermind Elton John? Tempting.
WAIT. I'VE GOT IT.
HE'S A SMOOTH CRIMINAL (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sj4zNWW2nvY). A GNOMISH MICHAEL JACKSON. THIS IS AMAZING.

Hrm... Warforged would be out, wouldn't they?  Since nobody's even concocted Plate Armor, an entire being made of metal wouldn't make sense...

What about an immigrant half-elf?  Father was an elf and mother was a human, mother decided to return to her own people when she found out she was pregnant (or whatever back story you want)?  Half-elves aren't game-breakingly powerful from what I can recall, and it's basically a human with a few extra privileges.
While being a robotic dancer would be awesome, to be a good Warforged, I would need to use a bunch of feats.
Half-elves aren't really my thing, I'm afraid.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Flying Dice on September 19, 2014, 04:01:54 pm
In, if there's still room. Starting on a sheet.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Remuthra on September 19, 2014, 04:02:15 pm
In, if there's still room. Starting on a sheet.
Nope.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Orange Wizard on September 19, 2014, 04:05:41 pm
Right. Good morning, everyone!

Hrm... Warforged would be out, wouldn't they?  Since nobody's even concocted Plate Armor, an entire being made of metal wouldn't make sense...

What about an immigrant half-elf?  Father was an elf and mother was a human, mother decided to return to her own people when she found out she was pregnant (or whatever back story you want)?  Half-elves aren't game-breakingly powerful from what I can recall, and it's basically a human with a few extra privileges.
Warforged are out, and half-elves are basically terrible humans. Instead of a bonus feat and skills, they get... wait for it... low light vision! So powerful!

In, if there's still room. Starting on a sheet.
Nope.
Yeah, we're full on players I'm afraid. If someone dies, though, and can't be resurrected, you're welcome to join in.

...

Edit:
II: The Bardic Knack ACF requires 1 actual rank to use skills that need to be trained. I took the Jack of All Trades feat, would that fulfill the requirement?
Spoiler: Jack of All Trades (click to show/hide)
Spoiler: Bardic Knack (click to show/hide)
It's a bit cheesy, but I'll allow it.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: My Name is Immaterial on September 19, 2014, 04:42:58 pm
Thank you!
Another question: I know it's pretty cheesy, but would you rule that Bardic Knack gives languages through bonuses in Speak Language?

Also: Someone please name their character Annie or some variation of it.
"Annie, are you okay? Annie, are you okay?"
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Orange Wizard on September 19, 2014, 04:45:35 pm
Wait, ignore that. Thought you meant Jack of All Trades.

Still no, seeing as Knack doesn't actually give you ranks in that skill.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Nerjin on September 19, 2014, 04:58:18 pm
Lanius the Red (http://www.myth-weavers.com/sheet.html#id=29264) the Red Dragon Shaman should be complete now.
Title: Re: D&D "Open World" Campaign: Gathering Interest
Post by: Arcvasti on September 19, 2014, 05:00:04 pm
I'll say that there are a near-infinite number of gods, but power is based on worship, so only a few are actually "present" so to speak.

This gave me the coolest idea for a character: A paladin, devoted to no one god, who remembers the small and forgotten gods that are no longer worshipped. and travels the land evangelizing them. Now I just need to get my sheet together, now that I've got a general concept.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Orange Wizard on September 19, 2014, 06:54:28 pm
I'll add Lanius to the OP.

If anyone else has finished their character and I haven't put the sheet in the OP yet, please PM it to me.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Nerjin on September 19, 2014, 07:15:16 pm
Some changes to Lanius:

