Huh, no evil yet. Interesting.
Honestly, I see people in general as being Neutral good.
We waver between liking and challenging authority, yet I'd trust most people to do the right thing most of the time.
Huh, no evil yet. Interesting.
WHERE IS WORKERDRONE WHEN YOU NEED HIM?
Lawful neutral. I was worried I was going to end up evil, to be honest.I think I have bordered that a few times mostly out of frustration (Neutral Evil. Cause: being too damn nice for too damn long, and getting sick of it (oft the bane of trying to get a date)). Having been close to turning over to the dark side a few times, I re-imagined Hell to end up being more like a production studio with all the nightmarish fire and brimstone and etc. being visible from windows, but indoors indoors is flourescant, air conditioned, and casual, smelling more like coffee if anything. Even the gruffest, most twisted, and outright horrifying looking of demons are actually refined and rather normal people "just doing their job". Who'd ever think being a tormentor would be a voluntary position?
Yeah... I think I end up more in the Chaotic Introverted category after a certain point, which can be either neutral or evil depending on how much I feel the need to get away. It's mostly frustration for me, too.People are only complicated in their simplicity
People are really quite complicated, it seems.
Neutral good. Pretty much what I expected.Huh, no evil yet. Interesting.
WHERE IS WORKERDRONE WHEN YOU NEED HIM?
...I didn't evil, or Chaotic. Janet, yes to both. But Aqizzar? No.
I'll admit I expected Evil (at least by the test's standards), but not Chaotic.
I didn't evil, or Chaotic. Janet, yes to both. But Aqizzar? No.
I'll admit I expected Evil (at least by the test's standards), but not Chaotic.
The test stated me as Chaotic Neutral. I'd say I'm border-lining on Chaotic Evil here.That's only what the Man wants you to believe, bro.
True Neutral, that's boring.Makes sense though, since all you lovecraftian horrors have such inhuman morals as to be undefinible by our pathetic moral codes.
This needs a poll so we can see a summary.I don't think I can add one now can it?
Neutral - A neutral character does what seems to be a good idea. She doesn’t feel strongly one way or the other when it comes to good vs. evil or law vs. chaos. Most neutrality is a lack of conviction or bias rather than a commitment to neutrality. Such a character thinks of good as better than evil. After all, she would rather have good neighbours and rulers than evil ones. Still, she’s not personally committed to upholding good in any abstract or universal way. Some neutral characters, on the other hand, commit themselves philosophically to neutrality. They see good, evil, law, and chaos as prejudices and dangerous extremes. They advocate the middle way of neutrality as the best, most balanced road in the long run. The common phrase for neutral is "true neutral." Neutral is the best alignment you can be because it means you act naturally, without prejudice or compulsion.
Yeah, some of the questions seem pretty off at times, but you have to remember that sometimes those questions are not about what they seem to be about. That question for instance more then likely expects you to extrapolate out like you did and as such it's answers are based more on forcing you to make a very cut and dry decision in a nebulous circumstance.QuoteNeutral - A neutral character does what seems to be a good idea. She doesn’t feel strongly one way or the other when it comes to good vs. evil or law vs. chaos. Most neutrality is a lack of conviction or bias rather than a commitment to neutrality. Such a character thinks of good as better than evil. After all, she would rather have good neighbours and rulers than evil ones. Still, she’s not personally committed to upholding good in any abstract or universal way. Some neutral characters, on the other hand, commit themselves philosophically to neutrality. They see good, evil, law, and chaos as prejudices and dangerous extremes. They advocate the middle way of neutrality as the best, most balanced road in the long run. The common phrase for neutral is "true neutral." Neutral is the best alignment you can be because it means you act naturally, without prejudice or compulsion.
Pfft, everyone knows morality is just an abstract concept that does not really exist.
I hate a lot of these questions. Like in that other not-D&D one for example "114) My own happiness and success are more important than the happiness and success of others.", well they are more important to me than anyone elses (it's my life I'm living), but I recognise in the grand scheme of it all they are as unimportant as everyone elses...So what answer do I give? :S
Neutral Evil is more than willing to hurt other people to get ahead or stay alive, and will take that option over most others.Hmm interesting, must re-read players handbook once I get home.
True Neutral is less than willing, and will only do so when there is no other option.
Neutral Good will never hurt someone to keep themselves alive.
Chaotic Neutral. Funny, I'll have to retake that quiz. I always think of myself more as a chaotic good sort of person.neutral can still be good, he's just not obsessed with it. Chaotic neutral can be a good Samaritan while chaotic good is more of a freedom fighter.
I am too lazy, but I would get neutral, true probably.
I don't care about anything right now...
Always remember that your actions determine your alignment, not the other way around. Remembering that is one step to never being That Guy.
I already took it, I was True Neutral.
I am surprised that no one has turned up Evil yet.
Or they're just not posting it...
I already took it, I was True Neutral.
You sadden me with your "whoosh-over-my-head"-edness.
Spoiler: Cattell 16-factor (click to show/hide)Spoiler: Advanced global (click to show/hide)
Hmm... I've changed a good deal over the past year or two. I hope I'll be able to change back to the person I used to be, or at least somewhere near it.
If offered enough money, would you slip a poison into your king's drink?Fuck, they're on to me. Anyway:
Yes, and I've done similar things before
Yes, if I thought I could get away with it
No, although a vast sum of money would tempt me
No, and I'd warn the king of the plot
Based on your answers to the quiz, your character’s most likely alignment is Lawful Good.I find it slightly surprising. I suppose I do generally defer to authority, but I don't think my frequently cowardly answers helped my alignment (would I fight a war? No. Would I help in a plague? No. Would I express a revolutionary opinion if threatened with punishment? No).
Lawful Good
A lawful good character acts as a good person is expected or required to act. She combines a commitment to oppose evil with the discipline to fight relentlessly. She tells the truth, keeps her word, helps those in need, and speaks out against injustice. A lawful good character hates to see the guilty go unpunished. Lawful good is the best alignment you can be because it combines honor and compassion.
It won't paste, I'll just post the personality snapshot, it's pretty accurate.
Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Eh.
Thats exactly how the new trait feature in df does it. It just points out everything that is horribly deformed.It won't paste, I'll just post the personality snapshot, it's pretty accurate.
That snapshot is so cruel. It takes the worst examples of every trait you kinda qualify for, and barrages you with them.
Chaotic Good. Pretty much always get that(Got Neutral Good once).
As for the reason. Ties into my personality type.
INFJSpoiler (click to show/hide)
Chaotic Good. Pretty much always get that(Got Neutral Good once).
As for the reason. Ties into my personality type.
INFJSpoiler (click to show/hide)
No way. I'm INFJ and Neutral Good. We should form a cult.
...Oh wait, cults are for Lawful Good.
INTP - "Architect". Greatest precision in thought and language. Can readily discern contradictions and inconsistencies. The world exists primarily to be understood. 3.3% of total population.
These tests seem to conflict with each other. :-\
That test really doesn't know me, likes following oreders (yeh right) :-\Hmmm... Post in every thread you can find! That's an order!
I think your conclusions say something deeper about everything, reveal something much more meaningful than just the invalidity of these bullshit tests. It strikes a chord with me and my perspective. Complex systems, like ourselves? Any sort of simple rules or general system cannot fully encompass our depth and breadth.Spoiler (click to show/hide)
I think your conclusions say something deeper about everything, reveal something much more meaningful than just the invalidity of these bullshit tests. It strikes a chord with me and my perspective. Complex systems, like ourselves? Any sort of simple rules or general system cannot fully encompass our depth and breadth.Spoiler (click to show/hide)