So .... must be all the whippersnappers being back in school right about now.Probably. I'll IC IN even though I do have school.
Your post says that ICs can be town or scum, but there is an IC list and a scum IC..? I am confusedThe Scum IC is a non-playing advisor for the scum. The playing ICs can be either town or scum.
Hi. I don't know if I will be any good at forum mafia, but I used to play on the same mafia bot as Webadict, Pandarsenic, Leafsnail, etc. which is how I made it here.welcome. Everybody here was new at one point.
Hi. I don't know if I will be any good at forum mafia, but I used to play on the same mafia bot as Webadict, Pandarsenic, Leafsnail, etc. which is how I made it here.Ah excellent, a new player to this forum. Hello, my name is 4maskwolf, and it will be my job to work alongside Persus13 to teach you some of the nuances of the Bay12 meta. I should warn you pregame, however, that my ideas differ from the general consensus here, but I will nontheless be serving as one of the IC's when this starts.
Confirming. Sorry, was in school and then talking to friends, but can confirm now.That offence can never be forgiven. You will now be shunned by this mafia community for the rest of your life. I cannot fathom how you could possibly have the audacity to commit that heinous offence. Shame on you.
Okay, that just leaves roo. I'll likely be starting this up tomorrow then.I take it Persus13 confirmed via pm, then?
Yes, he did.Okay, that just leaves roo. I'll likely be starting this up tomorrow then.I take it Persus13 confirmed via pm, then?
Posting to Bread.Feel free to loaf around.
I have never been scum with anyone in this group, so I don't have any preferences right now. I would probably pick someone with experience.I didn't ask what type of person or what class of person you'd pick, OSG.
I have never been scum with anyone in this group, so I don't have any preferences right now. I would probably pick someone with experience.I didn't ask what type of person or what class of person you'd pick, OSG.
originalscienceguyI'm origamiscienceguy by the way. You can call me OSG if you want.
Funny that I got asked the same question twice when I kinda already answered in my signups post. I have played IRC mafia but haven't played forum mafia before. Having the time to think through what I post and knowing that everyone else does too is going to take getting used to.Survey questions of a kind are fairly normal here, as they provide a small base of information to go off of if done legitimately. However, so many of the veterans (such as myself) either don't bother to do them or don't do them with intent to discern that more complicated games often don't have it. The "voting in first post" has been fading out of the B12 meta over time, it used to be far more common than it is today to the point where, due to the long days and it's prevelance, voting in and of itself lost its impact as a startle tactic.
I'm surprised to see so few people voting so far. Are these survey questions normal, or is Dorsidwaf copying the first guy?
I like Dorsidwaf's questions better than origamiscienceguy's because more of origami's seem to be filler questions with no purpose, and the question to playergamer could be rolefishing.Observations like the rolefishing one are the bread and butter of mafia games, as they provide both a frame of reference for other players and a basis on which to place our eventual reads. In regards to filler questions, it is very difficult to forumlate meaningful questions for even a subset of players every game, but I generally don't ask them at all rather than asking pointless ones. OSG: I'm not judging your questions, I'm talking about filler questions as a concept.
Not that knowing which alignment, and in some cases role, people prefer isn't a useful thing, it is, it just seems weirder in this context where everyone in the game has the same frame of reference and the scum can use it against you. I think it would've been better to ask about alignment over role if that was what you were going for though.The preferred alignment and preferred role questions are perhaps the most ubiquitous of RQS (Random Questioning Stage), because they are least have game relation despite having little relevance to the gameplay as a whole. Over time, perhaps, knowledge of a player's meta can allow more educated guesses based on their preferences, but in such an early game they tend to serve as filler questions.
I do not understand why Doridswaf seems so grumpy in his latest post and I also find that a bit weird. Does it really matter that he didn't give a specific name?I don't want to speak for Dorsidwarf, but one of the more (read: at all) reliable of the scumtells of the Bay12 meta is intentional vagueness and obfuscation. However, you are right in a sense: generally obfuscation on RQS questions in basic games is more due to misunderstanding the question as opposed to active malice.
originalscienceguyWhile a standalone vote can be a useful tool under certain circumstances, general Bay12 meta dictates that one should ask questions or drive home a point against them when voting. Beyond D1, it is indeed generally considered scummy to vote without rationale or any way of trying to find new information.
Since there are few but very powerful town roles it doesn't seem like a good idea to massclaim today, but it might be a good idea to do a 'if i am the cop i got xxx result' claim tomorrow? I don't know if those things are normal here though.It's not normal here, certainly, but there's a time to try everything, particularly in a beginner game.
originalscienceguy
Filthy liesQuote
The strategy I was talking about isn't one that I haven't used a lot because in the few setups I have played where cops have guaranteed sanity, there are often doctors so cops can afford to be more open about their results. It mostly gets used in dethy where everyone is a cop of a different sanity (it's like a logic puzzle) and the mafia has to give a fake cop result to try to blend in. But if we did do it, tomorrow everyone would give a fake cop result (and the cop, if there is one, would give their real one.) The purpose being that if the cop dies then we know for sure what they know if they die before they claim, and the problem being that the mafia know who is town and who is mafia and so could better narrow down who the cop is. So it would be something everyone would have to agree to - and we do it by countdowns on IRC so that scum can't use other people's claims to their advantage.Yeah, that's the strategy I was thinking of.
Thanks for your answers in your IC voice, but I am curious about what your actual opinions on the thread are as a player, too. Otherwise I am not sure how we are supposed to figure out if the ICs are mafia.I can't say there's all that much to go off of yet, but I'll try to keep in mind to moderate my use of IC advice with player commentary in the future.
I explained in my post why so far origamiscienceguy is the most scummy...that is my rationale.If the commentary and the vote are separated within the post by another block of text talking about something else, players will often miss the direct connections between them. Not a commentary on your playstyle, just something to keep in mind in the future.
Even if I hadn't, though, I think there can be value to voting people without giving reasons so I am not sure I understand why that is considered alignment-related.One of the main differences between this and IRC mafia is the pace at which it moves, as you have no doubt noticed. Not only does mafia here go slower, but votes are a relatively impermanent thing. Someone voting for you now could place three or more different votes before day end. This, in turn, leads to even relatively new players (OSG has I believe five or six completed games under his belt) being relatively unfazed by an early-day vote, making the entire purpose of the vote (pressure) a moot point. Thus, seemingly unsupported votes are generally viewed with suspicion, particularly when they are placed on people who already have one or more people voting for them (not that you did this, just for future reference).
It didn't seem to me like origamiscienceguy was being intentionally vague in that answer as he did give information about what he would be looking for in a partner, but I would like to know why Dorsidwarf was being grumpy because that would help me understand his thought processes.Dorsidwarf: Care to answer the bolded part?
It sounds like follow-the-cop could start and ruin the game for the scum.I'm not sure you understand what follow-the-cop means. Follow the cop is a strategy where the cop claims on D1 and a hidden doctor heals them every night. The use of a jailkeeper and the uncertain format are both intended to keep that from happening in this game, since a jailkeeper would also roleblock. Cop claiming would certainly WIFOM the scum, but without the knowledge of the presence of a jailkeeper it would be risky.
I've got to leave for a rehearsal soon (I'll probably post in a few other threads after this though), but I promise that I'll be working on a post here in the next three hours. One sad habit of mine is I tend to be fairly inactive recently, but when I do post it tends to be a fair bit of content.I feel you there, bud. While I'm still more active most people, my activity level is certainly lower than what it used to be.
Persus13: How long does it take the bread you normally eat to get moldy?Well, considering I eat it, it doesn't get mouldy. Serious answer, over a week, less than that I has fruit or something in it.
TeaUsing quotes is important. I have no idea what you are referring to in this post and that hinders our ability to get a read on you. Please consider using quotes.
I want some.
Osg you can wait and see :p.
dwarf I wouldn't say noncommittal just the over the top hyperagressiveness that has gotten me in trouble. Didn't think people are so sensitive but meh. also a lot of people are noncommittal here. And I think my style tickled some peoples fancy I am gonna turn it down tho and see what happens.
I'm surprised to see so few people voting so far. Are these survey questions normal, or is Dorsidwaf copying the first guy? I like Dorsidwaf's questions better than origamiscienceguy's because more of origami's seem to be filler questions with no purpose, and the question to playergamer could be rolefishing.Questions to start off with is normal. It gets conversations going. And asking someone what role they like isn't really rolefishing. People do tend to vote early on, but usually its attached to some sort of question.
I think it would've been better to ask about alignment over role if that was what you were going for though.Sometimes people do ask. Out of curiosity, what is your favorite alignment?
Since there are few but very powerful town roles it doesn't seem like a good idea to massclaim today, but it might be a good idea to do a 'if i am the cop i got xxx result' claim tomorrow? I don't know if those things are normal here though.Massclaim is a terrible idea, yes. Cop only should claim if they have a scum result or are about to be lynched. Jailkeeper should only claim if they are about to be lynched or they've been blocking the only scum for a while.
My "filler questions" were just trying to get some conversation going.What I mean by 'filler' is that I think that the content of Dorf's questions were more effective in actually getting conversation started rather than just asking stuff for the sake of it, but I can buy that you just didn't put a lot of thought into it, esp. since this was the first post in the thread.