Removed Skill Focus Craft for Endurance.
Took the Flaw Murky Eyed [Due to only having one eye] and added the feat Steadfast Determination [Swaps Will Bonus for Con Bonus to Will saves]
Took the Inattentive trait [Due to, again, one eye and focusing too much on his goal to pay much attention to outside factors] and added the Diehard feat [Because, if I'm correct, my healing aura thing only functions if I'm concious. Plus he just seems to be tough.]
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Arcvasti on September 19, 2014, 07:30:42 pm
Sent my sheet in.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: My Name is Immaterial on September 19, 2014, 07:53:43 pm
II: What do you think of the Pathfinder style Cantrips home rules that have been bandied around recently? Basically, Cantrips/Orisons can be used an unlimited number of times a day.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Nerjin on September 19, 2014, 08:00:13 pm
I suggest CERTAIN Orisons and Cantrips should have unlimited castings. Others not so much. Cure Minor Wounds comes to mind.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Orange Wizard on September 19, 2014, 08:08:27 pm
What do people think of taking a feat that allows you to cast unlimited cantrips, as long as you have one unused spell slot (or prepared spell that has not been cast) of first level or higher?
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Remuthra on September 19, 2014, 08:09:36 pm
Depends on the spells and levels, but even with a slot and a feat cost, that sounds quite exploitable.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Orange Wizard on September 19, 2014, 08:13:13 pm
Yeah, well. What would you suggest?
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Tawa on September 19, 2014, 08:15:09 pm
I recommend making the spells that do almost nothing (prestidigitation comes to mind) unlimited, so that you don't truly expend a spell just to turn your hat red.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Orange Wizard on September 19, 2014, 08:21:31 pm
Okay, then. I'll allow you to take the feat Cantrip Mastery which lets you cast cantrips that do "almost nothing" an unlimited number of times per day.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: My Name is Immaterial on September 19, 2014, 08:21:56 pm
What do people think of taking a feat that allows you to cast unlimited cantrips, as long as you have one unused spell slot (or prepared spell that has not been cast) of first level or higher?
Sort of Eh/Meh, since Bards don't get 1st level spells until level 2.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: My Name is Immaterial on September 20, 2014, 02:02:43 am
Alright, Rincewind's sheet's ready to go. Backstory/Personality is for tomorrow.

I have ask: II, is basing my character off of a certain dead and incredibly famous pop star okay with you? I'll be serious with my RP, except for the occasional dance fight. The character itself won't be a copy of the King of Pop, so no concern there.

It's probably not a good time to mention that I'm considering taking Dirgesinger and Undead Leadership to replicate Thriller.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Orange Wizard on September 20, 2014, 03:59:33 am
They did dancefighting in Erfworld, and I'll let in in here. It's the Rule of Funny.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Nerjin on September 20, 2014, 08:18:22 am
It's probably not a good time to mention that I'm considering taking Dirgesinger and Undead Leadership to replicate Thriller.
One buff buffoon, one paladin of lost gods, one cheery kleptomaniac thief and Michael Jackson.

This is looking good.

Buff Buffoon? I take offence to that. He's smarter than your average human... He's just lacks common sense and can't speak very well.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Tawa on September 20, 2014, 09:00:46 am
It's probably not a good time to mention that I'm considering taking Dirgesinger and Undead Leadership to replicate Thriller.
One buff buffoon, one paladin of lost gods, one cheery kleptomaniac thief and Michael Jackson.

This is looking good.
You seem to have forgotten 264-year-old Agent Smith.

Or, at least, what I plan for him to be, anyway.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Tawa on September 20, 2014, 09:04:37 am
Never PM'd it.

D'oh!
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Nerjin on September 20, 2014, 09:05:36 am
... Now I kinda wish I had gone for a Duke Nukem character with all this silly...
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: tryrar on September 20, 2014, 09:47:03 am
And here I am, the Generic ClericŪ  :P
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Nerjin on September 20, 2014, 09:47:49 am
Oh, so we have a form of healing in the party? Groovy.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Arcvasti on September 20, 2014, 02:43:40 pm
Oh, so we have a form of healing in the party? Groovy.

In a few levels, we'll have THREE. Dragon Shaman's Vitality touch + Paladin's Lay on Hands + Cleric healys.

I keep checking this topic every 15 minutes to see if it's been updated XD

Same. Who still needs to input sheets?
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: My Name is Immaterial on September 20, 2014, 02:44:17 pm
I keep checking this topic every 15 minutes to see if it's been updated XD
Same. Who still needs to input sheets?
Updated topics 4life
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Orange Wizard on September 20, 2014, 03:18:39 pm
I was asleep. I'm sorry, guys.

