I haven't played in a while, but may I join?But of course!
In, as long as we don't start for another week or so.
Scum ICCurses. :I
You could always be an actual IC. Your levels are activity are generally higher than mine, so you'd be better participant than me.Scum ICCurses. :I
"Townies wouldn't be concerned about being killed," but if that happens, "you are harming the town by making it lose another member, distracting them from hunts for the true scum, and worsening your own game as well.^ has context. Stuff which you aren't detailing.
Also, your "scumtells" make it so that literally everyone is giving some. Either they do one of the wide array of scumtells, or they don't do any and are hence suspicious. Plus, the only really "strong" ones (ie, the ones which give people good reason to be suspicious) are the really obvious ones, like lying and backtracking...which are not only not something beginners would need to be told, but also things that no sane mafia would do.^ has even MORE context. Which you have pretty much an easy time generalizing and not detailing.
Quote"Townies wouldn't be concerned about being killed," but if that happens, "you are harming the town by making it lose another member, distracting them from hunts for the true scum, and worsening your own game as well.^ has context. Stuff which you aren't detailing.
[Reacting to people wanting you lynched] implies that you're really concerned about being pressured/lynched and want them to stop, which is more a scum thing. A townie would, in theory, be more open to the notion that their fellow townie is attempting to scumhunt at them, and less concerned about being found out.Sorry, I don't see it. In one it's saying that [X] is a scumtell because good townies don't care much if they're lynched, and in the other it's saying that a good townie tries not to be lynched.
...
About the worst thing you can do is give up, whether you are town or scum; you are harming the town by making it lose another member, distracting them from hunts for the true scum, and worsening your own game as well.
What context am I missing?QuoteAlso, your "scumtells" make it so that literally everyone is giving some. Either they do one of the wide array of scumtells, or they don't do any and are hence suspicious. Plus, the only really "strong" ones (ie, the ones which give people good reason to be suspicious) are the really obvious ones, like lying and backtracking...which are not only not something beginners would need to be told, but also things that no sane mafia would do.^ has even MORE context. Which you have pretty much an easy time generalizing and not detailing.
Sometimes I seriously wonder if there's something with you on that aspect of your attitude :/
Sorry, I don't see it. In one it's saying that [X] is a scumtell because good townies don't care much if they're lynched, and in the other it's saying that a good townie tries not to be lynched....I must introduce you to rhetoric.
Is it theoretically possible for both facts to be true? Yes. Is it possible for the reasoning behind them to both be valid? No. Hence, I'd argue that it's you who's missing the context.
you are harming the town by making it lose another member, distracting them from hunts for the true scum, and worsening your own game as well.Which is where I wonder if something is up on your side :/
What context? That you may be taking many things a bit too objectively, for one.QuoteWhat context am I missing?QuoteAlso, your "scumtells" make it so that literally everyone is giving some. Either they do one of the wide array of scumtells, or they don't do any and are hence suspicious. Plus, the only really "strong" ones (ie, the ones which give people good reason to be suspicious) are the really obvious ones, like lying and backtracking...which are not only not something beginners would need to be told, but also things that no sane mafia would do.^ has even MORE context. Which you have pretty much an easy time generalizing and not detailing.
Sometimes I seriously wonder if there's something with you on that aspect of your attitude :/
1. "Trying too hard to not look like mafia" is a scumtell. Therefore, if someone gives no scumtells, he's a scum because he's trying too hard not to look like a scum.
2. A scum would logically try not to leave many signs. Therefore, a real scum would more likely have only a couple scumtells visible rather than a plethora. Hence, someone who gives a small number of scumtells is also a scum.
3. Let's not get into how good townies would also want to avoid being mistaken for scum, for both personal and team reasons. Unless, of course, you buy the "only mafia would fight against being lynched" bit...
If it's all subjective anyways, or the important bits at least, what's the point? Especially since, as I've repeatedly pointed out, everything can be a scumtell.Generalizing again!~~ :P
*points at edit* :PBit of a pain.
We're talking about a general guide. The points made within are meant to be generalized.If it's all subjective anyways, or the important bits at least, what's the point? Especially since, as I've repeatedly pointed out, everything can be a scumtell.Generalizing again!~~ :P
Meaning: Those things require context to be understood, and at a glance may look contradictory, but are not. It's like that Astrology thing you're criticizing. The subject is highly questionable due to you/your mind not having been exposed to it, but rather only the superficial articles about it via crude observation.Alright, first off, that was an analogy, and do you honestly believe in astrology?
There's a 'because' behind all those reasons. Good townies don't mind being lynched because they'd be scumhunting as their goal--if they get lynched, they try their best in getting as much info from their pursuers that they can, and mostly this overturns the lynch.How would you paraphrase it?
Your "a good townie tries not to be lynched" is badly paraphrased from the original statement.
Your concept of 'loss' ignores the gain by said loss. Your concept of loss focuses purely only that the member is dead, and not what the member has done--the generalization to your statements and the objective conclusion afterwards which I'm poking.The OP doesn't make any considerations for that. And besides, I'm still confused...how can a mislynch help the town?
Said quote seems to be taken out of context from a rather distinct area there. Mind to quote it?ctl-f, it's not that hard.
Fight them with your own arguments, and search for people you may think are scum, and try to turn the votes against them. About the worst thing you can do is give up, whether you are town or scum; you are harming the town by making it lose another member, distracting them from hunts for the true scum, and worsening your own game as well.I dunno about you, but when I read that, I see that as saying "you should try not to be lynched, because that will always hurt your team".
1. Prove. Note: "Trying" = actively doing. As in, it can be sensed. Your example does NOT (@orange) take that up. This requires context to specify.1. Alright, how do you tell that someone's trying to hide their scumtells, as opposed to someone who just doesn't have them? Wouldn't the most logical way to hide them be to know what they are and not do them at all, rather than...I dunno, how are you supposed to hide scumtells in some other way?
2. Prove. There are underlying reasons why a scumtell is a scumtell and not a towntell or a newbietell.
3. Prove. Generally everyone will fight the lynch, but also will fight according to their principle.
All of such are guides and not laws. :V
...What happened in your BM Sprint!? You should be acquainted with the game already due to it being a BM! (though fast paced :v)You were there, weren't you? You saw what happened.
Watching this. Good luck dove!Thank you! <3
Fniff: Please summarize your previous Mafia experience, whether on or off this forum. In addition, imagine you're the jailkeeper. Who do you act on: a scummy player or a player you think the scum are likely to kill?I was playing the One Day mafia. It was confusing, fast, and didn't teach me anything at all about playing mafia. Not good for a first time player. As for the jailkeeper, I'd prefer to block the likely to be killed player. Someone is going to be killed whether or not I block the scum, but a good player/role needs to be protected.
Fniff: If you were a Cop, what day would you likely want to claim assuming a lynch and a kill happened every day and night?1. If I was a cop, I wouldn't claim until I had a mafia confirmed. I would prefer this to be as early as possible, but if I claim the mafia will try to kill me and it would be a worthless sacrifice without some evidence. On the other hand, I might be lynched by the townies for seeming scummy, but that's always present no matter what you do.
Fniff: Who of the current players would be your ideal scum buddy?
If you were a Jailer, what would be your criteria for your night 1 target?RangerCado: After looking at who voted for the lynch target and why (and there had better be a lynch), I would consider multiple possible targets. If someone was particularly scummy D1, I would most likely jail them, hoping to prevent a kill. Without a strong read, however, I would most likely jail Tiruin: there is a tendency for BM scumteams to kill ICs.
As for the jailkeeper, I'd prefer to block the likely to be killed player. Someone is going to be killed whether or not I block the scum, but a good player/role needs to be protected.Fniff: If you block the scum player who would be carrying out the kill, you would prevent the kill. How does that information change your answer, if at all?
I still don't know who the killer is going to be. I would prefer to protect the valuable player, even if it means blocking their activities. Keeping an important player alive as long as possible is worth it. As for no questions, well... one it's late and I can't think of any, and two I'm not sure if I'd have the knowledge to ask those questions. I might come up with some tomorrow.As for the jailkeeper, I'd prefer to block the likely to be killed player. Someone is going to be killed whether or not I block the scum, but a good player/role needs to be protected.Fniff: If you block the scum player who would be carrying out the kill, you would prevent the kill. How does that information change your answer, if at all?
Furthermore, why no questions?
Scripten: Please summarize your previous Mafia experience, whether on or off this forum. In addition, imagine it's 5 player LYLO, you're a vanilla townie, and there are two cop claims. Each claims a guilty on the other, and an innocent on you. What would you do to sort this situation out?
Scripten:If you were a Cop, what day would you likely want to claim assuming a lynch and a kill happened every day and night?
RangerCado: I am not sure, I have not had enough experience with either of their play-styles or the game itself to make a judgement on that yet.Kansa: For me personally? Jack would be as I don't know him that well on the forum. This is for both. If I were Scum, I would fear Tiruin the most personally as well, due to her knowing more my style of play.
Which one would you say was the biggest threat?
Jack: It was mostly due to running out of ideas for questions. I was also distracted elsewhere, shown by asking Fniff two questions and forgetting about tn entirely. The potential is there, but it could also show some interesting information depending on their answers. Do you believe there will be a problem with this?If you were a Jailer, what would be your criteria for your night 1 target?RangerCado: After looking at who voted for the lynch target and why (and there had better be a lynch), I would consider multiple possible targets. If someone was particularly scummy D1, I would most likely jail them, hoping to prevent a kill. Without a strong read, however, I would most likely jail Tiruin: there is a tendency for BM scumteams to kill ICs.
I say "most likely" in both cases due to the fact that any actual jailing would involve examining far more information than a hypothetical question at the start of D1 can handle.
A question to you: did you think, when asking darkpaladin and Fniff the same question about an ideal scumbuddy, about the potential of the first answerer's answer influencing the second answerer?
Everybody: Since this is a beginner's game, it's more likely that well-used scumtells will be less effective. What strategies do you think would be best in a situation like this, where players may not know what actions to avoid and which ones to look out for?Scripten: I will likely use my usual strategies, but be SLIGHTLY more lenient on my reads. Tells are still tells, and hiding behind the newb screen can only go so far before people don't care anymore and vote you out regardless. Were you planning on hiding behind that screen?
... and two I'm not sure if I'd have the knowledge to ask those questions.Fniff: It may be helpful to check out the starts of some other games here. There will usually be some questions you can use as models, or outright reuse.
Also, as for questions, I haven't got a lot of time or information at the moment, so coming up with a list of questions for everyone is a bit much. Therefore, I'm just going to pose one question to everyone.Scripten: There is no need to make a list of questions for everyone. It can be useful, but as long as you're asking good questions, you're starting well.
Everybody: Since this is a beginner's game, it's more likely that well-used scumtells will be less effective. What strategies do you think would be best in a situation like this, where players may not know what actions to avoid and which ones to look out for?
Jack: The potential is there, but it could also show some interesting information depending on their answers. Do you believe there will be a problem with this?RangerCado: I do not think it will have an effect, as Fniff's answer was very personal. Furthermore, I believe that the chance of influence would not have been a problem in any case. It's a minor RVS question.
Scripten: I will likely use my usual strategies, but be SLIGHTLY more lenient on my reads. Tells are still tells, and hiding behind the newb screen can only go so far before people don't care anymore and vote you out regardless. Were you planning on hiding behind that screen?
Scripten: There is no need to make a list of questions for everyone. It can be useful, but as long as you're asking good questions, you're starting well.
Regarding your question: It is generally a good idea to ask oneself whether observed actions make sense from the actor as a townie. Furthermore, a scumtell is more than just a piece of evidence. It is a topic to ask the actor about. Questions about odd/scummy-looking actions help gather evidence for/against scumhood, and help players evaluate the scumminess of said actions.
The newbie tendency to screw up should be kept in mind when looking at everything, as a contextual factor when determining whether an action makes sense for town. It should not overwhelm everything, but it must be considered.
On asking questions directed to "Everybody"/"Everyone": This is not the best idea, as people tend to miss these.
Tiruin: You recently participated in a game with this setup, but without the teaching elements: NSBM 4. What did you learn from that game that you can apply to this game?NSBM4?
tn5421: Imagine you're a cop. What would you consider to be your goal in your night inspects: finding scum or finding town?
Everybody: Since this is a beginner's game, it's more likely that well-used scumtells will be less effective. What strategies do you think would be best in a situation like this, where players may not know what actions to avoid and which ones to look out for?
someone from MafiaScum is probably more knowledgeable than someone from EpicMafia
Tn5421 and darkpaladin109: Since you both were in the last beginner's mafia game, which was a sprint, how do you expect this game will differ? How will you be changing your playstyles to adapt to those differences?
Tiruin: You recently participated in a game with this setup, but without the teaching elements: NSBM 4. What did you learn from that game that you can apply to this game?NSBM4?
Without the teaching elements? :x
Was I a bad IC then?
PFP examtime soon
... finding out the best way to hang the Count with the use of a portcullis, a matchstick and a pretender.A Bay 12 specialty.
tn5421: Not exactly what I meant by the question, but okay. Let's try something similar to my intention, but informative in a different way:Quotetn5421: Imagine you're a cop. What would you consider to be your goal in your night inspects: finding scum or finding town?I would investigate someone I couldn't get a strong read on one way or another.
I'm going to play normally. I will take note of people not fully answering questions.Interesting. Yet you ask no questions yourself. Why?
I'm not a big fan of the barely-game-related questions that get asked at the start of a game.tn5421: D'accord. Honestly, I don't think anyone is much of a fan of them, but they at least get people talking.
Sorry for forgetting the Q/A format, I'm used to doing @user: and/or using a post tag to link the post I'm talking about. Example: @57: or [post]57[/post]Ah. We don't have nearly as simple a way to link directly to posts here, but giving post numbers with links to the posts is a fine alternative to quote-linking (for lack of a better term).
- darkpaladin109
- borno:
- Fniff:
- Scripten:
- tn5421:
- RangerCado:
- Kansa:
- Jack A T:
- Tiruin:
tn5421: Ah, okay.
On question-posing method: If there's another method you'd rather use to show who you're posing questions to that is clear, is noticeable, and doesn't make anyone want to gouge their own eyes out, feel free to use it.
In response to your question: The fact that you've been scum twice before lacks relevance to the question of whether you were given scum now, considering all three games involved independent rolls for roles. In addition, it is hard to effectively tell how you are as scum from those games, given One Day Mafia's incredible activity and Sprint's... stuff (you didn't seem bad in the latter, though), and I can't do much meta-analysis without both a larger sample and town games to compare them to.
Overall impact of your previous scum games on my feelings about your slot: not much.
Overall feelings about your slot: Not strong in any direction, the game having just started.
I'm going to sleep now.
borno: Please summarize your previous Mafia experience, whether on or off this forum. In addition, what scumtell (aside from lying) do you feel is scummiest in general?Last game I played was a year ago now. I played a little too lurky I think, and so when the mafia fakeclaimed no-one believed me and I was lynched. In response to your second question, I think that chainsawing is scummiest, as a normal player would have no reason to defend another person so hard. The other ones can sometimes be explained though, and as a plus you may also learn his partner's identity.
borno: Whats your preferred role as Town and why?Cop, as having the certainty that someone is scum is a huge advantage.
Everybody: Since this is a beginner's game, it's more likely that well-used scumtells will be less effective. What strategies do you think would be best in a situation like this, where players may not know what actions to avoid and which ones to look out for?I would chose aggressive tunneling, as newbies are more likely to panic and drop scumtells.
Scripten: While explaining to defend yourself, do you think you will end up trying to defend your reasons and actions during confrontation more than scum hunting others?Scripten: I will likely use my usual strategies, but be SLIGHTLY more lenient on my reads. Tells are still tells, and hiding behind the newb screen can only go so far before people don't care anymore and vote you out regardless. Were you planning on hiding behind that screen?
Not at all. I couldn't justify hiding behind total inexperience when I've played a couple of games already, and even if I were new, logically explaining my actions would help the town and thus myself, anyway. Such was the case in the last game I played and I don't believe I've seen any reason to not explain myself when confronted.
tn5421: How is this dodging the question exactly? Shes both trying to confirm a question, and has RL coming in. Can you explain to me how this is a dodge?Tiruin: You recently participated in a game with this setup, but without the teaching elements: NSBM 4. What did you learn from that game that you can apply to this game?NSBM4?
Without the teaching elements? :x
Was I a bad IC then?
PFP examtime soon
Tiruin
Don't dodge the question.
Let me revise that:Just because you've been scum twice in other games, doesn't mean you'll likely be one now. This question doesn't really have much in the way of relavence, even during the RVS stage. Why did you ask this?
Jack A T: How do you feel about my slot, knowing that I've been scum 2/2 completed games on this forum?
Sorry for forgetting the Q/A format, I'm used to doing @user: and/or using a post tag to link the post I'm talking about. Example: @57: or [post]57[/post]
RangerCado:borno: Fair. If it was Night 3, maybe. Night 1 and 2 has the major disadvantage of killing their chances of finding out who the mafia are. I would consider it Night 2 if I knew they were in trouble, but Night 1 has no purpose.borno: Whats your preferred role as Town and why?Cop, as having the certainty that someone is scum is a huge advantage.
If you were the jailkeeper and suspected that someone was the cop, would you jail them?
Everybody: Since this is a beginner's game, it's more likely that well-used scumtells will be less effective. What strategies do you think would be best in a situation like this, where players may not know what actions to avoid and which ones to look out for?Scumtells are essentially specific social mannerisms that are considered suspicious in the circumstances. People can tell when someone's acting shady, it's a natural human behavior. Since the Mafia are new too, we're on equal ground. I think if the group avoided forming into a mob and used their heads, we wouldn't need to adjust strategies.
darkpaladin109: Please summarize your previous Mafia experience, whether on or off this forum. In addition, which role do you feel would help the town more: the cop or the jailkeeper?My only mafia experiences are on this forum, but I don't know how to properly summarize it. I'm just bad at summarizing things, that's all. I'm not very good at Mafia due to the how I am as a person and such, though.
I don't think I have played here long enough to determine exactly who, but if I had to guess, it might be Tiruin? I've seen that she's pretty good in most of the games I've read, at least.
DarkPaladin: Who of the current players would be your ideal scum buddy?
To turn this question around, what do you think is the weakest scumtell?borno: "Lying" about prior in-thread events (which tends to just be poor memory, rather than deliberate lies). Discrepancies in roleclaims tend to be actual lies, but false claims about prior in-thread events tend to be mistakes.
