Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 148 149 [150] 151 152 ... 748

Author Topic: Future of the Fortress  (Read 3746530 times)

Naryar

  • Bay Watcher
  • [SPHERE:VERMIN][LIKES_FIGHTING]
    • View Profile
Re: Future of the Fortress
« Reply #2235 on: June 01, 2012, 06:29:50 am »

All the new stuff is gonna be awesome. Especially the kill order cancel, that was annoying. Although does it cancel some parts of the kill order when some creatures selected are killed ?

Also, villains... Will they cackle and twirl their long, greasy, handlebar mustaches and make slightly ridiculous plans and be generally incompetent ?

And more importantly, when will WE adventurers be able to take up a defined villain role other than wanton, pointless slaughter ?

Abitbol

  • Escaped Lunatic
    • View Profile
Re: Future of the Fortress
« Reply #2236 on: June 01, 2012, 07:11:16 am »

The dev page has changed. The following updates will be full of awesomeness :)
Logged

orius

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Future of the Fortress
« Reply #2237 on: June 01, 2012, 07:21:08 am »

Quote
•cleared kill orders after completion

This is good.  Removes another aspect of micromanagement.

The hero role stuff sounds promising too.  Right now there isn't a lot to really do in adventure mode except monster killing quests and exploring tombs and towers.
Logged
Quote from: ThatAussieGuy
That is an insane and dangerous plan.  I approve wholeheartedly. 


Fortressdeath

Quatch

  • Bay Watcher
  • [CURIOUSBEAST_ GRADSTUDENT]
    • View Profile
    • Twitch? Sometimes..
Re: Future of the Fortress
« Reply #2238 on: June 01, 2012, 08:14:26 am »

Quote
Responding properly to personal fire issues (all modes)

That is a lovely way of putting it. /newspeak
Logged
SAVE THE PHILOSOPHER!
>>KillerClowns: It's faster to write "!!science!!" than any of the synonyms: "mad science", "dwarven science", or "crimes against the laws of god and man".
>>Orius: I plan my forts with some degree of paranoia.  It's kept me somewhat safe.

Vattic

  • Bay Watcher
  • bibo ergo sum
    • View Profile
Re: Future of the Fortress
« Reply #2239 on: June 01, 2012, 08:30:59 am »

Will these:
Quote
Not being able to hit a giant in the head, hitting a dragon in the head as a reaction when it attempts to bite

Combat styles involving weapons or natural attacks with associated stances and moves

Certain moves may only be available as specific counters, while others might just be regular attacks
Also include things like much larger creatures being able to stomp on much smaller ones and similar? Larger creatures could just barge others using their bulk as a weapon. It need not stop at attacks of course, darting trough a giants legs would be cool.
Logged
6 out of 7 dwarves aren't Happy.
How To Generate Small Islands

Abitbol

  • Escaped Lunatic
    • View Profile
Re: Future of the Fortress
« Reply #2240 on: June 01, 2012, 08:39:35 am »

Will these:
Quote
Not being able to hit a giant in the head, hitting a dragon in the head as a reaction when it attempts to bite

Combat styles involving weapons or natural attacks with associated stances and moves

Certain moves may only be available as specific counters, while others might just be regular attacks
Also include things like much larger creatures being able to stomp on much smaller ones and similar? Larger creatures could just barge others using their bulk as a weapon. It need not stop at attacks of course, darting trough a giants legs would be cool.

This reminds me the fact that every creature occupies one square even the largest. Is it planned to make the largest creatures occupy more that one square(sounds complicated) ? Or change the range of the largest creatures melee attacks ?
Logged

Chronas

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Future of the Fortress
« Reply #2241 on: June 01, 2012, 08:47:36 am »

This reminds me the fact that every creature occupies one square even the largest. Is it planned to make the largest creatures occupy more that one square(sounds complicated) ? Or change the range of the largest creatures melee attacks ?

The pathfinding cost would be nuts.
Logged
He he he.  Yeah, it almost looks done...  alas...  those who are in your teens, hold on until your twenties...  those in your twenties, your thirties...  others, cling to life as you are able...
It should be pretty fun though.

hermes

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Future of the Fortress
« Reply #2242 on: June 01, 2012, 09:30:57 am »

The dev page has changed. The following updates will be full of awesomeness :)

Oh, wow.  Not a few eternal suggestions have made that list, and the Hero/Villain arc is really promising.  Reading through the goals, it feels like a lot of the Villain and other entries will rely on NPC personalities, and I'm wondering if the personality rewrite we've heard about is going kick-off this next dev arc.  Anyway, a great list of features.  The non-lethal submission system also sounds interesting, is that going to be like throwing booze at a dwarf to get him off you?

(Footkerchief quoted the relevant personality rewrite info in this post.)
Logged
We can only guess at the longing of the creator. Someone who would need to create one such as you. - A Computer
I've been working on this type of thing...

NW_Kohaku

  • Bay Watcher
  • [ETHIC:SCIENCE_FOR_FUN: REQUIRED]
    • View Profile
Re: Future of the Fortress
« Reply #2243 on: June 01, 2012, 11:15:25 am »

Will theseAlso include things like much larger creatures being able to stomp on much smaller ones and similar? Larger creatures could just barge others using their bulk as a weapon. It need not stop at attacks of course, darting trough a giants legs would be cool.

Also known as the "thrashing" or "stop, drop, and roll" attack...

It would be a step towards curing the problem of elephants dying from 3 hoary marmots nibbling them to death.

The current relative size issues mean that small creatures in great numbers often have much sharper teeth, relatively, than larger creatures (hence, giant cave spiders have teeth so large that they become so blunt they can't chew through a helmet), and as such, attrition beats power and mass.  Letting a dragon that is being climbed upon like a jungle gym by a dozen axe dwarves simply roll over and crush its tormentors would go a long way towards putting the fangs back in a largely defanged megabeast.



