Bay 12 Games Forum
Finally... => Forum Games and Roleplaying => Mafia => Topic started by: Servant Corps on August 02, 2009, 01:39:32 am
-
Top Secret Military Factroy, 1948
DAY 0:
Servant Corps: Roll call please.
Little
Mr.Person
ToonyMan
Pandarsenic
Leafsnail
Zaithemaster
Xegeth
inaluct
Webadict
Servant Corps: Thank you for coming on such short notice. You represent the brighest people we have. Now, I understand some of you are unfamilar with The American Chrononauts Project. Well, the Project is right here in this very base.
Servant Corps point to the military factory.
Servant Corps: We create experimental time machines, which we then give to our most important operatives. These operatives then uses these time machines to travel through time and implement our orders. There are many events that we say are...well...plainly Un-American. Now, what if we could wipe away these events? That's what the Project is. We could get rid of terrible dictators, erase embarrsing incidents, bring world peace throughout the world! Control over time will make us hegomons.
Little: This base must be important then. How do you ensure that it is kept secure from outside threats?
Servant Corps: As you can see, the security of this project is very tight. We have conducted background checks on all of you, so we can trust that you are all loyal to the United States. But, we still want you to remain vigliant, in the off chance that our background checks failed. Our spies has revealed that the Russian Communists are interested in stealing this technology for their own cynical purposes. Just stay alert though, you should be fine.
Webadict: Well, alright. We might as well go to bed and wake up the next day to start working here.
Servant Corps: Good. I don't want us to lose time in pointless discussion.
DAY 0 ended.
NIGHT 0:
Servant Corps was murdered.
DAY 1:
You arrive to see Servant Corps' corpse. Since you do not know whar orders Servant Corps would have given you, the Project grinds to a halt! But, more importantly, the murder of Servant Corps indicate that the security of the Factory has been compromised! You must now find the culprits and put a stop to them, before the culprits kill you too!
DAY 1 begins.
-
Hello everyone.
-
Well, gentlemen, considering the nature of the technology available to Servant Corps's murderers, I have a feeling that one of us is already dead.
So if you've ever wanted to say something to me without me being able to get a word in after, now would be a good time.
-
INALUCT LIKES THE COCK
-
Well, if we are all going to die, I always wanted to tell Pandar I think he is totally hot.
:-* ;) :o
-
Well, lemme just say that I think some of you guys take mafia a tad too seriously. At the same time, some of you guys don't take the game seriously enough. I think Pandarsenic strikes the balance perfectly, so <3.
-
I feel popular. <3
Speaking of seriousness, though, we should actually spend some time scumhunting instead of going about this sillyness.
....
....
....
I FoS all of you. ARE YOU OR HAVE YOU EVER BEEN A COMMUNIST?
-
Well, lemme just say that I think some of you guys take mafia a tad too seriously. At the same time, some of you guys don't take the game seriously enough.
Also, some people here abuse rules to win games.
-
Well, lemme just say that I think some of you guys take mafia a tad too seriously. At the same time, some of you guys don't take the game seriously enough.
Also, some people here abuse rules to win games.
Hey now, what you call "abuse" I call "playing". There has to be something besides pure discussion and debate, right? Or would you rather just play mountainous all the time?
I FoS all of you. ARE YOU OR HAVE YOU EVER BEEN A COMMUNIST?
No, I am not and have never been a communist. Pandarsenic, same question right back at you.
-
Well, gentlemen, considering the nature of the technology available to Servant Corps's murderers, I have a feeling that one of us is already dead.
Why do you think they'll go back in time? Wouldn't attacking in the present or future be just as useful for them?
-
One thing is that they may be able to "stack" kills... That's worrisome.
-
We can also stack heals, so that should prevent it from getting too bad.
-
Yeah, but... if they stack all three on one "middle" night, we need more healers than they have killers. :I
-
One kill per night doesn't seem to be any different from normal mafia. If the doctor dies we could lose multiple people though.
-
Sorry, I've just realised I made a mistake there. If they want to guarantee kills, they can only do it once every three nights. The only other choice is to attempt one kill per night until they hit the doctor, and before that the doctor can just heal any kills.
-
Yeah, finding the doctor will be of utmost priority to the mafia. My guess would be that they put tonight's kill tomorrow, and tomorrow's kill on tomorrow, and the next day's kill on tomorrow. Or something like that, to prevent the doctor from just resurrecting everyone. Of course, they may focus on another night, or do something completely different (maybe if they have a roleblocker he'll focus on the next night?).
Well, goddamn if this isn't confusing. Actually, the mafia may even try to kill one of us on night 0, since by the time we get to day 2 night 1 will be yesterday, and so anyone killed on night 0 can't be resurrected. Oh well, one of us is already dead.
-
Sorry, I've just realised I made a mistake there. If they want to guarantee kills, they can only do it once every three nights. The only other choice is to attempt one kill per night until they hit the doctor, and before that the doctor can just heal any kills.
... You guys are being really stupid right now.
Vote Xegeth.
You seem to be asking a lot of questions about inaluct's statement, as well somehow coming up with a "solution."
Also, explain who you think is scum.
-
You seem to be asking a lot of questions about inaluct's statement, as well somehow coming up with a "solution."
Also, explain who you think is scum.
The only questions I asked that were directed at inaluct were in my second post and I asked those because there was very little else to comment on. Everything else I was directing at Pandarsenic's comments about stacking kills. I wasn't attempting to give a solution, but just to try to predict how the communists would act.
So far, it seems like there's been very few people actually scumhunting or trying to look like they are so I don't have any ideas for the moment. For now, I'll vote ToonyMan because he hasn't posted yet.
-
You seem to be asking a lot of questions about inaluct's statement, as well somehow coming up with a "solution."
Also, explain who you think is scum.
The only questions I asked that were directed at inaluct were in my second post and I asked those because there was very little else to comment on. Everything else I was directing at Pandarsenic's comments about stacking kills. I wasn't attempting to give a solution, but just to try to predict how the communists would act.
So far, it seems like there's been very few people actually scumhunting or trying to look like they are so I don't have any ideas for the moment. For now, I'll vote ToonyMan because he hasn't posted yet.
There are a couple of people that haven't posted yet, especially before ToonyMan on the list. Why him?
-
So far, only two people haven't posted, ToonyMan and Zaithemaster. Toonyman was the first on the list out of the two of them.
-
So far, only two people haven't posted, ToonyMan and Zaithemaster. Toonyman was the first on the list out of the two of them.
Oh. I thought Mr.Person hadn't posted. Seems he posted twice. Well then, maybe you should say who you think is the most suspicious? Instead of avoiding the question...