Sorry for not answering questions earlier, the game began when I was in bed due to timezones, and I can't write answers and such in school.darkpaladin109: There's no need to apologize. Just try to be active when you can.
Everyone: Who would be your ideal scum buddy, and why?Out of the players here, Tiruin. She's experienced at being scum, and a two-IC scumteam would be amusing.
I'm not very good at coming up with questions, one of the many things that make me bad at Mafia.In the RVS phase, it can help to check previous games and use their RVS questions as models (or just outright reuse them). Beyond RVS, though, a good idea for a simple question is to ask people why they did something you find odd.
Scumtells are essentially specific social mannerisms that are considered suspicious in the circumstances. People can tell when someone's acting shady, it's a natural human behavior. Since the Mafia are new too, we're on equal ground. I think if the group avoided forming into a mob and used their heads, we wouldn't need to adjust strategies.Unvote, vote Fniff: I notice a rather interesting assumption about the scumteam in your answer. What makes you so sure the Mafia consists of newbies? Less importantly, what will you do to avoid mob behaviour?
I'm assuming they are. That would have been a better way of phrasing it. Anyway, this is beginner's mafia and as such, they can't be utterly amazingly experienced. They might know a lot, but they won't be experienced, if you get my drift. As for avoiding mob behavior, I'd avoid anything that lacks more then one piece of evidence, especially if it's circumstantial.Scumtells are essentially specific social mannerisms that are considered suspicious in the circumstances. People can tell when someone's acting shady, it's a natural human behavior. Since the Mafia are new too, we're on equal ground. I think if the group avoided forming into a mob and used their heads, we wouldn't need to adjust strategies.Unvote, vote Fniff: I notice a rather interesting assumption about the scumteam in your answer. What makes you so sure the Mafia consists of newbies? Less importantly, what will you do to avoid mob behaviour?
I'm assuming they are. That would have been a better way of phrasing it. Anyway, this is beginner's mafia and as such, they can't be utterly amazingly experienced. They might know a lot, but they won't be experienced, if you get my drift. As for avoiding mob behavior, I'd avoid anything that lacks more then one piece of evidence, especially if it's circumstantial.Fniff:
-snip-DarkPaladin: Tiruin all the way. Shes a player I can get along with quite easily, and shes a player who I know knows how to seem like a Townie ALL the time. Its nice to have a player who can usually earn others trust on a scum team.
@RangerCado: The question was "What did you learn from the other game with same setup?" and the reply was "Was I a bad IC?". That is the very picture of dodging the question. I have no idea what PFP exams are so I can't make the call on whether or not its legit, simply assuming it is.tn5421: PFP means 'posting from phone'. This usually means that the post was either rushed, not formatted well, or that they don't have time for full post or answer. Exams means she has exams, as is normal during May and June.
Because it's more relevant to the game than most of the handwave questions being asked currently.
@Everyone: How do you feel about our chances of finding and lynching a member of the scum team day one?This question shows up a lot, and the answer is always relative to the player. Personally? I don't believe its THAT likely, but you never know what will come up. An early slip-up could occur and we could get a scum player out day 1. Its really too early to tell.
@Everyone: How do you feel about our chances of finding and lynching a member of the scum team day one?tn5421: Not bad. While Day 1 is not known for scum lynches, we've got a reasonable (for day 1) chance if we are active. If we fail, well, we've got two survivable mislynches.
@RangerCado: The question was "What did you learn from the other game with same setup?" and the reply was "Was I a bad IC?". That is the very picture of dodging the question. I have no idea what PFP exams are so I can't make the call on whether or not its legit, simply assuming it is.Fascinating. You focus so much on one line of the reply, accusing Tiruin of active question evasion based on it. What did/do you think about the rest of the reply? What did Tiruin's first two lines indicate to you?
@darkpaladin109: My ideal scumbuddy would be Jack A T or RangerCado.Why?
Be bold. When you see something you think is suspicious/scummy, take action. Question. Vote, whether to lynch or just to apply pressure. If you don't know why someone took an action they took, ask. Ask people lots of questions about their actions. Don't hold back. Don't let nervousness prevent you from taking action.
Use your votes. Use them to apply pressure in your investigations. Use them to kill off the most suspicious players. Use them to show your suspicions.
Be active. When you can contribute, try to contribute. Low activity kills games, especially BMs.
Players have done stuff today (not much, but still), and there is material to look at. For that matter, you can look at players who haven't acted, whether through not posting or through not doing anything when they post.
Let's get this game moving a bit.
Everyone (yes, I know I recommended against posing questions like this, but fuck it): Look through the thread. Does anyone look suspicious? Who? Why?
borno: You mentioned in your first (and only) post that you felt you had been a bit too lurky in your last game. Are you going to do anything about that, or just keep on doing little?
@Jack A T: I would be highly suspicious of reply #80 if you weren't an IC. Being super bold just makes you the primary target for a nightkill.tn5421: The "be bold"-type advice (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=130600.msg4635411#msg4635411) is standard (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=117173.msg3694301#msg3694301) IC advice (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=105022.msg3114651#msg3114651). The goal is to make an environment that is harmful to scum.
point 2: The fact of the matter is we are still waiting on an answer from him, and I won't rest until I get it.tn5421 again: I know, but this doesn't answer my questions.
Oh hey, I'm here, don't worry.Fniff: Great! Would you be so kind as to answer my questions (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=138613.msg5296090#msg5296090)?
Certainly.Oh hey, I'm here, don't worry.Fniff: Great! Would you be so kind as to answer my questions (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=138613.msg5296090#msg5296090)?
Fniff:Ah, I was thinking that ICs were more "independent observer" then actual players. My bad. Anyway, I'll keep an eye on you lot.
On mafia experience in the scumteam: Be aware that ICs, who are experienced, could be scum. We are not above suspicion.
On the mob behaviour bit: How do you intend to ensure that multiple pieces of evidence accumulate against someone? Do you intend to question people who have one piece of evidence against them, or is avoiding such questioning part of avoiding anything that lacks more than one piece of evidence?
Are you going to depend on others to start cases with multiple pieces of evidence?
Everyone (yes, I know I recommended against posing questions like this, but fuck it): Look through the thread. Does anyone look suspicious? Who? Why?I think it may be too early in the game to tell. I've give the thread a look through.
Oh, and on a side note:tn5421: So what? Unless your the Jailer or the Cop, theres literally no reason to not be bold and risk your neck to dig for information. A lot of players, myself included depending on the game, get very attached to trying to keep themselves alive by not trying to be bold, or not taking some courses of action.
@Jack A T: I would be highly suspicious of reply #80 if you weren't an IC. Being super bold just makes you the primary target for a nightkill.
Oh hey, I'm here, don't worry.Fniff: ...Yes, now why don't you go answer the questions posed to you, as well as do a bit of your own hunting? Saying your here but doing nothing else is just being lazy, or active-lurking.
Jack A T: I am not sure who looks suspicious yet, mostly everyone has been acting ok for me.Kansa: In this situation, why not pick a couple people and start questioning them instead of sitting on the side lines? Even when you have nothing to work with, its never a good idea to sit there not hunting. You also said mostly. So there is someone your slightly suspicious of? If so, press them!
To Rangercado: I'm not really sure of the best questions to ask, I'll give it a try though.Kansa: A good idea, when you see behaviour you find suspicious or want more information on, is to ask whoever did it for their reasons for doing it. Try to come up with other questions as well when scumhunting, but the basic "why?" is usually helpful.
To borno: Would you ever claim you were a cop if you weren't if you thought it would help catch the scum?I'm just going to interrupt this question right now, for ICing reasons. Don't. Just don't.
@Everyone: How do you feel about our chances of finding and lynching a member of the scum team day one?I suppose our chances are slim, though I could be wrong.
Everyone (yes, I know I recommended against posing questions like this, but fuck it): Look through the thread. Does anyone look suspicious? Who? Why?Borno could look suspicious due to not posting much, but he did give a semblance of reason. Don't have any reads right now, I'l reread the thread tommorow.
@borno: Wow, no questions to me. The insult cuts deep.Sorry, friend.
@Everyone: How do you feel about our chances of finding and lynching a member of the scum team day one?I don't think that it is awfully likely, due to d1 lynches being more about information, but it may well happen.
Everyone (yes, I know I recommended against posing questions like this, but fuck it): Look through the thread. Does anyone look suspicious? Who? Why?I'll look through the thread once I get home from school in about nine hours. On your second question, I do hope to be more active in this game, but due to seemingly being in a different time zone to everyone else it's hard to have a proper conversation :(
borno: You mentioned in your first (and only) post that you felt you had been a bit too lurky in your last game. Are you going to do anything about that, or just keep on doing little?
@Jack A T: I would be highly suspicious of reply #80 if you weren't an IC. Being super bold just makes you the primary target for a nightkill.Unvote, vote tn5421. The more I think about this post, the more off-putting I find it. You claim that advice to be bold would be suspicious if I weren't an IC because bold players tend to be the targets of nightkills. That is to say, because scum tends to dislike bold players enough to want to get rid of them.
The question about how his experiences with the setup shape his views on how this game will play out has not been answered and I will not let go until it is.First, Tiruin is still female.
What did/do you think about the rest of the reply? What did Tiruin's first two lines indicate to you?Not very complicated questions. These two are focused on the context of the line you justified your initial accusation with.
@borno, #98: No. No. We are NOT in lylo. There are 2 scum / 7 town as per the setup. I do not like this post at all.... that's a hypothetical question. Even if it was not, how exactly would confusion about LYLO in day 1, especially in a Beginner's Mafia, be scummy?
Vote: borno
But please tell us how we are in LYLO on day one.
To Scripten: Who do you believe would be the greatest threat if they were scum?
First off, his first post. He doesn't ask any questions, as per normal first post on these forums. He follows it up with a vote against Tiruin for dodging the question, despite how she PFP'd. I guess I can understand not knowing the abbreviations and such as this is a whole new forum, but if there was an abbreviation I didn't understand there would be no reason not to check the first post-which has a whole spoiler about it. I guess the not asking game-related questions thing is fine too, as they don't really do that at mafia scum either. Moving on.Quotetn5421: Imagine you're a cop. What would you consider to be your goal in your night inspects: finding scum or finding town?
I would investigate someone I couldn't get a strong read on one way or another.QuoteEverybody: Since this is a beginner's game, it's more likely that well-used scumtells will be less effective. What strategies do you think would be best in a situation like this, where players may not know what actions to avoid and which ones to look out for?
I'm going to play normally. I will take note of people not fully answering questions.Quotesomeone from MafiaScum is probably more knowledgeable than someone from EpicMafia
Thanks for the laugh.QuoteTn5421 and darkpaladin109: Since you both were in the last beginner's mafia game, which was a sprint, how do you expect this game will differ? How will you be changing your playstyles to adapt to those differences?
I expect it to take longer and be more of a thinking game than a go-with-your-gut game.
Oh, and on a side note:(Which was in regards to this post)
@Jack A T: I would be highly suspicious of reply #80 if you weren't an IC. Being super bold just makes you the primary target for a nightkill.
Another thing:He says that he would be suspicious of this post if it were not made by an IC, yet there is no reason for this suspicion. Being active & bold is the best thing to do in mafia, and saying that you should be those things is not scummy at all. This is because if he was scum, then telling people to do something that would make him want to kill him and waste a NK just doesn't make sense. Oh well, this doesn't seem to be anything to warrant a vote by itself though.
Be bold. When you see something you think is suspicious/scummy, take action. Question. Vote, whether to lynch or just to apply pressure. If you don't know why someone took an action they took, ask. Ask people lots of questions about their actions. Don't hold back. Don't let nervousness prevent you from taking action.
Use your votes. Use them to apply pressure in your investigations. Use them to kill off the most suspicious players. Use them to show your suspicions.
Be active. When you can contribute, try to contribute. Low activity kills games, especially BMs.
Players have done stuff today (not much, but still), and there is material to look at. For that matter, you can look at players who haven't acted, whether through not posting or through not doing anything when they post.
@Jack A T, #85: That's why I included the qualifier "If you weren't an IC".However, this, in conjunction with the other random needlessly aggressive posts he has been making is. He votes me for asking a hypothetical question. I honestly am bamboozled, and he seems to make no effort in explaining it whatsoever when it is pointed out by Jack A T, instead making a pathetic 'Yeah, lynch me, I don't really care, nor will I make any defense whatsoever. I won't try to stay alive when I can just prove you wrong when I'm dead!', which no good townie would. So far, almost all of his posts have just been random, completely unfounded aggressive outbursts which serve to do nothing other than stir up suspicions between townies, and for that he gets my vote.
The question about how his experiences with the setup shape his views on how this game will play out has not been answered and I will not let go until it is.
@Kansa, #88: I'm not sure what this is a reply to, assuming you mean 'is anyone suspicious' but parts of your reply don't fit that line.
@Fniff, #89: The Scum IC is the independant observer, the other ICs are actual players.
@RangerCado, #90: What is the significance of Blue-Bolding my name? I am awaiting a reply from Tiruin in regards to reply #53 [http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=138613.msg5294398#msg5294398]. Reply #54 does not adequately explain anything except for Tiruin being busy IRL. People have commented on my tendency to take my time with things. I don't really understand that, but I don't dive in head first unless I'm fairly sure I can do something productive, as I'm an easy mislynch when I get aggressive.
@Kansa, #91: ALL OF MY FoS FOR POST EDIT[/rvs]
@Jack A T, #92: Does blue bold indicate a FoS?
@RangerCado, #94: Except I don't feel pressured, at all. I'm not doing anything wrong, you are suspecting me based on my playstyle only.
@Tiruin, #96: I don't mind waiting but I still want my question answered when RL isn't eating your time.
@borno, #98: No. No. We are NOT in lylo. There are 2 scum / 7 town as per the setup. I do not like this post at all.
Vote: borno
But please tell us how we are in LYLO on day one.
tn5421: Blue text means Finger of Suspicion. This implies that you are acting suspicious, but I either don't think its worth a vote yet, or that I wanted to keep my vote where it was.
@RangerCado, #90: What is the significance of Blue-Bolding my name? I am awaiting a reply from Tiruin in regards to reply #53 [http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=138613.msg5294398#msg5294398]. Reply #54 does not adequately explain anything except for Tiruin being busy IRL. People have commented on my tendency to take my time with things. I don't really understand that, but I don't dive in head first unless I'm fairly sure I can do something productive, as I'm an easy mislynch when I get aggressive.
@RangerCado, #94: Except I don't feel pressured, at all. I'm not doing anything wrong, you are suspecting me based on my playstyle only.
@Jack A T: Because getting nightkilled or mislynched day 1 gets boring really fast when it happens to you multiple times....REALLY!? Town shouldn't try to hard to keep themselves, but this is just... WHY!? Vote tn5421.
"I think she is busy IRL" answers both questions.
Because its right there in the rules, free for everyone to read, maybe?
You go right ahead and lynch me day one, it doesn't make a bit of difference to me.
And its more that your giving me a bad vibe with how your phrasing your posts.RangerCado: Can you describe this in more detail? What is it about the phrasing that gives you a bad vibe?
@All: You bitch about me playing cautiously, then immediately jump on my wagon when I start to make aggressive posts.This is likely to be because your case on borno, while aggressive, is shit. And, instead of accepting what everyone else has pointed out (that borno's question was a hypothetical question), you're flailing at those who attack you.
Fuck. You.
Borno: When quoting, try to cut the posts down to the parts you care about. This enhances readability quite a bit. For instance, that last quote could have been cut down to just the part about you. Also, regarding your PFP point, people often forget/don't notice the abbreviation spoiler. It happens.Right, I'll keep that in mind next time. And in regards to the PFP thing, I guess that is right. However, I still have two strong points telling me that he is scum.
@borno, #106: One long big pseudo-justification for your omgus. You must be so proud.For one, having any sort of justification for a vote makes it not an OMGUS. An OMGUS is when you vote someone for the sole reason that they voted you, which you would realise if you properly read my post. You claim that it is merely a pseudo-justification, yet you do nothing at all to back up your claim? Are you even trying anymore? Make a real post against me!
@All: You bitch about me playing cautiously, then immediately jump on my wagon when I start to make aggressive posts.For one, it is not a wagon if there's only three people voting you currently. And I'm sorry, you're not playing aggressively. You're just trying to stir up as much trouble between the townies that you can.
Fuck. You.
@Kansa: He was attempting to panic the townsfolk, which is an action that primarily advances the scum wincon. I don't see the need to defend myself at this point in the game, as the people that are voting me are doing so for mainly nonsensical reasons. Except for RangerCado, I think.What? I was never trying to panic the townsfolk; it was a hypothetical question! Really, I do see a need to defend yourself. You are acting incredibly scummy, and every post you refuse to make a defense just makes you even more. Please state why Jack A T and I have nonsensical questions, whereas RangerCado does when he just restates one of the points I made. Honestly, when you flip scum RangerCado's going to need some investigating.
The reality is that if you're stupid enough to lynch me, you deserve to lose my support anyway....I have nothing to say. You realise that you are the one who is throwing the game when you refuse to defend yourself? Honestly, I don't know who you're trying to persuade by calling the people voting for you dumb instead of actually making some points. I honestly just don't understand your logic.
That is a perfectly acceptable situation for me anyway, because it means I can avoid a wall-war with people that are just going to throw the game anyway.
tn5421:@borno: Wow, no questions to me. The insult cuts deep.Sorry, friend.
It is lylo, and the votes are tied. One player is slightly scummy and lurks and the other is more scummy but is active. Who do you choose to lynch?
It is lylo, and the votes are tied.is not a question. He keeps trying to frame it as a question because he knows I caught him out on a lie and is trying to cover it up by attacking me. Granted, I made it easier by deciding to play a bit different than I normally do. He also never connected the statements in any meaningful way.
One player is slightly scummy and lurks and the other is more scummy but is active. Who do you choose to lynch?
One player is slightly scummy and lurks and the other is more scummy but is active. You are in LYLO. Who do you choose to lynch?
Fniff: ...Yes, now why don't you go answer the questions posed to you, as well as do a bit of your own hunting? Saying your here but doing nothing else is just being lazy, or active-lurking.I'm sorry for not posting and asking questions. I'm not really sure if Mafia is the game for me at this point... It's not really what I come for when I play a forum game. I'm not even really sure where to start in terms of questions. I'll try to see if this picks up.
