In. I mean, I'm always scum, but maybe I'll be town this time?Please help me figure out what to do scum sensei.
mafiaaaaaaa in
I still have no idea how to play scum, maybe it'll work out this time.
is it cheating to simply not read my role pmTechnically, it's a gray area. In some forums, the answer is, indeed, yes. I honestly wouldn't recommend doing that, though, because you may very well make a lot of mistakes by doing that!
is it cheating to simply not read my role pm
Kick, punch, it's all in the mindIn. I mean, I'm always scum, but maybe I'll be town this time?Please help me figure out what to do scum sensei.
is it cheating to simply not read my role pmTechnically speaking, yes, since there is always a possibility of a post restriction being present in someone's role, including yours. Never mind how small it is, the chance exists, and you could be violating your post restriction if you don't read your role.
Technically speaking, yes, since there is always a possibility of a post restriction being present in someone's role, including yours. Never mind how small it is, the chance exists, and you could be violating your post restriction if you don't read your role.
BYOR 14Technically speaking, yes, since there is always a possibility of a post restriction being present in someone's role, including yours. Never mind how small it is, the chance exists, and you could be violating your post restriction if you don't read your role.
Post restriction roles are garbage; change my mind.
BYOR 14Technically speaking, yes, since there is always a possibility of a post restriction being present in someone's role, including yours. Never mind how small it is, the chance exists, and you could be violating your post restriction if you don't read your role.
Post restriction roles are garbage; change my mind.
I agree except for when they just make you say nya.
Making my dreams come true, here.
Is your role literally just "FallacyofUrist"?Making my dreams come true, here.
Guess who I'm gonna TUNNEL TUNNEL CHUNNEL CHUNNEL on D1?
Is your role literally just "FallacyofUrist"?Making my dreams come true, here.
Guess who I'm gonna TUNNEL TUNNEL CHUNNEL CHUNNEL on D1?
Making my dreams come true, here.
So you're a goo cultistIs your role literally just "FallacyofUrist"?Making my dreams come true, here.
Guess who I'm gonna TUNNEL TUNNEL CHUNNEL CHUNNEL on D1?
Obviously, that's a trade secret. But knowing my history, my role is something to give wubba the most trouble possible.
So you're a goo cultistIs your role literally just "FallacyofUrist"?Making my dreams come true, here.
Guess who I'm gonna TUNNEL TUNNEL CHUNNEL CHUNNEL on D1?
Obviously, that's a trade secret. But knowing my history, my role is something to give wubba the most trouble possible.
Making my dreams come true, here.
Guess who I'm gonna TUNNEL TUNNEL CHUNNEL CHUNNEL on D1?
In. I mean, I'm always scum, but maybe I'll be town this time?Please help me figure out what to do scum sensei.
Unfortunately, Jim's towntell is that he's a chickenshit.
Unfortunately, Jim's towntell is that he's a chickenshit.
What are my tells?
Dumps EchreJack into the Pie, and says In.Oh no, I'm bowing Out, as per contract.
Waits for Webadict to kick out the unwanted seasoning.
Dumps EchreJack into the Pie, and says In.
Waits for Webadict to kick out the unwanted seasoning.
Hush, you.Dumps EchreJack into the Pie, and says In.
Waits for Webadict to kick out the unwanted seasoning.
My god, not Tric! After what happened with you and blue i don’t trust you much
This game is literally designed to learn
Don't be toxic or I feed.
Don't be toxic or I feed.
Ok, first and last warning, don't threaten me with a good time.
Lenglon rolls her eyes and types a text message to ShakesDon't be toxic or I feed.
Ok, first and last warning, don't threaten me with a good time.
No Toxic else sliver quotes
Quote from: MeNo Toxic else sliver quotes
I tilt my head to the side and look at Shakes in bemusementQuote from: MeNo Toxic else sliver quotes
who tf is silver?
Quote slivers no problem now?
I tilt my head to the side and look at Shakes in bemusementQuote from: MeNo Toxic else sliver quotes
who tf is silver?Quote from: Me to ShakeragQuote slivers no problem now?
I put on my robe and wizard hat.
neat
I put on my robe and wizard hat.Quote from: Me to Shakeragneat
In reply, I summon Aleph-Zero (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fTaWKbD3UK8)I put on my robe and wizard hat.Quote from: Me to Shakeragneat
I meditate to regain my mana, before casting Lvl. 8 Mafia of the Infinite.
In reply, I summon Aleph-Zero (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fTaWKbD3UK8)I put on my robe and wizard hat.Quote from: Me to Shakeragneat
I meditate to regain my mana, before casting Lvl. 8 Mafia of the Infinite.
No, you get counterspelled.
Far be it from me to tell you guys to stop having fun, but fun is a filthy parasite and you should stop having it immediately.
I hate fun.
Far be it from me to tell you guys to stop having fun, but fun is a filthy parasite and you should stop having it immediately.
I hate fun.
... I'm... Okay. I'm gonna try to finish these sooner so you guys can get playing instead of whatever this is.
recognizing just how dangerous it is to bring a knife to a gunfight, Lenglon looks on in horror... and then comes to a realization
Shakerag has used several infinite or near-infinite spells now, and her own attempt to cast something similar was dismissed and negated without any effect. This can only be true if the system itself is broken. And in such a case, there is an obvious, direct solution. One that would force Shakerag to come down to her own mortal level, and lose his god-mod powers forever.
Lenglon casts Summon Rules Lawyer
Unfortunately the Rules Lawyers are the SCOTUS and because guns were involved they rule against you, 6-3.You're literally taking their guns away to make your gun singularity.
Unfortunately the Rules Lawyers are the SCOTUS and because guns were involved they rule against you, 6-3.You're literally taking their guns away to make your gun singularity.
X - to doubt
I lied when I said I'd be done in a few hours.
Bazinga!I lied when I said I'd be done in a few hours.
Honey, given your track record, I'll be happy if we start by Friday.
Shakerag advocates for the Lynch of Egan_BW!
NAI
Shakerag, you vicious, unrepentant criminal. How could you steal the birthday cake like that??!Depends on the flavor of the cake.
FallacyofUrist: How do you decide who to vote for on D1?Randomly, followed by aggressively and inaccurately.
FallacyofUrist: How do you decide who to vote for on D1?Randomly, followed by aggressively and inaccurately.
Shakerag: How do you decide who to vote for on Day 2?
Lenglon: Are you ok using discord?I've used Discord for years, and am currently a member of roughly 20 different discord servers.
Lidku Do you think a policy vote on lurkers is valid? Why or why not?
Lenglon: What is your opinion on the strategy of not looking at your role PM until N1?I think it's a silly thing to do. I think if you do that you won't know if you have a post restriction, won't know if you have day abilities that need to be used D1, and I think the only reason to do it is if you have little self-confidence about your scumgame. I don't think it's alignment indicative though, just personality indicative.
Lidku Do you think a policy vote on lurkers is valid? Why or why not?
It depends. If they're offline often and not active, then they're probably doing IRL things and cannot commit to the game as they should. Pinpointing on lurkers who generally cannot participate much isn't optimal in my opinion, until at least all other options are expended.
I say this because of what happened in the last BYOR I was in. I and TricMagic mistakenly honed-in on against BluarianKnight, when the actual mafia was Jim Groovester all along.
Maximum Spin: Are you the kind of person to stick on one player or switch your votes multiple times in one day?No.
Maximum Spin - If you had a 1-shot dayInspect which would make wub post the result in-thread publicaly, when would you use it, and on who?I don't like this question either. Assuming it can self-target, immediately, on myself.
I think if you do that you won't know if you have a post restrictionImagine accepting post restrictions.
Egan_BW If you were a survivor would you say that or not?
Lenglon: What is your opinion on the strategy of not looking at your role PM until N1?I think it's a silly thing to do. I think if you do that you won't know if you have a post restriction, won't know if you have day abilities that need to be used D1, and I think the only reason to do it is if you have little self-confidence about your scumgame. I don't think it's alignment indicative though, just personality indicative.
Shakerag - Please explain Miller Theory regarding D1 claims.
Egan_BW If you were a survivor would you say that or not?
mother-heckker, this is beginner mafia and I'm inexperienced, you tell me what to do in that situation, senpai
But there are no survivors in this setup so if I were one I'd be sending irate PMs to wuba right now.
FallacyofUrist - Is EuchreJack a player in this game?
[1] That seems chaotic. Are you certain that strategy is in the best interests of town?
[2] That would depend on the conversations of D1 and how people voted on D1. Would you do differently?
FallacyofUrist: Why are you cursed to always be scum in webadict games? For that matter, why am I?Dearest scumbuddy, don't call me out like that! We're supposed to be undercover -
My thoughts on everyone right now generally: Game has just started, so there is nothing to go off of in terms of suspicion. Some people have posted, but not enough.. but reasonable to understand, considering how late it is currently (Eastern US time, for me, specifically)A bit early, but I appreciate the enthusiasm!
Shakerag - Please explain Miller Theory regarding D1 claims.
How are you so certiain there wouldn't be a survivor in this game then?Note that it says in the OP that there are 7 Town and 2 Mafia. Just like the last Beginner's BYOR.
[1]: Oh, no, it probably isn't. That's for sure. But thanks to my curse of always being scum or third party whenever I try to play mafia, I haven't really learned a better methodology yet. I'll be trying to improve on my techniques this game, since it's a Beginner's game, heh.
[2]: Do the results of Night 1 not factor into your methodology? Surely you wouldn't ignore a guilty cop-check.
Ah in that case I'm like, omega miller. Inspects show me as mafia, surveys show my action as mafiakill, and tracking shows me as visiting whoever was killed. It's funny actually, I love it.Shakerag - Please explain Miller Theory regarding D1 claims.
Oh I just realized I missed that. I stick by the old (relative to this subforum) rules that you always claim miller ASAP. To do otherwise is to invite doubt.
How are you so certiain there wouldn't be a survivor in this game then?Survivor is a neutral alignment, only town and mafia alignments exist. Read the OP before playing pls~
Egan_BW - What do you think is the fastest way to end RVS?Probably for mafia to out themselves, but that's not easy to count on. I'm just going with controlled chaos for now.
How are you so certiain there wouldn't be a survivor in this game then?Note that it says in the OP that there are 7 Town and 2 Mafia. Just like the last Beginner's BYOR.
What's the point of this question?
1: Noted.[1]: It is notable. Since I have basically no town experience, I am effectively a beginner despite having years of games. A frustrating situation, that. Of course, I could be scum and fucking with you, but you know that already.
2: To be fair, I did forget about night results. In so far as cop claims are concerned, I did play in one paranormal game in which I sat on a scum inspect for one night and got a scum inspect on the second night. It was risky, but it paid off in spades. I don't think I would try and gamble on that again, to be fair.
I may be very drunk. I suppose that's not relevant then, yeah?Maybe it is.
WaitThere are 7 Town and 2 Mafia. There are no Third Parties.
Webadict Can you confirm there is 7 town and 2 Mafia? Or can you just confirm there is 2 mafia?
[2]: What is worth gambling on, in your opinion?
In that case - what does drunk!Shakerag think sober!Shakerag will think about the situation?Literally an impossible question. But as a counter, what information did you think that would give you?
[1] To be perfectly honest, it's been years since I played a game so fuck if I know anymore. I haven't the foggiest fucking clue what the "meta" is right now.[1] The good news is that this is a Beginner's BYOR, so the shenanigans level should be stuck somewhere between 2 and 4 out of 10.
[2] Literally an impossible question. But as a counter, what information did you think that would give you?
That's a valid assessment. How then do you feel about policy lynches on lurkers?Bear in mind that when I last played there was a plague of Extends, and many games died of inactivity. I personally am a huge fan of policy lynches on D1 specifically, but I think their use drops rapidly as the town gains information. Lurkers specifically are in my opinion major candidates for Policy-lynches, with all the same caveats that any other policy-lynch has (only do it when you don't have a solid scumread on someone, don't do it at MYLO/LYLO, overall use drops as game goes on, etc.)
Egan - Why are you claiming to be scum?
My thoughts on everyone right now generally: Game has just started, so there is nothing to go off of in terms of suspicion. Some people have posted, but not enough.. but reasonable to understand, considering how late it is currently (Eastern US time, for me, specifically)A bit early, but I appreciate the enthusiasm!
Shame you're definitely scum.
Lidku - Miller Theory asks the question of what someone should do if they are town, but have an ability that makes them show up as scum to inspects. There is first) what should someone do if they are themselves a Miller, and second) what should a town player do when someone ELSE claims miller.
What in YOUR opinion, is the correct answer to those questions?
[2] Your perception of yourself. What kind of a player are you? That's a question too.Well, I -think- I'm a decent player. My W/L ratio is in the positives. You also avoided my counter-question
That's a valid assessment. How then do you feel about policy lynches on lurkers?Bear in mind that when I last played there was a plague of Extends, and many games died of inactivity. I personally am a huge fan of policy lynches on D1 specifically, but I think their use drops rapidly as the town gains information. Lurkers specifically are in my opinion major candidates for Policy-lynches, with all the same caveats that any other policy-lynch has (only do it when you don't have a solid scumread on someone, don't do it at MYLO/LYLO, overall use drops as game goes on, etc.)
Max - Why?Maximum Spin - If you had a 1-shot dayInspect which would make wub post the result in-thread publicaly, when would you use it, and on who?I don't like this question either. Assuming it can self-target, immediately, on myself.
Max - Why?Which part?
[1] First of all, I should say that during the weekdays I'll be at work so I can't guarantee timely responses during "normal business hours".
FallacyofUrist:[2] Your perception of yourself. What kind of a player are you? That's a question too.[2] Well, I -think- I'm a decent player. My W/L ratio is in the positives. You also avoided my counter-question
Break it down for me. You alignment inspect as mafia and you're always tracked / watched as going to the mafiakill's target?Because I am.I'm joking around since I've rolled mafia for most of my games thus far. My Miller claim is really real, though.
Egan_BW: I don't believe you. I think you're pulling a miller gambit out of your ass. Call it a gut feeling. And if I get murdered in the night then everyone else can think my gut feeling was on point.
[2] My answer was 'your perception of yourself'. I'll go into more detail, though.
It's a way of asking 'what do you think you will think about the situation'. The only way to answer that is to go a layer beyond just what you're thinking. To get you to think about how you think, and give me an answer on that.
... It's admittedly a tricky question.
Egan_BW: I don't believe you. I think you're pulling a miller gambit out of your ass. Call it a gut feeling. And if I get murdered in the night then everyone else can think my gut feeling was on point.
A gut feeling, eh? Pushing me seems like a pretty safe play if you were mafia, to be honest.
Sorry, I still don't understand what you're asking. If your asking about my methodology I'm not certain I can so succinctly summarize it?I'm fine reading an essay about it if you need to go that far.
And that response is a pretty safe response if -you- were mafia, to be honest. Safe, but not optimal. My vote stays. Town would be less defensive.What makes it safe?
Why on yourself instead of on someone else, why immediately, and so on.I've seen the power of conftown. I've even BEEN the power of conftown before. I like being conftown. I guess I could let someone else have the fun, but I've got a pretty high self-opinion with respect to my own value. And when it comes to public information like that, the sooner the better.
I'm definitely not bold enough to go straight for a claim like that....I don't currently think you're scum but I don't actually believe this.
Town is precisely this defensive, dummy. Besides, you haven't seen my previous games as scum but I'm definitely not bold enough to go straight for a claim like that.But what's the ideal state of town? Defensive, or offensive?
I'd really rather you narrow down the question, rather than me having to write an essay.Sorry, I still don't understand what you're asking. If your asking about my methodology I'm not certain I can so succinctly summarize it?I'm fine reading an essay about it if you need to go that far.
The deflection. You're trying to turn my gut feeling back on me. Which would be more valid if I wasn't the sole vote on you. I think you jumped the gun.And that response is a pretty safe response if -you- were mafia, to be honest. Safe, but not optimal. My vote stays. Town would be less defensive.What makes it safe?
Egan - I don't know about your mafia play, but you do seem quite bold when I play with you in the RTD section though. Why would you not be bold here when you are bold there?I'm not very comfortable lying, it's a different thing to roleplay as an axe-wielding lunatic and actually manage all of this social nonsense.
Interesting. If you had a 1-shot, must-use-right-now, day ability that forced the target to announce their own alignment within their next post, who would you use it on, and why?Why on yourself instead of on someone else, why immediately, and so on.I've seen the power of conftown. I've even BEEN the power of conftown before. I like being conftown. I guess I could let someone else have the fun, but I've got a pretty high self-opinion with respect to my own value. And when it comes to public information like that, the sooner the better.
I'd really rather you narrow down the question, rather than me having to write an essay.That's fair. Let's separate it out, then.
Welcome to the Mafia boards. Two of us are out to get you. I promise I'm not, though, unless you're actually scum, which you're not.Egan - I don't know about your mafia play, but you do seem quite bold when I play with you in the RTD section though. Why would you not be bold here when you are bold there?I'm not very comfortable lying, it's a different thing to roleplay as an axe-wielding lunatic and actually manage all of this social nonsense.
The deflection. You're trying to turn my gut feeling back on me. Which would be more valid if I wasn't the sole vote on you. I think you jumped the gun.Isn't it too obvious to be safe?
Well, what I was really going for was to find someone to attack. I recall hearing that picking at whoever votes for you is an acceptable beginner strategy, so I went for that. Shakerag doesn't seem scummy to me at this point, but it doesn't really matter so much as that I got them to say some stuff and hopefully that helps people with more developed instincts than me.Pretty sure you're acting deliberately scummy as a gambit to see who takes you as an easy target.
I'd really rather you narrow down the question, rather than me having to write an essay.That's fair. Let's separate it out, then.
As town, how do you determine who is town?
As town, how do you determine who is scum?
As scum, how do you determine the greatest threat to your team?Activity. Active scum-hunters are always a huge threat. Killing the most active players, while kind of a dick move, is still optimal for scum.
As either alignment, how do you determine who can be made less of a priority?That depends on the team. See the above responses.
No. Egan_BW could easily be scum and making mistakes. And you could be chainsawing for him.The deflection. You're trying to turn my gut feeling back on me. Which would be more valid if I wasn't the sole vote on you. I think you jumped the gun.Isn't it too obvious to be safe?
Well, what I was really going for was to find someone to attack. I recall hearing that picking at whoever votes for you is an acceptable beginner strategy, so I went for that. Shakerag doesn't seem scummy to me at this point, but it doesn't really matter so much as that I got them to say some stuff and hopefully that helps people with more developed instincts than me.
alternately: if you were picking for someone else, instead of yourself, is there any player here that you think should not use the one-shot-public-day-inspect on themselves if they're the one with the ability?"should" from my perspective or the player's? From the player's perspective, whoever's scum shouldn't. :P
Interesting. If you had a 1-shot, must-use-right-now, day ability that forced the target to announce their own alignment within their next post, who would you use it on, and why?Probably TricMagic. He likes to have to tell the truth. More seriously - though that really would be my first impulse - it would probably have to be between Shakerag and Egan. Not specifically because of their spat right now, though, but that does make it even more potentially useful!
No. Egan_BW could easily be scum and making mistakes. And you could be chainsawing for him.
I refuse.
STOP POSTING WHILE I'M TRYING TO POST
]I don't like this question either. Assuming it can self-target, immediately, on myself.
By the way: there's probably one scum among Fallacy, Shakerag, Egan.I agree. It's Shakerag. 80%.
To be fair, that's a stupid decision. If you openly confirm yourself as town you just painted a huge target on your ass to get NK'd. And if you didn't die during the night then town needs to worry about if there is a doctor or if you're a godfather.Is there any reason the scum wouldn't immediately nightkill a confirmed town player? Assume there's no cult and they're not about to self-destruct.
Lol sorry. It's the opening hours of Day 1, of course we're active as heckaroni.I refuse.
STOP POSTING WHILE I'M TRYING TO POST
To be fair, prompting conversation on D1 is priority. The worst thing you can do on D1 is do nothing.Absolutely true. But this is true for all alignments.
Sorry Fallacy, thought you were Egan. That's what I get for posting shitfaced.It's an understandable mistake. I thought TricMagic was EuchreJack.
Is there any reason the scum wouldn't immediately nightkill a confirmed town player? Assume there's no cult and they're not about to self-destruct.
Is there any reason the scum wouldn't immediately nightkill a confirmed town player? Assume there's no cult and they're not about to self-destruct.
That's just WIFOM. Most of the time I would think it would be in scum's best interest to kill a confirmed town, unless they want to pull some kind of gambit (say if that player wasn't otherwise trusted).
Is there any reason the scum wouldn't immediately nightkill a confirmed town player? Assume there's no cult and they're not about to self-destruct.
That's just WIFOM. Most of the time I would think it would be in scum's best interest to kill a confirmed town, unless they want to pull some kind of gambit (say if that player wasn't otherwise trusted).
To add on to that, I'd be suspicious if one or two people suddenly ganged up on said "confirmed town" in such a scenario.
Adding on to -that-, it would ultimately depend on how many players are left and what roleclaims they have as well. There really aren't hard and fast rules in mafia; there is so so so much that is situational.If you ask me, the mafia, even if they manage to play aggressively, are all about looking for opportunities - times to strike and players to pounce on. Attacking vulnerabilities. Ambush predators. Town players try to focus more on narrowing things down.
Adding on to -that-, it would ultimately depend on how many players are left and what roleclaims they have as well. There really aren't hard and fast rules in mafia; there is so so so much that is situational.If you ask me, the mafia, even if they manage to play aggressively, are all about looking for opportunities - times to strike and players to pounce on. Attacking vulnerabilities. Ambush predators. Town players try to focus more on narrowing things down.
Honestly, not a bad assessment. But then the best scum players will make sure that they do not appear to be looking for opportunities as well. And novice town thinking that they are scumhunting could be pegged as town. It can be hard to discern which is which.At the very least new players are typically easier to read. Hence my 'examine Jack/Tric' strategy.
By the way: there's probably one scum among Fallacy, Shakerag, Egan.Max - I really dislike this post. It looks to me like setup to attempt to say X was town, so Y should be scum, later on down the line. And in the short term you're basically just egging them on to infight, without getting yourself bogged down by taking an actual position on who is scum. I really just do not see how, be you right or wrong, you are helping anyone but the mafia here. I'm only using FoS because Tric (who my vote is currently on) has yet to post since game start, the moment that Tric shows up, you can expect to see your name in red over this post if something doesn't change. Justify yourself please.
NJW2000: Hypothetically if you were scum would to actively try to bus your scummate to look town or play it calmly?Depends on the situation. At the start of the game, I'd have a strong preference for keeping my teammate alive.
NJW2000 - Why should or shouldn't I vote Shakerag after the incredible, absolutely amazing, case that FoU just made?It's a weak case, so I think more people should vote Shakerag, to make the case stronger.
Well, what I was really going for was to find someone to attack. I recall hearing that picking at whoever votes for you is an acceptable beginner strategy, so I went for that. Shakerag doesn't seem scummy to me at this point, but it doesn't really matter so much as that I got them to say some stuff and hopefully that helps people with more developed instincts than me.This is bad. You've heard it's ok for newbie players to do something that's bad, so you did it? And you're waiting for stronger players to figure out the game?
Web - It seems like LurkerTracker died while I was away. Is there a replacement ISO tool to help compile each player's posts individually for analysis?I made some functionalities. Do you need a specific player, or just in general?
TricMagic - Why am I voting you?
Probably get lynched Day 2. Also, that doesn't actually work Fal, I'm either working alone or with someone else. So in order to lynch me, you have to figure out my partner. Unless I did something WIFOM like completely ignore my PM Day 1. ;)FallacyofUrist - Is EuchreJack a player in this game?
Raises wing, beak open, then... lowers it slowly.
... Right, forgot Tric took his spot. My bad.
New plan.
We can logically assume that TricMagic is either Town or Mafia. A loyal agent or treacherous traitor. Well... since he's so easy to read, let's just badger him until we can make a solid judgement, then either build our core around him or execute him?
TricMagic: What's your alignment? What's your scum-hunting strategy this game?
:D[1] To be perfectly honest, it's been years since I played a game so fuck if I know anymore. I haven't the foggiest fucking clue what the "meta" is right now.[1] The good news is that this is a Beginner's BYOR, so the shenanigans level should be stuck somewhere between 2 and 4 out of 10.
[2] Literally an impossible question. But as a counter, what information did you think that would give you?
[2] Your perception of yourself. What kind of a player are you? That's a question too.
In general please, I like to use Lurkertracker when reviewing other people's cases as well as for activity-level analysis. Right now I'd be using it to ISO FoU to see if there's a pattern to their posts and on Maximum Spin because of my follow-up to the FoS I made. If there is a tool such that I can use it on a whim, I'd probably use it repeatedly throughout the game.Web - It seems like LurkerTracker died while I was away. Is there a replacement ISO tool to help compile each player's posts individually for analysis?I made some functionalities. Do you need a specific player, or just in general?
In general please, I like to use Lurkertracker when reviewing other people's cases as well as for activity-level analysis. Right now I'd be using it to ISO FoU to see if there's a pattern to their posts and on Maximum Spin because of my follow-up to the FoS I made. If there is a tool such that I can use it on a whim, I'd probably use it repeatedly throughout the game.I only have a version that posts to the thread, but I could make a version that sends a PM to keep the thread a bit orderly, but it'd be manual.
By the way: there's probably one scum among Fallacy, Shakerag, Egan.
oof, that's inconvenient. I guess I'll be doing things the old-fashioned wsy then, rather than LurkerTrackering the thread on a daily basis. Thank you though, and I may ask for its use later in the game but I'll try to not spam the request.In general please, I like to use Lurkertracker when reviewing other people's cases as well as for activity-level analysis. Right now I'd be using it to ISO FoU to see if there's a pattern to their posts and on Maximum Spin because of my follow-up to the FoS I made. If there is a tool such that I can use it on a whim, I'd probably use it repeatedly throughout the game.I only have a version that posts to the thread, but I could make a version that sends a PM to keep the thread a bit orderly, but it'd be manual.
Probably get lynched Day 2. Also, that doesn't actually work Fal, I'm either working alone or with someone else. So in order to lynch me, you have to figure out my partner. Unless I did something WIFOM like completely ignore my PM Day 1. ;)Tric - that isn't how this works, not in the earlygame. We don't need to find or even concern ourselves with who your partner might or might not be until either you flip or it becomes lategame.
As for scum-hunting strat... Wait and see, and vote Shakerag for earlier posts.Tric - which earlier posts? what's wrong with them?
That being said, NJW, Lidku, Knightwing. The rest of the posts is mostly Shakerag/Egan fighting.Tric - So you dismiss the Shakerag / Egan fight as generally being a nulltell here, but are voting Shakerag over "earlier posts". Make up your mind, is Shake scummy or not? If so, what is scummy about him? If not, then why are you voting him?
I trust Tric, for now, at least.So you think Tric is acting scummy right now, since you trust them?
A guide to Tric:
Acting scummy: town
Acting like a townie: scum
FallacyofUrist - 2 - Egan_BW* (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=180072.msg8388950#msg8388950),Egan - You appear to have two votes. Impressive. What do you plan to do with this power?
Shakerag - In my experience, you are more excited the more disruptive your role is. You appear to be very excited. How disruptive do you plan on being this game?
Shakerag: what's going on with the discord question here? (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=180072.msg8388939#msg8388939)A lazy attempt to trip up scum not paying attention.
I trust Tric, for now, at least.Yeah, Knightwing looks like town.
A guide to Tric:
Acting scummy: town
Acting like a townie: scum
As for why I’m not scum? Because… I’m not? Max apparently has a alignment detector for me on them, so they can clear me using voodoo magic, I hope.
Often, when two town players are spatting, a scum player will appear to butt in and egg them on in order to get chummy with one of the two and distance from the other. Under this analysis, Fallacy is the most likely to be scum. On the other hand, often, if that doesn't happen, a scum player will pick a fight with a town player and try to rope in another town player into the same kind of three-way. By that analysis, it's more likely to be Shakerag, although I wouldn't rule out Egan. In general, if I see three players in a runaround like that, I always suspect there's exactly one scum involved, who's trying to generate some interactions to make you think one of the others is also aligned with him in case something happens to out him later. I know for a fact that Fallacy, at least, knows how to do that since I've seen him do it; but I certainly figure the other two could do it as well.By the way: there's probably one scum among Fallacy, Shakerag, Egan.
Explain.
MaximumSpin - I've never been able to read him and seldom find him useful before D3.Incidentally (taking this at face value)... I've been trying to make more of an effort to be useful earlier, especially since being the n1 kill last game. I look forward to probably being the n1 kill this game too.
More people voting != stronger case. That just means you have more people voting on flimsy reasons which looks bandwagon-y. A stronger case is made by providing additional (and good) reasons to vote someone.NJW2000 - Why should or shouldn't I vote Shakerag after the incredible, absolutely amazing, case that FoU just made?It's a weak case, so I think more people should vote Shakerag, to make the case stronger.
Often, when two town players are spatting, a scum player will appear to butt in and egg them on in order to get chummy with one of the two and distance from the other. Under this analysis, Fallacy is the most likely to be scum. On the other hand, often, if that doesn't happen, a scum player will pick a fight with a town player and try to rope in another town player into the same kind of three-way. By that analysis, it's more likely to be Shakerag, although I wouldn't rule out Egan. In general, if I see three players in a runaround like that, I always suspect there's exactly one scum involved, who's trying to generate some interactions to make you think one of the others is also aligned with him in case something happens to out him later. I know for a fact that Fallacy, at least, knows how to do that since I've seen him do it; but I certainly figure the other two could do it as well.This is.... strange.
But that's really secondary... the real point of any post you might make on d1 is to see how people react to it, and frankly, I don't believe Lenglon doesn't know what I just said in that paragraph above. I guess I could see NJW as a partner, although it's kind of a stretch, and I don't really think I'm important enough to be a coordinated d1 scum push, so his vote on me actually acts to counteract that suspicion... although I guess that could be the point but, you know, not going to get too in the weeds right now. Lenglon has also been fishing and generally acting pretty scummy, so I'm pretty sure this is where my d1 vote is going to sit.
(Extra beginner mafia tip: I, personally, always find "analysis" to be a scumtell. What I mean is, scum will often try to make cases that don't really make much sense by appealing to a cloud of little details that can vaguely be made to sound bad, to try to make people doubt their intuitions. I think the last person I clearly remember doing this is ToonyMan, who's not in this game and therefore a nice neutral referent. On the other hand, this can also be a crutch of a player who isn't very good and doesn't have much social intuition, so you kind of have to balance it with other observations of the player. I put appeals to statistics in the same category as well.)
I pointed out that there was no town-friendly purpose to his statement, and said lack of town-friendly purpose was the reason for my accusation. (which, to reiterate, is me pointing out "you may or may not be right, but attempting to make a point of this only hurts town.) In his rebuttal, he instead gave reasons he thought his statement might statistically be likely true, which still doesn't actually explain how making that accusation helps town, nor what the purpose of the statement actually was. To my eyes, this kind of deflection is a sign that he doesn't have an actual response to the accusation, and is a significant scumtell. However, as I said, there is one little piece of this jigsaw puzzle here that doesn't fit quite right.By the way: there's probably one scum among Fallacy, Shakerag, Egan.Max - I really dislike this post. It looks to me like setup to attempt to say X was town, so Y should be scum, later on down the line. And in the short term you're basically just egging them on to infight, without getting yourself bogged down by taking an actual position on who is scum. I really just do not see how, be you right or wrong, you are helping anyone but the mafia here. I'm only using FoS because Tric (who my vote is currently on) has yet to post since game start, the moment that Tric shows up, you can expect to see your name in red over this post if something doesn't change. Justify yourself please.
(Extra beginner mafia tip: I, personally, always find "analysis" to be a scumtell. What I mean is, scum will often try to make cases that don't really make much sense by appealing to a cloud of little details that can vaguely be made to sound bad, to try to make people doubt their intuitions. I think the last person I clearly remember doing this is ToonyMan, who's not in this game and therefore a nice neutral referent. On the other hand, this can also be a crutch of a player who isn't very good and doesn't have much social intuition, so you kind of have to balance it with other observations of the player. I put appeals to statistics in the same category as well.)a scumtell. Max isn't stupid. He knows he did this. So now I'm confused. I don't quite get WHY he would do this. It doesn't help him as town, but it also doesn't help him as scum. It's just... strange.
It doesn't change my case in any way, there's still no scumhunting here.MaximumSpin - I've never been able to read him and seldom find him useful before D3.Incidentally (taking this at face value)... I've been trying to make more of an effort to be useful earlier, especially since being the n1 kill last game. I look forward to probably being the n1 kill this game too.
I pointed out that there was no town-friendly purpose to his statement, and said lack of town-friendly purpose was the reason for my accusation. (which, to reiterate, is me pointing out "you may or may not be right, but attempting to make a point of this only hurts town.) In his rebuttal, he instead gave reasons he thought his statement might statistically be likely true, which still doesn't actually explain how making that accusation helps town, nor what the purpose of the statement actually was. To my eyes, this kind of deflection is a sign that he doesn't have an actual response to the accusation, and is a significant scumtell. However, as I said, there is one little piece of this jigsaw puzzle here that doesn't fit quite right.... how the fuck does the accusation being right not help town? The point of the game is to find scum and lynch them. If scum are found, and lynched, this helps town.
It doesn't change my case in any way, there's still no scumhunting here.I'm hunting you, dumbass
I’m gonna wait for Max to respond so I can see both sides of the argument before I give my two centsWhat about the question I asked you earlier?
I don't answer questions I think are a waste of time, either.
FallacyofUrist - 2 - Egan_BW* (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=180072.msg8388950#msg8388950),Egan - You appear to have two votes. Impressive. What do you plan to do with this power?
Well, I answered all the questions I remember noticing this time. Did I miss any?I don't answer questions I think are a waste of time, either.
I don't think that's a good one to hang on to. Even if you think the question is a waste of time, I probably do not, and refusing to answer wouldn't make me think positively of you.
You aren't this stupid, so stop pretending that you can't read. I've explained this twice already, I have no need to bother humoring you a third time.I pointed out that there was no town-friendly purpose to his statement, and said lack of town-friendly purpose was the reason for my accusation. (which, to reiterate, is me pointing out "you may or may not be right, but attempting to make a point of this only hurts town.) In his rebuttal, he instead gave reasons he thought his statement might statistically be likely true, which still doesn't actually explain how making that accusation helps town, nor what the purpose of the statement actually was. To my eyes, this kind of deflection is a sign that he doesn't have an actual response to the accusation, and is a significant scumtell. However, as I said, there is one little piece of this jigsaw puzzle here that doesn't fit quite right.... how the fuck does the accusation being right not help town? The point of the game is to find scum and lynch them. If scum are found, and lynched, this helps town.
