Bay 12 Games Forum

Finally... => General Discussion => Topic started by: RoseHeart on November 29, 2021, 11:35:04 am

Title: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: RoseHeart on November 29, 2021, 11:35:04 am
http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=80245.0

That's a long list, most of them I didn't know, but several I did. All those names have a red mark, ban.

It works! A lot racist crap, a lot of violent threats, that shit is gone, good! But I...think we can do better. I have said and done some stupid shit in my past, held on to some ugly ideas that effected how I behaved. I've even been "canceled" which seemed like a big deal at the time, but time moved on. People change, James Gunn has probably tweeted shit 100x worse than what many or most, of these posters said. Whether you agree or not with him getting rehired by Disney and Marvel, his sense of humor has evolved more tact, his behavior has changed with time.

Isn't it time we give some of these guys another shot? I know at least one that wishes they could return, I bet they are not the only one that would do a lot with another opportunity.
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: wierd on November 29, 2021, 11:43:53 am
Toady is actually very lenient.

He goes way out of his way to warn and temp mute people to convince them to abandon thier wicked ways.

Hes warned me more than once, when I have been suckered into flamewars.  I prefer not to engage/act that way anyway.. but the fact I am still around is testament to the toad's long suffering and patience.

At some point, there is a point he stops being tolerant or hopeful for your cure, and he acts to protect the community.

This forum has been going for more than 15 years. That list is shockingly short for a forum as old as this one.

Is it a shame some old, well remembered names are in that list? Abolutely.

Is that on Toady?  No. Its not.
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: NullForceOmega on November 29, 2021, 11:45:33 am
No.  The severity of the penalty is equivalent to it's rarity, while that list appears long it also extends across nearly six years, meaning the total number of persons banned compared to the number of active users is very, very low.

It takes either a consistent, observable pattern of behavior or a substantial violation of the forum guidelines to end up banned (unless it's a bot), and I'm pretty sure that most people here will agree that perma-bans have contributed greatly to keeping the community welcoming and open to most discussions.

Finally, Toady is the moderator here, and most of us would prefer that he have the time and peace of mind to continue his mad passion project rather than wrangle cats.
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: Chevaleresse on November 29, 2021, 11:46:18 am
personally after interacting with a few people with the big red mark after their name, i'm inclined to trust Toady's judgement here. weird said basically everything I would, otherwise.
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: Reverie on November 29, 2021, 11:46:51 am
I can't really speak for Toady, but based on what I've seen, I can't imagine he'd have enough time to manage individual appeals and whatever potential drama they could risk inviting. In a community with more moderators, maybe, but not here.
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: nenjin on November 29, 2021, 11:49:39 am
Yeah. Toady has taken the time to tell me to chill out in the past rather than ban me. If he thinks a ban is warranted I don't see any reason to disagree with him. I wouldn't put up with anyone using my house as a platform for their bullshit either.
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: Man of Paper on November 29, 2021, 04:29:35 pm
Lol bro just go run your own forum so you can be the admin you so desperately want to be
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: Dorsidwarf on November 29, 2021, 05:23:44 pm
As someone with prior community administrative experience, the fact that Bay12 has only had to issue 45 permanent bans in the last ten years speaks wonders as to the patience/leniency of the site administrator... and the general kindness/maturity of the community. I checked the permanent ban logs of another community I'm in and there've been 9,826 permanent bans over roughly the same time period, in a similarly sized and active space.

The onus for stuff like this is pretty much on the person who got banned showing that they've changed enough from how they were that got them banned, though this can be pretty hard for a standalone forum like Bay12forums. Ultimately though this really seems like a direct message conversation that ought to be had with Toady or other applicable forum staff than a grandstand GD thread to everyone else.

And finally, while of course its always regrettable not being able to come back to a social space you enjoyed but arent welcome in any more... it's part of moving on with life.

Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: Man of Paper on November 29, 2021, 05:32:07 pm
Oh no, don't tell him to contact Toady, he's done it before about perfectly inane crap and postured like he was a voice of the people. If toady ever gives up developing DF I'm blaming it solely on roseheart's shoulders for pegging him with needless messages.

He doesn't understand that this niche forum is no more than a sidenote for toady, who I hear is working on something big nowadays. Or that he's not a big player on the forum. Or that the forum doesn't need any big players.

What he's doing, again, is looking somewhere where there isn't an issue, saying "yes I can make an issue out of this", doing so, then jumping in with "solutions". Honestly I'd talk some more shit if I didn't think there was an actual problem roseheart needs to work out with himself. One that preferably isn't solved in a thread on bay12
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: Dorsidwarf on November 29, 2021, 05:50:14 pm
Oh no, don't tell him to contact Toady, he's done it before about perfectly inane crap and postured like he was a voice of the people. If toady ever gives up developing DF I'm blaming it solely on roseheart's shoulders for pegging him with needless messages.