And asking someone what role they like isn't really rolefishing.I think it is because it gets people talking about differences in how they will play depending on what town role they have, which seems to help scum find power roles without providing enough benefit to the town to offset that, in this setup. I have often used knowledge of whether people prefer playing as a particular alignment to help me read them though, so I understand the value of that more.
Sometimes people do ask. Out of curiosity, what is your favorite alignment?I am always quite relieved to get a town role and tend to enjoy the process of figuring out the game more than trying to prevent other people from doing so, but I think as the game goes on either alignment can end up being equally frustrating and anxiety-inducing, just in different ways.
Tea: in bringing up that strategy, did it occur to you that there is only a 2/3 chance that we have a cop? Does that change your mind about the plan? What should the cop do if we do follow that plan and they get roleblocked by the jailkeeper one night?Yes, it did. In the hypothetical scenario of there not being a cop, it would actually be funny if the scum were overanalyzing it and made a suboptimal nightkill based on who is more likely to be a role that isn't in the setup. I hadn't thought through the jailkeeper thing though - that complicates things to the point that I'm not sure it's a good idea.
Advice in generalIs there a reason you didn't respond to any of the comments I made about your posts?
Your follow-up on this question seems both more conciliatory and more relaxed, which...is a thing that I don't know how to parse.I have never been scum with anyone in this group, so I don't have any preferences right now. I would probably pick someone with experience.I didn't ask what type of person or what class of person you'd pick, OSG.
Sorry about that.
In this game, the person I have played the most with is actually roo, and I definitely think being mafia together would be !!fun!! even if it won't work out that well. I also like 4mask's gameplay, so that is also who i'd pick.
I'd pick 4mask if I was playing to win, and roo if I was playing to have fun, which I am at this moment.
Everyone: From your own personal experience from various places and using your own judgement, how balanced do you believe this game to be? Why do you say that?Every beginner game I have played has been an overwhelming scum victory. The meta seems to have adapted to make it lean more in scum favor in my opinion.
Everyone: From your own personal experience from various places and using your own judgement, how balanced do you believe this game to be? Why do you say that?Every beginner game I have played has been an overwhelming scum victory. The meta seems to have adapted to make it lean more in scum favor in my opinion.
unless tea is crumbling cop should probably keep that to myself. Thoughts on this anyone?Wait, what? You acknowledge that you should keep something to yourself, then post it anyway and ask for thoughts on it? <<
@Tea 4mask is only commenting on theory. I think it is fine and actually like the posts; it is early game after all (and no one else is posting). 4mask is still a player and will take stances on other players. you can ignore the ic stuff as actually being in, this, game related. I would suggest becoming revolted if he accuses someone of gambiting and then explains in IC voice what gambiting is, but 4mask I am sure would never bend rules like that. I suggest stop being so paranoid at the ic content he wasn't lying when he said its advise. Also the paranoia indicates town. Unless I am corrected about tea being paranoid by tea.I mean, both 4maskwolf and Persus13's posts are "fine" in my opinion too, but I'm a bit paranoid (for lack of a better word) that that's all they'll ever come off as, since I can't get reads off of that. I'm not trying to insinuate that people would intentionally abuse their IC status but that I am unsure how balancing their role as an IC and their role in the game works. I will try to just let things play out tho.
Everyone: From your own personal experience from various places and using your own judgement, how balanced do you believe this game to be? Why do you say that?Well, I think having few but strong power roles can make the game harder because there's so much riding on specific players' actions. I also find that how people talk about their role, even if it's really weak but still not a plain townie, is helpful for trying to read people once claims come out. I do figure that this setup must be balanced-ish for this setting since it's not too crazy and it wouldn't have been put out as a beginner's setup otherwise, and I hope that people that think it's scumsided don't get demoralized.
It didn't seem to me like origamiscienceguy was being intentionally vague in that answer as he did give information about what he would be looking for in a partner, but I would like to know why Dorsidwarf was being grumpy because that would help me understand his thought processes.I didn't, in fact see it, because it was unbolded and started with someone else's name while I was skimming through before making my last post for the night. The reason I demanded clarity from OSG is because it's vitally important that the town not get into the habit of dodging questions or being vague, since those are effective scum-tells, especially later on, when everything's a bit more concrete. I'm satisfied with his updated answer, however.
/me cheers the newbies/veterans!Posting to Bread.Feel free to loaf around.
Everyone: From your own personal experience from various places and using your own judgement, how balanced do you believe this game to be? Why do you say that?I restate a proverb I'd like y'all to think about.
I believe roo is saying the cop should keep his information to him/herself unless he/she finds scum.unless tea is crumbling cop should probably keep that to myself. Thoughts on this anyone?Wait, what? You acknowledge that you should keep something to yourself, then post it anyway and ask for thoughts on it? <<
Tea, Dorsidwarf, Illgeo: What's y'all's mafia experience?I played in 2 BMs here.
Illgeo, Dani:Prior mafia experience, what was it? How confident do you feel in your alignment's chances of winning?Not particularly good. Mafia won both of BMs I played here.
Who is Tiruin? Are they in this game?Tiruin is one of the mafia players in this forum and who is one of the veteran mafia players. She isn't in the game but does occasionally pop in to BMs and comment on general Mafia stuff (Notice how she commented on a question that was mainly focusing on game mechanics than anything else).
Everyone except Tea: What do you think of Tea's suggestion about the cop thing?That was a suggestion? I thought it was just a strategy that he'd used before. At any rate it seems to require cops with questionable sanities and a doctor if I read that right. Neither of which we have.
Persus13: You didn't actually comment on Tea's idea, which is that everyone claims a (fake or real) cop result every day so that if the cop is ever nightkilled or lynched, their results will be immediately made public knowledge. I specifically asked in the post three above yours what everyone thought of it.You posted after I had already started working on that post, so I missed it. Then I misunderstood his strategy, and that's actually a pretty good idea. How a Jailkeeper factor into that would be interesting.
Everyone: From your own personal experience from various places and using your own judgement, how balanced do you believe this game to be? Why do you say that?
Ah, I see where you are coming from now. I've never used people's favorite alignments as a way of figuring out who they are. It's probably a better strategy in RL Mafia because you can see people grin randomly.And asking someone what role they like isn't really rolefishing.I think it is because it gets people talking about differences in how they will play depending on what town role they have, which seems to help scum find power roles without providing enough benefit to the town to offset that, in this setup. I have often used knowledge of whether people prefer playing as a particular alignment to help me read them though, so I understand the value of that more.
Am I posting too much? I don't want to make the thread annoying for people to read but I am eager to get to the point where people stop saying there's not much to go on.You are posting fine. More is only bad if you make a large post with barely anything worthwhile to say.
I'm not trying to insinuate that people would intentionally abuse their IC status but that I am unsure how balancing their role as an IC and their role in the game works. I will try to just let things play out tho.ICs can be really hard to get a bead on their alignment mainly because of their focus on teaching. Talking with them and trying to get their input on the actual game is a good way to get them off teacher mode and into game-playing mode.
Perseus I am convinced I was day killed because I was disliked actually. It affirmed certain truths. Like people like things the way they like them. I'd rather not talk about it if that's okay with you. Doesn't serve any actual purpose this game except to remind people how I play, which I am trying to change. I'm fine answering questions but curiosities seem to hold up the game.Okay, I don't think you were killed because you personally were disliked but because your playstyle was disliked (and Deathsword's kind of known for going after newish players when they make mistakes).
I do think some are too forgiving or not paranoid enough.I can definitely agree with this, but sometimes being too paranoid can be a block though, and being unforgiving can lead to more dead town than scum. There's a fine balance that needs to be walked.
Everyone: From your own personal experience from various places and using your own judgement, how balanced do you believe this game to be? Why do you say that?I personally find BM games to be reasonably balanced - unless one or more ICs are scum. Obviously having ICs be unable to be scum in completely unfeasible due to balance, but the skill and power that experienced players bring to the table (especially when they're frequent players and newer players recognize, them, and at least in my case, instinctively believe their analysises perhaps more than they're due on their own merit.)
I don't find that a reasonable interpretation of what he's said. As far as I can see, roo said (paraphrased into descriptive language for explanatory purposes)I believe roo is saying the cop should keep his information to him/herself unless he/she finds scum.unless tea is crumbling cop should probably keep that to myself. Thoughts on this anyone?Wait, what? You acknowledge that you should keep something to yourself, then post it anyway and ask for thoughts on it? <<
I've never used people's favorite alignments as a way of figuring out who they are. It's probably a better strategy in RL Mafia because you can see people grin randomly.Probably easier to tell in a more fast-paced setting, but if someone is totally not getting into a game, a reason for that can be that they hate their alignment. Regarding rolefishing, I honestly don't understand why you disagreed with me initially, as if the question is not intended to have any relation to how people are playing in the game, then it's a useless/filler question. The more interesting discussion is whether it's scummy or just anti-town.
I do think some are too forgiving or not paranoid enough.Funny that you point this out, since I'm seeing buddy-buddy behavior between you and origami already. When your read on him moves beyond gut I'd like to hear more, as I too have noticed people can tend to read people they like and are familiar with as town too quickly.
Orc, why did you ask someone what role they would like?(I am OSG By the way; Origami+Science+guy)
Illego, Dani: Are you having trouble posting? It's important to be active during the RVS/RQS, as otherwise concrete reads are more difficult to form. Lurking isn't a strategy for town.Hi, Dorsidwarf! Are you scum with Playergamer?