And other obvious lies. Do you honestly think I or anyone else is impressed with your "case" on me?It doesn't change my case in any way, there's still no scumhunting here.I'm hunting you, dumbass
Look, Lenglon, obviously you aren't familiar with my playstyle. I've had this same problem before with just about everyone else.I don't think you're failing (though I do think you're flailing). I think you aren't even trying. Failing would be if you try to find scum and either mis-identify town or come up with a giant load of null. You aren't failing, because you aren't trying in the first place. Stop making excuses, stop active-lurking, and instead get off your ass and participate.
I don't ask people dumb questions. Ever. It's a waste of time pretending to be generating activity. Unfortunately, most of the people who could usually vouch for this aren't playing, so go read some of my first few games or something.
I don't answer questions I think are a waste of time, either.
I don't respond to arguments I think are disingenuous or trivial.
I look for someone who looks like scum, and put my vote on scum. That's how I scumhunt. If you think I'm failing, find me someone who looks more like scum than you do... but I think you're just blowing smoke.
I can confirm from my readings that Max is usually this unhelpful regardless of alignment.Wait what? So he just afk's all D1 every game? ...
You aren't this stupid, so stop pretending that you can't read. I've explained this twice already, I have no need to bother humoring you a third time.Okay, let me be clearer. I think your argument is retarded and obviously wrong, so I'm not going to pay any more attention to it.
And other obvious lies. Do you honestly think I or anyone else is impressed with your "case" on me?Yes, I think most people can see what you're doing even without my pointing it out. Maybe I give them too much credit. Of course, I don't care about impressing you, as I don't expect you to vote for yourself.
Shakerag: can you verify that Max is always this worthless regardless of alignment?
Fair.Shakerag: can you verify that Max is always this worthless regardless of alignment?
Imma be honest with you; it's been so long since I played my last game I don't know if I could give a meta read on anyone anymore.
You aren't this stupid, so stop pretending that you can't read. I've explained this twice already, I have no need to bother humoring you a third time.Okay, let me be clearer. I think your argument is retarded and obviously wrong, so I'm not going to pay any more attention to it.
This is a beginner's mafia game. There is obviously a town-friendly purpose to pointing out patterns for beginners to notice them. You just flatly assert "there's no town-friendly purpose to it!" without any basis, why should I give that any value? If you can't see the town-friendly purpose, that's your problem.And other obvious lies. Do you honestly think I or anyone else is impressed with your "case" on me?Yes, I think most people can see what you're doing even without my pointing it out. Maybe I give them too much credit. Of course, I don't care about impressing you, as I don't expect you to vote for yourself.
To be sure, I don't know whether others will vote for you this turn, but I'm sure they'll all remember this later, when it counts.
You're being unhelpful, as usual.Really.
Murderize scum and be fabulous.
I don't think that Fallacy is scum, though. Unvote.
I actually finally have something I can do to be helpful on d1: Read Knightwing. And I did that. That's more helpful than anyone else has been so far.... Anyone could have done that?
I'm hunting you, dumbassWhy?
Fair.
FoU - What is the Maximum Spin normal meta?
Murderize scum and be fabulous.
I don't think that Fallacy is scum, though. Unvote.
Why don't you think I'm scum, Egan? As much as I enjoy your mafia persona, this response is a bit too casual and unjustified. I could be planning to stab you in the wing right this instant.
Unvote. Quick check shows, you, NJW, Tric, and me on Max, and that's one vote off from hammer. I'd rather not have someone accidentally execute Max within something like the first 24 hours of the day.
So you think Tric is acting scummy right now, since you trust them?
Also, what are your thoughts about Shakerag vs Egan?
Murderize scum and be fabulous.
I don't think that Fallacy is scum, though. Unvote.
Why don't you think I'm scum, Egan? As much as I enjoy your mafia persona, this response is a bit too casual and unjustified. I could be planning to stab you in the wing right this instant.
Perhaps i should say that I'm not sufficiently convinced that you're scum. I have two votes so I should be a little cautious with them, don't you think?
I do think there's some logic to the idea that there's scum between you and Shakerag (and me, from an outside perspective), as Max said. Though obviously he should have explained why first off and his reaction to being asked to explain why is strange. I know that I said that he's acting his usual self but it does seem a bit stronger than usual by my money.
Egan - Why are you making implied threats to FoU instead of answering his question?Unvote. Quick check shows, you, NJW, Tric, and me on Max, and that's one vote off from hammer. I'd rather not have someone accidentally execute Max within something like the first 24 hours of the day.
Means we're still in hammer range if I vote, right? Careful of that. If I were scum and Max weren't, this could be an awkward situation.
Also, Lenglon is acting kind of aggro.. Could be a town demeanor... but I feel like it's way too early to be acting this aggressive. On a D1 one, there is nothing to really go off of.Eh. Aggression and pursuit are nearly always better for the town than the mafia. Those methods generate more activity and more data to analyze. Even on day one.
Is that not an answer? I suspect Fal some from the way he jumped in between me and shakerag, but I'm not certain enough to put doublevotes on him.This is an answer, to my eyes your earlier response was not, but now that I've seen this one I do see how you did say the same thing in the earlier one, thank you for clarifying.
Though obviously he should have explained why first off and his reaction to being asked to explain why is strange.I did explain why, to Knightwing. I was more than happy to explain why. I was hoping to explain why! (Okay, I probably should've just explained why without needing to be asked, but, like I said at the time, I posted like that to gauge how people engaged with it.) My reaction was to being told, as a thought-free flat assertion, it was a scumtell by someone whom I thought would have understood my point.
I know that I said that he's acting his usual self but it does seem a bit stronger than usual by my money.... yeah. I do feel like I was really irritable this morning. I more or less understand why (external reasons probably not relevant to explain). I don't normally let things bleed out like that, but this was definitely bothering me more than it should've been. It's honestly annoying to me because I've been accused of overreacting as mafia before, so I feel like that's just going to feed people's assumptions, but it honestly really was just an unrelated bad mood... well, anyway.
If you are town? Tell me who's scum. Top three picks, actually. You can include me if you want, just have decent reasons for it.This question both A) stresses me out and B) separately makes me doubt you. I think you know very well that I hate being asked this, especially on d1. I don't trust you asking it. It's d1, I'm not good at d1, I'm never sure who to suspect until I see at least one flip or some kind of night result (and that wouldn't be much in this probably power-heavy setup anyway).
But I still FEEL SUSPICIOUS ABOUT him.((Her, by the way.))
NJW2000 and Lidku have not posted much. I think NJW has only posted once, and it feels like Lidku has done barely more than that. I don't trust this. Honestly, if I had to pick one OTP Scumteam out of everyone, I might say it's just the two of them riding it out and hoping to casually get me lynched in the shitfight.
I guess I should unvote.
NJW2000 and Lidku, what're you two up to?
Oh, Lidku just showed up, while I was writing, huh. Moving my vote to NJW2000 then. He still needs to DO MORE, though.
Egan: do you have any way we can confirm you as doing something other than mafiakilling and being mafia and stuff?It's a BYOR, I don't hold any answers if there's an inspection power which ignores autos which would spoof them or something. But my auto lies to inspects, survey, and tracks. If you have something which isn't those and indicates alignment, it'd work. If both me and the killer get surveyed, we'd both show up as having used mafiakill which shouldn't be possible, so you'd know there's some kind of unreliable inspection going on.
Don't necessarily say what it is, withholding information about your power is a good idea D1. A yes/no/maybe answer might be enough.
This is my second BYOR game and I think I just usually like to be passive in general on D1, then try to actively solve on D2 (like I did before). There is just never enough to go on in a D1 to make any substantive determination on who is Mafia, in general. The D1 vote, if it occurs, most likely just kills a town; then after that, the Mafia will be able to get another kill on N1.There's a good argument to be made for the existence of a kill-less Night 0 phase, just for this reason. That didn't happen this game, though, so we're left with a purely behavior-based start.
It's a BYOR, I don't hold any answers if there's an inspection power which ignores autos which would spoof them or something. But my auto lies to inspects, survey, and tracks. If you have something which isn't those and indicates alignment, it'd work. If both me and the killer get surveyed, we'd both show up as having used mafiakill which shouldn't be possible, so you'd know there's some kind of unreliable inspection going on.All my actions show up as mafiakill actions, because BYOR. Bolded so nobody misses it.
And I still flip as town. Not an ideal solution, but it would work.
Best solution is always to just figure it out from how I'm acting, of course.
[1] Fallacy, how have I not been engaged? I've been talking to people in this thread almost all the free time I have. I'm genuinely curious what specific things you think I'm not doing that I "would do as town". I know Lenglon thinks I should be asking people questions, but you know that's never my style. I prefer to sit and chat casually while looking to see whether anyone pegs my intuition, which is exactly what I've been doing.If you are town? Tell me who's scum. Top three picks, actually. You can include me if you want, just have decent reasons for it.[2] This question both A) stresses me out and B) separately makes me doubt you. I think you know very well that I hate being asked this, especially on d1. I don't trust you asking it. It's d1, I'm not good at d1, I'm never sure who to suspect until I see at least one flip or some kind of night result (and that wouldn't be much in this probably power-heavy setup anyway).
[3] I'm having this increasing nasty suspicion that this entire fight with Lenglon has been me tunnelling on someone for jumping to conclusions that I in turn assume to be in bad faith, just like you should remember happening in your MVMarathon when I managed to do it twice in one game, first on whoever roleblocked me (sorry I don't remember the name) and then again on Roden. But I still FEEL SUSPICIOUS ABOUT him. It doesn't just go away just because I start to think I might be in a blind alley. So... look, let me sort of half-answer your question, excluding Lenglon, and just tell you how I feel about the people.
[4]
NJW2000 and Lidku have not posted much. I think NJW has only posted once, and it feels like Lidku has done barely more than that. I don't trust this. Honestly, if I had to pick one OTP Scumteam out of everyone, I might say it's just the two of them riding it out and hoping to casually get me lynched in the shitfight.
You, Fallacy, give me a bad vibe. On the other hand, you're a weirdo. Maybe it's just that.
Shakerag is really null. I guess he seems to be behaving constructively? Like, if I were to give him the Knightwing Metric, I guess I'd say town, but he isn't Knightwing. The Knightwing Metric doesn't work on non-Knightwings, I saw that last time. :P
Speaking of which, Knightwing64 is town. TricMagic is... probably town. He looks like he's making weird decisions for vaguely scummy reasons, which is normal for town Tric. I don't think he's at the point of faking that successfully yet, but I don't know for sure. And finally, so far I think Egan_BW is town.
All my actions show up as mafiakill actions, because BYOR.
To everyone that isn't Egan. Do you think Egan and I are the scumteam?I am not interested in speculating about the scumteam as a group, and performing relational analysis, on day 1.
To everyone that isn't Egan. Do you think Egan and I are the scumteam?I am not interested in speculating about the scumteam as a group, and performing relational analysis, on day 1.
Individually you are each more townie than the players that have not posted enough content to form a read off of (Tric, Knightwing, NJW).
To everyone that isn't Egan. Do you think Egan and I are the scumteam?
[3] See, this sort of content is what I'd consider more active engagement. Even if you're not asking questions, it helps position you relative to the rest of the players, and establishes your views in a more concrete fashion. Making comparisons using available information. It seems like you're more really a part of the game. If you want to not ask questions, I can accept that, but you need more content like this to help make up the gap. IF you are town, then that's honest feedback to you.That's fair. I've said before I don't like giving reads on d1 because I don't like giving people I suspect a heads-up before they have a chance to do things to make me suspect them more, but I've been trying to get over that these last few games. I'm also realizing that the only people in this game with whom I've been playing much lately (not counting webadict who sadly cannot vouch for me) are Knightwing and TricMagic, so I can't rely on the "just like in that other game" shorthand that I... have a strong tendency to rely on and expect people to understand where I'm coming from. So that's a challenge.
[4] Reads lists are similarly useful.
Though I'm not sure how useful 'bad vibe' is. I can also accept gut feelings as data, so long as they're backed up with other connections. What makes me seem scummy?Well, concretely, what I can think of right now are the two things I mentioned: Interjecting yourself into the Shakerag/Egan fight, and putting me on the spot with a "PROVE YOU'RE TOWN, GIVE YOUR TOP THREE READS" that you even now admit you'd struggle with at the same time. But I guess you probably didn't mean it to be as confrontationally "answer me these questions three" as I interpreted it, based on what you've said here. I read it as more of a challenge than you seem to have meant it.
... you may have already pointed out something that backs this up, and I apologize if I missed that. From the rhetorician side of things, though, a quote of your earlier statements can be a good tool if you're building on it, not just reiterating on it.
All my actions show up as mafiakill actions, because BYOR. Bolded so nobody misses it.
Now I have to wonder if you'd be the kind of person to pull a gambit like that or if wubba is off his goddamn rocker...Oh that's easy.
Now I have to wonder if you'd be the kind of person to pull a gambit like that or if wubba is off his goddamn rocker...Oh that's easy.
Yes, but also yes.
NJW has posted recently. That just really leaves Tric and Knightwing.. but I personally think inactivity is a somewhat weak modem to go off of... They could be doing IRL things. Usually I believe it's more likely that the Mafia is always active in a thread, as a means to deflect suspicion that they COULD be Mafia.. An inverse of what you've posted.NJW literally has made one single post since game start. That is not enough content to form a read. I don't have any problems with that one post. It's a good post. But it's still a single, isolated, post. There is not enough content there to form a read, and you are deluding yourself if you think you can make a read from someone's first post of the game. (which is also why I am completely ignoring Max's claim that Knightwing is town.)
But at the same time... I am a really, really, really intuitionistic player and sometimes I don't have more than gut feelings and maybe a couple vague things to point to. I'm sorry, but you do have to accept that. All I can plead is that it seems to work okay, at least as well as everyone else does. This is honestly why I do let d1 slip by: it's definitely not my time to shine, and I kind of just expect/hope that people will give me enough credit to get through it so I can sit down and try actually finding scum d2 and on.Max - I am much the same actually. I often end up posting my read lists in pairs. I'll have an emotional read list, and a logical read list. And they will often conflict with each other. In point of fact, you'll usually find me getting the most involved with and questioning the hardest those people who I have a mismatched read about.
Knightwing64 - Please stop ignoring my questions.So you think Tric is acting scummy right now, since you trust them?Also, what are your thoughts about Shakerag vs Egan?
Yeah, I haven’t posted much, but there’s over two days left. I had a busy day.
Important question for fou FIRST then Egan: do your actions inspect as TARGETING the nightkill? Say I die but you target max, who do you show up as targeting?
Yeah, I haven’t posted much, but there’s over two days left. I had a busy day.whoopsie, missed that NJW had made a second post. No comment on this since it clearly has follow-up that hasn't played out yet.
Important question for fou FIRST then Egan: do your actions inspect as TARGETING the nightkill? Say I die but you target max, who do you show up as targeting?
In all seriousness...Now I have to wonder if you'd be the kind of person to pull a gambit like that or if wubba is off his goddamn rocker...Oh that's easy.
Yes, but also yes.
ಠ_ಠ
To be fair, that seems a little too batshit for even a beginner BYOR. Additionally sus because since that's miller-ish and you didn't claim it in your first post.Miller-ish? Sure. It's tricky because it's tied up in some other stuff about my role, and ultimately it's nowhere near as nasty as just plain alignment inspecting as mafia.
Now I have to wonder if you'd be the kind of person to pull a gambit like that or if wubba is off his goddamn rocker...
In all seriousness...
I know Fallacy is capable of pulling a gambit like that, because we've discussed just such gambits together in a mafia chat before. The latest KWN. We are definitely on the same page when it comes to bold gambits. I think he'd say the same of me.
Jim and Euche have apparently joined a spectator chat on us. Since they're in a chat together, they're informal scum and we should get 'em outta here.
But yes, I would pull a gambit like this if I was scum, and Egan would probably join me. Can't lie about that, we're exactly that kind of crazy, and this is WIFOM.
Regardless, I am town.
fuc uJim and Euche have apparently joined a spectator chat on us. Since they're in a chat together, they're informal scum and we should get 'em outta here.
Focus.
I find it strange that TricMagic has been so quiet as of late. In the last game we were in, he was very active in making D1 claims and was very responsive in general. Though I've often said that inactivity is a very lukewarm way of building evidence, at least the other two very inactive players as posted today (NJW and Knigtwing)... Just a smidgeon-holey thought, but he's just likely busy with IRL things atm.
fuc uJim and Euche have apparently joined a spectator chat on us. Since they're in a chat together, they're informal scum and we should get 'em outta here.
Focus.
I would also like to state, for the record, that Egan and I are not masons together.
fuc uJim and Euche have apparently joined a spectator chat on us. Since they're in a chat together, they're informal scum and we should get 'em outta here.
Focus.
You can figure that out yourself.fuc uJim and Euche have apparently joined a spectator chat on us. Since they're in a chat together, they're informal scum and we should get 'em outta here.
Focus.
Promise or a threat, sweetheart?
Yeah, I'd like to categorically agree that I find that really weird.I would also like to state, for the record, that Egan and I are not masons together.
FallacyofUrist that is a weird thing to suddenly throw out. Why would you say that now? What is your thought process that told you it was a good idea to say that?
The stupid reason is that I'm preventing my future self from trying to pull that later, because I know I'd be tempted to do so. Also to prevent Egan from doing the same.I would also like to state, for the record, that Egan and I are not masons together.
FallacyofUrist that is a weird thing to suddenly throw out. Why would you say that now? What is your thought process that told you it was a good idea to say that?
The stupid reason is that I'm preventing my future self from trying to pull that later, because I know I'd be tempted to do so. Also to prevent Egan from doing the same.I would also like to state, for the record, that Egan and I are not masons together.
FallacyofUrist that is a weird thing to suddenly throw out. Why would you say that now? What is your thought process that told you it was a good idea to say that?
The smarter reason is that I am explicitly stating that no, we are not coordinating. You may decide that I'm lying about that and I can't help it if you do so.
Maybe you'll execute us first just for the sheer WIFOM.
But it makes the game more interesting, so I'm going for it.
There's also another reason I've decided to claim after Egan, which I'm not sharing this Day. Suffice it to say that it creates an advantage of sorts, but only for me and maybe Egan, not for sure us both.
As for scum-hunting strat... Wait and see, and vote Shakerag for earlier posts.
It's said that when tric looks like scum he is town and vice versa, or that him not making sense is a towntell for him. But I also haven't really watched him and paid enough attention to really know that distinction.
It's said that when tric looks like scum he is town and vice versa, or that him not making sense is a towntell for him. But I also haven't really watched him and paid enough attention to really know that distinction.
I mentioned tracking powers before, they show as me targeting whoever died.
You never followed up on this; why?All my actions show up as mafiakill actions, because BYOR.
I've made a wonderful decision.
Ok, time to gather me thoughts.
Knightwing64 - looks new, but maybe an idiot. Leaning scum because of lack of engagement.
Which is to say that if two kills happen during the night, Egan's miller-weird-thing can tell us which was the mafia kill, assuming that Egan isn't scum. Which isn't a fair assumption to make with no backup.I mentioned tracking powers before, they show as me targeting whoever died.
Interesting. I just want to highlight this statement. I'm not sure how I feel about it alignment-wise, but I feel it's important to remember.
Okay, first of all 🖕I’m not a idiot.1: That has yet to be determined.
Secondly, I have been posting at a consistent rate. I’m juggling numerous other games and various RL things so forgive me if I can’t post every 5 minutes like you can.
3: Just a afterword, but how are you going to call me sus for “lack of engagement” but you gloss over the fact NJW has barely posted at all? Suspect.
3: Just a afterword, but how are you going to call me sus for “lack of engagement” but you gloss over the fact NJW has barely posted at all? Suspect.
Egan:
What happens if someone watches the player you actually targeted, when that player is not the one hit by the mafiakill?
Player A uses Watch, which lets them learn who targeted their target, on player B.
The mafia kill player C, and you, Egan, use your ability on player B.
Does your action show up on A's investigative results?
You never followed up on this; why?
Jim and Euche have apparently joined a spectator chat on us. Since they're in a chat together, they're informal scum and we should get 'em outta here.Egan: where did you get this information?
Lenglon: You asked the question, but what are your thoughts on "Shakerag vs Egan"? Also are you still comfortable with your earlier Max vote?To me your fight was mostly show and little substance. It boiled down to Egan making an extraordinary miller claim, and you doubting the veracity of said claim. It was very useful for me though because it was flashy and I could observe the reactions of those around you to it, and to see who got engaged in it and why. From my perspective, Egan looked slightly towny for the miller claim, but even more so scummy because of the extreme and extraordinary nature of that miller claim, Egan's reactions to being pressed were reasonable however, so overall Egan came out about null. You looked like annoyed town to me, pressing a problem you saw but not building towards a lynch case, and came out looking more towny for it. I felt no need to be involved, and didn't think either of you deserved my vote for it.
Meph's discord.Jim and Euche have apparently joined a spectator chat on us. Since they're in a chat together, they're informal scum and we should get 'em outta here.Egan: where did you get this information?
Knightwing, I do agree that the question was a stupid one, but I asked it anyway because you had made a self-contradictory claim. Please explain at length what you think of Tric, their meta, their behavior, and if they are scummy or not.Knightwing You have ignored this question, then deflected from answering it, and then ignored it once again. Answer the question.
Knightwing, I do agree that the question was a stupid one, but I asked it anyway because you had made a self-contradictory claim. Please explain at length what you think of Tric, their meta, their behavior, and if they are scummy or not.Knightwing You have ignored this question, then deflected from answering it, and then ignored it once again. Answer the question.
For me? My action would show up as targeting Max in that scenario, assuming I wasn't redirected or some other shenaniganery.
My actions show up as mafiakill actions, but their apparent targeting is not modified from what it actually is.
Ah in that case I'm like, omega miller. Inspects show me as mafia, surveys show my action as mafiakill, and tracking shows me as visiting whoever was killed.Shakerag - Please explain Miller Theory regarding D1 claims.
Oh I just realized I missed that. I stick by the old (relative to this subforum) rules that you always claim miller ASAP. To do otherwise is to invite doubt.
Failure to tell when someone is being facetious is a strong scumtell for me - especially if the player isn’t a weak newbie or too egoistic to read other player’s posts. You’re neither, and don’t come across as drunk here. I responded to a joke with a joke, and you decided to be serious about it. Explain.More people voting != stronger case. That just means you have more people voting on flimsy reasons which looks bandwagon-y. A stronger case is made by providing additional (and good) reasons to vote someone.NJW2000 - Why should or shouldn't I vote Shakerag after the incredible, absolutely amazing, case that FoU just made?It's a weak case, so I think more people should vote Shakerag, to make the case stronger.
Max is actually irritated with Lenglon, or appears to be. Unusual deviation from his standard tone… he likes explaining his D1 style, or comes across that way at least, in other games.I really was. It was unusual for me, yes. I did point that out in a later post too, so I want to be clear that I'm acknowledging it.
I agree with this interpretation, but doesn't it make more sense if Egan is the "suspicious one"? Fallacy is really only claiming... what's the word for someone who can find out what action you used? Let me check.For me? My action would show up as targeting Max in that scenario, assuming I wasn't redirected or some other shenaniganery.
My actions show up as mafiakill actions, but their apparent targeting is not modified from what it actually is.
Now this is WEIRD. Because the same does not seem to be true of Egan. See:Ah in that case I'm like, omega miller. Inspects show me as mafia, surveys show my action as mafiakill, and tracking shows me as visiting whoever was killed.Shakerag - Please explain Miller Theory regarding D1 claims.
Oh I just realized I missed that. I stick by the old (relative to this subforum) rules that you always claim miller ASAP. To do otherwise is to invite doubt.
So there are different Omega-millers in play?
Ho hum. I find that hard to believe. Also, have a look through Fal and EgAns early interactions. They’re just a tad weird. At the very least, I think FoU is lying here.
Anything to say for yourself, FallacyOfUrist?
Everyone: I'd like all anti-inspect claims out here on the table please. Miller claims, inspection block claims, whatever they may be, could anyone that has an anti-inspection mechanic of any kind (role, action, flavor, I do not care.) please speak up now so it won't be a viable claim for scum later. We've gone far enough into D1 for any gambits you wanted to play about how you reveal that stuff to have played out. Get them out here now please.Fine. I expect to be untargetable tonight. I was going to tell everyone before day end, so might as well do it now. I am sort of like a kind of commuter. I will not go into further detail until the future.
I keep asking the same question because you aren't giving a satisfactory answer, and still haven't. However, I don't think this is intentional on your part, which is why I'm not threatening to vote you over it or anything like that, and am instead repeating myself at you (remember that this is basically an RVS question, and that the main reason it's being pressed is your failure to give a satisfactory answer, not the question itself). The problem here is that "scummy" and "townie" are fairly vague terms at the end of the day, and the way you've been answering this question comes across as self-contradictory and meaningless. let me borrow an example of a satisfactory answer to this kind of question from myself of yesteryear:Knightwing, I do agree that the question was a stupid one, but I asked it anyway because you had made a self-contradictory claim. Please explain at length what you think of Tric, their meta, their behavior, and if they are scummy or not.Knightwing You have ignored this question, then deflected from answering it, and then ignored it once again. Answer the question.
:-\
I think Tric is town, they act scummy as town and they act like a town when scum. There is literally nothing else to say. I already told you what I thought about Tric and you keep repeating the same damn question over and over again.
Pozzai - my opinion of TBF's meta? well, first let me give you a heads up that I took something like a year and a half to 2 year break from mafia and only recently came back, so I might be out of tune with current metas on people that were newish back then - TBF, OSG, and TDS. also I myself am not the most experienced at mafia. I did my reading, and can do basic analysis and such decently well, so I might be projecting an 'old vet' attitude... but Im actually not, Ive been actually IN a low number of games, and this is only my 2nd BYOR.The important difference here between your current answer and my old one is specifics. I want you to list of which specific scummy behaviors you'd expect from town Tric and which ones you would not. If you honestly can't read Tric and to you they're a permanent null, then say so. If you think that scum-Tric gets energetic and engaged with the game while town-Tric gets bored and disengaged, say that. If you think Tric has certain patterns or strengths or weaknesses to their playstyle, then mention them. If you think certain scumtells should be ignored if Tric does them, say so. If you think certain scumtells should NOT be ignored, then say those too. Specifics. Details. That is what's important when explaining a self-contradictory statement like that. And you should expect to have to give that kind of more detailed explanation any time you make a self-contradictory statement.
Having said that, my opinion of TBF's meta is that hes shortsighted but energetic. Hes useful early on because his energy generates activity but the later in the game it gets the more he mostly generates white noise. His analysis is lackluster and he doesnt read into peoples posts deeply enough to make emotional reads either. He is pretty much impossible to tell alignment of because his town meta is nonfunctional as town, so hes on my standing list to just lynch on general principal if I dont have anyone better to lynch - hes a permanant nullread. He also has a tendency to bandwagon as both town and scum, and will, again as both, push weak cases with lots of vitriol, generally making him an easy lynch for the scumteam, so a number of vets around here treat pushing a case on him similar to pushing a case on an idle player - not a problem in itself but doesnt generate *real* activity and if done without anything else then it counts as active-lurking.
What do you think about Egans meta? Their behavior, and if they are scum or not. I legitimately don’t trust you anymore lmaoI haven't played mafia with Egan before, so my opinion of Egan's meta is going to be entirely based on their personality outside of mafia, which is not the best source of reads. What I am able to pull in from these outside sources is: Egan is comfortable with large mechanically complex systems, so I am expecting a strong nightgame from Egan. Egan has trouble taking a middle-ground approach to caution vs recklessness, tending to be cautious until some form of event horizon is reached, at which point they'll go all-in and throw self-preservation to the wind. Egan doesn't have super-resilient emotional defenses, and so I expect them to likely feel more heavily pressured than they actually are when a case is presented against them, and when pressured they tend to close themselves off, which means that while under threat they probably won't build good reads. Egan however is actually very insightful into other people's motivations and intent when calm, so I suspect that if they aren't pressed and threatened they'll have really good insight for us, which if it does not show up even while they're not pressured or threatened, I will consider mildly suspicious, but not super-suspicious because, again, I haven't seen Egan play mafia, and so they might have issues translating their talents elsewhere over to here.
So you think scum!Egan might claim to be a very unusual miller in a game where town!FoU is actually a very similar kind of miller, while unless Egan has an extraordinary day-cop as mafia, they have no way of knowing FoU had that role?I don't really agree with this characterization. I wouldn't even describe what Egan is claiming as "a very unusual miller" - he's just claiming to be in all ways indistinguishable from scum. I don't think it's implausible that a scum Egan might claim this, and then happen to be backed up by the existence of a real miller, by luck. I also wouldn't say that FoU is claiming to be a "very similar kind of miller". Any kind of miller claim would read as "very similar" to Egan's claim because Egan's claiming that everything would read scum for him. So to put it like this, your argument would apply exactly the same way even if Fallacy hypothetically claimed Regular Miller, or Tracking Miller. Furthermore, of all the possible fake miller claims, this one (Following Miller) would be a really weird choice! Followers are somewhat rare to begin with, in my experience, and this would only be workable as a fakeclaim if his action isn't confirmable in any other way - if he gets inspected or followed, or his target gets watched, we'd (barring other interference) know whether he lied. It's not something that I think even a Scum Fallacy, who is admittedly a weirdo, would jump to as the first choice.
That ascribes a level of luck indistinguishable from precognition to Egans play.
I don’t get it. How could you want Egan over FoU under these circumstances?
I need to see an explanation for this. I know from other games that a lot of your town D1 is about forming conditional judgements about alignment… this is not a vote I’d expect from you.
Failure to tell when someone is being facetious is a strong scumtell for me - especially if the player isn’t a weak newbie or too egoistic to read other player’s posts. You’re neither, and don’t come across as drunk here. I responded to a joke with a joke, and you decided to be serious about it. ExplainMore people voting != stronger case. That just means you have more people voting on flimsy reasons which looks bandwagon-y. A stronger case is made by providing additional (and good) reasons to vote someone.NJW2000 - Why should or shouldn't I vote Shakerag after the incredible, absolutely amazing, case that FoU just made?It's a weak case, so I think more people should vote Shakerag, to make the case stronger.
if Egan is fake claiming, FoU almost definitely is but not vice Versa.NJW: I firmly disagree with this. Please justify this assertion.
MaximumSpin: do you seriously believe there is anything like a reasonable chance of someone making a fakeclaim of miller + unusual extra action-related miller characteristics in a game in which such a role actually existed? Because that’s what you’re telling us.YES, when the fakeclaim is "everything that could possibly be millerized".
Because if Egan is fakeclaiming and FoU isn’t, Egan just claimed a highly unusual role, one I’ve never seen or even heard of, and something more similar than any other role I’ve seen just happened to exist in the game. It’s an astonishingly unlikely event. When there is a much more likely explanation involving FoU fakeclaiming or neither fakeclaiming, we are not entitled to accept the ridiculously unlikely explanation as plausible.if Egan is fake claiming, FoU almost definitely is but not vice Versa.NJW: I firmly disagree with this. Please justify this assertion.
Has anyone ever seen the “I appear to have done the mafia kill” role before? I think it’s a very nonstandard miller-like roleI'd like to add that Fallacy did not claim that he "appear[s] to have done the mafia kill". He claimed that his actions will appear to be kill actions, such as to a Follower. That's not really common, but then Followers aren't really common. I don't think it's in any way unreasonable as a kind of miller in a game where Followers exist (which they might here).
You misrepresent me here. I simply claim that the event of Egan guessing there were specialised millers for a D1 miller fake claim should be has such low enough epistemic probability that we ought to discount it, and consider the three other options above.
This is what actually happened:
Egan: "I look like scum in every possible way, fully exhausting millerspace."
Fallacy: "Interesting, I also look like scum, but only in one particular, fairly uncommon way."
You: "THIS IS TOO MUCH OF A COINCIDENCE TO BE TRUE."
*shrug* I thought you were being serious. Sue me for being autistic then.
It's a weak case, so I think more people should vote Shakerag, to make the case stronger.
I don't care if Egan claimed all of specialised-miller-space, they're rare enough we're entitled to rule out Egan making an improbably good guess that the game has specialised millers and going all-out with a D1 claim.I don't accept this. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_lie)
So to summarize the current discussion: everyone is trying to discern of Egan's legitimacy of being a Miller or not?Not quite, but that's a reasonable misunderstanding. If Egan were the one actually being scrutinized then Egan would be the one being questioned, this is more about NJW and FoU.
come to think of it, Lidku, I don't think anyone has really engaged with you today so far. How do you feel about that? Also, if you could get an investigate result on someone as a bonus action tonight, who would you pick? And if you had to take a vigi shot RIGHT NOW, who would you shoot with it?
My auto lists Inspection actions, Survey actions, and Track actions. I think that in this case Watching someone who is not me to see who targets them doesn't interact with my auto at all. So I would show up to A, having acted upon B.While I'm not sure if figuring out Egan's unique brand of shenanigans should be our highest priority, I do need to remind everyone that Egan has also claimed not having any targeted abilities. That seems relevant.
...Perhaps I should mention that I don't have any targeted abilities to test that with. Presumably if I get Surveyed while doing nothing I still show up as having done the mafiakill despite having done nothing.
Let me put it like this.Unfortunately roles are not random. Don't Outguess The Mod is a real factor. Basically... would webadict create a setup where both my claim and Egan's are true? Unfortunately, as much as this is something we can speculate on, it is pure and total WIFOM. So roles are not randomly created, but they are created by an inscrutable penguin.
Imagine that the same sequence of events happened, with Egan claiming the same role, but Fallacy claimed to be a normal alignment miller instead.
Egan's claim also covers being a normal alignment miller. Would you make this same argument in that case?
Fallacy's role cannot possibly change the probability of Egan's exact same claim being true.
So there are different Omega-millers in play?It's already been stated, but I'm nowhere near an Omega-miller. My actions appear to be mafiakills, and that's it. There's no track shenanigans, no watch shenanigans, no alignment warping shenanigans. It's worth reiterating just once.
Ho hum. I find that hard to believe. Also, have a look through Fal and EgAns early interactions. They’re just a tad weird. At the very least, I think FoU is lying here.
Anything to say for yourself, FallacyOfUrist?
Max is actually irritated with Lenglon, or appears to be. Unusual deviation from his standard tone… he likes explaining his D1 style, or comes across that way at least, in other games.I really was. It was unusual for me, yes. I did point that out in a later post too, so I want to be clear that I'm acknowledging it.