Fniff: No questions? Even if your going on a dig through the thread, you should still try to question someone for more information today.
Fniff: So, how's that readthrough going?Pretty well, but I'm still not sure what to do.
Fuck. You.
Let us maintain our chill composure.
@Jack A T: Please show where I have refused to answer a question, and I'll show you how to buy seafront property in Kansas.Of the questions in my spoiler here (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=138613.msg5302382#msg5302382), the only one you answered was the one on borno. You also spoke of seeing no need to defend yourself, called everyone attacking you stupid and said they deserve a loss of your support, and declared that you were avoiding a "wall-war."
...no, still not a good case.QuoteIt is lylo, and the votes are tied.is not a question. He keeps trying to frame it as a question because he knows I caught him out on a lie and is trying to cover it up by attacking me. Granted, I made it easier by deciding to play a bit different than I normally do. He also never connected the statements in any meaningful way.QuoteOne player is slightly scummy and lurks and the other is more scummy but is active. Who do you choose to lynch?
Should have been this:QuoteOne player is slightly scummy and lurks and the other is more scummy but is active. You are in LYLO. Who do you choose to lynch?
I was gonna say that... but seriously. This is a game, people. A serious game, yes, but a game nonetheless.Quote from: Life Advice of the ToadLet us maintain our chill composure.
Imp - You are scum. Right off the bat, you are confronted with the devil himself in Townie Form during RVS and he tunnels aggressively. How do you get him off your back?When searching for more examples (quick google search), I found this little post from borno:
So I'm ironically dying from resting so much (figuratively) and...thanks for the extend y'all :x
Day ends Monday at 7 pm EST
@borno: pseudo = false, but thanks for tryingI know what pseudo means. That's why I attached this
to the end of my point. Please, read my whole post.@borno, #106: One long big pseudo-justification for your omgus. You must be so proud.For one, having any sort of justification for a vote makes it not an OMGUS. An OMGUS is when you vote someone for the sole reason that they voted you, which you would realise if you properly read my post. You claim that it is merely a pseudo-justification, yet you do nothing at all to back up your claim? Are you even trying anymore? Make a real post against me!
Because it's a hypothetical question asked at the start at the game to start things up? Honestly, I don't know why you're attacking me asking a question when, bolded, you wanted me to give you one. In the next post you make you "clarify" why it was scummy by saying I should reverse the situation and the setting, but I prefer to give the setting before the situation. Anyway, I still don't see how that's scummy. If it's the 'sorry friend' bit you are mad about, I was saying it as a joke because you said I had insulted you.tn5421:Please tell me ALL ABOUT how its a question. I will redirect you to the seafront property in Kansas.@borno: Wow, no questions to me. The insult cuts deep.Sorry, friend.
It is lylo, and the votes are tied. One player is slightly scummy and lurks and the other is more scummy but is active. Who do you choose to lynch?
We both know I'm conftown, since your role pm told you who your scumbuddy was, I don't understand why you think you can keep this pretence of legitimacy up.I'm sorry, but you are certainly not conftown.
Nice twisting my words, by the way. I firmly stated my desire to not play with idiots, because it's not fun in the slightest.Firstly, if you don't want to play with idiots, don't join a BM. But in any case, I never twisted your words. You are refusing to answer me, no? So, this
As to why I don't need to defend myself; all you're going to do is twist anything I could possibly say until its barely recognizable anymore, so why should I feed the troll?
You realise that you are the one who is throwing the game when you refuse to defend yourself?still stands.
It's not like scum!borno is even innovating at all, this is a play I've seen dozens of times.You keep calling me scum, yet have no case beyond 'he attacked me!'. This is a good example of an OMGUS, not the post in which I gave good reasons for my vote.
darkpaladin109: So, how's that readthrough going?I suppose it's going....alright. All I really found was a question I didn't see, which I suppose I'l be answering now.
Tn5421 and darkpaladin109: Since you both were in the last beginner's mafia game, which was a sprint, how do you expect this game will differ? How will you be changing your playstyles to adapt to those differences?Sorry for missing the question Scripten. As for my answer, I have been in a BM before, though I haven't gotten through the end there. I suppose the difference is that it's going to be much slower paced, and I going to be able to get more posts in, at the very least. I don't really have a solid playstyle right now, to be perfectly honest, though.
I prefer to give the setting before the situation
@borno: Why should I waste 15 or more minutes of my life reading your scumpainting post?::) This is what got you into this mess, remember? Not properly reading my post?
What? So you're saying I should have structured it like this?QuoteI prefer to give the setting before the situation
Then maybe you should make it obvious that you're doing so.
No need to prod, posting now.Really? You take two days to read 7 pages, and this is all that you have? What are your reads? What do you think about tn5421 and I? Did kansa just drop a scumtell? There is so much more you can post with two days up your sleeve.darkpaladin109: So, how's that readthrough going?I suppose it's going....alright. All I really found was a question I didn't see, which I suppose I'l be answering now.Tn5421 and darkpaladin109: Since you both were in the last beginner's mafia game, which was a sprint, how do you expect this game will differ? How will you be changing your playstyles to adapt to those differences?Sorry for missing the question Scripten. As for my answer, I have been in a BM before, though I haven't gotten through the end there. I suppose the difference is that it's going to be much slower paced, and I going to be able to get more posts in, at the very least. I don't really have a solid playstyle right now, to be perfectly honest, though.
I think that's all the questions for me, so if I missed any, it would be nice if you let me know.
Hi all. I'm not sure if my current internet setup is going to be sufficient to finish out this game. I've just moved into a new apartment and my internet service has been delayed. What with this silly old town shutting down at 4 or 5 at night, I don't think using the internet cafes is going to cut it. I really do want to keep playing, but it doesn't seem to be working out right now. It's been fun so far, but my activity is terrible and I should give up my spot for someone who's able to be more active.Sad to see you go. Good luck in your new home!
Therefore, I'm going to put myself up for replacement.
There is no need for me to do so; you have already decided that I'm guilty, and no defense would stop you from seeing me lynched anyway.I don't know why you keep assuming that nothing you can do will stop me from voting you. If you give a decent enough explanation for your actions then I may drop my vote. But currently, by refusing to defend yourself you are being a huge scumbucket. You insist that playing with idiots is not fun at all, yet I think that playing with someone who resigns themselves to death for no good reason at all is not very fun. It doesn't matter if you're scum or town; you're throwing the game for yourself and your teammates by doing this.
Jack: His constant misinterpretation of borno's LYLO question, even after several people fixed the situation is a prime example.And its more that your giving me a bad vibe with how your phrasing your posts.RangerCado: Can you describe this in more detail? What is it about the phrasing that gives you a bad vibe?
@RangerCado: But can you deny that stuff is getting done?tn5421: Yes actually. You ask very few questions and are now yelling at everyone and giving up on town. Is that helping town?
-snip-Feeding the troll? Your the only one who appears to be trolling everyone, calling them names and generally being a very unwelcoming person. This entire post quoted is mostly you insulting us all.
Yet it can't be LYLO day 1 in a beginners mafia! It was obviously just written in a somewhat confusing manner to you, but most of us both understood, and tried to correct the situation. This is just making you even scummier looking.QuoteIt is lylo, and the votes are tied.is not a question. He keeps trying to frame it as a question because he knows I caught him out on a lie and is trying to cover it up by attacking me. Granted, I made it easier by deciding to play a bit different than I normally do. He also never connected the statements in any meaningful way.QuoteOne player is slightly scummy and lurks and the other is more scummy but is active. Who do you choose to lynch?
Should have been this:QuoteOne player is slightly scummy and lurks and the other is more scummy but is active. You are in LYLO. Who do you choose to lynch?
No need to prod, posting now.Darkpaladin: ...Several days of information to go off of and dig through, and yet this post... This is just so empty, with almost do information at all to go off of from it, and very little actually done. Do you have any suspects, reads, or questions to ask people? At all?darkpaladin109: So, how's that readthrough going?I suppose it's going....alright. All I really found was a question I didn't see, which I suppose I'l be answering now.Tn5421 and darkpaladin109: Since you both were in the last beginner's mafia game, which was a sprint, how do you expect this game will differ? How will you be changing your playstyles to adapt to those differences?Sorry for missing the question Scripten. As for my answer, I have been in a BM before, though I haven't gotten through the end there. I suppose the difference is that it's going to be much slower paced, and I going to be able to get more posts in, at the very least. I don't really have a solid playstyle right now, to be perfectly honest, though.
I think that's all the questions for me, so if I missed any, it would be nice if you let me know.
There is no need for me to do so; you have already decided that I'm guilty, and no defense would stop you from seeing me lynched anyway.tn5421: ...Dude, please just... this is partially what is killing you in this game. You've decided that your just gonna let yourself die. If your town, then you should still work to try and find scum. The more you do, and the more active you actually are, the less reason and sense we have to keep our votes on you if you start looking townie again. I know this feeling of getting ganged up on, but just try for the rest of the game.
I think that everyone should, at this point, show all of their reads on others, following Jack A T.Yes, let's do so.
@RangerCado: The defender is always wrong, and the attacker is always right in the eyes of public opinion.tn5421: Thats... a really pessimistic outlook. What you have to do is not just stick to defending, and acknowledge points they make against you that are true or understandable. While doing this, you check to see if their activity in them questioning you is scummy, as well as doing the rounds on others. Never STOP hunting, and your much more likely to survive. If you do end up day 1 lynched, or NKed, oh well. You got unlucky, but theres always the next game.
darkpaladin109: Well, that was certainly a very useful post. Were you left with any thoughts about anyone after your reread? Anything you wanted more information on? Anything at all?The sarcasm. It is strong.
borno: Can you give your list of points against tn5421? Why aren't you questioning others? Do you have anyone else on your radar?Sure thing.
@Everyone: If I were scum, why would I draw your attention and paint a target on myself?That's a terrible argument. No scum wants to draw others' attention too much; yet by dropping scumtells they inevitably end up being in the limelight.
@Everyone: If I were scum, why would I draw your attention and paint a target on myself?tn5421: Too keep suspicion away from your scum buddy, cause WIFOM. Really just to insue chaos.
@RangerCado: The defender is always wrong, and the attacker is always right in the eyes of public opinion.tn5421: The public clearly doesn't play enough Mafia, then. Kansa and RangerCado have points here. Don't let your attacker(s) control the narrative about you.
@Kansa: But you'll notice I'm on everyones 'suspicious' list....did you miss the whole thing where I unvoted you and later said I had a null read on you? Also, you haven't been a defender in this situation. You've actively been a non-defender.
@Everyone: If I were scum, why would I draw your attention and paint a target on myself?If I were scum, why would I ever do anything that makes people want to lynch me? The attack on borno can only be called painting a target on yourself in hindsight. The refusal to defend yourself was a poor idea whether town or scum, and you've been clearly running on rage (a state where people have poor ideas, among other things).
(to darkpaladin109) Did kansa just drop a scumtell?borno: (parenthetical added by me) Looking back, this question interests me. Do you think Kansa dropped a scumtell? Why point darkpaladin109 so specifically towards Kansa (and yes, I know you pointed him at the you/tn5421 feud as well)?
Honestly, I just chose a random player to try and give him ideas. Nothing against Kansa, I was just trying to motivate darkpaladin109.(to darkpaladin109) Did kansa just drop a scumtell?borno: (parenthetical added by me) Looking back, this question interests me. Do you think Kansa dropped a scumtell? Why point darkpaladin109 so specifically towards Kansa (and yes, I know you pointed him at the you/tn5421 feud as well)?
borno: ...How is he buddying me exactly? At all? And points 1, 2, 4, and 6 can all be somewhat explained by miscommunication and previous frustration. Yes, he's been aggresive and angry, but at this point, the only thing thats really against him beside 3 and 5 is his lack of actual hunting. I see someone who is confused at whats going on more than a scum.Well, earlier he mentioned that he would like to have you as a scum buddy and then later said that
And no, you haven't. In the last 2 pages approximately, you have only been attacking tn5421. Thats no questioning others. Who would you suspect if tn5421 ends up being town?
-snip-when what you said was something I had already stated myself. Granted, the first one doesn't really count, but the second still holds strong.
as the people that are voting me are doing so for mainly nonsensical reasons. Except for RangerCado, I think.
I guess I haven't really found anything else too scummy, and so I haven't been questioning others.Try also looking for things that are vague, or things that interest you. Find things you want more information on and ask about them. Even actions that are not immediately scummy can lead to the revelation of rather interesting/scummy things when you question people about them.
borno: For the tn5421 situation, probably because I wasn't using his anger and frustration as evidence. And thats not buddying to me. To me, thats more stating he thought I had the only somewhat valid case on him.Uh, yes you did.
And not seeing a scummy person is NO reason to not be questioning and hunting people. So yes, my point is valid. So whats your next reason for not questioning others borno?
Your only point against him is something he said... While very angry and frustrated at Jack A T's vote. Also, I believe that it is buddying or perhaps defending?-cut irrelevant bits-...REALLY!? Town shouldn't try to hard to keep themselves, but this is just... WHY!? Vote tn5421.
You go right ahead and lynch me day one, it doesn't make a bit of difference to me.
RangerCado:borno: That was not anger or frustration. That was giving up completely which made me really frustrated. And defending if the attacks are flimsy, or suspicious themselves is usually seen as a continuation of hunting. Can you give a couple examples of this buddying? Cause I really don't see it.borno: For the tn5421 situation, probably because I wasn't using his anger and frustration as evidence. And thats not buddying to me. To me, thats more stating he thought I had the only somewhat valid case on him.Uh, yes you did.
And not seeing a scummy person is NO reason to not be questioning and hunting people. So yes, my point is valid. So whats your next reason for not questioning others borno?Your only point against him is something he said... While very angry and frustrated at Jack A T's vote. Also, I believe that it is buddying or perhaps defending?-cut irrelevant bits-...REALLY!? Town shouldn't try to hard to keep themselves, but this is just... WHY!? Vote tn5421.
You go right ahead and lynch me day one, it doesn't make a bit of difference to me.
While I'm attacking someone, I usually focus my attention on them and ask questions to others when I see something scummy. So, that's my reason for not questioning anyone while I was attacking tn5421. I guess that now that I've stopped attacking him, I'll ask questions to others.
Once again, will post more after school.
@Everyone: If I were scum, why would I draw your attention and paint a target on myself?Question 1: I guess that's a pretty good point. Yeah, I think that tn451 might not be scum, BUT we'll see if that's true as the game unfolds.
@darkpaladin109: It's nice of you to finally participate. What kept you?
Kansa: Alright, you have reads. How do you intend to improve them? (I strongly recommend asking a few questions)Question 1, since you want me to answer it: I guess asking questions is a good thing. I'l read the recent replies tommorow and see what questions I can think from that.
darkpaladin109: See my question to Kansa. Also, why nothing about RangerCado?
No, he gave up because of his anger/frustration. He even says in a later post, 'if you're stupid enough to lynch me, you lose my support'. Doesn't sound what someone feeling happy would say. And no, I wasn't speaking about him defending himself.RangerCado:borno: That was not anger or frustration. That was giving up completely which made me really frustrated. And defending if the attacks are flimsy, or suspicious themselves is usually seen as a continuation of hunting. Can you give a couple examples of this buddying? Cause I really don't see it.borno: For the tn5421 situation, probably because I wasn't using his anger and frustration as evidence. And thats not buddying to me. To me, thats more stating he thought I had the only somewhat valid case on him.Uh, yes you did.
And not seeing a scummy person is NO reason to not be questioning and hunting people. So yes, my point is valid. So whats your next reason for not questioning others borno?Your only point against him is something he said... While very angry and frustrated at Jack A T's vote. Also, I believe that it is buddying or perhaps defending?-cut irrelevant bits-...REALLY!? Town shouldn't try to hard to keep themselves, but this is just... WHY!? Vote tn5421.
You go right ahead and lynch me day one, it doesn't make a bit of difference to me.
While I'm attacking someone, I usually focus my attention on them and ask questions to others when I see something scummy. So, that's my reason for not questioning anyone while I was attacking tn5421. I guess that now that I've stopped attacking him, I'll ask questions to others.
@Kansa: He was attempting to panic the townsfolk, which is an action that primarily advances the scum wincon. I don't see the need to defend myself at this point in the game, as the people that are voting me are doing so for mainly nonsensical reasons. Except for RangerCado, I think.Highlighting the buddying bit. There was absolutely no reason for him to say that. It's not something to vote you about straight away, but it certainly requires looking into if he flips scum.
And you may want to work on that, as tunneling someone usually blinds you to what else is going on in the game. Remember there ARE two scum, and the chances of getting them day 1 are generally slim. Your lack of going against others is very worrying to me, as it could mean you were trying to find as much dirt as possible in a short amount of time to rally against a player who for the past 2 days hasn't said much to even attack on. You've been going back and forth with me and Jack for the past while. Why didn't you ask questions of others then?Of course. That doesn't mean that I can't try, though. I don't really go after anyone else, because there is nothing else to go after. People are as lurky as a catfish in here. Also, I've stopped tunnelling tn5421 now, as detailed here:
tn5421, since you continue to refuse to defend yourself, I'll just leave my vote here until you prove to me that I can take it off.darkpaladin109:
That's really not good enough. Hopefully you'll make it up with your big post tomorrow, but the way you're going you're becoming scummier by the second.@Everyone: If I were scum, why would I draw your attention and paint a target on myself?Question 1: I guess that's a pretty good point. Yeah, I think that tn451 might not be scum, BUT we'll see if that's true as the game unfolds.
@darkpaladin109: It's nice of you to finally participate. What kept you?
Question 2: Laziness and I had to study for school. Eh, I'd say it's the first more than the second, though.Kansa: Alright, you have reads. How do you intend to improve them? (I strongly recommend asking a few questions)Question 1, since you want me to answer it: I guess asking questions is a good thing. I'l read the recent replies tommorow and see what questions I can think from that.
darkpaladin109: See my question to Kansa. Also, why nothing about RangerCado?
Question 2: Eh, I don't think there's anything to point him in either direction yet, at least as far as I see.
Bed soon, so more replies tommorow.
To borno: I really don't think personally that tn5421 was buddying rangercado, if they were buddies why would rangercado accuse tn5421 in the first place?Kansa: That's not what we tend to mean by "buddying." "Buddying" basically refers to attempts to cozy up to a player, making that player both more friendly to the buddier and easier to convince.