Can I ask for an replacement?Noted. It wouldn't be a BM without at least one replacement. I'll see if TheDarkStar is still up for it.
Kind of busy in University.
I don't find that a reasonable interpretation of what he's said. As far as I can see, roo said (paraphrased into descriptive language for explanatory purposes)I believe roo is saying the cop should keep his information to him/herself unless he/she finds scum.unless tea is crumbling cop should probably keep that to myself. Thoughts on this anyone?Wait, what? You acknowledge that you should keep something to yourself, then post it anyway and ask for thoughts on it? <<
"..Unless Tea is breadcrumbing 'cop' for a later claim, the I should probbbly keep that to myself. Thoughts on this theory, anyone?"
Which is why that it's weird that he posts the theory he immediately suggests he wouldn't want to mention, and draws attention to it by asking a question.
Roo, what is this post getting at? Is my interpretion correct? If so, why are you contradicting yourself?
Playergamer: The question was 'all else being equal', implying that neither were being particularly scummy, but thanks for responding. That's a pretty solid standard answer.
Roo: Do you think that Illego is being lazy as a town player, or lurking as a scum player?
I meant: I believe tea might be breadcrumbing that he is cop; I probably should not have said that.If you suspect someone to be a cop in this setup, it's probbably a good idea to not mention it, because a cop is the number 1 priority for scum, even over a jailkeeper.
origamiscienceguy: Why not let roo answer that question for himself, hmm?You ignored this bolded bright blue question directed at you. Why do you think you don't have to explain your defense of roo?
4maskwolf: Why did you FoS OSG over this and then fail to follow up his failure to answer?Oh hai!
English is not his first language, so he can be kind of confusing. Just ask for clarification.
OrigamiScienceGuy: Why did you defend roo again here, only a few posts after being questioned for defending roo?You literally just voted OSG twice in a row, silly.
English is not his first language, so he can be kind of confusing. Just ask for clarification.
4maskwolf: Why did you FoS OSG over this and then fail to follow up his failure to answer?Oh hai!
Because i haven't gotten around to it, and frankly if people don't answer crap I usually don't remember the question unless it is really important to a case.
I'm aware that roo's not great with english. It's the first trait I noticed about him when I encountered him. I'm also aware that his unorthodox playstyle has previously put him on the block. In fact, the post above OSG's post (mine) is in fact a request by me that roo clarify what he meant by a less-understandable-than-usual statement.OrigamiScienceGuy: Why did you defend roo again here, only a few posts after being questioned for defending roo?You literally just voted OSG twice in a row, silly.
English is not his first language, so he can be kind of confusing. Just ask for clarification.
Also, that's not defending, that's pointing out a fact about the person in question. There's a difference. He's not defending the play, he's defending the player.
I don't recognize who a post is addressing as well if the name comes after. So I thought you were asking a general question. As for the blue text, I have a bad habit of checking the most recent page of a thread and missing the 3 or so posts before the page ended, so sorry.You still didn't answer my question. The post I was referring to is as follows:
Roo just seems to push everybody's buttons, and has gotten killed day 1 I think for 3 out of 4 games he's played in. I just want people to recognize his language handicap to push past that.
I believe roo is saying the cop should keep his information to him/herself unless he/she finds scum.unless tea is crumbling cop should probably keep that to myself. Thoughts on this anyone?Wait, what? You acknowledge that you should keep something to yourself, then post it anyway and ask for thoughts on it? <<
I try to use Bold RedPlease don't do that. Some mods may count that as voting for a non-existent player.
Generally rolefishing is seen as scummy, so I assumed you meant that in a more scummy way. Asking questions like someone's preferred role tend to be relatively common. Thanks for clarifying, because now I agree with you that that question was rolefishing (using your definition of rolefishing)I've never used people's favorite alignments as a way of figuring out who they are. It's probably a better strategy in RL Mafia because you can see people grin randomly.Probably easier to tell in a more fast-paced setting, but if someone is totally not getting into a game, a reason for that can be that they hate their alignment. Regarding rolefishing, I honestly don't understand why you disagreed with me initially, as if the question is not intended to have any relation to how people are playing in the game, then it's a useless/filler question. The more interesting discussion is whether it's scummy or just anti-town.
I don't think origami was defending me tho. I think he was just trying to be helpful. You guys are like coyotes snapping at everything when nothing viable presents itself. What origami did can hardly be called "scummy" and if it is buddying I'd say it's very heavy handed. Origami did something that he thought would be helpful and didn't care about possible consequences. I think that is town mentality.I was seeing the OSG as making a mountain out of a molehill, but this post makes me a bit suspicious. Not suspicious enough to warrant my vote, but still suspicious.
Not sure who is scum yet.Why's it meh? Admittedly I was pretty annoyed with how the game was going at the time, but I was really hoping it'd motivate the guy to post, and I guess it's a placeholder now because I'm tired. Is being dramatic scummy? By the way, did you go read the first post like I asked?
Tea'd vote is meh even before illego replaced out. I was hoping it was a place holder vote but the initial post was very dramatic imho. Not as confident in tea town anymore.
Tea: I take it by your Illgeo vote you aren't a fan of people being inactive?Yeah, I'm a bit annoyed since the only content I really see posted is roo making the kinds of errors 4mask was saying often leads to Day 1 lynches regardless of alignment, and Dorsidwaf asking questions without giving very much analysis which I find kinda jarring and potentially scummy since it shows a lack of willingness to put your own self out there to be read (just gonna bold his name since this is turning into a response to the thing he asked me.) And I wanted to try out whether a pressure vote actually could be effective, but that didn't really go as planned (hopefully the new guy is more active though. In response to Dorsidwaf tho, I guess I find it weird how many times I've addressed people in the thread and they won't respond because I didn't phrase a specific question that needs a specific answer, and how people aren't really posting much in general that isn't in response to specific questions? IRC is more like a conversation cuz it's in real time.
4mask, which question? Are you talking to me?Are you not reading any of the posts addressed to you, OrigamiScienceGuy??
osg town definitelyThree points:
...
dani oozed town
If nothing of value happens I'd be okay with lurker hunting.
At what point do people normally claim their role when they're a potential lynch?From what I've seen, town PRs avoid claiming until they're the lynch leader by several votes, and usually that stuff comes within the last few hours.
Dorsidwaf asking questions without giving very much analysis which I find kinda jarring and potentially scummy since it shows a lack of willingness to put your own self out there to be read (just gonna bold his name since this is turning into a response to the thing he asked me.)The reason I've been asking a lot of question is that I've been wanting a lot of answers, generally from OSG. I'll probbably post some more deatailed reads later, especially if Persus13 starts posting enough lengthy posts to be properly analysed, and if TDS improves on Dani's activity levels. And I've definitely been putting myself forwards, in comparison to, say, Playergamer, who's flat-out lurking, and OSG (Yes, OSG again) who's done a lot of answering questions, but not a lot of asking his own.
Dorsidwarf, I disliked being brushed off like that. My #90 wasn't RQS. I am legit wondering why you glossed over the third inactive (Playergamer) (at the time). It's not like you had indication that he'd seen and read the thread and had planned to post something, right? I mean I noticed on reread of #116 that you even mentioned Playergamer, so what was going on in your #68After a more thorough re-read, I apologise for categorising post #90 as RVS. It's actually some okay analyses, although I have no clue what the hypothetical cop section is about. I'm not sure why I said it was RVS, seeing as you didn't post during that stage, so there shouldn't have been any posts to mix up.
I'm not flat-out lurking, I'm having trouble getting online.... and yet the second someone calls you on it, you're able to appear with a 1-line rejoiner with no other content.
Wait omg, I thought it was Wednesday. extend day pleaseExtend requests in bold, please. Only votes should be in red. I will not count this as changing your vote, but please note the rules in the OP.
Tea why do you think osg is town? or rather why player over osg?Earlier quote regarding his responses to my questioning him about the rolefishing/filler questions/his initial responses to Dorsidwaf:
I actually kinda like OSG's responses in here so far as he doesn't seem at all defensive and I generally get the sense that he believes what he's saying.
Roo:Now realizing I kinda misread your post and that you think me/OrigamiScienceGuy is more likely than me/Dorsidwaf. I'd rather now ask you to expand on why OSG/me is the most likely scumpair out of anyone in the game?
4) Why was my questioning of Dorsidwaf (which was in like, a post?) more significant than my questioning of other players (TheDarkStar's predecessor, you, OSG) to the point that you think it connects me to Dorsid?
Tea why do you think osg is town? or rather why player over osg?Who is this Perseus guy you keep referring too?
On much brighter news The night kill is good for us Perseus wasn't really doing anything except lurking. Which makes me wonder about 4mask, but i quickly put that thought to bed because 4mask would have picked imho someone who was active and was probably left alive because of misguided ideas/reads/or what have you. Long story short I think one of the mafia is a newer player or someone who has been found out/ caught by Perseus13 and respects him enough to kill him.
It doesn't help that almost everybody wasn't voting. I don't think darkstar even posted. I have this crazy out there theory that dani and Dorsi might be scum. but idk am really comfortable with what dani has said so far don't lik that they chose not to extend.
osg and tea is another potential team I have in mind. mainly because of tea attacking Dorsi.