[1] My temper was short yesterday morning. I'd been sick, and on top of that my room was really hot, and it just kind of made me more irritable than usual. Later in the day I put up a passive cooler and fan and then almost immediately felt normal again. I really don't like when my mood is that changeable, I usually try to keep things from leaking into my behavior like that, but I guess it was just a bad day for me. :-\
Anyway. It's not really important anymore, but I felt like I should explain.
Oh, almost missed this.Everyone: I'd like all anti-inspect claims out here on the table please. Miller claims, inspection block claims, whatever they may be, could anyone that has an anti-inspection mechanic of any kind (role, action, flavor, I do not care.) please speak up now so it won't be a viable claim for scum later. We've gone far enough into D1 for any gambits you wanted to play about how you reveal that stuff to have played out. Get them out here now please.[2] Fine. I expect to be untargetable tonight. I was going to tell everyone before day end, so might as well do it now. I am sort of like a kind of commuter. I will not go into further detail until the future.
I'm going to assume the autism thing is a joke.
I feel like Egan’s claim is kinda weird, but I think it could be true. Or it could be a incredibly daring attempt to appear so obviously scummy so that you aren’t seen as scummyfor the love of.
I see a loooot of hostility right now. Let's all take 2 chill pills and a deep breath.
You absolute muppet.
you brainless muppet?...what?
I like your answer about the investigate question, thank you, but you didn't actually answer the other two. I can understand that you might have not realized I did actually want you to say what your thoughts were about having not had anyone engage with you up to that point, but I am actually quite curious what your thoughts are about that.come to think of it, Lidku, I don't think anyone has really engaged with you today so far. How do you feel about that? Also, if you could get an investigate result on someone as a bonus action tonight, who would you pick? And if you had to take a vigi shot RIGHT NOW, who would you shoot with it?
For an investigation action, I would choose between either Egan, TricMagic, and admittedly... you.
You, because I feel like you're being a tad-bit aggressive for D1. Almost like you're trying hard to be considered Town with your constant activity and trying to grasp at things to nail who you suspect as Mafia.. an attempt to detract suspicion from yourself, perhaps?
TricMagic because he has been silent lately and he is usually more active than this. Though again, like I've broached before, it all could be IRL activities consuming up his time.
Egan, as a means to really discern of what they're saying about their "Miller" ability being true. But apparently the whole point of a "Miller" automatically typecasts the user as Mafia, no matter what? Then it becomes extremely hard to gauge whether or not Egan TRULY is either Mafia and Town (which is, I believe, is what everyone has been arguing these past pages.. I just realized we're still on D1, but at least somewhat half-up to the page number of the previous BYOR game :o).
Now, as for what I would do if I had a vigilante ability: I would save it for until I at least highly suspect someone. Doing the wrong the kill + a lynch vote killing a Town and not a Mafia member + the decided Mafia kill would devastate Town, bringing us way closer to a loss in one Day/Night. If I had such an ability, I would never disclose it and save it for at least N2 or N3 (if I was still alive, that is) for someone I highly suspected.
Then tone it down to extremely nice, deary. :)I see a loooot of hostility right now. Let's all take 2 chill pills and a deep breath.
Honey, this is not me being hostile. I'm not posting in all caps yet.
Then tone it down to extremely nice, deary. :)I see a loooot of hostility right now. Let's all take 2 chill pills and a deep breath.
Honey, this is not me being hostile. I'm not posting in all caps yet.
<.<You absolute muppet.you brainless muppet?...what?
I guess I'm just going to assume that Lenglon just read Shakerag saying that and therefore had the word in mind, because otherwise that's weird as hell.
I see a loooot of hostility right now. Let's all take 2 chill pills and a deep breath.apologies.
You absolute muppet.you brainless muppet?...what?
I guess I'm just going to assume that Lenglon just read Shakerag saying that and therefore had the word in mind, because otherwise that's weird as hell.
I feel like Egan’s claim is kinda weird, but I think it could be true. Or it could be a incredibly daring attempt to appear so obviously scummy so that you aren’t seen as scummyfor the love of.
Knightwing: Why do you insist on making me have to repeat myself over and and over over before you will actually answer the world's most basic questions you brainless muppet? Do you not have any follow-up to what you asked me in your last post? Do you have some kind of reading deficiency? Is the only reason you won't answer the world's most basic questions because you haven't been voted for it yet? Really? Got it Knightwing you have successfully frustrated me enough to get voted out of simple irritation at your flat refusal to have anything to do with actually progressing the game. Fix your shit you fucking dumbass.
On none, because I am not. The post before yours makes this clear Egan is only telling the truth in two of three plausible scenarios - and I don't necessarily think they're all equally likely. Like MaximumSpin, you misrepresented me. Kindly do not.I don't care if Egan claimed all of specialised-miller-space, they're rare enough we're entitled to rule out Egan making an improbably good guess that the game has specialised millers and going all-out with a D1 claim.I don't accept this. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_lie)
and I'm not convinced that you accept it either.
NJW: On what basis are you assuming Egan's extraordinary claim's extraordinary nature implies the truth of said extraordinary claim?
FallacyofUrist: Why are you cursed to always be scum in webadict games? For that matter, why am I?This is absolutely something ER would post if the two of you were both scum, it's exactly the kind of wild joke they're into.
Dearest scumbuddy, don't call me out like that! We're supposed to be undercover -Tone seems off. Three different jokes suggest nervousness.
Which is to say that I am not always scum, because I am definitely totally a loyal Town scum hunter this time around.
And I bet you are too.
👁👄👁Did you honestly think that ignoring the same ONE (and only one) question I've asked you over the course of the entire game six (now seven) times in a row wasn't going to get you voted?
Frankly, I’m quite irritated right now. I have been nothing but nice and cordial to you but you decide to insult me because I don’t want to answer all 50 of your questions? Look, you post like once every ten mins, I don’t read all of your posts.
Just….
Ugh.
That's literally the best thing you thought of posting right now? Max, webadict has requested that I tone it down but I -really- want to hurt your feelings presently.I think it's worth speculating about muppet-based post restrictions.
👁👄👁Did you honestly think that ignoring the same ONE (and only one) question I've asked you over the course of the entire game six (now seven) times in a row wasn't going to get you voted?
Frankly, I’m quite irritated right now. I have been nothing but nice and cordial to you but you decide to insult me because I don’t want to answer all 50 of your questions? Look, you post like once every ten mins, I don’t read all of your posts.
Just….
Ugh.
That's literally the best thing you thought of posting right now? Max, webadict has requested that I tone it down but I -really- want to hurt your feelings presently.I think it's worth speculating about muppet-based post restrictions.
NJW: There are four possibilities, not three:On none, because I am not. The post before yours makes this clear Egan is only telling the truth in two of three plausible scenarios - and I don't necessarily think they're all equally likely. Like MaximumSpin, you misrepresented me. Kindly do not.I don't care if Egan claimed all of specialised-miller-space, they're rare enough we're entitled to rule out Egan making an improbably good guess that the game has specialised millers and going all-out with a D1 claim.I don't accept this. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_lie)
and I'm not convinced that you accept it either.
NJW: On what basis are you assuming Egan's extraordinary claim's extraordinary nature implies the truth of said extraordinary claim?
I like your answer about the investigate question, thank you, but you didn't actually answer the other two. I can understand that you might have not realized I did actually want you to say what your thoughts were about having not had anyone engage with you up to that point, but I am actually quite curious what your thoughts are about that.
also, I put the RIGHT NOW in all caps about the vigi shot because I was already assuming that you'd give the answer you just gave if I didn't. I want to know who you would shoot RIGHT NOW if you were FORCED to take the shot RIGHT NOW.
There are no post restrictions in this game.Oh, good.
Why is nobody engaging me?I know you were repeating the question, not actually asking this, but, since you asked, what do you think of TricMagic's meta in this game so far?
Knightwing - when did I ask you anything about Egan? (hint: I didn't) Please actually read this post addressed to you. (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=180072.msg8389552#msg8389552)👁👄👁Did you honestly think that ignoring the same ONE (and only one) question I've asked you over the course of the entire game six (now seven) times in a row wasn't going to get you voted?
Frankly, I’m quite irritated right now. I have been nothing but nice and cordial to you but you decide to insult me because I don’t want to answer all 50 of your questions? Look, you post like once every ten mins, I don’t read all of your posts.
Just….
Ugh.
Okay. *breathes in
I have answered your self explanatory, dumbass question multiple times. I am not a expert mafia player, I don’t know Egan’s “meta” or their tells. Now, knowing that, can you please shut up? I’m actually begging you right now.
Lenglon: I mean, you seem to have words wrong there... I'll look through any edited version later, but sleeping now.Yeah, i accidently swapped NJW and FoU in the conclusion at one spot, here's the fixed version:
Knightwing - when did I ask you anything about Egan? (hint: I didn't) Please actually read this post addressed to you. (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=180072.msg8389552#msg8389552)👁👄👁Did you honestly think that ignoring the same ONE (and only one) question I've asked you over the course of the entire game six (now seven) times in a row wasn't going to get you voted?
Frankly, I’m quite irritated right now. I have been nothing but nice and cordial to you but you decide to insult me because I don’t want to answer all 50 of your questions? Look, you post like once every ten mins, I don’t read all of your posts.
Just….
Ugh.
Okay. *breathes in
I have answered your self explanatory, dumbass question multiple times. I am not a expert mafia player, I don’t know Egan’s “meta” or their tells. Now, knowing that, can you please shut up? I’m actually begging you right now.
I'm going to blatantly rolefish here and ask Egan if there's any way they can prove they had an effect on the Night that wasn't the mafiakill during a Night when the mafiakill occurs? Because that's probably the key to unraveling this mystery.
Okay, it was Tric then. I already told you what my answer was and why, I’m not dealing with you anymore.got it.
Why is nobody engaging me?I know you were repeating the question, not actually asking this, but, since you asked, what do you think of TricMagic's meta in this game so far?
This is very true, but I would prefer to lynch the active-lurker Knightwing over the passive-lurker Tricmagic, on the off-chance that Tric has a valid reason. After all, even if Tric doesn't come back, it's not like Knightwing is contributing any more than Tric is, and if Tric does come back we'll have more useful participation the moment they make a single post. Also, frankly, if Tric continues to be unable to post or act, they could end up force-replaced or modkilled, but Knightwing's active lurking does prevent that possible solution to his case.Why is nobody engaging me?I know you were repeating the question, not actually asking this, but, since you asked, what do you think of TricMagic's meta in this game so far?
TricMagic has been heavily silent... I've often put up some rationales that he maybe doing IRL things, but even with that as a factor, he should at least check in. If he is Mafia, then it wouldn't be tactically sound to be this quiet, as suspicions will be casted on you eventually for being so inactive. TricMagic usually is very talkative and a non-lurker.
I can't really tell what TricMagic is doing at all, but it's a SMIDGE (emphasis on smidge) suspect.
Okay, it was Tric then. I already told you what my answer was and why, I’m not dealing with you anymore.got it.
switching from pressure vote to policy lynch vote, In my opinion Knightwing should die, not only for his lurking behavior as documented kindly by FoU here (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=180072.msg8389427#msg8389427) but also for his flat refusal to engage with or read the posts of any of the game's participants. Even if he's town, he's not going to have any insights, present any cases, answer any questions, or generally do anything more than waste our space and time. If he doesn't want to play, we should oblige him and remove him from play.
No Lynch
In the words of yourself,
I think you are a fucking muppet.
No Lynch
AB-SO-LUTELY-FUCKING-NOT
D1 no lynch is always always always the worst thing you can do. I'd vote you twice if I could.
Knightwing (1x vote if that's allowed please?) and Lidku: It appears that you haven't made any votes yet this day, according to Mamobo at least. Is there a reason for this? I believe it's a good idea to use votes as pressure.
Knightwing (1x vote if that's allowed please?) and Lidku: It appears that you haven't made any votes yet this day, according to Mamobo at least. Is there a reason for this? I believe it's a good idea to use votes as pressure.
It's that I don't find anyone particularly suspicions at the moment. There is really no good option, but if I'm pressured to vote for someone, I'd guess it'd have to be between Lenglon and yourself. Lenglon because they're aggression is too high, and you, because I just found your claimed Miller ability too suspicious.. just chalk it up to a "monke brain" instinct.
Do you think this is too aggressive to be town for Lenglon? She's exerting even pressure and not focusing on any one person to the exclusion on others. If that's scum behavior, it's bold and well-measured scum. This reads to me just like an experienced player getting back into town mode like riding a bike.
It's that I don't find anyone particularly suspicions at the moment. There is really no good option, but if I'm pressured to vote for someone, I'd guess it'd have to be between Lenglon and yourself. Lenglon because they're aggression is too high, and you, because I just found your claimed Miller ability too suspicious.. just chalk it up to a "monke brain" instinct.
This is exactly why I believed that being so aggressive on D1 is not optimal. It just stokes up beginning tension when there is nothing truly to go off of yet.
Kindly fuck off. Okay, scratch the kindly, just fuck off.Oooh. Are you buckling under the pressure with an OMGUS? I still think you're pretty new so that might be a visceral response. But I think you're leaning more scum to me now.
Lenglon
Anyway, as self-appointed god of Knightwing's meta, I do want to reiterate that Knightwing looks town. Getting mad at him isn't worth wasting the lynch.There have people in this game with little confidence in your D1 play. Why are you confident that Knightwing64 looks town?
Has Knightwing done anything particularly bad, other than glossing over your queries to them? How much support would making Knightwing the policy-vote even be?The important thing about it is that Knightwing is actively and intentionally refusing to participate in the scumhunting process. In such a case where a player is going out of their way to make regular posts but never have any input about the game (https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Active_Lurking) then it's not a case like Tric's, where they're busy, but a case of scum hiding by not putting themselves out there to have their alignment and intentions determined. If we for the moment assume that Tric's lurking behavior is simply a act to hide being scum, then they're risking a modkill or force-replace for very little benefit, since they do have a spotlight on themselves for exactly this behavior. Knightwing's behavior does not risk this, and unlike Tric's, is unlike to improve when he gets less busy, since being busy isn't the thing keeping him from posting actual content, only his decision to refuse to do so is.
Well, that’s just untrue. You are the only person to directly ask me a question, I answered and have stated what I thought on my multiple occasions. It’s Day fucking 1. Forgive me for not having enough information for a stunning discovery.Knightwing - If I'm the only person to have asked you a question, then you have the time to actually answer it don't you? instead of either flat ignoring or deflecting like you have been doing? I'm not even asking you for a reads list, I'm asking you for a single meta read on a player you have played with before. This should be so easy to answer it's pathetic. And yet you won't do it. Not can't, wont. You have, over the entire day, been asked, in total, from everyone, ONE question. But apparently that's too hard for you. I'm not willing to accept that, and neither should anyone else be.
Kindly fuck off. Okay, scratch the kindly, just fuck off.
Lenglon
Also, all "pressure voting" does is input stabs in the dark and just make Town jumpy against one another. I don't really see the effectiveness of it, considering how little D1 anyone can possibly go off of.
You have, over the entire day, been asked, in total, from everyone, ONE question.
I feel like Egan’s claim is kinda weird, but I think it could be true. Or it could be a incredibly daring attempt to appear so obviously scummy so that you aren’t seen as scummyfor the love of.
Knightwing: Why do you insist on making me have to repeat myself over and and over over before you will actually answer the world's most basic questions you brainless muppet? Do you not have any follow-up to what you asked me in your last post? Do you have some kind of reading deficiency? Is the only reason you won't answer the world's most basic questions because you haven't been voted for it yet? Really? Got it Knightwing you have successfully frustrated me enough to get voted out of simple irritation at your flat refusal to have anything to do with actually progressing the game. Fix your shit you fucking dumbass.
Would you answer mine?
I’m not annoyed at Leng because of OMGUS, but because they are such a fucking asshole.I feel like Egan’s claim is kinda weird, but I think it could be true. Or it could be a incredibly daring attempt to appear so obviously scummy so that you aren’t seen as scummyfor the love of.
Knightwing: Why do you insist on making me have to repeat myself over and and over over before you will actually answer the world's most basic questions you brainless muppet? Do you not have any follow-up to what you asked me in your last post? Do you have some kind of reading deficiency? Is the only reason you won't answer the world's most basic questions because you haven't been voted for it yet? Really? Got it Knightwing you have successfully frustrated me enough to get voted out of simple irritation at your flat refusal to have anything to do with actually progressing the game. Fix your shit you fucking dumbass.
Apparently, I am a brainless dumbass muppet with a reading deficiency who needs to fix my shit because I don’t want to answer the same damn question 10 times.
I’m sorry I have nothing to add, I don’t have much to go on other then the fact I dislike you.
Maximum Spin:My Town Knightwing Radar is extremely effective, as webadict himself learned. Scum Knightwing is never this confident and direct; he tends to cover weakness with jokey disengagement. Like NJW accused Fallacy of doing before. I realize it's hard to take my word for it, but I really don't think he's learned to fake his town persona this well yet.Anyway, as self-appointed god of Knightwing's meta, I do want to reiterate that Knightwing looks town. Getting mad at him isn't worth wasting the lynch.There have people in this game with little confidence in your D1 play. Why are you confident that Knightwing64 looks town?
Lenglon I'm pretty sure, as far as I know, Knightwing64 is fairly new to this subforum. I think you might be drilling a touch too hard. More carrot and less whip, perhaps?I suppose that's fair. I did attempt to give him a walkthrough of how to answer the question effectively (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=180072.msg8389552#msg8389552), and his refusal to even make an attempt even after I put in the effort to filter through several old games to find as close of a match to his own situation as possible so that he'd have a good example, write two paragraphs to explain exactly what's going on and give him a guide on how to do it, and even write a second example of how to do things in the same post without directly calling attention to it so try to help protect his pride is what triggered me to get so aggressive against him. To my eyes, he lost the benefit of the doubt that he maybe just didn't know how to respond to this kind of thing, and so it's now a simple and direct active refusal, which is why the policy-lynch vote. I am fully prepared to retract my vote if he changes his tune.
Would you answer mine?
Yes, what’s your question?
Well, I haven't had much actual activity for the past IRL day or two, just answering questions I see. Anyone pick up on that? Just been feeling low energy and it's difficult for me to find the thread in this much activity without anything actually happening yet.
Knightwing (1x vote if that's allowed please?) and Lidku: It appears that you haven't made any votes yet this day, according to Mamobo at least. Is there a reason for this? I believe it's a good idea to use votes as pressure.
I feel like I should argue that Egan scum + FOU town should be discounted somehow, but maybe that's just because I already know my alignment. Omega Miller is a kinda extraordinary claim, I'm not sure if I could have thought of it without at least scumbuddy help it requires at least going through Wuba's OP carefully and checking what kinds of information powers exist and I'm not that committed to this game.
I'd feel a little suspicious of FOU for maybe copying the tracker part of my power. Honestly, if he is scum I don't feel like getting him outta here immediately anyways, let a fellow cursed player have a little fun.
reads: somewhat spooked by Max, Fal, Knight and Lidku. Just feels, you know. Activity is a bit too high for me to really remember everything which has happened so I'm not sure if I can bring up a more intelligent analysis right now. Have my monke feels instead.
I'm going to vote TricMagic for now, but I'm open to alternatives. Is anyone left not voting?Lidku appears to be making a policy of not voting D1. Apply newbie slack as you see fit, but I personally don't see it as being your style.
Lenglon I'm pretty sure, as far as I know, Knightwing64 is fairly new to this subforum. I think you might be drilling a touch too hard. More carrot and less whip, perhaps?I suppose that's fair. I did attempt to give him a walkthrough of how to answer the question effectively (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=180072.msg8389552#msg8389552), and his refusal to even make an attempt even after I put in the effort to filter through several old games to find as close of a match to his own situation as possible so that he'd have a good example, write two paragraphs to explain exactly what's going on and give him a guide on how to do it, and even write a second example of how to do things in the same post without directly calling attention to it so try to help protect his pride is what triggered me to get so aggressive against him. To my eyes, he lost the benefit of the doubt that he maybe just didn't know how to respond to this kind of thing, and so it's now a simple and direct active refusal, which is why the policy-lynch vote. I am fully prepared to retract my vote if he changes his tune.
From experience, scum absolutely loves to lynch (or NK) active players because active players sniff out scum. Are you nervous that Lenglon is so aggresive? If you were town you'd appreciate her levels of activity.
And if everyone is passive on D1 we have nothing to go on. I'm not saying you're scum, but you might not have the right attitude. I will be watching you in the future.
Lenglon I'm pretty sure, as far as I know, Knightwing64 is fairly new to this subforum. I think you might be drilling a touch too hard. More carrot and less whip, perhaps?I suppose that's fair. I did attempt to give him a walkthrough of how to answer the question effectively (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=180072.msg8389552#msg8389552), and his refusal to even make an attempt even after I put in the effort to filter through several old games to find as close of a match to his own situation as possible so that he'd have a good example, write two paragraphs to explain exactly what's going on and give him a guide on how to do it, and even write a second example of how to do things in the same post without directly calling attention to it so try to help protect his pride is what triggered me to get so aggressive against him. To my eyes, he lost the benefit of the doubt that he maybe just didn't know how to respond to this kind of thing, and so it's now a simple and direct active refusal, which is why the policy-lynch vote. I am fully prepared to retract my vote if he changes his tune.
in the last BYOR game doing that is what almost led to a Town victory; the Town in that game only lost when I fell for the manipulations of Jim Groovester and believed that mechanically solving was useless.. when the whole time he was deceiving me otherwise.
I just consider mechanically solving and figuring out who did what on D2 and building off of that to be the most effective.
this definitely happened. Jim was oozing scum from every pore, but you inspected him and decided he must have been the real hero all along.in the last BYOR game doing that is what almost led to a Town victory; the Town in that game only lost when I fell for the manipulations of Jim Groovester and believed that mechanically solving was useless.. when the whole time he was deceiving me otherwise.
I just consider mechanically solving and figuring out who did what on D2 and building off of that to be the most effective.
As I recall the opposite happened, you suspected Jim based on your intuition and his behavior, but were fooled by Jim being a Godfather who inspects as town, and he used that to gaslight you. You should have paid attention to your gut, rather than trusting the mechanics.
Also, Egan… buddy, I did vote. The vote count is literally right below your post. Come on.
Quote from: ShakeragFrom experience, scum absolutely loves to lynch (or NK) active players because active players sniff out scum. Are you nervous that Lenglon is so aggresive? If you were town you'd appreciate her levels of activity.
It just seems to me it's just breaking Town cohesion and trust. I'm just coming from a place of wanting the rising vitriol to just simmer down a bit. And being active and aggressive are two things, different things at that. Activity is a bonus for a Town overall, but as I broached before, wanton aggressive.. especially on D1.. is just making things messy right now. I just feel like they're is a lot of potential Town infighting going on at the moment. If I were the Mafia and Lenglon truly is Town, I'd actually dine just to leave them alive JUST for their aggression alone.
I'm not 100% comfortable with a Knightwing64 lynch, but that's mostly because they're new and, additionally, from a meta perspective I'd like them to play for longer.
Egan_BW: Would you summarize what is making you vote Knightwing64?
Knightwing (1x vote if that's allowed please?) and Lidku: It appears that you haven't made any votes yet this day, according to Mamobo at least. Is there a reason for this? I believe it's a good idea to use votes as pressure.
I understand, but again, beginner's game. No need to go full super sayan here.True, and I should have borne that in mind and not used so much vitriol. That was unnecessary to make my point.
in the last BYOR game doing that is what almost led to a Town victory; the Town in that game only lost when I fell for the manipulations of Jim Groovester and believed that mechanically solving was useless.. when the whole time he was deceiving me otherwise.
I just consider mechanically solving and figuring out who did what on D2 and building off of that to be the most effective.
As I recall the opposite happened, you suspected Jim based on your intuition and his behavior, but were fooled by Jim being a Godfather who inspects as town, and he used that to gaslight you. You should have paid attention to your gut, rather than trusting the mechanics.
Also, all "pressure voting" does is input stabs in the dark and just make Town jumpy against one another. I don't really see the effectiveness of it, considering how little D1 anyone can possibly go off of.
I normally wait to vote till there is somewhat of a consensus or I strongly suspect someone.Ok. Why?
You can see this in all of my other games.
Webadict: Since we don't have "official" IC roles, if I'm dead in game can I no longer post neutral advice?I see no problem in any players offering advice while dead, so long as all advice is completely neutral. I also have no problems with other forumgoers posting advice for players as well.
I normally wait to vote till there is somewhat of a consensus or I strongly suspect someone.
You can see this in all of my other games.
I normally wait to vote till there is somewhat of a consensus or I strongly suspect someone.Ok. Why?
You can see this in all of my other games.
Webadict: Since we don't have "official" IC roles, if I'm dead in game can I no longer post neutral advice?I see no problem in any players offering advice while dead, so long as all advice is completely neutral. I also have no problems with other forumgoers posting advice for players as well.
I don't know is a perfectly valid response. If you don't know why you do things then you don't, and there's nothing more to say on the subject.I normally wait to vote till there is somewhat of a consensus or I strongly suspect someone.Ok. Why?
You can see this in all of my other games.
Dunno. It’s just something I’ve always done.
I normally wait to vote till there is somewhat of a consensus or I strongly suspect someone.I'll take this as a satisfactory answer. Unvote.
You can see this in all of my other games.
Anyways, since I'm being pressured to vote, I'll put one on FallacyofUrist. I just find him kinda shady, but nothing truly strong..This feels sketchy. Is that all you can do? You were pretty strongly against Lenglon a minute ago.
What is the vote count now?Tied between Tric and Fal with 2 votes, it appears. Knightwing is back down to 0 votes.
TricMagic - I strongly prefer lynching an idle player over an active one, and don't like the tie. My vote could easilly shift off of here and I intend to unvote if Tric gets another because I don't want Tric at -1 Hammer.What is the vote count now?Tied between Tric and Fal with 2 votes, it appears. Knightwing is back down to 0 votes.
I remember doing this in that last BYOR, but I don't remember if it was you or Oliver...whatever the name was. Although that ended up being on the wrong person. Try not to do that....It turns out I just offered to do it, but you never took me up on the offer. I remember doing that with SOMEBODY in SOME recent game, at least.
To be fair, to talk about meta again, I don't think you usually get a -strong- feeling on D1 as to who to lynch. If you do, either scum really fucked up, or you're likely voting a newbie.That's fair. It's not the "I don't have a strong opinion" part I object to, it's the "well I GUESS I'll vote him if I HAVE to" feel.
D1 votes are generally best to analyze on D2/D3 after we've had a couple of roleflips.
Another note: I fixed the vote count so that No One, Not Voting, and the Hammer count properly factor in vote weight. Sorry about that!Ah! Makes me less scared of accidentally hammering with my doublevotes, thanks~
TricMagic - I strongly prefer lynching an idle player over an active one, and don't like the tie. My vote could easilly shift off of here and I intend to unvote if Tric gets another because I don't want Tric at -1 Hammer.What is the vote count now?Tied between Tric and Fal with 2 votes, it appears. Knightwing is back down to 0 votes.
6 to Hammer. Day ends on July 13, 2022 at 20:00 CDT (22 hours and 17 minutes remaining.)
5 to Hammer. Day ends on July 13, 2022 at 20:00 CDT (22 hours and 47 minutes remaining.)[/font]Web: Is this an error?
Anyways, since I'm being pressured to vote, I'll put one on FallacyofUrist. I just find him kinda shady, but nothing truly strong..This feels sketchy. Is that all you can do? You were pretty strongly against Lenglon a minute ago.
How about I make a deal with you. Tell me which player you really most want to get lynched and why, and if I can agree with you, I'll put my vote in the same place. You'll be a double-voter just like Egan! I remember doing this in that last BYOR, but I don't remember if it was you or Oliver...whatever the name was. Although that ended up being on the wrong person. Try not to do that.
wait a sec,
6 to Hammer. Day ends on July 13, 2022 at 20:00 CDT (22 hours and 17 minutes remaining.)5 to Hammer. Day ends on July 13, 2022 at 20:00 CDT (22 hours and 47 minutes remaining.)[/font]Web: Is this an error?
Hmm. An error or someone used a day ability? We'll find out.I think that's just what he meant by
Another note: I fixed the vote count so that No One, Not Voting, and the Hammer count properly factor in vote weight. Sorry about that!Counting Egan as 2, there would be 10 votes outstanding, so one more than one half is 6. But previously, it didn't factor that in properly, and just counted number of players, giving 5.
Hmm. An error or someone used a day ability? We'll find out.
The ending of BYOR 0 (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=164260.1350) makes me doubt that hammer is calculated that way.wait a sec,
6 to Hammer. Day ends on July 13, 2022 at 20:00 CDT (22 hours and 17 minutes remaining.)5 to Hammer. Day ends on July 13, 2022 at 20:00 CDT (22 hours and 47 minutes remaining.)[/font]Web: Is this an error?Hmm. An error or someone used a day ability? We'll find out.I think that's just what he meant byAnother note: I fixed the vote count so that No One, Not Voting, and the Hammer count properly factor in vote weight. Sorry about that!Counting Egan as 2, there would be 10 votes outstanding, so one more than one half is 6. But previously, it didn't factor that in properly, and just counted number of players, giving 5.
The ending of BYOR 0 (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=164260.1350) makes me doubt that hammer is calculated that way.wait a sec,
6 to Hammer. Day ends on July 13, 2022 at 20:00 CDT (22 hours and 17 minutes remaining.)5 to Hammer. Day ends on July 13, 2022 at 20:00 CDT (22 hours and 47 minutes remaining.)[/font]Web: Is this an error?Hmm. An error or someone used a day ability? We'll find out.I think that's just what he meant byAnother note: I fixed the vote count so that No One, Not Voting, and the Hammer count properly factor in vote weight. Sorry about that!Counting Egan as 2, there would be 10 votes outstanding, so one more than one half is 6. But previously, it didn't factor that in properly, and just counted number of players, giving 5.
[[Thanks to Webadict's invitation, I can give neutral advice.
1) At no point did the mod designate anyone an IC, Experienced Player, or anything else that would indicate who is or who is not qualified to give advice.
In fact, I would not classify myself an Experienced Player, but Webadict's did not limit whom could give neutral advice.
SO... you ALL can give advice! It might even help in convincing others that You Are Town, and who doesn't want that? ;D
2) Advice is hard to read if not formatted properly. Use numbering, paragraphs, and labels to break up your walls of text. You can even differentiate different things, like
Rational for Vote Advice and @Player: Answer this Question
3) Keep discussion of the game in-thread, or scumchat if you have one. Discussing the game in Discord is a consolation prize for of those of us who are unable to play. Including those who die via death chat.]]
[[As to your point #1, neutral advice should be -neutral-. I disagree that that should influence alignment perceptions.]]As you're not dead yet, it's probably best if we all assume every post you make is part of the game.
[[As to your point #1, neutral advice should be -neutral-. I disagree that that should influence alignment perceptions.]]As you're not dead yet, it's probably best if we all assume every post you make is part of the game.
wait a sec,
6 to Hammer. Day ends on July 13, 2022 at 20:00 CDT (22 hours and 17 minutes remaining.)5 to Hammer. Day ends on July 13, 2022 at 20:00 CDT (22 hours and 47 minutes remaining.)[/font]Web: Is this an error?
Another note: I fixed the vote count so that No One, Not Voting, and the Hammer count properly factor in vote weight. Sorry about that!The 5 hammer count was only correct at Day start. All others should have been 6.
The 5 hammer count was only correct at Day start. All others should have been 6....
But... they haven't expressed suspicion of anyone, not even once. Not a single 'this person is scummy'. Their current vote is a policy one at best, an easy pickoff at worst. I don't like that.EBWOP: actually they don't even have a current vote because they unvoted, but now they're 'tempted to angle for' an execution on the person they unvoted, Knightwing.
2) Egan town FoU scum. - you are advocating for thisShow me where I did this. Just show me where. Read my posts. Then reread them. Then see if you can pick out the bit where I say this.
I'm not misrepresenting anything. You are dismissing out of hand option 4, and you have stated that your reason for doing so is that it is to aduacious to be true. I consider this reason completely unacceptable.I am saying it is too unlikely to be reasonably accepted. READ MY POSTS. QUOTE THEM. Don't just ascribe random positions to me.
2) Egan town FoU scum. - you are advocating for thisShow me where I did this. Just show me where. Read my posts. Then reread them. Then see if you can pick out the bit where I say this.
For me? My action would show up as targeting Max in that scenario, assuming I wasn't redirected or some other shenaniganery.
My actions show up as mafiakill actions, but their apparent targeting is not modified from what it actually is.
Now this is WEIRD. Because the same does not seem to be true of Egan. See:Ah in that case I'm like, omega miller. Inspects show me as mafia, surveys show my action as mafiakill, and tracking shows me as visiting whoever was killed.Shakerag - Please explain Miller Theory regarding D1 claims.
Oh I just realized I missed that. I stick by the old (relative to this subforum) rules that you always claim miller ASAP. To do otherwise is to invite doubt.
So there are different Omega-millers in play?
Ho hum. I find that hard to believe. Also, have a look through Fal and EgAns early interactions. They’re just a tad weird. At the very least, I think FoU is lying here.
Anything to say for yourself, FallacyOfUrist?
Okay, so you are splitting the hair between "option 4 is too audacious to be true" and "option 4 is too unlikely to be reasonably accepted." somehow. To me those sound like the same thing. What is the relevant difference?QuoteI'm not misrepresenting anything. You are dismissing out of hand option 4, and you have stated that your reason for doing so is that it is to aduacious to be true. I consider this reason completely unacceptable.I am saying it is too unlikely to be reasonably accepted. READ MY POSTS. QUOTE THEM. Don't just ascribe random positions to me.
STOP MISREPRESENTING ME. I imagine several players don't particularly feel the need to see you survive the elim. If you continue to misrepresent what I say, I will be one of them. I don't care for players who post angry textwalls and fail to read the thread.
TricMagic How confident are you still feeling about that Max vote? Looking more bandwagon-y to me right now. Pretending you're scum, he -does- seem like an easy target for a D1 lynch, no?So begins the end of inactivity. Even if we have 29 posts you mad lads and girls.
You put a FoS on NJW and Knightwing earlier? Want to justify that now or change your mind?
As for scum-hunting strat... Wait and see, and vote Shakerag for earlier posts.
Town likes to hunt, scum likes to tag along. Why are you being passive? It kind of looks like you wanted to vote me because I was "fighting" with Egan, but you jumped ships onto Max because of Lenglon pretty quickly. Looking like you don't have your own arguments for voting someone.
Ok, time to gather me thoughts.
Knightwing64 - looks new, but maybe an idiot. Leaning scum because of lack of engagement.
Okay, first of all 🖕I’m not a idiot.