He doesn't understand that this niche forum is no more than a sidenote for toady, who I hear is working on something big nowadays. Or that he's not a big player on the forum. Or that the forum doesn't need any big players.

What he's doing, again, is looking somewhere where there isn't an issue, saying "yes I can make an issue out of this", doing so, then jumping in with "solutions". Honestly I'd talk some more shit if I didn't think there was an actual problem roseheart needs to work out with himself. One that preferably isn't solved in a thread on bay12

Oh dear, I didn't realise he was a regular trouble-rouser. Thought he was just an irate friend of someone who got banned for being repeatedly dumb or something.
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: Vector on November 29, 2021, 06:45:35 pm
We've had this convo before, yes. Toady gives many warnings and usually only bans somebody after they have repeatedly flouted moderation.

Roseheart, tempbanning does happen in the form of muting. Somebody breaks the forum rules, gets some time to cool off and think about what they did, and then they get to come back. People who get permabanned are usually banned after repeatedly making it clear that they have decided to use this space in a way that harms other users or Toady's ability to just, have a normal life.

This is not court. Being told, "please do not come back to this particular Waffle House" is not the same as being exiled from all community, i.e. social death. It is extremely different from real death.


I used to work at a school where some students were asked to leave mid-year for making "credible threats" of a school shooting. I really hope that they have changed, and grown up, but I also don't want those particular students in my classroom anymore, because that would mean that they had made their threat and were told by the authorities in charge that that was worth a slap on the wrist and no meaningful penalties.

Note that they were not given jail time or excluded from all schools. They were simply asked not to come back to that particular school.

Everyone makes mistakes but there needs to be consequences for threatening behavior. It is OK for Toady to set boundaries regarding what behavior he won't permit in the online space that he has personally built.

I was stalked by someone on this forum and they weren't banned because the stalking wasn't in public, rather via PMs. Toady resolved the situation to my satisfaction by telling the person to stop being a creeper, and eventually they left the forums on their own (I haven't seen them post in any context for 10 years).

The point is: yeah, maybe folks want to come back, but usually when people are banned, it's because they've acted in such a way that either they need to be banned or someone else who has done nothing wrong would have to leave. If the guy who wanted to pay me for tech support with photos of his girlfriend's tits (note, this is a different individual than the stalker) were allowed to become a regular commenter again, I'm pretty sure I'd go back to exclusively posting in the Mafia boards and letting the rest of you all deal with your own social problems.
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: Man of Paper on November 29, 2021, 07:05:18 pm
Oh man, what if this is a play to get his alts unbanned so he can artificially boost activity numbers in his forum games
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: None on November 29, 2021, 07:11:01 pm
Generally speaking, if you get banned, you're not allowed to have alts. I don't know what your axe to grind is, but maybe cool your beans, yeh?
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: delphonso on November 29, 2021, 07:36:39 pm
Agreed with None - it'd be hilarious if you ended up getting banned in a thread talking about loosening banning, though.

I think everyone's remarks here are strong arguments against lifting bans. People can always make alts, if they really have changed and want to return - I believe the only tracking is through IP and email, which are easy enough to get around, should you desire to.

Finally, most of the bans here are for bigotry and calls to violence - which people can surely recover from (I don't think the large increase in bans in 2016 happened in a vaccuum), but are also serious topics that should be associated with consequence.
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: RoseHeart on November 29, 2021, 08:17:07 pm
Yeah the whole alts thing is one side of it, the people that are still gone are the one's that respected that rule.

Man, a lot can change in 6 months. Or like 5 years? Forget about it. If you make the term long enough, then it's not really a game of whack a mole. Especially if you see this list as "short", multiple years and you bonk them and their gone. Hey, I bring this up because I have been forgiven in the past and I know the effect it had on me. I know that "former trouble makers" are often the ones first to correct the "new trouble makers". And often the one's that carry a tone they will actually listen too. Peace.
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: KittyTac on November 29, 2021, 09:54:18 pm
No. I have been warned several times for my... exploits back in the day. Toady would have been justified to ban me then and there. He gave me a chance. I improved.

But those who were banned went way beyond trolling in Suggestions. Racism should never be tolerated in the slightest for example. They probably wouldn't improve anyways.

Also @wierd, the top entry on the list disappears when a new one is added. So it's longer than it looks like.
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: scriver on November 30, 2021, 08:50:52 am
Yeah I'm with the general no on this.

Toady doesn't even have a arbitrary "three or other number strike rule" for mutings that escalates to a ban by default. He doesn't just give you repeated chances to better yourself but you have to generally go a step beyond to get banned instead of muted.
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: Loud Whispers on November 30, 2021, 11:04:32 am
So on that list, you can divide them into two groups. People who were clearly intent on disrupting the forum by spamming or doing something illegal, and those who got a lot of second chances. There are a number of people on that list who genuinely didn't mean anything ill but were nevertheless always causing drama and... Fair enough. At that point it isn't a punishment measure, but more a "I've run out of rope to give" deal. It hurts when we lose someone who's been with us for ages but it's not like the moderation on b12 has ever been unfair; people acting in good faith get plenty of warnings before banning
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: TamerVirus on November 30, 2021, 06:53:25 pm
I remember interacting with a number of folk on the wall of banishment. A colorful bunch who bought a lot of color to the forum during more active days for sure. Ah memories.