So I have 4mask as a definite town read. Am doubting the 4 i mentioned dani, Dorsi, tea, and osg; I like that tea and Dorsi were voting for somebody . No relevant reads on tds his predecessor was meh but what can you do. As far as the associations they are based on what's happened so far. and are my personal thoughts and are subject to change at anytime. I think osg and tea is the far more likely one tho. why not osg and Dorsi? I doubt highly that bussing is a sound strategy for scum. So yeah it might be dangerous making those assumptions but they are mine to make. I'll go look over what Perseus was thinking.
Hey mod, is Dark Star actually even gonna play?
Everyone: Why didn't you extend yesterday?I already answered this: I could see everything you were saying, because for some reason the "blanket internet blocker" that activates for most of the day for my iPad allows me to get emails, so I could get the gist of what was going on due to notifications. However, I was entirely unable to actually post anything, even though the conversation was flowing. I was also hesitant to extend over the weekend because that is a near-certain killer of activity: see my rant in the Mafia Theory thread on the matter.
Tea why do you think osg is town? or rather why player over osg?Earlier quote regarding his responses to my questioning him about the rolefishing/filler questions/his initial responses to Dorsidwaf:I actually kinda like OSG's responses in here so far as he doesn't seem at all defensive and I generally get the sense that he believes what he's saying.
And I mean, you can see my kinda stream of consciousness posting in the thread. I had just woken up, was like "oh my god fuck you guys for not showing up and extending DL, ooh I have 10 minutes to catch up on the thread and make a decision." While ideally I'd like to lynch scummy people over people who don't post, I didn't feel OSG was particularly scummy, had no confidence that Playergamer would suddenly get more active (and that even if we did get him replaced, would the replacement even post...? signs point to no) so I decided to vote off the dead weight and hope for the best as it seems fuckin stupid to vote someone off because they are posting??
Roo:
1) For the love of god, did you go read the first post and get a handle on the setup like I asked yet? Once you do, please let me know how that has that changed your perspective on relevant earlier conversations! This is the third time I've asked. :|
2) You seem much less confident about OSG being town. What different things are you seeing?
3) Why do you think 4mask had misguided ideas or reads when all he posted was theory? <_< What ideas do you think scum thought were misguided?
4) Why was my questioning of Dorsidwaf (which was in like, a post?) more significant than my questioning of other players (TheDarkStar's predecessor, you, OSG) to the point that you think it connects me to Dorsid?
Oh and also, roo, why didn't you vote for a day extension?
Dani and 4mask, I'm pretty mad that you dropped the ball on that too. @Dani- are you actually content w/ the information we got from yesterDay and the nightkill?
Hey mod, is Dark Star actually even gonna play?
Roo:Now realizing I kinda misread your post and that you think me/OrigamiScienceGuy is more likely than me/Dorsidwaf. I'd rather now ask you to expand on why OSG/me is the most likely scumpair out of anyone in the game?
4) Why was my questioning of Dorsidwaf (which was in like, a post?) more significant than my questioning of other players (TheDarkStar's predecessor, you, OSG) to the point that you think it connects me to Dorsid?
I guess I find it particularly irritating since the pool of people posting content is so small that it doesn't seem like analysis of pairs is going to be useful? But it feels like you're not taking into account everything I've posted, either.
Hey mod, is Dark Star actually even gonna play?
I'm here now. I got the PM at the end of Day 1, but I was asleep/away from home and wasn't able to post.
A few things I've noticed:
Tea decided to lynch playergamer at the very end of the day. There was no way that playergamer could have defended himself. Tea: Why did you choose to lynch playergamer over OSG? roo: Same question as the one to Tea.
Tea: Why did your vote on Illgeo for inactivity stay on him after he was replaced?
Everyone: Why didn't you extend yesterday?
roo: You seem to be remarkably keen on declaring one person at a time to be solid town. Pretty much every time I've seen your reads at least one person is marked as town, even the one you made early on in the game. What, specifically, draws you to a town read on me?
I was referring to this specific game, I haven't seen enough of you in other games to make generalizations.
I'll get to reads eventually, still processing the game so far.
Tea decided to lynch playergamer at the very end of the day. There was no way that playergamer could have defended himself. Tea: Why did you choose to lynch playergamer over OSG?I mean, I already answered this, but I'll give it another go. I woke up and signed on when there was like 12 minutes left before deadline. I placed my vote when there was one minute left in the day. Nobody was going to be able to defend anything in those circumstances; I could move my vote to one of them and have a lynch happen, or I could let no lynch happen. The first post said that no lynches are terrible because of the lack of information, and so I was like all right fine I'll make a decision. As I said at the time, the decision felt pretty random due to the lack of information that had been posted...I had had some vague good feelings about some things OSG had answered, but he was saying some confusing shit at the end of the day and hadn't yet answered some questions from Dorsidwaf and 4mask. Playergamer just hadn't done shit, period, and showed no signs of ever doing shit, period, so I decided to lynch the dead weight and hope for the best. (As I had more confidence OSG would show up to "defend himself" or at least, like, do something that can be read, maybe.
1.) Yes, but it didn't really change anything for me. Like nothing changed at all in terms of reads. it's one of three setups trying which is relevant if you're trying to find a game breaking strategy. And also relevant if you're trying to find some prs. Are you trying to find prs? Why so interested in the setup? And why did you think it might change my reads?You seemed confused about why the initial fake-cop-claiming thing was happening and why it was so bad to bring up who you think the cop might be; I wanted you to understand that jailkeeper!=doctor because that's relevant to both of those things. No, I am not interested in outing the PRs - making sure you understand why it's bad to out who you think is cop is part of that. You've been saying things all game that show you completely weren't understanding my thought processes and it was frustrating me, but I guess you still don't. -_-
Quote from: roo1.) Yes, but it didn't really change anything for me. Like nothing changed at all in terms of reads. it's one of three setups trying which is relevant if you're trying to find a game breaking strategy. And also relevant if you're trying to find some prs. Are you trying to find prs? Why so interested in the setup? And why did you think it might change my reads?You seemed confused about why the initial fake-cop-claiming thing was happening and why it was so bad to bring up who you think the cop might be; I wanted you to understand that jailkeeper!=doctor because that's relevant to both of those things. No, I am not interested in outing the PRs - making sure you understand why it's bad to out who you think is cop is part of that. You've been saying things all game that show you completely weren't understanding my thought processes and it was frustrating me, but I guess you still don't. -_-
I guess the other basis of my frustration is that I don't even understand why me "defending" OSG by way of questioning Dorsidwaf is a scumtell? I don't get why it's one thing in the thread you seem to be basing all of your other reads on, at all, when there's other..actual blatant defending that has happened that you've found completely understandable. And if you're that sure about it, why aren't you voting me?
Your assessment of why 4mask wasn't killed seems really arbitrary, which is also annoying because that's one of the things you seem most sure on. Tbh I thought it was weird that Persus would get killed over him. I can think of possible reasons 4mask would be left alive if he's town, but given that neither Persus33 nor 4mask disagreed on anything or really posted reads, I don't know why 4mask being more wrong would be a factor and it sounds like you're reaching.
Can you also explain why OSG not voting is worse than, say, Dani (someone with no pressure on them) not voting? By not voting, OSG was potentially letting himself get lynched. Or am I misunderstanding you that you actually think it's worse, and it's just the combination of me 'defending' him and him not voting (in which case, can you explain that)?
osg and tea is another potential team I have in mind. mainly because of tea attacking Dorsi.This is called Chainsawing, and as it's a fairly major scumtell, you should probbably provide quoted posts when you accuse somebody of it. I personally couldn't see tea's fairly basic questions as a chainsaw defense.
I'll get to reads eventually, still processing the game so far.Feel like getting around to posting your reads? Unless I'm being buggered by the time gap, this was yesterday. How long do reads of 6 players get?
[citation needed]
4mask's attitude against day extend worries me. While I know his concern for letting the game die, It does make him seem rushed. Slight scum lean.
Correct. I am not leaning either way on you yet. You are a confusing case for me as of now.
Origamiscienceguy:
Was constant questioning, scumreading, and a vote not enough posting for you to get a read on me, OSG?
[citation needed]
4mask's attitude against day extend worries me. While I know his concern for letting the game die, It does make him seem rushed. Slight scum lean.
I can't see an attitude against day extend - where's this?
I was also hesitant to extend over the weekend because that is a near-certain killer of activity: see my rant in the Mafia Theory thread on the matter.Here it is. I conceded that he has a reason for it, but that still makes me wary about it.
Everyone Hey guys, sorry for not posting sooner, I didn't see that the day had come.
Roo: Why has the person you chose to vote for by logic instead of voting me based on 'your gut' flipping town made you think me as more towny? Surely the opposite would be implied by that?
EBWOP
There are still three days in the Day, roo. Why are you trying to activate the three-day extension now?
TheDarkStar
I think this is the right course of action.
extend
EBWOP
There are still three days in the Day, roo. Why are you trying to activate the three-day extension now?
oh cool scum.
Dorsidwarf
I am not following your line of reasoning at all. Mainly because there was none. How is voting for an extension worthy of a vote? And I noticed this weird thing where people don't post for days and instead are left to the last minute playing catch up. And what is the difference between voting for an extension now over 2 (3?) days later?
roo:TheDarkStar
I think this is the right course of action.
extend
Why?EBWOP
There are still three days in the Day, roo. Why are you trying to activate the three-day extension now?
oh cool scum.
