In please! Attempting another large game may be hubris, but I'll try not to screw this up as badly as last time.
BYOR15 did not go very well for town...In please! Attempting another large game may be hubris, but I'll try not to screw this up as badly as last time.You certainly rocked the Robot game!
Yeah, that's definite, at the rate we're gaining players. After the 16th is pretty much a must.
Here everything is so efficient, people get furious if you don't already perform expected strategies, eh, I still remember for a rally to kick me for saying "hi", sorry, no thanks.
Spoiler: Super Secret Strategy (click to show/hide)
Toonyman (0):
Roden (0):
TricMagic (0):
EuchreJack (0):
NJW2000 (0):
Vector (0):
Metruption (0):
No Execution (0):
Not Voting (7): ToonyMan, Roden, TricMagic, EuchreJack, NJW2000, Vector, Metruption
4 to hammer.
GLHF! Should we mass claim to panic scum and force them to come up with a fake claim on the spot? I haven't played short games in awhile, but I imagine forcing scum to claim early could trip them up, at least in the first round.I'm game...care to go first?
GLHF! Should we mass claim to panic scum and force them to come up with a fake claim on the spot? I haven't played short games in awhile, but I imagine forcing scum to claim early could trip them up, at least in the first round.Does this strategy have anything to it other than the hope that the scum panic? Because if they don't, I think an early massclaim would probably be quite scum-sided. Is there something I'm not seeing?
ToonyMan: do you have any particular order in mind if we do massclaim? I.e. who goes after Roden?I can go second unless someone really wants to go before me. I don't think we need a particular order besides those that volunteer first.
Metruption: how much mafia have you played? Just trying to get an idea of where everyone is experience-wise.I'm very familiar with forum mafia.
The Mafia is also guaranteed to appear. A small-ish minority of players will be Mafia, and will have the benefits of private communication during both the Night and Day (potentially enabled by an Encryptor) and a factional Mafiakill ability which can be used by any of their players to kill a target once per night. They are undoubtedly anti-town, and will win once their membership count is greater than or equal to the number of other players in the game, at least one of them is still alive, and it is not possible for them to be opposed. For example, if there were four players left - two town and two mafia, but the town had a Bus Driver, it would be possible for the mafia's own kill to be redirected onto one of their own members and leave the game in a two-town one-mafia situation.Aside from the 'factional Mafiakill ability' statement (which has been modified as per my earlier note), the remainder of this still holds true.
I expect this to be a game with lots of low power roles.This sounds reasonable and matches what I have.
I expect poison to be the delayed night kill and I assume it works like they target a player at night and that player dies at the end of the next day, whether or not they KNOW they are poisoned I don't know. There might even be a town role that can tell if people are poisoned, but it wouldn't be me.Hmm, poison is possible but I don't think mafia actually have it.
I'm a commuter and you can expect me to be dabbing out each and every night so that I don't get stabbed, shot, poisoned, etc.So you can just self-hide every night to save yourself? I find this more suspicious than Tric's claim.
I'm Bulletproof, so the only way scum can get rid of me is either through poison or end gaming me. Met sounds like he's basically untouchable, and Tric's role will essentially reveal who poisons him if he has a delayed death. So far, this narrows down who can get shot or poisoned, giving scum less choices and town roles a better shot at investigating and protecting successfully.The amount of passive roles is a bit staggering to me right now. I was willing to throw down my role this morning, but I'm hesitant now as my ability is not passive and one that I would rather scum didn't know since every player so far has reactionary powers.
This also implies scum could have a 1-shot Ninja or Strongman though, since we have multiple roles that make it difficult for scum to do anything.
I'm Bulletproof, so the only way scum can get rid of me is either through poison or end gaming me. Met sounds like he's basically untouchable, and Tric's role will essentially reveal who poisons him if he has a delayed death. So far, this narrows down who can get shot or poisoned, giving scum less choices and town roles a better shot at investigating and protecting successfully.My pronouns are they/them.
This also implies scum could have a 1-shot Ninja or Strongman though, since we have multiple roles that make it difficult for scum to do anything.
I expect this to be a game with lots of low power roles.
I'm a commuter and you can expect me to be dabbing out each and every night so that I don't get stabbed, shot, poisoned, etc.You claim to have bulletproof-on-steroids and you expect lots of low power roles ???
Whoops, sorry, I'll keep that in mind.I'm Bulletproof, so the only way scum can get rid of me is either through poison or end gaming me. Met sounds like he's basically untouchable, and Tric's role will essentially reveal who poisons him if he has a delayed death. So far, this narrows down who can get shot or poisoned, giving scum less choices and town roles a better shot at investigating and protecting successfully.My pronouns are they/them.
This also implies scum could have a 1-shot Ninja or Strongman though, since we have multiple roles that make it difficult for scum to do anything.
@Roden:Honestly, I'm hesitant to believe the Commuter claim myself. Having a player with complete intangibility in a seven player game feels a little out there. If scum, it would be the easiest fake claim to deter investigative roles from targeting them so they don't "waste" their night action.I'm Bulletproof, so the only way scum can get rid of me is either through poison or end gaming me. Met sounds like he's basically untouchable, and Tric's role will essentially reveal who poisons him if he has a delayed death. So far, this narrows down who can get shot or poisoned, giving scum less choices and town roles a better shot at investigating and protecting successfully.The amount of passive roles is a bit staggering to me right now. I was willing to throw down my role this morning, but I'm hesitant now as my ability is not passive and one that I would rather scum didn't know since every player so far has reactionary powers.
This also implies scum could have a 1-shot Ninja or Strongman though, since we have multiple roles that make it difficult for scum to do anything.
The fact you're just Bulletproof and not One-Shot Bulletproof does implies that mafia may have a way to circumvent your armor, I agree.
Roden: you're bulletproof, or claim to be, and also suggested a massclaim right out the gate. I find this a little odd for several reasons.I think my suggestion makes perfect sense. First off, scum have to choose whether or not to believe me, since for all they know I'm really just a Cop faking BP so I don't get shot. Second, protective roles and/or the Vig know to stay off me now, if any exist, increasing our chances of blocking the NK/shooting scum tonight. And third, it reduces credibility for anyone else who claims BP or similar roles.
One is that a bulletproof town player is stronger if the scum don't know about them, as there's a reasonable chance that mafia will attempt to shoot them at some point. So a bulletproof townie would not particularly want to claim, all else being equal.
Another is that the presence of a town player with a passive bulletproof ability makes a massclaim weaker, as they would not be able to give town information of any kind in the night, and it would require some kind of investigative ability to even partially confirm their claim. If you are bulletproof town, you suggested doing something only you knew wouldn't be as useful to town as it might seem to other players. Odd.
So... any explanation, Roden?
Armor wouldn't work against poison.How confident are you that mafia have poison in this game?
EuchreJack: would you be more scared of a mafia with a standard mafiakill or a nonstandard lethal ability?
GLHF! Should we mass claim to panic scum and force them to come up with a fake claim on the spot? I haven't played short games in awhile, but I imagine forcing scum to claim early could trip them up, at least in the first round.
Jack...how serious will you be in this game?
I'll vote Vector, is Tric worth killing N1?
I have no reason to believe it, but the supposed presence of a bulletproof implies scum have a way to kill a bulletproof.
@Met:Armor wouldn't work against poison.How confident are you that mafia have poison in this game?
@Met: Do you know how or why you became a Commuter?It was just in my role PM, not sure what you mean.
Vector: how suspiscious are you of Day 1 rolefishing? As in, where do you place it on the spectrum from "Highly Reliable Scumtell" to "Not Indicative of Alignment"?
I'll vote Vector, is Tric worth killing N1?
For your second point, what scum suggests to mass claim and then claims BP?
Hm, but we don't know the setup. I think the mass claim strategy only works when we have at least some hint to the setup.
Not voting Roden because Town Roden seems to like the mass claim. Hell, I'm not even suspicious, I just think its bad strategy.
Essentially, what is your flavor for why/how you're a Commuter? This is a themed game, sort of, so we should all have a flavor wrt our role.@Met: Do you know how or why you became a Commuter?It was just in my role PM, not sure what you mean.
That's fair I guess, but it sounds like you already assume I'm scum.
This is a good post, NJW town equity ++.For your second point, what scum suggests to mass claim and then claims BP?
WIFOM... I don't like the points about "not wasting the town vig's time" either. Just doesn't smell right.
What do you mean? I wasn't voting Vector for not posting, it was still the morning and I wanted their thoughts on Tric. I don't like your vote here as it's backed by false reasoning, do you agree?I'll vote Vector, is Tric worth killing N1?
While cruel, voting Vector for not posting makes sense, as the failure to post is by far the most suspicious thing.
FOS on ToonyMan until I get an explanation as to why Vector and not me.
Question for Tric: Does FOS even make sense in such a small and fast setup?
The presence of Commuter implies scum have a way to kill commuter. Not a day kill though, since that wouldn't work on bulletproof. But a daykill would kill you. But it wouldn't kill the bulletproof.I have no reason to believe it, but the supposed presence of a bulletproof implies scum have a way to kill a bulletproof.
@Met:Armor wouldn't work against poison.How confident are you that mafia have poison in this game?
Essentially, what is your flavor for why/how you're a Commuter? This is a themed game, sort of, so we should all have a flavor wrt our role.@Met: Do you know how or why you became a Commuter?It was just in my role PM, not sure what you mean.
You pushed for poison as a likely mafiakill method before Roden claimed Bulletproof.@Met:I have no reason to believe it, but the supposed presence of a bulletproof implies scum have a way to kill a bulletproof.Armor wouldn't work against poison.How confident are you that mafia have poison in this game?
Jack is referring to the "Newbie" game where town!Roden wanted the one-shot BP to claim if they existed since there's a meta way to play in that open setup. It's a bit different here but I understand their view.Hm, but we don't know the setup. I think the mass claim strategy only works when we have at least some hint to the setup.
Not voting Roden because Town Roden seems to like the mass claim. Hell, I'm not even suspicious, I just think its bad strategy.
This seems specious. Overexplaining. What does Town Roden seems to like the mass claim mean
Essentially, what is your flavor for why/how you're a Commuter? This is a themed game, sort of, so we should all have a flavor wrt our role.
I have an active ability, so would be able to check Metruption's commuter claim if we do not lynch them today, and would not be particularly averse to doing this. Especially if they have no objection to an ability being used on them tonight.Go for it, I look forward to being confirmed. In the meantime I think even though my claim conflicts with roden that it's not prudent to yeet that slot yet (even though Roden absolutely is drowning in poisoned wine). I get the vibe that tomorrow will be 5p yeetlo. My current best guess at scum would be TricMagic, that slot has a bunch of weird interactions.
@Metruption, how would you feel about that? I'm quite interested in the answer to this.
This post seems to be genuinely bad faith. Vector posts in a way that makes me think they should absolutely be able to parse many likely meanings of this statement.Hm, but we don't know the setup. I think the mass claim strategy only works when we have at least some hint to the setup.
Not voting Roden because Town Roden seems to like the mass claim. Hell, I'm not even suspicious, I just think its bad strategy.
This seems specious. Overexplaining. What does Town Roden seems to like the mass claim mean
Am exhausted, sorry folks. I forgot that this was starting this evening.And here, they scumlean me for no reason.
Don't like Roden's call for a massclaim, and think that doing this with the bulletproof claim is scum-sided but perhaps NaI for Roden. Also feel ambiguous about Metruption's jumping on it + claim. Leaning Metruption scum.
@Toony: As usual I struggle to read Tric. Null.
@EuchreJack: If the vote on me is so obvious, why softpedal it with "regret?" FoS.
This post seems to be genuinely bad faith. Vector posts in a way that makes me think they should absolutely be able to parse many likely meanings of this statement.Hm, but we don't know the setup. I think the mass claim strategy only works when we have at least some hint to the setup.
Not voting Roden because Town Roden seems to like the mass claim. Hell, I'm not even suspicious, I just think its bad strategy.
This seems specious. Overexplaining. What does Town Roden seems to like the mass claim meanAm exhausted, sorry folks. I forgot that this was starting this evening.And here, they scumlean me for no reason.
Don't like Roden's call for a massclaim, and think that doing this with the bulletproof claim is scum-sided but perhaps NaI for Roden. Also feel ambiguous about Metruption's jumping on it + claim. Leaning Metruption scum.
@Toony: As usual I struggle to read Tric. Null.
@EuchreJack: If the vote on me is so obvious, why softpedal it with "regret?" FoS.
I'm seeing Vector cast a rather wide net of shade with few townreads and this creates a situation where scum!Vector can just hop on a lot of wagons easily. There's another scumtell I see Vector going for that I've struggled with in the past. I'll call it out if I see more of it.
Vote Vector for Elimination
What does Town Roden seems to like the mass claim mean in this context. Also, Vector notes NaI for Roden. Also, use Red, not bold. You are casting a wide net in hopes of netting a chance at survival.Survivalism is NAI and this sort of language thievery is scum indicative.
Active ability. Don't you need to target someone NJW? But the Commuter can't be targeted.If someone with an active ability targets a commuter then they will get a different result than if they target someone who is not a commuter. They will also get the same result as if scum roleblocked them but I don't think scum has a roleblocker in this game. There's a reason I think that and on day 2 when we have a LOT of information from night actions going into that yeetlo I expect everything to make a lot more sense. Notably, both Roden and I are town.
I understand assuming that you and Roden can survive to tomorrow given your claimed abilities.Active ability. Don't you need to target someone NJW? But the Commuter can't be targeted.If someone with an active ability targets a commuter then they will get a different result than if they target someone who is not a commuter. They will also get the same result as if scum roleblocked them but I don't think scum has a roleblocker in this game. There's a reason I think that and on day 2 when we have a LOT of information from night actions going into that yeetlo I expect everything to make a lot more sense. Notably, both Roden and I are town.
Unless one of us gets yeeted. Conflicting claims can be a good reason to yeet a slot but when neither of us actually act particularly scummy then it's better to yeet a slot that has been acting suspicious. I find TricMagic and Vector to be the most suspicious.
I understand assuming that you and Roden can survive to tomorrow given your claimed abilities.
You call it language thievery, I call it echoing your own words back at you.What does Town Roden seems to like the mass claim mean in this context. Also, Vector notes NaI for Roden. Also, use Red, not bold. You are casting a wide net in hopes of netting a chance at survival.Survivalism is NAI and this sort of language thievery is scum indicative.
Nin. Meta, why vote vector, weren't you pushing for me? What changed? Or are you Cornered (https://youtu.be/UFcJmOs8DRQ)?
Jack is referring to the "Newbie" game where town!Roden wanted the one-shot BP to claim if they existed since there's a meta way to play in that open setup. It's a bit different here but I understand their view.
My current best guess at scum would be TricMagic, that slot has a bunch of weird interactions.
And here, they scumlean me for no reason.
I'm seeing Vector cast a rather wide net of shade with few townreads and this creates a situation where scum!Vector can just hop on a lot of wagons easily. There's another scumtell I see Vector going for that I've struggled with in the past. I'll call it out if I see more of it.
Vote Vector for Elimination
That's fair I guess, but it sounds like you already assume I'm scum.
I never said there was a connection between you and vector. This is a transparent misrepresentation of what I originally posted to discredit me.
You accuse one of casting a net. But let's move on from that. What is your theorized connection between Vector and I?
Not OMGUS. This post is an incoherent salad of buzzwords.
Nice wheelaround OMGUS kid but I'm more likely to hit both members of the scumteam if I provide broad pressure within the first 24 hours. The difference between scumtell and dumbtell is how high the sucker jumps. . . . scumbucket.
Buzzwords.I never said there was a connection between you and vector. This is a transparent misrepresentation of what I originally posted to discredit me.
You accuse one of casting a net. But let's move on from that. What is your theorized connection between Vector and I?
Not OMGUS. This post is an incoherent salad of buzzwords.
Nice wheelaround OMGUS kid but I'm more likely to hit both members of the scumteam if I provide broad pressure within the first 24 hours. The difference between scumtell and dumbtell is how high the sucker jumps. . . . scumbucket.
@Jack:
You shouldn't mind me leaving a vote on you then if leaving yours on Vector is fine.
What do you think of Met? Town or mafia?
You asked my theorized connection which implied you had reason to believe I had one. I never stated that there was a connection. It's absolutely reasonable to search for individual scum members and not consider partner equity on day1. After a red flip it becomes exponentially easier to analyze scum equity, especially with poe reads taken into account.Buzzwords.I never said there was a connection between you and vector. This is a transparent misrepresentation of what I originally posted to discredit me.
You accuse one of casting a net. But let's move on from that. What is your theorized connection between Vector and I?Not OMGUS. This post is an incoherent salad of buzzwords.
Nice wheelaround OMGUS kid but I'm more likely to hit both members of the scumteam if I provide broad pressure within the first 24 hours. The difference between scumtell and dumbtell is how high the sucker jumps. . . . scumbucket.
I asked you what the connection was. But if there isn't one, who do you think my partner or ally is? Who's Vector's? What do you think of Jack's latest post?
Your busy-ness is expected because I believe you said you had things to do at the end of the month, however your indecision on Met is suspicious. Where are the wild accusations of town!Jack? I'm going to read into your sedated state as more than it seems.@Jack:
You shouldn't mind me leaving a vote on you then if leaving yours on Vector is fine.
What do you think of Met? Town or mafia?
Please do, it actually makes me feel better about you. For whatever its worth, I'm leaving my FOS on you until I get a chance to review your posts in-depth anyways. But suspecting me is part of your Town meta these days.
I'm really not sure on Met. They're doing a good job hunting Vector, but I think they're hunting Vector just because Vector voted them. They sort of dropped their case on Tric without a good reason other than to attack a player for voting them. There is also the concern that they claim to be an experienced mafia player, yet their play doesn't seem to be experienced. I really can't say at this time. I'm not sure why they're getting so much flak for being a Commuter though. It sounds like something to claim early that can lead to confirmed Town, so I think the claim is a good one to make if true and if town.
Nothing to add based on Met's newest posts. I've made FAR worse.
I'm not a huge fan of these jack posts, it feels like they lack any sort of real stance.Ding ding ding! That's how I feel.
Your busy-ness is expected because I believe you said you had things to do at the end of the month, however your indecision on Met is suspicious. Where are the wild accusations of town!Jack? I'm going to read into your sedated state as more than it seems.@Jack:
You shouldn't mind me leaving a vote on you then if leaving yours on Vector is fine.
What do you think of Met? Town or mafia?
Please do, it actually makes me feel better about you. For whatever its worth, I'm leaving my FOS on you until I get a chance to review your posts in-depth anyways. But suspecting me is part of your Town meta these days.
I'm really not sure on Met. They're doing a good job hunting Vector, but I think they're hunting Vector just because Vector voted them. They sort of dropped their case on Tric without a good reason other than to attack a player for voting them. There is also the concern that they claim to be an experienced mafia player, yet their play doesn't seem to be experienced. I really can't say at this time. I'm not sure why they're getting so much flak for being a Commuter though. It sounds like something to claim early that can lead to confirmed Town, so I think the claim is a good one to make if true and if town.
Nothing to add based on Met's newest posts. I've made FAR worse.
No clue, not worth thinking about. I'd rather see the flip and draw conclusions this way.I'm not a huge fan of these jack posts, it feels like they lack any sort of real stance.Ding ding ding! That's how I feel.
Who do you think mafia will gun for if they aren't capable of targeting you tonight?
Met is joining me in voting Vector, so I can't very well dump Met down the Scum drain should I chose to push on the Vector vote later on.Just because someone is on a wagon with you doesn't mean you share an alignment with them. While it is possible for there to be an all town wagon eliminating town this is exceedingly rare. It's a very safe assumption that there is always at least one scum on any wagon that eliminates town.
Tric you are getting really hung up on something that won't matter tomorrow. Both the person who claimed bulletproof and the person who claimed commuter are town. Someone is going to target me with a role that can confirm I am a commuter and then we will have an easy time in yeetlo tomorrow. You should seek to elim outside of {Metruption,Roden} right now.
Jack, a question. We have a claimed bulletproof, and a claimed commuter. 1 is outright immune to being targeted, and thus investigated. The other can't be killed normally.
In addition, those who target me, I'll know. So, taking your role into account, is this incredibly townsided, or balanced? Or is one of the two mafia?
... Yeetlo?Yeetlo. Yeet = eliminate
7 people. We hit 6, then 5. 1 more and we LOSE, not win. Why do you think it's that easy? Town targeting you gives you the perfect out along with Roden as a potential lynch. One thing to remember is your claim came after mine, not before.
town post, welcome to the blocTric you are getting really hung up on something that won't matter tomorrow. Both the person who claimed bulletproof and the person who claimed commuter are town. Someone is going to target me with a role that can confirm I am a commuter and then we will have an easy time in yeetlo tomorrow. You should seek to elim outside of {Metruption,Roden} right now.
... You do know if someone dies to your partner... Actually, that's quite good for an ally. The Mafia says they target you last night and confirm you as the commuter. But they killed someone else. As opposed to people targeting me and me confirming their actions, something you can't actually do. And a town doing that gains what exactly? Just suspicion. A commuter roll is perfect for an ally, they can avoid being killed or found out, so our only recourse is to find scum instead.
I don't like the agenda of this part of the post. It reads heavily like scum (informed minority who knows the alignment of every player) who is trying to make town go down a rabbit hole that leads to the townies doing the hard work of eliminating a townie.Jack, a question. We have a claimed bulletproof, and a claimed commuter. 1 is outright immune to being targeted, and thus investigated. The other can't be killed normally.
In addition, those who target me, I'll know. So, taking your role into account, is this incredibly townsided, or balanced? Or is one of the two mafia?
I think I'll refrain from discussing my role at this time. Bulletproof and Commuter could be powerful in LYLO. They're not much now. We really have no idea what else is out there.
Hm, if we're talking fakeclaims, we really should discuss fakeclaim of bulletproof versus fakeclaim of commuter by mafia. Or maybe it already came up, my apologies.
I...didn't say that?That's fair I guess, but it sounds like you already assume I'm scum.
Dude, I don't know if you and Metruption have the world's shittiest mindmeld or what, but "OMG scumhunting sus" is not the revelation you think it is.
This is by all means a themed game, and flavor claiming isn't out of the usual for Mafia.Essentially, what is your flavor for why/how you're a Commuter? This is a themed game, sort of, so we should all have a flavor wrt our role.
Let me establish right now that I am NOT going to engage in or cooperate with any attempts to gain or use flavour-based information, and would be completely sympathetic to any player adopting the same policy. This is not a bastard game, and I'm here to play mafia, not speculate about the mod's writing style. I could go on.
I don't like the agenda of this part of the post. It reads heavily like scum (informed minority who knows the alignment of every player) who is trying to make town go down a rabbit hole that leads to the townies doing the hard work of eliminating a townie.Jack, a question. We have a claimed bulletproof, and a claimed commuter. 1 is outright immune to being targeted, and thus investigated. The other can't be killed normally.
In addition, those who target me, I'll know. So, taking your role into account, is this incredibly townsided, or balanced? Or is one of the two mafia?
I think I'll refrain from discussing my role at this time. Bulletproof and Commuter could be powerful in LYLO. They're not much now. We really have no idea what else is out there.
Hm, if we're talking fakeclaims, we really should discuss fakeclaim of bulletproof versus fakeclaim of commuter by mafia. Or maybe it already came up, my apologies.
Tric you are getting really hung up on something that won't matter tomorrow. Both the person who claimed bulletproof and the person who claimed commuter are town. Someone is going to target me with a role that can confirm I am a commuter and then we will have an easy time in yeetlo tomorrow. You should seek to elim outside of {Metruption,Roden} right now.
Buddying Tric?town post, welcome to the blocTric you are getting really hung up on something that won't matter tomorrow. Both the person who claimed bulletproof and the person who claimed commuter are town. Someone is going to target me with a role that can confirm I am a commuter and then we will have an easy time in yeetlo tomorrow. You should seek to elim outside of {Metruption,Roden} right now.
... You do know if someone dies to your partner... Actually, that's quite good for an ally. The Mafia says they target you last night and confirm you as the commuter. But they killed someone else. As opposed to people targeting me and me confirming their actions, something you can't actually do. And a town doing that gains what exactly? Just suspicion. A commuter roll is perfect for an ally, they can avoid being killed or found out, so our only recourse is to find scum instead.
A survivor? Can't exist in this setup.
Sigh, FOS Metruption instead of Toonyman. I'm getting a survivor vibe out of Metruption.
Seriously, we yeet Vector today and then do this tonight. I'm sure that the results would be clairvoyant.
Other matters:
I have an active ability, so would be able to check Metruption's commuter claim if we do not lynch them today, and would not be particularly averse to doing this. Especially if they have no objection to an ability being used on them tonight.
@Metruption, how would you feel about that? I'm quite interested in the answer to this.
@FallacyofUrist: can we ask for votecounts? Is the bot being used this game?I have no idea how to use that bot so I'll be doing vote counts manually. You may request them at any time, though I can't guarantee a timely response in all circumstances. I will say I'll provide one a while before Day 1 ends, to give everyone an accurate picture of what's going on.
Toonyman (0):
Roden (1): NJW2000
TricMagic (0):
EuchreJack (1): ToonyMan
NJW2000 (0):
Vector (2): EuchreJack, Metruption
Metruption (2): Vector, TricMagic
No Execution (0):
Not Voting (1): Roden
4 to hammer.
Vote Vector for EliminationThe norm on this board is to use red or bold red for a vote, as bold is more commonly used outside of that context. That said I counted your vote this time.
Vector (2): EuchreJack, Metruption
Metruption (2): Vector, TricMagic
I want to believe Met, but a Commuter + Bulletproof combo seems kind of wild. Like how is scum supposed to win a 1v4 if their scum buddy/traitor gets out first? Also kinda feels like he's trying to buddy me.
Roden is town because as town I only mindmeld with town.No kidding.
By the same vein, voting Jack is something I'd be fine with. Or, you know, just skipping the vote today. Been in favor of that, though wanted the info pressure and talk would bring.Which players would you be okay with voting today? Do you think NJW is town?
Jack is yeetableHow yeetable?
By the same vein, voting Jack is something I'd be fine with. Or, you know, just skipping the vote today. Been in favor of that, though wanted the info pressure and talk would bring.Hadn't really considered the possibility, but not a fan of not killing anyone today. It may not be that bad a plan numerically... I'm just very uncertain that we'll have better info tomorrow.
Vector's ISO has them at odds with Jack, which could be distancing since their argument was short lived and didn't go anywhere. Jack also has Vector at the bottom of his reads list. I don't think anyone has a positive read on Jack besides NJW at this point though.how do I view an iso on this forum?
I don't think Jack has claimed yet, I'd rather he do that first before we decide to vote him.
I would yeet jack if I couldn't yeet vectorJack is yeetableHow yeetable?
Goodnight.So that's the answer? Lynch one of the claimed unkillables and hope the other is town? Or, if Met flips town are you going to push for Roden tomorrow? How does that help us?
I'm not voting Vector, vote Jack with me.I would yeet jack if I couldn't yeet vectorJack is yeetableHow yeetable?
Toonyman (0):
Roden (0):
TricMagic (0):
EuchreJack (3): ToonyMan, Metruption, Roden
NJW2000 (0):
Vector (0):
Metruption (4): Vector, TricMagic, NJW2000, EuchreJack
No Execution (0):
Not Voting (0):
4 to hammer.
1-Shot Cop (town):
(1-Shot, Night) Investigate [target]: You investigate your target’s private belongings, and learn their alignment (Town, Mafia, or Mafia-Ally). You only have enough forensics equipment to do this once, however.
Even-Night Doctor (town):
(Night) Protect [target]: You use your medical expertise and protect your target player from kill actions this Night.
(Auto) Even-Night: Due to fatigue, you can only take Night actions during even-numbered Night phases.
Roden (0):
TricMagic (0):
EuchreJack (0):
NJW2000 (0):
Vector (0):
No Execution (0):
Not Voting (5): Roden, TricMagic, EuchreJack, NJW2000, Vector
3 to hammer.
Ngl I have no idea why Met claimed Commuter. Mass claims just don't work if you fake claim because we're trying to catch liars with that.
Also not really sure why Tric got NK'd, but a gun implies one scum + one ally I guess. Gonna vote Jack because the last minute hammer is basically a scum claim.
I vote jack
I'm not going to be awake for day end so that's what I have to say on that. I'll be leaving my vote on Jack.
VOTE: EuchreJack
No ties
Vote Metruption
Hi -- I need to reread and have a lot of HW to do. I'll post later today, just announcing my presence.....
@FallacyofUrist: if two out of five players couldn't play for 24 of the 48 hours, would you consider an extension?I'd be willing to consider it if it was needed. I just don't want to extend indefinitely, but adding an extra day to compensate for someone not having the time to play would be reasonable enough.
No one dying would have been a perfectly fine result.
@EuchreJack: What was your action last night?
Is there something you're not telling us?
I hate being the newbie...Jack, you very much aren't a newbie now.
@EuchreJack: What was your action last night?
Is there something you're not telling us?
I'm a Rolecop. I targeted Roden, because I mostly hold them responsible for pushing me into casting the Hammer (as it was their vote that tied things, and I had no reason to believe that Tric would swoop in and untie it). Probably should have just self-voted, but Met seemed suspicious. Had Met actually claimed Cop to tank the mafia night kill, we'd be in a completely different scenario.
My attempt to Rolecop Roden failed. Dunno what that means.
I'm ok with an extension, although I generally have more time on the weekends to "catch up", so don't necessarily need it myself.
I'm unsure if further claims help or hurt town. A possible unknown Alien is a great tool for Town.Also, how do you go from not knowing what it means to claiming they are Ascetic. Not to mention that role is BASTARD in this setup with multiple confirming roles if we take it you're a rolecop on top of a cop, delayer, doctor, and self-vouyer. Vector can reveal his role and put your lies to bed EuchreJack
@Vector: Start hunting or become a policy lynch. Even without a through read, FOS would be of some use.
FOS Roden, mainly because an Ascetic Mafia is DANGEROUS.
Had you targeted me last night, I would have seen you, you could have confirmed me, and any others to target me would also be confirmed.
The traditional whiteboard of vote counting shone with little streaks of red ink, tally marks repeatedly added and removed, threat repositioned.Quote from: VotecountToonyman (0):
Roden (1): NJW2000
TricMagic (0):
EuchreJack (1): ToonyMan
NJW2000 (0):
Vector (2): EuchreJack, Metruption
Metruption (2): Vector, TricMagic
No Execution (0):
Not Voting (1): Roden
4 to hammer.
This is a good thing. If you were so worried about Vector before, why not check them? Also, are you a 1-shoteven Rolecop Jack?
This is a good thing. If you were so worried about Vector before, why not check them? Also, are you a 1-shoteven Rolecop Jack?
The traditional whiteboard of vote counting shone with little streaks of red ink, tally marks repeatedly added and removed, threat repositioned.Quote from: VotecountToonyman (0):
Roden (1): NJW2000
TricMagic (0):
EuchreJack (1): ToonyMan
NJW2000 (0):
Vector (2): EuchreJack, Metruption
Metruption (2): Vector, TricMagic
No Execution (0):
Not Voting (1): Roden
4 to hammer.
(opps.)
Tric,
I don't think that mentioning any limits on my role would help town. Better the mafia not know those things. Note how I didn't question NJW2000 on any limits to their Delayer power?
Roden was the one to investigate. There was a claim to be verified, and I was pissed that Roden pushed me to hammer, as I didn't think a tie would help town.
You seem to be adding a lot into my posts Tric.
Sincerely,
BlueJack
Roden (0):
TricMagic (0):
EuchreJack (3): Roden, TricMagic, EuchreJack
NJW2000 (0):
Vector (0):
No Execution (0):
Not Voting (2): NJW2000, Vector
3 to hammer.
Non-Consecutive Roleblocker (mafia):
(Night) Roleblock [target]: You knock out your target with a sleeping drug, blocking that player’s action tonight, preventing it entirely. They are given an ‘action failed’ result.
(Auto) Non-Consecutive: Due to your target potentially developing a tolerance to your drugs, you cannot affect the same player two Nights in a row.
Well, yes, I'd be willing to consider one at that point, but as it turns out that's kinda irrelevant, haha. Can't extend past a hammer.Welp. Would also like an extension. I'm interested in Vector's claim, if she's going to make one.
FallacyofUrist: would you be willing to consider an extension, given there are 12 hours left and Vector hasn't actually had a chance to play?
Roden (0):
TricMagic (0):
NJW2000 (0):
Vector (0):
No Execution (0):
Not Voting (4): Roden, TricMagic, NJW2000, Vector
3 to hammer.
NJW, who did you delay last night?
On a green Jack flip it's just a scum win I think. If we don't lose, then tonight Met should delay whoever he thinks is the final scum. But I'm pretty sure it's just Vector.
WhatI said the wrong name again there, sorry.
Posting from class, need an extension.Also, this just reads as self-incriminating now.
Pretty sure Euchre is scum given that townie role cop + cop doesn’t make a lot of sense for game balance. I’m sure enough on this that I’m good to hammer when the time comes, but would like to hear discussion on this point first.
I'll vote Vector, is Tric worth killing N1?
If I had a fairly good sense that this would mean that a. we wouldn't have to LYLO with Tric and b. it was unlikely to end the game D1: yes. No LuckyOwl means that Tric has become prime PoE real estate.
If Vector is not mafia, Roden is bulletproof in a setup without town bullets. If I'm locktown, then that means you are the most likely. There won't BE a delay tomorrow then.Well, yeah, that post was made from my perspective. From your perspective, assuming you're town... the above reasoning doesn't work unless you believe I'm a town delayer and are trying to decide between lynching Vector or Roden. Which isn't where you're at. Nonetheless, it explains why I'll most likely be voting Vector. Willing to wait for them to give a case or something though.
That said, your post is made from your assumption you are town, so.. I'm still kina annoyed though, given I want Vector to give his case against me.
Pretty sure we just vote Vector here lol. I didn't believe it when Jack said he checked me, and I have no reason to believe Vector would choose to check me either when I was the only person to full claim and Tric was literally asking to be targeted.
Does it matter? For all I know, you could be telling the truth and still be scum. A town Rolecop has no reason to check a BP claim, but a mafia Rolecop could do it to see if I'm bluffing and really just a Doc trying to deter scum from shooting me. That way you don't risk wasting your NK just in case I actually am BP.Pretty sure we just vote Vector here lol. I didn't believe it when Jack said he checked me, and I have no reason to believe Vector would choose to check me either when I was the only person to full claim and Tric was literally asking to be targeted.
OK, serious question ... if I didn't cop you, and I was delayed by NJW, then what do you think I did instead?
GLHF! Should we mass claim to panic scum and force them to come up with a fake claim on the spot? I haven't played short games in awhile, but I imagine forcing scum to claim early could trip them up, at least in the first round.
Posting from class, need an extension.
Pretty sure Euchre is scum given that townie role cop + cop doesn’t make a lot of sense for game balance. I’m sure enough on this that I’m good to hammer when the time comes, but would like to hear discussion on this point first.
Also, this. Just this. A better argument would be that you were the rolecop. Which in light of your own claim is very suspisous.
This shortly after, you already assume him to be scum, which is a point for checking him. Why though? Why think that yet vote for Meta?Essentially, what is your flavor for why/how you're a Commuter? This is a themed game, sort of, so we should all have a flavor wrt our role.@Met: Do you know how or why you became a Commuter?It was just in my role PM, not sure what you mean.That's fair I guess, but it sounds like you already assume I'm scum.
This is a good post, NJW town equity ++.For your second point, what scum suggests to mass claim and then claims BP?
WIFOM... I don't like the points about "not wasting the town vig's time" either. Just doesn't smell right.
I wish I had time to keep up with all of this. And with our deadline being in 13 hours, gotta keep things moving.
Hopefully I'll have time to work on this more thoroughly with at least a few hours before the deadline.
Keeping vote on Vector for now. The most recent post was good, but some of the previous ones sound like gibberish.
And the phone is ringing, sigh. Later folks.
Not OMGUS. This post is an incoherent salad of buzzwords.
Nice wheelaround OMGUS kid but I'm more likely to hit both members of the scumteam if I provide broad pressure within the first 24 hours. The difference between scumtell and dumbtell is how high the sucker jumps. . . . scumbucket.
Also, this. Just this. A better argument would be that you were the rolecop. Which in light of your own claim is very suspisous.
I wasn't going to out myself out without any results and draw the NK. Silly goose.
(Nice OMGUS).
To quote, a wide net is nessaceery to catch fish. And there are a lot of town to kill, huh Vector?This post seems to be genuinely bad faith. Vector posts in a way that makes me think they should absolutely be able to parse many likely meanings of this statement.Hm, but we don't know the setup. I think the mass claim strategy only works when we have at least some hint to the setup.
Not voting Roden because Town Roden seems to like the mass claim. Hell, I'm not even suspicious, I just think its bad strategy.
This seems specious. Overexplaining. What does Town Roden seems to like the mass claim meanAm exhausted, sorry folks. I forgot that this was starting this evening.And here, they scumlean me for no reason.
Don't like Roden's call for a massclaim, and think that doing this with the bulletproof claim is scum-sided but perhaps NaI for Roden. Also feel ambiguous about Metruption's jumping on it + claim. Leaning Metruption scum.
@Toony: As usual I struggle to read Tric. Null.
@EuchreJack: If the vote on me is so obvious, why softpedal it with "regret?" FoS.
I'm seeing Vector cast a rather wide net of shade with few townreads and this creates a situation where scum!Vector can just hop on a lot of wagons easily. There's another scumtell I see Vector going for that I've struggled with in the past. I'll call it out if I see more of it.
Vote Vector for Elimination
"No, it's you. You're trying too hard OMGUS."
PS: A good reason to check Roden over Tric is because of the [Roden, Metruption] contains a likely scum scenario. It wasn't Metruption so it's better to just ... go ahead and check.I'm confused. Why would knowing my role confirm my alignment? Why not check Jack, who was the opposing wagon? Why would you be uncertain about my alignment anyway when I was off the town wagon?
Next: folks who are asking me why I didn't check Tric, are you kidding me? Tric and I were mechanically confirmed townies in a game together and we lost. Confirming Roden's role is much more valuable for town because a confirmed bulletproof townie can eat an NK after being confirmed.
Based on playstyle I don't think it's NJW, so I'm voting for TricMagic.
I think doing what you want over doing what would get you confirmed as town just cost us the game then, if you're town.
Roden (0):
TricMagic (1): Vector
NJW2000 (0):
Vector (3): TricMagic, NJW2000, Roden
No Execution (0):
Not Voting (0):
3 to hammer.
Role Cop (mafia):
(Night) Investigate [target]: You rummage through and examine the target player’s private room, and learn their complete role, not including alignment.
Yeah, mafia being busy kinda screwed them over. Major issue is the Role Cop ruse got used twiceover in a game with cop and doctor already outed.It was good. I also wish Investigations 3 was real.
Any comments on my logic(chess) at the end? Always fun to get a chance to do those.
Good shit town, although I do feel bad that the mafia were busy this round.
@NJW:
Were you able to delay every night? That seemed suspicious to me considering the rest of town had nerfed powers.
@NJW:I was, yes. It was strong, but not that strong given that unlike a protect, I could only buy town time in the short term unless I hit the kill repeatedly.
Were you able to delay every night? That seemed suspicious to me considering the rest of town had nerfed powers.
Obviously, all the other players did a stellar job, and poor little me is woefully inadequate in every way. :'(Hey, you weren't bad. I think the self-vote might have been a bit premature, even: scum just needed to win one person over to their lynch on D2.
Yeah, mafia being busy kinda screwed them over. Major issue is the Role Cop ruse got used twiceover in a game with cop and doctor already outed.Yeah, it's unfortunate they couldn't be more active, it ultimately played a part in the town win since they got out-posted.
Any comments on my logic(chess) at the end? Always fun to get a chance to do those.
Metruption:
1-Shot Cop (town):
(1-Shot, Night) Investigate [target]: You investigate your target’s private belongings, and learn their alignment (Town, Mafia, or Mafia-Ally). You only have enough forensics equipment to do this once, however.
ToonyMan:
Even-Night Doctor (town):
(Night) Protect [target]: You use your medical expertise and protect your target player from kill actions this Night.
(Auto) Even-Night: Due to fatigue, you can only take Night actions during even-numbered Night phases.
NJW2000:
Delayer (town):
(Night) Delay [target]: You bend time, temporally displacing the target player’s action this Night (if any) to the following Night. They are given an ‘action failed’ result if they acted, then the following Night, they perform their displaced action (even if they are dead).
Roden:
1-Shot Bulletproof Townie (town):
(1-Shot, Auto) Bulletproof: If you would be killed during the Night, the kill fails thanks to your bulletproof vest. This ability only works once.
TricMagic:
Automatic Self-Voyeur (town):
(Auto): Awareness: You use your psychic awareness to learn what categories of actions were performed on you during the Night at the end of each Night. Available categories: Investigative, Interference, Protective, Lethal, Other.
Vector:
Role Cop (mafia):
(Night) Investigate [target]: You rummage through and examine the target player’s private room, and learn their complete role, not including alignment.
EuchreJack:
Non-Consecutive Roleblocker (mafia):
(Night) Roleblock [target]: You knock out your target with a sleeping drug, blocking that player’s action tonight, preventing it entirely. They are given an ‘action failed’ result.
(Auto) Non-Consecutive: Due to your target potentially developing a tolerance to your drugs, you cannot affect the same player two Nights in a row.
Night 1 attempted actions:
ToonyMan: None (odd Night)
NJW2000: Delay Vector
Roden: None (passive)
TricMagic: None (passive)
Vector: Investigate Roden
EuchreJack: Kill ToonyMan
Night 1 results:
ToonyMan is shot and killed
NJW2000 successfully delays his target
Roden has an uneventful night
TricMagic has an uneventful night (and receives no results)
Vector’s action is delayed to Night 2, and receives an action failed result
EuchreJack successfully kills ToonyMan
Night 2 attempted actions:
NJW2000: Delay Vector
Roden: None (passive)
TricMagic: None (passive)
Vector: Investigate TricMagic
Night 2 results:
NJW2000 successfully delays his target
Roden has an uneventful night
TricMagic has an uneventful night (and receives no results)
Vector’s action this Night (investigating TricMagic) is delayed to Night 3 and their action the previous Night is now performed, causing them to investigate Roden and learn Roden’s role.
Obviously, all the other players did a stellar job, and poor little me is woefully inadequate in every way. :'(Hey, you weren't bad. I think the self-vote might have been a bit premature, even: scum just needed to win one person over to their lynch on D2.
Scum Chat https://www.quicktopic.com/53/H/BL62cT7fGqKsuThose first eight messages :D
Scum Chat https://www.quicktopic.com/53/H/BL62cT7fGqKsuThose first eight messages :D
But thankfully, Tric generally needs another player to translate for him, so without Toony, Tric will probably flail ineffectively.Yeah, about that...
I smell a doctor somewhere. Probably Toony or Roden.I am not very good at hiding Doctor status am I?
They might have silenced me simply because of my active posting compared to Vector and Jack if both are town. If both are town I think Roden is probably clean which would make the scum team NJW/Tric which is just demoralizing.
Eh, I'm sure some players missed your Mafia Championship game.Quote from: Jack in ScumchatI smell a doctor somewhere. Probably Toony or Roden.I am not very good at hiding Doctor status am I?
They might have silenced me simply because of my active posting compared to Vector and Jack if both are town. If both are town I think Roden is probably clean which would make the scum team NJW/Tric which is just demoralizing.
It would have been bad if we were the scum team huh? And I could see it happening, since I'd know abilities that target me, and we could use that info with the Delay to mess with people. ;D With so many 1-shots though it was never going to happen.
Wonder what the next round will be. Am I mafia? Or is Tric Tric?
I only ask that you share the horrible imbalance after the game is over.
Toonyman (0):
Roden (0):
TricMagic (0):
EuchreJack (0):
NJW2000 (0):
Vector (0):
Metruption (0):
No Execution (0):
Not Voting (7): ToonyMan, Roden, TricMagic, EuchreJack, NJW2000, Vector, Metruption
4 to hammer.
Quite the question Jack. It has it's use for preserving the number of people who can action. Granted, as seen last game that's no excuse not to hunt.
you are capable of engaging right? Who do you think is most likely to be mafia?And thus, you Tric at this point. I'll not answer on Vector's behalf, although will gladly use my scant knowledge of Evil Workaholic Mafia Vector's mind for town's benefit.
Also, I'm a psychologist this time around. Make of that what you will.
If we mass claim then we all actually need to mass claim. Claiming BP helped catch scum intentions last time, but the confusion from not everyone claiming as well as some fake claims from town could easily tank us if we don't get as lucky this time. I was thinking how we should try to go about it and I think a no vote Day 1 and then mass claim Day 2 might be the optimal strat, if we do it.
Alright, what do everyone think about the tactical utility of Not Lynching? Is is good/bad/indifferent?The usefulness of no-lynching varies with the situation. I've seen some probability-based analyses suggesting it might help town in very specific circumstances, but I think all of those were predicated on a reasonably simple, or at least open setup. We don't know which powers are in play, so we can't make that kind of analysis. What we do know is that no-lynching involves town not using its main or only path to winning the game, while mafia moves closer to their win condition. It also means that there is next to no information in the open - almost everything will be focused on the night if town consensus is for a no-lynch, while the stakes of D1 discussion become really low.
If we mass claim then we all actually need to mass claim. Claiming BP helped catch scum intentions last time, but the confusion from not everyone claiming as well as some fake claims from town could easily tank us if we don't get as lucky this time. I was thinking how we should try to go about it and I think a no vote Day 1 and then mass claim Day 2 might be the optimal strat, if we do it.So... just going to jump on the no-lynch thing then?
Vector, Jack, both of you are capable of engaging right? Who do you think is most likely to be mafia?Why did you ask this, TricMagic? How is this ever a worthwhile question, outside of coaxing a completely new player into scumhunting?
NJW2000: What do you think of Roden's strategy to No Lynch Day 1, then mass claim Day 2?I answer this above.
Also: I see a flaw in Roden's plan, so I am now less in favor of it. Anyone else see it?
Gotta say, it's kinda weird two players immediately starting to talk about no-lynch as soon as the day begins, seemingly independently. Jack bringing it up immediately is weird, but Roden suggesting doing it right after is just too much. Bit of a weird swing from "suprise massclaim" strategy, too. Why have you decided that it's better to let mafia kill someone before a pre-arranged massclaim D2, Roden?
NJW2000: What do you think of Roden's strategy to No Lynch Day 1, then mass claim Day 2?I answer this above.
Also: I see a flaw in Roden's plan, so I am now less in favor of it. Anyone else see it?
I see a flaw in that the plan is bad. I am interested to hear what you see.
ninja'd by Euchre raising similar points. Tho Roden kinda says why he's hesistant to claim.
At a glance, it says everyone needs to claim on day 2. But for those with certain 1-shot abilities, (like any gun owners), that isn't really a good thing. That and the obvious issue of someone being dead, unless mafia chooses not to kill and blend in.
I've already said why I haven't auto claimed yet. I have no problem claiming if we do a Day 1 mass claim though, I just don't want to be the only player full claiming again.If we mass claim then we all actually need to mass claim. Claiming BP helped catch scum intentions last time, but the confusion from not everyone claiming as well as some fake claims from town could easily tank us if we don't get as lucky this time. I was thinking how we should try to go about it and I think a no vote Day 1 and then mass claim Day 2 might be the optimal strat, if we do it.
I'm actually heavily in favor of this strategy.
Still...Why is Roden the lover of mass claims hesitating to claim?
And...Why is Roden now favoring the "let mafia get the first kill instead of town" strategy?
Mainly because this isn't a typical set up, and trying something different each game is just a better strategy. If everyone knows I'm going to suggest a mass claim each game start, everyone can just prepare fake claims out-of-game every single time. The point is to catch scum off guard, and that literally cannot happen if everyone knows what to expect each time.If we mass claim then we all actually need to mass claim. Claiming BP helped catch scum intentions last time, but the confusion from not everyone claiming as well as some fake claims from town could easily tank us if we don't get as lucky this time. I was thinking how we should try to go about it and I think a no vote Day 1 and then mass claim Day 2 might be the optimal strat, if we do it.So... just going to jump on the no-lynch thing then?
Gotta say, it's kinda weird two players immediately starting to talk about no-lynch as soon as the day begins, seemingly independently. Jack bringing it up immediately is weird, but Roden suggesting doing it right after is just too much. Bit of a weird swing from "suprise massclaim" strategy, too. Why have you decided that it's better to let mafia kill someone before a pre-arranged massclaim D2, Roden?
At a glance, it says everyone needs to claim on day 2. But for those with certain 1-shot abilities, (like any gun owners), that isn't really a good thing. That and the obvious issue of someone being dead, unless mafia chooses not to kill and blend in.I'm not suggesting to end the day early. We should essentially just talk until we let the timer run out.
Also, there is one major flaw in just No Voting. And that happens to be discussion Roden. Why the change of heart?
NiNJW2000.
And others, reading. Unvote.
To note, the info did come in handy towards the end of the game. But falseclaiming is not something town should do in the first place. Given that's kinda what we use to pick out scum.
I asked that to check more than anything else, and maybe pick up some info for later on.
As far as why I'm suggesting to no vote today, it's because it's clear we have no VT's in this set up, so a mis-elim means we always lose a PR. As we saw last game, we lost our Cop Day 1, and then lost our Doc that night as well. If someone does something blatantly scummy then of course we should vote them out, but otherwise we just have a good chance of losing two strong PRs.
The idea of no-vote Day 1 into mass claim Day 2 is that it quite literally gives scum only minutes to come up with a fake claim that doesn't contradict the town mass claim + night action reveals. And with four town vs two scum that's one extra PR that can catch a slip up.
Must...not...vote...Roden...must...let...other...players...post. :-X
I think this is actually not in scum's favor. Last game, you and Vector tried to make your role claim fit the night actions and it ended up being major evidence against you.To note, the info did come in handy towards the end of the game. But falseclaiming is not something town should do in the first place. Given that's kinda what we use to pick out scum.
I asked that to check more than anything else, and maybe pick up some info for later on.
Just spotted this, and thought that it best to repeat that Town, except for maybe the Doctor, should never falseclaim.
And back to the question of "What's wrong with Roden's plan?" I think the second part of Tric's sentence is "close enough" that I'll mention the #1 flaw with Roden's plan:
Mafia can falseclaim Day 2 AFTER the Night Actions. Town has the advantage claiming D1 in that they don't have to make their claims "fit" into the night actions.
Whoops, sorry, VT is Vanilla Townie for anyone confused. I usually just refer to a Vigilante as a Vig.As far as why I'm suggesting to no vote today, it's because it's clear we have no VT's in this set up, so a mis-elim means we always lose a PR. As we saw last game, we lost our Cop Day 1, and then lost our Doc that night as well. If someone does something blatantly scummy then of course we should vote them out, but otherwise we just have a good chance of losing two strong PRs.
Just an FYI, I totally thought VT meant Vigilante, and was wondering if you bothered to look up Tric's ability. Also, might be easier if players who claim a role actually give some info on that role, instead of hoping that mafiawiki is up to date. For example, last game NJW2000's Delayer wasn't actually a Mafia wiki role, but rather an ability.
Oh, and Cops should claim Cop rather than be mislynched. Let's just keep repeating that, ok?
I did, and the fake claim got caught quickly lol.The idea of no-vote Day 1 into mass claim Day 2 is that it quite literally gives scum only minutes to come up with a fake claim that doesn't contradict the town mass claim + night action reveals. And with four town vs two scum that's one extra PR that can catch a slip up.
Minutes? Were we playing the same game last round?
I'll give you this much credit, you obviously read the mafia wiki article that said that bulletproof shouldn't claim Day 1, and are showing proper shame. But your claim did help town (more than you think, read the scumchat), so why the regret?
Must...not...vote...Roden...must...let...other...players...post. :-XNow that I know your playstyle, this is most likely a town tell lol.
A lot more normal than Scum Jack. Which kinda annoys me, we need more people posting.
It is too late for this. I'd question NJW, but so far only a single post compared to the rest active right now.
Alright, what do everyone think about the tactical utility of Not Lynching? Is is good/bad/indifferent?No.
Also: I have an active pro-town ability. Maybe I'll share more on D2. Declaring now so nobody thinks I'm making things up to avoid the lynch.Hmm you were unwilling to share anything on D1 of Round 1. This makes me think you're town now.
Thought: Some/Many/Most Town players have an active pro-town ability.
Toonyman: What do you think of my self-narrating?It shows you're eager to play.
Also, I'm a psychologist this time around. Make of that what you will.Heh, and I'm a biologist. Are you being honest with your profession here?
The idea of no-vote Day 1 into mass claim Day 2 is that it quite literally gives scum only minutes to come up with a fake claim that doesn't contradict the town mass claim + night action reveals. And with four town vs two scum that's one extra PR that can catch a slip up.Meh, I don't know. I like the idea of changing the D1 game plan each time though since in this game players are going to have recent memories of past rounds to use and exploit. Plus, a meta strategy is questionable with unknown setups each round. I think your intentions feel honest here which strikes me as town.
@Roden:The idea of no-vote Day 1 into mass claim Day 2 is that it quite literally gives scum only minutes to come up with a fake claim that doesn't contradict the town mass claim + night action reveals. And with four town vs two scum that's one extra PR that can catch a slip up.Meh, I don't know. I like the idea of changing the D1 game plan each time though since in this game players are going to have recent memories of past rounds to use and exploit. Plus, a meta strategy is questionable with unknown setups each round. I think your intentions feel honest here which strikes me as town.
3. TricMagic doesn't sound crazy, which means that he's probably scum.He didn't sound crazy to me in Round 1 either, does this change your feelings?
@Jack:Only if the plan was flawed. Also, haven't seen mafia Roden yet.
Do you think mafia!Roden would try to rock the boat by announcing his new D1 game plan? Or do you think he would play more cautiously and reserved as mafia to not stand out? I also haven't seen Roden as mafia yet so I think this is a reasonable conclusion to make.
Does the game still work if Met doesn't post? Even if we do decide to vote Day 1, we're missing someone who could be scum, and if they're town it means the entirety of town would have to come together to successfully vote out scum. Well, unless scum busses, technically.It worked well enough last round with Vector, so I don't seem a huge need for alarm bells. ::)
Could we maybe get an extension if Met still hasn't posted by the time the deadline comes around?
1. I'm very against no-kill D1.
2. I do not like D1 massclaim either.
3. TricMagic doesn't sound crazy, which means that he's probably scum.
Also, should Met be town and not post, we'd have to consider policy lynching Met instead of more interesting suspects. Not opposed to the extension.How do we determine Met is town before policy lynching them? Why would we want to vote a town player?
Honestly? No. I have plenty of town-Tric to compare him with.Go on...
My question to you Tric is why openly state your flavor role in the first place?That is the question isn't it? Why did I do so?
I think it's because you don't want to reveal your actual ability, but sure be annoying and difficult. This is different from last game where you were much more forthcoming. I'm probing to get a better idea of your motivations.My question to you Tric is why openly state your flavor role in the first place?That is the question isn't it? Why did I do so?
1. I'm very against no-kill D1.
2. I do not like D1 massclaim either.
3. TricMagic doesn't sound crazy, which means that he's probably scum.
This all sets off Mafia vibes for me. How I read all 3 of those points:
1) Lets kill more townies!
2) Lets give mafia more spaces to hide in!
3) Uh, let's push the lynch on Tric!
(Note, it isn't so much that I've cleared Tric but rather Tric has claimed and is thus clear-able to some extent)
Honestly? No. I have plenty of town-Tric to compare him with.Go on...
.... Fine, I can redirect someone's action to me. Kinda a weak man's doctor. Especially since it's a one-shot. You happy Vector? And what's with the talk against Jack anyway?Are you only just a psychologist?
@FallacyofUrist: Pokey Met sometime please?I'll prod them. If they show up, no problem. If they don't show up by day end, I'll replace them with someone - I already have someone lined up for the position. (And then I'll do a 24 hour extension for the sake of the replacement.)
Also, should Met be town and not post, we'd have to consider policy lynching Met instead of more interesting suspects. Not opposed to the extension.
Fair point. I can't really tell you who to shoot but I at least heavily recommend against shooting Jack, their tone has been fairly town. And I doubt scum would have a day kill so it would essentially confirm you as town if you did shoot someone.
.... Fine, I can redirect someone's action to me. Kinda a weak man's doctor. Especially since it's a one-shot. You happy Vector? And what's with the talk against Jack anyway?
Which means that only some of us have stated public professions.
Yep, actions end up targeting me. So a night kill would kill me..... Fine, I can redirect someone's action to me. Kinda a weak man's doctor. Especially since it's a one-shot. You happy Vector? And what's with the talk against Jack anyway?
I wish you had said that at the beginning, as Psychologist is a completely different ability on Mafia Wiki.
When you redirect, does that kill you if it was the Night Kill?
No problem.Fair point. I can't really tell you who to shoot but I at least heavily recommend against shooting Jack, their tone has been fairly town. And I doubt scum would have a day kill so it would essentially confirm you as town if you did shoot someone.
Thanks Roden. It looks like I'm not on Toonyman's "People to shoot" list this round.
But...how do we know that Toonyman's daykill is Town-aligned? Maybe FOU gave the mafia a daykill?
Hey Roden, who do you think is mafia? Failure to answer is Treason, punishable by Summary Execution underFriend ComputerToonyman's Day Laser, apparently.
Fair point. I can't really tell you who to shoot but I at least heavily recommend against shooting Jack, their tone has been fairly town.I agree.
And I doubt scum would have a day kill so it would essentially confirm you as town if you did shoot someone.Exactly. Another reason I felt like claiming since it removes a player from the D1 lynch pool. Or at least, if we start seeing people die during the night. If the mafia feel like framing me by not killing at night then be my guest.
Actually Vector and Tric could be distancing. I was about to say their interactions weren't scum vs scum but Day 1 distancing is really easy to do, especially since no one usually feels like they have to commit to have a vote.Quite interesting that you should say that, since I was just thinking the same thing about you and NJW. But I appreciate the info, it should help suss out your alignment once the bodies start to fall.
But...how do we know that Toonyman's daykill is Town-aligned? Maybe FOU gave the mafia a daykill?Ah, I miss these absurd reasonings. You're either town!Jack or playing mafia well.
Actually Vector and Tric could be distancing. I was about to say their interactions weren't scum vs scum but Day 1 distancing is really easy to do, especially since no one usually feels like they have to commit to have a vote.Possibly.
Gee I wonder who that could be.@FallacyofUrist: Pokey Met sometime please?I'll prod them. If they show up, no problem. If they don't show up by day end, I'll replace them with someone - I already have someone lined up for the position. (And then I'll do a 24 hour extension for the sake of the replacement.)
Also, should Met be town and not post, we'd have to consider policy lynching Met instead of more interesting suspects. Not opposed to the extension.
I'll vote NJW for going at Roden again, I think he might be doing this to look natural.I think I voted Roden for good reasons, yes. He did answer my question and explain the reasoning behind his strategy, but my vote is going to stay on him for now.
Do you think you're voting Roden for legitimate new reasons or are you not reflecting on what transpired in Round 1 with your feelings towards Roden? Remember that you even wanted Roden over Met on D1.
I'm currently eyeing NJW and Met since suspecting low posters worked so well last round.Now this is genuinely mystifying. There are over twenty hours left in the day, and FoU specifically said there was a replacement and an extension available if Met didn't show. I've always seen you as someone capable of basic reading comprehension, but apparently the dopamine buzz of constant back-and-forth interferes with those faculties.
To note, the info did come in handy towards the end of the game. But falseclaiming is not something town should do in the first place. Given that's kinda what we use to pick out scum.
I asked that to check more than anything else, and maybe pick up some info for later on.
I see. If you're replying to a question, please give some kind of indication of who you're talking to in the future.To note, the info did come in handy towards the end of the game. But falseclaiming is not something town should do in the first place. Given that's kinda what we use to pick out scum.
I asked that to check more than anything else, and maybe pick up some info for later on.
... I did answer it.
You say it's early in the day, why post a readlist that is so volatile? Particularly your read on toonyman.This just seems weak. People have given me a fair bit of content to work with; enough for a readslist. Baiting me on timings is genuinely a little irritating. Just because other people have the free time and inclination to post literally dozens of times in as many hours doesn't mean I'm going to.
If you think I might be mafia repeating my past behaviour to look like town, why are you asking me to reflect on my thought processes?Because I think you're wrong about Roden, again. I'm trying to determine if this is intentional or not.
I was bored at work and nobody was posting.I'm currently eyeing NJW and Met since suspecting low posters worked so well last round.Now this is genuinely mystifying. There are over twenty hours left in the day, and FoU specifically said there was a replacement and an extension available if Met didn't show. I've always seen you as someone capable of basic reading comprehension, but apparently the dopamine buzz of constant back-and-forth interferes with those faculties.
Perhaps you could read other people's posts as closely as you expect them to read your own.Welcome to Tric.
I definitely do want to make a no lynch happen today, that's part of the strat. I think it would be scummy if I suggested it but then weakly pushed for it IMO, since it would be clear I didn't really believe in what I was saying. However things do change with the possibility of a day kill. We should mass claim before the shot so we don't kill the Cop or Doc.True enough. I'd feel bad if I killed a cop or doc.
Since Tric and Toony have essentially full claimed, I will too. I'm a Tracker, and I am gated, but I won't say how so that a potential Roleblocker has to guess on whether or not I can even do anything tonight.Sounds good, I believe this.
Wait, why are there many rounds?haha
Suggested Daykill for Toonyman: NJW2000
Suggested Daykill for Toonyman: NJW2000What is this bullshit? You're telling me to kill a man and you color it brown?
@Jack and Tric:Suggested Daykill for Toonyman: NJW2000Suggested Daykill for Toonyman: NJW2000What is this bullshit? You're telling me to kill a man and you color it brown?
And Tric, why did you color it the same as Jack?
Wait, why are there many rounds?
Ouch, didn't even think of that. I just picked a color. Yeah, poor choice on my part.Oh...hah, that's not even what I meant it's just hard to read with my forum layout.
I commend Tric for being consistent, although we should pick another color. I like the idea that it is color-coded though. You can certainly suggest the color, or ignore us.You could just bold it. I think your reasoning for me to kill NJW is weak, same for Tric.
Unsure if NJW2000 is generally behind the eight-ball or mafia, so Suggested Daykill remains.
@Toonyman: Don't shoot Met, please. At least not for "a while".But it's okay to shoot NJW?
If Toony shoots scum, we should definitely vote today. But if he hits town, we can't vote. If Toony misfires and then we mislynch, scum wins by shooting town tonight unless a protective role comes in clutch.Roden.. Just a question. Why do you assume there are two mafia? What applies to one game may not apply to the other.
I will always assume two mafia. I've suggested there could be a Serial Killer scenario, but without proof it's always safer to assume two mafia so that we don't accidentally endgame ourselves Day 1.If Toony shoots scum, we should definitely vote today. But if he hits town, we can't vote. If Toony misfires and then we mislynch, scum wins by shooting town tonight unless a protective role comes in clutch.Roden.. Just a question. Why do you assume there are two mafia? What applies to one game may not apply to the other.
@Roden: Should a roleblocker claim?Last Roleblocker was scum, so they can go ahead lol. If a town Roleblocker exists I'd be really confused.
This is just an aside, but I haven't actually seen Toony's scum play yet, and every game I'm wondering if this is gonna be the one even though I'm not really noticing any differences in his playstyle.You and me both, bro. You and me both.
You don't think there's two mafia Tric? I think it has to be that or one mafia + one mafia-ally.If Toony shoots scum, we should definitely vote today. But if he hits town, we can't vote. If Toony misfires and then we mislynch, scum wins by shooting town tonight unless a protective role comes in clutch.Roden.. Just a question. Why do you assume there are two mafia? What applies to one game may not apply to the other.
This is just an aside, but I haven't actually seen Toony's scum play yet, and every game I'm wondering if this is gonna be the one even though I'm not really noticing any differences in his playstyle.Hehehe, I feel the same about you Roden.
Met are you able to play additional rounds? I want an extension at this point.
@Vector: Last game, as mafia, you didn't claim D1, held your vote on one person the whole day, and mildly FoS'd your scumbuddy. So far in this game you've held your vote on one person and not claimed. I don't really know your playstyle. If your alignment is different this game, is there going to be a difference between your D1s that indicates that?
in 5v2 you absolutely want to yeet every time
I'd be more impressed if you actually explained mathematically whether or not it would be good for Town to No-Lynch under a standard 7 player scenario.
i hope they do something like that so that we know who they are lolMust...not...vote...Roden...must...let...other...players...post. :-X
Public Service Announcement: With 4 to hammer this round, and one vote on Roden, another vote means the 2-person scum team we saw last round would have the votes to hammer Roden. Keep this in mind and vote responsibly. Thank you!
who claimed psychologist and then said they were actually a redirector? that's policy yeetable tbh
Except I was asking Vector a question, not directly accusing them of something. And furthermore, I played that way as town last game, unlike Vector. So... what you posted was garbage beneath a thin veneer of surface logic. I'd like this to be the kind of environment where that's a scumtell against you, but sadly it really isn't.@Vector: Last game, as mafia, you didn't claim D1, held your vote on one person the whole day, and mildly FoS'd your scumbuddy. So far in this game you've held your vote on one person and not claimed. I don't really know your playstyle. If your alignment is different this game, is there going to be a difference between your D1s that indicates that?
Ah, hypocrisy. NJW2000 is doing the same thing they're accusing Vector of doing. Hasn't claimed D1, is holding their vote on Roden the whole day, and hopefully FoS'd their scumbuddy. An attractive target indeed.
I don't like jack's play. It's similar to last game but instead of never taking a real stance this game jack is taking many weak stances. NJW seems like a player I will have difficulty reading. Ultimately I'll have to do some kind of agenda meta analysis. The way Tric tunnels on roden is notableI think the way Jack is flopping around is indicative they're town.
so you're just ignoring my soulread on you?
jack
Except I was asking Vector a question, not directly accusing them of something. And furthermore, I played that way as town last game, unlike Vector. So... what you posted was garbage beneath a thin veneer of surface logic. I'd like this to be the kind of environment where that's a scumtell against you, but sadly it really isn't.@Vector: Last game, as mafia, you didn't claim D1, held your vote on one person the whole day, and mildly FoS'd your scumbuddy. So far in this game you've held your vote on one person and not claimed. I don't really know your playstyle. If your alignment is different this game, is there going to be a difference between your D1s that indicates that?
Ah, hypocrisy. NJW2000 is doing the same thing they're accusing Vector of doing. Hasn't claimed D1, is holding their vote on Roden the whole day, and hopefully FoS'd their scumbuddy. An attractive target indeed.
If you want to know why Toony's stance changed, if change it did, try asking him, not guessing.
I'm kind of interested in how we went from trust tric to tric to kill tric for tricking.Do you think you're playing differently than last round? If so, is this a conscious decision?
Hmm... I'd play revisualization, but this isn't the end of the case. I'll do it anyway though.
Question, why Townread Roden so early on, despite disagreeing with him on not lynching.@Roden:The idea of no-vote Day 1 into mass claim Day 2 is that it quite literally gives scum only minutes to come up with a fake claim that doesn't contradict the town mass claim + night action reveals. And with four town vs two scum that's one extra PR that can catch a slip up.Meh, I don't know. I like the idea of changing the D1 game plan each time though since in this game players are going to have recent memories of past rounds to use and exploit. Plus, a meta strategy is questionable with unknown setups each round. I think your intentions feel honest here which strikes me as town.
Why I'm voting Toonyman. Roden has posted 3 times, not once pushing or accusing anyone of anything, and posting a "questionable" strategy that mafia may be able to exploit...and Toonyman TOWNREADS Roden.
Look, I dunno if Roden is mafia or town. Who does? MAFIA. Vote Toonyman!
Turning this on it's head. Do mafia have a nightkill? We have a lot of roles that can mess with things so far. Vector isn't talking, and you bring this out an ask who we want dead. Even though...I think it's because you don't want to reveal your actual ability, but sure be annoying and difficult. This is different from last game where you were much more forthcoming. I'm probing to get a better idea of your motivations.My question to you Tric is why openly state your flavor role in the first place?That is the question isn't it? Why did I do so?
This round has been boring. My flavor has my stated profession (biologist) along with my actual profession. Hence my extreme raised eyebrow at you simply claiming Psychologist and nothing else.
Also I have a day-kill. Should I use it today? Who's a good player for me to kill Tric? Somebody who isn't playing?
Surprisingly similar to your last round's ability albeit in a different way. I think you're being honest here. Which means that only some of us have stated public professions.To note. I'm pretty sure this is patently untrue of your N1 reads. You have a 50% read rate, never tying Jack/Vector together in one team. (Even if I like the idea of an NJW/Tric team, which would have been funny. But I'm not that good an actor to hem and haw over not trusting NJW.)
My ability is also one-shot and easily confirmable. I was thinking to target someone right before day end since I feel like mafia will just want to kill me N1 again and I'm selfish enough to want to actually take someone out myself. I had a 100% mafia read rate last round after all.
It's not so absurd if the mafia don't have a kill. And this probobly explains where the idea came from. Or at least not a traditional one. A poisoner kill would mean someone with a daykill would be useful near game end.But...how do we know that Toonyman's daykill is Town-aligned? Maybe FOU gave the mafia a daykill?Ah, I miss these absurd reasonings. You're either town!Jack or playing mafia well.
... Met hadn't actually had time to post. So why do you assume him to be Mafia? I mean, you assume me too, but I haven't had any interactions with him. No one has. Well, other than jack, but that's quite recent. He's still in the push stage of voting.I don't like jack's play. It's similar to last game but instead of never taking a real stance this game jack is taking many weak stances. NJW seems like a player I will have difficulty reading. Ultimately I'll have to do some kind of agenda meta analysis. The way Tric tunnels on roden is notableI think the way Jack is flopping around is indicative they're town.
I trust Roden who believes in Jack.
I trust Jack based on their behavior.
If I trust Vector then I should suspect Tric.
I don't trust Tric.
I'm mixed on NJW (I would shoot Tric or Met over NJW right now).
I think there's at least one mafia between Tric and Met.
@NJW:
Between Tric and Met who do you think is a more likely hit?
