Bay 12 Games Forum

Finally... => Forum Games and Roleplaying => Mafia => Topic started by: notquitethere on January 05, 2015, 09:35:35 pm

Title: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Game Over - Town Victory
Post by: notquitethere on January 05, 2015, 09:35:35 pm
Beginner's Mafia Sprint 3!
Thick as Thieves


The year is 1733 and you are a tight-knit gang of thieves. Or at least you were up until one of you got impeached. Now it's a race against time to find the squealers before you're all hanging in Tyburn Square.




This is a Sprint edition of Beginner's Mafia! Specifically designed to be great for newcomers and dabblers in Mafia, the game eschews many of the traditional rules of BMs to create a setup that is more fast-paced, fun and interesting. This game will never last more than a week! That means no waiting around, boredom or long-term commitment!

This setup puts its greatest emphasis on getting you to enjoy playing Mafia and to spark your interest in it. It still has an instructional aspect, however, and as such an IC will be present in the game to play the game with you. Their primary purpose is to teach you to play Mafia, and will do everything to further that goal even after death - but keep in mind that the playing IC will still play for keeps.


Mafia Gameplay

The game of mafia has a simple concept. A large group of players known as the town plays against a smaller group of players known as the mafia. In this setup, there are seven players, with five town and two mafia.

Before the game begins, each players is given a role and an alignment by the moderator. There are two alignments in this setup: Town and Mafia. The town outnumber the mafia, but each individual member of the town does not know the alignment of any of the other members. The mafia know the alignment of everyone on their team and they can discuss the game privately in a special mafia chat. The mafia has access to a nightkill that they may use in the Night phase, while the town occasionally has roles with abilities that are used during the night.

Once everyone has a role, the game begins in the Day phase. During the Day phase, players may discuss the game and each player has a vote that they cast publicly to lynch a player. At the end of the day after some predetermined amount of time, the player with the most votes is lynched. Lynching does two things: it reveals a player's role and alignment, and it removes a player from the game. Once lynched, a player is no longer allowed to post in the thread.


Sprint Gameplay

Sprint specifically plays much like normal mafia, but with two notable exceptions. The game is effectively Nightless: Each Day, players may collectively decide to lynch a player, but instead of advancing to a silent Night the game begins with the next Day immediately. Thus, the playerbase must talk constantly, and there is no set time to send in actions - anyone with a power role and thus a night action must send in the action during the Day. It will then occur after the lynch, before the next Day starts (like a normal game). Because of this, the game will start with a single 24 hour preparation phase to let everyone read their PMs and the Mafia to coordinate.

Each game is run with six beginner players and one IC, and the game will always consist of the following roles:


Rules


Player Roster

Short-Notice Replacers

Extra Resources

Reading the two (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=138309.0) previous (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=133901.0) Sprint games may be instructive.

Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Sign Ups [5(ish)/7]
Post by: UXLZ on January 05, 2015, 09:44:30 pm
In.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Sign Ups [5(ish)/7]
Post by: Scripten on January 05, 2015, 09:45:53 pm
In as IC or scum IC.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Sign Ups [6(ish)/7] - Replacements [0/7]
Post by: notquitethere on January 05, 2015, 09:56:56 pm
You can be the regular IC. Scum don't get an IC in a Sprint game.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Sign Ups [6(ish)/7] - Replacements [0/7]
Post by: UXLZ on January 05, 2015, 10:10:52 pm
I thought we weren't meant to know which team the IC was on. @_@
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Sign Ups [6(ish)/7] - Replacements [0/7]
Post by: notquitethere on January 05, 2015, 10:24:43 pm
I thought we weren't meant to know which team the IC was on. @_@
Hah, yeah the regular IC might still be scum. Just in some other Beginner Games, the scum team get a special "Scum IC" who only posts in their private chat, giving advice. I don't think it's particularly necessary, as beginner games tend to be quite easy for scum anyway.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Sign Ups [6(ish)/7] - Replacements [0/7]
Post by: UXLZ on January 05, 2015, 10:34:12 pm
Ah, I see what you mean. Rather than a member of the Scum in-game, just there to give them advice?

Man, that would suck so much if the regular IC ended up as one too...
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Sign Ups [6(ish)/7] - Replacements [0/7]
Post by: TheDarkStar on January 05, 2015, 10:38:23 pm
In, I've never played a Sprint game.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Sign Ups [6(ish)/7] - Replacements [0/7]
Post by: notquitethere on January 05, 2015, 10:44:33 pm
Ah, I see what you mean. Rather than a member of the Scum in-game, just there to give them advice?
Yeah that's right.

Man, that would suck so much if the regular IC ended up as one too...
It happens, so the town should suspect the IC as much as anyone else.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Sign Ups [6(ish)/7] - Replacements [0/7]
Post by: hector13 on January 05, 2015, 11:10:00 pm
I am IN yessiree bob.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Sign Ups [6(ish)/7] - Replacements [0/7]
Post by: Scripten on January 06, 2015, 12:37:49 am
You can be the regular IC. Scum don't get an IC in a Sprint game.

Oh, fair enough. Thanks!
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Sign Ups [6(ish)/7] - Replacements [0/7]
Post by: Deus Asmoth on January 06, 2015, 04:35:20 am
In
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Sign Ups [6(ish)/7] - Replacements [0/7]
Post by: notquitethere on January 06, 2015, 12:04:30 pm
Just waiting for Dani, Charazad and SBC to redeem their spots, but if one of them doesn't then I'll put you down Deus.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Sign Ups [6(ish)/7] - Replacements [0/7]
Post by: Deus Asmoth on January 06, 2015, 01:11:34 pm
That works. I can go in as a replacement in any case.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Sign Ups [6(ish)/7] - Replacements [0/7]
Post by: Shakerag on January 06, 2015, 03:03:22 pm
Ah, I see what you mean. Rather than a member of the Scum in-game, just there to give them advice?

Man, that would suck so much if the regular IC ended up as one too...
I thought it was hilarious. (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=108236.0)
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Sign Ups [6(ish)/7] - Replacements [1/7]
Post by: Supercharazad on January 07, 2015, 02:57:42 pm
In.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Sign Ups [6(ish)/7] - Replacements [1/7]
Post by: Jim Groovester on January 08, 2015, 01:50:06 am
Sign me up as a replacement.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Sign Ups [6(ish)/7] - Replacements [1/7]
Post by: Dani on January 08, 2015, 08:29:38 am
INb4full

Whew.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Sign Ups [6(ish)/7] - Replacements [1/7]
Post by: Dani on January 08, 2015, 08:33:12 am
Ah, didn't notice there was a roster.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Sign Ups [6(ish)/7] - Replacements [1/7]
Post by: UXLZ on January 08, 2015, 08:33:46 am
You can sign up for replacement, I guess.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Sign Ups [6(ish)/7] - Replacements [1/7]
Post by: Cheeetar on January 08, 2015, 08:36:57 am
No, Dani's in. He had a spot reserved for him and everything.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Sign Ups [6(ish)/7] - Replacements [1/7]
Post by: Dani on January 08, 2015, 08:40:38 am
Meaning to say, I was on the roster and didn't need to worry about hurrying.
I got here a bit late, though.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Sign Ups [6(ish)/7] - Replacements [1/7]
Post by: UXLZ on January 08, 2015, 09:23:59 am
Ah, I didn't see you on the roster. I thought everyone but one guy had been confirmed and you weren't them.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - The Preparation Phase
Post by: notquitethere on January 08, 2015, 11:49:02 am
OK, so there's been no sign of SBC, so I'll move Deus Asmoth into play. As such, we're now in...

The Preparation Phase

The gang huddles together in the sour smelling crowd as Moll Fletcher, the bawd of the gang, has a noose tied round her neck. The horse is whipped, the cart moves, she drops and swings by the noose.

"Well at least she weren't a light one," says one of the gang, holding back a sniffle, "nice and quick, alright."

"Still like to get me hands on whoever peached her," says another, while two of the gang, unseen, look nervously at one another...


I'm, just sending out the roles now. You have 24 hours (until Friday 9th January, 5PM GMT) to read your roles and understand what you're doing. The thread will be locked during that period. Feel free to PM me any questions. If any non-players would like to join the replacement players, do send me a message.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 1: In Amongst The Rookeries
Post by: notquitethere on January 09, 2015, 12:35:53 pm
Day OneIn Amongst The Rookeries

The seven thieves met in a shared garret somewhere in St Giles. The gangmaster closed the door and dragged a mouldering wardrobe across it. No one was going anywhere.

"No reason we can't be civil about this..." one began, nervously looking at the others.

And they did start civilly, with hands on pistols and swords...


Vote Tally
Deus Asmoth
Dani
UXLZ
Supercharazad
hector13
Scripten
TheDarkStar

Not voting: Deus Asmoth, Dani, UXLZ, Supercharazad, hector13, Scripten, TheDarkStar

The day ends Sunday 11th 5.38pm GMT. Please send any night actions to me before that time.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: hector13 on January 09, 2015, 12:50:49 pm
So...

Deus Asmoth, what do you think would be the best way to hide yourself, if you were Mafia?
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: Deus Asmoth on January 09, 2015, 02:01:32 pm
Act as town-like as possible and avoid being too late on a wagon.

Since I've played a full game with only one person here before;
Everyone:How much experience do you have with mafia?
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: hector13 on January 09, 2015, 02:08:27 pm
This be my first game.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: Supercharazad on January 09, 2015, 02:53:12 pm
Scripten, got a plan for finding the scum?

Everyone:How much experience do you have with mafia?

Played a bit several years ago, wasn't very good, played once IRL.


Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: Scripten on January 09, 2015, 03:21:34 pm
Hi all.

I'll be your friendly neighborhood IC for this game. When you see my text in maroon and italicized, you may rest assured that I am not lying to you and that I am, to the best of my ability, giving you genuine advice. As Mafia has its roots in social gaming, with healthy dashes of individual psychology, keep in mind that you can and occasionally should discount my advice depending on the circumstances. I have never met two people who play Mafia in exactly the same way, though you will often find players falling into various recurrent tropes (sometimes referred to as "tells") that can give you hints to their alignment.

That being said, I'll try to give advice whenever something of note appears. I would also recommend taking a look at mafia theory articles on the Mafiascum wiki. Many of them are outdated and, due to the way the game shifts in different environments, may not always be applicable in every situation. Still, they have been immensely useful to me and I hope they will serve you as well.

The most important thing to note is that you are playing to figure out other players' alignments. You aren't just trying to out-argue them, for if that were the case, the same players would always win as town or mafia. It is useful to be paranoid, but it is even more useful to find people you can trust. Scumhunting, the term for using various methods to capture mafia (scum), is the main aim of the game for town. This is in contrast to the mafia, who are expected to be scumhunting, but, because they know who are town and who are mafia, they have to fabricate their cases. The intricacies that allow a person to distinguish this is the gist of the game. One of my favorite adages which, to my knowledge, is not quite outdated yet, is that most occasions involving tunneling (a sort of single-minded, deep, but not especially broad questioning of another player) are generally between two town players during early parts of the game. A very successful scum tactic, especially among newbie games, is to egg on an argument without investing much in it, and when the player who loses is lynched, to push a wagon the next day on the person who was tunneling them. Keep an eye out for this, but remember, scum are also reading this and will most likely try to turn this technique to their advantage.

Now, with that initial bit of advice out of the way, let's move onto the current situation. Right now we are in a low-information stage of the game called RVS/RQS (respectively, random voting stage or random questioning stage) which is an early part of the game that gets things rolling. Note that I said "low-information." This is important because our two teams have different motivations. Scum want to keep town in the dark, because an ignorant town is a dead town, while town should try to get as much information as possible. Keep an eye on players who don't seem to understand the game state and try to see the difference between them and players who seem to understand the game state and are trying to keep it in low-information stages. The latter are more likely to be scum. This also has implications if you are town. Most directly, it means that it is a pro-town move to comment on events regarding the flow of the game as well as things you see affecting the lines of questioning people are drawing during RQS. The more you concentrate on making the game actually about the game, the faster we exit RQS and the more effectively we will be able to scumhunt.

More to come as we play! Good luck everyone.


Supercharazad: Not really. I find that overcooked plans are suboptimal. I'll probably move toward more effective plans later on in the game. What made you choose me as your RVS target?

TheDarkStar: How do you expect this sprint game to differ from a normal game of mafia in terms of play, rather than just mechanics, which we all are aware of?

Deus Asmoth: What insights do you plan on applying in this game based on your experiences in others?
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: Supercharazad on January 09, 2015, 03:42:26 pm
I didn't have any reason whatsover to pick you over anybody else.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: Deus Asmoth on January 09, 2015, 04:04:00 pm
Scripten: I'm planning on keeping calm for a start. Emotion seems to be a good way of getting myself killed.

UXLZ: How do you think having less time to choose their targets will affect the scum team?
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: hector13 on January 09, 2015, 05:08:01 pm
Are you worried at all about being killed, Deus?
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: Deus Asmoth on January 09, 2015, 05:11:48 pm
Not particularly. Why do you ask?
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: hector13 on January 09, 2015, 05:16:11 pm
Just curious.

Are there any players you might be worrying about right now? If so, why?
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: Deus Asmoth on January 09, 2015, 06:00:40 pm
It's bit early for me to be worrying about anyone yet I think. I like to see a bit more from people before I start trying to murder them.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: Scripten on January 09, 2015, 06:16:51 pm
This interactions reads as fake.

hector13: Why did you ask Deus is he was worried about being killed? What use would you get out of answers to that question?

Deus Asmoth:
It's bit early for me to be worrying about anyone yet I think. I like to see a bit more from people before I start trying to murder them.

This bothers me. Can you guess why this bothers me?
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: hector13 on January 09, 2015, 06:20:45 pm
The only players who should be worried about being killed are scum.

While it's not pleasant to be killed as town, it's less likely to mean you'll lose the game. The other town players can also read your previous posts as confirmed town, and adapt their future play accordingly. It's halfway to a loss as scum.

Like I said previously, this is my first game. I'm not entirely certain how to go about questioning people at this point in the game, so it just comes across as... feeble poking, really.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: Deus Asmoth on January 09, 2015, 06:25:17 pm
Deus Asmoth:
It's bit early for me to be worrying about anyone yet I think. I like to see a bit more from people before I start trying to murder them.

This bothers me. Can you guess why this bothers me?
Presumably you think I'm referring to a night kill rather than attempting to lynch someone. The obvious flaw in that is that the scum team don't need to see any action from anyone before killing them because they already know who their allies are, while townies have to try to figure out someone's motivations before they go for the throat since otherwise they're a lot more likely to kill town than scum.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: hector13 on January 09, 2015, 06:31:34 pm
Deus Asmoth:
It's bit early for me to be worrying about anyone yet I think. I like to see a bit more from people before I start trying to murder them.

This bothers me. Can you guess why this bothers me?
Presumably you think I'm referring to a night kill rather than attempting to lynch someone. The obvious flaw in that is that the scum team don't need to see any action from anyone before killing them because they already know who their allies are, while townies have to try to figure out someone's motivations before they go for the throat since otherwise they're a lot more likely to kill town than scum.

They do, however, benefit from seeing the interactions that the town players have with each other.

