Bay 12 Games Forum

Finally... => Forum Games and Roleplaying => Mafia => Topic started by: Toaster on October 20, 2010, 07:41:31 pm

Title: Beginner's Mafia XVII - It all ends in flames...
Post by: Toaster on October 20, 2010, 07:41:31 pm
Initial post info lovingly stolen from previous BM games.

Welcome to Beginner's Mafia! This is the seventeenth run of our Beginner's Mafia series. In Beginner's Mafia, you will be pitted up with a Town IC (Inexperienced Challenged) who will help you play the game, and will be just as clueless, if not more so, about the setup as you, and a Mafia IC, who will be helping out the Mafia.

In Mafia, you are divided into two parts: Town and Mafia:
If you are Town, your goal is to lynch the Mafia. You do this by convincing others that one of the group is scum, and getting enough votes on them to lynch them.  The Town does not know who else is Town.
If you are Mafia, your goal is to kill off the Town until there is an equal number of them to you by getting them to lynch other Town or by killing them. You are given a kill each Night to kill any player in the game.  All the Mafia members know each other, and can communicate privately.

Each Day, everyone votes to lynch a player.  Vote for a player by posting their name in red.  You may change your vote at any time, remove your vote, or vote for No Lynch.  Each Night, you send in your actions. The cycle continues until one side wins. Days are 72 hours and nights are 24 hours. Weekends count for zero hours.

Game rules:
You may not PM other players. The mafia will have a place to talk to themselves.
Never edit your posts, even to fix typos!  If you make a mistake, just double post- it's permitted here.  I recommend using the preview button every time you post.
Never quote your role PM or any other PM sent to you by the mod.
If you need more time to discuss, you may ask for an extension.  If 1/3 of players ask for one, the day will be extended by 24 hours.
Never underestimate your importance, and always play to win!


In this setup, there are the possibility of extra roles. These roles are Cop and Doctor for Town, and Roleblocker and Godfather for Mafia.
A Cop inspects any player at Night. They are told that player's alignment.
A Doctor may protect any player at Night. This stops that player from being killed.
A Roleblocker stops an extra role from using an action. This stops Doctors and Cops but does nothing for Townies.
A Godfather makes Cops get Town for their alignment, instead of Mafia.

There is a 50% chance for any of these roles to show up. It is possible to end up with no extra roles.

For a link to our Tutorial here at B12: http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=39338.0

If you're still confused, join anyhow and we'll teach you!

And if you have any other questions, just ask.

Extensions require support from at least 33% of the players.  You may oppose extensions as well, which cancels out an extension request.  For example, if there were five players, with two requesting and one opposing, there would be no extension.  (2-1 = 1 of 5, which is 20%)

Please bold requests/opposition to extensions, or Mod/my name if you want to ask me a question in-thread.  (IE: Mod: I have a question!)

Players:
1. ragnarok97071 NativeForeigner
2. Flintus10
3. Mindmaker Townsperson
4. Elegy Jetsquirrel Townsperson
5. Ottofar Townsperson
6. KaminaSquirtle Townsperson
7. Spade KaminaSquirtle Mk 2
8. Azure Sepulchre
9. Murphy


Town IC:
Vector

Mafia IC:
SirBayer
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: Zathras on October 20, 2010, 07:57:05 pm
Good luck with this game, may it be a great one!

FYI, Mindmaker stopped by the discussion thread recently asking about the next BM; it would be a nice courtesy if you could drop him a PM letting him know it's on.

Could anyone tell me, if there is another beginners mafia coming up anytime soon?
I'm eager to learn.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: Toaster on October 20, 2010, 08:05:37 pm
Good catch, and done.

Everyone:  If you know of someone who might want to try it out, go ahead and send them the link!  We're always looking for fresh blood.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: Vector on October 20, 2010, 08:15:44 pm
All right, I'll probably pass a link to Dr. Ug.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: ragnarok97071 on October 20, 2010, 09:18:02 pm
Eh, might as well try it. I'm in, I guess.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: SirBayer on October 20, 2010, 11:10:29 pm
Unless one of the better players requests it, I'll roll as one of the ICs. Which one makes little difference to me.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: Vector on October 20, 2010, 11:12:29 pm
Please IC scum.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: SirBayer on October 20, 2010, 11:13:04 pm
Given recent history, yeah, that'd be for the best.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: Toaster on October 21, 2010, 07:58:27 am
Bayer:  Works for me- you're in.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: Flintus10 on October 21, 2010, 08:15:30 am
I'll give this a shot count me in.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: Mindmaker on October 21, 2010, 11:40:16 am
Thank you for the invitation.
I'd like to joind and find out if mafia is the right game for me.

However could anyone give me some information on the usage of smack talk here? General rules, what is allowed, what is prohibited, general strategy etc.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: Elegy on October 21, 2010, 11:44:33 am
I'd like to play if possible
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: Vector on October 21, 2010, 11:52:28 am
However could anyone give me some information on the usage of smack talk here? General rules, what is allowed, what is prohibited, general strategy etc.

Just read some past games... There aren't really any rules for or against smack talk, so long as it's not nasty.

Actually, here (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=64229.0).  These are the best games we've played on the board.  If you read through a few, you should be able to get the general idea.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: Toaster on October 21, 2010, 11:55:42 am
Mindmaker: Generally, there's a fair amount of back and forth going on, with smack talk making up a good part of it.  Getting people riled up is a good way to get them to betray their true loyalties I'd suggest reading a couple of the old games here for examples.  As far as rules, the first post contains pretty much everything you must know, and has a link to a tutorial for strategy.  Again, I recommend reading at least one old game to see the general flow of things.  And remember- it's only a game.

(Vector summed it up better)

All those inning are in the first post.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: Mindmaker on October 21, 2010, 12:30:03 pm
Just read some past games... There aren't really any rules for or against smack talk, so long as it's not nasty.

Some of the smack talk seemed quite nasty.
Well I should constantly remind myself that it's just a game and I shouldn't take everything at face value (which I often do).

I just hope I don't get lynched first, like in any mafia related game I participated in real life.
Well, I can't blame them, I do look suspicious.
Fortunately, that factor is removed in a forum game (for the greater part) :D
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: Vector on October 21, 2010, 12:43:45 pm
Some of the smack talk seemed quite nasty.

Well... I think the point is that it's generally not meant as an actual reflection of what one thinks of the given individual.  It may be nasty in flavor, but typically it isn't what one really feels.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: Elegy on October 21, 2010, 01:02:51 pm
No, I'm actually that irrate.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: Ottofar on October 21, 2010, 01:12:19 pm
However could anyone give me some information on the usage of smack talk here? General rules, what is allowed, what is prohibited, general strategy etc.

Vector's probably going to post Dakarian's guide after the game starts.

Oh, and I'll in, but give my spot away if this fills quickly. If you don't mind?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: Vector on October 21, 2010, 02:02:04 pm
It's probably not gonna fill quickly >_>

Go for it.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on October 21, 2010, 07:31:40 pm
I'd like to join, but be warned I'm gonna suck. :P  I have little experience with mafia, and none playing it online.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: Spade on October 21, 2010, 07:40:42 pm
I'll be in.

I have more time now.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: Elegy on October 21, 2010, 07:42:13 pm
I'd like to join, but be warned I'm gonna suck. :P  I have little experience with mafia, and none playing it online.

Kamina, is it understood that you are an alt account? Because if so, it wouldn't be fair for you to join a game with both accounts. You don't have to say which your other one is, just... uh, don't. to be fair.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on October 21, 2010, 07:57:38 pm
I'd like to join, but be warned I'm gonna suck. :P  I have little experience with mafia, and none playing it online.

Kamina, is it understood that you are an alt account? Because if so, it wouldn't be fair for you to join a game with both accounts. You don't have to say which your other one is, just... uh, don't. to be fair.
I'm not an alt at all, where did you even get an idea like that?
I'm dead serious, where did you get that idea?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: Vector on October 21, 2010, 08:00:40 pm
I'm not an alt at all, where did you even get an idea like that?
I'm dead serious, where did you get that idea?

...... Yeeeeeeeeeeeah okay.


Town IC.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: Elegy on October 21, 2010, 08:00:52 pm
Never once posted in the DF upper forums, immediately jumped into the popular lower forum threads and commented on other users like you knew them all with an incredibly high post/day ratio.

I mean

That's exactly what I did, so it's kinda obvious to me o_o

edit: oh ya and the kamina glasses meme
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: Vector on October 21, 2010, 08:02:52 pm
That's exactly what I did, so it's kinda obvious to me o_o

What, are you someone's alt?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: Elegy on October 21, 2010, 08:04:35 pm
That's exactly what I did, so it's kinda obvious to me o_o

What, are you someone's alt?

Huh? No, where did you get that idea..
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: Bandages on October 21, 2010, 08:05:15 pm
In

(just kidding)
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: Vector on October 21, 2010, 08:07:17 pm
Kamina, is it understood that you are an alt account?

Never once posted in the DF upper forums, immediately jumped into the popular lower forum threads and commented on other users like you knew them all with an incredibly high post/day ratio.

I mean

That's exactly what I did, so it's kinda obvious to me o_o

Huh? No, where did you get that idea..

I... logic... auuuuugh
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: Elegy on October 21, 2010, 08:08:46 pm
vector maybe u r not as smrt as u let on :y
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: Vector on October 21, 2010, 08:09:57 pm
vector maybe u r not as smrt as u let on :y

You're right .-.  Time to hang myself.

BRB, defacing piano.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on October 21, 2010, 08:12:08 pm
Where did that school thread I started posting in go?  I was going to quote something from it as proof.  The posts I made in it were fairly unique.
But anyway, I mentioned it made me register, as I had been lurking for a while.
I started out watching the upper forums, feeling no need to register as I didn't have any questions that weren't already answered.
Kamina Glasses came with the avvy free of charge, no meme needed.
Also, who could I be?  How many people here would do math related stuff like I have?  Not many.
If there is any way I can prove it, I will gladly.
Also, this:
That's exactly what I did, so it's kinda obvious to me o_o

What, are you someone's alt?

"Warning - while you were typing 5 new replies have been posted. You may wish to review your post."
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: Vector on October 21, 2010, 08:20:15 pm
... Don't get so stressed, doodabuddy.  He's just being silly.

School thread disappeared because it had been created by a well-known troll.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: Elegy on October 21, 2010, 08:21:17 pm
vector maybe u r not as smrt as u let on :y

You're right .-.  Time to hang myself.

BRB, defacing piano.

(http://img835.imageshack.us/img835/7678/alsocanyouseewhykidslov.jpg)
haha jokes on U

PS. kamina u r totally cool wit me bro I was just giving u a hard time
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: Vector on October 21, 2010, 08:22:12 pm
God you're a creep ._.

THIS IS NOT A SAW MOVIE OKAY, YES OKAY
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on October 21, 2010, 08:22:36 pm
I...
I think I'll just go back to getting nowhere in this math problem.
*headlaptop*
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: Elegy on October 21, 2010, 08:23:37 pm
looks like i win again xector :y
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: Zathras on October 21, 2010, 08:25:31 pm
Wow. You guys are weird.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: Vector on October 21, 2010, 08:26:38 pm
Wow. You guys are weird.

>_>

Suddenly, you notice!  Did you miss the entire fanfiction thread debacle?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: Zathras on October 21, 2010, 08:29:08 pm
No, no. I knew about you being weird. I mean these other folks just jumping in with their parachutes full of weirdness too...
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: Vector on October 21, 2010, 08:32:58 pm
No, no. I knew about you being weird. I mean these other folks just jumping in with their parachutes full of weirdness too...

That is an excellent phrase.


Something about this subforum seems to just attract really ... strange folks.  And then normal folks come here, and they act normal briefly, and by the time they leave they're somewhat nuts.  It's like a centrifuge that precipitates out weird.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on October 21, 2010, 08:34:38 pm
Aww, hell; why not? I'm in.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - One spot remaining!
Post by: Toaster on October 21, 2010, 09:06:26 pm
8/9 spots filled!

Vector, you're in as Town IC.  Aren't you usually the scum IC?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - One spot remaining!
Post by: Vector on October 21, 2010, 09:07:45 pm
Vector, you're in as Town IC.  Aren't you usually the scum IC?

Yeah.  Bayer isn't ready to IC town yet.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - One spot remaining!
Post by: GlyphGryph on October 21, 2010, 09:29:56 pm
oh man u guys shud i play? i could tell ag ood stories to every one about auld tymes and also i could find the scum!!!

 ~also teh :y is my new favrite smily thank u guy who posts it ! ~

acully u no wut i hav too many iorns in the fire rite now so nevermind
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: webadict on October 21, 2010, 10:51:15 pm
No, no. I knew about you being weird. I mean these other folks just jumping in with their parachutes full of weirdness too...

That is an excellent phrase.


Something about this subforum seems to just attract really ... strange folks.  And then normal folks come here, and they act normal briefly, and by the time they leave they're somewhat nuts.  It's like a centrifuge that precipitates out weird.
Then... WHICH AM I?!?!?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: Zathras on October 21, 2010, 10:57:50 pm
No, no. I knew about you being weird. I mean these other folks just jumping in with their parachutes full of weirdness too...
That is an excellent phrase.
Something about this subforum seems to just attract really ... strange folks.  And then normal folks come here, and they act normal briefly, and by the time they leave they're somewhat nuts.  It's like a centrifuge that precipitates out weird.
Then... WHICH AM I?!?!?

You are the nexus of weirdness to which the others are attracted, of course. The central massive black, uhm, hole of weirdosity, around which all the other weirdness orbits. Clearly.

Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII
Post by: SirBayer on October 21, 2010, 10:58:55 pm
vector maybe u r not as smrt as u let on :y

You're right .-.  Time to hang myself.

BRB, defacing piano.

<creepy vector picture>

PS. kamina u r totally cool wit me bro I was just giving u a hard time

That... was hilarious.

No, no. I knew about you being weird. I mean these other folks just jumping in with their parachutes full of weirdness too...

That is an excellent phrase.


Something about this subforum seems to just attract really ... strange folks.  And then normal folks come here, and they act normal briefly, and by the time they leave they're somewhat nuts.  It's like a centrifuge that precipitates out weird.

Hey, I limit my strangeness to the element of fanfiction writing.

No, no. I knew about you being weird. I mean these other folks just jumping in with their parachutes full of weirdness too...

That is an excellent phrase.


Something about this subforum seems to just attract really ... strange folks.  And then normal folks come here, and they act normal briefly, and by the time they leave they're somewhat nuts.  It's like a centrifuge that precipitates out weird.
Then... WHICH AM I?!?!?

You're the Mafia God.

You have the strange. You have all the strange.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - One spot remaining!
Post by: Elegy on October 21, 2010, 11:00:01 pm
Zathras your avatar is far too creepy. Please, oh lord, change it.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - One spot remaining!
Post by: Zathras on October 21, 2010, 11:03:57 pm
Zathras your avatar is far too creepy. Please, oh lord, change it.

Harharhar... Not nearly as creepy as your previous jumping thing with the eyes! 8-)

But yes, I'll change it in a day or so. It was just inspired by the silliness in GG's bastard thread. I'm sure I'll grow to hate it pretty soon too. Maybe I'll follow your example and get a shiny sweet custardy thing like that.


Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - One spot remaining!
Post by: Elegy on October 21, 2010, 11:07:48 pm
I just wanted to change my avatar to reflect my sunny personality.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - One spot remaining!
Post by: Zathras on October 21, 2010, 11:08:33 pm

    8-P


ETA: BTW, I posted your thing in the attendance board thread, Webby's thoughts are on top of page three (with standard forum settings).
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - One spot remaining!
Post by: Elegy on October 21, 2010, 11:09:11 pm


    8-P

god damn clowns
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - One spot remaining!
Post by: Vector on October 21, 2010, 11:15:08 pm
I just wanted to change my avatar to reflect my sunny personality.

>_________________>
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - One spot remaining!
Post by: Elegy on October 21, 2010, 11:16:53 pm
Haha, looks like you got me Vector. Good one :D
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - One spot remaining!
Post by: Vector on October 21, 2010, 11:21:18 pm
Haha, looks like you got me Vector. Good one :D

Really?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - One spot remaining!
Post by: Elegy on October 21, 2010, 11:31:37 pm
Okay, this is getting pretty stupid. Besides, this is probably scaring off that last newbie who still wants to learn how to play the game!
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - One spot remaining!
Post by: Vector on October 21, 2010, 11:33:27 pm
B-bolgnaham?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - One spot remaining!
Post by: Elegy on October 21, 2010, 11:35:05 pm
BOLOGNA
HAM

to this there is no counter.

I will rule all the meat. All of it. Me.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - One spot remaining!
Post by: webadict on October 22, 2010, 12:20:59 am
Okay, this is getting pretty stupid. Besides, this is probably scaring off that last newbie who still wants to learn how to play the game!
Someone cannot spell.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - One spot remaining!
Post by: Murphy on October 22, 2010, 04:18:20 am
I'll play.
Know mafia well, but never played online. Also never played it in English =)
Consider me a beginner.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - One spot remaining!
Post by: Ottofar on October 22, 2010, 05:23:48 am
It filled relatively quickly.

If someone still wants in, I can give my spot away.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - One spot remaining!
Post by: Flintus10 on October 22, 2010, 06:44:52 am
I may miss the next 24 hours or so but after that I will be as active as I can in my lousy timezone, if that's not good enough feel free to replace me
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - One spot remaining!
Post by: Toaster on October 22, 2010, 07:42:01 am
Murphy- You're in, and we're full!

Otto:  If someone asks between now and when I get roles out (Shortly) they can have your spot; otherwise, it's you.

Flintus:  That's fine.  Weekends are slower anyway.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - One spot remaining!
Post by: Toaster on October 22, 2010, 09:36:02 am
Tewby Vale has been peaceful for many years.  The streets were clean, crime was low, and the children were generally well behaved.  That all changed about four months ago.  Over on the wrong side of the tracks, a criminal element had moved in, and it was recruiting locals- the Mafia had come to town.  Businesses were robbed, extorted, and driven away from town.  The locals began living in fear.

Finally, the police tracked down the ones responsible for bringing the Mafia to Tewby Vale in the first place.  In the dead of night, the headquarters was raided.  After a long gun battle, the mafia was dead.

But the crime did not stop!  After a week of investigation, it was determined that two of the Mafia’s recruits from the town had escaped.  The evidence has been gathered, witnesses have been questioned, and clues have been examined.  In the end, it was determined that the two were among the nine of you.

After hours of long discussion, it was decided to lock the nine of you in an abandoned hotel, give everyone a room, and put a gallows in the lobby.  Each day, you would determine by vote one among you to hang, and by that method eliminate those who would terrorize Tewby Vale, for here, justice is swift.  It is unlikely that the Mafia will cooperate fully, so expect them to attempt to silence the townspeople in the night.

Good luck, for many of you will not survive this ordeal.



DAY ONE BEGINS NOW!

Day one ends Wednesday 10/27 at 11 PM EST
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Zathras on October 22, 2010, 09:56:09 am
Great start! Good luck, Town, make us proud. Stay close to the ICs, and watch out for shadows -- they move when you're not looking at them.

Toaster: How about a spoiled spectation for an ex-scumbuddy of yours?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Ottofar on October 22, 2010, 10:03:32 am
Murphy, would you rather be scum or town?

Mindmaker,
who would you most like to be your scumbuddy, of the players of this game?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Ottofar on October 22, 2010, 10:04:47 am
Oh, and to both questions: "...and why?".
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Murphy on October 22, 2010, 11:06:32 am
@Ottofar
What I absolutely detest is unfairness, and if you play townie, you have potential to be accused falsely and lynched.
That's 12.0 on the 10-scale of unfairness.
On the other hand, scum are... well, scum. They are intrinsically unfair.
So I have no preference. I just play with what I get.

I'm supposed to vote for someone, eh?
Let it be Spade because there's equal probability of anyone (except myself) turning out to be scum, but his/her name is shorter, and easier for me to type.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Ottofar on October 22, 2010, 11:29:36 am
You should ask a question with your vote to get a reaction which you can use to read the player's alignment.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Mindmaker on October 22, 2010, 11:34:14 am
@Ottofar:
Probably Kamina Squirtle, simply because he's the only person participating this game, who looks somewhat familiar and I like sticking to things I know.

...well and his avatar is kinda awesome.

Zathras:
Why do you think I get killed first in these kind of games?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Ottofar on October 22, 2010, 11:45:59 am
Zathras isn't in the game.
KaminaSquirtle, who would you most like to be your scumbuddy, and why?
What do you think of Mindmaker liking you as his scumbuddy?

Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on October 22, 2010, 11:48:46 am
So, Spade. What was your opinion on the last Beginner's game, before it was cut short due to lack of activity? Have you learned anything from it? Do you intend to play this game any differently?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Mindmaker on October 22, 2010, 11:53:59 am
Whoops.
I didn't knew spectators would ask questions.

Then Ottofar:
You seem to be asking an awful lot of questions, considering the game has just started. Why is that?

Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Ottofar on October 22, 2010, 12:01:12 pm
To get reactions, to identify scum.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on October 22, 2010, 12:07:04 pm
Otto... you were in the Monks and Mason's game a while ago, right? As I recall, you did little beyond lurk when you could have changed the game (not that I'm really complaining, sayin' as it allowed me and Blargity to win. :P). How much has your game changed since then, and what brings you into a beginner game as opposed to - for instance - Glyph's Cybrid game?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on October 22, 2010, 12:09:59 pm
XD Herp-a-derp. Just noticed you are actually in that game, too.

Ah, well. The other question still stands.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Ottofar on October 22, 2010, 12:37:28 pm
Well. Let's say I'm trying to improve all the time. I'm not probably going to post WoT:s.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Mindmaker on October 22, 2010, 12:46:25 pm
@Ottofar:
Well that's one of the possible reasons...
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Elegy on October 22, 2010, 01:40:30 pm
Mindmaker, what made you want to play mafia for the first time?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on October 22, 2010, 02:49:30 pm
@Ottofar
I would have to say Elegy, he is a familiar face, and it seems to me like he would make a good mafia player.

I don't think it means much.  His reasons seem sincere, and choosing someone by familiarity is fairly neutral.  I don't care either way.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Spade on October 22, 2010, 02:53:44 pm
I'm supposed to vote for someone, eh?
Let it be Spade because there's equal probability of anyone (except myself) turning out to be scum, but his/her name is shorter, and easier for me to type.

You could at least ask me a question.

So, Spade. What was your opinion on the last Beginner's game, before it was cut short due to lack of activity? Have you learned anything from it? Do you intend to play this game any differently?
My opinion is that it could have been either side's win, so I'm sad it got cut short.
I think I'll be able to play the game better this time, with a little more experience.

ragnarok97071, have you played mafia before, or is this your first game? Do you have any experience with it?

Also, instead of using '@', could we use quotes? It makes things easier to read.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Mindmaker on October 22, 2010, 03:38:25 pm
@Elegy:
The wizard duel version of the game. The game itself seemed fairly interesting and some of the players seemed to conduct heated arguments in said game.
Not to mention I played the werewolf version of the game some years ago, in real life.
Last but not least, it allows me much closer intereaction with the community, than some of the other boards.

@Spade:
I agree. This would make things easier. I'll start using them with the next post.

So, Murphy, which aspect do you appreaciate most in a game of mafia?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Jetsquirrel on October 22, 2010, 03:47:35 pm
ahhhh.... could i still join this ? i really need to learn the mafia games.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Flintus10 on October 22, 2010, 04:25:41 pm
KaminaSquirtle  What exactly is it about Elegy that makes him a good mafia player??

And Mindmaker do you understand how asking questions can benefit the town?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: ragnarok97071 on October 22, 2010, 05:18:37 pm
ragnarok97071, have you played mafia before, or is this your first game? Do you have any experience with it?
No, I've never played it, just trying to get a new game type available to me.
Murphy: Why did you join a game which you yourself said that you probably would not like?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on October 22, 2010, 05:41:09 pm
KaminaSquirtle  What exactly is it about Elegy that makes him a good mafia player??
I don't really know, he just seems like he would be good at being scum.  And the question concerned scumbuddies, so yeah.

Flintus10, what do you think is the best way to play town?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Mindmaker on October 22, 2010, 05:50:58 pm
And Mindmaker do you understand how asking questions can benefit the town?

Well they are supposed to unmask the scum.
However I have not the slightest idea how someone could pull that off.
I guess the first lynchs are always pretty random, based on some vague speculations, derived from something a person said.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Vector on October 22, 2010, 06:01:14 pm
ahhhh.... could i still join this ? i really need to learn the mafia games.

No, sorry, it's full.  I'm going to suggest that you sign up as the first replacement and/or you wait for BMXVIII, which will be open soon enough =)
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Elegy on October 22, 2010, 06:45:43 pm
And Mindmaker do you understand how asking questions can benefit the town?

Well they are supposed to unmask the scum.
However I have not the slightest idea how someone could pull that off.
I guess the first lynchs are always pretty random, based on some vague speculations, derived from something a person said.

Wrong,

The point of questions early on is for someone to slip up and offer a logical fallacy or persform a scummy action. At that point, the whole game shifts into who is acting more scummy and the random questions stop.

But the questions do serve a really important purpose.

Votecount, please.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: ragnarok97071 on October 22, 2010, 06:58:28 pm
Murphy: III
Spade: II
MM: I
Ragnarok: I
Kamina: I
Flintus10: I
I've been keeping track.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Elegy on October 22, 2010, 07:02:48 pm
Okay, why are there three votes on Murphy?

Time to review the thread :|
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Elegy on October 22, 2010, 07:10:10 pm
Murphy, would you rather be scum or town?
Murphy, which aspect do you appreaciate most in a game of mafia?
Murphy: Why did you join a game which you yourself said that you probably would not like?

Hmmmm
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on October 22, 2010, 09:02:45 pm
Unvote.

Why so interested in the fate of Murphy, Elegy? Why cast such a disapproving eye over what is most likely merely a coincidental RVS? I'm sure he can take care of himself, when he gets around to answering the questions, and we have plenty of time yet before we settle on a lynch. However, as far as we all know, he could be as much scum as anyone else... unless you know him a lot better than any decent, law-abiding, God-fearing townie should. =/
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Elegy on October 22, 2010, 09:10:27 pm
Notice how I didn't cast a vote, or even a FoS at anyone for that. I was merely commenting on the fact that I was surprised someone already has three votes on themselves, which is still quite a lot for RVS. It is curious how quickly you jumped on me about it, though.

Why so interested in the fate of Murphy, Elegy?
Never said anything about whether I would care if he lives or dies.

Why cast such a disapproving eye over what is most likely merely a coincidental RVS?
Again, where did I say I disapproved?

I'm sure he can take care of himself, when he gets around to answering the questions, and we have plenty of time yet before we settle on a lynch. However, as far as we all know, he could be as much scum as anyone else... unless you know him a lot better than any decent, law-abiding, God-fearing townie should. =/

Cool.

Protip: next time you want to FoS me, have actual reasons, mate.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Toaster on October 22, 2010, 09:24:41 pm
Vote Count:

ragnarok97071: {1} Spade
Flintus10: {1} KaminaSquirtle
Mindmaker: {1} Elegy
Elegy: {0}   
Ottofar: {0}
KaminaSquirtle: {1} Flintus10
Spade: {2} Murphy,  Mindmaker
Azure Sepulchre: {0}
Murphy: {2} Ottofar, ragnarok97071

Not voting: Azure Sepulchre

Day 1 ends Wednesday 10/27 11 PM EST


Jetsquirrel:  I'll mark you down as first potential replacement.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on October 22, 2010, 10:01:18 pm
Ohohoho, you're not side-stepping that easily.

Notice how I didn't cast a vote, or even a FoS at anyone for that. I was merely commenting on the fact that I was surprised someone already has three votes on themselves, which is still quite a lot for RVS. It is curious how quickly you jumped on me about it, though.

It's 'curious' how I moved in on a trival pair of posts during the RVS, when people are looking for even the most minute scumtells anyway? Well, damn; if that seems suspect, we're in for a pretty rough game. >.> Besides, even if it is that peculiar to see three votes on one person during RVS, it's hardly unheard of and all three will vanish quick enough if Murphy answers the questions to a satisfactory degree. Certainly didn't warrant an ounce of interest from anyone not directly involved. Which I guess means you are involved to some degree, huh?

Also, half-assed attenpt to throw my suspicions back on me duly noted.

Never said anything about whether I would care if he lives or dies.

Your posts directly implied some kind of interest; whether it was just a harmless observation or something more is for me to determine, not you.

Again, where did I say I disapproved?

'Hmmmm' is certainly not an exclamation of surprise; I don't care what culture you're from. In fact, when vocalized, it directly implies a sense of impatience or annoyance. Your impatience wouldn't make sense in this scenario, so - under the circumstances - I can only conclude that something annoyed you.

So. What did you find annoying?

Cool.

Protip: next time you want to FoS me, have actual reasons, mate.

Huh; the condescending smartass. Practically a scum stereotype. Yeah, I think I'll keep my vote nice and snug up next to you for now. If you're gonna try again to convince me not to, then first dispense with the childishness. Elegy.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Elegy on October 22, 2010, 10:05:17 pm
lol what

There's nothing I can even contend, because you're just putting words in my mouth.. So, uhhh. good? Attack?

P.s. Sidestepping is when you avoid an attack, which... I didn't do... So...
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Vector on October 22, 2010, 10:08:22 pm
I'm just flying by briefly to thank all of you for being so active.  It's nice to see things running smoothly again.

Remember, if you have any questions then you can just ask me.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on October 22, 2010, 10:50:34 pm
There's nothing I can even contend, because you're just putting words in my mouth.. So, uhhh. good? Attack?

I put nothing in your mouth, whether they be words or not - I don't give a damn what the tabloids say.

I merely drew conclusions from what I had been given and acted accordingly. Point out to me what I have apparently 'put in your mouth' instead of complaining about it, and I'll elaborate if it seems I've been unclear. Scum simply giving up offers rather poor sport.

P.s. Sidestepping is when you avoid an attack, which... I didn't do... So...

...I know you didn't. Because I continued to attack. Hence the reason I said 'You're not side-stepping that so easily.'

I don't see the point you're getting at.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Murphy on October 23, 2010, 12:16:36 am
Quote
The point of questions early on is for someone to slip up and offer a logical fallacy or persform a scummy action. At that point, the whole game shifts into who is acting more scummy and the random questions stop.
I guess it is possible. I've just never seen it before, despite having played mafia IRL. We had different playstyle: the game began with a night so the mafia could kill someone, the cop and whoever else could do their actions, and there already was material for discussion by the time dawn had broken.

Murphy, which aspect do you appreaciate most in a game of mafia?
Dunno. An intellectual challenge probably.

Murphy: Why did you join a game which you yourself said that you probably would not like?
I did not say such thing. I merely said that there's something I do not like about both scum and town, so I have no preference over either one. I never said there wasn't also something I do like about them, and about the game in general.

Almost everyone seems to believe that asking questions early on can help them determine scum.
Yet I, an honest townie, have the most votes on me.
Fine, I'll play along.
Unvote.

