You think you've proven yourself, child? "Oh my, I won as town!" Meh, that's easy with a whole army at your back and power roles you can abuse. "But I've beaten the town as Mafia!" PHAH! With friends and a horribly weak town.
But can you do both? Can you take down the mafia with 6 others, then turn around as mafia and BEAT those 6 to a pulp? Can you pick just the perfect role-braving additions caused by an evil mod-that will not only help you as town but also as scum? Can you fight off endless waves of people, including those you've killed?
Well then step on the hill and see if you have what it takes to be King of the Mafia.Spoiler: Basic Rules: READ! (click to show/hide)
Specialized Rules:
Inning is not required to sign up. To sign up read only the first two pages of Xylbot's role list (http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=12368) and choose ONE role from there (and PM it to me). You will then be assigned with that role, with a possibility of additional features based on balance or tomfoolery(though nothing hidden).Spoiler: Largish rules for choosing a role (click to show/hide)
Once 7 people have signed up, the game begins. A random person will be picked as KING MAFIA and will be given, on top of their role, the Mafiakill. The First Round ONLY will start with a kill-less Night (that is all killing abilities will be disabled).
From there, the game continues. During the game, anyone else can Sign up to be put on a queue. Game will play like a standard mafia game. If you die at any time, you may Sign up again, though others who haven't played that round will have priority.
If King Mafia is killed at any time, the round ends. Those in queue will take the place of those that died to refill the ranks back to 7 (those still alive remain), a new KING MAFIA will be picked, and the game will start on the next phase (Old round ends in Day, new round starts at Night...)
Play continues until KING MAFIA succeeds in being the ONLY one alive. Note that all players being dead does not fulfill the KING MAFIA win condition - in that case a new round would begin with 7 new players.
There is an antilurk system in place. Each RL day, you MUST have either voted (even if its for the same person) or sent in an action. Fail once and you get one prod. Fail twice in the same round and you will be killed, a player in Queue will automatically Sub in for you, and you will not be able to rejoin. Ever.
All may join this game, though be aware of the antilurk system. Please read this line Dariush.
You're done with the rules. Now join and claim the mountain!
Oh, what the hell. If Tir and Toaster can do three I can manage two.One of them is exceptionally long ad the standard of how its going on seems to have settled, and the other is too fun to miss!
Make sure to send a Xylbot role Tiruin or you won't be added to sign-ups! Notice how Deathsword sign-upped without even posting.I just sent it - thanks for the note though :)
2. If there are no deaths for three full days and nights and there are at least 3 votes left in the game the town cannot choose to no lynch on the next day. With only 2 votes remaining in this situation the KING MAFIA would lose as above.So what if no one votes? Or there's a tie?
To win you must first become KING MAFIA.It should also be noted that the KING MAFIA was randomly selected after role assignment.
Hapah- If you're not Kingmafia, what's your plan for becoming King?
Ford: the only benefit I can see is maybe not having to declare a vote everyday. Unless no having a vote synergises well with some obscure role?That is a much better answer than the one NativeForeigner gave last time. I'd unvote you, but I didn't vote you in the first place. :/
But another question then: Do you think vote analysis is going to help you this game?
NQT: Shall you try to use statistics to find scum in this game like you did in others?In a word: no. I think my kewl powerz and a bit of luck are the only things I have going for me here. There's only one scum and so many unknown factors due to all the possible roles. I will continue to try to be logical and not make dodgy inferences.
Ford: Are you the mafia king?Nope. Are you?
NQT: Shall you try to use statistics to find scum in this game like you did in others?Your disdain is very obvious in the way you've worded this question. Trying to paint him as a hopeless newb?
Hapah: So your usual playstyle involves flying under the radar, then?It's not intentional, but it seems to happen. What I meant, though, is that I'm not typically the sort of player that leans on someone until the break. I like to put together all the pieces and see what doesn't quite fit (examples: calling out Tolyk in BYOC, calling out Tolyk on his fakeclaim in a BYOR [the one where he was Meph], pegging Toaster as the Exty a few Paranormal's ago). I'm less confrontational than most, but I'd like to think I still get results.
Hapah: How do you think the usual situation of nobody suspecting you will change with only 6 other players, if at all?I imagine people will be a little more critical. It's a good thing, though.
No. unvoteFord: Are you the mafia king?Nope. Are you?
It was actually a sad attempt at snark. There was no disdain involved. NQT has proved he is no newb in the games he's been in. I was actually curious if he was going to make statistics part of his meta.NQT: Shall you try to use statistics to find scum in this game like you did in others?Your disdain is very obvious in the way you've worded this question. Trying to paint him as a hopeless newb?
I was actually curious if he was going to make statistics part of his meta.I think he already has.
Oh right, a quick note on night action feedback. It's the same as Xylbot but it's occurred to me almost no-one is familiar with Xylbot anymore. Basically you'll receive a PM back from me if:Uhh ... so what about rules clarifications?
- Your role changes in any way
- You are blocked (but not if your actions are stopped in any other way)
- You are receiving an inspection result
Otherwise you will not receive a PM.
I'm less confrontational than most, but I'd like to think I still get results.Can't argue with you there.
Those apply to night action feedback, you can still receive answers to questions.*phew* Gods, actually having a bot for a mod sounds like it would be awful.
I already know Ford is the KING Mafia, but I need to settle this grudge match first. Admit defeat Hapah and vote yourself or I'm not budging.Haha ... I'm not. So if you've got something to claim, let's hear it.
Oh right, a quick note on night action feedback. It's the same as Xylbot but it's occurred to me almost no-one is familiar with Xylbot anymore. Basically you'll receive a PM back from me if:
- Your role changes in any way
- You are blocked (but not if your actions are stopped in any other way)
- You are receiving an inspection result
Otherwise you will not receive a PM.
Toaster: You'll do. You're the ruthless dictator of a small island nation, when the president of the united states flies out to your island and demands a roleclaim, or he'll get you lynched. What is the proper response?
Actually, Toaster, disregard that, I have a better question.
The last KotM tournament started with a discussion about whether or not to roleclaim at the beginning. At that time, the consensus was not to, since it made the tournament drag on. What are your thoughts on it now?
I already know Ford is the KING Mafia, but I need to settle this grudge match first. Admit defeat Hapah and vote yourself or I'm not budging.Haha ... I'm not. So if you've got something to claim, let's hear it.
Awfully eager to deny it, aren't you?Hey, "know" is a pretty strong word. If he's got incontrovertible proof, I wanna hear it. Especially since it can only be wrong.
No vote for anyone else after that...strange RVS vote? Why?No. unvoteFord: Are you the mafia king?Nope. Are you?
I hate you Hapah for making me lose BYOR11.How does this help find scum? Why do you hate Hapah?
Tiruin- I know you like to roleclaim. Will you do it here?Depends on the situation meaning yes, preferably later on in game.
Tiruin: What effect will a no-kill N0 have on RVS?That there are no kills at all, but people may still act given the night. Meaning added information.
All: It's worth noting that you will NOT be informed if you're redirected. That said, if you submit Anarchist, you're an asshole.How is this the case? So if I'm an Anarchist, that makes me...what? Reading it up, its a 50% on everyone.
Yes. :3Toony, that's Ford for you. He does that. And I'm quite unsure how excitement = scumtell.
Tiruin: If you were bruce wayne, would you try to get your buddy lynched?If I was...wait, why would I get robin lynched?
I hate you Hapah for making me lose BYOR11.I had to play the hand I was dealt, yeah? (Though FYI, I was prepared to off myself if you ALL voted to lynch me. It seemed the only sporting thing to do. I had the pic to post with it and everything, lol)
I am a Miller.Damnit, Toaster. All the roles on that list and you go with a freaking Miller? Why?
Toaster: If you were mafia and someone landed an inspect on you (having claimed miller earlier), how would you respond?
Tiruin: What effect will a no-kill N0 have on RVS?That there are no kills at all, but people may still act given the night. Meaning added information.All: It's worth noting that you will NOT be informed if you're redirected. That said, if you submit Anarchist, you're an asshole.How is this the case? So if I'm an Anarchist, that makes me...what? Reading it up, its a 50% on everyone.
I am a Miller.Damnit, Toaster. All the roles on that list and you go with a freaking Miller? Why?
Tiruin, have you played in similar set-ups before? If so, what role did you pick and why?Yep. In that other KotM "wherein Leafsnail dethroned Webadict and everyone played their worst" -- Bookthras (:P)
Deathsword:You call that question strange as if you have never seen a "are you scum?" question, Tiruin. And I am sure you have seen that question many times. Say, why that question and vote strange?No vote for anyone else after that...strange RVS vote? Why?No. unvoteFord: Are you the mafia king?Nope. Are you?
Good answer.I hate you Hapah for making me lose BYOR11.I had to play the hand I was dealt, yeah? (Though FYI, I was prepared to off myself if you ALL voted to lynch me. It seemed the only sporting thing to do. I had the pic to post with it and everything, lol)
Toony:WHY DO YOU ALWAYS HAVE TO ASK QUESTIONS THAT HAVE ALREADY BEEN ANSWERED?? You're wasting my time here.I hate you Hapah for making me lose BYOR11.How does this help find scum? Why do you hate Hapah?
Toony, what are your views on using rhubarb in desserts?Screw you!
Yeah totally. Captain Ford.Awfully eager to deny it, aren't you?Hey, "know" is a pretty strong word. If he's got incontrovertible proof, I wanna hear it. Especially since it can only be wrong.
Hapah, not that I'm fishing or anything but it would seem you must have a very powerful role for Miller to be added as a debuff. Is this a reasonable assumption?Stop saying things like this
Hapah, not that I'm fishing or anything but it would seem you must have a very powerful role for Miller to be added as a debuff. Is this a reasonable assumption?You're pointing that question the wrong way, stranger.
Hapah, not that I'm fishing or anything but it would seem you must have a very powerful role for Miller to be added as a debuff. Is this a reasonable assumption?
Tiruin, have you played in similar set-ups before? If so, what role did you pick and why?
Ford, I don't know about you, but this was the first game I've been in where I've got to chose my role. The choice was daunting. I won't ask what you picked but I will ask by what metric you made your choice.
(http://Deathsword): because town can't win in this game (it only ends when the King wins), is there any reason for town to co-operate overly?
Duly noted.Hapah, not that I'm fishing or anything but it would seem you must have a very powerful role for Miller to be added as a debuff. Is this a reasonable assumption?Stop saying things like this
NQT:Bwuhahaha, I thought the rhubarb question would throw you all off but you saw through my dastardly scheme. I'm not trying to divide or divine anything really, just trying to get a feel for how everyone else feels about this mode (that I'm new to).Hapah, not that I'm fishing or anything but it would seem you must have a very powerful role for Miller to be added as a debuff. Is this a reasonable assumption?
Tiruin, have you played in similar set-ups before? If so, what role did you pick and why?
Ford, I don't know about you, but this was the first game I've been in where I've got to chose my role. The choice was daunting. I won't ask what you picked but I will ask by what metric you made your choice.
Triple rolefish combo!(http://Deathsword): because town can't win in this game (it only ends when the King wins), is there any reason for town to co-operate overly?
Wow. NQT, why are you trying to divide the town against itself?
Ford: You're quite eager and ecstatic this time, why's that? Also, given a choice of an inspect, a roleblock or a redirect, as mafia, what would you use during the first night?1. I was in a playful mood. I wouldn't say I'm ecstatic. I'm actually under a lot of stress, considering I ran out of money last week and I have no idea how I'm going to get out of debt now.
Ford, I don't know about you, but this was the first game I've been in where I've got to chose my role. The choice was daunting. I won't ask what you picked but I will ask by what metric you made your choice.First thing that stood out to me. As the last player to sign up, I was in a bit of a time crunch.
I didn't pick miller. It got attached.So you didn't pick it for investigation immunity?
Yeah totally. Captain Ford.Fact: I have the most posts in every game I've played in (per day, for games I didn't play all the way through).
I'm not trying to divide or divine anything really, just trying to get a feel for how everyone else feels about this mode (that I'm new to).You could totally do that without blatantly rolefishing.
Toaster:I didn't pick miller. It got attached.So you didn't pick it for investigation immunity?
Also, I noticed you directed that last question at Deathsword, but enclosed his name in img tags instead of bold. I'm surprised that Toaster didn't notice that since it was clearly visible in his own post.
ToonyMan:I don't think I could top the number of facts you got backing you up Mafia King!Yeah totally. Captain Ford.Fact: I have the most posts in every game I've played in (per day, for games I didn't play all the way through).
Fact: This is because I have more time to waste than you.
Fact: That is completely independent of my alignment.
Got anything else?
It's true, NQT didn't fix it again when quoting himself and Toaster, he must be mafia!Also, I noticed you directed that last question at Deathsword, but enclosed his name in img tags instead of bold. I'm surprised that Toaster didn't notice that since it was clearly visible in his own post.I noticed it. I don't see why it was worth mentioning, though. How dare he hit the IMG tag button that is immediately under the bold button?
> Snip to original quote.ToonyMan:I don't think I could top the number of facts you got backing you up Mafia King!Yeah totally. Captain Ford.Fact: I have the most posts in every game I've played in (per day, for games I didn't play all the way through).
Fact: This is because I have more time to waste than you.
Fact: That is completely independent of my alignment.
Got anything else?
@Toony: So at the time you said this, I was under the impression that you 'knew' based on Ford's attitude...being overtly happy. My strange way of analysis, but it comes with what is generally seen @scum/non-cautious town anyway.I already know Ford is the KING Mafia, but I need to settle this grudge match first. Admit defeat Hapah and vote yourself or I'm not budging.Haha ... I'm not. So if you've got something to claim, let's hear it.
Awfully eager to deny it, aren't you?
Tiruin and NQT are also town in my mind thanks to Revolution.>.>
I noticed it. I don't see why it was worth mentioning, though. How dare he hit the IMG tag button that is immediately under the bold button?I at first thought it would alter the meaning of both his post and yours. But looking back on it, it doesn't really.
Right. A role that is useless 6/7ths of the time? No thanks.One could argue that it's valuable all the time, since when you're town, investigators won't waste their actions on you. And of course that isn't the only thing you can do. You wouldn't have claimed it was attached to something if you didn't have other abilities to prove it.
Tiruin and NQT are also town in my mind thanks to Revolution....so you suck at reading people, so instead of trying to get better at it, you hold grudges?
Hapah had a fine first response and Deathsword hasn't struck anything on me right now so the process isn't hard to see here.So you're voting me for ... what, exactly? Not being you?
Dude. You just wasted a whole RL day with only that question and you're not branching out. I've seen that question asked many times before - I've had that question posed at me many times before (because Tiruin is always scum and all that [was like an in-joke due to the fact that the recent games I was in always in and won popped with me being scum.])Deathsword:You call that question strange as if you have never seen a "are you scum?" question, Tiruin. And I am sure you have seen that question many times. Say, why that question and vote strange?No vote for anyone else after that...strange RVS vote? Why?No. unvoteFord: Are you the mafia king?Nope. Are you?
Duly what? Hapah didn't even state he was a miller anywhere. Toaster did.Duly noted.Hapah, not that I'm fishing or anything but it would seem you must have a very powerful role for Miller to be added as a debuff. Is this a reasonable assumption?Stop saying things like this
What am I going to do with an inspect result as mafia?Multiple choice type question. Its a list of probable actions you could do - the answer is the one that matters. But yeah, that type of question was mostly due to another game: Roguelike Mafia wherein one role [the Paladin] makes the user pop out as town in inspections regardless of their alignment and they've an item that inspects others. Items = actions here.
Woah there tiger, I'm curious. That was your first post of the day and the proceeding ones didn't help answer that. Well, ok, the latter question was answered (because he made you lose and all) but not the former.Toony:WHY DO YOU ALWAYS HAVE TO ASK QUESTIONS THAT HAVE ALREADY BEEN ANSWERED?? You're wasting my time here.I hate you Hapah for making me lose BYOR11.How does this help find scum? Why do you hate Hapah?
ToonyMan:It's safer to assume they're town so I don't go "they're totally acting scummy" and go for easy-lynch. That's a pretty fast way to lose. So no, I don't plan on voting them, today at least. It's hard to even call that a grudge, and more an improvement process.Tiruin and NQT are also town in my mind thanks to Revolution....so you suck at reading people, so instead of trying to get better at it, you hold grudges?
How clever, it's because I'm town and you're the only one left that can't be town, keep up! My first post was a pretty simple scum-catch technique so I really expected a better response, you know?Hapah had a fine first response and Deathsword hasn't struck anything on me right now so the process isn't hard to see here.So you're voting me for ... what, exactly? Not being you?
