Bay 12 Games Forum

Finally... => Forum Games and Roleplaying => Topic started by: ExKirby on August 12, 2010, 02:27:29 pm

Title: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
Post by: ExKirby on August 12, 2010, 02:27:29 pm
In this game, you want to have as FEW VOTES AS POSSIBLE. Every "day", there will be a vote, and the person who gets the most votes loses. Days will last 3 days and you can still vote after you've lost. In the event of a tie, all players that are tied lose. We keep going until we have one winner or everyone has lost.

Players:

Armok
Cheeetar
Vertigon
Imakuni
GlyphGryph
Hugehead
Toaster
Criptfeind
Lucus Casius
Pandarsenic
Barbarossa the Seal God
iceball3
ToonyMan
breadbocks
Title: Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
Post by: Armok on August 12, 2010, 04:11:08 pm
in
Title: Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
Post by: Cheeetar on August 12, 2010, 05:16:08 pm
In
Title: Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
Post by: Vertigon on August 12, 2010, 07:17:02 pm
Aw hell, I jumped ship in SCWW, I might as well.
Title: Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
Post by: Imakuni on August 12, 2010, 07:26:45 pm
In.
Title: Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
Post by: GlyphGryph on August 12, 2010, 10:00:40 pm
I'm definitely not involving myself in this kind of game. Definitely.
Title: Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
Post by: Hugehead on August 12, 2010, 11:57:46 pm
Why would I want to be in.
Title: Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
Post by: Toaster on August 13, 2010, 02:29:32 pm
We are the knights who say... IN!
Title: Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
Post by: ExKirby on August 13, 2010, 04:25:53 pm
7 down, 12 to go.
Title: Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
Post by: Criptfeind on August 13, 2010, 04:27:15 pm
Wait, you really think you can find 19 people to play this type of game?
Title: Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
Post by: Hugehead on August 13, 2010, 07:39:01 pm
Wait, you really think you can find 19 people to play this type of game?
Fixed for you.
Title: Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
Post by: Lucus Casius on August 13, 2010, 08:31:29 pm
in
Title: Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
Post by: GlyphGryph on August 16, 2010, 01:24:20 am
Why is this on the third page!?

We need more losers!

Also, you should flesh out in the OP that those who have lost can still vote.

I just realized - isn't this sort of how survivor works? Vote one person to lose each week... and in the end, don't the losers end up picking the winner? Crazy!
Title: Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
Post by: Pandarsenic on August 16, 2010, 01:34:25 am
In
Title: Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
Post by: Criptfeind on August 16, 2010, 01:35:25 am
Yeah this game seems a little bland to me, maybe there is someway to spice it up a little?

Like maybe make so there is two teams that are against each other, yeah. Like you are on a team and you win if anyone in your team wins, although that may be boring as well... hum... Perhaps you can make it so that one of the groups knows who is in each group and can talk to each other but are smaller. So basically the big group is trying to find the small group. Although that may make it hard for the small group... I know! You can give the small group the power to make one person lose after the main voting section is over! To keep it fair of course you would have to make it so that anyone who loses do not get any votes though.
Title: Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
Post by: Heron TSG on August 16, 2010, 01:39:48 am
In!
Title: Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
Post by: iceball3 on August 16, 2010, 01:44:10 am
IN
Title: Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
Post by: Ottofar on August 16, 2010, 08:41:09 am
Yeah this game seems a little bland to me, maybe there is someway to spice it up a little?

Like maybe make so there is two teams that are against each other, yeah. Like you are on a team and you win if anyone in your team wins, although that may be boring as well... hum... Perhaps you can make it so that one of the groups knows who is in each group and can talk to each other but are smaller. So basically the big group is trying to find the small group. Although that may make it hard for the small group... I know! You can give the small group the power to make one person lose after the main voting section is over! To keep it fair of course you would have to make it so that anyone who loses do not get any votes though.
This.
Title: Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
Post by: ExKirby on August 16, 2010, 09:36:35 am
That would turn it into a game of Mafia, not some fun minigame.
Title: Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
Post by: GlyphGryph on August 16, 2010, 10:21:34 am
Ooh, can we hammer on majority votes?
Title: Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
Post by: Cheeetar on August 17, 2010, 05:10:31 am
That would turn it into a game of Mafia, not some fun minigame.

That's the joke.
Title: Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
Post by: ExKirby on August 17, 2010, 07:27:56 am
I don't get it.
Title: Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
Post by: ToonyMan on August 17, 2010, 07:30:28 am
Joining this game.
Title: Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
Post by: Ottofar on August 17, 2010, 07:50:57 am
I don't get it.
Just as planned.
Title: Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
Post by: RedWarrior0 on August 17, 2010, 01:31:08 pm
Ooh, can we hammer on majority votes?
This.  want it like Pandar's game, where hammer ends day, new day starts in that post.
Title: Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
Post by: ExKirby on August 17, 2010, 02:13:00 pm
Ooh, can we hammer on majority votes?
This.  want it like Pandar's game, where hammer ends day, new day starts in that post.
...Meh sure whatever.
Title: Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
Post by: ToonyMan on August 18, 2010, 12:20:54 am
Ooh, can we hammer on majority votes?
This.  want it like Pandar's game, where hammer ends day, new day starts in that post.
...Meh sure whatever.
I DONT FEEL CONVINCED
Title: Re: Systematically Choose Who Loses: Taking people
Post by: breadbocks on August 18, 2010, 12:28:07 am
Ooh, can we hammer on majority votes?
This.  want it like Pandar's game, where hammer ends day, new day starts in that post.
...Meh sure whatever.
I DONT FEEL CONVINCED
STOP! Hammeh time! ===============[]

Hmmm. This post doesn't have anything for the impression that I would like to play.