But alas the Toad’s punishment is final. Plus it’s very easy to Not get banned from here, ya know.
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: Bumber on November 30, 2021, 07:20:35 pm
Hmm.. Maybe DerMeister was right about milkable ogresses? We'll never know unless we give him the chance to explain it more thoroughly!
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: Cthulhu on December 01, 2021, 03:15:00 am
Some of the bans are kind of weird, like Neonivek's "deliberately obtuse" is an understatement, he may as well have been posting from another dimension, but I don't remember him being malicious.

But then there was like the guy who spammed everyone's DMs with gore, various people who did nothing but start shit with everyone, I dunno.  Most of the names I actually remember were just the worst people.

Ultimately even if we thought it was fine to let them come back, who would?  The most recent was six months ago.  Is Neonivek gonna come back to a forum he got banned from four years ago?
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: nenjin on December 01, 2021, 11:14:58 am
Neonivek got his ban because he pretty much refused to debate things or discuss things in a reasonable manner, leading to pages and pages of people attempting to understand him to no avail, creating low-level drama in threads and derailing them with his refusal to just let stuff go.

I was one of the primary people he kept coming into conflict with. I was pretty frustrated ever trying to talk to him but it never reached the level of feeling like I should report him (I think? it's been a few years) for something: being obtuse is a personality trait and less an action. Right about the time I was like "I'm just going to stop trying to engage him on anything" is when he got banned.

But clearly it was enough for others to report him, probably just because they were tired of the effect he had on threads he posted in. He was a consummate contrarian. I can only imagine Toady attempted to talk to him and got the same kind of treatment which led to his ban. If there was one I would question on that list, it would be him. But he also is the only example I can think of on this forum where legitimately attempting to interact with him resulted in more trouble than it was worth.
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: Bumber on December 01, 2021, 01:48:02 pm
GoblinCookie was kind of like Neonivek, but stubborn instead of incomprehensible, and mainly focused on derailing suggestions threads. Utterly convinced he was right on a subject while focusing solely on one factor, ignoring all others that were brought up.

One of the derails involved him asserting that ducks would eventually wipe out all plant life and their own species forever due to overbreeding, while ignoring that they actually need to be able to reach every single plant, and the effects of malnutrition on reproductive capability before that point.

I probably would have gotten banned too if I didn't have the good sense to step back after the Toad posted a warning in a thread. Decided to let others engage instead until the Toad Hammer came down.
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: TamerVirus on December 01, 2021, 02:17:29 pm
Fun Fact: Neonivek is 4th on the list of most posts on this forum. Above him at 3rd is the similarly banished GWG, whose ban now predates updated ban list
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: nenjin on December 01, 2021, 02:23:27 pm
Kinda crazy that's still true after this many years.
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: EuchreJack on December 01, 2021, 03:30:09 pm
Play Forum Mafia: The Best Way to up your page count!
This ad brought to you by Forum Mafia, and it sponsors:
Cowboy Bebop Live Action Discussion (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=179291.0)
Paranoia RPG Recruitment Thread: Be a Troubleshooter Today (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=179246.msg8330299#msg8330299)
And more!

Fun Fact: Neonivek is 4th on the list of most posts on this forum. Above him at 3rd is the similarly banished GWG, whose ban now predates updated ban list
There are pretty obvious reasons for that.  It's a numbers game, in some ways.  The more you post, the more the responsibility.
It's also important to take breaks from the forum every once in a while.
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: Funk on December 01, 2021, 03:47:35 pm
Of death? there's been a dozen bans total that went bots or out right trolls.
As long as you follow the Forum Guidelines your fine.
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: Cthulhu on December 02, 2021, 03:57:08 am
Fun Fact: Neonivek is 4th on the list of most posts on this forum. Above him at 3rd is the similarly banished GWG, whose ban now predates updated ban list

Yeah, I used to be pretty high, fourth or fifth, but once the forum games section became popular all the top posters are from there.

It's weird, it's like there's three different forums.  There's the dorf forts stuff, the general discussion area down here, and then the forum games, where you've got people with a billion posts who've never even played DF or interacted outside that section of the forum.  I dunno, I kind of don't like it.

I remember GWG was just constantly starting shit though, extremely belligerent poster.  And a lot of racists, usually in the, like, slavic type of racism as opposed to american racism or nazi stuff.  There've been a couple of those but lots of guys like sarmatian getting banned over poland vs whatever flame wars.  Then people like MrPoo or x2yzh9 who were just extremely twelve years old.

Actually, I dunno if x2yzh9 actually got banned.  I remember his name because he had multiple entries in the old Goonstation 13 wiki for acting like a twelve year old.