Deathsword: because town can't win in this game (it only ends when the King wins), is there any reason for town to co-operate overly?Fail bolding is fail.
Nice dodge. Tell me, as I asked before, why that question I asked Ford, a question you have seen so many times, is strange.Dude. You just wasted a whole RL day with only that question and you're not branching out. I've seen that question asked many times before - I've had that question posed at me many times before (because Tiruin is always scum and all that [was like an in-joke due to the fact that the recent games I was in always in and won popped with me being scum.])Deathsword:You call that question strange as if you have never seen a "are you scum?" question, Tiruin. And I am sure you have seen that question many times. Say, why that question and vote strange?No vote for anyone else after that...strange RVS vote? Why?No. unvoteFord: Are you the mafia king?Nope. Are you?
But yeah. What are you even doing to scumhunt DS?
notquitethere:A reasonable and understandably unenlightening response. In case you were wondering, I chose the role that made me grin the most. Think of that what you will.Ford, I don't know about you, but this was the first game I've been in where I've got to chose my role. The choice was daunting. I won't ask what you picked but I will ask by what metric you made your choice.First thing that stood out to me. As the last player to sign up, I was in a bit of a time crunch.
But you see Ford, if role-fishing is blatant then it can't really be role-fishing as I could neither want nor expect anyone to take the bait. Is any discussion of roles (i.e. any discussion of the nature of this game-mode) automatically suspicious? As for the misbolding: serves me right for trying to play mafia on my phone.I'm not trying to divide or divine anything really, just trying to get a feel for how everyone else feels about this mode (that I'm new to).You could totally do that without blatantly rolefishing.
Also, I noticed you directed that last question at Deathsword, but enclosed his name in img tags instead of bold. I'm surprised that Toaster didn't notice that since it was clearly visible in his own post.
Sorry: a Britishism I expect. 'Duly' means 'in accordance with what is appropriate', and noted 'made a note of', so 'duly noted' in this context means, 'in accordance with what is appropriate, I have made a note of what you just said', and it implies (as is appropriate) that I will take on board the criticism in future. The benefit was, I could say all that in two words instead of 16. I got Hapah and Toaster mixed up: again, it serves me right for trying to play this game on my phone.Duly what? Hapah didn't even state he was a miller anywhere. Toaster did.Stop saying things like thisDuly noted.
NQT, what are you even doing here? Pre-game investigation?I believe, and please correct me if I'm mistaken, that the best way to try to win this game is to know as much about the game and what people believe about the game. As this information is gathered on this public thread, the results are shared with all, so any pre-game investigation is to everyone's benefit.
Town should cooperate because none of them is king and, thus, unable to win. By killing the King, a new round starts.I believe you have the right of it, and I will try to co-operate with all of you until a round comes when I am king. Sound fair?
One thousand apologies.Hapah, not that I'm fishing or anything but it would seem you must have a very powerful role for Miller to be added as a debuff. Is this a reasonable assumption?You're pointing that question the wrong way, stranger.
...Now you're just getting on my nerves.Nice dodge. Tell me, as I asked before, why that question I asked Ford, a question you have seen so many times, is strange.Dude. You just wasted a whole RL day with only that question and you're not branching out. I've seen that question asked many times before - I've had that question posed at me many times before (because Tiruin is always scum and all that [was like an in-joke due to the fact that the recent games I was in always in and won popped with me being scum.])Deathsword:You call that question strange as if you have never seen a "are you scum?" question, Tiruin. And I am sure you have seen that question many times. Say, why that question and vote strange?No vote for anyone else after that...strange RVS vote? Why?No. unvoteFord: Are you the mafia king?Nope. Are you?
But yeah. What are you even doing to scumhunt DS?
I am not accusing you of that Tiruin. I am accusing you of finding strange a question that has been used more time than I care to count....Now you're just getting on my nerves.Nice dodge. Tell me, as I asked before, why that question I asked Ford, a question you have seen so many times, is strange.Dude. You just wasted a whole RL day with only that question and you're not branching out. I've seen that question asked many times before - I've had that question posed at me many times before (because Tiruin is always scum and all that [was like an in-joke due to the fact that the recent games I was in always in and won popped with me being scum.])Deathsword:You call that question strange as if you have never seen a "are you scum?" question, Tiruin. And I am sure you have seen that question many times. Say, why that question and vote strange?No vote for anyone else after that...strange RVS vote? Why?No. unvoteFord: Are you the mafia king?Nope. Are you?
But yeah. What are you even doing to scumhunt DS?
I mean, what would that question accomplish? In most games - town or mafia would respond with a 'No' when asked "U mafia, bro?" Here, you did such.
The point of my question is, YOU'RE NOT DOING ANYTHING ELSE BUT THAT. Hello vote -> people for nonsensical questions.
Feels to me like you're just burning time for the night so you can kill, DS. Like I said, what have you done, and why are you falsely accusing me of what you're doing?
DeathswordWell that's good, it'll be easier to tell if you're mafia.Town should cooperate because none of them is king and, thus, unable to win. By killing the King, a new round starts.I believe you have the right of it, and I will try to co-operate with all of you until a round comes when I am king. Sound fair?
Nice dodge. Tell me, as I asked before, why that question I asked Ford, a question you have seen so many times, is strange.Dude, she DID just answer your question. Your question was strange because you hadn't done jack shit besides.
But you see Ford, if role-fishing is blatant then it can't really be role-fishing as I could neither want nor expect anyone to take the bait. Is any discussion of roles (i.e. any discussion of the nature of this game-mode) automatically suspicious? As for the misbolding: serves me right for trying to play mafia on my phone.Hard Lesson #1: Never assume that people will realize that something shouldn't be taken at face value. This is mafia. Anything you say can and will be used against you.
I believe you have the right of it, and I will try to co-operate with all of you until a round comes when I am king. Sound fair?Hard Lesson #2: Actions speak louder than words. You talk a good show, NQT, but rolefishing isn't a good way to win people over. Everyone here is "in it to win it", and giving up our role gives up an advantage.
My first post was a pretty simple scum-catch technique so I really expected a better response, you know?No, I don't know.
Note that I specifically gave an answer that -- while truthful -- revealed nothing.Hmm...you did already notice that, actually. I missed that part. One of the hazards of quote pyramids.
I am not accusing you of that Tiruin. I am accusing you of finding strange a question that has been used more time than I care to count.This argument is completely nonsensical. Tiruin very clearly said that your VOTE was strange. It's even clearly visible in your enormous quote pyramid:
No vote for anyone else after that...strange RVS vote? Why?But even so, what does that accusation even mean? Why are you accusing her of it?
I don't remember ever seeing a mafia claim Miller so Toaster is going to be town in my eyes unless everything else points otherwise.What is all this, Toony? How long do Tir and NQT get a free pass because of something that happened in another game?
Tiruin and NQT are also town in my mind thanks to Revolution.
This leaves: Deathsword, Hapah, and Captain Ford.
Hapah had a fine first response and Deathsword hasn't struck anything on me right now so the process isn't hard to see here.
Deathsword:This!Nice dodge. Tell me, as I asked before, why that question I asked Ford, a question you have seen so many times, is strange.Dude, she DID just answer your question. Your question was strange because you hadn't done jack shit besides.
I think you're talking to DS there? O_oNo vote for anyone else after that...strange RVS vote? Why?But even so, what does that accusation even mean? Why are you accusing her of it?
EBWOP2: Somehow I also missed a set of replies between DS and Tiruin. *facepalm* Still, my earlier response stands.
This argument is completely nonsensical. Tiruin very clearly said that your VOTE was strange. It's even clearly visible in your enormous quote pyramid:No vote for anyone else after that...strange RVS vote? Why?
ToonyMan:It seems weird to adamantly demand proof how I know you're the KING Mafia. That isn't insignificant at all.My first post was a pretty simple scum-catch technique so I really expected a better response, you know?No, I don't know.
You didn't vote me, so you clearly weren't serious. So I laughed and called it out as BS.
There was a night zero, so it was possible that you actually had something to share. I invited you to share it because I'm not psychic and I couldn't tell what kind of trap you were trying to catch me in.
Skimmed the thread so I have something to think about, and this sticks out like whoa:I already explained this wasn't right, look at my posts (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=123832.msg4108760#msg4108760) right after where I rectify that.I don't remember ever seeing a mafia claim Miller so Toaster is going to be town in my eyes unless everything else points otherwise.What is all this, Toony? How long do Tir and NQT get a free pass because of something that happened in another game?
Tiruin and NQT are also town in my mind thanks to Revolution.
This leaves: Deathsword, Hapah, and Captain Ford.
Hapah had a fine first response and Deathsword hasn't struck anything on me right now so the process isn't hard to see here.
(Also Dar fakeclaimed Kook in the last Paranormal)
Skimmed the thread so I have something to think about, and this sticks out like whoa:
I start my new work today, so in case I don't get to vote later: Hapah, when in a game is it possible to first get reads on people?
It seems weird to adamantly demand proof how I know you're the KING Mafia. That isn't insignificant at all."Adamantly demand" != "You're wrong. But if you have something to claim, I'd like to hear it."
No she didn't. "How does this help you find scum?" - Ring a bell?What is all this, Toony? How long do Tir and NQT get a free pass because of something that happened in another game?I already explained this wasn't right, look at my posts (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=123832.msg4108760#msg4108760) right after where I rectify that.
(Also Dar fakeclaimed Kook in the last Paranormal)
(I wasn't in last Paranormal, read my post you quoted)
This also answers Tiruin's question because she wanted the same thing.
Toony: How do you deal with people who you mistakenly read as scummy? (IE NQT and Tiruin)I don't really know yet. I sometimes right about Tiruin (Prince's Guard BUT THAT HURT ME REMEMBER) and sometimes wrong (whenever I'm actually town). I just need to be more careful since I know people who aren't experts in English are going to have a harder time.
PFPWhy does everybody do this?? I know it means posting for prosperity I believe, but there's no reason to state your posts are gonna be half-assed. You too Hapah and Tiruin!
Nah uh, accusations don't need evidence. Evidence != reasoning.It seems weird to adamantly demand proof how I know you're the KING Mafia. That isn't insignificant at all."Adamantly demand" != "You're wrong. But if you have something to claim, I'd like to hear it."
And I don't know why it seems weird. It's normal for accusations to come paired with reasoning.
ToonyMan. Do you think you could show a little more patience?Why? I want to roll for KING Mafia after lynching you.
Post from PHONE. As in it's hard to type a lot.I never thought of that okay, thanks. Suddenly everything makes sense. I think this proves how mobile-less I am.
Post from PHONE. As in it's hard to type a lot.This or Posting From Profession.
To tell you: You are right in guessing my alignment now (but that won't stop speculation anyway...Also sorry back then :/ And possibly now due to that last sentence)...Toony: How do you deal with people who you mistakenly read as scummy? (IE NQT and Tiruin)I don't really know yet. I sometimes right about Tiruin (Prince's Guard BUT THAT HURT ME REMEMBER) and sometimes wrong (whenever I'm actually town). I just need to be more careful since I know people who aren't experts in English are going to have a harder time.
Tiruin and NQT are also town in my mind thanks to Revolution.So your reads at that point on them were based on meta?
Hapah, not that I'm fishing or anything but it would seem you must have a very powerful role for Miller to be added as a debuff. Is this a reasonable assumption?Was supped to be directed at Toaster. Rolefishing and WIFOM.
Ford, I don't know about you, but this was the first game I've been in where I've got to chose my role. The choice was daunting. I won't ask what you picked but I will ask by what metric you made your choice.Rolefishing, trying to determine what kind of role Ford might have picked.
But you see Ford, if role-fishing is blatant then it can't really be role-fishing as I could neither want nor expect anyone to take the bait. Is any discussion of roles (i.e. any discussion of the nature of this game-mode) automatically suspicious? As for the misbolding: serves me right for trying to play mafia on my phone.[/quote]I'm not trying to divide or divine anything really, just trying to get a feel for how everyone else feels about this mode (that I'm new to).You could totally do that without blatantly rolefishing.
Also, I noticed you directed that last question at Deathsword, but enclosed his name in img tags instead of bold. I'm surprised that Toaster didn't notice that since it was clearly visible in his own post.
DeathswordSo you will be helpful to everyone unless you are king, at which point you will stop being helpful. Unless you decide to pretend you are helpful. More wine.Town should cooperate because none of them is king and, thus, unable to win. By killing the King, a new round starts.I believe you have the right of it, and I will try to co-operate with all of you until a round comes when I am king. Sound fair?
Hapah, when in a game is it possible to first get reads on people?Not wine. RVS question outside of RVS (I believe we are already out of it)
Tiruin: yeah, you're right. My actions have been somewhat lazy and minimal. I tend to let real life get to me a bit too much.TBH, this was the first thing that popped into mind regarding me mulling over your attitude during the game here...
ToonyMan. Do you think you could show a little more patience?What seems wrong with being enthusiastic that I see the Toony is?
That post is a bit old, simply put I need to be a bit more understanding with the language barrier. Although NQT's rolefishing this game has been alarming. If I wasn't voting Ford I would be doing NQT.Tiruin and NQT are also town in my mind thanks to Revolution.So your reads at that point on them were based on meta?
NQT:I've also got my charm and good looks. Today is the first day and there's been a lot of waffle and relatively little banana. I usually prefer to form my reads in light of role-flips and people's votes, and this game mode is especially ripe for taking a softly softly approach as everyone wants to survive until the second night so they can be sure to use their abilities. The scummiest thing I've seen is collectively the Deathsword-Tiruin-Ford dust up. That they're all so invested in it makes me think that one of them could be scum. My money's on DS for now.I start my new work today, so in case I don't get to vote later: Hapah, when in a game is it possible to first get reads on people?Is all you have rolefish and RVS? What's the scummiest thing you've seen so far?
notquitethereNot WIFOM or Rolefishing. More discussion on the nature of the game. It's obvious if Miller was added as a debuff, there must have been a reason to debuff. That doesn't narrow it down by any amount as there's loads of powerful roles. I don't think it's in my interest for anyone to tell their roles as it gives scum too big an advantage.Hapah, not that I'm fishing or anything but it would seem you must have a very powerful role for Miller to be added as a debuff. Is this a reasonable assumption?Was supped to be directed at Toaster. Rolefishing and WIFOM.
Again, this game is about roles, not talking about roles in general would be pretty weird.Ford, I don't know about you, but this was the first game I've been in where I've got to chose my role. The choice was daunting. I won't ask what you picked but I will ask by what metric you made your choice.Rolefishing, trying to determine what kind of role Ford might have picked.
How is discussing my own motivations possibly WIFOM? I know perfectly what I'm thinking.But you see Ford, if role-fishing is blatant then it can't really be role-fishing as I could neither want nor expect anyone to take the bait. Is any discussion of roles (i.e. any discussion of the nature of this game-mode) automatically suspicious? As for the misbolding: serves me right for trying to play mafia on my phone.Horrible, horrible WIFOM
PFPOkay.
Tiruin, truth be told, I'm having a really shitty day at work. I had to vote somebody, and didn't have a lot of time to think about it.
I've also got my charm and good looks. Today is the first day and there's been a lot of waffle and relatively little banana. I usually prefer to form my reads in light of role-flips and people's votes, and this game mode is especially ripe for taking a softly softly approach as everyone wants to survive until the second night so they can be sure to use their abilities. The scummiest thing I've seen is collectively the Deathsword-Tiruin-Ford dust up. That they're all so invested in it makes me think that one of them could be scum. My money's on DS for now.There's only one mafia so I wouldn't claim the pile-up excuse.
Everyone, I have never played a mafia game where you get to pick your own roles before. Now I have learned too late that discussing roles in any way is a cardinal sin and is only done by fiendish scum, apparently.Yes it is.
ToasterOh look, an OMGUS.NQT:I've also got my charm and good looks. Today is the first day and there's been a lot of waffle and relatively little banana. I usually prefer to form my reads in light of role-flips and people's votes, and this game mode is especially ripe for taking a softly softly approach as everyone wants to survive until the second night so they can be sure to use their abilities. The scummiest thing I've seen is collectively the Deathsword-Tiruin-Ford dust up. That they're all so invested in it makes me think that one of them could be scum. My money's on DS for now.I start my new work today, so in case I don't get to vote later: Hapah, when in a game is it possible to first get reads on people?Is all you have rolefish and RVS? What's the scummiest thing you've seen so far?