Ragnarok,
er... I have no idea what to ask...
Okay, what do you think of the cop role? How would you play it?

P.S. Also, aren't we all supposed to post in-character?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Flintus10 on October 23, 2010, 01:54:19 am
KaminaSquirtle  What exactly is it about Elegy that makes him a good mafia player??
I don't really know, he just seems like he would be good at being scum.  And the question concerned scumbuddies, so yeah.
Flintus10, what do you think is the best way to play town?
[/b]
Straight back at me eh?

Your answer is good enough though you could elaborate a bit more on exactly what makes a good scum player and why you believe Elegy fits that. (Though if you don't know you don't know that's cool)


And I'd say good town play involves being active and observant in scum hunting and making sure to use your vote wisely. Of course every player is different and has different guidlines.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Ottofar on October 23, 2010, 02:03:39 am
Unvote Murphy
Ragnarok,  if you have been keeping track, why did you land third vote on Murphy?

Murphy,
what do you think of having three votes on you this early?
Flintus, which town role would you like to have (Doc or cop)?
Elegy which scum role do you have?

Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Flintus10 on October 23, 2010, 02:04:03 am
Murphy: Why did you join a game which you yourself said that you probably would not like?
Also @Ragnarok
probably just a newbie mistake but adding a third vote to someone for absolutely no reason during RVS is reasonably suspicious and looks like a bandwagon vote so slight FOS on you for that scummy action.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Elegy on October 23, 2010, 02:06:53 am
Quote from: Ottofar
Elegy which scum role do you have?

none of them..
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Ottofar on October 23, 2010, 02:07:56 am
Quote from: Ottofar
Elegy which scum role do you have?

none of them..

Which one would you like then?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Flintus10 on October 23, 2010, 02:09:53 am
Also Ottofar I'd prefer doctor as it would allow me to operate more efficiently without the need for myself to roleclaim.

and Ottofar again Your vote is still on Elegy and your question insinuated that your were quite sure he was scum did you have proof or did you just misword it?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Murphy on October 23, 2010, 02:39:59 am
Murphy: Why did you join a game which you yourself said that you probably would not like?
Are you asking me the same question? I've already answered that:
I did not say such thing. I merely said that there's something I do not like about both scum and town, so I have no preference over either one. I never said there wasn't also something I do like about them, and about the game in general.

Murphy, what do you think of having three votes on you this early?
It is likely to find at least one scum in a group of three. And I think that two mafia players are likely to vote for the same person. So if one of the three is a scum, there's a good possibility that another one is, too. So there's good possibility that among these three we have both mafia players.

Of course, if both mafia players are experienced, they would not give away such an obvious sign, but we are playing beginners' mafia, aren't we?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Flintus10 on October 23, 2010, 02:44:34 am
Murphy: Why did you join a game which you yourself said that you probably would not like?
Also @Ragnarok
probably just a newbie mistake but adding a third vote to someone for absolutely no reason during RVS is reasonably suspicious and looks like a bandwagon vote so slight FOS on you for that scummy action.
Ah right no sorry that "Also" is a typo I was was just quoting ragnarok for proof that he put the vote on you.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Flintus10 on October 23, 2010, 02:49:02 am
Murphy, what do you think of having three votes on you this early?
It is likely to find at least one scum in a group of three. And I think that two mafia players are likely to vote for the same person. So if one of the three is a scum, there's a good possibility that another one is, too. So there's good possibility that among these three we have both mafia players.

Of course, if both mafia players are experienced, they would not give away such an obvious sign, but we are playing beginners' mafia, aren't we?

If that's your opinion do you have any idea which of the three is most likely to be scum?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Ottofar on October 23, 2010, 02:53:42 am
and Ottofar again Your vote is still on Elegy and your question insinuated that your were quite sure he was scum did you have proof or did you just misword it?
I find him scum. He appears to be protecting Murphy.


Murphy, what do you think of having three votes on you this early?
It is likely to find at least one scum in a group of three. And I think that two mafia players are likely to vote for the same person. So if one of the three is a scum, there's a good possibility that another one is, too. So there's good possibility that among these three we have both mafia players.

Of course, if both mafia players are experienced, they would not give away such an obvious sign, but we are playing beginners' mafia, aren't we?
You didn't take bussing (http://mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php?title=Bussing) into the account?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Murphy on October 23, 2010, 03:04:12 am
I did, but isn't is an advanced technique?
And if it is so common, then why are you suspecting Elegy for protecting me? If we two were scum, then, following your logic, he would rather throw me under the bus.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Flintus10 on October 23, 2010, 03:07:45 am
and Ottofar again Your vote is still on Elegy and your question insinuated that your were quite sure he was scum did you have proof or did you just misword it?
I find him scum. He appears to be protecting Murphy.

Really Ottofar you don't seem to have provided any evidence of this is it possible you are just going on Azure's opinion without formulating one on your own, scum?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Ottofar on October 23, 2010, 03:12:03 am
I did, but isn't is an advanced technique?
And if it is so common, then why are you suspecting Elegy for protecting me? If we two were scum, then, following your logic, he would rather throw me under the bus.
So now you're protecting Elegy.

and Ottofar again Your vote is still on Elegy and your question insinuated that your were quite sure he was scum did you have proof or did you just misword it?
I find him scum. He appears to be protecting Murphy.

Really Ottofar you don't seem to have provided any evidence of this is it possible you are just going on Azure's opinion without formulating one on your own, scum?
Azure got there before me. I find Elegy scum anyways.


Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Flintus10 on October 23, 2010, 03:22:10 am
I did, but isn't is an advanced technique?
And if it is so common, then why are you suspecting Elegy for protecting me? If we two were scum, then, following your logic, he would rather throw me under the bus.
So now you're protecting Elegy.

and Ottofar again Your vote is still on Elegy and your question insinuated that your were quite sure he was scum did you have proof or did you just misword it?
I find him scum. He appears to be protecting Murphy.

Really Ottofar you don't seem to have provided any evidence of this is it possible you are just going on Azure's opinion without formulating one on your own, scum?
Azure got there before me. I find Elegy scum anyways.
That's nowhere near a good enough excuse even reusing his evidence and formulating your own opinion on it would be better than "What he said"
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Flintus10 on October 23, 2010, 03:29:55 am
Murphy, what do you think of having three votes on you this early?
It is likely to find at least one scum in a group of three. And I think that two mafia players are likely to vote for the same person. So if one of the three is a scum, there's a good possibility that another one is, too. So there's good possibility that among these three we have both mafia players.

Of course, if both mafia players are experienced, they would not give away such an obvious sign, but we are playing beginners' mafia, aren't we?

If that's your opinion do you have any idea which of the three is most likely to be scum?
Murphy I'll ask again if someone of thre three voting for you is likely to be scum do you have any idea which of them it would be??
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Murphy on October 23, 2010, 03:33:20 am
If that's your opinion do you have any idea which of the three is most likely to be scum?
Let's see, Ottofar voted first, then it was Mindmaker, and then, shortly after that, Ragnarok.
I would suspect Ragnarok the most because he voted with such haste after there were two votes on me.
Also Mindmaker because he speaks so little, is he hiding something?
I'm not sure yet though.

So now you're protecting Elegy.
Mainly I'm pointing at the flaws in your logic. But whatever. I'm protecting him no more than Flintus does.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Flintus10 on October 23, 2010, 03:43:12 am
Mainly I'm pointing at the flaws in your logic. But whatever. I'm protecting him no more than Flintus does.
Care to explain this in more detail because the way it looks you are either clearly deflecting suspicion onto me and implying that you are indeed protecting Elegy?
Or
You are saying that neither of us are protecting Elegy in which case thanks but I don't need you or see a reason to drag me into it focus on just defending yourself. In fact you even gave a reason as to why you were not defending Elegy so why bring me into it at all???
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Murphy on October 23, 2010, 03:46:28 am
Flintus10, you're pointing at the flaws in his logic too. That's what I meant.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Flintus10 on October 23, 2010, 03:58:47 am
Fair enough

Anyways just a heads up that I will be gone for about a day so any questions will take awhile to recieve an answer.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Mindmaker on October 23, 2010, 04:56:05 am
Also Mindmaker because he speaks so little, is he hiding something?

When the American side of the world is most active, mine is mostly asleep.
It's not unusal to come online seeing several pages of text.

Does a name written in blue color has any more meaning than a bolded one? People seem to be mixing it and it confuses me.
And Elegy, could you possibly stop using abbreviations? A beginner like me has no idea what you are trying to say.

Unvote
The answer was satisfactory enough and I have someone else who I should watch closely...
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Ottofar on October 23, 2010, 05:11:57 am
Does a name written in blue color has any more meaning than a bolded one? People seem to be mixing it and it confuses me.
And Elegy, could you possibly stop using abbreviations? A beginner like me has no idea what you are trying to say.

Yeah, It's Finger of Suspicion, FoS for short.
Quote from: MafiaWiki
FOS: Finger of Suspicion. Used to indicate that you find someone suspicious but are not going to vote them, for whatever reason (often because you are voting for someone even more suspicious). Cf. HOS, the somewhat more dramatic Hand of Suspicion (very rare). Also FomS, the lesser Finger of minor Suspicion.
Here's (http://mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php?title=Commonly_used_abbreviations) a long list of abbreviations.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Elegy on October 23, 2010, 05:14:39 am
Quote from: Ottofar
Elegy which scum role do you have?

none of them..

Which one would you like then?

Godfather, I always loved those movies.

Alright, Ottofar, you said "you find me scum anyways"

Where is your evidence for that. You have none. The only reason azure is voting me is because he completely misread my post and is putting words in my mouth (stellar argument with the "hmmm means scum is any culture" bit, loved that). You have nothing.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Ottofar on October 23, 2010, 05:20:15 am
I can trust my gut. And I think you're too defensive. You should use more time to hunt scum, and prove yourself town that way, rather than claiming I have no evidence.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Elegy on October 23, 2010, 05:22:53 am
Okay, the "gut feeling" argument. Solid. I guess I should just quit now, your stomach thinks I am a mafia.

unvote

Ottofar, you are far too eager to jump on my case after azure, offering certainty "I find Elegy scum" and then complete bullshit "I can trust my gut". Get the fuck out of here, scum.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Ottofar on October 23, 2010, 05:24:09 am
And here's the OMGUS, yeah, Elegy. You're scum.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Elegy on October 23, 2010, 05:25:49 am
No, it's not an OMGUS, because I didn't do it right after you voted me (tard). I did it as soon as you dropped your scumtells in your bogus argument.

You are scum.

You are going to die.

It's as easy as that.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Mindmaker on October 23, 2010, 05:28:53 am
Well, he's got a point Elegy, you seem kind of suspicious.

However before I cast a vote I'd like to see a bit more mor kamina squirtle and ragnarok.
They're being very quiet.

So, Ragnarok, what's up with all this lurking?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Ottofar on October 23, 2010, 05:30:00 am
Elegy, Two posts in-between. Great job.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Mindmaker on October 23, 2010, 05:30:04 am
Oh and what is the blue color signaling? Nobody has answered me that.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Ottofar on October 23, 2010, 05:30:58 am
Does a name written in blue color has any more meaning than a bolded one? People seem to be mixing it and it confuses me.
And Elegy, could you possibly stop using abbreviations? A beginner like me has no idea what you are trying to say.

Yeah, It's Finger of Suspicion, FoS for short.
Quote from: MafiaWiki
FOS: Finger of Suspicion. Used to indicate that you find someone suspicious but are not going to vote them, for whatever reason (often because you are voting for someone even more suspicious). Cf. HOS, the somewhat more dramatic Hand of Suspicion (very rare). Also FomS, the lesser Finger of minor Suspicion.
Here's (http://mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php?title=Commonly_used_abbreviations) a long list of abbreviations.
MINDMAKER
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Mindmaker on October 23, 2010, 05:32:52 am
Does a name written in blue color has any more meaning than a bolded one? People seem to be mixing it and it confuses me.
And Elegy, could you possibly stop using abbreviations? A beginner like me has no idea what you are trying to say.

Yeah, It's Finger of Suspicion, FoS for short.
Quote from: MafiaWiki
FOS: Finger of Suspicion. Used to indicate that you find someone suspicious but are not going to vote them, for whatever reason (often because you are voting for someone even more suspicious). Cf. HOS, the somewhat more dramatic Hand of Suspicion (very rare). Also FomS, the lesser Finger of minor Suspicion.
Here's (http://mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php?title=Commonly_used_abbreviations) a long list of abbreviations.
MINDMAKER

I'm asking what the meaning of writing someones name in blue is.
But yes thanks for the list.
It's making the whole thing more understandable.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Murphy on October 23, 2010, 05:37:09 am
Yeah, It's Finger of Suspicion, FoS for short.
As in, writing a person's name in blue is a FoS directed to them.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Elegy on October 23, 2010, 05:37:31 am
Elegy, Two posts in-between. Great job.

Tough shit? I'm still right.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Ottofar on October 23, 2010, 05:38:21 am
Fine. Concealed OMGUS.

Does this sound right?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Elegy on October 23, 2010, 05:46:09 am
It's not OMGUS at all, but this is beginner's mafia so I wouldn't expect you to know better :/
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Ottofar on October 23, 2010, 06:01:36 am
scumtells
That's Plural. What are these tells aside from slight bandwagoning?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: ragnarok97071 on October 23, 2010, 08:42:54 am
Well, he's got a point Elegy, you seem kind of suspicious.

However before I cast a vote I'd like to see a bit more mor kamina squirtle and ragnarok.
They're being very quiet.

So, Ragnarok, what's up with all this lurking?
I went to sleep, pretty much right after that last post of mine, and then about a page of stuff got posted overnight...
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on October 23, 2010, 10:14:14 am
KaminaSquirtle  What exactly is it about Elegy that makes him a good mafia player??
I don't really know, he just seems like he would be good at being scum.  And the question concerned scumbuddies, so yeah.
Flintus10, what do you think is the best way to play town?
[/b]
Straight back at me eh?

Your answer is good enough though you could elaborate a bit more on exactly what makes a good scum player and why you believe Elegy fits that. (Though if you don't know you don't know that's cool)


And I'd say good town play involves being active and observant in scum hunting and making sure to use your vote wisely. Of course every player is different and has different guidlines.
Unvote.
I find little suspicious about you at this point.

Well, I would the most important part about being scum is keeping suspicion off of yourself, and, to a lesser extent, your partner.  If one of the scum dies early, then the remaining scum is going to have a lot harder time of it.  The way I see it, the point of being scum is to survive until you can kill all the townies.

And I retract my statement about wanting Elegy as my scumbuddy, I've seen him play more now, and there's already a lot of finger-pointing at him.  He's attracting too much attention to be good scum.

Elegy, why so desperate to point fingers at everyone else?  Calling them scum so quickly seems highly suspect.  I see little scumhunting from you at this point.  Just pointing fingers at everyone else, without any real reason.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Mindmaker on October 23, 2010, 10:28:25 am
I went to sleep, pretty much right after that last post of mine, and then about a page of stuff got posted overnight...

My bad.
I somehow thought a lot more time had passed.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on October 23, 2010, 10:34:59 am
And here's the OMGUS, yeah, Elegy. You're scum.

Fuck, yeah! I got a bite!

Unvote. I had nothing on Elegy, but I figured scum would try to start an early bandwagon on a lynch if I was forceful enough, and then - lo and behold - you tried to use my own worthless agrument in order to have Elegy lynched. Coupled with how curt your answers have been to past questions, Ottofar - almost as if you've been advised to say little to avoid dropping scumtells and took it too literally - and you've been bouncing between players too freely, asking questions that won't give you much in terms of information. Acting like scum, basically.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Spade on October 23, 2010, 10:40:30 am
Yeah, there's been four new pages since I left.

Anyway,

ragnarok97071, now that you're back, do you have anything to say?

Well, he's got a point Elegy, you seem kind of suspicious.

However before I cast a vote I'd like to see a bit more mor kamina squirtle and ragnarok.
They're being very quiet.

So, Ragnarok, what's up with all this lurking?
You're saying you really like Ottofar's reason, and you might vote Elegy without a reason of your own?


Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on October 23, 2010, 10:44:31 am
Whoops. Forgot to vote. Ottofar.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Murphy on October 23, 2010, 10:51:36 am
I'm confused. It's starting to be difficult to remember who accuses who.
Let me count the votes...
Ottofar - 2 (Elegy, Flintus10)
ragnarok97071 - 1 (Spade)
Elegy - 1 (Ottofar)
The others have 0.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Murphy on October 23, 2010, 10:53:17 am
Sorry, forgot to include Azure's vote.
Ottofar has 3 votes currently.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Murphy on October 23, 2010, 10:56:32 am
Damn I'm not good at topic-surfing. I overlooked Flintus' unvote.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Ottofar on October 23, 2010, 01:08:22 pm

[
Damn I'm not good at topic-surfing. I overlooked Flintus' unvote.
It helps if you open different tabs for posting and browsing.


Azure, who do you think is telling me what to do?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Mindmaker on October 23, 2010, 01:08:54 pm
You're saying you really like Ottofar's reason, and you might vote Elegy without a reason of your own?

I don't "like" his reason, however I came to a similar conclusion.
It's not enough to call someone scum though.
Not when we have two people arguing that is.

The others have 0.

Is there a rule that says, that you must have a vote on someone on any given time?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Ottofar on October 23, 2010, 01:15:24 pm
Is there a rule that says, that you must have a vote on someone on any given time?
No
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Ottofar on October 23, 2010, 01:41:11 pm
You're saying you really like Ottofar's reason, and you might vote Elegy without a reason of your own?

I don't "like" his reason, however I came to a similar conclusion.
It's not enough to call someone scum though.
Not when we have two people arguing that is.

Push. Always push.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Mindmaker on October 23, 2010, 01:49:11 pm
You're saying you really like Ottofar's reason, and you might vote Elegy without a reason of your own?

I don't "like" his reason, however I came to a similar conclusion.
It's not enough to call someone scum though.
Not when we have two people arguing that is.

Push. Always push.

You mean I should be more agressive and accuse people over their slightest mistake?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Ottofar on October 23, 2010, 01:54:08 pm
Yup.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Toaster on October 23, 2010, 02:04:41 pm
Vote Count:

ragnarok97071: {1} Spade
Flintus10: {0}
Mindmaker: {0}
Elegy: {1} Ottofar
Ottofar: {3} Flintus10, Elegy, Azure Sepulchre
KaminaSquirtle: {0}
Spade: {0}
Azure Sepulchre: {0}
Murphy: {1} ragnarok97071

Not Voting: Mindmaker, Murphy, KaminaSquirtle

Day 1 ends Wednesday 10/27 11 PM EST


Regarding rules on voting: It is legal to vote for nobody (abstain) or specifically vote for a No Lynch.  If No Lynch has the most votes at end of day, nobody will be lynched.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Ottofar on October 23, 2010, 02:41:54 pm
Yup.
At least until you're sure the player isn't scum, and then some.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Elegy on October 23, 2010, 02:54:40 pm
Elegy, why so desperate to point fingers at everyone else?  Calling them scum so quickly seems highly suspect.  I see little scumhunting from you at this point.  Just pointing fingers at everyone else, without any real reason.

So, figuring out Ottofar is scum through his scumtells doesn't count as scumhunting?

P.S. "pointing fingers" is a pretty fucking weak attack in this game, when all you do is point fingers.


scumtells
That's Plural. What are these tells aside from slight bandwagoning?
Eager to jump on me when there was no evidence or any scumtells (As Azure himself even pointed out)
Trying to call an OMGUS on me when there was, in fact, no OMGUS in sight.
Relying on a "gut feeling" argument.

Face it, Otto, you have nothing. You jumped on me because you thought you could get an easy bandwagon, but the person who started it was just fishing for scum. You're sunk.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Ottofar on October 23, 2010, 03:19:09 pm

So, figuring out Ottofar is scum through his scumtells doesn't count as scumhunting?
 You're not hunting. Just pointing out tells. There's a difference. 

Also, you (in lack of a better word) panicked, when it seemed to you that both me and Azure were attacking you, resorting to even calling names. Now, you're lot calmer after Azure revealed that he had nothing on you.  You're scum. Also, the same question to you, which I asked Azure.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on October 23, 2010, 03:32:52 pm
Elegy, why so desperate to point fingers at everyone else?  Calling them scum so quickly seems highly suspect.  I see little scumhunting from you at this point.  Just pointing fingers at everyone else, without any real reason.
So, figuring out Ottofar is scum through his scumtells doesn't count as scumhunting?

P.S. "pointing fingers" is a pretty fucking weak attack in this game, when all you do is point fingers.
I'll let you go for now, Ottofar looks way more scummy to me than you right now.  Would you care to defend yourself against Azure Sepulchre, Otto?  I find your glossing over the strongest argument against you suspicious.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Ottofar on October 23, 2010, 03:47:30 pm
Personally, I think defending is a waste of time, but if you so wish.
And here's the OMGUS, yeah, Elegy. You're scum.

Fuck, yeah! I got a bite!

Unvote. 1: I had nothing on Elegy, but I figured scum would try to start an early bandwagon on a lynch if I was forceful enough, and then - lo and behold - 2: you tried to use my own worthless agrument in order to have Elegy lynched. Coupled with how curt your answers have been to past questions,3: Ottofar - almost as if you've been advised to say little to avoid dropping scumtells and took it too literally - 4:and you've been bouncing between players too freely, asking questions that won't give you much in terms of information. 5:Acting like scum, basically.

1: Hell no. I'm not stupid. [undefendable without WIFOM]

2: To push, to get a reaction, which I then found scummy. He panicked, look at my previous post.

3: Who is giving advice, and why would I be posting this much, when I could be lurking. [WIFOM again]

4:I see no need to tunnel, and usefulness is relative.

5: And here would belong the meta argument.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Ottofar on October 23, 2010, 03:50:34 pm
Oh, and Spade, why so quiet?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Elegy on October 23, 2010, 03:58:19 pm
I always call people names, asshat. I don't need to be "panicking" (nice evidence on that, by the way) to be a jerk.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on October 23, 2010, 04:02:00 pm
Unvote.
I think I'll have to watch you two a bit more before I make a decision.  You both seem equally scummy.

I went to sleep, pretty much right after that last post of mine, and then about a page of stuff got posted overnight...
And yet you still have contributed little.  Why not ask a few questions, ragnarok?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Ottofar on October 23, 2010, 04:05:28 pm
I always call people names, asshat. I don't need to be "panicking" (nice evidence on that, by the way) to be a jerk.
The feel in the posts is different.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Elegy on October 23, 2010, 04:09:42 pm
That may have been from the fact I was shitface drunk last night when I was posting.

Also, next fucker who calls me scummy with no evidence gets ignore listed. You have to SUPPORT CLAIMS or else you might as well not post at all.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Ottofar on October 23, 2010, 04:14:54 pm
That may have been from the fact I was shitface drunk last night when I was posting.
Yeah. Right. You're still scum.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Elegy on October 23, 2010, 04:23:33 pm
You're still scum.

Also, next fucker who calls me scummy with no evidence gets ignore listed. You have to SUPPORT CLAIMS or else you might as well not post at all.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Mindmaker on October 23, 2010, 04:39:00 pm
Flintus, now that Kaminasquirtle has unvoted, you're the only one supporting elegy in his vote.
So what new evidence have you gathered, since you last posted, that would support your accusation?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Vector on October 23, 2010, 04:41:07 pm
You mean I should be more agressive and accuse people over their slightest mistake?

Mindfulness is more important than aggression.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Mindmaker on October 23, 2010, 04:43:07 pm
Well I was incorrect, there is still Azure.
However your motivation seems a bit unclear.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on October 23, 2010, 10:37:44 pm
Azure, who do you think is telling me what to do?

Bayer, obviously. Y'know, your scum IC? Oh, and if my initial impression of you taking a bit of scum advice too literally wasn't enough -

Push. Always push.

At least until you're sure the player isn't scum, and then some.

 - then you're idea of pushing a player to breaking point to verify their scummitude - a concept far too similar to Bayer's method of play in the last beginner game - cinched it for me. If you're propagating an idea expounded by another player who now happens to be the scum IC, then I'm gonna be pretty bloody suspicious of its origins. >.> Highly speculative, I admit, but coupled with how you've been acting all game it contributes to the slowly mounting pile of evidence that's been gathering against you.

Now, then; moving on to a more interesting post...

Personally, I think defending is a waste of time, but if you so wish.

... O.O

Pahahahahahaa... XD Wow. So you believe in just leaving arguments to fester and gather weight the longer you completely ignore them? Interesting tactic you've got there. Really seems to be working for you so far.

1: Hell no. I'm not stupid. [undefendable without WIFOM]

Heh... XD That read pretty funny.

Anyway, you've just kicked yourself in the teeth with your own defense here. Hell, if you were an idiot, you would at least have some excuse for following up on my weak attack. But if you're refusing that hypothesis, then you're encouraging me to think that you really are scum that fell into a day 1 trap and don't like it one bit. Smooth, dude.

2: To push, to get a reaction, which I then found scummy. He panicked, look at my previous post.

No, he hadn't panicked. He got annoyed, and appears to be getting progressively more annoyed as the game continues; primarily due to your own pathetic attempts to declare him scum when the evidence mounted against him is decisively less than that gathered against you, even if we exclude the fact that you fell into my gambit. I also find it interesting that you took this moment to completely ignore my point that you're being far, far too curt in your answers. I take it that's another one of those thigs there's no point in defending, eh? >.>

3: Who is giving advice, and why would I be posting this much, when I could be lurking. [WIFOM again]

Already answered the first part of this. As for the latter... well, that's true. That is a WIFOM question. However, you're attempting to divert the conversation away from what I was talking about. I was pointing out the fact that your answers to most everything thus far has been exceedingly short. Single sentence, in most instances, which I have always found distasteful and disruptive to town affairs in IRC games. It prevents town from gathering the information it sorely needs from every player, and allows scum to blend in uite easily.

However, while you have been active - having responded to every question in a timely manner - you have nonetheless refused to go beyond muttering much more than one sentence, more often than not. That simply isn't a townie attitude.

4:I see no need to tunnel, and usefulness is relative.

Now you're conflicting with our own advice. You're telling other people to pressure constantly until they have an answer, and then avoid doing exactly that. So, to put it into layman's terms, you're acting in the exact opposite way that you propose regular town should act. The only time you changed your tune was when I set up a potential bandwagon on Elegy, which - in turn - fell flat on its face.

Whoops. >.>

5: And here would belong the meta argument.

Oh, shut up. You haven't refuted a damn thing I've said, and only made yourself look even more scummy in the process.

long post is looooooooooong... wow, Glenfiddich is fierce. The Scots know their whiskey, even if they're a dour, unclouth lot I can't stand to speak with because I find them incomprehensible...

Oh, also:

Well I was incorrect, there is still Azure.

Still me what? What'chu talkin' 'bout?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on October 23, 2010, 10:46:30 pm
Still me what? What'chu talkin' 'bout?
Only you and Flintus still supporting Elegy in his vote against Ottofar.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Elegy on October 23, 2010, 10:50:38 pm
KS, why so interested in making it look like I'm leading a bandwagon?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on October 23, 2010, 10:52:55 pm
Ahh, right. You're wrong, though; I'm not supporting anyone in this lynch. I'm voting for Otto for my own reasons, not for Elegy's. Can't answer for Flintus, though. I wasn't even aware he was voting for Otto. >.>
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on October 23, 2010, 10:58:31 pm
KS, why so interested in making it look like I'm leading a bandwagon?
Ahh, right. You're wrong, though; I'm not supporting anyone in this lynch. I'm voting for Otto for my own reasons, not for Elegy's. Can't answer for Flintus, though. I wasn't even aware he was voting for Otto. >.>
Just saying what he said.  It doesn't reflect my views.  He's the one who used the word 'support'.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Murphy on October 23, 2010, 11:00:48 pm
Ragnarok has cast his vote, yet said almost nothing. Also said nothing to protect himself. My question, even though stupid it may be, went unanswered. Though Ragnarok still looks more newbie-townish than scummish to me.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on October 23, 2010, 11:02:52 pm
Ah, kk. I just caught my name in a post and wondered what he was on about. >.>
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Ottofar on October 24, 2010, 02:41:35 am
Azure, point me to a game, where I have answered more thoroughly
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Flintus10 on October 24, 2010, 02:45:26 am
Flintus, now that Kaminasquirtle has unvoted, you're the only one supporting elegy in his vote.
So what new evidence have you gathered, since you last posted, that would support your accusation?

I see very little real evidence as Ottofar has yet to post too much substance I do know for certain he still has not provided evidence that gives any reason for him to have been initially suspicious of elegy and his only excuse was essentially that he agreed with Azure's points and what do you know it turns out they were not based on anything either so Ottofar has essentially just voted for Elegy because someone else was.

I am almost certain that Ottofar is scum.

Also he is yet to come up with a reasonable defence for his actions and is instead just trying to shift suspicion onto Elegy
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on October 24, 2010, 08:12:00 am
Azure, point me to a game, where I have answered more thoroughly

Fair point, then; so you're okay with making a habit of using a playing style that's detrimental to the town. Sure thing, bro.

You still haven't adequately explained why you tried to initially lynch Elegy (beyond using my own fabricated reasons), nor have you explained why you play in a completely different way from the method you recommended to Mindmaker. Nor why you still insist on lynching Elegy despite having nothing to go on. The fact that you actually tried to get him lynched on nothing more than a 'gut feeling' is just plain laughable.  Try harder, scum.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Toaster on October 24, 2010, 11:59:30 am
Vote Count:

ragnarok97071: {1} Spade
Flintus10: {1} Mindmaker
Mindmaker: {0}
Elegy: {1} Ottofar
Ottofar: {3} Flintus10, Elegy, Azure Sepulchre
KaminaSquirtle: {0}
Spade: {0}
Azure Sepulchre: {0}
Murphy: {1} ragnarok97071

Not Voting: Murphy, KaminaSquirtle

Day 1 ends Wednesday 10/27 11 PM EST
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Ottofar on October 24, 2010, 12:23:14 pm
Azure, point me to a game, where I have answered more thoroughly

Fair point, then; so you're okay with making a habit of using a playing style that's detrimental to the town. Sure thing, bro.

You still haven't adequately explained why you tried to initially lynch Elegy (beyond using my own fabricated reasons), nor have you explained why you play in a completely different way from the method you recommended to Mindmaker. Nor why you still insist on lynching Elegy despite having nothing to go on. The fact that you actually tried to get him lynched on nothing more than a 'gut feeling' is just plain laughable.  Try harder, scum.

Yeah. I'm gonna hang today, concencrate on someone else. By lynching me, you'll be one step closer to LyLo.

I at first pushed him, with your argument. He reacted, and the reaction occurred for me as uncomfortable, and for you as annoyed1. I then proceeded to push, and you revealed your gambit. This is where I find Elegy's posts gain more confidence, as he doesn't seem to get lynched today, and less people suspect him.

1, you're not defending him, are you?

Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on October 24, 2010, 01:35:14 pm
Quote
Yeah. I'm gonna hang today, concencrate on someone else. By lynching me, you'll be one step closer to LyLo.