-
I think the communist witchhunt matches the usual tactics used in Bay12 mafia perfectly. Only over if we were really acting like them we'd probably kill anyone who used red text.
-
So far, only two people haven't posted, ToonyMan and Zaithemaster. Toonyman was the first on the list out of the two of them.
Oh. I thought Mr.Person hadn't posted. Seems he posted twice. Well then, maybe you should say who you think is the most suspicious? Instead of avoiding the question...
Maybe Little? He's only made one post and it didn't contain any useful content. As I've already said though, I have no real suspicions at the moment.
-
So far, only two people haven't posted, ToonyMan and Zaithemaster. Toonyman was the first on the list out of the two of them.
Oh. I thought Mr.Person hadn't posted. Seems he posted twice. Well then, maybe you should say who you think is the most suspicious? Instead of avoiding the question...
Maybe Little? He's only made one post and it didn't contain any useful content. As I've already said though, I have no real suspicions at the moment.
That was enough, thank you. I'd like Pandarsenic to explain his suspicions.
-
I don't think there's enough to go on, at the moment. I'd prefer to avoid OMGUS votes, so I abstain for now.
-
I didn't see this thread! Sorry!!! I'm here. ;D
This game is going to be so weird.
-
Unvote. What is your opinion on the situation so far ToonyMan? Do you think anyone's acting suspiciously?
-
Just the usually baseless accusations. I don't see any suspicious behavior yet.
-
Vote ToonyMan. It's him.
-
Vote ToonyMan. It's him.
You seem a bit sure that it's him after only two posts. I think I'll wait until I've heard what ToonyMan has to say for himself. Maybe you could explain how you're so sure?
-
Vote ToonyMan. It's him.
You seem a bit sure that it's him after only two posts. I think I'll wait until I've heard what ToonyMan has to say for himself. Maybe you could explain how you're so sure?
Let him explain, and I'll show you.
-
I was asleep. Sleep is suspicious, I know. I could have been dreaming about communism.
I actually agree with webadict right now. He's acting differently from what I've seen of him in other Mafias, which is not much considering he started playing after I "took a break." But for now, only FoS ToonyMan.
I vote Little because his single post so far was a nonsense post.
-
So we've all posted. Guess that's the lurker vote idea out the window.
I might have to FoS Little for now (due to not having posted anything meaningful on this thread so far), but I know that voting for someone with no reason will make me hated by that person for the rest of the game, so I still abstain.
-
webadict is just trying to make me break down or something. I can't say anything except I'm not scum. Although, he seems quite jumpy after I posted. Maybe he's trying to throw suspicion off himself?
-
webadict is just trying to make me break down or something. I can't say anything except I'm not scum. Although, he seems quite jumpy after I posted. Maybe he's trying to throw suspicion off himself?
Break down? Never. No one breaks down until the very end when it's hopeless. You are, however, scum.
-
P'shaw. Why do you think so?
-
I dunno, not seeing this thread shouldn't have meant you couldn't come down here, considering you got a role pm. I think Webadict may be implying that you were planning to lurk, saw we were planning a lynch of lurkers and then came down.
Or something.
-
I found the thread when I saw the PM, I was sleeping beforehand. :-\
-
I don't mean no confusion. ;D
-
I found the thread when I saw the PM, I was sleeping beforehand. :-\
That's funny, considering you were able to post in another thread plenty of time beforehand.
Time for some homework. Your first post was:
Just the usually baseless accusations. I don't see any suspicious behavior yet.
10:13 AM (My time)
So, you didn't see it until then, even though you were on at...
It's like when you're playing those stupid kill everyone missions in CoH and then you can't find the last guy. Stupid hidden lurker guy!
My god! That says 9:53 AM (My time)! So, either you ignored it, or you spent 20 minutes constructing an adequate response. Take your pick. But, you're scum.
-
Come on guys I didn't see the message [1] thing. The sleeping thing I just said was a joke. Stop trying to get a town killed already, like you always do webadict.
-
Come on guys I didn't see the message [1] thing. The sleeping thing I just said was a joke. Stop trying to get a town killed already, like you always do webadict.
I always get town killed, now do I? That seems a bit drastic to say. Can you be more specific as to which town I kill?
-
So we've all posted. Guess that's the lurker vote idea out the window.
I might have to FoS Little for now (due to not having posted anything meaningful on this thread so far), but I know that voting for someone with no reason will make me hated by that person for the rest of the game, so I still abstain.
That's the scummiest thing I've ever seen. You don't want to vote (and deny the town info) because you don't want to look suspicious? Vote Leafsnail. At least put forth your thoughts, if nothing else.
-
So we've all posted. Guess that's the lurker vote idea out the window.
I might have to FoS Little for now (due to not having posted anything meaningful on this thread so far), but I know that voting for someone with no reason will make me hated by that person for the rest of the game, so I still abstain.
That's the scummiest thing I've ever seen. You don't want to vote (and deny the town info) because you don't want to look suspicious? Vote Leafsnail. At least put forth your thoughts, if nothing else.
Thank you, Mr.Person, for additional support in scumhunting. I also agree that this post is indeed scummy. Leafsnail, just because somebody posts, does not count as them not lurking. You can lurk very easily, in fact, by saying very average things and going along with a crowd. It's called active lurking. Just because you're active does not stop you from lurking.
-
Come on guys I didn't see the message [1] thing. The sleeping thing I just said was a joke. Stop trying to get a town killed already, like you always do webadict.
I always get town killed, now do I? That seems a bit drastic to say. Can you be more specific as to which town I kill?
Saying anything else just makes me more suspicious, I know how this works. Even saying this is suspicious now isn't it?
-
Time for some homework. Your first post was:
Just the usually baseless accusations. I don't see any suspicious behavior yet.
10:13 AM (My time)
So, you didn't see it until then, even though you were on at...
It's like when you're playing those stupid kill everyone missions in CoH and then you can't find the last guy. Stupid hidden lurker guy!
Webadict, his first post was this:
I didn't see this thread! Sorry!!! I'm here. ;D
This game is going to be so weird.
He only took 4 minutes to notice the PM. His second post was just a response to mine.
I think I'm going to vote for Leafsnail for that comment but I will FoS Little.
-
Fair enough then, I don't know the terminology very well. I understand Mr. Person's suspicions, so I won't do a standard OMGUS vote. I personally agree with Webadict, especially since Toonyman has now resorted to calling what he did earlier a "Joke" (often a scum tell). Therefore I vote Toonyman, and ask him why he decided to lie to us previously.