DSYou asked if he had a powerful role. No matter the answer, yes or no, you'd get to know something about his role.notquitethereNot WIFOM or Rolefishing. More discussion on the nature of the game. It's obvious if Miller was added as a debuff, there must have been a reason to debuff. That doesn't narrow it down by any amount as there's loads of powerful roles. I don't think it's in my interest for anyone to tell their roles as it gives scum too big an advantage.Hapah, not that I'm fishing or anything but it would seem you must have a very powerful role for Miller to be added as a debuff. Is this a reasonable assumption?Was supped to be directed at Toaster. Rolefishing and WIFOM.
But trying to make people give you info on their roles is quite scummy.QuoteAgain, this game is about roles, not talking about roles in general would be pretty weird.Ford, I don't know about you, but this was the first game I've been in where I've got to chose my role. The choice was daunting. I won't ask what you picked but I will ask by what metric you made your choice.Rolefishing, trying to determine what kind of role Ford might have picked.
Let me follow the logic in your post:QuoteHow is discussing my own motivations possibly WIFOM? I know perfectly what I'm thinking.But you see Ford, if role-fishing is blatant then it can't really be role-fishing as I could neither want nor expect anyone to take the bait. Is any discussion of roles (i.e. any discussion of the nature of this game-mode) automatically suspicious? As for the misbolding: serves me right for trying to play mafia on my phone.Horrible, horrible WIFOM
Everyone, I have never played a mafia game where you get to pick your own roles before. Now I have learned too late that discussing roles in any way is a cardinal sin and is only done by fiendish scum, apparently.Please, don't try to paint yourself as a saintly newbie being attacked by the big bad Deathsword. Talking about roles in general once is normal. GOING THE WHOLE GAME ONLY TALKING ABOUT ROLES is scummy.
It hasn't quite been 24 hours since the last votecount so Hapah can escape a warning this time. Deadline is in roughly 24 hours time. Make sure you vote again before then!Thanks boss! Had a good friend of mine get back from his deployment, so I had to take him out for drinks and shoot the breeze with him for a while.
StuffSorry about that, I just skimmed. I don't normally pay the game much attention on the weekends.
I start my new work today, so in case I don't get to vote later: Hapah, when in a game is it possible to first get reads on people?Varies wildly based on the game and (to a lesser extent) the player. Some people are easier to read than others, and sometimes people slip and give you a good line of questioning when you wouldn't normally have a good angle.
Hapah:The more I think about it, the more I think your Miller claim might be bogus. It's the sort of bold action I might expect from the king, especially when you take into account that there are at least two really nuts-and-bolts type of players in the game.Skimmed the thread so I have something to think about, and this sticks out like whoa:So what did all your thinking amount to?
Ford: I fear your meta on me is based on the (relatively) short period of time we've been playing together, in which I've been quite cranky.Yeah, that describes it pretty well.
notquitethereHapah, not that I'm fishing or anything but it would seem you must have a very powerful role for Miller to be added as a debuff. Is this a reasonable assumption?Was supped to be directed at Toaster. Rolefishing and WIFOM.
-snip-
Toaster
The scummiest thing I've seen is collectively the Deathsword-Tiruin-Ford dust up. That they're all so invested in it makes me think that one of them could be scum. My money's on DS for now.
Hapah:The more I think about it, the more I think your Miller claim might be bogus. It's the sort of bold action I might expect from the king, especially when you take into account that there are at least two really nuts-and-bolts type of players in the game.Skimmed the thread so I have something to think about, and this sticks out like whoa:So what did all your thinking amount to?
ToonyMan is being hostile and reacting to queries to expand on his earlier answers with shouting. This is not normal for him.Not normal?? Although general reads are nice, I like how it's similar to mine, but just different people in the "probably town, no read, probably scum" slots.
So... you're saying you won't tell me your role then, Deathsword?I have to agree with Deathsword here.
Ah, I'm just winding you up. Unvote for now.
Not normal?? Although general reads are nice, I like how it's similar to mine, but just different people in the "probably town, no read, probably scum" slots.Yeah, alright, you're just ticking me off. That's entirely normal.
*long, long sigh* Yeah, you're right. I'm the one who's impatient. I'm under a lot of money-stress, and I'm angry because I feel trapped in my current situation. I'm just deflecting my own emotions onto ToonyMan (and in part, onto DS, too).ToonyMan. Do you think you could show a little more patience?What seems wrong with being enthusiastic that I see the Toony is?
Your vote seems like an OMGUS - however you're relating patience to...what now? That seems confusing. What I see it as, is that you're interpreting him wanting to get to day end by the definition of patience.
What's up?
No, I just forgot that my vote doesn't stick unless I refresh it.
@Hapah:
Why do you think Toaster is lying? Even if you took this at a pure probability run there's only a 1/6 chance he's being ballsy mafia.
Not voting: Hapah
(Oh man, it's finally happening! Posting to watch)You can join too!
...and now I've got to make a decision I know I'm not going to be satisfied with. Ugh.Ugh x2. Used undo one too many times and didn't catch that until after I'd hit the post button.
I start my new work today, so in case I don't get to vote later: Hapah, when in a game is it possible to first get reads on people?
The scummiest thing I've seen is collectively the Deathsword-Tiruin-Ford dust up. That they're all so invested in it makes me think that one of them could be scum. My money's on DS for now.
It's easy for him to follow up on to the next one once one of them flips town.Not "if" one of them flips town?
Ford: If you give NQT a free pass on multiple scumtells, what does he have to do to be guilty in your mind?Dunno. He hasn't done it yet.
"If he's town he's useful" is not something you should justify not attacking someone on, and that includes myself.True.
Hapah: Yes, one of them. You expect multiple people to flip town in a game with a single mafioso?I'm going to assume you meant scum instead of town, there. It doesn't make sense otherwise, I think.
Either you're scum making a gambit or a townmember that is impossible to read correctly with powers. Either way, you're too dangerous to live. You're toast, Toaster!Nuh-uh. That's too far.
Toony:Toaster NOT buddying me?? His response isn't even fully accurate with my statement.@Hapah:Statistics are still a crappy thing to bring into a Mafia argument.
Why do you think Toaster is lying? Even if you took this at a pure probability run there's only a 1/6 chance he's being ballsy mafia.
Also, extend. I'm not getting lynched over people being too lazy to make a case.Somebody doesn't want to die, ehehehe
You do realise that a day lynch is town's main weapon right? Or has accepted theory now swung to thinking no-lyches are hunky dory? Is Tiruin likely to turn up in the next 20 minutes?Dude, I don't want a no lynch either. I'd much rather see you die! Vote yourself or something.
Mod, can we get a votecount?Honesty, mostly. He could have tried a lot of things, but he said something sane. That's a good thing in my book.
Ford: why the sudden change of opinion on NQT? First you say he went too far, but when he appologizes you go "ok, I forgive you" and everything is suddenly pardoned?
You'll regret this you monsters!See?? I can never tell if that's him town-yelling or scum-yelling his lose. Argh.
More soberly, this might help me in the long run. Now you'll know what I look like when I play town in contrast to the only scum game I've played (in Mason Mafia).It is not a good idea to judge someone just on their meta. A player can exploit his/her meta to fool others.
For the record, the things NQT was lynched on are things he's been doing as both town and scum. I found him town because I saw critical thought behind his words and actions.More soberly, this might help me in the long run. Now you'll know what I look like when I play town in contrast to the only scum game I've played (in Mason Mafia).It is not a good idea to judge someone just on their meta. A player can exploit his/her meta to fool others.
HahahaWhat's so funny, Toony? Are you the new king?
PFPNo, Toaster was #2 lynch pick last day and then he got killed anyway. Notice how no town died, so he must have been blocked AND vigged or something like that.HahahaWhat's so funny, Toony? Are you the new king?
Something like that, all right. I'm sure you had nothing to do with it. *tight-lipped smile*You shouldn't reveal your role so much, it'll be harder to fakeclaim when you're King Mafia.
Toony: It could have been a doctor or reflection as well, yeah?Yes, if reflection is when you get redirected onto yourself then that is also very possible. The "or something" is there for a reason!
ToonyMan - When were you planning on telling us you had two votes?I don't have two votes.Spoiler (click to show/hide)
...fuck me. It does look like I revealed something, doesn't it. It sounded completely different to my suger-addled brain (damn my coworkers for being such good bakers).Something like that, all right. I'm sure you had nothing to do with it. *tight-lipped smile*You shouldn't reveal your role so much, it'll be harder to fakeclaim when you're King Mafia.
Nailed it.Totally. *fist bump*
There's a reflection ability? I missed that.Toony: It could have been a doctor or reflection as well, yeah?Yes, if reflection is when you get redirected onto yourself then that is also very possible. The "or something" is there for a reason!
You're not really meant to post in games you aren't playing! Can't stop you from betting thoughEep! I didn't mean to disturb the game! I was just strolling through and figured I'd root for who I think would win. Not that you aren't all good players. Just that I think Toonyman will win.
What I meant by that was, "Good response. I am, of course, curious as to whether or not you had a part in it, but we both know I wouldn't get anywhere by asking."Didn't y'all just lynch NQT for, among other things, rolefishing? What makes you think it's OK now?
Tsk, tsk. Buddying now, too. It's almost like you want us to think you're scum. Is that what you want, Captain Ford?Nailed it.Totally. *fist bump*
Hapah - You voted Toaster from the beginning, and never let your vote move until the tie forced you to hammer against your better judgement. Who's our scum this time?
No.Spoiler: OOG (click to show/hide)
Deathsword, are you the King Mafia now? Of course you are.
Sometimes a randomization can cause a player to target themselves as well.There's a reflection ability? I missed that.Toony: It could have been a doctor or reflection as well, yeah?Yes, if reflection is when you get redirected onto yourself then that is also very possible. The "or something" is there for a reason!
Umm...correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that is the opposite of what I said.What I meant by that was, "Good response. I am, of course, curious as to whether or not you had a part in it, but we both know I wouldn't get anywhere by asking."Didn't y'all just lynch NQT for, among other things, rolefishing? What makes you think it's OK now?
Tsk, tsk. Buddying now, too. It's almost like you want us to think you're scum. Is that what you want, Captain Ford?No.
Toony: Why do you get a fanclub and I don't?I think it's because he reminds her of her idol, Org.
Toony: Why do you get a fanclub and I don't?I think it's because he reminds her of her idol, Org.
That makes it subtle rolefishing in the form of reverse psychology.Didn't y'all just lynch NQT for, among other things, rolefishing? What makes you think it's OK now?Umm...correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that is the opposite of what I said.
For a direct answer: Yes we did, and nothing.
So why do you want to be on Hapah's good side? Why would you be pushing that sense of camaraderie from the Toaster Takedown?Tsk, tsk. Buddying now, too. It's almost like you want us to think you're scum. Is that what you want, Captain Ford?No.
Okami No Rei: If you had a mason role, who would you recruit as your buddy today? Why?I'd pick Hapah. I am fairly certain that he has an inspect, since he tunneled Toaster in Round 1 and probably only let himself switch because the Miller claim threw doubt on the accuracy of his inspection.
Urist Imiknorris - If you had to hammer last round, who would you have picked, and why?
I don't have two votes.Of course you don't. Of course that had to be a mod error.
((Oh sure. Pick ToonyMan :IToony: Why do you get a fanclub and I don't?I think it's because he reminds her of her idol, Org.Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Toony: Why do you get a fanclub and I don't?You serious bro? @_@
Tiruin: Are you excited for the new round?..That this is already the new round, yeah. Why?
Urist Imiknorris - If you had to hammer last round, who would you have picked, and why?NQT for being the only one in hammer range.
Yo, Urist: If you entered this game as a miller, would you claim?Yes. Also I'd be pissed.
..That this is already the new round, yeah. Why?Because not being excited would be kind of a town tell.
Aghhh, must vote. Placeholder - Ford, I believe you're adding third party players in suspect of ToonyMan, eh?Where was he doing this?
Tiruin:@First: Kind of a null tell actually - dependant on the person's personality. For me, tis a new round, new faces, new people, new tentative KotM candidate.Quote..That this is already the new round, yeah. Why?Because not being excited would be kind of a town tell.QuoteAghhh, must vote. Placeholder - Ford, I believe you're adding third party players in suspect of ToonyMan, eh?Where was he doing this?
Hapah: Why are you whining about not having a fan club?
With 7 players alive it takes 4 votes to lynch.
Okay.No.Deathsword, are you the King Mafia now? Of course you are.Spoiler: OOG (click to show/hide)
Toony: Why do you get a fanclub and I don't?Anime avatar.
I'm not sure if Captain Ford's question even matters here, because I'm pretty sure you can't recruit the King Mafia to your little club and with a new round started Hapah (or anyone) can easily be "the one" now.Okami No Rei: If you had a mason role, who would you recruit as your buddy today? Why?I'd pick Hapah. I am fairly certain that he has an inspect, since he tunneled Toaster in Round 1 and probably only let himself switch because the Miller claim threw doubt on the accuracy of his inspection.
Hapah - This is speculation on my part. Please don't confirm or deny this.
Urist Imiknorris - Not quite what I meant. Hapah had to switch votes in order to hammer NQT, because Tiruin wasn't there to break the tie. Would you have hammered Toaster or NQT had you been in Tiruin's position?Urist Imiknorris - If you had to hammer last round, who would you have picked, and why?NQT for being the only one in hammer range.
So what were you and Okami thinking?Tiruin - To the second, I quoted the votecount before Leafsnail edited it. Toony originally showed two votes on that count. I thought he'd slipped up and revealed part of his role by not unvoting first, but it was just a mod error.
Okami: Boiling a frog?! Also, what'cha doin' with that false votecount, bro?
I'm not sure if Captain Ford's question even matters here, because I'm pretty sure you can't recruit the King Mafia to your little club and with a new round started Hapah (or anyone) can easily be "the one" now.Recruiting as a mason carries the same risk now as it does any other time. If you miss your guess and try to recruit the King, you die. The only downside is that Mason only confirms town for one round, since afterward any of the masons recruited that round could roll KING MAFIA. I consider that a risk worth taking to get a possible Inspect. Worst that can happen is I die and go to the back of the line.
*snip**snip*Spoiler: Largish rules for choosing a role (click to show/hide)
To the first, do you know how to boil a live frog? Look it up (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boiling_frog) and see if that answers your question.Oh I know that process, however you didn't say it was live sir, oh no. You said frog, in general :I
You're saying what he'd do if he was asleep? :P Or if he carried the votebreaker? Disregard, I'm just poking at this.Urist Imiknorris - Not quite what I meant. Hapah had to switch votes in order to hammer NQT, because Tiruin wasn't there to break the tie. Would you have hammered Toaster or NQT had you been in Tiruin's position?Urist Imiknorris - If you had to hammer last round, who would you have picked, and why?NQT for being the only one in hammer range.
MOD: Can a Mason Leader who is also KING MAFIA still recruit masons? If so, will the recruited masons be (falsely) informed that the one who recruited them is town?What will this type of role show up on investigations?
MOD: Can a Mason Leader who is also KING MAFIA still recruit masons? If so, will the recruited masons be (falsely) informed that the one who recruited them is town?Yes, the Mason Leader can recruit regardless of his alignment. Masons are not told anything about each other's alignment, but masons who are recruited are effectively confirmed town for one round.
Quadressence: please don't post here if you aren't a living player. You're welcome to join if you really want to talk here.I think she stopped as said in her last spoiler :P
Yes, the Mason Leader can recruit regardless of his alignment. Masons are not told anything about each other's alignment, but masons who are recruited are effectively confirmed town for one round.Do masons know each other upon recruitment and who recruited them here? (excuse me if any of this is mentioned but it seems different given this context).
Aghhh, must vote. Placeholder - Ford, I believe you're adding third party players in suspect of ToonyMan, eh?
@Second: Placeholder vote because of technical anti-lurk system. That's me poking at him for getting Quadressence to post.Uhh...what? Are you somehow holding me responsible for Quad's actions?
Yes. Also I'd be pissed.No doubt. Unvote.
That makes it subtle rolefishing in the form of reverse psychology.Of course. My brilliant plan to fish out Toony's role is to not ask him about it.
So why do you want to be on Hapah's good side? Why would you be pushing that sense of camaraderie from the Toaster Takedown?1. Why wouldn't I want to be on his good side? No seriously. This is a dumb question.
I'd pick Hapah. I am fairly certain that he has an inspect, since he tunneled Toaster in Round 1 and probably only let himself switch because the Miller claim threw doubt on the accuracy of his inspection....really. You pick Hapah on the basis of an ability you suspect him to have, and not because he correctly picked out the king?