The job of scum is to sow confusion and doubt in the town, so knowing which players to night kill in order to increase that likelihood is important to them.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: Supercharazad on January 09, 2015, 06:33:50 pm
The only players who should be worried about being killed are scum.

Hector  why would you say that? If a townie is lynched then they instantly become useless, and the scum is one step closer to winning. Do you not care that the scum would only gain from a townie death?
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: hector13 on January 09, 2015, 06:41:04 pm
The only players who should be worried about being killed are scum.

Hector  why would you say that? If a townie is lynched then they instantly become useless, and the scum is one step closer to winning. Do you not care that the scum would only gain from a townie death?

They don't become useless.

It does mean the scum become one step closer to a win, and that there's one less townie to push with, but we can then look at the person's posts as a confirmed townie, and use whatever suspicions they had of others to guide our future actions.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: Supercharazad on January 09, 2015, 06:44:55 pm
They can no longer contribute to the discussion, and therefore are useless to any further investigation that the town will perform.
Besides that, why are you trying to justify lynching a townie in the first place? There is no good whatsoever that can come to the town from something like that, so are you trying to get people to be less careful about who they vote so that you can more easily have a townie lynched?

Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: hector13 on January 09, 2015, 06:53:38 pm
They can no longer contribute to the discussion, and therefore are useless to any further investigation that the town will perform.
Besides that, why are you trying to justify lynching a townie in the first place? There is no good whatsoever that can come to the town from something like that, so are you trying to get people to be less careful about who they vote so that you can more easily have a townie lynched?

There was no justification for a town lynch in that post. I said it wasn't as bad a situation as you say it is.

It's not an ideal situation, and they can't bring any new information to light, being dead and all, but their previous posts can be looked at because we know they were town.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: notquitethere on January 09, 2015, 07:12:55 pm
The thieves start clamouring and point fingers, while some of their number stand back, preparing to take their move.

Vote Tally
Deus Asmoth - [1] hector13
Dani
UXLZ - [1] Deus Asmoth
Supercharazad
hector13 - [1] Supercharazad
Scripten
TheDarkStar - [1] Scripten

Not voting: Dani, UXLZ, TheDarkStar
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: TheDarkStar on January 09, 2015, 07:17:41 pm
Since I've played a full game with only one person here before;
Everyone:How much experience do you have with mafia?

I'd IC, but Scripten beat me to it.

Hi all.

-snip-

More to come as we play! Good luck everyone.


TheDarkStar: How do you expect this sprint game to differ from a normal game of mafia in terms of play, rather than just mechanics, which we all are aware of?

The color. IT BURNS.

Anyway, people will probably be more hurried because decisions will have to be made faster.

Supercharazard (did I spell that right?): What should the cop do if he finds one scum and the other is alive?

PPE: Well, 10 posts between when I started this and now. I'll have detailed responses later, but hector is right in that day 1 lynches are good. Like he said, town flips give the town info that the scum already has. The list of votes is also highly useful.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: Supercharazad on January 09, 2015, 07:35:25 pm
DarkStar, that's a dilemma. Obviously if he roleclaims and points out that somebody is definitely scum, then he will be nightkilled. Because he's a macho cop, the doctor can't even protect him from that.
If he does point out scum, then he's helping the town in the short term but instantly becomes useless because he'll get nightkilled. If he doesn't, then he can direct questioning at the person who he knows is scum and can keep investigating.

I figure he should keep the information to himself until he discovers both of them, and then out them both simultaneously. At that point even if they do nightkill him then all the town has left to do is lynch the two scum, and the cop wins with the town even if he's dead.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: UXLZ on January 09, 2015, 08:16:00 pm
Posting to note presence. Haven't actually read anything else yet.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: Dani on January 09, 2015, 08:21:34 pm
Everyone:How much experience do you have with mafia?
Are you fishing for easy lynches?
This bothers me. Can you guess why this bothers me?
Scripten seems to have performed the exact scum tactic he warns about in his theory post.

((UXLZ vote for me do it nao))
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: UXLZ on January 09, 2015, 08:29:29 pm
Quote
Everyone:How much experience do you have with mafia?

Next to none. The only actual experience I've had with it is a few games on that custom map for SC2 several years ago. It was characterized mostly by random, totally thoughtless lynching so I grew bored of it.

Quote
UXLZ: How do you think having less time to choose their targets will affect the scum team?

Not too much. At least, in a newbie game like this. I'd assume four courses of action: Kill the IC (noting that this won't happen if he's a scum), kill someone who's being talkative to silence them, kill someone who isn't talkative because that also makes them stand out, or just kill at random. It shouldn't take too long to decide on one of these. 
Truth be told, I don't think scum kills generally have too much thought put into them. At least, it was that way in the SC2 custom map I played (since the night cycle was about 1 minute long, there wasn't much time to choose regardless.)
I'll have to admit that in this type of format there may be more thought to put into it. I haven't really... Thought of it, yet.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: Dani on January 09, 2015, 08:40:43 pm
 :(
Your unwillingness to ouroboros makes me sad.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: UXLZ on January 09, 2015, 08:43:11 pm
Scripten: What sort of mindset should a scum take into a Sprint game, as opposed to a regular one?

Deus Asamoth: What's your reasoning for deciding to vote for me, specifically? I can't imagine there actually is one, since I hadn't said anything at that point, but I'm curious none the less.

Dani: If you were a scum, what sort of questioning would make you... Nervous?

Supercharazad: What would your favorite scum tactic be, if you happened to be one?

hector13: How long do you think you'd be able to keep up the image of being a scum over a townie without a slip?

TheDarkStar: What sort of advantages do the scum have in a sprint game? Does that worry you?

and not to be unfair...

Myself: What do you think asking all these questions to different people will achieve?

The purpose of them is to try and discern what sort of mindset these different people would take if they were scum. Of course, this line of reasoning could be pointless, but it's interesting enough to pursue all the same. DarkStar gets more questions due to being more experienced. Scripten has kind of a two-in-one. I'm not asking a similar question to myself because, obviously, I would know how I would act, if I were scum.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: UXLZ on January 09, 2015, 08:44:04 pm
Ouroboros represents eternity, but it also represents stagnation. 
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: Deus Asmoth on January 09, 2015, 08:46:30 pm
Everyone:How much experience do you have with mafia?
Are you fishing for easy lynches?
...what? It's helpful to know how familiar someone is with the game when you haven't played with them before. How would finding someone with little experience (in a beginner's game) help with getting an easy lynch?

UXLZ: No particular reason. I just picked someone who hadn't posted yet to put pressure on them and your number came up.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: UXLZ on January 09, 2015, 08:51:31 pm
Quote
UXLZ: No particular reason. I just picked someone who hadn't posted yet to put pressure on them and your number came up.

I think you're misunderstanding something: Single votes have no power and exert very little pressure. 'Putting on' is quite the overstatement. You're going to need to find a buddy if you want to do that.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: Dani on January 09, 2015, 09:01:08 pm
Dani: If you were a scum, what sort of questioning would make you... Nervous?
The dramatic kind that has loads of... Unnecessary Emphasis.

It's helpful to know how familiar someone is with the game when you haven't played with them before. How would finding someone with little experience (in a beginner's game) help with getting an easy lynch?
A lack of experience will show itself quite plainly, no need for people to self-evaluate. A lack of experience is also a susceptibility to pressure and a greater-than-usual fear of the lynch as town, leading to looking scummy.

PPE:
I think you're misunderstanding something: Single votes have no power and exert very little pressure. 'Putting on' is quite the overstatement. You're going to need to find a buddy if you want to do that.
Vote UXLZ
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: UXLZ on January 09, 2015, 09:11:16 pm
Quote
The dramatic kind that has loads of... Unnecessary Emphasis.

That isn't what does dots mean... It's more a way of representing a slight pause, when I... Well, think. It leads to a more natural way of typing as I would speak with my voice. At least, that is how it feels to me. Others may interpret it somewhat differently. The 'emphasis' is purely in your head.

Quote
Vote UXLZ

There we go. Now you understand.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: UXLZ on January 09, 2015, 09:14:32 pm
Oh, I'd like to note that I won't be here in roughly four hours. Hopefully it won't coincide with events and make myself look... Bad? Regardless, I'm putting this here now, just in case.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: Scripten on January 09, 2015, 09:17:44 pm
Firstly, IC stuff:

Scripten: I'm planning on keeping calm for a start. Emotion seems to be a good way of getting myself killed.

Emotion can be dangerous, as it can cloud your actions. Keep in mind, though, that being genuine is a part of the game as well. Losing your cool does not mark you as scum, though it likewise does not clear you of it. Using emotion to appeal to or intimidate other players is also a viable tactic and, in some cases, can even get scum to crack and lose to the game, but it can also reveal a town player who just can't take it any more. Be mindful of the difference.

The only players who should be worried about being killed are scum.

While it's not pleasant to be killed as town, it's less likely to mean you'll lose the game. The other town players can also read your previous posts as confirmed town, and adapt their future play accordingly. It's halfway to a loss as scum.

Like I said previously, this is my first game. I'm not entirely certain how to go about questioning people at this point in the game, so it just comes across as... feeble poking, really.

From a purely theoretical standpoint, this is true. Keep in mind, also, that as a town power role, you should avoid getting lynched if at all possible and, if you are about to be lynched, claim your role. (Be sure to be mindful of the deadline, too. Don't wait until ten minutes to the end of the day to claim, or else nobody will have time to unvote you.) I would also like to add at this juncture that if you are a cop and you have a guilty, claiming sooner rather than later is not a bad idea. Consider that you will be eliminating 50% of the scumteam. Also, it is imperative that you claim a guilty if you are in a MyLo or LyLo situation. (These are days when, if scum are not lynched, the town loses.) If you've lost the game already, your own survival is a moot point.

The color. IT BURNS.

I can change my color. Anything that would be more preferable?

Deus Asmoth:

Presumably you think I'm referring to a night kill rather than attempting to lynch someone. The obvious flaw in that is that the scum team don't need to see any action from anyone before killing them because they already know who their allies are, while townies have to try to figure out someone's motivations before they go for the throat since otherwise they're a lot more likely to kill town than scum.

Sure, but you forget that the scum are looking to see who the most useful night kills will be. And beyond that, your specific choice of the word "murder" is interesting. It implies personal agency in the death rather than a consensus killing. Hence my reason for calling it a potential scumslip.

Dani:

Scripten seems to have performed the exact scum tactic he warns about in his theory post.

Can you explain this more? I'm not seeing the link you're making.

UXLZ:

Scripten: What sort of mindset should a scum take into a Sprint game, as opposed to a regular one?

Can you first explain why a town player would want advice on how to play scum?

Also, even though this is a sprint game, forum mafia isn't a real-time game, so being absent for certain stretches isn't terrible, though it helps to be active. An active, questioning town is a town that wins.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: UXLZ on January 09, 2015, 09:34:58 pm
Quote
Can you first explain why a town player would want advice on how to play scum?

Please read the entire post. My reasoning, if somewhat flawed, is already there, though it's an answer to a different question than this one specifically. I'd also like to add that this is my first game of this sort of Mafia. I'll need to learn how play both sides at some point since I won't always get to be a townie. It's better to do it when I stand to lose less.

Quote
would want advice on how to play scum?

Barring what I said above, I think you've also misunderstood the question. I'm asking about the mindset, not the action. That's the difference between asking 'How does an apple picker think?' and 'How do you pick apples?'. The town will certainly benefit from the former, somewhat less so from the latter though there is still some benefit to be had.
Essentially, I  am not asking advice on how to play scum like you seem to be assuming, I am asking advice on how to think like scum.

However... I'll rephrase the question, omitting the 'should' since that is under the assumption of 'perfect play'.

Scripten: What, in your mind, what would the mindset of a scum in a sprint game be, as opposed to a regular game?
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: TheDarkStar on January 09, 2015, 09:36:49 pm
TheDarkStar: What sort of advantages do the scum have in a sprint game? Does that worry you?

This (along with the rest of your post) seems to be written to get advice in playing scum, UXLZ. Why is this?

Scripten: Green is a nice color.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: UXLZ on January 09, 2015, 09:42:31 pm
Quote
This (along with the rest of your post) seems to be written to get advice in playing scum, UXLZ. Why is this?

Please, please actually read things before jumping to conclusions. Re-read that specific post, then the one I made in response to Scripten. Think about it for a second, and then we can keep discussing it if you still have questions.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: hector13 on January 09, 2015, 09:54:34 pm
hector13: How long do you think you'd be able to keep up the image of being a scum over a townie without a slip?

Not sure. I could lurk for a bit to avoid risking any slippage, at least for a portion of the first day.

I like to think I'm good at things before I actually try them, only discover this is far, far, far from the truth. So, the short answer would probably be "not long after someone put pressure on me".

Also:

...I won't always get to be a townie...

Well played.

Just in the interests of complete disclosure, how would you play, if you were scum?

DarkStar, are you a Hibs fan, by any chance?  :P
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: TheDarkStar on January 09, 2015, 10:07:01 pm
Hm, it seems that I missed the last post you made. Reading...

And it doesn't change the fact that your post consisted of trying to find advice on how to play scum. My vote stays where it is.

PPE: Yeah, that townclaim doesn't actually make you look any better. Anyone can say that they are town.

hector13: Nope. How many different places are there where someone used something similar to my username, anyway? I've heard at least three or four of them.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: UXLZ on January 09, 2015, 10:13:49 pm
Quote
Not sure. I could lurk for a bit to avoid risking any slippage, at least for a portion of the first day.

I like to think I'm good at things before I actually try them, only discover this is far, far, far from the truth. So, the short answer would probably be "not long after someone put pressure on me".

Also

Hehe, true enough for me as well, on the first part at least. I don't like the idea of this 'pressure', though. Relying on it seems ridiculous as it's the kind of thing that would only work against beginners, though I can't claim to know if that's actually true. I believe I have three votes against myself at the moment, and it isn't really that much of a concern. Of course, I could be lynched, but in that case I guess I'll learn not to... Try to learn?

Quote
Well played.

It's a true statement though, factually speaking at least. Of course, only the scum and I know what I really am. After today, the cop might as well. Depending on how suspicious I'm really acting. Though this all lays under the assumption that I'm not just killed off for the crime of being active.
Truthfully speaking, as this is irrelevant to the current game hopefully you'll believe me, I prefer to be town anyway. It's simply less stressful.

Quote
Just in the interests of complete disclosure, how would you play, if you were scum?

No idea, though I'd like to think it would be similar to how I'm playing now, I can't really say for sure... I remember that, in the SC2 custom map I used to play in, the mafia members tended to be quite quiet. Maybe I'd be like that? Who knows.
How I would play is impossible to know, how I would intend to play is, hopefully, 'flawless'. ;D
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: hector13 on January 09, 2015, 10:23:55 pm
You do seem to be trying quite hard to appear as town, UXLZ.

Not enough for me to want to vote for you, yet, but in saying that you are one vote away from having a majority against you. Perhaps you have concerns about another player you'd like to voice to convince me they're more likely to be scum than you?
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: UXLZ on January 09, 2015, 10:40:38 pm
I sure am garnering a lot attention, aren't I? Well, it's all useful, regardless.