Secondly, I have been posting at a consistent rate. I’m juggling numerous other games and various RL things so forgive me if I can’t post every 5 minutes like you can.
3: Just a afterword, but how are you going to call me sus for “lack of engagement” but you gloss over the fact NJW has barely posted at all? Suspect.
Knightwing, I do agree that the question was a stupid one, but I asked it anyway because you had made a self-contradictory claim. Please explain at length what you think of Tric, their meta, their behavior, and if they are scummy or not.Knightwing You have ignored this question, then deflected from answering it, and then ignored it once again. Answer the question.
:-\
I think Tric is town, they act scummy as town and they act like a town when scum. There is literally nothing else to say. I already told you what I thought about Tric and you keep repeating the same damn question over and over again.
What do you think about Egans meta? Their behavior, and if they are scum or not. I legitimately don’t trust you anymore lmao
It is completely fallacious, no pun intended, to say that Fallacy's role is "more similar" to Egan's role than anything else. Fallacy is a miller in one way, Egan is a miller in every way. Every other possible way of being a miller would be equally similar to Egan's role as Fallacy's is.
If anything, Egan's role is more similar to mine than to Fallacy's or any other miller. Egan gives a "maximally mafia-like result" for all kinds of inspection, while I would give "no result". Is that an unreasonable coincidence?Has anyone ever seen the “I appear to have done the mafia kill” role before? I think it’s a very nonstandard miller-like roleI'd like to add that Fallacy did not claim that he "appear[s] to have done the mafia kill". He claimed that his actions will appear to be kill actions, such as to a Follower. That's not really common, but then Followers aren't really common. I don't think it's in any way unreasonable as a kind of miller in a game where Followers exist (which they might here).
I'd definitely concur that we're not no-lynching, under any circumstances.
Knightwing is not a viable lynch target for me. Of currently voted people I'm not already voting for, I guess I'm most comfortable lynching... TricMagic, maybe Lenglon. I'd be open to suspecting Lidku over passive play, but I guess he should get some Noob Slack. Shakerag and Knightwing are town to me. Fallacy and NJW are both looking bad to me but seem mutually exclusive and I'm not sure which I should distrust. Then again, maybe that's the angle.
I... don't actually know why I'm voting Egan right now. I agree with what I SAID in the morning, but I don't know why I put a vote on it, I don't think it quite deserved that. I tend to be a little rash first thing in the morning. After the last several hours, he's definitely slid down my ranking of interest.
I do think Lenglon is being a dick. I don't know that I'd say that's lynchable in its own right outside some idea of a scum meta (like ToonyMan's), but I wouldn't call this normal town "aggression", and I do kind of want to get it out of the game.
I'm going to vote TricMagic for now, but I'm open to alternatives. Is anyone left not voting?
Vote Count
------------------------
Knightwing64 - 3 - Lenglon* (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=180072.msg8389719#msg8389719), Egan_BW* (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=180072.msg8389773#msg8389773),
TricMagic - 2 - Shakerag* (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=180072.msg8389388#msg8389388), Maximum Spin* (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=180072.msg8389800#msg8389800),
FallacyofUrist - 1 - NJW2000* (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=180072.msg8389533#msg8389533),
Lenglon - 1 - Knightwing64* (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=180072.msg8389770#msg8389770),
NJW2000 - 1 - FallacyofUrist* (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=180072.msg8389664#msg8389664),
Egan_BW - 0 -
Lidku - 0 -
Maximum Spin - 0 -
Shakerag - 0 -
No One - 1 - TricMagic* (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=180072.msg8389763#msg8389763),
Not Voting - 1 - Lidku,
5 to Hammer. Day ends on July 13, 2022 at 20:00 CDT (22 hours and 47 minutes remaining.)
Also, NJW, it's a little odd that you decided to cut out such tiny segments of my post and removed their context. You also didn't address the conclusion at the bottom in any way. Why did you do that? It already was a fairly small post, and it's especially odd that you would remove the context from my statements while pitching a fit about how I wasn't representing yours properly.You posted lies about what I said and didn’t quote me. I quoted those lies and explained that they were lies. If you think the context of a statement is more important than the actual truth about what was written in a thread, I don’t really think it’s possible for me to usefully communicate with you. You’re going to have to start responding to what was written, not what you vaguely imagine from a skimread, or this isn’t going to work.
*sigh*I don't find your failure to properly read my posts alignment indicative. I just find it obstructs my play. Also, yeah, I'm not doll, but confusion is fair enough. They did tend to be a bit more... abrasive.
NJW: Fix your lies. Now. I'm not going to put up with obvious bullshit, and you can just enjoy the vote for your troubles.
Lidku: ... I don't actually have much to say, Lidku hasn't really impacted me. That's not a good thing given the machine-gun like reading.
Quote from: TricMagicLidku: ... I don't actually have much to say, Lidku hasn't really impacted me. That's not a good thing given the machine-gun like reading.
Can you elaborate on how I haven't impacted you? I've been speaking about you quite a bit in the majority of my posts so far in D1; while I don't believe (and correct me if I'm wrong) NJW has really spoken about you at all.
Putting a vote on FallacyofUrist helps alleviate the calls from others for me to "vote" for someone.
K, so very late to this thread today. And a lot to read. Tomorrow morning.
... or now I'd just move to No Lynch if possible, and recontextualize tomorrow.
Putting a vote on FallacyofUrist helps alleviate the calls from others for me to "vote" for someone.
If I didn't think you were a clueless newbie a statement like that is incredibly scummy. Either way, my read on you is leaning scummier as the day has gone on.
At best your passivity is a detriment to town. At worst you're scum trying to fly under the radar by not standing out.
[spoiler=reads]Egan_BW: Lean scum. Highly dubious claim, admittedly. Many dubious points such as "haha we're both scum" with a nervy response from FoU as their first interaction, lack of suspects... and this (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=180072.msg8389865#msg8389865). If scum, probably with FoU.
FallacyofUrist: Scum. I don't really think there's going to be an omega-miller and a specialised-miller in the same game. If there are, Web has essentially created a bastard game instead of anything like a newbie game. I stand by my reasoning about the unlikelihood of a miller gambit + specialised miller guess on Egan's part, so I'm pretty sure FoU is scum. They also claimed miller quite late, which is not a townie thing to do.
In conclusion: Kill Fallacy Now.
No, that's about what I got. I'm just wondering why Fal over Egan?I've been wondering this too, as well as the inverse. There seems to be a strong division into two camps over this question, and I find it weird.
I was going to pick a post of Lidku's to respond to, but then this one showed up while I was typing... and this analysis is definitely completely spot-on. Lidku is being way too passive, and these weird little admissions are beyond scummy. If you didn't want to play, why are you here? At the same time, I can't understand why even noob scum would ADMIT to making a bullshit vote just to shut people up. Like, if nothing else, where is your partner in all this? Is nobody telling you to stop doing that? Or are you being bussed this early?Putting a vote on FallacyofUrist helps alleviate the calls from others for me to "vote" for someone.
If I didn't think you were a clueless newbie a statement like that is incredibly scummy. Either way, my read on you is leaning scummier as the day has gone on.
At best your passivity is a detriment to town. At worst you're scum trying to fly under the radar by not standing out.
Of course I'm making random stabs at people who are most likely town. most of the players here are town, and there's only two scum. There is nothing wrong with taking stabs at town players, up to a certain limit (and that limit is higher on Day 1 than it is on later days). The point of it all is to force people to be engaged and demonstrate what they think and especially WHY they think it. It tells you what behaviors are normal, and what behaviors are not. It tells you how invested players are in the process of finding the mafia. It shows who has doubts, concerns, questions, and generally is lacking information. Because the only people here that have the information they need, are the scumteam.Putting a vote on FallacyofUrist helps alleviate the calls from others for me to "vote" for someone.
If I didn't think you were a clueless newbie a statement like that is incredibly scummy. Either way, my read on you is leaning scummier as the day has gone on.
At best your passivity is a detriment to town. At worst you're scum trying to fly under the radar by not standing out.
And doing an outright No Lynch vote isn't scummy? You were one of the firsts to call out on TricMagic that doing that was a bad idea. And if anything, me becoming more moderately active than I was before is doing the opposite of being under the radar at the moment (to address your worst-case scenario of me).
It seems you favor aggression over passivity/neutrality as Town? That coincides with you for whatever reason favoring Lenglon, who is making a lot of random stabs at people who are most likely Town. It's just an off-handle playstyle and I don't think it favors Town as you seem to think.
After reviewing Egan's posts, just going by behavior alone?
The spooky, scummy thing is that they have no suspicions.
Good questions? Yes. Good interactions? Yes. Audacity? Yes.
But... they haven't expressed suspicion of anyone, not even once. Not a single 'this person is scummy'. Their current vote is a policy one at best, an easy pickoff at worst. I don't like that.
Egan_BW: Who's scum?
I don't know, as indicated by the fact that I haven't expressed much suspicion. Nobody's acting much differently than I'd expect based on their personality.This should itself affect who you suspect. Can you tell me which players you should view with more suspicion under that premise?
Well, Fallacy of course. being that the normal behavior I've seen before from him is as scum.I don't know, as indicated by the fact that I haven't expressed much suspicion. Nobody's acting much differently than I'd expect based on their personality.This should itself affect who you suspect. Can you tell me which players you should view with more suspicion under that premise?
Heh, I meant "veterans who are better at faking their normal selves", but yes, that's actually a great point.Well, Fallacy of course. being that the normal behavior I've seen before from him is as scum.I don't know, as indicated by the fact that I haven't expressed much suspicion. Nobody's acting much differently than I'd expect based on their personality.This should itself affect who you suspect. Can you tell me which players you should view with more suspicion under that premise?
Max was mostly a pressure vote to get him to actually interact or get lynched. Hence why I didn't want to answer Lenglon's questions on it. The other two are inactivity blues making them look like they're lurking, and Lidku not looking good either.Next time please include reasons, as you saw, Max got up to -1 Hammer during that, and your vote was just a bandwagon vote, pressure or not. Also, including reasons in your pressure votes makes them apply a lot more effective pressure.
Fun.. As of right now at this post, I'm leaning towards an Egan/Fal team.Tric: Why?
/... Fal's latest post are good I guess. Still, after reading everything..Thank you for posting this, it helps a lot for getting a quick evaluation of your mindset.
- Egan_BW: Egan's mostly been participating. But also playing rather fast and loose with their doublevote. Crucially, this is because they don't want to be the hammering vote. That would effectively draw suspicions down on them hard, but being Omega-Miller is definitely something you should either claim from day start or not at all. (Reasoning being that webadict is punishing mechanical claims.)
- FallacyofUrist: Fallacy remains a Fallacy, can't read them as anything other than scum-lean.
- Knightwing64: Knightwing continues to have one key issue, not able to generate quality posts during the few times he does post. The lack of actionable information or arguments makes them look scummy, but not actually useful as a tell.
- Lenglon: The hyper-aggressiveness isn't good. But their actions, arguments, and focus tells me they're town. That and I do actually have some idea of her personality, I think.
- Lidku: ... I don't actually have much to say, Lidku hasn't really impacted me. That's not a good thing given the machine-gun like reading.
- Maximum Spin: Actually pushing now, town-lean.
- NJW2000: Notable in quality posts lately, if not in great numbers. Unlike Lidku, they did impact me.
- Shakerag: Drunk or not, Shakerag has mostly taken the lead on posts meant to guide new players, and in between that mostly made a number of arguments and votes. I'm fairly confident this is Town-Shakerag.
- TricMagic: In which I go to play Minecraft for a bit.
Putting everything together, my vote would be for either Egan or Lidku.
Of course I'm making random stabs at people who are most likely town. most of the players here are town, and there's only two scum. There is nothing wrong with taking stabs at town players, up to a certain limit (and that limit is higher on Day 1 than it is on later days). The point of it all is to force people to be engaged and demonstrate what they think and especially WHY they think it. It tells you what behaviors are normal, and what behaviors are not. It tells you how invested players are in the process of finding the mafia. It shows who has doubts, concerns, questions, and generally is lacking information. Because the only people here that have the information they need, are the scumteam.
Additionally, the way I've been behaving on Day 1 is not how I plan to behave on Day 2 or later. It took an insane amount of work and investment, but the point of everything I was doing today was to establish the personalities and thought processes behind each of the usernames. On Day 2 and later, if I kept being this aggro for stuff this minor, it would be a problem, you're correct. But on Day 2, we're going to have a lot more mechanical information, and because of the Day 1 groundwork, we can combine that mechanical information with the personalities and behaviors shown during Day 1. Remember, on Day 2 we're probably going to have two different flips we can feed into our understanding of things. You should actually expect a shift in everyone's behavior tomorrow, and you will want to look at what has changed and attempt to figure out why it's changed. But if that groundwork didn't exist, you wouldn't have a baseline to compare against. That's the point of Day 1, establishing that baseline. For example, lets say that we lynch me today, and I flip scum. Well in that case you might want to look at who I gave free passes to on Day 1. Maybe I broke off a sequence of questions without following through on one particular person. Maybe I lept to the defense of someone that was having trouble defending themselves. If Scum!Lenglon played all of Day 1 perfectly then you won't find anything useful that way, but the more content there is to go through, the more chances Scum!Lenglon had to make mistakes. And nobody is perfect. Heck, maybe Scum!Lenglon isn't the one that made the mistake, maybe her scumbuddy did, and Scum!Lenglon might have tried to compensate for it! On top of that, you'll also get to compare everyone else's behavior shift after Scum!Lenglon flips. Maybe the scumbuddy will become more cautious because they're alone. Maybe they'll become more reckless. How would you know which to look for? Well, that would require having a basic understanding of the personalities of people wouldn't it? So compare to the Day 1 baseline. once again.
Day 1 is very difficult to handle in general because there is so little information to work with, and the Day 1 lynch almost never catches scum (and if you're going to policy-lynch someone, Day 1 is the time to do it as a result), but it's still actually a very important Day, just one that can't be mechanically solved in any meaningful way.
I just choose randomly between the two, but again, my vote (hopefully) isn't meant to get involved in a direct lynch. I know that sounds iffy, but it is at least better than a No Lynch vote.. which was something you put out TricMagic, but then funnily enough withdrawn to put a vote on me suddenly?Quote from: TricMagicK, so very late to this thread today. And a lot to read. Tomorrow morning.
... or now I'd just move to No Lynch if possible, and recontextualize tomorrow.
If you wanted to wait until tomorrow (which is today IRL-wise), why put in a random no vote like that? Why not just pop-in, say that you're going to post for tomorrow, and leave it at that? Why that random no lynch vote? Really strange...
Putting a vote on FallacyofUrist helps alleviate the calls from others for me to "vote" for someone.
If I didn't think you were a clueless newbie a statement like that is incredibly scummy. Either way, my read on you is leaning scummier as the day has gone on.
At best your passivity is a detriment to town. At worst you're scum trying to fly under the radar by not standing out.
And doing an outright No Lynch vote isn't scummy? You were one of the firsts to call out on TricMagic that doing that was a bad idea.
Oh, and.
If you think I’m suspicious, why aren’t you voting me? It’s not hammer if you vote me, don’t worry, just one off.
I guess that’s good enough of a reason, but it doesn’t change the fact that you’re still not really hunting at all.
Don’t you have questions to ask of me, or at least a sharp blue FoS prod?
Kicks feet about. Lidku, you can't lynch me. I'm perfectly willing to reveal my entire role today. Are you going to force the issue?
I was about to vote Egan now that we've established your own thoughts.
Also, that No Lynch s going to prove very informative day 2.
We’re not no-lynching.Do you mean your late claim, or the claimed thing you shouldn’t claim that explains it? Both slightly, I’d say.
NJW: Does my non-claim behavior support your case? I’m expecting a yes or no answer here.
We’re not no-lynching.I mean, obviously?
NJW: Does my non-claim behavior support your case? I’m expecting a yes or no answer here.
No, I mean my behavior which has nothing to do with my claim. Behavior that is not in the category of claim-related. Does that support your vote on me, and if so, why? Please provide direct quotes if possible.We’re not no-lynching.Do you mean your late claim, or the claimed thing you shouldn’t claim that explains it? Both slightly, I’d say.
NJW: Does my non-claim behavior support your case? I’m expecting a yes or no answer here.
...Nah, doesn't really make sense, does it? And I don't know how dangerous double voting is from the mafia's perspective. Could someone TM me whether my power would be likely to get me targetted by mafia as town?I would expect that it would.
Kay, rude. But OK.
All I have at the moment is my roleclaim. Put simply, I'm an entire game of BYOR Mafia, Again. At the end of the day I can pick an ability the previous game had, and if it's active it becomes 1-shot. I was planning on using it to grab the vote after death power.
... Really Lidku? I just explained what my role ability was.
... Really Lidku? I just explained what my role ability was.
You're saying that your role is "An Entire Game of BYOR Mafia," which was Maximum Spin's chosen role for the previous BYOR game we were in (and like I pointed out before, a role you didn't have in the previous game, but something else you had). His role didn't have the ability you claim it does; the ability to supposedly grab other abilities from a previous game?
Can you please elaborate on what you're trying to explain about your role? Does it have the same abilities as Maximum Spin in the previous game; or is this some new ability you're claiming this previous role has, as something new that webadict had added to it?
Tric elim isn't something I want, I want Egan or FoU.I'll take you up on that. Egan_BW
got any arguments to be left alive as an omega miller and double voter?Not particularly, seeing as that's objectively what I am. I think the onus of proof lies on you. Is it a good idea to policy lynch me?
I'm tired, you look scummiest to me.Gimme three reasons not related to my miller claim that I'm scum, then?
NOTE: In the event of a tie, the Mafia chooses the execution target.Well, what'll it be?
I really don't think a weak meta read without specific examples/comparisons and a conspiracy around my follower-miller claim is a stronger case than one actually based around a very simple question.
Has Fallacy been actively pushing cases and hunting scum?
Can you answer that one, too?
Lenglon, What do you think?I'd suggest using your own reasoning to make a decision instead of relying on everyone else's. You're here to learn, aye? Use the reasoning of others to support your own reasoning, but not to replace it.
Just a gut feeling, but I think Egan is town. Or scum who has given up.The latter is the opposite of helpful Knightwing.
FallacyKnightwing, are you aware that if the vote is tied at the end of the day, scum decide who is executed? You just tied the vote.
FallacyKnightwing, are you aware that if the vote is tied at the end of the day, scum decide who is executed? You just tied the vote.
Lenglon, What do you think?You don't have any need to ask this Knightwing. I posted my reads list here (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=180072.msg8390095#msg8390095) and there is exactly one piece of data we've gotten since then, though I do admit it's a bit of a complex and even now still evolving piece of data. We are getting to see various people's panic behaviors, and what their priorities are under pressure as the moment of the lynch draws near. What's happening right now is the last, and absolutely the most valuable, piece of information we're going to get from Day 1. You should be looking carefully for who is acting out of character for themselves, or changing their tune from the rest of the day as a whole, and be attempting to figure out WHY they're doing that.
Lenglon, What do you think?I'd suggest using your own reasoning to make a decision instead of relying on everyone else's. You're here to learn, aye? Use the reasoning of others to support your own reasoning, but not to replace it.
You can join Shakerag and push Egan down, or join with Egan and vote me (and tie the vote again, which is bad). Or you can even come up with a third, separate case and see if you can convince people to go along with it.
Your role isn't your only set of powers - your words are power, too. It's up to you to use them well.
FallacyofUristWhich honestly is not enough to form a lynch case on someone with. Fourth, as I hinted indirectly when talking knightwing through meta-reads, I've been leaving you mostly alone today to give you the space I thought you would need to provide good reads and analysis, with the expectation that around now you'd have posted something similar to the reads list I posted earlier, showing your in-depth thoughts about each player. This expected analysis never came, which could easilly be a sign of a scum player that think they aren't under scrutiny never actually bothering to build a set of believable reads in the first place.
ur scum copying my miller claim, cly
This theory is that you did not start the day with a doublevote, and that you gained doublevote status with the cost of permanently becoming an omega-miller as a day-activated ability. This theory also was the reason I was prepared to accept your omega-miller claim, it seemed like a reasonable price for the extra power, and to me it looked like a perfectly likely role for a player to have. And so in case you didn't notice, I've been treating you like a Mayor all day, and I kept this theory to myself because I wanted to avoid having you targeted. I personally have no major issue with either of our miller claims in a vaccum.The 5 hammer count was only correct at Day start. All others should have been 6....
Noted, and I have a theory about why this might be the case, but would like to keep it to myself until tomorrow.
It's fairly close. The reason why I didn't have double votes was because I started with a list of 5 powers I could pick 3 from during day 1. In exchange for being Omega Miller.
I immediately picked double votes and two other autos, because I don't like thinking.I can completely buy this. It seems very much like a Web thing to do, and you did breadcrumb it earlier as well when explaining what would happen if you were tracked. As I said before, my primary reasons for voting you over FoU are behavior-based, not claim-based. You do still have the problem of the Omega-miller status being so extreme that we aren't able verify you as town in any mechanical way. It's entirely reliant on your dayplay, so when you don't present a solid daygame set of insights, reads, interactions, and reasons, then we are kinda forced to vote you out. Leaving you in if we don't trust your dayplay introduces a world of WIFOM. Sorry. I think your role sounds very interesting, and was hoping we could see it in action as the game went on, but the dayplay presented by FoU seems to me to be more towny than the dayplay you have presented, and if necessary there are ways to check if FoU is actually town mechanically, and there aren't any for you.
I'm pretty sure you have consensus dude. But hold off if you think the remaining hours of day could have some insights.
I'm leaning to maybe change my vote to Egan, to just end this very drawn out D1, but I'm afraid to be the one to hammer without consensus..
I'm leaning towards Lidku as the day nears it's end though.Could you go into detail as to why?
The only ability I have potential access to is Great War>Deception is Truth, which could let me steal an Ability. No clue how effective it would be though.
I'm leaning towards Lidku as the day nears it's end though.
My reads for suspicion go like this:Personally, I want to see how TricMagic and Shakerag act on Day 2. Along with some Spin. And Knightwing. Actually I want to see how everyone acts on Day 2. Because while I'm pretty sure NJW2000 is the second mafia player, I'm not as certain about him as I am about Egan. More information will still be helpful.
TricMagic for his general strange behavior this game.
Oh, yeah, no. No ties. Ties very bad. Unacceptable, that.The only ability I have potential access to is Great War>Deception is Truth, which could let me steal an Ability. No clue how effective it would be though.
I'm leaning towards Lidku as the day nears it's end though.
That's worth noting for D2, but if you switch your vote with 45 minutes remaining you'll give us a tie.
I'm not really sure why Fal decided that me and NJW are scumteam, though. Because we both used the same stupid argument? Does that really tie us together?You following NJW's lead and exhibiting similar behavior patterns. Like I said, I'm not 100% confident NJW is the other scum, it just seems very likely.
Personally, I want to see how TricMagic and Shakerag act on Day 2. Along with some Spin. And Knightwing. Actually I want to see how everyone acts on Day 2. Because while I'm pretty sure NJW2000 is the second mafia player, I'm not as certain about him as I am about Egan. More information will still be helpful.
What will your opinion on NJW change to when I flip as town, then?
What will your opinion on NJW change to when I flip as town, then?
Didn't you say you were super miller so wouldn't you flip as scum?
What will your opinion on NJW change to when I flip as town, then?If you flip as town, I'll view NJW with less but not no suspicion. I'll probably start looking at Maximum Spin and Knightwing more heavily than I otherwise would, too.
What will your opinion on NJW change to when I flip as town, then?
Didn't you say you were super miller so wouldn't you flip as scum?
Doesn't apply to flips. Just powers. You can go back and check my original post, it's just powers.
I think that lying flips is too bastard for this game.
The only ability I have potential access to is Great War>Deception is Truth, which could let me steal an Ability.
I'd support that line of inquiry.What will your opinion on NJW change to when I flip as town, then?If you flip as town, I'll view NJW with less but not no suspicion. I'll probably start looking at Maximum Spin and Knightwing more heavily than I otherwise would, too.
I’m confused, what’s going on? Do people still want Egan out?Yes, we do. Egan is just playing nice in the last few minutes because the vote is pretty much settled. It's worthwhile to discuss future days in this case.
I don't, clearly.Your objection is noted.
I’m confused, what’s going on? Do people still want Egan out?short answer: yes. doing anything else at this point will just put the entire town into a deadlock and introduce a world of WIFOM. I am expecting Egan to flip town, but I don't see a better option at this time, especially with so little left in the day.
👁👄👁
You know I’m not that smart.
Egan
Egan_BW
Role: Really Bad Day Challenge
Alignment: Town
Abilities:
{PT} (Auto) Challenge Mode: Alignment Inspects show you as Mafia. Survey Actions show your Action as the Mafiakill. Track Actions show your target as any Players that died this Phase.
Tags: Trigger
(Auto) Pool Points: During Day 1, you may Choose up to three (3) of the following Abilities and add them to your role:
- (Auto) Pretty: You have an additional vote.
- (Auto) Good Memory: You cannot have your Abilities Removed or Stolen, and you cannot be Bussed, Redirected, or Blocked.
- (1-Shot, Auto) Tough: The first time a Mafiakill Action targets you, it fails.
- {P0} (1-Shot, Night) Driving [target/self]: You drive the target or yourself out of Town, becoming untargetable for the Night.
- {P10} (1-Shot, Night) Fabrication [target/self]: You give the target a toolkit, allowing them to Restore a Shot.
(Auto) Pretty: You have an additional vote.
(Auto) Good Memory: You cannot have your Abilities Removed or Stolen, and you cannot be Bussed, Redirected, or Blocked.
(1-Shot, Auto) Tough: The first time a Mafiakill Action targets you, it fails.
Tric elim isn't something I want, I want Egan or FoU.I'll take you up on that. Egan_BW
I stayed up late to get the first post, and I guess it worked out.
I originally just wanted to get in first to say this:
That thing with the crane? That wasn't my power. I don't know where it came from, and I consider it suspicious, especially that it occurred after I said I would be commuting.
FallacyofUrist used a Mafiakill on me.Yes, that is correct. Well, not the 'try to kill you' part. But I did act on you last night. Regardless, I am town.
Unfortunately for him, I was serious about being hidden. Even more unfortunately for him, I didn't let on that I learn certain actions that are used on me while doing so. FallacyofUrist, you tried to kill me! After I supported your possibly being town against NJW! At least now I see why you said that your actions will come up as "Mafiakill".
The action in question is called Mug, and it's clearly labelled a "Mafiakill".
Yes, that is correct. Well, not the 'try to kill you' part. But I did act on you last night. Regardless, I am town.Dude, I get told what the action does. Don't even. It kills. It literally says that it kills.
Maximum Spin is no longer targetable by Town Players.[/b][/font]and you admit you acted on me.
Can anyone explain to me what it means by Lenglon being "Ruler for the Day"?Lenglon is the only person who can vote, and the only person whose vote counts. For this Day only.
This seemed like a vote for the sake of voting, not for the sake of eliminating scum. Where was the justification?I thought Egan was more likely than you to be scum, based on my understanding of your behavior. Obviously this turned out to be wrong.
Yes. I acted on you. Regardless, I am town. My role is a flaming bucket of WIFOM, unfortunately....
When I said all my actions appear to be mafiakills, that's because they are in fact mafiakill abilities. They have the tag and everything.
However, my auto ability has two components.
Firstly, it lets me use abilities as though I was mafia-aligned, which includes using mafiakills. Turns out it also let me bypass that crane-shield thingamajig.
Secondly, it makes my mafiakill abilities not kill.
... I suspect if a mafia member manages to steal one of my actions, they will be able to kill with it, unfortunately.
I'm... well, I guess it doesn't matter whether I believe this or not, since I don't have The Vote. If I hypothetically pretend I believe you, does this imply that "Mug" is a real mafiakill ability the mafia also have?Fortunately not. Well, probably not. Nothing about my role suggests I'm copying mafiakills. My mafiakills are my own mafiakills. Which is good because scum don't have them and bad because I don't have theft immunity.
Oh right, I guess I should be fair and actually answer your question, at least for the sake of other people.This... is a reasonable enough justification.This seemed like a vote for the sake of voting, not for the sake of eliminating scum. Where was the justification?I thought Egan was more likely than you to be scum, based on my understanding of your behavior. Obviously this turned out to be wrong.
I do have a habit of placing votes in these kinds of ways, sometimes acting like it's a joke, or often offering to "go along with" someone else, but, as I've said before, I promise I only place votes when I mean them. In this case, for example, I put it like that because NJW2000 had been pushing for a vote on you the whole time, but then said that as if he was open to either, so I wanted to see how far he meant it.
Ugh, and I was so sure you were scum, too. Using the crane thing to hide while you chose someone to mafiakill, sure nobody could detect you due to being untargetable. I can't really make that argument at this point, though.Nope. I'm actually a commuter, and... well, you've seen what happens when I'm targetted while hiding. Under certain circumstances I can take other actions not to be disclosed yet, but those circumstances haven't applied. Actually, because of you, I kind of lost out on that chance for now, because the thing that you know happened was supposed to happen to me.
Nope. I'm actually a commuter, and... well, you've seen what happens when I'm targetted while hiding. Under certain circumstances I can take other actions not to be disclosed yet, but those circumstances haven't applied. Actually, because of you, I kind of lost out on that chance for now, because the thing that you know happened was supposed to happen to me.... Oops. Sorry. If it helps, at least I think you're town now?
That's real great, how many votes do you have today again? :PNope. I'm actually a commuter, and... well, you've seen what happens when I'm targetted while hiding. Under certain circumstances I can take other actions not to be disclosed yet, but those circumstances haven't applied. Actually, because of you, I kind of lost out on that chance for now, because the thing that you know happened was supposed to happen to me.... Oops. Sorry. If it helps, at least I think you're town now?
Same as you.That's real great, how many votes do you have today again? :PNope. I'm actually a commuter, and... well, you've seen what happens when I'm targetted while hiding. Under certain circumstances I can take other actions not to be disclosed yet, but those circumstances haven't applied. Actually, because of you, I kind of lost out on that chance for now, because the thing that you know happened was supposed to happen to me.... Oops. Sorry. If it helps, at least I think you're town now?
Lidku - you mentioned yesterday that you find it easier to engage in the more mechanical analysis part of the game, I'd like to hear your input in what you think happened last night between Max and FoU, and I'd also like to hear what you think of people's actions near the end of day yesterday, now that we know that Egan was town. From what you were saying before, this should be right up your alley.
Yes, that is correct. Well, not the 'try to kill you' part. But I did act on you last night. Regardless, I am town.Let me get this straight. You have an auto that makes all your mafiakill powers not kill?
Eh, I might as well reveal my role too.
My role is God of Mafia
Lenglon is a ruler because I used a one shot night ability on her called “The Royal We”
Eh, I might as well reveal my role too.
My role is God of Mafia
Lenglon is a ruler because I used a one shot night ability on her called “The Royal We”
I trusted the most as town.
That's interesting. I thought it was an ability she gave herself.
What was the particular reason for giving her this ability? Is it because you trust her the most as Town, or something else?
NJW: I claim it, but I don't have any feedback on the results, you're the only one with that. What did the alignment-inspect of FoU, who claimed that his actions, and noteably ONLY his actions, would come up as Mafia, say?I didn't... you outed yourself as having an inspect. I was going to see if anyone wanted to claim it as a one-shot, a passive, a weird part of their role, whatever. Whispering an alignment is usually a townie thing to do, and someone might have wanted the credit. I think I made it clear that I was letting people claim it, not demanding they do so. In any case, I really doubt having an inspect is that rare this game.
So why did you want me outed as having an inspect?
According to the night PM I received from Webadict, FallacyofUrist is town.
Web: could Mamobo please still track who the people with 0 vote power are currently voting for, and simply have their vote be valued at 0, instead of not listing their votes at all for today?I can. I don't like it, but I can.
It would help me out if you did please, I would like the rest of the town to have input, and to avoid a repeat of the Revolution game where when I had the only vote that mattered everyone else in the game quit trying to scumhunt.Web: could Mamobo please still track who the people with 0 vote power are currently voting for, and simply have their vote be valued at 0, instead of not listing their votes at all for today?I can. I don't like it, but I can.
Claims summary:
FoU - all actions are mafiakills, use abilities as though mafia-aligned, including mafiakills. mafiakill abilities do not kill. Targeted Max N1, unrevealed interaction with Max, showed as town to Lenglon's inspect.
Knightwing - Kingmaker
Lenglon - one-shot super-inspect (used on FoU(town)), results were given to NJW
Lidku - no action N1
Max - commuter, did NOT perform crane-action, 1-shot mafiakill vest (used), knows what action is attempted upon them, unrevealed interaction with FoU.
NJW - inspected FoU's action, received Lenglon's inspection's results, claims result shows FoU as town.
Shake - bodyguard same team, used on Lenglon.
Tric - omega-JOAT
is this correct?
Importantly, did you actually hit Max?I just want to confirm the answer is yes. If he hadn't, the Thing We Both Say Happened wouldn't have happened.
MaximumSpin: do you have any abilities that action? I'm guessing you must.Not at this juncture. Which means I'll presumably be hidden again tonight unless someone gives me an action.
So: Mug is P3/P7 and blocks actions as well as killing the target. [...] I'm fairly sure it's a 1-shotThat's what it does and the priority, but it isn't 1-shot. It's shotted, but he has more of it.
Max - commuter, did NOT perform crane-action, 1-shot mafiakill vest (used), knows what action is attempted upon them, unrevealed interaction with FoU.Not exactly. I don't have some kind of vest, it's just the commuting - if I just kept commuting and never did anything useful, I'm unkillable without a super and mafia would have to either use a super or live with me in their lylo field. (Or get me lynched. Please don't do that.) And I don't learn all actions used on me, unfortunately, only ones which trigger my role in a certain way.
is this correct?
But at this point, Lenglon's the one who had the inspect, so Lenglon's the one who can decide if the result is probably right.I have made public every piece of information I have from that inspect. It's a P (-1), inspects target 1, gives the results to target 2, 1-shot. It was used on FoU as target 1, sent results to NJW as target 2. NJW says the result he recieved was that FoU is town. So you are equally as qualified as I am to say if it's a reliable result or not.
I stayed up late to get the first post, and I guess it worked out.
I originally just wanted to get in first to say this:
That thing with the crane? That wasn't my power. I don't know where it came from, and I consider it suspicious, especially that it occurred after I said I would be commuting.
But then, in my night resolution PM, I learned something even more fascinating.
FallacyofUrist used a Mafiakill on me.
Unfortunately for him, I was serious about being hidden. Even more unfortunately for him, I didn't let on that I learn certain actions that are used on me while doing so. FallacyofUrist, you tried to kill me! After I supported your possibly being town against NJW! At least now I see why you said that your actions will come up as "Mafiakill".