That is pretty compelling. I think I'll add pressure, Okami no Rei.I'd pick Hapah. I am fairly certain that he has an inspect, since he tunneled Toaster in Round 1 and probably only let himself switch because the Miller claim threw doubt on the accuracy of his inspection....really. You pick Hapah on the basis of an ability you suspect him to have, and not because he correctly picked out the king?
Sounds to me like you're scum scanning for threats. I can't imagine anyone drawing that conclusion unless they were specifically trying to figure out who had investigative roles. Okami No Rei.
That seems like a pretty bad thing!I'm not sure if Captain Ford's question even matters here, because I'm pretty sure you can't recruit the King Mafia to your little club and with a new round started Hapah (or anyone) can easily be "the one" now.Recruiting as a mason carries the same risk now as it does any other time. If you miss your guess and try to recruit the King, you die. The only downside is that Mason only confirms town for one round, since afterward any of the masons recruited that round could roll KING MAFIA. I consider that a risk worth taking to get a possible Inspect. Worst that can happen is I die and go to the back of the line.
I'm boiling the frog.What is this? Because I can assure you it's not an answer to this:
Okami: if you think Ford is both rolefishing and buddying, why just an FoS?Answer it
WIFOMOkami No Rei: If you had a mason role, who would you recruit as your buddy today? Why?I'd pick Hapah. I am fairly certain that he has an inspect, since he tunneled Toaster in Round 1 and probably only let himself switch because the Miller claim threw doubt on the accuracy of his inspection.
Hapah - This is speculation on my part. Please don't confirm or deny this.Why? Afraid he'll expose your WIFOM for what it is?
Were you angry at this point because you could no longer use that to drive a lynch on Toony?I don't have two votes.Of course you don't. Of course that had to be a mod error.
*kicks something*
Are you claiming Mason Leader here?I'm not sure if Captain Ford's question even matters here, because I'm pretty sure you can't recruit the King Mafia to your little club and with a new round started Hapah (or anyone) can easily be "the one" now.Recruiting as a mason carries the same risk now as it does any other time. If you miss your guess and try to recruit the King, you die. The only downside is that Mason only confirms town for one round, since afterward any of the masons recruited that round could roll KING MAFIA. I consider that a risk worth taking to get a possible Inspect. Worst that can happen is I die and go to the back of the line.
Relevant rules from the first post:*snip**snip*Spoiler: Largish rules for choosing a role (click to show/hide)
I'd pick Hapah. I am fairly certain that he has an inspect, since he tunneled Toaster in Round 1 and probably only let himself switch because the Miller claim threw doubt on the accuracy of his inspection....really. You pick Hapah on the basis of an ability you suspect him to have, and not because he correctly picked out the king?
Sounds to me like you're scum scanning for threats. I can't imagine anyone drawing that conclusion unless they were specifically trying to figure out who had investigative roles. Okami No Rei.
This was in response to somebody's (can't remember who) question as to wheter you would appear before Day1 ended, since at the time the votes were tied and you were the only one not voting.Spoiler: Deathsword OOC (click to show/hide)
@First: Kind of a null tell actually - dependant on the person's personality. For me, tis a new round, new faces, new people, new tentative KotM candidate.Well yeah, but townies have the possible factor of "Oh, I'm not King. Damn." to drag down their excitement, whereas I don't believe the King has a similarly enthusiasm-dampening potential outlook.
That's me poking at him for getting Quadressence to post.Oh, that kind of third party. The fourth-wall breaking kind.
Do masons know each other upon recruitment and who recruited them here? (excuse me if any of this is mentioned but it seems different given this context).They know who the other recruited masons are, and they would presumably be able to tell from the quicktopic who the recruiter was.
Also, would a Mason Leader still appear as non-town upon investigation?The Recruiting Mason role has no effect on investigations at all.
Speaking of which, Toony, shame on you for putting someone at L-1 because "I think I'll add pressure."Sorry, I thought that would put him at L-2 and didn't think Deathsword would just hammer him 30 minutes later.
Of course. My brilliant plan to fish out Toony's role is to not ask him about it.Yup, stupid.
No, that's stupid.
1. Why wouldn't I want to be on his good side? No seriously. This is a dumb question.Aye, dumb question, and it did kick ass.
2. Because it kicked ass.
...really. You pick Hapah on the basis of an ability you suspect him to have, and not because he correctly picked out the king?You've got your logic turned around there. I picked Hapah because he correctly picked out the king, which means he got lucky, or he knows something. I don't believe in luck, not in this game, so that leaves him knowing something. So, he has an inspection, or he's damn good at finding scum. Both are pluses I'd look for in a potential fellow mason.
Sounds to me like you're scum scanning for threats. I can't imagine anyone drawing that conclusion unless they were specifically trying to figure out who had investigative roles.Sounds to me like I'm evaluating everyone from the perspective of a Recruiting Mason. You know, the premise of the original question that started this line of conversation. The question that you yourself asked me. Of all people, you're the one I shouldn't have to explain this to. So why are you ignoring your own question in order to devise a reason for me to be scum, Captain Ford?
Sorry, I thought that would put him at L-2 and didn't think Deathsword would just hammer him 30 minutes later.Both you and Deathsword were, apparently, not thinking. Or you're scum jumping on an easy lynch. Why shouldn't I believe the latter?
Okami's still alive though so it sort of works out.
That seems like a pretty bad thing!A very bad thing, but I don't believe in playing this game conservatively.
Okami No ReiLet me guess? You didn't even realize you were hammering with that vote?
What is this? Because I can assure you it's not an answer to this:Let me spell it out for you.Okami: if you think Ford is both rolefishing and buddying, why just an FoS?Answer it
WIFOMThis is a game of information, and more information for everybody is invariably good. If you ask me a theoretical question, as Captain Ford did, I will give the question thorough consideration, and answer it fully based on my current understanding of the situation. If the unknown variables in said situation make the whole exercise look like WiFoM to you, then I say that's a problem with my own inability to distinguish WiFoM from gameplay analysis (a distinction I've never cared for, nor indeed pay any attention to).
Why? Afraid he'll expose your WIFOM for what it is?My request for Hapah not to confirm or deny my speculation was there to make it explicitly clear that my speculation was not in any way an invitation or a request for him to reveal any information about his role. While I'm sure he has the necessary judgement to be discreet on the matter, I did not want to take chances on even the slightest misinterpretation of my intent. Thus the ham-handed request.
Were you angry at this point because you could no longer use that to drive a lynch on Toony?I was angry because what I hoped would be an interesting line of conversation was cut short.
Are you claiming Mason Leader here?Nonsense. Captain Ford just asked me to pretend to be a Recruiting Mason as an RVS question, so I did.
Okami No Rei: I'd still have hammered NQT. NQT spent the majority of the day doing some serious rolefishing. Additionally, the votes on Toaster were for claiming miller, for possibly having a powerful role, and a bandwagon by NQT, and I'm against letting people get away with lynching over trivialities.Thank you.
ToonyManThat wouldn't make sense, there's only one scum and I can't hope that Deathsword would blunder and quickhammer you. Also scary FoS there. OooOooO Okami Okami OkamiSorry, I thought that would put him at L-2 and didn't think Deathsword would just hammer him 30 minutes later.Both you and Deathsword were, apparently, not thinking. Or you're scum jumping on an easy lynch. Why shouldn't I believe the latter?
Okami's still alive though so it sort of works out.
I think it's just because you had a revive. Were you aware you had a revive?That seems like a pretty bad thing!A very bad thing, but I don't believe in playing this game conservatively.
DeathswordYou don't have to believe it. At the moment I thought it would take 5 to hammer, not 4.Okami No ReiLet me guess? You didn't even realize you were hammering with that vote?
I don't believe it.
After the break Toaster's body was found lying dead in the middle of the room. His body seemed to have been burned by the self-immolation kit carried by Toaster leaders.
Lying next to him were some kind of explosive device and a syringe. He seemed to have some kind of elaborate plan to use these as leverage to ensure his victory, but he was callously prevented from even explaining it to the rest of you. And just as well - it seemed that a new round was starting. The King was, once again, dead.
Toaster has been killed.
Nailed it.From here I'm pretty sure that Hapah primed Toaster. It would explain how Toaster died.
Wait...not because you didn't count up the votes right??DeathswordYou don't have to believe it. At the moment I thought it would take 5 to hammer, not 4.Okami No ReiLet me guess? You didn't even realize you were hammering with that vote?
I don't believe it.
That wouldn't make sense, there's only one scum and I can't hope that Deathsword would blunder and quickhammer you. Also scary FoS there. OooOooO Okami Okami OkamiSomehow, all three of you forgot that the mason discussion was kicked off by Captain Ford's RVS question. That means at least two of you weren't paying attention, and one of you is probably scum. Captain Ford is just the most culpable since it was his question in the first place.
I think it's just because you had a revive. Were you aware you had a revive?No, I was not aware of it before, and I have not since received any information that would cast light on it.
You don't have to believe it. At the moment I thought it would take 5 to hammer, not 4.And who, pray tell, are the other two people in this suddenly nine-player game?
You've got your logic turned around there. I picked Hapah because he correctly picked out the king, which means he got lucky, or he knows something. I don't believe in luck, not in this game, soWhat you said just now is not the same as what you said before. Your original answer focused entirely on him having an inspect. You never mentioned that his effectiveness in hunting scum was a factor.
that leaves him knowing something. So, he has an inspection, or he's damn good at finding scum. Both are pluses I'd look for in a potential fellow mason.
So why are you ignoring your own question in order to devise a reason for me to be scum, Captain Ford?I'm not. There was zero evidence of Hapah having an inspect. He didn't show any suspicion of Toaster until after Toaster claimed miller. He only unvoted with 20 minutes to spare, and he was clearly very reluctant to do so.
No, I was not aware of it before, and I have not since received any private information that would cast light on it.It may have been a gift from our Arsonist Santa.
I picked him because I thought he had an inspect. That was the important bit. You asked for clarification, so I clarified. I don't see the problem here.You've got your logic turned around there. I picked Hapah because he correctly picked out the king, which means he got lucky, or he knows something. I don't believe in luck, not in this game, soWhat you said just now is not the same as what you said before. Your original answer focused entirely on him having an inspect. You never mentioned that his effectiveness in hunting scum was a factor.
that leaves him knowing something. So, he has an inspection, or he's damn good at finding scum. Both are pluses I'd look for in a potential fellow mason.
Tell me how I'm not supposed to interpret "I'm fairly certain he has an inspect" as you picking him because you think he has an inspect?
I disagree with the idea that inspect results on a claimed miller should go right out the window in a role-heavy game. Anyway, where you see "zero evidence", I see a behavior pattern that makes him significantly more probable as the best choice for a Mason Recruit. Just because he's the best option, doesn't mean he's a great one, or even necessarily a good one. Your question was "If you had a mason role, who would you recruit as your buddy today?", not "If you had a mason role, would you recruit anyone as your buddy today?".So why are you ignoring your own question in order to devise a reason for me to be scum, Captain Ford?I'm not. There was zero evidence of Hapah having an inspect. He didn't show any suspicion of Toaster until after Toaster claimed miller. He only unvoted with 20 minutes to spare, and he was clearly very reluctant to do so.
On top of that, you don't have to be cop to know what result you would have gotten on Toaster last night. As soon as Toaster claimed miller, any inspect results on him would have been thrown right out the window.
Also, you're objectively wrong, since he's flipped now.I've been wrong before. I'll be wrong again. New data, new analysis.
I asked you those questions for the purpose of clarification. It was in the early stages of the day. What makes you think I was aiming for a lynch on you and not simply pressuring you?You apparently disregarded your own question, and took my answer out of context. I'm satisfied with explanation for this here:
You appeared to be looking for someone with an inspect and molding the evidence to fit your theory, rather than actually trying to draw conclusions from the evidence. It struck me that you might have already drawn that conclusion while looking for threats and simply reused it in this answer. It otherwise doesn't make any sense to me, as I explained above.Unvote. As a Mason, I have the unique opportunity to confirm someone as town with a successful recruit. That means whatever information they provide is inherently trustworthy. If I were to try to recruit a Vigilante, a Doctor, or a Roleblocker, all they could tell me is who they targeted. They may pay off in the long run, but they may also get lynched or mafiakilled at any time. A Cop, on the other hand (one who hasn't yet claimed), has inspect results available right then and there. That increases their value sufficiently that I feel it would be foolish, as a mason, to try and recruit anyone else. So you see, asking me to evaluate potential buddies from a mason's perspective is effectively the same as asking me who I think is a cop.
No insult was intended. I was more concerned with the process of boiling a frog than with the disposition of the frog itself, which is a variable outside of my control. That said, no metaphor is perfect, and this one had the intended effect of getting reactions from Deathsword.Spoiler: Boiling the Frog (click to show/hide)
You apparently disregarded your own question, and took my answer out of context. I'm satisfied with your explanation for this here:
EBWOPYeah I did >.>You apparently disregarded your own question, and took my answer out of context. I'm satisfied with your explanation for this here:
Tiruin - Looks like you missed all the action again.
Toony: I was the Purple Goo Magistrate who pardoned Okami about a minute before Deathsword hammered, so it really works out.Err...Deathsword was town then. Seeing the new round, you've no question for him other than this? Wait, not a question but a...statement. Ok...
Now I've been disabled and swapped with someone who is definitely not a disabler.
Tiruin:I point at the word "placeholder". And yeeesss, I hold you responsible for Quad's actions. Yes indeed.Aghhh, must vote. Placeholder - Ford, I believe you're adding third party players in suspect of ToonyMan, eh?@Second: Placeholder vote because of technical anti-lurk system. That's me poking at him for getting Quadressence to post.Uhh...what? Are you somehow holding me responsible for Quad's actions?
There's no way I could have predicted she would do that, or how she would react. And how could interactions with her have any meaning in the context of the game anyway?
EBWOPBut santas give one-shot actions...So how can this relate to private information? I mean, the only one-shot I can think about that gives such is an investigate.No, I was not aware of it before, and I have not since received any private information that would cast light on it.It may have been a gift from our Arsonist Santa.
Deathsword - Your explanation so far is "I knew it was a 7 player game, and I knew that I was the 4th vote on you, but I failed to put 2 and 2 together." Do I have that right? Why do you think that's a good enough excuse for lynching me?Other than personal mistake, I wonder why or how this pertains to how DS behaved...Because personal mistake seems like the most probable answer given what he said.
So they are. Apparently (Auto)gift is also a night action. So much for that. How it relates to private information? I meant I received no PMs from the mod regarding the revive.EBWOPBut santas give one-shot actions...So how can this relate to private information? I mean, the only one-shot I can think about that gives such is an investigate.No, I was not aware of it before, and I have not since received any private information that would cast light on it.It may have been a gift from our Arsonist Santa.
You can get away with a making mistakes in a Beginner's Mafia.Deathsword - Your explanation so far is "I knew it was a 7 player game, and I knew that I was the 4th vote on you, but I failed to put 2 and 2 together." Do I have that right? Why do you think that's a good enough excuse for lynching me?Other than personal mistake, I wonder why or how this pertains to how DS behaved...Because personal mistake seems like the most probable answer given what he said.
Err...Deathsword was town then. Seeing the new round, you've no question for him other than this? Wait, not a question but a...statement. Ok...How do you know Deathsword is town? And I'm voting him because he hammered Okami basically immediately.
Also, out of all the people voting for Okami, why DS? How does it work out?
...You claimed, why? And why exactly did you pardon Okami?
Also, why mention the last line of your post when Purple Goo translates to "Switch me and you if you touch me!"
I claimed because I want to know who I swapped with.Not me.
Err...Deathsword was town then.
Toony: I was the Purple Goo Magistrate who pardoned Okami about a minute before Deathsword hammered, so it really works out.This makes sense. I can also confirm that Urist Imik didn't kill anybody last night so he is very unlikely to be King Mafia this round, although I guess a vig wouldn't claim...
Now I've been disabled and swapped with someone who is definitely not a disabler.
Deathsword - Your explanation so far is "I knew it was a 7 player game, and I knew that I was the 4th vote on you, but I failed to put 2 and 2 together." Do I have that right? Why do you think that's a good enough excuse for lynching me?Oh, wow, having a hard day and counting something wrong is totally scummy. And I didn't vote you because of my incorrect counting. That makes no sense. I voted you because you were scummy.
[...]counting something wrong is totally scummy.[...]@UI: I...guess I messed up my wording? Now that I see it from how others do, yeah, pretty messed up :/
[I was thinking at this post]DeathswordYou don't have to believe it. At the moment I thought it would take 5 to hammer, not 4.Okami No ReiLet me guess? You didn't even realize you were hammering with that vote?
I don't believe it.
