Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 15

Author Topic: /v/'s potentially fail, fortress succession thread!  (Read 35638 times)

Lazareth

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
/v/'s potentially fail, fortress succession thread!
« on: December 16, 2009, 09:03:14 am »

LOLITROLU


Over on /v/, (A board on 4chan) we decided to give a go at a succession thread.
Although i was notified that these have failed in the past, I don't care.

Reply with applications on the thread (if your in it) or here.
(Note, people in the thread will be given priority)

Fortress name: The Leaky Noble

THE ORDER.
>Implying our fortress has order

1. As_Always Complete
2. Lukeevil Complete
3. Haar Complete
4. Skeleton Skipped (On return, will be reinserted into the list)
5. EElman/Lazareth Complete
6. Eruonen Complete
7. Moogly Skipped (his choice)
8. Hexon Complete
9. Arramiy Complete
10. Vasily Skipped
11. TKGP Complete
12. Slashcko Complete
13. KaelGotDwarves Complete
14. Powell
15. Defiance
16. TatersAndTots
15. GoldenSox
16. MacaqueAttack
17. LordSlowpoke
HUURRRR DURRR

Yet to be ordered:
-Those guys who asked to be in and I forgot to add then/didnt give a shit
-
-

Go to http://www.rizon.net/index.php?r=chat
Enter your desired nickname in the nickname text field
Enter #brofortress in the channels text field
Don't check the nickserv checkbox.
Click connect!

Rules:

>1 year in game per turn, with 4 days from the start of the turn to post an update. Note: When it is your turn you have 1 1/2 days to make contact with us, or you will be skipped.

>Name one dwarf after yourself of any profession / status, cannot rename other already taken dwarves. You cannot name yourself after the fuckwin nobles such as Dungeon master.

> Post pics along with update, and the more fleshed out the story is the better. Ensure to post updates on named dwarves if they have accomplished anything of note.

Pretty standard fare all up for anyone who's read or played a succession game before, no real restrictions on what you can and can't do in game. Attempt to finished any small projects of the previous leaders, just as common courtesy. This isn't necessary, but it's nice to know things you started get finished.

Another thing, by all means have a project, just don't go too overboard

<3
« Last Edit: February 14, 2010, 09:53:49 am by Lazareth »
Logged

Moogly

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: /v/'s potentially fail, fortress succession thread!
« Reply #1 on: December 16, 2009, 09:06:42 am »

I'm up for the challenge, but a bit busy right now, put me down a couple of turns in so my schedule has time to clear up.

And no, I'm not the tripfag Mog. Just share a similar fascination of moogles.
Logged

As Always

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: /v/'s potentially fail, fortress succession thread!
« Reply #2 on: December 16, 2009, 09:07:22 am »

Reporting in, bro, ready to roll.
Logged
"...Although, how you misplace an entire corpse is beyond me."

lukeevil

  • Escaped Lunatic
    • View Profile
Re: /v/'s potentially fail, fortress succession thread!
« Reply #3 on: December 16, 2009, 09:09:34 am »

Count me in bro, STRIKE THE EARTH !
Logged

Haar

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: /v/'s potentially fail, fortress succession thread!
« Reply #4 on: December 16, 2009, 09:22:42 am »

Count me in, it will be hard not refusing your sexual preferences or atesting the color of your skin when I'm angry, but I'll try.

Also, no aquifers, please. They are a powerfull source of fun.
Logged

Hexon

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: /v/'s potentially fail, fortress succession thread!
« Reply #5 on: December 16, 2009, 09:27:55 am »

Awesome we're actually doing this. Count me in.
Logged

Lazareth

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: /v/'s potentially fail, fortress succession thread!
« Reply #6 on: December 16, 2009, 09:31:36 am »

It will be hard not refusing your sexual preferences or atesting the color of your skin

Haha, I like you already.
Logged

As Always

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: /v/'s potentially fail, fortress succession thread!
« Reply #7 on: December 16, 2009, 09:33:24 am »

Just a request, but if there is not enough people to span the length of our fortress, could we go round-the-horn and let the starting people have a shot near the end game? Strictly if there is not enough participants.