The action in question is called Mug, and it's clearly labelled a "Mafiakill".
(Yes I did read the post and saw that I don't have a vote today, but that's not going to stop me from using red text for DRAMA.)
... Of note, the crane is likely either me or Lidku. And would likely be mafia-aligned to prevent protection from kills.Yes, that is correct. Well, not the 'try to kill you' part. But I did act on you last night. Regardless, I am town.Dude, I get told what the action does. Don't even. It kills. It literally says that it kills.
Besides,Maximum Spin is no longer targetable by Town Players.[/b][/font]and you admit you acted on me.
Claims summary:
FoU - all actions are mafiakills, use abilities as though mafia-aligned, including mafiakills. mafiakill abilities do not kill. Targeted Max N1, unrevealed interaction with Max, showed as town to Lenglon's inspect.
Knightwing - Kingmaker
Lenglon - one-shot super-inspect (used on FoU(town)), results were given to NJW
Lidku - no action N1
Max - commuter, did NOT perform crane-action, 1-shot mafiakill vest (used), knows what action is attempted upon them, unrevealed interaction with FoU.
NJW - inspected FoU's action, received Lenglon's inspection's results, claims result shows FoU as town.
Shake - bodyguard same team, used on Lenglon.
Tric - omega-JOAT
is this correct?
Tric - do you mind giving a summary of your analysis of everyone and the overall gamestate we're in? Also, why did you perform no actions last night?
Again, why is not performing a night action on a kill-less night suspect, when nobody's claimed a block or protect that would have been likely to interfere with you or Lidku?The main issue is the Crane NJW. It prevents town from targeting them. Come the next morning, someone tried to kill Max. It's a sneaky way to try and bypass Max's protection. Had they picked Lenglon up with the crane we'd be missing her today.
Mafia can just do a different action, or do something to sneakily set up a kill. If it's Lenglon/KnightWing, mafia essentially did give themselves a kill last night.
I stayed up late to get the first post, and I guess it worked out.
I originally just wanted to get in first to say this:
That thing with the crane? That wasn't my power. I don't know where it came from, and I consider it suspicious, especially that it occurred after I said I would be commuting.
But then, in my night resolution PM, I learned something even more fascinating.
FallacyofUrist used a Mafiakill on me.
Unfortunately for him, I was serious about being hidden. Even more unfortunately for him, I didn't let on that I learn certain actions that are used on me while doing so. FallacyofUrist, you tried to kill me! After I supported your possibly being town against NJW! At least now I see why you said that your actions will come up as "Mafiakill".
The action in question is called Mug, and it's clearly labelled a "Mafiakill".
(Yes I did read the post and saw that I don't have a vote today, but that's not going to stop me from using red text for DRAMA.)
I'll assume this is true, and go from there. Fal used a Mafiakill action. It failed, obviously.
On the other side, Fal got confirmed as Town, by the whispering. This is contingent on NJW being town and Always Godfather not being the actual role..
Shakerag has effectively confirmed Lenglon as town with his claim. Knightwing's given Lenglon the power of the King. Based on memory right now, I'd put Shakerag, Lenglon, and Knightwing as Core Town for now. This means Lidku, NJW, Fal, and Max, plus myself.
Lidku claims to have done nothing. So that leaves him open to framing.
Fal actioned on Max, this is pretty much confirmed outside shenanigans. NJW inspected Fal, apparently. Notably, that would mean that Mafia didn't try and kill anyone last night, as there are no claimed protections. Fal's the only one with a kill action on record.
Lidku, what are your thoughts on my reasoning?
Notably, that would mean that Mafia didn't try and kill anyone last night, as there are no claimed protections.
Wait... I may be missing something here, but how do you know someone tried to kill Max, Tric?
The main issue is the Crane NJW. It prevents town from targeting them. Come the next morning, someone tried to kill Max.
As I have stated before, I can grab abilities from the last game, and if they're active they become 1-shot.The crane cannot possibly have been a night action, as it took place at the end of the previous day. It must have been a day action or maybe some kind of passive. In that case, anyone could've done it.
Also, changing theories isn't how I would describe it. Right now there isn't a unified accounting of what happened last night. If Fal is mafia, then the Crane took their target out of town's reach to protect, followed by Fal attempting to kill them. If Fal is town, then Mafia didn't kill anyone last night, nor attempt to. But that isn't in line with the use of the Crane. Fal being an altered Godfather makes more sense, but we can't actually trust that 100%.
Hence, it makes more sense to remove those without stated actions last night, as they are likely the ones to have used the Crane. I claimed yesterday though, and my actions are confirmable N2. You, Lidku, did not perform a night action, but we don't know why not.
The only other person it could be that did the Crane is likely NJW or myself, and I'm excluding me doing it for obvious reasons.
As I have stated before, I can grab abilities from the last game, and if they're active they become 1-shot.The crane cannot possibly have been a night action, as it took place at the end of the previous day. It must have been a day action or maybe some kind of passive. In that case, anyone could've done it.
Also, changing theories isn't how I would describe it. Right now there isn't a unified accounting of what happened last night. If Fal is mafia, then the Crane took their target out of town's reach to protect, followed by Fal attempting to kill them. If Fal is town, then Mafia didn't kill anyone last night, nor attempt to. But that isn't in line with the use of the Crane. Fal being an altered Godfather makes more sense, but we can't actually trust that 100%.
Hence, it makes more sense to remove those without stated actions last night, as they are likely the ones to have used the Crane. I claimed yesterday though, and my actions are confirmable N2. You, Lidku, did not perform a night action, but we don't know why not.
The only other person it could be that did the Crane is likely NJW or myself, and I'm excluding me doing it for obvious reasons.
That would need to be unbalanced by also allowing the Night Action to be done by a single player.I don't know what you mean by this.
If we go with the reasoning anyone could do it, then that brings you under suspicion as well.Well... yeah. Fallacy can probably confirm that I was hidden, although it's a little unclear to me based on the flavor what he would actually see. But in principle, ignoring that, it's not impossible that I could have done it and then lied about it for some reason. It just doesn't seem like it would be helpful in any way. You shouldn't trust my say-so completely. It's even possible, in principle, that Fallacy and I are pulling off some weird gambit; NJW confirmed the kill action, but I would 100% use a mafiakill on myself (well, have someone use it on me) while protected for the WIFOM value. I've seen it work!
Wait... I may be missing something here, but how do you know someone tried to kill Max, Tric?You didn't answer this, TricMagic.
Yeah, that's also why I flagged the statement about "allowing the Night Action to be done by a single player". It certainly sounds like Tric is claiming mechanical knowledge of how the crane action worked. I'd really appreciate some clarification here.Wait... I may be missing something here, but how do you know someone tried to kill Max, Tric?You didn't answer this, TricMagic.
Please tell me you didn't TMI here...
If I was scum, who would I give rulership to the person who has voted me multiple times? If I was scum and afraid of dying, that would be a death sentence. If anything, I would give it to my scum partner and keep quiet about it while they give some inane reason about why they are the only one able to voteWell, you might do it so you could claim exactly that.
Wait... I may be missing something here, but how do you know someone tried to kill Max, Tric?You didn't answer this, TricMagic.
Please tell me you didn't TMI here...
Can we... take away the neutral advice privileges?
You, Lidku, did not perform a night action, but we don't know why not.
The only other person it could be that did the Crane is likely NJW or myself, and I'm excluding me doing it for obvious reasons.
To answer Max, the Crane Action sounds like the same End of Day thing I've got. I pick an ability and get it at the end of the day, they pick someone to be removed from town actioning them. Including the target themselves maybe. But if Max's thing is an auto that wouldn't actually work, if it wasn't, then it might have worked.
Same. read lists can go in any order you please, and use any formatting you please. The important thing is that the information is there and that it is clearly presented. If you feel like presenting your read list as an animated gif of a conversation between sockpuppets then more power to you.Can we... take away the neutral advice privileges?
Yeah, that's really a personal preference thing in regards to the reads lists. I'd rather get lynched every game than be told I need to use a specific formatting.
You, Lidku, did not perform a night action, but we don't know why not.
The only other person it could be that did the Crane is likely NJW or myself, and I'm excluding me doing it for obvious reasons.
I didn't do any night action because my role, Galactic Patrol Officer, primarily has "bus" abilities attached to it. I did not know who I should've targeted to have any effects go on me, so I simply chose not to do any action N1.To answer Max, the Crane Action sounds like the same End of Day thing I've got. I pick an ability and get it at the end of the day, they pick someone to be removed from town actioning them. Including the target themselves maybe. But if Max's thing is an auto that wouldn't actually work, if it wasn't, then it might have worked.
You admittedly have a lot of bizarre claims on what your single role can do, TricMagic. You DID mention that you apparently can get abilities from the last BYOR game we had, but now suddenly you can "pick someone to be removed from Town actioning them"?
Why did you not mention this until now? And why, conveniently, did something as Maximum Spin being targeted at the very end of the day coincide with what you're disclosing one of your abilities can do?
A newbie who's never played a normal game of mafia and rolled miller didn't have a constructive playstyle D1? Nani-desu? Or whatever exclamation of surprise furries use?Sigh.
I successfully targeted Max, bypassing the crane thing, but my action failed. This does mean my action expenditure was refunded, though. I imagine the action failure was due to Max's own shenanigans.Yes, that is correct. Well, not the 'try to kill you' part. But I did act on you last night. Regardless, I am town.Let me get this straight. You have an auto that makes all your mafiakill powers not kill?
And you targeted Max? A person not targetable by town players? Is there a reason you're not being a bit more specific about how your auto works, given how this looks? Yes/no answer to that one would be fine.
Importantly, did you actually hit Max?
Yes. I acted on you. Regardless, I am town. My role is a flaming bucket of WIFOM, unfortunately.All the information you need is here.
When I said all my actions appear to be mafiakills, that's because they are in fact mafiakill abilities. They have the tag and everything.
However, my auto ability has two components.
Firstly, it lets me use abilities as though I was mafia-aligned, which includes using mafiakills. Turns out it also let me bypass that crane-shield thingamajig.
Secondly, it makes my mafiakill abilities not kill.
... I suspect if a mafia member manages to steal one of my actions, they will be able to kill with it, unfortunately.
The only way I can confirm what I did during the night is by giving a very detailed account of FoU's blocking/mafiakill action. My role isn't that powerful N1.Like so.
So: Mug is P3/P7 and blocks actions as well as killing the target. FoU should be ok with revealing this, and I'm fairly sure it's a 1-shot anyhow.
I guess that fits with FoU's story.
Claims summary:Correct on my end, yeah. My ability failed, likely due to Spin's thing. There was also another thing, but zips up my beak. Good courtesy to keep the other part secret.
FoU - all actions are mafiakills, use abilities as though mafia-aligned, including mafiakills. mafiakill abilities do not kill. Targeted Max N1, unrevealed interaction with Max, showed as town to Lenglon's inspect.
In so far as mine, I think so, although I'm asking webadict some additional questions. Seems like I could also have gotten a success message if I was redirected to a different valid target?If Shakerag was scum, it'd be easy enough to fake his claimed action. Since Lenglon is already on everyone's town core list he doesn't lose much by 'confirming' her. Not definitive, but worth pointing out.
That's what it does and the priority, but it isn't 1-shot. It's shotted, but he has more of it.I has many mugs.
OK Lidku, at this point you're definitely doing this on purpose. Comprehend!
Tric's claimed role seems to be... ungodly powerful? Either he's scum or there's some catch to it that he's not telling us. Or just bluffing.
100% this.Can we... take away the neutral advice privileges?
Yeah, that's really a personal preference thing in regards to the reads lists. I'd rather get lynched every game than be told I need to use a specific formatting.
I'm 99% sure you're misinterpreting what TricMagic's saying. I'm not convinced TricMagic DIDN'T do it yet, but he's not saying that he could. He seems to be saying "both abilities are day actions that take effect at the very end of the day".To answer Max, the Crane Action sounds like the same End of Day thing I've got. I pick an ability and get it at the end of the day, they pick someone to be removed from town actioning them. Including the target themselves maybe. But if Max's thing is an auto that wouldn't actually work, if it wasn't, then it might have worked.
You admittedly have a lot of bizarre claims on what your single role can do, TricMagic. You DID mention that you apparently can get abilities from the last BYOR game we had, but now suddenly you can "pick someone to be removed from Town actioning them"?
Why did you not mention this until now? And why, conveniently, did something as Maximum Spin being targeted at the very end of the day coincide with what you're disclosing one of your abilities can do?
During the day I can pick an ability from the previous BYOR, and if it's Active, it becomes a 1-shot. I receive it at the end of the day. May only be able to get each once, but it's useful. That's 5 times I've explained it now, just to hammer the point home. Stop attributing discussion and theory to new unslated abilities!What's the catch?
... Hah.. I can't copy kill actions. So frustrated I forget to add that. And yeah, it's one per day. I don't have any other abilities but the ones I pick up.During the day I can pick an ability from the previous BYOR, and if it's Active, it becomes a 1-shot. I receive it at the end of the day. May only be able to get each once, but it's useful. That's 5 times I've explained it now, just to hammer the point home. Stop attributing discussion and theory to new unslated abilities!What's the catch?
Let's compare your claimed ability to Egan.
Egan had a much more limited ability selection to pick from, and was cursed with omega miller for it. Your selection is naturally incredibly expansive.
Scum typically get stronger roles than town players do, to balance out their lower numbers.
The only thing I can think of that balances out your roles is that you don't get three picks on Day 1, only one, but that's... not much, when you can pick players' strongest one-shots and make them yours to use.
Kinda like how litrally no one s brainstorming ways to break the game open with my abilities though. Or giving me something to do to confirm myself and someone else.That requires us to trust you.
Egan had a much more limited ability selection to pick from, and was cursed with omega miller for it. Your selection is naturally incredibly expansive.
Scum typically get stronger roles than town players do, to balance out their lower numbers.
The only thing I can think of that balances out your roles is that you don't get three picks on Day 1, only one, but that's... not much, when you can pick players' strongest one-shots and make them yours to use.
Least I have a solid explanation for why I did nothing last night...
Also, you're the one who's constantly misinterpreted things. Want me dead that badly? Do it tonight, rather than try and lynch me.
You, Lidku, did not perform a night action, but we don't know why not.
The only other person it could be that did the Crane is likely NJW or myself, and I'm excluding me doing it for obvious reasons.
I didn't do any night action because my role, Galactic Patrol Officer, primarily has "bus" abilities attached to it. I did not know who I should've targeted to have any effects go on me, so I simply chose not to do any action N1.
Claiming no actions on a night with no kill isn't particularly scummy to my mind - in fact, scum very frequently have other abilities allowing them to not kill and take an action, so it would be strange if they neither killed nor acted.I know this is fairly far back in the conversation, but NJW, I actually agree with this. Most of the claimed night actions are confirmable, so I see a number of them making various players involved with the actions more likely to be town, which is why focusing on the non-actors seems reasonable to me, but you are correct that there's nothing inherently scummy in not acting on a no-kill night.
What I'm trying to figure out is how come no mafiakill occurred.
Tric: I'm under the impression that you've played a number of past games at this point, could you link some of them? especially BYORs moderated by Web, and the more recent the games are the better for my purposes.Well, the obvious choice is obvious, so I'll throw it in for both of you: The prequel to this one. (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=179912)
If Shakerag was scum, it'd be easy enough to fake his claimed action. Since Lenglon is already on everyone's town core list he doesn't lose much by 'confirming' her. Not definitive, but worth pointing out.
Briefly reviewed that and didn't see what I was looking for, which was sad but also a long-shot anyway. We try things, sometimes they work.Tric: I'm under the impression that you've played a number of past games at this point, could you link some of them? especially BYORs moderated by Web, and the more recent the games are the better for my purposes.Well, the obvious choice is obvious, so I'll throw it in for both of you: The prequel to this one. (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=179912)
It seems to contain a good selection of everyone involved's typical behavior, really. Man, I was really out of it for d1 that time. I even used emoticons. You thought this one was bad.
Claiming no actions on a night with no kill isn't particularly scummy to my mind - in fact, scum very frequently have other abilities allowing them to not kill and take an action, so it would be strange if they neither killed nor acted.Lidku: could you explain why Bussing two players at random, assuming you have a null read of literally everyone in the game, would be a bad judgement call?
What I'm trying to figure out is how come no mafiakill occurred.
How about this, you use this Super Protect tonight, and I'll Sketch it.Claiming no actions on a night with no kill isn't particularly scummy to my mind - in fact, scum very frequently have other abilities allowing them to not kill and take an action, so it would be strange if they neither killed nor acted.Lidku: could you explain why Bussing two players at random, assuming you have a null read of literally everyone in the game, would be a bad judgement call?
What I'm trying to figure out is how come no mafiakill occurred.
Primarily because of that fact that I wouldn't want to be responsible for some catastrophic negative effect on someone that maybe Town. I just didn't see how effective my abilities would be on N1, so I chose not to do anything. The super protect I'm saving for a situation that absolutely requires it.
I'm still sus on FallacyofUrist because there is no good explanation as to how he was able to target Maximum SpinOkay, I believe I explained this once already but it's possible that you missed it, so I'll explain it again.
The Crane: "Bwahahahaha! Now, nobody with the Town alignment can target Maximum Spin!"
Maximum Spin: "Wait what? That's not my ability."
Shakerag and NJW2000, the scumteam (secretly): "Gottem."
Lenglon, Lidku, TricMagic, Knightwing64: "Well darn. Guess we can't target Spin, then."
Fallacy: "I'd like to Mug Maximum Spin."
The Crane: "Nope. You're town. Not allowed."
Fallacy: "But... you have to treat me like I'm mafia, because I'm always scum."
The Crane: "What?? That's not how this works."
webadict: "Checks out."
The Crane: "... ugh, fine."
Mug: fails
Fallacy: "Darn."
Maximum Spin: "Fallacy tried to kill me!"
Shakerag and NJW2000 (secretly): "Wait, what?"
Fallacy: "No, I didn't."
Maximum Spin: "Bwuh."
You gonna justify calling me scum though? Like any kind of explanation for that? How about going back to how I stole your idea... because that was suuuuch a good case.Well, if I use your approximate level of argument strength, 'stole my idea without mentioning I brought it up first at all' and a few other minor things would be enough to justify a vote on you.
FoU: Thank you. Could you summarize why you are sus of Shake and NJW again?The quick notes is NJW2000's behavior on Day 1 and extremely weakly justified voting - NJW2000 isn't a newbie. Surely he could at least try to poke holes in my behavior and not just 'miller late bad'. As for Shakerag, the bodyguard claim doesn't fit the rest of his role very well. I admit that's a weaker justification, but it's not like I'm going to stop here. Call it a gut feeling I'm going to follow up on.
FoU and Max would it be a bad thing for FoU to continue false-mafiakilling Max, as a way to prove himself? Since if the maf get a kill and Max sees that FoU actioned him, it will show that he really has the auto he says he does. And if he actually is maf, he will either have to never nightkill or out himself.I'm down for this.
Since it sounds like your bus isn't shotted, I don't see why you would not use it N1, and your explanation of your choice - that you didn't want to be responsible for... something? Doesn't seem reasonable to me.
FoU and Max would it be a bad thing for FoU to continue false-mafiakilling Max, as a way to prove himself? Since if the maf get a kill and Max sees that FoU actioned him, it will show that he really has the auto he says he does. And if he actually is maf, he will either have to never nightkill or out himself.I see no obvious problem with this plan. Fallacy, though, would you mind laying out your mafiakill options and what they do for me? I understand if you want to keep the information to yourself, but it'd be nice if there's one that will also not interfere with my own role so I can, you know, get an action to use one day.
I didn't want to be involved in a chance of my wayward random bus that has a high chance of killing a Town member.NOT redirecting the mafiakill means it has a 100% chance of killing a Town member. In theory.
I see no obvious problem with this plan. Fallacy, though, would you mind laying out your mafiakill options and what they do for me? I understand if you want to keep the information to yourself, but it'd be nice if there's one that will also not interfere with my own role so I can, you know, get an action to use one day.Well, I only have two mafiakill options. The first is what you've already seen. The second one is investigative in nature, though, and doesn't do any interference.
FoU: Lidku has the ability to protect you, and locking him into that job to confirm himself frees today's lynch up for an alternate choice - like those you're sus of.That's fair, then. I'll accept it. Let me write up my cases for Shakerag and NJW2000.
Okay, this might be a weird question, but is anyone of you okay with a 50 percent t chance of dying?Knightwing: Why are you asking this question at this time?
Basically, I have a ability that makes it so mafia kills only effect me and one other person, revives and protection is canceled
*various nonsense*
Okay, this might be a weird question, but is anyone of you okay with a 50 percent t chance of dying?I'm in!
Basically, I have a ability that makes it so mafia kills only effect me and one other person, revives and protection is canceled
Okay, this might be a weird question, but is anyone of you okay with a 50 percent t chance of dying?I'm fine with it given I still have a vote when I'm dead. Might have wanted to save that revelation till Day 3 though, given they can just kill you.
Basically, I have a ability that makes it so mafia kills only effect me and one other person, revives and protection is canceled
Honestly, my top scumpick right now would be Shakerag, but only because he's flying under the radar so much.Okay, this might be a weird question, but is anyone of you okay with a 50 percent t chance of dying?I'm in!
Basically, I have a ability that makes it so mafia kills only effect me and one other person, revives and protection is canceled
I find a common scum tactic to be argument-dismissal, that is, either misinterpreting or selectively quoting someone's post to make them look weaker than they actually are. NJW2000 has been doing this all game.*various nonsense*
I feel like web wouldn't put in random nonsense like non-shared mafiakills that also block so the victim doesn't get to play.As much as this is outguessing the mod, it's also absurd because NJW did play in BYOR 15 (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=177586.msg8216431#msg8216431). NJW2000 should have at least a basic understanding of the fact that webadict prefers to make setups more interesting and complex instead of less. Although this is a Beginner's BYOR, this game isn't trying to be Mostly Vanilla Mafia. If anything, a mafiakill ability that also blocks is really simple. It's not a reasonable argument to make that 'web wouldn't put in' my ability.
Yes, that is correct. Well, not the 'try to kill you' part. But I did act on you last night. Regardless, I am town.Let me get this straight. You have an auto that makes all your mafiakill powers not kill?
And you targeted Max? A person not targetable by town players? Is there a reason you're not being a bit more specific about how your auto works, given how this looks? Yes/no answer to that one would be fine.
Importantly, did you actually hit Max?
When I said all my actions appear to be mafiakills, that's because they are in fact mafiakill abilities. They have the tag and everything.I clearly stated that my auto 'lets me use abilities as though I was mafia-aligned' earlier, a fact which NJW seems to ignore.
However, my auto ability has two components.
Firstly, it lets me use abilities as though I was mafia-aligned, which includes using mafiakills. Turns out it also let me bypass that crane-shield thingamajig.
Secondly, it makes my mafiakill abilities not kill.
I'm still sus on FallacyofUrist because there is no good explanation as to how he was able to target Maximum SpinNote that Shakerag makes the exact same point later on, similarly blind - or misrepresenting/ignoring - my auto claim.
Jesus. I’m not going to bother responding to Lenglons text wall of mangled logic and misrepresentation. Max actually got my point, he just didn’t think the event I considered low probability was that unlikely. I don’t know why this is so hard for you Lenglon, but I’m really not interested in engaging with someone who responds so emotionally and with such little respect for other players. Given you thought I was someone else the whole game, I don’t really feel obliged to explain things to you.Ironic given the habit of misrepresentation NJW seems to have. While Lenglon has been emotional, it has not been to the exclusion of logic. As for the last sentence, 'given you thought I was someone else the whole game, I don't really feel obliged to explain things to you'...
Just earlier, NJW states that the identity confusion was 'fair enough', which is strange given he later used it as an excuse to not engage with her.*sigh*I don't find your failure to properly read my posts alignment indicative. I just find it obstructs my play. Also, yeah, I'm not doll, but confusion is fair enough. They did tend to be a bit more... abrasive.
NJW: Fix your lies. Now. I'm not going to put up with obvious bullshit, and you can just enjoy the vote for your troubles.
@FoU: yeah, that was your point on Egan, I hadn’t spotted it and acknowledged it was interesting after you posted it. It is the most dubious thing about their play today, aside from the miller stuff. I never claimed it was my point, and you making it doesn’t mean it’s wrong, regardless of alignment. This is a weak prod at me.Misrepresentation. I never said 'NJW is scum because he took my point and says it was his'. I pointed that out because NJW took my point, didn't acknowledge that it was mine in the first place - there's a subtle difference there, between 'says it was his' and 'doesn't attribute its origin'.
As to my case on you: sorry, but I think it’s good enough to vote on.
[1] It’s ironic that you tell me not to outguess the mod, given the last role you gave me was entirely about doing that.
[2] As for your other play… you’re decent at mafia, so the “you stole my idea” attack was about as weak as you’ll get.
[3] The miller stuff is simply the most important thing today, and it’s what I’m voting on.
I explicitly say 'non-claim behavior'. He responds with 'do you mean your late claim, or the claimed thing that you shouldn't claim' (the latter referring to my claim of the secret interaction involving Max's ability). I explicitly ask him if my behavior not related to my claim supports his case that I'm scum. He dodges the question, essentially.We’re not no-lynching.Do you mean your late claim, or the claimed thing you shouldn’t claim that explains it? Both slightly, I’d say.
NJW: Does my non-claim behavior support your case? I’m expecting a yes or no answer here.
No, I mean my behavior which has nothing to do with my claim. Behavior that is not in the category of claim-related. Does that support your vote on me, and if so, why? Please provide direct quotes if possible.I follow up on his bs. He does not respond to this post.
You missed me.This is NJW's next post, which does not address my response in the slightest. Possibly because he knows he can't point to scummy behavior of mine without using the power of misrepresentation.
Quite busy rn but I'd just like to note that voting someone other than one of the miller claims means you believe both miller claims or you're more than 50% on that person. Tric elim isn't something I want, I want Egan or FoU.
No real thoughts on his power... seems potentially overpowered, and capable of giving some info, but quite random?
I really don't think a weak meta read without specific examples/comparisons and a conspiracy around my follower-miller claim is a stronger case than one actually based around a very simple question.I will say that this post was sent to Egan, not NJW, but the point I make here is still widely applicable.
Has Fallacy been actively pushing cases and hunting scum?
Can you answer that one, too?
Because if Egan is fakeclaiming and FoU isn’t, Egan just claimed a highly unusual role, one I’ve never seen or even heard of, and something more similar than any other role I’ve seen just happened to exist in the game. It’s an astonishingly unlikely event. When there is a much more likely explanation involving FoU fakeclaiming or neither fakeclaiming, we are not entitled to accept the ridiculously unlikely explanation as plausible.NJW2000 has played BYOR15. He knows what our mod is capable of. The fact that we're playing a Beginner's game doesn't mean that webadict stops being webadict, it just means that webadict tones things down.
I mean, all Egans posts so far could have been ones he was forced to make by a post restriction. It’s an extremely unlikely explanation, so I reject it.
Has anyone ever seen the “I appear to have done the mafia kill” role before? I think it’s a very nonstandard miller-like role
Ho hum. I find that hard to believe. Also, have a look through Fal and EgAns early interactions. They’re just a tad weird. At the very least, I think FoU is lying here.Both Egan and I are practical jokers. Note that NJW does not quote the 'early interactions' or provide examples.
Anything to say for yourself, FallacyOfUrist?
I mean, you eliminating a very obvious town miller and asking Lenglon for my lynch without actually quoting my behaviour isn't very townie, but maybe you're just bad? Dunno.Misrepresentation. Note what I said earlier:
NJW2000 says that I'm asking Lenglon to execute him without trying to build a case.You gonna justify calling me scum though? Like any kind of explanation for that? How about going back to how I stole your idea... because that was suuuuch a good case.Well, if I use your approximate level of argument strength, 'stole my idea without mentioning I brought it up first at all' and a few other minor things would be enough to justify a vote on you.
NJW2000 sus.
No, I think I'll do better than that. This game deserves full cases. Behavior arguments, mechanics arguments, working in tandem. Not "Fallacy scum because miller and not claimed in first post!" That's not enough, buddy.
Your job here, if this is the alternate reality where you're town and I'm scum, is to use my behavior and the mechanics to show how I'm scum to get Lenglon to execute me. Not just the mechanics, and not just the behavior.
Let's get to happily trying to get each other eliminated, shall we?
FallacyofUrist: What's your case for Shakerag? It seems you have just focused on NJW in your above post; or do you want to hold off to see if NJW flips Town or Mafia on the lynch?Like I said, Shakerag needs his own post. Wouldn't be fair of me to mega post to attack NJW and not do the same for Shakerag.
I'm sorry to say that I realized after I said that that I actually do need you to trigger my role so I can, you know, confirm you did it. So you're stuck with the one you used if you wanna do that.I see no obvious problem with this plan. Fallacy, though, would you mind laying out your mafiakill options and what they do for me? I understand if you want to keep the information to yourself, but it'd be nice if there's one that will also not interfere with my own role so I can, you know, get an action to use one day.Well, I only have two mafiakill options. The first is what you've already seen. The second one is investigative in nature, though, and doesn't do any interference.
I think the biggest threat to Town is figuring out who's responsible for the crane. It's dangerous because it isolates one Town member and prevents others from doing either Protects, Redirects, Revives - just anything that is a positive ability toward another Town member that might save them.
I'm sorry to say that I realized after I said that that I actually do need you to trigger my role so I can, you know, confirm you did it. So you're stuck with the one you used if you wanna do that.Well, darn. Alright, Mug it is then, if you're sure my other option isn't viable.
You can probably figure out more than half of how my role works by now.
Lenglon, Lidku: What do we do if the crane-user targets me? In that case Lidku will be unable to provide protection. Does the plan change?In that case we'll know that publicly declared planned actions are a really really bad idea, and will have to adjust.
NJW2000, I have just one question for you, and remember I only ask questions when I think they're important.
Who do you think is Fallacy's partner?
I can see a few possibilities that would seem to be consistent with your worldview, but I want to hear what you think. You seem fully sold on Fallacy being scum, so you must have some idea. Fallacy, of course, has told us who he thinks your partner is.
*various nonsense*
Try to get you eliminated?
Nah, I don't particularly think you're scum, I feel like web wouldn't put in random nonsense like non-shared mafiakills that also block so the victim doesn't get to play. Mug was a pretty convincing ability on a meta level... especially as it could just be a high-priority kill if you were mafia. I mean, you eliminating a very obvious town miller and asking Lenglon for my lynch without actually quoting my behaviour isn't very townie, but maybe you're just bad? Dunno.
Obviously I'll be rereading the thread and looking for convincing evidence for scum on behaviour alone, but it's mostly misunderstandings and people getting mad at one another, so I doubt I'll find anything particularly damning.
Honestly, my top scumpick right now would be Shakerag, but only because he's flying under the radar so much.Okay, this might be a weird question, but is anyone of you okay with a 50 percent t chance of dying?I'm in!
Basically, I have a ability that makes it so mafia kills only effect me and one other person, revives and protection is canceled
NJW2000 is not hunting scum, and refuses to acknowledge that that is what I am doing.
Because, to put it simply, that is the strongest evidence against his argument that I must be scum. If I am actively scum hunting, attacking, creating cases - if I am acting town in every way other than claiming partial-miller late, then it undercuts his case, so he simply refuses to acknowledge it, and minimizes my points whenever possible.
Ok, I'll reply to some of FoU's endless wall, but I honestly don't have time to line-by-line the whole thing, especially in a game in which I don't currently have a vote or high hopes of persuading the one person who does. If people want me to address another of his points, I'm happy to do that, but tell me which. Let's address what he thinks is the strongest point.Okay.
Well, what I was really going for was to find someone to attack. I recall hearing that picking at whoever votes for you is an acceptable beginner strategy, so I went for that. Shakerag doesn't seem scummy to me at this point, but it doesn't really matter so much as that I got them to say some stuff and hopefully that helps people with more developed instincts than me.This is bad. You've heard it's ok for newbie players to do something that's bad, so you did it? And you're waiting for stronger players to figure out the game?
That's a very convenient position for mafia to take. Instead, try to play well, and actually play the game. You may not have played much mafia, but you're smart, so scumhunt.
MaximumSpin - I've never been able to read him and seldom find him useful before D3.
Unvote. Quick check shows, you, NJW, Tric, and me on Max, and that's one vote off from hammer. I'd rather not have someone accidentally execute Max within something like the first 24 hours of the day.Between this post and NJW's. Currently only one of them, instead we have infighting.
Alright, back from the mall. Alot of posts have been flung around and it seems everyone is centering toward Max?It's these sorts of posts that make me think Lidku is scum... You had better have a strong day 3.
Also, Lenglon is acting kind of aggro.. Could be a town demeanor... but I feel like it's way too early to be acting this aggressive. On a D1 one, there is nothing to really go off of.
Probobly a bit late.. But if nothing is done on Day 1, there is nothing to go off of on day 2. Being worried about town numbers is odd when there are 9 of us.Quote from: Maximum SpinNJW2000 and Lidku have not posted much. I think NJW has only posted once, and it feels like Lidku has done barely more than that. I don't trust this. Honestly, if I had to pick one OTP Scumteam out of everyone, I might say it's just the two of them riding it out and hoping to casually get me lynched in the shitfight.Quote from: Maximum SpinI guess I should unvote.
NJW2000 and Lidku, what're you two up to?Quote from: Maximum SpinOh, Lidku just showed up, while I was writing, huh. Moving my vote to NJW2000 then. He still needs to DO MORE, though.
Apologies for the inactivity, but I DID preface earlier that I was at the mall doing IRL matters.
This is my second BYOR game and I think I just usually like to be passive in general on D1, then try to actively solve on D2 (like I did before). There is just never enough to go on in a D1 to make any substantive determination on who is Mafia, in general. The D1 vote, if it occurs, most likely just kills a town; then after that, the Mafia will be able to get another kill on N1.
...Here's the other half of why I think Lidku may be scum. Out of the many many parts. Hunt! If you don't hunt, you get suspected.To everyone that isn't Egan. Do you think Egan and I are the scumteam?I am not interested in speculating about the scumteam as a group, and performing relational analysis, on day 1.
Individually you are each more townie than the players that have not posted enough content to form a read off of (Tric, Knightwing, NJW).
NJW has posted recently. That just really leaves Tric and Knightwing.. but I personally think inactivity is a somewhat weak modem to go off of... They could be doing IRL things. Usually I believe it's more likely that the Mafia is always active in a thread, as a means to deflect suspicion that they COULD be Mafia.. An inverse of what you've posted.