Jesus Christ I've made a mafia post Saturday at 9am. What am I doing anymoreYou're posting early in the morning so you can do other things later in the day because no personal schedule is rigid enough to mess it up by one mafia post.
Your question was "If you had a mason role, who would you recruit as your buddy today?", not "If you had a mason role, would you recruit anyone as your buddy today?".Point. I did make that question overly specific. You did a good job explaining why you wouldn't necessarily pick someone today and what criteria you would actually pick them on.
I disagree with the idea that inspect results on a claimed miller should go right out the window in a role-heavy game.Umm...no matter how you look at it, a scum result on a claimed miller is worthless. Sure, the investigator could have been redirected, or fooled by some other ability ... but if you get scum, it doesn't tell you anything about the miller, and if you get town it either means Toaster is a townie and lying or your result was unreliable.
Toony: I was the Purple Goo Magistrate who pardoned Okami about a minute before Deathsword hammered, so it really works out.If you were disabled, wouldn't that prevent your purple goo ability from kicking in?
Now I've been disabled and swapped with someone who is definitely not a disabler.
Urist Imiknorris:I think he's talking in the present tense?Toony: I was the Purple Goo Magistrate who pardoned Okami about a minute before Deathsword hammered, so it really works out.If you were disabled, wouldn't that prevent your purple goo ability from kicking in?
Now I've been disabled and swapped with someone who is definitely not a disabler.
You can disable someone's role. That player will temporarily lose all abilities/characteristics until the next night. Actions: disableThere's also a day version that disables until the next day.
They're probably saying "disabled" to be as vague as possible while still getting the point across the same way I'm trying to be as vague as possible in how I'm pretty sure UI is town thanks to something.Who are "they"?
Actually no, I'll put the vote on Captain Ford. I think Deathsword genuinely blundered and your attack on Okami is weird.The fuck are you talking about? Okami gave a good answer and I moved on. My current question to him is just because I'm confused about his logic.
This makes sense. I can also confirm that Urist Imik didn't kill anybody last night so he is very unlikely to be King Mafia this round, although I guess a vig wouldn't claim...Noted: Rolefishing.
This makes sense. I can also confirm that Urist Imik didn't kill anybody last night so he is very unlikely to be King Mafia this round, although I guess a vig wouldn't claim...This still looks like opportunistic rolefishing, Toony.
I did the disable on UI last night (it was a one-shot) and got his role. I didn't start the game with the disable, however. I recieved it on D2.Got it. Unvote.
Urist Imik.They're probably saying "disabled" to be as vague as possible while still getting the point across the same way I'm trying to be as vague as possible in how I'm pretty sure UI is town thanks to something.Who are "they"?
No...on second thought, the rest of that argument still holds.I'd rather not disregard the possibility that someone else who isn't the King Mafia killed Hapah while UI is actually guilty, but that's not what I believe.This makes sense. I can also confirm that Urist Imik didn't kill anybody last night so he is very unlikely to be King Mafia this round, although I guess a vig wouldn't claim...This still looks like opportunistic rolefishing, Toony.
...blarg. No, I'm wrong. Unvote. That's only rolefishing if you already had reason to think there was a vig.It's okay to be wrong! Unless you're scum, I need to stop using ellipses...
PPE: Tiruin
I did the disable on UI last night (it was a one-shot) and got his role. I didn't start the game with the disable, however. I recieved it on D2.And because I believe UI is town, and this backs up with UI's claim Deathsword looks confirmed to me as well.
I'd rather not disregard the possibility that someone else who isn't the King Mafia killed Hapah while UI is actually guilty, but that's not what I believe.Yes, I see that now. I thought the scenario made the most sense if someone used a one-shot disable, but didn't think they existed. Your posts seemed to strongly hint at you being the disabler, and a number of things clicked with that conclusion:
Anyways, you're wrong about Hapah killing Toaster. His ignite is specifically a day ability.Yeah that's right. I'm not sure then. Deathsword disabled UI anyway so both me and Deathsword are clearing him.
Oh, wow, having a hard day and counting something wrong is totally scummy. And I didn't vote you because of my incorrect counting. That makes no sense. I voted you because you were scummy.We've established this. You claim you made a mistake. I want to know why you think you should get a free pass on such a convenient excuse for "accidentally" hammering a bandwagon.
Can you explain this a bit better?You did a pretty good job explaining it yourself.
Sure, the investigator could have been redirected, or fooled by some other ability ... but if you get scum, it doesn't tell you anything about the miller, and if you get town it either means Toaster is a townie and lying or your result was unreliable.That's why I stated it this way:
I disagree with the idea that inspect results on a claimed miller should go right out the window in a role-heavy game.There's absolutely no reason to assume that, in a game such as this, your inspection is going to go through in isolation from the rest of the night's actions.
Because I'm having trouble seeing how a scum inspect result on a claimed miller tells you anything about the miller.Ah, you're more concerned with what it means right there and then, with no more information available. It means you have a scum inspect result. Miller is an unfortunate characteristic for Town to have, but it isn't a free pass from critical examination. Anyone claiming Miller should be carefully and critically observed until proven innocent or killed/lynched.
Damn. I scanned the role list and didn't see any one-shot disables. I sent a PM to LS asking if they were possible, but decided that was unlikely.
Santa (town, survivor; uncommon; 4+ players): You are the bearer of gifts. Each night, you will give a random player a one-shot action. (You can't choose not to use this ability.) Actions: (auto)giftThat accounts for Hapah's N1 gift.
That accounts for Hapah's N1 gift.What does? DS said he got it N2.
I did the disable on UI last night (it was a one-shot) and got his role. I didn't start the game with the disable, however. I recieved it on D2.
Toony: If there was an anarchist in the game, would that change your mind about UI?There better not be a fucking anarchist or I'll strangle them!!! That's such an anti-town role it's not even funny. There's still a 50% chance my action did work though and there's a 100% chance that Deathsword disabled and swapped roles with Urist Imik since both can confirm that themselves.
Not a lot of time right now, so I'll have to answer some stuff later.I'm not saying anyone in this game is incapable of mistakes. I'm saying apparent mistakes should be looked at with an eye for nefarious schemes. It seems too easy, to me, to simply write off your actions as a simple blunder.
Okami, you seem to be under the impression that all players in a KotM are immune to mistakes and thus anything that may even remotely resemble a mistake must be instead part of a nefarious scum plan.
In other words: your assumption that no KotM players are capable of making mistakes is a pile of feces.
Everyone makes mistakes. To believe yourself incapable of making one is stupid. Not everyone remembers constantly that 7 players = 4 to hammer. Some of us have important things to be worried about.
That leaves:There's one name you left off that list, Toony Man.
Tiruin, Okami, and Captain Ford.
That is pretty compelling. I think I'll add pressure, Okami no Rei.for a reason.
If somebody does claim the Hapah kill and they say they're not the King Mafia then that's a whole different story.How does that even make sense? Is there any reason they'd say they are King Mafia?
I believe Tiruin is just being confusing here, I'm voting Deathsword.Could you elaborate on this?
You can only use one night action per night (this doesn't include automatic actions).This means Deathsword is cleared as well, no doubts. That's good.
I'm not going to put myself on a possible scum list because I'm not scum. You're just trying to sound edgy/smart here.That leaves:There's one name you left off that list, Toony Man.
Tiruin, Okami, and Captain Ford.
Other people who voted your "bandwagon": Tiruin, Captain FordWith Captain Ford sorted out and Deathsword more or less cleared by claims, you're my next choice for scum.
You did join the bandwagon on me, after all, with onlyThat is pretty compelling. I think I'll add pressure, Okami no Rei.for a reason.
Sorry, I like covering possibilities. A vig claim would probably get that person lynched if they can't convince everyone, they would be pulling a gambit as the King Mafia. That's what I meant.If somebody does claim the Hapah kill and they say they're not the King Mafia then that's a whole different story.How does that even make sense? Is there any reason they'd say they are King Mafia?
I'm more sure about Captain Ford being mafia than Tiruin. Tiruin is still definitely possible since you seem to have a read, but I definitely feel more confident in Ford being the mafia. That's why I think Tiruin is just being confusing, since he's town in this case.I believe Tiruin is just being confusing here, I'm voting Deathsword.Could you elaborate on this?
You're deflecting attention away from yourself. Tiruin had a reason to vote Okami (or at least she did when she voted), and Captain Ford gave a reason as well. You didn't. You just tossed your vote on like whatever. So how are Tiruin's and Captain Ford's votes relevant to yours in any way?Other people who voted your "bandwagon": Tiruin, Captain FordWith Captain Ford sorted out and Deathsword more or less cleared by claims, you're my next choice for scum.
You did join the bandwagon on me, after all, with onlyThat is pretty compelling. I think I'll add pressure, Okami no Rei.for a reason.
...You seem really undecided currently.I made a mistake, and yeah, I put the PPE there to cover for it because you beat me to the punch. You didn't ninja me, exactly, but I had the thought while I was away from my computer and wasn't expecting your post when I returned.
What's up? RL factors? Or did you just put that PPE right there to cover a mistake.
Why did you disable me anyway?
Deathsword: I'm curious about your reasons for voting Okami yesterday - specifically, how is his speculation WIFOM?I misunderstood what he meant on that one. I believed he was claiming to know what Hapah thought.
Why did you disable me anyway?You seemed to be quite displeased with my hammer on Okami and I thought that would make me a very big target for any non-lethal actions you might have had.
While we are at it, how do you like your new role?I want a refund.
Toony:My vote on Okami was really bad I know. I was pointing out in your selective quote that my top two suspects were the other voters so it matches very very well. It's also very sad to be suspected by the guy who I confirmed first (which I can't prove 100% like DS unfortunately) and Okami who I'm pretty sure is town as well.You're deflecting attention away from yourself. Tiruin had a reason to vote Okami (or at least she did when she voted), and Captain Ford gave a reason as well. You didn't. You just tossed your vote on like whatever. So how are Tiruin's and Captain Ford's votes relevant to yours in any way?Other people who voted your "bandwagon": Tiruin, Captain FordWith Captain Ford sorted out and Deathsword more or less cleared by claims, you're my next choice for scum.
You did join the bandwagon on me, after all, with onlyThat is pretty compelling. I think I'll add pressure, Okami no Rei.for a reason.
Post coming up...finally awake at this unholy hour after a whole day of doing everything else not related to Mafia.You said this over three hours ago, and still nothing. Stalling for time, Tiruin?
I'm not going to put myself on a possible scum list because I'm not scum. You're just trying to sound edgy/smart here.One.
Other people who voted your "bandwagon": Tiruin, Captain FordAs Urist pointed out, Tiruin's vote was an RVS that he didn't have a chance to remove due to the time zone difference. Captain Ford and Deathsword both had cases to bring against me. Yours is the only vote that had nothing backing it up.
I understand why you suspect me, but I know I'm town so that's why like I said earlier the only possible scum I can see being left are Captain Ford and Tiruin. It can be either really, Tiruin is hard to read but you seem to notice a difference while Ford voted and unvoted me like three times a bit ago.Two.
Sorry, I like covering possibilities. A vig claim would probably get that person lynched if they can't convince everyone, they would be pulling a gambit as the King Mafia. That's what I meant.This is the only sensible thing in either of your last two posts. Thanks for clearing this up. Makes sense now.
I'm more sure about Captain Ford being mafia than Tiruin. Tiruin is still definitely possible since you seem to have a read, but I definitely feel more confident in Ford being the mafia. That's why I think Tiruin is just being confusing, since he's town in this case.Three.
PFPLet's get something very clear, here. There is no one in this game who is confirmed. Not me. Not you. Not Urist Imiknorris. Not Deathsword.You're deflecting attention away from yourself. Tiruin had a reason to vote Okami (or at least she did when she voted), and Captain Ford gave a reason as well. You didn't. You just tossed your vote on like whatever. So how are Tiruin's and Captain Ford's votes relevant to yours in any way?My vote on Okami was really bad I know. I was pointing out in your selective quote that my top two suspects were the other voters so it matches very very well. It's also very sad to be suspected by the guy who I confirmed first (which I can't prove 100% like DS unfortunately) and Okami who I'm pretty sure is town as well.
You're buddying every single person who you can even remotely claim to have "confirmed" and repeatedly insisting that you must be town because of your extraordinary efforts to confirm other town.
Toony: Hmm ...Your high-five with Hapah before he ends up dying, your attack on Okami (though you backed off), and you have un-voted and voted me in quick succession a lot, kind of like you're judging whether it'd be too scummy to vote.
You might be right about UI. Tell me, what makes you suspect me over Tiruin?
UI is coming off scummy to me but it might just be his playstyle. I think every game I've played with him he's been scum (he was even my scum IC), so it might just be that I have no idea what his town game looks like.True enough. I highly doubt UI and Deathsword are scum though.
I'm pretty sure I was redirected last night. I couldn't think of a reason for someone to redirect me specifically, and for a little while I wondered if UI might have been swapped with a Nexus.Redirected onto whom?
In short, you, ToonyMan, are this rounds KING MAFIA.Fine.
You can only use one night action per night (this doesn't include automatic actions).Deathsword and Urist Imik (and me) could not have killed anybody last night.
I'm a delayer. I delayed Toaster N0 and N1. I delayed UI N2. This is why I'm so sure UI is town. Deathsword disabling him just makes this better.
To put this simply:How convenient. There's absolutely no way for you or Urist to confirm your action last night, unless somebody happened to track you.You can only use one night action per night (this doesn't include automatic actions).Deathsword and Urist Imik (and me) could not have killed anybody last night.
The only possible scum left are Captain Ford, Tiruin, or you. I think it's either Captain Ford or Tiruin but if you're gonna be an idiot then I can accept it being you.So I'm back on the list just for attacking you? And there you go again with this "only possible scum" nonsense.
Okami, what should ToonyMan do? Say "I'm scum"?It's not just that he's saying he's town. It's the buddying combined with yesterday's bandwagoning.
Saying you are town is pretty null. It looks to me as if you want to drive a bullshit case on him.
So by your logic, if I ask if you are town and you answer "yes" then you are scum. If you answer "no" then you are scum.If you answer "Yes" and move on, then it's a null-tell. If you answer no, then you're a jester, or you're explaining how you've already won, and nothing can stop you now (much as Pandarsenic did (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=63487.msg1555094#msg1555094) in BYOR4).
Are you town?Yes
Day ends in 24 hours time. Everyone should vote before then (Deathsword's vote just now counts towards that though).Refresh Vote: ToonyMan
If your answer is...
Mod: If an action is delayed, and the user is killed before the action goes off, will the action still occur during the next night?No.
Secondly, does the start of a new round cancel any such pending actions or reset things like an arsonist dousing people in gasoline?No. Also arsonist dousing does not work at all as per the rules.
Your high-five with Hapah before he ends up dying, your attack on Okami (though you backed off), and you have un-voted and voted me in quick succession a lot, kind of like you're judging whether it'd be too scummy to vote.Seriously? Truth be told, Hapah's helping me out with some advice via PM. If you're gonna find me scummy for being nice to the nice guy, then you can
No. Also arsonist dousing does not work at all as per the rules.Say what? So Hapah had a role that didn't work?
Tiruin - Reading back over the thread, I notice that your D1 posts were coherent, but your D2 and D3 posts, well, not so much. Did you roll KING MAFIA and then get lazy now that you don't have to hunt scum?Several reasons (not lazy nor the KotM; here (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=123832.msg4130992#msg4130992) is a blatant NO.):
Why? You've got a disabling role, and was...ironically disabled by it. While your past role can save others from the hammer of death - the current role can stop a death from occurring.While we are at it, how do you like your new role?I want a refund.
I'm really betting Hapah's helping with personal non-Mafia advice as he helped me before, right? Also, overreaction is noted.Your high-five with Hapah before he ends up dying, your attack on Okami (though you backed off), and you have un-voted and voted me in quick succession a lot, kind of like you're judging whether it'd be too scummy to vote.Seriously? Truth be told, Hapah's helping me out with some advice via PM. If you're gonna find me scummy for being nice to the nice guy, then you canSpoiler (click to show/hide)
I'm a delayer. I delayed Toaster N0 and N1. I delayed UI N2. This is why I'm so sure UI is town. Deathsword disabling him just makes this better.
The only possible scum left are Captain Ford, Tiruin, or you. I think it's either Captain Ford or Tiruin but if you're gonna be an idiot then I can accept it being you.
I will also get pissed at UI for pardoning the fucking King Mafia but whatever...
The only possible scum left are Captain Ford, Tiruin, or you. I think it's either Captain Ford or Tiruin but if you're gonna be an idiot then I can accept it being you.This would be his defining points: It points out two things.