-
I agree that Leafsnail should come out and comment more on the game. We don't have too much to go on, and there's always a chance that whatever he has to say could result in finding some scum.
Ninja'd. :I
As for Toonyman, I agree that his posting style seems unusual, but I'm not really suspicious enough of him to vote yet.
-
I'm doing my best, but to be honest I'm not sure how to get people talking properly yet. Even if Toonyman isn't scum, he still decided to lie to the town, which isn't helpful to enquiries.
-
webadict knows how I am. I bet he's scum!! RARRR!
;D
-
Fair enough then, I don't know the terminology very well. I understand Mr. Person's suspicions, so I won't do a standard OMGUS vote. I personally agree with Webadict, especially since Toonyman has now resorted to calling what he did earlier a "Joke" (often a scum tell). Therefore I vote Toonyman, and ask him why he decided to lie to us previously.
Bandwagoning just because other people want you to vote? FoS Leafsnail
-
I'll be honest Toony, a flat OMGUS accusation with no supporting evidence isn't very helpful.
-
I'll be honest Toony, a flat OMGUS accusation with no supporting evidence isn't very helpful.
What he said was obviously him joking around. Notice the "RARRR!" and smiley.
But you're right. He isn't being helpful at all, except perhaps by digging his own trench deeper.
-
webadict is always scum when he does this, or atleast being a foolish townie. I read all the Paranormals, I've seen this in action. I'm starting to think if I should role-claim so you don't get the wrong guy lynched.
-
webadict is always scum when he does this, or atleast being a foolish townie. I read all the Paranormals, I've seen this in action. I'm starting to think if I should role-claim so you don't get the wrong guy lynched.
I'm not sure what you mean by "Does this". He just seems to be pointing out what he thinks is scummy about your posts, which is something he and a lot of other players regularly do. I'm not convinced about your guilt, or, indeed, his innocence, but some of what you've said seems to be rather odd.
-
Wrong, TM. Web scumhunts when he's townie (or even 3rd party after death in the case of Paranormal 4) too. And definitely not when he's being a "foolish townie." In fact, just because of that comment (along with your general attitude and comments this game), unvote Little. I vote ToonyMan. You're acting like a bad Org. And by "bad Org," I mean "can't lie worth shit."
Roleclaim wouldn't do much except probably bring WIFOM into play.
-
Time for some homework. Your first post was:
Just the usually baseless accusations. I don't see any suspicious behavior yet.
10:13 AM (My time)
So, you didn't see it until then, even though you were on at...
It's like when you're playing those stupid kill everyone missions in CoH and then you can't find the last guy. Stupid hidden lurker guy!
Webadict, his first post was this:
I didn't see this thread! Sorry!!! I'm here. ;D
This game is going to be so weird.
He only took 4 minutes to notice the PM. His second post was just a response to mine.
I think I'm going to vote for Leafsnail for that comment but I will FoS Little.
That seems to be my bad. I thought it seemed odd.
Come on guys I didn't see the message [1] thing. The sleeping thing I just said was a joke. Stop trying to get a town killed already, like you always do webadict.
I always get town killed, now do I? That seems a bit drastic to say. Can you be more specific as to which town I kill?
Saying anything else just makes me more suspicious, I know how this works. Even saying this is suspicious now isn't it?
The funny thing is that you, ToonyMan, didn't seem to notice that little blunder. Heck, I probably could've made something up and you would've had no retort for it.
webadict is always scum when he does this, or atleast being a foolish townie. I read all the Paranormals, I've seen this in action. I'm starting to think if I should role-claim so you don't get the wrong guy lynched.
Your sentence contains a paradox in that you say I'm always scum, unless I'm a townie. You should probably fix that to make sense.
-
By the way, I've just realised that the time travel element of this round may end up being less important than we originally thought it would be. This is because if you just set any actions you do to yesterday, there will be no way of undoing them. Just to make sure noone gets complacent thinking that the doctor can resurrect them no matter what.
Also, is there any actual confirmation on roles? I only found this on the other thread -
7) There is no Cult. Only Mafia, Town, and the possible Serial Killer. (EDIT: I am also considering a Survivor character too)
And, of course, since the kills will be done at different times, we won't be able to work out if there's a serial killer just by counting the bodies each night.
Also, we of course get no roleflips, so we will be sortof firing in the dark.
-
By the way, I've just realised that the time travel element of this round may end up being less important than we originally thought it would be. This is because if you just set any actions you do to yesterday, there will be no way of undoing them. Just to make sure noone gets complacent thinking that the doctor can resurrect them no matter what.
Also, is there any actual confirmation on roles? I only found this on the other thread -
7) There is no Cult. Only Mafia, Town, and the possible Serial Killer. (EDIT: I am also considering a Survivor character too)
And, of course, since the kills will be done at different times, we won't be able to work out if there's a serial killer just by counting the bodies each night.
Also, we of course get no roleflips, so we will be sortof firing in the dark.
Yes, that is why I was saying they were dumb. If there is someone that can kill in the past, then it won't matter what we do in the present. However, there might not be a person that kills in the past. There might be a person that can only kill in the future. Or a person that can only kill in the present. Servant Corps wasn't very clear on what roles there are, but he never said they could always go to the same point.
-
Sorry all, lighting struck near my house after I posted that last message, I don't have much time right now. A neighbor was kind enough to lend me her computer. My internet is destroyed. I won't get it back until tuesday or wensday. Sorry. :(
I'm docter by-the-way. Might as well while I can.
-
Does anyone else think this looks like a great, elaborate Webadict-bussing-Toonyman thing?
-
If it is, then that would still make Toonyman scum, and we should act accordingly.
-
Does anyone else think this looks like a great, elaborate Webadict-bussing-Toonyman thing?
I can see how could see that. But I still agree with him a bit. But anyways. I've lost the certainty of TM being scum. Unvote ToonyMan and revote for Little.
Scratch that. I just reread the last few posts from TM, and my certainty has been renewed. I'm still voting for TM.
-
Does anyone else think this looks like a great, elaborate Webadict-bussing-Toonyman thing?
That's some far-out thinking. I don't really like bussing. And the last time I had to bus someone it was myself. In Round... 3? Yeah, I think it was 3. I had to bus myself to save Frelock.
Especially in an unknown role game, that'd be a really bad idea.
Sorry all, lighting struck near my house after I posted that last message, I don't have much time right now. A neighbor was kind enough to lend me her computer. My internet is destroyed. I won't get it back until tuesday or wensday. Sorry. :(
I'm docter by-the-way. Might as well while I can.