Tawa's character has been added to the OP. I really should have started on the IC thread a while back, but I'm very good (bad?) at procrastinating.
I'll get onto it now. It should be up "soon".

Edit: By "soon", I mean in a few hours. Don't get too excited.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Tawa on September 20, 2014, 04:30:06 pm
What? Hm. Darn.

I guess I should cut off a Con point. One moment.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Tawa on September 20, 2014, 04:57:58 pm
Aw. I guess I'll just do one for Charisma, too. Fits him better anyway.

I had kinda written it like he had been old forever, see. Minmaxing mistake.

EDIT: Fix'd. Thanks, Greatorder!
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Tawa on September 20, 2014, 05:21:24 pm
I think I could've minmaxed harder, but I would have to have done something more than an SRD-only minor exploit.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Nerjin on September 20, 2014, 05:22:30 pm
Oh, so we have a form of healing in the party? Groovy.

In a few levels, we'll have THREE. Dragon Shaman's Vitality touch + Paladin's Lay on Hands + Cleric healys.

Except that Lanius has too low of Charisma to do that.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Orange Wizard on September 20, 2014, 07:48:21 pm
IC thread is up (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=143968).
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Tawa on September 20, 2014, 07:58:27 pm
You... you didn't list my name.

:*(
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Orange Wizard on September 20, 2014, 08:03:05 pm
You're just not important enough to have your name listed :P.

It's fixed now.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Orange Wizard on September 20, 2014, 08:25:57 pm
Well, I just finished eating lunch. Time zones are weird.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Tawa on September 20, 2014, 08:29:18 pm
Yeah, man.

Helpful xkcd. (http://xkcd.com/1335/)

Roughly 3 PM for you right now, right, II?
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Orange Wizard on September 20, 2014, 08:37:34 pm
Roughly 3 PM for you right now, right, II?
Half past one. Daylight saving might affect it, and the title text does say "roughly".
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Tawa on September 20, 2014, 08:39:03 pm
Wait a second... this is so weird.

Almost all of us are chaotic neutral, and all of us are male.

I have never played in or seen the playing of a game before with no female PCs or in a game where almost everybody has the exact same alignment.

Roughly 3 PM for you right now, right, II?
Half past one. Daylight saving might affect it, and the title text does say "roughly".
Stupid Daylight Savings, messing up estimates. :P
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Orange Wizard on September 20, 2014, 08:43:37 pm
A thing I should mention is that you guys are going to need to work together. I will make you go up against things that you won't be able to tackle alone, so at least try to get along.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: My Name is Immaterial on September 20, 2014, 08:47:12 pm
I'm going to be active in 30/45ish minutes, hopefully.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Tawa on September 20, 2014, 08:52:52 pm
A thing I should mention is that you guys are going to need to work together. I will make you go up against things that you won't be able to tackle alone, so at least try to get along.
You forgot something:

(http://s2.postimg.org/6q3baf621/Wizerd_Smith.png)
THE MATRIXWIZARD SMASHES EVERYTHING :P
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Orange Wizard on September 20, 2014, 08:55:20 pm
That would make an awesome avatar.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Tawa on September 20, 2014, 08:58:25 pm
That would make an awesome avatar.
You rang?
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Orange Wizard on September 20, 2014, 09:03:19 pm
No, I already have an awesome avatar.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Tawa on September 20, 2014, 09:03:54 pm
It's in my rotator now, silly.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Tawa on September 20, 2014, 09:09:44 pm
Too late, somebody else already did that.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Orange Wizard on September 20, 2014, 09:11:00 pm
It's in my rotator now, silly.
Your rotator hadn't rotated far enough, silly.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Remuthra on September 20, 2014, 09:35:26 pm
Right, I'll be confiscating this as part of the Sweet Hat Preservation Initiative.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: tryrar on September 20, 2014, 10:45:39 pm
...Not me? *Sad Puppy Dog Eyes*
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Orange Wizard on September 21, 2014, 12:11:23 am
Did I forget you? O.o

I can't see your sheet in my PMs or anywhere on this thread. That said, I am Legendary Bad Observer, so I might have missed it.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Karkov on September 21, 2014, 12:16:49 am
Malkor (http://www.myth-weavers.com/sheetview.php?sheetid=952248)
Did I forget you? O.o

I can't see your sheet in my PMs or anywhere on this thread. That said, I am Legendary Bad Observer, so I might have missed it.
Indeed!