@Vector: Last game, as mafia, you didn't claim D1, held your vote on one person the whole day, and mildly FoS'd your scumbuddy. So far in this game you've held your vote on one person and not claimed. I don't really know your playstyle. If your alignment is different this game, is there going to be a difference between your D1s that indicates that?
... K, if NJW is town/someone else notices the drop. Has he dropped in skill level? Anyway, Unvote.Toonyman, here is your proof that Tric is playing better. The control over the need to constantly vote someone.
Does make me wonder who I should be voting though.
I know that I've been one of the options. If you decide I'm going to die today, you need to let me claim first. I'll be on tonight but I may be absent for a while because, you know, I have grad school.
Ultimately I'll have to do some kind of agenda meta analysis.
Since you scum read me, do you not believe my Tracker claim? I could target you tonight to prove it, if you have an active ability.
If I trust Vector then I should suspect Tric.
Actually Vector and Tric could be distancing. I was about to say their interactions weren't scum vs scum but Day 1 distancing is really easy to do, especially since no one usually feels like they have to commit to have a vote.
@Vector: Last game, as mafia, you didn't claim D1, held your vote on one person the whole day, and mildly FoS'd your scumbuddy. So far in this game you've held your vote on one person and not claimed. I don't really know your playstyle. If your alignment is different this game, is there going to be a difference between your D1s that indicates that?
I'm town.
I'm also a veteran at this game. No, you shouldn't expect to be able to read me. Why does everyone think I'm not going to be good at this after 10 years @_@
I still think it's Tric and I'm sticking with it. P. sure Metruption is town, think Toony is town, ... Euchrejack is probably town, he's all over the place as town. I guess if I was going to think of a team it would be NJW/Tric. NJW was playing good town last game and just took a massive drop in skill level, so that's a tell of some kind.
@NJW:Based on the very little Met has posted and what Tric has done so far, I think Met. This is mostly due to a slight townread on Tric, and Tric again claiming a role that has a reasonable chance of being mechanically confirmed. I really don't like the idea of you shooting or us lynching either of them yet, because Met hasn't had a chance to say much.
Between Tric and Met who do you think is a more likely hit?
@NJW2000: Why shouldn't Toonyman shoot you? Who should Toonyman shoot?Why shouldn't Toony shoot me? Because (if) he doesn't read me as scum, or most likely to be that. People are talking about my dropping in skill level, although last game D1 I was the only town player committed to lynching Met, with everyone else either interested in nolynch or on the Vector wagon, so I'm not sure I could do much worse. I guess they mean my posts come across as more scummy. I'm certainly a bit more exasperated this game, so perhaps they can interpret it as that. As you say at some point above, defending myself isn't really that useful to town. So let's get to the good bit:
@EuchreJack: how likely do you consider the possibility that Roden is a mafia tracker?Next to nil, but I like considering the nearly impossible.
I'd be happier seeing Toonyman shoot you or Roden right now, although I want to see what else Met does before that happens.
Right, remove the person with the self-redirect. Great call. Is there a reason you want me dead before anything else?
... Jack are you playing a game? Which scumchat exactly? Because if it's last games, that does not automatically apply to this one unless you want to make an argument that has no application within this game. Or evidence behind it.
If I trust Vector then I should suspect Tric.
Ah, but recall the scumchats! Vector stated early on that they would probably confirm Tric as Town. If you don't trust Vector, then you should still suspect Tric!Actually Vector and Tric could be distancing. I was about to say their interactions weren't scum vs scum but Day 1 distancing is really easy to do, especially since no one usually feels like they have to commit to have a vote.
A valid strategy that worked relatively well in Round 1.@Vector: Last game, as mafia, you didn't claim D1, held your vote on one person the whole day, and mildly FoS'd your scumbuddy. So far in this game you've held your vote on one person and not claimed. I don't really know your playstyle. If your alignment is different this game, is there going to be a difference between your D1s that indicates that?
I'm town.
I'm also a veteran at this game. No, you shouldn't expect to be able to read me. Why does everyone think I'm not going to be good at this after 10 years @_@
I still think it's Tric and I'm sticking with it. P. sure Metruption is town, think Toony is town, ... Euchrejack is probably town, he's all over the place as town. I guess if I was going to think of a team it would be NJW/Tric. NJW was playing good town last game and just took a massive drop in skill level, so that's a tell of some kind.
Thus, logically, Toonyman should shoot Tric. I'm not 100% sure on Tric, but I gotta shake off the buddying and it isn't my call.
@EuchreJack: how likely do you consider the possibility that Roden is a mafia tracker?Next to nil, but I like considering the nearly impossible.I'd be happier seeing Toonyman shoot you or Roden right now, although I want to see what else Met does before that happens.
@NJW2000: Considering that Toonyman gets to take the shot, and is apparently convinced both Roden and I are town, whom is your third choice?Right, remove the person with the self-redirect. Great call. Is there a reason you want me dead before anything else?
... Jack are you playing a game? Which scumchat exactly? Because if it's last games, that does not automatically apply to this one unless you want to make an argument that has no application within this game. Or evidence behind it.
@Tric: It's not my shot to make. Shooting you isn't what I would do. You're talking to the wrong person.
Other than me, who's your scum pick?
If Toony trusts Vector, then suspecting Tric is only natural. But if Toony doesn't trust Vector, then he shouldn't come to that conclusion from trust. Or rather, if Vector is Mafia and your logic holds true, Vector doesn't trust me at all! Which is the opposite of what you are stating!If I trust Vector then I should suspect Tric.Ah, but recall the scumchats! Vector stated early on that they would probably confirm Tric as Town. If you don't trust Vector, then you should still suspect Tric!
IF Vector is Scum AND Tric is Town THEN Vector pushes Tric as Town. <-the argument at issue
Ah yes, logic classes serve me well, for "Vector pushes Tric as Town" is FALSE.
We thus know that "Vector is Scum AND Tric is Town" is also FALSE.
So, if Vector is Scum is TRUE, then Tric is Town must be FALSE.
@Tric: Self-redirects are tricky, and the results they provide vary based on mod.
Is proof of self-redirect proof of alignment? Pretty much the only role you wouldn't want directed onto yourself is cop.
Everything else lets your scumbuddy act freely.
Scum Chat https://www.quicktopic.com/53/H/BL62cT7fGqKsu
In case of mafia kill, it tells that I couldn't do it. Those without any claims when a kill happens would have to make one up, but mine is confirmable. It doesn't completely clear me though if there are two.
Also means Toony has a way to survive tonight if Jack is telling the truth.. Sorta inclined to believe him.
Turning this on it's head. Do mafia have a nightkill? We have a lot of roles that can mess with things so far. Vector isn't talking, and you bring this out an ask who we want dead. Even though...
Hmm. Do we have a doctor or not is my question. Right now we have a redirect, a track, and vig. Of the remaining, if two are mafia alligned. Granted, one of us could be.. Are you attempting to draw the doctor to target you?
... Not that that makes sense with the idea there is no mafia kill, but still. Perhaps as an ally. (Not enough info here. Day 2 gives a lot more based on what happens at night.)
OK, so you think the chance of a mafia tracker is next to nil, and that explains a hard townread. Glad that's cleared up.@EuchreJack: how likely do you consider the possibility that Roden is a mafia tracker?Next to nil, but I like considering the nearly impossible.I'd be happier seeing Toonyman shoot you or Roden right now, although I want to see what else Met does before that happens.
@NJW2000: Considering that Toonyman gets to take the shot, and is apparently convinced both Roden and I are town, whom is your third choice?
For some clarity, my daykill only pops at the same time the lynch happens. We can't flip someone and then decide on someone else the same day. It'll be simultaneous. I guess it's for game balance.Could have mentioned that. Does it still proc if we lynch you?
For some clarity, my daykill only pops at the same time the lynch happens. We can't flip someone and then decide on someone else the same day. It'll be simultaneous. I guess it's for game balance.That's not a day kill lol. This changes everything, it's way less safe than an actual day kill if it's conditional on there being an elimination.
1. I'm very against no-kill D1....because no-kill D1 denies the Toonyman/Vector scumteam of their 3 shots and win. Those would be the Lynch, the End-day Shot, and the Night Kill.
PS: I'm good with the "Toony shoots and NL if they're town" plan. I'm also OK with NJW, even. That would give us a lot of information about EJ and Tric, and I genuinely think NJW could be scum.
I know that I've been one of the options. If you decide I'm going to die today, you need to let me claim first. I'll be on tonight but I may be absent for a while because, you know, I have grad school.
In terms of my final decision making for today...
I'll be shooting NJW or Tric if the lynch isn't one of them today so.
If the lynch is one of them I might still kill the other or Met during end phase, not sure right now.
PPE:Also means Toony has a way to survive tonight if Jack is telling the truth.. Sorta inclined to believe him.
I would hope so, your statements gave the impression you wanted the doctor to out themselves:Turning this on it's head. Do mafia have a nightkill? We have a lot of roles that can mess with things so far. Vector isn't talking, and you bring this out an ask who we want dead. Even though...
Hmm. Do we have a doctor or not is my question. Right now we have a redirect, a track, and vig. Of the remaining, if two are mafia alligned. Granted, one of us could be.. Are you attempting to draw the doctor to target you?
... Not that that makes sense with the idea there is no mafia kill, but still. Perhaps as an ally. (Not enough info here. Day 2 gives a lot more based on what happens at night.)
Vector is likely to vote me once they read my posts about them
The Toonyman/Vector scum team needed to find out if there was a roleblocker or doctor, and who had it, before they could hammer for the win.
Could have mentioned that. Does it still proc if we lynch you?Yes. If people try to push for me I will absolutely bring down my top suspect with me.
There doesn't have to be an elimination, they die at the end of the day regardless. I apologize for not clarifying this sooner but I wanted to get some good reactions and voices on who people would like to see dead during the day, this is why I'm stating it now.For some clarity, my daykill only pops at the same time the lynch happens. We can't flip someone and then decide on someone else the same day. It'll be simultaneous. I guess it's for game balance.That's not a day kill lol. This changes everything, it's way less safe than an actual day kill if it's conditional on there being an elimination.
Can you tell us the name of your role? And does your day kill count as an actual Vig shot or is it technically a second lynch?
Do mafia have a nightkill?Guess we'll find out, huh?
My top suspects are you, NJW, and Met. There's either two mafia or mafia+ally so you can't all three be mafia. I think the rest of the players are likely town. This leaves Met (which I will need to read their posts now that they're here) and you two. This is why I would like to hear your opinion of the other two.@NJW:... Met hadn't actually had time to post. So why do you assume him to be Mafia? I mean, you assume me too, but I haven't had any interactions with him. No one has. Well, other than jack, but that's quite recent. He's still in the push stage of voting.
Between Tric and Met who do you think is a more likely hit?
So dead either way. Yeah, no ToonyMan, I don't buy it. This is the first I've heard of it occurring and day end. And that's important information. I don't mind dying if I take you out.The fact you don't mind dying here is actually pretty towny. Mafia should be 90% sure I'm not lying about my ability which means there's no way they'd risk getting taken down with me unless they have major guts. I like it.
Seriously, you left us with the impression we'd have discussion time, but it occurring at day end changes the narrative entirely. That makes it closer to a Mafia breaker than a town-aligned breaker.
NJWHow do you feel about Vector?
i would expect town!njw to respond to tric pointing out the logical leaps made by now, especially considering njw has posted since then and responded to something else entirely. my guess is that the badlogic was a genuine scumslip and njw just ignoring it, and hoping people forget about it
the right thing to do when you scumslip is explain how it isn't a scumslip and then win the game off of it with charisma by getting all of your detractors yeeted
This is such a bold claim...I don't think you're lying, it's way too specific and easily disprovable to be a lie. I want to believe it's a town ability too because I can see your intentions with your claim come from a townie mindset.Could have mentioned that. Does it still proc if we lynch you?Yes. If people try to push for me I will absolutely bring down my top suspect with me.There doesn't have to be an elimination, they die at the end of the day regardless. I apologize for not clarifying this sooner but I wanted to get some good reactions and voices on who people would like to see dead during the day, this is why I'm stating it now.For some clarity, my daykill only pops at the same time the lynch happens. We can't flip someone and then decide on someone else the same day. It'll be simultaneous. I guess it's for game balance.That's not a day kill lol. This changes everything, it's way less safe than an actual day kill if it's conditional on there being an elimination.
Can you tell us the name of your role? And does your day kill count as an actual Vig shot or is it technically a second lynch?
The full name is One-Shot Day Poisoner. My flavor's hidden profession is toxicologist.
This post in particular has been pinging me. When asked who else could be a decent target, he doesn't give a concrete answer and says he doesn't have a read on the others, but then immediately suggests a Toony lynch. This suggests that if two scum exist, he believes it's within Toony/Jack/me. The problem is that I know I'm town, Jack is obvtown, and Toony while not obvtown obviously cannot be a solo scum in this scenario without auto losing.OK, so you think the chance of a mafia tracker is next to nil, and that explains a hard townread. Glad that's cleared up.@EuchreJack: how likely do you consider the possibility that Roden is a mafia tracker?Next to nil, but I like considering the nearly impossible.I'd be happier seeing Toonyman shoot you or Roden right now, although I want to see what else Met does before that happens.
@NJW2000: Considering that Toonyman gets to take the shot, and is apparently convinced both Roden and I are town, whom is your third choice?
I don't really know who my third choice is. I've picked out who I think is the scumteam, who else is there? Can't ask Toony to shoot themselves, don't want them to shoot me, that leaves Tric, Met and Vector. Tric is pretty hard to read, Vector is right that I can't read them because I've literally never seen them play a game this decade where their D1 couldn't be summed up as "here's some reads, I'm better than y'all at mafia but don't have time to post because I'm doing a masters", and Met has about six sentences of actual content. So honestly no idea.
What's the agenda with this question, Jack? You honestly think Toony is going to let us vote on who he shoots?For some clarity, my daykill only pops at the same time the lynch happens. We can't flip someone and then decide on someone else the same day. It'll be simultaneous. I guess it's for game balance.Could have mentioned that. Does it still proc if we lynch you?
NJWI don't even know which posts you're referring to. This has been an 150 page D1.
i would expect town!njw to respond to tric pointing out the logical leaps made by now, especially considering njw has posted since then and responded to something else entirely. my guess is that the badlogic was a genuine scumslip and njw just ignoring it, and hoping people forget about it
the right thing to do when you scumslip is explain how it isn't a scumslip and then win the game off of it with charisma by getting all of your detractors yeeted
I think mechanically there is going to be a lot of death in this setup. Maybe even as little as one scum. My ability should allow me to be confirmable as town by a tracker during n2.What?
I don't like jack's play. It's similar to last game but instead of never taking a real stance this game jack is taking many weak stances. NJW seems like a player I will have difficulty reading. Ultimately I'll have to do some kind of agenda meta analysis. The way Tric tunnels on roden is notableMet susses Jack and Tric while thinking NJW is hard to read. Makes no mention of myself, Roden, or Vector.
who claimed psychologist and then said they were actually a redirector? that's policy yeetable tbh
also biologist is not really related to psychology. like maybe one could argue that psychology is a form of biology but if someone wants to get that pedantic then i will remind them that literally everything is just applied set theory
so you're just ignoring my soulread on you?A "soulread" vote on Jack for not addressing them properly, which is true so I don't fault them for this voting Jack based on their feelings.
jack
I still think it's Tric and I'm sticking with it. P. sure Metruption is town, think Toony is town, ... Euchrejack is probably town, he's all over the place as town. I guess if I was going to think of a team it would be NJW/Tric. NJW was playing good town last game and just took a massive drop in skill level, so that's a tell of some kind.Vector susses Tric and NJW. Thinks Met is town just based on their couple posts prior that don't really have much. Also believes in myself and Jack. Makes no mention of Roden either funny enough. To be fair mafia!Jack in the last round also forgot to mention Roden.
PS: I'm good with the "Toony shoots and NL if they're town" plan. I'm also OK with NJW, even. That would give us a lot of information about EJ and Tric, and I genuinely think NJW could be scum.Vector is cool with me killing NJW of course.
I know that I've been one of the options. If you decide I'm going to die today, you need to let me claim first. I'll be on tonight but I may be absent for a while because, you know, I have grad school.
NJWMet jumps to NJW now towards day end, doesn't talk about anything else.
i would expect town!njw to respond to tric pointing out the logical leaps made by now, especially considering njw has posted since then and responded to something else entirely. my guess is that the badlogic was a genuine scumslip and njw just ignoring it, and hoping people forget about it
the right thing to do when you scumslip is explain how it isn't a scumslip and then win the game off of it with charisma by getting all of your detractors yeeted
They don't really add much here.The Toonyman/Vector scum team needed to find out if there was a roleblocker or doctor, and who had it, before they could hammer for the win.
Which is why I said that I didn't want a fullclaim, which I already ate shit for. Please keep up.
I think mechanically there is going to be a lot of death in this setup. Maybe even as little as one scum. My ability should allow me to be confirmable as town by a tracker during n2.Fair enough.
Oh fuck, I actually did misread.NJW counters their argument against Met who goes "you're right, but I'll be leaving my vote on you anyway because soulread".
But the salt in your post still makes me sr you.
Toonyman (0):
Roden (0):
TricMagic (1): Vector
EuchreJack (0):
NJW2000 (1): Metruption
Vector (0):
Metruption (2): ToonyMan, TricMagic
No Execution (0):
Not Voting (3): Roden, EuchreJack, NJW2000
4 to hammer.
I think mechanically there is going to be a lot of death in this setup. Maybe even as little as one scum. My ability should allow me to be confirmable as town by a tracker during n2.
Votes EuchreackTric you tied the votes! I am not voting this.
Thought you were going to be gone. You're not. So I'm going back to my idea of a Toony/Jack team. Met's not going to answer, it seems.
MetMet
Proof I'm mostly unavailable
Toonyman (0):
Roden (0):
TricMagic (1): Vector
EuchreJack (1): TricMagic
NJW2000 (1): Metruption
Vector (0):
Metruption (1): ToonyMan
No Execution (0):
Not Voting (3): Roden, EuchreJack, NJW2000
4 to hammer.
Toonyman (0):
Roden (0):
TricMagic (0):
EuchreJack (0):
NJW2000 (0):
Vector (0):
Metruption (0):
No Execution (0):
Not Voting (7): ToonyMan, Roden, TricMagic, EuchreJack, NJW2000, Vector, Metruption
4 to hammer.
Ok, it looks like I won't be able to get Roden or Euchre eliminated, sad but not unexpected.
[...]
Not going to vote just yet because I'm not 100% sure that they're on two votes not three already and don't really want to hammer. Still, that's who I'll be voting to eliminate, unless a Roden or Euchre wagon springs up in the last three hours.
Claim: I Watched ToonyMan. He was visited by TricMagic and EuchreJack.Oh man.
NJW2000, would you mind speaking to what you did last night?
Of Metruption, Roden, and EJ, who do you presently think is most likely to be scum based on EoD?
Toony, thoughts?
Of Metruption, Roden, and EJ, who do you presently think is most likely to be scum based on EoD?Sorry, should have answered this earlier, impolite of me.
Weird that you didn't consider the possibility that I'm lying, especially as in this post (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8319439#msg8319439) from two minutes ago you say you've narrowed it down to three possible scumteams, two of them containing me and the other containing neither Tric nor Jack. So... as far as I understood town!Toony's state of mind five minutes ago, that interpretation should have been your go-to.Claim: I Watched ToonyMan. He was visited by TricMagic and EuchreJack.Oh man.
I can confirm somebody targeted me last night since I was targeted by a quite bad negative effect that will persist until the game is over.
The thing is, what I was hit by is not accounted for in Tric or Jack's role claim. Which means one of them is lying about their role.
There is of course the fourth possibility, which is that YOU are lying. Why the sudden shift in beliefs, Toony?Sorry, but I don't think you're lying NJW.
Also, I got hit by the Lover effect last night. Which means that Jack's ability isn't what he claims, since it's Toonyman I'm lover's with. Which if he was jailed, shouldn't have happened. I guess I'd be hit by it, but not Toony.Being jailkeep'd wouldn't have stopped that Tric.
? Doesn't Jailing protect from that? I'd assumed it would block every action made.Jailkeeping protects from kills and blocks players from doing anything as far as I can tell. I don't believe it stops other things from happening to someone.
As well I'd think you could make more use of... I don't understand why?
MetMet
Proof I'm mostly unavailable
... Right, apparently no guarantee of you being town. Which is annoying, I'd have liked to put the Toony/Jack team out of my head, but seems that's still possible. Least you won't survive once I flip town, and we'd know jack is scum.I admire your commitment at least.
What I'm surprised about is that I am alive and unaffected (as far as I know) by anything.I 100% expected myself, you, or Roden to die last night.
I think mechanically there is going to be a lot of death in this setup. Maybe even as little as one scum. My ability should allow me to be confirmable as town by a tracker during n2.
Now that is a scumslip. Full claim now
What I'm surprised about is that I am alive and unaffected (as far as I know) by anything.I 100% expected myself, you, or Roden to die last night.
Claim: I Watched ToonyMan. He was visited by TricMagic and EuchreJack.[/i]
My power, motivation, and mechanics are all consistent with my D1. Are seriously scumreading me just because I post too much?This reeks of mafia smugness. Why so eager to kill Met yesterday?
Yeah, no. We're not lynching Tric with the vote today. Tric FOR SOME REASON admitted we were made lovers with each other last night, which means we die together now. As you can plainly see this would be an absolute joke if me and Tric were both mafia. I'll take down Tric myself with my poison. One of you two is mafia and I have no reason to remove either of you from suspicion now.Does it even matter now? We all three die, then town can pick up the pieces. I had a good role too.
I'll use my poison on Tric today and then we have to hit mafia today with the lynch. There's at least one mafia inside Tric/Jack so when all three of us go down today we'll be down to 4 players but there will be only one mafia left.My power, motivation, and mechanics are all consistent with my D1. Are seriously scumreading me just because I post too much?This reeks of mafia smugness. Why so eager to kill Met yesterday?
I was frozen in place after Tric tied the votes, unable to vote between Tric (who gave me the gun in the first place) and NJW to kill.
Scumslip. Voted to lynch scum. I thought that was our job?I think mechanically there is going to be a lot of death in this setup. Maybe even as little as one scum. My ability should allow me to be confirmable as town by a tracker during n2.
Now that is a scumslip. Full claim now
What I thought was a scumslip, that caused Tric to immediately vote me because apparently taking a couple minutes away from a family engagement because I was thinking about the game is a good reason to lynch someone. It was a ploy to not vote Met, the question is why.
My power, motivation, and mechanics are all consistent with my D1. Are seriously scumreading me just because I post too much?This reeks of mafia smugness.
... Right, apparently no guarantee of you being town. Which is annoying, I'd have liked to put the Toony/Jack team out of my head, but seems that's still possible. Least you won't survive once I flip town, and we'd know jack is scum.I admire your commitment at least.
How about this, if you're really town then Jack is like 99% mafia. I will poison you today just in case and we vote off Jack today. At least one of you is mafia so town should still be able to win. Sound good?What I'm surprised about is that I am alive and unaffected (as far as I know) by anything.I 100% expected myself, you, or Roden to die last night.
Eh? I explained why I read you as scum D1. Vector asked me to post reads on three players based on the end of yesterday, if this (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8319446#msg8319446)post is what you're worried about. Odd thing to ask D2, but whatever. Anyway, that's not where I am today. Today there's mechanical information, which is just so much easier to work with.My power, motivation, and mechanics are all consistent with my D1. Are seriously scumreading me just because I post too much?This reeks of mafia smugness.
I just want to clarify, yes it reeks of smugness. TOWN smugness. I know I'm right, I know Tric is lying, I know I'm consistent.
@NJW: I want an answer to the question, irregardless. Why am I scum and Tric town?
This is all very confusing, so I'm going to get back to my other work, sleep on it, and maybe draw myself a diagram tomorrow.This. Just this.
NJW2000 is town.Now hold up. NJW is most likely telling the truth that he watched me last night since he claimed before either you or Tric did. That isn't the same thing as 100% town.
Tric I strongly recommend in future games not to admit being lovers in case mafia wasn't the one that did that to us, although in this case it's extremelyEdit after posting.unlikelylikely given that NJW's claim is 99% true which means either Tric or Jack is STILL lying about their night action making people lovers. Aka one of them is mafia and made me and Tric lovers.
The plan of Toonyman poisoning Tric and the town lynching me is crazy, because we might all three be townNope. Only two people targeted me last night according to NJW. Either you or Tric gave me lovers status with Tric which means one of you is still lying. The only other possibility is that NJW truly did watch me, but is also withholding a third player that targeted me, which would make NJW mafia partners with this third player. That's not something I believe right now, but we can talk about it moving forward.
What if mafia got a watcher, and NJW is scumbuddies with the watcher? The scumbuddy says "I saw NJW, Tric, and EJ visit Toonyman".Yes that is a possible argument. Who would be NJW's partner? Roden, Met, or Vector?
Then NJW reports 66% truthfully.
What if mafia got a watcher, and NJW is scumbuddies with the watcher? The scumbuddy says "I saw NJW, Tric, and EJ visit Toonyman".Yes that is a possible argument. Who would be NJW's partner? Roden, Met, or Vector?
Then NJW reports 66% truthfully.
That's also a possibility.What if mafia got a watcher, and NJW is scumbuddies with the watcher? The scumbuddy says "I saw NJW, Tric, and EJ visit Toonyman".Yes that is a possible argument. Who would be NJW's partner? Roden, Met, or Vector?
Then NJW reports 66% truthfully.
With that argument, Roden. It would be close to Roden's claim of tracker, and explain why NJW posted their watcher claim BEFORE Roden, who claimed tracker and was their Prime scum suspect all day 1.
Although, it might make more sense for the "mafia kill - Infect two with lovers" to also have a watcher ability tagged onto it.
... Jack, please Unvote? Well, Unvote. If there is a town vig in play, we could solve this.
EuchreJackStop. We can talk through this.
Looking at things, I can hope they could clear it up(they being Vector/Met). Met might be a vig, in which case we could save the poison kill. Hence him considering it 'death heavy'. With Lover that would certainly track.This is a reasonable conclusion. Met also asked for a tracker to follow them N2 to confirm them which makes me think Met could be a N2+ one-shot vig or something.
Evidence:Or if the killer was a third unknown player that NJW was withholding, but again why try to kill me when it was clear Jack would "jailkeep" me?
Nobody died, from my POV the only possibility a kill would have happened but failed would be if mafia tried to kill me and Jack protected it, but NJW's claim counters this unless exactly Tric is the would-be killer. In addition, mafia should attempt to kill Jack here every time as they are the doctor. Not me.
Why are we assuming that Lover-infector had to visit Toonyman? Why not have it trigger on visiting Tric instead? Or why require the visitation at all?You would be informed during the day if something happened to you. I wasn't informed of anything during Day 1. It wasn't a day ability.
Maybe it was pick at start, pick at day 1, pick at night.
For the other point, it's possible the Lover status could have transferred from Tric over to me, but in that case why weren't you struck with Lover sickness Jack?
Assuming that Toonyman, TricMagic, EuchreJack, and NJW are town.This can never be true. At least one person is lying in this group. This group has at least one mafia.
Assuming that Toonyman, TricMagic, EuchreJack, and NJW are town.This can never be true. At least one person is lying in this group. This group has at least one mafia.
Nah, in my opinion the mafia have a role called One-Shot Lovers Magic [TRICMAGIC], [TOONYMAN] or something. It can't be a town role as nobody has owned up to doing it. I claimed to have done nothing. NJW claims to have watched me (with supporting evidence), Tric claims to have redirected myself onto Jack, and Jack claims to have jailkeeped me.
They simply targeted me and Tric and forgoed their kill if they even have one.
Or in the case of Tric being the mafia: Tric targeted me and made themselves lovers with me during N1, which seems like a very weak ability if they aren't able to mafiakill.
Somebody made me and Tric lovers last night. We can confirm this between the two of us.Why?Assuming that Toonyman, TricMagic, EuchreJack, and NJW are town.This can never be true. At least one person is lying in this group. This group has at least one mafia.
Somebody targeted me (and Tric presumably) with Lover status last night.
I pick a first target and a second, the first target targets the second. As Toony apparently doesn't have an ability/you telling the truth, nothing happened. Though didn't get an action failed message. No clue if that's normal if the one I targeted.. Well, given how Jailkeep works, guess I wouldn't.
We don't have any idea how the lover skill works.We don't, but it has to be a targeting ability. It either targets one player or two players. There is no other way. Somebody did this.
Well that looks bad for me.
So fun fact. I kinda lied about my power, but thought Redirect could be used that way. Fal kindly informed me that it very much wasn't possible, so I targeted Toony and redirected him to Jack.
Also, I got hit by the Lover effect last night. Which means that Jack's ability isn't what he claims, since it's Toonyman I'm lover's with. Which if he was jailed, shouldn't have happened. I guess I'd be hit by it, but not Toony.
As for the end of day, I thought I had a few more hours. This is the first time in forever a day has ended while the sun was still up for me. So I was still pressuring.
Nin.
Tric claims they targeted me and Jack.
unfortunately i'm not confirmable today because what the fuck, but i think the fact that literally nobody is dead is proof that what i said wasn't a scumslipMetMet
Proof I'm mostly unavailable
Let me explain this post.
I wanted to vote Met to get the lynch, since I was thinking about the game and felt someone scumslipped. So I looked over the posts, and it was Met that made the post. Tric's jumping onto me to tie and keep Met alive was highly suspicious, so I wanted to vote. But I was on my cell phone, and I couldn't easily color the vote red. That proves I was "mostly unavailable", since I was using a phone while interacting with other, and that delay cost the vote.
Personally, I think Tric is either mafia with Met or Tric is Mafia-ally that thinks Met is mafia. Only one way to be sure...
.. If we go with Jack being the Mafia(or me), then it might not be best if we know what the other two did. Then again, it could be helpful. I err on the side of not knowing what they can do, since that means Mafia won't either.my pronouns are they/them
On the other hand, NJW is Mafia. That means we either have a Watcher/Tracker team, since claiming you can track and confirm Jack would be stupid if you couldn't. Or it's one of the other two.
Alternatively, Ninja. But given the roles involved? We'd have a Jailkeep who has no kill to protect from, two information roles, and a redirector. On top of Toony's Poison. And Lover in play. That's too crazy, but if true we'd need charts to track everything.
Looking at things, I can hope they could clear it up(they being Vector/Met). Met might be a vig, in which case we could save the poison kill. Hence him considering it 'death heavy'. With Lover that would certainly track.That's also a possibility.What if mafia got a watcher, and NJW is scumbuddies with the watcher? The scumbuddy says "I saw NJW, Tric, and EJ visit Toonyman".Yes that is a possible argument. Who would be NJW's partner? Roden, Met, or Vector?
Then NJW reports 66% truthfully.
With that argument, Roden. It would be close to Roden's claim of tracker, and explain why NJW posted their watcher claim BEFORE Roden, who claimed tracker and was their Prime scum suspect all day 1.
Although, it might make more sense for the "mafia kill - Infect two with lovers" to also have a watcher ability tagged onto it.
... Jack, please Unvote? Well, Unvote. If there is a town vig in play, we could solve this.
my pronouns are they/them
Why is Met pretty town to you?
in 5v2 you absolutely want to yeet every time
if you don't yeet the it's 4v2 next day which means you either yeet correctly (which is harder to do than in 3v2 because more townies to hit) so you can choose to not yeet and then give scum another night kill. just having the wagon analysis is so nice
I don't like jack's play. It's similar to last game but instead of never taking a real stance this game jack is taking many weak stances. NJW seems like a player I will have difficulty reading. Ultimately I'll have to do some kind of agenda meta analysis. The way Tric tunnels on roden is notable
Whoever voted to save me is absolutely town because scum would just pretend to be afk and take a free yeet.That would be Tric. I'm starting to feel the same that Tric is just town.
I'm still not confirmable tonight by tracker.Is this because nobody is dead still?
Sorry, had a really busy day. I Tracked Jack and he did target Toony.Thank you for the claim. Why did you decide on Jack?
Claim: I Watched ToonyMan. He was visited by TricMagic and EuchreJack.[/i]
Possibly there would have been an advantage from holding some of that back, maybe claiming watcher instead, but eh, I think I'd have had to lie about my role or something and I don't like that kind of gambit.
Of Metruption, Roden, and EJ, who do you presently think is most likely to be scum based on EoD?Sorry, should have answered this earlier, impolite of me.
Only Euchre was really present at end of day, right? Jack lunging to make the kill happen was exactly what he did as scum last game, but he could have genuinely suspected Met. As I've said, Met was basically anti-town, not sure I'd assign scum yet though. And yeah, I assume Roden wasn't lying about being asleep, but I still think Roden/Jack is a pretty plausible team. Hard to decide between Jack or Roden, but Roden does gutread a bit worse to me.
Anyhow, we now have claims and mechanical information, so... any particular reason for this specific question?
Eh? I explained why I read you as scum D1. Vector asked me to post reads on three players based on the end of yesterday, if this (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8319446#msg8319446)post is what you're worried about. Odd thing to ask D2, but whatever.
Hypothesis:
Mafia didn't perform a mafiakill last night.
Evidence:
Nobody died, from my POV the only possibility a kill would have happened but failed would be if mafia tried to kill me and Jack protected it, but NJW's claim counters this unless exactly Tric is the would-be killer. In addition, mafia should attempt to kill Jack here every time as they are the doctor. Not me.
Speculation:
Mafia making two town players lovers, but also not killing anyone that night sounds reasonably balanced for this setup.EuchreJackStop. We can talk through this.Looking at things, I can hope they could clear it up(they being Vector/Met). Met might be a vig, in which case we could save the poison kill. Hence him considering it 'death heavy'. With Lover that would certainly track.This is a reasonable conclusion. Met also asked for a tracker to follow them N2 to confirm them which makes me think Met could be a N2+ one-shot vig or something.
I'm starting to get a picture of this setup. Maybe FoU gave town a bunch of ways to kill while mafia are trying to make town self-destruct each other with their abilities?
Same question with Vector. Who did you target if so? That's really the only other option we have.
Looks at Meta and Jack. To note, my ability does require I pick two targets. The first which I'm redirecting, and the second which is the new target. And Meta, we already went through this, read the thread. Not just pop in, claim a death-related role, then pop out. I remember the game with the necromancer claiming Medium.
@mod if a player is targeted by a jailkeeper are they targetable by any other actions at night?
@are you using Normal Action Resolution to determine the order of night actions this game?
Euchrejack has been freaking out a lot any time that people suggest that the scumteam is EJ/Tric.
....
If Tric is scum I'm fairly confident his partner is EuchreJack.
Otherwise I think the team is Roden/Met.
My opinion at this point is that if this is LYLO/MYLO, everyone should claim, since it will help us root out the scumteam through fakeclaims. I'll continue the trend: I'm an ascetic with some restrictions. For example, I'm NKable.
Right. At this point not sure what your gameplan is jack. I get getting out of this.. But I don't really understand how.
Not the worst idea. Not the best, but not the worst. Issue with it is of course if someone dies we are in a worse spot, not a better one. That leaves us with 6 people, and if Toony uses their poison and we'll both town, we'd lose that day anyway.Right. At this point not sure what your gameplan is jack. I get getting out of this.. But I don't really understand how.
I'd like to see a no-lynch, followed by mafia killing someone that isn't you or Toonyman. It also puts town in a good spot D3, as opposed to the ELO that both of your deaths would entail.
Too many moving parts, and if one goes wrong they all do. Will Aesthetic return a Action Failed if you try to Jail him?
I'm an ascetic with some restrictions. For example, I'm NKable.Since the definitions provided on mafia wiki (https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Ascetic) explicitly state that an ascetic can be night killed. But maybe I just missed 10 years ago when ascetic was created and it was immune to the NK.
Also, when I said better, I meant its better to have one dead townie than two dead townies. Most plans seems to risk two dead townies, even if one dies later on.Not the worst idea. Not the best, but not the worst. Issue with it is of course if someone dies we are in a worse spot, not a better one. That leaves us with 6 people, and if Toony uses their poison and we'll both town, we'd lose that day anyway.Right. At this point not sure what your gameplan is jack. I get getting out of this.. But I don't really understand how.
I'd like to see a no-lynch, followed by mafia killing someone that isn't you or Toonyman. It also puts town in a good spot D3, as opposed to the ELO that both of your deaths would entail.
Too many moving parts, and if one goes wrong they all do. Will Aesthetic return a Action Failed if you try to Jail him?
@Toonyman: How much leeway do you have on your ability's day use? I mean, could you submit it after the vote? Otherwise my plan has the flaw that it creates a snipe hunt, wherein mafia could put in their vote 2 seconds before the deadline.I can't submit a day action after the day elimination, the day is officially over when that happens.
@NJW: Do you know if a watcher sees an Ascetic that visits another player?I assume so as I'm not targeting the ascetic, I'm targeting the visited player.
As for Vector. He's NKable.
Suspicious that Vector would say:I'm an ascetic with some restrictions. For example, I'm NKable.Since the definitions provided on mafia wiki (https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Ascetic) explicitly state that an ascetic can be night killed. But maybe I just missed 10 years ago when ascetic was created and it was immune to the NK.
@Vector: Are you still voting NJW2000?
Nice try Vector, but I'm not taking the scum bait. I'm heavily scum reading you for this. If anyone else thinks the scum team might be Tric and myself, I'd love to hear the explanation.
Euchrejack has been freaking out a lot any time that people suggest that the scumteam is EJ/Tric. Also self-voting which is just... extremely fucked up if they're a town doctor/roleblocker.
This is supposed to be mostly vanilla but it seems like a lot of the high impact roles this setup are bastard. Also, the fact everyone has a power role makes this so scumsided because people are too busy trying to figure out what happened instead of just catching scum. Whoever voted to save me is absolutely town because scum would just pretend to be afk and take a free yeet.This statement I believe would be very difficult for a mafia player to find the mindset for.
I'm still not confirmable tonight by tracker.
Sorry, had a really busy day. I Tracked Jack and he did target Toony. I'm kinda baffled by everything that's happened today, but the thing I'm most confused about is how Toony got a Lovers effect if Jack Jailed him. I'm pretty sure Jailkeeper protects from all lethal effects? So either Jack lied about his action, NJW lied about the total visits Toony had, Tric lied about his action and is a Strongman, or scum have a Ninja Strongman Lovers Maker. Which uhhh what the fuck.
@Toony so you're proposing a team from me, Roden, and NJW?Yes I think two mafia are inside Jack/Roden/Vector/NJW right now with Jack and NJW being mutually exclusive.
Toonyman (0):
Roden (1): Vector
TricMagic (0):
EuchreJack (1): TricMagic
NJW2000 (1): EuchreJack
Vector (0):
Metruption (0):
No Execution (0):
Not Voting (4): ToonyMan, Roden, NJW2000, Metruption
4 to hammer.
Toonyman, mechanically there is absolutely no way that I can prove to you that I am a jailkeeper.NJW claims you targeted me and Roden claims you targeted me and only me. That would make it difficult for you to have lovers me and Tric.
@TricMagic:Because at the moment I was thinking of a Toony/Jack team. So I wanted to make sure any ability you used would hit your partner in this. And if they weren't there was still the chance it would catch you in a lie. Also the fact I had the suspicion that your poison kill would only trigger if there was a lynch as why no-one died day 1.
Why did you redirect me N1 even though I only claimed a day ability?
Have any soul reads Met? I don't really feel pressured until mafia can prove they can kill.Mafia have used a potentially lethal ability. Unless you're lying about the lovers thing, mafia have already advanced at least one tick towards their final goal of outnumbering town. This is just so wrong.
You really want to lynch someone who isn't part of the me/Tric/Jack someone-must-be-lying trio? That seems pretty strongly counterindicated, especially if you have a hard townread on Jack.
Vector
Roden is town!
Fine. Daykill me or Vector then, ideally me so town can actually use information about the Lovers thing, and help me lynch EuchreJack.
Toonyman (0):
Roden (1): Vector
TricMagic (0):
EuchreJack (2): TricMagic, NJW2000
NJW2000 (0):
Vector (2): ToonyMan, EuchreJack
Metruption (0):
No Execution (0):
Not Voting (2): Roden, Metruption
4 to hammer.
Toonyman (0):
Roden (0):
TricMagic (0):
EuchreJack (0):
NJW2000 (0):
Vector (0):
Metruption (0):
No Execution (0):
Not Voting (7): ToonyMan, Roden, TricMagic, EuchreJack, NJW2000, Vector, Metruption
4 to hammer.
I Tracked Tric, he didn't do anything. No kill again just makes me assume Lovers is scum's obtuse kill method, and we likely have another pair.He did mention his redirect was one-shot on D1.
I Tracked Tric, he didn't do anything. No kill again just makes me assume Lovers is scum's obtuse kill method, and we likely have another pair.
@NJW: How do you know you got lovers from Tric?I did not say this. I know I am lovers with Tric - or at least that I die the day after he's eliminated. No guarantee it works the same way for him.
If Tric and I survive until end of day, shouldn't I jailkeeper Tric?
Roden could be telling the truth if Tric's accomplice did the Lover'ing to you. I'm surprised you didn't consider that possibility.That would mean that the ability is two-target, in which case scum would have chosen to target themselves both nights - an odd decision, to say the least.
I thought Tric's earlier discussion about Toonyman's day kill and the suggestion that mafia might not have a kill was relevant. The full post is below, spoilered for length:It's not so absurd if the mafia don't have a kill. And this probobly explains where the idea came from. Or at least not a traditional one. A poisoner kill would mean someone with a daykill would be useful near game end.But...how do we know that Toonyman's daykill is Town-aligned? Maybe FOU gave the mafia a daykill?Ah, I miss these absurd reasonings. You're either town!Jack or playing mafia well.
Roden could be telling the truth if Tric's accomplice did the Lover'ing to you. I'm surprised you didn't consider that possibility.That would mean that the ability is two-target, in which case scum would have chosen to target themselves both nights - an odd decision, to say the least.
... I kinda wonder why'd you push for the double elimination NJW. Would make more sense just to poison me and skip the lynch.
I should really read more though. Panicking over nothing. Skip Day. Well, go ahead Toony. Note that you're next NJW.
Not that it would mean much, but note Vector is still likely your partner in this. Or it's Jack/Roden, but eh.
Hm, I was thinking again about Tric's claimed ability, and it seemed odd that Tric would chose to Redirect Toonyman's actions onto me, since Toonyman had no claimed action role. Redirecting either my or Roden's ability would prove our roles, and redirecting me onto Roden (or visa versa) would make sense if we were the suspected scum team.Yeah it would make more sense wouldn't it? It's another illogical choice from Tric.
MetruptionI admit it's possible Tric is partners with Met, but Roden seems more likely to me. I will try to elaborate in the future.
@Toonyman: Does your Lovers work the same as NJW's, or differently?It is the same. In fact, NJW gave information that I never even stated on D2. He definitely knows fully how the effect works.
Ugh. There's the same problem as before: only I know that one of Tric and Euchre must be scum. Possibly there's a workaround here.I haven't faked any of my actions or results. I don't know what else to say, I've only told the truth and if you're town you'll just have to eat crow in the post game.
Ok. Scum know this information, so I'll make it public immediately.
I was hit with the lovers effect. I die the day after if Tric is eliminated. Note that it has to be through elimination for me to die. This is why I'd like Toonyman to daykill Tric, while we lynch EuchreJack.
Either Tric is doing the lovers'ing, in which case it looks like the ability is one-target, or EuchreJack is part of a scumteam and has a two-target ability.
In either case, Roden must have falsely reported a night result, unless someone interfered with a tracking action. At this point, I'm pretty sure Roden's scum. (I would actually consider us killing both me and Roden today, but I guess that might be taking a risk that their night result was due to a redirect or similar.)
That's all the information I have. I couldn't use my ability tonight because of the caveats FoU put on it.
My restriction is that I'm Roaming, I can't target the same player twice.
I'm also quite sure mafia didn't or were not able to kill again last night, how can I determine this?
Jack isn't dead. Jack should have always been the kill last night. I wrote in bold over and over that Jack would be the kill 100% of the time last night. Instead NJW was hit by Lovers, so yeah. That means NJW is town...unless someone else wants to claim they were hit by Lovers too last night? Any takers? Roden?
One mafia inside of NJW/Jack/Tric.
Jack is always town. NJW is most likely town.
Tric is mafia.
Vector/Met/Roden are the remainder, assuming one more mafia who is the most likely here?
Vector? Hardly, they've been on Tric's ass this whole game.
Met? Maybe, but also maybe not.
Roden? ...I will look into this.
That means the Ninja has to be either Met or Vector. The final proof of which is that even though you were asked to Watch Tric, scum still confidently targeted him with the Lovers mechanic. There's just too much pointing to this being the truth, and I'd appreciate it if you took a minute stop tunneling me to realize that this is a legitimate logical conclusion.
Also, I really am not used to it ending during the day. Was a bit sick so I lay down and played video games. Then you come in and tie things on my vote. You're either really confident or saving your partner. Night.This appeared to be addressed to me, although it's pretty hard to tell. I didn't tie things yesterday. EuchreJack did, saving himself.
...What? NJW claimed both of you are Lovers.That means the Ninja has to be either Met or Vector. The final proof of which is that even though you were asked to Watch Tric, scum still confidently targeted him with the Lovers mechanic. There's just too much pointing to this being the truth, and I'd appreciate it if you took a minute stop tunneling me to realize that this is a legitimate logical conclusion.
Roden. How did you know I was targeted before I posted that information?
Ugh. There's the same problem as before: only I know that one of Tric and Euchre must be scum. Possibly there's a workaround here.
Ok. Scum know this information, so I'll make it public immediately.
I was hit with the lovers effect. I die the day after if Tric is eliminated. Note that it has to be through elimination for me to die. This is why I'd like Toonyman to daykill Tric, while we lynch EuchreJack.
Either Tric is doing the lovers'ing, in which case it looks like the ability is one-target, or EuchreJack is part of a scumteam and has a two-target ability.
In either case, Roden must have falsely reported a night result, unless someone interfered with a tracking action. At this point, I'm pretty sure Roden's scum. (I would actually consider us killing both me and Roden today, but I guess that might be taking a risk that their night result was due to a redirect or similar.)
That's all the information I have. I couldn't use my ability tonight because of the caveats FoU put on it.
How about this, I poison Tric and we execute Roden today.
During N3 Jack will jailkeep Tric.
Tric will die at the end of D4 and this should be a loophole because it specifically says he needs to die by execution for the lovers effect to trigger so me and NJW should remain alive.
For D4 our actions depend on Roden's flip.
If Roden was town: We take a serious look at Met and Vector.
If Roden was mafia: We probably win when Tric dies.
How about this, I poison Tric and we execute Roden today.This seems to be predicated on a very hard townread of Jack. Do you consider the possibility that there are ninja matchmakers more likely than the possibility that EuchreJack is scum with a two-target lovers ability? Because if Roden flips mafia, Jack could very well have hit you and Tric with a two-target ability.
During N3 Jack will jailkeep Tric.
Tric will die at the end of D4 and this should be a loophole because it specifically says he needs to die by execution for the lovers effect to trigger so me and NJW should remain alive.
For D4 our actions depend on Roden's flip.
If Roden was town: We take a serious look at Met and Vector.
If Roden was mafia: We probably win when Tric dies.
How about this, I poison Tric and we execute Roden today.
During N3 Jack will jailkeep Tric.
Tric will die at the end of D4 and this should be a loophole because it specifically says he needs to die by execution for the lovers effect to trigger so me and NJW should remain alive.
For D4 our actions depend on Roden's flip.
If Roden was town: We take a serious look at Met and Vector.
If Roden was mafia: We probably win when Tric dies.
I wonder if the deal is that scum gets to NK only once and otherwise has to lovers people? Or I guess simply has no NK, who knows.
I've sort of lost interest as this is just a melange of wack mechanics and whatever is going on in this setup is super bastard and my ability that I thought would pop off n2 is going to still be useless going into n3What ability is that exactly? You've been super vague about it, which is why I am scumreading you. Could you describe it in detail? Or name the ability, so I can at least look it up myself?
I've sort of lost interest as this is just a melange of wack mechanics and whatever is going on in this setup is super bastard and my ability that I thought would pop off n2 is going to still be useless going into n3Nobody expects the double tie into mafia never killing.
I mean, not like I can actually kill using an ability that only activates on execution. Or the fact my partner is never on. Literally the worst people to get it. And the fact it was used wrongly.
TricMagic
Hey Tric can you describe exactly how the lover effect resolved on you, for N1 and N2?
By the way, convincing me to NOT poison you would be better for your wincon, regardless of your alignment.
Tric, I didn't use flavor to catch you at all. As someone mentioned, I've been on your butt the whole game due to your Day behavior. Toony even tried at one point to claim it was the same as last game and I was like, "LOL no."I wasn't sure but you're right. Tric still made some baffling decisions that mafia shouldn't do, but I guess it barely edged out in his favor because of that.
Nah I'm dumb actually.
Roden said Tric did nothing last night, which means Roden is lying or some bullshit is going on. That's game.
Vector is 1000 IQ mafia if that's even possible, and Met is probably just town. So it's just Roden. Feel pretty dumb not seeing that D1 but I kept a reminder that they would always be mafia first before Jack.
I did say I was being truthful about not doing anything. That Lovers on N2 surprised me as much as anyone. Our time zones just aren't synched up properly....and then mafia Tric tries to save Roden. Oooh, more Wine!
My issue, as I said before, is that if the scum team (tric and player x) had the ability: "Target player becomes lovers with Tric", then the scumbuddy could have bound NJW to Tric. Tric is probably lying about the ability going both ways.
But I've got no major problems voting Roden. If nothing else, it saves us from having this conversation tomorrow.I did say I was being truthful about not doing anything. That Lovers on N2 surprised me as much as anyone. Our time zones just aren't synched up properly....and then mafia Tric tries to save Roden. Oooh, more Wine!
I did say I was being truthful about not doing anything. That Lovers on N2 surprised me as much as anyone. Our time zones just aren't synched up properly.
Hm, I was thinking again about Tric's claimed ability, and it seemed odd that Tric would chose to Redirect Toonyman's actions onto me, since Toonyman had no claimed action role. Redirecting either my or Roden's ability would prove our roles, and redirecting me onto Roden (or visa versa) would make sense if we were the suspected scum team.Yeah it would make more sense wouldn't it? It's another illogical choice from Tric.
I think the main reason a mafia!Tric would have to make up the "I redirected Toony to Jack" claim is that NJW outed the fact that Tric targeted me on N1. NJW and Tric are at odds with each other.
Let's think about how a Tric/Roden mafia team would decide their target on N2:
Toony - they have already lover'd me
Tric - no reason to target self
Roden - no reason to target partner
Vector - immune for at least one cycle
Met - already kind of suspicious, could easily get lynched on D3
NJW - a good target, the least likely to get lynched between Met and Jack
Jack - a decent target, not as suspicious as Met but more likely to get lynched than NJW anyway
Mafia don't want to Lovers someone who is likely to get lynched. NJW was the least likely to be lynched between NJW/Jack/Met. This is why NJW was hit with Lovers last night.MetruptionI admit it's possible Tric is partners with Met, but Roden seems more likely to me. I will try to elaborate in the future.
What is this evenI've been thinking the same thing!
Everyone lives happily ever after.Lets do the time warp again!
Except Tric. I still shot him with my poison dart.
GGs Tric and Roden
I'll go ahead and post the setup and actions. However, I'd just like to bring up that I think Metruption implicitly asked for a replacement when he said he 'lost interest'. Webadict, you up for that?I'm available if he isn't, haha
My main issue is of course the fact Lovers is so nerfed. Even both town and mafia dying would be better if kills also triggered the lovers effect. I am not really capable of pushing a false lynch since I look for scum indicators to build cases off of. And while there were some, we kind of played the ability wrong from the very start.Would it help if I told you that you misread your role, too? Only the multitasking was one-shot, you had unlimited redirects.
ToonyMan:
1-Shot Day Poisoner (town):
(1-Shot, Day) Poison [target]: You shoot your target with a blowdart full of deadly frog venom, causing them to die at the end of the next Day (after the execution). They will be aware that they are poisoned, as well as their death condition.
EuchreJack:
3-Shot Jailkeeper (town):
(3-Shot, Night) Jailkeep [target]: You lock your target in their room this Night, protecting them from kills and preventing them from acting. They will be given a ‘you were roleblocked’ result if they attempted to act. You only have enough locksmith’s tools to do this three times, however.
Vector:
Limited Ascetic (town):
(Auto) Ascetic: Due to living in a state of constant meditation, you are immune to all non-kill actions. Any player that uses a non-kill action on you will receive an ‘action failed’ result. However, if a non-kill action is used on you, this Auto will be disabled during the next Cycle (Day and Night) as your meditation is shaken. You will not be aware of when this Auto is disabled/enabled.
Metruption:
Coroner (town):
(Night) Autopsy [target]: You visit a dead player in secret and use your forensics experience to learn the names of all abilities used on them for the Cycle (Day and Night) of their death.
NJW2000:
Secretive Watcher (town):
(Night) Watch [target]: You learn the names of all players who visited your target this Night by watching with your hidden camera.
(Auto) Secretive: Any ability you use fails if you are visited the phase you use it.
TricMagic:
1-Shot Multitasking Redirector (mafia):
(Night) Redirect [target1] [target2]: You use subliminal imagery and subconsciously-heard sonic tones to manipulate your first target into changing the target of their action (if any) to your second target. If they would visit multiple players, one of their targets is changed at random to be your second target. Furthermore, you cannot choose the same player to be both of your targets.
(1-Shot, Auto) Multitasking: Only once, you may choose to use a second action during the Night, as long as the second action is not the same as your first action.
Roden:
Odd Night Tracker (mafia):
(Night) Track [target]: You learn what players, if any, your target visits tonight by stalking them.
(Auto) Odd-Night: Due to fatigue, you can only use your Track action during odd-numbered Nights.
(Factional, Night) Matchmake [self/target1] [target2]: You use hypnotic flamingo pheromone perfume to brainwash two targets, causing them to gain the Lovers status permanently. If one of them is executed during the Day, the other will die at the end of the next Day, after the execution. (A player with the Lovers status will be aware of having it, who their joined partner is, and what the death condition is.) If a Mafia player is one of your targets, the execution of the other player in the partnership will not trigger the lethal effect of this status. This ability may be self-targeted.
Night 1 attempted actions:
ToonyMan: None (no Night action)
NJW2000: Watch ToonyMan
EuchreJack: Jailkeep ToonyMan
Vector: None (passive)
Metruption: None (nobody’s dead)
TricMagic: Redirect ToonyMan to target EuchreJack / Multitasking: Matchmake ToonyMan and TricMagic
Roden: Track EuchreJack
Night 1 results:
ToonyMan gains the Lovers [TricMagic] status, and gains awareness of what it is.
NJW2000 learns that ToonyMan was visited by TricMagic and EuchreJack
EuchreJack jailkeeps Toonyman
Vector has an uneventful Night
Metruption has an uneventful Night
TricMagic redirects ToonyMan to EuchreJack (which does nothing) and gains the Lovers [ToonyMan] status.
Roden learns EuchreJack visited ToonyMan.
Night 2 attempted actions:
ToonyMan: None (no Night action)
NJW2000: Watch Metruption
EuchreJack: Jailkeep ToonyMan
Vector: None (passive)
Metruption: None (nobody’s dead)
TricMagic: None (choice)
Roden: Matchmake NJW2000 and TricMagic
Night 2 results:
ToonyMan has an uneventful Night
NJW2000’s action fails, and he gains the Lovers [TricMagic] status, along with awareness of what it is.
EuchreJack jailkeeps ToonyMan
Vector has an uneventful Night
Metruption has an uneventful Night
TricMagic gains the Lovers [NJW2000] status.
Roden matchmakes TricMagic and NJW2000.
Day 3 attempted actions:
ToonyMan: Poison TricMagic
Day 3 results:
TricMagic gains the status Poisoned
Is this the loop where a mysterious 8th player shows up?I'll go ahead and post the setup and actions. However, I'd just like to bring up that I think Metruption implicitly asked for a replacement when he said he 'lost interest'. Webadict, you up for that?I'm available if he isn't, haha
I don't see why Web and MaximumSpin couldn't join as 8th and 9th players for the next round. The points don't really mean anything and there are no other games to join right now.
This wasn't bastard, I don't think.
While I felt kinda bad about it during the game when Met said this was a 'bastard game' or whatnot, I didn't comment on it because I didn't want to interfere with how things would play out. Now that the game's over though, I'd like to get y'alls opinion on it. I don't think it's bastard - at least by the standards of this board - myself, but what do you all think?
I don't see why Web and MaximumSpin couldn't join as 8th and 9th players for the next round. The points don't really mean anything and there are no other games to join right now.Sure. Well, it'd be seventh and eighth if Met decides to drop out.
Possibly being a bit more explicit with the term 'execution' might help.Noted.
So, what was the "more broken version"?
Points are for losers. I'll start with 0 like a professional.Noted.
@Roden: Overall, your town and mafia games are similar, so good job on that!That's good to know actually. I likely could've gotten away with being more aggressive in general this game, so I'll keep it in mind going forward.
However, as town you are an aggressive voter, whereas in this game as mafia you were very hesitant to vote. Hope that helps!
Yeah, I can play.I... Am already playing?
Always have been.Yeah, I can play.I... Am already playing?
Toonyman (0):
Roden (0):
TricMagic (0):
EuchreJack (0):
NJW2000 (0):
Vector (0):
webadict (0):
Maximum Spin (0):
No Execution (0):
Not Voting (8): ToonyMan, Roden, TricMagic, EuchreJack, NJW2000, Vector, webadict, Maximum Spin
5 to hammer.
Okay then.Awfully rude to ask someone else's before sharing your own.
Tric, what's your role this game?
I'm not even in this episode, webadict, but that's pretty funny, I was all set to do the same thing and you stepped all over it. I guess I should probably vote someone else but I feel like this is funnier.Oh yeah, who are you? Who is Maximum Spin?
Not telling this game. No point to it. Why are you asking Toony?Because I want to know if you'll reveal it easily. The answer appears to be a no.
Sorry, I'm a cop. The way we handle this is in my procedures. Ask then tell.Okay then.Awfully rude to ask someone else's before sharing your own.
Tric, what's your role this game?
Sorry, I'm a cop. The way we handle this is in my procedures. Ask then tell.Okay then.Awfully rude to ask someone else's before sharing your own.
Tric, what's your role this game?
Gunsmith Cop, certain town roles will come back positive but otherwise I can catch scum.Sorry, I'm a cop. The way we handle this is in my procedures. Ask then tell.Okay then.Awfully rude to ask someone else's before sharing your own.
Tric, what's your role this game?
... If you're a cop, what type of cop? Role Cop? Mafia Cop?
... Right, Toony is likely Town.Good to know. This means I will get a positive result on Tric if I investigate them. I think Tric is being honest here which means they're likely town.
Any others want to claim? I'm Parity.
Oh yeah, who are you? Who is Maximum Spin?I'm not even here!
Maximum Spin is the one who's going to get lynched for this.Oh yeah, who are you? Who is Maximum Spin?I'm not even here!
I have pertinent information that will likely get me killed if I reveal it but puts me at a disadvantage regardless, since revealing it is also helpful in narrowing down potential suspects, and, like, I'm gonna get killed tonight anyway, LOL.Is insisting you'll die N1 the bay12 meta or something?
But, I'll wait until everyone posts at least once.
Everything is meta if you make it meta.I have pertinent information that will likely get me killed if I reveal it but puts me at a disadvantage regardless, since revealing it is also helpful in narrowing down potential suspects, and, like, I'm gonna get killed tonight anyway, LOL.Is insisting you'll die N1 the bay12 meta or something?
But, I'll wait until everyone posts at least once.
Oh, is that what we're doing? Then I will claim to have no gun at all. I'm clean! But that doesn't matter because you won't believe me regardless, and I'd probably claim either way as Mafia, so it's up to you to believe my outlandish claims.... Right, Toony is likely Town.Good to know. This means I will get a positive result on Tric if I investigate them. I think Tric is being honest here which means they're likely town.
Any others want to claim? I'm Parity.
Euchrejack, what color is my tie?Don't fall for it, Euchre, Vector's not wearing a tie at all!
Roden: given there's a load of D1 copclaims, should town lynch today?Absolutely, less people to check tonight if we remove one.
Oho, you too?Roden: given there's a load of D1 copclaims, should town lynch today?Absolutely, less people to check tonight if we remove one.
If we're mass claiming, then I'll state now that I have a unique role. I can't choose my target at night, only my Captain can. I don't think they should claim today though, I want to see who they force me to target tonight.
... So, Roden and Webadict can be considered liabilities. With Max likely to be the one pulling their strings. Great...Oho, you too?Roden: given there's a load of D1 copclaims, should town lynch today?Absolutely, less people to check tonight if we remove one.
If we're mass claiming, then I'll state now that I have a unique role. I can't choose my target at night, only my Captain can. I don't think they should claim today though, I want to see who they force me to target tonight.
Well, that makes me a little less apprehensive to claim now.
Good to know. And you're right, I'll be checking you tonight. So you'll have to kill me if you're lying.Good to know. This means I will get a positive result on Tric if I investigate them. I think Tric is being honest here which means they're likely town.Oh, is that what we're doing? Then I will claim to have no gun at all. I'm clean! But that doesn't matter because you won't believe me regardless, and I'd probably claim either way as Mafia, so it's up to you to believe my outlandish claims.
... So, Roden and Webadict can be considered liabilities. With Max likely to be the one pulling their strings. Great...Why Max? I could see Web fucking around as the captain here.
Ok, let's verify. What happens if your Captain dies?Oho, you too?Roden: given there's a load of D1 copclaims, should town lynch today?Absolutely, less people to check tonight if we remove one.
If we're mass claiming, then I'll state now that I have a unique role. I can't choose my target at night, only my Captain can. I don't think they should claim today though, I want to see who they force me to target tonight.
Well, that makes me a little less apprehensive to claim now.
The beauty of it all is that I actually don't have to kill you if I'm lying, because you won't investigate me at all. Even when I write this, I would bet that you wouldn't waste your inspection on me. Partially because I don't believe you're actually a Gunsmith, but also partially because I think you think I'm not lying.Good to know. And you're right, I'll be checking you tonight. So you'll have to kill me if you're lying.Good to know. This means I will get a positive result on Tric if I investigate them. I think Tric is being honest here which means they're likely town.Oh, is that what we're doing? Then I will claim to have no gun at all. I'm clean! But that doesn't matter because you won't believe me regardless, and I'd probably claim either way as Mafia, so it's up to you to believe my outlandish claims.... So, Roden and Webadict can be considered liabilities. With Max likely to be the one pulling their strings. Great...Why Max? I could see Web fucking around as the captain here.
Hmm... Let's see... The optimal move here is to not answer that, because verifying this is trivially easy and accomplishes nothing to do so, especially because I think you're a weak player and not willing to reveal the information yourself. I'd also like to not answer that because I want people to think I'm fakeclaiming, because I am. I might just be lying so that the Mafia Captain is unsure of who is what role.Ok, let's verify. What happens if your Captain dies?Oho, you too?Roden: given there's a load of D1 copclaims, should town lynch today?Absolutely, less people to check tonight if we remove one.
If we're mass claiming, then I'll state now that I have a unique role. I can't choose my target at night, only my Captain can. I don't think they should claim today though, I want to see who they force me to target tonight.
Well, that makes me a little less apprehensive to claim now.
webadictWow that got screwed up.
Being right and being weak are not mutually exclusive. You should consider reading comprehension if you think I'm pointing out your ability to find scum as weak.webadictWow that got screwed up.
I was going to say that I can easily verify if you're telling the truth. You can say I'm a weak player but I caught you in D6 before you subbed out, and I called out both scum in the first round one after the other. If you want to underestimate me then I'm more than with not being fear killed tonight.
My issue here is that you can't even control your own actions, and if your captain dies, you likely do as well. And your role is way too idiotic given we can use our investigation just fine. I find it more likely you'd disable us, not enable.So, you believe I'm under control of the Captain, but
The fact you claim and then not bother to answer Roden's question doesn't help your claim.You don't believe my claim, but
Also, we do not need enabling unless Mafia is cheating the results.You do believe my claim.
With Max likely to be the one pulling their strings. Great...Haha, what? You are so nutbags. How can I be a captain when I am not even in this episode?
Agh, you got me. I know town!Web would be killed on N1 so my investigate would become useless. This means checking you is pointless!The beauty of it all is that I actually don't have to kill you if I'm lying, because you won't investigate me at all. Even when I write this, I would bet that you wouldn't waste your inspection on me. Partially because I don't believe you're actually a Gunsmith, but also partially because I think you think I'm not lying.Good to know. And you're right, I'll be checking you tonight. So you'll have to kill me if you're lying.Good to know. This means I will get a positive result on Tric if I investigate them. I think Tric is being honest here which means they're likely town.Oh, is that what we're doing? Then I will claim to have no gun at all. I'm clean! But that doesn't matter because you won't believe me regardless, and I'd probably claim either way as Mafia, so it's up to you to believe my outlandish claims.
Also true, if I were the Captain, I'd be the greatest Captain of all time. But, instead, I'm a *deep breath* Combined Activated Cop Enabler Doctor (Or, CACED, for short.) When I perform my Doctoring, I also enable Cop inspects. Which is why I'm fairly certain I'll be killed tonight, and also why I'm willing to bet at least one of the Cop claims is legit.What.
We'll now be able to determine if the Captain is, in fact, Mafia.
Fuck the police!*baton whack*
My issue here is that you can't even control your own actions, and if your captain dies, you likely do as well. And your role is way too idiotic given we can use our investigation just fine. I find it more likely you'd disable us, not enable.Tric is right. There's no mention in my role that it needs to be enabled.
You can say that, but the fact you are playing these games in the first place leads me to disbelief. Put simply, you claim to be controlled by a captain. You yourself say you could be lying. And you won't provide the proof Roden has. In case A where you are controlled, you're lying/truthtelling. There is no difference, simply chaos. In case b where you aren't, you are intentionally lying to not have to claim anything about your actual role, be that captain, cop, or mafia. Note that the three are not exclusive.If I ever stopped playing games, why would I be playing Mafia?
.... Also, that series of quotes, quite mean of you. The third is a true statement which is in direct contrast to your claim... Haa... At this point you're playing with me, which means little is gained other than... Point being, please don't play these games web, I'm not in the mood for them and am fully willing to lynch you over them.
I've seen set ups where Enabler modifiers for town roles were on scum teams and vice versa. I actually believe both Cop roles are town here because of that, and that Web is an Enabler.I am not scum. I'm choosing not to divulge the captain's authority because I want to look like I'm lying, and I don't necessarily want the Captain to know my role. Also, if the Captain is Town, they should know my role and can debunk me accurately.
Is he scum though? Because I'm a Jailer. Two gated invests is one thing, but two gated protective roles sounds really off.
Should our Captains claim then? Because they could very well be the same person.If they're Town, I'd rather they didn't.
Agh, you got me. I know town!Web would be killed on N1 so my investigate would become useless. This means checking you is pointless!Actually, if you were going to check me, which you're not, you'd likely just lie and say I have a gun, and then I'd call your obvious bluff, and then you'd admit who you actually inspected.
My theory on this game is that Mafia has an active captain who orders the town roles around. A Jailkeeper prevents kills, but also stops cops from doing anything. Web is just outright lying about their role, and I'll check them tonight. Which will likely get me roleblocked, but eh. If I'm alive day 2 I can at least confirm their allegiances.Waste of an inspect. Wouldn't recommend it, but you're going to anyway, which is incredibly silly.
Yeah no. I'm Parity. 8) I don't know why you are saying not to, do you have something to hide? Am I going to die N1?On the contrary, I'm trying to bait the kill, and if I succeed, I will be dead.
I agree completely with webadict which means he's probably mafia, so vote stands.Laaaazy voooote. Got a better reason?
I think Web is correct about this.Should our Captains claim then? Because they could very well be the same person.If they're Town, I'd rather they didn't.
Oh ok, so just a normal cop. I think Tric should just target someone else then.No. Web is dumb. Parity cops get some arbitrary result when they inspect someone which they can piece together to determine alignments. For example town might be a "1" and mafia might be a "2". Or it could be the other way around, we have no way to know until it's confirmed.
@Vector and Max: Do you have active or passive roles? Are you willing to full claim?I thought I already did. I mean, I wasn't subtle about it.
That comes off more jokingly than serious MS. And we lynched someone who claimed Commuter first round. That's not a good strategy for a cop to have. Unless of course only one mafia can get caught via the cops, the captain.@Vector and Max: Do you have active or passive roles? Are you willing to full claim?I thought I already did. I mean, I wasn't subtle about it.
I'm not willing to be more direct at this moment. But there isn't a whole lot more direct to be.
Where is Jack?I imagine even EuchreJack may sometimes go twelve hours without posting to bay12.
Anyway, should we be focusing Maximum Spin or Vector?Who is "we" here?
On the contrary, I'm trying to bait the kill, and if I succeed, I will be dead.I get that the meme shit and insulting people might just be how you play RVS, but if you've come around to "my claim was lying actually aha", what were your last nineteen posts meant to accomplish for town?
Yeah no. I'm Parity. 8) I don't know why you are saying not to, do you have something to hide? Am I going to die N1?Parity cop takes a minimum of two nights to return a useable result. You'd barely be a kill priority N2, let alone N1. Also, why would you claim it this early?
I can't choose my target at night, only my Captain can. I don't think they should claim today though, I want to see who they force me to target tonight.Does the captaincy thing work roughly like this (https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Captain)?
Where is Jack?I imagine even EuchreJack may sometimes go twelve hours without posting to bay12.
Some info on my role: I don't have a gun (flavor counted for something I guess), I am town, and I am the one most likely to die N1. My ability is fatal to me if I successfully use it.... are you Kurt Cobain?
I hope Jack posts soon, I want to hear his thoughts.
No. Stop with the cryptic bull, or I'll vote you. Speak plainly or not at all.Some info on my role: I don't have a gun (flavor counted for something I guess), I am town, and I am the one most likely to die N1. My ability is fatal to me if I successfully use it.... are you Kurt Cobain?
No. Stop with the cryptic bull, or I'll vote you.I think you might just not get the reference. Kurt Cobain sang the lyrics, "I don't have a gun", and then shot himself. I mean, not immediately. That was a bit later.