I will also get pissed at UI for pardoning the fucking King Mafia but whatever...
ToonyMan: Urist Imiknorris, Okami No Rei (2)
Captain Ford: ToonyMan (1)
Tiruin: Captain Ford (1 or 2,)
Okami No Rei: Deathsword (1)
Not Voting: Tiruin (1) - either here, or on myself
My vote on Okami was really bad I know. I was pointing out in your selective quote that my top two suspects were the other voters so it matches very very well. It's also very sad to be suspected by the guy who I confirmed first (which I can't prove 100% like DS unfortunately) and Okami who I'm pretty sure is town as well.And again, they voted because they had cases. You didn't. Stop trying to deflect suspicion. As it turns out, my top two suspects also voted Okami. Mostly because the ones who didn't are either dead, confirmed town, or Okami himself.
Several reasons (not lazy nor the KotM; here (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=123832.msg4130992#msg4130992) is a blatant NO.):So, similar excuses to Captain Ford's.
> Firstly, day keeps on ending when I'm away - I nearly have no say on the proceeding posts afterwards - see D1/D2.
> Secondly, King shifted Post-N1, here's me trying to find out through questioning...but then seemingly getting lost along the way.
> In the past 1/2 days, RL has cut in along with personal stuff...apologies for that one.
> Its only me and me alone posting, keep my security on any of my accounts at a high level...Its just my emotional/mental state contributing to what gets down.
UI/DS are town btw - claiming ahead of time, my inspect landed on DS...revealing him to be town. N1 - my action landed on the most useless (should've been useful but bleh) pick. And I really feel I've been redirected somehow because I didn't pick DS as my target during that time.Why claim now? We've already shifted off of DS and UI as scumpicks, so this serves no purpose other than announcing to the world that you have an Inspect. That' makes you a target for no reason.
Why? You've got a disabling role, and was...ironically disabled by it. While your past role can save others from the hammer of death - the current role can stop a death from occurring.DS claimed one-shot disable. With you claiming a town inspect and UI not counter-claiming the one-shot, that's pretty much certain.
Lastly...err, abstain from current vote - is this possible? If not then Tiruin because I'm pretty racked up with decisions here.Ummm...no? Last I checked, there's no such thing as conditional votes, meaning the vote on yourself stands as the last one appearing in your post. Mod, please confirm.
> Undergoing the reason by elimination, I'm not having that much of a read on the others though somehow Okami strikes me as the KotM...and I've no conclusive proof atm (I mean, day end already. Wow. No time for questioning other than what I said above.)No time for questioning? You could have easily asked me several questions. I've got plenty of time to answer them before the end of the day. Even if you do miss day-end, you could analyze and respond to my answers tomorrow if I survived to morning.
> 6 people, 1 scum, and probably 1 vig/one-shot killer due to how Toaster died. I've outed the first two who I'm pretty much confirmed on and myself because the usual "I'm town but nobody can prove it" cliche leaving the three of you down here.That bit of meta-argument doesn't mean a thing.
Now I'm in the belief that Toony's being town in the way that he's...well, his tendency is usually to go unhinged when scum - he doesn't smell, or is acting, like the scum Toony I know. Also, his latest reasons...I strongly don't believe he'd be acting like thatThis post (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=123832.msg4131101#msg4131101) doesn't qualify as unhinged?
UI/DS are town btw - claiming ahead of time, my inspect landed on DS...revealing him to be town. N1 - my action landed on the most useless (should've been useful but bleh) pick. And I really feel I've been redirected somehow because I didn't pick DS as my target during that time.How do you know you landed on DS? Leafsnail specifically said we aren't informed if we're redirected.
Ford: Here (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=123832.msg4127623#msg4127623), why Anarchist instead of another redirecting role?I said it here (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=123832.msg4130033#msg4130033), but I guess I didn't finish the thought. At the time, I didn't see a good reason for someone to redirect me specifically, and since UI seemed scummy to me, it made sense that whatever Toony did to proclaim his innocence may also have been redirected.
I'm really betting Hapah's helping with personal non-Mafia advice as he helped me before, right? Also, overreaction is noted.Yeah, that's exactly it. This isn't the first time I've been poked about that one-liner at the start of the day. Okami did it earlier (I think it was Okami). Toony ignoring it until late in the day is really, really low of him, and also him not stating it until I ask him about it is a really jerk move.
Tiruin, you don't want to question your suspects beyond rolefishing, so you have no case on anyone. Thus you vote yourself.I did read it...and the vote was because prod-limit thing...I claimed only part of my role, obviously. You'd expect me to fullclaim? No.
What the hell?
Also, didn't you read Deathswords claim? The disable was a one-shot from Hapah.
What makes you think you get to just sit out of the scumhunting and let everyone kill each other around you?...Not sitting out, just really really mentally tired.
Tiruin: (I think you put yourself at L-1 for a moment there. You would have been safer voting DS or UI since they're both confirmed town.)...Good point, but I only have 2 votes on me, we need 4 to hammer.
How do you know you landed on DS? Leafsnail specifically said we aren't informed if we're redirected.Well...I picked someone else, not DS.
Can you AT LEAST admit that Deathsword and UI are confirmed town?? That's what I was trying so hard to explain to you.I'm a delayer. I delayed Toaster N0 and N1. I delayed UI N2. This is why I'm so sure UI is town. Deathsword disabling him just makes this better.To put this simply:How convenient. There's absolutely no way for you or Urist to confirm your action last night, unless somebody happened to track you.You can only use one night action per night (this doesn't include automatic actions).Deathsword and Urist Imik (and me) could not have killed anybody last night.
Not true, you have always been a possible scum pick. I only doubted that because you didn't sound like the King Mafia about to get lynched Day 2 (remember you didn't know UI was pardoning you).The only possible scum left are Captain Ford, Tiruin, or you. I think it's either Captain Ford or Tiruin but if you're gonna be an idiot then I can accept it being you.So I'm back on the list just for attacking you? And there you go again with this "only possible scum" nonsense.
You're still deflecting, as Urist pointed out. You're trying to distract everyone with your roleclaim, and you've failed to address any specific points I've brought against you.I have not??
So, why Urist? Why disable him last night?1. I delayed him
Toony:Stop being an idiot!! Why do the confirmed town always become lazy idiots??My vote on Okami was really bad I know. I was pointing out in your selective quote that my top two suspects were the other voters so it matches very very well. It's also very sad to be suspected by the guy who I confirmed first (which I can't prove 100% like DS unfortunately) and Okami who I'm pretty sure is town as well.And again, they voted because they had cases. You didn't. Stop trying to deflect suspicion. As it turns out, my top two suspects also voted Okami. Mostly because the ones who didn't are either dead, confirmed town, or Okami himself.
Toony: Explain to me why there's a connection between me being nice to Hapah and him dying.Distancing. I wouldn't put it highest on the list of suspicious activity as it's not as convincing by itself (as in unless you've been acting scummy that can just be said to be null although I still wouldn't recommend camaraderie when there's mafia around). It also doesn't help you have likely a 50% chance of being scum.
So I get a vote but no summary on why I deserve that vote other than the 'other target'?You voted yourself because you didn't want to get prodded, that means you have ZERO SUSPECTS.
This also helps me believe more that Captain Ford is town, because I PM'd Leafsnail this exact same question. I was afraid that maybe my delay on Toaster killed Hapah but that is not the case. At the very least they're thinking the same as me.Mod: If an action is delayed, and the user is killed before the action goes off, will the action still occur during the next night?No.
I...also can't explain how I was redirected. However, I asked Leafsnail concerning redirect-ish types and an investigate, he answered with that I get the name of who I get redirected to and that its for successful inspections only. Obviously, not informed if we're redirected but the path of logic is obvious.That reminds me:
I'm pretty sure I was redirected last night. I couldn't think of a reason for someone to redirect me specifically, and for a little while I wondered if UI might have been swapped with a Nexus.These don't match up. I asked Captain Ford who they got redirected onto earlier but they never answered or I can't find it.
Okami: I see you're poking at every tidbit I have, why is that and how does it help clarify your reads? Because it seems your behavior from D1 shifted into overgear in D2 and beyond, what's up?I didn't get a chance to get into gear D1, because I got hammered out of the blue. I'm in overdrive now D2 to make up for lost time scumhunting.
Can you AT LEAST admit that Deathsword and UI are confirmed town?? That's what I was trying so hard to explain to you.DS is confirmed town with Tiruin's claim.
I have not??Until this post, you hadn't addressed any of the accusations in my "You are scum." post.
1. I delayed himSlip of the tongue.
2. His last post of the day looked like scum picking targets for the next day (I wanted to really make sure he was either scum or town).Makes sense. Thank you.
These don't match up. I asked Captain Ford who they got redirected onto earlier but they never answered or I can't find it.Sorry, I'm at work. I only just got the chance to respond to this. I prioritized addressing Tiruin first because of timezones (if I wanted a response from her today, I had to post early).
Captain Ford?
PFProfession
Hammer Tiruin.
Then why did you hammer him?? He can't inspect unless he's town. You're either being stubborn against me again for some reason or you're scum.Can you AT LEAST admit that Deathsword and UI are confirmed town?? That's what I was trying so hard to explain to you.DS is confirmed town with Tiruin's claim.
If Tiruin is town I'm going to delay you Captain Ford and if there's still a kill it can only be Okami. So we've pretty much won this now.Wait that won't work if the mafia doesn't use their mafiakill. :P
Wait that won't work if the mafia doesn't use their mafiakill. :PI was going to say.
Mod: If we lynch scum, does the next round start in night?Yes.
The day was going to end in a few hours regardless, and I'm happy as long as it's you or Tiruin.Wait that won't work if the mafia doesn't use their mafiakill. :PI was going to say.
Okami, that was just dumb.
...huh?Toony: Explain to me why there's a connection between me being nice to Hapah and him dying.Distancing.
Let me reiterate that anyone who sent Anarchist is an asshole.::) Yeah, sure.
Good lord, Deathsword. No wonder UI was unhappy with the swap. That's gotta be the mostWhile we are at it, how do you like your new role?I want a refund.
Okami no Rei: In this gametype, when do you think a massclaim is a good idea, if ever?Massclaims are not a good idea, unless we're certain they're all that's between us and a successful scum lynch the same day. There's otherwise no reason to give the KING a chance to make one or more informed mafia-kills.
notquitethere II - Who'd the Random Number God pick to be our adversary this time?Only Leaf and the King know that (unless someone has an infallible day inspect that they're not telling us about). Looking back at the last two King flips, were there signs in those player's posts that they were the King?
Toaster: The most important thing I realized is that I'll have to be at the top of my game. I was totally surprised by your and UI's flip. Also, that hammers mean keeping track of votes is vital.
Toaster II - How many times are you going to have to die for being KING MAFIA?
Okami no Rei: In this gametype, when do you think a massclaim is a good idea, if ever?Massclaims are not a good idea, unless we're certain they're all that's between us and a successful scum lynch the same day. There's otherwise no reason to give the KING a chance to make one or more informed mafia-kills.
Toaster II
Is it too early to rule out the possibility of even more anarchists in this game?
How does [asking about anarchists] help you find scum?If you were to have given me a compelling argument as to why there couldn't be any more anarchists, then we might have got a clearer idea about the night results if we don't manage to get the King today.
Do you think the wisdom or folly of massclaiming has changed in any way when you take into account the fact that survivors quite possibly will have picked up additional powers?
For the record, I shot Hapah N1 R1. If Toony delayed me, no idea where the bullet came from.Only Leafsnail knows what happened N1. I asked him about multiple anarchists, and it turns out their effects stack. Everyone had a 75% chance to be randomized that night.
If the wife is murdered chances are the husband did it. At least, in fiction. :P...Hapah isn't my wife.
But this is a fictional game!
Other than Mirror none of those seem particularly overpowered or annoying. I think I'm prepared to give them a second chance (which will be revoked if too many people submit them).I'd suggest Toxic Goo for the same reason (delayed PGO)
Nerf list addition: Mirror (because it's a stealth PGO)
Actually, the flavor kind of suggests you killed yourself. It clearly described a suicide pack.Flavour will never reveal or hint at anything that isn't also said in the summary text.
Urist Imiknorris has been killed.I love whoever is killing the King Mafia. It's hilarious, hahahaa.
He was an Anarchist Hospital director (mafia) and KING MAFIA.
Round 2 is now over.
Let me reiterate that anyone who sent Anarchist is an asshole.You should have seen how pissed I was when Tiruin flipped, and THEN Urist Imik flips as an Anarchist too (although I believe that means Deathsword was the one who picked that originally).
ToonyMan: What all happened in Round Two that will help you find scum in Round Three?Fucking Anarchists. Do they stack? I'm curious whether my delay of UI even had a 25% chance of working. Either way, I'll need to be less demanding with my power role. It's still possible that my delay DID work on UI and the Hapah death was from our wonderful vig, but the vig didn't claim (I guess I can't blame them) which made me really confused!
ToonyMan - I was wrong about you last round. Has that changed?Not much.
For the record, I shot Hapah N1 R1. If Toony delayed me, no idea where the bullet came from.Huh, Leafsnail confirmed that your kill wouldn't work then. So somebody else shot Hapah and it lined up perfectly.
On mass-claiming? If there's any more anarchists they'll probably keep their mouth shut in shame. And I don't think a mass-claim is a good idea either.How does [asking about anarchists] help you find scum?If you were to have given me a compelling argument as to why there couldn't be any more anarchists, then we might have got a clearer idea about the night results if we don't manage to get the King today.
Do you think the wisdom or folly of massclaiming has changed in any way when you take into account the fact that survivors quite possibly will have picked up additional powers?
Toonyman, what think you of this?
They stack?? Hahahaha how am I still alive in this game...so many random chances of dying...For the record, I shot Hapah N1 R1. If Toony delayed me, no idea where the bullet came from.Only Leafsnail knows what happened N1. I asked him about multiple anarchists, and it turns out their effects stack. Everyone had a 75% chance to be randomized that night.
Actually, the flavor kind of suggests you killed yourself. It clearly described a suicide pack.
ToonyMan:I was being an idiot really. I don't like how you specifically dissected one thing of my list on suspicions on you (it's like saying 10% of my case is wrong so my whole case is wrong). And while it was wrong I thought you were being anal. I should have just wrote it off the list instead of trying desperately to literate a meaning from it. It sort of works, right??If the wife is murdered chances are the husband did it. At least, in fiction. :P...Hapah isn't my wife.
But this is a fictional game!
I'd still like to understand what your logic was, exactly, even though it's irrelevant now.
Captain Ford must have figured out there was at least one anarchist because he mentions it quite a lot Round 2.In all fairness, I said it once, and most of the rest was answering questions about it.
I was being an idiot really. I don't like how you specifically dissected one thing of my list on suspicions on you (it's like saying 10% of my case is wrong so my whole case is wrong). And while it was wrong I thought you were being anal. I should have just wrote it off the list instead of trying desperately to literate a meaning from it.Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think I addressed both of your points against me (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=123832.msg4131417#msg4131417). The only other reasons you listed for suspecting me was process of elimination.
It sort of works, right??Sort of, I guess. If I was worried about it looking like I was buddying with Hapah, killing him off would be the easiest way to get rid of the problem. Except not, because it doesn't actually make the accusations go away.
Deathsword: How would you characterize your meta?Frankly, I have no idea what my meta is. Some people think I am rather cranky.
Deathsword: Does surviving several rounds give you an advantage here?I think not, since people know my role (UI's original role)
Deathsword: Why hospital director?That was added to my role, I picked just Anarchist.
Deathsword. You're King Mafia now right? I'm so jealous.Not yet. Maybe in the next round.
The Soldier - Would you rather be Ascetic or a Kill-Immune Townie, and why?Spoiler (click to show/hide)Okami no Rei: In this gametype, when do you think a massclaim is a good idea, if ever?Massclaims are not a good idea, unless we're certain they're all that's between us and a successful scum lynch the same day. There's otherwise no reason to give the KING a chance to make one or more informed mafia-kills.
The SoldierTraditional scumhunting. Unless one of the players is Heath Ledger's Joker, everyone does something for a reason, and that reason can be determined. Power roles certainly can help, but they can go wrong easily. And it doesn't matter that you got a guilty inspect if you have such a shitty day game that no one believes you. What do you think?
What's a more sure way of rooting out the king: using a power-role or traditional scum hunting?
The Soldier:Ending the day before any good discussion could happen. Town's gotta make the most of every day and find the KING before he plants a knife in everyone's back.Toaster: The most important thing I realized is that I'll have to be at the top of my game. I was totally surprised by your and UI's flip. Also, that hammers mean keeping track of votes is vital.