I am trying to figure out more questions, it's just difficult to think of that many that don't just seem pointless though.Kansa: Can you give an example of one of the seemingly pointless questions you came up with?
Kansa: Can you give an example of one of the seemingly pointless questions you came up with?
MyOwnWorstEnemy: In about an hour, Fniff will hit the 48 hour warning threshold.Thanks for all of the assistance! I hope my inexperience isn't too annoying...
So, hey. Back to mafia. I know I said I'd be back only at the end of the year, but things tend to become a lot less hectic when you stop caring too much about real life problems you can't solve. I'll be a bit free-er after next week, so I shot a PM to MOWE so I can replace in the BM and get up to speed with the game again.
Tiruin: So, how's that post going?Getting to it.
borno: My questions (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=138613.msg5310568#msg5310568), please.Ah, sorry, I missed them.
:-[ Well, actually... I was referring to 'buddying' in the same way as Kansa, as in a scum member doesn't want to draw attention to another scum player and so doesn't really attack them at all. What would that be in Mafia terms?To borno: I really don't think personally that tn5421 was buddying rangercado, if they were buddies why would rangercado accuse tn5421 in the first place?Kansa: That's not what we tend to mean by "buddying." "Buddying" basically refers to attempts to cozy up to a player, making that player both more friendly to the buddier and easier to convince.
borno: I'm going to take a different approach to the issue of alleged buddying. Why is tn5421 allegedly buddying RangerCado effecting your read of Cado so much? How exactly does someone you think is scum trying to buddy an attacker make the attacker in question scummier?Well, I guess if they flip scum then the person they were... whatever the term ising will be cast under suspicion. But right now, it's not really affecting my read of him. I'm just noting it in case tn5421 ever dies and flips scum.
To borno: I really don't think personally that tn5421 was buddying rangercado, if they were buddies why would rangercado accuse tn5421 in the first place?Since I think we were talking about the same 'buddying' (who knows anymore?), I think Jack A T's answer still applies. If RangerCado and tn5421 were scum, then they may try to bus eachother to take suspicion off of one of them I guess.
I don't see the need to defend myself at this point in the game, as the people that are voting me are doing so for mainly nonsensical reasons. Except for RangerCado, I think.
Well, damn. I replaced in for Scripten (No idea why MOWE hasn't changed the OP or said it here, but I got the role PM), but it's sad to see so many leave at once. I'll give the thread a read and post my views, shouldn't take too long.Because dummy me was waiting for a confirmation PM of some sort... :-[
:-[ Well, actually... I was referring to 'buddying' in the same way as Kansa, as in a scum member doesn't want to draw attention to another scum player and so doesn't really attack them at all. What would that be in Mafia terms?borno: Ah, communication failures...
Tiruin:[/b] Whats your take on the roster of players? Anyone you recognize who your going to be keeping an eye on? Potential skill?I always hold no bias on the roster of players in every game I play in, despite part of my judgement saying otherwise :) (ie If I see {experienced player} and I've an inspect--or rather, something to probably clear ANY {or aid in clearing such} doubt on the player, I don't use it because experience as a primary factor) mainly due to treating other players as myself. AMorphous.
Tiruin: You recently participated in a game with this setup, but without the teaching elements: NSBM 4. What did you learn from that game that you can apply to this game?A few facts:
Everybody: Since this is a beginner's game, it's more likely that well-used scumtells will be less effective. What strategies do you think would be best in a situation like this, where players may not know what actions to avoid and which ones to look out for?Really?
On asking questions directed to "Everybody"/"Everyone": This is not the best idea, as people tend to miss these.Not really, if bolded and being the only thing in a post :P
An additional note on evaluating newbie actions: This is why I asked all the beginners except tn5421 (who has the info in his sig) about their previous Mafia experience.[...]*looks at question asked to self*
TiruinWasn't dodging it :x Was making a quick-off reply towards Jack because my memory is fishy at times.
Don't dodge the question.
@Everyone: How do you feel about our chances of finding and lynching a member of the scum team day one?Depending on how we're doing it. I don't find much merit in statistics or such regarding the D1 lynch though--its more of a situational case if its scum.
Everyone: Who would be your ideal scum buddy, and why?,,,This is a hard question for me. >.>
PS: One should add the term 'EBWOP' into the BM dictionary.Editededd.
*nudges MOWE* ;p
I feel like the power roles would be at more risk of night killsgiven that that is a...role instead of any person or term related to a person in particular and why it was mentioned if at all. Then stuff cut off. :(
scripten/Deathsword: Y'need to post more buddy. (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=138613.msg5316834#msg5316834)I ate something yesterday that... well, let's just say the result wasn't exactly good.
On that note, hope everything is OK in South America!World Cup still a few weeks away, which is when the metaphorical feces will hit the fan. Still, thanks for the thought.
Because I don't really care about this game's outcome, borno.Might I ask why?
borno: Active, but tunneling. Slight scum lean. If scum, then RangerCado is probably also scum.Could you also elaborate on why you basically created two possible scumteams there? (bolded relevant parts). Why would the scum team be, say, borno and Cado instead of borno and Jack?
tn5421: Slight scum lean due to odd behavior, but (as Jack says) that could be unrelated to scumminess. If scum, then Jack A T is probably also scum.
RangerCado: Slight scum lean. Possibly borno's scumbuddy if borno is scum.
Jack A T: Slight scum lean due to waving away problems with tn5421's argument. Probably tn5421's scumbuddy if tn5421 is scum
*looks at question asked to self*Tiruin: Well, you are certainly a beginner (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=133728.0) of games (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=126082.0).
Tiruin has attained Beginner status! \o/
Achievement, get!
... hey Jack A T, what course are you into if in college and what's your favorite ice cream? Also, why ask me a question of personal reflection? It's nice, but I'm curious.I'm studying political science (major) and criminology (minor). Over the summer, I'm taking one course, a political science one titled "Globalization and the Canadian State." I lack a favourite ice cream flavour, due to the massive field of choices and my rejection of the idea that one must have a favourite thing in every category.
TheDarkStar/fniff: [...] while I am suspicious on this one point (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=138613.msg5295421#msg5295421) wherein he says 'the Mafia are new' (considering that even the ICs can be scum) [cont (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=138613.msg5296056#msg5296056)] {fin (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=138613.msg5299222#msg5299222)}, it may either be a slip or just an offhand gesture at the idea. T'would be strange, now that I think of it, if it were a scumslip, though he may have just forgotten, hence only suspicion.What do you make of Fniff's statement (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=138613.msg5299222#msg5299222) that he didn't know the ICs were players?
Everyone: What is the most confusing thing regarding Mafia that you have trouble with dealing, while playing, in this game, now? Do you wish to question it in public? Could you state it, if so?Tiruin: Newbies.
As a newbie, I can replace.Awesome! Role PM incoming.
Ooh a replacement storm, this ought to be interesting.
Because I don't really care about this game's outcome, borno.This is not good, to fix problem read this (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=76609.0) and do not emulate. Not only is it hilarious, but it provides a great example of what not to do. I read it many times before I stopped laughing. Anyway, do not loose heart. Things are not as bad as they seem but they can always get worse.
RangerCado:You try to back up your attacks on your attacker with evidence, but it really isn't that strong.borno: For the tn5421 situation, probably because I wasn't using his anger and frustration as evidence. And thats not buddying to me. To me, thats more stating he thought I had the only somewhat valid case on him.Uh, yes you did.
And not seeing a scummy person is NO reason to not be questioning and hunting people. So yes, my point is valid. So whats your next reason for not questioning others borno?Your only point against him is something he said... While very angry and frustrated at Jack A T's vote. Also, I believe that it is buddying or perhaps defending?-cut irrelevant bits-...REALLY!? Town shouldn't try to hard to keep themselves, but this is just... WHY!? Vote tn5421.
You go right ahead and lynch me day one, it doesn't make a bit of difference to me.
While I'm attacking someone, I usually focus my attention on them and ask questions to others when I see something scummy. So, that's my reason for not questioning anyone while I was attacking tn5421. I guess that now that I've stopped attacking him, I'll ask questions to others.
tn5421, since you continue to refuse to defend yourself, I'll just leave my vote here until you prove to me that I can take it off.This is also a bad thing. He has already proved that he will likely do nothing unless we attempt to win the game and drag him along with us. Your vote has more useful places than on him. I agree that he is probably mafia, but I he is typical of depressed new player under fire as exemplified in Kingmaker IV.
A few general questions to help me get up to speed.LARD:
1. Are we still in RVS or should I be more careful with my vote?
2. Is there anything outstandingly abnormal I should know here?
I will get a couple of chances to revote before day end but for now Borno, you're it. I like to leave my gate firing.No hammers in Beginner's Mafia.
(MyOwnWorstEnemy If this hammers, disregard vote. How many to hammer?)
Those who replaced I feel are less likely to be scum because scum is a fun role to play, and if I were a scum, I would focus my energies and be quite active in that game.I don't think this applies as well here as it does in other games. Scripten left because he had no internet access, which has no connection to alignment. Fniff was a first time player who found the game wasn't for him. Darkpaladin, while having a bit more experience, felt the same way. Scum's only very fun if one finds mafia to be fun in the first place.
Jack: You seem to be spending a large amount of your time commenting on other peoples questions. This makes it seem like you are pushing attention to other people's problems.One, this is Mafia. I'm supposed to examine what other people are doing, and try to get what evidence I can out of it. That includes asking people about the questions they ask.
I guess you never want to attract too much attention to yourself, but it does seem like you are pushing random people without any order.Low-activity game full of newbies. I'm trying to get whatever I can out of the players, to better determine their alignments. I had also been trying to get players to act at all. That means pushing people who do pushworthy actions, among other things.
I know your vote is on me, or my predecessor for things like lurking and I'd rather not have the most active and trusted player breathing down my neck. The question is this: What do you plan to do with me now that I have replaced Darkpaladin and what were your suspicions on him.It's not on you. (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=138613.msg5316518#msg5316518) I unvoted when he requested a replacement, recognizing that his reasons neutralized the high lurkiness issue he had. My non-voting has continued with the sudden gain of 4 players. My vote was primarily to pressure darkpaladin to act.
This is also a bad thing. He [tn5421] has already proved that he will likely do nothing unless we attempt to win the game and drag him along with us. Your vote has more useful places than on him. I agree that he is probably mafia, but I he is typical of depressed new player under fire as exemplified in Kingmaker IV.The underlined sentence is written with the assumption that he is town, and you downplay the issue of tn5421's breakdown under fire, saying his play is "typical of depressed new player under fire." You also push for borno to not vote tn5421, based on that, while mildly saying you think tn is scum.
Everyone: What is the most confusing thing regarding Mafia that you have trouble with dealing, while playing, in this game, now? Do you wish to question it in public? Could you state it, if so?tn5421 not defending himself. It confuses me beyond no end; he is being lazy (scumtell) evasive (scumtell) and uncooperative (scumtell), for what reason? To one-up me or something? I don't understand, and he's holding the whole game up because of it.
borno: Why, exactly, are you voting for tn? Compared to everyone else, why him?Because, as I've stated before, he's refusing to defend. I'm putting my vote on him to try and get him to do something, but all he is posting is sentence long half baked posts. And not even often, either.
darkpaladin109: Null read due to inactivity. I'll probably ask more things to his replacement if there is one.I don't know why I'm still being considered to be 'tunneling'. I've stopped attacking tn5421 as I have hit the magma sea and he has refused to say anything more. Also, I don't know how you got the impression that if I'm scum I'm probably buddies with RangerCado. Please enlighten.
borno: Active, but tunneling. Slight scum lean. If scum, then RangerCado is probably also scum.
TheDarkStar: Confirmed town for me ;D.
Deathsword: Scripten was inactive, so null read for now.
tn5421: Slight scum lean due to odd behavior, but (as Jack says) that could be unrelated to scumminess. If scum, then Jack A T is probably also scum.
RangerCado: Slight scum lean. Possibly borno's scumbuddy if borno is scum.
Kansa: Just started being active, but there isn't any reason to suspect him. Slight town lean.
Jack A T: Slight scum lean due to waving away problems with tn5421's argument. Probably tn5421's scumbuddy if tn5421 is scum.
Tiruin: Active now, and was inactive due to RL. Town lean.
Those who replaced I feel are less likely to be scum because scum is a fun role to play, and if I were a scum, I would focus my energies and be quite active in that game.Not necessarily. Maybe for people who are more comfortable playing Mafia, but for new players being scum can be a nerve-wracking experience-one that they may like to avoid.
Borno: You seem to be reacting strongly to Cado's accusations. Everybody has been throwing votes and random stuff around like confetti here. Most people seem to think that being defensive is a rather strong scumtell, and you seem to have an omgus here.Wait, wha? How's that an OMGUS? An OMGUS is, by the first post's definition:RangerCado:You try to back up your attacks on your attacker with evidence, but it really isn't that strong.borno: For the tn5421 situation, probably because I wasn't using his anger and frustration as evidence. And thats not buddying to me. To me, thats more stating he thought I had the only somewhat valid case on him.Uh, yes you did.
And not seeing a scummy person is NO reason to not be questioning and hunting people. So yes, my point is valid. So whats your next reason for not questioning others borno?Your only point against him is something he said... While very angry and frustrated at Jack A T's vote. Also, I believe that it is buddying or perhaps defending?-cut irrelevant bits-...REALLY!? Town shouldn't try to hard to keep themselves, but this is just... WHY!? Vote tn5421.
You go right ahead and lynch me day one, it doesn't make a bit of difference to me.
While I'm attacking someone, I usually focus my attention on them and ask questions to others when I see something scummy. So, that's my reason for not questioning anyone while I was attacking tn5421. I guess that now that I've stopped attacking him, I'll ask questions to others.
OMGUS - Oh My God U Suck, a vote on someone else simply because they voted or attacked youI didn't vote RangerCado, so it isn't an OMGUS.
This alsoHow's that a bad thing? And it's a pressure vote; it is in the most useful place it can be. Unless if you have someone in mind who I should be voting? If he gets lynched for stubbornly refusing to defend himself, so be it.tn5421, since you continue to refuse to defend yourself, I'll just leave my vote here until you prove to me that I can take it off.This is also a bad thing. He has already proved that he will likely do nothing unless we attempt to win the game and drag him along with us. Your vote has more useful places than on him. I agree that he is probably mafia, but I he is typical of depressed new player under fire as exemplified in Kingmaker IV.
Tiruin:Did you ask him these things based on your observations?
Glad to see you here.Everyone: What is the most confusing thing regarding Mafia that you have trouble with dealing, while playing, in this game, now? Do you wish to question it in public? Could you state it, if so?tn5421 not defending himself. It confuses me beyond no end; he is being lazy (scumtell) evasive (scumtell) and uncooperative (scumtell), for what reason? To one-up me or something? I don't understand, and he's holding the whole game up because of it.borno: Why, exactly, are you voting for tn? Compared to everyone else, why him?Because, as I've stated before, he's refusing to defend. I'm putting my vote on him to try and get him to do something, but all he is posting is sentence long half baked posts. And not even often, either.
PFP, also second half of my big post up there cont'd.Yes. I saw he was scummy, he refused to defend, and so I asked him to defend, if that was what you were asking. I feel like I may have misinterpreted your question somehow, though.Tiruin:Did you ask him these things based on your observations?
Glad to see you here.Everyone: What is the most confusing thing regarding Mafia that you have trouble with dealing, while playing, in this game, now? Do you wish to question it in public? Could you state it, if so?tn5421 not defending himself. It confuses me beyond no end; he is being lazy (scumtell) evasive (scumtell) and uncooperative (scumtell), for what reason? To one-up me or something? I don't understand, and he's holding the whole game up because of it.borno: Why, exactly, are you voting for tn? Compared to everyone else, why him?Because, as I've stated before, he's refusing to defend. I'm putting my vote on him to try and get him to do something, but all he is posting is sentence long half baked posts. And not even often, either.
Borno: How much do you think you've learned about the game since those BMs so many(two, I think) years ago? What are your reads on the ICs?Sorry, I was sure that I had missed a question somewhere, and I was right. I think that what I learned most from my previous mafia experiences is to keep calm, as anger just gets in the way of things.
-snip-Borno: I still don't see how thats buddying. I felt no attempt at trying to win my favor with that. Therefore, I didn't call him out on it which means its not really buddying.
To borno: I really don't think personally that tn5421 was buddying rangercado, if they were buddies why would rangercado accuse tn5421 in the first place?Kansa: Oh theres MANY reasons too. Deflection, diversion, to avoid seeming like there is buddying going on. The list goes on of potential reasons I WOULD do so if I were scum. Busing is also a thing.
Well, I guess if they flip scum then the person they were... whatever the term ising will be cast under suspicion. But right now, it's not really affecting my read of him. I'm just noting it in case tn5421 ever dies and flips scum.borno: This, the bolded especially, makes me suspicious. You've been pushing for a lynch against tn5421 for most of the day, but this makes me believe that you don't think that others will either A: See his scumminess, of B: You don't fully think he's scummy. Thoughts?
Everyone: What is the most confusing thing regarding Mafia that you have trouble with dealing, while playing, in this game, now? Do you wish to question it in public? Could you state it, if so?Tiruin: My biggest thing has always been trying to find the reasoning behind odd behavior by players in a game. Not all can be scum, and a lot of the time, this behavior has a reason and positive motif. Its difficult to catch the hidden reasons, rather than the obvious 'this is weird, press cause it might be scummy!' mentality.
Cado: How scummy do you consider buddying to be, seeing as there were accusations you were involved in the act?Death: You'd have to take it on a case by case basis a lot of the time, but in a beginners game? I would say a lot smaller than in other games for the simple fact that someone in a different and unfamiliar environment is likely to try and find a friend or ally they can get to trust them that will help them out a bit. Its like when you go to a new school and the first thing you do is try and find your old friends, or attempt to find a new one. If it were anything BUT a beginners game, I would be more suspicious. And I still don't think he was in fact trying to buddy me.
A few questions:
*You seem rather nervous about my vote. What is it about that vote, when nobody else had been voting you/your predecessor, that made you so nervous about it?
*What are your reads on players other than me, tn5421, and borno?