Yeah, I think I can ignore you now. If you're content to die and let an actual scum lynch go, then you ain't town. If you hadn't said that but kept on fighting instead, I might've ended up believing you. Too bad, so sad. >.>

Quote
1, you're not defending him, are you?

Heh; cute soft attack you got there - it being especially funny that it's directed at the person who's initial argument you're trying to use. XD

Anyway, telling you how his posts came across to me ain't defending - it was a clarification on my position, necessary for bringing my opinion across. Just as you pointing out he seemed scummy to you was your own clarificaion. Perhaps he really is scum; perhaps he isn't. Regardless, I'm sure you are, so this conversation is moot.

Murphy, Kamina - time to get off the bench and press a little harder, guys. What's your opinion on the Ottofar/Elegy situation? Have you got any leads of your own, any scumtell's you've noticed? Or do both plan to stay on the sidelines? Pretty suspicious behaviour, that.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Mindmaker on October 24, 2010, 03:22:54 pm
The situation is going out of hand.
I really don't like the constellation around Elegy, however there isn't much I can do about it.

Ragnarok/Kamina/Spade/Murphy what do you think of the situation?
Are the accusations against Ottofar justified? Or did the mafia just found a good opportunity to lynch a townie?

Unvote.
Flinutus just seems to have been drawn into the bandwagon, however Azure seems to know exactly what he is doing.
And so does Elegy.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: ragnarok97071 on October 24, 2010, 03:28:17 pm
In my opinion, they make a lot of sense. not quite enough to add my vote to his massive pile of votes, but they do make sense.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Elegy on October 24, 2010, 04:20:37 pm
The situation is going out of hand.
I really don't like the constellation around Elegy, however there isn't much I can do about it.

And so does Elegy.

Huh?

Because I was attacked by someone acting scummy, and then voted for them I'm suddenly a mastermind?

This game is weird. No one has used a single scrap of evidence against me, and yet I'm seen as this "Constellation".
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on October 24, 2010, 05:29:59 pm
Murphy, Kamina - time to get off the bench and press a little harder, guys. What's your opinion on the Ottofar/Elegy situation? Have you got any leads of your own, any scumtell's you've noticed? Or do both plan to stay on the sidelines? Pretty suspicious behaviour, that.
You claim me to be on the bench and not ragnarok?  He's contibuted nothing to the town over the entire game, and has refused to respond to people calling this out.  Seems pretty scummy to me.
Ragnarok/Kamina/Spade/Murphy what do you think of the situation?
Are the accusations against Ottofar justified? Or did the mafia just found a good opportunity to lynch a townie?
Azure has a good argument against Ottofar going.
But Azure, while pushing so hard against Ottofar, has completely ignored ragnarok's silence.  They may be the scum.  Why are you ignoring ragnarok's lack of contribution to the town, Azure?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on October 24, 2010, 07:04:34 pm
You claim me to be on the bench and not ragnarok?  He's contibuted nothing to the town over the entire game, and has refused to respond to people calling this out.  Seems pretty scummy to me.

Azure has a good argument against Ottofar going.
But Azure, while pushing so hard against Ottofar, has completely ignored ragnarok's silence.  They may be the scum.  Why are you ignoring ragnarok's lack of contribution to the town, Azure?

I called out you two because you were the only two that weren't voting in the latest count. I'll admit I have been focusing too much on one person, though; I've missed most of what's been said, and what I have seen I've skimmed unless it pertained to my case against Otto.

As for ignoring ragnarok's apparent silence... well, umm... >.>

In my opinion, they make a lot of sense. not quite enough to add my vote to his massive pile of votes, but they do make sense.

But I have my own questions about this, anyway, and my vote is secure against Otto, so I can scope out everyone else now before day ends.

On that note, enlighten me, ragnarok: if my attacks on Otto actually make sense to you, then why aren't you joining in? What else do you have that is worth pursuing? How do you intend to respond to the fairly large amount of pressure mounting against you from questions you've left unanswered and your lapses into silence? If you think I have a case against Otto, then what's your opinion of the case against Elegy?

Also, my favourite:

Flinutus just seems to have been drawn into the bandwagon, however Azure seems to know exactly what he is doing.
And so does Elegy.

What is this? Seriously, what the fuck is this? How do I even respond to this? 'How dare you try to lure scum into a trap, play fair like the rest of us sheep town'? Psh. >.>

I don't appreciate you lumping me in with Elegy, either. Had Otto used any kind of proper evidence to mount an attack on Elegy instead of the rubbish I coughed up, or - better yet - totally ignored me along with everyone else, then I would have stayed on Elegy under a fierce impression he actually was scum. A quick, apparently easy bandwagon is a difficult thing for scum to pass up on, so if I was ignored then it would've meant I'd picked out one of the scum as my target, and his buddy didn't want to risk a bandwagon on his pal day 1.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Flintus10 on October 24, 2010, 07:50:28 pm
Flinutus just seems to have been drawn into the bandwagon
1. That would be a reason to find me suspicious yet you decided to FOS two other people

...annnnddd 2. If you read back you will realise I was the first person to vote for Ottofar and provide an actual case against him, explain to me how that is bandwagoning?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Spade on October 24, 2010, 07:54:25 pm
I was away for around a day again. (That's an answer to Otto's 'where are you?' post. It's too far back for me to quote.)

In my opinion, they make a lot of sense. not quite enough to add my vote to his massive pile of votes, but they do make sense.

You're still not saying not saying anything useful, ragnarok. Do you actually have something good to say or maybe even a question?

Quote
Ragnarok/Kamina/Spade/Murphy what do you think of the situation?
Are the accusations against Ottofar justified? Or did the mafia just found a good opportunity to lynch a townie?
I'm unsure. Of course it's possible none of the people voting for them is maf, but that's three people on one person.
My guess would be that one of them is a maf trying to lynch a townie or their scumbuddy.


Ottofar: Who do you think(if you think), of the people voting you, has the best or worst argument about it?


Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Flintus10 on October 24, 2010, 07:55:09 pm
also Mindmaker what is your read on Ottofar?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: ragnarok97071 on October 24, 2010, 08:16:22 pm
I apologise for not posting much, got a lot of things going on right now, and in any case, I try not to put something up unless It is important. not a very good strategy for Mafia, I guess. anyway, I think that a vote at this point in the game would be founded more on random suspicion than any reasoned deduction of who is actually on the scumteam. Really, I think we'd be better off waiting untill we have some evidence to lynch anyone. right now, we have random guesswork, decently laid traps, and mob mentality to discern the scum. from this turns effects, we may be able to deduce, from who is killed, and what their suspicions were, who is likely to need lynching. on that note, I guess...
unvote
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Elegy on October 24, 2010, 08:24:33 pm
I apologise for not posting much, got a lot of things going on right now, and in any case, I try not to put something up unless It is important. not a very good strategy for Mafia, I guess. anyway, I think that a vote at this point in the game would be founded more on random suspicion than any reasoned deduction of who is actually on the scumteam. Really, I think we'd be better off waiting untill we have some evidence to lynch anyone. right now, we have random guesswork, decently laid traps, and mob mentality to discern the scum. from this turns effects, we may be able to deduce, from who is killed, and what their suspicions were, who is likely to need lynching. on that note, I guess...
unvote

I guess it's pretty easy to see the game from this perspective if you're not used to playing it a few times. The thing is, out of all the people posting so far, one or two people are going to fuck up and do something scummy. Ottofar is that one person in our game. He attacked me for no reason other than to bandwagon with someone who wasn't actually attacking me at all, his defense was feeble (if it existed at all) and he has tried to (unsuccesfully) shift off a lot of suspicion from himself. Right now, he is the person who is acting the most scummy, that's why I am voting for him, and that's probably why others are, too (although I can't speak for them).

If we just go no-lynch today, what do we get? Well, for one, we don't get to see if Ottofar truly is scum or not (assuming he is lynched), and a random townie dies during the night. Had the situation been different, say if no one had made any scummy moves so far, I might agree with you, but that is not the case, and that's why I continue to vote for the person who I think is scum.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on October 24, 2010, 09:57:49 pm
Azure, point me to a game, where I have answered more thoroughly

Fair point, then; so you're okay with making a habit of using a playing style that's detrimental to the town. Sure thing, bro.

You still haven't adequately explained why you tried to initially lynch Elegy (beyond using my own fabricated reasons), nor have you explained why you play in a completely different way from the method you recommended to Mindmaker. Nor why you still insist on lynching Elegy despite having nothing to go on. The fact that you actually tried to get him lynched on nothing more than a 'gut feeling' is just plain laughable.  Try harder, scum.

Yeah. I'm gonna hang today, concencrate on someone else. By lynching me, you'll be one step closer to LyLo.

I at first pushed him, with your argument. He reacted, and the reaction occurred for me as uncomfortable, and for you as annoyed1. I then proceeded to push, and you revealed your gambit. This is where I find Elegy's posts gain more confidence, as he doesn't seem to get lynched today, and less people suspect him.

1, you're not defending him, are you?

If he were scum, why would he lead such a hard push against you?  If you turn out to be town, then he would make himself highly suspect.  The only way I could see him being scum is if you were both scum, in which case lynching you would still be a good idea.

If Elegy were town though, his posts would still gain more confidence.  Being town doesn't make you exempt from lynching, and thus being nervous.  And honestly he just looked pissed off the entire time, which is understandable as multiple people were trying to lynch him for no real reason.

Azure's arguments are convincing and you have not given any kind of satisfactory counterargument.  And honestly even if you're town, we'll learn a lot from lynching you, Ottofar.

If we just go no-lynch today, what do we get? Well, for one, we don't get to see if Ottofar truly is scum or not (assuming he is lynched), and a random townie dies during the night. Had the situation been different, say if no one had made any scummy moves so far, I might agree with you, but that is not the case, and that's why I continue to vote for the person who I think is scum.
Exactly, the information gained from Ottofar's death will be invaluable.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Mindmaker on October 25, 2010, 12:11:36 am
If you read back you will realise I was the first person to vote for Ottofar and provide an actual case against him, explain to me how that is bandwagoning?

With drawn in, I mean that the mafia did see a good opportunity in your vote and picked the same target.
As to your second question, I'll answer it in the evening, as I'll be heading to work soon.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Murphy on October 25, 2010, 12:19:18 am
Quote
Ragnarok/Kamina/Spade/Murphy what do you think of the situation?
Are the accusations against Ottofar justified? Or did the mafia just found a good opportunity to lynch a townie?
Justified, I think. I'm only reluctant to vote because it is always better to find my own reason than blindly follow someone else. In other words, I'm keeping an eye on him and waiting for more scumtells which I could spot myself and not just be told of them by others.

However, I fail to see any scummy behaviour from Elegy, yet Ottofar continues to press. If he would back off, he might actually get away with this, I think. If he's a mafia, he would surely realize that. Maybe he's not scum, he's just stupidly stubborn. If this was not day 1, I would say this sounds like cop to me. On the other hand, it is day 1...

I would vote if there wasn't much time left, but right now I can afford to clear things up a bit for myself, right?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Murphy on October 25, 2010, 12:54:00 am
Ottofar, you seem to think that finding someone who's being voted for, then pressing on him until he panics and breaks is likely to yield scumtells. Did this tactic work for you when you were playing town in the past games?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Flintus10 on October 25, 2010, 01:03:10 am
Azure You have any reads on who you might think the second scum is?

Murphy If Ottofar does somehow flip town what do you think will happen next?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Murphy on October 25, 2010, 02:02:06 am
Murphy If Ottofar does somehow flip town what do you think will happen next?
I'm almost sure Azure will then survive the night, because he would either be mafia himself or a good daytime target for them to blame.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Toaster on October 25, 2010, 03:08:29 pm
Vote Count:

ragnarok97071: {1} Spade
Flintus10: {0}
Mindmaker: {0}
Elegy: {1} Ottofar
Ottofar: {4} Flintus10, Elegy, Azure Sepulchre, KaminaSquirtle
KaminaSquirtle: {0}
Spade: {0}
Azure Sepulchre: {0}
Murphy: {0}

Not Voting: Murphy, Mindmaker, ragnarok97071

Day 1 ends Wednesday 10/27 11 PM EST
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Flintus10 on October 25, 2010, 07:43:36 pm
My guess would be that one of them is a maf trying to lynch a townie or their scumbuddy.
Well do you any guess as to which of the four it is?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Ottofar on October 26, 2010, 07:50:30 am
Sorry I wasn't on yesterday, had terrible migraine. I'm still having a headache, but I'll do something.
Ottofar, you seem to think that finding someone who's being voted for, then pressing on him until he panics and breaks is likely to yield scumtells. Did this tactic work for you when you were playing town in the past games?
Actually, this is my first game I tried to push this hard. But I've seen it work.


I was away for around a day again. (That's an answer to Otto's 'where are you?' post. It's too far back for me to quote.)

In my opinion, they make a lot of sense. not quite enough to add my vote to his massive pile of votes, but they do make sense.

You're still not saying not saying anything useful, ragnarok. Do you actually have something good to say or maybe even a question?

Quote
Ragnarok/Kamina/Spade/Murphy what do you think of the situation?
Are the accusations against Ottofar justified? Or did the mafia just found a good opportunity to lynch a townie?
I'm unsure. Of course it's possible none of the people voting for them is maf, but that's three people on one person.
My guess would be that one of them is a maf trying to lynch a townie or their scumbuddy.


Ottofar: Who do you think(if you think), of the people voting you, has the best or worst argument about it?

Flintus, with no argument at all.

I don't personally think Azure is scum, but am I the only one to notice, that Elegy lurks, until called out, letting Azure's (unintentional[?]) chainsaw do the defending. 

I've stated a couple of times now, that I only used Azure's argument to push.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on October 26, 2010, 09:02:12 am
I don't personally think Azure is scum, but am I the only one to notice, that Elegy lurks, until called out, letting Azure's (unintentional[?]) chainsaw do the defending. 
Elegy:  What is your response to this comment?  Is it justified?  Why or why not?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on October 26, 2010, 11:48:53 am
Hmm... quite a lot of questions pointed at me, here, and a couple of things I want to address too. I have to go soon, but I'll see how many I can answer in about 5 minutes.

Actually, this is my first game I tried to push this hard. But I've seen it work.

Bayer used this tactic in the last Beginner's game, like I already said. It winded up with him calling the Godfather town, allowed me as Maf to score a lynch on a scummy player, and would have been a very easy lynch himself for the next day, had the game not been killed by lurkers - lurkers primarily brought on by how Bayer was playing, according to the post-game review. Perhaps one of us would have died before the end of the game, had we let our guard down and had the game been allowed to continue, but I doubt it.

Point being? Over-aggression kills more than townies, if left unleashed. =/

I've stated a couple of times now, that I only used Azure's argument to push.


Why do you think I used that particular quote of yours, when I called you out? The one where you ultimately declared - declared - that Elegy was scum? Because it was at exactly that point where you didn't think you needed to push any more. If you hadn't tried to dismiss him as scum while still trying to use my bogus argument, thn I wouldn't have my vote on you right now. Fancy that, huh?

I'm almost sure Azure will then survive the night, because he would either be mafia himself or a good daytime target for them to blame.

But he ain't, so I'm probably dead. Ah, well; good luck tomorrow, guys.

Azure You have any reads on who you might think the second scum is?

Since I'm probably a dead man, I'll offer my suspects:

Kamina - I never trust the fourth/third people on a scum lynch, and since I'm the third and I have an actual agrument, I can only suspect the fourth. In my experience in IRC games, it's more often scum bussig their team mate than anything else. This is highly speculative, of course, and relies on statistical information too heavily to be of much use in an individual game... but I noticed he sat on the fence for quite a while, before he joined the Otto lynch. Almost as if hoping he could pull off a lynch on Elegy instead. He also seemed much more interested in my reasons for lynching Otto than Otto's for lynching Elegy, despite the fact that mine were much clearer.

Mindmaker - I just can't forget this:

Flinutus just seems to have been drawn into the bandwagon, however Azure seems to know exactly what he is doing.
And so does Elegy.

This was such a lazy attempt to turn the town against an Otto lynch that its almost laughable. It just sounds like he's whining that the argument against Otto make's too much sense. For this alone, he's about equal with Kamina on my list of scum-partners.

Flintus - He's on the other end of the spectrum, for the moment. He caught on to the basis of my trap against Otto before I'd even posted it, and was the first person to vote for him; absolving him instantly of any 'bandwagoning' claim - and didn't try to back off onto Elegy when things clearly went south for Otto. However - even if I don't believe this myself - I should still point out that, if Otto does actually flip town, then you should consider my position on Flintus reversed assuming I'm dead. Make of that what you will.

Everyone else I'm still in two minds about. Consider yourselves about equal, depending on the outcome of tomorrow.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Mindmaker on October 26, 2010, 12:45:42 pm
Mindmaker - I just can't forget this:

Flinutus just seems to have been drawn into the bandwagon, however Azure seems to know exactly what he is doing.
And so does Elegy.

This was the final part, which was supposed to justify my unvote. Nothing more, nothing less.
It's just great how you just take a part of my post, ignoring the rest and try to picture me as an instigator.

This was such a lazy attempt to turn the town against an Otto lynch that its almost laughable. It just sounds like he's whining that the argument against Otto make's too much sense. For this alone, he's about equal with Kamina on my list of scum-partners.

If you would have looked at the upper part of the post, you would have seen that it was an inquiry, about what the others thought about the whole situation.
With all the lurking going on, I thought they too couldn't make heads or tails out of it.

So you think I'm trying to help Ottofar?
You're wrong.
Ever heard of the underdog syndrome?
I would be sceptic, if the situation was the other way round, too.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Bandages on October 26, 2010, 01:02:03 pm
Elegy has been banned and needs a replacement.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on October 26, 2010, 01:26:24 pm
Kamina - I never trust the fourth/third people on a scum lynch, and since I'm the third and I have an actual agrument, I can only suspect the fourth. In my experience in IRC games, it's more often scum bussig their team mate than anything else. This is highly speculative, of course, and relies on statistical information too heavily to be of much use in an individual game... but I noticed he sat on the fence for quite a while, before he joined the Otto lynch. Almost as if hoping he could pull off a lynch on Elegy instead. He also seemed much more interested in my reasons for lynching Otto than Otto's for lynching Elegy, despite the fact that mine were much clearer.
I sat on the fence because there was talk about bandwagoning, and I didn't want to be accused of that.  So I tried to look for an original argument against Ottofar I could use, so I wouldn't appear to be looking for an easy lynch, I was hoping Ottofar would post something more I could use against him.  But his posts of late have been quite lacking, so I decided what the hell, he's pretty obviously scum.  Should I have held my peace indefinitely?

Remember this is my first game, so I have gotten a much better idea of how things work than I did in the beginning.  I will make sure to do my best to dissect Ottofar's next post, to prove myself.

Elegy has been banned and needs a replacement.
This should help establish whether Elegy was scum or not, as we will get to see the same role being played by different people. 
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Mindmaker on October 26, 2010, 01:35:07 pm
So I've reread the thread up to the point where Ottofar has got 3 votes on him.

Is it allowed to quote text passages from back then? Or is there a limit of how far back in post history you can go?
Also where the hell can I find out when 11pm EST is supposed to be? Could anyone tell me what this is in GMT?
That's important, as I might ask for an extension, if my questions go by unanswered, by the time the day passes.

So Azure, why did you unvote Elegy, even though his answers were curt, evasive and unfriendly.
After you unvoted him, you suddenly lost all interest in him.
Why is that?

I'd rather not accuse you of anything, before I heard your answer, but given that we are running out of time, I'll do it anyway.
Could it be that this was an elaborate trap of the mafia?
Let me suggest a possibility.

We have scum A and scum B.
Scum B acuses scum A of being scum, which results in scum B acting agressive, tight-lipped and evasive.
Scum A then waits for reactions of the other players.
A townie eagerly points out the flaws in scum Bs answers.
Then a heated argument between scum B and the townie, which makes them both seem suspicious.
This is when scum A enters the scene again and supports scum B in his argument.
Now it's the time for scum B to keep posting to a minimum to escape further suspicion, while scum A takes over his argument.

It's one of many possible scenarios, but it's one we might give a try.

Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Toaster on October 26, 2010, 01:39:14 pm
Elegy is up for replacement.

I have PMed Jetsquirrel (who wanted to join late) and asked him if he wanted to replace in.

11:00:00 p.m. Wednesday October 27, 2010 in US/Eastern converts to 03:00:00 a.m. Thursday October 28, 2010 in GMT, approximately 32 hours and 20 minutes from this post.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Toaster on October 26, 2010, 02:32:46 pm
Jetsquirrel has replaced Elegy.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on October 26, 2010, 02:54:02 pm
Jetsquirrel:  How do you intend to play differently than Elegy?  How well would you say he played, on a scale of 1-10?  Why?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Spade on October 26, 2010, 02:58:09 pm
Jetsquirrel: What do you think of the situation? Do you find anyone suspicious?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: ragnarok97071 on October 26, 2010, 03:54:47 pm
Now that i'm back from school and reread the thread...
Ragnarok,
er... I have no idea what to ask...
Okay, what do you think of the cop role? How would you play it?
I'd probably use it to identify the persons who I see as suspicious and covertly point the angry mob in their direction. It's a useful role, as the player can find out what side the target is on, in a reliable manner.
Ragnarok,  if you have been keeping track, why did you land third vote on Murphy?
Because at the time, he looked untrustworthy. I'm not so sure of that anymore, however, and this is partly why I am not voting for Ottofar right now. He's already dead, and I see no reason to compound that without more compelling evidence, as I have said.

Also @Ragnarok
probably just a newbie mistake but adding a third vote to someone for absolutely no reason during RVS is reasonably suspicious and looks like a bandwagon vote so slight FOS on you for that scummy action.
I'll keep that in mind. As I said, he looked somewhat suspicious at the time. As you said, probably a Newbie mistake.
ragnarok: if my attacks on Otto actually make sense to you, then why aren't you joining in? What else do you have that is worth pursuing? How do you intend to respond to the fairly large amount of pressure mounting against you from questions you've left unanswered and your lapses into silence? If you think I have a case against Otto, then what's your opinion of the case against Elegy?
I'm not joining in because at this point, one vote one way or another won't really matter, will it? all it would do is make it look like i'm scum and waste a turn whenever you decide that I need to be lynched. On the case of Elegy, I have very little opinion on him. He looks somewhat suspicious, but as I have said, I have learned not to vote for someone unless I have good reason to see them as scum.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on October 26, 2010, 04:09:22 pm
Because at the time, he looked untrustworthy. I'm not so sure of that anymore, however, and this is partly why I am not voting for Ottofar right now. He's already dead, and I see no reason to compound that without more compelling evidence, as I have said.
What exactly did you find to look untrustworthy?
I'm not joining in because at this point, one vote one way or another won't really matter, will it? all it would do is make it look like i'm scum and waste a turn whenever you decide that I need to be lynched. On the case of Elegy, I have very little opinion on him. He looks somewhat suspicious, but as I have said, I have learned not to vote for someone unless I have good reason to see them as scum.
You don't need to join in with a vote, just help the argument against him.  Mind you, there isn't much chance to do that until he posts again.  Just try to find something to contribute somewhere.  That's how you avoid looking like scum.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Flintus10 on October 26, 2010, 06:45:08 pm
Mindmaker apart from calling him "the underdog" you are still yet to actually give me a proper opinion on Ottofar, do you or do you not think he is scum? Why?

Also in your little scenario who do you think is scum B and who do you think is scum A??? I have replaced the letters with who I think you suspect and have come up with nothing

 You seem to be determined to lynch Elegy/Jetsquirrel based only on the fact that they were agressive (a point which is moot now as Jet will play both townie and scum differently.) Are you still willing to suspect him?

Sorry for all the questions but I really do need an answer to them all.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on October 26, 2010, 06:59:49 pm
Elegy has been banned and needs a replacement.

wat

Well, whatever. Can we get an extension? Jet needs time to catch up on the game so far, and we all need to get a feel of the new player.

On that note, Jet: What have you discovered from the last Beginner's game? Is there anything you've learned about playing as town or as scum from observing how it all unfolded? How well do you think this knowledge will apply to this game? What are your thoughts on the game up to this point; particularly on the Otto/Elegy contest and Otto's current predicament?

Actually, since several players of the last Beginner game are now in this one, I'd recommend that some of you read over the last game - it isn't all that long, having died not long after the start of day 2 - if you'd like to use some meta arguments. :P At the very least, it'll show you why Otto's proposed method of play isn't the only kind nor necessarily the best, and could give you an idea of how Jet plays before he posts.

This was the final part, which was supposed to justify my unvote. Nothing more, nothing less.
It's just great how you just take a part of my post, ignoring the rest and try to picture me as an instigator.

I was actually pointing out the fact that you FOS'd me on the basis of apparently having some idea of 'what I was doing'. So because I'd tried out a scum trap, I should be condemned as scummy myself? I don't understand the reasoning behind it. I can at least understand one on Elegy, but it's like you FOS'd me for being town. =/

If you would have looked at the upper part of the post, you would have seen that it was an inquiry, about what the others thought about the whole situation.
With all the lurking going on, I thought they too couldn't make heads or tails out of it.

So you think I'm trying to help Ottofar?
You're wrong.
Ever heard of the underdog syndrome?
I would be sceptic, if the situation was the other way round, too.

I'm wrong? Oh, well, I apologise for making such awful presumptions!

Rooting for an underdog in Mafia has as good a chance of sparing a Maf lynch as saving a Town. Just be sure you have more than some sense of justice or morality to uphold before you consider siding with another player, or you'll be dragged down with them if they're not as clean as you'd suspected.

On the other hand, this is still a Beginner's game, and I'm more used to games where people have less time to think through what they say... hmph, and the fact that Jet has joined the game, too, has served to remind me how easily I managed to manipulate his posts. I still suspect you more than most others because of your sheer determination to stick by Otto, but not to such a strong degree. A pinky finger at best, Mindmaker. lolucwotididthar

Considering how things have gone, though, you're still my top lynch for tomorrow.

Click link to see post - deleted content to cut down the size of my post. 

Eh, fair points. I'll hold you to that, though, when Otto posts. If, rather. >.> Assuming you'll make stronger moves in day 2 if you don't get a chance against Otto, I'll defer judgement of you for now.

Also, I'd simply rather Elegy just answered whatever questions were put to him than to have him simply replaced. A new person playing as a replacement can easily shift everyone's opinions if they let him, but at the same time old prejudices could get him killed because of who he used to be. Not like there's a choice in the matter, but... eh. Don't mean I have to like losing the information I already have. >.>

So Azure, why did you unvote Elegy, even though his answers were curt, evasive and unfriendly.
After you unvoted him, you suddenly lost all interest in him.
Why is that?

Otto's answers were just as curt - if not moreso - by comparison (which, I might add, was a point I let go of because he's like that in most games), and Elegy comes across as unfriendly in many games regardless of his character template, from what I've seen and heard. As for evasiveness... I don't recall seeing him acting evasive. I saw him getting annoyed, and little else - as I would be, under the circumstances. How can I call him out on something like that if I would act the same way?

For your second point: because Otto had captured my interest. Hell, wasn't that obvious? I mean, I've paid about as much attention to Elegy since then as I have to... say, Murphy, this game, but you haven't brought that into question. I had to concentrate on Otto, to make sure he hadn't just stumbled into the elephant trap by accident - I mean, let's face it, that trap on its own wasn't enough to secure a lynch on anyone. I needed to be sure he wasn't town, so I continued to press the advantage the gambit gave me. Personally, I'm as sure right now as I can be that he isn't town.

We have scum A(zure) and scum Bee(legy).
Scum B acuses scum A of being scum, which results in scum B acting agressive, tight-lipped and evasive.
Scum A then waits for reactions of the other players.
A townie eagerly points out the flaws in scum Bs answers.
Then a heated argument between scum B and the townie, which makes them both seem suspicious.
This is when scum A enters the scene again and supports scum B in his argument.
Now it's the time for scum B to keep posting to a minimum to escape further suspicion, while scum A takes over his argument.

It's one of many possible scenarios, but it's one we might give a try.

lol, that's some knack for subtlety you got thar.

But getting back to the point at hand, I'd considered that, too - at least, I'd considered the gambit might appear as such, but figured it would look like that to some people no matter who I used it on. But there isn't such a thing as a fool-proof method of finding scum. It was risky in execution, but so is every move in Mafia. Would you prefer that we ask one another inane questions until the Maf outnumber the Town?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Toaster on October 26, 2010, 09:28:04 pm
Vote Count:

ragnarok97071: {1} Spade
Flintus10: {0}
Mindmaker: {0}
Jetsquirrel: {1} Ottofar
Ottofar: {4} Flintus10, Jetsquirrel, Azure Sepulchre, KaminaSquirtle
KaminaSquirtle: {0}
Spade: {0}
Azure Sepulchre: {0}
Murphy: {0}

Not Voting: Murphy, Mindmaker, ragnarok97071

Day 1 ends Wednesday 10/27 11 PM EST

One extension request heard.  Will extend 24 hours with two more requests.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on October 26, 2010, 09:54:12 pm
One extension request heard.  Will extend 24 hours with two more requests.
Request seconded.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Spade on October 26, 2010, 09:56:48 pm
extension.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Flintus10 on October 26, 2010, 10:39:59 pm
Extension
My guess would be that one of them is a maf trying to lynch a townie or their scumbuddy.
Well do you any guess as to which of the four it is?
Spade
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on October 26, 2010, 10:40:30 pm
Extension, to be official about it.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on October 26, 2010, 10:41:34 pm
Extension
My guess would be that one of them is a maf trying to lynch a townie or their scumbuddy.
Well do you any guess as to which of the four it is?
Spade
What?  Spade is voting ragnarok.
Are you suggesting they are the scum?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Spade on October 26, 2010, 10:44:09 pm
No, they were reminding me of the question.

I currently don't know. It probably depends on whether or not Ottofar is town or mafia.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on October 26, 2010, 10:48:46 pm
Oh ok, that makes more sense.
Eagerly awaiting Ottofar's next post/lynching.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Flintus10 on October 26, 2010, 10:51:17 pm
No, they were reminding me of the question.

I currently don't know. It probably depends on whether or not Ottofar is town or mafia.

really? because your quote seems to say you think one of those voting for ottofar is mafia regardless of his alignment

And Kamina i really doubt ottofar will post anything of substance as he seems resigned to his lynch like a good scum would be
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Murphy on October 27, 2010, 12:00:48 am
Yeah, I'm for extending the day too.
Jetsquirrel, will you maintain the vote Elegy has cast on Ottofar? Feel free to answer after you've taken time to familiarize yourself with the thread.
Also, do you consider your position unstable because of Elegy's actions, or do you think that there weren't any scumtells from him?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Jetsquirrel on October 27, 2010, 03:50:48 am
Jetsquirrel:  How do you intend to play differently than Elegy?  How well would you say he played, on a scale of 1-10?  Why?

Gotta read this whole thing so it's gonna take some time for a oppinion.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Spade on October 27, 2010, 05:36:17 am
No, they were reminding me of the question.