No. Stop with the cryptic bull, or I'll vote you.I think you might just not get the reference. Kurt Cobain sang the lyrics, "I don't have a gun", and then shot himself. I mean, not immediately. That was a bit later.
So like anything else I've said, that wasn't cryptic at all.
"We" is Toony and I, clearly.Anyway, should we be focusing Maximum Spin or Vector?Who is "we" here?On the contrary, I'm trying to bait the kill, and if I succeed, I will be dead.I get that the meme shit and insulting people might just be how you play RVS, but if you've come around to "my claim was lying actually aha", what were your last nineteen posts meant to accomplish for town?
Webadict, buddying me and telling us you'll be dead N1 so we don't vote you today. Roll mafia yet again?Nope. I rolled... Wait, hold on, Town isn't spelled with an M!
Quite rude, if you ask me. Haters are always in the process of hating.No. Stop with the cryptic bull, or I'll vote you.I think you might just not get the reference. Kurt Cobain sang the lyrics, "I don't have a gun", and then shot himself. I mean, not immediately. That was a bit later.
So like anything else I've said, that wasn't cryptic at all.
LOL, fair enough. I assume you're also claiming Commuter or something. The "or something" is why I'm getting pissy.
Oh, and Vote Webadict. Not enough voting, if you ask me.
Is this the part where I start actually trying, or should I just wait until it's socially acceptable to vote myself like you in a desperate attempt at... I don't know if that sentence has an ending.
Vector's actually posting MORE than usualI have to admit I would actually consider that suspicious.
Pure statistics time!Technically, since Max and I took over for Met, we'd be that slot's roll on the scum die.
We are in our 3rd game.
Round 1 mafia were: EuchreJack and Vector
Round 2 mafia were: Tricmagic and Roden
Town for both games were: Toonyman, NJW2000, and Met
New players are: Maximum Spin and Webadict.
Between Toonyman and NJW2000, one of them is "due" to be mafia, so I'd suggest they deserve "extra scrutiny". They're probably paired with someone else, as it would be unfair to put them both on the scum team, to be outed by Math Alone.
I thought someone told me webadict was supposed to be good at this?We execute our liars here. Except me. We don't execute me.
Maximum Spin based entirely on the premise that I think they're trying to coast by keeping their vote on me and simultaneously I don't want to have to unvote and vote someone else because I'm lazy. Vector because they didn't ask me a question, and sempai notice me.Is this the part where I start actually trying, or should I just wait until it's socially acceptable to vote myself like you in a desperate attempt at... I don't know if that sentence has an ending.
Always nice to meet a fan.
What about Vector and Maximum Spin has drawn your animosity? Vector's actually posting MORE than usual, and Maximum Spin...eh.
Maximum Spin based entirely on the premise that I think they're trying to coast by keeping their vote on me and simultaneously I don't want to have to unvote and vote someone else because I'm lazy.I know you did that on purpose, so I'm just going to laugh.
I do everything on purpose except win. That's by accident.Maximum Spin based entirely on the premise that I think they're trying to coast by keeping their vote on me and simultaneously I don't want to have to unvote and vote someone else because I'm lazy.I know you did that on purpose, so I'm just going to laugh.
Roden: given there's a load of D1 copclaims, should town lynch today?@NJW2000: What is the point with these questions?
EuchreJack: has anyone in this game already told a lie?
Vector: if you found out you were vanilla town this round, would you be likely to play a gambit?I have pertinent information that will likely get me killed if I reveal it but puts me at a disadvantage regardless, since revealing it is also helpful in narrowing down potential suspects, and, like, I'm gonna get killed tonight anyway, LOL.Is insisting you'll die N1 the bay12 meta or something?
But, I'll wait until everyone posts at least once.
That sounds about right for my role. I should clarify that I'm not Compulsive, so going by the wiki I should have a choice about whether or not I go through with it.I can't choose my target at night, only my Captain can. I don't think they should claim today though, I want to see who they force me to target tonight.Does the captaincy thing work roughly like this (https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Captain)?
If so, rather than be completely passive, have you considered publically stating a handful of targets you'd be willing to jail, and refusing to action people outside of that?
Jailor is an important role. I don't particularly like the idea of a claimed jailor getting to hide behind a captaincy restriction, or a potentially scum captain mucking about with the town's jailor.
What is with this behavior? You didn't react to me here (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8321510#msg8321510) and you're being evasive with everyone in general.@Vector and Max: Do you have active or passive roles? Are you willing to full claim?I thought I already did. I mean, I wasn't subtle about it.
I'm not willing to be more direct at this moment. But there isn't a whole lot more direct to be.
I apologize, that was more towards Webadict only wanting to focus on Vector and Maximum Spin, but made no mention of Jack who hadn't posted yet. It seemed weird to me that he would omit Jack without even having a read.Where is Jack?I imagine even EuchreJack may sometimes go twelve hours without posting to bay12.
Somebody is lying about their protective role, as I am a Bodyguard. But then again, I have no idea what this Captain BS is about, so maybe I'm the only one that doesn't have to answer to anyone to use my ability.I agree. I think there's one, and likely only one, mafia inside Roden/Web/Jack.
Pure statistics time!This reasoning is bad. Do you agree?
We are in our 3rd game.
Round 1 mafia were: EuchreJack and Vector
Round 2 mafia were: Tricmagic and Roden
Town for both games were: Toonyman, NJW2000, and Met
New players are: Maximum Spin and Webadict.
Between Toonyman and NJW2000, one of them is "due" to be mafia, so I'd suggest they deserve "extra scrutiny". They're probably paired with someone else, as it would be unfair to put them both on the scum team, to be outed by Math Alone.
wordsWow you're being cocky as shit. I can't tell if this is deliberate or not to look town.
What is with this behavior? You didn't react to me here (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8321510#msg8321510) and you're being evasive with everyone in general.I only answer questions I find interesting! What was I even supposed to say to that? I put my vote wherever I think it does the most good, that's all. That said, I don't think I'm being evasive, I just have a certain conversational style.
Where does this playful confidence stem from?We haven't interacted too much, have we? This is just me.
What is with this behavior? You didn't react to me here (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8321510#msg8321510) and you're being evasive with everyone in general.I only answer questions I find interesting! What was I even supposed to say to that? I put my vote wherever I think it does the most good, that's all. That said, I don't think I'm being evasive, I just have a certain conversational style.QuoteWhere does this playful confidence stem from?We haven't interacted too much, have we? This is just me.
I agree completely with webadict which means he's probably mafia, so vote stands.
How do I agree with your votes and cases if I don't understand them?It's d1, I don't even have a case! Honestly, I prefer d1-no-lynch because there's no real data until someone gets killed, but that doesn't play well here, so I settle for lynching somebody for no better reason than to have data and watch the rope sway.
What does that mean? What do you agree with? Why does that make them probably mafia?Man I don't even remember, do you always read this much into things? Okay, checking back, what I was agreeing with was that TM was going off into crazyland, which is known town TM behaviour. I didn't say that outright because I didn't want to be insulting. That probably making weber mafia was just meant as a jokey way to say that I wasn't moving my vote just yet, with the implication that anyone who seems reasonable in this game is probably mafia. In reality, it didn't have any effect on my vote, but I felt I should convey that I wasn't just leaving my vote in place out of sheer inattention.
@Jack:Somebody is lying about their protective role, as I am a Bodyguard. But then again, I have no idea what this Captain BS is about, so maybe I'm the only one that doesn't have to answer to anyone to use my ability.I agree. I think there's one, and likely only one, mafia inside Roden/Web/Jack.Pure statistics time!This reasoning is bad. Do you agree?
We are in our 3rd game.
Round 1 mafia were: EuchreJack and Vector
Round 2 mafia were: Tricmagic and Roden
Town for both games were: Toonyman, NJW2000, and Met
New players are: Maximum Spin and Webadict.
Between Toonyman and NJW2000, one of them is "due" to be mafia, so I'd suggest they deserve "extra scrutiny". They're probably paired with someone else, as it would be unfair to put them both on the scum team, to be outed by Math Alone.
Jack is suspicious to me
That sounds about right for my role. I should clarify that I'm not Compulsive, so going by the wiki I should have a choice about whether or not I go through with it.I can't choose my target at night, only my Captain can. I don't think they should claim today though, I want to see who they force me to target tonight.Does the captaincy thing work roughly like this (https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Captain)?
If so, rather than be completely passive, have you considered publically stating a handful of targets you'd be willing to jail, and refusing to action people outside of that?
Jailor is an important role. I don't particularly like the idea of a claimed jailor getting to hide behind a captaincy restriction, or a potentially scum captain mucking about with the town's jailor.
I plan to Jail Web and only Web. If the Captain ever chooses anyone else, that is a confirmed scum claim and we should always vote them out if they ever try to make me target otherwise. As it is, Web and I are likely priority targets tonight, and Jailing either Cop would be detrimental.
I had an idea about having the Captain also having the Doc randomly target one of the Cops, which forces scum to spin the wheel and hope they don't pick a protected target, but going by the wiki the Captain apparently knows which roles they can command. So the Captain already knows Web's real role, and if they're scum then Web's role claim gambit won't do anything.
We still found the mafia in Round 2, but I found it significantly harder.How do I agree with your votes and cases if I don't understand them?It's d1, I don't even have a case! Honestly, I prefer d1-no-lynch because there's no real data until someone gets killed, but that doesn't play well here, so I settle for lynching somebody for no better reason than to have data and watch the rope sway.
Yes. It's important.QuoteWhat does that mean? What do you agree with? Why does that make them probably mafia?Man I don't even remember, do you always read this much into things?
Okay, checking back, what I was agreeing with was that TM was going off into crazyland, which is known town TM behaviour. I didn't say that outright because I didn't want to be insulting. That probably making weber mafia was just meant as a jokey way to say that I wasn't moving my vote just yet, with the implication that anyone who seems reasonable in this game is probably mafia. In reality, it didn't have any effect on my vote, but I felt I should convey that I wasn't just leaving my vote in place out of sheer inattention.Got it. Web thinks Tric is town and you stuck a vote on Web as a joke, although I don't think Web has been reasonable at all this round so far.
Hehehe, town would be in trouble if true.This reasoning is bad. Do you agree?I'll admit, it is a dangerous line of reasoning, as random means random, and it can lead to us clearing players we shouldn't be clearing. But...it'll be your turn sometime Toonyman. You're not going to get through the entire tournament without rolling mafia.
I'll believe that if you die. Bodyguard is pretty easy to fake and I do think there's too many protection roles like you said.Jack is suspicious to mePromise to feel a bit bad when I die N1 protecting you, alright?
Seriously, not sure its even worthwhile this round. I'm going to die protecting you N1 (I have to, you're the claimed Cop), then watch the remainder of the game from the sidelines. We don't even have a dead chat for me and the other dead to spectate!
please kill meIs name calling really necessary, Netfanatic? You think you're so good you can prophesize the mafia team without doing any work?
---Starting discussion. Why, didn't want to answer yours?
@NJW2000: What is the point with these questions?
A bit suspicious that NJW2000 hasn't voted yet. They usually throw one out by now...I can't tell if you're genuinely trying to make me feel under pressure, but put that in red if you actually want to do that.
A reminder, claimed parity cop. NJW, what is this nonsense? As well as town-reading Roden for claiming bodyguard early on. That's not a bad claim to have..
Wait, getting stuff mixed up.. Roden claimed he has a captain and is a Jailkeeper. Jack being a Bodyguard, along with two known towncops. And another captain-led in Web.(Apparently.) ...That's 5 out of 8 roles known if we take us all to be town. As well as the Captain being Mafia.
Still means Max's Commuter claim(6 roles now, though he wasn't exactly concise, just joking.) is suspicious. Might be a compulsive commutter to add suspicion, could just be un-targetable mafia.
Also, Town should always lynch in this scenario. So long as it isn't one of the COP CLAIMS! Or the bodyguard/jailer claims. Or the captain-power claims. So just one of you three. Pick one.
You should probably protect Toony Jack, I'm not that valuable to the endgame. So proved last round, if not the first. (The chances of me dying N1 seem slim. I don't remember the last time it happened. I'm just too lynchable.)
I'm of the opinion that the push on web was led by Mafia right now. Otherwise a hammer could have been all too easy. Especially if it was Vector. So a Vector/Max team today.
No objection to the 24 hour extension requested by Vector.Not off work yet but also agree.
Hey, I was there for the endgame of Roguelike 6.You should probably protect Toony Jack, I'm not that valuable to the endgame. So proved last round, if not the first. (The chances of me dying N1 seem slim. I don't remember the last time it happened. I'm just too lynchable.)Eh, you won at least one endgame for town without Toonyman (Roguelike mafia), and you're a Parity Cop, which means after you inspect me, and I flip town upon death, you graduate Police Academy and become a Real Cop. So you're actually more useful than Toonyman on N2. Roden should know by their N2 orders and the N2 kill whether their captain is town or mafia, so the survival of both you and Toonyman till N2 is critical.
I'm of the opinion that the push on web was led by Mafia right now. Otherwise a hammer could have been all too easy. Especially if it was Vector. So a Vector/Max team today.
If we have a Town Vigilante who can only kill if given orders by a Captain, I would humbly suggest Not Killing, as knowing our devious GM FallacyofUrist, pulling that string by a Mafia Captain might be the mafia's only NK.There's no way it's 3 mafia. Even two mafia plus ally seems like too much.
Also, we should consider with 8 players that the mafia team might be more than 2 mafia. Maybe not 3 full mafia, but probably a 3rd player that can win with mafia somehow. We won't know until it is over.
and you stuck a vote on Web as a jokeNo, no, I stuck a vote on Web because I wanted to vote for him. Then I made a joke about it. These are different things.
Max seems to be someone who likes people to read them carefully, see Kurt Cobain reference somewhere above.I don't think reading into things and reading something carefully mean the same thing. The Kurt Cobain reference is absolutely a good example of this: while it did need to be read carefully, it also was not meant, and nobody seems to have taken it, as a signal of any deeper meaning or reasoning than a quick throwaway joke. Also, I am only one person.
@Max: What are your thoughts on the Captain situation? Do you believe Web is going to die tonight?I have no opinion on the second question. I don't generally go around believing things. Regarding the captain: I'm not convinced that there is one. If there is one, either the two, uh, becaptained individuals are probably mafia, or the captain is, or both. If there isn't one, then they definitely are. Frankly, it could easily be a claim intended to generate suspicion, like it clearly did with TM, who instantly concluded that I must be the captain for... some... reason.
Hi, I'd like to ask for an extension of 24 hours due to RL. Check my post history if you need deets.Extending would really suck for me but it's whatever. Although I couldn't find anything that looked like a reason. It's not like there really needs to be a reason anyway, but you did say there was a reason, so if you want people to know the reason could you elaborate?
Sorry for the crappy posting y'all. I want to get some substantial posts out today but I'm not feeling, shall we say, very well.
NJW2000, because townreading Roden is outside of your meta. Plus, following your advice. :PDo you believe NJW is unnaturally townreading Roden after playing 3 rounds in a row with them?
Yes. I actually thought most of NJW's reads were nonsense, but the townreading of Roden was unnatural, whereas the remainder seemed more typical NJW.NJW2000, because townreading Roden is outside of your meta. Plus, following your advice. :PDo you believe NJW is unnaturally townreading Roden after playing 3 rounds in a row with them?
NJW2000, because townreading Roden is outside of your meta. Plus, following your advice. :PGood. Now that there's pressure, use it by asking a question.
A reminder, claimed parity cop. NJW, what is this nonsense?It looks like an OMGUS bandwagon vote.
---Starting discussion. Why, didn't want to answer yours?
@NJW2000: What is the point with these questions?A bit suspicious that NJW2000 hasn't voted yet. They usually throw one out by now...I can't tell if you're genuinely trying to make me feel under pressure, but put that in red if you actually want to do that.
UNspoiler=readslist
EuchreJack: has claimed bodyguard, a bit hyper, steady engagement, using the gambler's fallacy... with EJ all signs point toTown.
Roden: active, claimed their role and its restrictions promptly which mafia might not want to do, lean town
Claimed controlled by captain, but NJW didn't think this worth repeating?!-EJ
Webadict: a load of random toss, but shying away from any real explicit claims in favour of "ah but I could be lying to draw the lynch". If they're scum, they can't be on particularly good terms with their scumbuddy, but hey. Null read.
Toonyman: strong engagement with the game. I don't know their scum game but imagine it's pretty powerful from their performance this tournament, so all this indicates is null.
Vector: only two posts with content, doesn't respond to questions, random votes, standard Vector D1. Throwing three votes in three posts feels a bit odd. Weak lean scum
MaximumSpin: Apparently doesn't think you really find scum D1 (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8321606#msg8321606), actions reflect that belief. Asking if Toony reads into things a lot is a bit dubious, because a) we're playing mafia and b) Max seems to be someone who likes people to read them carefully, see Kurt Cobain reference somewhere above. Lean scum.
TricMagic: claimed parity cop D1, going after easy targets of Web and Max, claimed parity cop D1, claimsthinks mafia might do a no-warning hammer D1 (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8321686#msg8321686), did I mention that they claimed parity cop D1? Even for Tric's early-claim meta, that claim cannot be townie. Scum
Also, pretty sure someone is lying about the captain thing.
TricMagic, for reasons stated in readslist.
NJW2000, because townreading Roden is outside of your meta. Plus, following your advice. :PGood. Now that there's pressure, use it by asking a question.
OK, so Tric is town and Web is a dumbass, what's new ... Unvote.A dumbass townie.
I think I'd like to see more from MaximumSpin and NJW. I agree with that vibe.
Although to be fair Web feels like they're lying out of their ass which mucks things up, but whatever.I lie about a lot of things because I'm actually sending secret messages to the captain.
@Webadict:... Yes? Is that not believable?please kill meIs name calling really necessary, Netfanatic? You think you're so good you can prophesize the mafia team without doing any work?
TricMagic: claimed parity cop D1, going after easy targets of Web and Max, claimed parity cop D1, claimsthinks mafia might do a no-warning hammer D1 (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8321686#msg8321686), did I mention that they claimed parity cop D1? Even for Tric's early-claim meta, that claim cannot be townie. ScumPick again. It's not Tric.
TricMagic, for reasons stated in readslist.
Webadict: a load of random toss, but shying away from any real explicit claims in favour of "ah but I could be lying to draw the lynch". If they're scum, they can't be on particularly good terms with their scumbuddy, but hey. Null read.It's pretty easy to do whatever you want when you're not constrained by things like alignment or scumbuddies. I'm free as Town.
Extending would really suck for me but it's whatever. Although I couldn't find anything that looked like a reason. It's not like there really needs to be a reason anyway, but you did say there was a reason, so if you want people to know the reason could you elaborate?
I don't really *want* people to know the reason per se, it's pretty embarrassing to have a disability like this. But it's common knowledge on some level in the subforum, so there you are.Well, you certainly didn't have to explain, I wasn't about to push. But I do appreciate being told, thank you.
I think their read of Roden is accurate and surprisingly unstubborn of NJW. I'm not sure if a mafia!NJW would try to stand out like that.Yes. I actually thought most of NJW's reads were nonsense, but the townreading of Roden was unnatural, whereas the remainder seemed more typical NJW.NJW2000, because townreading Roden is outside of your meta. Plus, following your advice. :PDo you believe NJW is unnaturally townreading Roden after playing 3 rounds in a row with them?
stuffYou're a logical person, yes? There is no good reason to lynch one of our cops on D1. If Tric is telling the truth we have a good, mechanical source of info. Even if Tric is bullshitting we'll be able to figure it out down the line. There's even two cop claims so we'll likely draw the fire from mafia and it should make it bleedingly obvious whether this captain player is working with town or not too.
Likewise, one of the first things he says after that, he's not the captain.Tric.
Also, if you were paying attention NJW, I did that because I figured two cops with with our abilities makes sense to work together. We can't just nail Mafia to the wall like a normal cop, we are a bit slower. And sense Toony claimed first, I figure he's town. And if I'm town, that also Toony is town to you guys. Funny how you didn't even bother to make that connection, my death means toony is town, ergo one doesn't need to use protection for me, they can protect him instead. Cause the moment I'm nightkilled Toony is cleared. And if he says someone does or doesn't have a gun, that's enough to believe him.
...Sure, got it.Although to be fair Web feels like they're lying out of their ass which mucks things up, but whatever.I lie about a lot of things because I'm actually sending secret messages to the captain.
You've done nothing but spin your wheels today.I don't RVS.
And yet, you're still voting for me, so those wheels keep on spinning.You've done nothing but spin your wheels today.I don't RVS.
I actually voted Skip so that you'd have a reasonable excuse to do so. Why won't you take that road?Because I consider keeping my vote on you the best source of information in the near term.
And what information have you gotten out of it? I don't buy it. (Or webadict saying I'm cleared if Toony dies, that sounds like a bad setup to a punchline.)I've gotten a lot of information in the form of weights on a directed graph. "If X flips Y, then A is more likely to be B". For an insignificant example that shouldn't disrupt the graph too much, if you are mafia, Vector is more likely to be mafia.
If Tric is Mafia, we're all fucked, so that doesn't particularly help.And what information have you gotten out of it? I don't buy it. (Or webadict saying I'm cleared if Toony dies, that sounds like a bad setup to a punchline.)I've gotten a lot of information in the form of weights on a directed graph. "If X flips Y, then A is more likely to be B". For an insignificant example that shouldn't disrupt the graph too much, if you are mafia, Vector is more likely to be mafia.
I don't see how continuing to vote me provided you that info, so if you'd like to explain that, then, please, be my guest.You misunderstand. I chose an example that does not relate to you to illustrate the concept.
Hey Maximum Spin, we have this thing called Reads Lists that let everyone see your awesome graphs of player alignment, you could even skip ahead to the connections thingy we do Day 2. Might even select players and ask "hey which of these is most likely scum".doooooooooon't care
How many votes are on you again?
@Jack:I think their read of Roden is accurate and surprisingly unstubborn of NJW. I'm not sure if a mafia!NJW would try to stand out like that.Yes. I actually thought most of NJW's reads were nonsense, but the townreading of Roden was unnatural, whereas the remainder seemed more typical NJW.NJW2000, because townreading Roden is outside of your meta. Plus, following your advice. :PDo you believe NJW is unnaturally townreading Roden after playing 3 rounds in a row with them?
I think NJW's read of Tric is ass, which does not appear to be an uncommon opinion either. Town!Tric would absolutely claim Parity Cop immediately. To add to that, I agree with Tric's suspicion of Maximum Spin and also that the Web wagon likely has mafia on it. I think it's possible NJW is mafia, but it's not a first pick at all.
Hey Maximum Spin, we have this thing called Reads Lists that let everyone see your awesome graphs of player alignment, you could even skip ahead to the connections thingy we do Day 2. Might even select players and ask "hey which of these is most likely scum".doooooooooon't care
How many votes are on you again?
Based on my role and what people have been claiming I believe there is a town false-positive and a mafia false-negative for my inspect. I think Tric is my town false-positive since he claimed so readily and willingly.
There are downsides with both of our inspections, however we should be able to narrow down suspects with our results combined.
His claim came before mine here, so no. Please go ahead and protect him, cause if he ends up dead, I'm blaming you Jack.Based on my role and what people have been claiming I believe there is a town false-positive and a mafia false-negative for my inspect. I think Tric is my town false-positive since he claimed so readily and willingly.
There are downsides with both of our inspections, however we should be able to narrow down suspects with our results combined.
Hm, I find this suspicious. Feels like too much information. I'm starting to wonder if Toonyman might be mafia claiming gunsmith cop to justify knowing town from mafia.
Just something to think about later on, after I'm dead.
That is not a good attitude here. Seriously, you should absolutely be finding a case or sharing info, OR show how what you're doing is useful.Hey Maximum Spin, we have this thing called Reads Lists that let everyone see your awesome graphs of player alignment, you could even skip ahead to the connections thingy we do Day 2. Might even select players and ask "hey which of these is most likely scum".doooooooooon't care
How many votes are on you again?
We've seen in past games that the scum team will get town-sounding roles to help them blend in. If Toony is scum, I think a mafia Gunsmith would exist to find a hidden Vig. But that's just post flip game spec, just something to keep in mind for now.Based on my role and what people have been claiming I believe there is a town false-positive and a mafia false-negative for my inspect. I think Tric is my town false-positive since he claimed so readily and willingly.
There are downsides with both of our inspections, however we should be able to narrow down suspects with our results combined.
Hm, I find this suspicious. Feels like too much information. I'm starting to wonder if Toonyman might be mafia claiming gunsmith cop to justify knowing town from mafia.
Just something to think about later on, after I'm dead.
You really don't get how my gambit works. I say that I'm going to protect either you or Toonyman, using a RNG to choose. Thus, you are both protected, since mafia has to risk 50% of not getting their kill in order to hit either of you. Mafia can of course take those odds, if they wish, but its a sub-optimal play. It would be better for them to eliminate me so I can't do the same thing tomorrow. Or pick off someone else that they read as uber-town.His claim came before mine here, so no. Please go ahead and protect him, cause if he ends up dead, I'm blaming you Jack.Based on my role and what people have been claiming I believe there is a town false-positive and a mafia false-negative for my inspect. I think Tric is my town false-positive since he claimed so readily and willingly.
There are downsides with both of our inspections, however we should be able to narrow down suspects with our results combined.
Hm, I find this suspicious. Feels like too much information. I'm starting to wonder if Toonyman might be mafia claiming gunsmith cop to justify knowing town from mafia.
Just something to think about later on, after I'm dead.
I don't know the vote count and don't want to accidentally hammer, so everyone should consider my vote to spiritually be on Max. They're purposely choosing not to be helpful, and I'm not really sure what their game plan is supposed to be if they're town.I'm only one person, and I am definitely trying to be helpful, moreso than at least two or three names here. But I'm not going to play stupid games to win stupid prizes, and I'm not going to change my vote if I think my vote is in the right place just because of "pressure".
@Maximum Spin: How many games of mafia have you played? On this forum?In order, bunches, like 4 I think not including running one, I am not a jester or trying to pretend to be one.
Need to know if you're just Newbie Townie or impersonating a Jester.
You are exerting no pressure on me, so it's not a pressure vote. You aren't asking me any questions, so it's not exploratory.Let me make this clear. I literally do not believe in either of those things. "Pressure" isn't real, and asking dumbass questions is "playing stupid games". I am not playing any kind of game, I am voting for the person I want lynched. I want you lynched because then I will have information. That is all.
'Then I will have information. That is all.' Quite the statement to make when you should be picking up info from interactions between people and keeping it in your head for future days. Not looking at things, or sharing, can mess you up something fierce. Just ask Toony about last game. If no-one dies, where will your information be then?You are exerting no pressure on me, so it's not a pressure vote. You aren't asking me any questions, so it's not exploratory.Let me make this clear. I literally do not believe in either of those things. "Pressure" isn't real, and asking dumbass questions is "playing stupid games". I am not playing any kind of game, I am voting for the person I want lynched. I want you lynched because then I will have information. That is all.
You almost have an explanation. Now you need a deeper explanation into why. Do you think I'm suspicious? Do you think I'm unreadable? Do you have a reason to want me dead? What information will be obtained? What information do you have now? Do you have a way to entice other people to your cause?You are exerting no pressure on me, so it's not a pressure vote. You aren't asking me any questions, so it's not exploratory.Let me make this clear. I literally do not believe in either of those things. "Pressure" isn't real, and asking dumbass questions is "playing stupid games". I am not playing any kind of game, I am voting for the person I want lynched. I want you lynched because then I will have information. That is all.
You pretend like pressure isn't real, but if you actually believed that and what you are saying, you wouldn't be answering my questions.I'm not answering your questions because of "pressure", I'm answering them because I have nothing better to do right now and I don't like seeing people be stupid.
It's more so because you don't even want to share your reads. Even if you don't want to write out a list, I don't really see a progression with your posts where I could pin point what you think of everyone else. At most, we know you suspect Web, and it's implied you think Vector and I are also scummy since you don't believe the Captain info. But not all three of us can be scum, so I ultimately don't know what you actually think of anyone besides Web.I don't know the vote count and don't want to accidentally hammer, so everyone should consider my vote to spiritually be on Max. They're purposely choosing not to be helpful, and I'm not really sure what their game plan is supposed to be if they're town.I'm only one person, and I am definitely trying to be helpful, moreso than at least two or three names here. But I'm not going to play stupid games to win stupid prizes, and I'm not going to change my vote if I think my vote is in the right place just because of "pressure".
Why Jack specifically? As one of the protector roles.. I agree with NJW being a good person to pressure, though keeping my vote on Max.I don't actually disagree about looking more into Jack. I thought the statistics post he made earlier was kinda sketchy, and I'm not confident that he's playing into his usual town meta. I understand that he feels half-hearted about this game since his only role is to die, so I don't scum read him for his tone. But if we can figure out his alignment today, it'll make your Parity check on him tonight a lot easier to understand.
It's more so because you don't even want to share your reads. Even if you don't want to write out a list, I don't really see a progression with your posts where I could pin point what you think of everyone else. At most, we know you suspect Web, and it's implied you think Vector and I are also scummy since you don't believe the Captain info. But not all three of us can be scum, so I ultimately don't know what you actually think of anyone besides Web.That's because I don't think of everyone else. What I mean is I don't have a list of reads, that doesn't exist, I just have this big web of connections, and I don't want to share them yet. You are wrong to think I suspect Web, you, or Victor. You are also wrong to think I specifically "don't believe the Captain info" - I am neutral on it.
Question: Why townread Roden even though Roden is "one of the two" discussing being under a Captain's thumb?I have no idea who you're quoting when you say ' "one of the two" ', but I'll assume the marks got in there by accident or it's scare quotes or something. I townread Roden because... he's been reasonably active pushing discussion forward, I wouldn't expect scum to immediately claim a jailor role and the captaincy thing because that information is likely useful to town in many ways and has a high chance of catching out Scum if they claim or fakeclaim it. So what I said, basically. Maybe that's not really answering your question, in which case rephrase it and I'll try again.
Everyone else: Could Maximum Spin be too scummy to be scum?No, because that's not possible. I'm not saying he's lockscum, but nobody is ever too scummy to be scum, that's WIFOM at best.
The last place I played we had a consistent d1 no-lynch rule put in place by a good friend whose brain works basically the same as mine.Unrelated to the game at hand, why did you leave to play here?
Unrelated to the game at hand, why did you leave to play here?Most of the players either left over time or literally died. It was a pretty high average age.
Look, I'm going to be really, really nice, just this once.Unfortunately, I'm the shittiest rookie mind-reader there is, which is why you need to take this nookie and highchair. Give me a sec, I'm setting the mood, and I'm sort of done dealing with your attitude.
If you lynch me, and I flip town (which I will), will you be any closer to figuring out who is mafia? Will you have gained anything, or just move on to your next best suspects?
What I want to do is lynch the person whose flip will most narrow down the suspects, regardless of what it is. I have been clear on this many times in the past.
I understand that your poorly-thought-out reaction results from never having read any of the games I was in before. I thought you had even been in some of them, but maybe I'm misremembering. So, I'd assumed originally that you were more informed than you clearly are. Therefore, even though you are being obnoxious and don't deserve help, I am going to explain.
There are three key sources of certain information in the game: death flips, investigative results, and choices of action targets, especially from mafia actions. Until we have one of those things, reads are meaningless. It's just a bunch of uncollapsed wavefunctions. For example, Tric is either town OR mafia with an experienced partner OR [...]. (There are weights on all the ORs, but that's not relevant to the point.) Until some of those wavefunctions collapse, I don't want to even try to explain them, for a few reasons, the most important of which is that they change when observed.
Being asked a bunch of dumbass questions completely kills my interest in participating, because not only do I not have answers, my brain does not even work that way. You might as well ask me whether green. "Do [I] think [you're] suspicious", I think everyone's suspicious, not even just in the game.
Oh good, I am cut off by a post that's actually useful and interesting.It's more so because you don't even want to share your reads. Even if you don't want to write out a list, I don't really see a progression with your posts where I could pin point what you think of everyone else. At most, we know you suspect Web, and it's implied you think Vector and I are also scummy since you don't believe the Captain info. But not all three of us can be scum, so I ultimately don't know what you actually think of anyone besides Web.That's because I don't think of everyone else. What I mean is I don't have a list of reads, that doesn't exist, I just have this big web of connections, and I don't want to share them yet. You are wrong to think I suspect Web, you, or Victor. You are also wrong to think I specifically "don't believe the Captain info" - I am neutral on it.
Ultimately that is the big difference in how I play this game and also, honestly, 95% of life. I am neutral on things until I have information. So no, you're right, I can't contribute a hell of a lot d1. D1 is this annoying dead zone for me that I just want to get through as quickly as possible without doing too much damage. The last place I played we had a consistent d1 no-lynch rule put in place by a good friend whose brain works basically the same as mine. That was great, but I'm under no illusions that it will happen here, so I try to parse who will split the web best. I'm not even trying to "catch scum" d1, honestly, I just want to split the web so I know where scum are. I don't believe in trying to mind-read people, that's rookie shit.
And also, just, basically, don't try to read into what I say. I am really a very direct person. If I suspect somebody I will say "I suspect [x] of being mafia", not hint at it. My policy is radical honesty.
Claps. Even if wedadict is mafia, he's got style. Let's see Max Spin, how many miles?Look, I'm going to be really, really nice, just this once.Unfortunately, I'm the shittiest rookie mind-reader there is, which is why you need to take this nookie and highchair. Give me a sec, I'm setting the mood, and I'm sort of done dealing with your attitude.
If you lynch me, and I flip town (which I will), will you be any closer to figuring out who is mafia? Will you have gained anything, or just move on to your next best suspects?
What I want to do is lynch the person whose flip will most narrow down the suspects, regardless of what it is. I have been clear on this many times in the past.
I understand that your poorly-thought-out reaction results from never having read any of the games I was in before. I thought you had even been in some of them, but maybe I'm misremembering. So, I'd assumed originally that you were more informed than you clearly are. Therefore, even though you are being obnoxious and don't deserve help, I am going to explain.
There are three key sources of certain information in the game: death flips, investigative results, and choices of action targets, especially from mafia actions. Until we have one of those things, reads are meaningless. It's just a bunch of uncollapsed wavefunctions. For example, Tric is either town OR mafia with an experienced partner OR [...]. (There are weights on all the ORs, but that's not relevant to the point.) Until some of those wavefunctions collapse, I don't want to even try to explain them, for a few reasons, the most important of which is that they change when observed.
Being asked a bunch of dumbass questions completely kills my interest in participating, because not only do I not have answers, my brain does not even work that way. You might as well ask me whether green. "Do [I] think [you're] suspicious", I think everyone's suspicious, not even just in the game.
Oh good, I am cut off by a post that's actually useful and interesting.It's more so because you don't even want to share your reads. Even if you don't want to write out a list, I don't really see a progression with your posts where I could pin point what you think of everyone else. At most, we know you suspect Web, and it's implied you think Vector and I are also scummy since you don't believe the Captain info. But not all three of us can be scum, so I ultimately don't know what you actually think of anyone besides Web.That's because I don't think of everyone else. What I mean is I don't have a list of reads, that doesn't exist, I just have this big web of connections, and I don't want to share them yet. You are wrong to think I suspect Web, you, or Victor. You are also wrong to think I specifically "don't believe the Captain info" - I am neutral on it.
Ultimately that is the big difference in how I play this game and also, honestly, 95% of life. I am neutral on things until I have information. So no, you're right, I can't contribute a hell of a lot d1. D1 is this annoying dead zone for me that I just want to get through as quickly as possible without doing too much damage. The last place I played we had a consistent d1 no-lynch rule put in place by a good friend whose brain works basically the same as mine. That was great, but I'm under no illusions that it will happen here, so I try to parse who will split the web best. I'm not even trying to "catch scum" d1, honestly, I just want to split the web so I know where scum are. I don't believe in trying to mind-read people, that's rookie shit.
And also, just, basically, don't try to read into what I say. I am really a very direct person. If I suspect somebody I will say "I suspect [x] of being mafia", not hint at it. My policy is radical honesty.
You're a quarter right, but you might forget that you've kinda got seven other people to let in on your plans to defeat me, man, but hey, I guess you can keep playing like your hands-up. Stand up, band up, take another chance, up until you finally die, my guy, you can give it a try, and that's why I'm telling you to stop being shy.
Obviously, the pressure works, and our quirk of getting you to finally spill the beans for the peons isn't just a free con, almost feels like I've got my pleats on, but I don't yet. Let's pretend (before we descend into insanity) that you actually see the benefits of going after me. And if that's the case, then you'll need a case (and as such I want to see you face debasement.)
I couldn't really care about your life philosophy, since you're playing a game based on sophistry. Show me why I'm wrong, play along, or get stronger, cuz I'm not gonna take your shit any longer.
Executing me would be a misstep, and quite a let down, mostly because the mafia wants my crown and life, a much better trade would be the NPC, who couldn't see why working together would really help our plight. But if that's the case, I'd have to commend, that you might've unintentionally defended yourself, which is what the entire point of our strife was.
Thus, you'll plainly see, Mr. Maximum Spin, that I've started this entire post with a win-dow into your soul, trolling for your thoughts from an empty bowl. I know you're hungry, but give me a minute, I just wanted to take this whole game for a spin-it.
You'll notice, perhaps, how little I care for there to be a barely believable theory in your weary letters, and to do you one better, I made this reply a mood setter and extraordinarily wry. Why, because I needed one of us to try, and it might let finally eat some humble pie.
But, unlikely, because, as I said before, your words frankly bore me, a chore to read and refute them a second more. But, here I am (as I was before) ready to drop you and the mic to the floor.
Let's start with the meaningless: the reading list. We can't take your word until you have a track record. On the other hand, you've got the rest of us, bound by noose and sword, and you aren't heeding shit that we give you's.
If you can't answer a simple question, at what hest can we just send our in best men in to get done in? If I were to follow you, it'd be awful, and we'd wallow in the maws of the Mafia.
Contribute what you can and develop a style, because I don't think you understand you're on trial.
1) We aren't executing Tric unless you have the hardest of proofs. It's not happening, and you're wrong if you think Tric is scum.Question: Why townread Roden even though Roden is "one of the two" discussing being under a Captain's thumb?I have no idea who you're quoting when you say ' "one of the two" ', but I'll assume the marks got in there by accident or it's scare quotes or something. I townread Roden because... he's been reasonably active pushing discussion forward, I wouldn't expect scum to immediately claim a jailor role and the captaincy thing because that information is likely useful to town in many ways and has a high chance of catching out Scum if they claim or fakeclaim it. So what I said, basically. Maybe that's not really answering your question, in which case rephrase it and I'll try again.
Ok, not even a desultory gesture towards a Tric lynch, we're just letting players build up a meta for scum-sided play on the assumption that they're easily read. No way that could go wrong.
Webadict: very precisely, what's the rationale for your desire to lynch Max? I don't mean in terms of his behaviour, I mean in terms of how it affects the likelihood of you winning the game.
Hi, I'm stabilized. I need to get back up to speed but ask me whatever you want, grill the shit out of me. I'm good to go 8)Hey Vector, are you Mafia? If you had to pick a flavor of ice cream from the following list, which would you choose:
2) The quotes are because there's THREE people with Captain claims, when you said there were two. Also, Roden is very likely Town as well, so there's no worries there.Show me where I said this or I'm going to have to assume you prioritise frequent posting over actually reading the thread.
Nah. If I got it wrong, someone else said it, but I don't really care because it's not important. I just explained why it was quoted. Don't pop a blood vessel. You should consider wasting your time and energy on other things, like posting frequently and rap battling.2) The quotes are because there's THREE people with Captain claims, when you said there were two. Also, Roden is very likely Town as well, so there's no worries there.Show me where I said this or I'm going to have to assume you prioritise frequent posting over actually reading the thread.
I'm not even gonna read that.You never were going to because your playstyle relies on computational analysis, and as such, I am likely your worst nightmare. I will never tell the truth to you, give partial facts, and always be whatever you think I'm not. I am the wild card, an unknown variable, mucking up the equation that you believe this game to be. Frankly, it's almost a good plan. It's just, you know, also illogical from your own point of view. Like you stated before, you believe that No Launch is the optimal D1 play, but that you've had to adjust your playstyle to match the meta here. But, honestly, that IS the logical move here. If you No Launch, then a player dies tonight and you can work with 7p instead of 8p. Not only that, but your plan also fails the rudimentary smell test, which is that you want to random launch, which would be 28% chance from a Town's perspective. If you performed this same feat Tomorrow, it'd be 33% chance, which is (if you weren't aware) higher. It'd also give you information to work with and would fit the odd-number of players test.
I am also back and similarly somewhat tired. I'll see what I can do about a votecount, since that seems useful right now.
In other news, Maximum Spin needs a replacement. I knew trying to run a bigger game was trying to tempt fate.
You never were going to because your playstyle relies on computational analysis,Wrong.
I am likely your worst nightmare.Wrong.
always be whatever you think I'm not.Wrong.
I am the wild card, an unknown variableWrong.
the equation that you believe this game to be.Wrong.
you believe that No Launch is the optimal D1 playWrong.
which is that you want to random launchWrong.
I am the player you will never be able to read.Wrong.
If I didn't exist, it'd probably be ToonyMan.Wrong. (It'd be EuchreJack.)
I'm sorry, I still don't understand. Who else said it, and why isn't it important? How did you explain why it was quoted?Nah. If I got it wrong, someone else said it, but I don't really care because it's not important. I just explained why it was quoted. Don't pop a blood vessel. You should consider wasting your time and energy on other things, like posting frequently and rap battling.2) The quotes are because there's THREE people with Captain claims, when you said there were two. Also, Roden is very likely Town as well, so there's no worries there.Show me where I said this or I'm going to have to assume you prioritise frequent posting over actually reading the thread.
Sorry, I actually don't know how to read or write, so if this makes any sense to you, it's entirely coincidental.
I also don't think you're a Gunsmith, though, but that okay. It's a good deflection, and I like it. In any case, I'll call you Town, and continue on my way.If you don't believe me then why am I town?
Hey Maximum Spin, we have this thing called Reads Lists that let everyone see your awesome graphs of player alignment, you could even skip ahead to the connections thingy we do Day 2. Might even select players and ask "hey which of these is most likely scum".This post rubs me the wrong way. Like kicking a man when he's down.
How many votes are on you again?
Hm, NJW's poor read of Tric is quite similar to NJW's usually poor read of Roden, in that NJW is essentially scumreading Tric for his claim in the same way that NJW usually scumreads Roden for their claim. Essentially, NJW has switched targets. This is actually quite useful to know!Exactly, I noticed this as well. NJW is usually pretty good, but always has a really bad take on one player.
I do have too much information, it's because of my role. Maybe instead of wondering you could press a case, while alive? Are you my speculative false-negative mafia Jack? Because that would explain why you subconciously felt the need to draw attention to my hypothesis.Based on my role and what people have been claiming I believe there is a town false-positive and a mafia false-negative for my inspect. I think Tric is my town false-positive since he claimed so readily and willingly.
There are downsides with both of our inspections, however we should be able to narrow down suspects with our results combined.
Hm, I find this suspicious. Feels like too much information. I'm starting to wonder if Toonyman might be mafia claiming gunsmith cop to justify knowing town from mafia.
Just something to think about later on, after I'm dead.
But, that's actually a fascinating stance. See, I could reasonably deduce that you might be Town from that stance. However, it could just as likely be that you're disgruntled Mafia. If you were Mafia, you'd be getting massive flak in Mafiachat, probs, so unless your buddy is ToonyMan or NJW (who appears to be trying their best to provide a bit of cover), that'd be the only logical pairing for me. EuchreJack... Maybe, but it seems a bit presumptuous. Really, I haven't seen enough Jack to know if they're really the trump suit or not, and Vector is technically possible. Tric and Roden are impossible. They can't be your scumbuddy because they're both Town.I agree with all of this. The rest of this post is town as fuck too. Crazy to see Web's difference in behavior when pressured and when not pressured.
@FallacyofUrist: Please just modkill Maximum Spin. If you don't, we know he's mafia that bailed before getting lynched. Yet we can't lynch, because new players are entitled to new consideration. A replacement now just adds further delay.I don't like this, at all. I was suspicious of Max for eagering wanting to kill Web for bad reasons, but I don't think the team can be Max/Jack (my top two suspects) because of your attitude here.
Ugh, whatever, I can do this. We both know you're not going to get a replacement. I'm still not reading that... whatever the hell that was, though. It rhymed.I will admit, I hadn't intended it to rhyme at first, but one of the first few lines did, and then it became a challenge to see how far I could take it.
Toonyman (0):
Roden (0):
TricMagic (1): NJW2000
EuchreJack (1): ToonyMan
NJW2000 (2): Vector, EuchreJack
Vector (1): Roden
webadict (1): Maximum Spin
Maximum Spin (1): TricMagic
No Execution (1): webadict
Not Voting (0):
5 to hammer.
@NJW2000: You are really stuck on something that doesn't matter.Nonetheless, talk me through it.
It's actually not on me to tell you anything about stuff that doesn't matter. It's on you to prove it's relevant, which you haven't. If anything, it feels like you're attempting to derail discussion. I'm actually going to take an opposite stance here: If the votes are tied at the end of the day, I will vote for someone.@NJW2000: You are really stuck on something that doesn't matter.Nonetheless, talk me through it.
Don't particularly think Jack is scum, but fair warning: I may vote him to tie the vote if Vector doesn't post before day-end. I don't think I can give town information by getting lynched by an AFK player and an OMGUS. I believe Max being like this is mostly NAI, but I also don't expect future interactions to be much more productive or less tiresome, so do think a Max lynch would be acceptably town-sided regardless. People have been pushing a "NJW defending Max" narrative, and will presumably see this as a swing, but I've seen Max's D1s before and he largely hasn't deviated from my expectations at all. Would like to see Vector post before I on a firm scumread for today.
It's actually not on me to tell you anything about stuff that doesn't matter. It's on you to prove it's relevant, which you haven't. If anything, it feels like you're attempting to derail discussion. I'm actually going to take an opposite stance here: If the votes are tied at the end of the day, I will vote for someone.So you posting incessantly but not actually bothering to read the thread is irrelevant? To me, it's an indication that someone's mafia.
I think a fun game we could play is to choose two people who would be the best to be tied to pick the loser of. If you want, we can have it be an unofficial one with no eliminations behind it. I'll go first: Maximum Spin or EuchreJack?There may be a clear and obvious meaning to "two people who would be the best to be tied to pick the loser of", and I'll gladly play along if I'm shown one, but right now I'm seeing nothing. Are we meant to pick the person who we'd like to lynch out of those two? Which of the two we'd like to break a tie?
\Hey Vector, are you Mafia? If you had to pick a flavor of ice cream from the following list, which would you choose:
a) Vanilla; b) Chocolate; c) I'm Mafia; or d) you'd invent a new type of ice cream made of half soy and half oat dairy-substitute.
This question is pointless because I actually want to hear your reads and maybe have your take on who's top suspect right now?
Thinks D1 lynches are pointless and stupid,That's not really accurate. I don't want to get into this all over again, but you've clearly misunderstood my whole point. I don't know how to explain it better. I despair.
moves discussion onto his theories about that,Believe me, I'd love to stop talking about that! I only go into it when some asshole gives me stick for not playing stupid RVS games. Hell, I tried to dodge talking about it for hours this time because I knew you would whine about it, but then people were like "weh weh you have to explain yourself". Make up your minds!
engages abrasively wherever possible,What, have you seen webadict? I dispute this altogether. I am engaging in the way I normally engage with people. I do come from a high-conflict culture, I'll give you that. My definition of "abrasive" might differ from yours.
refers to conditional judgements as "weights on a directed graph".well, they are.
StuffI see. I suppose the true mistake was that I actually spent 10 minutes searching for the post in question in a tired haze trying to reply to it before you mentioned it in your post because I wanted to point out that person was wrong, but it was after I had just woken up from a nap, and I literally lost the post somehow. I thought that it referred to another post entirely. You can see that as me not paying attention, but it was mostly just a mistake I wanted corrected and probably couldn't think properly on at the time.
Also, Mafia, plz no kill, I'll do whatever you want, just no kill plz. Thx.Lol
Oh I didn't even realize that. I'm sorry Jack if I'm wrong.Toonyman, 2 things:
Toonyman (0):
Roden (0):
TricMagic (0):
EuchreJack (5): ToonyMan, Roden, NJW2000, Maximum Spin, webadict
NJW2000 (1): EuchreJack
Vector (0):
webadict (0):
Maximum Spin (1): TricMagic
No Execution (0):
Not Voting (1): Vector
5 to hammer.
Bodyguard (town):
(Night) Protect [target]: You guard your target, protecting them from up to one kill action performed this Night. If you successfully prevent a kill action, however, you will be hit with its effects instead (this will not change the targeting of the action).
Toonyman (0):
Roden (0):
TricMagic (0):
NJW2000 (0):
Vector (0):
webadict (0):
Maximum Spin (0):
No Execution (0):
Not Voting (7): ToonyMan, Roden, TricMagic, NJW2000, Vector, webadict, Maximum Spin
4 to hammer.
Ok, looks like some claims may be in order, as the scumkill seems to have failed. We may be able to build up a picture of the night. I am a captain restricted deflector. I can choose my second target but my first is chosen for me.Aye. I did warn ye Mafia not to kill me. Now look whatcha gone an' done!
I deflected Webadict onto MaximumSpin.
Please tell me you stay in character this entire day. It's the only chance for Pirate Mafia 3.If'n I cen manage, then yaaaaarrr.
Right. I checked Vector and it was negative so no guns on them at least.Yarrrr, mateys. Why'n' we let ol' Toony pick who walks the plank today... wouldn'ye say that be more'n fair?
Right. I checked Vector and it was negative so no guns on them at least.K, I'm a 1-shot Parity Cop, rather than the other one. I check Two target's auras rather than 1. And I can confirm Vector and Max Spin have the Same Alignment.
Oh shit. And yes I agree with the Captain's list part.Right. I checked Vector and it was negative so no guns on them at least.K, I'm a 1-shot Parity Cop, rather than the other one. I check Two target's auras rather than 1. And I can confirm Vector and Max Spin have the Same Alignment.
In other news, if you don't believe me, lynch me. Or I'm a multiple, but what would be the balance in that?
That said, someone in the Captain's list is a traitor.
That's true, I could see Inventor being a way to hide your guns. Although if Vector and Web are telling the truth then Web gets to choose Vector's targets. In which case Web probably gave himself some shit last night.Yaarrrr, all actions were deflected to Maximum Spin, so I've only this key to me best treasure of all: solitude!
Oh wait nevermind, Web couldn't give himself anything because of the deflection.Me worst enemy... NINJAS.
LolololYe seasick scallion, I still think yer a lyin' landlubber!
I love how you think I'm full of shit but won't vote me without hard evidence.LolololYe seasick scallion, I still think yer a lyin' landlubber!
I just can't prove it.
I can accept that yer as slipp'ry as ambergris, and wait fer .e crew to give their reports, yaaaarrrr.I love how you think I'm full of shit but won't vote me without hard evidence.LolololYe seasick scallion, I still think yer a lyin' landlubber!
I just can't prove it.
you'd invent a new type of ice cream made of half soy and half oat dairy-substitute.
Interesting.MaxSpin, there isn't any reason for you to be a commuter, since that would mean actions should fail against you. Yet I recieved your alignment check with vector. Put simply, the team can't be Vector/? unless you yourself are the teammate with them. If you believed me to be lying, the obvious thing would be to vote me. But that would out you in an instant, wouldn't it?
I happen to be a commuter. I didn't do anything in the night, nor did I receive anything, unless some weird flavour about sitting in a room with chips and a book was supposed to indicate something. I am not entirely sure how this resolves the webadict-centred action web.
Vector/TMag is a highly plausible scum pairing - Vector knows TM's play well enough to coach him. This could, therefore, be a plan to appear to clear Vector by getting me lynched, since they would know I am town. This would be easy enough to pull off that it's an extremely sensible plan.
I am going to hold back on voting until I hear more results from people.
Max, you have to frame Tric if you are Mafia. If Tric is Mafia, they are currently framing you with a claim that can't be. You have to go after Tric.I don't have to do anything. I do what I want. Right now I actually do want to lynch Tric, since from my perspective that would either catch mafia or clear Vector, but hearing more from those who haven't spoken or haven't claimed is more important because it could change my mind.
How does Vector coach Tric when Vector has been away a lot of the game?Has Vector been away a lot of the game?
Sometimes I think I should just make a completely blank post to see what you read into it.... I have spent the entire game helping you, and you probably don't even realize it.
It would work better if we spoke the same language.Sometimes I think I should just make a completely blank post to see what you read into it.... I have spent the entire game helping you, and you probably don't even realize it.
(For that matter, someone else could also be coaching Tric, like, say, Toonyman. Or anyone who knows Tric's towngame, really.)I don't think I could handle being on a team with Tric.
(That's Wittgenstein, don't go driving yourself crazy trying to parse it. It means that communication is impossible between two minds that don't even share a reference frame.)Down the rabbit hole indeed.
If you don't think Wittgenstein is one of the greatest philosophers, then sad to say, your tastes are objectively wrong.(That's Wittgenstein, don't go driving yourself crazy trying to parse it. It means that communication is impossible between two minds that don't even share a reference frame.)Down the rabbit hole indeed.
I highly recommend that you accept that I'm Town. Do you think I am scum?Of course, but that's unrelated to the game.
I do like Witt.If you don't think Wittgenstein is one of the greatest philosophers, then sad to say, your tastes are objectively wrong.(That's Wittgenstein, don't go driving yourself crazy trying to parse it. It means that communication is impossible between two minds that don't even share a reference frame.)Down the rabbit hole indeed.
OooooooooooooI highly recommend that you accept that I'm Town. Do you think I am scum?Of course, but that's unrelated to the game.
If you think I'm scum, you have a reason to not trust me. If you think I'm Town, you have a reason to believe what I say.I highly recommend that you accept that I'm Town. Do you think I am scum?Of course, but that's unrelated to the game.
That was a joke. I'm obviously not gonna answer this. What could possibly be the benefit of answering?
Oh yeah, one last thing, your clearance of Roden depends on the assumption that I can be nightkilled. Did you think I would miss that? I hate assumptions most of all.True. I actually wasn't aware of how Commuter worked. My bad. Roden would never have killed you, though. They probably would've killed Tric, ToonyMan, or me. All three targets had no protection last Night if you are untargetable (Deflector would fail). Same for me. I would've killed TricMagic.
Less confusion for one. Where is the methodical logic, and when are you going to shared it. As it stands, you're looking for ways out rather than ways for things to make sense.I highly recommend that you accept that I'm Town. Do you think I am scum?Of course, but that's unrelated to the game.
That was a joke. I'm obviously not gonna answer this. What could possibly be the benefit of answering?
How exactly does Vector's inventor power work? Anything other than guns?
Yarrr... I be a One-shot Roleblocker Captain. Me crew consists of a Jailer... Nah, I'll let you claim as ye want, but this be a lie (Roden, the ship "doctor"), a 50% Inventor (Vector, me best cannoneer), and a Deflector (NJW2000, me first mate).
@NJW2000: I actually do not learn what abilities my crewmates get. I explicitly asked and was denied, sadly. I guessed what Roden's did, based on their claim.It sounds like everything you said is based on a playing card castle of assumptions.
@Maximum Spin: Correct. They can choose to follow my orders or not use that action. I am not told either way, but this also doesn't affect the Mafiakill.
The Commuter claim has to be a lie though because Tric has results on Max and NJW seems to have successfully Deflected me onto Max.Okay, I guess I need to make this clearer.
I didn't do anything in the night
FallacyofUrist: Surely, people are not told if they've been redirected to an unexpected target?
That is very much nonstandard and I now suspect Roden is lying.
The very fact you did nothing is strangeHow? What action should I have taken? What action that I do not have should I have taken?
Last night I was ordered to target Web. I did, and chose to Jail him. However, I actually got a results PM that told me that I screwed up and Jailed Max instead.Haha wait what
Hi,This is all I needed.
I was told to target Webadict last night, which I chose not to do. I have other Inventor gifts than the old pew pew but I didn't want to give any of them to Webadick, so I didn't.
Webadict does correctly have the title of my role.
I need to reread but I want to re-emphasize that it could be that both Tric and Max could be telling the truth if Tric were redirected to someone else without the commuter power. In that case both I and that other person would be town.
Do we already have a post compiling night actions?
Webadict, you've been talking a lot. Who's scum?We all are. You, me, Roden, NJW. Every signle one of us, man.
This is all I needed.
Maximum Spin
I'M SCUM? SINCE WHEN!October 17th.
Maximum Spin is 100% Mafia. Three people confirm targeting them.This is all I needed.
Maximum Spin
Also, wut?
Vector, why wouldn't you give me an Invention? Did I not seem Town to you?
I am not understanding how Tric's parity copping would work, then, because I'm town.Vec, I want to be clear about this. I am currently more or less convinced that we are both town, and Tric did in fact confirm our alignments to be the same. Let us proceed from that position. Tric is probably also town in this circumstance.
I'm 100% ok with trading me for MaximumSpin if it means that we hit scum, but someone has to be lying.
I am not understanding how Tric's parity copping would work, then, because I'm town.
I'm 100% ok with trading me for MaximumSpin if it means that we hit scum, but someone has to be lying.
@Tric: I'm sorry but what about Webadict with a gun sounds like a solid move
FallacyofUrist: Surely, people are not told if they've been redirected to an unexpected target?By default, people are always aware of who they end up targeting, at least in my games. This has been the case even in my earliest attempts at mafia-GM-ing. A variant ability could change this, however.
Toonyman (0):
Roden (1): Maximum Spin
TricMagic (0):
NJW2000 (0):
Vector (0):
webadict (0):
Maximum Spin (4): ToonyMan, TricMagic, webadict, Vector
No Execution (0):
Not Voting (2): Roden, NJW2000
4 to hammer.
2-Shot Commuter (town):
(2-Shot, Night) Commute: You temporarily exit the game by hiding on the roof of the hotel in a sleeping bag, granting you absolute immunity to all Night actions. (Players who attempt to act on you will receive a ‘your action failed’ result.) Your sleeping bag will wear out after you do this twice, however.
Captain (mafia-ally):
(Auto) Authority: You have command over the players with the roles 50% Inventor, Deflector, and Interference JOAT. If you do not use Command during the Day, it will be automatically used at Day end with random selections. If you die, the players bound to you lose the ability to act if you were Town and gain the ability to act freely if you were non-Town.
(Day) Command: You decide in advance what the Night-action primary targets of the players under your command must be. Each player affected by Authority will be made aware of your choice for them when the Night starts. (If a Mafia player is tied to your Authority, usage of their factional ability is exempt from this requirement. Furthermore, the players affected by Authority can still choose to take no action.)
Toonyman (0):
Roden (0):
TricMagic (0):
NJW2000 (0):
Vector (0):
No Execution (0):
Not Voting (5): Roden, ToonyMan, NJW2000, TricMagic, Vector
3 to hammer.
Toony, what order should we claim in? Who says what first can have a pretty big impact on the outcome of events.I think that's fine.
I'd suggest Vector, NJW, Toony, Roden. I'm both exempt and a natural suspect given I've used my sight up.
I'd suggest Vector, NJW, Toony, Roden. I'm both exempt and a natural suspect given I've used my sight up.I'd suggest a different order.
Hahahaha no. No it is not fine, we do not let the person who's been telling porkers about their role wait until the very end to claim.Toony, what order should we claim in? Who says what first can have a pretty big impact on the outcome of events.I think that's fine.
I'd suggest Vector, NJW, Toony, Roden. I'm both exempt and a natural suspect given I've used my sight up.
Quite the response. But I'm quite interested in who you targeted. Roden is last cause by that point he'll have an excuse.What on earth? Why would we want him to have an excuse? The entire point of claiming is that it makes life hard on scum because they have to lie without knowing everything about the night.
But that won't matter at all cause Webadict wouldn't have killed himself. Your role is key to this mystery. Vector's first because he's town and gives a big piece of the puzzle, you next to find out where the deflection was, and then Toony for who he targeted.
So yeah, going with my suggestion for who talks first, which Toony agreed with. And we'll go from there. Why did you deflect people night 1 off of webadict?Two folks ain't a consensus in my book. Especially when at least one of them has got to be scum. But hey, I've just had a look at the standard JOAT on mafiascum, and yeah, not looking good for Roden.
Why is Web dead and not me then? Your claim doesn't make sense. FoU stated at the end of D2 that redirects are told to the person being redirected.
FallacyofUrist: Surely, people are not told if they've been redirected to an unexpected target?By default, people are always aware of who they end up targeting, at least in my games. This has been the case even in my earliest attempts at mafia-GM-ing. A variant ability could change this, however.
Hi, just popping in to say that I'm here and ready to claim, although I agree that Toony and Roden should claim before me.I attempted to check NJW but my action failed.
Alternatively, it could just be a mafia strongman. Which would be annoying as it doesn't let us thin out the possibilities, but does suggest the unlikely Tric/Vec scumteam, as with town!Toony there's some possibility of a follow-the-cop type situation and corresponding counter powers.True. This also follows Vector not trusting Webadict.
A Toony/Roden team is impossible, cause NJW would be telling the truth and the kill would have just bounced back to Toony. Roden's repel would have done that too.A Roden/Toony team could have killed if they had a mafia strongman.
Yarrr... I be a One-shot Roleblocker Captain. Me crew consists of a Jailer... Nah, I'll let you claim as ye want, but this be a lie (Roden, the ship "doctor"), a 50% Inventor (Vector, me best cannoneer), and a Deflector (NJW2000, me first mate).I find this funny for some reason. Roden, one question, why didn't you say anything yesterday about this?
If TricMagic is lying, it's TricMagic and one of ToonyMan or Maximum Spin.If Maximum Spin is Bulletproof, Roden is no longer clear.MS is a Commuter.Vector and Maximum Spin are a possible pairing.Debunked hard, but Vector was the one to hammer. Roden/Vector? Web wouldn't have died if web was lying about targeting himself for Vector's invention.
If NJW2000 is lying, they're fucking galaxy brain Mafia, and we lose. Meh.
It's possible Maximum Spin was roleblocked by Roden. I think thier role does that? This comes after, and really should have been a big sign something was up. But the day ended way too quick.
So, if I accept Tric is Town, which is very likely, then the Mafia team is either Vector and Maximum Spin OR ToonyMan and one of TricMagic/NJW2000/Roden. Technically, Tric can be Mafia with pretty much anyone, but that's a tough pill to swallow.On this bit. I am pretty sure we can rule out Vector completely in this scenario. Web wouldn't have the needed info on his own. And if he did, I doubt he would have died.
If Vector/MS, then either MS did the kill and got blocked, or Vector did the kill and targeted me (They wouldn't do that, would they??? :()
If ToonyMan is Mafia, then... A lot of factors are unsure.
If Roden is Mafia, then who the fuck is their partner?? It has to be ToonyMan... or like, maybe NJW2000??
We could vote out one of Vector or Max to test them and then go into tomorrow. Max hasn't claimed, so that lends credit to them being scum, and Vector's lack of presence is also scummy. Additionally, me being attacked would make sense from their perspective because I soft-claimed to Vector yesterday, and they would've picked up on that, so their goal was to kill the Captain and remove all the power from Town.
I'm pretty sure that's what happened... Which would be really unfortunate if true, for so many reasons.
Tric - please stay off red text until everyone's certain on their choice.
Let's remember Toony and Vector were on the last lolhammer. I don't think the two of them can be scum but if Vector's town they hammered accidentally yesterday, so we really can't rely on them not to hand the game over with a careless vote. I don't entirely trust you or toony here, and I don't think you trust Toony or me, so you should unvote. Silly as this game has been, an opportunistic hammer would be a terrible ending.
Also, while I still have a fairly strong belief he's scum, Roden posted D2. Not a lot, but something. So no quick answer there, sadly.
http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=128804;area=showposts;start=0 (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=128804;area=showposts;start=0)
I did.Yarrr... I be a One-shot Roleblocker Captain. Me crew consists of a Jailer... Nah, I'll let you claim as ye want, but this be a lie (Roden, the ship "doctor"), a 50% Inventor (Vector, me best cannoneer), and a Deflector (NJW2000, me first mate).I find this funny for some reason. Roden, one question, why didn't you say anything yesterday about this?
Web knows my role name and has a general understanding of what it is. He's not saying it because it would only give the mafia team more information.___
Likelihoods:This especially looks awful, seeing as Toony had the most to gain from disabling all of the remaining roles in the game if he'd happened to be town.
Vector/Tric - possible
Vector/Roden - not possible
Vector/NJW - not possible
Tric/Roden - possible
Tric/NJW - unlikely
Roden/NJW - possible
I have to decide between voting Tric or Roden.
NJW says he Deflected Web onto Toony, yet Web still died. We know his night action claim is false now, because even if a Strongman were in the game it doesn't get around redirection according to the wiki.Nope. Maybe you can cherrypick a quote from somewhere that supports your statement, but so can I. Furthermore, any strongman or strongman equivalent put in the game would be there to get around my deflection power, because of how potentially gamebreaking powers like that are, so this is nonsense. Anyhoo, a strongman is only one theory. You have a bunch of interference roles, so perhaps there's an explanation there.
So why did Toony's and NJW's night actions not work?I don't know why my deflection let a kill through, but there are two mafia here so there's a whole lot I don't know. FoU cooks some pretty weird setups.
And why don't they suspect each other?Clearly untrue if you actually read my posts. Unless you assume I'm lying through our teeth, in which case you've already assumed I'm mafia, so don't need to consider this. Last person to misread my posts this badly was Webadict.
Another problem with this theory that I'm scum is that killing Web is non-sensical from my point of view. You can see that I had a clear progression in my posts where I went from not trusting Web and voting him, to getting to the point where I claimed that not protecting Web would be scummy. Why would I kill him if I trusted him? Furthermore, why would I kill him at all if he's the Captain? If he dies and he's town, I lose my abilities. If he's scum, I keep my abilities but lose an ally. It's a lose-lose scenario for me, I have zero reason to ever kill him, especially since it's clear that I did trust him.Your posts do not reflect your intentions if you're scum, so that's irrelevant. If you thought Web was town, according to your own claim you'd be trading a single one-shot ability to hamstring a deflector and an inventor, and kill a one-shot roleblocker... while you could still perform a kill at night. The trade would be worthwhile even if you didn't have a nightkill.
Tric could NOT have affected NJW because of my Repel.Tell me what a repel is! I can't find it on mafiascum.
I mean, that's assuming the Captain is Mafia, Tric.
But who would ever make that assumption...?
Good to know. This means I will get a positive result on Tric if I investigate them. I think Tric is being honest here which means they're likely town.Oh, is that what we're doing? Then I will claim to have no gun at all. I'm clean! But that doesn't matter because you won't believe me regardless, and I'd probably claim either way as Mafia, so it's up to you to believe my outlandish claims.
The beauty of it all is that I actually don't have to kill you if I'm lying, because you won't investigate me at all. Even when I write this, I would bet that you wouldn't waste your inspection on me. Partially because I don't believe you're actually a Gunsmith, but also partially because I think you think I'm not lying.
Also true, if I were the Captain, I'd be the greatest Captain of all time. But, instead, I'm a *deep breath* Combined Activated Cop Enabler Doctor (Or, CACED, for short.) When I perform my Doctoring, I also enable Cop inspects. Which is why I'm fairly certain I'll be killed tonight, and also why I'm willing to bet at least one of the Cop claims is legit.
We'll now be able to determine if the Captain is, in fact, Mafia.
Oh man, I missed this. You guys are just so easy. No wonder Tric never wins as Mafia.
So, Tric is probably Town because he's obviously stupid. Roden might be Town, but he'll be an absolute drag on the Town if he is, which is unfortunate. Vector is probably Mafia. ToonyMan is... Maybe Town. It wouldn't matter if he's Mafia because he won't be dying tonight regardless. Waiting on EuchreJack, but if Vector is Mafia like I think they are, then it's not EJ based on the Gambler's Fallacy, which would, in fact, leave it as either NJW2000 or Maximum Spin as the last Mafia. NJW2000 is not out of meta, so I'd be willing to leave them as neutral, and thus, it's Maximum Spin and Vector.
On the contrary, I'm trying to bait the kill, and if I succeed, I will be dead.
"We" is Toony and I, clearly.Anyway, should we be focusing Maximum Spin or Vector?Who is "we" here?On the contrary, I'm trying to bait the kill, and if I succeed, I will be dead.I get that the meme shit and insulting people might just be how you play RVS, but if you've come around to "my claim was lying actually aha", what were your last nineteen posts meant to accomplish for town?
[...]Webadict, buddying me and telling us you'll be dead N1 so we don't vote you today. Roll mafia yet again?Nope. I rolled... Wait, hold on, Town isn't spelled with an M!
[...]
Is this the part where I start actually trying, or should I just wait until it's socially acceptable to vote myself like you in a desperate attempt at... I don't know if that sentence has an ending. Anyway, I'll still adamantly point at Vector and Maximum Spin as top suspects, but I suppose it's easier to just defenestrate the emperor, and then find the actual bad guys when you know he's on your side.
Although to be fair Web feels like they're lying out of their ass which mucks things up, but whatever.I lie about a lot of things because I'm actually sending secret messages to the captain.
[...]
It's pretty easy to do whatever you want when you're not constrained by things like alignment or scumbuddies. I'm free as Town.
@Webadict:...Sure, got it.Although to be fair Web feels like they're lying out of their ass which mucks things up, but whatever.I lie about a lot of things because I'm actually sending secret messages to the captain.
[...]
Therefore I see NJW and Web in a better light than my last reads, besides getting a better feel from Web after rereading.
I also don't think you're a Gunsmith, though, but that okay. It's a good deflection, and I like it. In any case, I'll call you Town, and continue on my way.If you don't believe me then why am I town?
@ToonyMan: I never said you were Town. Only that I would call you Town. There's a subtle difference.
I'm not moving off Jack.
@Toony: Let's goooooo. EuchreJack
Also, Mafia, plz no kill, I'll do whatever you want, just no kill plz. Thx.
Also, Mafia, plz no kill, I'll do whatever you want, just no kill plz. Thx.Lol
Right. I checked Vector and it was negative so no guns on them at least.Yarrrr, mateys. Why'n' we let ol' Toony pick who walks the plank today... wouldn'ye say that be more'n fair?
So, ToonyMan, who be yer most suspicious? Ye can take yer time if'n ya want.