Point being, looking back through the list of banned posters I can't see a single person in there I'd want unbanned.  The only one that disappointed me was Torvac/Mictlantecuhtli, who was funny, but that predates the ban list.
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: Loud Whispers on December 02, 2021, 05:28:48 am
From the ban list I miss GWG, Neonivek and Necro910. The latter especially, since he's the only one of the three I knew who actually did want to rejoin bay12, and who got banned for spamming the magma meme too much.
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: wierd on December 02, 2021, 06:30:31 am
Again, I feel I have narrowly evaded the banhammer over the years; I have been suckered into 10+ page long tit-for-tat flame exchanges over my bad habit of having (and sharing) hot takes. (I prefer to state the hot take, and the reasoning behindv it to explain it, as I dont take to a position in a vacuum, but tend to end up arguing against the phantasms others invent, instead of accepting my reasoning at face value. This is especially true when somebody new joins, and doesnt realize just how much i live up to my username. ;) )

I really dont like such exchanges, but i acknowledge I tend to get into them, and that it is a problem.

Again, that I am still around is testament to the patience and leniency of the toad.

As a borderline troll myself, i can grasp how it hurts when a "notorious" poster gets banned. However, the same also tells me that every chance to be better was given.

Its not on the toad.
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: ChairmanPoo on December 02, 2021, 09:05:39 am
I think ban should be renamed excommunication because its more accurate. And anyone excommunicated should get a PM saying "You've been excommunicated for your sins against your fellow forum posters"
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: EuchreJack on December 02, 2021, 11:21:08 am
Actually, I dunno if x2yzh9 actually got banned.

Dunno, but x2yzh9 is still around. (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=18224)
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: None on December 02, 2021, 12:20:21 pm
Again, I feel I have narrowly evaded the banhammer over the years; I have been suckered into 10+ page long tit-for-tat flame exchanges over my bad habit of having (and sharing) hot takes. (I prefer to state the hot take, and the reasoning behindv it to explain it, as I dont take to a position in a vacuum, but tend to end up arguing against the phantasms others invent, instead of accepting my reasoning at face value. This is especially true when somebody new joins, and doesnt realize just how much i live up to my username. ;) )

(https://i.ibb.co/ypfhbk6/bait.gif)
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: Starver on December 02, 2021, 12:51:55 pm
For my part, I've been a silly poster in the past, I'm sure. Back when I was young I was temporarily banned from a BBS (this being pre-Web) on two occasions. One for (ab/over-)using a feature within the BBS itself, another for apparently being the single highest (by a long way) poller of the server[1]. A couple of years later, I actually deputised for the Sysop for a couple of weeks during which they needed some time off, so obviously I'd impressed them with my reformed[1a] (but keen) dedication to the system.

While I'm still a child at heart, I (mostly, and only by my reckoning) got all the modern sins[2] out of the way in the '90s and early millenium, before too many of hoi poloi (from The Eternal September onwards) started to (re)discover how to stand out.

Yes, I can be opinionated, I can think of a recent statement even on here that I currently wish I hadn't made (far from bannable, but bad-humoured[3]) and there's a lot of self-censoring I do that means a post (or PM) perhaps even gets written but never submitted. And I can understand those that step slightly over that line of mine with not quite the same level of awareness (or caring!).

And let a thousand flowers bloom. But sometimes weeding is needed, even if the invasive plant in question has its interesting petals.

If I were (suddenly) in Toady's position, I don't think I'd reverse past bans, much as I wouldn't carry forward my unease with  the odd other user and hurry towards newly banning. I also am sure I wouldn't have the time to catch up with various ongoing dramas before everyone started testing (playfully or otherwise) where my own line is for entirely new banhammering.

On a Wiki of my acquaintence I'm (without any powers of my own, besides the usual page de-editing) absolutely astounded by the number of new accounts being created[4], and occasionally I undo a vandalism (or far more subtle advertising) arising from one of these (as I'm sure other legitimate users do). I believe the challenges there are much greater in suppressing these things than on Bay12Forums, but possibly 'free' Wikis have helped in being the lower-hanging-fruit to attract those that I now haven't had cause to report on, here, for longer than I can reliably remember. I think the tolerance for the merely misguided and the prevention of the truly intentional shitposting/adspamming users is balanced pretty well. Edge-cases will of course exist, and I think benefit-of-the-doubt is the rule of thumb (with cautionary notes made publically or privately) without weakening the deterrant enough to make it drift towards hyper-libertarian hellscape.

I may be biased. i haven't found myself the wrong side of a misunderstanding, so I don't realise what exile from Bay12 would mean to me. I've dropped/idled out of many other places in the past...Lost passwords, extended periods of apathy, just forgetfulness and being occupied elsewhere for too long. (Including the place I learnt of DF from and the place I learnt of that forum from, both nice places). One rather nice Usenet group that I still think of myself as 'belonging to' I lost access to after an ISP reorganisation a decade ago that I never got around to reaccessing, and it sometimes tears at my heartstrings that I dropped out of that community. Being forced out on the whim of someone else (albeit the 'boss' of that area) might hit hard.