Dorsidwarf
I am not following your line of reasoning at all. Mainly because there was none. How is voting for an extension worthy of a vote? And I noticed this weird thing where people don't post for days and instead are left to the last minute playing catch up. And what is the difference between voting for an extension now over 2 (3?) days later?
Why is Dorsi scummy for voting for you?
Tea: Lynching a lurker for lurking probbably wasn't the best day 1 choice, as there's no way to examine connections and their posts to get solid detective work day. However, it sounds like you had to make pretty much a snap choice, and at the end of the Day, what's done is done.I mean, I've analyzed it way more in private than I have in public because it's apparently bad! Still have no idea why though - I remember Persus said it was bad, but didn't say why (when he popped back up, he decided to just make fun of someone for misspelling his name!) If the first post or if 4mask mentioned it, I didn't see it. My in-thread discussion of the kill was b/c I wanted to engage with roo about their analysis b/c their reasoning was questionable to the point of being odd.
Why have you been trying to analyse the scumkill, even though 2 ICs and the starter post told you not to?
I was also hesitant to extend over the weekend because that is a near-certain killer of activity: see my rant in the Mafia Theory thread on the matter.Here it is. I conceded that he has a reason for it, but that still makes me wary about it.
Tea: you're not annoying people with your posting rate, OSG and I can do far more on weekends when we don't have school (I love high school and little homework).So I'm confused. I was under the impression that you wanted to have the opportunity to post over the weekend and were aware of at least another player that would benefit from it..?
I was also hesitant to extend over the weekend because that is a near-certain killer of activity: see my rant in the Mafia Theory thread on the matter.Here it is. I conceded that he has a reason for it, but that still makes me wary about it.Tea: you're not annoying people with your posting rate, OSG and I can do far more on weekends when we don't have school (I love high school and little homework).So I'm confused. I was under the impression that you wanted to have the opportunity to post over the weekend and were aware of at least another player that would benefit from it..?
Wait, are there seriously not one but two people voting roo for trying to extend the deadline? Lmao how is that the most voteworthy thing in the thread. Holy shit. I think Dark Star bandwagoning on that shit without doing a legit catch-up is worse than Dorsid but I just don't even
roo:TheDarkStar
I think this is the right course of action.
extend
Why?EBWOP
There are still three days in the Day, roo. Why are you trying to activate the three-day extension now?
oh cool scum.
Dorsidwarf
I am not following your line of reasoning at all. Mainly because there was none. How is voting for an extension worthy of a vote? And I noticed this weird thing where people don't post for days and instead are left to the last minute playing catch up. And what is the difference between voting for an extension now over 2 (3?) days later?
Why is Dorsi scummy for voting for you?
I was also hesitant to extend over the weekend because that is a near-certain killer of activity: see my rant in the Mafia Theory thread on the matter.Here it is. I conceded that he has a reason for it, but that still makes me wary about it.Tea: you're not annoying people with your posting rate, OSG and I can do far more on weekends when we don't have school (I love high school and little homework).So I'm confused. I was under the impression that you wanted to have the opportunity to post over the weekend and were aware of at least another player that would benefit from it..?
Wait, are there seriously not one but two people voting roo for trying to extend the deadline? Lmao how is that the most voteworthy thing in the thread. Holy shit. I think Dark Star bandwagoning on that shit without doing a legit catch-up is worse than Dorsid but I just don't even
At this point, it's a pressure vote. Day 2 will still run for a while and there's still lots of time for him to answer.
Roo: Why did you think that I was the best person to vote?
Please go read my rant in the mafia theory thread. It contains my thoughts on the matter. It should be the last thing on my most recent post on it.I was also hesitant to extend over the weekend because that is a near-certain killer of activity: see my rant in the Mafia Theory thread on the matter.Here it is. I conceded that he has a reason for it, but that still makes me wary about it.Tea: you're not annoying people with your posting rate, OSG and I can do far more on weekends when we don't have school (I love high school and little homework).So I'm confused. I was under the impression that you wanted to have the opportunity to post over the weekend and were aware of at least another player that would benefit from it..?
Alrightyo, it's 10 PM my time and I should be asleep right now but here's what I'm thinking right now:Please go read my rant in the mafia theory thread. It contains my thoughts on the matter. It should be the last thing on my most recent post on it.I was also hesitant to extend over the weekend because that is a near-certain killer of activity: see my rant in the Mafia Theory thread on the matter.Here it is. I conceded that he has a reason for it, but that still makes me wary about it.Tea: you're not annoying people with your posting rate, OSG and I can do far more on weekends when we don't have school (I love high school and little homework).So I'm confused. I was under the impression that you wanted to have the opportunity to post over the weekend and were aware of at least another player that would benefit from it..?
Urk my brain is trying to shut down, but I'll try to do my best in this post.
origamiscienceguy, where are you? You're usually THE most active poster in any game you play, and now you're disappeared. Wub is up with you?
Tea: Please explain your vote on TDS.
roo: Do remember that TDS replaced in partway through the day, and take post number into account when making accusations like that.
TheDarkStar: What do you think of roo's accusations?
Dani: Wherefore art thou?
Dorsidwarf: You have yet to respond to roo's accusations. Wherefore art thou?
Extensions are for when the Day's nearly over and nothing conclusive has happened/discussion is ongoing. Calling an extension at the start of the Day is odd/pointless, especially when coupled with a reason-free vote ( Which is pretty suspicious in itself.) I voted you because my other scum pick was defending you Yesterday, you're acting erratically, and making no sense whatsoever.EBWOP
There are still three days in the Day, roo. Why are you trying to activate the three-day extension now?
oh cool scum.
Dorsidwarf
I am not following your line of reasoning at all. Mainly because there was none. How is voting for an extension worthy of a vote? And I noticed this weird thing where people don't post for days and instead are left to the last minute playing catch up. And what is the difference between voting for an extension now over 2 (3?) days later?
So you're saying the whole extension thing was bullshit and I was supposed to read several paragraphs of subtext. Cool.No? I'm saying that you're acting funny, and voting for a grace period days before it's needed is suspiscious enough for me to vote you. I don't expect any 'paragraphs of subtext', let alone several. I expect you to explain what's going on, why you're so buddy-buddy with OSG, why you were voting without any reason at all on D2, and why you voted for an extension out of the blue. Less than a day into the Day.
Dorsidwarf: You have yet to respond to roo's accusations. Wherefore art thou?Laptop woes, Roo's accusations rebuffed in previous post.
hey I forgot to bold but plz read the above post 4mask/Dark Star/Dorsidwaf. also can someone tell me why talking about nightkills is bad?? third time I've askedI think the reason why people aren't meant to mull over the nightkill D1 is that it leads to WIFOM.
origamiscienceguy
origamiscienceguy
Good job tying a lynch with no explanation, Tea. I'd be surprised if you and roo weren't scumbuddies right now.
Why did you think the OSG vote was good?
TDS:Why does tying the lynch (especially with another 3 day mod extension) make him so scummy? Or is the operative phrase "with no explanation"?. I haven't heard anything much from you, especially not suspiscion on a Tea-Roo scumteam. Why does Tea voting OSG make you think they're allied?
Tea:Why are you voting OSG? I'm noticing a really annoying trend of people just voting without explanation this game.Dorsi, enlighten me. I don't know what you are trying to say; if anything. Are you attempting to inlaid are what I'm saying? I you need advice on doing that I suggest actually responding to the questions in my post. Or perhaps explaining why what I said is not logical from a town perspective. Or maybe anything besides a one liner that has not relevant meaning.
OSG: Feel like playing anytime in the next millenium?
You last logged in a few hours ago. Why are you pretending to be away? Lurking when people have asked you questions and are expecting you could be considered rude. And scummy.
TDS:Why does tying the lynch (especially with another 3 day mod extension) make him so scummy? Or is the operative phrase "with no explanation"?. I haven't heard anything much from you, especially not suspiscion on a Tea-Roo scumteam. Why does Tea voting OSG make you think they're allied?
Roo: Try playing bay12 forum mafia here, instead of Town Of Salem.
Tea:Why are you voting OSG? I'm noticing a really annoying trend of people just voting without explanation this game.Dorsi, enlighten me. I don't know what you are trying to say; if anything. Are you attempting to inlaid are what I'm saying? I you need advice on doing that I suggest actually responding to the questions in my post. Or perhaps explaining why what I said is not logical from a town perspective. Or maybe anything besides a one liner that has not relevant meaning.
OSG: Feel like playing anytime in the next millenium?
You last logged in a few hours ago. Why are you pretending to be away? Lurking when people have asked you questions and are expecting you could be considered rude. And scummy.
TDS:Why does tying the lynch (especially with another 3 day mod extension) make him so scummy? Or is the operative phrase "with no explanation"?. I haven't heard anything much from you, especially not suspiscion on a Tea-Roo scumteam. Why does Tea voting OSG make you think they're allied?
Roo: Try playing bay12 forum mafia here, instead of Town Of Salem.
It begs the question why not vote for me yesterday? <- Because, as already stated, you were acting less suspisciously that OSG yesterday, despite your reciprocation to his defenses.
Or the beginning of today? I fail to comprehend the point of asking the question: "Why didn't you vote me before I became suspiscious enough to warrant a vote, for explanation or otherwise?"