For me? My action would show up as targeting Max in that scenario, assuming I wasn't redirected or some other shenaniganery.
My actions show up as mafiakill actions, but their apparent targeting is not modified from what it actually is.
Now this is WEIRD. Because the same does not seem to be true of Egan. See:Ah in that case I'm like, omega miller. Inspects show me as mafia, surveys show my action as mafiakill, and tracking shows me as visiting whoever was killed.Shakerag - Please explain Miller Theory regarding D1 claims.
Oh I just realized I missed that. I stick by the old (relative to this subforum) rules that you always claim miller ASAP. To do otherwise is to invite doubt.
So there are different Omega-millers in play?
Ho hum. I find that hard to believe. Also, have a look through Fal and EgAns early interactions. They’re just a tad weird. At the very least, I think FoU is lying here.
Anything to say for yourself, FallacyOfUrist?
... Sigh.... Really Lidku? Out of context this would be rather horrible. But it does setup Lenglon's day2 claim nicely. Hmm..come to think of it, Lidku, I don't think anyone has really engaged with you today so far. How do you feel about that? Also, if you could get an investigate result on someone as a bonus action tonight, who would you pick? And if you had to take a vigi shot RIGHT NOW, who would you shoot with it?
For an investigation action, I would choose between either Egan, TricMagic, and admittedly... you.
You, because I feel like you're being a tad-bit aggressive for D1. Almost like you're trying hard to be considered Town with your constant activity and trying to grasp at things to nail who you suspect as Mafia.. an attempt to detract suspicion from yourself, perhaps?
TricMagic because he has been silent lately and he is usually more active than this. Though again, like I've broached before, it all could be IRL activities consuming up his time.
Egan, as a means to really discern of what they're saying about their "Miller" ability being true. But apparently the whole point of a "Miller" automatically typecasts the user as Mafia, no matter what? Then it becomes extremely hard to gauge whether or not Egan TRULY is either Mafia and Town (which is, I believe, is what everyone has been arguing these past pages.. I just realized we're still on D1, but at least somewhat half-up to the page number of the previous BYOR game :o).
Now, as for what I would do if I had a vigilante ability: I would save it for until I at least highly suspect someone. Doing the wrong the kill + a lynch vote killing a Town and not a Mafia member + the decided Mafia kill would devastate Town, bringing us way closer to a loss in one Day/Night. If I had such an ability, I would never disclose it and save it for at least N2 or N3 (if I was still alive, that is) for someone I highly suspected.
Yeah, NJW2000 has rubbed me wrong all game. Enough's enough. He dies.I find a common scum tactic to be argument-dismissal, that is, either misinterpreting or selectively quoting someone's post to make them look weaker than they actually are. NJW2000 has been doing this all game.*various nonsense*
Also, NJW, it's a little odd that you decided to cut out such tiny segments of my post and removed their context. You also didn't address the conclusion at the bottom in any way. Why did you do that? It already was a fairly small post, and it's especially odd that you would remove the context from my statements while pitching a fit about how I wasn't representing yours properly.
The lack of suspiscions is not good.
I'm kind of ok with an Egan flip as I feel it may solve the FoU slot in some manner. I would prefer to see FoU eliminated though.
Will do a readslist but later... I have a train journey that would be perfect for that.
In any case, deep breath.2) Egan town FoU scum. - you are advocating for thisShow me where I did this. Just show me where. Read my posts. Then reread them. Then see if you can pick out the bit where I say this.QuoteI'm not misrepresenting anything. You are dismissing out of hand option 4, and you have stated that your reason for doing so is that it is to aduacious to be true. I consider this reason completely unacceptable.I am saying it is too unlikely to be reasonably accepted. READ MY POSTS. QUOTE THEM. Don't just ascribe random positions to me.
STOP MISREPRESENTING ME. I imagine several players don't particularly feel the need to see you survive the elim. If you continue to misrepresent what I say, I will be one of them. I don't care for players who post angry textwalls and fail to read the thread.
Also, NJW, it's a little odd that you decided to cut out such tiny segments of my post and removed their context. You also didn't address the conclusion at the bottom in any way. Why did you do that? It already was a fairly small post, and it's especially odd that you would remove the context from my statements while pitching a fit about how I wasn't representing yours properly.You posted lies about what I said and didn’t quote me. I quoted those lies and explained that they were lies. If you think the context of a statement is more important than the actual truth about what was written in a thread, I don’t really think it’s possible for me to usefully communicate with you. You’re going to have to start responding to what was written, not what you vaguely imagine from a skimread, or this isn’t going to work.
I’m going to be patient, and respond to your question. The difference between saying that an event is improbable compared to plausible alternatives and saying that scum would never be audacious enough to do it is that one is the first thing I just said and the other is the second.
In any case, readslist:Why am I lean-town when Lidku is Null? And not for the same reasons Shakerag is null, just that he's not rocking the boat. That is in and of itself suspicious, town should be hunting. A lot of this is tunneling Fal all day 1, and now into day 2 even with the supposed town confirmation.
(rather quick and scrappy, as it turns out, because I know who I have as scum already.)
Egan_BW: Lean scum. Highly dubious claim, admittedly. Many dubious points such as "haha we're both scum" with a nervy response from FoU as their first interaction, lack of suspects... and this (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=180072.msg8389865#msg8389865). If scum, probably with FoU.
FallacyofUrist: Scum. I don't really think there's going to be an omega-miller and a specialised-miller in the same game. If there are, Web has essentially created a bastard game instead of anything like a newbie game. I stand by my reasoning about the unlikelihood of a miller gambit + specialised miller guess on Egan's part, so I'm pretty sure FoU is scum. They also claimed miller quite late, which is not a townie thing to do.
Knightwing64: probably town. Tone reads as genuine (though mafia can get annoyed). D1
Lenglon: highly emotionally invested town. Obsessively pushing newer players and bringing in emotional/moral judgements, so helping noone, but probably louder D1 than they'd bother being as scum.
Lidku:Null. Not rocking the boat much. This post (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=180072.msg8389821#msg8389821) contains an "I'll vote if you insist", but Lidku may just be an unusually strong beginner, still liable to make that kind of error.
Maximum Spin: Weak scum lean. I can never really read Max well, but his defence of FoU over ER was a bit off.
Shakerag: Null. Not doing anything too aggressive, fair amount of activity. Not applying much vote pressure but asking questions. Strong and experienced enough that I'm very unlikely to catch them out D1, so can't call them town. Someone missing facetiousness is the subtlest tell I know, but if they're just autistic, it's not one I can use.
TricMagic: Lean town. Slightly ghostly presence but has made claims about what they'll be doing tonight, asked some reasonable questions.[/spoiler]
In conclusion: Kill Fallacy Now.
That's it.. Looking back over day one, the number of NJW posts is shockingly small.
... Sigh.... Really Lidku? Out of context this would be rather horrible.
Probobly a bit late.. But if nothing is done on Day 1, there is nothing to go off of on day 2. Being worried about town numbers is odd when there are 9 of us.
In any case, Lidku and NJW are both on Fal at Page 28.
Lidku: If you’re going to vote someone, do it because you think they’re scum, not because it’s just easier to leave a vote on them. Do you think I am mafia, with high or moderate confidence, or are you just voting so Lenglon doesn’t hunt you down?
To note, my day 1 actions means I'm fine with dying Knightwing. I'm kinda wondering if this is a way to try and save NJW now...
Lidku, a question for you. What should town do to achieve cohesion and trust in one another?
Is this really inactivity though? They've been pushing for a Fal lynch, been pushing a case, but the overall number of posts is fairly small. While they could be called quality, there needs to be more Day 2 to actually push the lynch and convince Lenglon.Quote from: TricMagicThat's it.. Looking back over day one, the number of NJW posts is shockingly small.
Ironic you say that to begin with, considering it was YOU that was noted on D1 of having little to no posts/activity. Remember I was the one trying to give you the benefit of the doubt, and say that inactivity is not a strong reason to suspect someone?
Shouldn't really need to. Put simply, you're saying you'd either want to investigate Lenglon, which is fair but horrid with the context of day 2, Egan, which is likewise such with day 2, or me, which is pointless given my lack of posts. It's something that looking back could be used to push an argument that you don't really want to build a town-core of people. While Godfather's may be a possibility, if you could confirm a strong player as town you could use that to snip away at the veil hiding who the mafia actually is. Lenglon's the only person in this list that is useful for that, and by tying them to Egan and I makes it seems like you're casting shade on Lenglon's town status.Quote from: TricMagic... Sigh.... Really Lidku? Out of context this would be rather horrible.
How even "out of context" does that post you quoted seem "rather horrible"? You just quoted but didn't really elaborate, just detracting it seems. Where is your argumentative logic in claiming it would be "horrible out of context"?
An issue with this is that I was putting myself out there during the times I posted.Quote from: TricMagicProbobly a bit late.. But if nothing is done on Day 1, there is nothing to go off of on day 2. Being worried about town numbers is odd when there are 9 of us.
And yet you were barely active to begin with on D1, which was bringing suspicions on you in the first place, and in which I tried to defend you against people soft-claiming against you for inactivity.
I am still very annoyed at you not comprehending things Lidku. Protecting afk players cause they're busy with RL is both easy brownie points and could be segwayed into protecting an absent-ish mafia player.... Really Lidku? I just explained what my role ability was.
You're saying that your role is "An Entire Game of BYOR Mafia," which was Maximum Spin's chosen role for the previous BYOR game we were in (and like I pointed out before, a role you didn't have in the previous game, but something else you had). His role didn't have the ability you claim it does; the ability to supposedly grab other abilities from a previous game?
Can you please elaborate on what you're trying to explain about your role? Does it have the same abilities as Maximum Spin in the previous game; or is this some new ability you're claiming this previous role has, as something new that webadict had added to it?
Do you really think webadict would just reuse a role? I've already explained it, I can grab an ability from the previous game at the end of each day. And active abilities become 1-shots. Useless if I get lynched before I can even get one though.
Did you even bother to look at the page? It's right at the top, and at the moment both of you were voting Fal. That simple, doesn't matter if there is a case or not, just a statement of fact.Quote from: TricMagicIn any case, Lidku and NJW are both on Fal at Page 28.
I don't know particularly about NJW, but to speak for myself, I simply just noted the inherent weirdness of FallacyofUrist's ability and how it interacted with Maximum Spin being isolated by the crane. It wasn't a case of me being "on FallacyofUrist".
I'll note that was litteally last night for me. I just went through day one and picked up the posts, a reread and my thoughts. You know, the types of thing that lets other people see your inner workings? NJW's posts look fine on day 1, but on day 2 looking back, well. Hindsight is 20/20, and they don't look nearly as good now.Lidku: If you’re going to vote someone, do it because you think they’re scum, not because it’s just easier to leave a vote on them. Do you think I am mafia, with high or moderate confidence, or are you just voting so Lenglon doesn’t hunt you down?
The page you even mention (pg.28) is where Fallacy convinced me to change my D1 vote to you TricMagic, since I started to feel strongest of you being scum, due to your weird behavior on D1. Your argument on me being "on Fallacy" doesn't make sense since my end-of-day vote remained on you, while everyone else was either dogpiling on either Egan or Fallacy (in which you were part of the vote on Egan).
Also, didn't you inference Knightwing and NJW being on a team a few posts ago? Why did that evaporate?
Post in question:To note, my day 1 actions means I'm fine with dying Knightwing. I'm kinda wondering if this is a way to try and save NJW now...
What did you mean by this post exactly? Are you relaying that you think Knightwing could be using somesort of tactic to "save NJW" from being lynched (since everyone in the thread seems to be focusing on him now)? And if so, why did you post this but not elaborate further, instead moving on to me at random being in a team with NJW, with shaky arguments (which were just quoting things from the thread and just inputting some blurbs.. nothing truly extensive).
As for your direct question for me:This was more a baited question, so good work on not falling for it and sticking to your root. Doesn't help me push a case on you, mind, but some fail and others catch a werewolf. (Catching out Moony is a highlight of my mafia gaming career on this forum. Wonder if you're be the next.)Quote from: TricMagicLidku, a question for you. What should town do to achieve cohesion and trust in one another?
It was something I already mentioned before in the thread. Just being inquisitorial but be sportsmen-like about it. No need to get a player riled to a point where they're throwing around insults and having bad feelings with each other. Aggression isn't a license just to make people feel bad about the game.
But I feel like the aggression has simmered down lately, so it's not really something I'm worrying about at the moment.
Honestly, my top scumpick right now would be Shakerag, but only because he's flying under the radar so much.Huh. Okay. I can actually get on board with this completely. Shakerag has been stubbornly null and I've been getting more and more concerned about it. I was expecting to have to wait until tomorrow to push on it. Do you have any previous Shakerag meta to back it up? I really don't myself. I'm not sure we've ever played together, certainly not very much.
Put simply, you're saying you'd either want to investigate Lenglon, which is fair but horrid with the context of day 2, Egan, which is likewise such with day 2, or me, which is pointless given my lack of posts.
Did you even bother to look at the page? It's right at the top, and at the moment both of you were voting Fal. That simple, doesn't matter if there is a case or not, just a statement of fact.
Anyways, since I'm being pressured to vote, I'll put one on FallacyofUrist. I just find him kinda shady, but nothing truly strong..
As for your direct question for me:This was more a baited question, so good work on not falling for it and sticking to your root. Doesn't help me push a case on you, mind, but some fail and others catch a werewolf. (Catching out Moony is a highlight of my mafia gaming career on this forum. Wonder if you're be the next.)Quote from: TricMagicLidku, a question for you. What should town do to achieve cohesion and trust in one another?
It was something I already mentioned before in the thread. Just being inquisitorial but be sportsmen-like about it. No need to get a player riled to a point where they're throwing around insults and having bad feelings with each other. Aggression isn't a license just to make people feel bad about the game.
But I feel like the aggression has simmered down lately, so it's not really something I'm worrying about at the moment.
Also, didn't you inference Knightwing and NJW being on a team a few posts ago? Why did that evaporate?
Post in question:To note, my day 1 actions means I'm fine with dying Knightwing. I'm kinda wondering if this is a way to try and save NJW now...
What did you mean by this post exactly? Are you relaying that you think Knightwing could be using somesort of tactic to "save NJW" from being lynched (since everyone in the thread seems to be focusing on him now)? And if so, why did you post this but not elaborate further, instead moving on to me at random being in a team with NJW, with shaky arguments (which were just quoting things from the thread and just inputting some blurbs.. nothing truly extensive).
NJW: Do you mind saying who you think is scum at this time and why?Believe me, that's what I want to be working on, rather than arguing with Fallacy about a case on him I already dropped.
NJW2000 was not saying 'FoU isn't scumhunting', he was not saying 'FoU is scumhunting'. Refusing to acknowledge positive points is different than asserting their opposite.I honestly do not understand why it is so important to you that he say that.
[1] You see why I complain about people not reading my posts? I don't make that many, it's not hard.[1] It seems to me like you're unhappy people aren't reading your posts the way you want them to, not in general.
[2] And again, with someone preemptively going "NJW is going to represent my points, boo-hoo!". This game is tedious.
I mean, I've pressed a bunch of people on stuff I found disturbing: Shake on the not-seeing-facetiousness tell, Max on his preference for Egan over you, Tric on what could have been a scumslip but it's very hard to tell with Tric, Egan on knowingly playing weakly and using his newness as an excuse, etc. So yeah, I've been looking for scum.Where are your detailed cases? You can point out individually scummy things, but you've never shown me the drive to take someone and get them executed.
As to the fact you've been scumhunting... sure you have. I acknowledge you did it D1, and I implicitly acknowledged it then by, you know, not pointing out "this vet isn't scumhunting at all, that's crazy!".I don't think I'm okay with 'implicit acknowledgement'. When something is relevant, you need to address it.
[1] Thing is, mafia can scumhunt too. You're a forum vet, so if you couldn't convincingly fake looking for scum, you'd have a reputation for being incredibly easily read. Which I'm pretty sure you don't.[1] Unfortunately this point is a bit convoluted since 90% of my games on this site have been as scum or third party. My reputation is inherently unbalanced.
[2] You eliminated Egan at least in part for not scumhunting as much and as loudly as other players, even though that was stupid, because of course they wouldn't, they're were a newbie miller in a crazy BYOR game.
[3] Again, you seem to have this mistaken idea that scumhunting -> always town, not scumhunting -> always scum. It doesn't.
[4] And you're insisting that the first one means people can't scumread you.
I don't vote based on virtue, I vote on who I actually think is scum.Does town-virtue not correlate with who is town?
Okay, I didn't argue clearly enough in this case. In the quote you took here, I was referring to your day-one behavior. Changing your read later on is okay.QuoteBecause, to put it simply, that is the strongest evidence against his argument that I must be scum. If I am actively scum hunting, attacking, creating cases - if I am acting town in every way other than claiming partial-miller late, then it undercuts his case, so he simply refuses to acknowledge it, and minimizes my points whenever possible.
Again, stop representing me as saying you must be scum. I thought you were the best choice D1, I don't have 100% confidence in my D1 reads.
Besides, you posted this in your mega-post after me, HERE (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=180072.msg8391170#msg8391170), explicitly stating that I don't think you're mafia. Unless you were referring to my case yesterday, but the point stands that a mafia player can look active and helpful, while a town player like Egan can look unhelpful. Would have been nice to see some evidence that you actually read that post, but hey.
I really wish people would actually read my posts.
If you're going to make a case on someone, you have to take into account the evidence for them being town as well as the evidence against them being town.NJW2000 was not saying 'FoU isn't scumhunting', he was not saying 'FoU is scumhunting'. Refusing to acknowledge positive points is different than asserting their opposite.I honestly do not understand why it is so important to you that he say that.
I would suspect fallacy due to the suspicious reaction to Egan’s joking about them being scum, and the fact that when I voted them, they sounded rather panicked until I explained myself. As well, they were the other major voting target.If you have a specific post you're referring to, it'd be a good idea to quote it. You can use the 'quote' button in the top right corner of a post to do this.
NJW2000 represents my role as absurd or unlikely, however they have experience with webadict's prior modding, which would suggest that my role is reasonable, even if webadict has scaled down to Beginner's level. Egan's role flip also provides an example of the level of power/complexity our mod is willing to create, and NJW2000 has also seen this. In spite of that NJW2000 argues my role is unlikely to truly exist.FoU: I am having trouble understanding what you're pushing at here. Could you please rephrase this accusation? It seems to me like your narrative of NJW's behavior is contradictory, and that makes the narrative far less convincing.Spoiler: Section 2 (click to show/hide)
FoU: I don't actually mind NJW asking for you to repeat something you'd said before in a slightly different way, it is a scumhunting tactic that gives a liar a chance to trip up and contradict themselves.I can see what you mean, but from my point of view, it looks like he just ignored what my post said.
FoU: To be fair, at the time NJW said these things you had not presented your case yet. I don't mind dismissing a case that hasn't been made yet as a case that hasn't been made yet. Also, this section feels kinda misrepresentation-ey, which I'd really REALLY prefer if you avoided doing when part of your own case is that NJW is misrepresentation-ey.While it is true I had not created my case yet at this point in time, I had stated my intention to do so. NJW2000 said, roughly speaking 'you're saying that I'm scum without showing evidence', failing to respond to the fact that I had publicly announced that I was going to be creating a full case.
[1] 1. I genuinely think FoU has been posting a lot of nonsense. "Why won't you acknowledge my scumhunting?" is half of his main argument against me. I explain why this is a worthless thing for a vet to post about above. So yeah, I'll dismiss his arguments.[1] I disagree. Scumhunting is strongly indicative of level of engagement with the game, which is a key component of towniness/scuminness. Specifically because NJW2000 is a veteran player, he should be creating cases and hunting down players. He is not.
[2] 4. My attitude to you changed between your posts, and I became less sympathetic to the doll confusion, after you voted and swore at me. Is this confusing?
[3] 5. I'm not sure which bit, but use without attribution post is here.QuotePosting from phone (you have no idea how annoying this formatting is to create) to point out that the “lack of suspects” thing NJW claims to suspect Egan for is one of the points I came up with, pretty much directly taken from my post. NJW does not mention this.He actually says taking so it does mean stealing nyaah.
I have no idea why he would post that unless to sus me, in which case he is kinda suggesting I stole it? I don't really get the distinction here, it seems like an insanely subtle quibble.
[3.5] Interesting that FoU is hitting the misrepresentation note hard - I think he really wants you to vote me, and is willing to be fairly instrumental about it. Still pretty much NAI though.
[4] 6. I misunderstand him once, because I think "non-claim" refers to all the not claiming he's been doing. Then I post once briefly at the end of the day and don't answer him. I've already stated that I find the miller stuff strong enough to vote on, as well as a few odd interactions with Egan and weak pushes, and that I only expect very slight tells like that from a vet D1. Fallacy is repeatedly yelling that my case can't be reasonable because he has been scumhunting and being active. That's the thing he wants me to answer here. Literally LAMIST.
I've already addressed this, I feel.
[5] 7. Do you want a line by line of this? It's mostly wrong, but the most damning thing is his:
"The strongest point I have to make is that NJW2000 is not hunting scum, and refuses to acknowledge that that is what I am doing."
Which is clearly a very weak "point". I have been hunting scum, and I am not obliged to acknowledge that FoU scumhunts, it's expected of him as either alignment. I never said he didn't scumhunt, so why is he repeatedly asking me to acknowledge it?
Believe me, that's what I want to be working on, rather than arguing with Fallacy about a case on him I already dropped.I should also note minimization and invalidation. As scum, you want to make your opponents' cases on you look pointless or not based in fact. This is the equivalent of NJW2000 saying 'Fallacy has no real points, ignore them'.
[2] I've seen Egan playing before - er. Maybe I haven't. Okay, you have a point here, and I forgot to take into account the meta situation when hunting Egan. I don't think I would have gone after them so hard if I realized their relative lack of experience.You absolutely have. The most recent example was the KWN where we were mafia together and he was cult.
I think FoU is saying he's not seen Egan's townplay, only games with Egan as scum.[2] I've seen Egan playing before - er. Maybe I haven't. Okay, you have a point here, and I forgot to take into account the meta situation when hunting Egan. I don't think I would have gone after them so hard if I realized their relative lack of experience.You absolutely have. The most recent example was the KWN where we were mafia together and he was cult.
Right. But they weren't town that game, were they?[2] I've seen Egan playing before - er. Maybe I haven't. Okay, you have a point here, and I forgot to take into account the meta situation when hunting Egan. I don't think I would have gone after them so hard if I realized their relative lack of experience.You absolutely have. The most recent example was the KWN where we were mafia together and he was cult.
I think FoU is saying he's not seen Egan's townplay, only games with Egan as scum.Yes, thank you.
Positive points make your target look town. Scum doesn't want that. So only point out negative points. By saying Fal isn't scumhunting, that can be used to push a lynch on them. Not that that is looking at all likely now, soNJW2000 was not saying 'FoU isn't scumhunting', he was not saying 'FoU is scumhunting'. Refusing to acknowledge positive points is different than asserting their opposite.I honestly do not understand why it is so important to you that he say that.
-they've started going after Shakerag for lack of interaction today. Or somesuch. Better to lynch town than get lynched yourself right?Positive points make your target look town. Scum doesn't want that. So only point out negative points. By saying Fal isn't scumhunting, that can be used to push a lynch on them. Not that that is looking at all likely now, soNJW2000 was not saying 'FoU isn't scumhunting', he was not saying 'FoU is scumhunting'. Refusing to acknowledge positive points is different than asserting their opposite.I honestly do not understand why it is so important to you that he say that.
It’s a fairly safe assumption that at least one of the scum voted Egan, who was town.
Excluding me, and Lenglon, this leaves TricMagic*, Maximum Spin*, FallacyofUrist*, and Shakerag. At least one of these are scum. I would suspect fallacy due to the suspicious reaction to Egan’s joking about them being scum, and the fact that when I voted them, they sounded rather panicked until I explained myself. As well, they were the other major voting target.
By saying Fal isn't scumhunting, that can be used to push a lynch on them.Sure, but he didn't say that. Fallacy's complaining that NJW just didn't point out that he was scumhunting, which, while a point, seems a lot more minor to me than Fallacy seems to think.
Right. But they weren't town that game, were they?Right, of course. Hardly anyone has seen Egan's townplay. You're both among the cursed. :PI think FoU is saying he's not seen Egan's townplay, only games with Egan as scum.Yes, thank you.
[3] I'm okay with players using my content. It's not about the usage. It's that you argued on Day 1 that Egan and I were likely the scumteam without considering why I would make the point about Egan that they possessed no suspicions. Using that point yourself proves you were aware of it, but you never addressed why I would make it.I understand you are busy, but it would be nice for you to address this point of FoU's in particular.
NJW: Thank you for responding.1) I explained why I would be dismissive of one of Fal's posts. I feel that addresses using it as a scumtell to some extent, but ultimately I exhibited a tell, sure.
@1) okay, but that's not a response to what FoU actually said. He accused you of dismissing arguments without engagement, you... dismissed this argument without engaging with it.
@4) I think you might want to check the timeline of things, because that does not line up with the order that things happened in. You were more sympathetic when I had the moment of doll confusion, voted you, and swore at you. When I apologized, backed off, and stopped presenting myself in a confrontational and threatening way was when you became less sympathetic and fully disengaged.
@5) That does sound accurate to me.
@6) so your response is that you decided that in FoU's case you want to evaluate off of claims and mechanics instead of behavior, and are also accusing his behavior of being Look At Me I'm So Town. Is this correct?
@9) I suppose that's fine, but it is his summary and conclusion, and it would help avoid the accusations of dismissing arguments without engagement if you at least engaged with that part fully
And I see your argument about Shake. Do you think Shake should be today's lynch, or would you prefer someone else be the lynch for today?
NJW:Hey, I thought it could be you/Max. Besides, I don't make entire-scumteam guesses D1 and assign them high probability, I don't think of myself as a genius. Your point was in itself correct about Egan - you could have made it as bussing scum. I still don't see what's confusing about the fact I found it fairly convincing.[3] I'm okay with players using my content. It's not about the usage. It's that you argued on Day 1 that Egan and I were likely the scumteam without considering why I would make the point about Egan that they possessed no suspicions. Using that point yourself proves you were aware of it, but you never addressed why I would make it.I understand you are busy, but it would be nice for you to address this point of FoU's in particular.
It’s a fairly safe assumption that at least one of the scum voted Egan, who was town.
Excluding me, and Lenglon, this leaves TricMagic*, Maximum Spin*, FallacyofUrist*, and Shakerag. At least one of these are scum. I would suspect fallacy due to the suspicious reaction to Egan’s joking about them being scum, and the fact that when I voted them, they sounded rather panicked until I explained myself. As well, they were the other major voting target.
What's your reasoning for excluding Lenglon and not just equally assume everyone who voted Egan could have been Mafia?
Possibly I would have more cases if I had a moment to post on anything but replies...It's okay to disregard the replies temporarily to make a case. It'd probably be a more useful use of your time. Just don't ignore the stuff addressed at you indefinitely.
FallacyofUrist: Why are you cursed to always be scum in webadict games? For that matter, why am I?Dearest scumbuddy, don't call me out like that! We're supposed to be undercover -
Which is to say that I am not always scum, because I am definitely totally a loyal Town scum hunter this time around.
And I bet you are too.My thoughts on everyone right now generally: Game has just started, so there is nothing to go off of in terms of suspicion. Some people have posted, but not enough.. but reasonable to understand, considering how late it is currently (Eastern US time, for me, specifically)A bit early, but I appreciate the enthusiasm!
Shame you're definitely scum.
FallacyKnightwing, are you aware that if the vote is tied at the end of the day, scum decide who is executed? You just tied the vote.
Right now, Shakerag, but I don't have a strong case on him. Haven't found anyone I strongly believe is scum - the new players all read town if sometimes a bit flailing, and I'm struggling to see the max/fal/you thing as involving mafia... Still trying to figure out what's going on or being said between Tric and Lidku, and barely have my head above water on the replies front.
Just seen that last reply... I know the huge wall of quotes is there.NJW:Hey, I thought it could be you/Max. Besides, I don't make entire-scumteam guesses D1 and assign them high probability, I don't think of myself as a genius. Your point was in itself correct about Egan - you could have made it as bussing scum. I still don't see what's confusing about the fact I found it fairly convincing.[3] I'm okay with players using my content. It's not about the usage. It's that you argued on Day 1 that Egan and I were likely the scumteam without considering why I would make the point about Egan that they possessed no suspicions. Using that point yourself proves you were aware of it, but you never addressed why I would make it.I understand you are busy, but it would be nice for you to address this point of FoU's in particular.
Possibly I would have more cases if I had a moment to post on anything but replies...
Nin. To answer Lidku's old question... Well, I don't have an answer to give you, given that you seem to miss stuff like the misconstruction of my own posts. One qustion to ask Knightwing is thus, what are the chances Scum weren't on Egan's Wagon?Possibly I would have more cases if I had a moment to post on anything but replies...It's okay to disregard the replies temporarily to make a case. It'd probably be a more useful use of your time. Just don't ignore the stuff addressed at you indefinitely.
Knightwing, we don't want the mafia to decide who is executed, do we? In the event of a tie, the mafia decide who is executed.FallacyKnightwing, are you aware that if the vote is tied at the end of the day, scum decide who is executed? You just tied the vote.
Maybe it’s just me, but this read to me as “oh shit what is he doing, ABORT”
This whole interaction is weird.What about it is weird?
Because I trust Lenglon as confirmed town, which I’ve said multiple times. and I’m getting more suspicious of you, you are acting off.I think the question was meant to mean something like "why do you trust Lenglon as confirmed town, especially since Lenglon has not been confirmed as town?"
Knightwing, we don't want the mafia to decide who is executed, do we? In the event of a tie, the mafia decide who is executed.FallacyKnightwing, are you aware that if the vote is tied at the end of the day, scum decide who is executed? You just tied the vote.
Maybe it’s just me, but this read to me as “oh shit what is he doing, ABORT”
Which is bad.This whole interaction is weird.What about it is weird?
Web: I like! Is it possible to run it on individual days? Like if we could run that tool on Day 1 specifically so we could see the sequence of votes players made over the course of that day?I'm currently getting it to work on Day 1 posts, with color coordination for Town/scum when they're revealed. It is nearly done, but I need to fix a few of the bugs that are appearing with dead players. Technically, it works now, but there's some minor issues with it.
True, we still haven't ruled out that a NPC Velociraptor was the true scum all along.ಠ_ಠ
Ignoring the shitpost though, I really would like to learn why Shake is on so many people's "lynch this" list. I am also wondering if Shake will show up today or not.
Knightwing, we don't want the mafia to decide who is executed, do we? In the event of a tie, the mafia decide who is executed.FallacyKnightwing, are you aware that if the vote is tied at the end of the day, scum decide who is executed? You just tied the vote.
Maybe it’s just me, but this read to me as “oh shit what is he doing, ABORT”
Nin. To answer Lidku's old question (which one exactly? Because you didn't bother to quote it when directly asked (your strange possible Knightwing+NJW link)).. Well, I don't have an answer to give you, given that you seem to miss stuff like the misconstruction of my own posts.
Lidku: What's wrong with the crane? I'm i'm understanding it correctly it would protect a town from the mafia NK
I am like borderline blackout drunk right now; bear with me.
Tric: Are you -trying- to draw an NK? Why?
Lidku: What's wrong with the crane? I'm i'm understanding it correctly it would protect a town from the mafia NK
I am like borderline blackout drunk right now; bear with me.
Tric: Are you -trying- to draw an NK? Why?
The Crane prevents Town from targeting them, not scum. Hence how Fal's ability would let them bypass it, apparently. Also spent Day 1 to pick up a pretty useful auto. Hitting me with the NK wouldn't do much as a result.
^_^True, we still haven't ruled out that a NPC Velociraptor was the true scum all along.ಠ_ಠ
Ha... You really aren't playing a strong game Lidku, get hunting. Who am I paired with?Nin. To answer Lidku's old question (which one exactly? Because you didn't bother to quote it when directly asked (your strange possible Knightwing+NJW link)).. Well, I don't have an answer to give you, given that you seem to miss stuff like the misconstruction of my own posts.
Just as I thought. Making blank statements that have no real weight toward them, then when probed on what exactly you mean by them, you just either ignore or scuffle up a light excuse to avoid outright answering. TricMagic is just really acting weird this game.
Ahh, Lidku, if you think someone is scum bus them to Tric then I guess.Yeah... He really should have done that last night, unless it's 1-shot.
Lidku: What's wrong with the crane? I'm i'm understanding it correctly it would protect a town from the mafia NK
I think the biggest threat to Town is figuring out who's responsible for the crane. It's dangerous because it isolates one Town member and prevents others from doing either Protects, Redirects, Revives - just anything that is a positive ability toward another Town member that might save them.
Lidku: What's wrong with the crane? I'm i'm understanding it correctly it would protect a town from the mafia NK
I actually say the opposite of what you've posted.I think the biggest threat to Town is figuring out who's responsible for the crane. It's dangerous because it isolates one Town member and prevents others from doing either Protects, Redirects, Revives - just anything that is a positive ability toward another Town member that might save them.
I don't know why you inferred I said otherwise.
Drunk, tired, cranky. Take you pick from their listed reasons. Instead of throwing a tree on top of them like it's actually subtle in the shade it casts and calling it a feather. It's a brush.Lidku: What's wrong with the crane? I'm i'm understanding it correctly it would protect a town from the mafia NK
I actually say the opposite of what you've posted.I think the biggest threat to Town is figuring out who's responsible for the crane. It's dangerous because it isolates one Town member and prevents others from doing either Protects, Redirects, Revives - just anything that is a positive ability toward another Town member that might save them.
I don't know why you inferred I said otherwise.
I think most of us would give you the benefit of the doubt on the weekend. I don't have any problem with your not being too active over the weekend.Ignoring the shitpost though, I really would like to learn why Shake is on so many people's "lynch this" list. I am also wondering if Shake will show up today or not.
Weekends are usually bad for me. Sorry. I prolly should have done due dilligance about if this was a "weekend active" game. I chalk that up to me not playing in a very long time.
Instead of throwing a tree on top of them like it's actually subtle in the shade it casts and calling it a feather. It's a brush.What does this sentence even mean.
Ha... You really aren't playing a strong game Lidku, get hunting.
Who am I paired with?
Also.. Why is there sudden italics, don't think that was in mine?
You poked at me for ignoring a question, I answered that I wouldn't be answering it.