But, unlike Marx, would I really want to be a member of a club who didn't want someone like me as a member? He who pays (or, indeed, is) the piper calls the tune. I do regret dropping out of online communities; But I can surely only regret what I hypothetically did, if I get pushed out instead.


You know, I originally had a short point to make, and I maybe submerged it in too many other words. (Despite writing the end of Footnote-2 really early on, which should have reminded me not to!) But having followed this discussion I think I've encompassed everything I might wish to say, so consider it said.



[1] Which meant the root of the server had a word with the sysop of the BBS who then had to seriously get my attention so that he could have a word with me. It was a (dubious) honour, but arising from a single little typo in a shell-script.  :P

[1a] The power... THE POWER!!!  Mwuhahaha... (Yes, I may have slightly overreached my remit with some newly-discovered admin commands, but only a liiiitle bit, and nothing actually bad/intrusive/corrupting... 8)

[2] Over-sharing, over-meming, cyberstalking, radically misrepresenting myself, etc. Never quite got the hang of being succinct and minimalst in my writing, though.

[3] What's worse is that I immediately had a more Wildean equivalent of the put-down that I'm sure even the target would have enjoyed, with a little thought.

[4] *counts...* 71 over the last 16 hours. Which is a typical rate. Many versions of a couple of different <SameFirstFewCharacters><PaddedWithRandomCharacters> names, a similar number of <Firstname><Lastname><Digits> that look just as suspicious (and/or 'borrowed' from external userlists for verisimilitude), a handful of possibly quite genuine usernames. When you check, almost none of the created names ever even make an edit
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: KittyTac on December 03, 2021, 10:17:00 pm
GoblinCookie was kind of like Neonivek, but stubborn instead of incomprehensible, and mainly focused on derailing suggestions threads. Utterly convinced he was right on a subject while focusing solely on one factor, ignoring all others that were brought up.

One of the derails involved him asserting that ducks would eventually wipe out all plant life and their own species forever due to overbreeding, while ignoring that they actually need to be able to reach every single plant, and the effects of malnutrition on reproductive capability before that point.

I probably would have gotten banned too if I didn't have the good sense to step back after the Toad posted a warning in a thread. Decided to let others engage instead until the Toad Hammer came down.
I had shitfights with GC regularly and even though I still think my takes were correct, my arguing methods meant I wasn't much better than him.
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: heydude6 on December 06, 2021, 10:43:03 pm
Toady doesn't even have an arbitrary "three or other number strike rule" for mutings that escalates to a ban by default.

I agree with this quite a lot. Most of the these policies were in some way inspired by the "three strikes" laws of California which were implemented as an experiment during the "tough on crime" era. Somehow they became incredibly influential, to the point where "3 strikes" is now the default way of thinking, even though California's 3 strikes have now been denounced as being overly punishing while doing little to deter crime.

I'm happy that Toady is able to see through this *expletive* and not perpetuate the madness.

GoblinCookie was kind of like Neonivek, but stubborn instead of incomprehensible, and mainly focused on derailing suggestions threads. Utterly convinced he was right on a subject while focusing solely on one factor, ignoring all others that were brought up.

One of the derails involved him asserting that ducks would eventually wipe out all plant life and their own species forever due to overbreeding, while ignoring that they actually need to be able to reach every single plant, and the effects of malnutrition on reproductive capability before that point.

I probably would have gotten banned too if I didn't have the good sense to step back after the Toad posted a warning in a thread. Decided to let others engage instead until the Toad Hammer came down.

My only encounter with GoblinCookie was in a suggestions thread where people were discussing possible implementations of economics into dwarf fortress. Everyone in the thread kept mentioning how the economics threads kept dying due to GoblinCookie showing up and then a few days later I got to see exactly what they meant. GoblinCookie showed up, disagreed with what the others were saying, and started arguments to push his point while stubbornly refusing to back down no matter how diplomatically people tried to engage with him. Suddenly, the thread revolved around him and the once productive discussion gave way to trying to get this idiot to shut up. Thread quickly died after that.

The guy was a leech, latching onto threads, draining them of all their life, and then moving on to the next one to repeat the cycle. I'm glad he's gone.
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: scriver on December 07, 2021, 07:14:18 am
Toady doesn't even have an arbitrary "three or other number strike rule" for mutings that escalates to a ban by default.

I agree with this quite a lot. Most of the these policies were in some way inspired by the "three strikes" laws of California which were implemented as an experiment during the "tough on crime" era. Somehow they became incredibly influential, to the point where "3 strikes" is now the default way of thinking, even though California's 3 strikes have now been denounced as being overly punishing while doing little to deter crime.

