Why are you posting like William Shatner acts?
Why are you posting like William Shatner acts?
Because sometimes I want to introduce a pause into what I'm saying for whatever reason.
What even are the rules in this game?
Are there known roles? Randomly generated rules? Powerful rules?What even are the rules in this game?
1) Sign up for the game
2) ???????
3) PROFIT!
If there is a role called Knightwing or Knightwing’s heir, I demand it nowYou have been assigned role: Knightwing's butt hair.
I’m struggling with sleep and keeping up with baby, so I’m just watching.There should be an unspoiled specchat on the Discord, so you can follow along at your own pace when the game begins.
Eh, I'll in.Excellent
Any objections
Nay.
I could play if you don't mind all my posts being this long.
I tried posting yesterday but the forums were Down For some reason.
I could play if you don't mind all my posts being this long.Same
I'm going to go out on a limb and say I think it's pretty unlikely Max and Jim are mafia together. I don't believe they would post in unison like that while giving different vote targets. Feels very uncoordinated.Alas, it is not me this time. I'll, uh, do a jig or something to prove it's not me or whatever.
On that note I'm gonna say Webadict is mafia. Knightwing should be easy enough to read. Tric is going to try to help mafia regardless of his alignment and I don't know what Deus Asmoth is going to do.
Sorry, I need a list of people in the game, so I'm putting it here:It's not me. You clearly misspelled "Jim".
Maximum Spin
TricMagic
Jim Groovester
Knightwing
webadict
Toonyman
Deus Asmoth
Ummm... Idk, it's Max.
If you mean mafia then no it's not me.I'm going to go out on a limb and say I think it's pretty unlikely Max and Jim are mafia together. I don't believe they would post in unison like that while giving different vote targets. Feels very uncoordinated.Alas, it is not me this time. I'll, uh, do a jig or something to prove it's not me or whatever.
On that note I'm gonna say Webadict is mafia. Knightwing should be easy enough to read. Tric is going to try to help mafia regardless of his alignment and I don't know what Deus Asmoth is going to do.
I also wasn't aware this game was starting until I saw the PM, but luckily, I appear to not have missed much.
Since that's out of the way, is it you, ToonyMan? I'd really appreciate it if it wasn't, because then I can be a lot lazier than I'm already being right now. Please.
Hm.Well by your logic I'm going to say Jim is town because he's been town in all the games I can think of recently that I was a part of, how's that??
Jim seems like the obvious choice. But is it too obvious?
Nah.
Jim
and then get mad when Jack steals a win...wait that can't happen this time.Jack the role could.
I'm debating how serious I want to take this game since I'm going to be pretty all over the place on Friday and Saturday. But then I remembered that I only take dumb trivial things seriously like a game of forum mafia and will probably post like my life depends on it and then get mad when Jack steals a win...wait that can't happen this time.Hey, that's not fair. Sometimes, Tric and Knightwing steal your wins, too!
Ah man, you don't need to defend Jim, he's gonna be fine by himself.Hm.Well by your logic I'm going to say Jim is town because he's been town in all the games I can think of recently that I was a part of, how's that??
Jim seems like the obvious choice. But is it too obvious?
Nah.
Jim
Hm.
Jim seems like the obvious choice. But is it too obvious?
Nah.
Jim
You know just because the game says to kill me now doesn't mean that you have to.
But we should still definitely kill TricMagic now, just to be sure.
I guess it's not necessarily true this game is 2 mafia 5 town, that's an assumption I'm making based on how I feel Jack would edit the game when cutting it down from 9 to 7 by not having mally or SK.
The instructions clearly say "Kill Jim Jack Tric Now". I say we go in order.
Killing Jack might be a little difficult, but luckily we only have to worry about that second!
TricMagic because the game says to kill him, now.
Also I still have a lot of Christmas preparations I need to do, so I might be scarce at times.
Hm.
Jim seems like the obvious choice. But is it too obvious?
Nah.
Jim
Maximum Spin, Jim, Knightwing: I just want to confirm that we're all aware that players have been given roles based on players from another game and lynching people based on their usernames probably isn't the most productive use of our time.Yeah, but it's Jim.
Maximum Spin: Did you have a plan for what to do about Jack, out of curiosity?Lynch whoever has his role, I guess.
webadict: What type of jig are we talking about here? Because some are more trustworthy than others.It will likely be a half-hearted combination of the Charleston, the robot, and then me falling to the floor to do half of a worm before I have enraged all observers and require protective services.
@Deus:I agree on Max, if only superficially.
I feel fairly confident in reading Knightwing. I think I've only been wrong once over numerous times.
I think he's town so far.
I also think Max has done all their town tells, but I'm not sure if they're purposely aware of that.
Tric seems suspicious. I feel like he would claim more about his role than simply being the spirit of Knightwing. I think claiming your spirit is more revealing than someone like Tric would realize.
To be fair.This is horrifying because I believe you.
... That's about it. I could be an SK again, right? You can't call me mafia without also finding my partner though. So it's a moot point for now.
I am in reality a killer, but that's not scum-indicative.
I mean, you're not wrong. Kinda makes me want to burn you at the stake.To be fair.This is horrifying because I believe you.
... That's about it. I could be an SK again, right? You can't call me mafia without also finding my partner though. So it's a moot point for now.
I am in reality a killer, but that's not scum-indicative.
In that other game Knightwing was town and also had a oneshot kill.
I can confirm I also have one of the abilities of the player I'm the spirit of.
Do I think you're mafia and using this vig claim as cover? Maybe, honestly not really. However, my instincts tell me that letting a town vig Tric survive into the night is a guaranteed town loss.
Anyway, Deus, who do you wanna vote off? Whatcha got?
Hah!Can you clarify your vote here? You do seem to have been Town in the previous game.
Tric, you fell into my trap!
You fool, if you have my spirit, you must be mafia!
Because I’m a asshole!
Tricmagic
I'm not comfortable with these ToonyMan-webadict interactions. Too much agreement between them makes me nervous. I don't think they're a team, though. (I tend to assume they don't make it so obvious when they're both mafia, although... I guess they would know that I assume that by now.)Is one of us mafia then? If so, which is more likely?
The main issue here is that we'd lose by day 2 if I kill someone and they aren't mafia. We'd be down to 2/2 in an instant. Assuming Jack's actually balanced things, we're fine. Particularly if there is an SK.That's true so I'm very curious how tonight will go.
Jack, should you be lynched? Also, what happens if mafia equals town but town/SK can still "win"?
@Max:It's d1, man, I may be trying to be more open but you're not gonna pin me to something like that already. I just think it's suspicious.I'm not comfortable with these ToonyMan-webadict interactions. Too much agreement between them makes me nervous. I don't think they're a team, though. (I tend to assume they don't make it so obvious when they're both mafia, although... I guess they would know that I assume that by now.)Is one of us mafia then?
If so, which is more likely?But I will say that Web buddied you like this (in my opinion) back in choose-your-own-fallacy 5 where he was scum, and seemed to try to use that to throw you off Jack.
Toony: Your instincts say that letting a vig Tric survive is a guaranteed town loss. You believe Tric's claim of having a vig role. You (presumably) don't want to town to lose. You are ok with Tric surviving anyway. What am I missing here?Vig Tric will shoot every single Town player before he shoots the Mafia. That isn't an unprecedented take, but it is a fact of life that we must live with. I, for one, have accepted my fate to be shot by our Trician Overlord. My jig is now one of sacrifice, and I will become a ghost of Christmas Past.
True. Although, it was less about throwing him off Jack as it was about escaping the torture chamber that was unkillability everywhere.@Max:It's d1, man, I may be trying to be more open but you're not gonna pin me to something like that already. I just think it's suspicious.I'm not comfortable with these ToonyMan-webadict interactions. Too much agreement between them makes me nervous. I don't think they're a team, though. (I tend to assume they don't make it so obvious when they're both mafia, although... I guess they would know that I assume that by now.)Is one of us mafia then?QuoteIf so, which is more likely?But I will say that Web buddied you like this (in my opinion) back in choose-your-own-fallacy 5 where he was scum, and seemed to try to use that to throw you off Jack.
Toony: Your instincts say that letting a vig Tric survive is a guaranteed town loss. You believe Tric's claim of having a vig role. You (presumably) don't want to town to lose. You are ok with Tric surviving anyway. What am I missing here?I'm positive Tric would throw as town and lose us the game. Regardless, I'm not going to vote someone I think is more likely town than others. Plus to add to what Max said, things can happen at night.
Maximum Spin, Jim, Knightwing: I just want to confirm that we're all aware that players have been given roles based on players from another game and lynching people based on their usernames probably isn't the most productive use of our time.
Toonyman: Why is Knightwing an easy read and why keep Tric alive if you think he's an asset to the mafia regardless of his alignment?
Revenge is a hell of a drug though. It consumes reason and leaves only emotion.
Jim will feel my wrath.
For the record, I am knightwing. Pay no attention to my scales and vote the 64th imposter Knightwing64. they even have 64 in their name, sus.
To be fair.
... That's about it. I could be an SK again, right? You can't call me mafia without also finding my partner though. So it's a moot point for now.
I am in reality a killer, but that's not scum-indicative.
Jack, should you be lynched? Also, what happens if mafia equals town but town/SK can still "win"?
Assuming Jack's actually balanced things
... Yeah, okay, if you're Town, you're absolutely right.Toony: Your instincts say that letting a vig Tric survive is a guaranteed town loss. You believe Tric's claim of having a vig role. You (presumably) don't want to town to lose. You are ok with Tric surviving anyway. What am I missing here?I'm positive Tric would throw as town and lose us the game. Regardless, I'm not going to vote someone I think is more likely town than others. Plus to add to what Max said, things can happen at night.
PPE:
@Web:
You already know Tric is going to shoot me.