Quote
And it doesn't change the fact that your post consisted of trying to find advice on how to play scum. My vote stays where it is.

Leave your vote where you want it to be. In response to the rest... Firstly I'm not trying to get advice on how to play scum, I'm trying to get advice on how a scum would think. Even if you don't believe me and think I'm trying to learn how to play it... Where's the problem in that? It might be my naivety showing through but I fail to see how that is an issue. In fact, I think it's actively a non-issue. That is to say, any advice given would have no effect on this game in particular. At least, in the context of the advice itself. If you understand that and are simply trying to prevent people from learning how to play, or at least, how it is perceived they should play the sum in any game ever I'd say that's quite short-sighted.

Quote
PPE: Yeah, that townclaim doesn't actually make you look any better. Anyone can say that they are town.

That wasn't what I was trying to bring attention to. Even ignoring that, I fail to see how saying 'I will not always be the town' is a town claim. You're reading into it too much, in this case. As I noted in my above post it is factually, 100% correct. At least, taken out of context like that.


PPE:

Quote
You do seem to be trying quite hard to appear as town, UXLZ.

Or maybe what I'm saying just naturally makes me appear as town?
You are though, of course, correct. That doesn't really matter though, what I'm appearing to be doesn't really matter, what I'm saying objectively should.

Quote
Not enough for me to want to vote for you, yet, but in saying that you are one vote away from having a majority against you. Perhaps you have concerns about another player you'd like to voice to convince me they're more likely to be scum than you?

Well, my original concerns were for Deus Asamoth, but in reading the rest of the posts they didn't seem to be the only ones casting random votes so those concerns were unfounded. Dani seemed awfully willing to up the count, voting for me due to my statement of:
(Also, I think they were just upset that I didn't vote for them to bring the vote counts to 1 each.)

Quote
I think you're misunderstanding something: Single votes have no power and exert very little pressure. 'Putting on' is quite the overstatement. You're going to need to find a buddy if you want to do that.

Which I'll admit may have been somewhat misguided and asking for trouble. I do think it's true though, which is the reason I believe I'm currently the only player without a standing vote. That, and casting it now would probably bring suspicion levels from healthy to lethal.

DarkStar seems to think that my questions about the mindset of a scum seem to be lynch worthy because... Screw people trying to learn different mindsets? I think people seem to keep interpreting my questions as 'How should I play scum?' rather than 'How does a scum player think?' which is saddening.

Truthfully though, I don't have too many suspicions because all the things I find somewhat suspicious I'm also capable of rationalising. It's kind of an unfortunate thing, but maybe I'm just too... Cautious a player.   

 
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: UXLZ on January 09, 2015, 10:44:36 pm
Quote
I think people seem to keep interpreting my questions as 'How should I play scum?' rather than 'How does a scum player think?' which is saddening.

Also noteworthy is that thus far hector13 is the only person to actually answer one of those questions rather than responding with 'You're talking/asking about scum? You must be scum!' Make of that what you will.

Oh, and Asamoth, but his question actually had nothing to do with scum so it's exempt from that point.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: UXLZ on January 09, 2015, 10:50:46 pm
Note: I'll be having a shower and then going for a walk. No idea when I'll be back, will probably take about one and a half hours? I'll try to get a few more replies in before I leave later tonight.

This is, of course, assuming I don't return to find myself dead as a doornail, in which case my dying words are 'God damnit.'

Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: hector13 on January 09, 2015, 11:05:58 pm
I would like to point out that DarkStar and Scripten, as the two most experience (I think) players in the game, do seem quick to either vote for or suspect UXLZ for trying to learn how to play.

It would be foolish, in the extreme, for UXLZ to ask questions on how to play as scum and then play as scum based on those answers in the same game.

I've read a few other beginner Mafia games on the forum, and a lot of them have the IC's asking questions in a similar vein to the ones UXLZ asked, without this degree of fuss.

What is different enough in this instance to warrant the suggestion that UXLZ is scum because of that?
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: UXLZ on January 10, 2015, 12:01:46 am
Quote
What is different enough in this instance to warrant the suggestion that UXLZ is scum because of that?

I managed to have a small amount of time to post here before I go for that walk, so I'd like to... Actually, that's a terrible idea. I was going to answer that question for DarkStar and Scripten but that would just be stupid. I do have an idea of why this could be, but I'm going to keep my mouth shut until they answer it themselves.

Quote
It would be foolish, in the extreme, for UXLZ to ask questions on how to play as scum and then play as scum based on those answers in the same game.

Thankfully someone seems to have realised this, though I was going to try to avoid using this line of reasoning until death was imminent on the hope that instead of accusing me (or at least, as well as accusing), actually, you know, answer the question rather than dodge it, in which case one of the mafia members may have been foolish enough to play based on that advice.

I'm hoping that this amount of fuss leads to some gain, rather than letting the scum merely stall for time. To get things moving a bit more...

I would like to point out that DarkStar and Scripten, as the two most experience (I think) players in the game, do seem quick to either vote for or suspect UXLZ for trying to learn how to play.

DarkStar's hastiness to vote is noteworthy. Scripten's suspicion, less so, because it's merely suspicion.
Actually, looking back, DarkStar said pretty much exactly the same thing as Scripten, except voting as well. (Note, these don't have the formatting like color and bb code but the quote is verbatim.)

Quote from: Scripten
Can you first explain why a town player would want advice on how to play scum?

Quote from: DarkStar
This (along with the rest of your post) seems to be written to get advice in playing scum, UXLZ. Why is this?

As you can see, Scripten's, while admittedly using the blue font of finger pointing before hand, is actually written quite neutrally and is mostly inquisitor-ey. DarkStar's in contrast is, while asking the same general question, extremely accusatory, also adding in his vote. Now, while there are reasons that I can think of to explain this, I wonder what theirs is. One possibility is trying to knock me off as an 'easy target'. Could you please explain, DarkStar?

Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: Scripten on January 10, 2015, 12:04:40 am
UXLZ:

Not too much. At least, in a newbie game like this. I'd assume four courses of action: Kill the IC (noting that this won't happen if he's a scum)

I missed this before. This bothers me, because it appears that you are setting up a bogus case later on so as to mislynch the IC when he is not killed overnight.

Please read the entire post. My reasoning, if somewhat flawed, is already there, though it's an answer to a different question than this one specifically. I'd also like to add that this is my first game of this sort of Mafia. I'll need to learn how play both sides at some point since I won't always get to be a townie. It's better to do it when I stand to lose less.

Scum try to act like town who are scumhunting others. I really don't see how this is useful.

Barring what I said above, I think you've also misunderstood the question. I'm asking about the mindset, not the action. That's the difference between asking 'How does an apple picker think?' and 'How do you pick apples?'. The town will certainly benefit from the former, somewhat less so from the latter though there is still some benefit to be had.

The problem with this is that each scum is going to play as close to what they think their town play is. You can't quantify that, and generalizing it is mostly useless.

Essentially, I  am not asking advice on how to play scum like you seem to be assuming, I am asking advice on how to think like scum.

Pretend you know the scumteam and go from there.

Scripten: What, in your mind, what would the mindset of a scum in a sprint game be, as opposed to a regular game?

The scum mentality should remain roughly the same.

Mod: Do scum have daytalk, seeing as there are no nights?

hector13:

So, the short answer would probably be "not long after someone put pressure on me".

Read: "I will pretend that I crack under pressure easily so that other players do not examine me too closely."

You do seem to be trying quite hard to appear as town, UXLZ.

Not enough for me to want to vote for you, yet, but in saying that you are one vote away from having a majority against you. Perhaps you have concerns about another player you'd like to voice to convince me they're more likely to be scum than you?

This looks more like a scumbuddy trying to tell their partner to shape up. Could also possibly be scum trying to buddy mislynch bait to get towncred after a flip.

Definitely doesn't feel like town, though.

Also noteworthy is that thus far hector13 is the only person to actually answer one of those questions rather than responding with 'You're talking/asking about scum? You must be scum!' Make of that what you will.

And a very interesting response to the coaching/buddying attempt from UXLZ.

I would like to point out that DarkStar and Scripten, as the two most experience (I think) players in the game, do seem quick to either vote for or suspect UXLZ for trying to learn how to play.

And then we get this bit here from hector13, which is quite notable in that it directly conflicts with his earlier post in which HE is suspecting UXLZ. Playing both sides of the fence, hector13?

It would be foolish, in the extreme, for UXLZ to ask questions on how to play as scum and then play as scum based on those answers in the same game.

This is true, but I was not suspecting him solely on that question. Still, you're rather defensive of him, aren't you?
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: Dani on January 10, 2015, 12:10:11 am
UXLZ
Undeclared L-1 is not cool.
Unvote UXLZ
Vote TheDarkStar
avoids blabbing about ongoing game

Scripten seems to have performed the exact scum tactic he warns about in his theory post.
Can you explain this more? I'm not seeing the link you're making.
A very successful scum tactic, especially among newbie games, is to egg on an argument without investing much in it, and when the player who loses is lynched, to push a wagon the next day on the person who was tunneling them. Keep an eye out for this, but remember, scum are also reading this and will most likely try to turn this technique to their advantage.
Quote
see posts #32-36
Admittedly, it's a weak read now, compared with everything else that's going on.

(Also, I think they were just upset that I didn't vote for them to bring the vote counts to 1 each.)
It would have created... a beautiful chain of blame. Never before has the chance to bring senseless order been so spurned. :weeps:

Pre-Post Edit: ninja'd.
Post-Pre-Post Edit: ninja'd again. D:
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: Scripten on January 10, 2015, 12:14:04 am
Undeclared L-1 is not cool.

I don't think we have hammers in newbie games. All lynches are deadline lynches.

Admittedly, it's a weak read now, compared with everything else that's going on.

Eh, okay. I don't see it, but there's conf bias from knowing my alignment.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: Dani on January 10, 2015, 12:18:56 am
By which I mean I have nothing to say right now about the two posts before my previous post.

PPE: ...Ah.
unvote
*kicks self*
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: Dani on January 10, 2015, 12:29:53 am
I'll be back when I've cleared my head.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: hector13 on January 10, 2015, 12:50:11 am
hector13:

So, the short answer would probably be "not long after someone put pressure on me".

Read: "I will pretend that I crack under pressure easily so that other players do not examine me too closely."
Or an honest description of what I think might happen.

It's easily tested of course.

You do seem to be trying quite hard to appear as town, UXLZ.

Not enough for me to want to vote for you, yet, but in saying that you are one vote away from having a majority against you. Perhaps you have concerns about another player you'd like to voice to convince me they're more likely to be scum than you?

This looks more like a scumbuddy trying to tell their partner to shape up. Could also possibly be scum trying to buddy mislynch bait to get towncred after a flip.

Definitely doesn't feel like town, though.

Given that my vote, which would be number 4 on UXLZ and would for all intents and purposes be a death knell for them (assuming, of course, no-one changed their vote) I wanted to get some information as a result of that threat. A target of opportunity, if you will.

Given, also, that I don't want them to defend themselves, as that would be entirely useless to the rest of the town, I wanted to know if they had suspicions on other players. The more information in the matrix, the better it is for the town.

Also noteworthy is that thus far hector13 is the only person to actually answer one of those questions rather than responding with 'You're talking/asking about scum? You must be scum!' Make of that what you will.

And a very interesting response to the coaching/buddying attempt from UXLZ.

You appear to be putting me in the role of coach, in that scenario. This is my first game, I've only read through a few beginner mafia games. I literally am learning on the fly here, man!

I don't really see where you're going with that one though. I was the only one to answer the questions (technically Dani did as well, but the answer wasn't very enlightening) to this point, why should that make me and UXLZ scumbuddies?

The entire point of questions is to garner answers and thus information. Given that we're in something of an information-sparse environment, far as I'm concerned, not answering/avoiding the question is quite scummy.

Oh snap, you didn't answer the question did you?

I would like to point out that DarkStar and Scripten, as the two most experience (I think) players in the game, do seem quick to either vote for or suspect UXLZ for trying to learn how to play.

And then we get this bit here from hector13, which is quite notable in that it directly conflicts with his earlier post in which HE is suspecting UXLZ. Playing both sides of the fence, hector13?

There are two scum, remember? UXLZ, at this point and in my opinion, is not in my top two of players that could be scum. It wasn't so much a defense of UXLZ, but rather an attempt for you (and DarkStar) to explain yourself.

You didn't, so I'll give you another opportunity to do so. Why so harsh on someone asking reasonable questions?

It would be foolish, in the extreme, for UXLZ to ask questions on how to play as scum and then play as scum based on those answers in the same game.

This is true, but I was not suspecting him solely on that question. Still, you're rather defensive of him, aren't you?

Like I say, questioning you, rather than defending them. What else is making you suspect UXLZ?
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: UXLZ on January 10, 2015, 01:03:13 am
I missed this before. This bothers me, because it appears that you are setting up a bogus case later on so as to mislynch the IC when he is not killed overnight.

Ah, sorry, I can see where you're coming from with this one. That would be extremely flimsy reasoning to use, anyway, so I doubt it would have worked even if it was my intention.

Scum try to act like town who are scumhunting others. I really don't see how this is useful.

I was looking for a bit more of an in-depth answer than that. What you've said is kind of a 'well, obviously' type answer. It's like one of those pre-fab answers you get from customer support: as you noted, absolutely useless.

The problem with this is that each scum is going to play as close to what they think their town play is. You can't quantify that, and generalizing it is mostly useless.

This is more the kind of thing I'm looking for.

Pretend you know the scumteam and go from there.

Noted.

The scum mentality should remain roughly the same.

I see...



Now, I don't like defending other people, but since in this case it concerns me...

This looks more like a scumbuddy trying to tell their partner to shape up. Could also possibly be scum trying to buddy mislynch bait to get towncred after a flip.

Definitely doesn't feel like town, though.

What if the scum have daytalk? Where does the reasoning go from there? Also, what do you mean with the mislynch bait stuff? In that case I'm genuinely confused. I've got an idea of what you mean but I'm not certain. Too much terminology I'm not used to.

The last one... You do have a bit of a point.

And a very interesting response to the coaching/buddying attempt from UXLZ.

Also a factually correct one. You can't deny that up until that point hector was indeed the only person who had actually answered one of my questions rather than ignoring it and attempting to cast suspicion on me. Of course, in some ways he was also trying to pressure me, but he also answered the question.

And then we get this bit here from hector13, which is quite notable in that it directly conflicts with his earlier post in which HE is suspecting UXLZ. Playing both sides of the fence, hector13?

Suspecting me for different reasons isn't a contradiction, you're strawmanning his post here and attempting to pull a case out of thin air. He never took back his own suspicion of me, he was saying that the reason why both you and DarkStar were doing so were strange. (Note: His reason was 'You're trying really hard to look like town', yours and DarkStar's were 'You're asking how to play as/think like scum'.)

This is true, but I was not suspecting him solely on that question. Still, you're rather defensive of him, aren't you?

Then maybe you should explain your reasons for suspecting me, rather than completely ignoring his question and attempting to shift the focus, right, Scripten?

I've read a few other beginner Mafia games on the forum, and a lot of them have the IC's asking questions in a similar vein to the ones UXLZ asked, without this degree of fuss.