I just realised how boring setting up the fortress is going to be in comparison to the rest.
Logged
"...Although, how you misplace an entire corpse is beyond me."

Lazareth

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: /v/'s potentially fail, fortress succession thread!
« Reply #8 on: December 16, 2009, 09:40:14 am »

Just a request, but if there is not enough people to span the length of our fortress, could we go round-the-horn and let the starting people have a shot near the end game? Strictly if there is not enough participants.

I just realised how boring setting up the fortress is going to be in comparison to the rest.

Ah yes i see what you mean.

I've got some general ground rules:

If someone begins a project in there turn and never gets to finish it (due to new year) THE NEXT PERSON MUST FINISH IT. Failure to comply will result in a hammering

If someone custom names a dwarf, it means that they want to know how he's going, so when your writing the fortress posts, try to tell them what hes up too (if its nothing, just say nothing).
Logged

Haar

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: /v/'s potentially fail, fortress succession thread!
« Reply #9 on: December 16, 2009, 09:43:20 am »

Just a request, but if there is not enough people to span the length of our fortress, could we go round-the-horn and let the starting people have a shot near the end game? Strictly if there is not enough participants.

But I tought that was the normal way to go.


>Haha, I like you already.

>Implying that I can write epic stories
>Implying that you like me
>Implying that I can green text

Green_Lex_Luthor.jpg

Yes, I had to to that.
Logged

As Always

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: /v/'s potentially fail, fortress succession thread!
« Reply #10 on: December 16, 2009, 09:46:02 am »

But I tought that was the normal way to go.

Well, it's my first succession fortress, bro. I spose choosing and naming a dwarf after ourselves is standard procedure as well?
Logged
"...Although, how you misplace an entire corpse is beyond me."

Haar

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: /v/'s potentially fail, fortress succession thread!
« Reply #11 on: December 16, 2009, 09:48:18 am »

I've got some general ground rules:

If someone begins a project in there turn and never gets to finish it (due to new year) THE NEXT PERSON MUST FINISH IT. Failure to comply will result in a hammering

If someone custom names a dwarf, it means that they want to know how he's going, so when your writing the fortress posts, try to tell them what hes up too (if its nothing, just say nothing).

Also, we need characters. Personalities that will oversee the fortress by their standarts. Like... uh... a Weeaboo will transform most of the Hunters into Fishers and arm the army with Iron swords because GLORIOUS NIPPON. A Furry will encage a lot of animals and will make a giant zoo, or will make them all "Avaliable" from the stocks menu and will avoid butchering them.

Quote
I spose choosing and naming a dwarf after ourselves is standard procedure as well?

You spouse did what I don't know man, all I know is that one of the Peasant will be named Lanced Jack.
Logged

Hexon

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: /v/'s potentially fail, fortress succession thread!
« Reply #12 on: December 16, 2009, 09:52:01 am »

>one of the Peasant will be named Lanced Jack.
This peasant will be a good recipient to one of my menacing spike trap bedrooms.
Logged

As Always

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: /v/'s potentially fail, fortress succession thread!
« Reply #13 on: December 16, 2009, 09:53:41 am »


Also, we need characters. Personalities that will oversee the fortress by their standarts. Like... uh... a Weeaboo will transform most of the Hunters into Fishers and arm the army with Iron swords because GLORIOUS NIPPON. A Furry will encage a lot of animals and will make a giant zoo, or will make them all "Avaliable" from the stocks menu and will avoid butchering them.


Eeh, I'm not a fan of that one. Why not just let our personalities be the personalities, however we decide to run it, instead of taking on bullshit /v/ personas?
Logged
"...Although, how you misplace an entire corpse is beyond me."

Lazareth

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: /v/'s potentially fail, fortress succession thread!
« Reply #14 on: December 16, 2009, 09:57:13 am »

however we decide to run it, instead of taking on bullshit /v/ personas?

Second.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 15