I currently don't know. It probably depends on whether or not Ottofar is town or mafia.

really? because your quote seems to say you think one of those voting for ottofar is mafia regardless of his alignment

I also mentioned that was a guess. I said it's possible they're all town.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on October 27, 2010, 06:15:21 am
And Kamina i really doubt ottofar will post anything of substance as he seems resigned to his lynch like a good scum would be
Sure looks like it.
I guess I'll just have to wait for day 2, there should be plenty to talk about then.
Or when Jetsquirrel catches up and starts posting interesting posts, that should be very interesting.
Jetsquirrel:  How do you intend to play differently than Elegy?  How well would you say he played, on a scale of 1-10?  Why?

Gotta read this whole thing so it's gonna take some time for a oppinion.
That's cool.
Eagerly looking forward to you finishing reading the thread.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Flintus10 on October 27, 2010, 08:00:49 am
No, they were reminding me of the question.

I currently don't know. It probably depends on whether or not Ottofar is town or mafia.

I also mentioned that was a guess. I said it's possible they're all town.

Fair enough you but most of your replies just seem so curt and lacking in much content so I am trying to get your opinion on things.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Ottofar on October 27, 2010, 08:03:39 am
There is no point in not lynching me, as I would screw the town over at LyLo.

Anyways, why would I resign to my lynch if I was scum. No. That'd take out 50% of all the mafia. When you lynch town, you take out 1/7th of the town.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Flintus10 on October 27, 2010, 08:16:13 am
There is no point in not lynching me, as I would screw the town over at LyLo.

Anyways, why would I resign to my lynch if I was scum. No. That'd take out 50% of all the mafia. When you lynch town, you take out 1/7th of the town.
Because if you were mafia you'd realise your screwed and just want to end it but if you were a good townie you would know you were innocent and therefor at least try to find the real mafia
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Ottofar on October 27, 2010, 08:25:38 am
There is no point in not lynching me, as I would screw the town over at LyLo.

Anyways, why would I resign to my lynch if I was scum. No. That'd take out 50% of all the mafia. When you lynch town, you take out 1/7th of the town.
Because if you were mafia you'd realise your screwed and just want to end it but if you were a good townie you would know you were innocent and therefor at least try to find the real mafia
I have. Elesquirrel.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Flintus10 on October 27, 2010, 08:30:44 am
There is no point in not lynching me, as I would screw the town over at LyLo.

Anyways, why would I resign to my lynch if I was scum. No. That'd take out 50% of all the mafia. When you lynch town, you take out 1/7th of the town.
Because if you were mafia you'd realise your screwed and just want to end it but if you were a good townie you would know you were innocent and therefor at least try to find the real mafia
I have. Elesquirrel.
So you keep saying so how about a reason he is other than "he defended himself and ma gut says that makes him scum."
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Ottofar on October 27, 2010, 08:32:14 am
I... You...

*sigh*
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Flintus10 on October 27, 2010, 08:40:32 am
Seriously after reviewing Elegy's posts I see no evidence of his confidence growing after Azure revealed his gambit they only got longer but that could just be because you also started to post more content once you realised you were screwed.

If you can prove me wrong please do so
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Toaster on October 27, 2010, 08:41:10 am
Vote Count:

ragnarok97071: {1} Spade
Flintus10: {0}
Mindmaker: {0}
Jetsquirrel: {1} Ottofar
Ottofar: {4} Flintus10, Jetsquirrel, Azure Sepulchre, KaminaSquirtle
KaminaSquirtle: {0}
Spade: {0}
Azure Sepulchre: {0}
Murphy: {0}

Not Voting: Murphy, Mindmaker, ragnarok97071

Five extension requests heard.  Day has been extended 24 hours.


Day 1 ends Thursday 10/28 11 PM EST


For reference, extensions require support from at least 33% of the players.  You may oppose extensions as well, which cancels out an extension request.  For example, if there were five players, with two requesting and one opposing, there would be no extension.  (2-1 = 1 of 5, which is 20%)  Please bold requests/opposition to extensions, or Mod/my name if you want to ask me a question in-thread.  (IE: Mod: I have a question!)
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Toaster on October 27, 2010, 08:46:56 am
MOD NOTE:

I will be out of town from late Friday to midday Monday.  I'll be able to check the game to see if there are any questions to me, but in all likelihood the night will be mod-lengthened to mid-late Monday, assuming there are no more day extensions.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on October 27, 2010, 09:21:40 am
There is no point in not lynching me, as I would screw the town over at LyLo.

Anyways, why would I resign to my lynch if I was scum. No. That'd take out 50% of all the mafia. When you lynch town, you take out 1/7th of the town.
What could you do but accept it?  I see little way out of a lynch now.
If you were town, you would have stopped this long before this point.
And of course you mentioning that a scum wouldn't let themselves die implies that you still are trying to prove your innocence, thus undermining your argument.
There is no point in not lynching me, as I would screw the town over at LyLo.

Anyways, why would I resign to my lynch if I was scum. No. That'd take out 50% of all the mafia. When you lynch town, you take out 1/7th of the town.
Because if you were mafia you'd realise your screwed and just want to end it but if you were a good townie you would know you were innocent and therefor at least try to find the real mafia
I have. Elesquirrel.
Yet you have little to no evidence, and won't try to find any other possible scum.  There has to be another one in addition to Jetsquirrel.
At this point, if you were town, why wouldn't you dump all your thoughts, so that when we see you were town, we could use them.
A real townie would try to help out his fellow townies before his death.
I... You...

*sigh*
Giving up?
Out of argument?
Despite claiming to have resigned yourself to death, you continue to fight it.  A real townie would at least attempt to make his death a credit to the team.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Ottofar on October 27, 2010, 09:54:28 am
I think I'm gonna throw the 'whatever'-gear on now. Sorry.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Mindmaker on October 27, 2010, 11:53:11 am
I was actually pointing out the fact that you FOS'd me on the basis of apparently having some idea of 'what I was doing'. So because I'd tried out a scum trap, I should be condemned as scummy myself? I don't understand the reasoning behind it. I can at least understand one on Elegy, but it's like you FOS'd me for being town. =/

If (bolded for emphasis) this was a trap, like I described it in my last post, I would have needed some planning and communication. And only two of the players here would be allowed to do that.

Rooting for an underdog in Mafia has as good a chance of sparing a Maf lynch as saving a Town. Just be sure you have more than some sense of justice or morality to uphold before you consider siding with another player, or you'll be dragged down with them if they're not as clean as you'd suspected.

Well I haven't been as active as I wanted to be in the beginning of the game and you could say I'm making up for it now.
It's like the die has been cast, whithout considering what most of the other players are thinking.

I still suspect you more than most others because of your sheer determination to stick by Otto, but not to such a strong degree. A pinky finger at best, Mindmaker. lolucwotididthar

Considering how things have gone, though, you're still my top lynch for tomorrow.

So it's already cast in stone?
Looks like you take care of people who come in your way fairly quick.
How convenient!

Either way, I "play to win".
If Ottofar turns out to be town, we might get a good lead to where the mafia is.
However if he turns out to be mafia, there's a good chance I might become the next lynch.
But if I turn out to be innocent, guess who has a good chance of getting lynched himself?

Unless of course "play to win" was meant as in "survive long enough, to be in the winning party", in which case my sacrifice would be of no earthly use.
Well it's to late to reconsider now...

Otto's answers were just as curt - if not moreso - by comparison (which, I might add, was a point I let go of because he's like that in most games), and Elegy comes across as unfriendly in many games regardless of his character template, from what I've seen and heard. As for evasiveness... I don't recall seeing him acting evasive. I saw him getting annoyed, and little else - as I would be, under the circumstances. How can I call him out on something like that if I would act the same way?

How should I know?
This is my first game of mafia, remember?
Therefore I can't give him the benefit of the doubt.

So these passages, which seem "normal" to you, seem fishy to me.

Cool.

Protip: next time you want to FoS me, have actual reasons, mate.

lol what

There's nothing I can even contend, because you're just putting words in my mouth.. So, uhhh. good? Attack?

P.s. Sidestepping is when you avoid an attack, which... I didn't do... So...

After that he simply ignored your next post.


For your second point: because Otto had captured my interest. Hell, wasn't that obvious? I mean, I've paid about as much attention to Elegy since then as I have to... say, Murphy, this game, but you haven't brought that into question. I had to concentrate on Otto, to make sure he hadn't just stumbled into the elephant trap by accident - I mean, let's face it, that trap on its own wasn't enough to secure a lynch on anyone. I needed to be sure he wasn't town, so I continued to press the advantage the gambit gave me. Personally, I'm as sure right now as I can be that he isn't town.

I have to admit it makes sense.
However you really can't compare Murphy to Elegy, if you walk into a game unprepossessed.
The answer "He always acts like that" isn't satisfactory, when you you play with a bunch of people, who don't actually know him.

lol, that's some knack for subtlety you got thar.

But getting back to the point at hand, I'd considered that, too - at least, I'd considered the gambit might appear as such, but figured it would look like that to some people no matter who I used it on. But there isn't such a thing as a fool-proof method of finding scum. It was risky in execution, but so is every move in Mafia. Would you prefer that we ask one another inane questions until the Maf outnumber the Town?

I'm sorry, if I offended you, but as I said we're running out of time.
And as I already mentioned, it's just one of many possibilities.
If I'd be absolutely sure about the accuracy of my theory, I'd have already cast my vote, wouldn't I?

Most of my points, however, might loose any substance they might have, once Jetsquirrel starts posting.
So all that's left is to wait.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Mindmaker on October 27, 2010, 11:56:47 am
Mindmaker apart from calling him "the underdog" you are still yet to actually give me a proper opinion on Ottofar, do you or do you not think he is scum? Why?

Also in your little scenario who do you think is scum B and who do you think is scum A??? I have replaced the letters with who I think you suspect and have come up with nothing

 You seem to be determined to lynch Elegy/Jetsquirrel based only on the fact that they were agressive (a point which is moot now as Jet will play both townie and scum differently.) Are you still willing to suspect him?

Sorry for all the questions but I really do need an answer to them all.

All of them should be answered in my most recent post to Azure.
To avoid redundancy, could you read it and tell me if, it there are any questions left unanswered?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Jetsquirrel on October 27, 2010, 01:49:07 pm
I can trust my gut. And I think you're too defensive. You should use more time to hunt scum, and prove yourself town that way, rather than claiming I have no evidence.

This, just THIS. Gut feeling arguments ARE the lowest possible argument that can be made in mafia games, this also indicates you want to attack the player without anything at all. But since you all cracked Ottofar, and got 3 votes on him i don't see any reason that my 4rth vote remains on him. Except ofcourse his mindless assault on Elegy ( now me)Unvote Ottofar

Jetsquirrel: What do you think of the situation? Do you find anyone suspicious?

The situation seems rather.... normal in begginer mafia games.

Jetsquirrel:  How do you intend to play differently than Elegy?  How well would you say he played, on a scale of 1-10?  Why?

Ehhhh..... dunno? I'd say 7. He seemed to defend himself properly but didn't attack anyone ( i think)

Yeah, I'm for extending the day too.
Jetsquirrel, will you maintain the vote Elegy has cast on Ottofar? Feel free to answer after you've taken time to familiarize yourself with the thread.
Also, do you consider your position unstable because of Elegy's actions, or do you think that there weren't any scumtells from him?

No, see first answer. I think that i'm in a normal position, i didn't notice any scumtells except that he was pretty passive (That means defensive> right?)
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Jetsquirrel on October 27, 2010, 01:55:00 pm
Oops forgt to write some more stuff

Edit by Post
Quote
The situation seems rather.... normal in begginer mafia games.
But i noticed Flint lurked quite much in the beggining of the game and jumped out when somebody asked him something, After answering he walked off and repeated the thing. The lurking stops i think at page 14 or 13 i think.

But i can't say much more il jsut wait for day 2 IF i dont get night killed.
Oh, and for the coming night kill i guess that Azure will get Nked, as they may find him a treat to the upcoming days.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on October 27, 2010, 02:09:32 pm
I can trust my gut. And I think you're too defensive. You should use more time to hunt scum, and prove yourself town that way, rather than claiming I have no evidence.

This, just THIS. Gut feeling arguments ARE the lowest possible argument that can be made in mafia games, this also indicates you want to attack the player without anything at all. But since you all cracked Ottofar, and got 3 votes on him i don't see any reason that my 4rth vote remains on him. Except ofcourse his mindless assault on Elegy ( now me)Unvote Ottofar
Why did you take away your vote if you aren't going to use it anywhere else?  Isn't his mindless attack on you good enough evidence to vote him?
Trying to fix a bussing attempt?
Jetsquirrel:  How do you intend to play differently than Elegy?  How well would you say he played, on a scale of 1-10?  Why?
Ehhhh..... dunno? I'd say 7. He seemed to defend himself properly but didn't attack anyone ( i think)
7, eh?  Sounds like you're trying to stay neutral as possible, as to not reveal anything important.  What do you mean he didn't attack anyone?
Do you mean he didn't contribute meaningfully?  Because he sure lashed out a lot.

I dunno, these answers seem evasive to me.  The combination of yours and Elegy's unhelpful questions and answers looks scummy to me.  I could see Otto and Elegy trying to evade suspicion by attacking each other, hoping the survivor is freed from suspicion.  And now you see how that may make you look suspicious, and decide to unvote as to alleviate that suspicion.

Oops forgt to write some more stuff

Edit by Post
Quote
The situation seems rather.... normal in begginer mafia games.
But i noticed Flint lurked quite much in the beggining of the game and jumped out when somebody asked him something, After answering he walked off and repeated the thing. The lurking stops i think at page 14 or 13 i think.

But i can't say much more il jsut wait for day 2 IF i dont get night killed.
Oh, and for the coming night kill i guess that Azure will get Nked, as they may find him a treat to the upcoming days.

I don't think azure will get nked to be honest.  He seems too likely a target.  It would mean that he was on to something more than just Ottofar being scum.  I think they'll kill someone whose suspicions are entirely off, as to throw us off the scent.
Or that could be my inexperience showing.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Spade on October 27, 2010, 02:38:36 pm
Quote
This, just THIS. Gut feeling arguments ARE the lowest possible argument that can be made in mafia games, this also indicates you want to attack the player without anything at all. But since you all cracked Ottofar, and got 3 votes on him i don't see any reason that my 4rth vote remains on him. Except ofcourse his mindless assault on Elegy ( now me)Unvote Ottofar
If the vote doesn't mean anything, why take it off? Is there a reason for you to take it off? You mention a reason for keeping it on, but you just unvote.

Quote
I don't think azure will get nked to be honest.  He seems too likely a target.  It would mean that he was on to something more than just Ottofar being scum.  I think they'll kill someone whose suspicions are entirely off, as to throw us off the scent.
Or that could be my inexperience showing.
I feel like there's some WIFOM coming from that.


Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Mindmaker on October 27, 2010, 02:57:13 pm
Edit by Post
Quote
The situation seems rather.... normal in begginer mafia games.
But i noticed Flint lurked quite much in the beggining of the game and jumped out when somebody asked him something, After answering he walked off and repeated the thing. The lurking stops i think at page 14 or 13 i think.

I noticed the same. And his answers weren't always satisfactory.
Ragnarok has posted even less and not enough to read anything out of it.
However I'm not experience enough, to judge if this is about him being new to the game or maybe something more.

Ottofar/Azure, what do you, as more experienced players, think of them?
And how do you smoke such players out of "hiding"?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Mindmaker on October 27, 2010, 03:01:57 pm
I dunno, these answers seem evasive to me.  The combination of yours and Elegy's unhelpful questions and answers looks scummy to me.  I could see Otto and Elegy trying to evade suspicion by attacking each other, hoping the survivor is freed from suspicion.  And now you see how that may make you look suspicious, and decide to unvote as to alleviate that suspicion.

Could be.
Or maybe Elegys all-out, screw-you-guys-playstyle doesn't suit him.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on October 27, 2010, 03:14:42 pm
Edit by Post
Quote
The situation seems rather.... normal in begginer mafia games.
But i noticed Flint lurked quite much in the beggining of the game and jumped out when somebody asked him something, After answering he walked off and repeated the thing. The lurking stops i think at page 14 or 13 i think.

I noticed the same. And his answers weren't always satisfactory.
Ragnarok has posted even less and not enough to read anything out of it.
However I'm not experience enough, to judge if this is about him being new to the game or maybe something more.
To me, ragnarok looks like a new townie, who doesn't know what to do.  Flintus...I don't know.  He did only stop lurking when Ottofar's lynching was pretty much assured.  Could be suspicious.
I dunno, these answers seem evasive to me.  The combination of yours and Elegy's unhelpful questions and answers looks scummy to me.  I could see Otto and Elegy trying to evade suspicion by attacking each other, hoping the survivor is freed from suspicion.  And now you see how that may make you look suspicious, and decide to unvote as to alleviate that suspicion.

Could be.
Or maybe Elegys all-out, screw-you-guys-playstyle doesn't suit him.
Maybe.  I just wanted to point out as many possibilities as possible, the more things we consider, the less chance of overlooking something essential.  I may get nked, and don't want to go out not having said something important.
Quote
I don't think azure will get nked to be honest.  He seems too likely a target.  It would mean that he was on to something more than just Ottofar being scum.  I think they'll kill someone whose suspicions are entirely off, as to throw us off the scent.
Or that could be my inexperience showing.
I feel like there's some WIFOM coming from that.
I didn't really intend it, but yeah, now that I look at it, it has layers and LAYERS of WIFOM.
It confuses the scum, though.
As does mentioning that.
And that.  Etc.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Jetsquirrel on October 27, 2010, 05:08:51 pm
I can trust my gut. And I think you're too defensive. You should use more time to hunt scum, and prove yourself town that way, rather than claiming I have no evidence.

This, just THIS. Gut feeling arguments ARE the lowest possible argument that can be made in mafia games, this also indicates you want to attack the player without anything at all. But since you all cracked Ottofar, and got 3 votes on him i don't see any reason that my 4rth vote remains on him. Except ofcourse his mindless assault on Elegy ( now me)Unvote Ottofar
Why did you take away your vote if you aren't going to use it anywhere else?  Isn't his mindless attack on you good enough evidence to vote him?
Trying to fix a bussing attempt?
DO i need to use it? That mindless attack was actually going for Elegy, its evidence that i find.... lacking. I can vote for him but will it matter now atm?

Jetsquirrel:  How do you intend to play differently than Elegy?  How well would you say he played, on a scale of 1-10?  Why?
Ehhhh..... dunno? I'd say 7. He seemed to defend himself properly but didn't attack anyone ( i think)
7, eh?  Sounds like you're trying to stay neutral as possible, as to not reveal anything important.  What do you mean he didn't attack anyone?
Do you mean he didn't contribute meaningfully?  Because he sure lashed out a lot.

I dunno, these answers seem evasive to me.  The combination of yours and Elegy's unhelpful questions and answers looks scummy to me.  I could see Otto and Elegy trying to evade suspicion by attacking each other, hoping the survivor is freed from suspicion.  And now you see how that may make you look suspicious, and decide to unvote as to alleviate that suspicion.
Interesting theory, but alas i dont have enough experience yet to pull of a bussing attempt succefully and Elegy got replaced remember? I may have other plans and Ottofar doesn't seem to be a Real threat expect a broken near-death townie. I can focus my energy to find some real scum.


Oops forgt to write some more stuff

Edit by Post
Quote
The situation seems rather.... normal in begginer mafia games.
But i noticed Flint lurked quite much in the beggining of the game and jumped out when somebody asked him something, After answering he walked off and repeated the thing. The lurking stops i think at page 14 or 13 i think.

But i can't say much more il jsut wait for day 2 IF i dont get night killed.
Oh, and for the coming night kill i guess that Azure will get Nked, as they may find him a treat to the upcoming days.

I don't think azure will get nked to be honest.  He seems too likely a target.  It would mean that he was on to something more than just Ottofar being scum.  I think they'll kill someone whose suspicions are entirely off, as to throw us off the scent.
Or that could be my inexperience showing.
I only guessed, as azure is a good player and could easly find scum. That's why the scum may want him dead, but like i said its only a GUESS


Quote
This, just THIS. Gut feeling arguments ARE the lowest possible argument that can be made in mafia games, this also indicates you want to attack the player without anything at all. But since you all cracked Ottofar, and got 3 votes on him i don't see any reason that my 4rth vote remains on him. Except ofcourse his mindless assault on Elegy ( now me)Unvote Ottofar
If the vote doesn't mean anything, why take it off? Is there a reason for you to take it off? You mention a reason for keeping it on, but you just unvote.
But would there be any difference if i would keep the vote on him?The answer is no, we cracked him. He ain't got anything more to say and or defend himself properly. Yes i could keep that vote but would it matter?But with 1 vote less he maybe feel less pressurized to actually do something usefull.


Quote
I don't think azure will get nked to be honest.  He seems too likely a target.  It would mean that he was on to something more than just Ottofar being scum.  I think they'll kill someone whose suspicions are entirely off, as to throw us off the scent.
Or that could be my inexperience showing.
I feel like there's some WIFOM coming from that.

I red the mafia wiki about the WIFOM and i still dont understan what it means. I know its WINE IN FRONT OF ME, but i don't know the rest ya know?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Jetsquirrel on October 27, 2010, 05:09:36 pm
okay hmmm the bold text may he hard to read, so il switch up the way i write next time.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Flintus10 on October 27, 2010, 06:05:38 pm
Edit by Post
Quote
The situation seems rather.... normal in begginer mafia games.
But i noticed Flint lurked quite much in the beggining of the game and jumped out when somebody asked him something, After answering he walked off and repeated the thing. The lurking stops i think at page 14 or 13 i think.

Well I did explicitly state I would be away twice and most of you post while i sleep but w/e

Edit by Post
Quote
The situation seems rather.... normal in begginer mafia games.
But i noticed Flint lurked quite much in the beggining of the game and jumped out when somebody asked him something, After answering he walked off and repeated the thing. The lurking stops i think at page 14 or 13 i think.

I noticed the same. And his answers weren't always satisfactory.

You say so much without giving any reasoning, WHAT questions didn't you like my answers to and WHY didn't you like them. Also you have actually started to post alot more content ever since Ottofar was a certainty to be lynched and I am half suspicious that may be because a scum IC may be feeding you your information. Though I haven't seen you play before so this could just be your style
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Spade on October 27, 2010, 06:09:48 pm
WIFOM is like trying to confuse.
Spoiler: example (click to show/hide)
Understand now?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on October 27, 2010, 06:18:12 pm
You're both correct and incorrect, Spade; WIFOM isn't necessarily intended to confuse, but is a never-ending logical line of reasoning with no clear solution. Your example illustrates this, (by having the town unendingly debate whether player B really is scum or not) but your definition was off a bit. I hope this makes things clearer.

I'd like to post actual content, but I have a maths test on Friday and I need to brush up on my matrices terminology. I'm just dropping by to keep track of the game, but I'll probably have something up later tonight if I'm still awake.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Jetsquirrel on October 27, 2010, 06:34:42 pm

Quote
The situation seems rather.... normal in begginer mafia games.
But i noticed Flint lurked quite much in the beggining of the game and jumped out when somebody asked him something, After answering he walked off and repeated the thing. The lurking stops i think at page 14 or 13 i think.
[/quote]

I noticed the same. And his answers weren't always satisfactory.[/quote]

You say so much without giving any reasoning, WHAT questions didn't you like my answers to and WHY didn't you like them. Also you have actually started to post alot more content ever since Ottofar was a certainty to be lynched and I am half suspicious that may be because a scum IC may be feeding you your information. Though I haven't seen you play before so this could just be your style
[/quote]

I never said anything about your questions jsut the pattern you were following so...
Flintus Why getting angry/jumpy now?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Flintus10 on October 27, 2010, 06:46:29 pm
...Uh Jet you realise I was answering Mindmaker with that second quote right?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Jetsquirrel on October 27, 2010, 06:51:15 pm
oh, sry then
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Jetsquirrel on October 27, 2010, 06:52:11 pm
would be handier if you directed the question to a person with a name.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Flintus10 on October 27, 2010, 07:08:05 pm
Well I assumed the quote and context made it clear enough but I will keep that in mind from now on
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on October 27, 2010, 08:47:40 pm
Ottofar/Azure, what do you, as more experienced players, think of them?
And how do you smoke such players out of "hiding"?

I'm not all that experienced at forum Mafia, (hence the reason I'm in this game) but - as far as wanton lurkers are concerned - I'd imagine the best way to lure them out of the woodwork is with the very real threat of a lynch. If even that doesn't work, then they're either so determinedly trying to injure the town with their inactivity that they'd be worth killing even if they're not scum or they're simply not playing.

To put it concisely? Give him no option but to go on the complete defensive if he wants to stay in the game. And as for how I feel about them... they're useful as scum, and a waste of space for town. If I hadn't hooked onto Otto so early into the game and started all this, I would've gone for ragnarok by now. Hell, he's replaced you at the top of the list for now, Mind. This amount of silence from one person simply isn't right - particularly when he's been cast under such an intense spotlight for most of the game.

If (bolded for emphasis) this was a trap, like I described it in my last post, I would have needed some planning and communication. And only two of the players here would be allowed to do that.

Indeed, it would have - in order to make it risk free. However, I went into this kind of attack knowing nothing about Elegy worth knowing in this game, but I thought I had developed the trap enough to make it reliable enough in a game where I doubted anyone would be experienced enough to see through it.

It's like the die has been cast, without considering what most of the other players are thinking.

Every other player is welcome to interject as much as they like to my own desired lynch. I'm not stopping anyone. Perhaps I could even be persuaded, although someone'd have to work some pretty damn suave charm to get me to back off from Otto after all the scumtells he's dropped.

So it's already cast in stone?
Looks like you take care of people who come in your way fairly quick.
How convenient!

...when did I say it was cast in stone? Things can change very, very easily in Mafia. My top scum-buddy - or at the very least, lurker-kill - at the moment is ragnarok, due to his common and protracted absences. It could very easily change back to you, or switch to anyone else if I'm given reason. Don't presume I'm a bull-headed buffoon just because I'm so adamant about Otto.

If Ottofar turns out to be town, we might get a good lead to where the mafia is.
However if he turns out to be mafia, there's a good chance I might become the next lynch.
But if I turn out to be innocent, guess who has a good chance of getting lynched himself?

Presuming the maf-buddy doesn't revenge-kill me.
Also, if you're gonna try and threaten me away from you, you chose the wrong game to do it. I've got my eye on you, dammit. o.o

How should I know?
This is my first game of mafia, remember?
Therefore I can't give him the benefit of the doubt.

So these passages, which seem "normal" to you, seem fishy to me.

Cool.

Protip: next time you want to FoS me, have actual reasons, mate.

lol what

There's nothing I can even contend, because you're just putting words in my mouth.. So, uhhh. good? Attack?

P.s. Sidestepping is when you avoid an attack, which... I didn't do... So...

After that he simply ignored your next post.

...what, are you surprised that I'm not pissed off or something?

I'd act the same way to someone behaving belligenently towards me for an ill-concieved/no reason. I was afraid his dismissal of my FOS/vote might rub scum off of voting for him, so I acted more aggressive in order to give the impression I wouldn't shift my vote unless something big happened. As far as I can tell, it worked.

However you really can't compare Murphy to Elegy, if you walk into a game unprepossessed.
The answer "He always acts like that" isn't satisfactory, when you you play with a bunch of people, who don't actually know him.

...fair point. I also like the use of the word 'unprepossessed'. I so rarely think to use it, myself...

Eh, I digress. The bottom line is I took a calculated risk to find scum. I had a paif of contingencies in place, to salvage what I could from the trap if it did not go as I had intended. As it turns out, it has gone quite smoothly - however, you appear to be under the presumption that it was my intention to orchesrate all of this in order to protect Elegy/Jet. You are, in fact, mistaken. I have done nothing to distract from asking questions of Elegy, unless it directly got in the way of my argument with Otto. You lot were welcome to do with him as you wished, as far as I was concerned.

I had hooked myself a fish, and I wanted to roast it fresh. Huh... surprisingly apt metaphor. >.>


I'm sorry, if I offended you, but as I said we're running out of time.
And as I already mentioned, it's just one of many possibilities.
If I'd be absolutely sure about the accuracy of my theory, I'd have already cast my vote, wouldn't I?

Most of my points, however, might loose any substance they might have, once Jetsquirrel starts posting.
So all that's left is to wait.

...eh? Offended? Pfft. XD I was just having a bit of fun. Think nothing of it.

Anyway, now that Jet has posted, has he influenced your opinion any?

I think there was more I wanted to respond to, but I can't remember, I'm tired and I've lost patience with my keyboard. Ciao.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Murphy on October 28, 2010, 07:55:09 am
About 55 hours back I said I wouldn't vote because there still was time left. There still was opportunity to fish for information; too bad we got next to none, only confusion. However, Ottofar still seems the most likely to turn out to be scum. As KaminaSquirtle has pointed out, a real townie would at least attempt to make his death a credit to the team.

Also, I didn't quite get Jetsquirrel's reasons to call his (well, Elegy's) vote back.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Toaster on October 28, 2010, 08:16:35 am
Vote Count:

ragnarok97071: {1} Spade
Flintus10: {0}
Mindmaker: {0}
Jetsquirrel: {1} Ottofar
Ottofar: {4} Flintus10, Azure Sepulchre, KaminaSquirtle, Murphy
KaminaSquirtle: {0}
Spade: {0}
Azure Sepulchre: {0}
Murphy: {0}

Not Voting: Mindmaker, ragnarok97071, Jetsquirrel


Day 1 ends Thursday 10/28 11 PM EST
(13 3/4 hours from now)
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Jetsquirrel on October 28, 2010, 09:30:53 am
About 55 hours back I said I wouldn't vote because there still was time left. There still was opportunity to fish for information; too bad we got next to none, only confusion. However, Ottofar still seems the most likely to turn out to be scum. As KaminaSquirtle has pointed out, a real townie would at least attempt to make his death a credit to the team.

Also, I didn't quite get Jetsquirrel's reasons to call his (well, Elegy's) vote back.

the reason is that Ottofar is broken and condemned to death my 4rth vote would not make much difference at that point
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Ottofar on October 28, 2010, 09:45:43 am
Ottofar/Azure, what do you, as more experienced players, think of them?
And how do you smoke such players out of "hiding"?

Lynch all Lurkers. In a BM, it's quite hard, without quite rough attacking.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Mindmaker on October 28, 2010, 11:36:15 am
Presuming the maf-buddy doesn't revenge-kill me.
Also, if you're gonna try and threaten me away from you, you chose the wrong game to do it.

I'm not threatening anyone, I'm merely speculating.

Anyway, now that Jet has posted, has he influenced your opinion any?

All I can say, that replacing a player in a game of mafia, is the single worst thing you can do.
It just seems unfair, to pin everything Elegy said and did on Jetsquirrel.
However it also opens up some new possibilities and new questions I could ask.

You're either a smart mafia member, or an innocent townie, Azure.
I really can't tell which one, as I haven't found any dirt on you.
Guess I have to look elsewhere for now.

Ehhhh..... dunno? I'd say 7. He seemed to defend himself properly but didn't attack anyone ( i think)

Let me rephrase that question:
On a scale from 1-10 how well did Elegy play as a
 a.) townie?
 b.) a member of the mafia?