Knightwing:Hah!Can you clarify your vote here? You do seem to have been Town in the previous game.
Tric, you fell into my trap!
You fool, if you have my spirit, you must be mafia!
Because I’m a asshole!
Tricmagic
Webadict: from that trio I would be more inclined to vote Knight currently until I get more of a response from them.I agree. I'm not really sure on a reevaluation and want to see more.
Response for what?
It’s D1. This is the time for trolling and fun before everyone reverts to tryhard mode.
The main issue here is that we'd lose by day 2 if I kill someone and they aren't mafia. We'd be down to 2/2 in an instant. Assuming Jack's actually balanced things, we're fine. Particularly if there is an SK.
Jack, should you be lynched? Also, what happens if mafia equals town but town/SK can still "win"?
UnvoteUmmm...
Webadict: from that trio I would be more inclined to vote Knight currently until I get more of a response from them. I can buy Toony being town and Spin trying to work around our apparent loose cannon means is at least useful to the town. Can you explain the logic behind your trios?
I'm gonna go with Max. Call it a group feeling.... Yeah, okay, if you're Town, you're absolutely right.Toony: Your instincts say that letting a vig Tric survive is a guaranteed town loss. You believe Tric's claim of having a vig role. You (presumably) don't want to town to lose. You are ok with Tric surviving anyway. What am I missing here?I'm positive Tric would throw as town and lose us the game. Regardless, I'm not going to vote someone I think is more likely town than others. Plus to add to what Max said, things can happen at night.
PPE:
@Web:
You already know Tric is going to shoot me.
Although, I'm in the "Vote TricMagic even if he is Town" this game. My hasty rationale is that karma only applies to everyone except me.
@Jim/TricMagic/Deus: Who should I vote between Max, ToonyMan, and Knightwing? At least one of them is scum, and at most one of you guys are (and it's probably not Tric)
The reason why I think it's Maximum Spin is that I feel like he moves more carefully on the ToonyMan + web interactions. I think he's always willing to vote out one of us to prove the other is scum in his eyes, but he also does this weird dance on telling everyone in coded language about everything which he tends to avoid doing as scum.I'm trying to stop doing that. :(
But how can I believe you, Max?!?The reason why I think it's Maximum Spin is that I feel like he moves more carefully on the ToonyMan + web interactions. I think he's always willing to vote out one of us to prove the other is scum in his eyes, but he also does this weird dance on telling everyone in coded language about everything which he tends to avoid doing as scum.I'm trying to stop doing that. :(
But how can I believe you, Max?!?I don't know if you can. Is there something I could do that would prove, in your opinion, that I'm town?
Mannnnn, I always get voted out so fast whenever I feel like trolling. Why can’t I have funnnnnnnnnKnightwing, you're not supposed to troll people, you're supposed to play mafia.
Mannnnn, I always get voted out so fast whenever I feel like trolling. Why can’t I have funnnnnnnnnKnightwing, you're not supposed to troll people, you're supposed to play mafia.
That's... What? You have whatever you want to go on.Mannnnn, I always get voted out so fast whenever I feel like trolling. Why can’t I have funnnnnnnnnKnightwing, you're not supposed to troll people, you're supposed to play mafia.
Why can’t I do both? I have nothing to go on. It’s D1, all we have is wild guesses at this point.
That's... What? You have whatever you want to go on.Mannnnn, I always get voted out so fast whenever I feel like trolling. Why can’t I have funnnnnnnnnKnightwing, you're not supposed to troll people, you're supposed to play mafia.
Why can’t I do both? I have nothing to go on. It’s D1, all we have is wild guesses at this point.
AlL wE hAvE iS WiLd GueSsEs!1!1!That's... What? You have whatever you want to go on.Mannnnn, I always get voted out so fast whenever I feel like trolling. Why can’t I have funnnnnnnnnKnightwing, you're not supposed to troll people, you're supposed to play mafia.
Why can’t I do both? I have nothing to go on. It’s D1, all we have is wild guesses at this point.
What?
Hey Knightwing, am I Town or what?
Okay, next question:Hey Knightwing, am I Town or what?
Probably? I remember someone saying the more of a asshole you are, the more likely you’re town.
Are you mocking me?Only about 5% mocking, really.
I just don’t like voting people out on D1.Why not?
It seems rushed, I dunno. It rubs me the wrong way.Do you not understand that this thinking conflicts with your earlier statement of not having anything to go on? Or do you think that this matches those sentiments?
Why do you think I'm Mally?I can't tell how sincere you're being, like here (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=180540.msg8438096#msg8438096) (emphasis on the KW part at the end). Is this town!Webadict trying to help? Or scum!Webadict mashing keyboard buttons? I don't feel very confident currently.
It seems rushed, I dunno. It rubs me the wrong way.
Really, I was pushing that because I wanted Max and Knightwing to comment on each other a bit, since they tend to have a fixation on the other.Oh. Why didn't you say so? I don't usually comment on people just because someone arbitrarily associated me with someone else.
The best strategy may in fact be no-lynching today and Tric not killing anyone tonight, since that leaves us with six players and the option for Tric to shoot someone in the case of a mislynch (assuming that they don't get killed).I'm firmly open to this plan.
I like that plan because it gives mafia an incentive to kill Tric tonight.I disagree with this plan on several levels, but also for role related reasons.
Worst case he shoots anyway and misses leaving us probably at a 5 player lylo instead of straight up losing.
I think this is town Knightwing being needlessly sketchy instead of mafia Knightwing trying to avoid having to play, but I'm not convinced of that.This is how I feel so maybe we're on the same page.
Max with no vote?Look, Tric is a scary mofo with a gun, but I'm not voting a player I think is town. You said earlier you were totally going to roleblock Tric so I see even less of a reason why you would disagree.
ToonyManI like that plan because it gives mafia an incentive to kill Tric tonight.I disagree with this plan on several levels, but also for role related reasons.
Worst case he shoots anyway and misses leaving us probably at a 5 player lylo instead of straight up losing.
If you want to control how Tric shoots, just use a vote, what the fuck, Toony?
Actually, I have reason to believe that there is a Mafia AND an SK, but I won't share why.Wouldn't that make the odds of Tric also being a town vig absurd? Why the lack of concern over Tric when he initially claimed?
As for me, think Knightwing is either SK or Mally. (Or Mafia if there is only one of them this game.)"I think Knightwing is third-party."
From my morning analysis of gut feelings. I surprisingly don't have any town reads other than knightwing, what the hell?
I think he just meant "any reads other than knightwing" and made a mistake.As for me, think Knightwing is either SK or Mally. (Or Mafia if there is only one of them this game.)"I think Knightwing is third-party."
From my morning analysis of gut feelings. I surprisingly don't have any town reads other than knightwing, what the hell?
"My only townread is Knightwing."
Why do you assume that I thought there were an SK and a Mafia when Tric claimed?I think this is town Knightwing being needlessly sketchy instead of mafia Knightwing trying to avoid having to play, but I'm not convinced of that.This is how I feel so maybe we're on the same page.Max with no vote?Look, Tric is a scary mofo with a gun, but I'm not voting a player I think is town. You said earlier you were totally going to roleblock Tric so I see even less of a reason why you would disagree.
ToonyManI like that plan because it gives mafia an incentive to kill Tric tonight.I disagree with this plan on several levels, but also for role related reasons.
Worst case he shoots anyway and misses leaving us probably at a 5 player lylo instead of straight up losing.
If you want to control how Tric shoots, just use a vote, what the fuck, Toony?
Are me and Max both wrong about Knightwing? I think it's possible, but unlikely.
PPE:Actually, I have reason to believe that there is a Mafia AND an SK, but I won't share why.Wouldn't that make the odds of Tric also being a town vig absurd? Why the lack of concern over Tric when he initially claimed?
Webadict : why are you more comfortable with lynching (presumably Toony?) than not? You mentioned that you think you think you're going to get killed, but I don't see how that makes a practical difference at six players rather than seven.Because voting is the most important way to gather information in this game. The Town do not normally win in the Night like the Mafia do. The Mafia knows who's Mafia and who's not. Player slip information subconsciously through their words, and defending your vote creates more words to develop an idea of their mindset.
No lynch
Max with no vote?
am I the only one who finds it weird Tric isn’t acting chaotic stupid?No. After I saw where you said that, I went back and looked more and that's why I wrote that I wasn't as confident about him anymore. I do think you have a point.
Yes? Okay.
I am Dragon, your argument is invalid.am I the only one who finds it weird Tric isn’t acting chaotic stupid?No. After I saw where you said that, I went back and looked more and that's why I wrote that I wasn't as confident about him anymore. I do think you have a point.
Yes? Okay.
I've laid out my thinking before. I don't necessarily expect to learn anything from not lynching, but from a practical standpoint the effect of mislynching today seems to be outright losing the game. If Tric could commit to not killing someone in the case of a mislynch then I'd be happier with lynching someone, but given that we have to accommodate the lunatic with a gun I think doing our best to avoid losing the game on N1 is ideal.I'd rather play to win than play to not lose. If you're worried about TricMagic, vote him. I'm still down to vote out TricMagic in this situation.
All right, let's see.As much as I'd be satisfied with a Toony/Jim team here, I don't think that's right. It feels too easy. And I don't think Deus is scum. I'm still unwilling to remove Knightwing from suspicion here.
I want to hear some more from Jim before I move my vote off him. Is Jim even still in this game?
(I have to admit he does this as town a lot, though. Probably NAI.)
God in the form of a moth is giving me bad vibes here, but I don't really have any experience playing with him. Can anyone give me any tips? Webadict, maybe?
TricMagic is town. HIS ROLE, HIS ROOOOOOLE. I honestly think he can be counted on not to shoot anyone in case of a mislynch, though. He's not that much of a loose cannon. Probably. I feel like I worry about a doctor Tric more than a vig Tric anyway.