What would be the worst part of accidentally hammering someone?
In any case, I wasn't worried about it. As I've made quite clear, I'm not afraid to be nice to the nice guy. (Or anybody else, if I'm in the mood)Nice guy is fine as long as you're productive and really you've been playing better than me probably. My night-action targets have been good (Toaster and UI), but it never works in my favor come day-time.
ToonyMan:Same question, same answer.Deathsword. You're King Mafia now right? I'm so jealous.Not yet. Maybe in the next round.
Toaster:The Soldier:Ending the day before any good discussion could happen. Town's gotta make the most of every day and find the KING before he plants a knife in everyone's back.Toaster: The most important thing I realized is that I'll have to be at the top of my game. I was totally surprised by your and UI's flip. Also, that hammers mean keeping track of votes is vital.
What would be the worst part of accidentally hammering someone?
It should also be said that Deathsword and Okami were town last round, the hammerers. I was also the L-1 voter in both cases.
The Soldier:It would depend on the circumstances. Nobody's perfect after all. I would overall lean towards giving them the benefit of the doubt, but repeat offenses would be taken seriously. I would think that once someone had accidentally hammered once, that they'd keep better track of the votes from then on.
-Quote Pyramid removed-
Very solid answer. Would you suspect someone who claimed to accidentally hammer a townie?
The Soldier:It would depend on the circumstances. Nobody's perfect after all. I would overall lean towards giving them the benefit of the doubt, but repeat offenses would be taken seriously. I would think that once someone had accidentally hammered once, that they'd keep better track of the votes from then on.
-Quote Pyramid removed-
Very solid answer. Would you suspect someone who claimed to accidentally hammer a townie?
Probably a few times. I had a high death rate in the last one.Probably because you're hard to read. I've got my eye on you. Unvote
Does this statement take into account the high rate of massclaims in the last game, that contributed to it lasting over 18 rounds?Negative. I'll add that one to my "To Read" list of games.
OkamiOther than Toaster's Miller claim, I didn't see a thing.notquitethere II - Who'd the Random Number God pick to be our adversary this time?Only Leaf and the King know that (unless someone has an infallible day inspect that they're not telling us about). Looking back at the last two King flips, were there signs in those player's posts that they were the King?
Do you think the wisdom or folly of massclaiming has changed in any way when you take into account the fact that survivors quite possibly will have picked up additional powers?What do you mean by this?
Okami: Why did you hammer Tiruin?Because he looked like scum, and I was working late that day. That was my last chance to post before the day ended. I bagged me an Anarchist, so I don't regret it.
Not much.So, on a scale of One (Town) to Ten (KING MAFIA), how much is not much?
I said I would delay Captain Ford last night, but I actually delayed you Okami just to at least cover the possibility it was you and not Ford (Ford wouldn't mafiakill if he knew I was going to delay him, probably).I figured you might do that.
Frankly, I have no idea what my meta is. Some people think I am rather cranky.Rather? It's clear to all that you've been taking lessons from Dariush.
Town Perspective:Must be why it's on the nerf list now.
Kill-immune means that you can checkmate the KING MAFIA if it gets down to 2 players, and gives town more time to find him should he try to kill me before then. Ascetic is nice to not get screwed with by anarchists, but Kill-Immune is the winner here.
Mafia Perspective:
In a normal game, I'd lean towards Ascetic to stop pesky inspects and roleblocks. Here in KotM, though, there are bound to be more kills flying around. So, Kill-Immune wins here too.
Interesting response. I noticed that in the previous KotM, early massclaims were fairly common. Do you feel that it was a mistake for those players to massclaim?Hold that thought. Apparently I have to read the previous KotM now. I'll answer in my next post.
PWI (Posting While Intoxicated)Ahh...interesting.
A town anarchist.Okami: Why did you hammer Tiruin?Because he looked like scum, and I was working late that day. That was my last chance to post before the day ended. I bagged me an Anarchist, so I don't regret it.
Does this statement take into account the high rate of massclaims in the last game, that contributed to it lasting over 18 rounds?Are you talking about the first KotM here? I'm pretty sure the game I just read was only one round. Or is there some other, non-KotM game that consists of multiple rounds?
Interesting response. I noticed that in the previous KotM, early massclaims were fairly common. Do you feel that it was a mistake for those players to massclaim?The massclaims were a mistake, in my opinion. The only one justified in claiming during the first day was Native Foreigner, as he needed to explain the lack of a vote. Everybody was so busy looking at the role logic, and Leaf just waltzed on through with some excellent Town play.
I agree with your point about the unreliability of powers, it's very easy to get blocked or re-directed. What happens at night is always going to be somewhat unclear whereas who people vote for and pressure during the day cannot be hidden.What's a more sure way of rooting out the king: using a power-role or traditional scum hunting?Traditional scumhunting. Unless one of the players is Heath Ledger's Joker, everyone does something for a reason, and that reason can be determined. Power roles certainly can help, but they can go wrong easily. And it doesn't matter that you got a guilty inspect if you have such a shitty day game that no one believes you. What do you think?
ToonyMan, are you just going to let that vote sit on me while doing nothing or are you going to do something with it?ToonyMan:Same question, same answer.Deathsword. You're King Mafia now right? I'm so jealous.Not yet. Maybe in the next round.
Deathsword, you going to post, your majesty?Your imperial highness should go hunt instead of prodding a guy with bad internet
Toony:Yes. The King Mafia so far have been acting anxious. Toaster wanted to extend the game to avoid dying, UI hardly posted at all.It should also be said that Deathsword and Okami were town last round, the hammerers. I was also the L-1 voter in both cases.I think this falls under one of Web's town tells- that of scum playing textbook to avoid doing things considered scummy. Do you think that is applicable in this game?
Toaster:I agree, accidental hammers are totally possible.
I meant accidentally hammering twice, and was thinking more about mistakes carrying over between rounds, but it now occurs to me that someone's alignment in one round means nothing for their alignment in another. So, bad logic on my end. With this in mind, my answer of overall being willing to believe it was a mistake remains unchanged.
ToonyManI'm still a town Delayer. I didn't even get a PM last night.Not much.So, on a scale of One (Town) to Ten (KING MAFIA), how much is not much?
Why?I said I would delay Captain Ford last night, but I actually delayed you Okami just to at least cover the possibility it was you and not Ford (Ford wouldn't mafiakill if he knew I was going to delay him, probably).I figured you might do that.
Let me get this straight. Your second post of the round doesn't do anything but complain about the guy voting you and that you have bad internet? Deathsword. I think you are the one that needs to stop sitting around doing nothing.ToonyMan, are you just going to let that vote sit on me while doing nothing or are you going to do something with it?ToonyMan:Same question, same answer.Deathsword. You're King Mafia now right? I'm so jealous.Not yet. Maybe in the next round.
Toaster: I presume you're not a miller this time?
NQT: What is the most suspicious thing you have seen someone do this round? This separate from your case on Deathsword, where you vote him for something he's not doing (IE hunt scum.)Good question. I'd say my eyebrow was raised by Toonyman's assurances in his first substantive post that he definitely wasn't scum for the third time around. But I can see why that could just be a note of exasperation, so maybe I should take that as a null tell.
Mod: If an action is delayed, and the user is killed before the action goes off, will the action still occur during the next night?No.
Why didn't you follow up when I forgot to answer this question?Didn't notice/wasn't important. You would've claimed it first post if you were.
Ford: Why are you scumhunting Okami for what he did last round?Even though he was town then, it seemed like the kind of subject that could make a person nervous. It certainly didn't seem worse than a throwaway RVS question.
Toaster: Did you know that you are the first person this round to ask me a question?
Why didn't you follow up when I forgot to answer this question?Didn't notice/wasn't important. You would've claimed it first post if you were.
Ford: Why are you scumhunting Okami for what he did last round?Even though he was town then, it seemed like the kind of subject that could make a person nervous. It certainly didn't seem worse than a throwaway RVS question.
Okami: Why did you hammer Tiruin?
A town anarchist.Okami: Why did you hammer Tiruin?Because he looked like scum, and I was working late that day. That was my last chance to post before the day ended. I bagged me an Anarchist, so I don't regret it.
Albeit a lying town anarchist.
...*sigh*. I guess I can't find you scummy for it. Considering you were objectively town. There were only a few hours left in the day, after all. And it being your last chance to vote is a perfectly fair justification. Unvote.
Deathsword is currently at L-1. I'm going to take a look into why.
How does being the first person to put a legitimate vote on someone bandwagoning, Ford? Toony RVS'd DS, I later put my second vote on DS for not participating/hunting. If anyone is the bandwagoner, it's Toaster, openly putting DS in L-1.
I was pretty ticked when he did that. I called him dumb, among other things. The *sigh* was me letting go of all the things I wanted to say, but that weren't going to lead anywhere....*sigh*. I guess I can't find you scummy for it. Considering you were objectively town. There were only a few hours left in the day, after all. And it being your last chance to vote is a perfectly fair justification. Unvote.This is... what? Regret that you can't scumhunt him for it? I take issue with this response.
LurkerTracker. And I missed that part of your post the first time through. I'm usually more observant, but I got my meds late today and I'm not all there right now.Deathsword is currently at L-1. I'm going to take a look into why.How did you know he was L-1 without even reading my blatant comment that I was doing it?
Ignored. And maybe a little lonely.Toaster: Did you know that you are the first person this round to ask me a question?How does that make you feel?
To see how you answered. To clarify: I forgot about it.I see. Then why ask?Why didn't you follow up when I forgot to answer this question?Didn't notice/wasn't important. You would've claimed it first post if you were.
Leafsnail, does a Delayer delayed action still happen in between rounds? What about if the original actor is dead?Yes, no.
Because you said you were going to Delay Captain Ford. My read of your meta resolved that bit of WIFOM as a Delay on myself.I figured you might do that.Why?
Okami has RVSed, and is currently voting Toony (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=123832.msg4136431#msg4136431) for unclear reasons. Pressure, maybe?Got it in one.
I'd keep an eye on Ford and NQT, but I have no problem putting Deathsword at L-1. If his only content is complaining about votes on him, this is not town behavior.Perhaps not Town behavior, but it does seem like Deathsword behavior.
(OOC) Okami: Here's the big thread. Thirteen, eighteen, it was a while ago. (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=79995.0)Many thanks. I thought the round in which Leaf won was both first and last. Didn't realize there was a prequel.
Do you think the wisdom or folly of massclaiming has changed in any way when you take into account the fact that survivors quite possibly will have picked up additional powers?What do you mean by this?
I agree.How does being the first person to put a legitimate vote on someone bandwagoning, Ford? Toony RVS'd DS, I later put my second vote on DS for not participating/hunting. If anyone is the bandwagoner, it's Toaster, openly putting DS in L-1.This is awfully defensive of a weak vote.
Proofread that one too few times.In addition,Not only did you vote Deathsword for not posting, but you didn't remove your vote, or ask him any further questions after he posted, so the pressure from your vote is currently going to waste. In addition, you've posted several times since Toaster put him at L-1, without moving your vote, so you're clearly OK with Deathsword dying tonight. For that reason, I believe the charge of bandwagoning stands.
I'd keep an eye on Ford and NQT, but I have no problem putting Deathsword at L-1. If his only content is complaining about votes on him, this is not town behavior.Perhaps not Town behavior, but it does seem like Deathsword behavior.
Is that it, Toaster? You want to lynch an active-lurker tonight since no one else is popping on your scumdar?(OOC) Okami: Here's the big thread. Thirteen, eighteen, it was a while ago. (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=79995.0)Many thanks. I thought the round in which Leaf won was both first and last. Didn't realize there was a prequel.
I'm not sure. Ford was correct in reading you as town in Revolution even though I couldn't see it. Voicing annoyance against the game itself is hard to call especially when you can manipulate that. I will be mad if Toaster got King Mafia again though.NQT: What is the most suspicious thing you have seen someone do this round? This separate from your case on Deathsword, where you vote him for something he's not doing (IE hunt scum.)Good question. I'd say my eyebrow was raised by Toonyman's assurances in his first substantive post that he definitely wasn't scum for the third time around. But I can see why that could just be a note of exasperation, so maybe I should take that as a null tell.
What do you reckon, Toony, would you be suspicious if, say, Ford went out of his way to assure everyone that he was town again this round as well?
Toaster: If you were roleblocked, would you claim it?
Hapah: Is that because you're a ho (ho ho)?Cute. I'ma Strike The Earth the next time you're in my Lib for that!
Deathsword: Are you king now?No.
Deathsword: Are you still busy? What do you think will be the consequences of doing nothing last round?I wasn't busy, my internet was complete shit. As for you question, I have no idea.
ToonyMan: Who did you delay last night?Captain Ford. You probably didn't kill Okami at the very least.
It's also possible Okami accidentally killed himself (Stalker can either inspect or kill at night) like the other King Mafia likely did but then we'd have a missing kill and other headaches.
ToonyMan:Huh? If you mean my parenthesis I was stating the entire role for the uninformed.It's also possible Okami accidentally killed himself (Stalker can either inspect or kill at night) like the other King Mafia likely did but then we'd have a missing kill and other headaches.What does the inspect/role have anything to do with that?
ToonyMan: Any reason for Ford in particular?I'd already done Toaster and Okami and I'm pretty sure Deathsword is a Purple Goo Magistrate if Urist Imik didn't lie with his claim (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=123832.msg4124569#msg4124569). At the very least the purple goo claim would explain why Deathsword and UI swapped roles in the first place (Deathsword targeted him with his one-shot disable given by Santa Hapah).
How does it feel being one of the longest-lived players in the game?Pretty good, actually. I also feel like a big target.
Toaster: I would vigkill N0 if there was someone I found dangerously difficult to read in the game.Is there anyone like that in this game?
In this game, probably. Not 100% certainly, but probably. Are you looking for a block claim? You sure sound like you are.Indeed I am. I blocked you last night using a one-shot I got from Hapah Night 0. (I figured there was no point in dying with it, and rolled to pick between you and Hapah)
Hapah, would you play purposely worst to avoid being night-killed (obviously not bad enough to get lynched) in a game like this?Nope. Seems like a lot of extra work.
Hapah: Have any questions for us?Not right now. I don't normally play much on weekends.
ToonyMan: How do you feel about Ford denying you the oportunity to ask if I am king this time?I'm just happy somebody asked it. I probably would have if I got on sooner. :P
Toaster:I wouldn't put these claims too highly. I do feel more confident you're town based on my night-action, but I can't make the same mistake I made with UI two rounds ago. It does help at least in confirming actions (I think with anarchists nerfed now they don't actually work anymore?), but I won't put you off my radar just because I got a town-type of result.In this game, probably. Not 100% certainly, but probably. Are you looking for a block claim? You sure sound like you are.Indeed I am. I blocked you last night using a one-shot I got from Hapah Night 0. (I figured there was no point in dying with it, and rolled to pick between you and Hapah)
So to be clear, you're saying you weren't blocked, then? If that's the case, then it looks like Toony was telling the truth about delaying me. Unless there are anarchists or redirects involved, you not being blocked would mean that both he and I are likely town.
PPE: Oooh ... actually, based on an answer I got from Leafsnail a while ago, it looks like you only get a blocked message if you actually took an action. If you didn't take an action, then I guess I can't verify Toony's claim. (A more recent answer had given me the impression that you'd get a message even if you didn't take an action)
ToonyMan: Your thoughts?
Toaster: I would vigkill N0 if there was someone I found dangerously difficult to read in the game.
Had I known then what I know now, I would have simply claimed the action and let it play out. It would probably have ended the same way, though.
Fair enough.Hapah, would you play purposely worst to avoid being night-killed (obviously not bad enough to get lynched) in a game like this?Nope. Seems like a lot of extra work.
Ford: I'll just have to take your claim at face value, because I took no action last night. I did not receive any night PM.What does that mean? Are they role-fishing or not?
This feels like rolefishing, but I'm not really sure.
But you asked how I feel, and sometimes that isn't rational. When the round started at night, I felt vulnerable because I had no reads and there was nothing I could do to defend myself. That's why I chose to fire off my block -- in the hopes of hitting scum and surviving until day.That makes sense, if my delay did work then Toaster should be unable to action next night.
Blaugh. You got me.
I totally didn't see that coming.
How would delaying Toaster one night prevent him from doing an action in another night?But you asked how I feel, and sometimes that isn't rational. When the round started at night, I felt vulnerable because I had no reads and there was nothing I could do to defend myself. That's why I chose to fire off my block -- in the hopes of hitting scum and surviving until day.That makes sense, if my delay did work then Toaster should be unable to action next night.