You say so much without giving any reasoning, WHAT questions didn't you like my answers to and WHY didn't you like them.

Well, then let's make up for the leeway.

Really Ottofar you don't seem to have provided any evidence of this is it possible you are just going on Azure's opinion without formulating one on your own, scum?

Very early in the game, when there was a lot of random voting going on, you were the first one to call someone scum (while Ottofar only said he "found" him scum).
Panicked, because your scumbuddy was in distress?
Can't tell, however it doesn't seem like a normal reaction to me.

I see very little real evidence as Ottofar has yet to post too much substance I do know for certain he still has not provided evidence that gives any reason for him to have been initially suspicious of elegy and his only excuse was essentially that he agreed with Azure's points and what do you know it turns out they were not based on anything either so Ottofar has essentially just voted for Elegy because someone else was.

So after he started to asking random question and making random votes, suddenly you jump on him as he votes for Elegy.
Just coincidence?
It looked like he did let go of a person, as soon as they provided him with an a satisfactory answer.
However Elegy didn't do that, instead he became agressive and even resorted to namecalling.
That alone should have been enough for him to see, that he obviously had hit a nerve.
In the meantime, you lurked until Ottofar had another vote on him (3 in total) and several people had announced, that they were watching him closely, until you resumed posting, as it seemed innocent enough by then.

I am almost certain that Ottofar is scum.

See above.

Also he is yet to come up with a reasonable defence for his actions[...]


The same applies to you.
After this post all, you did was asking random question, without doing anything with the answers you got.
You did only speak up, providing a longer answer, when I attacked you and your decision in some way.


Also you have actually started to post alot more content ever since Ottofar was a certainty to be lynched and I am half suspicious that may be because a scum IC may be feeding you your information.

You're right in that point.
Ottofar was certainly to be lynched quite early in the game. However the amount of content I posted began to grow gradually, much later in the game.
There was simply much more information posted by that time, to build theorys upon.
Also while I had no idea how to play in the beginning, so I kept watching the seemingly more experienced players and their tactics.
I especially took a liking in the PBPA, which Azure seems to use a lot.

What information is my IC supposed to be feeding me, in your opinion, Flintus?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Flintus10 on October 28, 2010, 06:02:48 pm
Very early in the game, when there was a lot of random voting going on, you were the first one to call someone scum (while Ottofar only said he "found" him scum).
Panicked, because your scumbuddy was in distress?
Can't tell, however it doesn't seem like a normal reaction to me.

Well someone is always going to be the first person to call somebody scum for one.

And plus "Finding someone scum" is exactly the same as labelling them scum Ottofar was actually the first one to legitimately label somebody as scum seeing as Azure was just using his gambit.

And the reason I initially voted for Ottofar as I stated was because he blatantly labelled Elegy as scum and then even when I asked him he refused to provide any reason whatsoever. I asked him what gives and he said that he clearly stated that he was following Azure's line of reasoning which even Azure knows was complete crap.

That is why it was my opinion that Ottofar was scum as he immediately jumped on the first person to actually have any kind of case brought against them. And he didn't even have his own reasons he was using somebody else’s. In RVS that is enough of a tell to justify my initial vote, and Ottofar's actions since then he simply deflected every single question and would refuse to justify his actions which is why my suspicions only intensified. And now he has simply resigned himself to his fate and refuses to co-operate or do anything productive with the town. Even you his self-appointed defence attorney must admit that.

So after he started to asking random question and making random votes, suddenly you jump on him as he votes for Elegy.
Just coincidence?
It looked like he did let go of a person, as soon as they provided him with an a satisfactory answer.
However Elegy didn't do that, instead he became agressive and even resorted to namecalling.
That alone should have been enough for him to see, that he obviously had hit a nerve.
In the meantime, you lurked until Ottofar had another vote on him (3 in total) and several people had announced, that they were watching him closely, until you resumed posting, as it seemed innocent enough by then.
Jeez man did you not see this

Fair enough

Anyways just a heads up that I will be gone for about a day so any questions will take awhile to recieve an answer.
I said I would be gone for 24 hours and that is basically how long it took for me to post again. You can’t say that is lurking. I WAS NEVER ONLINE (sorry but you’re the second person to point to this so I’d like to make it clear)


What information is my IC supposed to be feeding me, in your opinion, Flintus?

Well naturally I would not know for certain but posts to look at, tells other players have made ways to counter arguments ect ect. I mean at the start you literally seemed that you had no idea what was going on your posts were weak you even when you finally realised what use questions were you didn't use them effectively but know your posting these walls of text and working well. Which makes me wonder though it's not impossible for you to have gotten better I find it a little suspicious.

If Ottofar flips mafia then I will be quite suspect of you being his scum-buddy as he stopped posting around when you started getting better and you both seem to have the exact same opinions of me. Though if you were scumbuddy's I don't understand why you are defending his actions (see your second quote)
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Flintus10 on October 28, 2010, 06:05:28 pm
Also Spade, Kamina,Murphy, Ragnarok Look at all this lovely text for you to analyse lets see some action lads!
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on October 28, 2010, 07:06:29 pm
Also Spade, Kamina,Murphy, Ragnarok Look at all this lovely text for you to analyse lets see some action lads!
Yeah, no kidding!
Ottofar/Azure, what do you, as more experienced players, think of them?
And how do you smoke such players out of "hiding"?

I'm not all that experienced at forum Mafia, (hence the reason I'm in this game) but - as far as wanton lurkers are concerned - I'd imagine the best way to lure them out of the woodwork is with the very real threat of a lynch. If even that doesn't work, then they're either so determinedly trying to injure the town with their inactivity that they'd be worth killing even if they're not scum or they're simply not playing.

To put it concisely? Give him no option but to go on the complete defensive if he wants to stay in the game. And as for how I feel about them... they're useful as scum, and a waste of space for town. If I hadn't hooked onto Otto so early into the game and started all this, I would've gone for ragnarok by now. Hell, he's replaced you at the top of the list for now, Mind. This amount of silence from one person simply isn't right - particularly when he's been cast under such an intense spotlight for most of the game.
I agree 100% with first paragraph, nothing to add to this.

Agree on ragnarok.  This much lurking from one guy is IMPOSSIBLE, I mean lurking like that doesn't even HAPPEN.  I very much expect you to write a insightful post as to why you have been so lurky, if you want to live, ragnarok.  Oh yeah, and actually CONTRIBUTE.
About 55 hours back I said I wouldn't vote because there still was time left. There still was opportunity to fish for information; too bad we got next to none, only confusion. However, Ottofar still seems the most likely to turn out to be scum. As KaminaSquirtle has pointed out, a real townie would at least attempt to make his death a credit to the team.

Also, I didn't quite get Jetsquirrel's reasons to call his (well, Elegy's) vote back.

the reason is that Ottofar is broken and condemned to death my 4rth vote would not make much difference at that point
So why remove it?  What would that gain you?
Ottofar/Azure, what do you, as more experienced players, think of them?
And how do you smoke such players out of "hiding"?

Lynch all Lurkers. In a BM, it's quite hard, without quite rough attacking.

For once I agree, in general that is.  In this case...
If you turn out to be scum, then I suspect you're trying to protect your scumbuddy.
Which means your scumbuddy isn't a lurker.
Just something to think about.
Anyway, now that Jet has posted, has he influenced your opinion any?
All I can say, that replacing a player in a game of mafia, is the single worst thing you can do.
It just seems unfair, to pin everything Elegy said and did on Jetsquirrel.
However it also opens up some new possibilities and new questions I could ask.
How exactly is it bad?  It should benefit the town, as they know they have the same role, but they may have different approaches to it.  So we get to see two different performances of the same role, and therefore get more data to analyze.

Unless you're scum, and Elegy/Jetsquirrel is innocent, and you don't like that Elegy got replaced by someone who wouldn't get themselves lynched for being stupid, unlike Elegy.
What information is my IC supposed to be feeding me, in your opinion, Flintus?

Well naturally I would not know for certain but posts to look at, tells other players have made ways to counter arguments ect ect. I mean at the start you literally seemed that you had no idea what was going on your posts were weak you even when you finally realised what use questions were you didn't use them effectively but know your posting these walls of text and working well. Which makes me wonder though it's not impossible for you to have gotten better I find it a little suspicious.

If Ottofar flips mafia then I will be quite suspect of you being his scum-buddy as he stopped posting around when you started getting better and you both seem to have the exact same opinions of me. Though if you were scumbuddy's I don't understand why you are defending his actions (see your second quote)

Hmmm, many good points made here.  I agree.  This is suspicious, though there is definitely the possibility of Mindmaker just being a noob at the beginning.  I think he's at the top of my list of Otto's scumbuddies (assuming Otto's scum, everything changes if he's not), along with ragnarok.  The only reason I suspect him more is Otto's lynch all lurkers comment.

Why are you defending Ottofar's actions, Mindmaker?


And just so you know, I have two midterms and a lab report due next week, so my activity may die down a bit.  Just a heads up.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: ragnarok97071 on October 28, 2010, 08:08:37 pm
Well, actually, I just don't post much ever. Really, there is usually not much that I can think of something to say to. also, I have most of my day taken up by either school or sleeping, as well as other things I do with my family. I usually post when I can. I am NOT going to wake up early just so I can play this game, and it's pretty much impossible for me to stay up past 10:00 EST (In high school, so I have a curfew), so I have 7 and a half hours in which I can do stuff, minus a half for walking home, minus a half for dinner, minus others from when I just don't check (about 2 hours in full), and for today, minus a bunch for going out to dinner and playing Magic the Gathering with my bro. I show up as online a lot because I usually leave a tab open on the "Unread Replies" page when I leave. I have things that I am obligated to do outside of this thread, guys, and to be honest, this actually doesn't rate too high on my priorities right now, mostly because of all of the hate I seem to be catching (yes I am aware that most of that is because I don't post here much, thus making it a vicious cycle), though I know that this is so that you can semi-reliably find the people who need to die (in game). Hell, if all goes well, I may not be able to get on during any time but the weekends, as I am trying to find a part-time job. I was unaware that I needed approval in triplicate in order to have a life away from this game. Also I play dwarf fortress, and it tends to hold me for a few hours at a time.

Anyway, as to why I voted for Murphy at first, it was mostly because I really don't trust anyone, even now, as well as that he just happened to seem a bit... off. of course, this is the DF forums, so that should have been expected. I removed the vote partly because he seemed a bit less untrustworthy (still not trustworthy, IMO) than he had seemed, and partly because even if I still harbored suspicions toward him, the rest of you are all locked onto Otto, and I agree with that, but I have no solid evidence to go on, so I refrain from voting for him, as well as for reasons I have already stated (overkill). I also will probably abstain from voting for the rest of the day, as it would be futile.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on October 28, 2010, 08:25:39 pm
Hey, that's cool.  It's just people like to know these things.  I believe you, and that makes my suspicion of you go down significantly.  We just had no way of knowing you weren't lurking this entire time.  Now I know you're not.

And what exactly seems off about Murphy?  What makes you think him untrustworthy?

And you know what this means, Mindmaker?  You're number one on my list of scumbuddies for Otto, with no one else that close at all.  Then again, I don't have too much evidence for you, or anyone else at this point.  It's just a suspicion at this point.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Toaster on October 28, 2010, 10:04:38 pm
Day 1 Final Vote Count:

ragnarok97071: {1} Spade
Flintus10: {0}
Mindmaker: {0}
Jetsquirrel: {1} Ottofar
Ottofar: {4} Flintus10, Azure Sepulchre, KaminaSquirtle, Murphy
KaminaSquirtle: {0}
Spade: {0}
Azure Sepulchre: {0}
Murphy: {0}

Not Voting: Mindmaker, ragnarok97071, Jetsquirrel



After a long day of discussion, it is clear that Ottofar will be the one to hang.

“Time to die, mafioso!” shouts Murphy.

Ottofar just stares at him coldly.  “You know what?  I don’t care any more.  Just hang me and end my misery.”  He stands up and walks under the gallows in the lobby.  As a group, you get him on the chair, tie up the rope, and kick the chair out.  A short drop later, Ottofar is dead.

You untie him and search his belongings.  His room is mostly bare, with only a couple auto magazines to read.  In his wallet, you find a ripped Alcoholics Anonymous card, a little cash, and his driver’s license.  There’s nothing incriminating, and it appears that he was a simple Townsperson, caught up in the crime wave like many of the rest of you.

Unhappily, the group disperses and goes into their rooms for the night.  There are still two criminals out there- are you safe in your beds here in the hotel?


Quote from: Ottofar
You are Jack Wilson, a Townsperson.
You’ve worked as a auto mechanic in Tewby Vale for several long years.  After your wife left you for one of your coworkers, you began a deep, bitter slide into depression and drinking.  Your erratic behavior is likely what earned you the suspicion of the police force.  Bitter as you are, you don’t intend to go down without a fight- these mafia scumbags are the perfect targets to vent your aggression.


Night 1 begins now!  Send in your night actions!

Night 1 ends Friday, 10/29 11 PM EST.



MOD NOTE:  My trip begins early AM on Saturday.  If the night needs to be extended for any reason, it will be extended to Monday.  Get those night actions in, and you can have all weekend to discuss D2.  My availability will be very limited on the weekend.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Toaster on October 29, 2010, 10:02:58 pm
Morning comes, and everyone gathers in the lobby.  A quick count reveals that KaminaSquirtle is not among you.  After a couple minutes waiting, you head to his room to check it out.  Someone kicks down the door, and you instantly see why he did not come.  He is face-down on the table where he had been sitting, two bullet wounds in his back.  He had been working on some kind of painting when he was shot- he must have been distracted.  The canvas is now just a red smear of blood.

Disturbed, you head back to the lobby.  Can a Mafia member be found today?  Only time will tell...



Day two begins now!

Day two ends Wednesday, 11/3 11 PM EST


Quote from: KaminaSquirtle
You are Wilt Hankin, a Townsperson.

Red- the color of blood.  Much red has run through these streets lately, and your paintings have taken a darker mood as the town grows increasingly hostile and less trusting.  You try to catch the world in your art, and all you can capture is misery.  Your brother seemed to be oblivious to the misery- he was out enjoying himself every day... until he was one of those killed as a Mafioso.  You’re sure that’s why you’re here under suspicion, but there’s no connection- you had no idea he was up to no good.  Now you must prove to all that you had nothing to do with this atrocity, and help wash the stain from your family name.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on October 29, 2010, 11:56:26 pm
Well... fuck. -_- A cop with a guilty would be handy right about now.

As for me, I'm gonna go re-read through the thread and compile a scumtell list on those still with us. I musta missed something big if the maf don't even feel threatened by me.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Jetsquirrel on October 30, 2010, 03:32:22 am
Hmmm who did kaminasquirtle investigate or was clinging on to?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Jetsquirrel on October 30, 2010, 03:40:11 am
and who seemed the most suspicious in the ottofar votes? Since Ottofar himself presented himself as a easy lynch for scum due to his ehm... accusions on me (Elegy), while i clearly somewhere said that he was a BROKEN TOWNIE
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Jetsquirrel on October 30, 2010, 03:41:13 am
damnit i keep forgetting to direct these questions so Azure what do you think?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Murphy on October 30, 2010, 05:19:57 am
Hmmm who did kaminasquirtle investigate or was clinging on to?
I think Kamina got NKd not because of what threat he was, but just because he was mostly out of suspicion. The mafia are likely to leave suspicious people alive, because these can serve as daytime scapegoats, allowing the real scum to hide. Remember when I said that if Ottofar actually flips town, then Azure will likely survive the night, because he's either a mafia himself, or a good daytime target for them to blame?

I musta missed something big if the maf don't even feel threatened by me.
What if you are a mafia yourself?
Note that I'm not accusing you yet, but the following scenario looks plausible:
1) You see an opportunity to press against Elegy, and use it.
2) After seeing that this opportunity is too weak, you stop pressing it.
3) Seeing Ottofar accept your arguments against Elegy, you now rush to accuse Ottofar, claiming your own previous actions to be a clever gambit.
4) ...
5) PROFIT!!! (not for the town, sadly)

On the other hand...
During day 1, noone else besides me had suggested that Azure might be a mafia. It went unnoticed, or at least did not spark any discussion. But if he's actually a mafia, then he should notice that and become wary of me. Combined with the fact that I'm mostly out of suspicion right now (like Kamina was), this would make me an ideal NK target. But Kamina was killed instead, so I must conclude that Azure is not a mafia.

Which of the reasons is better, I leave for others to discuss. If someone sees any flaws in my logic, please point them out.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Spade on October 30, 2010, 07:08:55 am
Quote
Combined with the fact that I'm mostly out of suspicion right now (like Kamina was), this would make me an ideal NK target.
Saying you're not suspicious makes you suspicious.
Murphy, what did you think about Ottofar's town flip?

and who seemed the most suspicious in the ottofar votes? Since Ottofar himself presented himself as a easy lynch for scum due to his ehm... accusions on me (Elegy), while i clearly somewhere said that he was a BROKEN TOWNIE

I don't remember you saying that. Even if you did, that was just a guess. For all we knew you two could be scumbuddies.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Murphy on October 30, 2010, 08:58:57 am
Saying you're not suspicious makes you suspicious.
Why?
I'm just trying to look through the eyes of a mafia. Whom would they consider unsuspicious and thus good target? Surely one of those who had drawn few to none FoS during day one, which couldn't be said about Ragnarok, Jetsquirrel, Flintus and probably Mindmaker as well.

Murphy, what did you think about Ottofar's town flip?
I'm trying to figure out at what point we screwed it up.
A plausible scenario is that Azure's gambit wasn't a gambit initially, but a genuine attack, which he later dropped and then claimed it to be a trap in which Ottofar has fallen. But I want to hear other theories and see if I like them better.
Another possibility is that Elegy/Jetsquirrel (who had that strife with Ottofar) is a mafia, but I don't think so. There was arguing, and some of it was quite ugly, but no scumtells, as far as I noticed.
It may also be a whole town-on-town aggression, while the real mafia lurks in a corner and chuckles evilly. Maybe.

So what do you think of our situation, Spade?

P.S. On a side note, my first thought was "WTF? There weren't 5 votes, how come he is lynched?".
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Spade on October 30, 2010, 09:53:38 am
Saying you're not suspicious makes you suspicious.
Why?
I'm just trying to look through the eyes of a mafia. Whom would they consider unsuspicious and thus good target? Surely one of those who had drawn few to none FoS during day one, which couldn't be said about Ragnarok, Jetsquirrel, Flintus and probably Mindmaker as well.
I understand, but you shouldn't say you're not suspicious, since it makes it sound like you're saying that there's no way you're maf, which isn't true. I know that's not what you meant to say, but it's what it sounds like to me.

Murphy, what did you think about Ottofar's town flip?
I'm trying to figure out at what point we screwed it up.
A plausible scenario is that Azure's gambit wasn't a gambit initially, but a genuine attack, which he later dropped and then claimed it to be a trap in which Ottofar has fallen. But I want to hear other theories and see if I like them better.
Another possibility is that Elegy/Jetsquirrel (who had that strife with Ottofar) is a mafia, but I don't think so. There was arguing, and some of it was quite ugly, but no scumtells, as far as I noticed. It may also be a whole town-on-town aggression, while the real mafia lurks in a corner and chuckles evilly. Maybe.

So what do you think of our situation, Spade?

P.S. On a side note, my first thought was "WTF? There weren't 5 votes, how come he is lynched?".
I think the situation is pretty bad. We have seven people, none of which are non-suspicious. If I had to guess, I'd still say one of the people who voted for Ottofar were mafia. I want to see what everyone else has to say first before accusing anyone though.

Flintus10: What did you think at the end of D1? What about now?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Mindmaker on October 30, 2010, 10:17:41 am
If anyone is wondering why I'm not posting, let me assure you I will do that soon.
Just been busy today, but I'll try to wrap up my thoughts, suspicions and theories in one big post this evening.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Mindmaker on October 30, 2010, 12:31:40 pm
Wel, well, that's been an interesting turn of events.

Flintus/Azure:
What do you think about Ottofar turning out to be town?
What will you do now? Any new "targets" (Oh how ambiguous!)?
And how do you see my role in all of this? I was supposed to be the scumbuddy, isn't that right?

Jetsquirrel, KaminaSquirtle had asked you an interesting question, right before he died, which you unfortunately couldn't answer.

Quote
the reason is that Ottofar is broken and condemned to death my 4rth vote would not make much difference at that point
So why remove it?  What would that gain you?

What, indeed.
Since he was a dead man anyway, what was the point of unvoting? Washing our hands from Ottofars demolition, aren't we?

Not the big post I had hoped to come up with, but it's a good start.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Jetsquirrel on October 30, 2010, 12:46:45 pm
I also thought about azure being scum, his attack and defense seems to be just too good.....
Like someone is actually giving him stuff to argument about, which he himself could not think off. But i have never ( i think) seen or red a game where azure has played.

Quote
About 55 hours back I said I wouldn't vote because there still was time left. There still was opportunity to fish for information; too bad we got next to none, only confusion. However, Ottofar still seems the most likely to turn out to be scum. As KaminaSquirtle has pointed out, a real townie would at least attempt to make his death a credit to the team.

I find this vote also suspicous, there is no evidence backing that ottofar was SCUM at all. Because at some point there were 3 options for him,
1. He could defend himself makin him look even scummier
2. He could blame someone else, which would lead to a discussion about diverting attention to a other player to make himself look less scummy
3. He could do nothing,

but what he did was nothing... Because he knew he was town, i did exactly the same in a mafia and i turned out town.
 In the start Elegy questioned why there were 3 votes on murphy and azure jumped on him what looked like protecting.
And Flintus lurked in the start of the game quite much and activly attacked ottofar because it could be a easy lynch for you.

so Flintus what do you have to say about this blob of text?

Quote
Jetsquirrel, KaminaSquirtle had asked you an interesting question, right before he died, which you unfortunately couldn't answer.

Because i knew he was a townie, he acted like me when he broke. He got pinned down by both scum and town, and struggling would seem even more scummy. see first post of this thing
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Mindmaker on October 30, 2010, 01:07:48 pm
Because i knew he was a townie, he acted like me when he broke. He got pinned down by both scum and town, and struggling would seem even more scummy. see first post of this thing

There is no "knowing" in this game.
Even though I "defended" (well at least that's what people called it) him, it was just calculated risk.
There's no knowing, if you're town at least.

I forgot to include another question in my previous post, Jetsquirrel.
One I had already posted before.

You got asked, how you would rate Elegy and I found the question to be a bit imprecise.

Ehhhh..... dunno? I'd say 7. He seemed to defend himself properly but didn't attack anyone ( i think)

Let me rephrase that question:
On a scale from 1-10 how well did Elegy play as a
 a.) townie?
 b.) a member of the mafia?

Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Jetsquirrel on October 30, 2010, 01:43:56 pm
Ehhhh..... dunno? I'd say 7. He seemed to defend himself properly but didn't attack anyone ( i think)

Let me rephrase that question:
On a scale from 1-10 how well did Elegy play as a
 a.) townie?
 b.) a member of the mafia?

A. 5 B. 5 C. why both fives? he didnt act suspicious nor did he try to really blame someone for being scum expect ottofar which turned out to be town.

And you're right there is no knowing, but there is a high chance of guessing , Because i experience exactly the same what happended to Ottofar. So i could guess almost precisly that he was TOWN
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: webadict on October 30, 2010, 07:17:05 pm
I'm just going to post this now:

Town is going to lose hardcore in this game.

Seriously, do any of you know what you're looking for?

Here's a good lesson for all of you. List what you think a Town player will do, and then list what you think a scum player will do. Don't worry. I have no idea who's Town and who's not, but I'm simply going to tell you why you're all going to lose1.

I realize I'm not your IC, but there's only one way to stop you guys from losing every time, and that's to show you why you're so dreadfully unaware.

So, please, while you're playing, just list out what it is you think you're looking for, and I'll help point you guys in the right direction. This will also help scum by identifying some startling easy catches on your part.

1: This is referring to the Town only.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Toaster on October 30, 2010, 09:39:13 pm
Phone post, so no votecount, sorry.

Apologies to Flintus- he PMed me in the night and said that he would be away for day start but would return. I meant to post that at day start- oops!

Web- feel free to be co-town IC with Vector. I haven't seen her in a couple days.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Mindmaker on October 31, 2010, 05:26:49 am
I'm just going to post this now:

Town is going to lose hardcore in this game.
No shit, Sherlock?
Thank you for stating the obvious.

We are already 2 townies short and have next to no insight.
If someone besides me had bothered to question the Ottofar lynch, the mafia maybe would have made a stupid move and this tragedy wouldn't have happened.

So yes, we're screwed.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: webadict on October 31, 2010, 10:00:10 am
I'm just going to post this now:

Town is going to lose hardcore in this game.
No shit, Sherlock?
Thank you for stating the obvious.

We are already 2 townies short and have next to no insight.
If someone besides me had bothered to question the Ottofar lynch, the mafia maybe would have made a stupid move and this tragedy wouldn't have happened.

So yes, we're screwed.
Dude, don't be a moron. I'm trying to help you. You have all the means to finding scum already. In fact, with no more words, the scum could be found right now.

Tell me what you think you're looking for. Or is "stupid mistakes" your answer?

Also, NO EDITING IN MAFIA. You can get modkilled for that.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Mindmaker on October 31, 2010, 05:06:02 pm
Dude, don't be a moron. I'm trying to help you. You have all the means to finding scum already. In fact, with no more words, the scum could be found right now.

Tell me what you think you're looking for. Or is "stupid mistakes" your answer?

Sorry about that, it's just that I'm a bit grumpy, with the situation as it is.
Well I'll try my best today, even though I'm a bit alcohol impaired.
The post which will be following a bit later (hoepfully) will contain a vote, as I don't see any of my questions being answered and a reason for it.

Also, NO EDITING IN MAFIA. You can get modkilled for that.

Yeah, sorry about that.
I really just wanted to use that phrase for once and momentarily forgot the rules.
Let's hope I get away with a warning, since that poste wasn't really game related.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: SirBayer on October 31, 2010, 07:22:12 pm
May I first point out, Webadict, that negativity kills town faster than anything? Be confident, be passive, be witty or be blunt, look for the right thing or the wrong thing - it all makes less difference then enthusiasm.

Well, kinda sorta. Once you have enthusiasm, then the rest becomes important. But seriously, Webadict, don't jump into a Beginner's game and tell them they all suck so bad and they're never gonna win! Don't tell them to figure it out, they're beginners. Be useful, don't be negative. The game's not over. Help 'em.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: webadict on October 31, 2010, 07:36:57 pm
May I first point out, Webadict, that negativity kills town faster than anything? Be confident, be passive, be witty or be blunt, look for the right thing or the wrong thing - it all makes less difference then enthusiasm.

Well, kinda sorta. Once you have enthusiasm, then the rest becomes important. But seriously, Webadict, don't jump into a Beginner's game and tell them they all suck so bad and they're never gonna win! Don't tell them to figure it out, they're beginners. Be useful, don't be negative. The game's not over. Help 'em.
I am helping them. It was a warning. All they need to do to help themselves is to answer that question. And possibly continue playing as well.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Murphy on October 31, 2010, 08:07:48 pm
Yeah sure. Thank you very much, Mr. King of the Mafia.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Flintus10 on October 31, 2010, 08:45:09 pm
I'm back but with a killer hangover so I will finish reading through todays events tonight
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Toaster on October 31, 2010, 09:42:06 pm
Vote Count:

ragnarok97071: {0}
Flintus10: {0}
Mindmaker: {0}
Jetsquirrel: {0}
Spade: {0}
Azure Sepulchre: {0}
Murphy: {0}

Not Voting: Everybody

Day 2 ends Wednesday 11/3 11 PM EST


Reminder: Editing is against the game rules.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Jetsquirrel on November 01, 2010, 01:03:08 am
i looked at this thing again and....
Spade Aren't we lurking too much?You sometimes come out write something to make you less suspicious and blend in, while azure and some other guys cover you up (not saying that they are scum) with their talking.

Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Flintus10 on November 01, 2010, 05:47:13 am
Wel, well, that's been an interesting turn of events.

Flintus/Azure:
What do you think about Ottofar turning out to be town?
What will you do now? Any new "targets" (Oh how ambiguous!)?
And how do you see my role in all of this? I was supposed to be the scumbuddy, isn't that right?

I am so freaking confused as to why Ottofar decided to resign himself to a lynching with barely a whimper as a townie and his death has really caused problems for us and basically left things wide open.

As for who I am suspicious of Mindmaker

Why? Well for one reason after going back through the day your defence of Ottafar makes alot more sense. let's face facts if we review everything that happened on day one there is no way that you can say that Ottofar was actively helpful to the town and he certainly dropped alot of tells. And untill the very moment he flipped town there was absolutely no reason to think that he was on our side.

The only way you would know for certain if Otto was town would be if you were mafia correct? I notice that the large quantities of text we see from you now did not begin untill Otto had four votes on him and looked like a very likely lynching.
(fourth vote placed on Otto by Kamina on page 13 and you started posting more content on page 14)

So while it is not unreasonable to assume that you just did not like the fact that so many people were voting for a player who you may have was town but judging by your fairly good skills we could only consider that possibility if you had any justified reason to believe that Otto was town (as you wouldn't have pushed Azure and I over so hard unless you had more on us than just that or a good reason why Ottofar was town). Mindmaker Do you have any justified reason to think Otto was a townie?

My belief is that you knew Otto was town for certain as you were mafia and almost the very minute it seemed likely for him to be lynched you chose to defend him and throw as much suspicion towards Azure, Elegy/Jet and I as you could.
(Kamina meanwhile who was clearly following our lead and added the fourth vote you barely touched upon??? I guess you knew 100% he was town aswell eh?)

So to sum up more simply my belief that you are scum is based on the fact that
1. You seem to have believed Ottofar was almost certainly town despite him not helping his case at all.
2. You defended him quite feverently once he was almost certain to be lynched. I mean since page 13 every single bolded name/FOS/question/quote (except for one related to Ragnarok lurking, and please show me any others if I am wrong) either me, Elegy/Jet or Azure the three voting for Ottofar. (meanwhile Kamina who was the fourth and had the least amount of justification you did not focus on yet he died in the night?).
3. So obviously if you were mafia you defended Ottofar who you knew was town and you could defenetely safely assume was going to be lynched to make yourself look good and those  who voted for him look bad.

Of course I will have to go to the drawing board if you can provide a satisfactory answer this question and that is


Mindmaker Do you have any justified reason to think Otto was at least a likely town player?

And if you are indeed town then who are your prime suspects?

Sorry if anything seems difficult to understand my head is a little foggy right now.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: webadict on November 01, 2010, 07:03:45 am
Does anyone care to answer what they themselves are looking for? If not, I suppose it is no longer my responsibility to lead you to the right path, but I'd rather like to see some newbies win a game by themselves.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Flintus10 on November 01, 2010, 07:26:53 am
I'll get around to doing that tommorow if there isn't much activity
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on November 01, 2010, 08:48:39 am
I have class in 15 minutes for 2 hours. I'll post my list, webadict, and my list of potential scumtells and answer all questions offered my way when I get back.