Still stand by what I said about Knightwing, sorta.
Web and Toony continue to be the same as before. I think the fact that I can't confidently identify scum elsewhere makes it even more likely that one of them is, too. Or even both of them, I'm not married to what I said before, but I still don't think that yet. I'm more inclined to suspect [Godmoth or Jim] and [Web or Toony].
Okay, reading a little more, I feel less good about Tric, but I'm still not voting him today. I kind of DO believe he would claim vig as scum, in principle, though. Last paragraph still stands.
Web vs. modgoth on no-lynching feels a little odd, but also, would be kind of a really weird and pointless interaction for scum? I guess I'll tentatively say it's probably not them.
Um... You were an SK when you were a Dragon.I am Dragon, your argument is invalid.am I the only one who finds it weird Tric isn’t acting chaotic stupid?No. After I saw where you said that, I went back and looked more and that's why I wrote that I wasn't as confident about him anymore. I do think you have a point.
Yes? Okay.
If you're set on TricMagic, I'm not against voting him outRight now, I'm not set on anything. His play DOES remind me of times when he was third-party.
TricMagic because the game says to kill him, now.
Also I still have a lot of Christmas preparations I need to do, so I might be scarce at times.
Pretty quick reaction webadict. Why so red? Not like you can't stop it if you want to right? Or was that setup for an excuse later on?You had a question? I'll be honest, I didn't see it.
I don't think you ever answered my question either.
Would you like to vote out Jim? I'm down with that, honestly.TricMagic because the game says to kill him, now.
Also I still have a lot of Christmas preparations I need to do, so I might be scarce at times.
To note, before we start lynching me, given Jim a chance to react, yeah webadict?
No, just a trick to see how you would react. I'm good at those.I would shoot someone tonight if we no lynch, that way if mafia kill someone else you're pretty cleared as not mafia. (I think Webadict realizes this and is trying to pin you as a SK which makes sense to me if he's mafia.)
Consider this, how many people are interested in me not shooting them tonight? If town, they more want me not to shoot them. If scum, they want me dead so I can't shoot them.
For now your response seems townish enough, I guess. So Knightwing64.
Also, if you actually think I'm scum, you're gonna lose.If you're against no lynching I'm still fine seeing you flip.
I can only tell you what my role is, Toony. I can't make you believe me. So, how about this Toony? If you agree to being shot by TricMagic, I won't mind voting for a No Elim. I won't protect you, naturally, so there is that.I'm dead either way. If mafia don't kill me then Tric will, they may even both kill me which makes Tric look suspicious I guess but at least only one player dies.
I'd agree to that. Sounds pretty fair.
^ This is not a Townie understanding of my response to TricMagic.No, just a trick to see how you would react. I'm good at those.I would shoot someone tonight if we no lynch, that way if mafia kill someone else you're pretty cleared as not mafia. (I think Webadict realizes this and is trying to pin you as a SK which makes sense to me if he's mafia.)
Consider this, how many people are interested in me not shooting them tonight? If town, they more want me not to shoot them. If scum, they want me dead so I can't shoot them.
For now your response seems townish enough, I guess. So Knightwing64.
I'm dead either way. If mafia don't kill me then Tric will, they may even both kill me which makes Tric look suspicious I guess but at least only one player dies.How does that make Tric look suspicious? I already believe that Tric isn't (teamed) Mafia??
Okay how about this, statement time: If I'm the only dead person tonight don't vote Tric. Or Knightwing. I'm banking all my holiday marbles on this. If I'm dead along with someone else tonight then Tric is not mafia. Web could be correct in suspecting SK, but I don't believe this.
What?
(I think Webadict realizes this and is trying to pin you as a SK which makes sense to me if he's mafia.)If you think that I'm trying to "pin TricMagic as the SK", then you're essentially buddying TricMagic into believing that I'm trying to frame him to keep his vote on me. I think, in that particular case, I'd just stay voting TricMagic, but let's give me the consequence of the doubt, and say that I'd do everything the exact same as Town or scum no matter what because I'm simultaneously a genius and also an idiot. I thought that his response was fairly reasonable (for him) to being voted, which is to immediately OMGUS me for voting him, something he tends to do fairly often as Town to the detriment of others. Also, wanting Jim Groovester time to reply felt like he was resigned to his fate to die, which I could see him doing as Town. Now, how would he react as SK? Not sure. I don't think he spends his time defending Knightwing like that. I'm not really in the mood to vote TricMagic, but I think relying on TricMagic to do TricMagic things is so very silly.
@Jim/TricMagic/Deus: Who should I vote between Max, ToonyMan, and Knightwing? At least one of them is scum, and at most one of you guys are (and it's probably not Tric)
I tend to think it's Jim no matter what
webadict patiently interacts with Knightwing64, encouraging him to actually play mafia
Response for what?
It’s D1. This is the time for trolling and fun before everyone reverts to tryhard mode.
Webadict: from that trio I would be more inclined to vote Knight currently until I get more of a response from them. I can buy Toony being town and Spin trying to work around our apparent loose cannon means is at least useful to the town. Can you explain the logic behind your trios?
It seems rushed, I dunno. It rubs me the wrong way.
This is actually worth considering. If we're assuming that Tric uses their kill tonight and misses, lynching today puts us at four players left after the scumkill which is a loss if there are two scum players. The best strategy may in fact be no-lynching today and Tric not killing anyone tonight, since that leaves us with six players and the option for Tric to shoot someone in the case of a mislynch (assuming that they don't get killed).
I like that plan because it gives mafia an incentive to kill Tric tonight.
I'm firmly open to this plan.
I disagree with this plan on several levels, but also for role related reasons.
If you want to control how Tric shoots, just use a vote, what the fuck, Toony?
When did you start thinking a SK was possible then?
Why are you voting me Jim?
I am Dragon, your argument is invalid.
I have one last thing I want to say before day end but I don't want to say it YET. Don't let me forget though, it's important.
I feel like I worry about a doctor Tric more than a vig Tric anyway.
Consider this, how many people are interested in me not shooting them tonight? If town, they more want me not to shoot them. If scum, they want me dead so I can't shoot them.
I'll vote Jim Groovester for now, though.
Max with no vote?
ToonyManI like that plan because it gives mafia an incentive to kill Tric tonight.I disagree with this plan on several levels, but also for role related reasons.
Worst case he shoots anyway and misses leaving us probably at a 5 player lylo instead of straight up losing.
If you want to control how Tric shoots, just use a vote, what the fuck, Toony?
Thinking on it, Jim. This would be Dues, but they haven't shown up. Could be christmastime..I don't know if there's anything I'm meant to respond to here. I guess I'd like to know your reasoning if you didn't have a question.
You know, Dues, I'll just murder Jim tonight if he doesn't show.
@Jim:
I don't think Tric is with anybody, but at least you want to vote him because you think he's scum.
This is weird for me to say, but I'm seeing this premonition now where lynching Tric today loses us the game.
READS... I don't think I believe you in this post here. I don't know why, but I don't trust something.
webadict - I'm finding myself on the same page as webadict on a couple different points so I'm inclined to feel like he's town here but this could be a game losing assumption.
ToonyMan - Fine I guess. He's not making me feel like he's town as strongly as he normally does but I don't have any particular objections to anything he's done.
Maximum Spin - Fine I guess. Not really objecting to anything he's done but like ToonyMan he's also not making me feel super strongly about him being town.
Knightwing64 - Fine I guess. I'd have a hard time saying this is scum Knightwing64 honestly.
Deus Asmoth - There are parts of Deus Asmoth's play I don't like and other parts I do like. I don't remember the last time I played with him but I feel like part of the reason why I dislike some of the things he's done is because he's playing a bit more like the older B12 style which I generally don't like that much and find suspicious whenever I see it.
TricMagic - Like I mentioned above I don't like that in his second post of the game he's deflecting suspicion by demanding people identify his partner. My opinion hasn't changed much or improved since then.
TricMagic is my strongest scumread but I'm having trouble identifying who he could be partnered with.
@Webadict:Statistically, TricMagic has helped Mafia at a higher than average rate, so I don't see that as an unfounded worry.
I think mafia would be more afraid of a "wildcard" loose cannon than town would be.
I don't like how you don't think Tric is mafia but are still in favor of voting them.
Webadict:Because ToonyMan advocating for a No Elimination isn't a sight I'm used to, and it feels incorrect here.ToonyMan
I disagree with this plan on several levels, but also for role related reasons.
If you want to control how Tric shoots, just use a vote, what the fuck, Toony?
Why vote for Toony here? You've said that you disagree with the idea of a no-lynch which I get, but I don't see the link from that to voting Toony because of supporting that idea. The post you were responding to looks pretty consistent to his earlier idea of not wanting to vote for Tric, which you seemed to think he was town for before?
Maximum Spin: You brought up the idea that Webadict was buddying with Toony before, but you're directly asking him to provide his read on me. Why are you asking someone who you already have said is doing scum behaviour to do your scum hunting for you?That's a weird and somewhat shady interpretation.
If it helps, I wasn't really open to the idea. I just wanted to encourage him.I like that plan because it gives mafia an incentive to kill Tric tonight.I'm firmly open to this plan.
Why do I feel like the weird one here?
Uh, well, I just woke up and, right now, I can't remember why I was putting it off. I think I just forgot to say it when I should have, and then decided I should telegraph it ahead of time instead of bringing it up out of nowhere in the middle of the day. It's also possible that I then forgot again. Yesterday was a little weird.I have one last thing I want to say before day end but I don't want to say it YET. Don't let me forget though, it's important.
What difference does it make whether you say it now or later?