And just so everyone knows, I hate doctor claims! Not because they're scum tells, but because he might be telling the truth but he'll still die tonight.
-
Vote Count (from earliet to latest):
Toonyman = webadict, Leafsnail, Zaithemaster
Leafsnail=Mr.Person, Xegeth
All power roles, remember to send in your orders to me before I declare the end of Day 1.
-
Even worse, because Toonyman claimed Doc, we can hardly NOT lynch him... it reeks of desperation.
-
Why are you guys voting to lynch the doctor? If he's scum, he'll live til tomorrow. If he's not scum, the scum will kill him. In this game, a doctor can revive people. There's no way in hell the scum would allow a real, claimed doctor to survive the night. Don't think of a doctor as a doctor in this game, think of a doctor as a guy who can revive other people the night after they die.
-
Why are you guys voting to lynch the doctor? If he's scum, he'll live til tomorrow. If he's not scum, the scum will kill him. In this game, a doctor can revive people. There's no way in hell the scum would allow a real, claimed doctor to survive the night. Don't think of a doctor as a doctor in this game, think of a doctor as a guy who can revive other people the night after they die.
Because it reeks of WIFOM. I personally am going by how he's acted, not what role he claims in a last-ditch-effort to have.
-
Sorry, I was busy entertaining cousins all day. Having glanced over the dialogue, I have to ask: why the hell are people randomly voting me? :-\
Also, I would vote Toonyman for his ridiculous claim that he is Doctor, but I still haven't gathered enough satisfactory evidence to cast a vote with any certainty. We need to rationally think this out, people.
-
Sorry, I was busy entertaining cousins all day. Having glanced over the dialogue, I have to ask: why the hell are people randomly voting me? :-\
Also, I would vote Toonyman for his ridiculous claim that he is Doctor, but I still haven't gathered enough satisfactory evidence to cast a vote with an certainty. We need to rationally think this out, people.
You didn't glance too hard, did you? You're not being voted AT ALL right now...
-
why the hell are people randomly voting me? :-\
You had only posted one post, and it held no actual content in it.
-
FoS Little for the "still haven't gathered enough satisfactory evidence to cast a vote with an certainty" stalling tactic.
-
When does the day end?
-
Why are you guys voting to lynch the doctor? If he's scum, he'll live til tomorrow. If he's not scum, the scum will kill him. In this game, a doctor can revive people. There's no way in hell the scum would allow a real, claimed doctor to survive the night. Don't think of a doctor as a doctor in this game, think of a doctor as a guy who can revive other people the night after they die.
The time travel element of this game means it's not that simple. He could be killed yesterday or even night 2 (so if the mafia decide to kill him night 2 we'd end up lynching him anyway). Simply claiming doc at the last minute isn't helpful - if we don't lynch him and we're correct in not lynching him, he will die anyway.
-
I think I'm going to unvote and vote for ToonyMan. I'm not convinced he is mafia, but if the mafia decide to revive him, he would be even more suspicious than he is now and we would probably waste a day lynching him again.
-
I think I'm going to unvote and vote for ToonyMan. I'm not convinced he is mafia, but if the mafia decide to revive him, he would be even more suspicious than he is now and we would probably waste a day lynching him again.
How could the mafia revive him? If he's lynched, there's pretty much no way he can be revived, unless the mafia has enough nightkills to change which way this vote wemt.
-
All it would have taken is one person changing their vote from ToonyMan to you. Unlikely, but it's better to be sure they'll not try anything like that.
-
All it would have taken is one person changing their vote from ToonyMan to you. Unlikely, but it's better to be sure they'll not try anything like that.
Well then, that's a good sign that you're mafia and know that you can go back in time to kill.
-
3) All Power Roles have access to Time Travel. They may choose to use their Power in the past (Last Night), the present (the Present Night), and the future (the Next night).
I was just assuming the rules hadn't been changed because I haven't seen Servant Corps mention that he has modified time travel.
-
3) All Power Roles have access to Time Travel. They may choose to use their Power in the past (Last Night), the present (the Present Night), and the future (the Next night).
I was just assuming the rules hadn't been changed because I haven't seen Servant Corps mention that he has modified time travel.
Hmm... good call.
-
Which, strangely, means that one of us is probably dead already, and our vote won't count. Since all kills can be done the night before, doctors wouldn't be as powerful as we previously thought (we thought that the doctor could resurrect anyone, but he's powerless if the kill was already set to "yesterday").
And, of course, there are no roleflips in this game, for added confusion.
-
Which, strangely, means that one of us is probably dead already, and our vote won't count. Since all kills can be done the night before, doctors wouldn't be as powerful as we previously thought (we thought that the doctor could resurrect anyone, but he's powerless if the kill was already set to "yesterday").
And, of course, there are no roleflips in this game, for added confusion.
That is where you're wrong. Doctors simply have to work in the past, always. Otherwise, they are powerless. In fact, wouldn't it be better if every power went into the past? That was it couldn't be stopped... Now it's just about getting n+2 people to vote against scum than the n+1 that we thought. So, it's just that scum has much much more ability than normal.
-
Hmm, indeed.
Actually, if the doctor did decide to work in the present, he would have a greater chance of blocking the mafia's next nightkill.
-
Hmm, indeed.
Actually, if the doctor did decide to work in the present, he would have a greater chance of blocking the mafia's next nightkill.
Not really, since being killed in the past would stop them from protecting in the present...
-
Being killed in the past would also stop them protecting in the past though, since they wouldn't be able to go back in time and protect in the past.
Ok, this is confusing.
-
Being killed in the past would also stop them protecting in the past though, since they wouldn't be able to go back in time and protect in the past.
Ok, this is confusing.
Yeah, I actually thought of that later, too. These rules are confusing.
Basically, if we have a Vigilante, and he kills a mafia member in the past that kills a townie in the present. Therefore, he stops a kill from happening by being really really lucky.
This game is too influenced by power roles...
-
It stills comes down to lynching the scum, in the end.
-
Protection occur before killing though. So, a Doctor could protect someone one night and then get killed later on that same night.
(EDIT: But if you kill someone one night, they won't be able to protect anyone the next night.)
-
Protection occur before killing though. So, a Doctor could protect someone one night and then get killed later on that same night.
Yeah, but if he's killed on the previous night then he won't be able to protect someone.
-
Well, this got confusing pretty quickly.
-
How about we stop caring about the power roles and start worrying about who's still scum?
-
I agree with webadict. One of the easiest things for scum to do in this game is to focus on confusion.
When is Day 1 ending?