What is different enough in this instance to warrant the suggestion that UXLZ is scum because of that?

PPE: I'll do that in another post.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: UXLZ on January 10, 2015, 01:06:09 am
Looks like hector explained their reasoning reasonably (haha) well.

Quote
I was the only one to answer the questions (technically Dani did as well, but the answer wasn't very enlightening) to this point

Ah, I may have missed Dani answering it, or I read it but it slipped my mind. I thought no on else but you had done so.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: UXLZ on January 10, 2015, 01:12:37 am
Reading the abbreviation guide at the start, I seem to be WoTing a lot. Sorry about that for any who dislike reading a lot, but I like to respond to as many points as I can.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: UXLZ on January 10, 2015, 01:54:31 am
At this moment I will not be here until a later time, the exact moment of which I am not sure of.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: Supercharazad on January 10, 2015, 12:04:29 pm
Supercharazad: What would your favorite scum tactic be, if you happened to be one?

Somehow managed to miss this.
I honestly don't know, I suppose if I were scum then I'd try to forget I was during the day and follow whoever seems most suspicious. After all, the trick to acting well is to not act in the first place.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: hector13 on January 10, 2015, 01:42:45 pm
Have you noticed any actors thus far, charazad?
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: Supercharazad on January 10, 2015, 02:08:33 pm
Have you noticed any actors thus far, charazad?

It's early enough in the game that nobody's really done anything to draw suspicion on themselves, which means nobody really has a solid case, so they're pretty much indistinguishable from whatever case the scum may be pursuing.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: hector13 on January 10, 2015, 02:23:48 pm
I think there are plenty of people who have drawn suspicion on themselves. Why don't you?
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: notquitethere on January 10, 2015, 03:54:14 pm
By the middle of the day, the thieves are at each other's throats, knives drawn, eager for blood.

Vote Tally
Deus Asmoth - [1] hector13
Dani
UXLZ - [2] Deus Asmoth, TheDarkStar
Supercharazad
hector13 - [1] Supercharazad
Scripten
TheDarkStar - [2] Scripten, UXLZ

Not voting: Dani
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: hector13 on January 10, 2015, 04:48:35 pm
Dani and Deus Asmoth, what are your thoughts on proceedings so far?
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: Supercharazad on January 10, 2015, 05:29:03 pm
I think there are plenty of people who have drawn suspicion on themselves. Why don't you?

Would you mind sharing who exactly you suspect and why you suspect them? I think that'd be rather helpful.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: Deus Asmoth on January 10, 2015, 07:33:04 pm
I think there are plenty of people who have drawn suspicion on themselves. Why don't you?
This is an incredibly vague question, hector. Why didn't you provide some example of who you were suspicious of and why if you were going to ask someone why they weren't also suspicious of that person? All I'm seeing here is a blanket statement and an implication that charazard isn't as town as you are.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: hector13 on January 10, 2015, 11:12:03 pm
I think there are plenty of people who have drawn suspicion on themselves. Why don't you?
This is an incredibly vague question, hector. Why didn't you provide some example of who you were suspicious of and why if you were going to ask someone why they weren't also suspicious of that person? All I'm seeing here is a blanket statement and an implication that charazard isn't as town as you are.

unvote

It's not vague, it's actually quite specific. I'm not asking him if he's suspicious of certain players, I'm asking why he doesn't think anyone isn't acting suspiciously.

Scripten, DarkStar, UXLZ and I were all pointing fingers at each other to some degree, you've been conspicuously absent, dani changed their vote 3 times in as many posts, and charazad doesn't think anyone is suspicious. Everyone is acting suspiciously to an extent. I want to know why charazad doesn't think so.

And you're very much putting words in my mouth there, sunshine. You inferred that I was saying charazad wasn't as town as me. Like I keep saying, the name of the game is information, and that information would prove to be most enlightening.

I'm currently most suspicious of Scripten, DarkStar and Supercharazad. I didn't say before because I didn't want that to influence charazad's answers. Too late now, though, eh?

So I'll ask everyone then.

everyone: Who are you most suspicious of at present?
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: UXLZ on January 10, 2015, 11:51:48 pm
Quote
everyone: Who are you most suspicious of at present?

Everyone, for various reasons.
Let's try this on for size.
Scripten for ignoring questions, not even acknowledging some of them, and then attempting to shift the focus away. Perfectly understandable if you answer the question (or at least say 'I'm not answering because X) and then try to question people, but completely ignoring them is not a good look.

DarkStar is probably my prime suspect at the moment, the reasons are more detailed in a post on page 5 if you want to take a look at it.

Hector is quite... I don't even know how to put it into words, he just makes me a bit cautious.

Supercharazad obviously for lurking.

Deus for overly quick finger-pointing.

Dani for lurking, once again. Also, apparently extremely eager to change votes. (Though they unvoted me to keep me away from being at an L-1 state. I'm not sure how to look at that action since there are both good and bad reasons for it.)
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: hector13 on January 11, 2015, 12:17:31 am
I should explain in this instance why I'm voting for Scripten.

Scripten is asking questions, yes, but they're not questions that would reveal anything useful to the town with the answer:

hector13: Why did you ask Deus is he was worried about being killed? What use would you get out of answers to that question?

Can you first explain why a town player would want advice on how to play scum?

Further, Scripten hasn't answered any of my questions to him, or when they do, it's with another question:

I would like to point out that DarkStar and Scripten, as the two most experience (I think) players in the game, do seem quick to either vote for or suspect UXLZ for trying to learn how to play.
And then we get this bit here from hector13, which is quite notable in that it directly conflicts with his earlier post in which HE is suspecting UXLZ. Playing both sides of the fence, hector13?

note also, that in that instance my initial question wasn't quoted by Scripten:

What is different enough in this instance to warrant the suggestion that UXLZ is scum because of that?

Last but not least, his accusation of UXLZ and I being scumbuddies:

You do seem to be trying quite hard to appear as town, UXLZ.

Not enough for me to want to vote for you, yet, but in saying that you are one vote away from having a majority against you. Perhaps you have concerns about another player you'd like to voice to convince me they're more likely to be scum than you?

This looks more like a scumbuddy trying to tell their partner to shape up. Could also possibly be scum trying to buddy mislynch bait to get towncred after a flip.

Definitely doesn't feel like town, though.

Also noteworthy is that thus far hector13 is the only person to actually answer one of those questions rather than responding with 'You're talking/asking about scum? You must be scum!' Make of that what you will.

And a very interesting response to the coaching/buddying attempt from UXLZ.

Now, having read through some other beginner Mafia games on Bay12, I know that the scum players have scumchat, basically their own private chat-room away from the game to coordinate... whatever they need to coordinate.

Thus, why, in the name of the Wee Man, would any of the scum be so utterly f***ing stupid as to correct their buddy in the game!? It literally would serve no purpose that couldn't be served - absolutely risk-free I might add - in the scumchat.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: Scripten on January 11, 2015, 01:37:19 am
UXLZ:

Spoiler: "Reply to UXLZ" (click to show/hide)

hector13:

Spoiler: "Reply to hector13" (click to show/hide)

I have put my replies into spoilers. We're getting some really long walls going on here, which can cause people to become apathetic about the game, which is anti-town. We don't want people just skimming through posts and missing important information. Therefore, I would suggest only replying to the parts of posts that are most important from here on out. I'll try to cut down my post size as well.

Unvote TheDarkStar
Vote hector13
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: UXLZ on January 11, 2015, 02:40:16 am
Hmm... I'll spoiler things, then.


Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: hector13 on January 11, 2015, 03:18:32 am
Empty statement. Prove it.

Quote
hector13: Why did you ask Deus is he was worried about being killed? What use would you get out of answers to that question?
Can you first explain why a town player would want advice on how to play scum?

The answers to those questions should be obvious: they're trying to find out something about the other players. That's not helpful to the town.

Can you explain to me why you are so insulted by the very idea that you might be coaching another player when you have a private scumchat elsewhere from which to coordinate?

Because it would serve no purpose to coach here, in the game, beyond making both parties appear scummy. I'm not insulted, I just don't think anyone is that utterly stupid.

Hesistant to vote because one vote isn't much pressure. Unfortunately it was UXLZ who pointed this out...

Also vis a vis the OMGUS, I'm doing to you exactly what you were trying to do to UXLZ: Put pressure on you to discover your alignment. While you get information from UXLZ from your pressure, I get information about you from mine. Equally so, UXLZ's reaction to my pressure of you in this instance is useful. You also weren't suspecting me, you were suspecting him. I was pressuring you, and voted for you because you weren't responding.

Of note is the fact you didn't respond to anything until I voted for you. Perhaps coincidence, but noteworthy nonetheless.

Evidently my questions to you are... too vague. I was wondering why you were suspicious of UXLZ, rather than why you were questioning him. Inexperience on my part, perhaps.

And also you did answer his question so ah... sorry. Evidently it's a bad idea to read stuff when you should be sleeping.

Scripten: What, in your mind, what would the mindset of a scum in a sprint game be, as opposed to a regular game?
The scum mentality should remain roughly the same.

unvote

At least I'm trying to scumhunt. The same cannot be said for others.

DarkStar has only put pressure on UXLZ, following Scripten's line of questioning, and then nothing since. Has been active on bay12, though. Not sure what to read into that.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: Supercharazad on January 11, 2015, 05:30:40 am
Hector, you never answered my question adequately. Who do you suspect, and why do you suspect them?


To answer the question as to who I suspect most, it's currently Hector for ignoring my questions. As well as that, he changed his vote immediately when questioned on it, and flipped to Scripten with no real reasoning as far as I could see, and then when Scripten made the slightest hint of an attack on you by questioning you, you flip to DarkStar for not posting enough.

You seem to be flipflopping all over the place, why?
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: Dani on January 11, 2015, 07:14:49 am
Supercharazad, you really aren't going to talk about anyone other than hector? Just going to silently hop onto the heaviest hype train? The lack of Deus, DarkStar's quick in-and-out, the interaction between Scripten and UXLZ, my overtly casual attempt to duck under everyone's suspicions? Same goes for Deus Asmoth. He makes one post on a tangent and runs off.

In any case, hector v. Scripten (+ UXLZ) is far more interesting.

About my non-answer to UXLZ's question: I like being unhelpful with those kinds of questions, ever since an experience in my first game.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: UXLZ on January 11, 2015, 07:36:23 am
On a side note, I'd swear it's been a day already.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: Supercharazad on January 11, 2015, 09:53:25 am
Other people are pursuing other people, I'm pursuing the person who I see as most suspicious. Besides, I hardly hopped onto the train considering I was the first to vote and suspect him.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: notquitethere on January 11, 2015, 11:07:27 am
The air was heavy with acrimony as the day's end drew closer... who would be marked as the traitor?

Vote Tally
Deus Asmoth
Dani
UXLZ - [1] TheDarkStar
Supercharazad
hector13 - [3] Supercharazad, Deus Asmoth, Scripten
Scripten
TheDarkStar - [2] UXLZ, Hector

Not voting: Dani

Day ends at 5.40pm GMT, in an hour and a half.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: Scripten on January 11, 2015, 11:15:41 am
UXLZ:

And that's a very useless statement. I appreciate that you're saying things that cast me in a better light (and yourself, which hasn't slipped notice) than earlier but I thought we were cutting out the needless things?

Useless? Not at all. Getting town reads is important, because not everyone else in the game is scum. Sometimes, process of elimination (PoE) is the only way to go, especially later in the game when red herrings have been eliminated.

Ah, so what you're saying is that he's trying to get on good terms with me, and then when I'm mis-lynched claim he was on my side defending me and therefore town?
I know that I'm acting in a way that makes me easy to push a lynch on, but playing too cautiously will lead to a town defeat 95% of the time. A town that doesn't act is a town that loses.

Exactly. Though, my main observation was not that you were playing terribly (it is a newbie game, after all, so learning is to be expected) but rather that you had the biggest wagon on you and the most suspicion being cast your way.

It wasn't so much putting weight on merely answering questions, it was more that you attempted to use the questions I was asking to cast suspicion on me due to the content of those questions (being about scum).

Two things to note about this. Firstly, it was not only the content of your post (that is, talking about scum is not scummy) that was suspicious. It was that your questions were with regard to mechanics rather than content in this game and that their tone was... awkward. Mafia is a logical game, but sometimes you have to follow your hunches and pursue a player just because they just don't feel right.

Yes, I'd say it was chainsaw defending, but he was also bringing up fairly legitimate points. Also, while not answering questions in the RQS stage isn't inherently scummy as you say, refusing to answer those questions and then using them to FoS or vote for someone, while also not inherently scummy, is highly more suspect. Personally, it wasn't that you (or DarkStar) refused to answer the questions that I found suspicious, it was the attempt to reverse all the attention onto me that was strange.

Careful. Think about it like this: Were your posts casting suspicion on other players? If not, would a player suspecting you based on those questions REALLY be "reversing" suspicions as has been brought forward?

Do you see where I'm getting at with the concept of OMGUS and motivation?

I still don't like this whole 'pressure' idea. It seems quite useless. Only inexperienced players would crack so easily.

It's not exactly to make them "crack" and have a mental break, but to make them nervous and push them to slip up more often. This works on almost any player, regardless of experience. You just have to be looking out for different things with different players.

Mod: I am currently voting for hector13.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: TheDarkStar on January 11, 2015, 11:46:06 am
Ok, I've finally gotten around to posting. Posting requirements are generally a bit more relaxed during the weekend when people post less.

Dani and Deus Asmoth: What do you think of the current events? Who do you think is scummy? You two haven't posted much recently, and Dani hasn't voted.

hector13: Why are you pressure voting me to get me to post more when you say that you suspect both Deus and Scripten? Why did you unvote Scripten after explaining why you thought he was so scummy?
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: hector13 on January 11, 2015, 12:17:37 pm
Most of my basis for that was through not answering a question, and that proved to be hugely unfounded, hence the unvote.

I only mentioned 3 players who I thought were scummy at that point, and had been focusing (erroneously) on Scripten. I looked through the rest of the thread to see who hadn't really done much. I could just as easily have voted for Dani or Supercharazad for the same reasons I'm voting for you, DarkStar. I chose to vote them because their questioning wasn't original (they were following Scripten). As Scripten pointed out, I'm reticent to use my vote. I didn't think it would put much pressure on people to get them to talk. Hence the flip-flopping. The vote isn't actual of value, from my perspective, until the deadline.

You were the first to vote for me, Charazad, but you put minimal pressure on me, and appeared to stop after Scripten suggested in his IC-ese that my answer was reasonable. (that lynching town isn't necessarily a bad thing on day 1) I think the only thing of value I've done at this point is make Scripten appear more town, which I s'pose is better than nothing (assuming that they actually are town)
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: notquitethere on January 11, 2015, 12:54:13 pm
John Butcher was a highwayman by trade, good dishonest work and wasn't going to take these insinuations as to his character.

"There's no way I could impeach any of yers, you maggot-pated jingle brained cully cony bully-fops!" cried out the highwayman in a stream of invective cant, "there's the kings ransom on me head and you all know it!"