This reminds me the fact that every creature occupies one square even the largest. Is it planned to make the largest creatures occupy more that one square(sounds complicated) ? Or change the range of the largest creatures melee attacks ?

The pathfinding cost would be nuts.

The pathfinding costs would not be "nuts", they would require entirely new connectivity maps, which in turn require new pathfinding code. 

Just like how fliers can't fly using the current connectivity maps that are only built for dwarf-like walkers, and swimmers can't swim, and magma-swimmers can't magma-swim.  (The creatures that do so pathfind by brute-force flood-filling, which is horribly inefficient for long-distance pathfinding, so all fliers or swimmers lose the ability to fly or swim when they are tamed.)

It's just a flat truth that at some point, Toady's going to have to overhaul pathfinding, and put in a more robust system if he's going to have all the things he wants to put into the game work properly.  Those new connectivity maps are going to have to include flying, swimming, magma-swimming, and two-tile-wide and three-tile-wide etc. paths for each permutation. 

Given that he's going to have to do that, then a modular hierarchical system that doesn't have to recalculate the connectivity of the whole friggin' map every time a bridge is raised would be the logical next step, and overall reduce connectivity update times.  Hierarchical pathfinding itself would be a massive time-saver for normal long-distance pathfinding, and jump point search could fill in at close-range pathfinding. 



The dev page has changed. The following updates will be full of awesomeness :)

Oh, wow.  Not a few eternal suggestions have made that list, and the Hero/Villain arc is really promising.  Reading through the goals, it feels like a lot of the Villain and other entries will rely on NPC personalities, and I'm wondering if the personality rewrite we've heard about is going kick-off this next dev arc.  Anyway, a great list of features.  The non-lethal submission system also sounds interesting, is that going to be like throwing booze at a dwarf to get him off you?

(Footkerchief quoted the relevant personality rewrite info in this post.)

That's the same devpage we've had since 2010, but with the "short term release schedule" removed.  Did you guys forget what had been on there? 
Logged
Personally, I like [DF] because after climbing the damned learning cliff, I'm too elitist to consider not liking it.
"And no Frankenstein-esque body part stitching?"
"Not yet"

Improved Farming
Class Warfare

Kogut

  • Bay Watcher
  • Next account: Bulwersator
    • View Profile
Re: Future of the Fortress
« Reply #2244 on: June 01, 2012, 11:30:25 am »

So Caravan Arc is dumped?
Logged
The worst bug - 34.11 poll
Tired of going decades without goblin sieges? Try The Fortress Defense Mod
Kogut, the Bugfixes apostle of Bay12forum. Every posts he makes he preaches about the evil of Bugs.

Quatch

  • Bay Watcher
  • [CURIOUSBEAST_ GRADSTUDENT]
    • View Profile
    • Twitch? Sometimes..
Re: Future of the Fortress
« Reply #2245 on: June 01, 2012, 11:59:17 am »

That's the same devpage we've had since 2010, but with the "short term release schedule" removed.  Did you guys forget what had been on there?

...Yes. Also, apparently I loaded it from cache :P
Logged
SAVE THE PHILOSOPHER!
>>KillerClowns: It's faster to write "!!science!!" than any of the synonyms: "mad science", "dwarven science", or "crimes against the laws of god and man".
>>Orius: I plan my forts with some degree of paranoia.  It's kept me somewhat safe.

NW_Kohaku

  • Bay Watcher
  • [ETHIC:SCIENCE_FOR_FUN: REQUIRED]
    • View Profile
Re: Future of the Fortress
« Reply #2246 on: June 01, 2012, 01:26:02 pm »

So Caravan Arc is dumped?

I think it's just part of "Adventure Role: Trader" now, or something...  Basically, shuffled in with other things. 
Logged
Personally, I like [DF] because after climbing the damned learning cliff, I'm too elitist to consider not liking it.
"And no Frankenstein-esque body part stitching?"
"Not yet"

Improved Farming
Class Warfare

Footkerchief

  • Bay Watcher
  • The Juffo-Wup is strong in this place.
    • View Profile
Re: Future of the Fortress
« Reply #2247 on: June 01, 2012, 01:26:44 pm »

Everyone should make sure to Ctrl+R the dev page -- when I first went there, I was still seeing the old one.
Logged

Knight Otu

  • Bay Watcher
  • ☺4[
    • View Profile
Re: Future of the Fortress
« Reply #2248 on: June 01, 2012, 01:28:46 pm »

That's the same devpage we've had since 2010, but with the "short term release schedule" removed.  Did you guys forget what had been on there?
And a bit rearranged (though yes, that's mostly from the hero role being upped).

So Caravan Arc is dumped?
Several caravan arc goals have been shuffled into the other development goals (the 3d minerals/mine maps and villager schedules of the former release 2 have been added to the Trader role, for instance). There's a number I can't find, but I guess they're counting as goals that were already on the list. And since Toady hasn't quite gone by just the goal groups, I'd say that Caravan Arc continues along with the hero stuff, or after that.
Logged
Direforged Original
Random Raw Scripts - Randomly generated Beasts , Vermin, Hags, Vampires, and Civilizations
Castle Otu

Cruxador

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Future of the Fortress
« Reply #2249 on: June 01, 2012, 03:56:14 pm »

It's a shame we've lost the more concrete and linear plan for the caravan arc. It was real handy to be able to point people at it and say "this is the current plan". It might not have been all that solid of a plan in how closely actual development correlated to it, but the huge list of features doesn't tell you anything about what's planned for the near future compared to what might still be a few years out.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 148 149 [150] 151 152 ... 748