Well, jim gives a point about Dues playing in an older style. And I can be convinced not to shoot tonight. Save it for later. On the other dragon claw, Jim also doesn't have any other scum reads but me. Which, fair, but you do need to tie me with someone else most times. Or call me a Mally drawing attention, but I'm self-aware enough to point such out.If you're Town, keeping your kill for a Lylo situation is the best outcome, assuming you can convince people you're Town. If you don't think you can convince people you're Town, then using your kill as a second vote is the second best outcome.
I do have some reads though. Knightwing is probobly town. webadict and toony are arguing, so their is town in one of them. (at least.) And right now Max is also on my scumread list. So it's max/jim / webtoony.
The Nolynch arguments are probably the worst case, since we'd be on the defensive as a result here. We either start day 2 in the same spot as day 1, or worse off cause we're in Mylo.
It feels like No Elimination here leads to a second No Elimination Tomorrow or, even worse, a Miseliminate And Lose situation. It is playing to avoid a loss instead of playing to win, and no one has provided a solid reason as to why that should happen.I plan on voting someone tomorrow. I don't even think I should switch to no lynch right now since Tric is saying they're not going to shoot.
Mine doesn't say it's a 1-shot though.. shrugs.I think it's correct to shoot someone if no one dies today Tric.
I can protect you Tonight, so there's no worries about you dying if that's what you're worried about. I'll probably be protecting Max and you Tonight unless I come up with a target that's better, but there's not really much reason to think too hard about it.There's no reason to say your protect targets.
I can't really tell on Deus, but maybe Max is right and it really is Jim + Toony.
@Max:
I don't see a miller in the previous game, where?
My role power doesn't really seem to be based on the player's actual role from that gameIt seems to me like my role is more based on EuchreJack's interpretation of how the previous game worked. I assumed the other roles were also like that, so are you saying yours is exactly the power the player had?
I have one ability and works just like part of that player's role, it's not exact.@Max:
I don't see a miller in the previous game, where?My role power doesn't really seem to be based on the player's actual role from that gameIt seems to me like my role is more based on EuchreJack's interpretation of how the previous game worked. I assumed the other roles were also like that, so are you saying yours is exactly the power the player had?
I feel like the two people I most need to worry about being mafia are web and Toony. Moreover, I don't think you're both mafia. So, why don't each of you tell me who I should vote for?Well, we're not both mafia.
Both of you support no-lynching(I don't.)
That's maybe partially true? My role says the MOD feels bad about my person dying first, so my unnamed person takes matters into their own hands to stop others from dying.@Max:
I don't see a miller in the previous game, where?My role power doesn't really seem to be based on the player's actual role from that gameIt seems to me like my role is more based on EuchreJack's interpretation of how the previous game worked. I assumed the other roles were also like that, so are you saying yours is exactly the power the player had?
Mine doesn't say it's a 1-shot though.. shrugs.... That's broken, yo! Mine absolutely says 1-shot. This is garbage!
No elimination is for cowards!Both of you support no-lynching(I don't.)
The worst you can get from this is that I'm setting up a future where I can simply choose someone to kill that doesn't belong to Max or TricMagic. If I'm trying to frame you and Jim, I'd have to kill Deus or Knightwing and my partner would be in Max or TricMagic. I don't think you think any of those are my teammate, and it's also not a very good plan on my part. There's worries that I might be roleblocked, but that only makes me look scummier if Tric or Max die, so that's a really bad plan on my part. Quite silly.I can protect you Tonight, so there's no worries about you dying if that's what you're worried about. I'll probably be protecting Max and you Tonight unless I come up with a target that's better, but there's not really much reason to think too hard about it.There's no reason to say your protect targets.
I can't really tell on Deus, but maybe Max is right and it really is Jim + Toony.
Your words feel malicious in nature here.
Maximum Spin: You brought up the idea that Webadict was buddying with Toony before, but you're directly asking him to provide his read on me. Why are you asking someone who you already have said is doing scum behaviour to do your scum hunting for you?That's a weird and somewhat shady interpretation.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with asking a player in a mafia game a question. It's actually kind of important. I wanted his read on you because it's useful information.
I have to give you the benefit of the doubt for not having played a game together that I can remember, but man.
If it helps, I wasn't really open to the idea. I just wanted to encourage him.I like that plan because it gives mafia an incentive to kill Tric tonight.I'm firmly open to this plan.
Why do I feel like the weird one here?
MaximumI thought I did? If I wasn't clear enough, it's weird that you think I'm asking him to do my scum hunting for you when I first, didn't even ask him in particular anything, but just offered him as a possibility after asking a general question, and second, only asked a normal and reasonable question.Maximum Spin: You brought up the idea that Webadict was buddying with Toony before, but you're directly asking him to provide his read on me. Why are you asking someone who you already have said is doing scum behaviour to do your scum hunting for you?That's a weird and somewhat shady interpretation.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with asking a player in a mafia game a question. It's actually kind of important. I wanted his read on you because it's useful information.
I have to give you the benefit of the doubt for not having played a game together that I can remember, but man.
Two part response here:
1: Can you explain what's weird about my interpretation rather than gesturing vaguely and acting offended?
I do think there's something wrong with asking Webadict to tell you what your read on me should beSee, there you're doing it again. What the hell makes you think that's what I'm doing? I just asked for opinions on you. That doesn't mean "tell me what my read on you should be", it just means I want to hear thoughts so I can make judgements based on them. You know, like... playing the game.
Why should anyone believe you're telling the truth about this now?You know what? I agree with Jim on at least one thing: fuuuuuuuck this ancient meta.
Firmly open, supporting, whatever.Both of you support no-lynching(I don't.)
This sounds legit to me.That's maybe partially true? My role says the MOD feels bad about my person dying first, so my unnamed person takes matters into their own hands to stop others from dying.@Max:
I don't see a miller in the previous game, where?My role power doesn't really seem to be based on the player's actual role from that gameIt seems to me like my role is more based on EuchreJack's interpretation of how the previous game worked. I assumed the other roles were also like that, so are you saying yours is exactly the power the player had?
There's two other interpretations here that are far more plausible: I'm trying to bait the kill in the hopes that there is a Tracker or Watcher as well as remove myself from the equation as a suspect; Or, I'm trying to WIFOM the Mafia into killing Deus or Knightwing and removing someone that's hard to read or to last-second shift my protect to save him.If they kill me there won't be any tracker/watcher results. O_O
Two part response here:I'm on Max's side in this argument. I don't think you're onto anything suspicious.
1: Can you explain what's weird about my interpretation rather than gesturing vaguely and acting offended?
2: I agree that there's nothing wrong with asking a question. I do think there's something wrong with asking Webadict to tell you what your read on me should be when Webadict is one of the players you've said you're leaning scum on and you have yet to actually ask me a question.
Lol, see, that's all you gotta claim, man! I'll Protect you, you track/watch me (or don't, ooooo, spooooooky~~!) and confirm who I double-protected. Look at that, we're all in this together! See how easy that is?This sounds legit to me.That's maybe partially true? My role says the MOD feels bad about my person dying first, so my unnamed person takes matters into their own hands to stop others from dying.@Max:
I don't see a miller in the previous game, where?My role power doesn't really seem to be based on the player's actual role from that gameIt seems to me like my role is more based on EuchreJack's interpretation of how the previous game worked. I assumed the other roles were also like that, so are you saying yours is exactly the power the player had?There's two other interpretations here that are far more plausible: I'm trying to bait the kill in the hopes that there is a Tracker or Watcher as well as remove myself from the equation as a suspect; Or, I'm trying to WIFOM the Mafia into killing Deus or Knightwing and removing someone that's hard to read or to last-second shift my protect to save him.If they kill me there won't be any tracker/watcher results. O_O
Your attitude annoys me personally but I don't think I should be taking this game too seriously for my own health.
Since I don't know if I'll be available for deadline (I'm going to be away) I'm going to No Lynch and see what happens.
1. I want Tric to kill someone if the no lynch goes through, I think that's optimal. If he purposely doesn't kill then I will be very annoyed.
2. Web can protect whoever he wants. I don't think he believes me but I don't care.
3. I'm going to track (or maybe watch) someone.
4. Everyone else, do your thing I guess.
Deus Asmoth for now, but I'm willing to shift.... I want to follow but it would just reconstruct the tie.
I thought I did? If I wasn't clear enough, it's weird that you think I'm asking him to do my scum hunting for you when I first, didn't even ask him in particular anything, but just offered him as a possibility after asking a general question, and second, only asked a normal and reasonable question.
God in the form of a moth is giving me bad vibes here, but I don't really have any experience playing with him. Can anyone give me any tips? Webadict, maybe?
QuoteI do think there's something wrong with asking Webadict to tell you what your read on me should beSee, there you're doing it again. What the hell makes you think that's what I'm doing? I just asked for opinions on you. That doesn't mean "tell me what my read on you should be", it just means I want to hear thoughts so I can make judgements based on them. You know, like... playing the game.
But anyway,QuoteWhy should anyone believe you're telling the truth about this now?You know what? I agree with Jim on at least one thing: fuuuuuuuck this ancient meta.
If the current meta involves glossing over a player admitting to blatantly lying for no reason then I don't have any particular interest in modernising.But he did have a reason. He stated he was egging Jim on.
No? That interpretation of what he said makes absolutely no sense.If the current meta involves glossing over a player admitting to blatantly lying for no reason then I don't have any particular interest in modernising.But he did have a reason. He stated he was egging Jim on.
Oh, whoops, I misread that quote block. Not because of it having no reason, but because it wasn't anything that mattered to me.No? That interpretation of what he said makes absolutely no sense.If the current meta involves glossing over a player admitting to blatantly lying for no reason then I don't have any particular interest in modernising.But he did have a reason. He stated he was egging Jim on.