LolololYe seasick scallion, I still think yer a lyin' landlubber!
I just can't prove it.
So, if I accept Tric is Town, which is very likely, then the Mafia team is either Vector and Maximum Spin OR ToonyMan and one of TricMagic/NJW2000/Roden. Technically, Tric can be Mafia with pretty much anyone, but that's a tough pill to swallow.
If Vector/MS, then either MS did the kill and got blocked, or Vector did the kill and targeted me (They wouldn't do that, would they??? :()
If ToonyMan is Mafia, then... A lot of factors are unsure.
If Roden is Mafia, then who the fuck is their partner?? It has to be ToonyMan... or like, maybe NJW2000??
We could vote out one of Vector or Max to test them and then go into tomorrow. Max hasn't claimed, so that lends credit to them being scum, and Vector's lack of presence is also scummy. Additionally, me being attacked would make sense from their perspective because I soft-claimed to Vector yesterday, and they would've picked up on that, so their goal was to kill the Captain and remove all the power from Town.
I'm pretty sure that's what happened... Which would be really unfortunate if true, for so many reasons.
Thanks for the insight Web, you're town in my book right there with ol' Roden and Tric.
I really do think Tric just straight up caught the mafia team which is fucking hilarious, so I'll vote Maximum Spin.
Night 2, I used my Repel and prevented Tric from being able to interact with NJW. I actually misread it and thought I would be the reverse since I was trying to protect Tric, but it ultimately didn't matter.It's essentially a one-way target-specific role block.
So, we have a bit of a problem here, Tric and Vector. Toony and NJW both think I'm scum. They haven't really given a reason as to why I'm scum, but alright, they both suspect me.I think you're both scum dude. I wouldn't say Day 1 was obvious, I was wrong about Jack and the thread had been swaying between Max and Web. And for Day 2 we had an alignment check from Tric on the top two most suspicious players at the time.
...Why don't they suspect each other? They both have each other as a possible pairing with me, but they aren't actually considering that I could be town and the other the true scum. We've had two days in a row where we thought the scum team was obvious, but then turned out to be wrong, yet they both think third time's the charm and want to vote who they think is the obvious choice again?
So why did Toony's and NJW's night actions not work? And why don't they suspect each other?I do suspect NJW! I think he's distancing from you!!
If Web was my ally why would I fuck myself by killing him?? How would I have killed him unless I'm working with NJW??Likelihoods:This especially looks awful, seeing as Toony had the most to gain from disabling all of the remaining roles in the game if he'd happened to be town.
Vector/Tric - possible
Vector/Roden - not possible
Vector/NJW - not possible
Tric/Roden - possible
Tric/NJW - unlikely
Roden/NJW - possible
I have to decide between voting Tric or Roden.
case about me and Web interacting in-threadMe and Web have played a lot of games together. We mess around. I try to get a feel if they're town or not. Web tries to get a feel if I'm town or not. We're pretty good at figuring each other out.
This especially looks awful, seeing as Toony had the most to gain from disabling all of the remaining roles in the game if he'd happened to be town.Question, when was it brought up that the captain's death would disable the remaining rolls? And what would he gain from it any other mafia wouldnt'?
You had me up to voting NJW first. They are equally dangerous. But Roden's flip gives a lot of info for day 3. I'm likely to end up dead, or Vector's going to end up dead. Not that either matters given how we'll know exactly what happened.Okay, how about this: I'll go through this round and pick out everything I see on rereading. I'm busy tonight, but I'll be good tomorrow for us to crack this.
-Comes across as desperate, which is not Town!Toony in my experience. Could be that he thinks Vector and Web are better than him though, and this is genuine fear.
If I was corresponding with Web in-thread, why would I fuck myself by killing him?? Does that make sense??
You dumb fucks.If you're scum, Web is positing a psychological explanation here.
*bleh*
@Vector: got a question here (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8323496#msg8323496)about Web's supposed scheme to hand out guns like halloween candy. Any thoughts? Notice the issue at the time? I didn't until N2, but D2 was rather short from my perspective.
I'm pretty busy right now, but just let me say, Roden, that I wasn't 100% on you being scum before this post. Now I'm a lot closer.What? What are you referencing with cherrypicking?
A few points, briefly as I'm busy tonight.QuoteNJW says he Deflected Web onto Toony, yet Web still died. We know his night action claim is false now, because even if a Strongman were in the game it doesn't get around redirection according to the wiki.Nope. Maybe you can cherrypick a quote from somewhere that supports your statement, but so can I. Furthermore, any strongman or strongman equivalent put in the game would be there to get around my deflection power, because of how potentially gamebreaking powers like that are, so this is nonsense. Anyhoo, a strongman is only one theory. You have a bunch of interference roles, so perhaps there's an explanation there.
Uh, is this a TMI slip? What makes you think we have two mafia and an ally?QuoteSo why did Toony's and NJW's night actions not work?I don't know why my deflection let a kill through, but there are two mafia here so there's a whole lot I don't know. FoU cooks some pretty weird setups.
Clearly untrue...yet you've repeatedly said over and over that you think I'm mafia and how badly this looks for me. Which I'm still not sure why you think I look bad? If you're claiming solely off of my role name that I look scummy, you're completely ignoring how town has had scummy looking roles and mafia townie looking roles in past rounds.QuoteAnd why don't they suspect each other?Clearly untrue if you actually read my posts. Unless you assume I'm lying through our teeth, in which case you've already assumed I'm mafia, so don't need to consider this. Last person to misread my posts this badly was Webadict.
I'm sorry, what? How do posts not reflect intentions? That's literally how you're supposed to read people, wtf.QuoteAnother problem with this theory that I'm scum is that killing Web is non-sensical from my point of view. You can see that I had a clear progression in my posts where I went from not trusting Web and voting him, to getting to the point where I claimed that not protecting Web would be scummy. Why would I kill him if I trusted him? Furthermore, why would I kill him at all if he's the Captain? If he dies and he's town, I lose my abilities. If he's scum, I keep my abilities but lose an ally. It's a lose-lose scenario for me, I have zero reason to ever kill him, especially since it's clear that I did trust him.Your posts do not reflect your intentions if you're scum, so that's irrelevant. If you thought Web was town, according to your own claim you'd be trading a single one-shot ability to hamstring a deflector and an inventor, and kill a one-shot roleblocker... while you could still perform a kill at night. The trade would be worthwhile even if you didn't have a nightkill.
I did. And you're accusing me of not reading your posts, lol.QuoteTric could NOT have affected NJW because of my Repel.Tell me what a repel is! I can't find it on mafiascum.
I was honestly considering Tric/Toony before this but sheesh... That post was not worthy of Town!Roden. Currently this looks like distancing from Toony, but I'll try to keep an open mind. Not voting yet, this may just be the unfortunate breakdown of a usually calm and sanguine town player. Tric/Vector still needs another look too, can't be sure Vec hasn't been playing a very odd line due to absence. Is there a world in which Vector gave Web a gun and he somehow ended up shooting himself????
@Roden:Then vote NJW.So, we have a bit of a problem here, Tric and Vector. Toony and NJW both think I'm scum. They haven't really given a reason as to why I'm scum, but alright, they both suspect me.I think you're both scum dude. I wouldn't say Day 1 was obvious, I was wrong about Jack and the thread had been swaying between Max and Web. And for Day 2 we had an alignment check from Tric on the top two most suspicious players at the time.
...Why don't they suspect each other? They both have each other as a possible pairing with me, but they aren't actually considering that I could be town and the other the true scum. We've had two days in a row where we thought the scum team was obvious, but then turned out to be wrong, yet they both think third time's the charm and want to vote who they think is the obvious choice again?
So you're both accusing me of distancing from the other and also that the other is distancing from me. Do you realize how ridiculous this sounds? You're both fake distancing from me lol.So why did Toony's and NJW's night actions not work? And why don't they suspect each other?I do suspect NJW! I think he's distancing from you!!
Mafia team doesn't know who the ally is. And I do think both of you being the mafia team is a legitimate possibility, but I think between the two of you that NJW is more likely to be mafia in the case of a 1 mafia + one ally set up.If Web was my ally why would I fuck myself by killing him?? How would I have killed him unless I'm working with NJW??Likelihoods:This especially looks awful, seeing as Toony had the most to gain from disabling all of the remaining roles in the game if he'd happened to be town.
Vector/Tric - possible
Vector/Roden - not possible
Vector/NJW - not possible
Tric/Roden - possible
Tric/NJW - unlikely
Roden/NJW - possible
I have to decide between voting Tric or Roden.
Roden, between the two of you there's a higher probability you're mafia over NJW. This is the only reason why I would vote you over NJW.What makes me have a higher probability of being mafia over NJW?
Web hid info about your role. He forced Vector to give you stuff or do nothing at all. Which worked since Vector did seem to comply.
You had me up to voting NJW first. They are equally dangerous. But Roden's flip gives a lot of info for day 3. I'm likely to end up dead, or Vector's going to end up dead. Not that either matters given how we'll know exactly what happened.Somebody posted the wiki link for it. Toony being one of the few players not restricted by a Captain and still getting to keep his ability regardless of Web's alignment seems like a pretty obvious benefit.This especially looks awful, seeing as Toony had the most to gain from disabling all of the remaining roles in the game if he'd happened to be town.Question, when was it brought up that the captain's death would disable the remaining rolls? And what would he gain from it any other mafia wouldnt'?
I already gave Vector my vote though. So now Vector has 3 votes.You had me up to voting NJW first. They are equally dangerous. But Roden's flip gives a lot of info for day 3. I'm likely to end up dead, or Vector's going to end up dead. Not that either matters given how we'll know exactly what happened.Okay, how about this: I'll go through this round and pick out everything I see on rereading. I'm busy tonight, but I'll be good tomorrow for us to crack this.
After that Tric I give you my vote. Who you vote I'll vote. Vector suspects me because of Web, but I have to convince them as well or else it's over. I was thinking Vector could make you a gun, but NJW could deflect it to themselves if they're alive.
snipK, this is fun. To address the Roden/TricMagic team, we would definitely have to have learned from our previous mistakes.
snipK, this is fun. To address the Roden/TricMagic team, we would definitely have to have learned from our previous mistakes.
However, the clencher is you're not suspecting a Roden/Toony team here. You're actively suspecting the less likely option. Despite the fact Roden is the most likely option for web to have died. Roden would have to actively be lying to have messed with Toony/Web as well. Which isn't townie at all. In every case but a NJW/Toony team, Roden is the mafia. And as soon as he flips, you will be exposed as well. Which is why him flipping is game over for you.
Currently buying into the Toony/Roden possibility pretty hard.Clincher. And no, I do not think Roden is town. I pretty much say that in the exact post you quoted, so I don't know what's going on there. Breakdown of communication, I guess. Just because I mention the possibility that you're scum doesn't mean I think it's the most likely one. Please read carefully.
You had me up to voting NJW first. They are equally dangerous. But Roden's flip gives a lot of info for day 3. I'm likely to end up dead, or Vector's going to end up dead. Not that either matters given how we'll know exactly what happened.Okay, how about this: I'll go through this round and pick out everything I see on rereading. I'm busy tonight, but I'll be good tomorrow for us to crack this.
... Where is everyone? Pretty sure the day ends tonight.
There is one inarguable, undisputed truth that proves that I'm not lying here. Both Toony and NJW are claiming somebody screwed with their results, and it's 100% impossible for me to have somehow blocked both of them. We know for a fact that at least one of them has to be lying. And we know for a fact that I can't be a killer due to the Night 1 outcome.Reminder that NJW was not able to dispute this and didn't even try. Instead, he repeatedly tries to misrep me and my emotional state, twisting my aggressive play into some kind of attack on him. Yet, he can't disprove the facts of what I've said.
Say the set up is 2 mafia + 1 ally. I target Web and Jail him, as ordered. This leaves my scum buddy free to perform the NK, and they know not to target Web because I let them know I'm Jailing him. Yet nobody dies.
Scenario 2. 1 mafia + 1 ally. I would have to have Multitasking as a passive in order to kill and follow my orders. I know I'm Jailing Web, so I would target somebody else. Yet, nobody dies.
Finally, why do I ever kill Web when Vector is confirmed to be aligned with Town due to Tric's Parity check? Why risk killing a potential ally? Why not endgame the town Night 1? Why not kill a Cop claim who might check me and out me as mafia?
Just look at the facts, and you know I can't be mafia. It has to be either NJW, Toony, or both of them, and town wins by voting there no matter what.
NJW
It's very unlikely this game is only one mafia and one ally.
If we have a Town Vigilante who can only kill if given orders by a Captain, I would humbly suggest Not Killing, as knowing our devious GM FallacyofUrist, pulling that string by a Mafia Captain might be the mafia's only NK.There's no way it's 3 mafia. Even two mafia plus ally seems like too much.
Also, we should consider with 8 players that the mafia team might be more than 2 mafia. Maybe not 3 full mafia, but probably a 3rd player that can win with mafia somehow. We won't know until it is over.
Yes it is. That is what I said on D1 before seeing the nights and how this game has gone.It's very unlikely this game is only one mafia and one ally.If we have a Town Vigilante who can only kill if given orders by a Captain, I would humbly suggest Not Killing, as knowing our devious GM FallacyofUrist, pulling that string by a Mafia Captain might be the mafia's only NK.There's no way it's 3 mafia. Even two mafia plus ally seems like too much.
Also, we should consider with 8 players that the mafia team might be more than 2 mafia. Maybe not 3 full mafia, but probably a 3rd player that can win with mafia somehow. We won't know until it is over.
This you?
Note that if it's 1 Mafia, Roden needs to go in case it's 2. If it's 2 Mafia, Roden needs to go cause he's the other. Either way Mafia is caught tomorrow.It could be that it's one mafia and two allies. This would explaining the balancing better and the amount of people lying.
Well, unless the team is Roden/Vector and I got messed with hard. Which I'm starting to think might be the case, what is the case on toony other than him being slippery?
-Given my mechanical knowledge is highly incomplete, I'm not going to bother with a long reply to this. I don't think anyone has actually offered a convincing explanation of what did happen last night, or why the hell I'd be claiming to have deflected web if I were scum. Suffice to say, mafia could have no-killed, may have some kind of nonstandard kill or strongman, or all kinds of nonsense. As Toony just said, yeah, two allies and a mafia with a kill is another possible case.
Well, unless the team is Roden/Vector and I got messed with hard. Which I'm starting to think might be the case, what is the case on toony other than him being slippery?Hm... a worrying possibility. But that would require a redirection of your cop action you weren't told about, wouldn't it? Not impossible, but certainly a very marginal case.
I mean, that would be very simple and make sense. But I was told that I performed my action. So the Repel would have to be unnoticeable somehow. FoU apparently usually tells people when their action fails or gets redirected.
Can you agree this is what would have happened NJW?
FallacyofUrist: Surely, people are not told if they've been redirected to an unexpected target?By default, people are always aware of who they end up targeting, at least in my games. This has been the case even in my earliest attempts at mafia-GM-ing. A variant ability could change this, however.
Holy shit Tric, I've told you multiple times now that you're describing Repel wrong.
At work so I can't make a long post until later tonight, but I already explained what Repel does.Night 2, I used my Repel and prevented Tric from being able to interact with NJW. I actually misread it and thought I would be the reverse since I was trying to protect Tric, but it ultimately didn't matter.It's essentially a one-way target-specific role block.
Tric, find the hole in my logic.There is one inarguable, undisputed truth that proves that I'm not lying here. Both Toony and NJW are claiming somebody screwed with their results, and it's 100% impossible for me to have somehow blocked both of them. We know for a fact that at least one of them has to be lying. And we know for a fact that I can't be a killer due to the Night 1 outcome.Reminder that NJW was not able to dispute this and didn't even try. Instead, he repeatedly tries to misrep me and my emotional state, twisting my aggressive play into some kind of attack on him. Yet, he can't disprove the facts of what I've said.
Say the set up is 2 mafia + 1 ally. I target Web and Jail him, as ordered. This leaves my scum buddy free to perform the NK, and they know not to target Web because I let them know I'm Jailing him. Yet nobody dies.
Scenario 2. 1 mafia + 1 ally. I would have to have Multitasking as a passive in order to kill and follow my orders. I know I'm Jailing Web, so I would target somebody else. Yet, nobody dies.
Finally, why do I ever kill Web when Vector is confirmed to be aligned with Town due to Tric's Parity check? Why risk killing a potential ally? Why not endgame the town Night 1? Why not kill a Cop claim who might check me and out me as mafia?
Just look at the facts, and you know I can't be mafia. It has to be either NJW, Toony, or both of them, and town wins by voting there no matter what.
NJW
If this is indisputable then it has to mean that I'm town.
Take That! (https://youtu.be/lrOjYzmmUbk)Tric, find the hole in my logic.There is one inarguable, undisputed truth that proves that I'm not lying here. Both Toony and NJW are claiming somebody screwed with their results, and it's 100% impossible for me to have somehow blocked both of them. We know for a fact that at least one of them has to be lying. And we know for a fact that I can't be a killer due to the Night 1 outcome.Reminder that NJW was not able to dispute this and didn't even try. Instead, he repeatedly tries to misrep me and my emotional state, twisting my aggressive play into some kind of attack on him. Yet, he can't disprove the facts of what I've said.
Say the set up is 2 mafia + 1 ally. I target Web and Jail him, as ordered. This leaves my scum buddy free to perform the NK, and they know not to target Web because I let them know I'm Jailing him. Yet nobody dies.
Scenario 2. 1 mafia + 1 ally. I would have to have Multitasking as a passive in order to kill and follow my orders. I know I'm Jailing Web, so I would target somebody else. Yet, nobody dies.
Finally, why do I ever kill Web when Vector is confirmed to be aligned with Town due to Tric's Parity check? Why risk killing a potential ally? Why not endgame the town Night 1? Why not kill a Cop claim who might check me and out me as mafia?
Just look at the facts, and you know I can't be mafia. It has to be either NJW, Toony, or both of them, and town wins by voting there no matter what.
NJW
If this is indisputable then it has to mean that I'm town.
At work so I can't make a long post until later tonight, but I already explained what Repel does.Night 2, I used my Repel and prevented Tric from being able to interact with NJW. I actually misread it and thought I would be the reverse since I was trying to protect Tric, but it ultimately didn't matter.It's essentially a one-way target-specific role block.
Addendum: I wasn't told I was roleblocked. Could have been a redirect, that's pretty interfering.
Why is Web dead and not me then? Your claim doesn't make sense. FoU stated at the end of D2 that redirects are told to the person being redirected.
If there is a 1P scumteam, this probably isn't LaunchLO.... NJW, Toony, Vector, can we all agree on Roden? f it's one person, this isn't LYLO. If it's two, it most certainly is.
Toony is more dangerous and slippery as scum than either of NJW and Roden. Roden remains my #2 pick.
... You do know that isn't hammer range right? We need 3 to hammer. That's only hammer if Toony has a partner.
Tric, you're actually driving me insane here. You didn't address my argument at all. Not even a little bit. You just went off on an unrelated tangent and I don't even know why. Your entire post is speculation and does nothing to challenge the things I said that are guaranteed facts.Take That! (https://youtu.be/lrOjYzmmUbk)Tric, find the hole in my logic.There is one inarguable, undisputed truth that proves that I'm not lying here. Both Toony and NJW are claiming somebody screwed with their results, and it's 100% impossible for me to have somehow blocked both of them. We know for a fact that at least one of them has to be lying. And we know for a fact that I can't be a killer due to the Night 1 outcome.Reminder that NJW was not able to dispute this and didn't even try. Instead, he repeatedly tries to misrep me and my emotional state, twisting my aggressive play into some kind of attack on him. Yet, he can't disprove the facts of what I've said.
Say the set up is 2 mafia + 1 ally. I target Web and Jail him, as ordered. This leaves my scum buddy free to perform the NK, and they know not to target Web because I let them know I'm Jailing him. Yet nobody dies.
Scenario 2. 1 mafia + 1 ally. I would have to have Multitasking as a passive in order to kill and follow my orders. I know I'm Jailing Web, so I would target somebody else. Yet, nobody dies.
Finally, why do I ever kill Web when Vector is confirmed to be aligned with Town due to Tric's Parity check? Why risk killing a potential ally? Why not endgame the town Night 1? Why not kill a Cop claim who might check me and out me as mafia?
Just look at the facts, and you know I can't be mafia. It has to be either NJW, Toony, or both of them, and town wins by voting there no matter what.
NJW
If this is indisputable then it has to mean that I'm town.At work so I can't make a long post until later tonight, but I already explained what Repel does.Night 2, I used my Repel and prevented Tric from being able to interact with NJW. I actually misread it and thought I would be the reverse since I was trying to protect Tric, but it ultimately didn't matter.It's essentially a one-way target-specific role block.
https://youtu.be/YDcvkQ3_Ibc (https://youtu.be/YDcvkQ3_Ibc)
One way and target specific. Which would work on multiple targets. Right now, you can Deny interactions with a player. But this doesn't stop them from making their own actions, it's one way. As a result, Toony's Action Failed. Now, who here has that ability?
In this case, it's you, or Toony is lying. However, NJW targeted Web. In order for a kill to go through, he would need to be blocked. But he hasn't claimed such a thing. So, under these conditions, how did web die?
Let's look at the order of claims.
TricMagic, Did Nothing.[See this as me being Mafia if you like for the purpose of deduction.]
NJW: Deflection: Web to Toony.Addendum: I wasn't told I was roleblocked. Could have been a redirect, that's pretty interfering.Why is Web dead and not me then? Your claim doesn't make sense. FoU stated at the end of D2 that redirects are told to the person being redirected.
Roden: Ordered to Target Tric by Web. Claims Repel, preventing others from interacting with me. Note this does not reflect actions, simply causes them to fail. [Hypothosis: By nature, it's priority is higher than any other currently active. Only the Commuter would be higher.]
ToonyMan: Attempted to check NJW, Action Failed.
Vector: Gave Watcher Invention to Roden.[Roden claims this before Vector. Only applicable in a Vector/Roden team, otherwise truth.]
No actions currently known could bypass NJW's Reflection, but for Strogman that NJW brought up early on before any other claims were made. But for argument, he also said Roden would interfered. But there wasn't an Action Failed, so this isn't true if they aren't the same alignment.
In this case, Toony has to be lying about his role. But here is the kicker. Toony was the first person to really claim today. Not later. Not even after info had popped up. This would be the long con, and he'd need to have a second ability.
Under what conditions could Toony kill Web? Not alone unless it is a Strongman case. Together, it would be Roden. And here is the first nail awaiting your coffin.
Moving on, me. The exact same applies, except I've been lying about Parity from the beginning. This is one possibility. I'm actually very likely to have been able to kill webadict in that case. Nail here happens to be this is literally the first time I've heard of Parity, it's not something I'd come up with on my own. In this case, it's more likely to be true. Toony could search for town guns, while I searched for Mafia Allies. But then, why would web die? The answer is, he wouldn't. We would have just stuck to cover till we found our ally, or shot Vector instead, securing our victory. There are currently no circumstances where this sequence of events is false. No one protected Vector last night. Therefore, it is FALSE by default, for it didn't happen.
Next, NJW. In this case, he simply killed Web alone. However, Toony's ability wouldn't have failed. This would imply an extra power to him.
However, this is the second nail. Roden, you, would have just the ability to manage that. And your claim time fits too. No one is left who can confrim your action against me, and Vector had already given you the invention, so you knew what he did. One can't take the chance your single gun is noticed.
Vector next. Not much here, my ability would have needed to be messed with, or he's a godfather. The latter is unlikely given my one-shot nature. So in any team he's mafia, so are you. This, however, is unlikely.
Roden: Interference, brainwashing, redirection, repulsion, roleblocking, JOAT. You handed NJW the gun he killed with, with him none the wiser. You did not roleblock the first night. This is a far out theory however, as you'd need to be solo. Though having a secondary action might help with that, it's unlikely.
Funnily enough, you are well suited to negating the protection on web, or blocking abilities and results, hence reducing the info town has.
... 1 shot, 1 guarantee of victory. But only 1 mafia and 1 mafia ally. Or, 2 mafia allies and 1 mafia. Or perhaps, an even-day factional kill to balance the setup a bit more. Either way, all roads lead to Ro(me)den.
The issue is this entire setup is a mess. Toony would need to be strongarm and acting alone for you not to be mafia of some stripe. In order for any case where you are town, mafia must be acting alone, not together with allies. That's the only result that makes sense. And if Mafia is acting alone, then they'd die tomorrow either way. And in every case where Mafia are 2, you are the other. The only other case is me being mafia.
There is one inarguable, undisputed truth that proves that I'm not lying here. Both Toony and NJW are claiming somebody screwed with their results, and it's 100% impossible for me to have somehow blocked both of them. We know for a fact that at least one of them has to be lying. And we know for a fact that I can't be a killer due to the Night 1 outcome.I will self-vote if somebody can actually prove this is incorrect. I'm beyond frustrated at this point. Every single bit of suspicion towards me has been speculation without a single shred of hard proof to back it up and I'm kind of over it.
Say the set up is 2 mafia + 1 ally. I target Web and Jail him, as ordered. This leaves my scum buddy free to perform the NK, and they know not to target Web because I let them know I'm Jailing him. Yet nobody dies.
Scenario 2. 1 mafia + 1 ally. I would have to have Multitasking as a passive in order to kill and follow my orders. I know I'm Jailing Web, so I would target somebody else. Yet, nobody dies.
Finally, why do I ever kill Web when Vector is confirmed to be aligned with Town due to Tric's Parity check? Why risk killing a potential ally? Why not endgame the town Night 1? Why not kill a Cop claim who might check me and out me as mafia?
Just look at the facts, and you know I can't be mafia. It has to be either NJW, Toony, or both of them, and town wins by voting there no matter what.
NJW
Ok, looks like some claims may be in order, as the scumkill seems to have failed. We may be able to build up a picture of the night. I am a captain restricted deflector. I can choose my second target but my first is chosen for me.
I deflected Webadict onto MaximumSpin.
Ok, looks like some claims may be in order, as the scumkill seems to have failed. We may be able to build up a picture of the night. I am a captain restricted deflector. I can choose my second target but my first is chosen for me.Aye. I did warn ye Mafia not to kill me. Now look whatcha gone an' done!
I deflected Webadict onto MaximumSpin.
Yarrr... I be a One-shot Roleblocker Captain. Me crew consists of a Jailer... Nah, I'll let you claim as ye want, but this be a lie (Roden, the ship "doctor"), a 50% Inventor (Vector, me best cannoneer), and a Deflector (NJW2000, me first mate).
During the day, I can set the course for me crews' ships. And once at Night, I can lock onna ye in the brig!
T'prove I be a scurvy sea dog, I sent me best men... er, sea dogs... to come test their metal against yer's truly! Needed to prove which o' ye were truly up ter the task of sailin' me ship! NJW2000 passed th' bar with flyin' colors. Tha' should prove the lad's greener'n seaweed.
So, either Maximum Spin be Kill-Immune, or Roden may be yer savior, ya harr.
Interesting.
I happen to be a commuter. I didn't do anything in the night, nor did I receive anything, unless some weird flavour about sitting in a room with chips and a book was supposed to indicate something. I am not entirely sure how this resolves the webadict-centred action web.
Vector/TMag is a highly plausible scum pairing - Vector knows TM's play well enough to coach him. This could, therefore, be a plan to appear to clear Vector by getting me lynched, since they would know I am town. This would be easy enough to pull off that it's an extremely sensible plan.
I am going to hold back on voting until I hear more results from people.
Right. I checked Vector and it was negative so no guns on them at least.
Right after Web, before Max.Right. I checked Vector and it was negative so no guns on them at least.K, I'm a 1-shot Parity Cop, rather than the other one. I check Two target's auras rather than 1. And I can confirm Vector and Max Spin have the Same Alignment.
In other news, if you don't believe me, lynch me. Or I'm a multiple, but what would be the balance in that?
That said, someone in the Captain's list is a traitor.
Ok, I think we caught scum.And you are last, besides Vector. Why, what a perfect time to make your claim.
Last night I was ordered to target Web. I did, and chose to Jail him. However, I actually got a results PM that told me that I screwed up and Jailed Max instead. With no kill happening, it leads me to believe Max made the NK and that I stopped him. I just don't think scum would've targeted him, so I don't think I protected him. Though if NJW's Deflect also affects kill actions, that would explain why there wasn't a kill, since I would be protecting someone who became the NK target.
The Commuter claim has to be a lie though because Tric has results on Max and NJW seems to have successfully Deflected me onto Max. Toony's claim that Vector doesn't have a gun is Strange though, if both Max and Vector are scum. It's possible we have a scum Inventor who has to hand out guns to town who they believe will misfire at night, I suppose. Maybe that's what the Gunsmith is for?
Does it say something We're 3 hours from the end of the day.A few more minutes. Long post soon, then we'll settle on an elimination target.
... Those words do not fill me with confidence NJW. Compared to Toony you set off far more of my scum-senses.Does it say something We're 3 hours from the end of the day.A few more minutes. Long post soon, then we'll settle on an elimination target.
Spoiler: Don't peak till after NJW everyone (click to show/hide)
?Spoiler: Don't peak till after NJW everyone (click to show/hide)Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Having two or more conversations is the only way I can talk.Ok, I have to say that now we know Web's role, some of his posts are absolutely lustrous.
I was ordered to target Tric, which knowing that Web was mafia-aligned now, seems like TMI that Tric is town. He knew I was a JOAT and assumed I have blocking abilities (even though he claimed I was a Doctor lol, pretty sure that was supposed to be a crumb for scum to NK me), and he wouldn't have me directly role block the mafia team, so I'm fairly certain Tric is town.This post asks us to believe that Web knew the mafia team, was willing to order one town player to interfere with another that claimed to no longer have a power, and wanted scum to kill someone under his command. Web can't TMI as far as I know, would probably have tried to use interference abilities to his advantage, and being Web would have held onto his power as Captain at any cost, not asked the mafia to slaughter his pet townies. Also, he would have used an interference ability to interfere with someone more threatening- perhaps even me, not someone with no ability to act. So maybe killing Roden wouldn't be such a bad plan, considering posts like these
Give Vote to Vector
Ima try this. As the only confirmed town, he's likely the best suited to cracking things.
Case in point. Toony, can you doublecheck Vector? I'm a bit worried.I could, okay.
That's hammer.It's stuff like that that makes me worried Vector.
Toonyman (0):
Roden (3): TricMagic, ToonyMan, Vector
TricMagic (0):
NJW2000 (1): Roden
Vector (0):
No Execution (0):
Not Voting (1): NJW2000
3 to hammer.
Interference JOAT (town):
(Auto) Orders: Instead of being able to choose your own action target, your target is selected for you by the Captain. You may still choose not to act. If the Captain dies, you lose the ability to act if they were Town and gain the ability to act freely if they were non-Town.
(1-Shot, Night) Jailkeep [target]: You use a set of locksmith’s tools to lock your target’s door shut, preventing them from acting but also protecting them from kill actions, this Night. They will be given a ‘you were roleblocked’ result if they attempted to act.
(1-Shot, Night) Rolestop [target]: You use a network of tripwires and chains to ensure that all actions used on your target tonight will fail, except this one.
(1-Shot, Night) Repel [target]: Choose a player (you do not visit your choice). You use magnetic dust on your target, causing their action to fail if it would visit your chosen player.
Toonyman (0):
TricMagic (0):
NJW2000 (0):
Vector (0):
No Execution (0):
Not Voting (4): ToonyMan, TricMagic, NJW2000, Vector
3 to hammer.
You dumb fucks.Mood.
*bleh*
It's Toonyman. I checked a bizarre one-time condition on my deflect, and it turned out it came into play. Should have done due diligence at the start of the game, I guess. Interesting that people get told who their actions get deflected onto but I get an "action successful" result if my action just doesn't occur.
If not game, mechanical analysis suggests Vector will be their mafia ally, as does the fact they hammered town twice - glad Tric's on the same page here.
This is also the final nail in the coffin of Vector's mafiahood. As in we can confirm via Toony's result that Vector did not have a gun N1 if he got a positive result off of me. So I now hold one of these 50/50 guns I can use tonight. A coinflip's chance of victory, but one nonetheless.
Killing Vector would have been the smart play, but open up to a 3 person standoff. Killing Toony would make it NJW. The opposite is also true.Why exactly are you panicking? And no way I'm voting till some talk is done.
Funnily enough, if it is Toony he couldn't target Vector. Otherwise I would have died last night. The same doesn't hold if it's NJW. So that's likely why there was no kill.
This is also the final nail in the coffin of Vector's mafiahood. As in we can confirm via Toony's result that Vector did not have a gun N1 if he got a positive result off of me. So I now hold one of these 50/50 guns I can use tonight. A coinflip's chance of victory, but one nonetheless.
Also, sorry Roden. But with your role flipped, we can confirm your actions.
Vector>Roden=Watcher Invention.
Toony>NJW(Interrupted by Roden)
Roden>TricMagic=Repel shield.
NJW>Web=Deflection
This is the current claims today. Notice something off in them?
Panicky much? And yes, I will shoot you or toony, if we get the wrong person.Yeah, I panicked pretty hard. And posted with a regrettable tone, I'll admit. I don't regret the panicking though, I was pretty sure you/Toony were the scumteam, and thought mafia were about to hammer for game. I really don't pretend to be good at reading you, I genuinely thought you were mafia.Killing Vector would have been the smart play, but open up to a 3 person standoff. Killing Toony would make it NJW. The opposite is also true.Why exactly are you panicking? And no way I'm voting till some talk is done.
Funnily enough, if it is Toony he couldn't target Vector. Otherwise I would have died last night. The same doesn't hold if it's NJW. So that's likely why there was no kill.
This is also the final nail in the coffin of Vector's mafiahood. As in we can confirm via Toony's result that Vector did not have a gun N1 if he got a positive result off of me. So I now hold one of these 50/50 guns I can use tonight. A coinflip's chance of victory, but one nonetheless.
Also, sorry Roden. But with your role flipped, we can confirm your actions.
Vector>Roden=Watcher Invention.
Toony>NJW(Interrupted by Roden)
Roden>TricMagic=Repel shield.
NJW>Web=Deflection
This is the current claims today. Notice something off in them?
....
I'll let Toony tear your case to shreds. Cause that's all that's going to be left after he's done.I mean... is there a reason you're not going to try that yourself? Because you seem to enjoying that sort of large-scale analysis, and things would go faster if I could answer any obvious questions sooner rather than later.
Toony: Why are you unconcerned about Tric having a gun?Should I be? I'm glad you were able to give a gun to Tric as this means Tric can shoot NJW if you mislynch me. I don't believe NJW can self-target their deflection...at the very least it should raise town's win rate by 50% no matter what happens.
NJW is the killer.
It’s either Toony/NJW or just Toony.Which is it Vector? I refuse to lose to NJW who is openly being scum in front of me.
So there's really just one mafia... ok, that's pretty weird. Could be a very odd situation with mafia-allies... but I figure they'd have hashed out who their partners are.The game would have auto-ended if there were two mafia, there's only four people left.
Yeah, I panicked pretty hard. And posted with a regrettable tone, I'll admit. I don't regret the panicking though, I was pretty sure you/Toony were the scumteam, and thought mafia were about to hammer for game. I really don't pretend to be good at reading you, I genuinely thought you were mafia.None of this makes sense, mafia would have already won if there were two alive still. It's just you.
My role, in more detail:You never deflected Web to me on N2 did you? You shot Web and are trying to frame me by explaining some unique made up case where your deflection wouldn't work.
So, turns out that my deflection fails if I'd make someone target themselves, and the mod doesn't tell me that this happened. This is why I spent D3 theorizing about nonsense like bus drivers and mafia deflection-strongmen. And also why I didn't really engage with Roden's post about how someone had to be lying about what happened in the night - I thought that he had a weird interference power, or mafia had something hidden up their sleeve, or so on.
I should have checked this earlier, I'll admit, but it was just a possibility I completely failed to see. It is weird that I get less reliable information whenever I deflect, but in this specific case I get to know who performed the kill, but that's the way FoU has it.
I targeted Toony, so it has be Toony that did the kill. There's no other way through my deflection without actually mucking with my action, and I'd get told about that.
Welp, Vector was completely right, it's just Toony. And not Tric. Which feels crazy.Why does it feel crazy?
I'll let Toony tear your case to shreds. Cause that's all that's going to be left after he's done.Vector would have to agree or else we're going to end with a tie/no-lynch today.
I tried to check Vector but targeted Tric instead who came back positive but I don't find that alarming.
While it appears true that Tric has a new gun, I can't fully confirm that is the case because there are certain town roles that I will always get a guilty result on, such as cops. All I can say is that Vector was clean on N1 and that Tric was loaded on N3.
The game would have auto-ended if there were two mafia, there's only four people left.Obviously not, Vector can give themselves guns and I have a deflect, so if it was Vector and I against you and Tric, we could have potentially done something. It was perfectly reasonable not to expect the game to end while we still had a chance to win. FoU isn't going to break that convention.
Your mafiakill is only on even-numbered nights, isn't it? We have no reason to believe a kill happened on N1 or N3.6 town vs a mafia and a mafia ally, where the mafia kill is only on even numbered nights? What kind of nonsense is this? FoU gives some weird kill restrictions but that really takes the cake. Mafia would be absolutely nerfed to the ground if that were the case.
And the mafiakill must be special like multi-tasking, as Roden targeted you with Repel or Rolestop instead which caused my action to fail, or you have a second ability that is a part of your factional kill. This information would not show up on Webadict's captain flip.
Night 2, I used my Repel and prevented Tric from being able to interact with NJW. I actually misread it and thought I would be the reverse since I was trying to protect Tric, but it ultimately didn't matter.It's essentially a one-way target-specific role block.
(1-Shot, Night) Repel [target]: Choose a player (you do not visit your choice). You use magnetic dust on your target, causing their action to fail if it would visit your chosen player.
While it appears true that Tric has a new gun, I can't fully confirm that is the case because there are certain town roles that I will always get a guilty result on, such as cops. All I can say is that Vector was clean on N1 and that Tric was loaded on N3.Why will you always get a guilty result on cops? FoU gave my ability an unusual endgame-weirdness, but this just makes no sense.
Roden flipped town, so we can trust that he used the repel:Night 2, I used my Repel and prevented Tric from being able to interact with NJW. I actually misread it and thought I would be the reverse since I was trying to protect Tric, but it ultimately didn't matter.It's essentially a one-way target-specific role block.
So... Tric not being able to interact with me is why your action failed? This is going to be interesting.Quote(1-Shot, Night) Repel [target]: Choose a player (you do not visit your choice). You use magnetic dust on your target, causing their action to fail if it would visit your chosen player.
Main issue here is that Toony would have had to try and kill me to get the action failed result.NJW claims they deflected Web to me. So I should have died if he's telling the truth I think.
Ah, right. Toony never brought this up. Why did you never tell us who you deflected Web to? We focused on someone managing to bypass it Day 3, but we never learned who would have died instead.
Main issue here is that Toony would have had to try and kill me to get the action failed result.He is lying about the action failed result. He did not get an action failed result.
Ah, right. Toony never brought this up. Why did you never tell us who you deflected Web to? We focused on someone managing to bypass it Day 3, but we never learned who would have died instead.
What's the difference between Rolestop and Repel? Web ordered Roden to target me, but Roden targeted NJW?Repel stops one specific player (the target) acting on another specific player. Roden claimed, and we should believe him, that he was forced to target you, and repelled from me. So for Toony's interpretation to make sense, Web would have had to order both roden and I to target you, from his perspective assigning roden's ability at random and losing his protection. Which I don't think is something Web would do. Especially as he gave himself two layers of protection the night before.
Hope you're enjoying the fact that you're still in the game solely due to luck and town's incompetence :PYeah, sweat more buddy.
I did deflect Web onto Toony, but Toony was targeting web. My action gets bypassed without me being told if it would cause someone to self-target. Because, as you found out last round, FoU has some very particular ideas as a GM. I think the logic is that my action doesn't fail or change target, it's just the shield I create that fails.Why make hypotheticals on D3 instead of just asking the mod like you have today? It's only because you need to now.
That's why I spent all of D3 attempting to work out what was going on. Why wouldn't I just claim something easier - like deflecting myself or Toony onto someone, or simply not obeying Web because I didn't trust him, or having been roleblocked? Anything would be better as scum than what I actually did.Why wouldn't I just claim something easier? I'm under suspicious for this action failed result the same way you are for your non-deflection. Right now I think the most likely explanation is the solo mafia has a special ability you are taking advantage of. The Captain ally would not be aware of any of that so we're in the dark.
Why make hypotheticals on D3 instead of just asking the mod like you have today? It's only because you need to now.I needed to know D3, except FoU had made it pretty clear that we'd know if we were roleblocked or redirected, so I assumed something else must have happened. I freely admit I screwed up there, weird as FoU's convention is.
Why wouldn't I just claim something easier? I'm under suspicious for this action failed result the same way you are for your non-deflection. Right now I think the most likely explanation is the solo mafia has a special ability you are taking advantage of. The Captain ally would not be aware of any of that so we're in the dark.You didn't have any better ideas for claims, presumably.
NJW, Vote for Toony.Eh?
Kinda funny that is all you have to say. Are you still holding doubts?QuoteWhy make hypotheticals on D3 instead of just asking the mod like you have today? It's only because you need to now.I needed to know D3, except FoU had made it pretty clear that we'd know if we were roleblocked or redirected, so I assumed something else must have happened. I freely admit I screwed up there, weird as FoU's convention is.QuoteWhy wouldn't I just claim something easier? I'm under suspicious for this action failed result the same way you are for your non-deflection. Right now I think the most likely explanation is the solo mafia has a special ability you are taking advantage of. The Captain ally would not be aware of any of that so we're in the dark.You didn't have any better ideas for claims, presumably.
And yeah, if Tric and Vector haven't clocked that one of us must be lying by now, I'd be pretty astonished.NJW, Vote for Toony.Eh?
ok, unvote, this was just a trick I was trying to play on Tric....
NJW was the one thing preventing Web from dying on N2. Web still died.My ability cannot deflect someone if they'd self-target, yes. I can't beat the mafia in a 1v1, I just die at that point. You being mafia would imply you're solo scum with a standard kill you haven't successfully used every day. Mafia don't have to kill.
Me being mafia would imply I am solo scum with a standard kill I can't even use every day, as NJW is stating that me killing Web only worked because I was their deflection target, which is bullshit. How is that fair for mafia? Even if that's how deflection works, NJW can say whatever he wants as he shoots Web while also planting suspicion on me.
Vector, I am going to be annoyed if you're mafia. Where are you?I'd also like it if Vector turned up, as you might have some faith in their analysis.
At least there's a 50/50 chance of winning if I do get ML'd. I know you know this Tric, but I feel compelled to reiterate that shooting Toony is really what you have to do in that case.On the same token, if I'm mislynched you need to shoot NJW tonight Tric. I don't believe he can self-deflect.
I haven't seen NJW as mafia so as for their general post behavior and emotions I can't judge them as well. For example, their attitude towards other players under different circumstances, I can't tell on that front. It reminds me a lot of Jim's mafia play.Regardless of my alignment, I suspect this is something of an affront to Jim.
Vector, I am going to be annoyed if you're mafia. Where are you?
I would let Tric unvote so this game can end faster rather than have a tie in a game where mafia suck.Ultimately I can't really justify this as Tric's vote happened well after 2 AM. Technically speaking the Day should have ended then.
Toonyman (2): NJW2000, Vector
TricMagic (0):
NJW2000 (2): ToonyMan, TricMagic
Vector (0):
No Execution (0):
Not Voting (0):
3 to hammer.
Deflector (town):
(Auto) Orders: Instead of being able to choose your own action's primary target, your primary target is selected for you by the Captain. You may still choose not to act. If the Captain dies, you lose the ability to act if they were Town and gain the ability to act freely if they were non-Town.
(Night) Deflect [target1] [target2]: You tear open a wormhole, causing every player whose primary target matches your first target to change their primary target to your second target. The redirection will not occur if it would cause a player to self-target.
ToonyMan (0):
TricMagic (0):
Vector (0):
No Execution (0):
Not Voting (3): ToonyMan, TricMagic, Vector
2 to hammer.
Right, at this point I think you are mafia Vector. What were you thinking?
Nice theory, except I gave Tric a gun two nights ago?That it is. But Vector. I'm not that dumb. Using a gun last night would result in 2 town dying, cause I fully expected you to die last night. Or me. Instead, NJW died.
- I've been cleared by two cops, yourself included.We can't trust our results if you're a godfather or have some factional ability benefit as solo scum.
Nice theory, except I gave Tric a gun two nights ago?
- My actions on nights 2 and 3 were publicly recorded. For N4 you can't actually record that I gave NJW a bulletproof vest, but I did. Regardless, I could not have killed N2 or N3.Multi-tasking!
- ToonyMan was communicating with Webadict in-thread. See my large case against him.Bait by Web to falsely implicate me!
If you want to throw the game and let Toony convince you, that's fine. I don't really feel motivated to fight with someone who ignores their own inspection result + record that I couldn't have possibly killed on nights that kills happened + the fact that if I'm scum, I literally made a townie into a vig.If Tric votes wrong today then they'll get endgamed. I don't think they can act as a vig anymore with your gun. So it's not even a 50/50 anymore like if we hit town yesterday, which was guaranteed to happen between me and NJW. Another reason you would want a tie yesterday as now today is definitive.
Another reason you would want a tie yesterday as now today is definitive.Well, a tie or for me to be lynched yesterday. As a tie would still likely lead to my death today unless Tric voted against you.
If Vector/MS, then either MS did the kill and got blocked, or Vector did the kill and targeted me (They wouldn't do that, would they??? :()Web might have knew he was targeted by Vector?
(If a Mafia player is tied to your Authority, usage of their factional ability is exempt from this requirement. Furthermore, the players affected by Authority can still choose to take no action.)If you have a delayed killed - which I suspect - then you simply targeted Web with it on N1 and that's why they perished on N2.
Then N3 I decided not to kill, and gave Tric a gun. And on N4 I both made NJW bulletproof and shot him.No, you targeted NJW on N3 with your kill while also giving Tric a gun. You didn't give NJW a bulletproof obviously since that would protect him from dying.
You played a good game, bud, but it's time to give up. You've lost.The game's not over because you couldn't lynch me yesterday Vector.
... ToonyMan Let the chips fall where they may. Also Shoot Vector Tonight. The main issue here is the whole Copsensor thing. If you are mafia vector, this trick won't ever work again.The game is over now Tric. You can't shoot Vector tonight even if you wanted to, that's how being endgame'd works.
Alos, why did the Mafia get gimped so hard?!I was a Role Cop that could only kill every other night. I had multi-tasking and a strongkill but it didn't matter at all. I was basically fucked on my own.
I did wonder briefly if that happened - I assumed Vector must have been wrong about the "communication in thread" thing otherwise, but their case seemed very tight. I didn't really think you were mafia, I just wanted to interact with someone I didn't think I'd ever manage to read without mechanical info.Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Alos, why did the Mafia get gimped so hard?!It was very weird that my ability had four major weaknesses (captain control, no self-target, no causing self-targets, not being told about some failures) but then this one very specific strength in that if one mafia targets their ally they kill their ally through the protection and instantly out themselves to me. So Toony kinda stepped on a mine there, no real way he could have seen it coming. In fact, I struggled to see it coming after it happened. Don't know enought to speculate on the game balance more generally, but it looked like you had a pretty hard job.
I would like to know the extent to which you two were actually communicating in-thread, if you don't mind telling us.
... What. That's so BAD. But WHY?!Alos, why did the Mafia get gimped so hard?!I was a Role Cop that could only kill every other night. I had multi-tasking and a strongkill but it didn't matter at all. I was basically fucked on my own.
I would like to know the extent to which you two were actually communicating in-thread, if you don't mind telling us.We weren't. That was an assumption by Vector. I left clues because I didn't want to die by the nightkill! I was actually trying to pretend I was fake Mafia, so I could off myself if things looked bad for the real Mafia.
I am wayward Cassandra, o woe is me!I think this is the most fitting quote for me this game.
6.) The Commuter. We got super lucky that Maximum Spin didn't explain what happened well. Had they said what actually happened, we would've had an essentially unkillable Townie.I'm only one person. I thought I conveyed it pretty clearly, what would you have said?
I was honestly shocked that NJW2k wasn't mafia. I thought him and Toonyman were the team (and they were just busing each other) right up until he died. The major wrong assumption I had was that the setup wouldn't be so, uh, bad as to only have one severely gimped member. Toonyman and webadict as actual scum seems like it would have worked better, but webadict was too obviously an ally.More or less the same with me. I honestly thought NJW was mafia because the NK and night actions made no sense. I didn't vote Toony because I knew one of NJW/Toony had to be mafia, but it looked like NJW was taking advantage of Tric's tunnel on me to set me up to get lynched in the scenario where NJW-mafia Toony-town and we mislynch Toony with me as the deciding vote. And if both were mafia NJW never votes Toony. So I just felt defeated and gave up, especially since Tric's tunnel felt unreasonable and everyone's accusations were all speculation based and contradicted the apparent mass town read I had the two days prior.
We all assumed it was auto if true, and since you got jailed and copped it looked like you were lying. Nobody realized that you had to activate it.6.) The Commuter. We got super lucky that Maximum Spin didn't explain what happened well. Had they said what actually happened, we would've had an essentially unkillable Townie.I'm only one person. I thought I conveyed it pretty clearly, what would you have said?
You should've claimed X-Shot Commuter (You can hide the number of shots, if you want) or you claim that you are an activated Commuter, but you needed to claim that you didn't activate your ability more obviously than you did. The issue is that you claimed to be a Commuter, which sort of has implications that you automatically commute. Had you claimed your full role (2-shot Commuter), people would have instantly known you hadn't used your ability. It was a bit clearer in hindsight that you didn't commute, but you seemed to say that your commuting stopped the kill, but the kill wouldn't've bounced to you if you were commuting. It was a bit confusing.6.) The Commuter. We got super lucky that Maximum Spin didn't explain what happened well. Had they said what actually happened, we would've had an essentially unkillable Townie.I'm only one person. I thought I conveyed it pretty clearly, what would you have said?
You should've claimed X-Shot Commuter (You can hide the number of shots, if you want) or you claim that you are an activated Commuter, but you needed to claim that you didn't activate your ability more obviously than you did. The issue is that you claimed to be a Commuter, which sort of has implications that you automatically commute. Had you claimed your full role (2-shot Commuter), people would have instantly known you hadn't used your ability. It was a bit clearer in hindsight that you didn't commute, but you seemed to say that your commuting stopped the kill, but the kill wouldn't've bounced to you if you were commuting. It was a bit confusing.I see. I did not actually know how commuters normally work. I don't think I've ever played a game with the role before. I didn't want to specify how many shots I had, but you're right, I could have been clearer that it was at least shotted.
ToonyMan (2): Vector, TricMagic
TricMagic (0):
Vector (1): ToonyMan
No Execution (0):
Not Voting (0):
2 to hammer.
Odd Night Multitasking Even Night Strong Role Cop (mafia):
(Auto) Odd Night Multitasking: During odd-numbered Nights, you may take an additional action as long as it isn’t the same as the first action you took.
(Auto) Even Night Strong: Your actions bypass all failure-causing effects, such as a role block or Doctor protection, as long as the Night is even-numbered. You may still have your target changed, and this effect does not bypass a commute action.
(Night) Role Cop [target]: You use telepathy to invade the target’s mind and steal the secrets of their role - and learn their entire role, but not their alignment.
webadict:
Captain (mafia-ally):
(Auto) Authority: You have command over the players with the roles 50% Inventor, Deflector, and Interference JOAT. If you do not use Command during the Day, it will be automatically used at Day end with random selections. If you die, the players bound to you lose the ability to act if you were Town and gain the ability to act freely if you were non-Town.
(Day) Command: You decide in advance what the Night-action primary targets of the players under your command must be. Each player affected by Authority will be made aware of your choice for them when the Night starts. (If a Mafia player is tied to your Authority, usage of their factional ability is exempt from this requirement. Furthermore, the players affected by Authority can still choose to take no action.)
Roden:
Interference JOAT (town):
(Auto) Orders: Instead of being able to choose your own action target, your target is selected for you by the Captain. You may still choose not to act. If the Captain dies, you lose the ability to act if they were Town and gain the ability to act freely if they were non-Town.
(1-Shot, Night) Jailkeep [target]: You use a set of locksmith’s tools to lock your target’s door shut, preventing them from acting but also protecting them from kill actions, this Night. They will be given a ‘you were roleblocked’ result if they attempted to act.
(1-Shot, Night) Rolestop [target]: You use a network of tripwires and chains to ensure that all actions used on your target tonight will fail, except this one.
(1-Shot, Night) Repel [target]: Choose a player (you do not visit your choice). You use magnetic dust on your target, causing their action to fail if it would visit your chosen player.
Vector:
50% Inventor (town):
(Auto) Orders: Instead of being able to choose your own action target, your target is selected for you by the Captain. You may still choose not to act. If the Captain dies, you lose the ability to act if they were Town and gain the ability to act freely if they were non-Town.
(Night) Invent [target]: You grant your target your choice from a 1-Shot 50% Bulletproof, a 1-Shot 50% Kill, or a 1-Shot 50% Voyeur. You must use all three of your available choices before you can repeat a choice. Abilities you gift will not appear in roleflips as they are not part of your target’s original role.QuoteReference:
(1-Shot, Auto) 50% Bulletproof: This shoddy vest provides weak protection. If you would be killed, this ability is expended and you have a 50% chance to survive the kill.
(1-Shot, Night) 50% Kill [target]: This improvised gun provides a chance to kill. There is a 50% chance you kill your target and a 50% chance this action fails.
(1-Shot, Night) 50% Voyeur [target]: These faulty binoculars allow you to try and get the gist of what’s happening to your target. You have a 50% chance to learn what categories of actions were performed on your target during this Night, and a 50% chance for this action to fail. Available categories: Investigative, Interference, Protective, Lethal, Other.
NJW2000:
Deflector (town):
(Auto) Orders: Instead of being able to choose your own action’s primary target, your primary target is selected for you by the Captain. You may still choose not to act. If the Captain dies, you lose the ability to act if they were Town and gain the ability to act freely if they were non-Town.
(Night) Deflect [target1] [target2]: You tear open a wormhole, causing every player whose primary target matches your first target to change their primary target to your second target. The redirection will not occur if it would cause a player to self-target.
Maximum Spin:
2-Shot Commuter (town):
(2-Shot, Night) Commute: You temporarily exit the game by hiding on the roof of the hotel in a sleeping bag, granting you absolute immunity to all Night actions. (Players who attempt to act on you will receive a ‘your action failed’ result.) Your sleeping bag will wear out after you do this twice, however.
TricMagic:
1-Shot Parity Cop (town):
(1-Shot, Night) Parity Cop [target1] [target2]: You inspect the auras of your two targets, and learn whether your first target’s alignment is the same as your second target’s alignment, or different. If either of your targets dies tonight, this action fails, but this action’s shot is not used up.
EuchreJack:
Bodyguard (town):
(Night) Protect [target]: You guard your target, protecting them from up to one kill action performed this Night. If you successfully prevent a kill action, however, you will be hit with its effects instead (this will not change the targeting of the action).
ToonyMan:
Odd Night Multitasking Even Night Strong Role Cop (mafia):
(Auto) Odd Night Multitasking: During odd-numbered Nights, you may take an additional action as long as it isn’t the same as the first action you took.
(Auto) Even Night Strong: Your actions bypass all failure-causing effects, such as a role block or Doctor protection, as long as the Night is even-numbered. You may still have your target changed, and this effect does not bypass a commute action.
(Night) Role Cop [target]: You use telepathy to invade the target’s mind and steal the secrets of their role - and learn their entire role, but not their alignment.
(Factional, Night) Honor Duel [target]: You kill your target in a gentleman’s duel. If you successfully kill them, you may not attempt to use this action during the next Night.
On a second inspection you find a logbook within the "professional" killer's belongings. (https://quicktopic.com/53/H/c8eTn5uLy9U)You know, I saw Message 15, web's post, while looking through the pages. Which was a part of why I decided the way I did. Cause web wasn't town. Anything he said was suspect. (HAHAHA to quote Toony.)
How are you going to handle the private chats without Quicktopic now?
Oh man, I missed this. You guys are just so easy. No wonder Tric never wins as Mafia.Well, it was actually this post I saw. But that one gives the same energy.
So, Tric is probably Town because he's obviously stupid. Roden might be Town, but he'll be an absolute drag on the Town if he is, which is unfortunate. Vector is probably Mafia. ToonyMan is... Maybe Town. It wouldn't matter if he's Mafia because he won't be dying tonight regardless. Waiting on EuchreJack, but if Vector is Mafia like I think they are, then it's not EJ based on the Gambler's Fallacy, which would, in fact, leave it as either NJW2000 or Maximum Spin as the last Mafia. NJW2000 is not out of meta, so I'd be willing to leave them as neutral, and thus, it's Maximum Spin and Vector.Being right and being weak are not mutually exclusive. You should consider reading comprehension if you think I'm pointing out your ability to find scum as weak.webadictWow that got screwed up.
I was going to say that I can easily verify if you're telling the truth. You can say I'm a weak player but I caught you in D6 before you subbed out, and I called out both scum in the first round one after the other. If you want to underestimate me then I'm more than with not being fear killed tonight.
@ToonyMan: I never said you were Town. Only that I would call you Town. There's a subtle difference.I was actually signaling you back here :(
@ToonyMan: I never said you were Town. Only that I would call you Town. There's a subtle difference.I was actually signaling you back here :(
Toonyman (0):
Roden (0):
TricMagic (0):
EuchreJack (0):
NJW2000 (0):
Vector (0):
webadict (0):
Maximum Spin (0):
No Execution (0):
Not Voting (8): ToonyMan, Roden, TricMagic, EuchreJack, NJW2000, Vector, webadict, Maximum Spin
5 to hammer.
@Maximum Spin: What are your thoughts on Toonyman's first post?I don't think Toonyman is really that dumb, but that doesn't necessarily mean he's mafia. It's not a good first-post look, though.
-Good stuff Toony. The chance of the roles being assigned exactly as they were in the last three games is already 1/(7!)(7!)(8!), in other words 0.000000000097638%, so your case looks pretty watertight already. More seriously, I know what this play is and I don't like engaging with it.
-This is bad logic, and you were right to say so last game. I see your point about the probing Max thing, in that you can't really expect to read someone whose town game is so deeply scum-sided, but generally speaking I don't like excuses for not scumhunting people, Jack. If you think one of Max and I are scum, you should at least be asking me questions.
@Roden: Your thoughts declaring roles?It's been a consistently pro town game winning strategy to claim roles or at least half claim, mafia doesn't really get much wiggle room. Do you feel hesitant to claim this time?
Roden: How confident do you feel that you can recognise Toony's scum play after the last game?I don't feel confident at all lol. His scum play doesn't really seem that different to his town play, even his tone read the same to me until the endgame. He's really good at flying under the radar especially early on, so early pressure on him honestly might be a good idea from now on.
@Maximum Spin: What are your thoughts on Toonyman's first post?I don't think Toonyman is really that dumb, but that doesn't necessarily mean he's mafia. It's not a good first-post look, though.
EuchreJack, what do you think of TricMagic's first post? Try to be as specific as possible.
-This is bad logic, and you were right to say so last game. I see your point about the probing Max thing, in that you can't really expect to read someone whose town game is so deeply scum-sided, but generally speaking I don't like excuses for not scumhunting people, Jack. If you think one of Max and I are scum, you should at least be asking me questions.
I'm assuming Toony is making a play here, I don't take him to be the type use RNG as an actual case against somebody. Toony, what's your role?@Roden: Your thoughts declaring roles?It's been a consistently pro town game winning strategy to claim roles or at least half claim, mafia doesn't really get much wiggle room. Do you feel hesitant to claim this time?
I'm a Delayer btw.
I did originally want to poke Tric but I'm fine seeing how Toony reacts to pressure.Nah, the right play here is that ToonyMan is actually Town. ToonyMan is so Town that I plan to pocket him without ever engaging with him. Thus, my play has begun. MUAHAHAHA!
I'll throw in my role. I will say that I can tell if someone was targeted by an action. Anyone else want to volunteer some info?i will not be volunteering information unless Forced to, as my role can determine If others are lying. Or maybe it can't, who can tell? I'm not a lie detector. the mafia will naturally assume this is a Soft/Hardclaim, and they'll be wrong. it's actually a fAkeCLAiM, NERDS!
Webadict: How are you planning to take advantage of the fact that half the players here are given to semi-truthfully roleclaiming almost immediately D1 come hell or high water?Ummm... Sure, let's play that game. Usually anyone that claims immediately is more likely to be Town, and some players can be ascertained to be Town from this, since I very much wouldn't expect them to fakeclaim early. This list includes EuchreJack, TricMagic, and, perhaps surprisingly, Vector. The first two for obvious reasons, and the last because if Vector fakeclaims, they use all their available information, and they wouldn't risk a fakeclaim early. They, also, wouldn't be claiming early, period, so this will never happen.
I don't think Toonyman is really that dumb, but that doesn't necessarily mean he's mafia. It's not a good first-post look, though.Wrong.
... It's Roden. Delayer isn't exactly townie, and we see how Toony's ealry gunsmith claim worked out last session.
I'll throw in my role. I will say that I can tell if someone was targeted by an action. Anyone else want to volunteer some info?i will not be volunteering information unless Forced to, as my role can determine If others are lying. Or maybe it can't, who can tell? I'm not a lie detector. the mafia will naturally assume this is a Soft/Hardclaim, and they'll be wrong. it's actually a fAkeCLAiM, NERDS!
The fact they are using it to hide. By saying what their role is so early without promting, us being delayed would be seen as normal, town trying to stop the kill. But all it does is delay us, resulting in mafia being able to take advantage of it. It's also trying to get roles to reveal, giving them options on who to delay.... It's Roden. Delayer isn't exactly townie, and we see how Toony's ealry gunsmith claim worked out last session.
Hm, but WHY is a claim of delayer not a townie claim, especially in one's first post (as in the case with Roden)?I'll throw in my role. I will say that I can tell if someone was targeted by an action. Anyone else want to volunteer some info?i will not be volunteering information unless Forced to, as my role can determine If others are lying. Or maybe it can't, who can tell? I'm not a lie detector. the mafia will naturally assume this is a Soft/Hardclaim, and they'll be wrong. it's actually a fAkeCLAiM, NERDS!
Hm, your first post was actually much more subdued than I expected from you, Webadict. Thanks, I guess. But, aren't most roles at least somewhat useful in determining if others are lying?
The fact they are using it to hide. By saying what their role is so early without promting, us being delayed would be seen as normal, town trying to stop the kill. But all it does is delay us, resulting in mafia being able to take advantage of it. It's also trying to get roles to reveal, giving them options on who to delay.No thanks. TricMagic.
Put simply, just because they revealed, does not make them town. If anything Delayer is a very negative role regardless of who has it. For one, it would ruin my own role's ability if it's used on me N1.
Hm, it would seem that Web would like you to claim your role, TricMagic. Or maybe it's just me. If you were town, would it not be best for you to either say more or less than what you have already said? Since you can't say any less any more, might as well tell us everything now.The fact they are using it to hide. By saying what their role is so early without promting, us being delayed would be seen as normal, town trying to stop the kill. But all it does is delay us, resulting in mafia being able to take advantage of it. It's also trying to get roles to reveal, giving them options on who to delay.No thanks. TricMagic.
Put simply, just because they revealed, does not make them town. If anything Delayer is a very negative role regardless of who has it. For one, it would ruin my own role's ability if it's used on me N1.
That's not what I said at all. I don't believe TricMagic, is all. Calling Delayer Mafia, fine, whatever, but their reasoning is wrong. By claiming Delayer immediately, they're mitigating the effects of the role. By NOT claiming it, they'd be scummier, so TricMagic is wrong.Hm, it would seem that Web would like you to claim your role, TricMagic. Or maybe it's just me. If you were town, would it not be best for you to either say more or less than what you have already said? Since you can't say any less any more, might as well tell us everything now.The fact they are using it to hide. By saying what their role is so early without promting, us being delayed would be seen as normal, town trying to stop the kill. But all it does is delay us, resulting in mafia being able to take advantage of it. It's also trying to get roles to reveal, giving them options on who to delay.No thanks. TricMagic.
Put simply, just because they revealed, does not make them town. If anything Delayer is a very negative role regardless of who has it. For one, it would ruin my own role's ability if it's used on me N1.
While we have heard from everyone I expect to hear from at this point (Vector doesn't usually post much D1), I think I'd like to see a few more posts before throwing up a reads list. But I think I can start voting NJW, at least.
Hm, so you're voting TricMagic because their logic is WRONG!? Uh, doesn't the TricMagic Town/Scum analysis work the other way, in that Logical Tric = Mafia Tric?That's not what I said at all. I don't believe TricMagic, is all. Calling Delayer Mafia, fine, whatever, but their reasoning is wrong. By claiming Delayer immediately, they're mitigating the effects of the role. By NOT claiming it, they'd be scummier, so TricMagic is wrong.Hm, it would seem that Web would like you to claim your role, TricMagic. Or maybe it's just me. If you were town, would it not be best for you to either say more or less than what you have already said? Since you can't say any less any more, might as well tell us everything now.The fact they are using it to hide. By saying what their role is so early without promting, us being delayed would be seen as normal, town trying to stop the kill. But all it does is delay us, resulting in mafia being able to take advantage of it. It's also trying to get roles to reveal, giving them options on who to delay.No thanks. TricMagic.
Put simply, just because they revealed, does not make them town. If anything Delayer is a very negative role regardless of who has it. For one, it would ruin my own role's ability if it's used on me N1.
While we have heard from everyone I expect to hear from at this point (Vector doesn't usually post much D1), I think I'd like to see a few more posts before throwing up a reads list. But I think I can start voting NJW, at least.
MaximumSpin: Why ask questions about a post that hasn't happened yet?Because I wanted to know what he expected it to be.
TricMagic has not posted yet in this game, so I can't answer that. Did you by any chance mean Toonyman?Pursuantly, no, I didn't. By the way, I'm only one person.
@Maximum Spin & Webadict: What is your read on NJW so far?He's going 80 in a 35 zone.
Hm, so you're voting TricMagic because their logic is WRONG!? Uh, doesn't the TricMagic Town/Scum analysis work the other way, in that Logical Tric = Mafia Tric?In a way, yes. Their conclusion is correct, but their leading information is not. But, if I'm fully reliant on that way of analyzing Tric, then I'd be under the impression that TricMagic can never get better, which is, in a way, completely dumb.
+2 Scum Points for House Webadict!
I don't think both would be the mafia team, although I think there is one mafia in NJW and Max.Hm, why? Is it because of my reasoning?
Toony, what's your role?Very deadly, very stupid. It works better if mafia don't know about it.
I did originally want to poke Tric but I'm fine seeing how Toony reacts to pressure.I appreciate the thought. I usually get to coast during every Day 1 since people just assume I'm town.
My savior is here. Dude this shit is so easy, Webadict is town. Boom only six people left to choose from.I did originally want to poke Tric but I'm fine seeing how Toony reacts to pressure.Nah, the right play here is that ToonyMan is actually Town. ToonyMan is so Town that I plan to pocket him without ever engaging with him. Thus, my play has begun. MUAHAHAHA!
The fact they are using it to hide. By saying what their role is so early without promting, us being delayed would be seen as normal, town trying to stop the kill. But all it does is delay us, resulting in mafia being able to take advantage of it. It's also trying to get roles to reveal, giving them options on who to delay.Your vote on Roden is ass, but I understand the paranoid after my Gunsmith claim last round.
Put simply, just because they revealed, does not make them town. If anything Delayer is a very negative role regardless of who has it. For one, it would ruin my own role's ability if it's used on me N1.
Thank you, thank you. I would be lying if I said I wasn't being at least semi-serious.-Good stuff Toony. The chance of the roles being assigned exactly as they were in the last three games is already 1/(7!)(7!)(8!), in other words 0.000000000097638%, so your case looks pretty watertight already. More seriously, I know what this play is and I don't like engaging with it.
What do you think of Max so far, being the Maxpert? Can you promise to keep extra scrutiny on Max?-This is bad logic, and you were right to say so last game. I see your point about the probing Max thing, in that you can't really expect to read someone whose town game is so deeply scum-sided, but generally speaking I don't like excuses for not scumhunting people, Jack. If you think one of Max and I are scum, you should at least be asking me questions.
How about I justy target you tonight web. Then you will know, you're all KNOW! WUBA-INC's food is the best.Hm, so you're voting TricMagic because their logic is WRONG!? Uh, doesn't the TricMagic Town/Scum analysis work the other way, in that Logical Tric = Mafia Tric?In a way, yes. Their conclusion is correct, but their leading information is not. But, if I'm fully reliant on that way of analyzing Tric, then I'd be under the impression that TricMagic can never get better, which is, in a way, completely dumb.
+2 Scum Points for House Webadict!
Call it intuition if you'd rather. I'd explain this vote a bit better, but I'd rather explain later. You can add some more scum points if you believe my explanation is unsatisfactory at that point, but I'd like TricMagic to explain more first.
More seriously, why? In what world is the delay of action resolution positive to finding out what happened and didn't happen at night? Cop results are delayed, roleblocks don't work properly, and it doesn't stop the one delayed from just dying the next night, or that very night.Yeah but, the thing is, sometimes town get unproductive roles, or heavily counterbalanced ones. And in general, a mafia member who gets an anti-town role probably doesn't SAY so, whereas a town member who does very well might, since it lets everyone know ahead of time that it might come up.
How about I justy target you tonight web. Then you will know, you're all KNOW! WUBA-INC's food is the best.Hm, so you're voting TricMagic because their logic is WRONG!? Uh, doesn't the TricMagic Town/Scum analysis work the other way, in that Logical Tric = Mafia Tric?In a way, yes. Their conclusion is correct, but their leading information is not. But, if I'm fully reliant on that way of analyzing Tric, then I'd be under the impression that TricMagic can never get better, which is, in a way, completely dumb.
+2 Scum Points for House Webadict!
Call it intuition if you'd rather. I'd explain this vote a bit better, but I'd rather explain later. You can add some more scum points if you believe my explanation is unsatisfactory at that point, but I'd like TricMagic to explain more first.