"I've a mind to prove this!" replied one of the others, grabbing Butcher by his arms while another grabbed his legs. Together they hauled him to a tavern frequented by a renowned thief-taker. Right enough, there was a warrant out for butcher which hadn't been commuted. There was no way he was the traitor. However, to find this out, they had to hand him in and by that point the poor John was as good as hanged...


Hector13 was lynched. Hector13 was a regular townie.

The gang split up and some time later met back at Tyburn square for the next hanging day. There was their hapless highwayman friend being fitted for the noose. And who was that standing next to him? Jack Splinters! Their smuggler associate had been impeached by two unknown gangmembers for helping flood the city with duty free gin. The thieves made their way straight to the garrett: with two traitors still in their midst, time was running out.

Deus Asmoth has been night killed. Deus Asmoth was a regular townie.



Day 2 - Hard Words and Sharp Blades

The wardrobe and bed were piled against the door. Swords were drawn as the five stood in a circle. There wouldn't be any taking to the courts or hangings from now: the traitor was to die by their fellows hands...

Vote Tally
Dani
UXLZ
Supercharazad
Scripten
TheDarkStar

Not voting: Dani, UXLZ, Supercharazad, Scripten, TheDarkStar

The day will end in 48 hours: Tuesday 13, 6pm GMT (on my birthday)
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: TheDarkStar on January 11, 2015, 01:07:04 pm
We're now at LyLo (Lynch-or-Lose), meaning that we HAVE to lynch scum today or we lose.

-Longer post with analysis of the first day later today-

Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: Scripten on January 11, 2015, 01:54:34 pm
Dani: You were very quiet during day 1 and never voted anyone by day's end. Why not?

TheDarkStar: Hi TDS. You're a fairly experienced player. Can you give me a run-down of everything you've contributed to this game? I'd like to see you give me an overview of your play thus far.

UXLZ & Supercharazad: Can you give a reads list on the other players? I'd like to know how you rank them from most scummy to most town.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day -1: The First Hanging
Post by: Supercharazad on January 11, 2015, 02:19:16 pm
Shit, now I'm not sure. I was pretty certain Hector was scum.

Dani -
Spoiler (click to show/hide)

TheDarkStar - Joined the bandwagon on voting Hector just before the end of the day with shaky reasoning.

Scripten - I do not even know what to think, I haven't seen him act particularly scummy but this might just be me failing to notice things.

UXLZ - Much of the case against him seems to have been that he appeared to be Hector's scumbuddy. Would have been top of the list of Hector had been scum.

Supercharazad - I know I'm town, therefore I'm town and I don't suspect myself of being scum.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 2 - Hard Words and Sharp Swords
Post by: UXLZ on January 11, 2015, 07:20:41 pm
I think towards the end of this we will have to do a role call... It may be our only hope in this sort of situation. We still have 2 power roles and a single regular townie. The power roles can't be contested (and if they are, it's a terrible idea for the mafia), the single regular townie will know who the scum are, and we'll have to hope that they're capable of opening our eyes. Also, a 2/3 chance is better than a 2/5 chance.
Regardless, I do think that a role call, at some point, is necessary.

Also, it isn't technically LyLo because the Doctor can still save someone.

@Scripten

Spoiler: Most to Least Scummy (click to show/hide)

DarkStar sounding the death knell for hector without actually giving a reason for thinking he's scum. The others can be acquitted because they were scumhunting and screwed up, but DarkStar just kind of put in the last second vote while 'whistling casually'. I have other reasons for suspecting DarkStar in a post on page 5 of this thread, I believe.

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

Something just makes me feel uneasy about Scripten. Not nearly enough to make me vote for him over DarkStar though.

Dani/Charazad. Lack of activity. It's kind of a normal scum thing, to stay out of the limelight and all, but I can't make myself vote for either of them over DarkStar.

Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 2 - Hard Words and Sharp Swords
Post by: UXLZ on January 11, 2015, 07:21:26 pm
Oh, probably shouldn't have put that in a spoiler. Currently I am voting for DarkStar, again.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 2 - Hard Words and Sharp Swords
Post by: Dani on January 11, 2015, 09:19:32 pm
Dani: You were very quiet during day 1 and never voted anyone by day's end. Why not?
After I unvoted TDS (since you explained the no-hammer mechanic), things got kind of convoluted between you and hector13 and UXLZ, with the back-and-forth of multiple talking points and everything. I wasn't planning to vote for anyone circa my last post, but I did forget that it was Day end, and fell asleep. Yes, I know, this makes me look even more noncommittal, but that is what I did yesterDay.

As for my constant flipping, that was
*Holds both tongue and suspicions in check*

UXLZ: Why do you think counterclaiming would be a bad idea for the mafia? Both roles would be easy to fake, considering the information the mafia has.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 2 - Hard Words and Sharp Swords
Post by: UXLZ on January 11, 2015, 09:57:14 pm
Dani: Because it narrows down who they are, obviously. At the moment town's chances, even if lynching at random, are 2/5. Any sort of roleclaiming makes those odds better, it's simple math.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 2 - Hard Words and Sharp Swords
Post by: TheDarkStar on January 11, 2015, 10:27:05 pm
I was actually going to reply to hector, but I misread the time that the day ended and thought that there was a chance to question him. Just before I posted in reply, I noticed that the had day ended at 11:40 (my time) rather than ending in the future at 1 o'clock.

Anyway, where do you not see me giving a reason for why I found hector scummy?

hector13: Why are you pressure voting me to get me to post more when you say that you suspect both Deus and Scripten? Why did you unvote Scripten after explaining why you thought he was so scummy?

I pointed out that he was voting for reasons that he was not detailing. If he had been scum, I probably would have gone after Scripten because of the way that he was not voting for him despite a long list of reasons.

On role call: Your logic has a problem: The scum can claim power roles, forcing town to choose between them and the real one. On the other hand, the cop has an inspect result that can be used to clear a player or point out one of the scum.

You are right that it might not be LyLo if the doctor picks the right target, but it will be a 1/12 chance (because the doctor will have to correctly pick the vanilla townie out of four and the scum will have to pick the vanilla townie out of three).

Scripten:

My play hasn't consisted of much so far - the game started near a weekend which caused me to post less. I've questioned UXLZ and Hector, but not really anyone else yet.

Everyone who has not posted reads yet: Post them. Here's mine:

Dani: Null read mostly - Post more!

UXLZ: Town lean - Scumhunting and strategizing for the town, although I've had some doubts about him (especially an odd Day 1 post)

Supercharazard - Slight town lean - Not that active, but has done some scumhunting. Post more!

Scripten - Null read or slight scum lean - Puts effort but doesn't make strong cases. Also made the tiebreaker vote on hector. However, there is definitely some scumhunting going on.

PPE: Fakeclaiming for mafia is actually a good idea. If they don't, it's a 2/3 chance to hit lynch one of them. If one of them does, it's a 1/2 chance.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 2 - Hard Words and Sharp Swords
Post by: TheDarkStar on January 11, 2015, 10:28:34 pm
EBWOP: UXLZ should be marked as neutral read or slight scum lean.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 2 - Hard Words and Sharp Swords
Post by: UXLZ on January 11, 2015, 11:00:38 pm
Quote
PPE: Fakeclaiming for mafia is actually a good idea. If they don't, it's a 2/3 chance to hit lynch one of them. If one of them does, it's a 1/2 chance.

I really don't know what you're saying here. My math isn't incorrect, I know that for sure, so I can't see how a role call could possibly hurt our chances. It's currently a LyLo situation so we really need all the advantages we can get.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 2 - Hard Words and Sharp Swords
Post by: UXLZ on January 11, 2015, 11:04:29 pm
Quote
On role call: Your logic has a problem: The scum can claim power roles, forcing town to choose between them and the real one. On the other hand, the cop has an inspect result that can be used to clear a player or point out one of the scum.

That's only if you're willing to believe the cop is who they say they are. Also, as I've been saying, even if the scum claim power roles then it still increases town's chances of hitting the right one. If it misses it's game over anyway, even without the role claiming.

Just to be certain though, do you support roleclaiming, or reject it?
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 2 - Hard Words and Sharp Swords
Post by: Dani on January 12, 2015, 12:45:06 am
Quote
PPE: Fakeclaiming for mafia is actually a good idea. If they don't, it's a 2/3 chance to hit lynch one of them. If one of them does, it's a 1/2 chance.
I really don't know what you're saying here. My math isn't incorrect, I know that for sure, so I can't see how a role call could possibly hurt our chances. It's currently a LyLo situation so we really need all the advantages we can get.
Okay, I see where you're coming from now, and the math works out so that, optimally, at least one of the mafia has to fakeclaim. UXLZ, TDS isn't saying that massclaim is a bad idea: he's just saying that scum has to fakeclaim to maximize their chance of winning.

As for a reads list, I'm not really one for compiling evidence, but
UXLZ & Scripten: Both town, after seeing their interaction yesterday. But if either one says otherwise, I'd have to concede to them because this read is only my gut feeling.
Charazad: His questions D1 felt weird, as if only tangential to the discussion. Only goes after the easily lynched. Stretches my actions D1 to paint me as a frustrated wagon-starter. Scum.
TheDarkStar: Scum by process of elimination, but I super doubted myself when he posted.

In any case, more information is required for a proper decision. I support the idea of massclaiming toDay.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 2 - Hard Words and Sharp Swords
Post by: UXLZ on January 12, 2015, 01:27:22 am
We'll wait for a few more people to input before actually starting the massclaim, but I'll just mention that my role is actually in one of my earlier posts. Unfortunately, it's totally useless information since I was the one who proposed the massclaim in the first place and could have easily used this to set the person who actually has that role up. (If I was scum, that is.) Basically, if one of the scum decides to claim my role it will be my word vs. theirs.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 2 - Hard Words and Sharp Swords
Post by: notquitethere on January 12, 2015, 10:49:42 am
"Who are you really?" asked one of them.

"You know who I am!"

"That's exactly what someone who I didn't know would say!"


Vote Tally
Dani - [1] Supercharazad
UXLZ
Supercharazad
Scripten
TheDarkStar - [1] UXLZ

Not voting: Scripten, TheDarkStar, Dani

Day ends Tuesday 13, 6pm GMT in about 26 hours
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 2 - Hard Words and Sharp Swords
Post by: Supercharazad on January 12, 2015, 01:20:25 pm
Charazad: His questions D1 felt weird, as if only tangential to the discussion. Only goes after the easily lynched. Stretches my actions D1 to paint me as a frustrated wagon-starter. Scum.

If I'm scum, why the fuck aren't you voting for me? As far as I can see, you're afraid that I'll call that out as an OMGUS. Furthermore, this seems to be aimed at getting somebody else to vote for me so that you can more easily jump on their arguments, as you did in D1.
I should also point out that I went after exactly one person on day one, and was the first person to either suspect or vote for them once they started to appear to be scum. My read was wrong, but nevertheless it invalidates your argument that I only go after the easily lynched.
This supports my claim that your aim with this post is to fabricate arguments against me such that if others make arguments for you, you can jump on their bandwagon easily whilst claiming that you suspected me from the start.

At this point, I am fairly certain that you are scum.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 2 - Hard Words and Sharp Swords
Post by: Scripten on January 12, 2015, 04:10:56 pm
UXLZ:

I think towards the end of this we will have to do a role call... It may be our only hope in this sort of situation. We still have 2 power roles and a single regular townie. The power roles can't be contested (and if they are, it's a terrible idea for the mafia), the single regular townie will know who the scum are, and we'll have to hope that they're capable of opening our eyes. Also, a 2/3 chance is better than a 2/5 chance.
Regardless, I do think that a role call, at some point, is necessary.

Also, it isn't technically LyLo because the Doctor can still save someone.

Since we have an open setup, a mass-call isn't a bad idea, especially since the cop will have a result on someone, assuming they did not investigate Deus Asmoth. I would prefer that we do not treat today as anything but LyLo, though, because, as pointed out, the odds are against us at that point. However,

Something just makes me feel uneasy about Scripten. Not nearly enough to make me vote for him over DarkStar though.

Dani/Charazad. Lack of activity. It's kind of a normal scum thing, to stay out of the limelight and all, but I can't make myself vote for either of them over DarkStar.

So you find a gut feeling more indicative of scum than actual evidence with scum-sided intent? This worries me, especially given my read on your slot.

TheDarkStar:

I pointed out that he was voting for reasons that he was not detailing. If he had been scum, I probably would have gone after Scripten because of the way that he was not voting for him despite a long list of reasons.

Mod error. I was voting for hector13.

My play hasn't consisted of much so far - the game started near a weekend which caused me to post less. I've questioned UXLZ and Hector, but not really anyone else yet.

This is disappointing. We're in LyLo and the game ends tomorrow if we don't catch scum. Right now, the majority of your content in this game is speculation about the setup and debating the semantics of LyLo. I don't care much for that. I'm also rather bothered by your play due to the game this post is in (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=144554.msg5767611#msg5767611). You're playing the same way as you were in that game in which you were scum.

You've done nothing but sheep me and throw some toothless gak at people. Oh, and setup/stats speculation, but that's just fluff.

Everyone who has not posted reads yet: Post them. Here's mine:

Dani: Null read mostly - Post more!

UXLZ: Town lean - Scumhunting and strategizing for the town, although I've had some doubts about him (especially an odd Day 1 post)

Supercharazard - Slight town lean - Not that active, but has done some scumhunting. Post more!

Scripten - Null read or slight scum lean - Puts effort but doesn't make strong cases. Also made the tiebreaker vote on hector. However, there is definitely some scumhunting going on.

This is pretty lackluster. You've referenced only a single actual event; the rest of your supporting cases are generic enough that you could reorder them onto other players and nobody would notice. So you have exactly two actual reads, and your scumread on me is... tenuous at best. You're saying that I don't make strong cases. Prove it.

You're skating by this game, TheDarkStar and you're going to have to do better than that.

UXLZ 2.0:

We'll wait for a few more people to input before actually starting the massclaim, but I'll just mention that my role is actually in one of my earlier posts. Unfortunately, it's totally useless information since I was the one who proposed the massclaim in the first place and could have easily used this to set the person who actually has that role up. (If I was scum, that is.) Basically, if one of the scum decides to claim my role it will be my word vs. theirs.

I'll go first.

I'm the vanilla townie. I will expect one scum to counterclaim me and one to counterclaim the doctor. It would make the most sense. However, I would discourage talking about this, lest we give the scum advice on what to do from here on out.



Reads List
~Most Town~
Dani - Town. His activity levels are low, but his reads do not look fabricated. He has not scumhunted much, but I see this coming more from a newbie perspective than a scum perspective. His voting activities are actually more likely to call attention to him than to make him skim under the radar and, especially given that he is a town PR.
UXLZ - More likely town. While I was suspicious of him before, with hector13 flipping town, I'm inclined to see UXLZ's interactions coming from a townie mindset. I may be wrong here, though.
Supercharazad - More likely scum. Lurking throughout the game, defensive, and very little actual scumhunting. Also drops a few mild scumtells during later D1, notably staying out of the way and egging on other arguments which were, apparently, town vs. town. He may also be newbie town, but I do not see townie earnestness in his posts.
TheDarkStar - Scum. I've detailed why above.
~Most Scum~
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 2 - Hard Words and Sharp Swords
Post by: Dani on January 12, 2015, 05:11:52 pm
I'm the doctor.