Which of my posts are erratic and what posts don't make any sense whatsoever? See addenendum for a list of suspiscious/confusing/erratic posts I highlighted in a five-minute sweep
One thing I do know for certain Dorsi needs more votes. It should be clear to anyone my "omgus" vote on Dorsi was a direct response to his vote on me. Dorsi voted me for wanting to extend the day. I thought that was definitely worth of pursuit and voted back. This is not only a misrepresentation, but also an appeal to emotion "He NEEDS you to vote him for nebulous reasons which I will now proceed to lie about!"
FTR tho am not in favor of the aforementioned cop play. It does not make any sense here. unless tea is crumbling cop should probably keep that to myself. Thoughts on this anyone?
I also like origami as town this game gut mostly. I'm sure he'll make a post that screams town I'll quote it and show it to all.
I am not entirely convinced it is that. The rqs is scum favored and the inability of some to post and apathy of others gets town in trouble a lot. Meta is just how people play the game. I do think some are too forgiving or not paranoid enough. And some don't take this seriously. Which incidentally I have started doing. being aggressive and competitive is definitely not the meta. If you have a problem with the mets then you by extension have a problem with the people playing; What do you wanna see change?You say "agressive and competitive is not the meta" in such a way that implies those are negative traits, and yet consistently play a hyper-agressive playstyle.
I meant: I believe tea might be breadcrumbing that he is cop; I probably should not have said that.I know you already had a discussion about this topic, but as you say,
"some are too forgiving or not paranoid enough, and I don't feel like letting that one slide under the circumstances just because you already excused yourself over it.
I'm hesitant to say any alignment indicative posts about lurkers. I mean there could be a ton of reasons why someone isn't posting. I don't wanna associate both minorities that would just be fallacious.But then...
@doris I mentioned player lurking in one of my posts, and explained why I think origami did what he did and why it makes him town in my eyes.
*snip*
#Playergamer. Although tbh I'd rather vote for Doris. I think potentially more associative reads can come from him. but I'd rather not give player a free pass if he's lurking scum. (sorry about internet problems player).
2.)Osg not voting. Tea defending osg by attacking Dorsi.NB: This never happened, as far as I can see. Also, a flip from "Dors is total scum only lynching PG because lurker" to "Tea is defending OSG by questioning my top scumpick! He's suspiscious!"
And Tea voting for player gamer actually makes me want to put him in my town pile but a couple things are preventing that.And then immediately saying that wait no she's one of your towniest people you're almost certain of her towniness.
tds on what you've read who do you think needs to feel the heat?
What was that quote again?
I think I need to trust someone. And it helps me immensely if I do not need to worry about one person and look to them for advice on reads. Perseus dying makes me think you're next to die. Mafia killed an IC makes sense they'll kill the next one off. If you remain alive next day my read might change. You are only town in my eyes as long as I deem you town. It is subject to change like any read.
"some are too forgiving or not paranoid enoughAgain, erraticness and refusal to stick to any one principle/lying about principles when asked.
Only two people are playing, while 4 mask theorizes.Some sort of generalised complaint, after 4mask says he's too busy to post, and that you'll have to wait till monday. At the weekend, on a sunday, expecting rapid participation from others.
TheDarkStarVoting someone because it's "the right course of action" (super scummy/weird)
I think this is the right course of action.
extend
roo: for your number seven, voting for someone with no given reason (and 'it's the right course of action' is not a valid reason) doesn't aid the town very much at all. What's your definition of Bay12 Mafia, since you seem to disagree with Dorsi's?First part noted. The question is not relevant. If you want to quibble ask me post game.
I don't want to quibble. I want to know what you think Bay12's mafia is like and why Dorsi is wrong about it.Good, then you won't have a problem waiting and asking me post game.
If you're going to be that condescending, try reading the thread first, scumfuck.origamiscienceguy
Good job tying a lynch at the end of the day with no explanation, Tea. I'd be surprised if you and roo weren't scumbuddies right now.
Why did you think the OSG vote was good?
Unfortunately, yes I will have a problem with that, because your opinion on how mafia should be played here informs on why you do certain things. The fact that you've refused to answer me twice at this point just leads me to believe you were dismissing Dorsi for the sake of being contrary.I don't want to quibble. I want to know what you think Bay12's mafia is like and why Dorsi is wrong about it.Good, then you won't have a problem waiting and asking me post game.
hey 4mask do you still think osg is scummyI vooted him to get him in the game.
darkstarTea and roo: please start explaining your votes in the same post that you make them, unless there is a VERY good reason not to.
Come at me bro
Tea,, if your vote on OSG was a pressure vote (in spite of you not having any questions you were pressuring him into answering), what's the logic behind your vote on TDS?That's fine; your assumptions are your own.Unfortunately, yes I will have a problem with that, because your opinion on how mafia should be played here informs on why you do certain things. The fact that you've refused to answer me twice at this point just leads me to believe you were dismissing Dorsi for the sake of being contrary.I don't want to quibble. I want to know what you think Bay12's mafia is like and why Dorsi is wrong about it.Good, then you won't have a problem waiting and asking me post game.
I feel like my reasons for revoting dark star should be obvious to people who have read my last like five posts! Do you think anyone is scum?hey 4mask do you still think osg is scummyI vooted him to get him in the game.darkstarTea and roo: please start explaining your votes in the same post that you make them, unless there is a VERY good reason not to.
Come at me bro
Tea,, if your vote on OSG was a pressure vote (in spite of you not having any questions you were pressuring him into answering), what's the logic behind your vote on TDS?I just left it as something for him to react to and as possible motivation to post about fking anything at all (to which the response was replacing out? Which is annoying as shit and I don't really know what to do about!) Dark Star still seems to be pushing bad lynches with bad, scummy reasoning while not actually trying to game solve, so I decided to move it back there!Unfortunately, yes I will have a problem with that, because your opinion on how mafia should be played here informs on why you do certain things. The fact that you've refused to answer me twice at this point just leads me to believe you were dismissing Dorsi for the sake of being contrary.I don't want to quibble. I want to know what you think Bay12's mafia is like and why Dorsi is wrong about it.Good, then you won't have a problem waiting and asking me post game.
Dark Star still seems to be pushing bad lynches with bad, scummy reasoning while not actually trying to game solve, so I decided to move it back there!Would it really have been so difficult to include this reasoning when you voted for him?
Feel free to contribute instead of continuously posting fluff questions that generate fluff posts. :rolls:Dark Star still seems to be pushing bad lynches with bad, scummy reasoning while not actually trying to game solve, so I decided to move it back there!Would it really have been so difficult to include this reasoning when you voted for him?
Somewhat, as I'm on mobile and busyish? Mostly I was trying to annoy him tho. What was the point of this question?Dark Star still seems to be pushing bad lynches with bad, scummy reasoning while not actually trying to game solve, so I decided to move it back there!Would it really have been so difficult to include this reasoning when you voted for him?
My apologies, Person Who Has Repeatedly Refused to Answer My Simple Question. Allow me to post an essay to satisfy your standards for participation.Feel free to contribute instead of continuously posting fluff questions that generate fluff posts. :rolls:Dark Star still seems to be pushing bad lynches with bad, scummy reasoning while not actually trying to game solve, so I decided to move it back there!Would it really have been so difficult to include this reasoning when you voted for him?
How about a post that indicates that you have actually read the thread? Instead of pointless inane questions that serve no purpose.My apologies, Person Who Has Repeatedly Refused to Answer My Simple Question. Allow me to post an essay to satisfy your standards for participation.Feel free to contribute instead of continuously posting fluff questions that generate fluff posts. :rolls:Dark Star still seems to be pushing bad lynches with bad, scummy reasoning while not actually trying to game solve, so I decided to move it back there!Would it really have been so difficult to include this reasoning when you voted for him?
I'll take that as a no. That you haven't read the thread.
That's fine; your assumptions are your own.
Dark Star still seems to be pushing bad lynches with bad, scummy reasoning while not actually trying to game solve, so I decided to move it back there!
I'll take that as a no. That you haven't read the thread.That's fine; your assumptions are your own.
Much as I'd like to leave it at that due to my enjoyment of being a smart arse, I don't see where you're getting that idea. But in any case, let's start on how my question is inane and pointless considering I've already given my reasoning behind it and you've still not answered it in spite of one sentence being more than enough to do so. Though if we're going on about inane questions, let's think about the fact that your only question to me has been utterly pointless.
Then, if you want me to bring up some past details to satisfy your need to ensure that I know my history, why did you decide to vote for Playergamer despite thinking Dorsi was scummier? Is a possible lurker seriously that much of a threat to you, or were you just going for someone who mightn't be able to defend themselves?
I'll take that as a no. That you haven't read the thread.That's fine; your assumptions are your own.
Much as I'd like to leave it at that due to my enjoyment of being a smart arse, I don't see where you're getting that idea. But in any case, let's start on how my question is inane and pointless considering I've already given my reasoning behind it and you've still not answered it in spite of one sentence being more than enough to do so. Though if we're going on about inane questions, let's think about the fact that your only question to me has been utterly pointless.
Then, if you want me to bring up some past details to satisfy your need to ensure that I know my history, why did you decide to vote for Playergamer despite thinking Dorsi was scummier? Is a possible lurker seriously that much of a threat to you, or were you just going for someone who mightn't be able to defend themselves?