Any ideas what that might mean about NJW's alignment? Null, Scum, Town, maybe leaning one way or the other? What does "Too fast" mean, to you?@Maximum Spin & Webadict: What is your read on NJW so far?He's going 80 in a 35 zone.
Hm, so you're voting TricMagic because their logic is WRONG!? Uh, doesn't the TricMagic Town/Scum analysis work the other way, in that Logical Tric = Mafia Tric?In a way, yes. Their conclusion is correct, but their leading information is not. But, if I'm fully reliant on that way of analyzing Tric, then I'd be under the impression that TricMagic can never get better, which is, in a way, completely dumb.
+2 Scum Points for House Webadict!
Call it intuition if you'd rather. I'd explain this vote a bit better, but I'd rather explain later. You can add some more scum points if you believe my explanation is unsatisfactory at that point, but I'd like TricMagic to explain more first.
Any ideas what that might mean about NJW's alignment? Null, Scum, Town, maybe leaning one way or the other? What does "Too fast" mean, to you?I really don't want to give reads d1. It changes the facts on the ground too much. If I tell you what I think of what NJW is doing, then he also knows that, and what he does afterward has to be interpreted in light of his possession of that information. I don't like that kind of feedback loop.
Well, at least that matches what you said last round. Plus you were town last round, so good for you I guess.Any ideas what that might mean about NJW's alignment? Null, Scum, Town, maybe leaning one way or the other? What does "Too fast" mean, to you?I really don't want to give reads d1. It changes the facts on the ground too much. If I tell you what I think of what NJW is doing, then he also knows that, and what he does afterward has to be interpreted in light of his possession of that information. I don't like that kind of feedback loop.
@Jack:Technically, you stole my reasoning from last round and applied it here. So yes, it is because of "your" reasoning, because it is actually my own reasoning. Nothing from last round convinces me to abandon that reasoning, and I think the scum team last round actually reinforces it a bit.I don't think both would be the mafia team, although I think there is one mafia in NJW and Max.Hm, why? Is it because of my reasoning?
And what are your thoughts on NJW? You haven't said anything regarding your thoughts on NJW yet, either positive or negative.None. I could probably look at NJW if you'd like, but I think I'm not great at reading NJW, so my opinion should be regarded poorly.
You can't read him at all, so you're going to pressure him with an RVS stage vote. How convenient. No question or anything either, you're just going to plonk that vote down and leave it. And any poking of Tric is just going to be a blue-text declaration of poking.Roden: How confident do you feel that you can recognise Toony's scum play after the last game?I don't feel confident at all lol. His scum play doesn't really seem that different to his town play, even his tone read the same to me until the endgame. He's really good at flying under the radar especially early on, so early pressure on him honestly might be a good idea from now on.
I did originally want to poke Tric but I'm fine seeing how Toony reacts to pressure.
You know what this reminds me of? The chain of posts you created last round D1 that started here (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8321465#msg8321465) and ended here (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8321501#msg8321501). Going from "I'm a very unlikely town role" to "aha, I was baiting the kill with that post". Looks like a response to claims and calls for claims, but could have fitted with any subsequent actual claim. Makes town read it and think about it, but doesn't tell them a thing and just leads them into second-guessing if they actually try to get info about your role. Doesn't even work against scum, unlike Met's fake commuter claim in the first round. It just leads to draining, sterile recursion, like a Rick and Morty episode.I'll throw in my role. I will say that I can tell if someone was targeted by an action. Anyone else want to volunteer some info?i will not be volunteering information unless Forced to, as my role can determine If others are lying. Or maybe it can't, who can tell? I'm not a lie detector. the mafia will naturally assume this is a Soft/Hardclaim, and they'll be wrong. it's actually a fAkeCLAiM, NERDS!
Ok, wanting me to post before asking questions makes some sense. And no, I haven't been particularly aggressive, I just FOS'd you. You asked Max a question after saying probing them was pointless. That's... not really scumhunting, you just preemptively killed any pressure your question would have.If it's any consolation, I wouldn't be pressured anyway. It doesn't work.
What's going on here? Is voting/FOS-ing people while declaring it's entirely to see how they react your typical scumhunting method, or do you just like the pretty colours?This seems to be what like half of the people on this forum do? I don't disagree that it's pointless.
You know what this reminds me of? The chain of posts you created last round D1 that started here (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8321465#msg8321465) and ended here (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8321501#msg8321501). Going from "I'm a very unlikely town role" to "aha, I was baiting the kill with that post". Looks like a response to claims and calls for claims, but could have fitted with any subsequent actual claim. Makes town read it and think about it, but doesn't tell them a thing and just leads them into second-guessing if they actually try to get info about your role. Doesn't even work against scum, unlike Met's fake commuter claim in the first round. It just leads to draining, sterile recursion, like a Rick and Morty episode.I claim when I need to and I don't claim when I don't need to.
So... is this something you always do when people mention roleclaims, Webadict?
Scum has poison. I will not explain why I know that, so take it or leave the information as you will. Longer post later.I don't believe you.
-When you claim is your prerogative. I don't like these D1 claims myself, I think they tend to take a lot of the sting out of a role-heavy setup for the mafia. But I'm not asking you why you didn't claim. I'm asking why you felt the need to post this:
EJ asks generally if anyone else is going to claim, doesn't even put an "@all" in front of it, and you actively feel the need to reply with this ambiguous, could-have-been-breadcrumbing-anything, post that requires people's attention but doesn't actually offer any information.I'll throw in my role. I will say that I can tell if someone was targeted by an action. Anyone else want to volunteer some info?i will not be volunteering information unless Forced to, as my role can determine If others are lying. Or maybe it can't, who can tell? I'm not a lie detector. the mafia will naturally assume this is a Soft/Hardclaim, and they'll be wrong. it's actually a fAkeCLAiM, NERDS!
Clams and clams and fish and clams.EJ asks generally if anyone else is going to claim, doesn't even put an "@all" in front of it, and you actively feel the need to reply with this ambiguous, could-have-been-breadcrumbing-anything, post that requires people's attention but doesn't actually offer any information.I'll throw in my role. I will say that I can tell if someone was targeted by an action. Anyone else want to volunteer some info?i will not be volunteering information unless Forced to, as my role can determine If others are lying. Or maybe it can't, who can tell? I'm not a lie detector. the mafia will naturally assume this is a Soft/Hardclaim, and they'll be wrong. it's actually a fAkeCLAiM, NERDS!
I'm not asking why you're not claiming, although thank you for such a detailed answer to that question. I'm asking why you bothered to write anything further than "no", if you had to reply at all. And why you wrote something that looks like activity and takes up people's mental space, despite saying nothing. Because I don't see what this post does for town. I can see what it might do for scum!web, however.
I have no idea if you'll stick to your not-claiming today. I'd say it's pretty NAI in either case, there are roles you shouldn't claim as either alignment and L-1 isn't a death sentence. Not really as interesting an announcement as you seem to think it is.
In any case, Web's declaration upstaged by an exciting claim from Vector. @Web, going to tell us why you don't believe them?No reason. I just don't believe Vector. Do you believe Vector?
I'm going to guess that what Vector wants us to conclude is either that A) Vector has poison, or B) Vector is particularly vulnerable to poison.
I'm feeling charitable enough to imagine that one of the two positions might be the truth. Anyone have poison so we can test this?
Why not? I believe Vector.Scum has poison. I will not explain why I know that, so take it or leave the information as you will. Longer post later.I don't believe you.
I was a day poisoner in Round 2. I was also town. Why are you sure scum specifically has poison?I'm going to guess that what Vector wants us to conclude is either that A) Vector has poison, or B) Vector is particularly vulnerable to poison.I'm in.
I'm feeling charitable enough to imagine that one of the two positions might be the truth. Anyone have poison so we can test this?
I'm in.Wait, really? I was just joking. Well, okay.
To be fair, ... I've got a headache, wha... Right, RVS.Unvote.Weaksauce Tric, weaksauce.
I got nothing right now. Other than a headache and too much web.
I really don't want to give reads d1. It changes the facts on the ground too much. If I tell you what I think of what NJW is doing, then he also knows that, and what he does afterward has to be interpreted in light of his possession of that information. I don't like that kind of feedback loop.Yeah, but what if you die tonight? Or is that not something you are considering?
It's a good point, although would mafia!Roden try to push a vote on me for Day 1?You can't read him at all, so you're going to pressure him with an RVS stage vote. How convenient. No question or anything either, you're just going to plonk that vote down and leave it. And any poking of Tric is just going to be a blue-text declaration of poking.Roden: How confident do you feel that you can recognise Toony's scum play after the last game?I don't feel confident at all lol. His scum play doesn't really seem that different to his town play, even his tone read the same to me until the endgame. He's really good at flying under the radar especially early on, so early pressure on him honestly might be a good idea from now on.
I did originally want to poke Tric but I'm fine seeing how Toony reacts to pressure.
What's going on here? Is voting/FOS-ing people while declaring it's entirely to see how they react your typical scumhunting method, or do you just like the pretty colours?
Yeah, but what if you die tonight? Or is that not something you are considering?Of course I'm considering it, but then it's just "well fuck". I still think anything I say about reads would be negative town utility right now, so it's just a risk between hopefully being useful tomorrow, or not really getting to contribute at all.
I'm in.Wait, really? I was just joking. Well, okay.
@Max: One thing you consistently fail to consider is that your fellow town players need to read YOU. Giving some info helps us help you help town... mmm. I am not failing to consider it. The thing is that I act exactly the same either way. However, I do try to give you as much non-negative-value information as possible by engaging conversationally like this. You have seen that I will interact extensively as long as someone doesn't ask me a question I think would be counterproductive.
... It's Roden. Delayer isn't exactly townie, and we see how Toony's ealry gunsmith claim worked out last session.Tric...we literally had a Town Delayer round 1. And last round the only reason I got voted out was because my role sounded scummy and I still ended up being town. I know others have already talked you down from this, but I have no idea why you'd scum read me for my role again when that clearly isn't working. FoU has clearly been giving town scummy roles and scum townie roles to counteract the mass claim meta.
Also, why you asking about my first post in advance Max?
Ninjadict
I explained why I voted Toony. And I did ask him a question. He answered it.You can't read him at all, so you're going to pressure him with an RVS stage vote. How convenient. No question or anything either, you're just going to plonk that vote down and leave it. And any poking of Tric is just going to be a blue-text declaration of poking.Roden: How confident do you feel that you can recognise Toony's scum play after the last game?I don't feel confident at all lol. His scum play doesn't really seem that different to his town play, even his tone read the same to me until the endgame. He's really good at flying under the radar especially early on, so early pressure on him honestly might be a good idea from now on.
I did originally want to poke Tric but I'm fine seeing how Toony reacts to pressure.
What's going on here? Is voting/FOS-ing people while declaring it's entirely to see how they react your typical scumhunting method, or do you just like the pretty colours?
@Roden:Let's not do this thing again where you don't read my posts then shit fight with me the rest of the day, NJW.Toony, what's your role?Very deadly, very stupid. It works better if mafia don't know about it.
@NJW:I don't push early on. I'll vote, see where everyone's progressions go, then reevaluate and push.It's a good point, although would mafia!Roden try to push a vote on me for Day 1?You can't read him at all, so you're going to pressure him with an RVS stage vote. How convenient. No question or anything either, you're just going to plonk that vote down and leave it. And any poking of Tric is just going to be a blue-text declaration of poking.Roden: How confident do you feel that you can recognise Toony's scum play after the last game?I don't feel confident at all lol. His scum play doesn't really seem that different to his town play, even his tone read the same to me until the endgame. He's really good at flying under the radar especially early on, so early pressure on him honestly might be a good idea from now on.
I did originally want to poke Tric but I'm fine seeing how Toony reacts to pressure.
What's going on here? Is voting/FOS-ing people while declaring it's entirely to see how they react your typical scumhunting method, or do you just like the pretty colours?
I suppose they haven't really pushed me at all so that could be suspicious, but...
Scum has poison. I will not explain why I know that, so take it or leave the information as you will. Longer post later.
Should go without saying, but if we have a Watcher they should go on Vector.I'm in.Wait, really? I was just joking. Well, okay.
Yep, ready to be tested on this topic. Poisoners come forth OvO
YupScum has poison. I will not explain why I know that, so take it or leave the information as you will. Longer post later.Should go without saying, but if we have a Watcher they should go on Vector.I'm in.Wait, really? I was just joking. Well, okay.
Yep, ready to be tested on this topic. Poisoners come forth OvO
Frankly, I don't know how you could possibly think that because that makes no sense. It honestly feels like your plan to find scum is to coinflip your way into it. Which it probably is. It's weird that you don't think that you can determine anything from what people say while simultaneously thinking that people can use what you say to their advantage. Are you saying that your words will be used out of context, or do you think that your reads will somehow lead others in the wrong direction? Is that because you think your reads are right or because you think your reads do not contain enough information and are therefore incomplete? In the latter case, your arguments being half-filled wouldn't really make a full-fledged case, now would they?Yeah, but what if you die tonight? Or is that not something you are considering?Of course I'm considering it, but then it's just "well fuck". I still think anything I say about reads would be negative town utility right now, so it's just a risk between hopefully being useful tomorrow, or not really getting to contribute at all.
Toony is different though, and as much as the game gets easier when I know I can trust him, it gets that much harder when he's actually scum. So yes, I'm poking Tric to get him to wake the hell up, and I'm voting Toony because blindly trusting him isn't a good idea.Toony isn't scum, I don't know why you can't see that. Go after one of NJW and Tric and you'll be fiiiiiiine. Trust me. I'm a doctor.
Frankly, I don't know how you could possibly think that because that makes no sense. It honestly feels like your plan to find scum is to coinflip your way into it. Which it probably is. It's weird that you don't think that you can determine anything from what people say while simultaneously thinking that people can use what you say to their advantage. Are you saying that your words will be used out of context, or do you think that your reads will somehow lead others in the wrong direction? Is that because you think your reads are right or because you think your reads do not contain enough information and are therefore incomplete? In the latter case, your arguments being half-filled wouldn't really make a full-fledged case, now would they?No, none of that is what I meant. Try pulling the lever again, maybe next roll's the one.
Whelp, that's the problem with not explaining the things you do, eh?Frankly, I don't know how you could possibly think that because that makes no sense. It honestly feels like your plan to find scum is to coinflip your way into it. Which it probably is. It's weird that you don't think that you can determine anything from what people say while simultaneously thinking that people can use what you say to their advantage. Are you saying that your words will be used out of context, or do you think that your reads will somehow lead others in the wrong direction? Is that because you think your reads are right or because you think your reads do not contain enough information and are therefore incomplete? In the latter case, your arguments being half-filled wouldn't really make a full-fledged case, now would they?No, none of that is what I meant. Try pulling the lever again, maybe next roll's the one.
Anyway, my point is that you shouldn't vote for ToonyMan because it's not ToonyMan.Why have you decided to not interact with me in this game Web? That's no fun.
Making assumptions is a choice!Having seen Max's play now in the last round this looks exactly the same to me. That's why I think they're probably town. It's kind of whatever now, but you'll likely see me much more openminded if say they're trying to explain themselves on Day 2 after people think they're lying about their claims.
I really don't like people making assumptions about things I didn't say, but I will tell you this so you don't have to assume: I am only one person.
To be fair, ... I've got a headache, wha... Right, RVS.Unvote.
I got nothing right now. Other than a headache and too much web.
Ok Max, on these forums we use the pronoun "They/them/their" if we don't know if someone is self-declared as a male or female. I think you've self-declared as male, so He/His/Him are the pronouns we should be using folks. If you respect the They/Them/Their, I guess we should also respect the He/His/Him and She/Hers/Her.I honestly don't care what you call me as long as it isn't that. I guess, really, I don't care that much if you keep calling me that either but I'm going to keep saying it.
Good to know, I'll try to keep it in mind, hopefully others will as well. We've sort of gotten in the habit around here of calling everyone They/them/their, so apologies bro/dude/man.Ok Max, on these forums we use the pronoun "They/them/their" if we don't know if someone is self-declared as a male or female. I think you've self-declared as male, so He/His/Him are the pronouns we should be using folks. If you respect the They/Them/Their, I guess we should also respect the He/His/Him and She/Hers/Her.I honestly don't care what you call me as long as it isn't that. I guess, really, I don't care that much if you keep calling me that either but I'm going to keep saying it.
But yeah, I'm male.
Thank you. Like I said, it doesn't bother me that much, but it does a little.Good to know, I'll try to keep it in mind, hopefully others will as well. We've sort of gotten in the habit around here of calling everyone They/them/their, so apologies bro/dude/man.Ok Max, on these forums we use the pronoun "They/them/their" if we don't know if someone is self-declared as a male or female. I think you've self-declared as male, so He/His/Him are the pronouns we should be using folks. If you respect the They/Them/Their, I guess we should also respect the He/His/Him and She/Hers/Her.I honestly don't care what you call me as long as it isn't that. I guess, really, I don't care that much if you keep calling me that either but I'm going to keep saying it.
But yeah, I'm male.
Well, I guess we're approaching the 75% mark rapidly, so it's worth posting reads. In summary: I want to lynch Web, or failing that within Roden/Toony/Max.
...
TricMagic: Null. Aggressive focus on Roden, frustration at Webadict, very little else. I sympathise with his scumreading someone because of a claim he thinks shouldn't have been made, but the case he presented was really not good. Not enough information here to read Tric, although if the Roden thing is all they do today they'll be a prime elimination target.
NJW: Isn't it unusual for you to want to lynch one out of five people (in an eight person game)? Aren't you at least a little bit more specific D1 in previous games?I have a wider pool of people I'd be ok with lynching this game, yes. I'd prefer Web really, but I don't think I'm going to get that today, so I'm open to other options. I see basically everything Max does D1 as NAI, but am more willing to eliminate him than your standard null-read because I think dialogue involving him tends to hurt town, so that's another acceptable target. Oh, also, it's one out of four, unless Tric's play towards the end of the day is particularly scummy.
-I'm not relying on your past behaviour particularly. I think the way you're playing is inherently scum-sided, so worthy of suspiscion in itself. And perhaps I'd rather vote you than shovel through bullshit, as you so aptly put it. My time isn't worth less than other people's. I have no idea what your flipping town would say about Toony, I'm don't have any conditional judgements linking the two of you. I suppose I should go through what you wrote more carefully, but anything else is going to have to wait.
@NJW:My opinion of Vector is entirely based on the few sentences of content I've seen from them, and I already noted that because of this it is liable to change. As I've said, I'm not sure why scum!Vector would introduce the poison information immediately - it would be a very questionable gambit in most situations.
I have no idea why you're town reading Vector. I'm unable to distinguish their play today from any other round. You must be really good at reading Vector, foolish, or mafia.
As for your lynch preferences, why is Max an okay nullread lynch but not nullread Tric?
First off, my mafia meta usually ends up with me being bussed, not the other way around. Second, I didn't say Max was a nullread lynch, I said he was playing his day 1 meta. The fact you make that accusation just makes you more scummy in my eyes Toony.If you don't unvote Toony, I will tunnel you into oblivion. I have no qualms about doing so.
Max isn't playing off his day 1 meta, he's playing on/to it. And my lynch preference is you and NJW.
Ah.. Webadict. Still don't trust the two of you, but.Ninja'd. Better.
I'm willing to launch Tric solely on principle. I don't have clear reads on anyone just yet (for the most part I agree with EJ's readlist) but I do not want to LYLO with him again. Sure, MaxSpin is slightly obdurate. So what? Did you read LYLO last game?
@Tric:
Why are you holding onto your role so hard? It's not very like you.
@Jack:
If I'm reading this right your top townread is Vector? Are you serious? Why?
Jack is that list ordered from highest to lowest?
@Jack:
If I'm reading this right your top townread is Vector? Are you serious? Why?
Wow, webadict can't even be bothered to create their own reads list. Just copied Toonyman's list. Lazy.
EuchreJack's Reads List:
Vector: Warned us that Scum has Poison. That would be a Town Tell, unless nobody claims to be poisoned D2. Nobody has counter-claimed to be a Town day poisoner.
Toonyman: I'll admit, this mostly comes down to Gambler's Fallacy, but does seem to be playing different than last round. More tricky methodical, less pushy.
Roden: Obviously burned pretty hard by mafia!Toonyman. Claimed D1, like usual. Claiming their particular role of Delayer is a sub-optimal D1 claim, as usual. Sub-optimal since he can't trick anyone by announcing that he's a Delayer later on, although can (and should) give info D2. Could be cover for a Poisoner? Still trying to work that one out, but that seems risky to pull off. We'll see on D2 & D3.
Maximum Spin: Seem like standard D1 Maximum Spin, after the cobwebs have been cleaned off the sentient AI that is Maximum Spin. A bit too scientific for D1, should be an asset to town D2 on. Null-slightly town (since similar behavior last game when town).
webadict: Not only can not be bothered to post their own reads list, they had the gall to copy someone else'shomeworkreads list. But typical Webadict. Subdued methodical behavior does remind me more of Town!Webadict than Mafia!Webadict. Straight Null.
TricMagic: Maybe if I scum-read you, you'll play to your potential? Typical TricMagic mistakes, but is smart enough to "hide in audacity". Sorta Scummy.
NJW2000: Yes, suspicions were based upon Gambler's Fallacy, but I sense an aggression that was absent in other games. It's like you're trying to smear players, rather than find scum. First post was quite scummy:Spoiler (click to show/hide)
I underlined the areas I think existed purely to smear other players rather than actually find scum. Also, TricMagic never answered NJW's question, yet NJW let it drop. Vector's question also remained unanswered, yet NJW dropped it, although you can see I found it to be a scummy question to ask, since its hard to answer without looking like scum.
@NJW: You like to get questions when you're getting scumread, so why did you let TricMagic's question drop? Why did you let Vector's question drop?
I'm willing to launch Tric solely on principle. I don't have clear reads on anyone just yet (for the most part I agree with EJ's readlist) but I do not want to LYLO with him again. Sure, MaxSpin is slightly obdurate. So what? Did you read LYLO last game?I read it, and believe you would make this statement regardless of alignment. We'll see how your poison claim pans out. How might you disagree with my readlist?
@Tric:
Why are you holding onto your role so hard? It's not very like you.
@Jack:
If I'm reading this right your top townread is Vector? Are you serious? Why?
@Toony
Why do you want to know so badly?
My reasoning will become clear tomorrow. So long as I don't end up delayed anyway. Lynch me then if you want.That's great and all Tric, but even as an extremely powerful cop last round that should not have claimed under normal circumstances, you still claimed within the first 10 posts of Day 1. See my point? You did not have inherent protection or even the knowledge of others that could protect you at that point, but yet you still revealed yourself because you felt it was what you should do as town.
While that is true, right now is not the right time to claim. For this role anyway. I claimed last round since you were also a type of cop, but you note I didn't say I was 1-shot and could inspect two.I am not. And Vector won't answer my questions. :(
Also, why mention that? Don't Mafia know about it now? Are you the one who poisons?
Toonyman, what constitutes "death-related" for you?Things that involve death, such as someone dying or being dead.
While that is true, right now is not the right time to claim. For this role anyway.That's hardly stopped you with any role that shouldn't claim. Such as a Knight in Supernatural 10 which blew my mind during that game.
I claimed last round since you were also a type of cop, but you note I didn't say I was 1-shot and could inspect two.Sure, but I was absolutely going to kill you on N2 (my scumlog has the evidence of this) since I was under the impression you would not have gotten anything useful during N1. Shame on me for not expecting a ridiculously powerful N1 ability. You were a powerful cop either way and marked yourself for death by claiming.
I suspect I might have an inkling what Toonyman does, actually. Whether I'm right or wrong, you're not my prime suspect right now.Hm... Okay, less null from this. It's something.
Because you placed Vector as a solid town, only under Jack. Vector has done very little this day, which is not alignment indicative since they've done the exact same thing as town and mafia on D1. If you check my reads of Vector on D1 of every round I always find them null or suspicious, this has not changed at all although I have realized more this is just how Vector plays. I find it extremely odd how strongly you think Vector is town because of a simple poison claim, especially since you don't find many players town at all in this game.I don't understand why NJW and Jack both townread Vector.I've explained my reasoning already, Toony, come on. The post about poison means I don't want to lynch them D1, because I don't think scum would lie about that or immediately give up that information. I haven't yet seen any strong reason to believe they're scum. Ergo, they're in the town section of my readslist.
I mean, if they don't post anything else before the end of the day, that's a different matter. I'm assuming that we're going to see more than ten sentences from them though. Unsure how I'd respond to someone just not really turning up.
Why are you so caught up on this? Is there something I'm not putting clearly?
And no, scumhunting you is not lazy. I wouldn't choose to deal with your nonsense if I were scum, I'd be "reluctantly" voting Tric for having posted a weak case, or trying to get Max out on a policy lynch, or voting Roden because it's just what's expected of me. Absolutely anything less frustrating than reading your prose.See, this is odd. You "reluctantly" voted Jack last round on Day 1 because me and Roden both voted him for reasons you didn't really understand, but respected my opinion against Jack even though I was mafia and lying out my ass to get Jack lynched since it fit my meta. And so you voted Jack.
you misrepresent meLet's use your own words then. That'll give you an advantage.
you misrepresent meDid I? Why don't you link that post? Is it this one?
I'm not asking why you're not claiming, although thank you for such a detailed answer to that question. I'm asking why you bothered to write anything further than "no", if you had to reply at all. And why you wrote something that looks like activity and takes up people's mental space, despite saying nothing. Because I don't see what this post does for town. I can see what it might do for scum!web, however.The point was that the initial post was fishing for information, but your post was ALSO fishing for role information, and I unfortunately screwed up the real message in the post:
i will not be volunteering information unless Forced to, as my role can determine If others are lying. Or maybe it can't, who can tell? I'm not a lie detector. the mafia will naturally assume this is a Soft/Hardclaim, and they'll be wrong. it's actually a fAkeCLAiM, NERDS!
Forced If Or I'm[/i] Soft/Hardclaim, fAkeCLAiM, NERDS!
F I S H A CLA M NERDS!I then politely made fun of you to your face by explaining the joke, but the joke wasn't exceptionally funny. It was, however, dead, and therefore pointless.
Clams and clams and fish and clams.You killed the joke.
I wouldn't choose to deal with your nonsense if I were scum, I'd be "reluctantly" voting Tric for having posted a weak caseWould you? This guy has some sort of weird fascination with NOT suspecting TricMagic:
Well, I guess we're approaching the 75% mark rapidly, so it's worth posting reads. In summary: I want to lynch Web, or failing that within Roden/Toony/Max.Weird how Max is on that list but Tric isn't, but in the reads, Tric is lower (or at the same level, depending on how you look at it.) Feels like you're putting Tric here because you can't get away with putting Tric higher, and possibly because you don't want to put him lower.
MaxSpin: Null.
TricMagic: Null.
Toonyman: weak lean scum
Roden: Lean scum.
Webadict: scum
or trying to get Max out on a policy lynchUnlikely, that'd be a recipe for disaster, as it'd make you look bad the next day.
MaximumSpin:[/b] Apparently doesn't think you really find scum D1 (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8321606#msg8321606), actions reflect that belief. Asking if Toony reads into things a lot is a bit dubious, because a) we're playing mafia and b) Max seems to be someone who likes people to read them carefully, see Kurt Cobain reference somewhere above. Lean scum.You have previously suspected Max before, but you were hesitantly defending them.
Oh, and in case people aren't getting the picture, Max is just like this. Thinks D1 lynches are pointless and stupid, moves discussion onto his theories about that, engages abrasively wherever possible, refers to conditional judgements as "weights on a directed graph". Does this kind of thing consistently D1 as town, and presumably as scum too. N. A. I.But, you did give a good reason for their behavior, in a way that passively defends them. Now, your actions were intended to remove them from Town that game, by deflecting onto Maximum Spin, because you realized they were anti-Town, but you didn't push that case at all. If you were going to push that as scum, you'd have this as evidence against it.
or voting Roden because it's just what's expected of meIf you were Town, you wouldn't be suspecting Roden at all. Let's follow some logic on this one.
Roden: active, claimed their role and its restrictions promptly which mafia might not want to do, lean townRoden has followed the exact same conditions as last game, but your suspicions appear to not be the same. This is even called out by EuchreJack in the previous game:
It's also odd because you're enticing Jack to bring pressure, which is certainly a helpful measure, as opposed to how you essentially treated Roden here. So weeeeeeird.NJW2000, because townreading Roden is outside of your meta. Plus, following your advice. :PGood. Now that there's pressure, use it by asking a question.
EuchreJack: Town, extremely hung up on my first post in which I FoS'd him, constantly asking other people to post their reads on me, asking obviously pointless questions, I really wish this stuff was at least alignment indicative here. But nah, I don't think scum!EJ could fake this play, or would fixate so hard.EuchreJack made a rather astute assessment, and I'm going to post it here:
Vector: Town thus far, I don't see scum wandering in and simply announcing "scum have poison, more later". Obviously a read subject to change when we see more content.
MaxSpin: Null. I'm not going to make guesses about Max's alignment D1. Would still be very happy to eliminate them if nothing better is available.
TricMagic: Null. Aggressive focus on Roden, frustration at Webadict, very little else. I sympathise with his scumreading someone because of a claim he thinks shouldn't have been made, but the case he presented was really not good. Not enough information here to read Tric, although if the Roden thing is all they do today they'll be a prime elimination target.
Toonyman: weak lean scum, he's been defending people more than usual, I think. Has a whole lot of townreads too, but he'll do that as either alignment. No strong read on him, nor do I expect to have one D1.
Roden: Lean scum. Not much to say here, they seem to be sticking to their guns on the whole "putting people's names in a colour and doing nothing else is pressuring them" idea. Claim largely NAI I think. Need to see more content but right now it isn't looking good.
Webadict: scum. I don't trust the whole "this is a claim, actually no it isn't lol" stuff, for reasons I've explained. I don't think Web posts without an agenda - reread the last game (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8322935#msg8322935). Max thinks they're exchanging banter about Wittgenstein or whatever, Web is actually using it as a way to communicate with their partner. His posts have reasons behind them. Also a slightly too strong reaction here (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8327321#msg8327321) followed by a refusal to actually answer my question doesn't look great. Also is engaging with Max on his philosophies of mafia, which was a good way to waste Town's time last round.
I sense an aggression that was absent in other games. It's like you're trying to smear players, rather than find scum.And I think that this is absolutely true. Look at the difference between these Day 1 reads and tell me if you think games 1-3 are trying to smear the Town reads?
I called you out for playing like this in the last game, and I'm calling you out on it now - that's the only real correspondence with R3 worth considering, so you can stop complaining about references to the last game. You're doing what a scum player who wants to coast through D1 on a reputation for wacky and aggressive play does. Or, in a very marginal case, a town player who thinks their years of experience and strong mechanical/reads game gives them the right to clown about and harm town D1. And hey, if it's the second, good for you I guess. That kind of self-belief would be nice to have.The easiest answer is that you believed it last game. Frankly, everyone has plenty of reason to vote me, and I honestly wouldn't fault anyone Town for doing so if they truly couldn't find a better target. Also, you had me listed as null last game, soooo, I'm not sure that that's a truly accurate statement at all. I actually did a reread of last game, and I'm actually pretty sure you never suspected me? But, if you'd like to prove me wrong, I suppose that's a fair assessment.
ToonyMan (1): Roden
Roden (0):
TricMagic (2): Webadict, ToonyMan
EuchreJack (0):
NJW2000 (1): EuchreJack
Vector (0):
webadict (2): TricMagic, NJW2000
Maximum Spin (0):
No Execution (0):
Not Voting (2): Vector, Maximum Spin
5 to hammer.
4.) Maximum Spin really sitting back on this one.I seem to be consistently sleeping when people make the most noise right now. It is regrettable.
...of course, if Tric flips town, we should heavily suspect both Toonyman and Web for planting the idea of Tric as scum.Come at me bro, I live with my decisions.
I just want to know whom each of you think I should vig n1, if I had such an ability.
Vig me, Web, Vector, or Jack if Tric is town. Up to you who, but I think Web is the likeliest hit there.I know I said I wouldn't interact, but I wanted to say that this is probably correct. I'm actually okay with being vigged if Tric is Town because I will likely be a detriment unless you adequately believe I am Town. In order of preference for me is:
Vig NJW if Tric is mafia.
Nah, it's a good idea to shoot if you believe Vector. Poison at 6p is gonna be better, and if I'm removed, it's a smaller ring for Town to have as action confirmations.I just want to know whom each of you think I should vig n1, if I had such an ability.
Damn, nice final hour discussion topic!
Honestly, you should vig no one. You probably don't have unlimited shots, and I don't see you as the N1 kill. Wait until N2 when you've got a better idea of who is scum, and perhaps those we think are scum will have actually revealed themselves as helpful townies. Vig N1 risks both killing a townie and losing valuable info.
I'm totally and genuinely surprised by this post Maximum Spin. Good job!
I would like to hear answers from the other three too! Don't be shy....or Maximum Spin will shoot you! ;D
Just had two back to back ten hour shifts. I'm exhausted and just skimmed the thread.Uhhh, okay, guess that's that then.
Tric is my choice if we're not doing Toony.
Toonyman (0):
Roden (0):
TricMagic (5): webadict, ToonyMan, Vector, EuchreJack, Roden
EuchreJack (0):
NJW2000 (1): Maximum Spin
Vector (0):
webadict (2): TricMagic, NJW2000
Maximum Spin (0):
No Execution (0):
Not Voting (0):
5 to hammer.
Sandwich Vendor (town):
(Night) Distribute [target]: You give your target a sandwich. They are informed that they received a sandwich during the Night.
Toonyman (0):
Roden (0):
EuchreJack (0):
NJW2000 (0):
Vector (0):
webadict (0):
Maximum Spin (0):
No Execution (0):
Not Voting (7): ToonyMan, Roden, EuchreJack, NJW2000, Vector, webadict, Maximum Spin
4 to hammer.
I'd prefer not to get Vig'd but the choice is ultimately yours Max. I won't Delay you so don't worry about that being an issue.I was scum when I said that. I was making up stuff to try to appease Vector.
If I had to pick it would be Toony or Web. It's too late to get into it more, but Toony's and Web's initial insistence that they could read other when last round Toony NK'd Web due to misreading him as town is giving me massive cognitive dissonance.
Nope. You wouldn't read me or Tric this badly as town. This is just like your Matrix6 mafia play before you blew up and quit.Yep, a guy with Investigation copying abilities is fucking scum, you got me.
I did nothing and nothing happened to me.Nope. You wouldn't read me or Tric this badly as town. This is just like your Matrix6 mafia play before you blew up and quit.Yep, a guy with Investigation copying abilities is fucking scum, you got me.
Wanna try again? What did you do last Night?
Tric should have been a hit, I need to understand their completely illogical play for the future.Don't feel sorry for Tric. Tric didn't defend himself. That's his fucking fault. But, he'll learn. But pushing the conversation to NJW vs me let's you take a backseat on that conversation, doesn't it?
I think it's very likely there's a mafia inside NJW/Web with the other one being town.
If mafia can mask their primer they will want to push for a lynch today on someone with "no alibi" kind of like with Max last round. They will yell and howl and point fingers with no rational thought as innocent townies are made targets during the day.I don't play the what-if game with you. If you think it's me, who's my partner? Also, why the fuck did I grab a potential poison inspect if I am scum?
I will consider the most likely primer today as people post, but I'm not fully falling into mechanical bullshit unless it's coming out of a confirmed town's mouth.
But pushing the conversation to NJW vs me let's you take a backseat on that conversation, doesn't it?I am not taking a backseat on this.
I don't play the what-if game with you. If you think it's me, who's my partner? Also, why the fuck did I grab a potential poison inspect if I am scum?That's exactly what my goal is today unless you convince me otherwise. You are more likely the dangerous partner out of the two which is why I won't chance wildly shooting into the crowd if I'm lynched.
You don't make sense with your suspicion here. If it's not you, then it's at least one of the other three, no? So find them!Uh, yeah. I keep saying that's my goal. I assume you have resigned yourself to dying by my hand now, hence your attitude.
But Day 1 of this round, you both said you could read each other.I'd prefer not to get Vig'd but the choice is ultimately yours Max. I won't Delay you so don't worry about that being an issue.I was scum when I said that. I was making up stuff to try to appease Vector.
If I had to pick it would be Toony or Web. It's too late to get into it more, but Toony's and Web's initial insistence that they could read other when last round Toony NK'd Web due to misreading him as town is giving me massive cognitive dissonance.
I can't read Web currently, he could be town but I kind of doubt it if NJW is town.
@Webadict:And only towards EoD did this change. Once Tric looked like a guaranteed elimination, you both started having more visible conflict with each other. And now that we have a green flip from Tric with no NK, the two of you are now suddenly at each other's throats even though you both voted Tric early. The final vote count puts both of you as the first two votes on Tric.My savior is here. Dude this shit is so easy, Webadict is town. Boom only six people left to choose from.I did originally want to poke Tric but I'm fine seeing how Toony reacts to pressure.Nah, the right play here is that ToonyMan is actually Town. ToonyMan is so Town that I plan to pocket him without ever engaging with him. Thus, my play has begun. MUAHAHAHA!
...As I was saying, people just assume I'm town on D1. Webadict especially likes to do this.
I want Web or NJW dead today so this aligns with my interests at least.Ok, besides the fact that anyone claiming Vengeful while under pressure should just be policy lynched, your claim doesn't make sense for the set up.
WebadictI did nothing and nothing happened to me.Nope. You wouldn't read me or Tric this badly as town. This is just like your Matrix6 mafia play before you blew up and quit.Yep, a guy with Investigation copying abilities is fucking scum, you got me.
Wanna try again? What did you do last Night?
I don't have a night action. I'm a vengeful townie, if I'm lynched during the day I can choose to kill one player. I will be targeting Web if I'm lynched, still want to go?
I don't want to be wrong again if you're both town, but D1 doesn't make sense to me if both of you and Tric are all town. Tric should have been mafia. Can you explain your D1 behavior with regards to me please?
I wasn't being serious when I called Webadict town there at the start of the day. I put in the acronym tag that Web likes to call me locktown as town and mafia.But Day 1 of this round, you both said you could read each other.I'd prefer not to get Vig'd but the choice is ultimately yours Max. I won't Delay you so don't worry about that being an issue.I was scum when I said that. I was making up stuff to try to appease Vector.
If I had to pick it would be Toony or Web. It's too late to get into it more, but Toony's and Web's initial insistence that they could read other when last round Toony NK'd Web due to misreading him as town is giving me massive cognitive dissonance.
I can't read Web currently, he could be town but I kind of doubt it if NJW is town.@Webadict:My savior is here. Dude this shit is so easy, Webadict is town. Boom only six people left to choose from.I did originally want to poke Tric but I'm fine seeing how Toony reacts to pressure.Nah, the right play here is that ToonyMan is actually Town. ToonyMan is so Town that I plan to pocket him without ever engaging with him. Thus, my play has begun. MUAHAHAHA!
...As I was saying, people just assume I'm town on D1. Webadict especially likes to do this.
Btw, I Delayed you Toony. If nobody comes forward as being Poisoned, we're gonna have a major problem.Excellent. I can't confirm you did this, but I believe you did. If nobody claims the prime on Vector then it's likely neither me or Roden did it.
Btw, I Delayed you Toony. If nobody comes forward as being Poisoned, we're gonna have a major problem.
Ok, that's true, even if I did Delay your Poison, you couldn't have Primed. Jack basically soft claimed Watcher, which would explain the Inspect NJW saw visit Vector. If Jack denies visiting Vector then that'll be a problem, but if he confirms then everybody is accounted for except Max.I wasn't being serious when I called Webadict town there at the start of the day. I put in the acronym tag that Web likes to call me locktown as town and mafia.But Day 1 of this round, you both said you could read each other.I'd prefer not to get Vig'd but the choice is ultimately yours Max. I won't Delay you so don't worry about that being an issue.I was scum when I said that. I was making up stuff to try to appease Vector.
If I had to pick it would be Toony or Web. It's too late to get into it more, but Toony's and Web's initial insistence that they could read other when last round Toony NK'd Web due to misreading him as town is giving me massive cognitive dissonance.
I can't read Web currently, he could be town but I kind of doubt it if NJW is town.@Webadict:My savior is here. Dude this shit is so easy, Webadict is town. Boom only six people left to choose from.I did originally want to poke Tric but I'm fine seeing how Toony reacts to pressure.Nah, the right play here is that ToonyMan is actually Town. ToonyMan is so Town that I plan to pocket him without ever engaging with him. Thus, my play has begun. MUAHAHAHA!
...As I was saying, people just assume I'm town on D1. Webadict especially likes to do this.Btw, I Delayed you Toony. If nobody comes forward as being Poisoned, we're gonna have a major problem.Excellent. I can't confirm you did this, but I believe you did. If nobody claims the prime on Vector then it's likely neither me or Roden did it.
Of course, if this becomes true for everyone then Webadict will have to admit the mafia are masking their primer somehow.
@Toony: So, one question for you to claim WIFOM over or whatever you wanna do because you're apparently 100% on me being scum because you probably want an excuse to go after NJW Tomorrow when I flip Town: Do you think I used Prodigious Study last Night? If I did, why did I target Vector?I think you did, yes. You would have to be making a play with NJW otherwise which seems extremely unlikely. I don't really understand Prodigious Study as it would be useless for mafia to have it if NJW is telling the truth about how it works, which he should be if you're mafia.
I voyeur'd Vector and there were three other abilities used on them: They were inspected, targeted with an ability called "Prodigious study"and primed.Fascinating. I happen to know someone who visited Vector, but I want to see if that person will claim first.
Did Max ever hardclaim vig? I think that was just a play/speculating. Otherwise Max is probably lying, but I don't think that makes them mafia just because of that.I did not. I can kill someone though. Potentially.
Did Max ever hardclaim vig? I think that was just a play/speculating. Otherwise Max is probably lying, but I don't think that makes them mafia just because of that.Isn't Arsonist usually 3P? If we believe Vector, which you claimed to yesterday, then scum have Poison. Why would scum have Poison and Prime/Arson? Both are slow kills and I don't see scum having access to both at the same time. Plus too many actions are being confirmed, Max has to be the Primer in this scenario.
Vector is speculating about the poison and hasn't answered my question from D1.
NJW is probably telling the truth that the mafia have a prime/arson for this game.
It's typically assumed that if you can kill and you're not mafia, then you're either a Vig or 3P. So what are you admitting to here?I voyeur'd Vector and there were three other abilities used on them: They were inspected, targeted with an ability called "Prodigious study"and primed.Fascinating. I happen to know someone who visited Vector, but I want to see if that person will claim first.
I knew, for reasons presumably similar to Vector's knowledge of poisoning, that someone has priming. I tried to indicate that to Toonyman ("prime suspect") on a hunch that that was his death-related role.
Question for today: If you could trade your life for TricMagic's, would you?
Not reading all the posts yet, but:Did Max ever hardclaim vig? I think that was just a play/speculating. Otherwise Max is probably lying, but I don't think that makes them mafia just because of that.I did not. I can kill someone though. Potentially.
It's typically assumed that if you can kill and you're not mafia, then you're either a Vig or 3P. So what are you admitting to here?Being a certain kind of a JOAT, actually. It's a Fallacy setup, what're you expecting?
Also I don't believe that you know someone who visited Vector. There's nobody left who could. I Delayed Toony, so both of us are accounted for. NJW claimed Voyeur, Web claimed Study, and Vector likely didn't self-Prime. So either you or Jack is the Inspect, and Jack soft claimed Watcher yesterday. Everyone is accounted for except you. Unless NJW and Web are covering for each other, you're the Primer. Unless Jack denies visiting Vector, this is just confirmed.All right, since you're already most of the way there, I'll admit that I tracked Jack and saw that he visited Vector.
Scumteam is Roden and ToonyMan, calling it now.I'm struggling to understand this. Do you think Toony told me to randomly hard bus him in the mafia PT? What am I supposed to gain from this?
I mean, sure, why not? That's something I've done.Scumteam is Roden and ToonyMan, calling it now.I'm struggling to understand this. Do you think Toony told me to randomly hard bus him in the mafia PT? What am I supposed to gain from this?
Right. Having had a reread of yesterday overnight, I may have had a bit of a case of tunnel vision when it came to Web. Nonetheless, I'm going to be looking very closely at everyone on the Tric wagon, that elimination was pursued in some highly suspect ways. Especially by Toony and Web, so... still pretty invested in the possibility web is mafia, same goes for toony. Going to wait until people have had a chance to claim before I can form a judgement with much weight behind it.Honestly, I get it. I was rethinking through the possibilities, but I was perusing the case yesterday, and honestly, your case wasn't entirely off-merit, but I was still stuck in attack mode. I figured I'd be willing to not explode right out the gate.
Couple of questions for Web and Toony:Spoiler: 'd for your viewing pleasure (click to show/hide)Btw, I Delayed you Toony. If nobody comes forward as being Poisoned, we're gonna have a major problem.Stunning analysis Roden, but you seem to have missed the vital fact that someone primed Vector.Ninja'd by your subsequent post, which I guess I'll have to read properly, but at a glance looks equally uninspiring.
The thread is already getting flooded with less than vital posts, so I'm going to try and hold back on posting for a few hours after this.
I mean... Hardbus? Your bus had no wheels on it, Broden. I'll call it a bus when he's at L-1. But, also, yes, ToonyMan probably would absolutely tell you to do that.Scumteam is Roden and ToonyMan, calling it now.I'm struggling to understand this. Do you think Toony told me to randomly hard bus him in the mafia PT? What am I supposed to gain from this?
and Maximum Spin was softclaiming kill-stuff, which would ALSO look suspicious if I claimed targeting them with what essentially is a copying ability.Oh damn, you have a copycat ability? Was it only one-shot?
Ok, a JOAT can be a Vig. So you are claiming Vig then.It's typically assumed that if you can kill and you're not mafia, then you're either a Vig or 3P. So what are you admitting to here?Being a certain kind of a JOAT, actually. It's a Fallacy setup, what're you expecting?QuoteAlso I don't believe that you know someone who visited Vector. There's nobody left who could. I Delayed Toony, so both of us are accounted for. NJW claimed Voyeur, Web claimed Study, and Vector likely didn't self-Prime. So either you or Jack is the Inspect, and Jack soft claimed Watcher yesterday. Everyone is accounted for except you. Unless NJW and Web are covering for each other, you're the Primer. Unless Jack denies visiting Vector, this is just confirmed.All right, since you're already most of the way there, I'll admit that I tracked Jack and saw that he visited Vector.
One last: My role definitely makes it plausible to me that mafia do actually have dual poison/priming. Certainly I can confirm they both exist in the game.Prime, but not Ignite?
Cool. This means either Max is telling the truth and Jack is the primer. Or that Max is lying to get Jack mislynched...except Max is a deadman if Jack flips town so lying like this isn't worth the trade.It's typically assumed that if you can kill and you're not mafia, then you're either a Vig or 3P. So what are you admitting to here?Being a certain kind of a JOAT, actually. It's a Fallacy setup, what're you expecting?QuoteAlso I don't believe that you know someone who visited Vector. There's nobody left who could. I Delayed Toony, so both of us are accounted for. NJW claimed Voyeur, Web claimed Study, and Vector likely didn't self-Prime. So either you or Jack is the Inspect, and Jack soft claimed Watcher yesterday. Everyone is accounted for except you. Unless NJW and Web are covering for each other, you're the Primer. Unless Jack denies visiting Vector, this is just confirmed.All right, since you're already most of the way there, I'll admit that I tracked Jack and saw that he visited Vector.
Ok, a JOAT can be a Vig. So you are claiming Vig then.No, I'm not a vig at all. I could use all my abilities without killing anyone.
Cool. This means either Max is telling the truth and Jack is the primer. Or that Max is lying to get Jack mislynched...except Max is a deadman if Jack flips town so lying like this isn't worth the trade.Dude, there were three different things used on Vector, as you well know, and Roden, however crazy he's getting about the vig thing, could be right that Jack is just the inspect. Missing obvious details like that is naturally suspicious.
I did, give me time to respond to things.I mean, sure, why not? That's something I've done.Scumteam is Roden and ToonyMan, calling it now.I'm struggling to understand this. Do you think Toony told me to randomly hard bus him in the mafia PT? What am I supposed to gain from this?
Are you interested in answering my general question above?
He'd tell me to immediately accuse him of being the Poisoner and that he was going to flop like a fish once I accused him? What alternate universe Toony have you been playing with?I mean... Hardbus? Your bus had no wheels on it, Broden. I'll call it a bus when he's at L-1. But, also, yes, ToonyMan probably would absolutely tell you to do that.Scumteam is Roden and ToonyMan, calling it now.I'm struggling to understand this. Do you think Toony told me to randomly hard bus him in the mafia PT? What am I supposed to gain from this?
I'm actually going to take a wild guess and say that ToonyMan probably DOES have a Vengeful role but that he's also Mafia, so he can break a 5p lylo in his favor. That'll be why he'll be pushing for an execution Today on EuchreJack.Oh ho, so you do believe my role-claim? I find it hard to believe town!Webadict would believe me...mafia!Webadict on the other hand knows I'm telling the truth.
Of course, me saying this might make me look suspicious, but that's how I perpetually role, isn't it?
Cool. This means either Max is telling the truth and Jack is the primer. Or that Max is lying to get Jack mislynched...except Max is a deadman if Jack flips town so lying like this isn't worth the trade.It's typically assumed that if you can kill and you're not mafia, then you're either a Vig or 3P. So what are you admitting to here?Being a certain kind of a JOAT, actually. It's a Fallacy setup, what're you expecting?QuoteAlso I don't believe that you know someone who visited Vector. There's nobody left who could. I Delayed Toony, so both of us are accounted for. NJW claimed Voyeur, Web claimed Study, and Vector likely didn't self-Prime. So either you or Jack is the Inspect, and Jack soft claimed Watcher yesterday. Everyone is accounted for except you. Unless NJW and Web are covering for each other, you're the Primer. Unless Jack denies visiting Vector, this is just confirmed.All right, since you're already most of the way there, I'll admit that I tracked Jack and saw that he visited Vector.
Got anything to say to that Jack? Web is your partner isn't he?
Oh sorry, Max wouldn't be targeting Vector in this case...For this to be true then NJW is lying about the Inspect visit...except NJW can only lie in this scenario if he's paired with Web. But Max is also claiming Jack visited Vector. This thought process doesn't make sense.
Still, Max is not as suspicious as Web or Jack in this scenario.
You tend to have a certain way that you lie while claiming. This one doesn't feel like a lie. It could be, but... Eh? It feels like it could fit for the Mafia team if the Mafia was an Arsonist. In fact, it could be that you're a death-activated Arsonist? That might also be potentially Vengeful.I'm actually going to take a wild guess and say that ToonyMan probably DOES have a Vengeful role but that he's also Mafia, so he can break a 5p lylo in his favor. That'll be why he'll be pushing for an execution Today on EuchreJack.Oh ho, so you do believe my role-claim? I find it hard to believe town!Webadict would believe me...mafia!Webadict on the other hand knows I'm telling the truth.
Of course, me saying this might make me look suspicious, but that's how I perpetually role, isn't it?
You are correct. I can't see a way NJW or Web is mafia currently unless Web is some weirdass two-action role so I need to reevaluate what's going on.Cool. This means either Max is telling the truth and Jack is the primer. Or that Max is lying to get Jack mislynched...except Max is a deadman if Jack flips town so lying like this isn't worth the trade.It's typically assumed that if you can kill and you're not mafia, then you're either a Vig or 3P. So what are you admitting to here?Being a certain kind of a JOAT, actually. It's a Fallacy setup, what're you expecting?QuoteAlso I don't believe that you know someone who visited Vector. There's nobody left who could. I Delayed Toony, so both of us are accounted for. NJW claimed Voyeur, Web claimed Study, and Vector likely didn't self-Prime. So either you or Jack is the Inspect, and Jack soft claimed Watcher yesterday. Everyone is accounted for except you. Unless NJW and Web are covering for each other, you're the Primer. Unless Jack denies visiting Vector, this is just confirmed.All right, since you're already most of the way there, I'll admit that I tracked Jack and saw that he visited Vector.
Got anything to say to that Jack? Web is your partner isn't he?Oh sorry, Max wouldn't be targeting Vector in this case...For this to be true then NJW is lying about the Inspect visit...except NJW can only lie in this scenario if he's paired with Web. But Max is also claiming Jack visited Vector. This thought process doesn't make sense.
Still, Max is not as suspicious as Web or Jack in this scenario.
Jack needs to confirm that they inspected Vector
Question for today: If you could trade your life for TricMagic's, would you?Interesting if not obviously relevant. Depends if Tric could keep his town confirmed status. If he couldn't, then nope, don't need a sandwich vendor as much as we need my mechanical info, and his death was good in that I think mafia showed their hand in the wagon. If he could keep it, or we could keep my results and the wagon info after the trade... that's a difficult question to answer without seeing all the claims today.
3P ArsonistThis is a weird statement, but it was insightful, thank you.
Man, I wish I could prime people.Maximum Spin has an auto ability that allows them to prime anyone their target targets. It'd be a good limiter on the role, and it meshes with the setup (i.e. Everyone has targeted abilities.)
Probably would've tried to convince me to copycat him.and Maximum Spin was softclaiming kill-stuff, which would ALSO look suspicious if I claimed targeting them with what essentially is a copying ability.Oh damn, you have a copycat ability? Was it only one-shot?
Hi, I'm a 1-shot poison doc. I protected NJW last night. I was not poisoned.What a boring target, you should've targeted me, your BFF and secret idol.
This is even further justified by this post:I would have, but... not for sinister reasons. Rather, it'd be really helpful to have two of... well, either of my two remaining abilities, but especially the better one.Probably would've tried to convince me to copycat him.and Maximum Spin was softclaiming kill-stuff, which would ALSO look suspicious if I claimed targeting them with what essentially is a copying ability.Oh damn, you have a copycat ability? Was it only one-shot?
Maximum Spin has an auto ability that allows them to prime anyone their target targets. It'd be a good limiter on the role, and it meshes with the setup (i.e. Everyone has targeted abilities.)This is wrong. In fact, I can't prime anyone at all, directly or indirectly. I wasn't being hinty in any weird way, except, I guess, insofar as I have already explained that other people being primed affects my own power.
There are no third parties in this setup, unless you mean a mafia ally which is not very accurate. FoU has stated the only possible alignments will be town, mafia, and mally.Ahhhhh, maaaaan. That would've been a cool setup.
I can confirm that an action was performed on Vector.What do you mean?
Hi, I'm a 1-shot poison doc. I protected NJW last night. I was not poisoned.Did anything else happen to you? Can you confirm you were primed?
Bzzz, wrong. Try again idiot.There are no third parties in this setup, unless you mean a mafia ally which is not very accurate. FoU has stated the only possible alignments will be town, mafia, and mally.Ahhhhh, maaaaan. That would've been a cool setup.
Oh well, then it's a two-man prime-timer, with ToonyMan and Roden/EuchreJack. But ToonyMan is definitely in there.
Bzzz, wrong. Try again idiot.Rude. Seems like a bad idea to insult me if your plan is to convince me to not vote for you.
Web's Prodigious study is suspicious but nothing clear cut.Well, that's completely expected.
Jack's inspect is possibly suspicious.
Max (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8328131#msg8328131) claims they tracked Jack and they targeted Vector. They also mention (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8328116#msg8328116) a bit earlier they know someone who targeted Vector, although their timing is unfortunate as the only people who haven't claimed yet are Vector and Jack.
Everything about Max is suspicious, but it honestly feels like poor timing to me. I really feel like they could have claimed earlier if they were able to, like before NJW.I was off the internet most of today. I only got in here after getting back from the dentist. So yeah, I missed the turnover and a lot of the beginning of the day.
There are no third parties in this setup, unless you mean a mafia ally which is not very accurate. FoU has stated the only possible alignments will be town, mafia, and mally.
Did anything else happen to you? Can you confirm you were primed?
@Web:
You don't care because I think you're mafia. You spin shit on players when you feel like it, I haven't seen any genuine good faith trickery from you to find mafia. I hate that you chose to ignore me on D1 and I hate how you play as mafia because it pisses me off how you can endlessly throw bullshit such as made up third parties to make it look like you're helping when you have done nothing but cause problems. You insult players far more heavily as town and get genuinely angry at players for being idiots. I have seen no rage this game, just jokes and jests. Yes I'm pulling this card even if you don't like it. No I don't care how you respond to me. No I don't care if you vote me, it's a win for me still because even if you're somehow town you can feel like a fucking moron after because I sure won't because I know I'm trying my best and you aren't.
I don't understand why Vector is a one-shot poison doctor, that seems extremely bad and pointless in this setup?
I can confirm that an action was performed on Vector.What do you mean?
Quote from: VotecountToonyman (0):
Roden (0):
TricMagic (5): webadict, ToonyMan, Vector, EuchreJack, Roden
EuchreJack (0):
NJW2000 (1): Maximum Spin
Vector (0):
webadict (2): TricMagic, NJW2000
Maximum Spin (0):
No Execution (0):
Not Voting (0):
5 to hammer.
"You don't have to d-do this." TricMagic nervously stepped back. As always, he tried to keep up a humorous demeanor, and gave everyone a smile that spoke of internal pain. "I'm innocent, I swear -"
It was moments before the clock would strike and darkness would fall, and even the dying light of the lantern would be suppressed. Despite that, Roden took it upon himself to give the final push needed to send TricMagic over the edge.
His was the first death of this deadly game, yet somehow, every one of those present felt like they had seen such sights before. A pounding sense of deja vu that came with a mass of headaches.
Before the day drew to a close, you took it upon yourselves to use TricMagic's death as an opportunity to determine his guilt or innocence.
But within his chambers? You could find nothing of note beyond a portable cart stocked with fresh sandwiches. A godsend for your meals, but one that brought you incredible guilt, now. Save for the guiltless.
TricMagic was Town.QuoteSandwich Vendor (town):
(Night) Distribute [target]: You give your target a sandwich. They are informed that they received a sandwich during the Night.
His death could only be the first death of many, however. Peace was never an option - not in this place.
Night 1 has begun, and will end Wednesday at 9 AM, Central/Forum time (or if I receive all needed actions early and have the time to process).
(If you can't act or choose not to act, notifying me regardless will help speed up processing.)
If NJW is faking their prime result that would mean the mafia are me and NJW, since the no kill would be from Roden delaying me. This is impossible from my POV and I think in general doesn't make sense.
Actually, Vector isn't cleared but rather must be on a scum team with NJW in order to be scum. But as you point out, NJW to be scum has others whom he should be teamed up. So it is quite unlikely.Yes. Vector as mafia would have to be exactly with NJW. It's an extreme gambit by scum and I find exceedingly unlikely.
Nobody has claimed the prime action on Vector that NJW claims to exist. This must be mafia's lethal action, although it's possible they have others I suppose.If NJW is faking their prime result that would mean the mafia are me and NJW, since the no kill would be from Roden delaying me. This is impossible from my POV and I think in general doesn't make sense.What do you mean by that? What is your theory of the mafia team's night kill?
ToonymanCool. This confirms at least two mafia should be voting me right now.
I would be a prime suspect of this prime action, however Roden has cleared me with their delay. This is why I find it unlikely that Roden is mafia. What this means Jack is that if I believe you the mafia team is exactly Web/Max. (assuming two mafia which I suspect)
If NJW is faking their prime result that would mean the mafia are me and NJW, since the no kill would be from Roden delaying me. This is impossible from my POV and I think in general doesn't make sense.
Jack I'm being as open as possible. I like your reasoning posts because you seem to at least be trying more than Web. I need to get as much reasoning out as possible in case I face my demise so that town have the greatest chance of winning. It's very likely two mafia are voting me right now.
If NJW is faking their prime result that would mean the mafia are me and NJW, since the no kill would be from Roden delaying me. This is impossible from my POV and I think in general doesn't make sense.
I find this hard to believe. Are you not capable of no-killing when it causes more confusion? Like, I dunno, last round?
Does anyone have any kind of protect left to claim other than mine?
Does anyone have any kind of protect left to claim other than mine?
Question for today: If you could trade your life for TricMagic's, would you?
Question for today: If you could trade your life for TricMagic's, would you?
Nah. Tric's role actually has negative utility when compared to my role, as it produces useless info. Plus I thought Tric was scum. I'm answering this question based upon the frame of reference that Tric would be here with their history and role instead of my being here with my history and role.
Frankly, if Tric wasn't lynched yesterday, with their role and history they would probably be lynched today. I really should re-examine D1, see how the lynch of Tric actually occurred. I had remarked back in D1 that I thought the seeds of doubt that I had regarding Tric came from Web/Toonyman. Maybe they were in turn influenced.
Sandwich Vendor (town):After two nights, that role should allow the player to become confirmed town.
(Night) Distribute [target]: You give your target a sandwich. They are informed that they received a sandwich during the Night.
Web then jumps on some of Tric's Famous Poor Reasoning, and places the first vote.The fact they are using it to hide. By saying what their role is so early without promting, us being delayed would be seen as normal, town trying to stop the kill. But all it does is delay us, resulting in mafia being able to take advantage of it. It's also trying to get roles to reveal, giving them options on who to delay.No thanks. TricMagic.
Put simply, just because they revealed, does not make them town. If anything Delayer is a very negative role regardless of who has it. For one, it would ruin my own role's ability if it's used on me N1.
I had to nokill so I could strongkill on N2. FoU has said mafia were too weak last round so it is unlikely they would voluntarily nokill this round. But yes that does create a possibility of Toony/NJW.Why would NJW ever claim Priming on Vector as scum?! That makes no sense!
I would be a prime suspect of this prime action, however Roden has cleared me with their delay. This is why I find it unlikely that Roden is mafia. What this means Jack is that if I believe you the mafia team is exactly Web/Max. (assuming two mafia which I suspect)No one was poisoned! If Vector is Town, this fucking confirms you're Mafia!
PPE:ToonymanCool. This confirms at least two mafia should be voting me right now.
Lol were you trying to quickhammer me?Everyone is Mafia but you, the delayed Poisoner, yes?
You would be notified if you were poisoned, yes. Nobody has claimed being poisoned. I'm not a poisoner. I have no night action.True. Roden isn't necessarily Mafia. But if Roden doesn't vote you, then they are Mafia, unless they believe Vector is lying, since you are the only person that was delayed.
Because Roden delayed me Web has to conclude the mafia team is Toony/Roden, which isn't true and doesn't explain the prime on Vector. If my "poison" was delayed then Roden or me could not prime Vector. Mafia primed Vector, therefore neither of us are mafia.
Web insists I think everyone is mafia, this isn't true. After consideration I don't think Vector, NJW, or Roden can be mafia. Jack has seemed like town last night, but either way I would always want Web over Jack. I am also willing to vote Max, those are my two choices.
Vector doesn't confirm poison exist. Vector claims they are a oneshot poison doctor, even if they are being truthful we still have no evidence of poison. I am speculating that mafia may have poison though, sure.So, then who did Prodigious Study? Why is there no poison? Roden delayed you, and there was no poison. Did someone really poison NJW? Unlikely, as they were super suspected D1.
I don't trust you one bit even with "Prodigious study" as at least two people targeted Vector and I have a damn good feeling Jack is the clean one here and you and Max are the mafia.
Seriously, Toony, if I remove Multitasker for a second, the only teams viable consists of you, Maximum Spin and Roden.
If you add Multitasker, then you have to believe one of the following:
Vector being scum means their teammate primed them.
NJW being scum doesn't seem possible, even with this constraint, unless scum with only ToonyMan, ironically.
EuchreJack or me being scum means the Mafia was given a fairly weak but Townie investigation ability (and I have an extra constraint that I poisoned NJW for some reason)
All of those are weak possibilities.
It STILL only leaves you, Maximum Spin, and Roden. Any of those three should be voting any of the other two, if they're Town.
You would be notified if you were poisoned, yes. Nobody has claimed being poisoned. I'm not a poisoner. I have no night action.
Because Roden delayed me Web has to conclude the mafia team is Toony/Roden, which isn't true and doesn't explain the prime on Vector. If my "poison" was delayed then Roden or me could not prime Vector. Mafia primed Vector, therefore neither of us are mafia.
Web insists I think everyone is mafia, this isn't true. After consideration I don't think Vector, NJW, or Roden can be mafia. Jack has seemed like town last night, but either way I would always want Web over Jack. I am also willing to vote Max, those are my two choices.
This post is quite incriminating. If Toonyman was town, then he would have no need to bolster Roden. The logical fallacy that Toonyman is trying to push, and that is tripping Toonyman up, is that Roden's CLAIM of delaying Toonyman, a CLAIMED no-night action player, somehow means anything. It doesn't.This essentially summarizes my opinion too. Toonyman is playing below his level, dramatically and obviously so.
Town Toonyman should know that Roden could just be lying. Why bolster another player if you are town?
And what have you done? Or your partner Roden? Quit shit slinging and help.This post is quite incriminating. If Toonyman was town, then he would have no need to bolster Roden. The logical fallacy that Toonyman is trying to push, and that is tripping Toonyman up, is that Roden's CLAIM of delaying Toonyman, a CLAIMED no-night action player, somehow means anything. It doesn't.This essentially summarizes my opinion too. Toonyman is playing below his level, dramatically and obviously so.
Town Toonyman should know that Roden could just be lying. Why bolster another player if you are town?
I think Max has been helping, but maybe I'm just reading too much into his posts. Maybe you should actually look at Roden? Or Max?And what have you done? Or your partner Roden? Quit shit slinging and help.This post is quite incriminating. If Toonyman was town, then he would have no need to bolster Roden. The logical fallacy that Toonyman is trying to push, and that is tripping Toonyman up, is that Roden's CLAIM of delaying Toonyman, a CLAIMED no-night action player, somehow means anything. It doesn't.This essentially summarizes my opinion too. Toonyman is playing below his level, dramatically and obviously so.
Town Toonyman should know that Roden could just be lying. Why bolster another player if you are town?
Unvote until I can confirm the number of votes on Toonyman, whom I am inclined to vote. I see the mafia team as Toonyman/Roden.What I am saying there is that a setup of Toony/Roden isn't possible. I'm not saying Roden is cleared. I am even willing to vote Roden if people decide on that instead. I will vote Roden or Max. I concede to Web.You would be notified if you were poisoned, yes. Nobody has claimed being poisoned. I'm not a poisoner. I have no night action.
Because Roden delayed me Web has to conclude the mafia team is Toony/Roden, which isn't true and doesn't explain the prime on Vector. If my "poison" was delayed then Roden or me could not prime Vector. Mafia primed Vector, therefore neither of us are mafia.
Web insists I think everyone is mafia, this isn't true. After consideration I don't think Vector, NJW, or Roden can be mafia. Jack has seemed like town last night, but either way I would always want Web over Jack. I am also willing to vote Max, those are my two choices.
This post is quite incriminating. If Toonyman was town, then he would have no need to bolster Roden. The logical fallacy that Toonyman is trying to push, and that is tripping Toonyman up, is that Roden's CLAIM of delaying Toonyman, a CLAIMED no-night action player, somehow means anything. It doesn't.
Town Toonyman should know that Roden could just be lying. Why bolster another player if you are town?
I am doing everything in my power so that town can win this game. Please read my posts.I think Max has been helping, but maybe I'm just reading too much into his posts. Maybe you should actually look at Roden? Or Max?And what have you done? Or your partner Roden? Quit shit slinging and help.This post is quite incriminating. If Toonyman was town, then he would have no need to bolster Roden. The logical fallacy that Toonyman is trying to push, and that is tripping Toonyman up, is that Roden's CLAIM of delaying Toonyman, a CLAIMED no-night action player, somehow means anything. It doesn't.This essentially summarizes my opinion too. Toonyman is playing below his level, dramatically and obviously so.
Town Toonyman should know that Roden could just be lying. Why bolster another player if you are town?
NJW - god player if mafia, very unlikelyJust in case we might be missing something, and a warning for Round 5:
If people want to give suggestions for who I should target I'm all ears.I'm willing to vote Max or Roden, but I am still targeting Max if I'm lynched currently.
I am doing everything in my power so that town can win this game. Please read my posts.
NJW is probably one of the best Town players in this tournament.I disagree, heh.
I had considered Roden/Max earlier in the day when I had first unvoted Webadict, but Web was pissing me off and I don't feel Web would misread both Tric and me which is why I am having a hard time trusting him. If I believe both you and Webadict then yes, it's Roden and Max so I'm willing to concede that.I am doing everything in my power so that town can win this game. Please read my posts.
I believe you, but it is difficult to examine all the players all the time. I think you got jammed up suspecting Web, and overlooked Roden and Max.
I'm now inclined to vote Roden, but not Max.
Uh, how come people forget that Vector prevented NJW from being poisoned?That would imply that mafia primed Vector and tried to poison NJW but failed. Vector claimed they protected NJW, this doesn't mean they actually stopped a poison unless Vector can clarify. I was under the impression that players aren't told either way whether their protection worked or not.
I mean, I thought that is what Vector said, but people keep trying to say "Nobody got poisoned" and blame it elsewhere. Why is not possible that Vector actually stopped the poison?
TLDR:Seriously, Toony, if I remove Multitasker for a second, the only teams viable consists of you, Maximum Spin and Roden.
If you add Multitasker, then you have to believe one of the following:
Vector being scum means their teammate primed them.
NJW being scum doesn't seem possible, even with this constraint, unless scum with only ToonyMan, ironically.
EuchreJack or me being scum means the Mafia was given a fairly weak but Townie investigation ability (and I have an extra constraint that I poisoned NJW for some reason)
All of those are weak possibilities.
It STILL only leaves you, Maximum Spin, and Roden. Any of those three should be voting any of the other two, if they're Town.
Hey, I'm willing to switch to Roden if Toonyman is. :)Why? Do you believe Web and Jack?
I agree with Webadict and am prepared to vote Toony. I'm calling Toony/Roden.@Vector: Any chance you might consider Roden instead? Not that Toonyman is really any better mechanically, but his freakout seems legit.
Alright, so nobody is voting Roden, and lots really should be.I think I will stay on ToonyMan, on the off-chance the scumteam did go for the double poison. I might've been convinced to do so earlier, but it required a different input from Toony. Plus, if he's Town, he's still the safer option, as he would shoot someone. But, progression is progression, and I won't slow down the Roden train.
Hey, I'm willing to switch to Roden if Toonyman is. :)Twisting that dagger, eh?