*You stated around the start of your post that you suspect tn5421 the most due to his breakdown under fire. However, later in your post, you write this as part of your attack on borno (formatting added by me):This is also a bad thing. He [tn5421] has already proved that he will likely do nothing unless we attempt to win the game and drag him along with us. Your vote has more useful places than on him. I agree that he is probably mafia, but I he is typical of depressed new player under fire as exemplified in Kingmaker IV.The underlined sentence is written with the assumption that he is town, and you downplay the issue of tn5421's breakdown under fire, saying his play is "typical of depressed new player under fire." You also push for borno to not vote tn5421, based on that, while mildly saying you think tn is scum.
Please explain. Please also give more detail regarding your thoughts on tn and borno.
MOWE: sorry to bug you, but the title of the thread still has replacement needed on it, and I think I filled the last slot. Cheers!I did change it not long after you replaced in. When you begin a post by quoting another, your post has that same title. That's why your post has the old title.
Yes, as clarified earlier, I misused the term 'buddying'.-snip-Borno: I still don't see how thats buddying. I felt no attempt at trying to win my favor with that. Therefore, I didn't call him out on it which means its not really buddying.
Well, according to the votecount, no, no-one else sees his scuminess. I put that in there because many people believe that he is just a 'misguided townie' or whatever, and certainly not scum.Well, I guess if they flip scum then the person they were... whatever the term ising will be cast under suspicion. But right now, it's not really affecting my read of him. I'm just noting it in case tn5421 ever dies and flips scum.borno: This, the bolded especially, makes me suspicious. You've been pushing for a lynch against tn5421 for most of the day, but this makes me believe that you don't think that others will either A: See his scumminess, of B: You don't fully think he's scummy. Thoughts?
Actually I played mafia on these forums two years ago, but then I mysteriously disappeared. So technically I wouldn't consider myself a 'new' player, but I'm still coming to terms with some things I've forgotten.-snip-
*What are your reads on players other than me, tn5421, and borno?
*You stated around the start of your post that you suspect tn5421 the most due to his breakdown under fire. However, later in your post, you write this as part of your attack on borno (formatting added by me):This is also a bad thing. He [tn5421] has already proved that he will likely do nothing unless we attempt to win the game and drag him along with us. Your vote has more useful places than on him. I agree that he is probably mafia, but I he is typical of depressed new player under fire as exemplified in Kingmaker IV.The underlined sentence is written with the assumption that he is town, and you downplay the issue of tn5421's breakdown under fire, saying his play is "typical of depressed new player under fire." You also push for borno to not vote tn5421, based on that, while mildly saying you think tn is scum.
My point was that I like to have unbalancing forces in the game, such as an edgy player like tn5421. I didn't vote him even though I think he's scum because of this and that he seems like he could learn a lot from surviving. People don't learn if you kill them straight away. That being said, I had forgotten that borno is quite a new player (right?) and so it was rather unkind of me to vote like that. That being said, he is quite eloquent and is playing well, so I consider him a more valid target.
The third point was just me asking borno to reconsider the usefulness of his vote. He is attacking the easy target and tunneled on him until it became clear that others disapproved of it.No, I attacked him until he kept on refusing to defend himself, and then stopped but didn't remove my vote to try and pressure him into action. I don't believe I was tunneling; there was just not much I considered immediately scummy.
How about a dangerous question to everybody: If you were scum, who would you nightkill?If I was scum I would also kill Jack A T. This is because he is giving lots of helpful advice and being a strong player, and an IC. I would likely not choose Tiruin as she has been less active and therefore helpful.
The reasoning behind this is this: the favored targets can give reads and stuff, we get d2 accusation material, and the mafia will likely get nothing from people's responses.
Now to BornoAgain, I don't think I'm being overly defensive. See my previous post. Why do you think that me defending myself normally is suddenly being overly defensive?
1. You are correct, it isn't an OMGUS, my apologies. That was just a bit of pressure from me about you being overly defensive.
2. I still disagree that the most useful place for your vote is on tn5421. (tn5421 if you are reading this, prove me wrong, please.)
3. tn5421 is just being a bit overdefensive, and I don't think that it's a scumtell. We find the scumtells later by how people respond to him.
I did a quick read through and I think that tn5421 is still the most likely scum because of the way he freaked out so much when a bit of pressure was put on him.
The borno and tn situation could mean one of a few things,So, just to be clear, you think tn5421 is the most likely player to be scum. However, you think that it is more likely that tn5421 is town and borno is scum. Yet borno is your second scumpick, and is less likely to be scum than tn5421, who is less likely to be scum than borno.
1. tn is scum and just getting used to it. If that is the case, then the breakdown under pressure makes sense.
2. borno is scum and targeting the easy player. Personally I find this more likely just due to the fact that the play-style of tn is more typical of a depressed new player (see KM IV) than of a scum, but it is so hard to tell.
3. neither of them are scum. Just borno targeting a suspicious person and things happening the way they should. I don't think this is likely, but it sure is more likely than point 4.
tn5421 not defending himself. It confuses me beyond no end; he is being lazy (scumtell) evasive (scumtell) and uncooperative (scumtell), for what reason? To one-up me or something? I don't understand, and he's holding the whole game up because of it.Thing is, we're reaching the end of the day, and you're posting stuff like this. You're doing the "and that's a scumtell!" thing newbies often do to convince people of their arguments against their lynch targets, and you're doing it even more gratuitously than it is usually done. You're trying to get attention on tn5421 by pointing out scummy actions. Yet...
I'm putting my vote on him to try and get him to do something, but all he is posting is sentence long half baked posts. And not even often, either.... you refuse to commit, and distance yourself from the idea that you want tn dead. Your vote is now a pressure vote, to get tn to act. Oh, you'd be fine, absolutely fine, with tn5421 being lynched for the inaction and actions you point out, but you're clearly not trying to lynch him or anything. You're just pressuring him.
[...]
How's that a bad thing? And it's a pressure vote; it is in the most useful place it can be. Unless if you have someone in mind who I should be voting? If he gets lynched for stubbornly refusing to defend himself, so be it.
Well, according to the votecount, no, no-one else sees his scuminess. I put that in there because many people believe that he is just a 'misguided townie' or whatever, and certainly not scum.Oh, hey, an announcement that people are missing how scummy tn5421 is, with an implication that if they noticed, they'd be voting for him. Of course, it's soon followed by a reiteration of your position that your goal for your vote is to pressure tn5421 into acting.
[...]
No, I attacked him until he kept on refusing to defend himself, and then stopped but didn't remove my vote to try and pressure him into action.
Borno: So, one of your recent posts (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=138613.msg5321450#msg5321450) got me to look back at your activity so far, and I'm noticing an interesting pattern of actions.Firstly, two other people isn't 'public opinion' to me. Secondly, isn't doing scummy stuff and being scum one and the same? I admit that I have laid off attacking him as hard as usual for two reasons: He refuses to defend himself, and the revelation of the possibility that he isn't scum, but confused town. Until he posts more I have no way of telling which one he is, so at times I may be wishy-washy.
See, back when public opinion was turning strongly towards lynching tn5421, you explicitly thought he was scum (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=138613.msg5302834#msg5302834). Since public opinion shifted against a tn5421 lynch, you've eased off from saying you think he's scum and have stuck to saying that he does things that make him look scummy.
If you want me to be honest, I had no idea that it's the end of the day today. It's a public holiday over here, so my silly brain assumed that it was Saturday, and the lynch next week. ::) Sorry. If I had known, I would have taken a much more aggressive stance against tn5421 for not defending himself for the whole day. I think that tn5421 is, indeed scum, I want to lynch him and I'm fine with being seen as the lynch leader. For your other questions, please see before.tn5421 not defending himself. It confuses me beyond no end; he is being lazy (scumtell) evasive (scumtell) and uncooperative (scumtell), for what reason? To one-up me or something? I don't understand, and he's holding the whole game up because of it.Thing is, we're reaching the end of the day, and you're posting stuff like this. You're doing the "and that's a scumtell!" thing newbies often do to convince people of their arguments against their lynch targets, and you're doing it even more gratuitously than it is usually done. You're trying to get attention on tn5421 by pointing out scummy actions. Yet...I'm putting my vote on him to try and get him to do something, but all he is posting is sentence long half baked posts. And not even often, either.... you refuse to commit, and distance yourself from the idea that you want tn dead. Your vote is now a pressure vote, to get tn to act. Oh, you'd be fine, absolutely fine, with tn5421 being lynched for the inaction and actions you point out, but you're clearly not trying to lynch him or anything. You're just pressuring him.
[...]
How's that a bad thing? And it's a pressure vote; it is in the most useful place it can be. Unless if you have someone in mind who I should be voting? If he gets lynched for stubbornly refusing to defend himself, so be it.
You want people voting tn5421. You want them off you and on tn5421, but you don't want to be seen as the one leading the lynch of tn5421. The initial push, not led by you, would have been great for you, but now you are nearly alone against tn. You want him dead, but you don't want to lead the lynch.
So. I have a few questions for you, borno: Is tn5421 scum? If so, why avoid actively pushing for his lynch? Why focus on a "pressure vote" near the end of the day?
PPE:Again, no idea that it was the end of the day today. I apologise. I know that pressure votes have no place at the end of the day, and so I'm switching it into a dead-serious vote.Well, according to the votecount, no, no-one else sees his scuminess. I put that in there because many people believe that he is just a 'misguided townie' or whatever, and certainly not scum.Oh, hey, an announcement that people are missing how scummy tn5421 is, with an implication that if they noticed, they'd be voting for him. Of course, it's soon followed by a reiteration of your position that your goal for your vote is to pressure tn5421 into acting.
[...]
No, I attacked him until he kept on refusing to defend himself, and then stopped but didn't remove my vote to try and pressure him into action.
Borno seems to me like a fairly experienced player playing scum.Wrong on both, sorry. Also, please could you respond to my response sometime today? That would be helpful.
Firstly, he states that Jack A T is suspicious for giving IC advice. Not a case on its own, but gives early insight into tn5421's aggressive, trouble-brewing nature.
Then he attacks me for asking a hypothetical question. This is where I start to think that he is scum, as he once again all he is doing is trying to stir up trouble with a nonsensical question.
Then, when Jack A T votes him for his behaviour, he suddenly just gives up and refuses to make any sort of defence.
He then gets really mad at the three people voting him, and again refuses to defend himself-except with a single hypocritical statement and insults to the people attacking him.
Also, apparently being on the verge of being lynched is 'the perfectly acceptable' for him.
Again, more insults and a baseless accusation that I'm scum. And apparently my hypothetical question wasn't a question but instead a statement. Huh. Also, more refusing to defend himself.
Once again refuses to defend himself, and claims that nothing he says will be believed until he dies.
It's not like he's even innovating at all, this is a post from him I've seen dozens of times: Nothing but insulting and baseless accusations.
Says that he refuses to read my post. That explains a lot, including why he got negative attention in the first case: The refusal to read posts properly. He also does his usual act of portraying himself as a poor, alone townie who has everything they say turned against him.
Apparently tn5421 can dictate what I think, and so refuses to defend more because I have already decided that he's guilty. What he fails to realise is that, by now, this is the major reason why I'm voting him in the first place.
More pathetic excuses. He claims that scumtells are all intentional and asks why he would drop one on purpose.
He doesn't post anything meaningful for a while, but then this. He's going to throw the game because he doesn't really care about its outcome in any case. Honestly, if he is town then this is the worst town play I've seen.
Actually, it is. There's nothing wrong with pursuing someone aggressively, but when you fire at anyone and everyone for anything and everything, usually you're scum.QuoteFirstly, he states that Jack A T is suspicious for giving IC advice. Not a case on its own, but gives early insight into tn5421's aggressive, trouble-brewing nature.
Aggression isn't alignment indicative. His advice was essentially "Walk off the cliff; you don't fall down".
No. But you did that anyway, what with your refusal to respond to me. Also, how is the solution to not making baseless attacks on everyone lurking? Enlighten me, please.QuoteThen he attacks me for asking a hypothetical question. This is where I start to think that he is scum, as he once again all he is doing is trying to stir up trouble with a nonsensical question.
What did you want me to do, lurk the whole game?
It's pretty relevant. Not only is refusing to defend yourself annoying to your attackers, it's also incredibly scummy.QuoteThen, when Jack A T votes him for his behaviour, he suddenly just gives up and refuses to make any sort of defence.
I don't see how this is relevant.
Aggressively, not overly-aggressively. And how am I distorting your words? What I've written all came out of your mouth.QuoteHe then gets really mad at the three people voting him, and again refuses to defend himself-except with a single hypocritical statement and insults to the people attacking him.
Also, apparently being on the verge of being lynched is 'the perfectly acceptable' for him.
I love how you distort what I said here. YOUR hypocrisy and that of every other person I've played with is fucking sickening. You advocate 'playing aggressively' and then jump on someone that actually takes your advice.
Please tell me where exactly I have lied today, because I can't remember lying myself.QuoteAgain, more insults and a baseless accusation that I'm scum. And apparently my hypothetical question wasn't a question but instead a statement. Huh. Also, more refusing to defend himself.
Lying is a universal scumtell, and you've lied more than once over the past game-day.
No, I'll keep on attacking you until you prove that you're town. Also, I don't know where all of these tunneling claims came from. There has just been little activity, and subsequently nothing I've found scummy.QuoteOnce again refuses to defend himself, and claims that nothing he says will be believed until he dies.
Of course it won't, because you'll keep scumpainting me until I flip town.
You've tunneled me so hard that everyone has noticed it by now.
You know that laziness is a scumtell, right? Why exactly weren't you willing to make the effort? And how is my case circumstantial?QuoteIt's not like he's even innovating at all, this is a post from him I've seen dozens of times: Nothing but insulting and baseless accusations.
That requires effort that I wasn't willing to make. Besides, your case by this point is extremely circumstantial at best.
If you did nothing scummy, then nothing would be turned against you. And don't be ridiculous. If everything you said had been turned against you, then you would have been lynched by now.QuoteSays that he refuses to read my post. That explains a lot, including why he got negative attention in the first case: The refusal to read posts properly. He also does his usual act of portraying himself as a poor, alone townie who has everything they say turned against him.
Because that's exactly what you're doing, trying to turn almost literally every word I have typed in this game against me.
What? I am voting you. What are you talking about?QuoteApparently tn5421 can dictate what I think, and so refuses to defend more because I have already decided that he's guilty. What he fails to realise is that, by now, this is the major reason why I'm voting him in the first place.
No, you aren't voting me because the rest of the players caught on to your attempted train and told you to fuck off.
QuoteMore pathetic excuses. He claims that scumtells are all intentional and asks why he would drop one on purpose.
Where did I say my 'scumtells' were intentional, liar?
@Everyone: If I were scum, why would I draw your attention and paint a target on myself?The quoted bit. You ask why you would draw attention and paint a target on yourself, as if you drew the attention on purpose and not by dropping scumtells.
I'm sorry, but I'm appealing to emotion? The one reason that people keep stating as why they aren't voting you is because apparently you seem to be a 'confused, lost townie'. I'm not the one appealing to emotion; It's you.QuoteHe doesn't post anything meaningful for a while, but then this. He's going to throw the game because he doesn't really care about its outcome in any case. Honestly, if he is town then this is the worst town play I've seen.
Stop appealing to emotion. It's making you look like a loser. I don't even understand how this qualifies as a case, since you don't have enough evidence to convince water that it is wet.
To borno: Why did you claim it was a pressure vote to get tn5421 to defend when you do believe he was actually scum?Because he was refusing to defend himself, and so I left my vote on him as a pressure vote. Since almost a whole day had passed and he still was refusing to defend himself, it transformed back into a lynch vote.
Day ends today at 7 pm EST (4 hours from now)...
There are no more extends available for today.
For other playersOpinion stated above, however in the likelihood that my intuition is wrong and one of them is scum, then I've to paint a possible other as a distancer given how both seem individualistic in their modes of acting and how they seem...like vigilantes(?), like...well, loners(?). In how they act.
Tiruin: what is your opinion on this conflict and who could be a likely scumbuddy?
Sorry for not posting in the last couple of days, I'm sad to see people leavingHi too Kansa, nice to see you around! :)
To Tiriun: Most confusing thing would probably be finding the right questions to ask people to ascertain their scumminess.
To borno: Why did you claim it was a pressure vote to get tn5421 to defend when you do believe he was actually scum?
Tiruin: No idea what to make of her, just massive piles of post to sift through. My last game I tried to lead a lynch on her only to find she wasn't scum. Such is life. I generally get reads on people when they start specifying their attacks.Do note: My posts are limited to those giant piles of post and smaller posts containing questions :P
Jack A T: Why are you not going for tn5421?LARD: Because his behaviour did not indicate scumhood.
As for my take, the scumbuddy is probably hidden in those few we haven't heard from recently. This kind of bothers me. If a scumbuddy is under fire, I think a scum would probably be active in either bussing or trying to get buddy off the hook.Why did you think this?
Borno seems to me like a fairly experienced player playing scum.and here
tn5421 seems to me like a rather twitchy player, possibly indicating scum, but more likely indicating unfamiliarity with this forum's playstyle. In any case, he will be useful to stir things up and get reactions, just like I was in my first game.
I agree that he is probably mafia, but I he is typical of depressed new player under fire as exemplified in Kingmaker IV.
Jack A TTDS This is confusing, you say you were incredibly suspicious of Jack, before you read his posts? I dunno, this seems a bit suspect. Could just be a slip of the tongue, is that right? Or is there more here?
I thought this was going to be a strong scum lean, but then I read through your posts, so you're leaning town.
To LARD: Honestly because I'm not entirely sure who is and who isn't mafia at this point, I probably should have cast a vote earlier on to add pressure to somebody but as we are really close to the end now it wouldn't do anything.This doesn't sit right for me. You just seem to be acting confused and unsure of yourself. That in itself is not a bad thing, but you use it as an excuse for not hunting or voting. Don't worry about that, you are far more suspicious when you sit on the fence than when you start hunting and savagely tearing people apart for their smallest verbal blunders.
I would probably wait for them to slip up and contradict something or do something that makes them seem suspicious, I'm not really sure what questions to ask to make them slip up though. As for the actual method of that I would probably as them a question to clarify the part that contradicted something else or made them suspicious in my eyes.
Jack: Probably would have killed Tiruin, the other IC, not tn5421. But we did make a lot of comments how the doctor/jailkeeper should protect the IC's. Moderate town. I would like to see his opinions on TiruinLARD: Please tell me that your read of me is based on more than just very WIFOMy nightkill speculation. For that matter, please tell me that your read of Tiruin is based on more than just very WIFOMy nightkill speculation.