It's not even inactivity, exactly, it's just that you seem so... null. This is the first time I even remember you clearly expressing an opinion that someone is scum. Besides, the Fallacy/NJW angle is covered fully at this point, so I just wanted to raise you as an issue to be considered... the vote means a little less than it normally would for me since I don't get to make the decision. I don't, exactly, think you're mafia, but... most of the people I (think I) can read seem pretty town. At some point I have to assume the exceptions are the exceptions. And you don't seem pretty town, you just seem kind of there. I don't really know if I'll be pushing for you tomorrow or not; it depends on the night results. But for today, when one person has the vote and there's nothing for me to do, I just want to make sure everyone is getting looked at fairly, and it seems a little like Lenglon is biased toward you. Then again, maybe that's just me being antsy about the decision because I have no influence.Max: You're right, I am biased in Shake's favor, however, for one, he's also failing to meet the conditions I was expecting of him when I gave him the special read, similar to Egan, and for two, I am attempting to be aware of my own bias and adjust. That's actually a very large part of why I'm actively asking for others to present their cases regarding Shake, because your concern IS well-placed.
10, I'm tired, and more the fact that the post I quoted wasn't subtle in it's accusation of Shakerag. Despite the fact Shakerag gave reasons, they just ignored them, as usual this game. Lidku keeps doing it.Instead of throwing a tree on top of them like it's actually subtle in the shade it casts and calling it a feather. It's a brush.What does this sentence even mean.
Max: You're right, I am biased in Shake's favor, however, for one, he's also failing to meet the conditions I was expecting of him when I gave him the special read, similar to Egan, and for two, I am attempting to be aware of my own bias and adjust. That's actually a very large part of why I'm actively asking for others to present their cases regarding Shake, because your concern IS well-placed.Hm. Thank you for saying that. It makes me feel a little better about this.
10, I'm tired, and more the fact that the post I quoted wasn't subtle in it's accusation of Shakerag. Despite the fact Shakerag gave reasons, they just ignored them, as usual this game. Lidku keeps doing it.Lidku seems to be missing a lot of things and it would be good for all of us to push him over it, yes. That said... I think you would have found it more productive to quote the post where Shakerag said that and say something like "right here, pay attention", instead of making a weird metaphor. :P
Lidku, you don't seem to be paying a lot of attention here. From my perspective, it looks like you are tunnelled right onto TricMagic and letting everything else fall by the wayside, which is not town-positive behavior. That isn't helpful regardless of whether you are town or scum. As such, you definitely need to take my advice from the last post: if you are suspicious of TricMagic, then tell me who his partner is, what happened last night, where the crane came from (it doesn't seem related to Tric's claim, for example) and why...I'll also note that this is similar to my own newbie behavior. Picking a single target, then latching on like a lamprey and refusing to consider anything else? That's classic Fallacy. It's not good but it is understandable.
And that response is a pretty safe response if -you- were mafia, to be honest. Safe, but not optimal. My vote stays. Town would be less defensive.
Right, here comes the slog and the massive back and forth trying to take each other down. Frankly I'm not the most confident my abilities here, but I'll do my best.I have not been trying to take you down. I didn't want to engage with you at all on this stuff today, I wanted to try and find scum becuase basically all I can do at this point is find an amazing case against scum. I didn't think you were scum at the start of the day. Now I'm not so sure. I'm starting to think you can't be acting in good faith here, saying stuff like "Right, here comes the slog and the massive back and forth trying to take each other down", when that isn't what's been happening.
One thing I want to note straight away is that there's a difference between 'not doing x' and 'opposite of x'.
NJW2000 was not saying 'FoU isn't scumhunting', he was not saying 'FoU is scumhunting'. Refusing to acknowledge positive points is different than asserting their opposite.
In any case I now need to make another mega post with all the replies and such to what's already been said.
Then another one for the NJW-Lenglon Day 1 scuffles.
Then another one for Shakerag.
Long deep sigh. Alright, let's get on with it.
Is it just me or does anyone else think it's odd everyone is talking around me, but not engaging me? Or am I just blind and missing direct questions? I -did- just order new glasses for the first time in years.As I kinda started, or was near the start, of a fairly general interest in eliminating you, I'll take a sec to answer this
Shit... I did forget that Lenglon/FoU probably can't be true though, so ignore that in my last post.Actually... I woke up this morning thinking exactly that it's totally possible. Think about this:
Given Shake's inspect-bodyguard... it's quite unlikely. This is a bastard game though, so vOv
Max: NJW's claimed information gained at day start seemed correct in every way except the number of shots. If NJW had targeted you instead of FoU, potentially with a copy random ability or something similar, would it have come up that way?I don't fully follow the question. Would what have come up?
Max: I was doing my final re-read and getting ready to vote NJW and realized an oddity in last night's actions. I'm currently mentally in a rapid-pivot and am having some trouble resolving the sequence of events and motivations for them. currently kicking myself for not resolving this in my head fully earlier. I however also now realize that my question to you was nonsense as-phrased.Okay. For the record, if he'd targeted me, he probably would have got no result, since I was hidden.
So to conclude, Tric has assembled something that looks like the product of a reread, but in fact he knew he was going to go after me anyway before he did it. He has no coherent new points about me except the claim that I didn't post much. He's created a giant post that suggests a lot of effort and evidence, but in fact does not seem to have properly read the thread. Many of the quotes he has used have very little beneath them, often only narration or repetition of other people's questions.... I really question if I could even fake such a product, since it involves premeditation. But my wall was the result of chain of thought as I reread the thread. Even if it doesn't have content or just retreads points others have made, that's not intentional.
Is it just me or does anyone else think it's odd everyone is talking around me, but not engaging me? Or am I just blind and missing direct questions? I -did- just order new glasses for the first time in years.As I kinda started, or was near the start, of a fairly general interest in eliminating you, I'll take a sec to answer this
I think it's because you haven't said much today? I don't have a question about the alignment-inspecting bodyguard action, and if it's real asking a lot about the mechanics of it might actually be scum-sided... I just think it's pretty suspect that you managed to both confirm and protect the person who happens to have the single vote today.
Shit... I did forget that Lenglon/FoU probably can't be true though, so ignore that in my last post.
Given Shake's inspect-bodyguard... it's quite unlikely. This is a bastard game though, so vOv
I assumed your vote was meant to be signalled as a low-commitment gut read. Do you want people to start taking it very seriously?
So Fallacy's claim, to me, makes it feasible that Shakerag's bodyguard claim could both be true, yet not confirm the target.
Oh yeah, duh. We even have one bus claim and I forgot about that possibility, heh.So Fallacy's claim, to me, makes it feasible that Shakerag's bodyguard claim could both be true, yet not confirm the target.
Also, to be fair, as I think I pointed out it is possible I got bussed and not made aware of that. All I know is that my action succeeded.
Max: I was doing my final re-read and getting ready to vote NJW and realized an oddity in last night's actions. I'm currently mentally in a rapid-pivot and am having some trouble resolving the sequence of events and motivations for them. currently kicking myself for not resolving this in my head fully earlier. I however also now realize that my question to you was nonsense as-phrased.If it helps, the ability used let me copy stuff, and also gave me an ability from my targets target, and so forth.
NJW2000
Role: Saturn’s Hexagon
Alignment: Town
Abilities:
{PT} (Auto) Extraterrestrial North Pole: You have your own Santa here. When you receive an Action, you gain a gift copy of that Action you can give away. You may give a gift copy of an Action to another Player once per Night as a free Action.
Tags: Trigger
{P10} (Used, Night) Eye of the Storm [target]: You summon the power of Saturn's winds. Gain a 1-Shot copy of an Action from the target. Then, gain a 1-Shot copy of an Action from their target(s). Repeat this Action until you hit a Player that has already been hit by this Action or no targets are available.
Tags: Copy
{P3/P7} (1-Shot, Mafiakill) Mug [target]: You mug the target, blocking them from making Actions, and then kill them.
Tags: Kill, Block
Knightwing64
Role: God of Mafia/Bay12
Alignment: Town
Abilities:
(1-Shot, Day) Sacrifice [target/self]: Mafiakill Actions can only be performed on the target or yourself during the next Night Phase. Protections and Revives fail against the target.
{P6} (Used, Night) The Royal We [target]: The target becomes Ruler during the following Day. Only the Ruler is allowed to vote.
I did another thing of benefit to Lenglon last night, because I figured y'all were going to lynch me today. She can verify what it is if she likes.I VERY MUCH want to keep what it is to myself, and plan to take advantage of it immediately. It's a very nice thing.
Lidku: I watched you perform the mafiakill last night.Oh boy, here we go.
and for those that want to figure out how reliable the action was, it was an action inspect with P5.
Was the thing in Shakerag's original role claim at all?I did another thing of benefit to Lenglon last night, because I figured y'all were going to lynch me today. She can verify what it is if she likes.I VERY MUCH want to keep what it is to myself, and plan to take advantage of it immediately. It's a very nice thing.
Was the thing in Shakerag's original role claim at all?
Yes, and thinking on it the important part for me to keep to myself is how it combines with my role. So I can claim what it is after all if people care.Was the thing in Shakerag's original role claim at all?I did another thing of benefit to Lenglon last night, because I figured y'all were going to lynch me today. She can verify what it is if she likes.I VERY MUCH want to keep what it is to myself, and plan to take advantage of it immediately. It's a very nice thing.
Shake, the part you didn't claim is a non-factor for me. You picked a thing with extremely good synergy.Was the thing in Shakerag's original role claim at all?
Essentially. I might have left out one detail, but the gist is there.
Is this MYLO? I think this is MYLO.
I Mugged Maximum Spin as agreed.Are you sure about this?
There goes my theory of the crane thing doubling as an arsonist-style ability.
oh, and by the by, FoU, the reason I accepted your claim of action-miller on day 1 so quickly was because I had the action-inspect.Oh, I see. Yeah, that makes logical sense.
Yes.I Mugged Maximum Spin as agreed.Are you sure about this?
Would be unbalanced to both prime and kill in the same Cycle.There goes my theory of the crane thing doubling as an arsonist-style ability.
I didn't consider that myself, but what makes you certain it still can't be?
I did not receive a notification either. It's possible you were roleblocked.Yes.I Mugged Maximum Spin as agreed.Are you sure about this?
Though the thing that happened the first time didn't happen the second time. My action still failed and was refunded, though.
I did not receive a notification either. It's possible you were roleblocked.Weird. I guess 'your action failed' due to a roleblock and 'your action failed' due to targeting you would show up the same way?
I couldn't possibly say, but it seems like the most likely explanation. You would've gotten a thing again if you'd hit me (I got to keep it instead). BTW, that means I'm not consenting to a third round of the game, since I have an action now I'd like to be able to use. It's even decently useful!I did not receive a notification either. It's possible you were roleblocked.Weird. I guess 'your action failed' due to a roleblock and 'your action failed' due to targeting you would show up the same way?
Lidku: I watched you perform the mafiakill last night.
and for those that want to figure out how reliable the action was, it was an action inspect with P5.
So are you arguing that I have a false result, or that I'm scum? If the latter, please present your case.Lidku: I watched you perform the mafiakill last night.
and for those that want to figure out how reliable the action was, it was an action inspect with P5.
This is ridiculous. I used my 1 and only Super Protect on FallacyofUrist like you asked. Now you're turning to accuse me as being Mafia? Most of the people you have been targeting as Mafia, has been proven to be Town.
You're shooting randomly and getting people wrongfully lynched here.
But at this point, Lenglon's the one who had the inspect, so Lenglon's the one who can decide if the result is probably right.I have made public every piece of information I have from that inspect. It's a P (-1), inspects target 1, gives the results to target 2, 1-shot. It was used on FoU as target 1, sent results to NJW as target 2. NJW says the result he recieved was that FoU is town. So you are equally as qualified as I am to say if it's a reliable result or not.
Lidku: I watched you perform the mafiakill last night.
and for those that want to figure out how reliable the action was, it was an action inspect with P5.
This is ridiculous. I used my 1 and only Super Protect on FallacyofUrist like you asked. Now you're turning to accuse me as being Mafia? Most of the people you have been targeting as Mafia, has been proven to be Town.
You're shooting randomly and getting people wrongfully lynched here.
Also, you said here that your Inspect was a 1-Shot and only a Priority -1 (auto) ability:lol what? did you honestly think the only thing in my entire kit was a 1-shot, with no autos or other abilities?But at this point, Lenglon's the one who had the inspect, so Lenglon's the one who can decide if the result is probably right.I have made public every piece of information I have from that inspect. It's a P (-1), inspects target 1, gives the results to target 2, 1-shot. It was used on FoU as target 1, sent results to NJW as target 2. NJW says the result he recieved was that FoU is town. So you are equally as qualified as I am to say if it's a reliable result or not.
Why the sudden change up in claims to your abilities?
Lidku: I watched you perform the mafiakill last night.
and for those that want to figure out how reliable the action was, it was an action inspect with P5.
This is ridiculous. I used my 1 and only Super Protect on FallacyofUrist like you asked. Now you're turning to accuse me as being Mafia? Most of the people you have been targeting as Mafia, has been proven to be Town.
You're shooting randomly and getting people wrongfully lynched here.
Correction, you would have hit me. Also, that was the wrong move entirely Lidku. Did you really think I'd leave Fal unprotected? Or did you not bother to take into account my own abilities?
Rather, Knightwing dying is probably something I should have foreseen. Got too blinded by the fact I expected someone to target Fal last night. But as far as I know, no-one did.
Also, you said here that your Inspect was a 1-Shot and only a Priority -1 (auto) ability:lol what? did you honestly think the only thing in my entire kit was a 1-shot, with no autos or other abilities?But at this point, Lenglon's the one who had the inspect, so Lenglon's the one who can decide if the result is probably right.I have made public every piece of information I have from that inspect. It's a P (-1), inspects target 1, gives the results to target 2, 1-shot. It was used on FoU as target 1, sent results to NJW as target 2. NJW says the result he recieved was that FoU is town. So you are equally as qualified as I am to say if it's a reliable result or not.
Why the sudden change up in claims to your abilities?
partial claims are not fullclaims.
even in the post you're quoting I specify "from that inspect".
Lidku whispered to NJW, who told us Fal was Town.
Lidku whispered to NJW, who told us Fal was Town.
When did I ever whisper anything to NJW? When, in the time when he was still alive, did NJW ever say that I whispered to him? Why would you make up something so bizarre?
It's a P (-1), inspects target 1, gives the results to target 2, 1-shot. It was used on FoU as target 1, sent results to NJW as target 2. NJW says the result he recieved was that FoU is town. So you are equally as qualified as I am to say if it's a reliable result or not.
Correction, you would have hit me.(To be completely fair, he wouldn't be informed of this.)
Lidku: Becuase this IS a beginner's, I'm going to go ahead and give you advice real quick: CALM DOWN.
Your panic is making you throw accusations out that you haven't thought through.
Lidku: I claimed my protect can only hit aligned players. So are you ready to back up that either: 1) Myself and Leglon are scum, or 2) My protect got redirected?
I'm sorry, but I never addressed you so directly. The only ones I have so far is FallacyofUrist, TricMagic, and Lenglon. My own personal claim for N2 was using my Super Protect on FallacyofUrist. Did you mistake me posting that referencing you at all?
Still reading the thread, more to come possibly, if I have time.Actually, I don't really have anything else to say now that I've finished. Lidku's looking pretty bad. I guess I just have to figure out who the partner is now.
Max: quick question, if you had been hit by two mafiakills in the same night, would you have been notified of both of them?Very unlikely. In fact, it being day 3 and probably MYLO, I'll go ahead and explain how my role actually works: It's the other half of Fallacy's action that caused me to hear about it. I automatically hide if I don't act, and, if blocked by an ability, learn who and what was responsible. If I hide on my own - which so far has been my only option, because I didn't come with any powers - then I give myself an invention; otherwise the person who blocked me gets it. Since Fallacy's "kill" was a block, it triggered my ability and he stole the invention (a roleblock). A normal kill would still not affect me when hiding, but I wouldn't hear of it.
while he hasn't voted that I sawWhoops, this stopped being true while I was answering Lenglon and I forgot to change it.
So you mean to inform that your role supposedly just has multiple versions of Inspect, and no other tag abilities? I find that hard to believe.This is rolefishing. I have not fullclaimed and have in fact specifically said today that I don't plan on claiming my abilities when I was commenting on what Shakerag did last night. What I have claimed is each individual action I've done after I've already done them.
Lidku, you just said yourself that the target of your protect wasn't going to be notified of your action. You should have known I was going to action inspect you the moment that I agreed to the plan, because that is the only way that plan could have actually cleared you.-snip-I was the one that was the one that was protecting Fal last night. And even if your claim of doing a "bus-like" ability on Fal is true, you would not have been informed of the Super Protect to begin with. You would just have a Protection effect on you like normal without being notified.
This was already something that was discussed between me, Lenglon, and FallacyofUrist. To prove my innocence, they made me use my 1-use Super Protect on Fallacy for the Night. Now all of a sudden I'm the one that did the kill?
... Opps. Leglon whispered, not Lidku. Why are you being so aggressive over that though? Like you've been all game.Lidku whispered to NJW, who told us Fal was Town.
When did I ever whisper anything to NJW? When, in the time when he was still alive, did NJW ever say that I whispered to him? Why would you make up something so bizarre?
Still reading the thread, more to come possibly, if I have time.Tric - I think this is fairly likely. First of all, I don't think Tric would be able to guide Lidku to better reactions in the scumchat at all. Second, they've been distancing from each other the whole game, but in a way that never quite comes to building a meaningful case or seriously risking a lynch. Even now, Tric is acting in a way that seems to be anti-Lidku, while kind of throwing mild amounts of dirt around at other people, as if he's hoping to look like he was on-side if Lidku does get lynched, but still wants a chance at getting someone else lynched. Tric also bluetexted Lidku, which fits in with what I said in Shakerag's line about wanting to look willing to lynch.
Lidku, you just said yourself that the target of your protect wasn't going to be notified of your action. You should have known I was going to action inspect you the moment that I agreed to the plan, because that is the only way that plan could have actually cleared you.
I'm sorry, but I never addressed you so directly. The only ones I have so far is FallacyofUrist, TricMagic, and Lenglon. My own personal claim for N2 was using my Super Protect on FallacyofUrist. Did you mistake me posting that referencing you at all?Not you not answering my question.
... Opps. Leglon whispered, not Lidku. Why are you being so aggressive over that though? Like you've been all game.Lidku whispered to NJW, who told us Fal was Town.
When did I ever whisper anything to NJW? When, in the time when he was still alive, did NJW ever say that I whispered to him? Why would you make up something so bizarre?
I'd suggest backing that up Shakerag, cause if Lidku is town you're getting lynched tomorrow after that claim. Bodyguard didn't inform N1, even if you gave something to Lenglon today to get in her graces.I'm sorry, but I never addressed you so directly. The only ones I have so far is FallacyofUrist, TricMagic, and Lenglon. My own personal claim for N2 was using my Super Protect on FallacyofUrist. Did you mistake me posting that referencing you at all?
Not you not answering my question.
I'm kinda sorta thinking a Lidku and Tric scumteam.
Lenglon[/color].]=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2naim9F4010I think the scumteam might be Maximum Spin and Lenglon.Wrong. Try again Lidku.
(http://=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2naim9F4010I think the scumteam might be Maximum Spin and [color=red)
I think the scumteam might be Maximum Spin and Lenglon....
... Yeah, I've accused you of Misconstruction. It's a type of aggression, a very scum type.... Opps. Leglon whispered, not Lidku. Why are you being so aggressive over that though? Like you've been all game.Lidku whispered to NJW, who told us Fal was Town.
When did I ever whisper anything to NJW? When, in the time when he was still alive, did NJW ever say that I whispered to him? Why would you make up something so bizarre?
This is a strange turnaround. Earlier before, you were one of the ones criticizing me over my passivity. Now you're framing I've been aggression all game? Interesting.
If you've claimed to have read my posts over again,Well, just to be clear, I'm not claiming that. I've read through one time, in the process of playing the game, that's all. But anyway,
Two times I've voted TricMagic as scum before in two separate days, with a middling argument on D2 against him to begin with. Mind explaining what you mean by this, Maximum Spin?sure, voting someone for a while with no intention of allowing it to reach possible lynch levels is a common distancing tactic that even noobs frequently use. Especially when one of those days, you didn't even have a vote, so your vote was meaningless without some kind of argument to convince Lenglon. It's impossible to prove now whether you meant it or not. That's all in the past.
I think the scumteam might be Maximum Spin and Lenglon.I feel like this is really hard to justify with D1, let alone everything that happened afterward, but you do you.
Not counting the fact lynching me tomorrow is a loss for mafiaUhhh, is this a typo or a really weird slip?
Lidku, there were two scum alive at the time. If I had said I was going to inspect your action your scumbuddy would have done the kill. I would only claim the action if I wanted to cause the scum to have to deal with WIFOM, and I generally consider that a far weaker play than just not saying things because it's easy to overlook stuff that people just plain don't directly claim. Actually, I would also have claimed the inspect if I was actually going to vigi-shoot you instead, but that's minor.Lidku, you just said yourself that the target of your protect wasn't going to be notified of your action. You should have known I was going to action inspect you the moment that I agreed to the plan, because that is the only way that plan could have actually cleared you.Well guess what, I didn't "know" because you never informed me of that, intentionally. Irregardless, I STLL would have used my Super Protect N2 on Fallacy as the plan specified. It's your word against mine and your Inspection claim would be MORE credible if you would have told Town that, Lenglon.
Tric - I think this is fairly likely. First of all, I don't think Tric would be able to guide Lidku to better reactions in the scumchat at all. Second, they've been distancing from each other the whole game, but in a way that never quite comes to building a meaningful case or seriously risking a lynch. Even now, Tric is acting in a way that seems to be anti-Lidku, while kind of throwing mild amounts of dirt around at other people, as if he's hoping to look like he was on-side if Lidku does get lynched, but still wants a chance at getting someone else lynched. Tric also bluetexted Lidku, which fits in with what I said in Shakerag's line about wanting to look willing to lynch.I do not want the day to end in 6 hours. I do want to work out who the partner is and give Lidku at least a chance to make a case. There is one I think is a possibility. If Lidku doesn't bring it up...
Not counting the fact lynching me tomorrow is a loss for mafiaUhhh, is this a typo or a really weird slip?
Oh, okay, I see what you mean. Tiny bit more towncred for you.Not counting the fact lynching me tomorrow is a loss for mafiaUhhh, is this a typo or a really weird slip?
If the mafia rn is Lidku, then if I do get lynched.. We're at 2 the next day, and my dead-vote breaks ties.
... Granted, I'm assuming Mafia doesn't auto-win in that scenario. And more likely they just don't kill that night. I spent D1 picking up that ability just so I could mess with the lynch at end game. If I'm mafia, you had better be damned sure Lidku is Mafia.
I think the scumteam might be Maximum Spin and Lenglon....
And Shakerag's N1 action confirms that I'm the same alignment he is.
So is Shakerag town or scum?
Lidku: I claimed my protect can only hit aligned players. So are you ready to back up that either: 1) Myself and Leglon are scum, or 2) My protect got redirected?
My paranoia is saying it's a Lenglon Shakerag scumteam and we're fucked.
I think the scumteam might be Maximum Spin and Lenglon....
And Shakerag's N1 action confirms that I'm the same alignment he is.
So is Shakerag town or scum?Lidku: I claimed my protect can only hit aligned players. So are you ready to back up that either: 1) Myself and Leglon are scum, or 2) My protect got redirected?
I re-read both of these posts, and now I understand what Shakerag is trying to say. Admittedly, I got confused about his question, because he only said "aligned" and nothing else with no other identifying modifier. If he would have said "my protect can only hit Town algined players," than I could have answered promptly before.
For the entire game, it seems as if Shakerag, out of everyone, has been seemingly and on the low, has been at the beck-and-call of Lenglon; always softly agreeing with their reads or backing them up, even on D1 (before N1 claims could come into effect). That N1 claim of Shakerag "protecting" Lenglon, and that his Protection only is "alignment"-based, could be a cover to confirm Lenglon as Town to the Town.
My strongest suspicious of Mafia right now is a mix of Lenglon, Maximum Spin, and Shakerag. But the strongest team on my mind is Lenglon and Shakerag now.
Even FallacyofUrist has a small subconscious inkling of this:My paranoia is saying it's a Lenglon Shakerag scumteam and we're fucked.
... Welp.
Wrong. (https://youtu.be/2naim9F4010) Try again Lidku.
Stop being ghetto, TricMagic ???No clue what that means, but I'll give you one more shot. As town, you're in a unique position to crack things. As mafia, well. It's something you could come up with if the circumstances are right.
Let me add that I agree with this position and, while I think you are capable of making it as mafia, it does also improve my outlook. Actually, although I'm not going to give up a very likely lynch at probably MYLO, I'd be happier lynching the partner first if we can figure it out, since Lidku would still be there next turn and will, I strongly suspect, be a lot less dangerous without a more experienced partner. (And since we're all more experienced, that goes without saying.) No matter what, more time to get more information is best; and if we both agree to hold back from voting for the time being, then we can be certain there won't be a hammer. It does also make me think better of you since bussing scum are usually eager to be seen voting, like I said.Tric - I think this is fairly likely. First of all, I don't think Tric would be able to guide Lidku to better reactions in the scumchat at all. Second, they've been distancing from each other the whole game, but in a way that never quite comes to building a meaningful case or seriously risking a lynch. Even now, Tric is acting in a way that seems to be anti-Lidku, while kind of throwing mild amounts of dirt around at other people, as if he's hoping to look like he was on-side if Lidku does get lynched, but still wants a chance at getting someone else lynched. Tric also bluetexted Lidku, which fits in with what I said in Shakerag's line about wanting to look willing to lynch.I do not want the day to end in 6 hours. I do want to work out who the partner is and give Lidku at least a chance to make a case. There is one I think is a possibility. If Lidku doesn't bring it up...
My apologizes, but can you be clear of what you're asking? Because I didn't understand the context of your question, because I never addressed you at all personally and I'm mostly worried about my own actions last night, and what I'm being accused of.
Lidku: I claimed my protect can only hit aligned players. So are you ready to back up that either: 1) Myself and Leglon are scum, or 2) My protect got redirected?
Yeha, lidku with the OMGUS and Tric chainsawing for Lidku. I'm comfortable with what I said already.I don't see Tric chainsawing.
Not at the moment. Want Lidku to get one more shot at it before I list my own.
My apologizes, but can you be clear of what you're asking? Because I didn't understand the context of your question, because I never addressed you at all personally and I'm mostly worried about my own actions last night, and what I'm being accused of.
Literrally what I asked you before. Fuck lemme find it.Lidku: I claimed my protect can only hit aligned players. So are you ready to back up that either: 1) Myself and Leglon are scum, or 2) My protect got redirected?
My strongest suspicious of Mafia right now is a mix of Lenglon, Maximum Spin, and Shakerag. But the strongest team on my mind is Lenglon and Shakerag now.
Yeha, lidku with the OMGUS and Tric chainsawing for Lidku. I'm comfortable with what I said already.I don't see Tric chainsawing.
To be fair, it was me and Lenglon until he was reminded that you're confirming Lenglon. So I don't think it's long on reasoning, if you follow my drift. :PMy strongest suspicious of Mafia right now is a mix of Lenglon, Maximum Spin, and Shakerag. But the strongest team on my mind is Lenglon and Shakerag now.
Panic more scum. Do enlighten everyone as to why myself and Lenglon are the scummiest.
To be fair, it was me and Lenglon until he was reminded that you're confirming Lenglon. So I don't think it's long on reasoning, if you follow my drift. :PMy strongest suspicious of Mafia right now is a mix of Lenglon, Maximum Spin, and Shakerag. But the strongest team on my mind is Lenglon and Shakerag now.
Panic more scum. Do enlighten everyone as to why myself and Lenglon are the scummiest.
Yes, and I give a reply after I fully understood what you were trying to say.
I think the scumteam might be Maximum Spin and Lenglon....
And Shakerag's N1 action confirms that I'm the same alignment he is.
So is Shakerag town or scum?Lidku: I claimed my protect can only hit aligned players. So are you ready to back up that either: 1) Myself and Leglon are scum, or 2) My protect got redirected?
I re-read both of these posts, and now I understand what Shakerag is trying to say. Admittedly, I got confused about his question, because he only said "aligned" and nothing else with no other identifying modifier. If he would have said "my protect can only hit Town algined players," than I could have answered promptly before.
For the entire game, it seems as if Shakerag, out of everyone, has been seemingly and on the low, has been at the beck-and-call of Lenglon; always softly agreeing with their reads or backing them up, even on D1 (before N1 claims could come into effect). That N1 claim of Shakerag "protecting" Lenglon, and that his Protection only is "alignment"-based, could be a cover-plot to confirm Lenglon as Town to the Town.
My strongest suspicion of Mafia right now is a mix of Lenglon, Maximum Spin, and Shakerag. But the strongest team on my mind is Lenglon and Shakerag at the moment.
Even FallacyofUrist has a small subconscious inkling of this:My paranoia is saying it's a Lenglon Shakerag scumteam and we're fucked.
Yeha, lidku with the OMGUS and Tric chainsawing for Lidku. I'm comfortable with what I said already.I don't see Tric chainsawing.
I hop on the Lidku train and suddenly Tric is all up in my shit?
I think you missed my post, but I gave an answer to this already:I think the scumteam might be Maximum Spin and Lenglon....
And Shakerag's N1 action confirms that I'm the same alignment he is.
So is Shakerag town or scum?Lidku: I claimed my protect can only hit aligned players. So are you ready to back up that either: 1) Myself and Leglon are scum, or 2) My protect got redirected?
I re-read both of these posts, and now I understand what Shakerag is trying to say. Admittedly, I got confused about his question, because he only said "aligned" and nothing else with no other identifying modifier. If he would have said "my protect can only hit Town algined players," than I could have answered promptly before.
For the entire game, it seems as if Shakerag, out of everyone, has been seemingly and on the low, has been at the beck-and-call of Lenglon; always softly agreeing with their reads or backing them up, even on D1 (before N1 claims could come into effect). That N1 claim of Shakerag "protecting" Lenglon, and that his Protection only is "alignment"-based, could be a cover-plot to confirm Lenglon as Town to the Town.
My strongest suspicion of Mafia right now is a mix of Lenglon, Maximum Spin, and Shakerag. But the strongest team on my mind is Lenglon and Shakerag at the moment.
Even FallacyofUrist has a small subconscious inkling of this:My paranoia is saying it's a Lenglon Shakerag scumteam and we're fucked.
Yeha, lidku with the OMGUS and Tric chainsawing for Lidku. I'm comfortable with what I said already.I don't see Tric chainsawing.
I hop on the Lidku train and suddenly Tric is all up in my shit?
He only did so because you bizarre claimed me and him being on a team, when the entire game we've been at odds with each other.
So you're assuming scum!Shakerag has literally fullclaimed and said, twice now, that I'm giving positive actions to Leglon?
Question: Do you think I'm actually being -that- bold-faced this game then? That I, as scum, would claim two days in a row that I'm giving positive actions to my "scummate"?
Lidku: Additionally, do you think scum!Shakerag and scum!Lenglon would straight up both vote you early on in the day? That's an awful bold move.
Nothingburder. Standard scum strat is to aggro each other at least a bit.
Lidku, in regards to your latest post. You seem to be making a logical Fallacy.
... You're being very confident for someone in roleblock range Shakerag. That said.. Do you really not have any other options for scumteams Lidku?
... You're being very confident for someone in roleblock range Shakerag. That said.. Do you really not have any other options for scumteams Lidku?
Process of elimination leaves Tric.
Without hard inspects, that's what I'm working with.
Process of elimination leaves Tric.
Without hard inspects, that's what I'm working with.
This is extremely shaky reasoning with no arguments to back it up, at all. You just think TricMagic is Mafia just from sheer "process of elimination"? This doesn't look very good, Shakerag.
K. So Night 1. Fal targeted Max, Max blocked and learned Fal's action. Lenglon whispered to NJW, who told us Fal was Town.Here's the secret Lidku. Fal was confirmed by NJW through Lenglon's whisper. No action happened Night 2 however. The only two known who could create this result are myself, and Fallacy. While others could have a hidden ability and are lying, it's contingent on them blocking Fal from confirming the result, and I as town would have diverted it. Unless they themselves attempted to roleblock me silently.
[Fal is confirmed to have used a Kill action Night 1, after the Crane had removed their target. However Night 2 there was no action on MaxSpin, but there are no other players to block them silently known.]
Lidku and I both claim no actions. Shakerag claims Bodyguard. Knightwing used The Royal We.
Lenglon's recap of Night 1 (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?action=post;quote=8390726;topic=180072.525;last_msg=8392092)
Redacting info in this post to see if Lidku can present a case arguing Lenglon is Mafia. Or any other combination, remember to include teams.
You assume them voting you is the result of a mafia backchannel to get a reaction. They don't need to get a reaction, Lenglon has enough town-cred to get you lynched. Them both voting you is not a sign of them being the scumteam together.Lidku, in regards to your latest post. You seem to be making a logical Fallacy.
Can you please elaborate further?
You assume them voting you is the result of a mafia backchannel to get a reaction. They don't need to get a reaction, Lenglon has enough town-cred to get you lynched. Them both voting you is not a sign of them being the scumteam together.
K. So Night 1. Fal targeted Max, Max blocked and learned Fal's action. Lenglon whispered to NJW, who told us Fal was Town.Here's the secret Lidku. Fal was confirmed by NJW through Lenglon's whisper. No action happened Night 2 however. The only two known who could create this result are myself, and Fallacy. While others could have a hidden ability and are lying, it's contingent on them blocking Fal from confirming the result, and I as town would have diverted it. Unless they themselves attempted to roleblock me silently.
[Fal is confirmed to have used a Kill action Night 1, after the Crane had removed their target. However Night 2 there was no action on MaxSpin, but there are no other players to block them silently known.]
Lidku and I both claim no actions. Shakerag claims Bodyguard. Knightwing used The Royal We.
Lenglon's recap of Night 1 (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?action=post;quote=8390726;topic=180072.525;last_msg=8392092)
Redacting info in this post to see if Lidku can present a case arguing Lenglon is Mafia. Or any other combination, remember to include teams.Lidku, in regards to your latest post. You seem to be making a logical Fallacy.
Your original "you seem to be making a logical fallacy" (and the post I've currently quoted, which is an extension from when I asked you to elaborate your meaning of it) post, you were responding to this post below:So you're assuming scum!Shakerag has literally fullclaimed and said, twice now, that I'm giving positive actions to Leglon?
Question: Do you think I'm actually being -that- bold-faced this game then? That I, as scum, would claim two days in a row that I'm giving positive actions to my "scummate"?
Yes, I very much believe so, since almost everyone has seemingly eased Lenglon into their "Town" read. Nobody has strongly questioned them at all the entire game, which has allowed them to skirt-by for this long. Giving your teammate additive cover for the deception would be a boon for your team (and is, if I'm correct about you and Lenglon being Mafia together).