I don't think that his lie furthered a scum wincon. I think it's indicative of a pattern of behaviour from Maximum Spin, by which I mean he's unwilling to commit to anything. He's suspicious of me but seems to be refusing to directly engage with me any further than I force him to. He says he's willing to go with one plan, but when that plan receives any pushback he was actually lying the whole time. Why are you framing this as though the only way to decide if someone is scum is for them to directly hinder the town? Trying to avoid suspicion by dodging direct confrontation seems equally scummy to me.How am I dodging direct confrontation? I just swore at you a few minutes ago. I have directly stated that I think your argument is dumb and obviously shady and I don't believe you when you pretend not to understand that.
I don't think that his lie furthered a scum wincon. I think it's indicative of a pattern of behaviour from Maximum Spin, by which I mean he's unwilling to commit to anything. He's suspicious of me but seems to be refusing to directly engage with me any further than I force him to. He says he's willing to go with one plan, but when that plan receives any pushback he was actually lying the whole time. Why are you framing this as though the only way to decide if someone is scum is for them to directly hinder the town? Trying to avoid suspicion by dodging direct confrontation seems equally scummy to me.Hm, I understand a bit where you're coming from. That's... kinda just how Max is? Like, take my word for it or don't, he's actually engaging a lot more than he used to.
Alright, let's dial it down. We're getting nowhere fast in this argument.I don't think that his lie furthered a scum wincon. I think it's indicative of a pattern of behaviour from Maximum Spin, by which I mean he's unwilling to commit to anything. He's suspicious of me but seems to be refusing to directly engage with me any further than I force him to. He says he's willing to go with one plan, but when that plan receives any pushback he was actually lying the whole time. Why are you framing this as though the only way to decide if someone is scum is for them to directly hinder the town? Trying to avoid suspicion by dodging direct confrontation seems equally scummy to me.How am I dodging direct confrontation? I just swore at you a few minutes ago. I have directly stated that I think your argument is dumb and obviously shady and I don't believe you when you pretend not to understand that.
In terms of "refusing to directly engage with you", how so? I've responded to you a couple times now. If you're trying to spin something out of what you said before about me not asking you any questions... why would I want to hear your answers to any questions when I would not believe them? That's just more boring old-meta.
How am I dodging direct confrontation? I just swore at you a few minutes ago.
I have directly stated that I think your argument is dumb and obviously shady and I don't believe you when you pretend not to understand that.
In terms of "refusing to directly engage with you", how so? I've responded to you a couple times now.
If you're trying to spin something out of what you said before about me not asking you any questions... why would I want to hear your answers to any questions when I would not believe them? That's just more boring old-meta.So we've gone from you having generic 'bad vibes' to you being willing to believe Webadict's opinion about me being town-ish despite him being one of your scum reads to you not being able to believe a word I say. Did you figure out there was no point in asking me anything before the game started or did this opinion develop partway through?
I didn't specifically say "Jim" but... yeah, pretty much.In what way does you agreeing to a plan that I suggested and Toony agreed to have anything to do with Jim?
I'm not forced to engage with you at all, dude. I could, like, leave. Like Jim has!QuoteIn terms of "refusing to directly engage with you", how so? I've responded to you a couple times now.
What I actually said was that you refuse to engage with me further than you're forced to. I'll add 'blatantly misrepresents the accusations against him' to the list though.
So we've gone from you having generic 'bad vibes' to you being willing to believe Webadict's opinion about me being town-ish despite him being one of your scum reads to you not being able to believe a word I say. Did you figure out there was no point in asking me anything before the game started or did this opinion develop partway through?You're misunderstanding again, but you gave me an easy way to explain it, at least. Yes, before the game started. Because this is a game of mafia where I don't believe anything anyone says. It's actually not somewhere I've gone, it was the starting point.
I'm, honestly going to keep my vote on webadict right now. I feel they're trying to control the narrative.Please show which game I don't try to control the narrative?
Sometimes, in order to understand a mind frame, seeing how far they'll take it will tell you a lot. In this particular case, Max looks like he wanted to see who was actually in for a No Elim. To me, that's not scummy behavior, but if you think he was actually for a No Elim, then that's what you should be trying to prove. However, I don't really see it. The best you could argue is that he made an an argument and tried to get everyone on board with it slyly, but that's gonna involve you understanding Max's mindset here.I don't think he was for a No-lynch. I don't think he cares about the lynch result either way. If you want to know how that furthers the scum wincon, joining bandwagons is generally a way that scum players try to avoid suspicion. The only thing unusual about this one is that it was for a No-lynch rather than a player, but the concept is the same. That's why I think he played it off as him baiting (checks notes)... Jim, somehow... when it was obvious that most players weren't in favour of it.
The point of me asking how it furthers scum wincon is what's going to persuade me the most.
I'm not forced to engage with you at all, dude. I could, like, leave. Like Jim has!QuoteIn terms of "refusing to directly engage with you", how so? I've responded to you a couple times now.
What I actually said was that you refuse to engage with me further than you're forced to. I'll add 'blatantly misrepresents the accusations against him' to the list though.
QuoteYou're misunderstanding again, but you gave me an easy way to explain it, at least. Yes, before the game started. Because this is a game of mafia where I don't believe anything anyone says. It's actually not somewhere I've gone, it was the starting point.
So we've gone from you having generic 'bad vibes' to you being willing to believe Webadict's opinion about me being town-ish despite him being one of your scum reads to you not being able to believe a word I say. Did you figure out there was no point in asking me anything before the game started or did this opinion develop partway through?
I had written more but I changed my mind because every part of your post is just so goddamn disingenuous and I was starting to rant. I think I'll take webadict's advice, even if he does turn out to be scum, and just let it be. I think everyone can tell that you're willfully misunderstanding.Maybe if you keep saying I'm misrepresenting you people will just believe it without you substantiating the claim.
Please tell me that you understand that openly ignoring someone's questions would be scummy as hell.Ha ha ha, no, see, this is the point, you just haven't played with me before. I basically always do that.
I'm, honestly going to keep my vote on webadict right now. I feel they're trying to control the narrative.If Web is town I think he's probably right on who scum are.
I'm, honestly going to keep my vote on webadict right now. I feel they're trying to control the narrative.From a practical standpoint, I'm voting no Lynch because I don't think there's enough time left to get Max lynched. From the original plan though:
Well I was. Dues, can you give a solid rundown on why No Lynch is the currect move here? Put it out like we're new to the game, way back when.
You claiming to be bad at the game isn't actually a defence.Please tell me that you understand that openly ignoring someone's questions would be scummy as hell.Ha ha ha, no, see, this is the point, you just haven't played with me before. I basically always do that.
In fact, please show a game where I allow players to fight for no reason, and I turn out to be scum. Or, really, explain to me how I'm controlling the narrative in a negative way? Do you believe I should let players argue the entire thread instead of being "controlling"? I am, as always, at a loss for how when you use the logic in its opposite fashion. I do congratulate you that you are correct, I am, in fact, attempting to control discussion so that we don't get stuck at nothing, and yet... you don't identify that as a positive aspect, and I cannot identify why.I'm, honestly going to keep my vote on webadict right now. I feel they're trying to control the narrative.Please show which game I don't try to control the narrative?
I don't think he was for a No-lynch. I don't think he cares about the lynch result either way. If you want to know how that furthers the scum wincon, joining bandwagons is generally a way that scum players try to avoid suspicion. The only thing unusual about this one is that it was for a No-lynch rather than a player, but the concept is the same. That's why I think he played it off as him baiting (checks notes)... Jim, somehow... when it was obvious that most players weren't in favour of it.Oh boy... Where to start...
I have literally public acknowledged ignoring entire players as Town, I don't see this as a viable method of attack on Max. Not because he's doing that, but because you're egging him on for no reason, and he's actively trying to de-escalate.You claiming to be bad at the game isn't actually a defence.Please tell me that you understand that openly ignoring someone's questions would be scummy as hell.Ha ha ha, no, see, this is the point, you just haven't played with me before. I basically always do that.
@Deus Asmoth: If you want to vote out Max, then you're doing a bad job at it. The more you are fighting over nothing, the more I don't want to vote him out, and the more I'll probably defend him.You're free to do whatever you want. I'd appreciate it if you don't pretend that I'm fighting over nothing when all I've done so far is point out why I think Tric is scum and respond to his non-answers.
I have literally public acknowledged ignoring entire players as Town, I don't see this as a viable method of attack on Max.
Not because he's doing that, but because you're egging him on for no reason, and he's actively trying to de-escalate.Explain to me how this isn't you just making shit up? The first thing I've said that I would consider even coming close to egging him on is saying he's bad at the game for using his meta of doing something I would consider bad play as a defence for when I said that his behaviour was scummy. I can't see a single instance of him attempting to de-escalate either, mainly since he was the only one escalating to begin with.
Joining a bandwagon isn't inherently scummy. In fact, it's one of the only ways to actually win as a Town player. But, that's not really what Maximum Spin is doing. If anything, I'm the one that's bandwagoning, and that's really loosely using the term. Voting people for no reason is scummy, yes, but it's (1) Day 1, so there's a lot of leeway on what's acceptable, (2) NOT joining a bandwagon for no reason at all, and (3) expressing an idea for something that you explicitly believe is the correct decision. Are you saying that joining what you think is the right decision is wrong? No, of course you're not. So, you must instead point out that the motivations behind that decision are wrong. His actions don't look like they have ill intent, so I don't think this is a viable method to attack Max.
If you're accepting the claim that him joining to idea of a No-lynch was somehow a bait for Jim then I'd really like it if you'd explain how that makes an iota of sense.Web said "for Jim". I said it was a bait for anyone.
Really? Because I would have said it's more like you and Webadict are chainsawing for each other.If you're accepting the claim that him joining to idea of a No-lynch was somehow a bait for Jim then I'd really like it if you'd explain how that makes an iota of sense.Web said "for Jim". I said it was a bait for anyone.
It does sound like you're chainsawing for Jim now though.
Webadict I'd rather if you actually responded to the things I asked you.Good luck getting webadict to do that.