-
Can doctors revive lynch victims? Because then it'd be confirmed they were townie and you'd be able to build a stable base built around the Townie like in the LOTRM Mafia.
-
Can doctors revive lynch victims? Because then it'd be confirmed they were townie and you'd be able to build a stable base built around the Townie like in the LOTRM Mafia.
How would them being lynched confirm they're townies? That just confirms that the popular vote wanted them dead.
Retroactively FoS Mr.Person for his defense of TM.
-
Can doctors revive lynch victims?
No.
And I'll need to do a offical vote tally, and wait for the last Power Role to send me his order before I end Day 1.
-
Can doctors revive lynch victims? Because then it'd be confirmed they were townie and you'd be able to build a stable base built around the Townie like in the LOTRM Mafia.
How would them being lynched confirm they're townies? That just confirms that the popular vote wanted them dead.
Traditionally in Mafia games, a Player's role is revealed when he dies.
-
Little, people can COME BACK. There's no role-flip.
-
Tricky, then. It'll be much harder to identify Mafia then.
-
Yup.
-
Can doctors revive lynch victims? Because then it'd be confirmed they were townie and you'd be able to build a stable base built around the Townie like in the LOTRM Mafia.
How would them being lynched confirm they're townies? That just confirms that the popular vote wanted them dead.
Traditionally in Mafia games, a Player's role is revealed when he dies.
SC has already said there would be no roleflip.
Pseudo-FoS Little
-
I got my internet back. I HATE LIGHTNING. Anyway, it's still day 1! I can defend myself still. Let me read through everything.
-
SERVANT CORPS
WHEN IS DAY 1 ENDING?
I already asked this, but you didn't respond. So now it gets ALL CAPS.
-
I'm most suspicious of Little and Leafsnail. I would be suspicious of webadict, but that's like OMGUS or something.
My Little Suspicion:
Well, if we are all going to die, I always wanted to tell Pandar I think he is totally hot.

Sorry, I was busy entertaining cousins all day. Having glanced over the dialogue, I have to ask: why the hell are people randomly voting me? 
Also, I would vote Toonyman for his ridiculous claim that he is Doctor, but I still haven't gathered enough satisfactory evidence to cast a vote with any certainty. We need to rationally think this out, people.
Can doctors revive lynch victims? Because then it'd be confirmed they were townie and you'd be able to build a stable base built around the Townie like in the LOTRM Mafia.
Can doctors revive lynch victims? Because then it'd be confirmed they were townie and you'd be able to build a stable base built around the Townie like in the LOTRM Mafia.
How would them being lynched confirm they're townies? That just confirms that the popular vote wanted them dead.
Traditionally in Mafia games, a Player's role is revealed when he dies.
Tricky, then. It'll be much harder to identify Mafia then.
If you are going to base lynches on who is lurking, here's one. I see little of anything. Hee hee.
My Leafsnail Suspicion:
Agh, I can't quote everything he said.
Anyway, he keeps talking about how "this is confusing" to webadict and asks too suspicious questions! I think webadict and/or Leafsnail and/or Little is scum.
Well, yeah, umm....tell my grandmother I will miss her apple pies.
Vote Leafsnail.
-
SERVANT CORPS
WHEN IS DAY 1 ENDING?
I already asked this, but you didn't respond. So now it gets ALL CAPS.
I'm waiting for two power roles to send me their actions. But you know what...
YOU GOT UNTIL TOMORROW TO SEND IN YOUR POWER ROLES ACTIONS. UNDERSTAND?
EDIT: Updated Vote Count (from earliet to latest):
Toonyman = webadict, Leafsnail, Zaithemaster, Pandarsenic, Xegeth
Leafsnail=Mr.Person, ToonyMan
-
In the signup thread, Leafsnail said
'll be away from Tuesday and -
Eh, what the hell, I'll probably be dead by then.
Unless they've changed their mind, this could cause delays. Will this affect the game much, Servant Corps?
-
In the signup thread, Leafsnail said
'll be away from Tuesday and -
Eh, what the hell, I'll probably be dead by then.
Unless they've changed their mind, this could cause delays. Will this affect the game much, Servant Corps?
No it will not. Those who already going away would have likely already sent orders to me before leaving.
-
I'm most suspicious of Little and Leafsnail. I would be suspicious of webadict, but that's like OMGUS or something.
My Little Suspicion:
Well, if we are all going to die, I always wanted to tell Pandar I think he is totally hot.

Sorry, I was busy entertaining cousins all day. Having glanced over the dialogue, I have to ask: why the hell are people randomly voting me? 
Also, I would vote Toonyman for his ridiculous claim that he is Doctor, but I still haven't gathered enough satisfactory evidence to cast a vote with any certainty. We need to rationally think this out, people.
Can doctors revive lynch victims? Because then it'd be confirmed they were townie and you'd be able to build a stable base built around the Townie like in the LOTRM Mafia.
Can doctors revive lynch victims? Because then it'd be confirmed they were townie and you'd be able to build a stable base built around the Townie like in the LOTRM Mafia.
How would them being lynched confirm they're townies? That just confirms that the popular vote wanted them dead.
Traditionally in Mafia games, a Player's role is revealed when he dies.
Tricky, then. It'll be much harder to identify Mafia then.
If you are going to base lynches on who is lurking, here's one. I see little of anything. Hee hee.
My Leafsnail Suspicion:
Agh, I can't quote everything he said.
Anyway, he keeps talking about how "this is confusing" to webadict and asks too suspicious questions! I think webadict and/or Leafsnail and/or Little is scum.
Well, yeah, umm....tell my grandmother I will miss her apple pies.
Vote Leafsnail.
So, you think Leafsnail is more suspicious than Little?
-
Yeah, about. I had to choose one.
-
Yeah, about. I had to choose one.
What makes him more suspicious?
-
He speaks to yooooooooooou. ;D
-
He speaks to yooooooooooou. ;D
So it's more like I'm suspicious and not Little or Leafsnail?
-
I didn't say that. No. I'm just upset you think I'm scum. Pretty normal for me atleast.
Doesn't matter who I vote anyway.
Unvote.
-
I didn't say that. No. I'm just upset you think I'm scum. Pretty normal for me atleast.
Doesn't matter who I vote anyway.
Unvote.
It actually matters a lot on who you vote.
-
Don't do your jedi mind tricks webadict, I know your power.
-
Don't do your jedi mind tricks webadict, I know your power.
You know what the funny thing is? There is a way to make your role known. Have a cop go back in time and inspect you.
Also, I don't have Jedi powers. *hand wave*
-
You don't have jedi mind tricks.