If you vote Roden, you prove the Maximum Spin/webadict team is no longer possible.Hey, I'm willing to switch to Roden if Toonyman is. :)Why? Do you believe Web and Jack?
Why? Do you believe Web and Jack?See, this is why I think you're suspicious. You keep saying dumb things like this, and I believe you are smarter than that.
Twisting that dagger, eh?Absolutely. What else would you do with a dagger?
+1 Stupid Townie Points to ToonyMan.Hey, I'm willing to switch to Roden if Toonyman is. :)Why? Do you believe Web and Jack?
You didn't answer me.Why? Do you believe Web and Jack?See, this is why I think you're suspicious. You keep saying dumb things like this, and I believe you are smarter than that.
Actually, I wasn't expecting you to vote Roden, although if Roden flips Town, I will be blaming you for the push.Alright, so nobody is voting Roden, and lots really should be.I think I will stay on ToonyMan, on the off-chance the scumteam did go for the double poison. I might've been convinced to do so earlier, but it required a different input from Toony. Plus, if he's Town, he's still the safer option, as he would shoot someone. But, progression is progression, and I won't slow down the Roden train.
I think I will stay on ToonyMan, on the off-chance the scumteam did go for the double poison. I might've been convinced to do so earlier, but it required a different input from Toony. Plus, if he's Town, he's still the safer option, as he would shoot someone. But, progression is progression, and I won't slow down the Roden train.Oh, however, I do think the delay-poison is likely impossible unless there are at least 3 scum (not necessarily all a team) or multitasking (or maaaaaybe some kind of weird-ass passive similar to what you supposed I had, but this is Mostly Vanilla), because someone had to do the priming. I could have believed, at start of day, a townie with a power that primes as a side effect, but since nobody CLAIMED such, I don't see how it wasn't sinister.
@Maximum Spin:Okay. I don't really "believe" people. I agree with webadict on some things. I agree with Euchrejack on some things. I would consider Roden a valid lynch target independently of both of them, because I can indeed think for myself. In general, I am more or less willing to lynch anyone whose lynch I think would be positive, without strong preference, so I don't mind switching.You didn't answer me.Why? Do you believe Web and Jack?See, this is why I think you're suspicious. You keep saying dumb things like this, and I believe you are smarter than that.
EuchreJack, I'm gonna say this nicely: You're pulling a TricMagic. Third impostering. Scumsiding. Anti-Town. Whatever you want to call it. The point is that you're purposefully blinding yourself for no good reason.Actually, I wasn't expecting you to vote Roden, although if Roden flips Town, I will be blaming you for the push.Alright, so nobody is voting Roden, and lots really should be.I think I will stay on ToonyMan, on the off-chance the scumteam did go for the double poison. I might've been convinced to do so earlier, but it required a different input from Toony. Plus, if he's Town, he's still the safer option, as he would shoot someone. But, progression is progression, and I won't slow down the Roden train.
Igniting is typically an all-or-nothing type of action. So, yes, they could do that, it's just a very silly thing to ignite your partner, so I'm not willing to believe it at all.I think I will stay on ToonyMan, on the off-chance the scumteam did go for the double poison. I might've been convinced to do so earlier, but it required a different input from Toony. Plus, if he's Town, he's still the safer option, as he would shoot someone. But, progression is progression, and I won't slow down the Roden train.Oh, however, I do think the delay-poison is likely impossible unless there are at least 3 scum (not necessarily all a team) or multitasking (or maaaaaybe some kind of weird-ass passive similar to what you supposed I had, but this is Mostly Vanilla), because someone had to do the priming. I could have believed, at start of day, a townie with a power that primes as a side effect, but since nobody CLAIMED such, I don't see how it wasn't sinister.
In any situation in which the delay-poison is possible, Vector is definitely not confirmed town. Indeed, Vector isn't confirmed town in *any* case... mafia can prime someone they never plan to ignite.
ALSOTo be fair, if we were the team, we are both smart enough to just not do it.
LOL, YOU JUST GOT SCUMHAMMERED BY MAX/WEB!!!
Just wanted to prove I am, in fact, not scum by posting this when I could've hammered Roden.
Is this enough proof?
Igniting is typically an all-or-nothing type of action. So, yes, they could do that, it's just a very silly thing to ignite your partner, so I'm not willing to believe it at all.... the track I used on Euchrejack would've ignited him (and only him) as a side effect if he were primed. That's actually why I asked the vig question, because I knew there was a chance I'd be killing my target. So, individual piecemeal igniting is definitely available here. This fact is also why I think it's possible that priming and igniting could be on wholly separate roles.
... OH. THAT'S NEW INFORMATION.Igniting is typically an all-or-nothing type of action. So, yes, they could do that, it's just a very silly thing to ignite your partner, so I'm not willing to believe it at all.... the track I used on Euchrejack would've ignited him (and only him) as a side effect if he were primed. That's actually why I asked the vig question, because I knew there was a chance I'd be killing my target. So, individual piecemeal igniting is definitely available here. This fact is also why I think it's possible that priming and igniting could be on wholly separate roles.
To be fair, if we were the team, we are both smart enough to just not do it.We both know I'm dumb enough to try anyway.
The real reason we can't be the team is that we would have had to fight over which of us doesn't get to be a giant jerk.
... OH. THAT'S NEW INFORMATION.A powerful but heavily downsided JOAT.
The fuck kinda role do you have?!?!
I don't understand why Max would vote Roden, I think that makes it unwinnable for him if they're both mafia. Is it Web/Roden?Because I'm town, you goof.
Well, okay, I've done YOLOier plays than that as mafia, so it's not really inconceivable, but I am actually town this time.I don't understand why Max would vote Roden, I think that makes it unwinnable for him if they're both mafia. Is it Web/Roden?Because I'm town, you goof.
@Vector: Any chance you might consider Roden instead? Not that Toonyman is really any better mechanically, but his freakout seems legit.
You fought off Scum!Toonyman last round, does this play seem similar to that? Note the word usage and tone.
... the track I used on Euchrejack would've ignited him (and only him) as a side effect if he were primed. That's actually why I asked the vig question, because I knew there was a chance I'd be killing my target. So, individual piecemeal igniting is definitely available here. This fact is also why I think it's possible that priming and igniting could be on wholly separate roles.
I don't understand why Max would vote Roden, I think that makes it unwinnable for him if they're both mafia. Is it Web/Roden?⢀⣠⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⣤⣶⣶
It would've been L-1 if Max was still on it, but sadly it is not.@Vector: Any chance you might consider Roden instead? Not that Toonyman is really any better mechanically, but his freakout seems legit.
You fought off Scum!Toonyman last round, does this play seem similar to that? Note the word usage and tone.
I mean, yes, this is perfectly within ToonyMan's range as scum.
I believe that Max is town based on his last post. I'll vote ToonyMan in say half an hour if no one objects to me putting him at L-1.
@Max:Well, at least one would have. I won't make any statements about the others. I've already shared useful tidbits, I don't think town gains enough from my fullclaim at this time. I'm open to convincing.
So you have powerful abilities, but there's a possibility you kill the player if they're primed?
Hm, then it is possible that the primer is town-aligned, so that Town has a vigilante split between two Town players.I THOUGHT so, but nobody CLAIMED it when they had the chance, you know? I was specifically hinting about it hoping for that.
@Max: Anything in your role reference sandwiches?Nah, that one was a surprise to me.
It's so weird that you're STILL going after me.I don't trust you, at all.
Vector was primed 100% by scum.Hm, then it is possible that the primer is town-aligned, so that Town has a vigilante split between two Town players.I THOUGHT so, but nobody CLAIMED it when they had the chance, you know? I was specifically hinting about it hoping for that.
Right, some info from tonight.
I am a voyeur: I can learn any abilities used on my target during the night.
I voyeur'd Vector and there were three other abilities used on them: They were inspected, targeted with an ability called "Prodigious study"and primed.
I do get some information about what the abilities I see do. Prodigious study lets someone copy an investigative ability their target has. Priming gives them the primed status, FoU wasn't more explicit about that, but I really do not think it's good.
Have asked FoU for more info on the priming, but it really looks like someone has some kind of arsonist role. Most likely scum, but maybe some kind of arsonist vig given Vector's claim about poison.
Any analysis later, time for food.
Death Arsonist (sk, survivor; super-rare; 4+ players): You can prime a player at night by dousing them in gasoline. During the day, you may set a fire which kills all primed players. If you die, your fire goes off automatically. Actions: prime (day)igniteFrom Xylbot.
That leaves Toony, Web, and Roden. The idea that both Toony and Web are scum again is not impossible, but the two of them arguing has been half the posts today, so that's a pretty marginal possibility. They also seems quite big on the idea of eliminating one another? Roden's dubious because of their lack of scumhunting D1 and their weird takes D2, but their vote on Tric is largely NAI to me because it came at a point where it didn't really matter, so the Tric wagon isn't relevant to my read on Roden. To be honest, I don't get why he'd do that hammer as either alignment, but hey, I guess it's one of those Just Roden Things I'm slowly learning not to flip out about. Still someone I'm worried about, but he didn't orchestrate the ML.
Hm, what if mafia needed Tric to distribute the poison? Sort of the opposite of the mafia needing Maximum Spin to kill off those who are primed.Heh, that'd be a hilarious setup, but it seems unlikely that mafia would be TOTALLY dependent on town player actions to kill, or they could end up with their hands tied the whole game. They're supposed to be stronger this time than last time.
It's proooooobably because ToonyMan or Roden did it.
Probably ToonyMan, if I had to guess. The guy with the "death-related" roleQuoteDeath Arsonist (sk, survivor; super-rare; 4+ players): You can prime a player at night by dousing them in gasoline. During the day, you may set a fire which kills all primed players. If you die, your fire goes off automatically. Actions: prime (day)igniteFrom Xylbot.
@Jack:I appreciate the complement, although my eagerness is probably just because I didn't get to play a lot last round.
I greatly appreciate your consideration into the game. You didn't have to do any of this as mafia which makes me feel good that it's not Web/Jack.
... the track I used on Euchrejack would've ignited him (and only him) as a side effect if he were primed. That's actually why I asked the vig question, because I knew there was a chance I'd be killing my target. So, individual piecemeal igniting is definitely available here. This fact is also why I think it's possible that priming and igniting could be on wholly separate roles.
I'm also not buying the Toonyman/Roden scum team. Their actions link them in a way that a scum team would not want to do.omfg, Euchre.
I've also indicated that if poison exists, I generally believe Roden to be scum. Delayer when the mafia's kill is delayed seems under-powered, albet FOU does seem to like delayers way way way too much. Didn't Roden roll delayer already in the tournament?
Heh, silly me thinking that I was being protected instead of being almost vigilante killed.Well, I wasn't hoping it would kill you.
Like do none of you see that Toony repeatedly said "Roden is probably town" over and over and over, but then voted me? He isn't pushing his actual scum reads, he's just trying to survive. Why would a Vengeful Townie try to lynch his town read?Yes, I do see that. That's why I'm voting Toony.
Web seems to be consistently suggesting that Toony is scum with a vengeful thing. Here's the issue with that: scum don't claim vengeful death-arsonist or whatever, they just let town eat it when they die. Seems like Web wants to push the scum!Toony idea but not elim. And I don't know what situation Web wants to do that in, but I don't like it.8| Sure.
will Delay Max because it honestly just looks like Toony is 50/50 distancing with both Web and Max so we can't figure out who his actual scum buddy is.If you're town this is the single worst idea anyone has had this game. Like, seriously, now I pretty much HAVE to lynch you. If you flip town I promise to make up for it.
Huh. I notice there isn't even a role that delays people (anywhere I can see) on the mafiascum wiki. Are we sure that delaying is even a thing in this setup? Granted, Fallacy said most roles would be there, but...Delayer is a real role. Not sure why it wouldn't be there, though.
I'm pretty sure Vector will vote me over Roden here so let me just say I will be targeting Web or Roden.Fucking shoot me, then. If you're Town and play this shitty, we both deserve to lose. Way to threaten Town, lolol.
... I mean... If Roden is Delaying you, then it sort of proves they're Town, no?will Delay Max because it honestly just looks like Toony is 50/50 distancing with both Web and Max so we can't figure out who his actual scum buddy is.If you're town this is the single worst idea anyone has had this game. Like, seriously, now I pretty much HAVE to lynch you. If you flip town I promise to make up for it.
There are at least three other people I would have been willing to lynch. I only voted you as part of an exchange with Toony, it's not like I was married to the idea. But now that you have suggested that you will do that, you are extremely dangerous to me.
Unless... hold on a sec.
Why wouldn't I Delay you? I suspect you and you're voting me over Toony! Give me one good reason that I shouldn't Delay you. Give an alternative. I have no reason to Delay anyone on Toony's wagon, if they were scum they'd just hammer me. Vector's a Poison Doc, so obviously not getting Delayed. It just leaves Jack, who I admit could be the Primer if it isn't you.will Delay Max because it honestly just looks like Toony is 50/50 distancing with both Web and Max so we can't figure out who his actual scum buddy is.If you're town this is the single worst idea anyone has had this game. Like, seriously, now I pretty much HAVE to lynch you. If you flip town I promise to make up for it.
There are at least three other people I would have been willing to lynch. I only voted you as part of an exchange with Toony, it's not like I was married to the idea. But now that you have suggested that you will do that, you are extremely dangerous to me.
Unless... hold on a sec.
Huh. I notice there isn't even a role that delays people (anywhere I can see) on the mafiascum wiki. Are we sure that delaying is even a thing in this setup? Granted, Fallacy said most roles would be there, but...We had a Town Delayer during the first round.
I'm pretty sure Vector will vote me over Roden here so let me just say I will be targeting Web or Roden.Wtf are you doing Toony? How did you go from "Roden is town, don't lynch him" to "Roden is town but needs to get lynched or Venge'd"?
Max why are you so scared of getting Delayed if you're just a JOAT Tracker? You keep hinting at Vig but refuse to claim Vig. From your perspective, nobody can be Primer except Jack if it isn't you. So where's the suspicion towards Jack? Why not tell me to Delay Jack instead of threatening to purposely mislynch me just so you can Track someone tonight?Why can only Jack be the primer? Why can't you be the primer?
... I mean... If Roden is Delaying you, then it sort of proves they're Town, no?Sure, but if Roden is lynched and flips town, that ALSO proves he's town, and then you can have Roden back, if I don't get delayed.
How can I be the Primer if I Delayed Toony? Even if you want to suggest Multitasking, I still said early into Day 1 that if a Watcher exists that they should be on Vector, which Jack agreed to after heavily soft claiming that he indeed was a Watcher. Why would I Prime Vector instead of literally anybody else who didn't have the threat of a Watcher visiting them? What is the logic behind that?Max why are you so scared of getting Delayed if you're just a JOAT Tracker? You keep hinting at Vig but refuse to claim Vig. From your perspective, nobody can be Primer except Jack if it isn't you. So where's the suspicion towards Jack? Why not tell me to Delay Jack instead of threatening to purposely mislynch me just so you can Track someone tonight?Why can only Jack be the primer? Why can't you be the primer?
I am not a... what even is a "JOAT Tracker"? Do you not know what a JOAT is? I get a bunch of different powers. Including the one which I was going to use tonight, if you don't delay me. But if you do I will probably die before I can use it.... I mean... If Roden is Delaying you, then it sort of proves they're Town, no?Sure, but if Roden is lynched and flips town, that ALSO proves he's town, and then you can have Roden back, if I don't get delayed.
I wasn't kidding about the question, guys. I can actually do that.
How can I be the Primer if I Delayed Toony?I have no reason to believe you did. Toony himself claims to have no action anyway.
Nobody else is claiming getting Delayed though, and my role PM says my target will know since they'll get a message about their action failing. Like I actually can't fake this.How can I be the Primer if I Delayed Toony?I have no reason to believe you did. Toony himself claims to have no action anyway.
Nobody else is claiming getting Delayed though, and my role PM says my target will know since they'll get a message about their action failing. Like I actually can't fake this.I mean... it could be that nobody got delayed at all because there's no delay. I hope there's no delay, then you can't stop me.
Why are you believing Toony over me after literally everything he said today anyway? I seriously don't understand.
Toonyman (4): webadict, NJW2000, Roden, Vector
Roden (3): EuchreJack, ToonyMan, Maximum Spin
EuchreJack (0):
NJW2000 (0):
Vector (0):
webadict (0):
Maximum Spin (0):
No Execution (0):
Not Voting (0):
4 to hammer.
Vengeful Roleblocker (town):
(Auto) Vengeful Roleblocker: When you are executed during the Day, during the following Night you may choose one player to haunt, which blocks their Night action (if they attempted any). They will be told that they were roleblocked if this does occur.
ToonyMan (0):
Roden (0):
EuchreJack (0):
NJW2000 (0):
Vector (0):
webadict (0):
Maximum Spin (0):
No Execution (0):
Not Voting (7): ToonyMan, Roden, EuchreJack, NJW2000, Vector, webadict, Maximum Spin
4 to hammer.
Fourth of all, I will never include alignment conversion in a game with less than 13 players, and even when it's an option it will not be deployed in an unlimited form.
Fourth of all, I will never include alignment conversion in a game with less than 13 players, and even when it's an option it will not be deployed in an unlimited form.
Thirdly, it is possible for role flips to be obscured by a Janitor, but role flips will not lie (though let's be honest, this is just basic decency - I'm not running a bastard game).seems at least as important.
I am confirmed town now as well, yes Jack.Indeed. I would think the last thing that Mafia would want is a player that is confirmed town. There are a few fringe cases where they can put you back in the ground quickly AND hurt others, but frankly even one day of having a confirmed town is brutal. So we can infer that Max is town.
Max isn't confirmed, but I'm hard pressed to see a reason why Max would bother ressing me (or Tric if I was mafia) as mafia. Sure he could be doing it for brownie points, but the disadvantages are horrible. Although this likely means mafia are quite powerful.
Webadict is never town in this game, ever.You are STILL going for me. I wish you were Mafia, I truly do.
I explained in my notes, but I can paste them here:
1. Why did Webadict target Vector on N1? During D1 other players made large hints that they were a type of investigator (such as Jack), but Webadict chose to "copy" Vector who had only hinted at the fact they were a doctor. Vector was a prime kill target, not a prime target for Webadict's inspection copy ability. His night-action choice makes no sense, but NJW spotted it so he chose to confirm himself on that.
2. As mafia last round I was the first vote on every mislynch that happened. This is a huge scumtell. Webadict is the same this round.
3. Town!Webadict would never misread both me and Tric like this.
4. Webadict didn't hesitate at all trying to kill me through all of D2 while I was hesitating over the fact we could both be town and team-killing each other. Hence why I unvoted him multiple times and wasn't even voting Web for end of Day 2. This shows an agenda-based play by Web which is a big scumtell. Mafia want to follow a plan they have and will only deviate if it benefits them.
I'm willing to out Roden today as well, but my vote is not leaving Webadict until he's dead.
Maximum Spin has Ember Tracking, which does exactly what he says it does.Well, had.
Prodigious study lets someone copy an investigative ability their target has.
Yes, it is indeed a one-shot for me as well (as well as the downside you stated), but I'm not sure why I'd want to use it.Maximum Spin has Ember Tracking, which does exactly what he says it does.Well, had.
I guess this confirms two things: that webadict does have the ability to get ability names - that is indeed the actual ability name - and that doing so does not necessarily prime people.
Yes. I'm not scum, and I won't be using this ability.Prodigious study lets someone copy an investigative ability their target has.
I think we have to vote Web, since he now has the ability to set off those who are primed. Any flaws in this logic?
Not quite, Jack. Vector is basically confirmed town due to the unclaimed mafia prime unless exactly with NJW, but NJW is very very likely town as well since Web is mafia.
You and Max are a tier lower in the "probably town, but not as convincingly town as Vector/NJW".
And at the bottom are Web and Roden.
Webadict is never town in this game, ever.1. Correct. The only way you can justify me making a target that makes no sense on purpose in this case is if you pair NJW and I together. I made a decision that, irrefutably, doesn't make sense if you think about it from a perspective of trying to obtain abilities. Unfortunately, this argument fails because you do not believe that NJW2000 and I are a team. What this DOES make sense as is someone that had just voted out a Townie needed a way to confirm what his actions were during the Night. EuchreJack had claimed the ability to watch targets, stating that he would be doing so on Vector, and thus, I determined that the best way to confirm that I, in fact, am not fucking scum, was to forgo gathering abilities (or hope that Vector had an investigation ability.) I was saved by NJW2000 of all people.
I explained in my notes, but I can paste them here:
1. Why did Webadict target Vector on N1? During D1 other players made large hints that they were a type of investigator (such as Jack), but Webadict chose to "copy" Vector who had only hinted at the fact they were a doctor. Vector was a prime kill target, not a prime target for Webadict's inspection copy ability. His night-action choice makes no sense, but NJW spotted it so he chose to confirm himself on that.
2. As mafia last round I was the first vote on every mislynch that happened. This is a huge scumtell. Webadict is the same this round.
3. Town!Webadict would never misread both me and Tric like this.
4. Webadict didn't hesitate at all trying to kill me through all of D2 while I was hesitating over the fact we could both be town and team-killing each other. Hence why I unvoted him multiple times and wasn't even voting Web for end of Day 2. This shows an agenda-based play by Web which is a big scumtell. Mafia want to follow a plan they have and will only deviate if it benefits them.
I'm willing to out Roden today as well, but my vote is not leaving Webadict until he's dead.
Yes. I'm not scum, and I won't be using this ability.Well, maybe you should. If you're town, and Toonyman and I are both town - you must believe this at this point, I hope - then for you the plausible suspects are Vector, Roden, NJW2k, and EuchreJack, right? So, wouldn't you be curious to verify the claims of half of that group by seeing whether Vector is in fact really primed?
I None'd, and I have been poisoned. I will die post-elimination at EoD.
@Maximum Spin: I think you need to tell us how poison might exist.I'm not sure I understand the question.
I None'd, and I have been poisoned. I will die post-elimination at EoD.I roleblocked Roden last night and Max was res'ing me.
@Toonyman, since you are confirmed town, and want Web dead, maybe you can explain this to me. How do we know that the scum team is not NJW2000 and Vector, with Vector having primed 2 people, and NJW2000 watching for the last two nights, with the end game being after elimination N3 when one of them primes a 3rd target and the other pushes the detonator for the win?Because Jack/Web is more likely than NJW/Vector.
What happened to Roden/Web? You can't be that pissed that I suggested Web might not be scum. I mean, I think NJW/Vector is less likely than Roden/Web, hence why I asked you.@Toonyman, since you are confirmed town, and want Web dead, maybe you can explain this to me. How do we know that the scum team is not NJW2000 and Vector, with Vector having primed 2 people, and NJW2000 watching for the last two nights, with the end game being after elimination N3 when one of them primes a 3rd target and the other pushes the detonator for the win?Because Jack/Web is more likely than NJW/Vector.
At some point, you indicated that you could confirm that poison existed in this setup. Or maybe I misread that, I'll try and hunt down the specific post.@Maximum Spin: I think you need to tell us how poison might exist.I'm not sure I understand the question.
Oh, yes.At some point, you indicated that you could confirm that poison existed in this setup. Or maybe I misread that, I'll try and hunt down the specific post.@Maximum Spin: I think you need to tell us how poison might exist.I'm not sure I understand the question.
I'm gonna be so happy when you see how fucking wrong you are, it's gonna be hilarious.@Toonyman, since you are confirmed town, and want Web dead, maybe you can explain this to me. How do we know that the scum team is not NJW2000 and Vector, with Vector having primed 2 people, and NJW2000 watching for the last two nights, with the end game being after elimination N3 when one of them primes a 3rd target and the other pushes the detonator for the win?Because Jack/Web is more likely than NJW/Vector.
Okay, what's going on here then? Don't be afraid to be wrong three times in a row, I'll listen.I'm gonna be so happy when you see how fucking wrong you are, it's gonna be hilarious.@Toonyman, since you are confirmed town, and want Web dead, maybe you can explain this to me. How do we know that the scum team is not NJW2000 and Vector, with Vector having primed 2 people, and NJW2000 watching for the last two nights, with the end game being after elimination N3 when one of them primes a 3rd target and the other pushes the detonator for the win?Because Jack/Web is more likely than NJW/Vector.
One last: My role definitely makes it plausible to me that mafia do actually have dual poison/priming. Certainly I can confirm they both exist in the game.The post from Max about confirming poison. Now to read the posts since my last post.
If the mafia group is NJW/Vector, and we assume that they have been priming people secretly, we do need to ask ourselves which of them can pull the ignite trigger. I think it's more likely to be Vector, because in that case the poison claim would essentially be a bid to survive today on the grounds that a lynch would become irrelevant.
@Jack:
I don't understand the sudden shift onto NJW and Vector. Why do you think Vector and NJW have been lying now?
Jack, I only think you're mafia if it's exactly with Webadict. Web is always the first pick here though.
I also overlooked that Max sorta counterclaimed Vector, since Max only sorta claimed until now.It's entirely possible that we both have that power.
The way I see it, if Webadict is town (false) the only possibility is NJW/Vector omegabraining as mafia. This is extremely unlikely.Why is that unlikely, though? It's not THAT advanced a tactic, and they're both good players.
@Jack:Web just told you the name of Maximum Spin's power, which means Web could not have poisoned Vector unless Web was on a scum team with Maximum Spin.
Why not consider Webadict is mafia with Roden or Max? Even though both Roden and Max couldn't have poisoned Vector they could still be mafia with Web if Web is the poisoner.
I am open to Vector/NJW theories though, as we don't want to leave any stone unturned today.
Why is that unlikely, though? It's not THAT advanced a tactic, and they're both good players.It means mafia chose not to kill or do anything harmful on N1.
...Why do you think Web is town Jack?@Jack:Web just told you the name of Maximum Spin's power, which means Web could not have poisoned Vector unless Web was on a scum team with Maximum Spin.
Why not consider Webadict is mafia with Roden or Max? Even though both Roden and Max couldn't have poisoned Vector they could still be mafia with Web if Web is the poisoner.
I am open to Vector/NJW theories though, as we don't want to leave any stone unturned today.
And frankly, if Maximum Spin had to resurrect someone as mafia, why again is Tric dead and you alive?
Why is that unlikely, though? It's not THAT advanced a tactic, and they're both good players.It means mafia chose not to kill or do anything harmful on N1.
This is possible since I was restricted last round, but FoU said they'd make mafia stronger. I was just res'd so mafia have to be at least kind of powerful. Web and NJW are not of the same alignment at least this much I feel confident.
Because I'm town, and I can't see any mechanical way that Web would be scum if I'm not scum. Since I know I'm town, I'm forced to clear Web, even though they're acting really scummy....Why do you think Web is town Jack?@Jack:Web just told you the name of Maximum Spin's power, which means Web could not have poisoned Vector unless Web was on a scum team with Maximum Spin.
Why not consider Webadict is mafia with Roden or Max? Even though both Roden and Max couldn't have poisoned Vector they could still be mafia with Web if Web is the poisoner.
I am open to Vector/NJW theories though, as we don't want to leave any stone unturned today.
And frankly, if Maximum Spin had to resurrect someone as mafia, why again is Tric dead and you alive?
I also overlooked that Max sorta counterclaimed Vector, since Max only sorta claimed until now.It's entirely possible that we both have that power.
To clarify, your powers could overlap, I think we've seen that. But the roles would have to differ. Sorta like how a Jailer protects and roleblocks could possibly appear in a game with a bodyguard who protects and dies.I also overlooked that Max sorta counterclaimed Vector, since Max only sorta claimed until now.It's entirely possible that we both have that power.
Not in a FOU game. In this tournament, you could have similar powers, but not the same powers. FOU is too crazy to give out two of the exact same roles.
Well, it wouldn't be the same role, though, as I'm a JOAT with other stuff, it would just be one same ability. And Vector's power probably doesn't set people on fire.I also overlooked that Max sorta counterclaimed Vector, since Max only sorta claimed until now.It's entirely possible that we both have that power.
Not in a FOU game. In this tournament, you could have similar powers, but not the same powers. FOU is too crazy to give out two of the exact same roles.
@Jack:I've realized this likely isn't possible since Web knew Max's role, so I see what you mean there.
Why not consider Webadict is mafia with Roden or Max? Even though both Roden and Max couldn't have poisoned Vector they could still be mafia with Web if Web is the poisoner.
What did you do last night Jack?I inspected NJW2000. I did this to check Web, at least a little bit.
@Jack:I've realized this likely isn't possible since Web knew Max's role, so I see what you mean there.
Why not consider Webadict is mafia with Roden or Max? Even though both Roden and Max couldn't have poisoned Vector they could still be mafia with Web if Web is the poisoner.
Jack, you've realized the only person that could be the Vector poisoner is you yourself, or Vector has to be lying. I get that now.
Damn, does everything you do set people on fire? Please tell me your ability that revived Toonyman wasn't called "The Spark of Life"...Well, it wouldn't be the same role, though, as I'm a JOAT with other stuff, it would just be one same ability. And Vector's power probably doesn't set people on fire.I also overlooked that Max sorta counterclaimed Vector, since Max only sorta claimed until now.It's entirely possible that we both have that power.
Not in a FOU game. In this tournament, you could have similar powers, but not the same powers. FOU is too crazy to give out two of the exact same roles.
Please tell me your ability that revived Toonyman wasn't called "The Spark of Life"...It was not.
Inteeeeresting, you watched the person that could not have been targeted anymore from what people have claimed. Gotta make sure NJW can't contradict you when he comes in right?What did you do last night Jack?I inspected NJW2000. I did this to check Web, at least a little bit.
My results were that NJW2000 was not targeted. I figured town!Web couldn't resist knowing what was in the Maximum Spin grab bag, whereas mafia!Web would probably claim to have copied NJW2000's voyeur power as it is the more reliable investigative role.
Damn, does everything you do set people on fire? Please tell me your ability that revived Toonyman wasn't called "The Spark of Life"...I was struck by lightning when I was revived, so that's pretty fitting.
Are you still voting Roden?
VectorOkay, I'm lost on why Vector?
Because we gotta hit scum. I'm happy to answer any questions, but I think everyone else needs time to discuss, so I'll shut up and let others discuss for a bit.
Drat, so I am right. Vector has been lying all along.
Jack, you've realized the only person that could be the Vector poisoner is you yourself, or Vector has to be lying. I get that now.
Drat, so I am right. Vector has been lying all along.
I ... no? I'm town.Jack, you've realized the only person that could be the Vector poisoner is you yourself, or Vector has to be lying. I get that now.
@WEB: This is why. Anyway, as I'm not lying I guess it's EuchreJack 9_9
I actually don't know Max's role. Just that action. I also have a copy of it.@Jack:I've realized this likely isn't possible since Web knew Max's role, so I see what you mean there.
Why not consider Webadict is mafia with Roden or Max? Even though both Roden and Max couldn't have poisoned Vector they could still be mafia with Web if Web is the poisoner.
Jack, you've realized the only person that could be the Vector poisoner is you yourself, or Vector has to be lying. I get that now.
I'm not willing to vote Euchre or you until I'm done musing.Drat, so I am right. Vector has been lying all along.
I ... no? I'm town.Jack, you've realized the only person that could be the Vector poisoner is you yourself, or Vector has to be lying. I get that now.
@WEB: This is why. Anyway, as I'm not lying I guess it's EuchreJack 9_9
Also, if you try to convince me to vote with you, you are mistaken. I would vote you over Jack.Drat, so I am right. Vector has been lying all along.
I ... no? I'm town.Jack, you've realized the only person that could be the Vector poisoner is you yourself, or Vector has to be lying. I get that now.
@WEB: This is why. Anyway, as I'm not lying I guess it's EuchreJack 9_9
I have night action news but will wait for Wubz to post.
Maximum Spin has Ember Tracking, which does exactly what he says it does.Webadict is never town in this game, ever.You are STILL going for me. I wish you were Mafia, I truly do.
I explained in my notes, but I can paste them here:
1. Why did Webadict target Vector on N1? During D1 other players made large hints that they were a type of investigator (such as Jack), but Webadict chose to "copy" Vector who had only hinted at the fact they were a doctor. Vector was a prime kill target, not a prime target for Webadict's inspection copy ability. His night-action choice makes no sense, but NJW spotted it so he chose to confirm himself on that.
2. As mafia last round I was the first vote on every mislynch that happened. This is a huge scumtell. Webadict is the same this round.
3. Town!Webadict would never misread both me and Tric like this.
4. Webadict didn't hesitate at all trying to kill me through all of D2 while I was hesitating over the fact we could both be town and team-killing each other. Hence why I unvoted him multiple times and wasn't even voting Web for end of Day 2. This shows an agenda-based play by Web which is a big scumtell. Mafia want to follow a plan they have and will only deviate if it benefits them.
I'm willing to out Roden today as well, but my vote is not leaving Webadict until he's dead.
Not quite, Jack. Vector is basically confirmed town due to the unclaimed mafia prime unless exactly with NJW, but NJW is very very likely town as well since Web is mafia.
You and Max are a tier lower in the "probably town, but not as convincingly town as Vector/NJW".
And at the bottom are Web and Roden.
And since I'm below Vector in the Towniness assessment of our Confirmed Townie Toonyman, I think that means I have to claim before Vector and NJW.
I inspected NJW, and nobody targeted NJW.
I None'd, and I have been poisoned. I will die post-elimination at EoD.
OK. I am going to die at EOD and I frankly don't give a shit if people vote me out or not, because I'm already dead. In fact, voting for me is effectively voting for No Launch.
I did lie about my role. I'm a 2-shot poison doctor.
If we accept Vector is Town, then we accept that Poison is a potential kill method.Unfortunately, you accept that either poison is a potential kill method or there are totally useless poison-related abilities as a prank regardless, because I also have one.
OK. I am going to die at EOD and I frankly don't give a shit if people vote me out or not, because I'm already dead. In fact, voting for me is effectively voting for No Launch.Well, this is believable, at least, since you stated Noning earlier.
I did lie about my role. I'm a 2-shot poison doctor.
Hm... Okay. Then I believe that. And if I believe that, then I also believe Vector is Town. But, the thing is, I also believe EuchreJack is Town. And ToonyMan is Town. And if all those are Town, how do I justify Roden and NJW2000 as scum?If we accept Vector is Town, then we accept that Poison is a potential kill method.Unfortunately, you accept that either poison is a potential kill method or there are totally useless poison-related abilities as a prank regardless, because I also have one.
I'm gonna take the risk and assume Roden is solo scum.How? I blocked Roden last night and Vector claims to be poisoned. You also seemed ASSURED of poison's existence on D2 when there was no evidence of it. If Vector's claim is the truth then it's like you knew, impressive!
And I'm going to assume that... we, at best, have two solo scum (Either 2 unteamed Mafia, or Mafia and Mafia-Ally.) But, it also possible we have one really powerful scum.
How? I blocked Roden last night and Vector claims to be poisoned. You also seemed ASSURED of poison's existence on D2 when there was no evidence of it. If Vector's claim is the truth then it's like you knew, impressive!Well, both Vector and I agreed poison existed D1. That isn't a reason to be "ASSURED", but it's definitely "evidence".
Toony. You are retroactively trying to find evidence when other, more simple (and incredibly obvious), explanations work. Like this: I was convinced of poison's existence because I believed that Vector was Town. I thought Vector was Town because NJW2000 confirmed my action and target (thus making NJW2000 Town) and Vector was targeted by Prime. Why would Vector lie about that if I think Vector is Town? I will cherish this moment between us. This is the moment where you have a choice: You can choose to waste your Day 3 like you wasted your Day 2 trying to frame me for being scum, OR you can look at what I presented: Factual arguments, logical deductions, processes of eliminations; and realize that removing you was the correct option, especially since you didn't really do anything to help narrow it down.I'm gonna take the risk and assume Roden is solo scum.How? I blocked Roden last night and Vector claims to be poisoned. You also seemed ASSURED of poison's existence on D2 when there was no evidence of it. If Vector's claim is the truth then it's like you knew, impressive!
And I'm going to assume that... we, at best, have two solo scum (Either 2 unteamed Mafia, or Mafia and Mafia-Ally.) But, it also possible we have one really powerful scum.
Could also be teamed without a chat. Webadict and I were talking about that possibility after last round.I'm refering to this in my previous post.
Okay sure, but if the mafia team can't communicate the Poisoner Mafia still shouldn't target Vector N2 who everyone learned was Primed on D2. Seems like a straight up bad play to overlap like that...except if the Poisoner Mafia was not sure of a safe target besides Vector who they knew could not be the other mafia. Still seems kind of fishy though.Poisoner could plausibly believe EuchreJack's case that the primer has no ignite and was relying on surprise mines, making the known prime on Vector useless. Alternatively, that case could be true and the poisoner knows it.
The poisoner knows poison exists. Recall last game where the claimed Cop Gunsmith was actually mafia? FOU doesn't repeat roles in the way that both you and Vector are claiming. They're too similar.How? I blocked Roden last night and Vector claims to be poisoned. You also seemed ASSURED of poison's existence on D2 when there was no evidence of it. If Vector's claim is the truth then it's like you knew, impressive!Well, both Vector and I agreed poison existed D1. That isn't a reason to be "ASSURED", but it's definitely "evidence".
OK. I am going to die at EOD and I frankly don't give a shit if people vote me out or not, because I'm already dead. In fact, voting for me is effectively voting for No Launch.
I did lie about my role. I'm a 2-shot poison doctor.
Web KNEW the correct name of Max's Night 1 power and thus must have been truthful about visiting Max unless Max is scum,So? Maybe you knew it and told him.
The worst case scenario with Vector/NJW as the scum team is game over if one of them is not lynched. Is that the case if I or Web are scum and they are lynched?I don't understand why you think this is necessarily the case, but if we follow my plan, even if that is the case, we have a 50% chance of stopping it, and if one has to prime and the other ignite, as seems likely, we have a 50% chance of preventing the ignition completely and a 50% chance of preventing a prime.
The worst case scenario with Vector/NJW as the scum team is game over if one of them is not lynched. Is that the case if I or Web are scum and they are lynched?I don't understand why you think this is necessarily the case, but if we follow my plan, even if that is the case, we have a 50% chance of stopping it, and if one has to prime and the other ignite, as seems likely, we have a 50% chance of preventing the ignition completely and a 50% chance of preventing a prime.
It isn't that Fallacy does things that are unusual (although Fallacy certainly DOES), but rather that Fallacy does things that are unique. Your theory makes more sense if you assign me something else.Web KNEW the correct name of Max's Night 1 power and thus must have been truthful about visiting Max unless Max is scum,So? Maybe you knew it and told him.
I mean, Web's getting into the wild theories, here's a perfectly conceivable one: Both members of a Web and Jack team could have Prodigious Study. Oh, but Fallacy never does such a thing, they claim. It's not like he's capable of making a choice to do something unusual.
Also, I should add, partly because I am not sure Toonyman would go for lynching not-webadict.Eh, I think it's possible for them to kiss and make up. Toonyman has indicated more openness to the not-webadict world.
Well, I can construct the following alternate plan: Lynch Vector, Roden delays NJW if Vector was scum, or randomly from you and web if town. We can't lynch NJW reasonably, though, because if they are both town, Vector would also die.
The reason I chose the other way around is because I believe this version has higher chance of failure in less likely possible arrangements (Web/NJW, for example).
Under Web/NJW, it's possible that Web never actually used Prodigious Study on Vector, but (one of them; it's clear that there is an ability that can learn ability names, but not necessarily who has it or precisely what else it does) used it on me that turn instead. That would leave both of them free this turn.
Jack and Vector are the only players who can't be ruled out through confirmed night actions. Though Vector's alignment resolves itself tonight anyway, if they don't die from Poison like they've claimed then we can just vote them out tomorrow.
@Anyone trying to mechanically solve this game: I'm not 100% certain, but I suspect mafia have something weird and powerful like a "your target's target" passive or a multitask. There's a revive ability, so we can probably assume mafia has something pretty messed up. Look at the last game: Roden, Tric and I spent all of D3 trying and failing to puzzle out mechanical nonsense, while Toony ensured an ML and Vector instantly zeroed in on the one scum player remaining. I'm going to be voting on reads enhanced by mechanical info, not mechanical info or reads used to choose between mechanically equal choices.Also, you DID mechanically solve the game last Round. The only person who could've killed me N2 was ToonyMan!!!
I mean, sure, but not D3 I didn't. Toony lasted until D5 when he really shouldn't have. My point is, relying on what one thinks is a mechanical solution can lead to nasty suprises and disappointments.Okay, but the game was fully solved when your role was flipped, and the only reason you didn't solve it D3 is because you didn't read your role. But, the game was, indeed, mechanically solved.
@NJW:It really doesn't matter who I targeted because you think I'm scum no matter what.
Man you're right, I wasn't even thinking about that.
Why would Web target Max on N2? There's a huge reason why. On D2 Max admitted his track can cause primed people to die. Mafia don't start with this ignite so that's why Web can copy invest abilities. Neither of Web's targets on N1 or N2 make a lick of sense unless they're mafia.
Web should have targeted Jack on N1 since he was heavily hinting he was an invest role, Web did not. He targeted Vector the implied doctor.
Web should have targeted NJW on N2 since a vouyer that doesn't accidentally kill people is better than what Jack or Max claimed, Web did not. He targeted Max the one with the igniter.
Hi, I'm not pissed about being poisoned, I love being NKed LOL. I'm playing shitty (or not-here) this game because I'm so burned out from last round.^Exactly what I claimed D2 for Max. I absolutely believe it. But, the only two people that could've done that are you, Maximum Spin, or Roden, unless you count Multi-task shenanigans.
I have succeeded in my mission of getting Tric dead D1 and am now trying to succeed as town on zero effort U_U
I want you guys to think about priming in the context of Tric's sandwich-giving role. Tric's role "does nothing" except create a record of a neutral action between him and his target.
It's my theory as NJW says that like our JOAT's passive ignite, the mafia (or someone else) could have a passive priming action, piggy-backing onto someone else's target.
Euchrejack:
1. Regarding the poison overlap, it would make sense for me for a JOAT to have a one-shot poison move if scum also have a non-traditional NK.
2. I don't need to find your partner if it's you vs. me and I know that I'm town. You've been process-of-elimination'd according to present suspicions.
3. I've been online and reading, just not posting here. You can check my posting history if you want 9_9 Point is, yes, I coulda quickhammered if I wanted. But I didn't.
waah I'm a babyVote me bitch.
As NJW has stated, we can't mechanically figure out how mafia work until the game is over. Thus, our reads needs to be based on actual post analysis that is supported by mechanical info, not solely relying on it.Except that you can confirm pieces, like the fact that Prodigious Study is 100% confirmed to exist, and it 100% works as I claimed UNLESS you don't believe NJW2000.
Max or Web, what exactly does the Ember Track do?Haven't read rest of thread yet, sorry if web already answered, but:
Although Roden's actions n1 can't be confirmed, it would have taken brass to claim to have delayed Toony without knowing whether Toony could have said "no you didn't".
I don't have a night action. I'm a vengeful townie, if I'm lynched during the day I can choose to kill one player. I will be targeting Web if I'm lynched, still want to go?ToonyMan claimed first.
In this scenario, mafia cannot win, even if I'm paired with Vector. Otherwise, if I'm town and they're scum, if Vector doesn't die of Poison tonight then all I have to do is Delay them to stop a mass Ignite. At most, mafia could have one townie Primed, because Vector is still confirmed to be Primed Night 1 (unless NJW lied, which he only does if paired with Vector).Jack and Vector are the only players who can't be ruled out through confirmed night actions. Though Vector's alignment resolves itself tonight anyway, if they don't die from Poison like they've claimed then we can just vote them out tomorrow.
If Vector is mafia and is not voted out, then there is no tomorrow. Vector (or scumbuddy) detonates the 2 existing primes and 1 new prime.
There is no tomorrow where town can "fix this" if Vector is mafia.
Although, your delay might bring town a 50% of not losing N3. But does that save town?
The only person we can be totally sure wasn't primed is me.
3. I've been online and reading, just not posting here. You can check my posting history if you want 9_9 Point is, yes, I coulda quickhammered if I wanted. But I didn't.
2. I don't need to find your partner if it's you vs. me and I know that I'm town. You've been process-of-elimination'd according to present suspicions.
The only person we can be totally sure wasn't primed is me.I'm assuming this is a role-related thing?
It's not likely to be Vector, and I don't want to vote them.2. I don't need to find your partner if it's you vs. me and I know that I'm town. You've been process-of-elimination'd according to present suspicions.
Ah, but if you were town, you would want to share your suspicions of whom is my partner, since according to your story you will be dying by end of day.
As mafia, you don't want to risk offending someone that could vote me, or not vote you. Ergo, you're hedging your bets by not accusing anyone else of being scum.
Not even Web, whom has been pointed out as a potential answer but is not currently voting you.
@Jack:@Toonyman:
You're miscounting primes. Vector was the N1 prime so at most two players will be primed on D4, with one being primed right now besides already dead Vector.
It's my theory as NJW says that like our JOAT's passive ignite, the mafia (or someone else) could have a passive priming action, piggy-backing onto someone else's target.@Vector: How do you think that would work?
Web is a Supersaint, or at least has been hinting about it for quite a while. Scum team of Vector and whomever (maybe NJW2000) don't want to quickhammer Web, as it means one of them could die.What.
I have. I believe NJW over Web. If that means town loses then that just means NJW is the better player and I accept that.@Jack:@Toonyman:
You're miscounting primes. Vector was the N1 prime so at most two players will be primed on D4, with one being primed right now besides already dead Vector.
You're believing NJW2000. While I respect his logic, I am unwilling to trust him. What if NJW2000 is lying?
You're smarter than this, Toonyman. I mean, you really are. You have to look at all the options.
Really? That is it? You're our confirmed townie, and you're just giving up?I have. I believe NJW over Web. If that means town loses then that just means NJW is the better player and I accept that.@Jack:@Toonyman:
You're miscounting primes. Vector was the N1 prime so at most two players will be primed on D4, with one being primed right now besides already dead Vector.
You're believing NJW2000. While I respect his logic, I am unwilling to trust him. What if NJW2000 is lying?
You're smarter than this, Toonyman. I mean, you really are. You have to look at all the options.
Hardly. I'm writing a post for tonight why you and Web are the mafia team so I can gloat if I'm right after the game is over. If I'm wrong then I can learn where to improve, such as with my misunderstanding of Tric on D1.Really? That is it? You're our confirmed townie, and you're just giving up?I have. I believe NJW over Web. If that means town loses then that just means NJW is the better player and I accept that.@Jack:@Toonyman:
You're miscounting primes. Vector was the N1 prime so at most two players will be primed on D4, with one being primed right now besides already dead Vector.
You're believing NJW2000. While I respect his logic, I am unwilling to trust him. What if NJW2000 is lying?
You're smarter than this, Toonyman. I mean, you really are. You have to look at all the options.
What a waste of a confirmed townieI agree. But, he's 100% set on me being scum, so you're an unfortunate casualty of him retroactively justifying his bad choices.
That's not true. You've looked at all the options where I'm scum, which is *checks notes* completely wrong.I have. I believe NJW over Web. If that means town loses then that just means NJW is the better player and I accept that.@Jack:@Toonyman:
You're miscounting primes. Vector was the N1 prime so at most two players will be primed on D4, with one being primed right now besides already dead Vector.
You're believing NJW2000. While I respect his logic, I am unwilling to trust him. What if NJW2000 is lying?
You're smarter than this, Toonyman. I mean, you really are. You have to look at all the options.
ToonymanWhat the fuuuuuuuck are you doing.
Fine, you want to lose, then go for it.
Hardly. I'm writing a post for tonight why you and Web are the mafia team so I can gloat if I'm right after the game is over. If I'm wrong then I can learn where to improve, such as with my misunderstanding of Tric on D1.You can learn right now, because it's Roden.
ToonymanYes! Vote the confirmed town!!
Fine, you want to lose, then go for it.
VectorToonymanYes! Vote the confirmed town!!
Fine, you want to lose, then go for it.
Why you gotta think like a Loser, Toonyman? Join team Winner, actually look at the game!Hardly. I'm writing a post for tonight why you and Web are the mafia team so I can gloat if I'm right after the game is over. If I'm wrong then I can learn where to improve, such as with my misunderstanding of Tric on D1.Really? That is it? You're our confirmed townie, and you're just giving up?I have. I believe NJW over Web. If that means town loses then that just means NJW is the better player and I accept that.@Jack:@Toonyman:
You're miscounting primes. Vector was the N1 prime so at most two players will be primed on D4, with one being primed right now besides already dead Vector.
You're believing NJW2000. While I respect his logic, I am unwilling to trust him. What if NJW2000 is lying?
You're smarter than this, Toonyman. I mean, you really are. You have to look at all the options.
I am not voting Roden. I roleblocked him last night and I believe the motivation and logic behind both of his night-actions. If Roden is mafia there's no partner that makes sense, so Web is correct that he would have to be solo scum, but that would also mean he bypassed my block and I strongly don't believe this is a solo mafia game.Hey, we agree on something! Good job Toonyman!
Vector is also town unless exactly with NJW who I believe is town. You're trapped Jack.
I am not voting Roden. I roleblocked him last night and I believe the motivation and logic behind both of his night-actions. If Roden is mafia there's no partner that makes sense, so Web is correct that he would have to be solo scum, but that would also mean he bypassed my block and I strongly don't believe this is a solo mafia game.That's a big negatory, ghost rider.
Web, we still can't afford to get into a pissing match with Toonyman, so lay off ok?Oh, but it's soooo easy. All you have to do is be right, and it just sends him into an angry spiral!
-Not much to say in response to most of this, but if mafia have poison as well as arson, and didn't N1 poison for some reason, then yes it does make sense balance-wise.
-Uhhh... wait up. Prodigious study gives you a permenant copy of the ability, whatever that means. I assume that a permenant one-shot is a one-shot nonetheless, but I'd better check this with FoU.
-Toony... I am not voting Jack today without extremely convincing evidence. Weird theories are not enough. After you and myself, EJ is my last target today due to reads and a very clean record mechanically. If you think there is a case on Jack, I am going to read your arguments with more charity and attention than anyone else's, but you need to present it to us in one properly-argued post.
ToonymanDeep breaths. We can figure this out. I think Toony has gone a little mad with power after being townconfirmed and res'd, but there's still 7 players and most likely 2 mafia, we don't need his vote, strictly speaking.
Fine, you want to lose, then go for it.
@Web: Yeah, but he's confirmed town, so other town might actually listen to him. We're wasting time getting into these pissing matches. People don't want to read about it, then they ignore us, then they vote us, then town loses.Uggggghhhhhh.
Ok, FoU's online, so it turns out web just gets the one one-shot.Well, whaddaya know, looks like I was telling the truth, eh? There's a reason for that: I'm not scum.
Like look at that, Web is voting Roden purely because of mechanical info. The exact same way he voted me on D2 and lazily voted Tric on D1. He doesn't care, at all. He's not scumhunting, he's not looking into how people are playing or anything. Complete garbage.Yep. You got me. My partner is Roden, though, so you should consider voting for them first.
Let me share a little bit of speculation I have as part of my larger post as a teaser, although let me state again that behavioral analysis is more valuable than mechanical guessing:Seriously, easy questions: Why would we Prime AND Poison Vector? Also, explain to me, please, which ability Poisons Vector from the list from NJW2000. Because, I'd have to have some type of echoing ability that Poisons to do that, because it didn't happen on N1 by your list.
Web's target becomes poisoned the following day.
Jack's target is primed concurrently with their inspect.
Web targets Vector N1
Jack targets Vector N1
Vector becomes primed, will become poisoned on D3
Web targets Max N2
Jack targets NJW N2
Vector's poison kicks in, still primed
Max has their Ember Track copied, will become poisoned on D4
Jack primes NJW
This post has just as much value as any of Web's shitty posts that don't scumhunt.
On D2, Web yelled over and over (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8328366#msg8328366) that mechanically the scum had to be inside me, Roden, and Max.Weird, Roden is in that trio. Damn, I good at this game.
Vector, you're wrong about Webadict. He's mafia.It's not NJW or Vector. I refuse to vote for them. You will literally never see me try. You will eliminate me before I go after them. It doesn't make sense for the team to be Vector/NJW. One of them scum with Roden? Possible! But, I'm not gonna go after NJW/Vector because that team makes no sense.
NJW, you're wrong about Jack. He's mafia.
I am here to show you the light. Unless Web and Jack actually work together and push a NJW/Vector team it's over for them. Max is town. Roden is town.
I'm voting ToonyMan as promised. Scum!Web always softpedals that I maaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy be scum but he might not attack me oh no last minute time to launch Vector. Town!Web knows my alignment unerringly when I'm town. Somehow.
Anyway, Web is town, he has dropped none of his personal scumtells and I agree the old Toonster has slipped into his scumsided play.
But, I'm not gonna go after NJW/Vector because that team makes no sense.
You know, it would be great if NJW could explain the full details of the abilities he saw.Yes, NJW's info has been...inconsistent. NJW has complete descriptions for Web's ability, but can't define "Primed".
Uh, Toonyman. Why are you against voting the person who hammered you:The only answers I have are insulting, so per your request, I won't say them.I'm voting ToonyMan as promised. Scum!Web always softpedals that I maaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy be scum but he might not attack me oh no last minute time to launch Vector. Town!Web knows my alignment unerringly when I'm town. Somehow.
Anyway, Web is town, he has dropped none of his personal scumtells and I agree the old Toonster has slipped into his scumsided play.
Honestly, I have been pushed into the despair state at this point. Town deserve to lose if this is the best we can do even after I resurrected a confirmed townie.I, disappointingly, agree.
Honestly, I have been pushed into the despair state at this point. Town deserve to lose if this is the best we can do even after I resurrected a confirmed townie.
Web, wtf are you doing? I can't be solo scum because I was role blocked when a Poison happened, and this isn't a bastard game so we know mafia can't bypass role blocks. Prime turning into Poison isn't a thing that could ever exist because again, this isn't a bastard game, plus it would severely handicap mafia if they had to wait for two days for their NK to actually do anything.^This is the person that ToonyMan says is Town.
Furthermore, I already proved we can't be the scum team. I was role blocked the same night you performed your Study action, which NJW confirmed you have and Max confirmed that you did it successfully. Yet there was still Poison.
It's impossible for me to be solo scum, and the only players I could be paired with are Vector and Jack. And I've already explained that if me and Vector are the mafia team, we already lost since they wouldn't actually die from Poison today and instead get themself killed with the supposed Ignite factional ability. This leaves Jack as my only potential partner that is not only possible, but also doesn't end in an automatic loss for the mafia team. But you town read Jack, so I should be town through PoE.
"But what about Multitasking?"
Then I'm hard confirmed as town because I claimed to Delay Toony Night 1. If I was Multitasking Mafia, I could use my fractional kill and Delay someone, I wouldn't have to fake claim targeting Toony like you accused me of doing.
Preview edit: Guys. It makes it a lot harder to keep up when you hyper post. Give us time to talk.
Preview edit: Guys. It makes it a lot harder to keep up when you hyper post. Give us time to talk.That's because both of the mafia post like fucking crazy.
Dude, I'll hammer myself. Get me to L-1, I'll end this nightmare for everyone!Preview edit: Guys. It makes it a lot harder to keep up when you hyper post. Give us time to talk.That's because both of the mafia post like fucking crazy.
EJ, you already posted that you dingus.Nah, the posts are different albet similar. Don't marginalize me.
OK, whatever. Toony's confirmed and apparently we're not killing EJ, so let's take out Webadict.Web doesn't have to do that. You certainly didn't vote yourself, Vector.
Ready to put your money in your mouth, Wubzy?
Hmmmmm....OK, whatever. Toony's confirmed and apparently we're not killing EJ, so let's take out Webadict.Web doesn't have to do that. You certainly didn't vote yourself, Vector.
Ready to put your money in your mouth, Wubzy?
Hey Web, join me in voting Vector. It's PETTY and VINDICTIVE. Your favorites! But its also the right call.
No. It's not Vector. Maybe next game it will be though!
Dude, I'll hammer myself. Get me to L-1, I'll end this nightmare for everyone!
Web doesn't have to do that. You certainly didn't vote yourself, Vector.
Because Roden hasn't voted me yet.No. It's not Vector. Maybe next game it will be though!
Why not?
Toony came to the same conclusion Jack did: I am mechanically cleared.Web, wtf are you doing? I can't be solo scum because I was role blocked when a Poison happened, and this isn't a bastard game so we know mafia can't bypass role blocks. Prime turning into Poison isn't a thing that could ever exist because again, this isn't a bastard game, plus it would severely handicap mafia if they had to wait for two days for their NK to actually do anything.^This is the person that ToonyMan says is Town.
Furthermore, I already proved we can't be the scum team. I was role blocked the same night you performed your Study action, which NJW confirmed you have and Max confirmed that you did it successfully. Yet there was still Poison.
It's impossible for me to be solo scum, and the only players I could be paired with are Vector and Jack. And I've already explained that if me and Vector are the mafia team, we already lost since they wouldn't actually die from Poison today and instead get themself killed with the supposed Ignite factional ability. This leaves Jack as my only potential partner that is not only possible, but also doesn't end in an automatic loss for the mafia team. But you town read Jack, so I should be town through PoE.
"But what about Multitasking?"
Then I'm hard confirmed as town because I claimed to Delay Toony Night 1. If I was Multitasking Mafia, I could use my fractional kill and Delay someone, I wouldn't have to fake claim targeting Toony like you accused me of doing.
Preview edit: Guys. It makes it a lot harder to keep up when you hyper post. Give us time to talk.
Jack brought up that the safest choice today would be to vote Vector. Best case scenario, we stop a big brain Ignite strategy. Worst case scenario, it's no different from a No-Lynch if Vector flips town and does die from Poison.Because Roden hasn't voted me yet.No. It's not Vector. Maybe next game it will be though!
Why not?
You also haven't voted Vector yet.Jack brought up that the safest choice today would be to vote Vector. Best case scenario, we stop a big brain Ignite strategy. Worst case scenario, it's no different from a No-Lynch if Vector flips town and does die from Poison.Because Roden hasn't voted me yet.No. It's not Vector. Maybe next game it will be though!
Why not?
True enough, you only claimed that you didn't care if you were voted out.Dude, I'll hammer myself. Get me to L-1, I'll end this nightmare for everyone!Web doesn't have to do that. You certainly didn't vote yourself, Vector.
I didn't claim that I would vote for myself though?
Because I'm not ready for today to end.You also haven't voted Vector yet.Jack brought up that the safest choice today would be to vote Vector. Best case scenario, we stop a big brain Ignite strategy. Worst case scenario, it's no different from a No-Lynch if Vector flips town and does die from Poison.Because Roden hasn't voted me yet.No. It's not Vector. Maybe next game it will be though!
Why not?
Hey, you know what? I'm a bit strained going through hundreds upon hundreds of posts trying to work out who is and isn't mafia, so my psionic powers aren't operating at their usual capacity. Maybe you can tell me when you want an ability clarified, rather than going for this passive-aggressive stuff? I thought you came from a confrontational culture, Max.First of all, I wasn't being passive-aggressive. You weren't even around to ask, so I just stated that I wanted to hear the details, hoping you would see it when you came around. But I don't understand why you were so vague about it in the first place.
Anything else you want clarified? If you've asked me this, I've missed it in the endless posts, so I won't know until you tell me.Yes, what does the ability EuchreJack claimed do, exactly? I only ever saw you describe the other two. I would just like a thorough explanation of the effects of each like I gave about Ember Tracking. "Priming gives someone the primed status" was actually fine.
Well, I'm having doubts about Vector, so I'll UNVOTE.This doesn't leave many options. Vector wants you gone, and from my perspective only you and Web are the only other players I would vote for besides Vector. I'm leaning more towards Web since I don't think you have much motivation to mention that I'm mechanically cleared if you're mafia. Who do you plan to vote for?
In no way, shape, or form, are you mechanically cleared, for the same reasons that I'm not mechanically cleared, except you're EVEN LESS mechanically cleared because your Night 1 action is unconfirmed.Well, I'm having doubts about Vector, so I'll UNVOTE.This doesn't leave many options. Vector wants you gone, and from my perspective only you and Web are the only other players I would vote for besides Vector. I'm leaning more towards Web since I don't think you have much motivation to mention that I'm mechanically cleared if you're mafia. Who do you plan to vote for?
Also: I'm really surprised Web is getting scum read for Studying Max. Town!Web is curious!Web, and can't help but check out the strange and mysterious powers that Max might have, rather than checking out NJW's lame Voyeur ability. Really, I can't have been the only one that saw that coming.I agree with this, for the record.
If Vector is scum, then who even has poisoning?If Vector is scum, then Vector is the poisoner. I still can't get over the fact that both Vector and Max are claimed poison docs, and I believe Max.
If Vector is scum, then who even has poisoning?I don't know, Vector? NJW? Nobody? Maybe my poison doctor ability is 100% a fakeout to get me to accidentally trip primes.
https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=StrongmanWHO CARES ABOUT
Here's literally ONE example.
https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Ascetic
Here's another.
Boom, not cleared.
NJW2000 anyway.
I was totally going to post this before EuchreJack said that.
In no way, shape, or form, are you mechanically cleared, for the same reasons that I'm not mechanically cleared, except you're EVEN LESS mechanically cleared because your Night 1 action is unconfirmed.AMAZING SCUMHUNTING
To be clear, Roden is cleared as having not poisoned Vector N2. Roden was roleblocked N2 by Toonyman.
There are only three options:
1) Vector is lying about being poisoned.
2) NJW poisoned Vector
3) I, EuchreJack, poisoned Vector
There is also the possibility of slow acting, slow detecting poison, but I'm going to disregard that.
To be clear, Roden is cleared as having not poisoned Vector N2. Roden was roleblocked N2 by Toonyman.
There are only three options:
1) Vector is lying about being poisoned.
2) NJW poisoned Vector
3) I, EuchreJack, poisoned Vector
There is also the possibility of slow acting, slow detecting poison, but I'm going to disregard that.
THIS ISN'T SCUMHUNTING
THIS ISN'T SCUMHUNTING
Webadict decides to ignore me for D1, how helpful. (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8327140#msg8327140)@Toonyman: Is this what it is all about? Web ignores you D1, so you have to punish him, even if means losing the game for the rest of us?
NJW2000 anyway.Honestly... I'll vote NJW2000. It feels incredibly stupid when I am almost positive that Roden is scum, but I'll do it. I seriously do not think Vector or Euchre are scum.
I was totally going to post this before EuchreJack said that.
@Max:My decisions are beyond mortal comprehension.
Why would Web target Vector on N1 and you on N2? Neither of those actions make sense as town.
Doesn't mean anything for Roden, he's voted just like that as town and mafia.
Looks horrible for Web though, he's the start of every mislynch which is personally my biggest scumtell.
Doesn't mean anything for Roden, he's voted just like that as town and mafia.Meh, I've looked worse. Played worse, too!
Looks horrible for Web though, he's the start of every mislynch which is personally my biggest scumtell.
I can't tell who fucked up more this game: me or ToonyMan.I feel like there is plenty of blame to go around and have already accepted my own share.
Yeah, although I wish I knew how to avoid my own faults in the future. I post too much, but at least on this day I see no other option.I can't tell who fucked up more this game: me or ToonyMan.I feel like there is plenty of blame to go around and have already accepted my own share.
In no way, shape, or form, are you mechanically cleared, for the same reasons that I'm not mechanically cleared, except you're EVEN LESS mechanically cleared because your Night 1 action is unconfirmed.Well, I'm having doubts about Vector, so I'll UNVOTE.This doesn't leave many options. Vector wants you gone, and from my perspective only you and Web are the only other players I would vote for besides Vector. I'm leaning more towards Web since I don't think you have much motivation to mention that I'm mechanically cleared if you're mafia. Who do you plan to vote for?
1. Being unable to be roleblocked is NOT bastard mechanics, there are a number of roles that are IMMUNE to actions, and plenty of roles that can do things through roleblocks. It's not rocket science. It's unlikely, but it is possible.
2. Prime to Poison is ALSO not bastard. There's no reason to think so.
3. I'm much more mechanically cleared than you are. My N1 and N2 action and targets are confirmed. My role is essentially confirmed. Your Night 1 target and action are unconfirmed. Only your N2 action and target are confirmed.
4. I can absolutely believe that Vector and EuchreJack are Town AND that you're scum. Doesn't make sense not to.
https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=StrongmanLet's get this straight. You've now accused me of:
Here's literally ONE example.
https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Ascetic
Here's another.
Boom, not cleared.
@Roden: Why do you think is scum?I honestly don't fucking know at this point. If Web isn't one of of them and Vector dies from Poison, it literally only leaves you and NUW. Toony is confirmed town, mafia can't have a ressurect since they can just win a 1v2 endgame with it, so Max is town, and I know I'm town and am mechanically cleared.
But what if Vector doesn't die from poison?@Roden: Why do you think is scum?I honestly don't fucking know at this point. If Web isn't one of of them and Vector dies from Poison, it literally only leaves you and NUW. Toony is confirmed town, mafia can't have a ressurect since they can just win a 1v2 endgame with it, so Max is town, and I know I'm town and am mechanically cleared.
I think we've already gone over what this entails.But what if Vector doesn't die from poison?@Roden: Why do you think is scum?I honestly don't fucking know at this point. If Web isn't one of of them and Vector dies from Poison, it literally only leaves you and NUW. Toony is confirmed town, mafia can't have a ressurect since they can just win a 1v2 endgame with it, so Max is town, and I know I'm town and am mechanically cleared.
Web, wouldn't you rather lynch NJW?Technically, yes, but at least two Town are voting me, and NJW is not, so there's no way to avoid being hammered if NJW is scum.
Web, wouldn't you rather lynch NJW?Technically, yes, but at least two Town are voting me, and NJW is not, so there's no way to avoid being hammered if NJW is scum.
@Web: You have to admit, it is suspicious that several possible scum teams could have hammered you after Vector's vote.NJW hasn't been online in hours.
NJW/Roden
NJW/Jack
Jack/Roden
Max/any of the above
@Web: You have to admit, it is suspicious that several possible scum teams could have hammered you after Vector's vote.NJW hasn't been online in hours.
NJW/Roden
NJW/Jack
Jack/Roden
Max/any of the above
OK, whatever. Toony's confirmed and apparently we're not killing EJ, so let's take out Webadict.
Ready to put your money in your mouth, Wubzy?
Spoiler: clarification on abilities (click to show/hide)
@EuchreJack: thank you for this post. (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8329323#msg8329323) Makes a strong, concise case on in-thread evidence without untoward speculation. This is head and shoulders above most of today.
I disagree with it, because I think my seeing Vector get primed would change what scum wanted to do. A 1-shot poison doctor is hard to believe, and Vector was locktown to most people D2, so poisoning them would make sense as they could stop a kill and would be harder to ignite. And cause chaos, I guess. I do wish I could read the low-justification vote on Tric and the hammer as alignment-indicative, but after round three I sympathise with Vector having a policy elim on Tric and expect the hammer from town!Vector.
Anyway, I bothered to respond to this because it was good, not because it was weak.
Web if you're town and confident this game won't end if you're mislynched then I need some actual thought of who you think scum are. Please give me actual insight into this that isn't just mechanical info. Reread the round for me. Explain to me why Roden is scum based on their actual posts. Or NJW, or anybody!Gonna be honest, I will be rereading jackshit. I will be hammering myself because you deserve to lose. Not just for your play D2, but also for your play D3. I will be hammering myself because no one stopped ToonyMan from being an absolute dumpster fire as confirmed Town. I will be hammering myself because this Day was a nightmare. I will be hammering myself because being deD is better than being around ToonyMan.
It's possible we go into D4 still since I was brought back to life and Vector was double targeted by mafia.
I'm never unvoting you today, but this will be extremely valuable if the game continues. It would be redemption for myself and you.
webadictThank you.
ToonyMan (0):
Roden (0):
EuchreJack (0):
NJW2000 (2): Maximum Spin, EuchreJack
Vector (0):
webadict (4): ToonyMan, Vector, Roden, webadict
Maximum Spin (0):
No Execution (0):
Not Voting (1): NJW2000
4 to hammer.
Investigative Student (town):
(Night) Prodigious Study [target]: You study your target in action. If they possess an investigative ability, you gain a permanent copy of that ability if you do not already have a copy of that ability. If they possess multiple investigative abilities, you only copy one of them (selected at random). Investigative abilities are abilities that return informative results after being used.
2-Shot Poison Doctor (town):
(2-Shot, Night) Antidote [target]: You administer a poison-antidote injection, preventing your target from receiving the Poisoned status effect this Night. You only have two antidotes to use, however.
Sickly Arsonist JOAT (town):
(1-Shot, Night) Healing Flames [target]: You cast a spiritual flame on your target, preventing them from being afflicted by the Poisoned status effect this Night. You kill your target if they have the Primed status effect.
(1-Shot, Night) Ember Tracking [target]: You use embers to scorch runes into the floor, and read them to determine who your target visits this Night. You kill your target if they have the Primed status effect.
(1-Shot, Night) Fire of Life [target]: You can only target dead players with this ability. You kindle a vital flame in your target’s heart, reviving them. If your target had the Primed status effect prior to their death, you kill them at the end of the Day after this ability was used. Furthermore, if you die after using this ability and the player you revived using this ability is still alive, your gifted fire dies and so do they.
(Auto) Sickly: If you receive the Poisoned status effect, you die immediately.
Vengeful Roleblocker (town):
(Auto) Vengeful Roleblocker: When you are executed during the Day, during the following Night you may choose one player to haunt, which blocks their Night action (if they attempted any). They will be told that they were roleblocked if this does occur.
EuchreJack:
Inspector (town):
(Night) Inspect [target]: You check your target’s surroundings for clues related to disturbances, and learn whether or not your target was targeted by any action tonight.
TricMagic:
Sandwich Vendor (town):
(Night) Distribute [target]: You give your target a sandwich. They are informed that they received a sandwich during the Night.
Vector:
2-Shot Poison Doctor (town):
(2-Shot, Night) Antidote [target]: You administer a poison-antidote injection, preventing your target from receiving the Poisoned status effect this Night. You only have two antidotes to use, however.