@Max: Please stop.Yeah. Okay. Should I switch back to Jim? I'm comfortable voting out either today.
Are you asking if I want you to shoot me? No, that's OK thanks. You can shoot Max though.Webadict I'd rather if you actually responded to the things I asked you.Good luck getting webadict to do that.
To web, that was mostly my thoughts at the time. So I posted them.
So.. Max, Jim, or Dues, which would you suggest Asmoth?
Webadict I'd rather if you actually responded to the things I asked you.What did you ask me?
What did you ask me?Webadict I'd rather if you actually responded to the things I asked you.Good luck getting webadict to do that.
To web, that was mostly my thoughts at the time. So I posted them.
So.. Max, Jim, or Dues, which would you suggest Asmoth?
Go look yourself, I know you can read.Webadict I'd rather if you actually responded to the things I asked you.What did you ask me?
I obviously can't because I don't know which things you think I haven't responded to.Go look yourself, I know you can read.Webadict I'd rather if you actually responded to the things I asked you.What did you ask me?
Follow up for WebadictQuoteI have literally public acknowledged ignoring entire players as Town, I don't see this as a viable method of attack on Max.
Have you publicly acknowledged your intent to ignore players you've never played with before while asking other players (who you claim to think are scum) what you should think of them?QuoteNot because he's doing that, but because you're egging him on for no reason, and he's actively trying to de-escalate.Explain to me how this isn't you just making shit up? The first thing I've said that I would consider even coming close to egging him on is saying he's bad at the game for using his meta of doing something I would consider bad play as a defence for when I said that his behaviour was scummy. I can't see a single instance of him attempting to de-escalate either, mainly since he was the only one escalating to begin with.
Further follow up for WebadictQuoteJoining a bandwagon isn't inherently scummy. In fact, it's one of the only ways to actually win as a Town player. But, that's not really what Maximum Spin is doing. If anything, I'm the one that's bandwagoning, and that's really loosely using the term. Voting people for no reason is scummy, yes, but it's (1) Day 1, so there's a lot of leeway on what's acceptable, (2) NOT joining a bandwagon for no reason at all, and (3) expressing an idea for something that you explicitly believe is the correct decision. Are you saying that joining what you think is the right decision is wrong? No, of course you're not. So, you must instead point out that the motivations behind that decision are wrong. His actions don't look like they have ill intent, so I don't think this is a viable method to attack Max.
I can only assume you're intentionally misrepresenting what happened here, and I'm not sure why you're doing that. Max has explicitly claimed he was lying about wanting to No-lynch, so either he was lying then or he's lying now. Either way, it's not possible for you to honestly argue that he was joining a movement that he believed was correct.
If you're accepting the claim that him joining to idea of a No-lynch was somehow a bait for Jim then I'd really like it if you'd explain how that makes an iota of sense.
Dues Asmoth
Times ticking down.
Tric:Mostly for a decision to be made one way or the other. Even if you lynch me, it's better than running down the clock. Or not lynching anyone in the first place, who voted says a lot about the mafia. And why.Dues Asmoth
Times ticking down.
I'm genuinely at a loss about what you want from me here, or if you even want anything.
Have you publicly acknowledged your intent to ignore players you've never played with before while asking other players (who you claim to think are scum) what you should think of them?Yes. Hydra Mafia on the MU forums with Vector and 4maskwolf. There were several groups I was unfamiliar with that I had to take several people's opinions on, and thus ignorring them completely was the optimal strategy.
He's doing a terrible job at de-escalating, but you're doing a much worse job at de-escalating. But, that doesn't mean he's not trying to de-escalate.QuoteNot because he's doing that, but because you're egging him on for no reason, and he's actively trying to de-escalate.Explain to me how this isn't you just making shit up? The first thing I've said that I would consider even coming close to egging him on is saying he's bad at the game for using his meta of doing something I would consider bad play as a defence for when I said that his behaviour was scummy. I can't see a single instance of him attempting to de-escalate either, mainly since he was the only one escalating to begin with.
Cool. I don't care if he was lying about wanting a No Elim. Wanting a No Elim doesn't make him scum. Not wanting a No Elim doesn't making him scum. Lying about either of them doesn't make him scum. The only thing that makes someone scum is that their reasons for doing any of these try to make a Town win less likely.QuoteJoining a bandwagon isn't inherently scummy. In fact, it's one of the only ways to actually win as a Town player. But, that's not really what Maximum Spin is doing. If anything, I'm the one that's bandwagoning, and that's really loosely using the term. Voting people for no reason is scummy, yes, but it's (1) Day 1, so there's a lot of leeway on what's acceptable, (2) NOT joining a bandwagon for no reason at all, and (3) expressing an idea for something that you explicitly believe is the correct decision. Are you saying that joining what you think is the right decision is wrong? No, of course you're not. So, you must instead point out that the motivations behind that decision are wrong. His actions don't look like they have ill intent, so I don't think this is a viable method to attack Max.I can only assume you're intentionally misrepresenting what happened here, and I'm not sure why you're doing that. Max has explicitly claimed he was lying about wanting to No-lynch, so either he was lying then or he's lying now. Either way, it's not possible for you to honestly argue that he was joining a movement that he believed was correct.
If you're accepting the claim that him joining to idea of a No-lynch was somehow a bait for Jim then I'd really like it if you'd explain how that makes an iota of sense.
PFPI don't really care if there is a tie, frankly, but I'll do my best to avoid one for the most part.
I'm not voting Tric but I'll vote someone to prevent a tie if I have to.
I'm pretty sure we should not tie, although tying an actual mafia member with No Lynch and forcing the scum to pick would be kind of funny.That would be funny.
I'm pretty sure we should not tie, although tying an actual mafia member with No Lynch and forcing the scum to pick would be kind of funny.Or tying two Mafia members.
... What?Tric:Mostly for a decision to be made one way or the other. Even if you lynch me, it's better than running down the clock. Or not lynching anyone in the first place, who voted says a lot about the mafia. And why.Dues Asmoth
Times ticking down.
I'm genuinely at a loss about what you want from me here, or if you even want anything.
NOTE: In the event of a tie, the Mafia chooses the execution target.
Webadict the only thing that's annoying me here is you insistence on misrepresenting everything I do. How am I attacking 'everyone who questions me' when even among the people you're pretending that I've attacked, you're the only one who actually asked me anything? How is asking you to explain your overt lies unreasonable of me?Because you're calling them overt lies. It's entirely reasonable for me to misunderstand things. It's entirely reasonable for me to misspeak. I don't think I'm overtly lying in this case, so I'll need a better idea of what you think I'm lying about here.
Sorry for not being able to post much, but Deus just seems like a particularly zealous town member.Only Tric and Max are, though I know Max will likely switch to Jim if given a situation to do so.
Why are we voting them, exactly?
Sorry for not being able to post much, but Deus just seems like a particularly zealous town member.I don't think I agree, but I might have a particular tendency to find his playstyle scummy. Either way, who would you prefer to vote?
Why are we voting them, exactly?
JiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiimSorry for not being able to post much, but Deus just seems like a particularly zealous town member.I don't think I agree, but I might have a particular tendency to find his playstyle scummy. Either way, who would you prefer to vote?
Why are we voting them, exactly?
Webadict the only thing that's annoying me here is you insistence on misrepresenting everything I do. How am I attacking 'everyone who questions me' when even among the people you're pretending that I've attacked, you're the only one who actually asked me anything? How is asking you to explain your overt lies unreasonable of me?Because you're calling them overt lies. It's entirely reasonable for me to misunderstand things. It's entirely reasonable for me to misspeak. I don't think I'm overtly lying in this case, so I'll need a better idea of what you think I'm lying about here.
I'm trying to get you to refocus your attention, here, because it's going in the wrong direction. Would you like to work together to figure this out? It's entirely possible to work together on this without being hostile. Doesn't that sound better? Or is that not a possibility for you? I'm just here to look for Town players.
... You're literally voting no one, and tomorrow your hope is to vote Maximum Spin. You understand how bad that looks, right?QuoteI'm trying to get you to refocus your attention, here, because it's going in the wrong direction. Would you like to work together to figure this out? It's entirely possible to work together on this without being hostile. Doesn't that sound better? Or is that not a possibility for you? I'm just here to look for Town players.
Give me an argument for who you think is scum if you actually have one. I'm happy with my attention where it is.
No clue. I barely skimmed the past couple pages, and I don’t have much time online today. so I’m looking for a debrief and a general “what are we doing”Vote no lynch
Give me an argument for who you think is scum if you actually have one.Okay. I'm not gonna do that. Not because I can't, but because it's not gonna get me anywhere that I wanna be.
I have to vote Deus here to break the tie but I don't really want to, bleh.You have an hour. You're fine.
There's an hour left??Lol, yeah. Default forum time doesn't change for DST, did that throw you off?
Pretend I don't. Explain how it looks.... You're literally voting no one, and tomorrow your hope is to vote Maximum Spin. You understand how bad that looks, right?QuoteI'm trying to get you to refocus your attention, here, because it's going in the wrong direction. Would you like to work together to figure this out? It's entirely possible to work together on this without being hostile. Doesn't that sound better? Or is that not a possibility for you? I'm just here to look for Town players.
Give me an argument for who you think is scum if you actually have one. I'm happy with my attention where it is.
... You're literally RVSing Jim and are refusing to present any actual information after asking to work together. You understand how that looks, right?Give me an argument for who you think is scum if you actually have one.Okay. I'm not gonna do that. Not because I can't, but because it's not gonna get me anywhere that I wanna be.
Suppose, in your hypothetical, that Maximum Spin dies Tonight and flips Town. Who is scum?
Suppose, again hypothetically, that I die Tonight and flip Town. Who is scum?
Just do that for everyone real quickly and see where it goes. I just want to see what your backup scum picks are.