-
Screw this. ToonyMan is stupid but I'll unvote and go with Little. He isn't actively participating, while asking questions and not scumhunting. ToonyMan might actually be right about that.
He actually did something. ToonyMan. Who'da thunk it?
-
Day 1:
Toonyman = Leafsnail, Zaithemaster, Pandarsenic, Xegeth
Leafsnail = Mr.Person, ToonyMan
Little = webadict
ToonyMan has been executed. You return home, safe that you have caught at least one of the murderers.
NIGHT 1:
{TIMELINE CHANGED!}
NIGHT 0:
Servant Corps killed.
webadict killed.
DAY 1:
Final Vote Count:
Toonyman = Leafsnail, Zaithemaster, Pandarsenic, Xegeth
Leafsnail = Mr.Person, ToonyMan
ToonyMan has been executed. You return home, safe that you have caught at least one of the murderers.
NIGHT 1:
Nothing happens.
It is now DAY 2.
-
I think that today I'm going to vote for Little. He's posted very little, and none of that was scum hunting. He was also only one of two people that didn't vote. It is a bit odd that ToonyMan attacked him just before being lynched though. I'm going to also FoS inaluct. He's also been acting suspiciously for very similar reasons, although, looking at some of his previous games, he does seem to act like that frequently.
-
Xegeth, you've also been lurking. You also jumped on the ToonyMan wagon. However, your last post has some good content, so I'll leave it at a pinky FoS.
-
:-[
Fine, since you all seem so intent on hanging me, I'll reveal my role.
I claim as The Doctor. Since you all seem to be set on killing me, it won't matter either way whether I reveal or not.
-
:-[
Fine, since you all seem so intent on hanging me, I'll reveal my role.
I claim as The Doctor. Since you all seem to be set on killing me, it won't matter either way whether I reveal or not.
If you are the doctor, who did you protect last night? Also, why did you not vote? You were the one pro-town player that knew for a fact that he was lying but you said you needed more evidence. For that reason, along with your lack of any other scumhunting, I think lynching you would be a good idea.
-
I didn't protect anyone last night since I didn't want to accidentally protect a Mafia member.
And I thought TM was joking when he claimed he was The Doctor.
-
Why would the scum fake claim doctor after we already lynched a guy claiming doctor? And you're fishing for info? Vote Xegeth.
-
I just thought it was odd that he chose not to vote, even with proof. Claiming a role at this point seemed strange considering that he had until the next night phase to try to talk us out of it or even just help with finding mafia.
-
You were the one pro-town player that knew for a fact that he was lying but you said you needed more evidence. For that reason, I think lynching you would be a good idea.
This.
I vote Little. And FoS Mr.Person for continued unquestioned defense of him.
Both are scum. I'm about 75% sure. Which is more than enough to lynch them.
-
No, I just think it would be odd for scum to claim doctor when somebody else has already claimed doctor. It just wouldn't make sense.
-
It's probably WIFOM. If you're protecting him because no-one would try it as mafia, it's working.
-
TM is definitely scum, since I actually am The Doctor.
-
I've just noticed, if Zai is correct and there are two more mafia, we're almost in a LYLO situation. If the mafia manage to get a night kill and vote first tomorrow, they can force a draw during that night to kill a townie. Maybe the best option is to change our vote just in case he is really a doctor? I'm not sure anymore. We can't win against an organised mafia without the use of a doctor or, if we have one, a roleblocker. If he is wrong and there is only one more, this should be much easier.
-
Vote Little.
If he was legit, he should have voted for Toony, even without making a counterclaim.
-
I think that Little is suspicious, due to the counterclaim. He can't protect himself against the mafia, so his claim reeks of WIFOM ("a mafia wouldn't claim doctor after someone had been hanged for claiming it" - unless that's what they want us to think). Claiming doctor in this game as a town allied player is basically suicide, and the fact that he left it until that point to counterclaim also makes him suspicious.
So yeah, vote Little.
I'm also gonna FoS Mr. Person for this:
Why would the scum fake claim doctor after we already lynched a guy claiming doctor? And you're fishing for info? Vote Xegeth.
Has he really missed the potential WIFOM here?
-
Actually, I did miss the WIFOM potential because I find that, most of the time, there is no WIFOM and I'm just overthinking things.
Well, after rethinking it over and after listening to what people have to say, I would also agree Little is suspicious. Still, I just find it odd to lynch everybody who claims doctor, you know? Usually the scum kills the doctor, not the town, and I doubt very much that 2 members of the mafia would claim doctor like that, since the whole facade would be broken in a snap by the real doctor. On the other hand, ToonyMan might of been scum and Little might be the doctor or ToonyMan might of been the doctor and Little might be the scum. It's hard to tell.
Not protecting as a doctor... I've never seen scum try that strategy before. Every time I've seen somebody say they protected nobody, they were, in fact, the doctor. Again, I dunno. Little, if you had protected, who and when would it have been?
-
Why would a doctor even protect no-one? There's no consequences for accidentally protecting the mafia and the chance of protecting one is low in the first round anyway.
-
I agree 100%, it is stupid and makes no sense. I just usually only see noob doctors do that, I don't ever see the scum claiming no protect.
-
If I were a town doctor, I'd see no real reason to counter claim. I mean, there's a chance that the mafia are just trying to lure you into roleclaiming so they can take you out, and there would be pretty much no way to tell who was the real doctor ("I'm Spartacus!").
-
You see, I don't know what power roles the Townies have, and I don't know what powers the Mafia has. I don't know who is Town reliably, and I don't know who is Mafia. Protecting a random person seems fairly stupid to me since I could possibly protect a Mafia member. So, I decided I'd sit and wait to see what happens, and now I'm going to hang.
Fantastic. :-\
-
Well this thread has grinded to a screehing halt.
Little: Xegeth, Zaithemaster, Pandarsenic, Leafsnail
POWER ROLES, please send me your actions. DEAD PEOPLE, please remember to send me your votes and power roles (in case come back to life). Please?
-
One more person needs to send me their actions, and then I'll advance to the next day.
-
Day 2:
Little: Xegeth, Zaithemaster, Pandarsenic, Leafsnail
Little has been executed. You return home, safe that you have caught at least one of the murderers.
Night 2:
{TIMELINE CHANGED!}
NIGHT 0:
Servant Corps killed.
DAY 1:
Final Vote Count:
Toonyman = Leafsnail, Zaithemaster, Pandarsenic, Xegeth
Leafsnail = Mr.Person, ToonyMan
Little=webadict
ToonyMan has been executed. You return home, safe that you have caught at least one of the murderers.