ToonyManCaptain Ford pretty much answered this.How would delaying Toaster one night prevent him from doing an action in another night?But you asked how I feel, and sometimes that isn't rational. When the round started at night, I felt vulnerable because I had no reads and there was nothing I could do to defend myself. That's why I chose to fire off my block -- in the hopes of hitting scum and surviving until day.That makes sense, if my delay did work then Toaster should be unable to action next night.
I do want an answer!Ford: I'll just have to take your claim at face value, because I took no action last night. I did not receive any night PM.What does that mean? Are they role-fishing or not?
This feels like rolefishing, but I'm not really sure.
Hapah: You've also done essentially nothing. Who is scum and why?Also I agree, it's Monday now Hapah, PROD.
KotM4 totally needs a TRUE MAFIA KING.No way. It'll just get out of hang: KotM9 would have the Lord Sensai Baron Doctor True King Mafia or something.
I don't see how you getting delayed says a thing about your alignment. Toony's, maybe. What's your reasoning?In this game, probably. Not 100% certainly, but probably. Are you looking for a block claim? You sure sound like you are.Indeed I am. I blocked you last night using a one-shot I got from Hapah Night 0. (I figured there was no point in dying with it, and rolled to pick between you and Hapah)
So to be clear, you're saying you weren't blocked, then? If that's the case, then it looks like Toony was telling the truth about delaying me. Unless there are anarchists or redirects involved, you not being blocked would mean that both he and I are likely town.
Hapah: You've also done essentially nothing. Who is scum and why?I'll wait for Ford to answer a few questions, if you don't mind.
ToasterI do want an answer!Ford: I'll just have to take your claim at face value, because I took no action last night. I did not receive any night PM.What does that mean? Are they role-fishing or not?
This feels like rolefishing, but I'm not really sure.
I don't see how you getting delayed says a thing about your alignment. Toony's, maybe. What's your reasoning?If I was delayed then I didn't kill Okami. I guess I am assuming that Okami was killed by the king, though. He at least wasn't killed by me or Toony (I don't think Toony would lie about that, considering how easily it could have come back to bite him).
Also, why use the block this particular night, instead of any of the past nights? It smells a little off.This is the first time we've started a round at night with kills allowed. I had no clue who might be the king, and it felt like an appropriate time to use it.
I guess I am assuming that Okami was killed by the king, though.Mhmm. Just wanted to pick your brain a little.
That is technically true, but it's not the first night where the King could kill. He could kill any night besides the first one, yeah? The difference seems rather trivial to me.Also, why use the block this particular night, instead of any of the past nights? It smells a little off.This is the first time we've started a round at night with kills allowed. I had no clue who might be the king, and it felt like an appropriate time to use it.
I don't see what this has to do with me being scum, though. My claim is unprovable either way (unless Toaster actions the next night).I'm just struggling to piece together why you would use this action on this particular night, of all nights. It feels inconsistent.
...it's not the first night where the King could kill. He could kill any night besides the first one, yeah? The difference seems rather trivial to me.Yes, you're right about that. Obviously the differences were not trivial to me.
Was your Deathsword vote pressure or lynch? Also, why did you think Toaster was most likely to target you?1. Pressure.
I don't see what this has to do with me being scum, though. My claim is unprovable either way (unless Toaster actions the next night).I'm just struggling to piece together why you would use this action on this particular night, of all nights. It feels inconsistent.
Toony:Hmmm okay.ToasterWhoops, missed that one.I do want an answer!Ford: I'll just have to take your claim at face value, because I took no action last night. I did not receive any night PM.What does that mean? Are they role-fishing or not?
This feels like rolefishing, but I'm not really sure.
I don't know. I guess you could say it looks like a duck but it doesn't quack like a duck, so I'm not sure if it's a duck or not. I suppose it isn't if he legitimately didn't know that I wouldn't know if I was blocked if I had taken no action.
The Soldier: Until he convinces me otherwise (or someone overtakes him like last round), it's a lynch vote. He got away with it last round, but enough is enough.I do agree that it's possible Deathsword is King Mafia, but aren't you just completely gambling here? You managed to lynch NQT correctly because you had a good "actively-scummy" read on him.
Toaster, I don't like his subtle suspicion throwing on Captain Ford, and he had been very quick to try to lynch Deathsword for the exact same reasons as last time.The Soldier: Until he convinces me otherwise (or someone overtakes him like last round), it's a lynch vote. He got away with it last round, but enough is enough.I do agree that it's possible Deathsword is King Mafia, but aren't you just completely gambling here? You managed to lynch NQT correctly because you had a good "actively-scummy" read on him.
Lynching me is pretty stupid, when if I'm blocked tonight (yes I'll be acting tonight) will clear both you and Ford.Okay, that makes sense. I was voting the top person purely on my scumreads, I forgot to incorporate other factors.
This is the first time we've started a round at night with kills allowed. I had no clue who might be the king, and it felt like an appropriate time to use it.
Deathsword: Do you think having Purple Goo out in the open is giving you a defensive advantage?I can't remember if I answered this or note (probably not), so here an answer: I don't think so. I believe my disable worked on UI, so if I am the target of a kill it means I'd day and cause a minor inconvenience for the King.
Soldier, please answer this. It was asked way back, you failed to answer it and it went unnoticed.Toaster: I would vigkill N0 if there was someone I found dangerously difficult to read in the game.Is there anyone like that in this game?
Deathsword: Do still explain your mistake.The post I did not long ago should explain it.
You may have made a different decision in my shoes. Statistically, you're probably right that firing off my primary ability would have been better. But I wasn't thinking statistically.The statistics don't really worry me at all. But do you see how I might be a tiny bit concerned about a change in behavior patterns as a new King Mafia is crowned?
He did, actually, but he didn't quote the question. He fingered Toaster as hard to read.Soldier, please answer this. It was asked way back, you failed to answer it and it went unnoticed.Toaster: I would vigkill N0 if there was someone I found dangerously difficult to read in the game.Is there anyone like that in this game?
...what post?Deathsword: Do still explain your mistake.The post I did not long ago should explain it.
Deathsword:I'll try to find it. I've gone through the thread at least 3 times searching for it before posting.He did, actually, but he didn't quote the question. He fingered Toaster as hard to read.Soldier, please answer this. It was asked way back, you failed to answer it and it went unnoticed.Toaster: I would vigkill N0 if there was someone I found dangerously difficult to read in the game.Is there anyone like that in this game?
This post:...what post?Deathsword: Do still explain your mistake.The post I did not long ago should explain it.
I'll read the thread and post. I shouldn't have abandoned the game like I did. I apologize.
PFP
Captain Ford: Toaster's hard to read. How does surviving longer make you more of a target?
But you should definitely be able to tell if it was successful. Did it work all nights?Good. You do actually know what my role is. That means you didn't kill Okami last night.
I actually did answer that, here:Soldier, please answer this. It was asked way back, you failed to answer it and it went unnoticed.Toaster: I would vigkill N0 if there was someone I found dangerously difficult to read in the game.Is there anyone like that in this game?
Additionally, how hard do you find reading Okami?
PFPSee the underlined. PPE2: Leaving a post sitting while you eat lunch leads to ninjas.
Captain Ford: Toaster's hard to read. How does surviving longer make you more of a target?
Toaster: My logic is this. Hard to read players have scum games that are nearly identical to their town games. It's often possible to seem like town's greatest asset up until they win. N0, all I know is that I have a kill, who knows if anyone else does. Ideally, killing the hard to read player would mean that candidates for King would be easier to read. I feel that tbis is worth the high chance of hitting town.
Ford should be red up there, but my phone doesn't like going back.
Cheater (town, mafia, mafia-ally; uncommon; 4+ players): Each night you learn the role PM of a random role in the setup, but not who has it. Actions: (auto)cheatUgh, I'm so confused. I'd still be up for lynching Hapah, because all he's done today is get Ford to softclaim, and his potential roles wouldn't be too big a loss for town if he isn't the King. Toaster should live to confirm Ford and Toony, and Deathsword is back in action.
Mod: Would a Cheater receive a random player's alignment along with their role?No - the role PM a cheater sees has the alignment obscured, and they will not see the "mafiakill" ability if it is present.
Hapah: Looking at the role list, I don't see any rolecop-type abilities that also reveal alignment (unless Cheater does; it's a little ambiguous). Rolecopping isn't bad per se, but when literally any role could be King Mafia, it's less useful than other abilities like a standard inspect. And if you aren't a rolecop type role, I don't know how you know Ford's role. If I'm missing something, point it out toI had a rolecop last night, yeah. And my issue with Ford was that I don't know why he'd use the block; the other ability seems significantly better. I really don't know why he'd wait until N4 to use it.
Toony: Why? It's not like you have a record of actually delaying the people you say you will.I'm mad because I did delay The Soldier last night. I should have expected this could happen.
...I was actually not expecting that.
Hapah: Before you ask, yes I did.*raises eyebrow*
Hapah: Primary ability.That's...hrm. Why?
How do you figure?I'd like to know this too.
So if N4 Toony delayed Ford and Ford blocked me, N5 I was blocked, and Hapah just confessed to not having an alibi, is there any reason to not lynch Hapah today?I could come up with one. I'd like to know why Ford targeted who he did as well.
Toony: Where'd you claim your delay at? Or did you ever explicitly claim it?I was going to get lynched Round 2, the only reason I think I survived is because Tiruin voted themsleves. So I role-claimed (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=123832.msg4131085#msg4131085) to try to avoid the lynch, it didn't really work and I regret doing it.
So if N4 Toony delayed Ford and Ford blocked me, N5 I was blocked, and Hapah just confessed to not having an alibi, is there any reason to not lynch Hapah today?If we're wrong I will definitely be delaying you though. Even randomly guessing will give us a 50% of victory, but that's worst-case scenario. It still doesn't make any sense if Hapah isn't King Mafia though. I should have delayed him instead ugh.
You just put me at L-1. Unvote until I can post after work, at least, please.Relax it ain't gonna kill you, yet. Only you or Captain Ford can do the hammer and I have no reason to vote anybody else to "avoid being prodded". Ford is the one that needs to post now anyway.
PFPIf Ford also targeted The Soldier last night then who killed Okami? Ford went to block Toaster (but was delayed by me), there's no anarchists left as far as I know, and my delay wouldn't have work if the delayed target has already died.
Tell me who you ended up targeting each night (you know damn well who you actually actioned even with the Anarchists arounds) and explain why you visited TheSoldier.
PFPHmm???
Oh my god, it all just clicked. Ford, you crafty son of a bitch. I haven't given you half the credit you deserve.
PFP
Tell me who you ended up targeting each night (you know damn well who you actually actioned even with the Anarchists arounds) and explain why you visited TheSoldier.
Toony: I don't see a good reason for The Soldier to have fired off a blind kill instead of a blind protect on N4.Well:
Toaster: My logic is this. Hard to read players have scum games that are nearly identical to their town games. It's often possible to seem like town's greatest asset up until they win. N0, all I know is that I have a kill, who knows if anyone else does. Ideally, killing the hard to read player would mean that candidates for King would be easier to read. I feel that tbis is worth the high chance of hitting town.This just applies for N0 here but it IS possible.
It's possible that you're lying and used a block last night to cover for the fact you didn't delay N4. I don't believe that's the case.Back at you! Also I wouldn't lie about my full-claim if I was going to get lynched.
I've got to get ready to go. All I can ask of you at this point is that you don't hammer me or hammer nolynch until we've had a chance to talk things over. And I would ask you, Toaster and Toony, even if you think I'm full of shit, to please go and read Ford's early D5 with the above in mind. It fits.We can spend the next day talking about it.
Ford: I still wanna know why you ate Soldier last night.Yes me too.
Mod: To verify, can a cannibal acquire the anarchist ability by eating someone?Yes.
Yeah, no. Hapah. I'm done with this dance.
I'm a Cannibal.
N0: Did nothing. Got Block from Santa.
N1: Killed Toaster. Gained dirty bomb.
N2: Targeted UI, got bounced to Hapah. Became Santa.
N3: Killed UI, gained Census.
N4: Blocked Toaster.
N5: Killed The Soldier. Gained Protect.
Aside from the dirty bomb, I really don't have anything all that threatening. Hapah either failed to ask the necessary questions, or he's just trying to create paranoia.
I realized after starting the game that if I ever claimed vig, I'd have a tough time later on as king when there weren't two kills anymore, so I wanted to keep the dirty bomb a secret so I could set it off and then have an excuse for not killing.
I can only gain active abilities. I can't gain passive abilities such as kill immunity or an anarchist's randomization.
I don't have the faintest clue what Hapah is on about.
PPE: Who are you asking Toony?Captain Ford really, we still have an unsolved mystery in Ford's claim. Hapah explains it in his accusation post and honestly one thing that Hapah's post has over Ford's is an account of how every kill happened.
Toaster: If you were roleblocked, would you claim it?
I was heavily suspicious of Toaster, but on rereading I don't see it anymore. His reasons for voting DS aren't bad. Even so, if my block was delayed (and I believe it was), then he couldn't kill this coming night if he wanted to. (PPE: Toaster beat me to it)
Hapah has my suspicion for doing nothing but picking at my block claim. He hasn't talked to or about anyone else (except to respond to Toaster), and we're very close to the lynch. Definitely feels wrong.
Soldier's reasons for unvoting Deathsword strike me as earnest.
*sigh* Calming down a bit now.With the eventual claimed kill on Soldier, these posts don't add up. If he reread and didn't suspect me any more, why reread and decide against me again at night?
I'll do my best to explain what was running through my head when I picked the Soldier as my target last night.
- I think Toaster is scum.
- *rereads Toasters posts* Hmm...actually, he's not that scummy.
- Hapah is incredibly scummy.
- But he couldn't have killed Okami, he inspected me last night. Unless he was a cheater.
- *asks Leafsnail about how cheater and rolecop work, and the answers are hugely illuminating* He's not a cheater. (I completely miss other roles that could allow him to both kill and get my role, because I am doing this thinking under a lot of time pressure and don't have time to search the role list).
- Well, if it isn't Hapah, then it's Toaster. (I actually send in a kill on Toaster)
- Wait, if it's NOT Toaster, then I'm going to get lynched tomorrow, because it will look like I did that to cover up a lie. (I send in a decision to no action)
Also, you lied. You claimed a Rolecop ability yesterday, distinctly implying you couldn't have killed Okami. Scum.
Yeah, that's accurate. Except I can't acquire passive abilities. I acquired the census ability from UI, not Anarchist.
Toony: Hapah's claim doesn't explain Okami's death either. It makes a helluva lot more sense that either Hapah or Toaster is the king and one of them killed Okami.It does explain Okami's death if you're lying! The only death Hapah's claim doesn't account is Urist Imik but he could have killed himself by accident (seeing that at the time there was only one anarchist, himself) or the less likely chance Urist Imik did something else and Okami killed him (or used his kill and random'd onto UI).
Toony, any issues with that?No.
So did you get a one-shot block or something? I got the feeling you lied about both delays.I never lied about my night-actions, except for delaying Hapah at the end. I did not think you would kill Soldier N5.
By the way, I took down every previous king for you Toony. I hope you at least give me some kind of memorial.I also need to thank you for killing everybody for me until the end. When I got the King Mafia alignment switch I figured the vig was 90% likely to be you and chose not to mafiakill N4 or N5 because the benefits of not doing so was worth it.
I didn't kill Okami, actually. I really did block Toaster....Who killed Okami?
P.S. I like your new avatar. What's it from? I almost feel like I should recognize it.Shikkoku no Sharnoth (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shikkoku_no_Sharnoth).
...Toony: Why do you get a fanclub and I don't?I think it's because he reminds her of her idol, Org.Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Umm...that might be the scariest thing to come out of this, Web.Agreed.
Toony, what was your thinking over not killing twice?So everybody thought I was town. Also with so many vigs I was going to have to be really lucky anyway.
Which guess would that be, Web?Quadressence called the winner! WHAT THE FUDGE! She guessed it right based only on what she knew about the player's playstyles...
Hi. Sorry to barge in, but can I bet on this game? Because I have my money on Toonyman.
Why is no one else as impressed about the guess as I am?!?I already conveyed my feelings on that matter.
Fuck. I'm an idiot.Secondly, does the start of a new round cancel any such pending actions or reset things like an arsonist dousing people in gasoline?No. Also arsonist dousing does not work at all as per the rules.
I'm playing the long, long game, lulling you all into a false sense of security so I can blitz to victory in KotM 4...Unlikely. I'm going to wait for the full Quadressence analysis.