... You're literally RVSing Jim and are refusing to present any actual information after asking to work together. You understand how that looks, right?I mean, obviously I'm Town, that's really easy for me.
Basically, Deus, I'm gonna vote you if you can't convince me you're Town.Quite a predicament this puts Deus in I would say, what can Deus do I wonder?
Then vote for me and stop trying to pretend I forced you into doing it. I already think you're scum.Want to roleclaim? It could help dissuade people.
Quite a predicament this puts Deus in I would say, what can Deus do I wonder?Claiming and/or Voting Jim Groovester would probably be his best ideas. I feel like he might realize he's in a no-win situation, but I sort of have to force that decision on him...
I don't think Tric should shoot unless whoever dies today flips mafia.Let's spell it out. If whoever dies today DOES flip mafia, and it's either Deus or Jim, who do you say he should shoot? My money's on "the other one", but I wonder if you have some better plan.
Sure. I'm a cop and I'm going to inspect Webadict tonight.Then vote for me and stop trying to pretend I forced you into doing it. I already think you're scum.Want to roleclaim? It could help dissuade people.
TricThat's not really a reaction. Just a question on what I'm talking about? Use your words Asmoth!... What?Tric:Mostly for a decision to be made one way or the other. Even if you lynch me, it's better than running down the clock. Or not lynching anyone in the first place, who voted says a lot about the mafia. And why.Dues Asmoth
Times ticking down.
I'm genuinely at a loss about what you want from me here, or if you even want anything.
... K, just for that I'm shooting you.Sure. I'm a cop and I'm going to inspect Webadict tonight.Then vote for me and stop trying to pretend I forced you into doing it. I already think you're scum.Want to roleclaim? It could help dissuade people.
Wonderful! That means voting Jim Groovester would be the best thing you can do to ensure that, no? Or would you rather vote me? Both of those are valid strategies here!Sure. I'm a cop and I'm going to inspect Webadict tonight.Then vote for me and stop trying to pretend I forced you into doing it. I already think you're scum.Want to roleclaim? It could help dissuade people.
Or you can vote to No-lynch.Wonderful! That means voting Jim Groovester would be the best thing you can do to ensure that, no? Or would you rather vote me? Both of those are valid strategies here!Sure. I'm a cop and I'm going to inspect Webadict tonight.Then vote for me and stop trying to pretend I forced you into doing it. I already think you're scum.Want to roleclaim? It could help dissuade people.
The question is whether Deus doesn't want to vote Jim because he really likes the no lynch plan, or because he cares about Jim.The answer is that 'vote Jim because Webadict said so' is not a compelling argument.
Why?Because you've given me literally no reason to, and several reasons not to trust your vote choice.
*sigh* I don't want Toony to freak out, so I'll move here unless you swap to Jim Groovester.Not voting a cop claim.
Deus Asmoth
Max will probably join tooCan confirm.
I... gave you a compelling list of why I thought everyone else was Town. Is that not good enough for you?The question is whether Deus doesn't want to vote Jim because he really likes the no lynch plan, or because he cares about Jim.The answer is that 'vote Jim because Webadict said so' is not a compelling argument.
Why?Because you've given me literally no reason to, and several reasons not to trust your vote choice.
Coward.*sigh* I don't want Toony to freak out, so I'll move here unless you swap to Jim Groovester.Not voting a cop claim.
Deus Asmoth
Come on Deus vote Jim and I'll switch. Web and Max will probably join too and you stay alive.You know what? Sure, let's see how that goes.
I... gave you a compelling list of why I thought everyone else was Town. Is that not good enough for you?The question is whether Deus doesn't want to vote Jim because he really likes the no lynch plan, or because he cares about Jim.The answer is that 'vote Jim because Webadict said so' is not a compelling argument.
Why?Because you've given me literally no reason to, and several reasons not to trust your vote choice.
Not exactly what I wanted. But…
Web, what did you do last night?Nothing.
Do you want to explain that in a way that doesn't involve posting a read list where every result reads 'Town I guess lol'?Are you saying that I'm scum?
Okay, well, whatever.I mean, it should be pretty obvious I'm not a killer, but I also think it should be pretty obvious that you're not either.
Tric, did you do anything last night?
Knightwing, how about you?
And you, Deus?
Because unless one of you tells me an unexpected story, I know web isn't the killer.
I mean, it should be pretty obvious I'm not a killer, but I also think it should be pretty obvious that you're not either.I didn't really think you were, but you were the only one I felt like I could justifiably use my action on. I mean, I wanted to use it on Deus, but he had his whole cop claim thing he apparently forgot about already, so I didn't want to screw it up if it were actually true.
Agreed. I'm 95% on it being Deus, 5% on it being Knightwing, and like .1% that it's somehow you. I'd say it could be TricMagic... but, like, can it?I mean, it should be pretty obvious I'm not a killer, but I also think it should be pretty obvious that you're not either.I didn't really think you were, but you were the only one I felt like I could justifiably use my action on. I mean, I wanted to use it on Deus, but he had his whole cop claim thing he apparently forgot about already, so I didn't want to screw it up if it were actually true.
Unless Tric has pulled off a master gambit, it looks like it's between Deus and Knightwing. And, well, I don't really think it's Knightwing.
I'm saying you're playing like a lunatic and I don't know why.Do you want to explain that in a way that doesn't involve posting a read list where every result reads 'Town I guess lol'?Are you saying that I'm scum?
Already answered your question Max.You didn't technically, you just said you didn't shoot. I don't know if you can do anything else. :P
Townhunting is a legitimate strategy for finding scum. It can be used to create a Process of Elimination (PoE) on who scum can be. ToonyMan was listed as "lol, cuz" because he's legitimately that good and sometimes, I have to take a risk on assuming he's Town or scum because if I don't, I'll be stuck in an endless battle of wondering if he's Town or scum. I'm actually fine with ToonyMan being dead because it verifies that he's Town, although he was just about as confirmed as Max or I were from Yesterday's play.I'm saying you're playing like a lunatic and I don't know why.Do you want to explain that in a way that doesn't involve posting a read list where every result reads 'Town I guess lol'?Are you saying that I'm scum?
In any case, as far as I can make out the only player who could reasonably be scum is Knightwing. Forcing a policy lynch on Jim doesn't make any sense for Webadict to do if they were on the same team, and killing Toony when he'd already signed over his free will to Webadict wouldn't make any sense for either Webadict or Max to do. It also wouldn't make sense for me to do as scum, but I already know that pointing that out is a waste of effort from me. I also know that there are plenty of WIFOM arguments you can make against those conclusions, but the fact of the matter is that it's completely counterproductive for any of the players I mentioned to kill the one town member who didn't want any of us dead.
Already answered your question Max.You didn't technically, you just said you didn't shoot. I don't know if you can do anything else. :P
But since it looks like webadict knows what I did, it follows that nobody misdirected me anyway.
Deus, in that case, would you consent to be lynched if Tric agrees to shoot Knightwing immediately afterward if the game does not end?
None of this explains why your current theory that I'm scum directly contradicts most of what you said yesterday. It also doesn't explain the pointless antagonism you were doing, but I don't think either or us are interested in discussing that.Townhunting is a legitimate strategy for finding scum. It can be used to create a Process of Elimination (PoE) on who scum can be. ToonyMan was listed as "lol, cuz" because he's legitimately that good and sometimes, I have to take a risk on assuming he's Town or scum because if I don't, I'll be stuck in an endless battle of wondering if he's Town or scum. I'm actually fine with ToonyMan being dead because it verifies that he's Town, although he was just about as confirmed as Max or I were from Yesterday's play.I'm saying you're playing like a lunatic and I don't know why.Do you want to explain that in a way that doesn't involve posting a read list where every result reads 'Town I guess lol'?Are you saying that I'm scum?
In any case, as far as I can make out the only player who could reasonably be scum is Knightwing. Forcing a policy lynch on Jim doesn't make any sense for Webadict to do if they were on the same team, and killing Toony when he'd already signed over his free will to Webadict wouldn't make any sense for either Webadict or Max to do. It also wouldn't make sense for me to do as scum, but I already know that pointing that out is a waste of effort from me. I also know that there are plenty of WIFOM arguments you can make against those conclusions, but the fact of the matter is that it's completely counterproductive for any of the players I mentioned to kill the one town member who didn't want any of us dead.
Web, I think I'm not going to vote until we hear from Knightwing. Deus actually agreeing to that plan makes me want to be careful.I mean, yeah, but the chance that it's him has increased to 99% because he forgot that he claimed Cop and hasn't posted inspection results.
There is that, lol.Web, I think I'm not going to vote until we hear from Knightwing. Deus actually agreeing to that plan makes me want to be careful.I mean, yeah, but the chance that it's him has increased to 99% because he forgot that he claimed Cop and hasn't posted inspection results.
I honestly don't see any reason to post my inspection results. They're not useful and it's easier to just skip to the bit where I die.Web, I think I'm not going to vote until we hear from Knightwing. Deus actually agreeing to that plan makes me want to be careful.I mean, yeah, but the chance that it's him has increased to 99% because he forgot that he claimed Cop and hasn't posted inspection results.
AlsoI posted my reasons in the same post that your clearly read. If you have a problem with my logic you can explain it.
How did you come to the conclusion that I’m the only person that could reasonably be scum?
That makes no sense, none of us are hard cleared, anyone could be mafia. If the mod hasn’t outright stated someone is town, there’s room to doubt.
Lynch me and then him, lynch me and kill him, no lynch and kill me and then kill him. I don't particularly care.
I'm not willing to invest the effort necessary into pursuing that line of logic and then wrangling Tric into acting like a sane person long enough to put a lynch together.
Deus Asmoth
I honestly don't see any reason to post my inspection results. They're not useful and it's easier to just skip to the bit where I die.