Jack A T: Either good town, or really good scum.RangerCado: And which do you lean towards me being, if you lean either way?
Jack is the kind of IC i'm always wary of as he puts his cases and posts into his tips and explanations. It makes it me nervous, and unsure of what I could be missing in the veil of explanations. I'll have to keep a good eye on his posts, and I encourage the rest of you as well.Just know that any advice I give is in good faith, and anything else is important to keep a good eye on.
Being the final vote on borno before lynch puts you under a bit of suspicion in and of itself. What was your thought process behind that vote?
How likely did you think he was scum?Not incredibly likely, but more likely than anyone else at the time. Probably around 45%: significantly higher than the baseline chance of 25%, but still a day 1 suspicion. Still likely wrong.
TheDarkStar: Evidence shows a good lean town, but something is giving me a bad feeling. I don't know what, and have to physical evidence reason why. Something is just... offsetting to me, as bad as that sounds.Alright, I've been noticing a sort of division you put up in your reads between the evidence (that is, what you think a player's behaviour points to) and your feelings about players (that is, what their behaviour actually points you to). You did this before, back with your read of tn5421. (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=138613.msg5309179#msg5309179)
TheDarkStar:
I forgot to put an explicit statement of my read on you in. I shall correct that now: scum lean. My reasons are in my reads post.
I wasn't just trying to get you to post reads. Believe me, I could have done that with a lot less. I want you to explain your Day 1 behaviour. Your active-lurky, unfocused Day 1 behaviour. Your "semi-irrelevant" Day 1 behaviour.
Now, would you be so kind as to actually answer the assorted questions I linked to in my reads post? Because you're not. You somehow managed to respond to only the questions I missed, and even those you largely left unanswered:Could you also elaborate on why you basically created two possible scumteams there? (bolded relevant parts). Why would the scum team be, say, borno and Cado instead of borno and Jack?Also, to answer his question, I had two main ideas for scumteams because of the way that people seemed to be cooperating, but later things made this doubtful. However, I still see Jack A T as scummy.You can say your opinions have changed as many times as you want, but that doesn't mean you can avoid explaining why you thought what you claimed to think yesterday.... you use some reasoning that has mostly been used already.Do remember that there is a difference between reasoning and evidence. I used some of the same evidence that others used (the "pressure vote" thing), but the reasoning I used to apply said evidence was very different than prior reasoning.
Also, please preview your posts before posting. Not only did you leave an extra colour tag in, but you left fragments early on from when you thought I was scum in the Deathsword section of the post before saying in my section that you think I am town.
To TDS and Jack: The main suspicion on me, that of voting borno and not tn is understandable, but I addressed it when I made the suspicious statements and votes. I said that tn is behaving scummy, as in giving up, lashing out etc, but that could just be the signs of not understanding our game play. In addition to that, I agree with 4maskwolf's policy of not lynching new players (judging on their game play) on the first day. I also thought that having a destabilizing force to the discussions, such as a hot-head or person with different play style would encourage discussion and would help us find scum.
Anyway, if I was mafia, the only reason I can think of for me to distance myself from tn and not vote him would be if he was mafia. Heiswas town, and so I think that point is kind of moot.
Jack A T As for borno's questions, here are the answers
Most of my questions on borno were just to put pressure on, and to tell the truth, I had just jumped in and replaced and I thought borno was the most likely candidate. He reminds me a lot of myself when scum, refusing to rise to bait and calmly refuting evidence, but restating himself and not hunting other people because he is too busy defending himself.
Most of his points on me were just him wondering about my views on him and tn. This is understandable, but I think I explained it here.Borno seems to me like a fairly experienced player playing scum.and here
tn5421 seems to me like a rather twitchy player, possibly indicating scum, but more likely indicating unfamiliarity with this forum's playstyle. In any case, he will be useful to stir things up and get reactions, just like I was in my first game.I agree that he is probably mafia, but I he is typical of depressed new player under fire as exemplified in Kingmaker IV.
I said that borno's vote on tn was useless because tn just gave up. He wouldn't respond to the vote. So borno's vote would probably be more telling elsewhere.Jack A TTDS This is confusing, you say you were incredibly suspicious of Jack, before you read his posts? I dunno, this seems a bit suspect. Could just be a slip of the tongue, is that right? Or is there more here?
I thought this was going to be a strong scum lean, but then I read through your posts, so you're leaning town.
-snip-
KansaTo LARD: Honestly because I'm not entirely sure who is and who isn't mafia at this point, I probably should have cast a vote earlier on to add pressure to somebody but as we are really close to the end now it wouldn't do anything.This doesn't sit right for me. You just seem to be acting confused and unsure of yourself. That in itself is not a bad thing, but you use it as an excuse for not hunting or voting. Don't worry about that, you are far more suspicious when you sit on the fence than when you start hunting and savagely tearing people apart for their smallest verbal blunders.
I would probably wait for them to slip up and contradict something or do something that makes them seem suspicious, I'm not really sure what questions to ask to make them slip up though. As for the actual method of that I would probably as them a question to clarify the part that contradicted something else or made them suspicious in my eyes.
Oh, and waiting for mafia to slip up and contradict themselves is something that will keep you waiting for a while. When somebody does contradict themselves, it is more often than not just an honest townie mistake.
So Kansa, You are sitting on the fence, confused and unsure, while afraid to make a move against anybody for fear of looking suspicious. You should probably have cast your vote, it would have taken the suspicion off your head. But you didn't. And now bad things will happen. :P
Whats your take on buddying, if I may ask as well?It depends a lot on meta. For instance, Tiruin buddying is null, since she tends to do that regardless of alignment. If I don't know someone's meta, or if their meta goes against buddying, then I'd question them.
1. You literally said that tn was probably mafia, but you didn't vote for him.
2. borno is new too, right?
3. It could also help to distance yourself from tn by voting for the person who everyone thinks is scummy and then have the person who you decided was town get killed, making you seem more town-aligned.
4. Why do you think borno wasn't voting for tn because he thought tn was scum?
5. I was suspicious of Jack when I just read posts as they came to the thread (and I skimmed some of them), but my opinion changed when I read through things in detail.
6. Updated read list?Quote from: LARDSo Kansa, You are sitting on the fence, confused and unsure, while afraid to make a move against anybody for fear of looking suspicious. You should probably have cast your vote, it would have taken the suspicion off your head. But you didn't. And now bad things will happen. :P
This isn't actually a good accusation; mafia actually mess up fairly often. Finding it can be difficult, but it's there. Also, when you're confused, random voting or joining the mob is usually a bad idea. Why are you voting someone who seems unsure who to vote for? It's a problem later on, but it's not that bad on Day 1
If you're going to try to interpret the NK, do take caution. It is a road that can easily lead to much WIFOM. Remember that there are two scum, and that they have a private advisor. This is not an area from which strong evidence for or against a specific player is likely to come.
Edit: MOWE didn't send a Prod, I was mentally prodded :PI've only actually managed to prod like 2 people. By the time I see the requests and such, they've posted.
1. You only said I was scum now; your previous reason for voting was essentially a pressure vote where you asked me questions and reads. Why do you suddenly think I am scum now?TheDarkStar:To answer your question...
I forgot to put an explicit statement of my read on you in. I shall correct that now: scum lean. My reasons are in my reads post.What is it about bold red text followed by "TheDarkStar appears to be trying to give the impression of being here, but without actually saying anything of substance" that makes you only think "pressure vote"?
-I suspected buddying between borno and Ranger because Ranger was the only one defending borno for a while.Huh? Can you give any example of this? The only defense of borno by RangerCado I can find is the one regarding that baseless accusation about RVS question writing style, and Ranger certainly wasn't alone in pointing out how poor that accusation was. After the tn5421 mess, Cado began his attack on borno, which clearly isn't a defense of borno.
Jack and Tiruin As the IC's I would like to see you two go head to head because it would be instructive and interesting. If one of you is scum then I would like to know sooner rather than later because later you will be rallying the town to attack itself because that's what good scum does.LARD: You do realize that you can't just tell two people to attack each other, right?
If that is not an option, then at least answer this: What possible motives are there for killing tn5421 other than avoiding being blocked?A few posts back, in a spoiler addressed to TheDarkStar (spoilers being a useful way to organize posts. Do read spoilers not addressed to you. It's worthwhile.), I listed a few of the many, many possibilities.
Perhaps because he was thought by several players to be town. Perhaps to cause chaos. Perhaps because he would be a difficult target to lynch and too risky to want anywhere near LYLO. I have little reason to lean strongly towards any one of those theories, or any other theory, at this time.There are a lot of possibilities, and those are just a start.
6. No change, except for a bit more suspicious of you [TDS]. I don't use FoS, but if I did, you would have mine.Why? What was it about TheDarkStar's actions after you posted your reads that made you more suspicious of him? About how strongly do you suspect him compared to Kansa/PTDfun?
[...]
Also darkstar, I am very close to voting for you, so keep that in mind. It is a little threat, but I am still going after Kansa.
Was it a bandwagon vote to avoid suspicion?RangerCado: I notice I missed this reaction test. The answer is no. Considering you didn't call me out for failing to answer this, I assume you didn't care much about this question?
1. You only said I was scum now; your previous reason for voting was essentially a pressure vote where you asked me questions and reads. Why do you suddenly think I am scum now?TheDarkStar:To answer your question...I forgot to put an explicit statement of my read on you in. I shall correct that now: scum lean. My reasons are in my reads post.What is it about bold red text followed by "TheDarkStar appears to be trying to give the impression of being here, but without actually saying anything of substance" that makes you only think "pressure vote"?-I suspected buddying between borno and Ranger because Ranger was the only one defending borno for a while.Huh? Can you give any example of this? The only defense of borno by RangerCado I can find is the one regarding that baseless accusation about RVS question writing style, and Ranger certainly wasn't alone in pointing out how poor that accusation was. After the tn5421 mess, Cado began his attack on borno, which clearly isn't a defense of borno.
Furthermore, did you have any reasons to lean towards borno being scum aside from RangerCado's actions?
Jack and Tiruin As the IC's I would like to see you two go head to head because it would be instructive and interesting. If one of you is scum then I would like to know sooner rather than later because later you will be rallying the town to attack itself because that's what good scum does.LARD: You do realize that you can't just tell two people to attack each other, right?If that is not an option, then at least answer this: What possible motives are there for killing tn5421 other than avoiding being blocked?A few posts back, in a spoiler addressed to TheDarkStar (spoilers being a useful way to organize posts. Do read spoilers not addressed to you. It's worthwhile.), I listed a few of the many, many possibilities.Perhaps because he was thought by several players to be town. Perhaps to cause chaos. Perhaps because he would be a difficult target to lynch and too risky to want anywhere near LYLO. I have little reason to lean strongly towards any one of those theories, or any other theory, at this time.There are a lot of possibilities, and those are just a start.6. No change, except for a bit more suspicious of you [TDS]. I don't use FoS, but if I did, you would have mine.Why? What was it about TheDarkStar's actions after you posted your reads that made you more suspicious of him? About how strongly do you suspect him compared to Kansa/PTDfun?
[...]
Also darkstar, I am very close to voting for you, so keep that in mind. It is a little threat, but I am still going after Kansa.
One more question to you, LARD: Did Kansa's replacement request have any effect on your read of him? If so, what?
Alright PTDfun I don't know how much experience you have (please tell me) or what your game is. But I thought your predecessor was scum and as follows, you are.
Seriously though, if you could do a few things on this list, that would be great.
1. Tell us your previous mafia experience. I'm pretty new around here, so if you are a regular, I apologize.
2. Read the last few pages thoroughly (if not the whole game) and tell us your suspect list.
3. Start attacking someone.
4. Ask for advice from the IC's
5. Ask for updates on the game.
6. Read people's read lists. For me this is what I use to get the gist of a game.
Sorry, I'm not trying to be an IC, but I want a good idea of you before I put my vote back where it was.
Hope to hear from you!
1. Ok, by attack I meant put pressure on, because in your position, I would feel nervous not knowing whether the other most experienced player was mafia or not. Pressure and discussion was what I was asking for.
PTDfun:(btw, what does IC stand for?)
Inexperience Challenged. On these forums in beginner Mafia games, it refers to the experienced people who have signed up to help new people along with playing (except the mafia IC, who just advises them). The ones for this game are Jack A T and Tiruin, which you probably already know.
Also, what are your reads?
LARD:1. Ok, by attack I meant put pressure on, because in your position, I would feel nervous not knowing whether the other most experienced player was mafia or not. Pressure and discussion was what I was asking for.
Why didn't you just put pressure on them yourself? They might be experienced, but it's a good idea to put pressure on people you find scummy to see how they react.
His requesting replacement was suspect, like a mafia panicking under fire...LARD: Alright, I really have to wonder how this notion is in the heads of so many newbies. Replacement requests should be assumed to be in good faith, and I've never seen scum quit the game to give the team they would no longer be on an advantage.
Simply because pressure from an IC means a lot more and carries a lot more weight than anything I could offer. If I put pressure on one of them, they would calmly refute it because it would probably have to be about some stupid wording or interpretation error. Not to say I won't try. Things are going slow around here though and it's the weekend.1. Ok, by attack I meant put pressure on, because in your position, I would feel nervous not knowing whether the other most experienced player was mafia or not. Pressure and discussion was what I was asking for.
Why didn't you just put pressure on them yourself? They might be experienced, but it's a good idea to put pressure on people you find scummy to see how they react. You'll also learn a lot from pressuring experience people.
-snip- I want a good idea of you before I put my vote back where it was.PTDfun: OK, I heard from you. I still think you are mafia because of your unwillingness to post anything long and detailed. Your posts have been short and generic. I realize this could just be because you are still reading and getting the gist of the game. I would be completely open to being convinced by you about your not being scummy.
Hope to hear from you!
PTDfun: Welcome to the game! After you read through the thread, please give your thoughts on the game so far, including reads of your fellow players. In addition, would you mind summarizing your previous Mafia experience, if any?
Oh hey, I'm here, don't worry.type statements, responses to others, or vague theory about not voting for someone without sufficient evidence. He spent more effort on theorizing on when not to vote for someone than he did on how to actually identify scum. This seems scummy because the mafia benefits by convincing other players to doubt. He was requested to ask questions by tn and Jack A T and never did. I know you don't have any control over that, but since your are playing his slot, it's a point against you.
PTDfun: OK, I heard from you. I still think you are mafia because of your unwillingness to post anything long and detailed. Your posts have been short and generic. I realize this could just be because you are still reading and getting the gist of the game. I would be completely open to being convinced by you about your not being scummy.
RVSP
TheDarkStar: You seem scummy to me. Please give the reasons for the following:
1. You avoided doing much for the first 6 days you were playing. By looking at your forum profile I can see that you were quite active posting on other things at the time.2. Your posts since have been mostly defense.Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Also, Fniff was fairly inactive. His posts were eitherOh hey, I'm here, don't worry.type statements, responses to others, or vague theory about not voting for someone without sufficient evidence. He spent more effort on theorizing on when not to vote for someone than he did on how to actually identify scum. This seems scummy because the mafia benefits by convincing other players to doubt. He was requested to ask questions by tn and Jack A T and never did. I know you don't have any control over that, but since your are playing his slot, it's a point against you.
What do you think the best way to play mafia (as in scum roles) is?I know it's a bit open ended. Answer however you would like. I am asking about strategy. Assuming you are town, it will be helpful for scum hunting. Assuming you are scum, it may also be helpful for scum hunting.
PTDFun: A quick question with regard to your attack on TheDarkStar: When looking at his early inactivity, did you take into account the fact that 2 of those 6 days were during the night, when nobody could post?That is a good point that I did not take into account.
Extend, post coming up.Tiruin: I am sorry that you have been sick and depressed, and that RL has been a pain in your butt the past few weeks. (To be clear, I am being entirely genuine.) With that said, you might want to get a replacement rather than trying to juggle this game (a lesser obligation) with things in RL that have consequences. I'm new, so I don't know how that works for an IC, but it's worth considering and completely acceptable.
Being sick + depressed + :( == :'(
Sorry for being that one IC x_x
Who's like, inactive. But I'm active :x
I'm having trouble finding the spoiler addressed to TheDarkStar you mention. Would you mind linking to it or giving me the reference number?If that is not an option, then at least answer this: What possible motives are there for killing tn5421 other than avoiding being blocked?A few posts back, in a spoiler addressed to TheDarkStar (spoilers being a useful way to organize posts. Do read spoilers not addressed to you. It's worthwhile.), I listed a few of the many, many possibilities.
This question still needs answering. If TheDarkStar doesn't want to answer, then I'll refer it to his replacement.
TheDarkStar and Tiruin:What do you think the best way to play mafia (as in scum roles) is?I know it's a bit open ended. Answer however you would like. I am asking about strategy. Assuming you are town, it will be helpful for scum hunting. Assuming you are scum, it may also be helpful for scum hunting.
*RangerCado: Part of both major lynch pushes in day 1. After initially FoSing tn5421 (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=138613.msg5299232#msg5299232) for vague reasons largely relating to tn's poor playstyle, what finally got RangerCado to vote for him was tn's breakdown (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=138613.msg5301739#msg5301739) and decision to let himself die. Of all of tn's attackers, Cado had the least reason to attack. However, RangerCado withdrew (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=138613.msg5307028#msg5307028) soon after I did, for much the same reason that I did.I read what follows this in the thread, but I couldn't see if this ^ actually got resolved, is currently being resolved, or has been passed over. I'm also interested in the more substantial post (which may already be written somewhere). Thanks for understanding that I'm trying.
RangerCado then started the main push against borno. The focus was on borno's failure to do much beyond attacking tn5421. Borno didn't do much to get rid of that.
Overall: slight scum lean, primarily gut-based. I await that more substantial post he's promised.
LARD: If you had just replaced in, and had only read early posts in the thread, do you think you would be able or willing to post anything long and detailed about the game?It was simply a pressure vote to get the game moving and to get you (PTDfun) more invested in the game. Now that you are here, I have a whole new list of questions.