EDIT:  Dude, Aasimar are hella strong early on.  Daaaang.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Orange Wizard on September 21, 2014, 12:33:51 am
Egad! Well, he's added to the list now. That's six players, so if I've missed anyone else, they're just going to have to wait.

Aasimar also have +1 LA, so he'll level up slower. WOTC aren't always terrible at balancing.
DAMN YOU WIZARDS
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: My Name is Immaterial on September 21, 2014, 12:37:39 am
He's a Lesser Aasimar. They're a variation without LA. I'm keeping my head down on this one.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Orange Wizard on September 21, 2014, 03:14:17 am
Tryrar? We're just waiting for Malkor to do something and then I can update ye olde thread.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: My Name is Immaterial on September 21, 2014, 03:37:39 am
He hasn't been online for 5 hours, and he probably wont be online for another 7.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: tryrar on September 21, 2014, 09:05:48 am
Sorry, I have to sleep sometime :P

Oh, and just for the record, I'm a lessar aasimar, which is a zero la race(loses the spell likes and the resists over regular aasimar)
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Nerjin on September 21, 2014, 11:17:40 am
THat's part of the beauty of PbP.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: flabort on September 21, 2014, 01:01:07 pm
So that's where the Wizard Smith avatar came from.
Thanks to Taw for showing me the way to this.

Will be reading more. PTW.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Tawa on September 21, 2014, 02:38:59 pm
Right, I'll be confiscating this as part of the Sweet Hat Preservation Initiative.
I demand you trim Smith off of my masterpiece hat.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Orange Wizard on September 21, 2014, 03:07:16 pm
First not-the-OP update is up.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Nerjin on September 21, 2014, 07:49:24 pm
Except that Lanius started buying into it near the end. I don't like playing low charisma characters it turns out. Speaking like that is... Rough on me.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Orange Wizard on September 21, 2014, 07:50:59 pm
Actually, could one of you please change your speech colour? I'm getting confused as to who's who.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Nerjin on September 21, 2014, 08:00:16 pm
I actually figured, too late, that I should be red as he is Lanius the red but I figured I could do a thing where it gets closer to Red the more powerful he got. But this just gives me a reason to do it early.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Nerjin on September 22, 2014, 08:59:54 am
Why would people who are perfectly happy in normal society go adventuring? It's just sorta the career that attracts weirdos.

Although I've seen games where the people in it are all friends or co-workers prior to the campaign start.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Nerjin on September 22, 2014, 05:06:04 pm
Could the guy using URL change it to something else please? It's really weird. Plus you have a bunch of broken URL tags in the most recent one.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Arcvasti on September 22, 2014, 05:10:38 pm
Could the guy using URL change it to something else please? It's really weird. Plus you have a bunch of broken URL tags in the most recent one.

Yeah, you're probably right. Fixed the broken post, but I should still change it to something more conventional.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Nerjin on September 22, 2014, 05:12:24 pm
Yep. This is getting somewhere quickly. Problem with sandbox games. YOu don't really have a goal...
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: My Name is Immaterial on September 22, 2014, 05:27:40 pm
Meanwhile, the old old man waves to the ambassador, and walks around behind the tavern. The dwarves follow him, leaving the crowd behind.
I just sent a PM where I left the tavern by the back entrance.
SHITSHITSHITSHITSHITSHITSHITSHITSHITSHITSHITSHITSHITSHITSHITSHITSHITSHITSHITSHITSHITSHITSHITSHITSHITSHITSHITSHIT
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Worldmaster27 on September 22, 2014, 05:28:58 pm
If you need a goal, here's one: Become the richest and most powerful people in the known world through any means necessary!