I'm happy that Toady is able to see through this *expletive* and not perpetuate the madness.

I am fairly certain thst the "three chances/strikes is the reasonable amount of chances" concept is far older than those laws -- in fact I'd hazard a lot on a guess thst they're based on that pee-existing notion, not the other way around. You guys on your side of the trwnch even got it in baseball even :P
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: martinuzz on December 07, 2021, 08:05:11 am
Even though there probably are people around that don't always catch my satire or shock-and-absurdism, I've only ever once received a friendly warning, and that was something like 12 or more years ago, IIRC for letting myself get flamebaited.
As far I can tell, bans on this forum are exceptionally rare, and the Toad is very tolerant and fair.
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: Cthulhu on December 07, 2021, 09:39:29 am
I've gotten in trouble a few times but yeah, you can see by how most of the ban reasons are for racism and stuff that Toady is pretty slow to ban to begin with.  A lot of the guys who got banned for causing non-racist problems were around for months or years doing their thing before they went too far.
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: ChairmanPoo on December 09, 2021, 04:36:56 am
Toady doesn't even have an arbitrary "three or other number strike rule" for mutings that escalates to a ban by default.

I agree with this quite a lot. Most of the these policies were in some way inspired by the "three strikes" laws of California which were implemented as an experiment during the "tough on crime" era. Somehow they became incredibly influential, to the point where "3 strikes" is now the default way of thinking, even though California's 3 strikes have now been denounced as being overly punishing while doing little to deter crime.

I'm happy that Toady is able to see through this *expletive* and not perpetuate the madness.

I am fairly certain thst the "three chances/strikes is the reasonable amount of chances" concept is far older than those laws -- in fact I'd hazard a lot on a guess thst they're based on that pee-existing notion, not the other way around. You guys on your side of the trwnch even got it in baseball even :P
The Rule of three is... one of those 'laws' about the Planes, about everything tending to happen in threes... or everything's composed of three parts, or there's always three choices, and so on and so forth.
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: Starver on December 09, 2021, 06:44:45 am
"To offend once may be regarded as a misfortune, to offend twice looks like carelessness. To offend for a third time is clearly taking the piss, so STFU and GTFO!."
- Oscar Wilde, confronting online trolls on his LiveJournal comments section.
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: Il Palazzo on December 09, 2021, 11:49:11 pm
snip
If there's any justice in the world [1], one day you'll end up banned [2] for overusing parentheses and footnotes, mister (or miss (or gender-neutral alternative)).

[1] there ain't any
[2] that'll teach* ya talk proper like

*debatable
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: nenjin on December 10, 2021, 10:45:20 am
Not to make this a singling out session, but yes Starver, I've wanted to comment on it so many times but stopped myself.
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: None on December 10, 2021, 12:14:13 pm
noooo don't come after my boy starver like this for a harmless communicative idiosyncrasy
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: Starver on December 10, 2021, 12:50:53 pm
Fetenete mean less ((()))s. While ((()))s mean less fetenete. I always strive for the best balance, and make no excuses.

In leiu of the exact smiley type I think I need, let's use this one...  :P
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: Vector on December 10, 2021, 12:54:31 pm
noooo don't come after my boy starver like this for a harmless communicative idiosyncrasy

I feel it's common among computer programmers, my ex also did that in his personal emails :V
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: Amaranth on December 10, 2021, 09:05:31 pm
Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: Uthimienure on December 10, 2021, 09:10:11 pm
noooo don't come after my boy starver like this for a harmless communicative idiosyncrasy

I feel it's common among computer programmers, my ex also did that in his personal emails :V

If Starver's long, footnoted posts bother you, simply don't read them.
Unless, that is, you're Alex.
Spoiler (click to show/hide)
(edit: I read them because it keeps my mind sharp in addition to hearing what Starver has to say.)
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: IamanElfCollaborator on December 10, 2021, 10:12:05 pm
To toss in my two cents as a dude who rarely ventures out of FGRP except to lurk on the upper boards to see what good DF mods have been cooked up, we really don't need unbanning. Like some of our more experienced colleagues here have said, it's damn hard to be banned on Bay to begin with; we're a mature lot and I wouldn't have hung around so long if this was a more drama-filled forum.

If we started unbanning, even for people like GWG who DIDN'T get banned for racism or incessant trolling, we'd end up with more drama than it's worth. It's already hard to tick off Toady as it is, just leave the system be. It clearly works.

*retreats back to FGRP*
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: AzyWng on December 10, 2021, 11:21:01 pm
Nitpick, but calling a permaban a "Death Penalty" is a false equivalence that seems like it was something put in the thread's title for shock value.

To state the obvious: Banning someone from a forum on the internet is not the same as executing them. Comparing banning to execution makes a ban sound like a far more serious action than it actually is. Making actions sound more serious than they actually are is unfair.