Gonna be a damn long post. No New Vegas for me tonight... -_-
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: webadict on November 01, 2010, 08:48:52 am
You could probably get around to doing it right now so there is activity.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on November 01, 2010, 08:51:51 am
Nah, it's gonna take a while to get to the uni anyway - hell, I pretty much have to go now. I'll get everything out of the way in one go when I come back.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Flintus10 on November 01, 2010, 08:57:47 am
And Flintus lurked in the start of the game quite much and activly attacked ottofar because it could be a easy lynch for you.
so Flintus what do you have to say about this blob of text?

I have explained about three times now but it seems I must one more time.  It is not lurking if I am physically unable to use a computer. Hell I even gave prior warning to the two  RL days I missed during day one

And what do you mean I actively attacked Ottofar because it would be an easy lynch. I was the first to vote for him and only continued attacking him because he would not defend himself, his reason for trying to lynch you or even contribute in any meaningful way.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Mindmaker on November 01, 2010, 10:11:53 am
I'm not answering any of your question, until you answer some of mine, Flintus.
If this is enough reason to vote me, then do so.
I believe a certain other player will be happy to add his vote.

That's it, I guess.
At least with the town unorganized and callous, as it is now.

Town is going to lose hardcore in this game.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Jetsquirrel on November 01, 2010, 11:34:59 am
And Flintus lurked in the start of the game quite much and activly attacked ottofar because it could be a easy lynch for you.
so Flintus what do you have to say about this blob of text?

I have explained about three times now but it seems I must one more time.  It is not lurking if I am physically unable to use a computer. Hell I even gave prior warning to the two  RL days I missed during day one

And what do you mean I actively attacked Ottofar because it would be an easy lynch. I was the first to vote for him and only continued attacking him because he would not defend himself, his reason for trying to lynch you or even contribute in any meaningful way.

huh what? i already red the answer or i must've have forgotten it and answered the same question again...
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on November 01, 2010, 01:25:35 pm
...a'ight.

For scum, my top tell is whiners. People who don't try to defend themselves from an attack and simply OMGUS them out of spite, or just sit there complaining about a vote on them or about how he game tis going and doing little else. The whole 'why me = fry me' logic, basically, which I believe works. The third or fourth bandwagoneer, too, obviously, which was why I was gonna suspect Kamina today if he hadn't been done in. Lurking can be a scumtell, but in my experience it generally isn't (particulaly due to the whole spiral of quiet that's descended on most games around here and the fact that everyone likes to lurk in IRC games). Flakiness and bouncing between votes is very scummy, in my opinion. Ending the day without a final vote on anyone despite plenty of FOS's and chatting is scummy (yeah, you guys know who I'm talking about. =/). Buddying/keeping a large distance between yourself and another player, bodyguard defending, using plenty of WIFOM arguments, curt answers that tell the town nothing, dolling out FOS's like pain pills but keeping your vote on a tight leash... I think that's a long enough list. There's more, but these are the more important ones to me.

As for town... hrm. Actually hunting's the big one, of course. Sitting on your laurels with your hands in your pockets will just get the town killed - which means the most obvious townie is the one hunting the hardest, although I'd personally trust the one trying second-hardest as the first could perhaps be scum trying too hard. Asking penetrating questions instead of letting others do all the work, avoiding sheeping on a risky lynch, thinking nothing of the liklihood you will die to lynch a scum, having sound reasoning backing up every critical move you make, suspecting everything within reason and using a fair amount of common sense. I think that's about all I look for in town, although most could be easily replicated by scum who knew what they were doing. A fool-proof method, though? I don't think one exists. >.>

Hrm... actually, I think I'll wait for Web to post again before I go any further. I'm interested it hearing what he has to say as it could influence what I would consider a scumtell, and I need time to slim down this damn massive list anyway. Hell, some of you are practically short stories, due to a bunch of minor tells I figured were relevent. Nonetheless, no point in posting a bloody wall of text if it'd be such an awful read. >.>
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Mindmaker on November 01, 2010, 02:49:25 pm
People who don't try to defend themselves from an attack and simply OMGUS them out of spite

In this case, I don't see how you simply seemed to have "forgotten" about Elegy.

Ending the day without a final vote on anyone despite plenty of FOS's and chatting is scummy (yeah, you guys know who I'm talking about. =/).

Well we've seen where the last FOS has led us, didn't we?
And what's the point on being the only person with a vote on someone?
As long as you can't convince anyone to vote for the same person, it's wrothless.
I doubt anyone of the mafia would care, if I placed a single vote on him.

By the way, my questions still haven't been answered, Azure/Flintus.

Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on November 01, 2010, 05:26:40 pm
In this case, I don't see how you simply seemed to have "forgotten" about Elegy.

I haven't. Otto used a "gut feeling" argument, which is daft. You can't expect other people to believe in a lynch if that's all you have. You won't convince me Otto wasn't acting scummy, so please stop trying to. I also haven't once mentioned Elegy/Jet is above suspicion. I simply went for who I believed was the correct choice, and Otto superceded Elegy in scumminess; something else I believe I have already mentioned. Now leave the horse alone; it died days ago.

Well we've seen where the last FOS has led us, didn't we?

Ooh, meow. Perhaps you're right, though. Maybe we should have gone for your intended lynch target. No Vote is one pretty scummy bastard, after all. Damn lurker.

And no, you haven't pissed me off. I'll just stop being snide when you do.

And what's the point on being the only person with a vote on someone?
As long as you can't convince anyone to vote for the same person, it's wrothless.

Dammit, man, your vote is your only scumhunting weapon! How were you supposed to convince the town to vote for someone else if you're not even willing to put it down on them? Instead you just sat on the bench like you didn't give a damn who was being lynched! Hell, if you still wanted to stop the Ottofar lynch, all you had to do was vote for one of the other people that had one vote on them and convince someone else to - equal votes means a no lynch. But no. Votes don't do anything. >.>

Actually... that sounds a lot like a scum argument. Thinking only of the value of a vote instead of the conoctations behind it makes me wonder why it's only the vote you care about. Care to elaborate, Mindmaker, on what makes you think of a vote in this context? Why didn't you try to save Otto, if you were so very sure he wasn't scum? Hmm?

I doubt anyone of the mafia would care, if I placed a single vote on him.

Bahahaa... heh. Quite funny, that, if you consider the implications of that sentence from another angle. Or perhaps that was a slip. I know I was uncomfortable with telling outright lies when I first played as scum. I often tried to hide any slips behind double-meanings, used turn of phrases. Tried to hide what I was saying in a mask of text. I wonder...

Anyway, yeah; you're right. Your questions have been on the bench quite a while, and I'm free at the moment.

Flintus/Azure:
What do you think about Ottofar turning out to be town?
What will you do now? Any new "targets" (Oh how ambiguous!)?
And how do you see my role in all of this? I was supposed to be the scumbuddy, isn't that right?

1) ...seriously? What, are you expecting me to say I'm ecstatic? I got a townie lynched by accident, my next FOS was NK'd, and the maf left me alive either because I'm supposed to take the fall or because I'm now about as clueless as everyone else and Kamina wasn't. I feel like a god damn moron. >.> But meh, they're dead and there's nothing I can do about that, so I'll just have to see what I can do about the scum instead.

2) Yes. You. Presuming one of my former theories was correct and maf let me live to work a lynch on me, then the strongest two contenders so far are you and Elegy/Jetsquirrel. No one besides you two has asked me a single question since day 2 started, but you've taken on this whole doom-and-gloom persona like you're trying to kill the town's spirit by wailing out a few MCR numbers, while Jetsquirrel is spinning so much bullshit I'm amazed none of it's oozed out of the monitor yet... and you seem to be accepting it!

On the other hand, it's merely a theory - one that holds just about as much merit as the other - but I still wonder why you're acting like it's the end of the god damn world and why Jet somehow 'knew' Otto wasn't scum and decided not to say a word about it yesterday. Hell, I wonder how he even expects me to buy such drivel.

As an aside, I also find it highly, highly amusing that Jetsquirrel claims he's never been in a game with me, despite the fact that I was the mafioso who had him lynched in the death he's referring to. One funny selective memory you got thar. I will admit I know from same that game that Jetsquirrel can be made to look scummy just by pointing at him and letting the town do your work for you, but still... that's still an awful lot of bullshit. 

3) You can still be scum. You simply weren't his buddy, which has been made abundantly clear to me.

As an added bonus to this post, I'm going to point out Jetsquirrel's bullshit. Edit's are in bolded orange:

I also thought about azure being scum, his attack and defense seems to be just too good.....
My 'attack' killed a freakin' townie, and all I've had to really 'defend' against is Mindmaker's incessant crying about the Ottofar lynch. I'm not exactly a mafia genius, dude. Or perhaps you think Otto's death is a good thing? I'd really like to hear why, personally.

Like someone is actually giving him stuff to argument about, which he himself could not think off. But i have never ( i think) seen or red a game where azure has played.
God dammit, stop being a tard. I got you lynched in the last Beginner's Mafia game after you kept editing your posts and refusing to answer a single one of my - or anyone elses - questions (instead responding with the most asinine one-liners you could think of). Even Bayer commented that he didn't think I was scum, and you think I can't argue for myself? Get the hell up outta my face, son; you got nuthin'.

I find this vote also suspicous, there is no evidence backing that ottofar was SCUM at all. Because at some point there were 3 options for him,
1. He could defend himself makin him look even scummier If he'd defended himself, he'd have looked less scummy.
If he had answers to our arguments that went beyond 'whatever', he'd still be alive. Also, not once in day one did you deign to mention this; all you said was 'there's too many lynches on Otto that aren't needed, so I'm gonna sit this one out', which roughly translates - to me, at least - into 'I don't want it to look like I lynched a townie so I'm gonna go sit on the fence and pretend I knew Otto was town all along in day 2, despite the fact that - if I had wanted to save him - I could have put my vote on soneone else along with Mindmaker and done exactly that'. I can smell the bullshit from here, and I'm in Dundee. =/
2. He could blame someone else, which would lead to a discussion about diverting attention to a other player to make himself look less scummy
No, it wouldn't. If he had legit reasons for pointing at someone else, they would have been taken into due consideration. Don't you dare think to presume how I or anyone else will react to anything and try to use it as evidence. It means nothing.
3. He could do nothing,
Which is what he did, and it got him lynched; who'd have thunk it? Whereas, if he'd have fought against it instead of ignoring everyone, he may have persuaded someone. It did not make him look like town. At all.

<I don't care about the Flintus bit; it doesn't pertain to Jet's bullshit claim that he knew Otto was town>

Because i knew he was a townie, he acted like me when he broke. Town does not sit on its ass and allow itself to be attacked! God dammit, why would town allow everyone else to waste a valuable lynch on them? Why wouldn't they struggle against it? Why wouldn't they fight to make sure the scum got lynched and not them, like they're supposed to? What kind of townie are you, to even suggest thatwe should all sit here and twidle our thumbs the moment someone puts a vote on us? >.> He got pinned down by both scum and town, and struggling would seem even more scummy. No. It. Wouldn't! see first post of this thing

Finally - Mindmaker, I'll reiterate my questions for you and add a few more:

Why do you think votes are useless in scumhunting?
Why didn't you try to save Ottofar the first night, if you were so damn sure he wasn't scum?
Also: What kind of town are you, to clean ignore a question simply because the guy who asked it hasn't answered yours? I mean seriously, you're trying to use playground logic in this game? 'He didn't answer my question, so I'm not answering his, nyeh nyeh nyeh'? Jesus, you even commented that you don't much care if this makes you look scummy! Why not? Do you think yourself that much above suspicion?
Also also: Why do you keep acting like you were the only person that gave Otto a chance? The only person to question his scumminess? If you really do think you were the only one who thought he might not be scum, then why the hell did you think I kept asking him questions, even after be effectively told me to stop doing so and just lynch him? If I was so certain he was scum, wouldn't I have just put my vote on him and ignored him? Stop trying to pretend you were the only person who so much as suspected he was town. I gave him every chance to change my mind.

Jetsquirrel, your turn.

Why didn't you try to save Ottofar the first night either?
If you were also so cocksure he was town, why didn't you say anything to even so much as discourage the lynch?

EAT WALL OF TEEEEEEEEEEEEXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXT!!! Have fun with that, guys. :P
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Toaster on November 01, 2010, 05:46:10 pm
Vote Count:

ragnarok97071: {0}
Flintus10: {0}
Mindmaker: {0}
Jetsquirrel: {0}
Spade: {0}
Azure Sepulchre: {0}
Murphy: {0}

Not Voting: Everybody

Day 2 ends Wednesday 11/3 11 PM EST
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Flintus10 on November 01, 2010, 07:46:20 pm
Mindmaker I believe answered all three of your questions in my post.

I think Ottofar flipping town sucks because
1. we lynched a townie obviously
2. And he just sat there whimpering and let us do it.

As for who I suspect and what I think your role is in all this well that is also answered. (did you even read it?)

But to elaborate a bit more if you are not town then I think it will be either Azure/Lurker or Jet/lurker but I have nothing on azure except that his initial attack on elegy/Jet did not look too much like a bluff to me.

as for elegy/Jet you need to post more actual content. you can ask questions obviously but you need to start looking through peoples quotes analysing them ect ect.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Flintus10 on November 01, 2010, 07:49:00 pm
SPADE You are online now and you are my second suspect because of the active lurking read over some posts analyse them and tell us who you think is suspicious!
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on November 01, 2010, 10:08:46 pm
But to elaborate a bit more if you are not town then I think it will be either Azure/Lurker or Jet/lurker but I have nothing on azure except that his initial attack on elegy/Jet did not look too much like a bluff to me.

That was rather the point. =/ I assume you're referring to something more specific, though, so please elaborate. You're right about the lurkers, though, but there's another one a good deal worse than Spade.

Ragnarok. Post and post properly, because this isn't moving unless I'm given a damn good reason. And no, I won't ask you any questions or tell you what to post. By this stage, you should be able to draw your own conclusions and ask your own questions. I can't be bothered to give any concessions to a blatant lurker.

Dammit, scum; why didn't you kill Spade or ragnarok? Kamina actually played, for Christ sake... >.>
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Murphy on November 02, 2010, 01:45:55 am
Quote from: Azure Sepulchre
Jetsquirrel, your turn. Why didn't you try to save Ottofar the first night either?
He did remove his vote though. I only managed to get a very vague answer on what was the reason of that, something about Ottofar being broken.
But on day 2 he suddenly says he unvoted because
Quote from: Jetsquirrel
i knew he was a townie, he acted like me when he broke.
Well, Jetsquirrel, you've seen Otto act like you did sometime ago and, based on that, concluded that he's a townie.
1) Why that? People are different, so this was barely a reason to be sure about his identity.
2) If you were so sure he was a townie, why didn't you post your thoughts before Day 1 had ended? This is uncooperative.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: webadict on November 02, 2010, 06:51:25 am
I think Azure Sepulchre is the only one that answered my question. Does anyone else wish for the Town to succeed?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Toaster on November 02, 2010, 07:56:07 am
Vote Count:

ragnarok97071: {1} Azure Sepulchre
Flintus10: {0}
Mindmaker: {0}
Jetsquirrel: {0}
Spade: {0}
Azure Sepulchre: {0}
Murphy: {0}

Not Voting: Everybody but Azure Sepulchre

Day 2 ends Wednesday 11/3 11 PM EST

Spade and ragnarok97071 have been prodded.

Note: If someone has not posted for some time (Longer than 36 hours, less strict over weekends), you may request a prod.  I can't guarantee I'll notice who is posting and who isn't, but if one is requested, I'll go back and see when that player's last post is.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Mindmaker on November 02, 2010, 02:59:35 pm
Why didn't you try to save Ottofar the first night, if you were so damn sure he wasn't scum?

Are you kidding me?
What the hell was I trying to do all day long?
I ceartainly did deliver a lot of theories, asked a lot of questions and gave reasons, why the whole thing with Ottofar being scum was rubbish.
You really can't blame me, that the only people responding to this posts were the ones, which I directly adressed.
How am I supposed to save someone, who has 3+ votes on him, alone?
All I can do is trying to see the situation from another angle, from my angle, to be exact.
If nobody does express interest to the walls of text I wrote, how should I know they're not sharing you beliefs?

Why do you think votes are useless in scumhunting?

If you vote, without providing a good reason, its useless. People will not care, and even find you suspicious.
If you vote, provide a good reason, but other peple simply ignore you, it's still useless.
A townie is not a one-man-army, you know?

Also: What kind of town are you, to clean ignore a question simply because the guy who asked it hasn't answered yours? I mean seriously, you're trying to use playground logic in this game? 'He didn't answer my question, so I'm not answering his, nyeh nyeh nyeh'? Jesus, you even commented that you don't much care if this makes you look scummy! Why not? Do you think yourself that much above suspicion?

Your pitiful attempt to ridicule me is noted, but ignored.

At the first glance it looked like he tried to overrun me with accusations, hoping that I would forget any of the questions I had asked.
However I have to admit, that the answers are there, even if they are all extremly narrow minded.
Sorry about that, Flintus.

I'm not above suspicion.
I was angry, that's all.

Also also: Why do you keep acting like you were the only person that gave Otto a chance? The only person to question his scumminess? If you really do think you were the only one who thought he might not be scum, then why the hell did you think I kept asking him questions, even after be effectively told me to stop doing so and just lynch him?
If I was so certain he was scum, wouldn't I have just put my vote on him and ignored him? Stop trying to pretend you were the only person who so much as suspected he was town. I gave him every chance to change my mind.

Don't ask questions, where you already know the answer.
I doubt you haven't looked at it from a scum point of view.

If you have two people, voting on somehow, who in the end turns out to be town, then those two players will most likely become the new prime suspects.
However if you manage to convince other players, to follow you example, the blame is shared and you've made yourself more that enough room to argue, who the "real" scum is.
So yes, this is another possible use of further questioning.

Mindmaker Do you have any justified reason to think Otto was at least a likely town player?

It's actually quite simple.
Why would a member of the mafia act so dumb, to get himself lynched on day one.
You can answer me this, Azure.

What tactic did he employ?
How was it supposed to gain him anything?

And I never was sure he was, in fact, a townie. I gave that possibility about 70%. So yeah, it was a gamble.
The way you both behaved, only reinforced me in my beliefs.

And if you are indeed town then who are your prime suspects?

Well for once you and Azure, for reasons already posted and now seeing you working together against me. Why is no one else bothered by me if I'm so obviously scum?

Then Jetsquirrel. Altough I think that Elegy was just being childish at the beginning, I don't see why Jetsquirrel is defending him (even after I questioned his answer regarding the appraisal of the way Elegy played).

Afterwards Ragnarok. There is a fifty-fifty chance he could be on either side.

Spade/Murphy. No idea, there isn't enough substance to guess anything. If they could post some more, adressing the current situation, I could tell you more.

Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Jetsquirrel on November 02, 2010, 03:28:11 pm
Quote
Then Jetsquirrel. Altough I think that Elegy was just being childish at the beginning, I don't see why Jetsquirrel is defending him (even after I questioned his answer regarding the appraisal of the way Elegy played).

Fuck elegy man, IM NOT HIM. I'm a other being i got a different brain a other way of thinking. See this is the minus of getting replaced because your precessor may have fucked up everything.

Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Mindmaker on November 02, 2010, 03:37:56 pm
Fuck elegy man, IM NOT HIM. 

I never said that.

See this is the minus of getting replaced because your precessor may have fucked up everything.

So now he "fucked up"?
Didin't you rate him somewhere between "average" and "quite good"?

Please elaborate, why you change your mind every couple of posts.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on November 02, 2010, 07:58:30 pm
Are you kidding me?
What the hell was I trying to do all day long?
I ceartainly did deliver a lot of theories, asked a lot of questions and gave reasons, why the whole thing with Ottofar being scum was rubbish.
You really can't blame me, that the only people responding to this posts were the ones, which I directly adressed.
How am I supposed to save someone, who has 3+ votes on him, alone?
All I can do is trying to see the situation from another angle, from my angle, to be exact.
If nobody does express interest to the walls of text I wrote, how should I know they're not sharing you beliefs?

Eh, I already explained how you and Jetsquirrel (presuming, for a moment, I bought into his nonsense about knowing Otto was scum) could have saved him. If I recall correctly, there were two other people with a single vote on either of them. Now, if both you and Jetsquirrel had placed your votes on one of those people, then it would have become a tied vote and no one would have been lynched. Better yet, if someone withdrew a vote on someone else in order to make sure at least someone got lynched and they flipped town, it would have all but guaranteed their position as scum. Ah, well; I'm just postulating now. >.>

I still don't know why you tried to defend him, though, considering he wasn't even defending himself. Personally, I still can't even fathom how that makes someone look like town. It was tantamount to active bloody lurking.

If you vote, without providing a good reason, its useless. People will not care, and even find you suspicious.
If you vote, provide a good reason, but other peple simply ignore you, it's still useless.
A townie is not a one-man-army, you know?

That's not necessarily how every game is played. If a good reason is provided for a vote and it is nonetheless ignored, that just means you're playing with shitty town who can't see the writing on the wall. Not much you can do about that, but it has little bearing on the power of a vote. Just means town is full of lurkers/people who don't much care which way the game goes. >.>

Your pitiful attempt to ridicule me is noted, but ignored.

Ahahahahaa... aha... hmm. You're funny. :)

Don't ask questions, where you already know the answer.

Hmm? Oh, no; you just missed the point of the question. I was quite annoyed after trawling through Jet's big ol' postful of bollocks and was just venting my frustration at your mixture of self-satisfied smugness over arguing against the Otto lynch and your emo attitude towards town future. I will admit the whole thing was rhetorical, but I was still annoyed.

I doubt you haven't looked at it from a scum point of view.

If you have two people, voting on someone, who in the end turns out to be town, then those two players will most likely become the new prime suspects.
However if you manage to convince other players, to follow you example, the blame is shared and you've made yourself more that enough room to argue, who the "real" scum is.
So yes, this is another possible use of further questioning.

...I'm trying to figure out what your point here is. Are you attacking me over rying tp persuade people to lynch Otto because I thought he was scum?

...Jesus. Do you even know what he fuck town have to do?

It's actually quite simple.
Why would a member of the mafia act so dumb, to get himself lynched on day one.
You can answer me this, Azure.

What tactic did he employ?
How was it supposed to gain him anything?

You appear to be under the presumption the Mafioso are criminal masterminds with a hand in every decision town makes, when in reality they're just as human as anyone else. Just as easily as they can play tactics, they can make mistakes and they can fuck up. Perhaps Otto had simply resigned himself to a lynch, perhaps he couldn't think of how to argue back, perhaps he was just crap scum. Hell, if scum were to play perfectly, how do you think town would be able to catch them? The only way we can really catch them is by waiting for them to make scumslips, to make mistakes, to answer an important question too quickly or too slowly. By watching voting patterns, reading through the arguments; in other words, by playing the damn game.

As for what I thought he was doing... I've explained all that before. If you haven't read it, then it's your own damn fault.

And I never was sure he was, in fact, a townie. I gave that possibility about 70%. So yeah, it was a gamble.
The way you both behaved, only reinforced me in my beliefs.

Sooo... you're really gonna try and tell me you found Otto's silence to be a towntell? You're really gonna try and say the fact that I gave him every chance I could throughout the day to let him change my mind was a scumtell?

Huh. Right. Whatever you say.

Well for once you and Azure, for reasons already posted and now seeing you working together against me. Why is no one else bothered by me if I'm so obviously scum?

Hmph. I see what you're trying to do. You're trying to orchestrate a pair-up between me and Flintus. You asked us each separate questions earlier today, and now that we're responding to them and offering questions of our own back you're trying to claim we're teaming up on you.

Also, explain to me why no one else bothered to suspect me after day 2 started except you and Jetsquirrel? If I'm so obviously scum, then why hasn't everyone voted for me yet? Fuck you and your scummy attempt to make it look like we're ganging up on you when you can't be assed to answer questions handed back to you. You're no victim.

On a final note:

Fuck elegy man, IM NOT HIM. I'm a other being i got a different brain a other way of thinking. See this is the minus of getting replaced because your precessor may have fucked up everything.

Heh... hehahahahahahahaa... hah...

You're either very clever scum, Jet, or you're a shared account between, like, five people with none of you ever checking the others posts. How you can contradict yourself this many times, this easily... wow. Just wow. You're Phoenix Wright's wet dream.

Ragnarok's probably getting kicked for being crap, so I'll put my vote on Spade until he says something worth saying. Assuming he can stop being lurky, you can bet your ass I'll be lynching you instead, Jet.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Flintus10 on November 02, 2010, 08:04:43 pm
Mindmaker Do you have any justified reason to think Otto was at least a likely town player?
It's actually quite simple.
Why would a member of the mafia act so dumb, to get himself lynched on day one.
You can answer me this, Azure.

So...you think he was town because he acted too scummy.
And you spent the entire first day trying to protect him and now you admit he was acting dumb?
Then in that case you can hardly blame us for thinking he was scum right?
 Either way that is a terrible reason and does give you any reason to not suspect him I mean why a townie would play so badly and get himself lynched.
I also love how it seems like you know how a good scum would act considering this is your first game and you are apparently town.

However I have to admit, that the answers are there, even if they are all extremly narrow minded.
Sorry about that, Flintus.
God just before giving me a bunch of extremely narrow minded answers you state this, and you also just had a crack at Azure for his “Pitiful attempt to ridicule you”.
And I never was sure he was, in fact, a townie. I gave that possibility about 70%. So yeah, it was a gamble.
The way you both behaved, only reinforced me in my beliefs.
Based on your answer I find it absolutely ridiculous that you could possibly find Ottofar 70% likely to be town for the simple reason that he played so badly.
And if you are indeed town then who are your prime suspects?
Well for once you and Azure, for reasons already posted and now seeing you working together against me. Why is no one else bothered by me if I'm so obviously scum?
Well we have two lurkers who do not want to post anything. Jet-squirrel who you yourself have said can’t seem to decide anything and Murphy just seems to be passively aggressively prodding everyone and we have to assume that if you are scum then at least one of the others players is mafia right?
ALSO

Hmmm, many good points made here.  I agree.  This is suspicious, though there is definitely the possibility of Mindmaker just being a noob at the beginning.  I think he's at the top of my list of Otto's scumbuddies (assuming Otto's scum, everything changes if he's not), along with ragnarok.  The only reason I suspect him more is Otto's lynch all lurkers comments realised what use questions were you didn't use them effectively but know your posting these walls of text and working well. Which makes me wonder though it's not impossible for
Otto did not flip scum but that still does not change the fact that Kamina was both suspicious of you and a confirmed townie and he died during the night...coincidence eh? Or did you decide to kill the quietest of those who you thought were on to you so as to avoid suspicion?

No questions that desperately  need answering here but I think it is your best interest that you think about all these points.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Toaster on November 02, 2010, 08:21:38 pm
Spade and Ragnarok have been prodded again. They are up for forced replace unless they post before I find replacements.

I won't have non-participation ruin my games.

If either are replaced, there will be a mod-extension.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [Two replacements needed!]
Post by: ragnarok97071 on November 02, 2010, 08:56:38 pm
sorry for not doing stuff, stuff happened. Nothing to say, really. Sad that we're not doing so well.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [Two replacements needed!]
Post by: Flintus10 on November 02, 2010, 09:02:31 pm
If stuff happened you could have said.

Either way if you are trying to say you will be playing from now on then read through some posts and actually post something
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Toaster on November 02, 2010, 09:23:15 pm
Ragnarok has returned.  Still looking for replacement for Spade unless he posts again.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Murphy on November 02, 2010, 11:22:56 pm
I'm sorry for not posting enough substantial thoughts. I'm just at a loss.
Maybe we need an extension again.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on November 02, 2010, 11:33:22 pm
Mmm, I agree. Extension.

Also, guys: give Web your list. It doesn't have to be comprehensive, and it's not like it'll hurt our chances. >.>
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Murphy on November 03, 2010, 12:26:58 am
It's actually quite simple.
Why would a member of the mafia act so dumb, to get himself lynched on day one.
As Flintus already said, why would a townie act so dumb, to get himself lynched on day one, huh?

I'll answer Webadict's question, seeing as he insists on it.
Quote
So, please, while you're playing, just list out what it is you think you're looking for, and I'll help point you guys in the right direction. This will also help scum by identifying some startling easy catches on your part.
You're asking what we're looking for?
Well, for every person, I'm looking for a plausible scenario of how their words and actions justify as townie's/mafia's words and actions. If I can only come up with a non-plausible or overcomplicated scenario for a person, I consider them scummy/non-scummy. Unfortunately I think I'll have to abandon this tactic because it becomes too difficult to keep everything in mind after a week of posting and mutual accusations.

Furthermore, I'll withdraw my earlier suspicions against Azure. I was suspecting him because I've come up with a plausible scenario of how scum-Azure could make it all like it turned out. However, I've realized that just like Ottofar's bad play wouldn't indicate him as a townie (to anyone but Mindmaker), Azure's very active play does not necessarily make him mafia.

My top suspect is now Jetsquirrel, if only for inconsistence of his answers. Also, I'll repeat my questions:
Jetsquirrel, you've seen Otto act like you did sometime ago and, based on that, concluded that he's a townie.
1) Why that? People are different. You've even used this as an argument yourself:
Quote from: Jetsquirrel
Fuck elegy man, IM NOT HIM. I'm a other being i got a different brain a other way of thinking.
so you barely had a real reason to be sure about Otto's identity.
2) If you were so sure he was a townie, why didn't you share your thoughts before Day 1 had ended? Especially suspicious is that you did so after he was lynched.

My secondary suspects would be Spade and Ragnarok. Too little cooperation.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Jetsquirrel on November 03, 2010, 01:06:58 am
Quote
So now he "fucked up"?
Didin't you rate him somewhere between "average" and "quite good"?

Please elaborate, why you change your mind every couple of posts.

what nononononono, i never said he fucked up but people now think all the time that im Elegy which i am not i replaced him both physicly speaking and mentally.

Quote
2) If you were so sure he was a townie, why didn't you share your thoughts before Day 1 had ended? Especially suspicious is that you did so after he was lynched.

i could but lets now do this, suppose you knew that he was a townie (almost sure) then what would you do to save him with +3 votes on his head? The answer is not much since the scum would convince the other people that voting ottofar is the best choice!
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Mindmaker on November 03, 2010, 01:16:29 am
I agree on the extension .
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Flintus10 on November 03, 2010, 01:18:42 am
I can trust my gut. And I think you're too defensive. You should use more time to hunt scum, and prove yourself town that way, rather than claiming I have no evidence.

This, just THIS. Gut feeling arguments ARE the lowest possible argument that can be made in mafia games, this also indicates you want to attack the player without anything at all. But since you all cracked Ottofar, and got 3 votes on him i don't see any reason that my 4rth vote remains on him. Except ofcourse his mindless assault on Elegy ( now me)Unvote Ottofar

Jetsquirrel: What do you think of the situation? Do you find anyone suspicious?


So about here Jet did you think Ottofar was town when you made this quote?