 :P
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Nerjin on September 22, 2014, 05:32:59 pm
By repairing one plow at a time!

GENIUS!!!
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Orange Wizard on September 22, 2014, 05:42:30 pm
I'm going to pause here to give everyone a chance to post.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: My Name is Immaterial on September 22, 2014, 07:26:16 pm
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Worldmaster27 on September 22, 2014, 07:47:58 pm
Make it so!
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Orange Wizard on September 22, 2014, 09:07:02 pm
/me weeps.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: My Name is Immaterial on September 22, 2014, 09:33:59 pm
Don't worry, II. It's prohibitively expensive.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Nerjin on September 22, 2014, 09:41:26 pm
Don't worry, II. It's prohibitively expensive.

We should run our plans like the American military. Why should we have 5 x's that kill 100 y's when we could have 2,000 Z's that kill 0 y's because we can't deploy them. Come on Immaterial, get your head in the game. Cost effectiveness is for people with intelligence scores over 13.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Nerjin on September 22, 2014, 09:45:57 pm
Of which Lanius has neither [shush] so we may now commence doing stupid shit until we find a plot thread. Well, you guys do. I'm repairing a plow for like... two gold tops?
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Orange Wizard on September 22, 2014, 09:54:11 pm
You'd be lucky if the plough itself was worth that much.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Nerjin on September 22, 2014, 09:56:54 pm
Oh well. Lanius committed to this. It would be bad for a blacksmith to just up and walk away from a job. There's also the fact that he doesn't know you guys are about to get into a scrape with the law.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Orange Wizard on September 23, 2014, 05:18:09 am
So, a quick status report on who/what/where kind of things. I'll post this on the IC thread as well.

Wyrne Carver, Mic Jak's-Con Ehal, Veneficus Jenlus, Malkor, the priests' guard and horses: Hanging out in front of the tavern
Razed, High Priest Urien: Chatting behind the tavern
Lanius: Working in the smithy on the edge of the village
Father Eogan: Last seen walking away from the village centre
Dwarven ambassador, his guards: Inside the tavern

Most of the peasants have gone home. Some are wandering about doing peasanty things, but for the most part they're ignoring you.

It's mid morning, and the weather is clear. It's not cold, but the breeze is slightly chilly.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Orange Wizard on September 25, 2014, 06:33:36 am
Excellent. I'll update tomorrow. Probably. Spam me with PMs and the like if I become lax.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Harbingerjm on September 26, 2014, 11:31:11 pm
Thank you!
Another question: I know it's pretty cheesy, but would you rule that Bardic Knack gives languages through bonuses in Speak Language?
You don't actually have ranks in Speak Language the way you do in other skills.

I recommend making the spells that do almost nothing (prestidigitation comes to mind) unlimited, so that you don't truly expend a spell just to turn your hat red.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
Prestidigitation has been given the nickname Minor Wish.
It is far, far from "almost nothing".
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Tawa on September 27, 2014, 09:44:14 am
Counterpoint: Spell specifically states that nothing it does can injure, kill, or otherwise affect other living things.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Harbingerjm on September 27, 2014, 10:06:17 am
Counterpoint: Spell specifically states that nothing it does can injure, kill, or otherwise affect other living things.
Except it doesn't. It can't directly deal damage or break a spellcaster's concentration. There are plenty of ways around that.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Tawa on September 27, 2014, 10:34:35 am
It's not like I ever actually plan to abuse it, anyway.

I usually just use it as an RP aid or as a sort of parlor magic thing.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Harbingerjm on September 27, 2014, 10:35:47 am
I suspect you've not read the spell closely enough.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Tawa on September 27, 2014, 10:51:16 am
I've read the spell description multiple times, for your information.

Nothing I've ever done with it has invoked that kind of thing.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Orange Wizard on September 27, 2014, 02:28:10 pm
It's okay, Harbingerjm. I trust Tawa not to screw with me.