I'm not really active on the forums enough to say whether the people who were banned should be allowed to be brought back, mind, but I largely agree with the people saying no. There aren't very many people who have been banned. Allowing them to return may not actually have any effect considering many of these bans were several years ago. On top of that, allowing banned users to return may mean having to deal with the behavior that got them banned yet again.

Maybe this community has problems, but I don't believe allowing banned users to return is the solution.

Besides, Toady banned the users in question. It's ultimately Toady's decision as to whether "it's time [he gives] these guys another shot".

To repeat what another user said: If you feel strongly enough about this issue to create a post here, why not message Toady, instead?
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: Vector on December 11, 2021, 03:54:12 am
If Starver's long, footnoted posts bother you, simply don't read them.
Unless, that is, you're Alex.
Spoiler (click to show/hide)
(edit: I read them because it keeps my mind sharp in addition to hearing what Starver has to say.)

Oh! Sorry for the lack of clarity. It doesn't bother me, I think it's funny.
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: Egan_BW on December 11, 2021, 04:30:19 am
I appreciate the footnotes. They're like little post lootboxes!
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: MaxTheFox on December 11, 2021, 04:34:43 am
I also tend to overuse parentheses (in informal messages at least).

As for the topic itself, some people just don't deserve a second chance.
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: scriver on December 11, 2021, 04:45:46 am
I appreciate the footnotes. They're like little post lootboxes!

You'd love Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrel by Susanna Clarke. There are pages where half the page is taken up by footnotes, as well as footnotes thst go on for pages
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: SirAston on December 11, 2021, 07:46:38 am
All forums/boards are autocratic by design, so there's no such thing as an unjustified ban in the first place. The difference is how the userbase reacts to these bans, and their options are staying or leaving.
The userbase tends to stay when they overall feel that these bans were taken as a last measure. The userbase tends to leave when they feel that bans are used willy-nilly or for nefarious/selfish reasons (just because a ban can't be unjustifiable doesn't mean a ban can't be bad, since actions will usually lead to reactions).

The vast majority here seems to be in favor of staying because they trust, by experience or by proxy, that Toady does a good job overall about banning people, using it as a last resort when all other options have been exhausted.

Plus, as some people have pointed out, people can, in theory, always return with an alt, it doesn't require mental gymnastics to mask oneself. If they still behave like the same dungheads they were last time, people will pick up on that and the alt will receive a fast ban, but if they have truly changed, people will also pick up on that and users tend to accept an alt if they don't make a mess. So, in a way, even if they get the door slammed shut into their face, in a roundabout way, it's still the banned user's choice if they want to stay out and move on, or return (and hopefully be better from that point on). That doesn't really happen with a death penalty.

*returns to Forum Games*
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: None on December 11, 2021, 09:26:37 am
I appreciate the footnotes. They're like little post lootboxes!

You'd love Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrel by Susanna Clarke. There are pages where half the page is taken up by footnotes, as well as footnotes thst go on for pages

Ooh oooh ooh or the, uh, Bartimaeus trilogy (?) I think it was, the one with some kid summoning a bored demon? Or House of Leaves, with literal actual pages of footnotes, some meaningful, some tangents, some long long lists of rooms without windows, etc.
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: George_Chickens on December 11, 2021, 11:52:46 am
I think everyone in this thread should be Bay12 executed. Right now. In fact, why stop there? We should give the Bay12 Death Penalty to people outside of Bay12's jurisdiction.
Necro910
Actually, he was banned for joking about pedophilia with a user. The quote was something like "The little girl next door was winking at me wtf", and then "You're either a very lucky young boy or a very lucky pedophile. I wish you luck either way.". If it were just MAGMAAAAAAAAAAAAing, he surely would have been muted first.
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: Cthulhu on December 11, 2021, 09:14:50 pm
If we're doin' this now, I'm wantin' to subtweet everybody who types out colloquialisms.

Also people who still say "gorram."  I hated firefly even before all the joss whedon stuff came to life.  Every character he writes is the most annoying person in the universe.
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: Il Palazzo on December 11, 2021, 09:17:32 pm
#Cancel_Cthulhu
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: Yoink on December 11, 2021, 09:18:04 pm
I appreciate the footnotes. They're like little post lootboxes!

You'd love Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrel by Susanna Clarke. There are pages where half the page is taken up by footnotes, as well as footnotes thst go on for pages
Cosmic Banditos is a truly wonderful book, much recommended. Some of the footnotes even travel through time!   
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: Starver on December 11, 2021, 10:47:09 pm
I suppose I'm mostly influenced by Pratchett's liberal (though less expansive than mine) usage. And, in specific form, by the AFP conventions that developed to transcribe it in pure 7-bit unformatted text. Which means I'm also somewhat overly used to the [I]rrelevent subject-tag, too.

(But Randall Munroe also is known to multinest feteneet, on occasion, so another creative person who doesn't discourage my habits at all...)
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: lemon10 on December 12, 2021, 12:21:17 am
Mmmm I'm on Starvers side here as well, footnotes are cool.
---
On the subject of permabans, I'm heavily for them. I'm reminded of post recently I saw on a different forum where someone went "I just got permabanned from [sister forum] after fifty infractions" in the rant thread about said forum.