You completely excluded to even mention Tric in your “reasoning” post, first of all.
Lynch me and then him, lynch me and kill him, no lynch and kill me and then kill him. I don't particularly care.
I'm not willing to invest the effort necessary into pursuing that line of logic and then wrangling Tric into acting like a sane person long enough to put a lynch together.
Deus Asmoth
For someone who claims to not care, you seem to be taking this particularly rough.
I honestly don't see any reason to post my inspection results. They're not useful and it's easier to just skip to the bit where I die.
This doesn’t explain why you forgot that you had even claimed cop in the first place, and you didn’t “post your inspection results” even when nobody was outright saying they sussed you.
Any sort of inspection is useful and saying otherwise isn’t very smart. If you are town, tell us the results so we have something to go off of if we lynch you.
Awfully convenient that you picked Toony.
I think you’re taking this rough because you seem very passive aggressive. A lot more so then you started as. Therefore, I can make the assumption that the change in your tone is because this is affecting you more then you say.It's so cool how this is definitely true and I haven't said some variation of 'Tric is insane and it annoys me that I have to play around that' on multiple occasions.
web100% truthful.
please help
I'd like to clear up at least one thing. Web, are you being truthful in your latest roleclaim? I know you, so I have to wonder.
It wasn’t a gradual buildup though, you just suddenly get more angry?I can't control the point at which you decide to project emotions onto me. If you have any actual response to the points that I've made feel free, I'm not inclined to debate your interpretation of my feelings.
Max, just hammer. There's no point overthinking this.Okay. I was overthinking it because I feel like that is too much non-nightkillability to all be town-sided, but, I guess we'll cross that bridge if we come to it.
Well, upon further inspection…I agree.
I think it’s Tric. Do you agree, Max?
So on for an hour. Maxy Maxy Maxy. I killed web. Web was bulletproof. So he had to have been shot twice. Not once. So who fired the other shot?I noticed Jim had a superkill in BeBYOR1.
Also, I am the spirit of knightwing, no one contested that claim. This game. You want it to end quickly without thought?I don't want it to get confounded by FUD either, but. Unvote. Convince me that it's knightwing.
I'm going to go out on a limb and say I think it's pretty unlikely Max and Jim are mafia together.
I'd have gotten you if TricMagic hadn't chosen the worst Action on every possible Night.Yeah what the fuck? Not shooting N1 and then shooting Web N2?
"DUH! WEBADICT WENT WEALLY HAWD ON JIM, SO NOW I SHOOTED HIM A DAY WATE AND HE DIE WHY HE DO DAT?!?"I'd have gotten you if TricMagic hadn't chosen the worst Action on every possible Night.Yeah what the fuck? Not shooting N1 and then shooting Web N2?
I wanna check one thing. Web, were you actually told I roleblocked you n1 despite having no action? Because I really did - double-acting - but it would be pretty funny if that huge benefit ended up being useless.No, but I knew you did, and I wasn't going to tell you. Deadchat has a complete log of Toony and I figuring out the entire game. It's unfortunate, because the two remaining players were never going to logic through the evidence to win. TricMagic had part of why you were scum, but he didn't have the rest:
You actually made the wrong play if you wanted to look like Town, which was to vote Knightwing. TricMagic was confirmed by the double shot.Right, I just wanted to get Knightwing to vote at that point, because I thought it would be easier to get him to vote Tric than to get Tric to vote Knightwing. And I did have the fact of Jim's superkill in the original game to back it up.
Additionally, you roleblocking me on Night 1 was also evidence of you being scum, since ToonyMan never gets shot by anyone unless they know I was roleblocked as a fakeclaim Doctor.I didn't believe you were really a doctor, because it was you claiming it, but yeah, I was worried someone would notice that. I was going for "well, either Knightwing and Tric might just not have believed you or not thought of that".
Web, first, you pushed for that lynch really quickly. Second, you had already lied once before. Third, Knightwing you idiot.I'm actually really mad, because I think that had TricMagic shot literally anyone except me on Night 2, the game would've been a win for Town.
I'm actually really mad, because I think that had TricMagic shot literally anyone except me on Night 2, the game would've been a win for Town.I also had a bulletproof, so maybe not. There was actually nobody Tric could kill on N2. And realistically, I bet I could get him and KW to vote you out and then nightkill him.
I cannot overstate enough that TricMagic managed to lose a won game for Town. If anyone wants proof that voting TricMagic on Day 1 was wrong, this is all the evidence you need.You say this like you're not the one who spend D1 gaslighting me over my correct read on Max.
Web, first, you pushed for that lynch really quickly. Second, you had already lied once before. Third, Knightwing you idiot.So... You believed Max was a Town Roleblocker, blocked me, and I somehow still killed through the roleblock on ToonyMan, a player I claimed I was protecting?
Unlikely. You being alive would only raise eyebrows if TricMagic shot you. Your roleblocking me Night 1 only makes you as the possible scum other than Deus Asmoth. No one else shoots ToonyMan there. You would've had to prove that both Mafia had resistance to Town Roleblocking.I'm actually really mad, because I think that had TricMagic shot literally anyone except me on Night 2, the game would've been a win for Town.I also had a bulletproof, so maybe not. There was actually nobody Tric could kill on N2. And realistically, I bet I could get him and KW to vote you out and then nightkill him.
You spent the entire Day being combative. I told you exactly what you were doing wrong, and you fought with me the entire time. You can say I was gaslighting you, but I wasn't.I cannot overstate enough that TricMagic managed to lose a won game for Town. If anyone wants proof that voting TricMagic on Day 1 was wrong, this is all the evidence you need.You say this like you're not the one who spend D1 gaslighting me over my correct read on Max.
Unlikely. You being alive would only raise eyebrows if TricMagic shot you. Your roleblocking me Night 1 only makes you as the possible scum other than Deus Asmoth. No one else shoots ToonyMan there. You would've had to prove that both Mafia had resistance to Town Roleblocking.Yeah, if I were arguing it to not Tric and Knightwing. But like, your first paragraph already shows that Tric suspected you despite my roleblock for no reason!
You spent the entire Day being combative. I told you exactly what you were doing wrong, and you fought with me the entire time. You can say I was gaslighting you, but I wasn't.So you just saying things that you want to be true isn't just an in game thing, you do it all the time? Cool. The fact of the matter is that I asked Max to justify a single action, he threw a tantrum and you decided that somehow made me scum. You can argue that my responses to you were combatitive, but you had fully earned it.
The fact of the matter is that I asked Max to justify a single action, he threw a tantrum and you decided that somehow made me scum.You were actually wrong, though. I really did everything I would have done as town, and the fact that it looks shady to you helps me because the people who have played with me more will defend it. I did something similar in day 1 of BeBYOR2.
I see. So, you just sound combative. That makes sense. I don't see why you wouldn't listen to what I was saying when I was doing my best to get you to look Town. It took until the last two minutes of the Day to get you to vote Jim, for instance, in spite of three other players trying to get you to do the same.You spent the entire Day being combative. I told you exactly what you were doing wrong, and you fought with me the entire time. You can say I was gaslighting you, but I wasn't.So you just saying things that you want to be true isn't just an in game thing, you do it all the time? Cool. The fact of the matter is that I asked Max to justify a single action, he threw a tantrum and you decided that somehow made me scum. You can argue that my responses to you were combatitive, but you had fully earned it.
Knightwing would be easier to convince. TricMagic is a loose grenade, but Knightwing usually thinks things through. Usually.Unlikely. You being alive would only raise eyebrows if TricMagic shot you. Your roleblocking me Night 1 only makes you as the possible scum other than Deus Asmoth. No one else shoots ToonyMan there. You would've had to prove that both Mafia had resistance to Town Roleblocking.Yeah, if I were arguing it to not Tric and Knightwing. But like, your first paragraph already shows that Tric suspected you despite my roleblock for no reason!
My revenge for Tric grows ever stronger.Remember this my young Padawan: Embrace your emotions, let them fill you with rage and hatred.
Jim wins by doing nothing?
Jim totally did something: he agreed to let me bus him hard from the very start. Without that I think we would have had a much harder time.
The only winning move when Tric is involved seems to be ignoring his existence.
To be fair, Knightwing, there were pieces of information that made Max the likeliest scum that you didn't sift through. Max's best play was definitely rushing you into voting without looking at it, since I think he accurately identified that either of you would jump on a vote without realizing hammer. His unvote allows him to potentially get TricMagic to vote Knightwing, as an insurance card.To be fair, Web thought Max was Town right up to the moment he got shot twice.
I think your best move (if possible) would be to post while he had voted TricMagic to prove your were Town, and then have them argue who was scum for you. Hammers being active means that someone can prove their Town by not Hammering. I'm not sure if you saw that or not, but it was a possibility.
I think, thinking it through, Max might've made the right play as scum. The right play as Town was to vote Knightwing, since Tric is cleared of the kill (double shot on the Bulletproof Vest), but I think relying on TricMagic to decide is probably too dangerous as scum. I think TricMagic still votes Knightwing here, though, so Max played it really well to get in a position like that.
You can rush any Day except the last one! Never rush the last Day!
To be fair, Web thought Max was Town right up to the moment he got shot twice.No, getting shot twice was the moment I realized TricMagic was FUCKING TOWN.
=TricMagic - Vigilante Spirit of Knightwing]Congratulations!This was in no way prophetic. :)
You are NOT one of the people being hunted! Although, in another life, you might have accidentally assisted in murdering one or more people, that is now somebody else's problem.
Instead, you are:
Vigilante Spirit of Knightwing: Once per night, you can KILL one player, sidestepping the stupid town that lost the game last time.
:o
Don't get shot twice, and you should be fine. 8)Or this :P
You're a COP, the only one who should legitimately be hunting mafia criminals. Oh well, you'll have to suffer through Amateur Hour to find the culprits.