BECAUSE IF HE DOES I WILL CRUSH HIM.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Nerjin on September 27, 2014, 09:44:59 pm
I did... I threw a hammer.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Tawa on September 27, 2014, 09:46:03 pm
Oh yeah, the reason I came here.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Orange Wizard on September 28, 2014, 12:04:49 am
You say that, and you still haven't posted an action :P.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: tryrar on September 28, 2014, 08:58:21 pm
It's not just the paladin you'll have to worry about if that sceptre is found. Malkor would do his level best to skewer you if he knows you stole from his Church! :P
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Orange Wizard on September 30, 2014, 12:38:28 am
SILENCE FOOL
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Orange Wizard on September 30, 2014, 04:13:42 pm
Alright. I'll update 1 p.m. each day, New Zealand time.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: My Name is Immaterial on October 02, 2014, 11:10:33 pm
Bumpitybump.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Arcvasti on October 07, 2014, 09:15:43 pm
Bumpitybumpbumpitybumpbumpitybumpbumpitybump.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Orange Wizard on October 07, 2014, 10:08:45 pm
There's not enough actions posted in the IC thread for me to do anything.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Arcvasti on October 07, 2014, 10:14:51 pm
There's not enough actions posted in the IC thread for me to do anything.

/me pokes Taw and Tryrar suggestively

Razed and presumably Lanius[Or whatever the dragon shaman was] are waiting for Venefucius[Or what ever the wizard was] to finish talking with the High Priest and for Malkor to respond to Razed.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Nerjin on October 07, 2014, 10:26:02 pm
Lanius is indeed the Dragon Shaman... And I'm pretty sure that Tawa is going away for a week [or so I heard.]
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Arcvasti on October 07, 2014, 10:29:50 pm
And I'm pretty sure that Tawa is going away for a week [or so I heard.]

/me checks Taws most recent posts

Yep, sounds like he is. : o [

This is hibernating then. Considering the amount of D & D games he's involved, I think he just singlehandedly paused the entire 3.5e bay12 community.

[mild derail]
In any case, I love your avatar. Fireplace safety FTW.
[/mild derail]
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Nerjin on October 07, 2014, 10:39:57 pm
Yeah. There should be a No-Tawa DnD game just sot hat when he pops off for a snooze the community still has its fix.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: My Name is Immaterial on October 08, 2014, 12:16:48 am
I'm starting my games back up tomorrow, so that's something.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Orange Wizard on October 08, 2014, 12:50:51 am
Well, I PMed Tawa, so once he gets his act together we can resume.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Tawa on October 16, 2014, 03:01:59 pm
Hello?

II?

I did PM you.

Can we continue?
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Nerjin on October 16, 2014, 03:09:57 pm
Did it get lost in the void?
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Orange Wizard on October 16, 2014, 04:07:15 pm
I didn't forget

I swear
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Tawa on October 20, 2014, 09:27:17 pm
Bump.

Seriously, I don't want to have to remove Venificus from my concept artwork sheets due to him being in an inactive/dead game.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Orange Wizard on October 20, 2014, 11:24:35 pm
Augh.


...



No.

...


Sorry, I guess.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Nerjin on October 20, 2014, 11:42:35 pm
I'd appreciate a bit more reasoning than that.

I would reccomend, though, in the future that you have a plot. Sandboxes are fun, but we as players really didn't have an overall goal or direction. Maybe it would have come later. At the very least you probably should have given us a reason to be together. Even if that reason was as simple as "You were hired to be together."

Anyways... Time to delete Lanius from Mythweavers. AWAY!!!
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Orange Wizard on October 21, 2014, 05:15:00 am
The whole sandbox idea was poorly-implemented, I admit. To the point where the DM has no motivation to do anything.
Title: Re: D&D 3.5E Campaign: Aperta Mundi: OOC Thread
Post by: Tawa on October 21, 2014, 02:59:36 pm
:(

I'm totally going to reuse Veneficus anyway.