Some people in said thread who weren't a fan of the mods on that forum were vaguely supportive of him, but I was thinking "WTF mods, why would you bother keeping someone around after 49 infractions. The idiot is obviously too stupid to learn and you should have just permabanned them at like ten".

I have the same opinion here. If someone is so obviously annoying or unwilling to learn that they squander their chances giving them an unlimited amount over time serves little purpose besides making things more annoying for the mods.
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: hector13 on December 12, 2021, 07:26:47 pm
I didn’t expect this thread to still be going after a page of people hailing Toady’s reluctance to wield the banhammer.

Ah well, I miss OW, but as mentioned Toady gives many second chances before ejecting.

To be perfectly honest, so long as the folks weren’t banned for something horrible or stupid, like condoning genocide, and didn’t cause any further issues, Toady would probably be alright with some of them coming back.
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: Il Palazzo on December 12, 2021, 07:40:03 pm
I didn’t expect this thread to still be going...
That's because this is no longer a thread about leveraging absurd hyperboles when discussing moderation.
Now it's about Starver's pigheaded reluctance to communicate clearly. Also, if I can have my way, about cancelling Cthulhu for casting aspersions on what is most holy. #Cancel_Cthulhu
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: Cthulhu on December 12, 2021, 07:45:13 pm
Joss Whedon was already the worst thing to happen to the visual arts even before it turned out he was an abusive creep.  I will gladly go to calvary for this.
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: delphonso on December 12, 2021, 07:47:23 pm
As a fellow abuser of parentheticals, I appreciate Starver's long, meandering and often branching posts.

Starver once sent me a PM that hit the character limit and was cut off mid-footnote. 

Also, #Cancel_Cthulhu, gorramit.
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: None on December 12, 2021, 08:12:30 pm
This is the part where Il Palazzo is subverted by his plucky, hyper-energetic oaf of an assistant, isn't it? I watched like one episode of Excel Saga and then shelved it knowing that I needed to be less sober and I'd find it hysterical.

Can we bastardize gorram into something even more unpalatable? A 'gorrarmit' or a 'garrummit' or a good swanky 'grangit' maybe? Gorspeed (gorreed?) and good luck, perhaps?
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: Starver on December 12, 2021, 08:14:21 pm
Starver once sent me a PM that hit the character limit and was cut off mid-footnote.
Did I? Was it?

Do you want me to try to find the rest for you?

Anyway, I try to be concise. But I also don't want to miss out anything if I've already compiled a lot of the back and forth of argument and counter-argument in my head. When I do miss that out, someone ends up saying what I didn't bother and if I then comment on it it looks like I'm just "me too"ing. In a non-hashtaggy way. So I'd rather just shorten the process.

If I can help by shoving a side-thought or three to somewhere you don't have to read. Consider it all Easter Eggs, perhaps.


(As far as I'm concerned[1], I'm not sure the primary title-invoked purpose of this thread is being successfully argued. I've been holding back[2], with my famed iron constitution and adamantine will[3], but now I'm here again, I might as well say that I apologise if I seem to be hijacking this thread, but I don't see many other people honouring its purpose so I don't feel too guilty. Hopefully not a banning matter[4], or even warning, but I'd not be the only one. Perhaps best to let it die, before we do.)


[1] Not that it helps.

[2] You ought to see the replies I haven't made!

[3] And led zeppelins.

[4] If I may try to drift back sort-of-on-topic.
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: delphonso on December 12, 2021, 08:31:32 pm
Judging by the overall thread, it seems roseheart is the sole proponent of removing permabans on people, with strong arguments against changing what seems to work already.

With that, I think it's safe to derail the thread entirely off a cliff. Gawrshspeed, thread.
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: Loud Whispers on December 13, 2021, 08:07:06 am
Actually, he was banned for joking about pedophilia with a user. The quote was something like "The little girl next door was winking at me wtf", and then "You're either a very lucky young boy or a very lucky pedophile. I wish you luck either way.". If it were just MAGMAAAAAAAAAAAAing, he surely would have been muted first.
I didn't know this deepest lore

To be perfectly honest, so long as the folks weren’t banned for something horrible or stupid, like condoning genocide, and didn’t cause any further issues, Toady would probably be alright with some of them coming back.
It's surprising how advocating for IRL genocide has happened before on bay12 whenever Eastern Europe or the Balkans was brought up. It wasn't common but it was surprising to have it nonetheless; I miss some of our slavic posters but they needed to amplify their chill states
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: heydude6 on December 13, 2021, 08:10:47 am
I miss some of our slavic posters but they needed to amplify their chill states

We aren't all gone
Title: Re: Ending the Bay 12 Death Penalty
Post by: Loud Whispers on December 13, 2021, 09:32:42 am
Long may we stay