((have to go to class, I'll be back at 9 am GMT))
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 2 - Hard Words and Sharp Swords
Post by: TheDarkStar on January 12, 2015, 06:38:23 pm
UXLZ:

I think towards the end of this we will have to do a role call... It may be our only hope in this sort of situation. We still have 2 power roles and a single regular townie. The power roles can't be contested (and if they are, it's a terrible idea for the mafia), the single regular townie will know who the scum are, and we'll have to hope that they're capable of opening our eyes. Also, a 2/3 chance is better than a 2/5 chance.
Regardless, I do think that a role call, at some point, is necessary.

Also, it isn't technically LyLo because the Doctor can still save someone.

Since we have an open setup, a mass-call isn't a bad idea, especially since the cop will have a result on someone, assuming they did not investigate Deus Asmoth. I would prefer that we do not treat today as anything but LyLo, though, because, as pointed out, the odds are against us at that point. However,

Something just makes me feel uneasy about Scripten. Not nearly enough to make me vote for him over DarkStar though.

Dani/Charazad. Lack of activity. It's kind of a normal scum thing, to stay out of the limelight and all, but I can't make myself vote for either of them over DarkStar.

So you find a gut feeling more indicative of scum than actual evidence with scum-sided intent? This worries me, especially given my read on your slot.

TheDarkStar:

I pointed out that he was voting for reasons that he was not detailing. If he had been scum, I probably would have gone after Scripten because of the way that he was not voting for him despite a long list of reasons.

Mod error. I was voting for hector13.

My play hasn't consisted of much so far - the game started near a weekend which caused me to post less. I've questioned UXLZ and Hector, but not really anyone else yet.

This is disappointing. We're in LyLo and the game ends tomorrow if we don't catch scum. Right now, the majority of your content in this game is speculation about the setup and debating the semantics of LyLo. I don't care much for that. I'm also rather bothered by your play due to the game this post is in (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=144554.msg5767611#msg5767611). You're playing the same way as you were in that game in which you were scum.

You've done nothing but sheep me and throw some toothless gak at people. Oh, and setup/stats speculation, but that's just fluff.

Everyone who has not posted reads yet: Post them. Here's mine:

Dani: Null read mostly - Post more!

UXLZ: Town lean - Scumhunting and strategizing for the town, although I've had some doubts about him (especially an odd Day 1 post)

Supercharazard - Slight town lean - Not that active, but has done some scumhunting. Post more!

Scripten - Null read or slight scum lean - Puts effort but doesn't make strong cases. Also made the tiebreaker vote on hector. However, there is definitely some scumhunting going on.

This is pretty lackluster. You've referenced only a single actual event; the rest of your supporting cases are generic enough that you could reorder them onto other players and nobody would notice. So you have exactly two actual reads, and your scumread on me is... tenuous at best. You're saying that I don't make strong cases. Prove it.

You're skating by this game, TheDarkStar and you're going to have to do better than that.

UXLZ 2.0:

We'll wait for a few more people to input before actually starting the massclaim, but I'll just mention that my role is actually in one of my earlier posts. Unfortunately, it's totally useless information since I was the one who proposed the massclaim in the first place and could have easily used this to set the person who actually has that role up. (If I was scum, that is.) Basically, if one of the scum decides to claim my role it will be my word vs. theirs.

I'll go first.

I'm the vanilla townie. I will expect one scum to counterclaim me and one to counterclaim the doctor. It would make the most sense. However, I would discourage talking about this, lest we give the scum advice on what to do from here on out.



Reads List
~Most Town~
Dani - Town. His activity levels are low, but his reads do not look fabricated. He has not scumhunted much, but I see this coming more from a newbie perspective than a scum perspective. His voting activities are actually more likely to call attention to him than to make him skim under the radar and, especially given that he is a town PR.
UXLZ - More likely town. While I was suspicious of him before, with hector13 flipping town, I'm inclined to see UXLZ's interactions coming from a townie mindset. I may be wrong here, though.
Supercharazad - More likely scum. Lurking throughout the game, defensive, and very little actual scumhunting. Also drops a few mild scumtells during later D1, notably staying out of the way and egging on other arguments which were, apparently, town vs. town. He may also be newbie town, but I do not see townie earnestness in his posts.
TheDarkStar - Scum. I've detailed why above.
~Most Scum~

Scripten:

Why do you find Charazard (btw, Charazad or Charazard?) scummy? You detail your reads for everyone else, but then just note he's scummy and move on.

Other than plan for the town (which you note is towny in the case of UXLZ, a ridiculous double standard) and scumhunt (which you dismiss), yes, there hasn't been much else going on. That's because if you disregard all my posts, yes, you happen to have nothing left. Case in point:

Quote
You've done nothing but sheep me and throw some toothless gak at people. Oh, and setup/stats speculation, but that's just fluff.

You say this, and yet it makes UXLZ town when he does the exact same things. Why?

Why do you think UXLZ is town despite worries? Why do you find Dani so likely to be town when you have practically nothing to go off of? These facts indicate that you have insider information and don't need to read posts to know if people are town or not.

At this point, I think you're down to no reads that are based on anything or that aren't up to how you interpret different people making the same actions. Why am I not voting for you? Because I'm the doctor (and targeted UXLZ last night). I know for a fact that Dani is lying.

Dani: Who did you claim to target last night? Why?

Rolecop (charazard or UXLZ): Who did you pick, what was the result, and why did you pick them?
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 2 - Hard Words and Sharp Swords
Post by: TheDarkStar on January 12, 2015, 06:44:02 pm
EBWOP for formatting:

Dani: Who do you claim to target last night? Why?

Rolecop (charazard or UXLZ): Who did you pick, what was the result, and why did you pick them?
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 2 - Hard Words and Sharp Swords
Post by: Scripten on January 12, 2015, 07:23:42 pm
Wow, that's some crazy misrep going on there.

Why do you find Charazard (btw, Charazad or Charazard?) scummy? You detail your reads for everyone else, but then just note he's scummy and move on.

Uhh... no, I don't? My read on Supercharazad has the most detail of all my reads, save for yours. Are you reading my posts?

Other than plan for the town (which you note is towny in the case of UXLZ, a ridiculous double standard) and scumhunt (which you dismiss), yes, there hasn't been much else going on. That's because if you disregard all my posts, yes, you happen to have nothing left.

I asked you to tell me what you have done all game. You came up with less than I did when I looked, so I was nothing if not charitable. So exactly what am I supposed to take from that?

What scumhunting have you done? Please provide examples.

You say this, and yet it makes UXLZ town when he does the exact same things. Why?

I'm not scumreading you for having fluff and emptiness in your posts. I'm scumreading you for having nothing but that. Big difference.

Why do you think UXLZ is town despite worries?

Process of elimination. One of {UXLZ, Supercharazad} is scum, and UXLZ seems more townie to me. That read may change, but it's anything but null.

Why do you find Dani so likely to be town when you have practically nothing to go off of? These facts indicate that you have insider information and don't need to read posts to know if people are town or not.

Then obviously you haven't been looking into the tone with which Dani is posting. Not that you would need to, since you're scum, but his posts read as an earnest newbie. His reads list comes from a townie mindset.

At this point, I think you're down to no reads that are based on anything or that aren't up to how you interpret different people making the same actions.

You know, just regurgitating what I use to build my case on you isn't going to help you when it's obvious that you aren't paying attention to my posts.

Why am I not voting for you? Because I'm the doctor (and targeted UXLZ last night). I know for a fact that Dani is lying.

I knew you wouldn't pick me, since town would have to decide between yourself and me instead of Dani and you, and you see Dani as being more likely as a mislynch. Congrats for passing scum 101.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 2 - Hard Words and Sharp Swords
Post by: UXLZ on January 12, 2015, 11:00:04 pm
Okay, my roleclaim: Cop. I don't have detail on anyone. Why? I was intending to investigate Hector, but everyone lynched him while I was away and since this is a Sprint game there was no night-phase for me to actually choose someone else instead.

Essentially what happened was this:

Me: Intend on investigating Hector, go to sleep.
Me: Wake up, Hector lynched, no investigation results.

Kinda got screwed a little by the game format. 
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 2 - Hard Words and Sharp Swords
Post by: UXLZ on January 12, 2015, 11:06:50 pm
Even more so screwed since no one seems to be counterclaiming Cop and a single read could be the difference between victory and defeat. (For instance, I'd know if either Scripten or DarkStar were what they say they are.)
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 2 - Hard Words and Sharp Swords
Post by: Scripten on January 12, 2015, 11:07:01 pm
Okay, my roleclaim: Cop. I don't have detail on anyone. Why? I was intending to investigate Hector, but everyone lynched him while I was away and since this is a Sprint game there was no night-phase for me to actually choose someone else instead.

Essentially what happened was this:

Me: Intend on investigating Hector, go to sleep.
Me: Wake up, Hector lynched, no investigation results.

Kinda got screwed a little by the game format.

This is believable and it makes absolutely no sense for scum to fake-claim this way.

UXLZ is town. Supercharazad is scum. Due to the way TheDarkStar defended him, TDS is further associated with his scumbuddy. We've solved the game.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 2 - Hard Words and Sharp Swords
Post by: Scripten on January 12, 2015, 11:09:10 pm
From here on out, it makes the most sense to lynch Supercharazad, since UXLZ is now more confirmed as town than Dani is, despite my prior read on Dani.

Unvote TheDarkStar
Vote Supercharazad
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 2 - Hard Words and Sharp Swords
Post by: UXLZ on January 12, 2015, 11:45:28 pm
Okay, so the roleclaims are:

Cop: Myself (uncontested)
Doctor: TheDarkStar vs. Dani

I'd prefer to lynch DarkStar today, if we're believing that Dani is town. My death is certain tonight, (assuming we aren't all being deceived by Scripten and the game actually reaches the next night) since I'm the cop.


Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 2 - Hard Words and Sharp Swords
Post by: Dani on January 13, 2015, 07:58:01 am
Last Night I targeted Scripten, because I town read both him and UXLZ yesterDay, but there was kind of a versus between them and I think if one died, the other would have been the target of a mislynch (maybe from hector13, who I thought was scum, attacking UXLZ again) the next Day. I didn't target UXLZ because I felt Scripten would have been able to defend himself better.
Deus was killed instead, which gave me no idea for a motive. Would this be a case of scum "removing information" from their NK, that I read about in another game?

TheDarkStar seems to have given up and is now townreading Scripten, since he believed the VT claim (by saying cop was either UXLZ/Charazad). It felt weird because he didn't mention townreading Scripten at all, and puts an FoS on him in the same post. Although it's possible that Charazad will claim VT. Or also that Scripten is on the scumteam, and he's planning to throw his buddy under the bus and win the game with his untarnished towncred. However, I don't think either of these is likely. Just my paranoia.

At UXLZ's surprisingly logically sound request (given what I believe to be true),
Vote TheDarkStar

Also, yeah, Town PRs don't get the information from the flip to help with their Night choice, and I'm assuming scum basically have Day-talk. Sprint seems kinda skewed.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 2 - Hard Words and Sharp Swords
Post by: UXLZ on January 13, 2015, 08:12:30 am
The biggest issue I can see is Scripten not coming online again before the end of the day... Should we go for an extension, Dani?
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 2 - Hard Words and Sharp Swords
Post by: Scripten on January 13, 2015, 08:37:59 am
I won't be able to get on until later in the day, so I am going to put in my vote for an extend.

I'll switch my vote to TheDarkStar before leaving for class to avoid a no-lynch which will lose the game for us, but I'd like to talk more before the end of the day.

Unvote Supercharazad
Vote TheDarkStar
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 2 - Hard Words and Sharp Swords
Post by: Dani on January 13, 2015, 09:24:13 am
An extend sounds like a good idea.

...Hey. UXLZ.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 2 - Hard Words and Sharp Swords
Post by: UXLZ on January 13, 2015, 09:30:31 am
Well, the extend's going to kick in at this point since we have the minimum votes. Now's just time to wait for Scripten to talk about whatever it was that they wanted to talk about.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 2 - Hard Words and Sharp Swords
Post by: notquitethere on January 13, 2015, 01:40:30 pm
Just as one of the thieves was about to be beheaded, there came a general clamour for more time to consider the matter... a stay of execution.

Vote Tally
Dani - [2] Supercharazad, TheDarkStar
UXLZ
Supercharazad
Scripten
TheDarkStar - [3] UXLZ, Dani, Scripten

Day has been extended to Wednesday 14, 6pm GMT.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 2 - Hard Words and Sharp Swords
Post by: Scripten on January 13, 2015, 03:20:06 pm
Well, the extend's going to kick in at this point since we have the minimum votes. Now's just time to wait for Scripten to talk about whatever it was that they wanted to talk about.

I didn't really have anything in particular to talk about. I just didn't want the day to end when there were a couple of players who haven't spoken up. Looking at the current vote count, it sure looks like the scumteam is currently voting Dani and town is voting TheDarkStar. I really think we've solved the game and the scumteam has hence given up, but I want to be sure and to give the town time to speak up.

Extensions are usually good for the town, though there are cases where they can be detrimental. One of the major town-killers is apathy, and extending too often can make town players take risks that they otherwise would not for the sake of generating content, which is a scum-sided situation. On the other hand, if discussion is ongoing constantly up to deadline, to the extent that people are still talking after deadline has been hit, then extending is almost always town-sided.

Both of you guys' most recent posts reek of town mentality, though, so I'm not worried even after the reread I just did.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 2 - Hard Words and Sharp Swords
Post by: TheDarkStar on January 13, 2015, 08:14:29 pm
I don't see what making this day any longer will do. The scum are about to kill me and the town will lose. One question, though:

Dani, why are you certain that Scripten is the vanilla townie?
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 2 - Hard Words and Sharp Swords
Post by: TheDarkStar on January 13, 2015, 08:30:37 pm
Okay, my roleclaim: Cop. I don't have detail on anyone. Why? I was intending to investigate Hector, but everyone lynched him while I was away and since this is a Sprint game there was no night-phase for me to actually choose someone else instead.

Essentially what happened was this:

Me: Intend on investigating Hector, go to sleep.
Me: Wake up, Hector lynched, no investigation results.

Kinda got screwed a little by the game format.

This is believable and it makes absolutely no sense for scum to fake-claim this way.

UXLZ is town. Supercharazad is scum. Due to the way TheDarkStar defended him, TDS is further associated with his scumbuddy. We've solved the game.

Why wouldn't scum fake-claim this way? It's much easier for scum to claim that they missed inspecting than to make up an inspect target and correctly guess the role.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 2 - Hard Words and Sharp Swords
Post by: Dani on January 13, 2015, 09:52:05 pm
...correctly guess the role.
The Cop is a Macho alignment-Cop (not a roleCop), according to the roles list in post #0.[/nitpick]
Dani, why are you certain that Scripten is the vanilla townie?