NIGHT 1:
Zaithemaster killed.
DAY 2:
Little: Xegeth, Pandarsenic, Leafsnail, webadict
Little has been executed. You return home, safe that you have caught at least one of the murderers.
NIGHT 2:
Nothing happens.
It is now DAY 3.
-
So a roleblocker successfully hit whoever killed webadict on night one?
-
If we have only one mafia left, a roleclaim should win the game. If this is correct, could you say who you blocked, roleblocker? It is possible that it was Zai though.
-
If it was Zai then his action wouldn't've been undone - he would've killed webadict and then gone back to night one and been killed by his mystery assasin. I'm thinking one possibility is that the Role Blocker hit Little on night one.
-
Cute how Zaithemaster dies and Webadict jumps in to replace his vote.
-
Cute how Zaithemaster dies and Webadict jumps in to replace his vote.
Ha ha. Yeah. Seriously though, what the heck happened?
-
Either we have a doc/roleblocker that can act two nights back, or... wait...
Is an action to be blocked tied to the night it occurs or the night it is initiated? Like, if someone was blocked n1 and they killed on n0 from n1, would that kill be stopped?
-
Is an action to be blocked tied to the night it occurs or the night it is initiated?
The night it is initiated.
-
Someone blocked someone that killed me. Anyone feel like telling me who was blocked?
-
I sent the order "Block Mr.Person yesterday."
His behavior was as scummy as we thought.
-
I sent the order "Block Mr.Person yesterday."
His behavior was as scummy as we thought.
...Anyone disagree? Because I'm thinking that's a good idea.
Mr.Person
-
Alright, yes, I killed Webadict. I am, however, not the scum you think I am. I am a vigilante. Note that, despite me being blocked, Zaithemaster was still killed. The real scum is there, and I want to find that person. In face, Webadict was the one who awoke, yes? Vote Webadict. I believe I got it right the first time.
-
Alright, yes, I killed Webadict. I am, however, not the scum you think I am. I am a vigilante. Note that, despite me being blocked, Zaithemaster was still killed. The real scum is there, and I want to find that person. In face, Webadict was the one who awoke, yes? Vote Webadict. I believe I got it right the first time.
So... you're saying that somehow you were the ONLY person that killed? Scum didn't do anything, despite the two "doctors," one claiming they protected no one and the other dead. I highly doubt that. In fact, that's pretty spectacularly bogus.
That's an outstanding claim if ever I saw one...
-
Alright, yes, I killed Webadict. I am, however, not the scum you think I am. I am a vigilante. Note that, despite me being blocked, Zaithemaster was still killed. The real scum is there, and I want to find that person. In face, Webadict was the one who awoke, yes? Vote Webadict. I believe I got it right the first time.
So... you're saying that somehow you were the ONLY person that killed? Scum didn't do anything, despite the two "doctors," one claiming they protected no one and the other dead. I highly doubt that. In fact, that's pretty spectacularly bogus.
That's an outstanding claim if ever I saw one...
They killed in the future. Easy. There's lots of WIFOM to be had in this game.
-
Alright, yes, I killed Webadict. I am, however, not the scum you think I am. I am a vigilante. Note that, despite me being blocked, Zaithemaster was still killed. The real scum is there, and I want to find that person. In face, Webadict was the one who awoke, yes? Vote Webadict. I believe I got it right the first time.
So... you're saying that somehow you were the ONLY person that killed? Scum didn't do anything, despite the two "doctors," one claiming they protected no one and the other dead. I highly doubt that. In fact, that's pretty spectacularly bogus.
That's an outstanding claim if ever I saw one...
They killed in the future. Easy. There's lots of WIFOM to be had in this game.
Why would they kill in the future?
Also, if that were true, wouldn't somebody have died last night? Nice job, though. You tried at least, to defer away from yourself. Everyone vote Mr.Person.
-
Alright, yes, I killed Webadict. I am, however, not the scum you think I am. I am a vigilante. Note that, despite me being blocked, Zaithemaster was still killed. The real scum is there, and I want to find that person. In face, Webadict was the one who awoke, yes? Vote Webadict. I believe I got it right the first time.
So... you're saying that somehow you were the ONLY person that killed? Scum didn't do anything, despite the two "doctors," one claiming they protected no one and the other dead. I highly doubt that. In fact, that's pretty spectacularly bogus.
That's an outstanding claim if ever I saw one...
They killed in the future. Easy. There's lots of WIFOM to be had in this game.
Why would they kill in the future?
Also, if that were true, wouldn't somebody have died last night? Nice job, though. You tried at least, to defer away from yourself. Everyone vote Mr.Person.
Am I the only one bugged out by the fact that Webadict was revived and THEN a kill happened AFTERWARDS? Also, I do not know the inner working of the scum mind, but since they're fairly confident the doctor is dead, killing in the future actually makes sense. It looms kills over the town, but it also forces the town to lynch with more people than otherwise necessary.
-
I blocked webadict for n1. Nice try, Mr.Person.
n0 webadict died (and returned)
d1 I issued order "block webadict tonight"
n1 Mr. Person issued kill on Webadict, my d2 roleblock landed on Mr.Person, my d1 roleblock landed on webadict
d2 We're voting to lynch Mr.Person
So webadict can't be our murderer, can he?
-
Or Pandar could be Mafia and covering for him.
-
Little, how could I have revived Webadict, then?
-
Little, how could I have revived Webadict, then?
Luck. Well, I guess I WAS acting scummy, so it might of been the attention I've been drawing to myself.
-
Or Pandar could be Mafia and covering for him.
Little, how could I have revived Webadict, then?
... Mr.Person, you, and I are obviously working together.
And Little. You're dead. Get out of here, time paradox!
-
Vote Mr. Person. If the game doesn't end after your death, we still have another night to find mafia. I do think that you are the mafia though.
-
Or Pandar could be Mafia and covering for him.
Little, you're dead.
-
/me floats away on the wind, howling like a spooky ghost.
-
I agree that Mr Person is most suspicious. I don't really buy the idea that the mafia decided to do absolutely nothing even though there could potentially be a doctor out there to resurrect anyone they killed in the present or future. Here's what I think probably happened -
Night one - Mr Person goes back in time one night and kills webadict
Night two - Mr Person goes back in time one night and kills zai. Pandar blocks Mr Person one night in the past, resurrecting Webadict.
So, Pandar, if you wouldn't mind roleblocking Mr Person one night in the past once again?
Vote Mr Person.
-
Sounds like a plan.
-
If you don't want me to kill anymore, I won't, but there's another killer who hasn't claimed out there. There's your real scum, right there.