And why do you think he was town, a reason other than "He played like me when I was town once" Because it is fairly certain that Ottofar played town terribly.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Jetsquirrel on November 03, 2010, 01:21:25 am
This is a begginer game aye? He played like me when i play my 3rd mafia game i think and i also had no jackshit what was going on. and i just knew it unless you will accuse me of being the cop.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Murphy on November 03, 2010, 02:17:50 am
Quote
2) If you were so sure he was a townie, why didn't you share your thoughts before Day 1 had ended? Especially suspicious is that you did so after he was lynched.

i could but lets now do this, suppose you knew that he was a townie (almost sure) then what would you do to save him with +3 votes on his head? The answer is not much since the scum would convince the other people that voting ottofar is the best choice!
Er, I wasn't asking why didn't you save him. I was asking why didn't you elaborate on your thoughts. You only made a short remark on how he is broken anyway. During day 2 you did reveal a bit more, you now said:
Quote
Because i knew he was a townie, he acted like me when he broke

Were you afraid of drawing suspicion? To think about it now, it's kinda justified, seeing as Mindmaker did elaborate and is now being pressed about that. But a good townie should elaborate anyway, especially when asked to do that. And you were asked repeatedly before the night.

Regarding your unvote of Ottofar I'll say this:
Of course, if I replaced someone, it would be only natural for me to call my vote back as a first action, then study the thread and think who to vote for. But you stated a different reason. You implied that you were familiar with the thread already.

I'm very interested in hearing what Spade and Ragnarok have to say about it.
Also, an advice from Town IC would be appreciated.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Flintus10 on November 03, 2010, 02:48:31 am
What the hell jet you know Ottofar was town "Just becasue you knew?"
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Toaster on November 03, 2010, 08:07:29 am
Vote Count:

ragnarok97071: {0}
Flintus10: {0}
Mindmaker: {0}
Jetsquirrel: {1} Murphy
Spade: {1} Azure Sepulchre
Azure Sepulchre: {0}
Murphy: {0}

Not Voting: ragnarok97071, Flintus10, Mindmaker, Jetsquirrel, Spade

Three extension requests heard.  Day 3 has been extended, and now ends Thursday 11/4 11 PM EST

One replacement needed.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: webadict on November 03, 2010, 08:21:44 am
*sigh* I hate doing this, but I might be able to play.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Jetsquirrel on November 03, 2010, 08:32:06 am
*sigh* I hate doing this, but I might be able to play.

oh god no
i just got a mental image of John travolta punching kids in a swimming pool to get information out of them. Being john (you) and the kids (us)
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Jetsquirrel on November 03, 2010, 08:32:44 am
but i do however agree that he joins , but the scum will be fucked....
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: webadict on November 03, 2010, 08:34:50 am
What if I'm scum?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Jetsquirrel on November 03, 2010, 08:36:43 am
What if I'm scum?

ARG! hes in my head already!
*headslam*
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Flintus10 on November 03, 2010, 08:38:06 am
I don't think the game would be as much fun if Webadict joins as town then yes we should definetely win...although Jet webadict could be scum if Spade was also, or are you certain that spade is town scum?  ;)
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Jetsquirrel on November 03, 2010, 08:39:55 am
what? hes not in the game yet so i dont, i however red some mafia games where he played in and he probaly is a freaking good player and ehh town scum?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Flintus10 on November 03, 2010, 08:42:10 am
You don't seem to understand see if spade was scum then Webadict would be also but in your post you seemed sure that Spade/webadict would be town and the only way you would know that for sure is if you were the scum
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Jetsquirrel on November 03, 2010, 08:46:10 am
You don't seem to understand see if spade was scum then Webadict would be also but in your post you seemed sure that Spade/webadict would be town and the only way you would know that for sure is if you were the scum

Nice one but that wasn't what i meant because i forgot to write Either scum or town will be fucked
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Flintus10 on November 03, 2010, 08:51:22 am
That's a little hard to believe
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Murphy on November 03, 2010, 09:25:57 am
Does the game outcome really depend on skill that much?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on November 03, 2010, 10:08:30 am
If Web joins as town, he'll be too much of a threat for beginner maf to allow to live and he'll be killed this night. If he doesn't die, then I'd be almost certain he's scum. Pretty WIFOMie, true, but that's what happens when you have a reputation like his and let it loose in a beginner game.

I mean, hell; he's already told us that - without posting any more - the scum could be found already. It's basically game over for maf if he's town, in which case they can't afford not to kill him. Which is why I don't have any problems announcing this to everyone. Scum should probably already know this, actually, if Bayer's already decided to warn them, but meh.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Vector on November 03, 2010, 10:18:58 am
Does the game outcome really depend on skill that much?

Yes.  Always.


I mean, hell; he's already told us that - without posting any more - the scum could be found already.

I support Webadict in this statement >_>
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on November 03, 2010, 10:33:18 am
Spade's being replaced, ragnarok's posted (although he hasn't posted near enough to satisfy me, but nonetheless he did)... yeah. I think I'll go for my main actual FoS now instead of bashing lurkers.

Unvote Spade, Vote Jetsquirrel.

I support Webadict in this statement >_>

You dang pro's and your omniscience... -_-

Stop making me feel inadequate, you monster. ;_;
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on November 03, 2010, 10:40:07 am
Also, as an argument for getting Web into this game:

Note to all: If you don't let me in, your game dies.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Vector on November 03, 2010, 10:44:02 am
You dang pro's and your omniscience... -_-

Stop making me feel inadequate, you monster. ;_;

Nah... what I'm saying, and what Webadict's saying, is that if you looked carefully at everything people are saying and put it together, you could figure out the game quite easily.  But you guys don't seem to know what you're looking for, and when we suggest that you should find out what you're looking for, you ignore us.

Him, rather.  It was his idea.  But it's what everyone should be doing.


Why yes, I AM the Town IC.  Glad you noticed.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Jetsquirrel on November 03, 2010, 10:54:35 am
Quote
Unvote Spade, Vote Jetsquirrel.

is that all? nothing more to add to that?
I find it funny that Murphy votes for me and a few posts later you vote for me, scum buddy maybe?
Azure Why didn't you start attacking me earlier when i was your MAIN FoS? If i really was your main FoS then you would have attacked me much much earlier but you didnt do that so there must be a other reason? One of those reasons can be
1. I said that i knew that Ottofar was town and he turned out town magicly! Coincidence i think not i assumed from his actions that he was town.
2. The fuck im not Elegy post, Which i think is true since quite some people kept asking me stuff about elegy while they should go scumhunting and not ask questions about a person that left.
Like i said that can be 1 of the reasons you have voted for me now. But i think that your vote is scummy, you did exactly in that post what Ottofar did. VOTE because he thinks im scum.

Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Murphy on November 03, 2010, 11:15:49 am
Quote
if you looked carefully at everything people are saying and put it together, you could figure out the game quite easily
Yeah, yeah. "I'm trying to free your mind, Neo. But I can only show you the door. You're the one that has to walk through it."
Heh, now I know what ICs are for. To be cryptic and tell us now much we suck at this game!

Quote
But you guys don't seem to know what you're looking for
We're looking for scumtells. Are you asking what looks like a scumtell to us? Or are you asking what should we look for instead?
I'll answer both questions with one word: dunno.
Gut feeling probably. 'Cause we're.. y'know, beginners.

For some reason I regret having asked for advice already.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on November 03, 2010, 11:24:57 am
is that all? nothing more to add to that?

No, there isn't. I've said all I'm gonna say on the subject of you. It isn't my fault if you decide to completely ignore it. However, as for why I didn't immediately try to lynch you - I was trying to encourage the two lurkers to act. Now that that's done, I'm voting you.

However, stop claiming you knew Otto was town on the first day because he acted like you. If you had, you would've said so instead of claiming he didn't need any more votes on him. I've had enough of your bullshit.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Mindmaker on November 03, 2010, 12:41:04 pm
Does the game outcome really depend on skill that much?

Yes.  Always.

If you're scum, then maybe.
You could still win, even if your partner screwed up badly.

However I don't see how this does apply to town.


Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Mindmaker on November 03, 2010, 12:43:23 pm
[...]and when we suggest that you should find out what you're looking for, you ignore us.

Maybe if Webaddicts entrance would have been less arrogant, some more people would have listened to him.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: webadict on November 03, 2010, 12:48:32 pm
To be fair, it's neither my game nor my job.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Toaster on November 03, 2010, 12:52:17 pm
Web: Please confirm that you want to replace, and I'll get the role PM to you if so.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on November 03, 2010, 01:26:49 pm
Maybe if Webaddicts entrance would have been less arrogant, some more people would have listened to him.

Don't ignore sound advice just because you don't like the source. >.>
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Jetsquirrel on November 03, 2010, 01:35:48 pm
Quote
However, stop claiming you knew Otto was town on the first day because he acted like you. If you had, you would've said so instead of claiming he didn't need any more votes on him. I've had enough of your bullshit.

K seriously this is starting to get repetive, all the time people are sitting here and accusing me for those 2 reasons. Well to be honest you need a lot more than 2 reasons and some very good arguments.

But now i'm going to do a trick which can be probaly reckless and stupid as hell.

but to do that i need to ask a question first.
How many scum are in this game btw?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on November 03, 2010, 01:45:38 pm
Of course it's getting repetitive; you, against all evidence to the contrary, keep saying you knew Otto was town on day 1 when all you did day 1 was agree that the lynch should go through. You're trying to distance yourself from a lynch you wanted in the most pathetic manner possible. My vote ain't going nowhere.

Also, there's two. Read the first page; it should've told you everything you needed to know.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Mindmaker on November 03, 2010, 03:11:32 pm
Eh, I already explained how you and Jetsquirrel (presuming, for a moment, I bought into his nonsense about knowing Otto was scum) could have saved him. If I recall correctly, there were two other people with a single vote on either of them. Now, if both you and Jetsquirrel had placed your votes on one of those people, then it would have become a tied vote and no one would have been lynched. Better yet, if someone withdrew a vote on someone else in order to make sure at least someone got lynched and they flipped town, it would have all but guaranteed their position as scum. Ah, well; I'm just postulating now. >.>

Why should I have diverted attention to someone, who was way down in the list of my suspicous subjects, if the prime subjects were right in fron of me (they were Elegy/Azure back then)?
Sure it couldn't be worse, than the Ottofar lynch and we might even have gotten a lucky hit (assuming the mafia deployed some strategy I didn't think of), but still doesn't make much sense.

I still don't know why you tried to defend him, though, considering he wasn't even defending himself. Personally, I still can't even fathom how that makes someone look like town. It was tantamount to active bloody lurking.

Several times you considered the actions of players from two angles (mafia/town).
I can't see why you didn't spent a single thought to the possibility of Ottofar being town.

...I'm trying to figure out what your point here is. Are you attacking me over rying tp persuade people to lynch Otto because I thought he was scum?

...Jesus. Do you even know what he fuck town have to do?

I bloddy well know, that it isn't their job to jump at the first target that offers itself.

As for what I thought he was doing... I've explained all that before. If you haven't read it, then it's your own damn fault.

You only explained, what he did from a mafia point of view.
I haven't seen you post any other theory about him after he got killed.
Point me in the right direction, if I'm wrong.

Also, explain to me why no one else bothered to suspect me after day 2 started except you and Jetsquirrel? If I'm so obviously scum, then why hasn't everyone voted for me yet?

I guess because no beginner wants to pick a side, at least this is how I felt.

So...you think he was town because he acted too scummy.
And you spent the entire first day trying to protect him and now you admit he was acting dumb?
Then in that case you can hardly blame us for thinking he was scum right?
Either way that is a terrible reason and does give you any reason to not suspect him I mean why a townie would play so badly and get himself lynched.

The only thing I could blame you for, is for not thinking outside the box, in a game which basically requires to do so.

I also love how it seems like you know how a good scum would act considering this is your first game and you are apparently town.

That contradicts what you just said.
So I either have no idea, how scum is supposed to act, or I have a damn good idea.

Hmmm, many good points made here.  I agree.  This is suspicious, though there is definitely the possibility of Mindmaker just being a noob at the beginning.  I think he's at the top of my list of Otto's scumbuddies (assuming Otto's scum, everything changes if he's not), along with ragnarok.  The only reason I suspect him more is Otto's lynch all lurkers comments realised what use questions were you didn't use them effectively but know your posting these walls of text and working well. Which makes me wonder though it's not impossible for

Otto did not flip scum but that still does not change the fact that Kamina was both suspicious of you and a confirmed townie and he died during the night...coincidence eh? Or did you decide to kill the quietest of those who you thought were on to you so as to avoid suspicion?

No questions that desperately need answering here but I think it is your best interest that you think about all these points.

I bolded the part, which is important.
Whatever he wrote, was null and void at the end of day 1.

Even though he wasn't a threat, I'd agree he was a viable target. Not too involved or suspicious, but neither to passive.
You could eliminate him, leaving everyone else in the dark.

However assuming that I'm mafia, I'd get rid of Azrure right away.
That would at least lift this fatiguing stalemate.
I'd be able to talk my way out of everything else, using the Ottofar-card right and diverting suspicion on any of the other voters, as well as the lurkers.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Vector on November 03, 2010, 03:39:31 pm
Quote
if you looked carefully at everything people are saying and put it together, you could figure out the game quite easily
Yeah, yeah. "I'm trying to free your mind, Neo. But I can only show you the door. You're the one that has to walk through it."
Heh, now I know what ICs are for. To be cryptic and tell us now much we suck at this game!

I'm sorry, honey-baby.  Should I have named the scumteam for you?  I know!  Next time I'll tell you that you don't have a prayer at winning, because you're too damned stupid and lazy to go find out what's what.

I don't think you're stupid and lazy.

I think that this is a hard game to learn.  I had a hard time learning it, and no matter what anyone told me about how to play, it didn't matter--because I had to find out how to play myself.  It's like learning social skills in general, you know?  You have to pay attention.  People can outline basic principles, but they can't just give you a manual to read and leave you with a solid understanding.

You have to do the legwork, just like everyone else.


We're looking for scumtells. Are you asking what looks like a scumtell to us? Or are you asking what should we look for instead?
I'll answer both questions with one word: dunno.
Gut feeling probably. 'Cause we're.. y'know, beginners.

For some reason I regret having asked for advice already.

I'm asking you what you think you're looking for, yes.  What is your profile of a scumbag?  If you don't have any idea, then read a completed game or two.  I suggest Beginner's Mafia I.  It's pretty obvious in its development.

Blame us all you want.  I'm trying to help, here, and if you don't want to play along, then you don't have to--but as Webadict said, this is not my job.  If you want another IC, ask for another IC.  Right now, though, I'm what you have... so take it or leave it.


However I don't see how this does apply to town.

You use skill to find the scum and make them slip.  Apply pressure.  Be powerful.  This isn't a game where the scum are picking off the townies like sheep, and the scum control the game.  You allow them to control the game.  You have to take back control and hunt those scum.  Make them scared of you.


Maybe if Webaddicts entrance would have been less arrogant, some more people would have listened to him.

We can always blame our own failures on other people's problems.  Yes, Webby is very, very arrogant.  That is his problem.  He is also very, very good at this game.  Not listening to him is your problem.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Jetsquirrel on November 03, 2010, 04:11:42 pm
How many scum are there in this game?!?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Mindmaker on November 03, 2010, 04:27:21 pm
You use skill to find the scum and make them slip.  Apply pressure.  Be powerful.  This isn't a game where the scum are picking off the townies like sheep, and the scum control the game.  You allow them to control the game.  You have to take back control and hunt those scum.  Make them scared of you.

I meant that skill isn't as important as communication and teamwork, if you're playing town.

I'd believe the mafia could win without communicating at all.
You could act independent, blending in with the town and the others wouldn't be able to draw a connection between you two.

We can always blame our own failures on other people's problems.  Yes, Webby is very, very arrogant.  That is his problem.  He is also very, very good at this game.  Not listening to him is your problem.

Never said I didn't listen to him.
However I was already bulding my own list (in my head), before he told us how badly we sucked.

Anyway I don't think a scum-stereotype will bring us anywhere.
People are different and there won't always be foolproof way to determine someones scumminess.

I'd like to figure it out on my own.
See what their playstlye is, watch their behaviour and simply get to know them.
That much more useful, than a "How scum are you?"-checklist.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Mindmaker on November 03, 2010, 04:28:08 pm
How many scum are there in this game?!?

2, I think.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on November 03, 2010, 04:32:19 pm
How many scum are there in this game?!?

Also, there's two. Read the first page; it should've told you everything you needed to know.

After reading through it I realized the first post doesn't say the number of maf. However, this post (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=68860.msg1660557#msg1660557) does.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Mindmaker on November 03, 2010, 04:35:13 pm
By the way, who is getting replaced?
Spade or Ragnarok?
Because both of them are pretty much inactive, but it only says that one will be replaced.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Vector on November 03, 2010, 04:37:31 pm
Never said I didn't listen to him.
However I was already bulding my own list (in my head), before he told us how badly we sucked.

Anyway I don't think a scum-stereotype will bring us anywhere.
People are different and there won't always be foolproof way to determine someones scumminess.

I'd like to figure it out on my own.
See what their playstlye is, watch their behaviour and simply get to know them.
That much more useful, than a "How scum are you?"-checklist.

All right, good.  You should do very well in the future, then.  Just keep up the good effort =)
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: webadict on November 03, 2010, 04:44:44 pm
By the way, who is getting replaced?
Spade or Ragnarok?
Because both of them are pretty much inactive, but it only says that one will be replaced.
I would suggest both of them being replaced.

I am also unsure if I should join. I'd have to trudge through a lot... Hmph. When's Day end?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on November 03, 2010, 04:50:43 pm
Tomorrow at 11 PM, EST.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Toaster on November 03, 2010, 07:36:10 pm
Vote Count:

ragnarok97071: {0}
Flintus10: {0}
Mindmaker: {0}
Jetsquirrel: {2} Murphy, Azure Sepulchre
Spade: {0}
Azure Sepulchre: {0}
Murphy: {0}

Not Voting: ragnarok97071, Flintus10, Mindmaker, Jetsquirrel, Spade

Day 2 ends Thursday 11/4 11 PM EST

Currently only Spade is up for replacement, though Ragnarok will be force replaced if he goes 48 hours from his last post without posting (Weekends, again, give more slack.)  You may ask for more extensions if they are needed.  I'm pretty generous with them.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Flintus10 on November 03, 2010, 08:10:51 pm
Quote
Unvote Spade, Vote Jetsquirrel.

is that all? nothing more to add to that?
I find it funny that Murphy votes for me and a few posts later you vote for me, scum buddy maybe?
Azure Why didn't you start attacking me earlier when i was your MAIN FoS? If i really was your main FoS then you would have attacked me much much earlier but you didnt do that so there must be a other reason? One of those reasons can be
1. I said that i knew that Ottofar was town and he turned out town magicly! Coincidence i think not i assumed from his actions that he was town.
2. The fuck im not Elegy post, Which i think is true since quite some people kept asking me stuff about elegy while they should go scumhunting and not ask questions about a person that left.
Like i said that can be 1 of the reasons you have voted for me now. But i think that your vote is scummy, you did exactly in that post what Ottofar did. VOTE because he thinks im scum.

Okay Okay Okay.... JET
You know if you could just provide us with the quote from DAY 1 stating that you thought Ottofar was town this would all go away.

I still don't know why you tried to defend him, though, considering he wasn't even defending himself. Personally, I still can't even fathom how that makes someone look like town. It was tantamount to active bloody lurking.

Several times you considered the actions of players from two angles (mafia/town).
I can't see why you didn't spent a single thought to the possibility of Ottofar being town.
Are you trying to say here we should only look at a player ONLY from a town angle, because nobody is 100% confirmed and this is a horrible way to play as town.
...I'm trying to figure out what your point here is. Are you attacking me over rying tp persuade people to lynch Otto because I thought he was scum?

...Jesus. Do you even know what he fuck town have to do?

I bloddy well know, that it isn't their job to jump at the first target that offers itself.
Which is funnily enough EXACTLY what Ottofar did as well and he did not even have a legitimate reason nor would he explain himself. If Ottofar did not act how you think a townie should act then why were you so sure he was innocent?
So...you think he was town because he acted too scummy.
And you spent the entire first day trying to protect him and now you admit he was acting dumb?
Then in that case you can hardly blame us for thinking he was scum right?
Either way that is a terrible reason and does give you any reason to not suspect him I mean why a townie would play so badly and get himself lynched.

The only thing I could blame you for, is for not thinking outside the box, in a game which basically requires to do so.

You just completely palmed this one away without justification. I mean what the heck you don’t get it I want to know what made you so sure that Ottofar was town and saying that he played badly may be an “Outside the Box” reason for thinking he is town but there is no way that could give you the assurance that you had.
I also love how it seems like you know how a good scum would act considering this is your first game and you are apparently town.

That contradicts what you just said.
So I either have no idea, how scum is supposed to act, or I have a damn good idea.

No you see my point is the only way you’d have a good idea is if you had a scum IC assisting you.
Hmmm, many good points made here.  I agree.  This is suspicious, though there is definitely the possibility of Mindmaker just being a noob at the beginning.  I think he's at the top of my list of Otto's scumbuddies (assuming Otto's scum, everything changes if he's not), along with ragnarok.  The only reason I suspect him more is Otto's lynch all lurkers comments realised what use questions were you didn't use them effectively but know your posting these walls of text and working well. Which makes me wonder though it's not impossible for

Otto did not flip scum but that still does not change the fact that Kamina was both suspicious of you and a confirmed townie and he died during the night...coincidence eh? Or did you decide to kill the quietest of those who you thought were on to you so as to avoid suspicion?

No questions that desperately need answering here but I think it is your best interest that you think about all these points.
I bolded the part, which is important.
Whatever he wrote, was null and void at the end of day 1.

Even though he wasn't a threat, I'd agree he was a viable target. Not too involved or suspicious, but neither to passive.

However assuming that I'm mafia, I'd get rid of Azrure right away.
That would at least lift this fatiguing stalemate.
You could eliminate him, leaving everyone else in the dark.I'd be able to talk my way out of everything else, using the Ottofar-card right and diverting suspicion on any of the other voters, as well as the lurkers
.
So if you were mafia then you would be doing exactly what you have been today then? Except apparently azure is in your way or something?

Either way I have heard enough Mindmaker
1.   You claim that you certainly knew Ottofar was town despite not having any reason to be assured.
2.   You did not start defending him until it was almost certain he would be lynched
3.   Since the new day you have started acting a lot more smug and confident and yet bemoaning the fact that the town will lose, which is definitely a scum tell.
You are mafia and that is how you knew Ottofar was town so you defended him after it was almost certain he would be lynched so you could spend all of day two saying “I told you so therefore I am town” Which is a scum tell.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Toaster on November 03, 2010, 08:28:58 pm
Ragnarok has requested a replacement.  Now seeking two replacements!
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: webadict on November 03, 2010, 08:56:18 pm
Ragnarok has requested a replacement.  Now seeking two replacements!
You might want to consider modkilling both of them.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on November 03, 2010, 09:12:39 pm
If you do plan to modkill them, then I'd like to request another extension. If they both appear as town, then we'll instantly be in mylo. I dunno how the rest of the players would feel about that, but I'd rather make damn sure of my lynch on such a precarious occasion - assuming I'll lynch at all.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on November 03, 2010, 09:18:26 pm
*whoops; counted the wrong number of names. I meant lylo... which I suppose is a good deal worse. >.>
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Flintus10 on November 03, 2010, 09:21:31 pm
Yeah I'd rather we didn't modkill them and lose the game if they are town
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Toaster on November 03, 2010, 09:22:30 pm
Ragnarok has requested a replacement.  Now seeking two replacements!
You might want to consider modkilling both of them.

I'd like replacements if at all possible.  You said you might, plus I PMed a fellow who posted in DMA that he hadn't played before, asking him if he wanted in.  If you both in, we're back up to full.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: webadict on November 03, 2010, 09:27:00 pm
Ragnarok has requested a replacement.  Now seeking two replacements!
You might want to consider modkilling both of them.

I'd like replacements if at all possible.  You said you might, plus I PMed a fellow who posted in DMA that he hadn't played before, asking him if he wanted in.  If you both in, we're back up to full.
I'm going to be too busy and uninterested to play to my full ability, plus asking a newbie to join a game in progress is not ideal.

Seeing as how there's two players missing, just modkill them both and pretend it's Day 3.

Sorry. I know it's bad practice, but letting them stay in is doing no one any good.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Toaster on November 03, 2010, 09:40:06 pm
I'd rather not have to modkill at all, if possible.  It's a last resort for any game.

Also, Kamina has offered to replace back in.  It's unorthodox, but no spoilers have been posted in dead chat, and he knows nothing more than he did first go-around.  If there are no serious objections, I'll let him replace back in.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Vector on November 03, 2010, 09:45:41 pm
There's precedent.  Go for it.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: webadict on November 03, 2010, 09:46:58 pm
I'd rather not have to modkill at all, if possible.  It's a last resort for any game.

Also, Kamina has offered to replace back in.  It's unorthodox, but no spoilers have been posted in dead chat, and he knows nothing more than he did first go-around.  If there are no serious objections, I'll let him replace back in.
It should be fine, barring anyone in dead chat speaking as well.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Toaster on November 03, 2010, 09:50:38 pm
Good enough for me!  I put a note in deadchat that it's now closed, and I'll open a new one.

KaminaSquirtle has replaced Spade.

Game on!  Still need one more replacement.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on November 03, 2010, 09:52:26 pm
Soooo... Kamina. Was there a bright white light at the end of the tunnel, or what?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 03, 2010, 09:59:42 pm
Ok, thought you could keep the mighty Kamina down, did you?  TOO BAD HE COMES BACK EVEN WHEN KILLED, BITHCES!  TIME TO DIE, SCUM!
Here's my theory, which I cooked up in dead chat.  (It makes more sense if you reread the thread as you read it.)
Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Soooo... Kamina. Was there a bright white light at the end of the tunnel, or what?
This theory seems pretty bright to me!  Dead chat was like a journal, Ottofar said almost nothing.
I also have a new word for how jet was/is acting "lolstupid".
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 03, 2010, 10:02:29 pm
This should be enough to chew on for QUITE a while.  It's good to be back, my friends(or enemies?  you can never tell in mafia).
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 03, 2010, 10:31:11 pm
HOW COULD I FORGET HOW MUCH I WANTED TO DO THIS?!!!
Quote
if you looked carefully at everything people are saying and put it together, you could figure out the game quite easily
Yeah, yeah. "I'm trying to free your mind, Neo. But I can only show you the door. You're the one that has to walk through it."
Heh, now I know what ICs are for. To be cryptic and tell us now much we suck at this game!

Quote
But you guys don't seem to know what you're looking for
We're looking for scumtells. Are you asking what looks like a scumtell to us? Or are you asking what should we look for instead?
I'll answer both questions with one word: dunno.
Gut feeling probably. 'Cause we're.. y'know, beginners.

For some reason I regret having asked for advice already.
(http://www.bingegamer.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/phoenix-wright-objection.jpg)
Why the hell would a townie want their IC to shut up, hmmmm?  You're just trying to shut up any help we could get at finding scum!  Too bad it's too late!  Great job on killing me, I must congratulate you, if it weren't for the circumstances, it would have worked!  But it didn't! 
The game is up, Murphy!

Srs:  I chose Murphy over Jet because without him, Jet would be lot worse off than Murphy without Jet.  Kill the partner who can think, and the one who can't will be rendered useless!
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 03, 2010, 10:37:51 pm
Oh, and votecount, please.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on November 03, 2010, 10:41:44 pm
Murphy votes for Otto at last second, bandwagoning and generally being useless to town. But that vote showed a contrast with Jet's, thus separating them so if one gets killed the other will be mostly free of suspicion. And after I was killed Jet immediately jumped to see who I was suspicious of, consistent with a mafia member who killed me to move suspicion on to who I last suspected.

Gaaaaaaaaaah why didn't I notice that..! >.<

If there had been anything in that list - anything - that should have been obvious, it was that. I iz tardd  :-[

Ah, well. Feel pretty bad for him. He'd come pretty close to winning until you showed up with your damned logic and giant Phoenix Wright billboard.

You went with me on Otto, which went to hell instead; I'll go with you on this, sayin' as it makes so much damn sense anyway. Unvote Jet, Vote Murphy. Well done on your epic win, sirrah. Perhaps I should strive to be dead more often myself, if it proves to be so enlightening.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 03, 2010, 10:54:40 pm
Yeah, after being detached from the game for a while, you can view it more objectively.  I came up with this theory after seeing them both being stupid at once a few pages ago, and saw how well it fit when I reviewed the thread.  Then I was pretty much going insane with wanting to tell you guys, but then I found a way back in, to steal the day from scum!  I'm gonna go to bed now.  Can't wait to see the full discussion when I get up!
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on November 03, 2010, 11:02:45 pm
...oh God. Oh God no. I just noticed...

Ok, this is hilarious! Under my theory, Azure's BS argument was correct! XD

...

(http://kazikox.blogas.lt/files/2009/05/yet_another_picard_facepalm.jpg)
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Murphy on November 03, 2010, 11:29:25 pm
Ha, now's where it gets interesting.
You think I'm a smart scum and Jet is a stupid scum.
And I have to prove that I'm actually not that smart :D

Quote from: KaminaSquirtle
And then at Murphy raging at the ICs for giving advice.
So you won't believe that a newbie townie can think of ICs as useless?
I don't really believe that ICs could be of any help to town.
They are forbidden to help us directly, and they are just bad at helping indirectly. At least Webadict is.
Also, Webadict wasn't an IC from the start. He's just some person who came here to say how bad we suck at this game. I'd rather have him leave us alone and learn by myself. Or maybe he could join, I'd like to see how he miraculously finds the real scum for us (assuming he does not become one).

Quote from: KaminaSquirtle
And Murphy is impersonating a raeging idiot who doesn't get the IC's help
I'm not impersonating anyone. I was just tired of how complex the situation had become; of my own inability to find reliable clues in this mess. And I'm also angry at the ICs claiming to be of help while they in fact can't help the town.

Quote from: KaminaSquirtle
And honestly I could easily see Elegy doing something that stupid.
Quote from: KaminaSquirtle
And continuing, Murphy seems to have known way too many things. No scummy behavior from Elegy, even though he was pretty obviously scummy.
Are you speaking of Elegy "protecting" me? It could in fact be a scumtell, no matter if I'm scum or town. But it was the only scumtell by that time. I just considered it too little to accuse Elegy. Ottofar looked way more scummy for me.

Quote from: KaminaSquirtle
He even suggested Otto wasn't scum, just stupidly stubborn. He KNEW that, since he was scum.
Now that's ridiculous. Every time someone makes a correct guess, they are automatically assumed to have known all along.
I only tried to look through all possibilities. And I was trying to be careful, because at day one we didn't have much certainty.

Quote from: KaminaSquirtle
AND Murphy's questions when Jet rejoined seemed an awful lot like something you would ask your scumbuddy.
No idea what are you talking about.
Gonna read again later, currently I don't have time.