In any case, you seem to be treating the person contesting your claim as someone whose thoughts are worth finding out. This kind of really cements my scumread on you.

~~~

...but I'll just mention that my role is actually in one of my earlier posts.
UXLZ, is this still a thing that you're going to show us?
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 2 - Hard Words and Sharp Swords
Post by: Scripten on January 13, 2015, 10:47:28 pm
TheDarkStar:

I don't see what making this day any longer will do. The scum are about to kill me and the town will lose. One question, though:

TDS, if you are town, I will have some severe words for you post-game about this post. AtE like this just cements my scum read on you. When you are town, you should be trying to find scum, not just trying to stop town from lynching you by being defeatist. That said, I doubt you are town.

Why wouldn't scum fake-claim this way? It's much easier for scum to claim that they missed inspecting than to make up an inspect target and correctly guess the role.

Like Dani said, the scum could fake claim any town player and be perfectly fine. This feels like a bit of a scumslip, as scum would be concerned about roles much more than alignment, while townies would be inclined to want to know players' alignments over their roles.

Just food for thought.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 2 - Hard Words and Sharp Swords
Post by: UXLZ on January 14, 2015, 01:59:46 am
What the hell is an AtE?

Also, @ Dani, sure. In this post

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

DarkStar sounding the death knell for hector without actually giving a reason for thinking he's scum. The others can be acquitted because they were scumhunting and screwed up, but DarkStar just kind of put in the last second vote while 'whistling casually'. I have other reasons for suspecting DarkStar in a post on page 5 of this thread, I believe.

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

Something just makes me feel uneasy about Scripten. Not nearly enough to make me vote for him over DarkStar though.

Dani/Charazad. Lack of activity. It's kind of a normal scum thing, to stay out of the limelight and all, but I can't make myself vote for either of them over DarkStar.
[/quote][/spoiler]

Open the spoiler with the quote from DarkStar and highlight the area underneath the bolded 'Dani and Deus Asmoth.'
It simply says 'I am the Cop'. =\
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 2 - Hard Words and Sharp Swords
Post by: UXLZ on January 14, 2015, 02:00:21 am
Oh blarghity blargh, the format sure got messed up. Still, just follow the instructions.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 2 - Hard Words and Sharp Swords
Post by: Scripten on January 14, 2015, 09:00:00 am
What the hell is an AtE?

Sorry, AtE means Appeal to Emotion. It's a tactic sometimes used by scum to make town feel sympathetic toward them, possibly by showing a defeatist attitude or, in less savory cases, bringing real life events into the mix.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 2 - Hard Words and Sharp Swords
Post by: Dani on January 14, 2015, 09:13:34 am
*crumb*
Alright. I didn't know that using invisible text was within game rules. Going to highlight every post from now on.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 3 - Cold Revenge
Post by: notquitethere on January 14, 2015, 02:20:49 pm
Will Snaffler, scourge of the handkerchief-owning populace of the city, backed against the wall. One of the others had a sword to his neck.

"I.. I needed the money alright. Any of you would have done the same!"

His assailant sadly looked down, "That's the thing, Will, most of us would never betray a friend." With that, Will's gut was punctured by three swords simultaneously, and after a few more hacks he lay bleeding on the ground.


TheDarkStar was lynched. TheDarkStar was a mafia goon.

The living reposed for a night and awoke refreshed and ready to hunt out the final traitor.

No one died in the night.



Day 3 - Cold Revenge

The four were walking back from the river where they'd weighted Will's body down with pried-up cobblestones. By uneasy agreement they climbed to the top of the tenement once more, to hammer out who would be killed next. There in the chilly room they began to argue once more...

Vote Tally
Dani
UXLZ
Supercharazad
Scripten

Not voting: Dani, UXLZ, Supercharazad, Scripten

The day will end in 48 hours: Friday 13, 7.20pm GMT
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 3 - Cold Revenge
Post by: Scripten on January 14, 2015, 03:37:49 pm
Targets for the night and results, everyone?

I'm assuming Supercharazad is the last scum, but I would like to make sure that TheDarkStar was not busing his buddy. Of course, we're all pretty much in the clear, but it doesn't hurt to have information out.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 3 - Cold Revenge
Post by: TheDarkStar on January 14, 2015, 04:57:46 pm
Bah. I'll save further comments for after the game is over.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 3 - Cold Revenge
Post by: UXLZ on January 14, 2015, 07:12:57 pm
I... Didn't set anyone. I was expecting to be killed. That was a huuuge cock-up on my part. The first night could be excused but I really don't know why I didn't set anyone.

God damned Sprint format.

I still don't understand why *no one* was killed. Did they decide to target Scripten?
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 3 - Cold Revenge
Post by: UXLZ on January 14, 2015, 08:24:07 pm
Oh, while I'm here. SuperCharazad
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 3 - Cold Revenge
Post by: Dani on January 14, 2015, 08:48:32 pm
I protected Scripten during the Night, since the Cop is unprotectable, and if Charazad was the one who died, his roleflip would make it obvious which one of you was the actual scum. This is still MyLo, though, and a lack of death could just as well be the result of scum sending in no Night kill. I'm actually surprised that UXLZ wasn't the NK target, unlike what he had predicted.

Charazad hasn't come in to claim yet. If there are any votes to shorten, I'm afraid I must oppose until he, at the least, tries to defend himself. Without information from him yesterDay, after the TheDarkStar wagon formed, I cannot be certain of anyone's alignment. That investigation could have been really helpful here.

But then again, Charazad logged in again about an hour after Scripten's post. Make of that what you will.

Since there are no hammers in this game, and I'm certain that my actions make this Day shorten-proof, I'm going to go and Vote Supercharazad .
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 3 - Cold Revenge
Post by: UXLZ on January 14, 2015, 09:35:13 pm
The fact that no one was killed is actually very strange. The mafia know exactly who our roles are: Dani is confirmed doctor, I'm unopposed Cop, and Scripten is quite likely town. Did they actually target Scripten knowing he's the only person the Doctor can heal?
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 3 - Cold Revenge
Post by: Scripten on January 14, 2015, 10:36:14 pm
It's also very possible that Supercharazad has just given up. If he is town, however, he needs to show up and start doing some work.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 3 - Cold Revenge
Post by: Supercharazad on January 15, 2015, 12:51:34 pm
Haven't actually been able to use any internet apart from 3G on my incredibly shit phone for the last while, so I wasn't really capable of posting anything of any substance whatsoever. In retrospect, I probably should have just asked for a replacement, but I'm back on my desktop now and can post with some degree of regularity.


First of all, Dani is scum, as I said before. I wasn't around to claim cop when he did, but I'm going to go ahead and do that now.

I am the cop.

As we can see, DarkStar was scum. Going on my actual arguments against Dani, he tried to jump on a failing bandwagon with no real reasoning. As Dani falsely claimed to be the doctor, it's a certainty that he is Darkstar's scumbuddy and that Darkstar tried and failed to throw Dani underneath the bus.
As doctor, I protected Scripten both days on the basis that he is the IC and therefore, if town (which I wasfairly sure he was and am now certain he is), the town's biggest asset. This is likely why there was no kill, the mafia trying and failing to kill Scripten.
Also, UXLZ, are you seriously telling us that you made your role as the cop entirely useless both days? .

So yeah. Been inactive because I was unable to post anything of substance, am back now, Dani is scum, I am the doctor.
At this point I feel that the best course of action would be for us to vote nobody (It's MYLO, so we won't immediately lose) and for UXLZ to investigate me or Dani. Dani will be confirmed scum by the cop, and therefore confirmed scum to us all (Unless UXLZ is secretly the scum, but I can't see that being a possibility).
If UXLZ is nightkilled, then Dani is scum because they murdered him to avoid investigation.

At worst, we stand to lose nothing or win the game by doing that. I'll be protecting Scripten yet again tonight.

The fact that no one was killed is actually very strange. The mafia know exactly who our roles are: Dani is confirmed doctor, I'm unopposed Cop, and Scripten is quite likely town. Did they actually target Scripten knowing he's the only person the Doctor can heal?
Doctors can protect themselves, can't they?


Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 3 - Cold Revenge
Post by: Scripten on January 15, 2015, 01:40:13 pm
First of all, Dani is scum, as I said before. I wasn't around to claim cop when he did, but I'm going to go ahead and do that now.

I am the cop.

-snip-

As doctor, I protected Scripten both days on the basis that he is the IC and therefore, if town (which I wasfairly sure he was and am now certain he is), the town's biggest asset.

lol

Vote Supercharazad

Did you forget which role you were fake-claiming midway through your post?
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 3 - Cold Revenge
Post by: Supercharazad on January 15, 2015, 03:26:19 pm
Yes, I committed the most heinous sin of all: The typo.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 3 - Cold Revenge
Post by: Scripten on January 15, 2015, 03:33:27 pm
Twice? Doubt it.

Also, you're pushing for no lynch but voting for Dani. Can you explain that discrepancy?
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 3 - Cold Revenge
Post by: Supercharazad on January 15, 2015, 04:15:34 pm


Twice? Doubt it.
Believe what you want, I made a typo twice. I meant to say that I am the doctor, which now forms the entirety of my suspicion on Dani.

Also, you're pushing for no lynch but voting for Dani. Can you explain that discrepancy?
If we do lynch, I'd rather we lynch and win than mislynch and lose. If people agree to my plan, then we all unvote and the game can be won easily.

Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 3 - Cold Revenge
Post by: Scripten on January 15, 2015, 04:55:03 pm
Believe what you want, I made a typo twice. I meant to say that I am the doctor, which now forms the entirety of my suspicion on Dani.

I find this explanation highly suspect. Can you explain why you may have made this "typo"? Role claims are very rarely subject to typos, as a player's role PM motivates their play all game.

If we do lynch, I'd rather we lynch and win than mislynch and lose. If people agree to my plan, then we all unvote and the game can be won easily.

Or you are conveniently away from the computer come deadline and you push a lynch on town instead of opting for a no-lynch. I don't like that idea.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 3 - Cold Revenge
Post by: Supercharazad on January 15, 2015, 05:10:48 pm
I find this explanation highly suspect. Can you explain why you may have made this "typo"? Role claims are very rarely subject to typos, as a player's role PM motivates their play all game.

Because it's late and I didn't get much sleep last night?

Or you are conveniently away from the computer come deadline and you push a lynch on town instead of opting for a no-lynch. I don't like that idea.

Since I am town, sir, I find it decidedly inconvenient that I was away from my computer.
Basically, I'd rather have a no-lynch than a lynch, but if there must be a lynch then for obvious reasons I'd like it to be the scum. The no-lynch scenario only exists to prove my case against Dani, after all.

Do think that my plan is viable, Scripten? After all, you're the one with the experience here.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 3 - Cold Revenge
Post by: Supercharazad on January 15, 2015, 05:15:44 pm
I should probably mention at this point that now I'm going to sleep, and then I'm going to school. I'll be back in 19 hours or so.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 3 - Cold Revenge
Post by: Dani on January 15, 2015, 11:42:38 pm
... the best course of action would be for us to vote nobody and for UXLZ to investigate me or Dani. If UXLZ is nightkilled, then Dani is scum because they murdered him to avoid investigation.
<Emphasis mine.>
First of all, you need to work on your arguments. UXLZ's death is inevitable, since when I am confirmed as town by the investigation, it automatically points to you as the last scum, by process of elimination. Letting that happen goes against your win condition, so you will definitely NK UXLZ, and the investigation result does not see the light of day.
Saying that UXLZ dies == Dani is scum is a blatant lie. It's not even a plan: you're just falsely associating a probable event with a non-existent cause.
Spoiler: Other slips. (click to show/hide)