PTDfun: The list I referred to is the quote immediately after the material you quoted. Clicking on the timestamp for that quote would lead you to the post (link here (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=138613.msg5339805#msg5339805)) the quote was from.A few posts back, in a spoiler addressed to TheDarkStar (spoilers being a useful way to organize posts. Do read spoilers not addressed to you. It's worthwhile.), I listed a few of the many, many possibilities.I'm having trouble finding the spoiler addressed to TheDarkStar you mention. Would you mind linking to it or giving me the reference number?
I read what follows this in the thread, but I couldn't see if this ^ actually got resolved, is currently being resolved, or has been passed over. I'm also interested in the more substantial post (which may already be written somewhere). Thanks for understanding that I'm trying.The substantial post Cado promised was this. (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=138613.msg5339267#msg5339267) In addition, my read of Cado has changed little: still slightly off, primarily gut.
When you give your reads, the one you are least suspicious of, it seems, is me. Now to me that seems like you are buddying me. You're just making yourself seem more suspicious.LARD: Can you give more detail here? What makes it come off as buddying?
LARD: Town leaning.Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Tiruin: I am sorry that you have been sick and depressed, and that RL has been a pain in your butt the past few weeks. (To be clear, I am being entirely genuine.) With that said, you might want to get a replacement rather than trying to juggle this game (a lesser obligation) with things in RL that have consequences. I'm new, so I don't know how that works for an IC, but it's worth considering and completely acceptable.I'm not aiming for a replacement because...I know I can do this--the game has enough replacements queued already (though they are technically still playing, only until they are confirmed replaced).
That was... unexpected.Point like this.
Tiruin:Currently I'd...honestly abstain from voting at the moment. Really bad stuffs as of late and morale is at an all time low that I haven't focused much here, so rather I'd look back on my notes and check--who seems too be aggressive in such a way that it doesn't need aggression? Maybe that person is pushing for a slip all too eagerly? Who seems to be using brevity in such a way that there is too general a viewpoint on them to glean any pertinent information? Maybe there either is something with how their viewpoint is, or they're using a logical smokescreen.
What do you think of yesterday's events? What do you vote now? What are your reads?
Tiruin: Same as Jack but vice versa. Also moderate town. But I can't read experienced players very well. I would like to see her opinions on Jack.What's holding you back from reading experience? Any details on that?
Jack and Tiruin As the IC's I would like to see you two go head to head because it would be instructive and interesting. If one of you is scum then I would like to know sooner rather than later because later you will be rallying the town to attack itself because that's what good scum does.Ok? So let's say I'm scum--what can you infer from my words since before?
If that is not an option, then at least answer this: What possible motives are there for killing tn5421 other than avoiding being blocked?
MOWE is bad mod... :(MOWE is good mod D:<
TheDarkStar and Tiruin: What do you think the best way to play mafia (as in scum roles) is?Do not rely on the role and instead define the role by your own playstyle and your own scumhunting. The role is like a crutch or a support to your goal, but it does not define how you play. (unless you're a jester, but that ain't mafia :v)
Tiruin: I know that RL keeps getting in the way, but I also think you are slightly on the scummy side. Difficulties in RL serve as legitimate grounds for lurking (which benefit the mafia). You have managed to make a few posts, but I did not find them to contribute much.Valid, though it is wrong.
LARDTiruin: Same as Jack but vice versa. Also moderate town. But I can't read experienced players very well. I would like to see her opinions on Jack.What's holding you back from reading experience? Any details on that?Jack and Tiruin As the IC's I would like to see you two go head to head because it would be instructive and interesting. If one of you is scum then I would like to know sooner rather than later because later you will be rallying the town to attack itself because that's what good scum does.Ok? So let's say I'm scum--what can you infer from my words since before?
If that is not an option, then at least answer this: What possible motives are there for killing tn5421 other than avoiding being blocked?
Note: Nobody would declaim themselves directly as scum--while it may be done in jest, its...more of cheap play. >.> Hard to descrbe.
Query on the orange part: Yes that's what good scum does, so take in my first sentence here--what if one of us was scum? What would you--or possibly the rest of you who aren't ICs, do?
Also possible motives? I have no idea where you got that notion of avoiding being blocked (where did you get that idea?) but possibly to narrow down...townies. :v
I have no idea, sincerely. If I was scum, I'd delegate my choice to my partner (though obviously giving my opinion on the matter) but let them choose--because it would be teaching them how to make a decision. Like that ol' adage of teaching a man how to fish as opposed to giving them fish only.
You have an odd way to count. Why do you call my main question post something other than offensive? If you include that important one (especially what I ask the people I suspect), I have about as many offensive posts as defensive ones. Also, it doesn't have to end in a question mark to demand a response. Why did you make it seem like I was being much more defensive than I was?I don't believe that I am counting his posts in a weird way, but if someone wants to correct me, then I am open to it. Does anybody know which post he means when he says "my main question post"? I grant that a statement doesn't have to end in a question mark to demand response, but in his words:
You can say whatever you want, but it is useless unless you include evidence.I am not deliberately misrepresenting him, and I am trying to be true to the way I currently see it. I am not trying to make him seem more defensive than he was. I saw his actions as defensive.
I did not think Jack A T and RangerCado were scum; I thought they (along with others) were scummy. It wasn't as much specific things as the general feel I got from reading things; my results from reading things in detail are already posted. I've said this several times; why do you ask me again?My mistake. I should have typed 'scummy' (adjective) instead of 'scum' (noun). But despite the flaw in the grammar of my post, I asked again because I wanted his prior reason, not the one in the posted reads. I have now been answered by:
It wasn't as much specific things as the general feel I got from reading things
People tend not to have too much control over some things in RL - if he doesn't have time, he doesn't have time. Why do you see this as scummy?
I am sorry for my mistake. I will take all further remarks concerning RL in good faith. This is my first game of mafia in text format. I am trying to learn. Thank you for correcting me for my crass behavior.Tiruin: I know that RL keeps getting in the way, but I also think you are slightly on the scummy side. Difficulties in RL serve as legitimate grounds for lurking (which benefit the mafia). You have managed to make a few posts, but I did not find them to contribute much.Valid, though it is wrong.
Assuming someone would use RL as a scapegoat is a...universal NO. in Mafia. It is disgust on the player, the principle, the role and the spirit of the game.
The normal (and yet unspoken) rule regarding people asking for a replacement is: Assume it is for legitimate reasons despite ANYTHING the player acts in game (even if said player is an immature jerk, leave it be...at least they have the...dignity to ask for a replacement).
If the player states RL as the reason--then it should be assumed that RL is giving heck for delaying in playing a game. However, notes of concern should also be posted so in such a case that RL is too much--the player would still know people care [like in this game :-[]
I'd ask what exactly isn't it contributing? Yes, I agree that it isn't in some ways, but what.../isn't\?
On that note: No, an IC or a player [IC is just a tag for me :v] will not use RL as grounds for lurking--that's just scummy, in out-of-mafia context of the word.
HOWEVER, lurking in the case of posting everywhere else? That is legitimate grounds for suspicion--howeve,r should be followed up by a query at first, if ever the case happens.
Why did you ask that question about the best way to play scum? Was the scum IC not responding in mafia chat?:P Seriously, it just seems like you're asking how you should play scum. As I said though, it's not a bad piece of evidence against you because if you were scum, you would just ask talk in scumchat.1. I asked that question about the best way to play scum to Tiruin and TheDarkStar because I suspected them.
Could you state your reasons for accusing TDS that haven't been said by the other players, or more specifically, Jack?Jack A T's reasons were
TheDarkStar appears to be trying to give the impression of being here, but without actually saying anything of substance2.
His first post (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=138613.msg5319717#msg5319717), as read lists go, is strange. He declared that he suspected every single consistently active player in the game, each for vague reasons (except RangerCado, who didn't even get a reason), and he declared that at least one of the scum was probably among that half of the players.3.
No vote was made.4.
So, there we got TheDarkStar taking little in the way of a position.5.
He did, at least, say he would give more reasons later.My reason is that I see his actions as primarily defensive as detailed in the spoiler on post 274. As opposed to Jack A T's remark #1, I think that TheDarkStar's posts have been substantial, but primarily about his own neck.
That never happened. Two days later, about 3 hours before the end of the day and with numerous questions to answer, he posted (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=138613.msg5326034#msg5326034) that he'd taken too long to get detailed reasons together and that he decided to wait for the lynch results. Still no solid position taken, and no questions answered.
When you give your reads, the one you are least suspicious of, it seems, is me. Now to me that seems like you are buddying me. You're just making yourself seem more suspicious.I listed both you and RangerCado as town leaning. I didn't specify degrees. The quotes in the spoiler of my read of you are all pro-town. I don't care if you like me or not. I want to win. You are inquisitive. That helps town. Your directing attention at Jack A T also helps town. As I put in my reads, I'm having trouble reading him. I'm blanking out on what to even ask him about. Your efforts are helping me read him. That makes you look more townish.
In the meantime, I would like everybody to consider my case against PTDfun.LARD: Meh. I don't read Kansa's behaviour as waiting for a wagon, but as a nervous and clueless newbie, trying to figure out the game. Looking at the attack you made against Kansa...
1. Kansa's dithering and not making a call, waiting until something would happen that he could bandwagon on.
2. Buddying me.
3. Targeting TDS. Because of Jack's case on TDS, he is arguably the easiest target.
... there isn't much. You say a lot about him trying to avoid looking suspicious, but there isn't much I see to indicate that. Can you explain? The fence-sitting and confusion I think is due to his inexperience more than alignment (see me way back in Supernatural 3, for instance).To LARD: Honestly because I'm not entirely sure who is and who isn't mafia at this point, I probably should have cast a vote earlier on to add pressure to somebody but as we are really close to the end now it wouldn't do anything.This doesn't sit right for me. You just seem to be acting confused and unsure of yourself. That in itself is not a bad thing, but you use it as an excuse for not hunting or voting. Don't worry about that, you are far more suspicious when you sit on the fence than when you start hunting and savagely tearing people apart for their smallest verbal blunders.
I would probably wait for them to slip up and contradict something or do something that makes them seem suspicious, I'm not really sure what questions to ask to make them slip up though. As for the actual method of that I would probably as them a question to clarify the part that contradicted something else or made them suspicious in my eyes.
Oh, and waiting for mafia to slip up and contradict themselves is something that will keep you waiting for a while. When somebody does contradict themselves, it is more often than not just an honest townie mistake.
So Kansa, You are sitting on the fence, confused and unsure, while afraid to make a move against anybody for fear of looking suspicious. You should probably have cast your vote, it would have taken the suspicion off your head. But you didn't. And now bad things will happen. :P
*I noticed in your reads (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=138613.msg5357922#msg5357922) that you say you like several of LARD's posts. It doesn't help much to just say you like certain posts. Why do you like the ones you like?I "like" the first two quotes because they answer my question about why tn5421 died (I question I posed in my second post). The disruption he caused helped the town by shaking things up - thus extracting more information. Now, LARD seems to be an aggressive player. This seems to help the town. If LARD is mafia, then his explanation would make him look more towny and thus help him. On the other hand, the information he uncovers will hurt him. If, upon rereading through LARD's posts I find that the content he is shaking up is unproductive (and aggression for aggression sake) then I would look on him with more suspicion.
*You seem comfortable using Fniff's low activity against TheDarkStar. Considering Fniff quit due to finding the game too advanced (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=138613.msg5314747#msg5314747) for him, is Fniff's inactivity worth all that much against TheDarkStar?As I stated in post #295, I will take statements about RL in good faith. Thus, I must rescind this point against TheDarkStar. But, as in my reads, I still think he is mafia for another reason.
What does it mean to be "blocked"?Jack and Tiruin As the IC's I would like to see you two go head to head because it would be instructive and interesting. If one of you is scum then I would like to know sooner rather than later because later you will be rallying the town to attack itself because that's what good scum does.Ok? So let's say I'm scum--what can you infer from my words since before?
If that is not an option, then at least answer this: What possible motives are there for killing tn5421 other than avoiding being blocked?
Note: Nobody would declaim themselves directly as scum--while it may be done in jest, its...more of cheap play. >.> Hard to descrbe.
Query on the orange part: Yes that's what good scum does, so take in my first sentence here--what if one of us was scum? What would you--or possibly the rest of you who aren't ICs, do?
Also possible motives? I have no idea where you got that notion of avoiding being blocked (where did you get that idea?) but possibly to narrow down...townies. :v
Like a poisoner--you hit a guy at night, they die next...time tmorrow after day but before night. So you plan in advance who to pick, and 'scumhunt' on the others that aren't your target--usually said target is the one you'd choose as a 'safecard' or someone you don't necessarily suspect but isn't Mafia so you won't kill your own people.Would you mind elaborating on the green part? The way you word it, I can read it two ways:
4maskwolf: Welcome to the game. What is your previous mafia experience?My previous mafia experience... somat like ten games or so... At least one win as scum, that's all I can remember (my first scum game).
I had some things against your predecessor. I understand that you might have to read the thread for a few days before you have anything. I joined last week though, so if you're curious about my complaints you don't have to go back far in the thread.
Quick post: Because MOWE did not extend for the last-minute replacement, day ends today at 10 PM EST. Nobody has days to read the thread.Already read the thread, it doesn't matter. Though if we have any extends left, extend.
Quick post: Because MOWE did not extend for the last-minute replacement, day ends today at 10 PM EST. Nobody has days to read the thread.Oh no! I forgot! D:
Don't worry MOWE, I would have forgotten it too.Quick post: Because MOWE did not extend for the last-minute replacement, day ends today at 10 PM EST. Nobody has days to read the thread.Oh no! I forgot! D:
Day two has been mod extended! Day ends tomorrow at 10 PM EST!
I'm not really sure what to make of it, to be honest. Without having been here throughout the entirety of day one, I don't have the gut feelings of the moment of each post, since I can see other posts and am looking at it from a more impassive viewpoint. I'll get back to you when I've ferreted out a little more, I just got tired of reading halfway through.
Lolwut is this another one of your traps?I'm not really sure what to make of it, to be honest. Without having been here throughout the entirety of day one, I don't have the gut feelings of the moment of each post, since I can see other posts and am looking at it from a more impassive viewpoint. I'll get back to you when I've ferreted out a little more, I just got tired of reading halfway through.
This is suspicious because above you mentioned that you had read the whole thread already. I get that it's hard to get a cohesive viewpoint from this, so that's okay. It all seems to blur together, right?
It was! I'm glad you recognized it. Excellent. Okay then. It's too bad that your predecessor was on the chopping block. I was looking forward to playing with you again. I would like to know your opinion on PTDfun though, just to see.LARD: How would you have reacted to a "yes"? How about a "no"?
It was just a joking reference to a "trap" I pulled on him last game we played together. If he had said yes, I would have accused him of using the "easy out" I provided in my post, therefore having him fall into my trap. A townie would have a legitimate reason and therefore say it and not have to use the one I provided. It didn't really matter that much except that the last time he fell for my trap he was scum and this time he didn't. The conclusion: 4mask is safe. :Dlolz. Just of note, don't be so sure. The fact that I recognized it for a trap should clue you in that even as scum I wouldn't have fallen for it. I must say, though, when you pulled it on me in the last game that was freaking clever. I couldn't have seen it coming in a million years. I had to use all of my scum bsing ability to pull myself out of that rabbit hole.
Alright. Here's the deal everyone. My life is becoming very... turbulent to say the least. I'm probably going to move out from my home because I can't stand one more day around my father. I might not be able to give this the regular attention it needs. I'll do everything I can to be a good mod, but I'm deputizing Nerjin to do votecounts and such for me until such time things settle down.No problem MOWE. RL come first.
Again, I'm really sorry everyone...
Alright. Here's the deal everyone. My life is becoming very... turbulent to say the least. I'm probably going to move out from my home because I can't stand one more day around my father. I might not be able to give this the regular attention it needs. I'll do everything I can to be a good mod, but I'm deputizing Nerjin to do votecounts and such for me until such time things settle down.*hugs so hard*
Again, I'm really sorry everyone...
Good news! Luck decided to be on my side for once! Thank you all for your concern, but the problem turned out to do more good to me than harm. Which was kinda unexpected... Anyways... votecount!Also, LARD is supposedly voting for me and PTDfun. It's PTDfun who is voting for me.
Votecount:
- LARD:
- 4maskwolf: Jack A T, LARD (2)
- Deathsword:
- RangerCado:
- PTDfun: LARD (1)
- Jack A T:
- Tiruin:
Not voting: PTDfun, Deathsword, RangerCado, Tiruin
Day two will end today at 10 pm EST (~2 hours from now).
There are no more extends available today.
RangerCado has requested replacement.
LARD is only voting PTD when I see the lurkertrackerThat's what I'm saying. LARD is voting PTD and PTD is voting me.
...We're heading into a tie, why?Because I'd rather not be lynched for circumstances outside of my control (the actions of my predecessor). I'd rather sleep through the night, see what happens, then engage full attack mode the next day.
EBWOP
Vote 4maskwolf
Good news! Luck decided to be on my side for once! Thank you all for your concern, but the problem turned out to do more good to me than harm. Which was kinda unexpected... Anyways... votecount!I think you have a typo on the vote count.
Votecount:
- LARD:
- 4maskwolf: Jack A T, LARD (2)
- Deathsword:
- RangerCado:
- PTDfun: LARD (1)
- Jack A T:
- Tiruin:
Not voting: PTDfun, Deathsword, RangerCado, Tiruin
Day two will end today at 10 pm EST (~2 hours from now).
There are no more extends available today.
RangerCado has requested replacement.
MOWE, it's LYLO and PTDfun is dead.PFP: Count again. It's MYLO. :V
TIRUIN!!!!!!!!
unvote...Explain.
wait, we're past time, aren't we...
damn it...
No.MOWE, it's LYLO and PTDfun is dead.PFP: Count again. It's MYLO. :V
TIRUIN!!!!!!!!
4maskunvote...Explain.
wait, we're past time, aren't we...
damn it...
*Does a player count*
Alright, PTDfun. Nothing personal, but I'd rather stay alive long enough to be useful. This is basically day one for me.
If anyone finds this offensive, feel free to kill me off by moving the vote from a tie.
O-o?No.MOWE, it's LYLO and PTDfun is dead.PFP: Count again. It's MYLO. :V
TIRUIN!!!!!!!!
4maskunvote...Explain.
wait, we're past time, aren't we...
damn it...
PTDfun is dead.
He is currently on the alive list.
Thus, it is LYLO.