Why would the scum be so hesitant about doctors? The doctor(s) is/are dead. There are no more doctors. You guys lynched the doctor(s).
-
If you don't want me to kill anymore, I won't, but there's another killer who hasn't claimed out there. There's your real scum, right there.
Why would the scum be so hesitant about doctors? The doctor(s) is/are dead. There are no more doctors. You guys lynched the doctor(s).
How is there another killer? As far as I can tell, this could have all been done with just mafia using their night kills.
You also mentioned that you were confused about webadict being revived first and then a death occurring. The rules in the signup thread stated that roleblocks happen before kills.
-
I'm going to be gone for a few Days. Just so you know.
-
If you don't want me to kill anymore, I won't, but there's another killer who hasn't claimed out there. There's your real scum, right there.
Why would the scum be so hesitant about doctors? The doctor(s) is/are dead. There are no more doctors. You guys lynched the doctor(s).
How is there another killer? As far as I can tell, this could have all been done with just mafia using their night kills.
You also mentioned that you were confused about webadict being revived first and then a death occurring. The rules in the signup thread stated that roleblocks happen before kills.
Zaithemaster died. Did everybody else miss that?
-
You could've gone back on night 2 and killed him. Simple as that.
-
If you don't want me to kill anymore, I won't, but there's another killer who hasn't claimed out there. There's your real scum, right there.
Why would the scum be so hesitant about doctors? The doctor(s) is/are dead. There are no more doctors. You guys lynched the doctor(s).
How is there another killer? As far as I can tell, this could have all been done with just mafia using their night kills.
You also mentioned that you were confused about webadict being revived first and then a death occurring. The rules in the signup thread stated that roleblocks happen before kills.
Zaithemaster died. Did everybody else miss that?
I actually did not. I'm sorry. The timeline is hard to see, but the fact that I know I'm town and that you killed me is very good evidence.
Unless you think the scum killed in the present...? I really really doubt it...
-
If you don't want me to kill anymore, I won't, but there's another killer who hasn't claimed out there. There's your real scum, right there.
Why would the scum be so hesitant about doctors? The doctor(s) is/are dead. There are no more doctors. You guys lynched the doctor(s).
How is there another killer? As far as I can tell, this could have all been done with just mafia using their night kills.
You also mentioned that you were confused about webadict being revived first and then a death occurring. The rules in the signup thread stated that roleblocks happen before kills.
Zaithemaster died. Did everybody else miss that?
I actually did not. I'm sorry. The timeline is hard to see, but the fact that I know I'm town and that you killed me is very good evidence.
Unless you think the scum killed in the present...? I really really doubt it...
I think the scum killed in the future. No need to worry about doctor kills, forces the town to lynch with the largest number possible, and allows for 3 kills in one night, if the scum wants to for some reason.
-
You're crazy, Mr.Person. If you're the Vigilante, you should've claimed you killed me the night after you did. The fact that you didn't is stupid and scummy, and you certainly know better, because we'd be going off faulty information. I know you know better than that...
-
You're crazy, Mr.Person. If you're the Vigilante, you should've claimed you killed me the night after you did. The fact that you didn't is stupid and scummy, and you certainly know better, because we'd be going off faulty information. I know you know better than that...
Oh, excuse me for not assuming it was a roleblocker. There clearly weren't other possibilities, oh no. I don't know of any, but that doesn't mean there weren't other possibilities. In any case, claiming the kill would only draw attention to myself and create those nasty WIFOM situations. Then again, I guess this is a WIFOM situation already, so maybe you're right.
-
So do we lynch him yet?
-
Well, I've already voted for him. Actually, I accidentally voted for Person.
So
Unvote.
Vote Mr Person.
-
That was more directed to Servants Corps and people who haven't submitted their night actions.
-
So do we lynch him yet?
Yes. Mr. Person and ToonyMan are Scum working for the Time Repair Agency. Mr. Person was the Killer, ToonyMan was the Roleblocker.
For the Town, Pandarsenic was the Roleblocker, and Little was the Doctor.
This was the first game I saw where a Scum lost because he defended the Town Doctor.
-
What can I say? I honestly wasn't expecting you guys to lynch Little and then shit hit the fan. Hell, I would of done the same thing in a town position as well.
-
Sorry, Mr.Person
Good game, everyone.
When I revived Webadict, though, it was all over. The thing is, it was Mr.Person's behavior that caused me to RB him....
-
Good game everyone.
-
Good game. I guess it was good work on Pandarsenic's part to correctly identify Mr Person as scum. Perhaps we also have to bear in mind in future games that killing somone in the past or present means that a well placed rollblock will stop you in your tracks.
-
I screwed Mr.Person by doing my diabolical lurking plan which I never planned on doing. Just chance I was scum. :P
-
Since Pandar could now go back and save Zai, I think this may be the only mafia game ever where more scum died than townies.
-
Good game. I guess it was good work on Pandarsenic's part to correctly identify Mr Person as scum. Perhaps we also have to bear in mind in future games that killing somone in the past or present means that a well placed rollblock will stop you in your tracks.
Yeah, when I asked Servant Corps about the roleblocking technicality I'd never thought of (that protection affects the day something occurs but roleblocking affects the day something is initiated), it was obvious that Mr.Person was it, between the kill and his behavior.
e: I think what gave it away was how certain you were.
-
Since Pandar could now go back and save Zai, I think this may be the only mafia game ever where more scum died than townies.
I saw an IRC mafia where, one time, a vig shot one of the mafias and a redirector moved the mafiakill to the other one. Both scum dead n0, game over.
My favourite is one where an elite guard (Doctor that kills the would-be-killer, powerful role) guarded the same guy 2 nights in a row... and the scum attacked that guy 2 nights in a row.
-
If you are scum you must move like sniper. If you shoot and miss, do not try to shoot again.
-
My favourite is one where an elite guard (Doctor that kills the would-be-killer, powerful role) guarded the same guy 2 nights in a row... and the scum attacked that guy 2 nights in a row.
Let's go mining for dynamite.
-
My favourite is one where an elite guard (Doctor that kills the would-be-killer, powerful role) guarded the same guy 2 nights in a row... and the scum attacked that guy 2 nights in a row.
Let's go mining for dynamite.
Exactly.
-
It was probably WIFOM, but I guess that the doctor probably really wanted to keep that person alive, and the mafia lost the game of bluff.
-
It was probably WIFOM, but I guess that the doctor probably really wanted to keep that person alive, and the mafia lost the game of bluff.
Well, if it was someone random, they thought the person wouldn't be protected again...