So much for whatever your definition of what bay 12 might be. Yes let's think it through Why would a scum want to lynch a lurker? Pray tell Deus. You seem to be flabbergasted at the idea of player being much of a threat partly because he's already dead and the rest because you already know that he is town. Or am I mistaken?I'll take that as a no. That you haven't read the thread.That's fine; your assumptions are your own.
Much as I'd like to leave it at that due to my enjoyment of being a smart arse, I don't see where you're getting that idea. But in any case, let's start on how my question is inane and pointless considering I've already given my reasoning behind it and you've still not answered it in spite of one sentence being more than enough to do so. Though if we're going on about inane questions, let's think about the fact that your only question to me has been utterly pointless.
Then, if you want me to bring up some past details to satisfy your need to ensure that I know my history, why did you decide to vote for Playergamer despite thinking Dorsi was scummier? Is a possible lurker seriously that much of a threat to you, or were you just going for someone who mightn't be able to defend themselves?
roo:TheDarkStar
I think this is the right course of action.
extend
Why?EBWOP
There are still three days in the Day, roo. Why are you trying to activate the three-day extension now?
oh cool scum.
Dorsidwarf
I am not following your line of reasoning at all. Mainly because there was none. How is voting for an extension worthy of a vote? And I noticed this weird thing where people don't post for days and instead are left to the last minute playing catch up. And what is the difference between voting for an extension now over 2 (3?) days later?
Why is Dorsi scummy for voting for you?
hi 4mask! you replied while I was writing up an explanation
thedarkstar only choosing to engage w/ the person that voted him is lazy, bad and kinda scummy. it's like he wanted to OMGUS but then came up with the pressure vote excuse.
origamiscienceguy
Good job tying a lynch at the end of the day with no explanation, Tea. I'd be surprised if you and roo weren't scumbuddies right now.
Why did you think the OSG vote was good?
Now I might be biased because he sounds like a condescending prick here, but I also think he in the EBWOP still seems unreasonably invested in roo getting lynched considering he's posted zero follow-up analysis or anything at all regarding roo. He's just here to tell us that the people that have attacked him are scum together! It seems like there's more of an interest in trying to make ppl look bad than actually gamesolving...considering he just explained the roo vote as a pressure vote to get roo to answer questions. I'm not convinced he actually cares about finding scum.QuoteGood job tying a lynch with no explanation, Tea. I'd be surprised if you and roo weren't scumbuddies right now.
Why did you think the OSG vote was good?
EBWOP because I missed the extension.
More interested in defending self than actually following up about his earlier questions? Does he even think roo is scummy? Did he ask them to look like he was doing something or b/c he actually wanted an answer?? Who fucking knows!TDS:Why does tying the lynch (especially with another 3 day mod extension) make him so scummy? Or is the operative phrase "with no explanation"?. I haven't heard anything much from you, especially not suspiscion on a Tea-Roo scumteam. Why does Tea voting OSG make you think they're allied?
I remembered seeing that the day was supposed to end today. After posting, I saw the post about the extend. If the day was actually ending around now, I'd be very suspicious, but I'm just mildly suspicious because of the lack of a reason for that vote.
lol why do you care so much that I'm voting you (and about discrediting everyone who has ever voted you) and not care about where your own vote is?? do you actually have opinions about anything or are you going to just keep asking empty questions? how much mafia experience do you have?Dark Star still seems to be pushing bad lynches with bad, scummy reasoning while not actually trying to game solve, so I decided to move it back there!
Where do you see this? Include quotes, please.
Nightkills are information. If nightkill discussion is completely off the table, this seems beneficial to scum as they have zero motivation to do suboptimal kills for WIFOM purposes, and reading into a nightkill clearly should be part of a case on a player and not a case in and of itself! But okay I guess?hey I forgot to bold but plz read the above post 4mask/Dark Star/Dorsidwaf. also can someone tell me why talking about nightkills is bad?? third time I've askedI think the reason why people aren't meant to mull over the nightkill D1 is that it leads to WIFOM.
"The scum would kill the more active player! X is scum!"
"No! They'd want us to think that, it's clearly a trick!"
"How can you tell that! Are you scum?"
"Baseless accusation! You're trying to push an agenda! Scum!"
and so forth.
oh I also wanted to ask why you didn't acknowledge the post where I explained why I voted you, Dark Star.
I don't think you were. I knew you were. No content. No stances. Even now your vote isomgusfor pressure. lurking. Right now tho Dorsi is worse imho. Don't worry yes we'll lynch you yet.
Those are two different people, TDS. are you even paying attention?oh I also wanted to ask why you didn't acknowledge the post where I explained why I voted you, Dark Star.I don't think you were. I knew you were. No content. No stances. Even now your vote isomgusfor pressure. lurking. Right now tho Dorsi is worse imho. Don't worry yes we'll lynch you yet.
Those are two different people, TDS. are you even paying attention?oh I also wanted to ask why you didn't acknowledge the post where I explained why I voted you, Dark Star.I don't think you were. I knew you were. No content. No stances. Even now your vote isomgusfor pressure. lurking. Right now tho Dorsi is worse imho. Don't worry yes we'll lynch you yet.
I looked through the thread and found this quote:I don't think you were. I knew you were. No content. No stances. Even now your vote isomgusfor pressure. lurking. Right now tho Dorsi is worse imho. Don't worry yes we'll lynch you yet.
where you voted for me because I had "no content" at the beginning of the day that I replaced in and then said that you didn't like my vote. You also said that you knew for certain that I was scum because of this and then said that Dorsi was worse even though you somehow "knew" I was scum. You also use "we", which is worrying. It has no backing and contradicts itself.
A few questions for you: Who do you find scummiest right now? What are your reads on other people? What do you think of roo?
Votecount please.
I think roo is awesome and doesn't afraid of anything. We are not entirely sure what you are asking.Those are two different people, TDS. are you even paying attention?oh I also wanted to ask why you didn't acknowledge the post where I explained why I voted you, Dark Star.I don't think you were. I knew you were. No content. No stances. Even now your vote isomgusfor pressure. lurking. Right now tho Dorsi is worse imho. Don't worry yes we'll lynch you yet.
Huh, so they are. I just mentally merged their posts because they have similar posting styles.
Tea: Apparantly I can't actually find your explanation of why you voted for me. Can you quote it?
Roo: The questions I had for Tea are now addressed to you.I looked through the thread and found this quote:I don't think you were. I knew you were. No content. No stances. Even now your vote isomgusfor pressure. lurking. Right now tho Dorsi is worse imho. Don't worry yes we'll lynch you yet.
where you voted for me because I had "no content" at the beginning of the day that I replaced in and then said that you didn't like my vote. You also said that you knew for certain that I was scum because of this and then said that Dorsi was worse even though you somehow "knew" I was scum. You also use "we", which is worrying. It has no backing and contradicts itself.
A few questions for you: Who do you find scummiest right now? What are your reads on other people? What do you think of roo?
Votecount please.
So much for whatever your definition of what bay 12 might be.[citation needed]. What do you think my definition of Bay12 mafia is, and how does quoting the same post three times disprove it?
Yes let's think it through Why would a scum want to lynch a lurker? Pray tell Deus.Because scum don't actually care who gets lynched and it's easier to push a wagon on someone who isn't defending themselves?
You seem to be flabbergasted at the idea of player being much of a threat partly because he's already dead and the rest because you already know that he is town. Or am I mistaken?I'm going to say yes, mostly because this sentence makes no sense whatsoever.
It really does show how much you have read tho. Besides the fact where I talk about the very subject you bring up at least twice before iirc.Berates someone because he doesn't think they read the thread -> doesn't bother reading up to verify his own claims.
I voted Player because he might be scum the only other alternative was osg who I had as a town read, and surprise surprise no one was very active. In fact most of the players did not take a stance. I presented an alternative to my town read.How was the only alternative OSG? TDS had the same number of votes and you said Dorsi was a better lynch.
Hey Deus you have something there; it's your bias showing.[citation needed]
Cherry picking things,[citation needed]
trying to connect me to scum[citation needed]. How exactly am I meant to be connecting you to scum unless you already know who is on the scum team?
so you'll be justified in disliking me.Like and dislike has nothing to do with how I play. You're the one reacting personally to this interaction.
If you're gonna vote me vote me. I tire of these monkeyshines. Find some weird erratic text or look at my voting for an extension as vote worthy (yes that was a shot at Dorsi). I still have no clue what the point of all this progression leading up to this was(I assume you'll find something vote worthy eventually). I still don't see why my opinion of the meta at this site is relevant.It's relevant because of your casual dismissal of someone else's opinion on it. Either you had your own opinion on it or you were just disagreeing in an attempt to sound superior. Your defensiveness about it points to the latter.
And I know you've given your "justification" for wanting to satiate your curiosity about what I think of bay 12 mafia. I simply said no. Feel free to keep pressing the issue because the next time around I'll definitely tell [/sarcasm].I simply asked you about it, then asked why you were refusing to answer a question about something you appeared to be completely certain about. You've talked about it far more than me at this stage though, so I'm not sure that trying to say that I'm the one making a song and dance about it is the best card for you to play at this point.
I think roo is awesome and doesn't afraid of anything. We are not entirely sure what you are asking.