The acting "aggressive" bit was a rouse the whole time, to gain the unnecessitated trust of Town (and also, you were one of the first one's to agree with this behavior from Lenglon). This was especially suspect when you and Lenglon pivoted interest to get NJW lynched, even though he read very much Town or neutral by many others at the time before.Lidku: Additionally, do you think scum!Shakerag and scum!Lenglon would straight up both vote you early on in the day? That's an awful bold move.
Easy. Lenglon says a deception about my N2 action (which was me using my Super Protect on Fallacy). Either one of you did the kill. Then soon after as the Day opens, you both eventually blindside me with votes to gain some sort of reaction (which admittedly, you have, to an extent). All of which can be easily coordinated from a Mafia backchannel, which both of you are likely on.
My "latest" post was me discussing my N2 action and discussing my theory on Lenglon-Shakerag. The actions you're talking about, of when Fallacy was confirmed Town by NJW, was all on N1. I fail to see what relevance you tried to bring up with your post, and I also fail to see why are you claiming no action was done on N2?
Max I'm willing to take you up on looking for Lidku's partner in discussion only for today. I am not willing to give up a lynch on confirmed scum in order to take a blind shot at maybe-scum.Right, I agree with this. Personally, I'd take the shot if I felt it was really really obvious and eat the blame for the loss if it came down to it, but I don't really think it's getting to that point today anyway. Certainly the Tric Interaction doesn't rise to that level even though I find it suspicious.
Having said that, the oddity last night of your interaction only has three possibilities:I won't say fullclear, as I've seen web give scum multiple-acting for exactly this reason (web hates mechanical clearing). But yeah, it's reasonable, and I have no intention of ever voting you if Lidku is indeed mafia, nor Shakerag unless something really convinces me that's what happened. Which isn't likely given my current suspicions.
A) FoU did not use Mug on you last night, so FoU is scum.
B) You are lying and Mug DID block you last night, and you are lying in order to avoid FoU becoming confirmed town because you are the last scum.
C) You are both telling the truth and a third party roleblocked FoU, and this third party is the final scum.
In the case of option C, we need to see who has un-accounted-for actions. My action is clearly accounted for, and I confirm that Shakerag's is, this means that in case C the only possibility is TricMagic.
As a result I believe we can fullclear both myself and Shake for mechanics reasons, pending Lidku flipping scum. Is this reasonable to you?
Well I'm just gonna go ahead and push the issue then.Lol, nah. I mean, it's still in the back of my mind, it's always in the back of my mind, but if Lidku's town and you managed to goad him to react this badly, I guess you deserve the win.
FoU:
and Max: How likely do you both think that Lenglon and myself are the scumteam after all this?
You assume them voting you is the result of a mafia backchannel to get a reaction. They don't need to get a reaction, Lenglon has enough town-cred to get you lynched. Them both voting you is not a sign of them being the scumteam together.
So, can I assume from this that you think I'm scum who is buttering up Lenglon by using my abilities on her?
TricMagic: Additionally, I would like to hear your thoughts on this "crane" ability and why Max and I were targeted with it.I'm mostly reducing things into various paths that could exist.
Bedtime for me. Unvote just to avoid the hammer and get more discussion, but I will re-vote Lidku tomorrow, barring some insane revelation.
Reminder hammer is at 4 right now.
One thing I don't fully understand about the night is this: If Fallacy really didn't target me, what did he do? It would seem pretty stupid for him to intentionally break off from the routine we'd planned, then have Lidku do the kill - unless he had an even more important power available. It seems to me like the roleblock option is more likely. Tric, what's your theory?
Hm. I find it suspicious Shakerag would just remove his vote, worrying about a hammer of all things? His justification for removing it is really weird.I have a feeling you're about to propose something about as realistic as this:
You know what?
I want to see something.
Lidku
to which yes, Shakerag's reaction then was the right one, and the one that I'm going to borrow now:True, we still haven't ruled out that a NPC Velociraptor was the true scum all along.ಠ_ಠ
Let me guess, you thing that will get people off your back? It might but uh.. There isn't any desperation. Use it with a case that you put together for when you flip town. Let your thoughts flow into the thread that will lead town to the right answer.
[long and I don't want to include the whole thing but there's no obvious single point to snip]Oh, and I just realized, a Fallacy/Max team is actually impossible because we would've hammered, unless you believe it isn't really MYLO.
Hm. I find it suspicious Shakerag would just remove his vote, worrying about a hammer of all things? His justification for removing it is really weird.Do you want to get hammered? Are you afraid of giving something away? Because I'm not going to hammer you.
You know what?
I want to see something.
Lidku
FoU: I have been considering the thought that the crane user (assuming they aren't Lidku) could make it difficult to coordinate actions tonight, and seems to be growing in power every night. For mechanical reasons I would benefit from targeting the same person you do, and I do not have a way to bypass the crane. Tonight when you are deciding on your action target, if you are uncertain of who to target with your action, and one of your potential targets is behind the crane and one is not, please target the one that is not hidden by the crane. Of course, if you do have a better target and a reason for it then you should go with your own idea. The synergy would be nice but it'd be far better for you to have a well-aimed ability. Thank you.Noted.
Is there any reason we're not mass full-claiming when it's literally MYLO?I think I'm the only one that hasn't fullclaimed at this point. Is there a need? I don't really want to reveal because I can be countered if the scum know what to do about me.
Probably not at this point given your actions so far.Is there any reason we're not mass full-claiming when it's literally MYLO?I think I'm the only one that hasn't fullclaimed at this point. Is there a need? I don't really want to reveal because I can be countered if the scum know what to do about me.
I don't really want to reveal because I can be countered if the scum know what to do about me.
-outed scum going rolefishing-I don't care.
Very unlikely. In fact, it being day 3 and probably MYLO, I'll go ahead and explain how my role actually works: It's the other half of Fallacy's action that caused me to hear about it. I automatically hide if I don't act, and, if blocked by an ability, learn who and what was responsible. If I hide on my own - which so far has been my only option, because I didn't come with any powers - then I give myself an invention; otherwise the person who blocked me gets it. Since Fallacy's "kill" was a block, it triggered my ability and he stole the invention (a roleblock). A normal kill would still not affect me when hiding, but I wouldn't hear of it.Wait, did you gain an invention Night 2?
If you're so sure about me being Mafia, why worry about a hammer at all? Wouldn't it make sense just to leave it?
Max I'm willing to take you up on looking for Lidku's partner in discussion only for today. I am not willing to give up a lynch on confirmed scum in order to take a blind shot at maybe-scum.Right, I agree with this. Personally, I'd take the shot if I felt it was really really obvious and eat the blame for the loss if it came down to it, but I don't really think it's getting to that point today anyway. Certainly the Tric Interaction doesn't rise to that level even though I find it suspicious.
I'm slightly surprised no one is suggesting no lynch for the day. I thought that used to be the "technically best play" on MYLO? Or did that change?I think it still is generally, but I honestly am just that confident that Lidku's scum at this point.
I was thinking the same thing, yes. In theory, I'd suggest it, but I don't see the point now.I'm slightly surprised no one is suggesting no lynch for the day. I thought that used to be the "technically best play" on MYLO? Or did that change?I think it still is generally, but I honestly am just that confident that Lidku's scum at this point.
Wait, did you gain an invention Night 2?Yes.
On that point, gut feeling only, I wonder if Tric is throwing Lidku under the bus today. I thought I had remembered Tric as being more defensive towards me last night, but on re-read I'm not getting that anywhere near as strongly now.
On that point, gut feeling only, I wonder if Tric is throwing Lidku under the bus today. I thought I had remembered Tric as being more defensive towards me last night, but on re-read I'm not getting that anywhere near as strongly now.
Is there actually any particular concrete reason why you think I'm supposedly on a "team" with TricMagic?
Very unlikely. In fact, it being day 3 and probably MYLO, I'll go ahead and explain how my role actually works: It's the other half of Fallacy's action that caused me to hear about it. I automatically hide if I don't act, and, if blocked by an ability, learn who and what was responsible. If I hide on my own - which so far has been my only option, because I didn't come with any powers - then I give myself an invention; otherwise the person who blocked me gets it. Since Fallacy's "kill" was a block, it triggered my ability and he stole the invention (a roleblock). A normal kill would still not affect me when hiding, but I wouldn't hear of it.To clarify, do you have to be actually blocked or just targeted by a block?
Very unlikely. In fact, it being day 3 and probably MYLO, I'll go ahead and explain how my role actually works: It's the other half of Fallacy's action that caused me to hear about it. I automatically hide if I don't act, and, if blocked by an ability, learn who and what was responsible. If I hide on my own - which so far has been my only option, because I didn't come with any powers - then I give myself an invention; otherwise the person who blocked me gets it. Since Fallacy's "kill" was a block, it triggered my ability and he stole the invention (a roleblock). A normal kill would still not affect me when hiding, but I wouldn't hear of it.To clarify, do you have to be actually blocked or just targeted by a block?
So the most likely situation is that I was blocked Night 2. Ultimately this means that if we're wrong about Lidku being scum, I'll be blocked again Night 3, which'll prevent me from having any shot at roleblocking whoever may be performing the scum mafiakill.
Is there any reason not to no-execute? Confident or not, you can never be 100% sure of things. I'm feeling pretty paranoid about everything going wrong right now. This is either our moment of triumph or our final step before our loss.
To clarify, do you have to be actually blocked or just targeted by a block?Actually blocked, sort of. As a matter of fact, I asked webadict about it at the time because I thought it was weird that you could block me while I was hiding, and he said that the roleblock didn't technically *work* on me, but "it's weird". So I'm not really sure how to define the interaction, but what I described is what seems to make sense.
Max isn't actually blocked when I block him, because my actions fail when targeting his hide effect, so he could have blocked me for whatever reason.While this is theoretically possible, I can't act and hide at the same time, and even if you think I might be lying about that, it doesn't seem likely to me that anyone would be given that ability, since it would make that player immune to everything.
While this is theoretically possible, I can't act and hide at the same time, and even if you think I might be lying about that, it doesn't seem likely to me that anyone would be given that ability, since it would make that player immune to everything.So this is why I trust you the most of everyone. You can't (reasonably) have performed the kill and can't (reasonably) have been the one to roleblock me.
What's your reasoning for a no-lynch here Fal?A: The mafia cannot kill more than one person per night, or at least it's very very unlikely that they can.
Ultimately I can't determine who blocked me, because the claims just aren't confirmable enough.
Ultimately I can't determine who blocked me, because the claims just aren't confirmable enough.
Am I wrong, but hasn't TricMagic claimed to have blocked you before?
As mentioned, I bypass the crane entirely. It was never really relevant to me, which I guess makes up for my weak role a little bit.
Ultimately I can't determine who blocked me, because the claims just aren't confirmable enough. If it's Lenglon-Shakerag then Shake could be doing anything with his actions while Lenglon covers for him. Max isn't actually blocked when I block him, because my actions fail when targeting his hide effect, so he could have blocked me for whatever reason. I don't think your action is confirmed either.
Honestly, I'm about at my limit so I'd just like to see the game resolved. I'm not certain if I even want to action tonight because my role is so shite.I don't understand why you think so poorly of your role.
I got "remove an action" and "delayed 1N roleblock" left and fuck me if I know who do put that sin on.you remove an action from FoU. FoU roleblocks + mafiakills Tric, if he's town and you happen to remove his auto, then he roleblocks+nightkills Tric. If he IS mafia, you simply weaken his abilities without changing the total number of mafiakills. If Tric has the role they say they have, then even if FoU is mafia then Tric will live because of their own roleblock. If Tric is lying, then FoU's action kills them, assuming you get the auto removed.
I got "remove an action" and "delayed 1N roleblock" left and fuck me if I know who do put that sin on.
Also, if Lidku's actually town everything is off the rails tonight.Of course, I think we can all take that as a given.
Lidku
Lidku
Role: Planet Trade Organization Officer
Alignment: Mafia
Abilities:
(Day) Embargo [target/self]: The target or yourself may not be the target of Actions performed by Town Players. All Players are notified at the end of the Day of this choice.
{P10} (Night) Purchase [target]: Pick one (1) of the following Abilities and give it to the target and yourself.
- (Auto) Attack Ball: You cannot be Bussed, Blocked, or Redirected.
- (Auto) Saiyan Armor: You Learn any Actions that target you.
- (Auto) Ray Gun: Mafiakill Actions you perform ignore Protections and Revives.
- (Auto) Saibamen: Inspects against you return Town.
- (Auto) Scouter: At the end of each Night, you Learn a random Town Player’s role.
Tags: Gift
{P10} (1-Shot, Night) Buy-Out [target]: You remove all Actions from the target. If the target is Town, they gain an additional vote for the remainder of the game.
Tags: Steal, Motivate
Shakerag
Role: The Beginner BYOR 2 Role That Won’t Ruin The Balance
Alignment: Town
Abilities:
{P5} (Used, Night) Bodyblock [target]: Whenever the target would be Killed by an Action, you are Killed instead. This Action lasts for the rest of the game and does nothing on non-Allied players.
Tags: Protect
{P10} (1-Shot, Night) Yawn [target]: The target is roleblocked during the following Night. The target is warned that they will be roleblocked.
Tags: Block
{P10} (1-Shot, Night) Obliterate [target]: Remove a random Ability from the target.
Tags: Remove
{P10} (Used, Night) Redouble [target]: Choose another Action you own. Give a 1-Shot copy of the Action to the target.
Tags: Gift
{P-1} (1-Shot, Night) 2 Times: Choose another Action you own that can be used and remove it from your role. Perform that Action twice, with separate targets and Choices for each Action.
Tags: Super
TricMagic, could you check with web and make sure that if you are today's lynch you can hammer the last scum tomorrow? As in, could we theoretically win just by lynching you be you town or scum?Yeah, hopefully this is the case.
by the way:
Tric:
I understand why you couldn't target FoU, but you should have roleblocked ME last night. That way I could confirm that you didn't perform the mafiakill.
Like I said, I think it's FoU, but if you will be able to hammer from the grave then we can cover all possibilities.by the way:
Tric:
I understand why you couldn't target FoU, but you should have roleblocked ME last night. That way I could confirm that you didn't perform the mafiakill.
Probably, yeah. I was seriously worried about interrupting whatever action you had planed though.
Alos, Falacy is lying, nothing happened to me last night. Let me check my abilities really quickly, though I have access to Dragon Cloak still.
[[Hi, I'm dead but since this is technically a beginner's game I can still post in a neutral way. It may behoove you all to look back at previous lynches and see who voted for whom. Also it may be beneficial to look at interactions between players given roleflips. This late in the game, previous posts become all the more important.]]((To be fair, I think the newest player left here is Tric, and I don't think Tric is all that new))
I mugged TricMagic to follow the plan posted earlier here.I got "remove an action" and "delayed 1N roleblock" left and fuck me if I know who do put that sin on.you remove an action from FoU. FoU roleblocks + mafiakills Tric, if he's town and you happen to remove his auto, then he roleblocks+nightkills Tric. If he IS mafia, you simply weaken his abilities without changing the total number of mafiakills. If Tric has the role they say they have, then even if FoU is mafia then Tric will live because of their own roleblock. If Tric is lying, then FoU's action kills them, assuming you get the auto removed.
and the night after, if it happens, we will have to have lynched town, so you'll want to delay roleblock the last mafia to prevent the endgame nightkill, giving us a extra final day to find and kill the last scum.
FoU: Could you please explain why it is highly unlikely to be Max for us please?1, I think Lidku would have behaved very differently with Max in scumchat.
Side note, if I was mafia, why on earth would I target Maximum Spin, who claimed a hide-type ability, with my kill on Night 1, when I could have killed basically anyone else and been more productive with it? Spin confirmed Mug was used with his ability, and NJW's roleflip contains a copy of Mug so anyone can see it's not some fancy hide bypassing ability.Because if his hide was a self-targeted ability then him being hit by the crane would have prevented him from targeting himself.
I don't think Spin's claimed this Night's results yet.
Is that generally how hide abilities work?Okay, so what do you think were the night actions each night?
I had thought previously that Coming Out Alive would count FoU's mafiakills as Kill Actions, however I checked with Web during the night and apparently a Mafiakill that does not Kill does not count as a Kill action.It's interesting that you say that, since, the very first night, the action Fallacy used on me was explicitly listed as a Kill.
My current working theory is that FoU is the last scum, that Tricmagic told the truth all game, and that on N2 when Tric bussed themselves with FoU, FoU had been attempting to roleblock Tric, and he ended up roleblocking himself.This actually sounds mechanically very plausible, and I like how neatly it ties up the night actions. I'm annoyed to think Fallacy would have been able to convince me he was town, though.
Alos, Falacy is lying, nothing happened to me last night.
As of right now, it can only be either me or Fal, I think.Technically, it could still be Lenglon dicking us all around with a massive bus, since we don't really know what role powers are involved... there might even be something to make Fallacy's claimed roleblock on you misfire to make him look bad. I don't know how likely I think this is anymore, but far less likely than that it really is just between you and Fallacy.
Side note, if I was mafia, why on earth would I target Maximum Spin, who claimed a hide-type ability, with my kill on Night 1, when I could have killed basically anyone else and been more productive with it? Spin confirmed Mug was used with his ability, and NJW's roleflip contains a copy of Mug so anyone can see it's not some fancy hide bypassing ability.On top of what Lenglon said, I've also been the first nightkill after truthfully claiming a hide ability (that I just didn't use that turn) before, in the totem mafia I was in, AND I claimed commuter but chose not to commute in one of your own Marathon games which I think got me lynched or at least heavily suspected. It's not unreasonable you could've just thought I would do it again. That's why I thought baiting the kill would work this time, actually, but I guess I was just a lower-value target, probably since Shakerag was bodyguarding.
Max: I'm rapidly becoming fully convinced that it's FoU, and am considering voting him instead of Tric simply to avoid the risk of him having some way to double-kill tonight or double-vote tomorrow, but am very aware of how risky that is compared to the no-vote or lynch Tric options.I definitely feel that. I think a no-lynch might be optimal, but... well, there's plenty of time so let's get as much information as possible, right?
My current thoughts on the question I just asked FoU: based on the intimidated way Lidku played all game, paired with how a godfather made him lose his last game as town, and with how most of D1 was talking about millers and inspects, and nobody claimed to have roleblocks D1, I find it hard to believe that Lidku would pick anything other than Saibamen for his N1 purchase. I also suspect that Lidku's partner LACKS most if not all of the abilities that Lidku was able to choose from using Purchase, simply because they would be clearly inferior if they are doubling up on the same abilities. As a result I personally find it more likely that Max is scum with a weird gifting mechanic than that Tric is scum that can bypass roleblocks.I think this is a good point. Let me add one thing:
I'm currently looking through last game's roles to see whether there are any powers that would apply. Tric usually more or less tells the truth about his role so I imagine that, even if he is scum, he's probably still using last game's powers.... well, there is a roleblock-piercing super in the very first role on the document.
In retrospect, I don't think that one makes sense, though, since it targets someone else, so we'd have to speculate something more complicated for that to be it.I'm currently looking through last game's roles to see whether there are any powers that would apply. Tric usually more or less tells the truth about his role so I imagine that, even if he is scum, he's probably still using last game's powers.... well, there is a roleblock-piercing super in the very first role on the document.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/15f43w-WKOU6TZVnVwivhCSyWdur-HDsnZIjyIA_VQqk
...I think this might be optimal. If Tric is town, then Fallacy most likely just lied about roleblocking him, and we know what to do next.
okay, now I'm back to gameplan: Lynch Tric First, Lenglon Dies Tonight, Tric Hammers.
I think this might be optimal. If Tric is town, then Fallacy most likely just lied about roleblocking him, and we know what to do next.Sadly it's not that simple. Town!Tric No-Action'd last night, so I'm not at all convinced that he'd be notified that he'd been roleblocked. Which is why I have to consider the possibility that FoU and Tric are both town and that you're the true scum. I consider this the least likely of the three possibilities, but I kinda have to mention it.
Wait, he did? That's a good point then. I must have missed him saying that so I'm going to go back and look.I think this might be optimal. If Tric is town, then Fallacy most likely just lied about roleblocking him, and we know what to do next.Sadly it's not that simple. Town!Tric No-Action'd last night, so I'm not at all convinced that he'd be notified that he'd been roleblocked. Which is why I have to consider the possibility that FoU and Tric are both town and that you're the true scum. I consider this the least likely of the three possibilities, but I kinda have to mention it.
... naturally, that means by the same token that I have to suspect you, as I'm sure you're aware.yep, I'd have to have faked out Shakerag's bodyguard somehow, And Saibamen wouldn't do it considering that it just changes inspect results. Oh, and on top of that you'd have to pair whatever let me do that with the existence of Lidku's Saibamen ability. And with me bussing Lidku for whatever reason. And with me whispering NJW that FoU is town on N1 for no benefit to myself. So, possible, but unlikely.
And with me whispering NJW that FoU is town on N1 for no benefit to myself.Oh jeez, right, I didn't think of that. I was 100% willing to imagine an "acts as town" auto for the reason I explained yesterday (and I'm not as confident as you are that Lidku's abilities couldn't be duplicated, since it looks like he could give them to anyone), but there'd really be no reason for you to do that whatsoever, that I can think of.
I got a protect from my last hide. So I'm going to commit to protecting Lenglon, making me the only viable kill target. This will effectively guarantee that, if Tric is town, the final choice will come out all right.(For the record, I was planning to do that anyway, I just wasn't going to claim it since I didn't want to get killed for doing it. But now I think it's better to set it up this way.)
Max: I'm rapidly becoming fully convinced that it's FoU, and am considering voting him instead of Tric simply to avoid the risk of him having some way to double-kill tonight or double-vote tomorrow, but am very aware of how risky that is compared to the no-vote or lynch Tric options.I definitely feel that. I think a no-lynch might be optimal, but... well, there's plenty of time so let's get as much information as possible, right?
Tric: lets pretend for the moment that Max has us all fooled, and is the final scum. Are you able to pick an ability that would prevent me from being tonight's mafiakill? It doesn't matter if you die because you can ghost-vote, but if you're the last townie standing then we lose. could you do it?
...
okay, now I'm back to gameplan: Lynch Tric First, Lenglon Dies Tonight, Tric Hammers.
TricMagic, you don't seem to have said one way or the other actually, so can you clarify whether you did anything last night?
10:50 PM for me here, so bit late.TricMagic, you don't seem to have said one way or the other actually, so can you clarify whether you did anything last night?Nope. The lynch Tric plan doesn't actually work given mafia just needs to equal or outnumber town.
PfP againIf it kills at all, we can't trust what you say.
Also Bleed Out says it kills at the end of the Night, not the end of the next Day.
webadict: In a situation such that one town player is left alive, and one mafia player is left alive, does endgame occur if the town faction possesses two votes and the mafia faction possesses one?Yes, the game ends immediately. The Mafia's goal is to equal or outnumber the Town in Beginner Mafia. This means that the Town possessing Roleblocks, Kills, extra or missing votes, or Kill Immunity will NOT stop the Mafia win condition, as it would in other games I run. This is mostly for sanity's sake, and so that Miseliminate and Lose and Eliminate or Lose are more clearly defined.
As mentioned before, my auto ability prevents my mafiakill abilities from killing.PfP againIf it kills at all, we can't trust what you say.
Also Bleed Out says it kills at the end of the Night, not the end of the next Day.
As mentioned before, my auto ability prevents my mafiakill abilities from killing.PfP againIf it kills at all, we can't trust what you say.
Also Bleed Out says it kills at the end of the Night, not the end of the next Day.
Didn’t expect the win condition change, gotta be honest. Still it’s good to know.
If we decide to no execute, I’m mugging Tric again. I doubt he has another roleblock bypass. That should confirm him as scum.
Only me or Tric can be mafia at this point. Lidku’s self vote means that he was unlikely to have been tutored in chat by an experienced player, which leaves me (insane) or Tric (inexperienced). Lenglon or Spin would never advocate a self vote.
Unfortunately if I’m executed and I’m town, there’s a 50 50 we lose, based on whether or not Spin hides versus who Tric chooses to kill. This also applies if Tric is executed and I’m the last mafia.
Ultimately the 50 50 is biased in Tric’s favor, since he may be able to pull an ability out of nowhere to let him break it.
Tric’s claimed role fits the power level shown by Lidku’s role much better than mine does. I have middle grade utility and that’s it. Tric has whatever he wants.
Anyways. I’ll stake my confidence on TricMagic being the last scum. I don’t believe anyone else would let Lidku self vote.
If it helps, I submitted the role... always scum.I'm... well, I guess it doesn't matter whether I believe this or not, since I don't have The Vote. If I hypothetically pretend I believe you, does this imply that "Mug" is a real mafiakill ability the mafia also have?Fortunately not. Well, probably not. Nothing about my role suggests I'm copying mafiakills. My mafiakills are my own mafiakills. Which is good because scum don't have them and bad because I don't have theft immunity.Oh right, I guess I should be fair and actually answer your question, at least for the sake of other people.This... is a reasonable enough justification.This seemed like a vote for the sake of voting, not for the sake of eliminating scum. Where was the justification?I thought Egan was more likely than you to be scum, based on my understanding of your behavior. Obviously this turned out to be wrong.
I do have a habit of placing votes in these kinds of ways, sometimes acting like it's a joke, or often offering to "go along with" someone else, but, as I've said before, I promise I only place votes when I mean them. In this case, for example, I put it like that because NJW2000 had been pushing for a vote on you the whole time, but then said that as if he was open to either, so I wanted to see how far he meant it.
Ugh, and I was so sure you were scum, too. Using the crane thing to hide while you chose someone to mafiakill, sure nobody could detect you due to being untargetable. I can't really make that argument at this point, though.
You get a promotion to likely town in my readometer. Unfortunately.
Lidku - you mentioned yesterday that you find it easier to engage in the more mechanical analysis part of the game, I'd like to hear your input in what you think happened last night between Max and FoU, and I'd also like to hear what you think of people's actions near the end of day yesterday, now that we know that Egan was town. From what you were saying before, this should be right up your alley.
I find FallacyofUrist very suspicious at the moment, for the fact that he was able to target someone who the Town apparently wasn't allowed to target. Also, FallacyofUrist outright admits to being able to use abilities on Maximum Spin, along with dubious claims that he has "Mafiakill" but it doesn't actually let him kill at all. Maybe he's lying and he was blocked by someone?
But I also find it strange on the reasons HOW Maximum Spin got to be able to not be targetable at all.. it's really odd.. Did someone target him that way, just so he could even look more suspicious, considering the fact on how much you suspected him as scum in the beginning? Isolate him? I'm generally not sure.
As for everyone else, I cannot be sure until everyone begins posting what they have done during the Night. I myself just did nothing last night, as I felt I had no good options to do anything with my abilities that time.
Nin. To answer Lidku's old question (which one exactly? Because you didn't bother to quote it when directly asked (your strange possible Knightwing+NJW link)).. Well, I don't have an answer to give you, given that you seem to miss stuff like the misconstruction of my own posts.
Just as I thought. Making blank statements that have no real weight toward them, then when probed on what exactly you mean by them, you just either ignore or scuffle up a light excuse to avoid outright answering. TricMagic is just really acting weird this game.
in the last BYOR game doing that is what almost led to a Town victory; the Town in that game only lost when I fell for the manipulations of Jim Groovester and believed that mechanically solving was useless.. when the whole time he was deceiving me otherwise.
I just consider mechanically solving and figuring out who did what on D2 and building off of that to be the most effective.
As I recall the opposite happened, you suspected Jim based on your intuition and his behavior, but were fooled by Jim being a Godfather who inspects as town, and he used that to gaslight you. You should have paid attention to your gut, rather than trusting the mechanics.
That was only because due to me being a Noob, I didn't even know about Godfather or what the role did. If I knew about it in a prior instance, I would have lied and said that my Inpsect on him had read as Mafia anyway: the tactic being that "damned if I'm wrong, but good if I'm right" type of situation. Mechanics in that game was how Town even came somewhat close to victory.
Anyways, since I'm being pressured to vote, I'll put one on FallacyofUrist. I just find him kinda shady, but nothing truly strong..
Fallacy. I'm guessing you did get one of Max's abilities? Or inventions, as it were?For the record, we have both already confirmed that, and I told you what it was. This probably won't get you very far as a line of inquiry.
10:50 PM for me here, so bit late.TricMagic, you don't seem to have said one way or the other actually, so can you clarify whether you did anything last night?
Nope. The lynch Tric plan doesn't actually work given mafia just needs to equal or outnumber town. So..
TricMagic> Syncth Dragon Cloak for Lenglon
Fal>Mug TricMagic
Max>Watch Tricmagic
Lenglon=Townie
This should prove Fal the killer, correct? Either you or I die. Or that Bleed effect Fal has kills at end of day... But that still means we'd just need to pick someone.
Well, that or I survive due to this Bleed action being more delayed than is mentioned. If Fal is town, they would Mug me, preventing me from killing. Max can't self-kill, so they can't be the kill if Max is Mafia. So if Max dies, it's Fal, once again barring me lying through my teeth.
Most likely I die and Lenglon has to choose between two. This is kinda saying Max is town since it's reliant on them not killing me and claiming Fal targeted me. But night actions can probably solve that.
I'm somewhat fine with no-lynching....I thought you were explicitly advocating for no-lynching, based on that previous post. If you're not, I'm still open to argument here.
QuoteShakerag
Role: The Beginner BYOR 2 Role That Won’t Ruin The Balance
Alignment: Town
Abilities:
{P5} (Used, Night) Bodyblock [target]: Whenever the target would be Killed by an Action, you are Killed instead. This Action lasts for the rest of the game and does nothing on non-Allied players.
Tags: Protect
{P10} (1-Shot, Night) Yawn [target]: The target is roleblocked during the following Night. The target is warned that they will be roleblocked.
Tags: Block
{P10} (1-Shot, Night) Obliterate [target]: Remove a random Ability from the target.
Tags: Remove
{P10} (Used, Night) Redouble [target]: Choose another Action you own. Give a 1-Shot copy of the Action to the target.
Tags: Gift
{P-1} (1-Shot, Night) 2 Times: Choose another Action you own that can be used and remove it from your role. Perform that Action twice, with separate targets and Choices for each Action.
Tags: Super
I could build and post a large case explaining why I think it's FoU, but there wouldn't be any actual questions in it, just pointing at specific actions and interactions throughout the game, and the only person I might be trying to convince with it is Max.I think I already agree with you anyway. I already know that Tric sometimes says weird, vaguely suspicious things as town, just like Knightwing and I both said from the start, so even though he keeps pinging me in weird ways, your argument has been stronger.
Dam it all. Really Max?I really did feel bad once or twice there. But that's the game.
That No Show is just evil, going off even if you're roleblocked.I take it as a point of pride that I out-evil myself with Abilities. That one was... Way too complicated in hindsight, but also a nice way to stop people from being super confirming with Roleblocks. It has some things that I'd need to change if I re-implemented it next time.
Nice job Max. I would have hammered Tric, and didn't even suspect you.That reminds me, I need to get back on Meph's discord to see your reflections.
I loved my role. Commuting is kind of my favorite thing, and this kind of thing is exactly what I was hoping for with my role submission.
Lidku's role was pretty good too. I think we made great use of the crane, and I agree that it was a really cool power. It's a shame he never got to buy anything, but it's okay.
I loved that I got towncred n1 for A) being made unactionable by town (ie, uninvestigable) and B) being roleblocked during a no-kill.
I'm still annoyed at myself for not realizeing that my N1 inspect was faster than Saibamen, and that as a result FoU was town. we could have won off of that.Probably not. If you would have then voted Tric, he would've voted someone else, and if it wasn't me, I'd be tying the vote. This way was a lot easier for me, though.
I did in fact bought Saibamen, but it was indirectly interrupted by Fallacy when he tried to Mug you, but didn't work since the crane effect was still on you.I remember, yes. Since I was untargetable, the action failed and we didn't actually GET it, though, which was my point.
also, I REALLY hated being given the crown D2. It reminded me of a really unplesant experience I've had in the past. Also, so far in cluch "Lenglon has full power and can game-determine if she just makes the right call" situations, I'm 0/4. I really hate that.Ah, yes, the Ruler power was a mistake and will be removed from future games, for multiple reasons. I was stuck on something that would make Knightwing's role feel unique, and... Well, I wanted to try it out again. Total noob mod move.
Ah, yes, the Ruler power was a mistake and will be removed from future games, for multiple reasons. I was stuck on something that would make Knightwing's role feel unique, and... Well, I wanted to try it out again. Total noob mod move.I'm glad to hear it. I absolutely hate not having a vote, because I feel like I might as well not be there.
Ah. Turns out I only had the potential to kill one half of the mafia, so what I thought was my strongest effect (Mugging the mafia-killer and then killing them) was actually not that good. Welp.You had the way to effectively stall the game forever if you had Mugged Max! Max could never kill and you could never kill him!
I feel like my performance on the last Day wasn’t that good, but y’all did end before I got out of work.
I’m comparing that in utility level to literally every other town player and coming up short. Aside from Knightwing, who kinda got a raw deal too.I think you're underselling yourself. If I hadn't done the self-embargo trick, which was a pretty risky and clever play in my opinion, then you would've had me d2. You roleblocked me on a no-kill night.
Still a good game overall. I got some good practice in hunting town.
I’m comparing that in utility level to literally every other town player and coming up short. Aside from Knightwing, who kinda got a raw deal too.Yes, but you'd assumedly be using these Abilities on people you suspect. The watch/target combined just requires figuring things out, plus being able to target within the Embargo means you could see if anyone targeted your target... Ya know, because only Mafia can!
Still a good game overall. I got some good practice in hunting town.
Also, you guys should consider joining Demon Mafia so that can start!I need a cooling off period between games. My preferred D1 style is really energy-draining and I don't think I can do it for back-to-back games.
FallacyofUrist has been executed.
FallacyofUrist was Always Scum (Town).
Luck was against Fallacy in the alignment department!The narrative force of irony 'Always Scum being Town' was greater than the narrative force of 'Fallacy is always scum'
Webadict, for curiosity's sake, how exactly did you invision my role playing out?Uh... I just gave it a bunch of Abilities that were kinda weaker than average, but had the potential to be strong if things worked out. I didn't really think about anything other than your Abilities spelled out BYOR2.
Once Lidku flipped I guess none of us considered he would have been bold enough to crane his scumbuddy first, huh?Fallacy should've known, he's been scum with me before. :P
You assume I know how to play town.Once Lidku flipped I guess none of us considered he would have been bold enough to crane his scumbuddy first, huh?Fallacy should've known, he's been scum with me before. :P