ToonyMan:
Vengeful Roleblocker (town):
(Auto) Vengeful Roleblocker: When you are executed during the Day, during the following Night you may choose one player to haunt, which blocks their Night action (if they attempted any). They will be told that they were roleblocked if this does occur.
webadict:
Investigative Student (town):
(Night) Prodigious Study [target]: You study your target in action. If they possess an investigative ability, you gain a permanent copy of that ability if you do not already have a copy of that ability. If they possess multiple investigative abilities, you only copy one of them (selected at random). Investigative abilities are abilities that return informative results after being used.
Maximum Spin:
Sickly Arsonist JOAT (town):
(1-Shot, Night) Healing Flames [target]: You cast a spiritual flame on your target, preventing them from being afflicted by the Poisoned status effect this Night. You kill your target if they have the Primed status effect.
(1-Shot, Night) Ember Tracking [target]: You use embers to scorch runes into the floor, and read them to determine who your target visits this Night. You kill your target if they have the Primed status effect.
(1-Shot, Night) Fire of Life [target]: You can only target dead players with this ability. You kindle a vital flame in your target’s heart, reviving them. If your target had the Primed status effect prior to their death, you kill them at the end of the Day after this ability was used. Furthermore, if you die after using this ability and the player you revived using this ability is still alive, your gifted fire dies and so do they.
(Auto) Sickly: If you receive the Poisoned status effect, you die immediately.
Roden:
Delayer (mafia):
(Night) Delay [target]: You distort time, temporally shifting the target player’s action this Night (if any) to the following Night. They are given an ‘action failed’ result if they acted, then the following Night, they perform their displaced action. They will not perform their action if they are dead when they would perform it.
NJW2000:
Priming True Voyeur (mafia)
(Night) True Voyeur [target]: You learn the full text of any abilities used on your target this Night, pulling knowledge from the weave of the past using psychometric oils.
(Auto) Priming: When performing a Night action, you may choose to give the player or players you target the Primed status effect using your oils. (Players who are Primed are not aware that they are Primed.)
(Factional, Night) Poison [target]: You flood your target’s room with poisonous gas, causing them to become Poisoned. They will die at the end of the following Day, after that Day’s execution. They will be aware that they are Poisoned and what their death condition is.
I'm out, I'd rather play Totem.
And yes, the Delayer was Mafia.Congratulations.
I didn't have a bad experience. I did what I could. I just want to play Totem, and I can't play two games at once.I'm out, I'd rather play Totem.
Noted. My apologies for the bad experience.
LOL, mafia never had the igniter.Yes, this is one of the reasons why Max was always town. I couldn't understand why Web would specifically target Max on N2 after learning Max had the igniter. It was the perfect frame job on himself. NJW of course brings this up and I caught it immediately since it's suspicious. NJW claiming their own prime was very smart as it implicated Vector if there was a situation where NJW was lynched first and Vector was still around.
Well, Totem comes first, then we go to the next one of this. So no worries there.I didn't have a bad experience. I did what I could. I just want to play Totem, and I can't play two games at once.I'm out, I'd rather play Totem.
Noted. My apologies for the bad experience.
It was obvious Euchre was Town because he asked Vector if you were Mafia on Day 2. That was such a Town!Euchre play that it was impossible for me to ever vote Euchre.Fair point, I didn't notice that.
It was obvious Euchre was Town because he asked Vector if you were Mafia on Day 2. That was such a Town!Euchre play that it was impossible for me to ever vote Euchre.Fair point, I didn't notice that.
I wish I wasn't lying about being a regular Vengeful Townie. I was targeting Roden N2 regardless which means he would have died instead of merely being roleblocked.
I've learned that being mad doesn't help at all. And my moments of clarity were when I listened to Jack because he was nice to me.
You're right, I don't think I would have changed my mind on D3, no. Maybe if you didn't make me feel miserable on D2 for doubting you over NJW I would have been more considerate, and I don't know how to say that any way else.Fair. A lot of that was because you continued to put me on Mafia teams (other than NJW2000/me, which would've been the only combination that makes sense) when my ability and target were readily confirmed by NJW2000 (and were also very Townie in nature). I would not have been able to vote for NJW on D2 at all, but I would've potentially jumped to Roden or Max. My tunnel on Day 2 focused a lot on you still trying to incriminate me in spite of the massive evidence for me being Town. Silly, yes, but it is a move you pull while scum.
In my defense, I was voting Roden as a way to prove I wasn't paired with them. So if we both agreed that Roden was mafia...I know this isn't full-proof since Roden flipping mafia would just make me look like I'm bussing, especially since I was lying about being a killing Vengeful role. I should have been honest about my role, but I wanted to seem more threatening to mafia than I was for reactions.
Considering I don't want to get in the way of Meph's game, I think it's fair to say I can delay the Final Round to after Totem Mafia finishes. Sadly I doubt I can join it myself as I have my final college semester to deal with.
Chat on Discord, probablyConsidering I don't want to get in the way of Meph's game, I think it's fair to say I can delay the Final Round to after Totem Mafia finishes. Sadly I doubt I can join it myself as I have my final college semester to deal with.
But if you're not playing forum mafia, what else can you do during those boring college lectures? :P
Good job NJW2000, your consistent play as both mafia and town deserves you the win.This is kind of you, but I haven't been that consistent... Round 3 had a pretty huge blunder. I think my not losing thus far has often been due to other players putting their best foot forward when I happened to be on their teams, especially Roden and some of the vets.
Looking at the game, the setup was certainly kinder to mafia than some of the previous rounds. It certainly was close, if not for the Sickly modifier town would probably have won.Nah, even if Max was still alive I was gone and mafia would have endgame'd 2v2.
I suspect the main thing that killed Town was the sheer quantity of posts D2 and D3. Too much text crowded out less prolific posters, and sapped people's will to play. This deprived town of input from people like Vector, and probably made scumhunting much harder.It's true. It made me not want to look at anything besides D1.
I suspect the main thing that killed Town was the sheer quantity of posts D2 and D3. Too much text crowded out less prolific posters, and sapped people's will to play. This deprived town of input from people like Vector, and probably made scumhunting much harder.
I don't think you'd be gone if I lived, actually. You don't blow up if you're primed afterward, but you died because of the quasi-lovers bond.Looking at the game, the setup was certainly kinder to mafia than some of the previous rounds. It certainly was close, if not for the Sickly modifier town would probably have won.Nah, even if Max was still alive I was gone and mafia would have endgame'd 2v2.
I'm happy to just announce NJW2000 the winner of our little tournament and move on with our lives. I also have my doubts of my ability/fun to play two games at once.Thanks Jack, but honestly I owe the win to NJW. I freaked out a couple times but he kept me calm even when I lost hope. After the ressurect happened, I genuinely thought we couldn't win it since our kills were slow and it felt impossible to try to trick Max into Igniting our Prime targets for extra kills. I kept expecting to get voted out, especially Day 2, and thought it was inevitable Day 3 until NJW pointed out how worn out and defeated everyone was feeling. He was also very detailed and methodical in the scumchat, which helped to map out our possible choices and keep things organized.
Good job NJW2000, your consistent play as both mafia and town deserves you the win.
Some townies in this round did well. Some townies did poorly. I think you know who you are, so I'll leave it at that.
Roden, good job as mafia this round, good job as town in previous rounds. You've earned your second place. Dunno if you are sharing it with others, or if you alone are second place.
LOL, mafia never had the igniter.
Wait shit really, that means if mafia poisoned me instead (since I was confirmed town that is a reasonable expectation) it really would have been a 5p lylo.You'll see in the chat that we did almost Poison you. Our best hope in the end though was to Poison Max and hope he tried to protect you from Poison but accidentally Ignite you as well.
I don't think your posts were detrimental, and I actually really appreciated the constant vote counts.I suspect the main thing that killed Town was the sheer quantity of posts D2 and D3. Too much text crowded out less prolific posters, and sapped people's will to play. This deprived town of input from people like Vector, and probably made scumhunting much harder.
I can certainly take some responsibility there, although I'm unsure how to do better in the future. I'm working on it, maybe?
Let me explain the issues in this post, since I never got to it.Toony came to the same conclusion Jack did: I am mechanically cleared.Web, wtf are you doing? I can't be solo scum because I was role blocked when a Poison happened, and this isn't a bastard game so we know mafia can't bypass role blocks. Prime turning into Poison isn't a thing that could ever exist because again, this isn't a bastard game, plus it would severely handicap mafia if they had to wait for two days for their NK to actually do anything.^This is the person that ToonyMan says is Town.
Furthermore, I already proved we can't be the scum team. I was role blocked the same night you performed your Study action, which NJW confirmed you have and Max confirmed that you did it successfully. Yet there was still Poison.
It's impossible for me to be solo scum, and the only players I could be paired with are Vector and Jack. And I've already explained that if me and Vector are the mafia team, we already lost since they wouldn't actually die from Poison today and instead get themself killed with the supposed Ignite factional ability. This leaves Jack as my only potential partner that is not only possible, but also doesn't end in an automatic loss for the mafia team. But you town read Jack, so I should be town through PoE.
"But what about Multitasking?"
Then I'm hard confirmed as town because I claimed to Delay Toony Night 1. If I was Multitasking Mafia, I could use my fractional kill and Delay someone, I wouldn't have to fake claim targeting Toony like you accused me of doing.
Preview edit: Guys. It makes it a lot harder to keep up when you hyper post. Give us time to talk.
I cannot be solo scum. I can only be paired with either Jack or Toony, whom you both town read. In the case of Multitasking, I am hard cleared since faking targeting Toony would be pointless due to being free to target whoever I want while also targeting someone with the factional kill. There is no feasible way for me to be mafia.
What is there to dispute?
Seeing as things are at a lull, Imma just pop in and say the flavor here has been impressively unsettling… the long-form gameplay really lends a sense of attrition to it all. Very cool!... it's not just a "sense", but a reality.
I assume this is how it feels being locked in a death game for 2 months.Two months? How nice. Still doesn't beat Mafia Marathon. You ever just play mafia for a year straight in (technically) one game?
I'll try another game. In.Nope
What's this game's deal? Do I need to know anything going in?
I'll try another game. In.Roles are pseudo-related to mafiascum roles. There's a wiki link on the front page, in case you need to fakeclaim. Other than that... nope, not really.
What's this game's deal? Do I need to know anything going in?
I'll try another game. In.Don't read Round 3 or 4 unless you want to see some majorly embarrassing play.
What's this game's deal? Do I need to know anything going in?
webadict (0):
NJW2000 (0):
EuchreJack (0):
Maximum Spin (0):
Roden (0):
Jim Groovester (0):
ToonyMan (0):
Magma Mater (0):
Toaster (0):
No Execution (0):
Not Voting (9): webadict, NJW2000, EuchreJack, Maximum Spin, Roden, Jim Groovester, ToonyMan, Magma Mater, Toaster
5 to hammer.
This is going to be one of those weird games. Anyway, I'm a miller.I believe this claim. My role is useless, I'm an Unreliable Cop.
I believe NJW's claim.This is going to be one of those weird games. Anyway, I'm a miller.I believe this claim. My role is useless, I'm an Unreliable Cop.
I am town, and my role is useful, and I am not claiming.At least throw a fakeclaim out.
EuchreJack, please subscribe me to your mailing list. I do not have a private chat and I want one.
ToonyMan, you Town? Are you able to read me yet?Yes. No.
Unreliable just means my results have a chance to be wrong. Not invalid, just wrong, and I have no way of knowing if my Cop check is accurate. Since my results don't really matter, I figured I would just full claim now since it would look suspicious if I claimed it later.I believe NJW's claim.This is going to be one of those weird games. Anyway, I'm a miller.I believe this claim. My role is useless, I'm an Unreliable Cop.
@Roden: What is an Unreliable Cop?
I am a Neighborizer. I can set up a private chat with other players. Sorta like unreliable mason I guess?
Unreliable just means my results have a chance to be wrong. Not invalid, just wrong, and I have no way of knowing if my Cop check is accurate. Since my results don't really matter, I figured I would just full claim now since it would look suspicious if I claimed it later.What chance? (I.e. what percentage?)
I am a Neighborizer. I can set up a private chat with other players. Sorta like unreliable mason I guess?Hm. That sounds like a rather weak role. Is this a day or night action?
Have you really never seen a neighbor / neighborizer role webadict? Seems difficult to believe. I feel like you're trying to play dumb with regard to your knowledge of Euchre's role.Okay, let's expound on that. What would I gain by playing dumb?
If Euchre is mafia, or if you somehow know his role already, this is a way to distance yourself from that.Have you really never seen a neighbor / neighborizer role webadict? Seems difficult to believe. I feel like you're trying to play dumb with regard to your knowledge of Euchre's role.Okay, let's expound on that. What would I gain by playing dumb?
That's a very short-sighted goal if I'm Mafia, and also that would imply that I'd be really bad as Mafia. The better answer is that I can use that as a way to see who's okay with claiming their alignment with someone else, but that only applies if you think I'm Town. So, that's not the worst look for you, but it does make it seem as though you don't care about looking for Town, especially since EuchreJack is more like Town than not.If Euchre is mafia, or if you somehow know his role already, this is a way to distance yourself from that.Have you really never seen a neighbor / neighborizer role webadict? Seems difficult to believe. I feel like you're trying to play dumb with regard to your knowledge of Euchre's role.Okay, let's expound on that. What would I gain by playing dumb?
This is going to be one of those weird games. Anyway, I'm a miller.
Why would there be a miller if you're an unreliable cop?This is going to be one of those weird games. Anyway, I'm a miller.I believe this claim. My role is useless, I'm an Unreliable Cop.
I am a Neighborizer. I can set up a private chat with other players. Sorta like unreliable mason I guess?Sounds true.
Is this what we're doing? Aight I'm in: I'm a Motion Detector. Or maybe I'm not, who knows?Sounds false.
Anyway, I'm gonna vote Magma Mater.Why?
There's certain roles I could see Max not wanting to share, but also there's certain roles I could see Max not wanting to share if that makes sense. Sometimes you want to paint a target on your back at night...a fakeclaim would avoid the attention all together, why would Max not choose to do that instead? I think this makes Max look good.I am town, and my role is useful, and I am not claiming.At least throw a fakeclaim out.
EuchreJack, please subscribe me to your mailing list. I do not have a private chat and I want one.
I, on the other hand, will claim my 100% real role as Ninja Fruit Vendor.
@Max and Magma:I appreciate the vote of confidence but, I have to admit, I'm not sure I've put as much thought into it as you're implying.There's certain roles I could see Max not wanting to share, but also there's certain roles I could see Max not wanting to share if that makes sense. Sometimes you want to paint a target on your back at night...a fakeclaim would avoid the attention all together, why would Max not choose to do that instead? I think this makes Max look good.I am town, and my role is useful, and I am not claiming.At least throw a fakeclaim out.
EuchreJack, please subscribe me to your mailing list. I do not have a private chat and I want one.
I, on the other hand, will claim my 100% real role as Ninja Fruit Vendor.
Even though you mention fakeclaims I think you're telling the truth about your role Magma.
This is going to be one of those weird games. Anyway, I'm a miller.
@Toaster:
Thankfully, there's a 0% chance you can get converted in this game.
I think I know your scum tells pretty well now after playing with you in KWN, scared? Want to know what they are?
I am town, and my role is useful, and I am not claiming.
EuchreJack, please subscribe me to your mailing list. I do not have a private chat and I want one.
I think it's more likely Roden is telling the truth here then NJW unless they're both in on it, although I find Roden believable here. Especially since NJW claimed first and Roden second. I got caught out pretty badly from claiming double voter first in a past game as mafia since I had no idea there would be another claim to "meta counter" it.
Would you claim a useless role?It depends on the role. The three clauses were independent.
Do you not think that claiming a useful role is not a claim unto itself?Not in the sense I mean. Obviously it is a claim of some kind, you put the verb "claiming" right there in it.
I suspect this has a typo as the first sentence seems to have form "P although P", so can't really tell which of us you suspect of lying. In any case, the idea that a miller and a unreliable cop couldn't coexist in a FoU game shows a disappointing lack of imagination. Not sure how unreliable Roden is claiming, but if they're essentially just a visitor, the presence of a miller doesn't change the usefulness of their role, while their role does not preclude the presence of a miller.I believe this claim. My role is useless, I'm an Unreliable Cop.Why would there be a miller if you're an unreliable cop?
I think it's more likely Roden is telling the truth here then NJW unless they're both in on it, although I find Roden believable here. Especially since NJW claimed first and Roden second. I got caught out pretty badly from claiming double voter first in a past game as mafia since I had no idea there would be another claim to "meta counter" it.
I haven't read any of the previous games. Is this going to be an issue for me or should I get off my butt and do it?The games are long and frustrating to read, but can offer useful information about someone's meta. Be warned: FoU has some conventions, like people being informed who their abilities actually hit if redirected (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8323049#msg8323049), and the roles are non-standard so can be a bit swingy or odd. It's well worth the chance to play hand-crafted completely new role-heavy mafia variants.
I'm clearly not focused, but I am sad that Jim is not here. Who will bully me now?
@Toaster: I don't really buy there being two Millers in a game, why should I believe you?
This is going to be one of those weird games. Anyway, I'm a miller.
ToonyMan, you Town? Are you able to read me yet?
Same question to Jim Groovester. Wow, haven't played with you in forever.
This is going to be one of those weird games. Anyway, I'm a miller.I believe this claim. My role is useless, I'm an Unreliable Cop.
Neighborizer sounds like at least one of them tells the other their alignment.
Anyway, I'm gonna vote Magma Mater.
Have you really never seen a neighbor / neighborizer role webadict? Seems difficult to believe. I feel like you're trying to play dumb with regard to your knowledge of Euchre's role.
@Jim: What is your opinion on the mass claiming?
@Jim:
Rejoice! RVS is not meta in this game! Instead it's mass-claiming at the start of D1.
I think this has helped more than hindered, do you agree?
I'm not going to join a mass-claim, because there are strong reasons not to reveal my role right now.
You mean past me never loudly stating that I hate cult games? I have a few ideas of my own, but sure, I'm game.Fair enough. I did this with NQT (after being mafia with him) and it worked really well, so I will share my list I made if I feel you've struck all the points like he did in Magic Mafia. Unfortunately, I am not masons with 4mask this time so I have no one to share with in private in case of my demise...
Why does it have to be either/or?You're right, that's my mistake. I didn't mean to phrase that as mandatory. If there's mafia inside NJW/Roden then I would vote NJW over Roden currently. Your null miller claim makes this even more interesting though. As now that's two claims I feel that jive against NJW.
In any case, the idea that a miller and a unreliable cop couldn't coexist in a FoU game shows a disappointing lack of imagination. Not sure how unreliable Roden is claiming, but if they're essentially just a visitor, the presence of a miller doesn't change the usefulness of their role, while their role does not preclude the presence of a miller.I would say yes, but Jack has convinced me otherwise.
tl;dr I didn't catch your read, but there's a faulty dichotomy here.
@ToonyMan: What's so false about it? Why you gotta be like that? Who's are these strong players to look out for? Also, pick me someone scummy (that isn't me, plz.)You always lie about your role.
Also my role name is Day 3 Innocent for those of you who were dying of anxiety about the name of my role.
@Maximum Spin: Honestly, you kinda get a free pass Today, whatcha wanna spend it on?Can I exchange it for cash value?
So can somebody answer me whether this is one of those games where town and scum share roles, or is it one of those games where town have unique roles and scum have unique roles?More the former than the latter. Roles don't seem to be particularly alignment-indicative. I take it your role announces itself as town on day 3? Just based on the name, that seems most likely. I'm curious what motivated this claim.
Also my role name is Day 3 Innocent for those of you who were dying of anxiety about the name of my role.
If I had that role, I would simply not use it. Particularly if there is a motion detector in the game capable of checking you. Alternatively, I'd test Toaster's claim.Unreliable just means my results have a chance to be wrong. Not invalid, just wrong, and I have no way of knowing if my Cop check is accurate. Since my results don't really matter, I figured I would just full claim now since it would look suspicious if I claimed it later.I believe NJW's claim.This is going to be one of those weird games. Anyway, I'm a miller.I believe this claim. My role is useless, I'm an Unreliable Cop.
@Roden: What is an Unreliable Cop?
I am a Neighborizer. I can set up a private chat with other players. Sorta like unreliable mason I guess?
I'm having trouble parsing this. Are you saying that you do know what a neighborizer is, and are just testing the waters to see who'd volunteer to be neighborized? I don't see how that'd really gain you anything useful, as town.That's a very short-sighted goal if I'm Mafia, and also that would imply that I'd be really bad as Mafia. The better answer is that I can use that as a way to see who's okay with claiming their alignment with someone else, but that only applies if you think I'm Town. So, that's not the worst look for you, but it does make it seem as though you don't care about looking for Town, especially since EuchreJack is more like Town than not.If Euchre is mafia, or if you somehow know his role already, this is a way to distance yourself from that.Have you really never seen a neighbor / neighborizer role webadict? Seems difficult to believe. I feel like you're trying to play dumb with regard to your knowledge of Euchre's role.Okay, let's expound on that. What would I gain by playing dumb?
@Max and Magma:Mm, I agree that it makes him look good, although my reasoning is a little different. I like that he openly stated his intent to not claim early on, as opposed to ignoring the massclaim or postponing his response until more people had weighed in.There's certain roles I could see Max not wanting to share, but also there's certain roles I could see Max not wanting to share if that makes sense. Sometimes you want to paint a target on your back at night...a fakeclaim would avoid the attention all together, why would Max not choose to do that instead? I think this makes Max look good.I am town, and my role is useful, and I am not claiming.At least throw a fakeclaim out.
EuchreJack, please subscribe me to your mailing list. I do not have a private chat and I want one.
I, on the other hand, will claim my 100% real role as Ninja Fruit Vendor.
You guess? Your role name should be pretty clear. This wording is suspicious, specifically because if you're mafia then I believe your real role name would be Null Godfather.This is going to be one of those weird games. Anyway, I'm a miller.
Interesting. I am a... Null Miller, I guess? Investigations on me simply don't work; you get a null result. I think that extends past simple cop results.
Webadict:In that case, which word is involved in the role?@Toaster: I don't really buy there being two Millers in a game, why should I believe you?
Honestly? Don't much care if you do. I policy-claim Miller in the first post of any game I am one in, and this is... close enough to miller. The word "miller" isn't involved in the role and I'm not sure Miller is even the right way to describe it; probably not. In any case, investigative role actions on me are going to be wasted.
Don't you think free day passes are a bit much to hand out at the beginning of a nine player game? Sure, if there were 15 I can greatly appreciate wanting to pare down the choices, but it's not THAT many right now.
Why is that a weird thing to get contentious about?Neighborizer sounds like at least one of them tells the other their alignment.
Anyway, I'm gonna vote Magma Mater.Have you really never seen a neighbor / neighborizer role webadict? Seems difficult to believe. I feel like you're trying to play dumb with regard to your knowledge of Euchre's role.
I am also going to vote for Magma Mater as if I had to make a snap judgment based on less than three full pages of game this is the most suspicious interaction I've seen so far.
Whether webadict has or has not seen a neighbor/neighborizer role before is a weird thing to get contentious about.
I got caught out pretty badly from claiming double voter first in a past game as mafia since I had no idea there would be another claim to "meta counter" it.Do you think that Roden would consider this?
A scum role that announces itself as town on day three would be hilarious, but bad.@Maximum Spin: Honestly, you kinda get a free pass Today, whatcha wanna spend it on?Can I exchange it for cash value?So can somebody answer me whether this is one of those games where town and scum share roles, or is it one of those games where town have unique roles and scum have unique roles?More the former than the latter. Roles don't seem to be particularly alignment-indicative. I take it your role announces itself as town on day 3? Just based on the name, that seems most likely. I'm curious what motivated this claim.
Also my role name is Day 3 Innocent for those of you who were dying of anxiety about the name of my role.
Magma Mater, I can't believe you just deployed a reaction gifLOL, I just noticed that like four people had used the word "honestly" so far this game, and I couldn't resist.
Ninja@NJW: Uh huh... So, at first, I wasn't on board with what Toony was saying, but I think I change my mind. Why would there be a Miller and an Indecisive Cop?Why wouldn't there be? The presence of an indecisive cop doesn't mean there's not a real cop, a cop power handed out by an inventor, a mafia ally with alignment investigation, etc. Also, from my role's wording, I'm pretty sure Roden can semi-confirm my miller claim by investigating me and automatically reading mafia, although I'll have to check this with FoU. Ditto the null-miller, if their role is phrased like mine.
@Toony & @Jim: I think that NJW is rescinding his miller claim and is instead saying that he has a different role that he'd prefer not to claim at the moment.Not this. Check the other (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8320924#msg8320924)round's (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8326236#msg8326236)roles (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8317860#msg8317860): FoU does modifiers.
1. At the start of Round 3 of this game Jack said me or you had a high chance of being mafia simply because we were the only ones who "hadn't had the chance yet", this turned out to be true as I was mafia.I was going to call this apophenia, but 1. and 2. actually suggest I'm not mafia, if you're interested in second-guessing the dice. Which, by the by, I do sincerely think is very, very stupid, I wasn't saying that last round just because I actually was mafia. I'm struggling to parse the last sentence, but applying general mod rules-of-thumb to closed FoU setups is exactly what you shouldn't do.
2. This left you - NJW - as the only player to not "have the chance" to be mafia. Lo 'n behold you were mafia with Roden in Round 4. This is statistically unlikely. FoU is absolutely playing favorites with the players for setups. This also applies to what roles we receive as players.
3. Jack suspected me because they were a double voter in Totem Mafia 3, after I had claimed I was also a double voter. This was a correct reason to suspect me as I was mafia. I think you can very reasonably read a mod's setup as part of suspecting someone as this was not a FoU ran game, but shows that mods will do this in general.
Points one and two are about picking players for alignments which does not directly translate to my argument, however it's general support for "reading the mod". Point 3 applies directly to our situation here though. It's not a strong vote but I want to start at least somewhat reasonably.
75%, which doesn't sound bad at all, but I wouldn't rely on my check. I just plan to announce my results every Day start to help get conversations going.Unreliable just means my results have a chance to be wrong. Not invalid, just wrong, and I have no way of knowing if my Cop check is accurate. Since my results don't really matter, I figured I would just full claim now since it would look suspicious if I claimed it later.What chance? (I.e. what percentage?)
@Max & NJW & Web: Neighborizer is a night action. It does nothing to confirm roles. Ideally, it would allow me to have confidential communications with someone that is confirmed town. But I'll probably use it Night 1, so it might just let mafia whisper horrible things into my ears.So you're 1-shot then, if I'm reading this correctly? Interesting. Your best move might be to Neighborize whoever you think you can trust the most, and who is also someone you can solve efficiently with.
@NJW and Roden:I believe the Miller claim because there seems to a certain theme with roles each round, and this time it looks like it has to do with obscuring alignment peeks. I wouldn't be surprised if scum had a Janitor of some sort, for instance. But also, mechanically NJW's claim is convincing since he said the Miller part of his role was "auto", which is exactly what my Unreliable passive is labeled as. It's a little angle shooty, but I'm fine with just putting him aside for now.This is going to be one of those weird games. Anyway, I'm a miller.Why would there be a miller if you're an unreliable cop?This is going to be one of those weird games. Anyway, I'm a miller.I believe this claim. My role is useless, I'm an Unreliable Cop.
I think it's more likely Roden is telling the truth here then NJW unless they're both in on it, although I find Roden believable here. Especially since NJW claimed first and Roden second. I got caught out pretty badly from claiming double voter first in a past game as mafia since I had no idea there would be another claim to "meta counter" it.
I actually did plan on inspecting Toaster tonight. I'm interested to see how my Unreliable passive interacts with his Null passive.If I had that role, I would simply not use it. Particularly if there is a motion detector in the game capable of checking you. Alternatively, I'd test Toaster's claim.Unreliable just means my results have a chance to be wrong. Not invalid, just wrong, and I have no way of knowing if my Cop check is accurate. Since my results don't really matter, I figured I would just full claim now since it would look suspicious if I claimed it later.I believe NJW's claim.This is going to be one of those weird games. Anyway, I'm a miller.I believe this claim. My role is useless, I'm an Unreliable Cop.
@Roden: What is an Unreliable Cop?
I am a Neighborizer. I can set up a private chat with other players. Sorta like unreliable mason I guess?
ToonyMan is using fringe logic to justify the NJW vote that they themselves shot down in Round 3, somehow invoking my name into the atrocity, and getting all creepy buddy on me.I'm not gonna agree with you on principle, mostly because if I do, Magma Mater might not defend themselves.
I don't suspect Magma Mater at this point. While we haven't seen them as Town, we did see them as Mafia and they played quite differently.
@Max: We've worked well in the past in-thread, to the point that maybe we actually don't need a private chat to work together?
What do you think?
@Web:Yeah, you're right. I definitely didn't.
You never answered me about why you're voting Magma.
Jim is voting Magma as a "snap judgement".
Max is voting Magma because they posted a meme gif.
@Max: We've worked well in the past in-thread, to the point that maybe we actually don't need a private chat to work together?I don't necessarily think anyone needs a private chat, and it would give me something to do. I guess there are other, potentially more useful choices for neighbors, especially if you have a limited number of shots, but on the other hand, it would gain you access to my thoughts without filtering against the possibility of distorting others' play.
What do you think?
@Jack:Hm, upon a reread, using me would be a better description. I thought your "Sounds True" (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8345334#msg8345334) regarding me was an inappropriately premature townread, but I had misread it.
Shot down? I was mafia in Round 3 and didn't want to implicate myself with NJW. I truly believe my logic is reasonable, but I've decided it's too weak since Toaster and Roden have added more to the game.
How am I buddying you? I've done nothing to support you this game besides believe your role claim. You weren't actually town in KWN so clearly I don't have a black and white read of you anymore. I'm currently undecided but I will say I like your vote on me over every vote on Magma.
That might be useful, but I've found that you tend to "open up" on Day 2, and I can't invite you to the private chat until Night 1.@Max: We've worked well in the past in-thread, to the point that maybe we actually don't need a private chat to work together?I don't necessarily think anyone needs a private chat, and it would give me something to do. I guess there are other, potentially more useful choices for neighbors, especially if you have a limited number of shots, but on the other hand, it would gain you access to my thoughts without filtering against the possibility of distorting others' play.
What do you think?
I was kinda hoping MM would reply sooner rather than later, so I'm ready to jump on a ToonyMan train if anyone else is, and I can reassess later. Maybe it's because I feel like their claim is too close to Vector's role in Round 3, but they're getting too combative with EJ.
@Web:
You never answered me about why you're voting Magma.
Yeah, you're right. I definitely didn't.Wow, cool.
I was kinda hoping MM would reply sooner rather than later, so I'm ready to jump on a ToonyMan train if anyone else is, and I can reassess later. Maybe it's because I feel like their claim is too close to Vector's role in Round 3, but they're getting too combative with EJ.Is this bait? You vote Magma for no reason and then noncommital vote me for bad reasons. This is very opportunistic.
Is that a problem? Whatever. I'll think about it later.
I WAS town in KWN until YOU made me Scum, although I had a side-win condition. So I'd say I was Suburban.Oh, I thought Mechromancer was third-party. My bad then.
Readslist, as much to help me as for other people.I mostly agree with your reads, although I'm more null on Jim and believe Roden more.
Since probably either NJW or Toaster is scumYeah, I agree this is possible.
Now that you mention it, ToonyMan should be able to confirm that much on Night 1. Plus Toonyman can't kill anyone because they HAVE to confirm their inventor on Night 1.Yep, that's the plan.
webadict (1): ToonyMan
NJW2000 (0):
EuchreJack (0):
Maximum Spin (0):
Roden (1): NJW2000
Jim Groovester (0):
ToonyMan (1): webadict
Magma Mater (2): Jim Groovester, Maximum Spin
Toaster (1): EuchreJack
No Execution (0):
Not Voting (3): Roden, Magma Mater, Toaster
5 to hammer.
Regarding why Magma isn't looking like mafia!Magma:I agree, I think this reasoning is correct.
In the one game where Magma was mafia (Newbie Mafia), Magma was town read the entire game.
In this one, Magma seems to have stirred up a hornets nest.
Ergo, not meta for mafia!Magma, although I would expect new strategies for new games.
It is enough that I would at least like to see the lynch of Magma re-evaluated.
Overall, I disagree with your assertions, and I think you're stretching a bit to try to make me scum. I kinda want to keep voting you, so I probably will, but I am unlikely to be able to justify voting you over someone else on Day 1.Like who?
@Magma Mater: I think this is a silly argument, and I think you think this is a silly argument, and I think you're going to do better focusing on something or someone else. I am Town here, and even if I was lying about knowing what the role does based on name alone (which I'm not because I was aware of a role by the name of Friendly Neighbor who says their alignment to a target each Night), the only real benefit for me as scum is that I am activelurking. I don't really even see a benefit for EuchreJack. It's just a flimsy argument.It's only become a silly argument because you've chosen to argue with me. You've chosen to make assumptions about what kind of information I'm hoping to gain by asking the questions, and you've chosen to be obtuse instead of simply answering my questions. Dodging questions only makes you more difficult to read.
So, let's back this up a bit because I think we can work better in the opposite direction: Who do you think is Town and why?
Readslist, as much to help me as for other people.Because it is useless, or at least I believed it was. A 25% chance of misclearing mafia or miscondemning town isn't a chance I'm willing to take. However, now I'm starting to think this set up is less power heavy and instead more of a puzzle, and that my role can help solve that puzzle. It's why I want to inspect Toaster tonight, I'm probably the best choice for confirming their role.Spoiler (click to show/hide)
In summary, Roden, I want to know why you initially claimed your role was useless, but now you're claiming a 75% accurate ability.
The previous rounds used roles with 'auto' abilities. The mafia team also undoubtedly has 'auto' abilities. I wouldn't town read him for that.@NJW and Roden:I believe the Miller claim because there seems to a certain theme with roles each round, and this time it looks like it has to do with obscuring alignment peeks. I wouldn't be surprised if scum had a Janitor of some sort, for instance. But also, mechanically NJW's claim is convincing since he said the Miller part of his role was "auto", which is exactly what my Unreliable passive is labeled as. It's a little angle shooty, but I'm fine with just putting him aside for now.This is going to be one of those weird games. Anyway, I'm a miller.Why would there be a miller if you're an unreliable cop?This is going to be one of those weird games. Anyway, I'm a miller.I believe this claim. My role is useless, I'm an Unreliable Cop.
I think it's more likely Roden is telling the truth here then NJW unless they're both in on it, although I find Roden believable here. Especially since NJW claimed first and Roden second. I got caught out pretty badly from claiming double voter first in a past game as mafia since I had no idea there would be another claim to "meta counter" it.
ToonyMan is using fringe logic to justify the NJW vote that they themselves shot down in Round 3, somehow invoking my name into the atrocity, and getting all creepy buddy on me.Can you quantify this? How am I playing differently?
I don't suspect Magma Mater at this point. While we haven't seen them as Town, we did see them as Mafia and they played quite differently.
@Max: We've worked well in the past in-thread, to the point that maybe we actually don't need a private chat to work together?
What do you think?
Yeah, I think I'll just say EJ is probs Town and call it a day.Why is EJ town? I'm assuming it's meta-related... I obviously wasn't trying to read him in the other game we played together, so I don't know his tells, if he has any.
I was kinda hoping MM would reply sooner rather than later, so I'm ready to jump on a ToonyMan train if anyone else is, and I can reassess later. Maybe it's because I feel like their claim is too close to Vector's role in Round 3, but they're getting too combative with EJ.
Is that a problem? Whatever. I'll think about it later.
Readslist, as much to help me as for other people.Hm, this is nitpicky. 75% chance is pretty useless. I also don't like the fact that you haven't given play-related reasons for voting him, other than "tone and post content" a couple posts down. Can you expand on how his tone and content make you scumread him?
Roden: went from "my role is useless" to "75% cop", which are two completely different things. Rather dubious. Otherwise constructive. I'm quite conflicted here, but this is making me think scum. Given the picture of the game I'm building up based on roles, I'm not as scared of ML'ing a cop as I would normally be, especially not a 75% one, so I can see voting Roden as a good idea.
[/spoiler]
In summary, Roden, I want to know why you initially claimed your role was useless, but now you're claiming a 75% accurate ability.
Day 1 will end at 2 AM, Central/Forum time Thursday. This is approximately 8 hours from now - votes after the deadline will not count.
ToonyMan is using fringe logic to justify the NJW vote that they themselves shot down in Round 3, somehow invoking my name into the atrocity, and getting all creepy buddy on me.Can you quantify this? How am I playing differently?
I don't suspect Magma Mater at this point. While we haven't seen them as Town, we did see them as Mafia and they played quite differently.
@Max: We've worked well in the past in-thread, to the point that maybe we actually don't need a private chat to work together?
What do you think?
I see your response regarding others' reactions to me. I don't think that's good enough to justify the read, since there are different people in this game, it could be them and not me. Why do you think I've received votes this time and why do you think I didn't receive them last time?
75% cop would be a fantastic scum claim, but only if people agree that it isn't useless - then you can lead town to mislynch *and get away with it*. Claiming it would be useless would have to be an exercise in reverse psychology. On that basis, the logical scumpartner for Roden would be NJW - Roden to call it useless and NJW to convince everyone that it's good enough to go on.If Roden becomes confirmed town (for example, by dying), how do you plan on treating his results?
Of course, we could ask, is Roden/NJW likely on meta terms? Well... honestly, maybe? I can imagine a "now do it again" setup like that. That said, I think it probably shouldn't be at the forefront of anyone's mind right now.
The important thing I wanted to convey, though, is this: If we all agree to treat Roden's results as unreliable, then its value as a fakeclaim is ruined. Therefore, I am going to commit to ignoring them.
Lynch the unreadable Toaster then.What do you think the chances are that NJW and Toaster are both town? And I believe the things you said about NJW also apply to Toaster, no? Wouldn't claiming Miller after someone else had already claimed Miller be a bad idea as mafia?
Since probably either NJW or Toaster is scum, and I'll bet on Toaster as the liar. Or maybe I'm being played by Toonyman.
Give me two options with my logic, and point at one so that I'll go with the other?
Still, I think Toaster is the scum because:
1) NJW plainly stated that he was a Miller. This drew suspicion as it could be a mafia gambit, but is the Townie thing to do if true.
Besides, isn't Good Mafia play to AVOID suspicion?
2) Toaster sorta fumbled with his claim. Like he didn't want to say too much about it. I'm still waiting for an answer to my question as to whether or not my Neighborizer would work on them.
As things stand, I want a Roden elim, but it seems nobody else does. I don't want a magma elim particularly, although I'm not dead set against it as I don't have any really hard scumreads and I don't expect to be strong enough to read magma immediately. So I'm stuck between Toaster and Webadict. I'm going to trust my gut on Toony, although I'm feeling shakier about that. I don't want a no-lynch, for a couple of reasons.Your reads don't mesh very well.
I believe Toaster's null-claim... there does seem to be a weird theme this game, and falseclaiming a confirmable investigation-blocker against an unreliable cop would be insanity. On the other hand, I don't think it clears them... I've BEEN ascetic scum, for example. NAI.
I know I always complain about there being too much in each day, but I do feel like I don't have enough information from people this time. On the basis of a number of very weak factors, such as our not having seen much input from them, Toaster.
Edit: Ninja'd twice by Toony... doesn't really help or change the above. Sorry if new stuff comes to light and my vote stays on Toaster when it shouldn't, but I'd be in the wrong end of the small hours if I were up then.
Hm, can you give me an example of where you think I'm focusing on scumhunting?ToonyMan is using fringe logic to justify the NJW vote that they themselves shot down in Round 3, somehow invoking my name into the atrocity, and getting all creepy buddy on me.Can you quantify this? How am I playing differently?
I don't suspect Magma Mater at this point. While we haven't seen them as Town, we did see them as Mafia and they played quite differently.
@Max: We've worked well in the past in-thread, to the point that maybe we actually don't need a private chat to work together?
What do you think?
I see your response regarding others' reactions to me. I don't think that's good enough to justify the read, since there are different people in this game, it could be them and not me. Why do you think I've received votes this time and why do you think I didn't receive them last time?
Last time, you were engaging in more mechanical discussion and not interrogating players as you are now.
I think your votes this time are due to bandwagoning. Previously, you were focused on looking town, and were successful at that.
Now, you know that you are town, so you're not worrying about how you look. Its actually easier to be non-offensive if you don't have to scumhunt.
One thing to consider: There is probably one town player that voted you to see who else would vote you, and there is probably one mafia that voted you to see if they could get you lynched or even hammered. How high did your vote count get, and how many were needed for hammer?
PPE:Also my role name is Day 3 Innocent for those of you who were dying of anxiety about the name of my role.Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Points one and two are about picking players for alignments which does not directly translate to my argument, however it's general support for "reading the mod". Point 3 applies directly to our situation here though. It's not a strong vote but I want to start at least somewhat reasonably.
I'm curious what motivated this claim.
75% cop would be a fantastic scum claim, but only if people agree that it isn't useless - then you can lead town to mislynch *and get away with it*. Claiming it would be useless would have to be an exercise in reverse psychology. On that basis, the logical scumpartner for Roden would be NJW - Roden to call it useless and NJW to convince everyone that it's good enough to go on.
Of course, we could ask, is Roden/NJW likely on meta terms? Well... honestly, maybe? I can imagine a "now do it again" setup like that. That said, I think it probably shouldn't be at the forefront of anyone's mind right now.
The important thing I wanted to convey, though, is this: If we all agree to treat Roden's results as unreliable, then its value as a fakeclaim is ruined. Therefore, I am going to commit to ignoring them.
A power role. I have a miller auto and a power role.I'm not going to join a mass-claim, because there are strong reasons not to reveal my role right now.What would you have on top of Miller in a mostly vanilla mafia game? What could you have on top of Miller in a mostly vanilla mafia game?
Yeah, I think I'll just say EJ is probs Town and call it a day.
I was kinda hoping MM would reply sooner rather than later, so I'm ready to jump on a ToonyMan train if anyone else is, and I can reassess later. Maybe it's because I feel like their claim is too close to Vector's role in Round 3, but they're getting too combative with EJ.
Is that a problem? Whatever. I'll think about it later.
readslist
Regarding why Magma isn't looking like mafia!Magma:
In the one game where Magma was mafia (Newbie Mafia), Magma was town read the entire game.
In this one, Magma seems to have stirred up a hornets nest.
Ergo, not meta for mafia!Magma, although I would expect new strategies for new games.
It is enough that I would at least like to see the lynch of Magma re-evaluated.
One thing to consider: There is probably one town player that voted you to see who else would vote you, and there is probably one mafia that voted you to see if they could get you lynched or even hammered. How high did your vote count get, and how many were needed for hammer?
@Jack:Regarding why Magma isn't looking like mafia!Magma:I agree, I think this reasoning is correct.
In the one game where Magma was mafia (Newbie Mafia), Magma was town read the entire game.
In this one, Magma seems to have stirred up a hornets nest.
Ergo, not meta for mafia!Magma, although I would expect new strategies for new games.
It is enough that I would at least like to see the lynch of Magma re-evaluated.
A scum role that announces itself as town on day three would be hilarious, but bad.
Why is that a weird thing to get contentious about?
To fully explain, the reasons web's "neighbor" post pings me is this:
- It's an inaccurate statement. If he's town and doesn't know what a neighborizer is, why not ask a question instead?
- It looks like it was posted for the sake of being posted. Town doesn't have much to gain by posting that as a statement, if he believes it to be true (nobody asked what a neighborizer is). On the other hand, scum-web might want to look ignorant about Euchre's role for distancing reasons.
- webadict is an experienced player, and neighborizer really is a common role. Obviously, this is speculation on my part, and is probably unfair to webadict, but it is something that I thought about and I'd be lying if I said it's not affecting my read on him.
Now I'm going to be entirely hypocritical and neglect to answer your question about who I think is town, since it isn't really beneficial to reveal those at this time. My reasons are pretty much mech-based so it wouldn't give you any insight into my alignment anyway.
Rereading a bit and thinking about my vote. Do we need a majority hammer, or does the person with the most votes at deadline die (plurality)?
ninja fruit vendor is a fakeclaim, it's a nonsense role.fucking finally someone gets it
NJW2000
I don't like the vote on Roden, and I don't like the vote on Toaster. I don't think that either make a lot of sense from your PoV if you're town.
Scumreading Roden especially is... you're supposedly a miller, how do you not town-read the cop claim??
I don't know what I would say to you privately that I wouldn't say to you publicly.Yeah, radio to you would be a waste I imagine.
NJW2000 but mostly just to see who chickens out or hammers.
Really? So the official VC on page 77 is wrong?NJW2000 but mostly just to see who chickens out or hammers.
Actually, that was Hammer. Roden already had a vote on NJW. Damn me, should have counted the votes better and mentioned it was L-1.
I thought my vote was third not fourth.
damnit, I read the VC wrong.Really? So the official VC on page 77 is wrong?NJW2000 but mostly just to see who chickens out or hammers.
Actually, that was Hammer. Roden already had a vote on NJW. Damn me, should have counted the votes better and mentioned it was L-1.
I thought my vote was third not fourth.
Day 1 will end at 2 AM, Central/Forum time Thursday. This is approximately 8 hours from now - votes after the deadline will not count.
My Day 1's usually suck, sorry. Jim, Toaster, Jack are on my no touch list for today. I don't necessarily scum read Web or Max today, they're null town for me. I generally always want to trust Toony, but tonally he's pinging me as scum. NJW as was described before feels very off. Magma is probably town but I don't have any reason for why besides sheeping Jack since I town read him.
Damn sorry, I accidentally fell asleep but it looks like I woke up before day end. I can at least respond to new posts before day end it looks like.You could Hammer NJW so we could go to bed...
webadict (1): ToonyMan
NJW2000 (5): Magma Mater, webadict, EuchreJack, Jim Groovester, Roden
EuchreJack (0):
Maximum Spin (0):
Roden (0):
Jim Groovester (0):
ToonyMan (0):
Magma Mater (1): Maximum Spin
Toaster (1): NJW2000
No Execution (0):
Not Voting (1): Toaster
5 to hammer.
Miller Magpie (town):
(Auto) Miller: Your unusual, birdlike behaviors leave you suspicious. Alignment-investigative abilities return results as if you were mafia aligned.
(Auto) Scavenge: Using your keen instincts for finding useful trinkets and your sharp, adaptive mind, you are able to use the actions of dead players as if they were a part of your own role.
Uuuh I can remove these posts if that was hammer
webadict (0):
EuchreJack (0):
Maximum Spin (0):
Roden (0):
Jim Groovester (0):
ToonyMan (0):
Magma Mater (0):
Toaster (0):
No Execution (0):
Not Voting (8): webadict, EuchreJack, Maximum Spin, Roden, Jim Groovester, ToonyMan, Magma Mater, Toaster
5 to hammer.
Toaster, what exactly are you?
PFP
I gave an item to Jack, please confirm but don't say what it is though.
Good morning Maximum Spin. Care to explain why there was no kill last night?I have no idea. Thanks for roleblocking me, though.
Maximum Spin: You never did a damned thing with your vote on Magma. Please justify the vote and leaving it there all D1.He posted a reaction gif, and that's terrible. Then I went to bed. When I got back to the thread, it was night.
Toaster claiming Null Miller makes no fucking sense as scum.You misunderstand. Toaster is a mafia quasi-ascetic roleblocker. The claim was probably true. Since he appears to be flavored as some kind of hurricane, it makes sense that nobody could get close enough to investigate him.
Ah, but Toonyman going down the ToonyTunnel means he's town, Web.Euchre, do you absolutely 100% believe Toony is Town? Did you get a gun? I literally can't think of anything else that you could get from Toony that would indicate why you think he's Town. I think you are wrong here. Toony could've actioned you twice.
you to be going after Roden for bothering to check as a 75% Cop.What makes you think he did? That wasn't my impression.
...Wait, Max, you were Roleblocked? Who did you target? You're implying you targeted Toaster, but I'd like you to confirm that for me first.I am absolutely not implying that, why do you think so?
Because you're claiming Toaster Roleblocked you, and you then called him Ascetic....Wait, Max, you were Roleblocked? Who did you target? You're implying you targeted Toaster, but I'd like you to confirm that for me first.I am absolutely not implying that, why do you think so?
Because you're claiming Toaster Roleblocked you, and you then called him Ascetic.Oh, no, I suggested he's quasi-Ascetic because he claimed that investigations on him would fail, and also has some action he used to roleblock me (or else how else would he know to blame me for the no-kill?). I think he just has a theme of pushing people away (apparently using storms), like my fire theme last round.
Toaster can still be Ascetic I guess, since I don't know how we both could've been blocked here otherwise. But I'm just not sure why he would lie about his role if he's town. Then again, I'm not sure why anyone would waste their Roleblock on me just to stop me from confirming that Toaster is Null to investigations.I thought Toaster was pretty honest about being unreadable from the beginning.
Why did you target Jack, btw?Jack has asked me not to claim until d3. I just thought it would be useful to do so.
Why did you target Jack, btw?Jack has asked me not to claim until d3. I just thought it would be useful to do so.
Jim: Why was NJW's claim bad and mine unworthy of mention at all?
Alright, I believe Jack and Max. More so Jack, but I trust Max through Jack right now. I just need to hear from Jim and Magma now.
I grant you that it's entirely possible that Toaster is scum. I don't think this is true, but it's possible. My issue is that Roden was my other suspect, and there just isn't a reason to think that Roden is scum UNLESS Roden and Toaster are a team. But, this doesn't make sense, as Roden is the only known Cop at the moment.you to be going after Roden for bothering to check as a 75% Cop.What makes you think he did? That wasn't my impression.
Your entire theory of Toaster being town from the beginning has been premised on the assumption that a scum toaster must be lying about the claim. Even here, you say "I'm much more confident that [...] Toaster is telling the truth." But what if he is telling the truth about his role and scum? This is not inconceivable. I mean, you literally just saw me do it in another game.
I'll grant you that I don't have much data on Toaster as a player, maybe he is usually a boat-non-rocker, but I'm never going to accept the theory that someone can't be mafia because of audacity. Audacity is easy.
Anyway, I don't want a No Lynch, I want a lynch of someone who will narrow down the suspect list. I think Toaster is the best lynch candidate.
Good morning Maximum Spin. Care to explain why there was no kill last night?I have no idea. Thanks for roleblocking me, though.
QuoteMaximum Spin: You never did a damned thing with your vote on Magma. Please justify the vote and leaving it there all D1.He posted a reaction gif, and that's terrible. Then I went to bed. When I got back to the thread, it was night.
Anyway, EuchreJack has convinced me that he's either town or absolutely stupid, and I don't think he's absolutely stupid. That makes Toaster and [in retrospect, redacted until later] my top picks. Why Toaster? Dropping a roleblock on a guy, choosing to no-kill, and blaming that guy? Sure, I'd do it. Ballsy, but far from implausible, especially if the kills are limited in one way or another.
(I also thought NJW was practically obvtown, so why would I want to move my vote? Criticizing me for not joining the bandwagon kind of misses the important point that the bandwagon was wrong.)
I'm pretty confident that Toaster and Webadict are mafia. I can give detailed reasoning when I'm at a computer. For now, in short Web has been trying to lead bandwagons and get the heat off Toaster. This nokill is a frame job. Toaster is framing Max while also protecting Web.
Hm, so one item of analysis is WHY did Toaster roleblock Max?
We'll start from the beginning:
@Toaster: WHY did you roleblock Max? There were plenty of others you could roleblock, so why Max?
@Toaster: Did you get any results from your role blocking?
Red text of please answer my questions variety
Jim: Why was NJW's claim bad and mine unworthy of mention at all?
I know you always claim Miller. It wasn't remarkable so I didn't comment on it. I commented on NJW2000's miller claim because it felt weird.
I targeted Toaster last night but was also Roleblocked. I thought he might've been lying and was actually just Ascetic, but you're also claiming that you were Roleblocked. My Unreliable passive can't cause my action to fail either, I was specifically told something else caused it to fail. This is why I asked if you targeted Toaster.
Toaster can still be Ascetic I guess, since I don't know how we both could've been blocked here otherwise. But I'm just not sure why he would lie about his role if he's town. Then again, I'm not sure why anyone would waste their Roleblock on me just to stop me from confirming that Toaster is Null to investigations.
Magma Mater: I'm also going to need to see more justification of your vote on NJW. Why was his vote on me bad?
I believe Toaster's null-claim... there does seem to be a weird theme this game, and falseclaiming a confirmable investigation-blocker against an unreliable cop would be insanity. On the other hand, I don't think it clears them... I've BEEN ascetic scum, for example. NAI.It's this passage that made me uneasy. In the first paragraph, he talks about how Toaster's claim makes sense in this setup specifically because there are lots of investigatives and whatnot. Then in the second paragraph, he votes for Toaster for weak factors, basically something that would apply to people other than Toaster. I'd have thought that the first paragraph would be enough to leave Toaster out of the PoE for at least a day, in NJW's mind.
I know I always complain about there being too much in each day, but I do feel like I don't have enough information from people this time. On the basis of a number of very weak factors, such as our not having seen much input from them, Toaster.
I'm pretty confident that Toaster and Webadict are mafia. I can give detailed reasoning when I'm at a computer. For now, in short Web has been trying to lead bandwagons and get the heat off Toaster. This nokill is a frame job. Toaster is framing Max while also protecting Web.Looking forward to hearing detailed explanations for these bold claims.
I also wrote notes during N1 but they're at home and I won't be there for awhile today. I will post them when I can.
As for my action, I gave a radio to Maximum Spin.Why Max? Seems like an odd choice.
Alright, I wasn't sure if you had any other abilities that might have affected anyone last night. You get resolved on Day 3 so that's fine for now.Alright, I believe Jack and Max. More so Jack, but I trust Max through Jack right now. I just need to hear from Jim and Magma now.Hear from me for what?
I fully claimed on Day 1. I have no night action. I got flavor related to my role (I'm frantically searching for my papers that prove my innocence) but nothing related to anything that may have targeted me.
Roden:My action did fail, but nearly everyone's actions have been accounted for.I targeted Toaster last night but was also Roleblocked. I thought he might've been lying and was actually just Ascetic, but you're also claiming that you were Roleblocked. My Unreliable passive can't cause my action to fail either, I was specifically told something else caused it to fail. This is why I asked if you targeted Toaster.
Toaster can still be Ascetic I guess, since I don't know how we both could've been blocked here otherwise. But I'm just not sure why he would lie about his role if he's town. Then again, I'm not sure why anyone would waste their Roleblock on me just to stop me from confirming that Toaster is Null to investigations.
I find this quite interesting. Are you 100% sure you were blocked as opposed to your action just failing? That wasn't me that blocked you. Either someone blocked you or reflected my action?
Does anyone want to claim affecting Roden?
@web: You got a result of 3 on EuchreJack, does that include yourself?It does not. There is a third person that targeted EuchreJack that has not confessed.
Toony gave Jack an item, which Jack confirmed.Well, technically, no, my action requires one more person to confirm me fully. Unless Maximum Spin actually did target EuchreJack, but that doesn't seem like it should if he was roleblocked.
Jack Neighborized Max, which Max confirmed.
Web gave an accurate count on the number of actions affecting Jack, so his action is essentially accounted for.
Jim claims Day 3 IC with no abilities, he gets resolved tomorrow.
You blocked Max, which confirms both of your actions.
All that leaves is Magma Mater. If their action can be confirmed, then no one else could have made my action fail except you, by way of you lying and actually being Ascetic.
A bit unrelated, but if you are lying and are mafia, then the lack of NK may be because of either a delayed kill or an alternative passive killing method.
It occurs to me, Toaster, that since you appear not to have read the previous rounds, you don't know that we've already had two setups where scum didn't actually have an immediate kill at all. It is extremely possible that the no-kill was not a choice.I think we should wait for Magma Mater to confirm their action. I will unvote for now.
I don't think Toaster is scum here. I think it's very likely to be Maximum Spin, ToonyMan, or maybe Magma Mater.You should be considering Roden, who was also apparently roleblocked.
Only thing I'm willing to claim at the moment is that my action would not have blocked Roden.Worse, I think Toaster knew that and made the misleading claim to try to bait people into wasting investigations checking it.
To me the obvious explanation is that Toaster is just not explaining their ability properly, and that null = ascetic. But I'm also prone to making game-losing assumptions so LOL
If Roden becomes confirmed town (for example, by dying), how do you plan on treating his results?The same way I said I would. When I commit, I commit.
I got to 3 votes, with 5 to hammer. Max's vote looked the worst both because it was the third on me for a silly reason, and because he hasn't changed it yet.Why does a vote look worse if I don't change it? I prefer to leave my votes in place as much as possible because I mean them. (And, to me, it is an entirely serious reason.)
You immediately voted Toaster right after he claimed to have roleblocked you. If anything, it's possible that you initially overreacted. He had a very good reason to suspect you especially because, as you put it, he would have no reason to believe there isn't another kill method. So, assuming this, that's reasonable suspicion to think that you're scum. He's still Town in this instance.I don't think Toaster is scum here. I think it's very likely to be Maximum Spin, ToonyMan, or maybe Magma Mater.You should be considering Roden, who was also apparently roleblocked.
Separately, let's be realistic, if I had been scum and tried to do the kill etc., I wouldn't have admitted to being roleblocked in my response, I would have claimed to have done an action, which my partner would seem to confirm, and, when/if Toaster claimed the roleblock, suggested that the action must have failed somehow. (Of course, I most likely wouldn't have been the one to do the kill, anyway; too much daytime visibility.) Unless you're suggesting that I'm solo scum in a setup with at least two roleblockers and no strongman ability to make up for it. I think it's more likely that there just aren't d1 kills for whatever reason again.
You, on the other hand, voted him in retaliation for his vote on you.No, I voted him because I think he's scum.
I ended up messaging the mod about this, and unfortunately they couldn't confirm if someone who was Roleblocked would still visit their target. Though I was informed that visiting a Commuter wouldn't happen, but visiting an Ascetic would.@web: You got a result of 3 on EuchreJack, does that include yourself?It does not. There is a third person that targeted EuchreJack that has not confessed.Toony gave Jack an item, which Jack confirmed.Well, technically, no, my action requires one more person to confirm me fully. Unless Maximum Spin actually did target EuchreJack, but that doesn't seem like it should if he was roleblocked.
Jack Neighborized Max, which Max confirmed.
Web gave an accurate count on the number of actions affecting Jack, so his action is essentially accounted for.
Jim claims Day 3 IC with no abilities, he gets resolved tomorrow.
You blocked Max, which confirms both of your actions.
All that leaves is Magma Mater. If their action can be confirmed, then no one else could have made my action fail except you, by way of you lying and actually being Ascetic.
A bit unrelated, but if you are lying and are mafia, then the lack of NK may be because of either a delayed kill or an alternative passive killing method.
Do you think that Max is town?Why did you target Jack, btw?Jack has asked me not to claim until d3. I just thought it would be useful to do so.
To clarify, I've asked Max not to claim his role. I also told Max to reveal that he targeted me.
The nature of that role should be reserved for after it actually gets used, whatever it might be.
This could just be another Toony/McMiner situation from Totem Mafia. Toaster shouldn't be exempt from suspicion just because of his claimed role.You immediately voted Toaster right after he claimed to have roleblocked you. If anything, it's possible that you initially overreacted. He had a very good reason to suspect you especially because, as you put it, he would have no reason to believe there isn't another kill method. So, assuming this, that's reasonable suspicion to think that you're scum. He's still Town in this instance.I don't think Toaster is scum here. I think it's very likely to be Maximum Spin, ToonyMan, or maybe Magma Mater.You should be considering Roden, who was also apparently roleblocked.
Separately, let's be realistic, if I had been scum and tried to do the kill etc., I wouldn't have admitted to being roleblocked in my response, I would have claimed to have done an action, which my partner would seem to confirm, and, when/if Toaster claimed the roleblock, suggested that the action must have failed somehow. (Of course, I most likely wouldn't have been the one to do the kill, anyway; too much daytime visibility.) Unless you're suggesting that I'm solo scum in a setup with at least two roleblockers and no strongman ability to make up for it. I think it's more likely that there just aren't d1 kills for whatever reason again.
You, on the other hand, voted him in retaliation for his vote on you. That does seem to indicate that you were OMGUSing based entirely on that. To me, you are the one that seems suspicious in this, not Toaster.
If I'm to say anything here, it's that Toaster's role is literally too suspicious to be scum, and while that's the stupidest thing I've ever said, I'm all in on that stupid fucking idea.
Or at least, Toaster's definitely not lying. Maybe he's scum. It just seems too stupid for him to be scum.
?? You're forgetting to count yourself bro@web: You got a result of 3 on EuchreJack, does that include yourself?It does not. There is a third person that targeted EuchreJack that has not confessed.Toony gave Jack an item, which Jack confirmed.Well, technically, no, my action requires one more person to confirm me fully. Unless Maximum Spin actually did target EuchreJack, but that doesn't seem like it should if he was roleblocked.
Jack Neighborized Max, which Max confirmed.
Web gave an accurate count on the number of actions affecting Jack, so his action is essentially accounted for.
Jim claims Day 3 IC with no abilities, he gets resolved tomorrow.
You blocked Max, which confirms both of your actions.
All that leaves is Magma Mater. If their action can be confirmed, then no one else could have made my action fail except you, by way of you lying and actually being Ascetic.
A bit unrelated, but if you are lying and are mafia, then the lack of NK may be because of either a delayed kill or an alternative passive killing method.
If we treat Max and Toaster as a dichotomy
I'd lean toward Toaster being scum. His reaction of immediately accusing and voting for Max makes me think that, in his mind, he'd already set up the day's lynch. The thought of other factors potentially causing the lack of kill (including arsonist, or even a simple doctor) should have given him pause, I think, until he had more information.
I would also like to hear an explanation as to why Max was blocked. He seems like the kind of person you block as a scum RB because it'll always be plausible that you "thought he was scum", whereas a town RB who's thinking about which of two scum would perform the kill probably would not choose Max.
Magma Mater: I'm also going to need to see more justification of your vote on NJW. Why was his vote on me bad?I believe Toaster's null-claim... there does seem to be a weird theme this game, and falseclaiming a confirmable investigation-blocker against an unreliable cop would be insanity. On the other hand, I don't think it clears them... I've BEEN ascetic scum, for example. NAI.It's this passage that made me uneasy. In the first paragraph, he talks about how Toaster's claim makes sense in this setup specifically because there are lots of investigatives and whatnot. Then in the second paragraph, he votes for Toaster for weak factors, basically something that would apply to people other than Toaster. I'd have thought that the first paragraph would be enough to leave Toaster out of the PoE for at least a day, in NJW's mind.
I know I always complain about there being too much in each day, but I do feel like I don't have enough information from people this time. On the basis of a number of very weak factors, such as our not having seen much input from them, Toaster.
Separately, let's be realistic, if I had been scum and tried to do the kill etc., I wouldn't have admitted to being roleblocked in my response, I would have claimed to have done an action, which my partner would seem to confirm, and, when/if Toaster claimed the roleblock, suggested that the action must have failed somehow. (Of course, I most likely wouldn't have been the one to do the kill, anyway; too much daytime visibility.)
Regarding the jailkeeper claim... I suppose if you're town, that means it's very likely that the mafia do not have an arsonist, recruit, or delayed kill ability, do you agree?
Did you give any thought to that aspect of your role before choosing a target?
Also, please target Jim tonight for obvious reasons.
So you are proposing that Scum!Toaster and friend decided to- in a nine player game- skip the kill N1 in order to frame a townie D2? This gets them a easy lynch in exchange for... heat on Scum!Me all the rest of the game and then a probably no lynch later on to give the town an extra day avoiding MYLO? All this above option B: just kill someone? Is there a gain for this theoretical scum team that I'm just not seeing? It seems like an awfully bad trade for no real reason.It makes sense if mafia couldn't kill last night or have a nonstandard kill.
And finally, you consider this likely over the possibility that Maximum Spin tried to kill someone and got blocked by me?It's possible, but I read Max as town. He was my second choice for giving an item over Jack I would say.
If I'm to say anything here, it's that Toaster's role is literally too suspicious to be scum, and while that's the stupidest thing I've ever said, I'm all in on that stupid fucking idea.What does this even mean
Or at least, Toaster's definitely not lying. Maybe he's scum. It just seems too stupid for him to be scum.Why is Toaster definitely not lying?
Toaster: Null Investigative result AND Jailkeeper? Give me a break, Toaster. Just claim Godfather Roleblocker and save us some time.
I've highlighted the section you missed. :P?? You're forgetting to count yourself bro@web: You got a result of 3 on EuchreJack, does that include yourself?It does not. There is a third person that targeted EuchreJack that has not confessed.Toony gave Jack an item, which Jack confirmed.Well, technically, no, my action requires one more person to confirm me fully. Unless Maximum Spin actually did target EuchreJack, but that doesn't seem like it should if he was roleblocked.
Jack Neighborized Max, which Max confirmed.
Web gave an accurate count on the number of actions affecting Jack, so his action is essentially accounted for.
Jim claims Day 3 IC with no abilities, he gets resolved tomorrow.
You blocked Max, which confirms both of your actions.
All that leaves is Magma Mater. If their action can be confirmed, then no one else could have made my action fail except you, by way of you lying and actually being Ascetic.
A bit unrelated, but if you are lying and are mafia, then the lack of NK may be because of either a delayed kill or an alternative passive killing method.
Important claim updateMy reasoning is that I was pretty sure you were Town, and I very much wasn't a fan of Maximum Spin's reaction. I'm down to vote out Maximum Spin here. I still feel like a Maximum Spin/ToonyMan team explains everything, and that ToonyMan might be giving out guns to kill people.
I have an addition to make to my claim. Yes, I blocked Maximum Spin, but the kicker is that I am a Jailkeeper. Maximum Spin was blocked and protected. As stated, I went after him hard at the outset to get reactions from him (and everyone else.) Having gotten all the available reactions, it's time to give the full action.
For the record, I also asked Fallacy if I would know if I prevented a kill, and the answer is no.
So let's give all these reactions some analysis.
Maximum Spin: Not great, really. His immediate reaction is to accuse me of setting him up, in lieu of any other option. Next post he's emphatically calling me Mafia, ostensibly firmly convinced of my scummitude. This smells of caught scum.
ToonyMan: Hard chainsaw defense of Maximum Spin. This feels wrong coming from Toony, especially how he doesn't consider any other option at all.
Webadict: Believes my claim. Goes straight for the Spin vote; had some suspicion of him late D1. I'm heavily biased here, so probably more important is Web's reaction to this post.
EuchreJack: Sits and ponders my claim, then questions the base reasoning of me targeting Spin. This is a solid analytical play. Pretty sure EJ is town, honestly.
Roden: Claims to be roleblocked as well. Is surprised by two claimed roleblocks. Is analyzing situation. Good look. PPE: Has voted me now. Still reasoning out his thoughts. Still good look.
Jim: No comment, but claims to be distracted. Unfortunate.
Magma: Suspects me over Spin. Backs up his reasoning well enough. Misses the obvious pressure of my vote, but I don't attribute that to being scum. Fine response.
So here's the big obvious question. Do *I* believe the lack of NK was due to Spin being protected instead of blocked? Well... it's possible, yes. I need to run over a few scenarios (like figuring out who else could have blocked Roden, who would have targeted Town!Spin, who Scum!Spin's scumbuddy is, etc.) I want to get this out (short days lololo) but I've got to do some thinking.
@Webadict:Because the best lie is either something that's only barely a lie or dramatically a lie. And for the most part, I think there's only a few players in this game that'd make dramatic lies, and they're you, me, and... honestly, I think that's it. I was gonna say Fallacy, but he's not technically a player, so that's it out of all of us. Toaster tends to go for different plays as scum that rely more on laying in the shadows, so claiming something like Null-Investigative just seems like a Towntell to me, and combining this with immediately claiming the roleblock which explains why there's no kill is, like, a no-brainer to me?If I'm to say anything here, it's that Toaster's role is literally too suspicious to be scum, and while that's the stupidest thing I've ever said, I'm all in on that stupid fucking idea.What does this even meanOr at least, Toaster's definitely not lying. Maybe he's scum. It just seems too stupid for him to be scum.Why is Toaster definitely not lying?
I am a roleblocker
I never said I was only a roleblocker, I am also a jailkeeper
it cant be
Webadict is reaching too hard.
I KNOW the mafia team isn't EuchreJack/Max/Toonyman
Webadict is reaching too hard.Would you like to waste everyone's time by pretending I said that or just your own trying to find where I didn't say that?
I KNOW the mafia team isn't EuchreJack/Max/Toonyman
EuchreJack:Because I'm not scum.Webadict is reaching too hard.
I KNOW the mafia team isn't EuchreJack/Max/Toonyman
How do you ALL CAPS KNOW this?
Webadict is reaching too hard.Would you like to waste everyone's time by pretending I said that or just your own trying to find where I didn't say that?
I KNOW the mafia team isn't EuchreJack/Max/Toonyman
I'll be honest here, Euchre, I think you're probably Town, even when you try your darnedest not to be.
Subtle attempt to suggest I might be scum.I've highlighted the section you missed. :P?? You're forgetting to count yourself bro@web: You got a result of 3 on EuchreJack, does that include yourself?It does not. There is a third person that targeted EuchreJack that has not confessed.Toony gave Jack an item, which Jack confirmed.Well, technically, no, my action requires one more person to confirm me fully. Unless Maximum Spin actually did target EuchreJack, but that doesn't seem like it should if he was roleblocked.
Jack Neighborized Max, which Max confirmed.
Web gave an accurate count on the number of actions affecting Jack, so his action is essentially accounted for.
Jim claims Day 3 IC with no abilities, he gets resolved tomorrow.
You blocked Max, which confirms both of your actions.
All that leaves is Magma Mater. If their action can be confirmed, then no one else could have made my action fail except you, by way of you lying and actually being Ascetic.
A bit unrelated, but if you are lying and are mafia, then the lack of NK may be because of either a delayed kill or an alternative passive killing method.
No, I don't count in the 3. I get a ping for each instance of a person actioning and being actioned (other than myself, which would be a bit silly).
It's quite possible that EuchreJack is the other Roleblocker? I was going to say that'd explain the ping, but it'd actually not because EuchreJack then used another action on top of it, which still leaves the action economy unresolved.
PFP
I gave an item to Jack, please confirm but don't say what it is though.
I got 3 on Jack. I assume Jack actioned, so who's the last one?You'll see Web "using his ability" after ToonyMan revealed giving me an item.
@Toonyman: Are you SURE you don't want me to say what I got? It would help me figure out how to use it...No. It's better this way.