~~~

We're in MyLo. The options open to you are mislynch and no lynch. The only person you can push a mislynch on is me. Failing that, your NK after no lynch would have to be either of Scripten and UXLZ, since my death and townflip would confirm you as scum. Scripten is protectable, and UXLZ can provide both of our alignments with certainty. So the obvious choice for you is to kill UXLZ, and try to paint his death to convince Scripten that I'm the last scum. Unfortunately, everyone knows your plan, so it won't work anymore. I applaud your tenacity. +1 for effort, -100 for style.

~~~

My uncertainty is gone, now that Supercharazad has outed himself as scum. Here's my vote to shorten.
Yes, I am definitely still voting for Supercharazad, from my previous post.

...In case it wasn't clear,
Ol' Bertie says die, Supercharazad, you scum!
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 3 - Cold Revenge
Post by: UXLZ on January 16, 2015, 01:54:55 am
Just in case I haven't done this yet, Supercharazad.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 3 - Cold Revenge
Post by: Supercharazad on January 16, 2015, 12:33:27 pm
If I were scum, do you honestly think I'd be stupid enough to vote for the person who the doctor would be most likely to protect?
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 3 - Cold Revenge
Post by: Supercharazad on January 16, 2015, 12:33:47 pm
That is, of course, vote in the scumchat for the nightkill. Obviously.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 3 - Cold Revenge
Post by: Scripten on January 16, 2015, 01:29:06 pm
If I were scum, do you honestly think I'd be stupid enough to vote for the person who the doctor would be most likely to protect?

WIFOM. This doesn't clear you, as it could apply to anyone who was scum. I mean, it is surprising that the cop wasn't killed since we all know it is UXLZ (And if he was scum, he'd know Supercharazad was the cop) but that doesn't really change anything.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 3 - Cold Revenge
Post by: UXLZ on January 16, 2015, 01:31:58 pm
Honestly, the only reason I can think of for no one to have been killed last night would be that the scum got screwed over by the Sprint format as much as I did.

Do you know if you get attacked but were healed, Scripten?
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 3 - Cold Revenge
Post by: UXLZ on January 16, 2015, 01:32:23 pm
Sorry, better way of asking:

If you're attacked but healed, do you know?

Did this happen to you?
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 3 - Cold Revenge
Post by: Scripten on January 16, 2015, 01:49:35 pm
Nah, I didn't get anything, and I don't think you are informed about it, no.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Day 3 - Cold Revenge
Post by: notquitethere on January 16, 2015, 02:21:23 pm
Vote Tally
Dani - Supercharazad
UXLZ
Supercharazad - Dani, UXLZ, Scripten
Scripten

The crooks turn on Ben Powder, sweat pouring from his blue skin in grimy rivulets.

"Now, listen here..."

But they were done listening. They hauled him to the magistrates and the three of solemnly swore he was responsible for the murder of the Snaffler.

Next hanging day the three survivors of the gang watched as Powder swang. With that out of the way, the gang returned to the garret... to plan their next job.


Supercharazad was lynched. Supercharazad was a mafia goon.

Town Have Won!

Spoiler: Actions (click to show/hide)
Spoiler: Role PMs (click to show/hide)

Scum Chat (http://www.quicktopic.com/51/H/CgrA2j7GmNtL)
Dead Chat (http://www.quicktopic.com/51/H/bU23S5X3UDW)
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Game Over - Town Victory
Post by: Supercharazad on January 16, 2015, 02:47:41 pm
Yeah, it was pretty obvious from the end of D2 that we'd lost. Good game.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Game Over - Town Victory
Post by: Scripten on January 16, 2015, 02:54:05 pm
Sweetdiculous.

Good play by the scumteam. Supercharazad, you had some pretty good insights in the scumchat and I'm impressed. In most newbie games, I imagine this sort of planning would have worked masterfully, but we had a pretty exceptional show of townie play by the newer players. I'm legitimately impressed across the board. I'll write up some postmortems about everyone's play soon.

Oh, and if anyone has any questions they'd like to ask, feel free.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Game Over - Town Victory
Post by: notquitethere on January 16, 2015, 03:00:05 pm
This was a nice example of town winning the game with solid hunting rather than relying on power roles.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Game Over - Town Victory
Post by: UXLZ on January 16, 2015, 03:01:36 pm
Yes, this was quite fun, after all. I may have drawn a liiiittle too much attention on day one, but hopefully in games with more experienced people, that kind of show of activity is less uncommon.

Honestly, depending on how things played out, claiming Cop before I did could have won you the game. Of course, I made sure to make it clear that I, as the proposer of the mass-claim was most likely to be scum. Fortunately, I also had 100% logical and factual reasons for why it was in Town's best interests. It would have been a WiFoM situation. Unfortunately, you didn't counterclaim early enough and left it waaay too late. Ignoring your forgetfulness, or whatever it was, in the claiming post, you left if for a whole day before attempting to claim Cop. There's no way someone who was actually Town would do that.

Yeah, us power role players were totally useless. In my case, I literally did nothing. xD
Power role wise, that is.
Actually, so did Dani, come to think of it.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Game Over - Town Victory
Post by: UXLZ on January 16, 2015, 03:11:31 pm
@Scripten

Was the level of activity I showed throughout the game too high? It seems to have made it obvious to the mafia that I was a power role, but at the same time it also helped with the hunting and made them decide to try and use me as a red herring. Which didn't turn out well for them. 
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Game Over - Town Victory
Post by: Supercharazad on January 16, 2015, 05:22:34 pm
No, my intention was to claim doctor, I just managed to write cop instead twice because of the earlier plan for me to claim cop before you could.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Game Over - Town Victory
Post by: Persus13 on January 16, 2015, 07:19:50 pm
Wow, this is the first Sprint Town have won. Congrats town.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Game Over - Town Victory
Post by: Dani on January 16, 2015, 08:22:25 pm
Heehee, got away with faking my N1 action. Yes, I forgot to send one in.
I wouldn't say that we won the game without relying on power roles. I mean, the massclaim marked the start of our win, imo.
Solid play and planning by the scumteam. That was fun.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Game Over - Town Victory
Post by: Scripten on January 17, 2015, 12:20:10 am
@Scripten

Was the level of activity I showed throughout the game too high? It seems to have made it obvious to the mafia that I was a power role, but at the same time it also helped with the hunting and made them decide to try and use me as a red herring. Which didn't turn out well for them.

Nah, there's not really such a thing as being too active, as long as what you are contributing is meaningful and informative. I wouldn't even say that your activity was inordinately high, just that you started getting some WoTs midway through, but that was mitigated. And, frankly, WoTing isn't rare or even particularly anti-town, unless it's to excess. Many experienced players will WoT if the situation is ripe, including myself. Human nature, I suppose.

No, my intention was to claim doctor, I just managed to write cop instead twice because of the earlier plan for me to claim cop before you could.

This is actually a really clear example of a scumslip. While you were probably going to be lynched anyway, I'm glad you made this error so we could have a demonstration of an actual slip. Both UXLZ and Dani townslipped earlier, as well. (Which is actually harder to fake than scumslipping is to avoid, which makes recognizing townslips an incredibly useful tool.) That being said, if you had claimed earlier and made the same slip, it probably would have been less noticeable.

Heehee, got away with faking my N1 action. Yes, I forgot to send one in.
I wouldn't say that we won the game without relying on power roles. I mean, the massclaim marked the start of our win, imo.

The massclaim was a really fantastic idea. We probably would have lynched TheDarkStar anyway, but massclaiming set the scumteam up to out one another.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Game Over - Town Victory
Post by: hector13 on January 17, 2015, 12:25:13 am
Could you give us the examples of townslips you mentioned, in case we missed them?
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Game Over - Town Victory
Post by: Scripten on January 17, 2015, 12:41:16 am
Could you give us the examples of townslips you mentioned, in case we missed them?

Yep. I'm currently working on a fairly long post with IC advice/reads on everyone's play this game, but here are the townslips.

For Dani, his reads list felt insanely town to me. It's harder to put into words than UXLZ's, but the earnestness I felt from the tone in this post in particular would be hard to replicate as scum.

As for a reads list, I'm not really one for compiling evidence, but
UXLZ & Scripten: Both town, after seeing their interaction yesterday. But if either one says otherwise, I'd have to concede to them because this read is only my gut feeling.
Charazad: His questions D1 felt weird, as if only tangential to the discussion. Only goes after the easily lynched. Stretches my actions D1 to paint me as a frustrated wagon-starter. Scum.
TheDarkStar: Scum by process of elimination, but I super doubted myself when he posted.

UXLZ's townslip was really straightforward and I said so in-game. If scum fakeclaimed cop, they would have no reason to try to pretend that they hadn't made an investigation. Actual scum would know exactly who town were and could get at least one townie on their side during fakeclaim, so pretending to have no results is sub-optimal. Again, townslips are not really reproducible, so this will probably never work for UXLZ or anyone who reads this game unless future towns forget about it and scum reading this game do.

Okay, my roleclaim: Cop. I don't have detail on anyone. Why? I was intending to investigate Hector, but everyone lynched him while I was away and since this is a Sprint game there was no night-phase for me to actually choose someone else instead.

Essentially what happened was this:

Me: Intend on investigating Hector, go to sleep.
Me: Wake up, Hector lynched, no investigation results.

Kinda got screwed a little by the game format.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Game Over - Town Victory
Post by: Scripten on January 17, 2015, 01:14:32 am


Postmortem

Deus Asmoth

Seeing as we've played a couple games together so far, I haven't got a ton to say about your play this game. Your scumhunting was good as usual, and I felt that your cases were sound. I would encourage slightly more aggressive play, regardless of my in-game taunts from the last newbie game. (I was actually not wholly truthful when I was scumhunting you. Your play was not terrible and I've been meaning to mention that you needn't feel bad about it. I used the more aggressive playstyle to make you crack rather than to push you to improve your play, since you seemed more susceptible to that type of pressure than any other. You have my belated apologies for the excess harshness.) The only times I was at all suspicious of your play was when hector13 was interacting with you, and seemed to be scumbuddies with you and trying to distance himself from you.

I would also recommend being a little more active and more forthcoming with your thoughts at the end of the day so that town can read where you stand if you get NKd. Low info NKs are scum-sided. Otherwise, good show!

Dani

Be more active! You're a competent player, as shown in the later game, and having you participate earlier on would have helped you keep track of the game better. We did still win, so I can't rag on you too much, but remember that active towns are towns that win. Even from a personal perspective, participating in events is more useful than just watching them. You retain more information and get a more intimate feel for the interaction. This post (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=147264.msg5941574#msg5941574) saved you from a strong scumread on my end. Specifically, unvoting UXLZ because of L-1 is a townslip. (Of course, it's not something that can be replicated, like more townslips.) Also, admitting that you are wrong without making it look like you are trying to take refuge behind your newbie status is pro-town and can help get you townread, though scum usually pull this off poorly and make themselves obvious. Careful with the "why aren't you suspecting me for this scummy behavior" posts like this one (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=147264.msg5944617#msg5944617). While it may help you look like town in natural conversation, outright stating it looks like fishing for towncred.

I don't really have any complaints for after we hit LyLo, though. Good play!

UXLZ

Your entry to the game wasn't too bad. Participating in RVS/RQS isn't actually that big of a deal. That being said, it's pro-town to participate, because the more people in RVS, the faster we get out of RVS and start generating game-related content. I started scumreading you immediately for this post (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=147264.msg5941171#msg5941171) due to the way you brought up the IC being likely scum if they stayed alive the next day. (The reason being that a living IC is WIFOM-bait for day 2's lynch, which is scum-sided.) Slightly experienced scum versus newbie town can turn that to their advantage.

This post (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=147264.msg5941194#msg5941194) rightfully got you a lot of flack. While we mostly went at you because of your question to me, the questions were all weighted toward questions that felt slightly off, like someone was asking them to generate suspicion on another player rather than to help reveal that player's alignment. (I realize how difficult it is to see the difference here. As you become more experienced, you'll start seeing what I mean if you don't now.) Asking people how they would act as scum doesn't really help discern their alignments, since the answers these questions generate are WIFOM-y at best. Hence why I started pushing on you, by asking what your motivation was in asking the question. (Asking for other players to explain their motivations can reveal their alignments, as there's a sort of equation I've stolen from another player on a different site. Basically, motivation + personality = post content. That is, the role PM plus the personality of the player motivates their posting, so a large part of scumhunting is reverse-engineering that.)

Be careful with posts like this. (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=147264.msg5941403#msg5941403) As town, you open yourself up for scum buddying you and getting you dragged down with them if they get lynched. As scum, you'll be setting yourself up for other players accusing you of buddying, which can start creating chinks in your armor and get you lynched, especially if the person you're talking about is townread by other players OR is about to be mislynched. Started townreading you here. (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=147264.msg5941559#msg5941559) Very good observations and scumhunting for the rest of the game. Your plan for LyLo basically won us the game, so props for that.

Supercharazad

Our first scummer on the list! Overall, pretty strong scum play here. You managed to avoid my suspicions for most of the game until I started to notice that you were just sort of coasting through. (This was especially apparent once the whole town started being active later on. Remember what I said about active towns, everyone? ;) ) Your past experiences with the game do show through, as you had some good insights in the scum QT, as I said. This post (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=147264.msg5940911#msg5940911) is an example of dangerous fake scumhunting. Overreacting to small things is a good sign of scumminess, since, rather than pursuing a lead, scum often just find the least charismatic or agreeable player, latch on, and ride them into a mislynch. To be honest, though, it was your lack of participation in and scumslips during the massclaim that got you. Once UXLZ townslipped, you were pretty much scum in my eyes, but if you killed me or Dani, you might have had a sight chance. Oh, and claiming doctor was probably a bad choice. While claiming vanilla would have put you at odds with me, the idea that the scumteam fakeclaimed the same thing and got one of them lynched for towncred, especially when the lynch was an experienced player like TDS was not particularly believable. That being said, quite good play, especially for newbie scum.

hector13

And our single mislynch of the game. Sorry you had to get lynched in your first game, but luckily your flip was informative and you got to get the experience of being lynched, which is useful in and of itself. Your first RVS post (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=147264.msg5940204#msg5940204) set off some red flags for me immediately. The "if you were mafia" question is often scum-motivated, because it's easy to push mislynches using it by finding "inconsistencies" in other players' play. You can use it to gauge reactions, especially if the scum you are questioning believes you are cheating somehow and flips out. :P (This also sometimes works in games with potential daytime vigilantes, which are town players that can kill other players by saying something like shoot: Scripten, making the player become more honest as if they were soon to be dead. As with all gambits, be careful with that as they can backfire.) Your early interactions with Deus Asmoth look a little suspicious, as if you are pushing him a little but not enough to get noticed. This can be considered distancing, as it was by me.

This post (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=147264.msg5941378#msg5941378) made me scumread you quite hard. Not voting for a player for any reason other than thinking someone else is scummier is very often a scumtell. If you suspect someone, vote them or have a very good reason why you are not. When I was a newbie, I had a very similar sort of checklist-style playstyle as you did. Remember that a player trying to reveal the alignments of other players is generally town, even if they happen to check a box in the list of general scumtells. not answering questions is sometimes a scumtell, but if the player is responding to a question by probing the player asking the question, take a close look at the interaction and consider the motivations behind each players' actions. Sometimes, missing a question or avoiding a question is not anti-town, but is actually reducing clutter in the game. You do have a good mentality and you show a willingness to improve your game. With some experience, you will definitely shine as a player.

TheDarkStar

Hi TDS. You were scum this game. :P I don't really have much to say, since you've been playing here longer than I have. I do have a few things to note, and I hope I am not being too presumptuous. Firstly, you RVS'd your partner, but you never really pressed him. One of the things I look for when finding associative tells is a distinct lack of any linkage between two players. There was nothing linking you and Supercharazad. As in, the fact that there were little to no interactions between you two was telling, especially when you were lynched and Supercharazad was voting alongside you. (This may actually be more advice for him than you, tbh.) Your early buddying/sheeping of me was not missed, either, and it was a big motivation for me to ask the question I did at the start of D2. That is, to get you to explain everything you'd accomplished all game, which cornered you into admitting that you'd been active lurking. Your reads on D2 also have you way too much leeway and felt like you didn't know who to start fake scumhunting. There was an air of insincerity that really caught my eye. Sadly, I don't know what to really tell you to hide that, save for maybe working to be less consistent as scum and instead pushing townies with more gusto. I also noticed that you had "suspected" me for not voting hector13, when I had posted that it was a mod error the day before. In that case, it showed that your mental inertia wasn't natural and that you were hunting for a mislynch. This post (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=147264.msg5951131#msg5951131) heavily implicated Supercharazad as your scumbuddy. You made it very plain that you were trying to implicate UXLZ and you also scumslipped with the role cop bit. Otherwise, it was a lot of fun playing alongside you. Sometime we'll have to play scum together. That'll be a fun game.



So, any questions, comments, and/or insults anyone wants to send my way?
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Game Over - Town Victory
Post by: hector13 on January 17, 2015, 01:33:05 am
I think my initial interactions with players was because I didn't really know what I was doing, specifically in regards to how to scumhunt D1 with no info. That made my initial pressures not seem very... well, pressing.

So a question: what you think would be some reasonable RVS/RQS questions to be asking, if any?
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Game Over - Town Victory
Post by: Scripten on January 17, 2015, 01:50:13 am
So a question: what you think would be some reasonable RVS/RQS questions to be asking, if any?

It's hard to say, really. RVS is an annoying part of the game that we tolerate pretty much because we haven't found anything better. Trying to garner reactions works for me, but different people prefer different things. What's important is that, when people start replying, you exit RVS-mode and start examining answers and generating content. You'll notice that I had only one post with random questions and started in on scumhunting immediately after content was generated. This is usually ideal.
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Game Over - Town Victory
Post by: UXLZ on January 17, 2015, 01:50:59 am
I was hoping that I'd be able to rev up the game with all the activity at the start. I kind of play with a strange... Style.

I'd also like to mention that I was the first to vote for DarkStar, yaaay. Actually, in response to my specific scumreads on him, do you think they were fairly accurate ones, or just false reads and he just happened to also be scum?
Title: Re: BM Sprint 3: Thick as Thieves - Game Over - Town Victory
Post by: Scripten on January 17, 2015, 01:54:13 am
I was hoping that I'd be able to rev up the game with all the activity at the start. I kind of play with a strange... Style.

Your playstyle is fine. Keep in mind that, just because someone starts scumreading you, that doesn't mean that your play was bad, just that you did something that got someone suspicious of you. As long as you are scumhunting as well as defending/supporting your actions, you're solid.

I'd also like to mention that I was the first to vote for DarkStar, yaaay. Actually, in response to my specific scumreads on him, do you think they were fairly accurate ones, or just false reads and he just happened to also be scum?

Nope, your scumhunting was great and inspired me to look at TDS's posting more carefully and ultimately led to my scumread on him come D2. All of our town players this round were very insightful, which is pretty much why we won.