You played a sneaky scum trick there, Tiruin. I tied up the vote specifically so that I would have an additional day to read people, but instead you pushed the vote over the top on someone I didn't think was scum. I tried to remove my vote from them, but then realized it was too late. You sneaked in a vote at the last minute, like Leafsnail tried to do, and this time I reacted too late and didn't have a personal extend.
O-o?Hi Tiruin.
Err, hi 4mask.
You do know I knew that you were online, yes? Next: How does the orange portion justify your read as of the yesterday when your justifying note had the addendum of 'lynch me I don't care'?
Next orange: Someone I didn't think was scum? Did you bother to voice that out when you voted them? You didn't say snuff about that reason. (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=138613.msg5370058#msg5370058)
And now you bring up one of the cheapest and most undignified cards to accuse others of?
...The very fact that you're doing such breaks my confidence that you're not doing a scum ploy--yet it is possible.
MOWE: Extend until suitable replacements are found!
...We're heading into a tie, why?Grousing about the tie with an hour to go but only vote here:
...PTDfun. More on solidifying this than not.with THREE MINUTES to go, thus nullifying the ability to counteract your vote. You were well aware that the game was going to a tie almost an hour before that, yet you chose to wait until the last minute to make your vote.
I would like RangerCado and Deathsword in here post haste. I know Tiruin and 4maskwolf have been active, but it would really be lousy if you two were the mafia and we ripped each other to shreds while you lurked. I know there are technical difficulties on your ends or something like this, but I would really rather you gave us a list of reads at least.LARD, Cado and Deathsword are GONE. They have requested replacement: we can't rely on them to play at all. It's down to the three of us. They aren't lurking: they are no longer in the game.
As for my reads:
4maskwolf: Slightly scummy due to this*Does a player count*
Alright, PTDfun. Nothing personal, but I'd rather stay alive long enough to be useful. This is basically day one for me.
If anyone finds this offensive, feel free to kill me off by moving the vote from a tie.
his throwaway attitude seems to me like a scum under heavy fire, but last game I played with him he didn't do this kind of thing at all, so I'm confused about him.
His push for an extra day at MYLO isn't all that in his favour in my opinion. I always thought that one should try to avoid a tie in votes as a tie in votes would just grant the mafia an extra kill in relation to the number of lynches. It would seem that he was sure that PTDfun wasn't mafia and then despite being active, "missed" the chance to unvote.
Tiruin: I don't like making references to past games, but I will again. She seemed like mafia to me then, but wasn't. This is why I wish she and Jack had interrogated each other more. Now that I know that what Jack said was genuine, I would have had a better picture of Tiruin. She jumped in to avoid a tie, I suppose that could have been intended to kill a townie, but since I though PTDfun was acting like mafia, it was justified.
Other two: Please just give me something to work with. I miss you :-[.
I think that probably there is one mafia between the two active players and one between the two inactive ones.
I can't imagine this morning behaviour between tiruin and 4mask if they are both scum, and I also can't imagine that two "lurkers" have hoodwinked us for so long.
I'm going to ask MOWE if I can LARD Unvote as just a way to extend the day a bit and give us a bit more time.
with THREE MINUTES to go, thus nullifying the ability to counteract your vote. You were well aware that the game was going to a tie almost an hour before that, yet you chose to wait until the last minute to make your vote.>_>
Not really--they are technically still playing if and until MOWE finds a considerable replacement.I would like RangerCado and Deathsword in here post haste. I know Tiruin and 4maskwolf have been active, but it would really be lousy if you two were the mafia and we ripped each other to shreds while you lurked. I know there are technical difficulties on your ends or something like this, but I would really rather you gave us a list of reads at least.LARD, Cado and Deathsword are GONE. They have requested replacement: we can't rely on them to play at all. It's down to the three of us. They aren't lurking: they are no longer in the game.
As for my reads:
4maskwolf: Slightly scummy due to this*Does a player count*
Alright, PTDfun. Nothing personal, but I'd rather stay alive long enough to be useful. This is basically day one for me.
If anyone finds this offensive, feel free to kill me off by moving the vote from a tie.
his throwaway attitude seems to me like a scum under heavy fire, but last game I played with him he didn't do this kind of thing at all, so I'm confused about him.
His push for an extra day at MYLO isn't all that in his favour in my opinion. I always thought that one should try to avoid a tie in votes as a tie in votes would just grant the mafia an extra kill in relation to the number of lynches. It would seem that he was sure that PTDfun wasn't mafia and then despite being active, "missed" the chance to unvote.
Tiruin: I don't like making references to past games, but I will again. She seemed like mafia to me then, but wasn't. This is why I wish she and Jack had interrogated each other more. Now that I know that what Jack said was genuine, I would have had a better picture of Tiruin. She jumped in to avoid a tie, I suppose that could have been intended to kill a townie, but since I though PTDfun was acting like mafia, it was justified.
Other two: Please just give me something to work with. I miss you :-[.
I think that probably there is one mafia between the two active players and one between the two inactive ones.
I can't imagine this morning behaviour between tiruin and 4mask if they are both scum, and I also can't imagine that two "lurkers" have hoodwinked us for so long.
I'm going to ask MOWE if I can LARD Unvote as just a way to extend the day a bit and give us a bit more time.
You only think it was justified because you thought PTDfun was mafia. Would you have the same reaction if I had been last minute lynched? Because it could have gone either way. Tiruin lynched the less suspicious (in the eyes of the majority of active players) player, then killed off one of the players who was not highly suspected, leaving the game with really herself, a guy who was suspicious due to the actions of his predecessor, and a somewhat inexperienced player, the idea likely being that it is easier to hide scummy actions from someone who is new than a veteran like Jack. Because Jack would have called her on the last minute vote just the same as I did.
[1] You would do it because you are clever and good at playing mafia. I just realized something else, too: guess who died in the past day? That's right, both the players who were voting for me. Because you are confident you can pin the blame for your actions on me, so you took a chance. A chance that you still hope will pay off.LARD, Cado and Deathsword are GONE. They have requested replacement: we can't rely on them to play at all. It's down to the three of us. They aren't lurking: they are no longer in the game.Not really--they are technically still playing if and until MOWE finds a considerable replacement.
You only think it was justified because you thought PTDfun was mafia. Would you have the same reaction if I had been last minute lynched? Because it could have gone either way. Tiruin lynched the less suspicious (in the eyes of the majority of active players) player, then killed off one of the players who was not highly suspected, leaving the game with really herself, a guy who was suspicious due to the actions of his predecessor, and a somewhat inexperienced player, the idea likely being that it is easier to hide scummy actions from someone who is new than a veteran like Jack. Because Jack would have called her on the last minute vote just the same as I did.
Now I query your less suspicious person in the eyes of the majority--what makes you say that when you conclude before asking me anything (yeah PTD, sorry for not getting your post back there, only saw it lately). The second orange area leaves a large case of paranoia and oversimplification of your role--you just by generalizing experience. You attempt to bring up the motive of the kill, and pin me on it. You state all these without giving any sort of backing other than empirical data which you judged and concluded with your own eye.
[1]Tell me, you judge me so hard on that 'last minute vote'. Explain why I would do such if I would be caught in the tomorrow? I find it impractical do so such an error (and indignified to pull that 'LAST MINUTE VOTE HAHA' scum card you tote) in that case, given the state of the situation at hand.
Next point. [2]Why did you want an extra day, even? heading into the tie? What made you so sure to tie it instead of go into the lynch to eliminate probable suspects? Given your detail in recent posts, you are very much "certain" in your tone and judge because he's town--[3]how did you see PTD before the lynch?
I wasn't aware of the time when I had posted due to net shenanigans--It's raining day and night here and the net is slower than molasses. I can't even get any LONG posts (such as Long Live the Queen's DF Update + Save; My RTD update; The RTD Library...) to work because I click post...If you can email the LLtQ update to me, I can post it in your stead, since you are having difficulty.
...
Loading...
...
And then nothing!
[1] You would do it because you are clever and good at playing mafia. I just realized something else, too: guess who died in the past day? That's right, both the players who were voting for me. Because you are confident you can pin the blame for your actions on me, so you took a chance. A chance that you still hope will pay off.*opens mouth to speak*
[2] I wanted the extra day because if I didn't, I would be lynched before being able to get a full read of the players in this game. Thus, I placed the tieing vote in order to give myself that time.IC advice on: Speaking it like this (and like as said the previous day) would give a hunch that you're a power role because +1 day.
[3] Before I even placed the vote on him, I said that I saw him as town right here (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=138613.msg5368140#msg5368140). Nothing he did struck me as scummy, and he was active and playing well, so I read him as town....I didn't even see that. Blehh new pages. >_>
If you can email the LLtQ update to me, I can post it in your stead, since you are having difficulty.When I said I'm seriously getting arghghghnet, I seriously mean I'm getting arhghg net. Yahoo mail can't even :I
*opens mouth to speak*My theories popped up at LYLO because I replaced in the day before LYLO, so I didn't have a chance to formulate theories before now. For me to formulate theories, I have to actually be present when things are happening.
...
What did I say about paranoia :I
If I was taking that chance, I'd be attacking you head on since the start. I'm just confused how you're focused on me due to that one part there, and by that I mean all your theories popping up especially at a crucial point in time such as LYLO [thanks MOWE...it wasn't LYLO when you didn't edit it ._.].
IC advice on: Speaking it like this (and like as said the previous day) would give a hunch that you're a power role because +1 day.As much as I would like to be, I am not the cop. As a point of fact, I think our power role (singular) is replacing out right now.
Let me be frank. Are you the cop? It would do best to roleclaim during these times.
...I didn't even see that. Blehh new pages. >_>Erm...
Unvote. Reasonable note there: cycle back to #2 query due to importance.
Why would you tie a vote based on your read of a person instead of putting the notice towards the majorty? How did you view everyone, then?
When I said I'm seriously getting arghghghnet, I seriously mean I'm getting arhghg net. Yahoo mail can't even :IOuch.
Also, unvote? That threw me for a loop a little, time to reconsider.O_o [The BM no timer rule works given that I just unvoted by the way]
wait, wait everyone, I can't have this happening. To be honest, I'm not really happy with how the game is shaping up. I don't really think Tiruin is scum and I'm leaning toward 4mask. I hope this is okay, I only want to prevent a stupid mistake. Tiruin, do you still want to play or has this game died out?I fail as an IC and as my role dictates.
You don't fail.wait, wait everyone, I can't have this happening. To be honest, I'm not really happy with how the game is shaping up. I don't really think Tiruin is scum and I'm leaning toward 4mask. I hope this is okay, I only want to prevent a stupid mistake. Tiruin, do you still want to play or has this game died out?I fail as an IC and as my role dictates.
Though 3/5 players are stepping out.
...
Words can't explain my feelings at this.
I have stated my case against Tiruin repeatedly. However, I'm straddling to become more suspicious of you, what with your weak case against me. Let's assume for a minute that despite your belief, I am town. Now, let's extend this assumption.1. I don't know what your case on Tiruin is other than that she moved to stop you tying a vote that would save a suspected mafia. I mean, look at it from her perspective. She didn't know whether PTDfun was scum or not, but the prevailing view (which I shared) was that PTDfun was the most likely to be scum. When you jumped in and tied the vote, Tiruin would probably only have seen somebody trying to save a suspected scum. This is not to say that she was wise or did the right thing or even that she isn't acting scummy. My point is that your actions are suspicious and unwarranted to say the least.
At the end of yesterday, I was fairly certain I knew who was going to be nk'd, regardless of who the scum actually was. Assuming Jack A T wasn't scum, he was the IC who was the most active, indeed possibly the player who was most active. If he was scum, then the nk would likely have been directed against Tiruin.
So, let's just say I rolled over and got lynched without tying up the vote. Now, I knew you were suspicious of PTDfun, so after I died, along with Jack (I suspected Jack was town, but I wasn't as sure as about PTDfun), you would move to lynch PTD, my primary town suspect. As such, I moved for a no-lynch to avoid this scenario. Tiruin broke the tie, and the one person I thought was town got killed.
Now, I know at least one of you two is scum. Initially I thought it was Tiru, but I'm starting to suspect you are playing the game more shrewdly than I thought. However, I don't have a firm case against you right now.
So tell me, why do you not believe Tiruin is scum?
Also, on the off chance both of you are scum, you should just both vote me rather than continuing the charade. The other two won't interfere, they're not playing anymore.
Oh, and surgery was bothersome.
1. The way she wielded her vote was logical for someone not knowing that PTDfun was town, as I said.1.1: My case is, to repeat for the fifteenth time, NOT that she used her vote. She posted an hour before day end to gripe about the tie, was on for most of that hour, yet only posted a vote with THREE MINUTES left in the day to prevent me from unvoting to tie it again. But this has been explained, so I unvoted.
2. So you moved to a tie, and she moved it off a tie to someone who looked suspicious. Is that a bad thing?
3. I said it was unlikely, yes, but I think that the probable scum team is you and one of the replacers. Simple math if you take for granted that you are not scum, which I doubt.
4. OK, if you were both scum you could just stomp me, game over, so apparently you're not and it is you and one of the replacers. Or it is tiruin and one of the replacers.
I will give my case on you in points and clearly. I hope you will do the same for Tiruin because for the life of me I can't figure out why you think her behaviour is scummy.
1. Pushing for a tie. Logical to save oneself, but it just gives the mafia an extra kill that night, placing us at Mylo, where the correct procedure, I believe, is to nolynch again.
2. Attacking someone for logical town behaviour. You freak out because your plan didn't work and immediately pin suspicion on Tiruin in the morning, where she could just have been acting out of suspicion of PTDfun and a desire to not see the game go to Lylo.
3. No. Your arguments make no sense. You vote me simply because you don't agree with my points but you have neglected to answer my queries as to this one point: Why attack Tiruin for something she was logically entitled to do?
Thank you
Also, on the off chance both of you are scum, you should just both vote me rather than continuing the charade. The other two won't interfere, they're not playing anymore.I would not do this if I and LARD was scum. Because that cheaps the game, to use crude adjectives for it.
Naturally, I forgot to vote LARD and continue the day*hugs*
Day has ended!Same to you MOWE. Sorry :X
Write up will come when I get home.
There's nothing to be sorry for. You did your best to be here and were more active than most.Day has ended!Same to you MOWE. Sorry :X
Write up will come when I get home.
CALLED IT!!!!!*Claps* So you did... so you did.
I still could've done something...though al my teaching methods were torn between 'hey town, look at how I played earlier and see how I associated with 1. my partner and 2. y'all.' and directly talking with them ._.There's nothing to be sorry for. You did your best to be here and were more active than most.Day has ended!Same to you MOWE. Sorry :X
Write up will come when I get home.
Nerjin is awesome MOWE. You don't complain in public tho o_OCALLED IT!!!!!*Claps* So you did... so you did.
Also, before I forget, special thanks to Nerjin who put up with me asking random Mafia related questions and dealing with me complaining that I'm a bad mod on an almost daily basis.
I complained once or twice... I just didn't want to bother everyone with complaining. I've thought about going to the sad thread, but I start reading other people's issues and find that I have nothing to really complain about...Nerjin is awesome MOWE. You don't complain in public tho o_OCALLED IT!!!!!*Claps* So you did... so you did.
Also, before I forget, special thanks to Nerjin who put up with me asking random Mafia related questions and dealing with me complaining that I'm a bad mod on an almost daily basis.
You're awesome by that logic \o/
Troubles do make everyone sorta grumpy...
Challenge accepted. If nobody else is modding the next beginner game, I'll take it. This will prove exactly how bad of a mod I am compared to you.I complained once or twice... I just didn't want to bother everyone with complaining. I've thought about going to the sad thread, but I start reading other people's issues and find that I have nothing to really complain about...Nerjin is awesome MOWE. You don't complain in public tho o_OCALLED IT!!!!!*Claps* So you did... so you did.
Also, before I forget, special thanks to Nerjin who put up with me asking random Mafia related questions and dealing with me complaining that I'm a bad mod on an almost daily basis.
You're awesome by that logic \o/
Troubles do make everyone sorta grumpy...
I know how awesome the Nerjin is. *Goes into hour-long explanation of this fact*
MOWE, you were a fine mod. At no point did you, say, replace someone for inactivity without proper warning, for instance.Or, you know, reveal facts about your game without the player's permission.
Now now Tiruin, you did great. Though why didn't you and LARD just dogpile me as soon as day began. The game would have been over quicker.Because Tiruin is Lawful Evil and won't be cheap when playing as scum.
And I was the affected party in both instances.Sorry about that...Now now Tiruin, you did great. Though why didn't you and LARD just dogpile me as soon as day began. The game would have been over quicker.Because Tiruin is Lawful Evil and won't be cheap when playing as scum.
Also, I tried giving IC advice, but didn't do too much.
Suddenly, I feel very silly for complaining.I still don't Dx
I can detect your jokes der :pAnd I was the affected party in both instances.Sorry about that...Now now Tiruin, you did great. Though why didn't you and LARD just dogpile me as soon as day began. The game would have been over quicker.Because Tiruin is Lawful Evil and won't be cheap when playing as scum.
Also, I tried giving IC advice, but didn't do too much.
Ah, I see. Tiruin has MORALS. And VALUES.
Pshh. Weakling.
(I'm just kidding, Tiru, don't get offended...)
Now now Tiruin, you did great. Though why didn't you and LARD just dogpile me as soon as day began. The game would have been over quicker....
I know. I was just reading the scumchat where LARD was trying to get you to just end the thing.Suddenly, I feel very silly for complaining.I still don't Dx
But you're justified in your complaints though. Parental stuffs are...serious. .__.I can detect your jokes der :pAnd I was the affected party in both instances.Sorry about that...Now now Tiruin, you did great. Though why didn't you and LARD just dogpile me as soon as day began. The game would have been over quicker.Because Tiruin is Lawful Evil and won't be cheap when playing as scum.
Also, I tried giving IC advice, but didn't do too much.
Ah, I see. Tiruin has MORALS. And VALUES.
Pshh. Weakling.
(I'm just kidding, Tiru, don't get offended...)
And yes it did Persus.
I tried giving IC advice.
I have no idea if anyone is learning from it ._.Now now Tiruin, you did great. Though why didn't you and LARD just dogpile me as soon as day began. The game would have been over quicker....
Would the best explanation be 3 words that say 'it feels wrong'.
Also, for future reference LARD, liking someone outside the game is not a reason, at least not in my book, not to lynch them.No of course not. That was buddying you.