The game has to make sense logically. I don't understand or am going to pretend to understand where you are going with this. I assumed you wanted to eventually call me scum because of x y or z. But if you just wanna talk and not play. Then I direct you to RPGs. Who is town Deus? Who is scum?So much for whatever your definition of what bay 12 might be.[citation needed]. What do you think my definition of Bay12 mafia is, and how does quoting the same post three times disprove it?QuoteYes let's think it through Why would a scum want to lynch a lurker? Pray tell Deus.Because scum don't actually care who gets lynched and it's easier to push a wagon on someone who isn't defending themselves?QuoteYou seem to be flabbergasted at the idea of player being much of a threat partly because he's already dead and the rest because you already know that he is town. Or am I mistaken?I'm going to say yes, mostly because this sentence makes no sense whatsoever.QuoteIt really does show how much you have read tho. Besides the fact where I talk about the very subject you bring up at least twice before iirc.Berates someone because he doesn't think they read the thread -> doesn't bother reading up to verify his own claims.QuoteI voted Player because he might be scum the only other alternative was osg who I had as a town read, and surprise surprise no one was very active. In fact most of the players did not take a stance. I presented an alternative to my town read.How was the only alternative OSG? TDS had the same number of votes and you said Dorsi was a better lynch.QuoteHey Deus you have something there; it's your bias showing.[citation needed]QuoteCherry picking things,[citation needed]Quotetrying to connect me to scum[citation needed]. How exactly am I meant to be connecting you to scum unless you already know who is on the scum team?Quoteso you'll be justified in disliking me.Like and dislike has nothing to do with how I play. You're the one reacting personally to this interaction.QuoteIf you're gonna vote me vote me. I tire of these monkeyshines. Find some weird erratic text or look at my voting for an extension as vote worthy (yes that was a shot at Dorsi). I still have no clue what the point of all this progression leading up to this was(I assume you'll find something vote worthy eventually). I still don't see why my opinion of the meta at this site is relevant.It's relevant because of your casual dismissal of someone else's opinion on it. Either you had your own opinion on it or you were just disagreeing in an attempt to sound superior. Your defensiveness about it points to the latter.QuoteAnd I know you've given your "justification" for wanting to satiate your curiosity about what I think of bay 12 mafia. I simply said no. Feel free to keep pressing the issue because the next time around I'll definitely tell [/sarcasm].I simply asked you about it, then asked why you were refusing to answer a question about something you appeared to be completely certain about. You've talked about it far more than me at this stage though, so I'm not sure that trying to say that I'm the one making a song and dance about it is the best card for you to play at this point.
I think roo is awesome and doesn't afraid of anything. We are not entirely sure what you are asking.
Very funny ::)
What do you think of Tea and what are your responses to my other questions?
Naturally you guys post a crapton in my absence...It tried man I really tried.
roo: I feel like you are a naturally agressive person, but could you tone down the antagonism a bit? Like, you've surpassed Jim Groovester by an order of magnitude, which is an impressive feat.
I need to read up on what happened...
trying to connect me to scum, so you'll be justified in disliking [you]?
Vote count:
4maskwolf - (0) -
Deus Asmoth - (0) -
Dorsidwarf - (1) - roo
TheDarkStar - (1) - Tea
origamiscienceguy - (1) - 4maskwolf
roo - (2) - Dorsidwarf, TheDarkStar
Tea - (0) -
Right. I'm going to vote for Roo to avoid last minute vote shenanigans.Lol I say it here it comes out there.
I think I'd actually prefer TDS getting lynched for being (as far as I can tell) best case disinterested town or worst case scum trying to skate by under the radar. Confusing the person he's voting for with someone else makes me think he doesn't particularly care who gets lynched, indicating scum. I'll be hanging around until day's end in case someone else comes online, but I don't want to tie the vote with one hour left in the day as far as I can tell.
Origami, what's the difference between anger and aggression on a forum? I appreciate that it may be a difficult one to answer, but that's the difference you've given between roo's scum meta and his town meta, so it does seem like an answer is needed.(I'm replacing, so my opinion on this might be different from OSG's)
@Deus noHow can we be sure you're the cop? You might be one of the mafia trying to kill the innocent Dorsi and deus, and trying to gain the support of the innocent 4mask and me to get enough votes to lynch them.
gg wp.
I am cop. Investigated 4mask early read explains why I was so confident in them being town and used basically meh reasoning, then origami/lemon. Both turned up town. there is 1 scum left.
Either deus or Dorsi. 5 players left. We can lynch one then scum kills someone and it will be 2-1. Assuming we pick wrong.
Dorsidwarf
Have you read the thread?@Deus noHow can we be sure you're the cop? You might be one of the mafia trying to kill the innocent Dorsi and deus, and trying to gain the support of the innocent 4mask and me to get enough votes to lynch them.
gg wp.
I am cop. Investigated 4mask early read explains why I was so confident in them being town and used basically meh reasoning, then origami/lemon. Both turned up town. there is 1 scum left.
Either deus or Dorsi. 5 players left. We can lynch one then scum kills someone and it will be 2-1. Assuming we pick wrong.
Dorsidwarf
Roo. Answer the questions, please. Any you being you explains your early behaviour and reads.
Roo. Answer the questions, please. Any you being you explains your early behaviour and reads.I already said no.
Yuh huh. You're really instilling me with a lot of confidence about your cop claim here, what with refusing to answer questions and investigating someone you weren't scum reading. Why did you investigate Lemon instead of Dorsi or me, considering we were both scum according to you?alright not changing my vote at all.
No you didn't. You said you investigated Mask for 'meh reasoning' and gave no reason whatsoever for investigating Lemonpie over your top two scumpicks, aside from claiming to already know that Dorsi was mafia. And you're so confident in your theory of Dorsi being scum that you immediately OMGUS when someone doesn't believe your claim.Yuh huh. You're really instilling me with a lot of confidence about your cop claim here, what with refusing to answer questions and investigating someone you weren't scum reading. Why did you investigate Lemon instead of Dorsi or me, considering we were both scum according to you?alright not changing my vote at all.
Deus Asmoth Either you or I are gonna be lynched. I already said why.
As far as reads I'm fairly certain I'm doing it wrong. I have three scum reads. Dorsi, TDS, Deus. 4mask definite town. Tea most likely town.OSG wasn't mentioned, which implies a neutral read. It makes no sense that a cop would investigate a neutral read over two scum reads with only one scum left in the game. So either roo was lying about their reads then, or they're lying about their role now, the latter being more likely.
Also wish either IC had, like, ever posted reads? :|I was dead before I was a point to do so. 4maskwolf was lurking super hard, I was surprised by that.
Good game everybody. I regret to say that I won't be in another mafia game until school is done because of AP tests and stuff.
@Roo, it is great to see your play develop to the point where people believe your claim ;D
Given 2 of the 3 worst lurkers were scum, I stand behind the playergamer lynch. Just got unlucky with the one we hit. :b
Next time I would recommend explaining your decision to investigate OSG and answer Deus Asmoth's questions though. In a more active game and one with a jailkeeper, you might have gotten lynched for that.Good game everybody. I regret to say that I won't be in another mafia game until school is done because of AP tests and stuff.
@Roo, it is great to see your play develop to the point where people believe your claim ;D
ayyyyye :D
Next time I would recommend explaining your decision to investigate OSG and answer Deus Asmoth's questions though. In a more active game and one with a jailkeeper, you might have gotten lynched for that.Good game everybody. I regret to say that I won't be in another mafia game until school is done because of AP tests and stuff.
@Roo, it is great to see your play develop to the point where people believe your claim ;D
ayyyyye :D
Roo did explain that the decision was made BC he was the least likely night kill, and not accounting for the jailkeeper, it did make sense (though was a bit misguided. )Also, Deus refusing to acknowledge how Dark Star's flip had changed the game and just continuing to bitch about the questions was so silly fmpov that I can understand not answering them? So I'd be surprised if a more active game would've impacted that as I think the lack of activity is what contributed to ppl only wanting to lynch ppl with high post counts
Dark Star's attitude in the scum QT is still super annoying to me and I'm glad I got him lynched (with the help of the last minute bus.) I'm kind of sad Dorsid just disappeared at the end as I was starting to townread him and would've liked to see if his game sense changed at the end. Also wish either IC had, like, ever posted reads? :|
I feel like my reads were okay despite everything?? Had fun arguing and working with roo
I did actually consider making a post but I frankly didn't want roo to move his laser-guided random selection away from the person who wasn't me.Lmao. Did you believe the claim?
Well GG. Remember, inattentive mafia-playing kills!Social Loafing~ :<
Obviously, since nobody counterclaimed cop or even jailkeeperI did actually consider making a post but I frankly didn't want roo to move his laser-guided random selection away from the person who wasn't me.Lmao. Did you believe the claim?
Roo did explain that the decision was made BC he was the least likely night kill, and not accounting for the jailkeeper, it did make sense (though was a bit misguided. )Also, Deus refusing to acknowledge how Dark Star's flip had changed the game and just continuing to bitch about the questions was so silly fmpov that I can understand not answering them? So I'd be surprised if a more active game would've impacted that as I think the lack of activity is what contributed to ppl only wanting to lynch ppl with high post countsSimple question. If I'd been town and roo had been scum, would you still think it would be acceptable that roo refused to answer any questions for the majority of the game?