Alternate Theory: Scum team is Webadict and Toaster, they tried to kill ME, they failed, and are now looking for the doctor.The fact that you might be Town is a mystery that will never truly be solved, even after the game.PFP
I gave an item to Jack, please confirm but don't say what it is though.I got 3 on Jack. I assume Jack actioned, so who's the last one?You'll see Web "using his ability" after ToonyMan revealed giving me an item.
Also, Web "isn't sure" if my action counts. So if 2 people claim to have actioned me, he can "clarify" my action actually didn't count.
Sometimes a Motion Detector checks only for actions performed by their target, or only for actions performed on their target.
@Roden: Can you please explain the Toony/McMiner situation? And, do you think that Toaster's play has been scummy disregarding his role claim?So, back in Totem Mafia, McMiner tried to claim that his role let him send someone a message and optionally kill them. He claimed to target Toony, who said he never got a message, but also didn't question the suggestion that McMiner had maybe been Roleblocked and just accepted it. Their interactions and the weird role claim were initially seen as too scummy to actually be scummy, but it turned out both of them were the mafia. Short answer is probably just Occam's Razor.
Actually, I think Webadict & Roden makes a better scum team than Webadict & Toaster.Do you honestly think it's in my scum range to fake a claim as specific as the one I've made?
Web always picks one town player to defend regardless of the evidence, which could be Toaster.
Toaster's irrational push of Jim as mafia is the sort of mistake typically a Town player would make.
Mafia knows that is a losing battle, and generally prefer softer targets.
@Toaster: Do you see any connections between Web & Roden?
Or I, knowing something I haven't yet disclosed (but I'm about to), wanted to hit Max for maximum pressure to see how he reacted.This was unwise. I don't believe in "pressure". I would have reacted exactly the same to your action if you hadn't voted, simply on the understanding that you had roleblocked me and were using that to implicate me as the killer.
@Max: If you forget about the Toaster thing for a minute, who are your top scum reads? Who would you have voted yesterday, had you been around? Why did you think that NJW was obvtown?You and webadict; maybe Jim for lack of presence. I believe I did, in fact, vote yesterday, so you know who I would have voted yesterday - I'd tell you my second pick but I think that might give away information I have been asked to reserve. I can't really answer the third question very well, though... he just smelled like the color of town NJW, if that makes sense. I'm a very abstract thinker by nature; I'd have to go back over his posts to get back the specifics, and I don't really want to do that right now.
Anyway, I've already taken a bunch of tranqs like 30 minutes ago, so I'm fucking outta here, lmao, it's so fucking obvious that it's ToonyMan and Maximum Spin, I swear to fucking god, I have to carry the Town every fucking gamePeople remember when you say shit like this, you know. On the off-chance that you're actually town it just makes you look reeeeeeeally dumb.
Do you honestly think it's in my scum range to fake a claim as specific as the one I've made?Anything can be in your scum range if you want it to be. You were last scum with me, and I distinctly remember discussing, with you, fake-claiming at least two extremely specific things. :P)
Do you think Toaster is possibly more dangerous than Web here then?@Roden: Can you please explain the Toony/McMiner situation? And, do you think that Toaster's play has been scummy disregarding his role claim?So, back in Totem Mafia, McMiner tried to claim that his role let him send someone a message and optionally kill them. He claimed to target Toony, who said he never got a message, but also didn't question the suggestion that McMiner had maybe been Roleblocked and just accepted it. Their interactions and the weird role claim were initially seen as too scummy to actually be scummy, but it turned out both of them were the mafia. Short answer is probably just Occam's Razor.
I don't think Toaster's play has been particularly scummy, and in fact the more I read his posts the more I feel myself being convinced that I possibly really was Roleblocked. My problem with that though is that the suspect pool is tiny and doesn't make sense. I'm also just not sure why anyone would try to fuck with my Inspect anyway. I'm already Unreliable as it is, and even if I wasn't Toaster supposedly would come up Null anyway, so what's the point? Why block me over someone like Toony or Jack, who have objectively stronger abilities?
I strongly suspect that webadict is town. His play doesn't make sense from a mafia perspective. I don't support any of the votes. The only way web can be scum here is if it's with Toaster, which... alright, but why would we lynch web first in that situation?Who's Toaster most likely mafia with then, Jim?
I don't view Toaster as likely to be mafia. But if he does flip red, I'd suspect Roden most. The guy just compared his relationship with Toaster to a scum/scum relationship in another game, lolI strongly suspect that webadict is town. His play doesn't make sense from a mafia perspective. I don't support any of the votes. The only way web can be scum here is if it's with Toaster, which... alright, but why would we lynch web first in that situation?Who's Toaster most likely mafia with then, Jim?
The only way web can be scum here is if it's with Toaster, which... alright, but why would we lynch web first in that situation?I simply don't see how this is possibly true. Webadict has a tendency to pick someone to latch onto, like that - it doesn't necessarily mean they're partners.
Motion Detector (https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Motion_Detector)I literally cannot make this up.QuoteSometimes a Motion Detector checks only for actions performed by their target, or only for actions performed on their target.
Sometimes a Motion Detector checks only for actions performed by their target, or only for actions performed on their target.IN THE LINK YOU GIVE, FIVE SENTENCES BELOW WHERE IT LITERALLY DESCRIBES THE VARIANTS:
The Motion Detector learns if any actions were performed by or on a player, but not what they were, or who else was involved.I cannot believe this is what I have to point out, but it literally is.
This is all shit.You wanna know why I know ToonyMan isn't trying?
Here's my theory:This one is actually really silly: The obvious conclusion is that I ROLEBLOCKED RODEN. I mean, it's literally so obvious that it doesn't seem like I'd have to point it out, but I do.
Toaster is some kind of Ascetic Roleblocker/Jail Keeper.
Web is possibly lying about being a motion detector.
Toaster roleblocks/jailkeeps Max.
Roden gets roleblocked by something Toaster has, like a strong passive.
Webadict either actually motion detected Jack or is lying and did something else in secret.
Actually, I think Webadict & Roden makes a better scum team than Webadict & Toaster.Oh look, it's EuchreJack again! Wonderful.
Web always picks one town player to defend regardless of the evidence, which could be Toaster.
Toaster's irrational push of Jim as mafia is the sort of mistake typically a Town player would make.
Mafia knows that is a losing battle, and generally prefer softer targets.
@Toaster: Do you see any connections between Web & Roden?
Fair. I definitely outbursted there, but I just saw two terrible attacks after the other. It gets old after a while.Anyway, I've already taken a bunch of tranqs like 30 minutes ago, so I'm fucking outta here, lmao, it's so fucking obvious that it's ToonyMan and Maximum Spin, I swear to fucking god, I have to carry the Town every fucking gamePeople remember when you say shit like this, you know. On the off-chance that you're actually town it just makes you look reeeeeeeally dumb.
Part of the reason why I believe it's Max is because he was literally against a No Launch at the beginning of Today.Why should I support no-lynch if I think I know who scum is? Actually, lynching Toaster would divide the field best (that is, if he's scum, scum is X, if he's town, scum is Y, where X and Y are specific sets of people), but lynching you is almost as good. I'm also down to lynch Magma but I think this is less likely to hit.
I've got to be honest with you, you should see me/Toaster as 100% plausible. I have pulled ploys more insane than this.It's not you that I'm worried about for plausibility. I don't think Toaster would want in on it.Part of the reason why I believe it's Max is because he was literally against a No Launch at the beginning of Today.Why should I support no-lynch if I think I know who scum is? Actually, lynching Toaster would divide the field best (that is, if he's scum, scum is X, if he's town, scum is Y, where X and Y are specific sets of people), but lynching you is almost as good. I'm also down to lynch Magma but I think this is less likely to hit.
Not sure how available I'll be on the weekends.To me this sounds you like you already knew what you were going to say ahead of time.
ToonyMan
I feel that his recent posts have been shallow. His points against web are things that look ostensibly scummy, but lack substance. For example, who cares if web bandwagoned onto NJW? He had already expressed suspicion there.
Actually, lynching Toaster would divide the field best (that is, if he's scum, scum is X, if he's town, scum is Y, where X and Y are specific sets of people), but lynching you is almost as good. I'm also down to lynch Magma but I think this is less likely to hit.I'm fine with either. Toaster is a more likely hit mechanically so maybe that's logically better, but Webadict is pissing me off.
Because there's a much better conclusion here than this:I had thought of that, but mafia having two roleblockers sounds unlikely to me so I put down what I felt was what most likely happened. I also think it's really unlikely there's multiple millers. I remember you even saying there might be three town millers with the third staying quiet. Why would you say this unless you're trying to clear Toaster? I can see that you're trying now, which might be because you are posting from a computer finally.Here's my theory:This one is actually really silly: The obvious conclusion is that I ROLEBLOCKED RODEN. I mean, it's literally so obvious that it doesn't seem like I'd have to point it out, but I do.
Toaster is some kind of Ascetic Roleblocker/Jail Keeper.
Web is possibly lying about being a motion detector.
Toaster roleblocks/jailkeeps Max.
Roden gets roleblocked by something Toaster has, like a strong passive.
Webadict either actually motion detected Jack or is lying and did something else in secret.
I'm fine with either. Toaster is a more likely hit mechanically so maybe that's logically better, but Webadict is pissing me off.I would just like to add that I consider "makes ToonyMan more effective" a side benefit of lynching webadict (in general, probably).
@Webadict:The only conclusion you should reasonably make here is that there's at least one Town from this pairing because otherwise the Mafia has two Roleblockers. Am I wrong? But, this also fails because I'm not a Roleblocker.Because there's a much better conclusion here than this:I had thought of that, but mafia having two roleblockers sounds unlikely to me so I put down what I felt was what most likely happened. I also think it's really unlikely there's multiple millers. I remember you even saying there might be three town millers with the third staying quiet. Why would you say this unless you're trying to clear Toaster? I can see that you're trying now, which might be because you are posting from a computer finally.Here's my theory:This one is actually really silly: The obvious conclusion is that I ROLEBLOCKED RODEN. I mean, it's literally so obvious that it doesn't seem like I'd have to point it out, but I do.
Toaster is some kind of Ascetic Roleblocker/Jail Keeper.
Web is possibly lying about being a motion detector.
Toaster roleblocks/jailkeeps Max.
Roden gets roleblocked by something Toaster has, like a strong passive.
Webadict either actually motion detected Jack or is lying and did something else in secret.
I really only targeted EuchreJack because I figured he'd be alive Today, but, eh.@Web: This bothers me because I don't understand why you would target someone that you thought would be alive (me), rather than someone that would likely be dead (Jim). Also, why me again? What made me more likely to be alive than other players? I had some doubts whether I was going to see Day 2, so why were you so sure of me rather than other players?
Because my goal is primarily to clear myself, and claiming to action the dead guy usually makes me look like scum.I really only targeted EuchreJack because I figured he'd be alive Today, but, eh.@Web: This bothers me because I don't understand why you would target someone that you thought would be alive (me), rather than someone that would likely be dead (Jim). Also, why me again? What made me more likely to be alive than other players? I had some doubts whether I was going to see Day 2, so why were you so sure of me rather than other players?
One other thing: Why is Web discussing Poison/Priming? Nobody has said they were poisoned, and in the previous Fallacy games people knew when they were poisoned.
@WebAgain: What about Magma? Town or scum? Why?
What do you plan on doing if you're alive for N2?Because my goal is primarily to clear myself, and claiming to action the dead guy usually makes me look like scum.I really only targeted EuchreJack because I figured he'd be alive Today, but, eh.@Web: This bothers me because I don't understand why you would target someone that you thought would be alive (me), rather than someone that would likely be dead (Jim). Also, why me again? What made me more likely to be alive than other players? I had some doubts whether I was going to see Day 2, so why were you so sure of me rather than other players?
One other thing: Why is Web discussing Poison/Priming? Nobody has said they were poisoned, and in the previous Fallacy games people knew when they were poisoned.
@WebAgain: What about Magma? Town or scum? Why?
@Webadict:Well, my ability is only meant to find Multitaskers, so I guess target someone that is suspicious.What do you plan on doing if you're alive for N2?Because my goal is primarily to clear myself, and claiming to action the dead guy usually makes me look like scum.I really only targeted EuchreJack because I figured he'd be alive Today, but, eh.@Web: This bothers me because I don't understand why you would target someone that you thought would be alive (me), rather than someone that would likely be dead (Jim). Also, why me again? What made me more likely to be alive than other players? I had some doubts whether I was going to see Day 2, so why were you so sure of me rather than other players?
One other thing: Why is Web discussing Poison/Priming? Nobody has said they were poisoned, and in the previous Fallacy games people knew when they were poisoned.
@WebAgain: What about Magma? Town or scum? Why?
So then you think there's two scum Roleblockers?It's possible (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8346242#msg8346242), although like I said in my case post (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8346111#msg8346111) I think the more likely scenario is that Roden interacted with something Toaster has.
So, your suspicion of me is predicated on Toaster.So then you think there's two scum Roleblockers?It's possible (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8346242#msg8346242), although like I said in my case post (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8346111#msg8346111) I think the more likely scenario is that Roden interacted with something Toaster has.
Not sure how available I'll be on the weekends.
ToonyMan
I feel that his recent posts have been shallow. His points against web are things that look ostensibly scummy, but lack substance. For example, who cares if web bandwagoned onto NJW? He had already expressed suspicion there.
My second suspect is Roden. I feel like he's coasting on the Cop claim. His play here contrasts greatly from the other game we played together, where he was town and actively trying to solve the game. In this game, he's talking more about his own role interactions with Toaster and waiting for other people to post. I get the impression that he's comfortable allowing the lynch to fall wherever it falls today.
I strongly suspect that webadict is town. His play doesn't make sense from a mafia perspective. I don't support any of the votes. The only way web can be scum here is if it's with Toaster, which... alright, but why would we lynch web first in that situation?
If I'm to say anything here, it's that Toaster's role is literally too suspicious to be scum, and while that's the stupidest thing I've ever said, I'm all in on that stupid fucking idea.
Or at least, Toaster's definitely not lying. Maybe he's scum. It just seems too stupid for him to be scum.
My reasoning is that I was pretty sure you were Town, and I very much wasn't a fan of Maximum Spin's reaction. I'm down to vote out Maximum Spin here. I still feel like a Maximum Spin/ToonyMan team explains everything, and that ToonyMan might be giving out guns to kill people.
@Toony: I actually was hoping the Mafia killed Max N1 because he was flaunting his role and it was an easy way to get rid of him because he's unreadable half the time. I was actually wondering if Roden was some type of Mafia meant to throw the Millers off or if Toaster might somehow be scum, but I'm much more confident that Max is lying and Toaster is telling the truth. Either that, or you actually did prime Euchre or something.
Part of the reason why I believe it's Max is because he was literally against a No Launch at the beginning of Today. He has explicitly stated that he will vote for a launch. With Toaster gone, this feels like a slam dunk for the Mafia team, as it removes what amounts to the only Roleblock against them. I'd much rather prefer me over Toaster in this case, as Toaster's role can still potentially win this.
One other thing: Why is Web discussing Poison/Priming? Nobody has said they were poisoned, and in the previous Fallacy games people knew when they were poisoned.
Just because I mentioned Toaster in that sentence and not you doesn't make that true. Your behavior is worse and more suspicious than Toaster's. Especially on Day 1. Which is why I'm voting you. I'm honestly hesitating if this is the optimal move or exactly what you want at this point.So, your suspicion of me is predicated on Toaster.So then you think there's two scum Roleblockers?It's possible (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8346242#msg8346242), although like I said in my case post (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8346111#msg8346111) I think the more likely scenario is that Roden interacted with something Toaster has.
In essence, you're building a case for Toaster so that you can swap when I flip Town, because you can shrug your shoulders on that.
Weeeeeeeiiiiird.
Are the setups in this series always confusing to navigate? I'm getting the impression the night game is difficult to sort out because all sorts of random and arbitrary nonsense can happen.Yes. See 2 and 3 especially.
Toastadict Case
1. Webadict
2. Toaster
3. NJW reads
4. What happened Night 1?
5. Conclusions
1. Webadict
#1851 (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8345270#msg8345270) - Webadict votes Magma without a reason.
#1863 (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8345366#msg8345366) - Webadict tells Toaster he doesn't believe this game would have two millers. He's laying suspicion on Toaster. He also agrees with my points on NJW (which were incorrect).
#1880 (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8345479#msg8345479) - Webadict confirms they voted Magma without giving a reason.
#1885 (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8345499#msg8345499) - Webadict changes their vote to myself right after Jack votes me. Writes off Jack as town. Decides to switch to me because Magma isn't posting and includes some minor reasons why they're voting this time. What I find important is the suddenness after Jack puts an arguably solid vote on me for voting NJW. It's wagon hop.
#1900 (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8345574#msg8345574) - Explains their vote on Magma now, it was simply "intuition" which is fine since it was basically RVS. Web's first vote on Magma is the most NAI.
#1910 (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8345594#msg8345594) - Web puts Toaster as their second highest town right under Jack. "No reason to claim Null Miller" and yet they voted NJW who had claimed miller. Why believe Toaster over NJW? They even admit themselves they read NJW's miller claim was super townie at the start of the game. He's contradicting himself to suspect NJW.
#1917 (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8345613#msg8345613) - Webadict goes into overdrive now. They switch back to Magma for their suspicious Fruit Vendor claim, which is fine since Magma really was lying. They then unvote again in a flurry of PPEs. Right after this Magma admits they were fakeclaiming and votes NJW for justifiable reasons.
#1923 (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8345619#msg8345619) - Webadict jumps on the NJW vote after Magma does and just says "fucking finally someone gets it". This is a pure wagon vote. I believe they did this to try to swing momentum off of Toaster since NJW's Toaster vote could have possibly swung that way instead, but Webadict also didn't want to vote NJW first so they did weird shit until someone - in this case Magma - voted NJW first. Then they pounced. Afterwards Jack and Jim joined in quick succession before Roden hammered.
Additionally,.If Web flips Town, then I'm probably Primed. Why Web is arguing that their lynch won't reveal anything...is weird.Where did he say that?
Additionally,.If Web flips Town, then I'm probably Primed. Why Web is arguing that their lynch won't reveal anything...is weird.Where did he say that?
If Magma is a Cop, then them inspecting me is the only way I see myself living, because I've kinda got everything I'm gonna get out Today, and with me dying, it proves that a Multitasker is the only way the current game state works, and that breaks a lot of the mechanical aspects wide open. I've sort of accepted the inevitability of it. I think it's dumb, and I don't think it narrows down the scum, like, at all, but being dead is a lot less stressful than being alive.
EuchreJack:Because I'm not scum.Webadict is reaching too hard.
I KNOW the mafia team isn't EuchreJack/Max/Toonyman
How do you ALL CAPS KNOW this?
Alternate Theory: Scum team is Webadict and Toaster, they tried to kill ME, they failed, and are now looking for the doctor.
@Toaster: Do you see any connections between Web & Roden?
@Web: Why are you pushing the Two Roleblocking Scum when Toaster being a lying Ascetic Roleblocker explains everything?
Or I, knowing something I haven't yet disclosed (but I'm about to), wanted to hit Max for maximum pressure to see how he reacted.This was unwise. I don't believe in "pressure". I would have reacted exactly the same to your action if you hadn't voted, simply on the understanding that you had roleblocked me and were using that to implicate me as the killer.
In reading your Web/Toaster case post (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8346111#msg8346111), I can't help but notice you don't really lay out any accusations against me. Sure, you've got something on Web, but me it's... because I have Web as my only town read? That's it?First, that's not it. Roden's interactions with you are suspicious (and I believe Roden) and I also included NJW's reads. You don't have much activity on D1, but I've been trying to pay attention to player's behavior with one another.
Gonna throw this out here; if Maximum Spin is Town, it's probably Roden as scum, who tried to kill Maximum Spin last night and failed. He- instead of claiming a Null on me and lending me credibility- claims getting blocked to do me no favors and instead set out confusion. It's... not impossible, certainly. I'd need to think on who Roden's theoretical partner is in this case. If Roden's not a cop, then my role needs extant investigative abilities to make sense. Other investigations? Web's motion detector, Toony might have a investigative invention, and Magma hasn't claimed? It's... possible?Funny how you pointed out I was either/or-ing NJW and you, but you're either/or-ing Max and Roden here.
I should clarify that; Toony seems scummy because his arguments suck.Magma seems to think that too.
Why is everyone else OK with Magma not claiming?I'm neutral. It's okay for the same reasons you not sharing what my item is or what Max's role are good, but it's bad if Magma is mafia.
UnvoteZero chance of me ever claiming sry
I'm having internet problems and doubts about Webadict being scum.
I'd like to vote Magma to get him to claim, but internet problems and insufficient time to push and argue the issue.
Why is everyone else OK with Magma not claiming?
webadict (1): Maximum Spin
EuchreJack (0):
Maximum Spin (1): Toaster
Roden (0):
Jim Groovester (0):
ToonyMan (1): Magma Mater
Magma Mater (0):
Toaster (1): Roden
Not Voting (4): EuchreJack, webadict, Jim Groovester, ToonyMan
I'm also voting Webadict, but let's make that accurate by unvoting.I claimed to have not blocked Roden.
So let me get this straight: We don't know how Roden was roleblocked. Everybody has claimed an action besides Jim and Magma. However, Jim has claimed Day 3 Innocent so he gets a pass. Magma has not claimed and refuses to claim except that they're a ninja and did not action Jack...or at least wouldn't show up on Web's sensors. I've been assuming Roden was blocked because of Toaster or Web, but Magma is a complete unknown.
Look, we need to pick someone inside Magma/Toaster/Webadict because at least one of them is lying. I'm excluding Jim, because again he'll be a known quantity tomorrow.
I don't believe Roden is lying. They claimed second, right after NJW, there haven't been any other cop claims, and we've had two roleclaims that would mess with him. Besides that I feel they're being genuine.My reasoning for what, for suspecting Roden? The entire reason for why I'm not voting Roden right now is because of the cop claim. I think his play has been by far the scummiest today, for reasons I've already mentioned. The tl;dr being that he isn't trying to find scum at all.
Magma, you voted NJW mainly because NJW's vote on Roden looked bad, right? Do you believe your reasoning is better, why?
N1:
Jim does nothing
Toaster jails Maximum Spin
EuchreJack gives radio to Maximum Spin
Maximum Spin targets EuchreJack, is blocked
Roden tries to inspect Toaster, is blocked
webadict targets EuchreJack, gets three pings
Magma Mater does not block Roden/did not target EuchreJack
ToonyMan gives item to EuchreJack
Toaster's claim is supported by Maximum Spin's claim
ToonyMan's claim is supported by EuchreJack
EuchreJack's claim is supported by MaximumSpin
I don't believe Roden is lying.
My reasoning for what, for suspecting Roden? The entire reason for why I'm not voting Roden right now is because of the cop claim. I think his play has been by far the scummiest today, for reasons I've already mentioned. The tl;dr being that he isn't trying to find scum at all.
My second suspect is Roden. I feel like he's coasting on the Cop claim. His play here contrasts greatly from the other game we played together, where he was town and actively trying to solve the game. In this game, he's talking more about his own role interactions with Toaster and waiting for other people to post. I get the impression that he's comfortable allowing the lynch to fall wherever it falls today.
Okay, but why am I a better vote over Roden if my action is confirmed by Jack? Roden claiming cop is also mechanical but isn't even confirmable currently.I don't believe Roden is lying. They claimed second, right after NJW, there haven't been any other cop claims, and we've had two roleclaims that would mess with him. Besides that I feel they're being genuine.My reasoning for what, for suspecting Roden? The entire reason for why I'm not voting Roden right now is because of the cop claim. I think his play has been by far the scummiest today, for reasons I've already mentioned. The tl;dr being that he isn't trying to find scum at all.
Magma, you voted NJW mainly because NJW's vote on Roden looked bad, right? Do you believe your reasoning is better, why?
Regarding Magma: Did Magma say that they didn't action me? Or did we just assume they said that? Magma did claim ninja, but they threw that into their Obviously Fake claim on D1. So the Ninja part actually looks legit.
Checking in. No-kill is surprising. I'll say that I was neither responsible for the lack of kill, nor did I target EuchreJack. More later.
I'm inclined to vote Roden over Magma, purely because Magma seems to have more to offer. Roden's ability is patently unreliable, and Roden pulled the only parlor trick he could out of it. Magma has unlimited potential. Even better, if Magma is town, that unlimited potential means drawing a night kill over someone that is more obviously town. Going to the grave to keep secret? What commitment! I'm swooning over Magma!Well, I'm not swooning over it.
That's what I thought, and then here (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8346347#msg8346347) they give me this corrective attitude by saying "I claimed to have not blocked Roden" when I mentioned that.Regarding Magma: Did Magma say that they didn't action me? Or did we just assume they said that? Magma did claim ninja, but they threw that into their Obviously Fake claim on D1. So the Ninja part actually looks legit.Yes.Checking in. No-kill is surprising. I'll say that I was neither responsible for the lack of kill, nor did I target EuchreJack. More later.
Because as crazy as I am, "Scum Cop" is a crazy assumption to make at 8p. Especially with so many unknowns. The truth is that his claim has earned him some slank cover. If he's still slanking at 5p then I'll be willing to reassess.N1:
Jim does nothing
Toaster jails Maximum Spin
EuchreJack gives radio to Maximum Spin
Maximum Spin targets EuchreJack, is blocked
Roden tries to inspect Toaster, is blocked
webadict targets EuchreJack, gets three pings
Magma Mater does not block Roden/did not target EuchreJack
ToonyMan gives item to EuchreJack
Toaster's claim is supported by Maximum Spin's claim
ToonyMan's claim is supported by EuchreJack
EuchreJack's claim is supported by MaximumSpin
So I'm thinking. Aren't there more actions than there are people?
webadict, EuchreJack, and ToonyMan account for four - Inventor item giveaway to Jack, Jack giving away a radio, webadict targeting EuchreJack and getting three pings, and the unclaimed third ping that webadict claimed
Roden accounts for two - Roden's blocked inspection, the unclaimed blocker
Toaster and Maximum Spin together account for two - Maximum Spin attempting something on EuchreJack, getting jailed by Toaster
Magma Mater claims to not have targeted either Roden or EuchreJack
This is nine actions with eight remaining players in a game with seven roles that can actually perform actions.
So,
Roden is lying about being blocked
Toaster is lying (or is wrong) and is actually an ascetic
webadict lied about targeting EuchreJack or the number of pings he got
Magma Mater lied about who they targeted
I'm inclined to believe Roden and Toaster more than I am Magma Mater and webadict at this point.I don't believe Roden is lying.
Roden was also the first person to claim some sort of failed role result on Toaster.My reasoning for what, for suspecting Roden? The entire reason for why I'm not voting Roden right now is because of the cop claim. I think his play has been by far the scummiest today, for reasons I've already mentioned. The tl;dr being that he isn't trying to find scum at all.My second suspect is Roden. I feel like he's coasting on the Cop claim. His play here contrasts greatly from the other game we played together, where he was town and actively trying to solve the game. In this game, he's talking more about his own role interactions with Toaster and waiting for other people to post. I get the impression that he's comfortable allowing the lynch to fall wherever it falls today.
Why is a 75% reliable cop who's scummy because he's coasting on his cop claim and who you suspect of lying not worth voting because of his cop claim?
Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm there's a lot about Magma Mater that's bothering me, and more than webadict right now.
Magma Mater.
@Magma:Why would I care if your inventor claim is confirmed? How is that relevant?Okay, but why am I a better vote over Roden if my action is confirmed by Jack? Roden claiming cop is also mechanical but isn't even confirmable currently.I don't believe Roden is lying. They claimed second, right after NJW, there haven't been any other cop claims, and we've had two roleclaims that would mess with him. Besides that I feel they're being genuine.My reasoning for what, for suspecting Roden? The entire reason for why I'm not voting Roden right now is because of the cop claim. I think his play has been by far the scummiest today, for reasons I've already mentioned. The tl;dr being that he isn't trying to find scum at all.
Magma, you voted NJW mainly because NJW's vote on Roden looked bad, right? Do you believe your reasoning is better, why?
Just acknowledging this and repeating that I won't be claiming today.I'm inclined to vote Roden over Magma, purely because Magma seems to have more to offer. Roden's ability is patently unreliable, and Roden pulled the only parlor trick he could out of it. Magma has unlimited potential. Even better, if Magma is town, that unlimited potential means drawing a night kill over someone that is more obviously town. Going to the grave to keep secret? What commitment! I'm swooning over Magma!Well, I'm not swooning over it.
I think I'm actually going to vote Magma. What'd you do last night?
PPE:That's what I thought, and then here (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8346347#msg8346347) they give me this corrective attitude by saying "I claimed to have not blocked Roden" when I mentioned that.Regarding Magma: Did Magma say that they didn't action me? Or did we just assume they said that? Magma did claim ninja, but they threw that into their Obviously Fake claim on D1. So the Ninja part actually looks legit.Yes.Checking in. No-kill is surprising. I'll say that I was neither responsible for the lack of kill, nor did I target EuchreJack. More later.
Because as crazy as I am, "Scum Cop" is a crazy assumption to make at 8p. Especially with so many unknowns. The truth is that his claim has earned him some slank cover. If he's still slanking at 5p then I'll be willing to reassess.You know why those unknowns exist, right?
Why would I care if your inventor claim is confirmed? How is that relevant?I can't be lying unless I'm mafia with Jack. Mafia have to be lying in this situation to account for the unknowns, therefore voting someone who could be lying sounds sensible to me.
Are you actually trying to imply that you cannot possibly be a mafia inventor??Because as crazy as I am, "Scum Cop" is a crazy assumption to make at 8p. Especially with so many unknowns. The truth is that his claim has earned him some slank cover. If he's still slanking at 5p then I'll be willing to reassess.You know why those unknowns exist, right?Why would I care if your inventor claim is confirmed? How is that relevant?I can't be lying unless I'm mafia with Jack. Mafia have to be lying in this situation to account for the unknowns, therefore voting someone who could be lying sounds sensible to me.
Why would I care if your inventor claim is confirmed? How is that relevant?Because you might be able to ascertain whether or not ToonyMan is scum via the inventor claim. Or "more likely scum" vs. "More Likely Town".
Cop claim is relevant because we have a flipped miller. Inventor claim is totally different.
ToonyMan could TOTALLY be a mafia inventor. But is it more likely than ToonyMan being a Town inventor? That is the question!Are you actually trying to imply that you cannot possibly be a mafia inventor??Because as crazy as I am, "Scum Cop" is a crazy assumption to make at 8p. Especially with so many unknowns. The truth is that his claim has earned him some slank cover. If he's still slanking at 5p then I'll be willing to reassess.You know why those unknowns exist, right?Why would I care if your inventor claim is confirmed? How is that relevant?I can't be lying unless I'm mafia with Jack. Mafia have to be lying in this situation to account for the unknowns, therefore voting someone who could be lying sounds sensible to me.
Seriously, the "unknowns" that people are basing the entire game on could both be explained by moderation quirks.Good points, especially in a Fallacy game.
1. The Roden "block" can be explained by either of them not understanding their role / result correctly.
2. The webadict 3rd person can be Max who was blocked but still counts as "targeting".
The most likely scenario here is that y'all are chasing after a couple of red herrings. I don't get why that's difficult to understand for the people in this game. Just play Mafia please.
Uhhh off the top of my head, reasons for giving a gift to town-Jack instead of to a scumbuddy:Why would I care if your inventor claim is confirmed? How is that relevant?Because you might be able to ascertain whether or not ToonyMan is scum via the inventor claim. Or "more likely scum" vs. "More Likely Town".
Cop claim is relevant because we have a flipped miller. Inventor claim is totally different.
Why do you think ToonyMan gave me something? Why not someone else? Why not their scumbuddy?
Who needs a fake claim when your scum buddy can just GIVE you something to do?
That's not what I'm saying.Are you actually trying to imply that you cannot possibly be a mafia inventor??Because as crazy as I am, "Scum Cop" is a crazy assumption to make at 8p. Especially with so many unknowns. The truth is that his claim has earned him some slank cover. If he's still slanking at 5p then I'll be willing to reassess.You know why those unknowns exist, right?Why would I care if your inventor claim is confirmed? How is that relevant?I can't be lying unless I'm mafia with Jack. Mafia have to be lying in this situation to account for the unknowns, therefore voting someone who could be lying sounds sensible to me.
Seriously, the "unknowns" that people are basing the entire game on could both be explained by moderation quirks.I try to present cases and people say they suck (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8346328#msg8346328).
Just play Mafia please.
Seriously, the "unknowns" that people are basing the entire game on could both be explained by moderation quirks.Good points, especially in a Fallacy game.
1. The Roden "block" can be explained by either of them not understanding their role / result correctly.
2. The webadict 3rd person can be Max who was blocked but still counts as "targeting".
The most likely scenario here is that y'all are chasing after a couple of red herrings. I don't get why that's difficult to understand for the people in this game. Just play Mafia please.
Other than ToonyMan, what are your other suspects?
@ToonyMan: What are YOUR other suspects?
Maybe you two could agree to go after them instead of each other? :'(
By "play mafia" I mean vote for people other than me, obviously! 8)That's not what I'm saying.Are you actually trying to imply that you cannot possibly be a mafia inventor??Because as crazy as I am, "Scum Cop" is a crazy assumption to make at 8p. Especially with so many unknowns. The truth is that his claim has earned him some slank cover. If he's still slanking at 5p then I'll be willing to reassess.You know why those unknowns exist, right?Why would I care if your inventor claim is confirmed? How is that relevant?I can't be lying unless I'm mafia with Jack. Mafia have to be lying in this situation to account for the unknowns, therefore voting someone who could be lying sounds sensible to me.
I'm not accounting for the unknowns. I've decided my choices are between the four players that are. I want to believe Roden so that leaves Toaster, Webadict, and you. Strangely enough these are most of the players I've been suspicious of this whole game!
PPE:Seriously, the "unknowns" that people are basing the entire game on could both be explained by moderation quirks.I try to present cases and people say they suck (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=178730.msg8346328#msg8346328).
Just play Mafia please.
@ToonyMan: What are YOUR other suspects?I'm only voting Magma, Toaster, or Webadict.
It occurs to me, Toaster, that since you appear not to have read the previous rounds, you don't know that we've already had two setups where scum didn't actually have an immediate kill at all. It is extremely possible that the no-kill was not a choice.I think we should wait for Magma Mater to confirm their action. I will unvote for now.
I don't think Toaster is scum here. I think it's very likely to be Maximum Spin, ToonyMan, or maybe Magma Mater.
Seriously, the "unknowns" that people are basing the entire game on could both be explained by moderation quirks.
1. The Roden "block" can be explained by either of them not understanding their role / result correctly.
2. The webadict 3rd person can be Max who was blocked but still counts as "targeting".
The most likely scenario here is that y'all are chasing after a couple of red herrings. I don't get why that's difficult to understand for the people in this game. Just play Mafia please.
How come Web isn't voting?
We need to pick somebody. I don't want to screw around and get a no lynch.Toaster or Webadict? Princess Choice
The downside is that Jim will likely die tonight, but that might not be such a terrible thing, given his reads LOL
We need to pick somebody. I don't want to screw around and get a no lynch.Toaster or Webadict? Princess Choice
If it's between myself, web and Toaster then...
Toaster
The downside is that Jim will likely die tonight, but that might not be such a terrible thing, given his reads LOL
If it's between myself, web and Toaster then...
Toaster
The downside is that Jim will likely die tonight, but that might not be such a terrible thing, given his reads LOL
Oh wow a tie :|
Roden is voting Toaster, so 3 votes on Toaster. I don't see the tie.
+1Roden is voting Toaster, so 3 votes on Toaster. I don't see the tie.
If I have a complaint about this game it would be lack of votecounts.
If it's between myself, web and Toaster then...
Toaster
The downside is that Jim will likely die tonight, but that might not be such a terrible thing, given his reads LOL
If I have a complaint about this game it would be lack of votecounts.Right away. In the future of this game, I'll try to get one out per real-life day to make things more clear.
webadict (3): Maximum Spin, Jim Groovester, EuchreJack
EuchreJack (0):
Maximum Spin (1): Toaster
Roden (0):
Jim Groovester (0):
ToonyMan (0):
Magma Mater (0):
Toaster (3): Roden, Magma Mater, ToonyMan
No Execution (0):
Not Voting (1): webadict
5 to hammer.
Please just vote Toaster, if I'm wrong then you're all free to yell at me post game.You know what? Okay.
Please just vote Toaster, if I'm wrong then you're all free to yell at me post game.An offer I can't refuse.
webadict (1): Jim Groovester
EuchreJack (0):
Maximum Spin (1): Toaster
Roden (0):
Jim Groovester (0):
ToonyMan (0):
Magma Mater (0):
Toaster (5): Roden, Magma Mater, ToonyMan, Maximum Spin, EuchreJack
No Execution (0):
Not Voting (1): webadict
5 to hammer.
Non-Consecutive Investigative-Null Jailkeeper (town):
(Auto) Non-Consecutive: Your psychic will puts too much strain on you if you use it against the same mind multiple times. You cannot use Imprison on the same player two Nights in a row.
(Auto) Investigation Nullification: Thanks to your obscured psychic presence, investigative abilities return NULL RESULT instead of any information gathered from you directly or indirectly.
(Night) Imprison [target]: You lock your target in a psychic barrier, roleblocking them and causing them to be protected from targeted kills during this Night.
Day 3 Innocent (town):
(Auto) Evidence of Innocence: Once you get your documentation sorted out, you can conclusively prove that you’re not a vile traitor. Once Day 3 starts, you will be publicly confirmed to be town-aligned.
webadict (0):
EuchreJack (0):
Maximum Spin (0):
Roden (0):
ToonyMan (0):
Magma Mater (0):
No Execution (0):
Not Voting (6): webadict, EuchreJack, Maximum Spin, Roden, ToonyMan, Magma Mater
4 to hammer.
What are you?I'm just a man. A man who loves his country.
I have a red check on EuchreJack. Since it's mylo I won't vote right away, but that's probably where I'll be placing my vote.
Care to tell us whom you neighborized last night?I have a red check on EuchreJack. Since it's mylo I won't vote right away, but that's probably where I'll be placing my vote.
Well, since you think it's MYLO, I won't vote you now. Instead, explain the red check on me?
Actually, no.Care to tell us whom you neighborized last night?I have a red check on EuchreJack. Since it's mylo I won't vote right away, but that's probably where I'll be placing my vote.
Well, since you think it's MYLO, I won't vote you now. Instead, explain the red check on me?
So, I think the best strategy is No Lynch.Tell me you're scum with Max, without telling me that you're scum with Max. ???
It gives all of us one more chance to use our powers before we have to lynch or lose.
If mafia chooses to no kill, even better.
I don't think Max needs to claim unless he got results because the kill of Jim and the Jailkeeping of Max show the most likely outcome is that Mafia tried to kill Max Night 1.
Otherwise, we have a doctor or a scumteam with Max that decided to no-kill.
Disregarding the accusation, which is a legit question, what are your thoughts on a No Lynch?Why would I want to no lynch when I have a red check
I got an innocent result on Max. I'm genuinely so lost. This means there was a 75% chance scum legit tried to NK Max on Night 1. And that the mafia blocked me to stop me from confirming a Null passive instead of blocking literally any other useful action.Your result was correct, at least, I'll promise you that.
I don't think Max needs to claim unless he got results because the kill of Jim and the Jailkeeping of Max show the most likely outcome is that Mafia tried to kill Max Night 1.Besides that, Roden is 75% clearing them.
My N2 claim:Neat, me too.
I did something last night.
So... It's Magma Mater and ToonyMan?Oh, you are being suspected. Just not as much.
Also, why am I not being suspected anymore?
just claim your target jack so that we can all move on with our lives, thanks.No. I don't cave in to mafia demands.
you've claimed neighborizer. in what world does someone with a town PoV have anything to gain by withholding their target?just claim your target jack so that we can all move on with our lives, thanks.No. I don't cave in to mafia demands.
If you were town (which you aren't) you would be respecting this, Mr. No Claim.
you've claimed neighborizer. in what world does someone with a town PoV have anything to gain by withholding their target?This one. Trust me on this.
you were blocked the night of a no-kill, and you want me to trust you LOLyou've claimed neighborizer. in what world does someone with a town PoV have anything to gain by withholding their target?This one. Trust me on this.
Max did in fact tell me what he did last night.Yes, I see that. I am not entirely sure why, but I assume that the ringing in my ears is my fillings picking up radio waves, and not my Tinnitus flaring up.So... It's Magma Mater and ToonyMan?Oh, you are being suspected. Just not as much.
Also, why am I not being suspected anymore?
just claim your target jack so that we can all move on with our lives, thanks.'Twasn't I. I can hear a voice in my head, and it's not Euchre's.
Why would Max be cleared? Who is he cleared by?Max did in fact tell me what he did last night.Yes, I see that. I am not entirely sure why, but I assume that the ringing in my ears is my fillings picking up radio waves, and not my Tinnitus flaring up.So... It's Magma Mater and ToonyMan?Oh, you are being suspected. Just not as much.
Also, why am I not being suspected anymore?
O overlords, please feed us poor beleaguered fools some morsels.just claim your target jack so that we can all move on with our lives, thanks.'Twasn't I. I can hear a voice in my head, and it's not Euchre's.
Also, he just said Roden was suspicious, so either Roden is the world's worst negotiator, or the radio fell into ToonyMan's dictatorial grasp, and I will be executed shortly under the hellish regime that has formed. I only request that a state funeral be held.
Anyway, for real, if Max is cleared, it probably not Euchre and Max, so it really is between us three. Neither Roden nor I can be confirmed, so if you have a confirmable action, you should literally claim it, Magma. It only hurts you to not do so.
Anyway, I was blocked last night. The red check is the realization that Jack used two actions on night one. Even from the PoV of other people, I don't think there's any possibility other than Jack being the person who blocked Roden night one. This is something we should have realized yesterday, but I was too stubborn in my thinking that there was an error of some sort at play.Would you mind running through your theory for the benefit of those who aren't me, at the very least?
Anyway, I was blocked last night. The red check is the realization that Jack used two actions on night one. Even from the PoV of other people, I don't think there's any possibility other than Jack being the person who blocked Roden night one. This is something we should have realized yesterday, but I was too stubborn in my thinking that there was an error of some sort at play.I see. So then you think it's Max and Euchre or Euchre and Toony (But not Max and Toony)? Because that theory relies on you thinking Roden and I are both Town.
I see. So then you think it's Max and Euchre or Euchre and Toony (But not Max and Toony)? Because that theory relies on you thinking Roden and I are both Town.It honestly can't be Euchre and Toony unless you believe one of the following:
From these claims, I think it's nearly confirmed to everyone that there is a mafia roleblocker. For there to not be a mafia roleblocker, you have to assume that Roden and I are both mafia. To assume that, you have to believe that Roden was given a useless Cop role (we know that he has this role, since there were multiple millers) as mafia. I think you'd have to take a pretty big leap in judgement to believe this.Well, I got bad news for you, kid.
Oh my God. Thank you, this just made the game so much easier.From these claims, I think it's nearly confirmed to everyone that there is a mafia roleblocker. For there to not be a mafia roleblocker, you have to assume that Roden and I are both mafia. To assume that, you have to believe that Roden was given a useless Cop role (we know that he has this role, since there were multiple millers) as mafia. I think you'd have to take a pretty big leap in judgement to believe this.Well, I got bad news for you, kid.
Roden's a damn liar. He sure didn't get a clear result on me last night because I'm a tracker, and I know he visited webadict instead.
Class, who can tell me what we do to liars in this game? I appreciate the gesture of clearing me, but no, you go in the pit.
And since Roden is indeed a liar, there's no reason to believe he got roleblocked last night either, which means there's no reason to believe you're getting roleblocked now, Magma.
Anyway, let's remember that Toaster's auto applied to all investigative abilities, so probably also mine (and another that I... know exists...), while it's entirely possible that NJW's was just there to provoke the traditional d1 miller claim with the effect that it did, indeed, have. I think it's just more likely that Roden claimed unreliable cop for exactly the reasons I stated on d1, which statement was probably also the reason I would've been the n1 kill target.
I'll take some responsibility here.Thanks for the answers Jack, but this raises even more questions.
1) I suggested that Max track Roden. Dunno if Max was going to do so anyway.
2) I told Max to not claim Day 2. Figured it would be more powerful if Max kept quiet about his role until he actually got to use it (since Max was blocked Day 1).
3) I thought it might be best for the New Neighbor to remain silent for as long as possible.
So yeah, blaming Max is somewhat incorrect.
I think that Max just mech locked himself as scum with that claim LOLThat's how it looks, I just don't understand why he did this. He basically turned a really scary and vague Final 6 MELO into a straightforward 1v1 (or 2v1, technically). Because with this claim, he's proven that I didn't do the kill since he only saw me target Web. And by saying a scum Roleblocker doesn't exist and accusing you of being my partner, that means you would've had to have done the kill. Except you're claiming Ninja, and Web wouldn't be able to see it. And isn't pushing you to claim your role or who you targeted. It doesn't add up.
The only real assumption you need to make is that I am not lying about being a ninja.
I need to go to bed, and also I need to think about this for a bit. If the game is solved for me, that would be pretty great.
But what I don't understand is the logic of this play. Obviously I'm a pretty good target to scapegoat after I fucked up with the Toaster elim, but still. I don't understand the logic of fake claiming that I targeted Web. Or why Max thinks targeting Web would make me scum when Jim is the one who died. Or why he "Tracked" me in the first place tbh.Well, it's really simple: You targeted Web. I assume Magma killed Jim. Based on the available information, maybe it could be someone else - you could even be teamed with web if you're actually a lawyer or inventor or something else who would want to target your teammate - but I don't think so, because the roleblock Magma claimed isn't coming from anywhere unless you are specifically teamed with webadict and there's multitasking on the kill. Given that I know this actual version of the events last night:
Except you're claiming Ninja, and Web wouldn't be able to see it. And isn't pushing you to claim your role or who you targeted. It doesn't add up.You do have a history of doing this. That is to say, making a really obvious logical error and hoping nobody will point it out. Obviously, Magma isn't actually a ninja. He's the only one who said so.
I have no idea. Thanks for roleblocking me, though.This bit was worrying me for some time, because I assumed it was a negative thing he attempted to perform (On EuchreJack, as he said.)
[...]
Anyway, EuchreJack has convinced me that he's either town or absolutely stupid, and I don't think he's absolutely stupid.
Roden claimed second, which really does put a lot of Towncred on Roden, and for the most part, that claim has been maintained throughout the game.This is going to be one of those weird games. Anyway, I'm a miller.I believe this claim. My role is useless, I'm an Unreliable Cop.
Hmmm...ok. But something isn't adding up.Roden claims the Roleblock on N1. Assuming that Roden is scum, this might be an explanation to the no-kill on N1, as Roden attempted to kill Maximum Spin, who was protected. It doesn't really make sense for Roden to claim being blocked, though. It is a complication measure that hasn't been explained.
I targeted Toaster last night but was also Roleblocked. I thought he might've been lying and was actually just Ascetic, but you're also claiming that you were Roleblocked. My Unreliable passive can't cause my action to fail either, I was specifically told something else caused it to fail. This is why I asked if you targeted Toaster.
Toaster can still be Ascetic I guess, since I don't know how we both could've been blocked here otherwise. But I'm just not sure why he would lie about his role if he's town. Then again, I'm not sure why anyone would waste their Roleblock on me just to stop me from confirming that Toaster is Null to investigations.
Why did you target Jack, btw?
For your list:1. If Roden is a scum cop, he claims the null result on Toaster IMO. He also simply targets Max on n2 if his plan is to claim to have targeted Max. The only reason for him to be lying about his target is if he is a scum role other than cop.
1. It's not entirely impossible for Roden to be a scum Cop. I do think that's not very likely, but it's partially why it's hard to think Roden is scum.
2. You could very well be a scum Ninja, so this isn't too risky at all. Combined with the fact that you haven't fully claimed your role, this isn't exactly a point I consider.
3. This point is incorrect: One Night 1, one of you could've targeted Maximum Spin and the other targeted EuchreJack. If you're a Ninja, then you would have been Max's potential killer, OR no kill was performed, for whatever reason.
4. This would have to be true, assuming no Multitasking. In this case, Roden could be a Role Cop. However, this fails because Roden still would've targeted Maximum Spin or ToonyMan, so Roden's role would be entirely unknown in this case.
5. This is true. The real kicker was asking Maximum Spin if Max also targeted Toaster, to see if investigative roles were essentially roleblocked. This makes either assumption pretty decent, but there does appear to be genuine confusion about it.
6. In this situation, it was likely assumed I would be voted out next, so allowing for Max to be cleared was a safer bet than red checking me. This also opens up some obfuscation in case there is another Day Tomorrow.
To me, it seems as though ToonyMan would be a person to convince here, as well, but a lot of the explanations have been going to me. This is concerning for a lot of reasons, not the least of which is that ToonyMan is very much wrapped up in his chat. It does seem like No Launch would be a beneficial vote for either party, unless there is a Delayer.I'm explaining to you because you said that you might vote for Roden, even though he's unlikely to be scum specifically from your PoV.
I think, if your perspective is true, then you two have no reason to not vote Maximum Spin or No Launch. Of course, I'm really only saying this because I want to be cleared, but it seems odd that you wouldn't consider me being the Roleblocker, as this perfectly covers all the bases: Max kills N1, I RB Roden, Max kills N2, I RB you. In this case, Max and I are the scumteam, AND it's even easier than EuchreJack + Maximim Spin. But, really, this is a forcing play on you. You need to convince one of ToonyMan or EuchreJack to also agree with you (or both of them if you accept I'm scum) that Maximum Spin is scum, or you need to No Launch. Those are the options as I see them.
I wanted to add my second neighbor before using the device.@Toony, in your mind, was Jack justified in doing this? Is your invention less useful than a neighbor?
You'll find out what Toonyman gave me...when I use it. Not before.
Why is Mr. No Claim asking me this?
Lol, are you fishing to try to figure out whether ToonyMan is the MTN?I wanted to add my second neighbor before using the device.@Toony, in your mind, was Jack justified in doing this? Is your invention less useful than a neighbor?
You'll find out what Toonyman gave me...when I use it. Not before.
Why is Mr. No Claim asking me this?
@Toony, why did you give Max a bulletproof vest?Because I believed mafia tried to kill him on N1 for some reason and would want to do it again. I could have given the BP to Jim, but I overthought it. I did something similar in the Gnosia game here as the Guardian Angel.
I don't know, maybe.I wanted to add my second neighbor before using the device.@Toony, in your mind, was Jack justified in doing this? Is your invention less useful than a neighbor?
You'll find out what Toonyman gave me...when I use it. Not before.
Why is Mr. No Claim asking me this?
Also Magma you might want to claim, it's not like you're dying tonight if we no lynch.exactly, so no point claiming before tomorrow 8)
There's a bit of a complication, though, for Roden, besides the current situation, which is N1:The Roleblock N1 is proven to come from scum though? I made it clear I was targeting Toaster, and the first thing I claimed D2 was that I targeted Toaster, before anyone else made a single claim. If I was scum, I would've risked getting contradicted by town claims. If I was Roleblocked by town, I wouldn't show up on the motion count you gave and town would claim it by now. The only possible thing you could claim is that Magma fake claimed Ninja (??? What?) and I used Multi-Tasking to target both Toaster and Max.Hmmm...ok. But something isn't adding up.Roden claims the Roleblock on N1. Assuming that Roden is scum, this might be an explanation to the no-kill on N1, as Roden attempted to kill Maximum Spin, who was protected. It doesn't really make sense for Roden to claim being blocked, though. It is a complication measure that hasn't been explained.
I targeted Toaster last night but was also Roleblocked. I thought he might've been lying and was actually just Ascetic, but you're also claiming that you were Roleblocked. My Unreliable passive can't cause my action to fail either, I was specifically told something else caused it to fail. This is why I asked if you targeted Toaster.
Toaster can still be Ascetic I guess, since I don't know how we both could've been blocked here otherwise. But I'm just not sure why he would lie about his role if he's town. Then again, I'm not sure why anyone would waste their Roleblock on me just to stop me from confirming that Toaster is Null to investigations.
Why did you target Jack, btw?
Roden also claims targeting Maximum Spin N2, which is another complication measure.
Honestly, I think I'd probably vote Roden in this situation, with the assumption that the Roleblocker doesn't exist. What would you say to that, Roden? If Maximum Spin is scum, who's his partner? Work through it with me.
PPE: I'll think about it more tomorrow, but it's possible this is a trap set by Maximum Spin? I'm a bit sleepy, but this could be a neat trap to test if Magma and I are scum. I'm not really in a rush to vote yet, because there's still plenty of time, so let's just think about it until then.
Do you plan to no lynch today?Also Magma you might want to claim, it's not like you're dying tonight if we no lynch.exactly, so no point claiming before tomorrow 8)
I'd prefer to kill Max, honestly. I don't see myself reevaluating after a nolynch.Do you plan to no lynch today?Also Magma you might want to claim, it's not like you're dying tonight if we no lynch.exactly, so no point claiming before tomorrow 8)
webadict (0):
EuchreJack (0):
Maximum Spin (1): Roden
Roden (1): Maximum Spin
ToonyMan (0):
Magma Mater (0):
No Execution (1): ToonyMan
Not Voting (3): webadict, EuchreJack, Magma Mater
4 to hammer.
Alright, I apologize for being busy.Are you kidding me.
... I'm gonna get shit for this if I'm wrong, and I'm gonna deserve it.
Maximum Spin.
I'm also going to say that I don't think it's EuchreJack, and that it's probably ToonyMan, but I think I die Tonight either way.Nobody dies tonight if you're wrong, the game will probably end before then. So good job.
Alright, I apologize for being busy.
... I'm gonna get shit for this if I'm wrong, and I'm gonna deserve it.
Maximum Spin.
I don't know what to say today. No-lynching is logically better here than trying to vote someone who might be scum. I'm like 90% sure Max is the legit one here which makes you mafia Roden, but I'm not willing to throw the game over that when we could learn more tonight.Why do you think Max is legit? You didn't answer any of my questions.
So yes, if I were to vote someone today it would be you, Roden.
I'm totally open to no-lynch, to be clear.Yes, we all know you want Web dead.
No Lynch, so now tied and thus No Lynch?If you think I'm full of shit then why not vote me instead of No Lynch?
Four to Hammer.
I think Roden is full of shit, sorry Roden.
Magma is suspicious, but not quite as nonsensical.
webadict, how about this. I'm going to track you tonight to prove that I can track. Don't claim your target until I do.You can be a Tracker and still be Mafia.
25% chance of being Town is enough risk not to make it worthwhile. I just wish you'd explain yourself better. I couldn't even read your last "theory".
"25% chance of town" is a joke on your ability, which I think is fake.What?
I don't see why not. To me, there are a few issues.Alright, I apologize for being busy.
... I'm gonna get shit for this if I'm wrong, and I'm gonna deserve it.
Maximum Spin.
Mind explaining?
You know me, always suspicious. Just because Max is in the Neighborhood, doesn't mean I'm not getting played.
Although, I do think Max is town.
As for my preference for No Lynch, I'd rather use Toony's gift before making a vote that could end the game.Sometimes, you gotta aim high. I probably die Tonight unless ToonyMan has an extra vest in his bag of goodies, so I'm gonna put out what I think before I do. I think it's probably Max and Toony, but if I'm wrong, I'm wrong.
I'm surprised others don't want to use their stuff before ELO and avoid a less informative MLO.
webadict, how about this. I'm going to track you tonight to prove that I can track. Don't claim your target until I do.That would prove you're a Tracker, but might not necessarily prove you're Town. But, I'm like 99% sure I die Tonight either way, so it's not necessarily a bad plan.
@Roden: Isn't it true that Day 1 Max claimed to have a powerful role?That doesn't mean much tbh, you claimed you had a powerful role before and ended up being a Sandwich Vendor, lol. Why do you trust the Tracker claim but not the Cop claim when we have two Millers and a Motion Detector? And why do you think Max would be a higher priority target to me over anyone else?
I mean honestly when Max revealed in the Neighborhood that he was just a Tracker, I was disappointed.
It's harder to fake a tracker claim than a cop claim.Jack...Max only has one Tracker result, and he's using it to say I targeted Web instead of himself. Even disregarding how that's his only reason to think I'm scum and doesn't even implicate me in Jim's death, he has no real proof of his results.
Mafia can always fake a Cop claim, because they know who is town!
Faking Tracker requires either reporting on your scum buddy's movements or having some other investigation role.
Perhaps I overestimate Max and Toony's skill (or underestimate Roden's), and that will lead to my downfall, and if that's the case, it'll be determined tomorrow, but I'm pretty confident in their scum ability.I'm being completely honest and speaking entirely outside the game when I say that this means a lot. However (back inside the game)... if you feel such confidence... why would I have done this? Surely I could've claimed I tracked Magma, or you, or anyone else to Jim. Tracking Roden to you doesn't even answer what action actually took place or, on its own, prove anyone's alignment, and removes the only thing ostensibly confirming me town. I could have just said... "oops, guess Toaster was just misinformed after all, but hey, look, [anyone else] is the killer!", especially since I waited till last to claim and explicitly asked people to claim before me. (I actually did this because of the non-conclusiveness of the result, as I wanted to give Roden the chance to convince me he was just doing a town play... he did not)
Oof, my bad, that was Tric. I think the general point still stands that claiming to have a powerful role =/= actually having a powerful role. And even then that doesn't explain why I would try to NK Max instead of the IC claim.I actually never did claim to have a powerful role. I just said it was "useful". I didn't mean for people to read that much into it.
Let me ask you something else. When did he claim I targeted Web? Before or after Web claimed his results? And did he ever mention his results in your hood chat?
I'll respond in a bit Max, I just need these questions answered first.Let me ask you something else. When did he claim I targeted Web? Before or after Web claimed his results? And did he ever mention his results in your hood chat?
Max claimed the tracker results in the Neighborhood after Web gave his results. Past Noon on the 24th, so point Roden(Actually, a minor point: You know that I didn't actually understand that web was giving his results until after you said so, some time after I gave mine. I guess I could have faked that, but it would be pretty weird.)
Max claimed the tracker results in the Neighborhood after Web gave his results. Past Noon on the 24th, so point Roden(Actually, a minor point: You know that I didn't actually understand that web was giving his results until after you said so, some time after I gave mine. I guess I could have faked that, but it would be pretty weird.)
Ok, that's all the proof I need then. Max claimed his results before Web claimed his. And who did Web claim to target? Jim.Max claimed the tracker results in the Neighborhood after Web gave his results. Past Noon on the 24th, so point Roden(Actually, a minor point: You know that I didn't actually understand that web was giving his results until after you said so, some time after I gave mine. I guess I could have faked that, but it would be pretty weird.)
This does not look at all like someone that "knows" I'm lying. There isn't any surprise, not even a "are you sure you did that" type of statement. He accepts the clear and moves on. He then goes on to ask what everyone else's actions were without giving his own results. What reason could he possibly have to want to know what everyone else did first when he apparently already caught me in a lie?I got an innocent result on Max. I'm genuinely so lost. This means there was a 75% chance scum legit tried to NK Max on Night 1. And that the mafia blocked me to stop me from confirming a Null passive instead of blocking literally any other useful action.Your result was correct, at least, I'll promise you that.
I can confirm that EuchreJack did neighborize someone successfully, so he couldn't have done the kill without multitasking. Magma, would you care to elaborate on your suspicions? Do you have any actual mechanical information?
So I'm seeing the following...
Roden claims to have copped Maximum Spin
webadict claims to have counted Jim Groovester
Maximum Spin did... something
EuchreJack neighbourized (I know whom)
ToonyMan ?
Magma Mater ?
Frankly, I think Roden is a Role Cop. It would explain the missing visitor on me and why Web was visited Night 2.I'm sorry, what? Why do I target a claimed Motion Detector? Why do I target a claimed Neighborizer? Why wouldn't I target Toony to find out what his inventions are? Why wouldn't I target Magma or Max to find out what their roles were ahead of time? I feel like this just proves I'm not a Rolecop and that I never targeted you or Web. Those are literally the least useful targets I could've picked as a Rolecop.
Can anybody reasonably explain why an Inventor who claims on Day 1 doesn't get Rolecop'd, doesn't get Roleblocked, and doesn't get NK'd?I assume its because Toony said it was 50% reliable, or otherwise implied that his inventions had a decent chance of not working.
Max held off primarily because I advised him to hold off. It was my gambit, not Max's.Holding off on mentioning it isn't a gambit though. I gave my info in post 1, there's nothing to gambit on.
In fact, Max only claimed AT ALL because he so desperately wanted to do so.
My advice was to not mention it and secretly track Roden N3.Can anybody reasonably explain why an Inventor who claims on Day 1 doesn't get Rolecop'd, doesn't get Roleblocked, and doesn't get NK'd?I assume its because Toony said it was 50% reliable, or otherwise implied that his inventions had a decent chance of not working.
Toony, if your n1 invention is relevant at all you should prob claim it. I won't believe anything Jack claims it to be if you die lolIt goes bang bang.
Maximum SpinToony, if your n1 invention is relevant at all you should prob claim it. I won't believe anything Jack claims it to be if you die lolIt goes bang bang.
Throwing the game with a bad mech solve is a terrible habit of mine. I do it so often I even have a meme about how often I do it.This game wasn't mech solvable.
God damn it. Well played. I should have just stuck with my d2 reads instead of trying to mech solve. :(Were you seriously town this whole time? My god, you gave Roden so much help...
Roden was ALSO Town.God damn it. Well played. I should have just stuck with my d2 reads instead of trying to mech solve. :(Were you seriously town this whole time? My god, you gave Roden so much help...
Roden was ALSO Town....
Mafia can have ninjas too.It was not entirely fair for Town, and this wasn't even the half of it.
We're going to block Magma again and kill Roden tonight, so that's why I'm confident this is over.But what if Roden was lying?
It's true, if Roden is carrying a gun or something then FoU will have to let the game progress.
But I don't think Roden is lying.
Roden wasn't lying. Roden did target me.It's true, if Roden is carrying a gun or something then FoU will have to let the game progress.
But I don't think Roden is lying.
But you KNOW Roden is lying because Max is Town.
I wish I had explained this better, but one reason to keep some info confidential in The Neighborhood is that should that info be leaked, it shows one neighbor is probably scum.I realized this which is why I only told Web I got a radio and barely told him anything.
But yeah, I made some mistakes with Toonyman.
New Rule: Lynch Toonyman Day 1, ok?
Roden is 100% a 75% cop.It's true, if Roden is carrying a gun or something then FoU will have to let the game progress.
But I don't think Roden is lying.
But you KNOW Roden is lying because Max is Town.
But Roden SAID he targeted Max. So Roden lied. Roden never admitted to targeting Web.Roden wasn't lying. Roden did target me.It's true, if Roden is carrying a gun or something then FoU will have to let the game progress.
But I don't think Roden is lying.
But you KNOW Roden is lying because Max is Town.
I'm fucking throwing.
I got an innocent result on Max. I'm genuinely so lost. This means there was a 75% chance scum legit tried to NK Max on Night 1. And that the mafia blocked me to stop me from confirming a Null passive instead of blocking literally any other useful action.
Even worse, this means there's a 75% chance that I'm in MELO with Web and Toony and that at least one of them is mafia. I hate it here.
We have ninja redirecting.But Roden SAID he targeted Max. So Roden lied. Roden never admitted to targeting Web.Roden wasn't lying. Roden did target me.It's true, if Roden is carrying a gun or something then FoU will have to let the game progress.
But I don't think Roden is lying.
But you KNOW Roden is lying because Max is Town.
So your claim is that Web (not you, unless you got Multi as well) Ninja Redirected a 75% Cop onto his Mafia self.We have ninja redirecting.But Roden SAID he targeted Max. So Roden lied. Roden never admitted to targeting Web.Roden wasn't lying. Roden did target me.It's true, if Roden is carrying a gun or something then FoU will have to let the game progress.
But I don't think Roden is lying.
But you KNOW Roden is lying because Max is Town.
webadict (0):
EuchreJack (0):
Maximum Spin (4): webadict, Roden, Magma Mater, ToonyMan
Roden (0):
ToonyMan (0):
Magma Mater (0):
No Execution (2): EuchreJack, Maximum Spin
Not Voting (0):
4 to hammer.
Tracker (town):
(Night) Track [target]: You follow your target stealthily, tracking them with your keen eyes, and learn who (if anybody) they visited this Night.
2-Shot Neighborizer (town):
(2-Shot, Night) Neighborize [target]: You possess a set of portable radios, which give you access to a private chat which may be used at any time while you still live. During the Night you may give another player one of these radios to give them equal access to this chat.
75% Cop (town):
(Auto) Unreliable: The spirits do not always show the true nature of things. 25% of the time, Inspect will return the opposite of the result it would have had. A town alignment will appear to be mafia and traitors - mafia and mafia-allies - will appear to be town.
(Night) Inspect [target]: You see through the eyes of the fallen spirits of this cursed realm and learn your target’s alignment.
Ninja Bodyguard (town):
(Auto) Ninja Training: Your stealthy garb and precision of movement ensure that Track and Follow abilities fail if used on you and Watch and Voyeur abilities do not detect you.
(Night) Protect [target]: You use your protective training to protect your target, preventing kill actions from killing them this Night. However, this has a cost - if you successfully save them from a kill, you die in their place.
Concealed Busdriver (mafia):
(Night) Drive [target1/self][target2]: You sunder the world, altering casualty such that the targeting placed upon your first target and your second target is switched. You may affect yourself with this ability. Players whose targets are changed by this ability are deceived by your corruptive elements, and are not told that their targeting was changed.
Inventor (mafia):
(Night) Invent [self/target]: You give your target a cursed ability infused with demonic essence from your list of inventions - you may freely choose which one to give, but you cannot select the same one more than once. Additionally, you may choose to make an invention for yourself, and inventions will not appear in a death roleflip.Quote from: Inventions Reference:(1-Shot, Auto) Bulletproof: This hefty vest protects you from one kill action targeted at you.
(1-Shot, Night) Follow [target]: This spyglass allows you to discern the nature of your target’s activities, causing you to learn what category their action this Night occupied from the set of Investigative, Interference, Lethal, Other. If they perform no action, you receive a result of ‘Other’.
(1-Shot, Auto) Multitasking: This stimulant allows you to take one additional action during a Night of your choice, so long as that additional action does not target the same player or players as your first action.
(1-Shot, Auto) Strengthen: This lucky charm allows you to choose for your actions to be unaffected by action interference for one Night of your choice. For example: protection would not stop a kill you used, roleblocking you would do nothing, and redirection would not change your target.
Sorry, I forgot how unprepared I am for these quickfire Fallacy games, I'm always getting wiped out by work just as the game activity reaches it's peak.
Somebody said I'm not scum hunting, but I am, because I'm certain Toaster is scum and I've been pushing how his role isn't adding up. It's possible Web isn't voting because he wants to tie the vote. Or maybe he's a Mafia Ally and he gains nothing from bussing Toaster. Or Toaster could have the passive necessary to pull off alternative kills. Either way, we 100% need to have an overwhelming majority of votes to avoid ties. Please just vote Toaster, if I'm wrong then you're all free to yell at me post game.
@Max: Good play overall. Next time you probably won't get a radio. While it was fun working together on a private chat, I think we could get similar results without.I am completely sure that we could repeatedly get tricked into making bad decisions and jointly swing 100% of all lynches the wrong way with or without a private chat, yes.
ninja fruit vendor is a fakeclaim, it's a nonsense role.fucking finally someone gets it
NJW2000
I don't like the vote on Roden, and I don't like the vote on Toaster. I don't think that either make a lot of sense from your PoV if you're town.
Scumreading Roden especially is... you're supposedly a miller, how do you not town-read the cop claim??
NJW2000, someone break the tie, plz
The Toaster elim was 100% me throwing though since we almost voted out Web instead. That one really bothers me...Yeah, I definitely thought I was dead there, especially because I was typing a reply... And then fell asleep, so I never posted it.
The Toaster elim was 100% me throwing though since we almost voted out Web instead. That one really bothers me...I was sweating, trust me. Especially when Jim was pushing for Web and Jack joined them.
The Toaster elim was 100% me throwing though since we almost voted out Web instead. That one really bothers me...I was sweating, trust me. Especially when Jim was pushing for Web and Jack joined them.
I don't think this game was lost in the setup phase or the night phase. I think back to Magic Mafia and that setup may have favored the scum team in that one, but town absolutely had a chance to win that one, and I think the town fell into the same trap in that game as they did this game of focusing too much on the setup and the night results over just lynching the scummy dude.Yeah, we had thrice as much reason to go after you on N2 because we figured you'd actually lead the Town in a better direction, and being confirmed would've overridden EuchreJack, plus you seemed like you had gotten a good read on the scum at that point. It was vitally necessary to remove you at that point.
I don't feel great about offing NJW2000 or being after Magma Mater most of the game, but my feelings regarding webadict and to a lesser extent ToonyMan had some merit.The Toaster elim was 100% me throwing though since we almost voted out Web instead. That one really bothers me...I was sweating, trust me. Especially when Jim was pushing for Web and Jack joined them.
I should have pressed you on that. It did not go unnoticed.
Yeah, we had thrice as much reason to go after you on N2 because we figured you'd actually lead the Town in a better direction, and being confirmed would've overridden EuchreJack, plus you seemed like you had gotten a good read on the scum at that point. It was vitally necessary to remove you at that point.
Toony, what's your list on me? I'm curious how much it matches my own list on me- that chiefly I become way more passive when I have access to a group chat.I had none! I made it up!
Is there a scum chat link anywhere so that I canI don't know how to link Discord chats.flatter myself by seeing what you say about melook it over?
I didn't do very well, myself. I put too much faith in me stopping the kill via block instead of the protect half, and I didn't nearly push Toony hard enough, who I scumread the whole game. That block on Roden I knew should have cleared him, but I started second guessing myself then becoming unable to push myself to do something about it. Oh well.If you want my list, yes, passivity is definitely a scumtell of yours, but it's actually a bit better to say that you're more passionate as Town. There's an element that you can't quite fake as scum that you get as Town, that tends to get you labelled as scum for reasons.
Toony, what's your list on me? I'm curious how much it matches my own list on me- that chiefly I become way more passive when I have access to a group chat.