Quote from: KaminaSquirtle
Murphy pretty much stopped posting once Ottofar was pretty much the guaranteed lynch.
Quote from: KaminaSquirtle
Murphy votes for Otto at last second, bandwagoning and generally being useless to town.
I was thinking that you need 5 votes to lynch someone, dammit! I said so explicitly!

Quote from: KaminaSquirtle
When I pointed out Azure probably won't get NKed, Jet's answer was consistent with the scum not NKing him.
Can't find where you did that. It was I who pointed that out:
Quote from: Murphy
I'm almost sure Azure will then survive the night, because he would either be mafia himself or a good daytime target for them to blame.

Quote from: KaminaSquirtle
And after I was killed Jet immediately jumped to see who I was suspicious of, consistent with a mafia member who killed me to move suspicion on to who I last suspected.
Maybe. Jet is likely scum.

Quote from: KaminaSquirtle
And Murphy claims he's not suspicious, lol nice slip up there bub.
Wat?
How's that supposed to be a slip? I was just trying to look through a mafia's eyes and analyse.
My analysis was mostly crap though.

Quote from: KaminaSquirtle
And look at you lurking in a corner and chuckling evilly.
I'm chuckling right now, yeah.
No, I'm not mafia. But the situation is still hilarious. Webadict was right after all, we are going to lose hardcore.

Quote from: KaminaSquirtle
Murphy now protects Jet with the fact that he removed his vote. Now THAT isn't suspicious at all.....
You probably misread. I do not protect him. I suspect him because he removed his vote. That's partly the reason I'm voting for him now.

Quote from: KaminaSquirtle
Curiosity from Murphy on how bad Webadict joining will screw him over. What stupid trick is Jet going to pull? He already knows the number of mafia, he can't expect saying that to make him look innocent. So much lolstupid. Probably will out Murphy as scum out of raeg. Or maybe one last ditch chance to save his own skin.
I'm curious what is that question Jetsquirrel is going to ask. If he's going to ask it at all.

P.S. Kamina, I'm glad you're back, regardless ;)
Because at least the game now won't stall.

P.P.S. Please stop posting unspoilered images. They make the topic harder to read. Or make them smaller at least.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Vector on November 03, 2010, 11:32:24 pm
And I have to prove that I'm actually not that smart :D

... No, you have to prove that you're not scum.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Murphy on November 03, 2010, 11:42:33 pm
Quote
... No, you have to prove that you're not scum.
Kamina seems to imply that I could only be a townie if I'm not smart =)

Could it be that your new role is scum, KaminaSquirtle? I was suspecting Spade too.
Although no... it is unlikely. Too little time has passed since you replaced Spade. You wouldn't have enough time to come up with a false accusation, especially one so complex and plausible-looking.
So you're probably a townie.

The first scum is Jetsquirrel, but who's the second then... Azure?
Sorry, don't have time right now. Gotta go, looking forward to see how it all unfolds.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day One: The Mafia of Tewby Vale
Post by: Murphy on November 04, 2010, 12:22:18 am
What errands I was going to do now got cancelled, so I'm back.

Quote from: KaminaSquirtle
AND Murphy's questions when Jet rejoined seemed an awful lot like something you would ask your scumbuddy
Found what I was asking Jetsquirrel when he replaced Elegy.
Jetsquirrel, will you maintain the vote Elegy has cast on Ottofar? Feel free to answer after you've taken time to familiarize yourself with the thread.
Also, do you consider your position unstable because of Elegy's actions, or do you think that there weren't any scumtells from him?
I can see your point now. Although I'm unsure why'd a mafia need to ask their scumbuddy anything at all.
I'm just unfamiliar with replacements (I've only played IRL before, remember?), what I thought was "Jet's position is handicapped, let me ask him something ambiguous, if he's a mafia, he'll slip easily". Unfortunately, his answer was bland.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Flintus10 on November 04, 2010, 01:09:47 am
My tunnel vision shames me  :-[ but my money is still on Mindmaker/Jet
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: NativeForeigner on November 04, 2010, 01:25:26 am
Hey, I'll be the replacement if you still need one.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Mindmaker on November 04, 2010, 01:26:43 am
My tunnel vision shames me  :-[ but my money is still on Mindmaker/Jet

You'll lose that bet, buddy.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Jetsquirrel on November 04, 2010, 02:07:11 am
Murphy do you have more than that to prove that i'm scum?
because you gave the reasons which everybodt already did, so you either got no evidence at all or you are just parroting people to keep a low profile.

and like Kamina said you bandwagoned Ottofar at the last moment and right now you are not much of a help either expect trying to find a lynch to scum win.






Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Murphy on November 04, 2010, 02:14:03 am
If I and Jet are scum, why'd I want to remove my vote from innocent Azure and shift to lynching a scumbuddy? When I have a good cause against Azure? Quite a stupid move it would have been if I was a mafia.

Flintus, I humbly ask you to support me against Jetsquirrel. I doubt that you will get any support to your current vote, and everyone (even those accusing me) seems to agree that Jetsquirrel is a mafia. I realize that with Jet flipping mafia, I'll still be under heavy suspicion. But at least we won't have a LyLo on the third day.

I'll make a roster of who might be scum, in case I'm killed the town can use it. I'll reconsider and reuse some of my earlier posts in it.
The suspects are listed from most scummy to least scummy.

1) Jetsquirrel (former Elegy):
Has extremely inconsistent behavior. Had one scumtell during day 1 (that's going into discussion about me having three votes, and overly trying to sound unsure and vague). During day 2 his actions generally contradict each other. Also claimed to have known Otto to be town; note - he didn't suggest, he claimed to have known.
Mafia with 90% certainty.

2) Azure Sepulchre:
As I've said, a plausible scenario is that scum-Azure's gambit wasn't a gambit initially, but a genuine attack, which he later dropped and then claimed it to be a trap in which Ottofar has fallen.
Was expected to not get NKd; knowing these expectations, the scum could kill him to confuse everyone. They didn't.
As a townie he could probably be a threat, being slightly more experienced than everyone. They didn't kill him.
Also, him sounding experienced could be because he had actually known everything from the start (yes, this one is a lame argument, so feel free to disregard it).
Quite eagerly jumps on me after barely enough time to read and carefully analyze Kamina's post.
Mafia with 70% certainty (successfully bussing Jetsquirrel would practically make him win).

3) KaminaSquirtle (former Spade):
While dead, he gets an "insight". Then he reads the topic very carefully, collecting much of what he thinks could be evidence against me. 10 minutes after he's back into the game, he posts all this. Could he be a mafia? Having got a lot of arguments against me and having got a mafia role, it'd be only natural to post these arguments (being mafia he now sees them to be wrong but plausible - just what a mafia needs), thus shifting any suspicion from himself. But to post that within 10 minutes of his return? Without any reconsidering? Quite reckless, though still possible.
Mafia with 50% certainty.

4) Ragnarok
No idea.

5) Mindmaker, Flintus:
Can't notice any good tells. I didn't pay much attention to these two, sadly.
Speaking about being drunk/having hangover could be preparing a good excuse for a possible slip, but that's hardly a good scumtell.

Quote from: Jetsquirrel
Murphy do you have more than that to prove that i'm scum?
because you gave the reasons which everybodt already did
Just because someone spotted these reasons before, they don't magically become any less convincing.
If you insist, I'll look through the thread and carefully list all the scumtells that came from you.

Quote
and like Kamina said you bandwagoned Ottofar
I've said already - I was thinking we need 5 votes to lynch him, and if we don't get 5 votes by the end of day, noone will be lynched.
And I would prefer lynching scummy-looking Ottofar than lynching noone.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Murphy on November 04, 2010, 02:19:25 am
Quote from: Murphy
As I've said, a plausible scenario is that scum-Azure's gambit wasn't a gambit initially, but a genuine attack, which he later dropped and then claimed it to be a trap in which Ottofar has fallen
Wait.
I suddenly realized that this couldn't be a genuine attack. A scum can't attack another scum genuinely.
It means that my "Azure=scum" scenario is wrong.

Now I'm truly confused.
Okay, still I'll try to think everything through a bit later. Will we get an extension due to the replacement?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Vector on November 04, 2010, 02:24:07 am
A scum can't attack another scum genuinely.

Just so you know, it's called a "staged fight."  I've successfully pulled one once, but it helped that we were arguing violently in both the main thread and the scumchat.

In any case, it's an advanced technique that usually doesn't feature in beginners' games.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Murphy on November 04, 2010, 02:25:40 am
Do the scum have their own chat?
I was thinking they could only communicate during the night.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Vector on November 04, 2010, 02:28:44 am
Do the scum have their own chat?
I was thinking they could only communicate during the night.

Yeah, scum have a QuickTopic (it's a host for private threads) where they talk to each other at any time, day or night.  It makes the games here a bit crazier because the scum can always coordinate.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Flintus10 on November 04, 2010, 02:52:43 am
My tunnel vision shames me  :-[ but my money is still on Mindmaker/Jet

You'll lose that bet, buddy.
heh either way I have enjoyed it.

What do you think of the Jet/Murphy scum team? I believe you thought that it was Azure and I yes?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Mindmaker on November 04, 2010, 03:40:37 am
Gaaaaaaaaaah why didn't I notice that..! >.<

If there had been anything in that list - anything - that should have been obvious, it was that. I iz tardd  :-[

Ah, well. Feel pretty bad for him. He'd come pretty close to winning until you showed up with your damned logic and giant Phoenix Wright billboard.

You went with me on Otto, which went to hell instead; I'll go with you on this, sayin' as it makes so much damn sense anyway. Unvote Jet, Vote Murphy. Well done on your epic win, sirrah. Perhaps I should strive to be dead more often myself, if it proves to be so enlightening.

This hipocisy ends now, Azure.
You won't accuse others for not providing any reasons on their own for voting and then do the same thing yourself.
This vote stays here until you elaborate why you are voting for Murphy yourself, or at least deliver a heavily  commented version of Kaminas theory.

The way it looks now, is that you tried to rally support against me and as I didn't work out as you expected, you started looking for an easier target.
First elaborate, then vote.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Vector on November 04, 2010, 03:41:21 am
Good.  This is looking better, guys.  Congratulations!
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Mindmaker on November 04, 2010, 03:53:19 am
Furthermore, I second the request for an extension.
This whole replacing and coming back from the dead, is making this beginners game unnecessary confusing.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Vector on November 04, 2010, 03:55:57 am
This whole replacing and coming back from the dead, is making this beginners game unnecessary confusing.

You're doing better, and yes, you deserve the extension... but quit bitchin', folks.  The beginners' games here are usually the most cutthroat, fast-paced, and brutal.  The BMs are hard games.  Rather than complaining about the difficulty, try feeling proud of yourself for how well you're doing.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Mindmaker on November 04, 2010, 04:23:20 am
Are you trying to say here we should only look at a player ONLY from a town angle, because nobody is 100% confirmed and this is a horrible way to play as town.

Never said that. Please read my posts again.

Quote
Which is funnily enough EXACTLY what Ottofar did as well and he did not even have a legitimate reason nor would he explain himself. If Ottofar did not act how you think a townie should act then why were you so sure he was innocent?

I've explained this several times now and I don't feel like repeating myself.

Quote
You just completely palmed this one away without justification. I mean what the heck you don’t get it I want to know what made you so sure that Ottofar was town and saying that he played badly may be an “Outside the Box” reason for thinking he is town but there is no way that could give you the assurance that you had.

Well at least I tried to think about the possibility.
Why didn't you do that?
And if you did, why didn't you share your thoughts?

Quote
No you see my point is the only way you’d have a good idea is if you had a scum IC assisting you.

I'm not even sure if they are allowed to do such a thing.
And if they were, I wouldn't make use of it.

Sure, I appreciate constructive criticism, however I don't want anyone to tell me how I'm supposed to play the damn game.
I can think for myself.

Quote
So if you were mafia then you would be doing exactly what you have been today then? Except apparently azure is in your way or something?

No, if I was mafia, everything would be different.
Azure would have died in night one.
There would be no annoying stalemate and I would have more room to act on the other players.

Either you didn't read my post properly, or I completely missed what you were trying to say now.

Quote
1.   You claim that you certainly knew Ottofar was town despite not having any reason to be assured.

I was quite sure, because of the reasons already posted. The lack of imagination on you side, is hardly my fault.

Quote
2.   You did not start defending him until it was almost certain he would be lynched

2 votes is far from certain.
The mafia can achieve 2 votes all by itself, don't forget that.

Quote
3.   Since the new day you have started acting a lot more smug and confident and yet bemoaning the fact that the town will lose, which is definitely a scum tell.
You are mafia and that is how you knew Ottofar was town so you defended him after it was almost certain he would be lynched so you could spend all of day two saying “I told you so therefore I am town” Which is a scum tell.

How is this a scum tell?
Is there a rule or something?

I'm annoyed for reasons already stated.
Not one damn player here listened to me, although I was right all along.
You didn't even gave my theory a chance.

You're telling me I must be mafia, based on that what I did, would be an unreasonable thing for a townie to do.
However I disagree with you on that.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 04, 2010, 06:44:35 am
I don't have much time now, so this'll be short, I'll write a more detailed post when I have time later.
Murphy's defense.
My main point isn't each one of those examples, it's the combination of them and how they mesh with EleJet's behavior over the thread that incriminates you.  Will counter each individual point later.
Quote from: Murphy
P.P.S. Please stop posting unspoilered images. They make the topic harder to read. Or make them smaller at least.
Ok, will do.
Quote from: Murphy
As I've said, a plausible scenario is that scum-Azure's gambit wasn't a gambit initially, but a genuine attack, which he later dropped and then claimed it to be a trap in which Ottofar has fallen
Wait.
I suddenly realized that this couldn't be a genuine attack. A scum can't attack another scum genuinely.
It means that my "Azure=scum" scenario is wrong.

Now I'm truly confused.
Okay, still I'll try to think everything through a bit later. Will we get an extension due to the replacement?
It then would have been a gambit, which was engineered to look like a genuine attack.  However, the way I see it, Azure has been the only thing keeping you guys scumhunting at this point.  Why not let the day pass with little-to-no scumhunting, so us townies are totally confused?  Honestly I think Azure is town.
My tunnel vision shames me  :-[ but my money is still on Mindmaker/Jet

You'll lose that bet, buddy.
Why Mind, though?  Granted I haven't fully analyzed this pairing, but he looks like frustrated town to me, as I (think?) I mentioned in my argument.

Ok, I've run out of time, will be back later to finish up this train of thought.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on November 04, 2010, 06:53:19 am
Gaaaaaaaaaah why didn't I notice that..! >.<

If there had been anything in that list - anything - that should have been obvious, it was that. I iz tardd  :-[

Ah, well. Feel pretty bad for him. He'd come pretty close to winning until you showed up with your damned logic and giant Phoenix Wright billboard.

You went with me on Otto, which went to hell instead; I'll go with you on this, sayin' as it makes so much damn sense anyway. Unvote Jet, Vote Murphy. Well done on your epic win, sirrah. Perhaps I should strive to be dead more often myself, if it proves to be so enlightening.

This hipocisy ends now, Azure.
You won't accuse others for not providing any reasons on their own for voting and then do the same thing yourself.
This vote stays here until you elaborate why you are voting for Murphy yourself, or at least deliver a heavily  commented version of Kaminas theory.

The way it looks now, is that you tried to rally support against me and as I didn't work out as you expected, you started looking for an easier target.
First elaborate, then vote.

Sure thing. I just woke up and have maths, though, so don't expect it right now.

I will say two things, though; Murphy and Jet being the scum simply merges together far more smoothly than you and Jet being scum. Besides, we have a free lynch at the moment. Kamina trusted me with Otto, so I'll trust him with this. And if it's wrong, you can always try to lynch me tomorrow. Or, if you wind up dead, other people can if Murphy flips as town.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Flintus10 on November 04, 2010, 07:24:53 am
Okay I think I will back off Mindmaker for now so unvote, you havn't really answered my questions in a way that gets rid of all suspicion nor have you provided good reasoning but I am beggining to suspect that it is mearly a clash on the way we play the game and inexperienced tells, rest assured if either Murphy or Jet is town then you will be straight back to number one.

But it seems we aren't getting anywhere right now so I will concentrate on Kamina's accusations. and look through them tomorow.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Flintus10 on November 04, 2010, 08:03:22 am
I suppose it is only fair that I still answer your questions so here goes.

Well at least I tried to think about the possibility.
Why didn't you do that?
And if you did, why didn't you share your thoughts?

Actually I am gona need you to explain this one why didn't I do what?


How is this a scum tell?
Is there a rule or something?

I'm annoyed for reasons already stated.
Not one damn player here listened to me, although I was right all along.
You didn't even gave my theory a chance.

You're telling me I must be mafia, based on that what I did, would be an unreasonable thing for a townie to do.
However I disagree with you on that.

It is a scum tell because if we were on sucessful on day one a scum player would bemoan and complain how they were right in order to influence the rest of the town but they would still be quite happy that they had succesfully eliminated a townie and therefor confidence would grow. understand?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 04, 2010, 08:20:40 am
Okay I think I will back off Mindmaker for now so unvote, you havn't really answered my questions in a way that gets rid of all suspicion nor have you provided good reasoning but I am beggining to suspect that it is mearly a clash on the way we play the game and inexperienced tells, rest assured if either Murphy or Jet is town then you will be straight back to number one.

But it seems we aren't getting anywhere right now so I will concentrate on Kamina's accusations. and look through them tomorow.
You say that it's a clash in the way you two play the game?
Then this should help:  Both Azure and Flintus, what are your philosophies when playing the game?    What do you consider a scumtell?  How do you think your ideas on playing the game could differ?
Well at least I tried to think about the possibility.
Why didn't you do that?
And if you did, why didn't you share your thoughts?

Actually I am gona need you to explain this one why didn't I do what?
He's asking why you didn't consider the possibility of Ottofar being town.  Way to beat a dead penguin, Mindmaker.

How is this a scum tell?
Is there a rule or something?

I'm annoyed for reasons already stated.
Not one damn player here listened to me, although I was right all along.
You didn't even gave my theory a chance.

You're telling me I must be mafia, based on that what I did, would be an unreasonable thing for a townie to do.
However I disagree with you on that.

It is a scum tell because if we were on sucessful on day one a scum player would bemoan and complain how they were right in order to influence the rest of the town but they would still be quite happy that they had succesfully eliminated a townie and therefor confidence would grow. understand?

Also fits with Mind being pissed off in general, especially with the fact that we had very few leads until I resurrected myself.  And I don't see any confidence from Mind, just anger at the situation, and really wanting to tell everyone HOW STUPID THEY WERE for not agreeing with him in the first place, so we could have gotten more leads.

But seriously, Mindmaker, beating a dead horse won't help town.  While I don't think you're scum at this point, since that invalidates my theory, which at this point works a lot better than the theory of you being scum, you're sure doing a great job of trying to make me change my mind.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Toaster on November 04, 2010, 08:31:03 am
NativeForeigner has replaced ragnarok97071.

Game on!  We're up to full capacity now.  Thanks to all the replacements!

Day has been mod-extended 24 hours.  Please bold extension requests, or I will probably miss them.


Vote Count:

NativeForeigner: {0}
Flintus10: {0}
Mindmaker: {0}
Jetsquirrel: {1} Murphy,
KaminaSquirtle: {0}
Azure Sepulchre: {1} Mindmaker
Murphy: {2} KaminaSquirtle, Azure Sepulchre

Not Voting: NativeForeigner, Jetsquirrel, Flintus10

Day 2 ends Friday 11/5 11 PM EST
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on November 04, 2010, 09:53:57 am
Alright, then...

First off, I'd like to point out to Mindmaker that I didn't put into writing during day 1 that I had any suspicions at all that Otto was town because that would automatically make my attack look weak. When attacking someone when you're looking for a lynch, you don't have the convenience of being able to show you're in two minds about them, otherwise town will dismiss your argument as weak-willed hogwash and the scum will know they have a chance of manipulating your opinion. So I attempted to give him a chance the only way that was available - by posing a flood of questions. He answered little, and even the answers contained little more than a dismissive 'whatever', so what did you expect me to do? Think he was town because he blanked me? Pssh.

You say that it's a clash in the way you two play the game?
Then this should help:  Both Azure and Flintus, what are your philosophies when playing the game?    What do you consider a scumtell?  How do you think your ideas on playing the game could differ?

I've already listed what I think are scumtells. As for general philosophy... I'm not great at reading people, particularly through the written medium, so I try to mainly work on logic. Which is why I put more faith in tried-and-tested scum slips than in 'gut feeling' arguments. The fact that I missed Murphy jumping on Otto after Jet had quit the field still rankles. -_- 

As for why I'm butting heads with Mindmaker? Most likely because he plays like an ass. He's tunnelled on me since day 1 and just refuses to let go, even when his argument gets slapped in the face by stupidscum. I mean, fuck, he actually had the balls to declare me the hypocrite after all that crap Jet said! Do you seriously believe Jet, as a normal townie, also knew Otto was town, Mindmaker? Are you just gonna ignore how he spazzed out about Elegy when he started getting pressed in favour of lynching me because I know a winning argument when I see one? I should ignore every scumtell ever unless I think of it first? I only proposed that people think for themselves before relying on others for a vote. Well, I've thought about it, and I'm going with Kamina's argument because it makes more sense than you being scum. What the hell else do you want?

Elaborate why you are voting for Murphy yourself, or at least deliver a heavily commented version of Kaminas theory.

...God damn, son. You be wearin' me out. -_-

You know what? Fuck it. We're pretty much on an accelerated end game here, so my role isn't needed much longer, if it was any use at all.

I'm the Doc. I tried to save Mindmaker night 1 as I figured, if the scum didn't NK me, they'd target my biggest detractor to make me look like an idiot who panics under pressure and kills scary townies. Turns out I'd tried to save the wrong person and I was roleblocked by the scum anyway. This led crecedence (at least to me) to my theory that Mind was scum, as I figured he disliked me enough that - if he couldn't kill me so I could take the heat - he'd at least want a roleblock on me for good measure.

I don't usually play a very aggressive game; I prefer being a lot more quiet and careful than this, being used to playing as the scum more than anything else, but I wanted to hide the Doc is plain sight by being a good deal meaner than I usually am. On the other hand, I didn't realize this might encourage scum to think I was the cop trying to take control of the group, which would explain the roleblock if Mind isn't scum. Since I stupidly said the moment day 2 began that a 'cop with a guilty would be handy right about now', the roleblock would probably be staying on me regardless, so I may as well out.

I was also planning to try to convince scum before night 2 to NK one of the two heavy lurkers as a favour to the game, then I would try to save one of them. If no one died, yay! I have a guaranteed townie. If not, then they weren't much use anyway. If they killed anyone else or if I was roleblocked, then I probably wouldn't have been able to predict it no matter what or it would be irrelevant if I did. Obviously, this all changed when Kamina appeared with his ultra-super-special-awesome scum sheet on Murphy/Jet.

I doubt this'll be enough for Mind anyway, or for anyone else really, so I'll go through Kamina's sheet on a point-by-point basis (although I don't see the purpose, really) and see if I can find a few little scumnuggets of my own.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Mindmaker on November 04, 2010, 10:26:17 am
What do you think of the Jet/Murphy scum team?

Well I could agree on Jet being scum.
He's being far to inconsistent with his answers.

No idea about Murphy though.
He could be just an inexperienced player.
However it's interesting how active he has become, once he got put in the spotlight.

I need to give that idea some proper thought.

Quote
I believe you thought that it was Azure and I yes?

Yes, however I might need to reconsider.
Just give me some time to think about it and to read what Azure is about to post.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Mindmaker on November 04, 2010, 10:37:23 am
Okay I think I will back off Mindmaker for now so unvote, you havn't really answered my questions[...]

Well, I'm doing civil service right now.
So when I'm not in transit with the ambulance and there isn't anything to do with the office, I'll go online, read everything that has been posted and try to answer single question.
I'm a bit restricted in doing so as there could be a deployment at any time and key combinations (Copy&Paste) are deactivated (therefore I can answer only one post at a time.

I should be able to address all the questions once I'm home.
During working hours you only can expect to get bits of information from me.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - One spot remaining!
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on November 04, 2010, 10:56:31 am
Also, something I just noticed:

I'll play.
Know mafia well, but never played online. Also never played it in English =)
Consider me a beginner.

At the very least he's no complete beginner. He can probably still get off with being new to online games, but assuming the game transfers smoothly from forum to IRL play, such a claim should come under scrutiny.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Murphy on November 04, 2010, 12:42:44 pm
It's not like I've ever been in such a heated argument.
What games I had played were much calmer. Also there was much more randomness and less deduction.

Quote
I'm the Doc.
Oh, I completely forgot that there could be power roles.
Wiki says doc claim is mafia.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on November 04, 2010, 01:07:52 pm
In regular circumstances, you'd be correct. However, I couldn't do anything as Doc since I was roleblocked last night and, if not because I acted like a Cop then because I outright stated what I am, it's gonna stay that way. All I have on me is my vote - someone stole my doctor's bag. ;_;

Figured I may as well be frank with the town, though, if I'm gonna be an impotent power role.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: SirBayer on November 04, 2010, 03:34:18 pm
Hey, I didn't know Native was playing Mafia.

Good luck to yah.

I'm scum IC, in case you didn't know, Native. I can totally be posting in this thread.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 04, 2010, 03:41:51 pm
Ok, Mind cut this shit out, if you're town, all you're doing is making yourself look scummy.  Can you honestly say you think Azure is working in the interests of the scum?  Ask yourself that.  Because it looks to me you're just basing your arguments off disagreements, not actual scumhunting.  Just stop this spat, you're just helping scum.  Of course this is assuming you're town.  If you're scum, it should be obvious what you're doing.  But honestly I don't think you're scum at this point.  I can't find a scumteam for you that works nearly as well as Murphy/Jet.  So STOP IT with this stupid (probably) town-town raegfest.
lolstupid
What.  Just.... what.  You haven't even TRIED to defend yourself, and you're accusing someone suspected as your scumbuddy?  Because honestly you're the worst scum I've seen.  Ever.
Big post.
I already said, he's being so stupid that he could blow your cover at any point.  And you call that a good case?  What about Azure being the only thing that kept you guys on topic during my absence?  Why wouldn't scum just let you guys be stupid together?  While I was dead, every time Azure posted I cheered a little.  If Azure is scum, he's ridiculously good at it.  Not good enough

You listed jet as #1, which I can agree with, that is of you town.  But you're just going with your last plan, as you would immediately be called out as scum if you changed it.  I don't see how Azure is anywhere near #2, for reasons mentioned above.  Why so intent on lynching one of our best scumhunters, hmmmmm?  Of course you want me hanging, but don't want to be too obvious about it, so you put me under your other two targets.  And nothing from Mindmaker?  While I don't think he's scum, he would be my next choice after you and Jet.

While you may have thought you needed 5 votes, that wouldn't have stopped you from trying to lynch otto anyway.

And now the scum plays confused townie, so he has an excuse to act dumb and, well, confused.  That way he can contribute nothing to town.
Do the scum have their own chat?
I was thinking they could only communicate during the night.
Great way to show you're stupid, it should be obvious that you're just trying to play dumb now.  Guess you're desperate.
The way it looks now, is that you tried to rally support against me and as I didn't work out as you expected, you started looking for an easier target.
First elaborate, then vote.
Or maybe he saw a very convincing theory, and decided to throw his weight behind it?   You can't accept he found my theory a good one?  Would you care to explain any issues you have with it?
It's not like I've ever been in such a heated argument.
What games I had played were much calmer. Also there was much more randomness and less deduction.

Quote
I'm the Doc.
Oh, I completely forgot that there could be power roles.
Wiki says doc claim is mafia.
Hey guys, great idea!  Let's accuse more people other than me of being scum!  That'll definitely make me look like town.
Also: Azure, you do realize this makes you a prime target for scum, right?  And makes you look a scummier?  Surely you do.  What exactly do you expect to gain from claiming your role?  I'm curious as to your reasoning.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 04, 2010, 03:48:55 pm
And where's NativeForeigner, anyway?  I want to hear what a new player with a has to say on my theory.  Maybe he can point out something obvious I missed.
I just hope he doesn't turn out as horrible as Jet.....
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Mindmaker on November 04, 2010, 04:08:38 pm
Way to beat a dead penguin, Mindmaker.
Quote
But seriously, Mindmaker, beating a dead horse won't help town. 

It's not like I wanted to do that.
I'd have let it go a long time ago, if people would have bothered to spend a single post contemplating on what went wrong.
It just looks like everything I posted on day 1, was a total waste of time and effort this way.

As for why I'm butting heads with Mindmaker? Most likely because he plays like an ass.

We probably both do that.
However I'm not here to be nice and to go a long way round, just to avoid annoying someone.
Being reserved, quiet and minding ones own business, won't save anyone.
You have to be in ones face, if you wan't to get results.
That's one thing Ottofar was right about.

[...]even when his argument gets slapped in the face by stupidscum.

Could you elaborate that?
I'm not quite sure what you are trying to say.

Do you seriously believe Jet, as a normal townie, also knew Otto was town, Mindmaker?

Not even for a second.
However, I'll get around to that later.

I should ignore every scumtell ever unless I think of it first?

No, just think about it first, before you start pointing with fingers.

Well, I've thought about it, and I'm going with Kamina's argument because it makes more sense than you being scum. What the hell else do you want?

Gee, thanks.
So now I'm supposed to close my eyes and pretend I'm not seeing any inconsistencies, just because you're doing me a favor, in lowering me in your list of suspects?

What I want?
No more unnecessary town deaths.

I'm the Doc. I tried to save Mindmaker night 1 as I figured, if the scum didn't NK me, they'd target my biggest detractor to make me look like an idiot who panics under pressure and kills scary townies. Turns out I'd tried to save the wrong person and I was roleblocked by the scum anyway. This led crecedence (at least to me) to my theory that Mind was scum, as I figured he disliked me enough that - if he couldn't kill me so I could take the heat - he'd at least want a roleblock on me for good measure.

I don't usually play a very aggressive game; I prefer being a lot more quiet and careful than this, being used to playing as the scum more than anything else, but I wanted to hide the Doc is plain sight by being a good deal meaner than I usually am. On the other hand, I didn't realize this might encourage scum to think I was the cop trying to take control of the group, which would explain the roleblock if Mind isn't scum. Since I stupidly said the moment day 2 began that a 'cop with a guilty would be handy right about now', the roleblock would probably be staying on me regardless, so I may as well out.

I was also planning to try to convince scum before night 2 to NK one of the two heavy lurkers as a favour to the game, then I would try to save one of them. If no one died, yay! I have a guaranteed townie. If not, then they weren't much use anyway. If they killed anyone else or if I was roleblocked, then I probably wouldn't have been able to predict it no matter what or it would be irrelevant if I did. Obviously, this all changed when Kamina appeared with his ultra-super-special-awesome scum sheet on Murphy/Jet.

Huh.
To be honest I haven't been really taking roles into account in all my theories.

Is it even allowed to reveal your role (or fake it)?
Let's assume it is.

If everything you wrote here is true, then kudos to you.
You really are thinking with portals.

Still, there's the possibility of it being fake, even though I don't believe that.
You would need to be desperate, to make this up and you don't seem to be the type, which gets desperate over such things.

I doubt this'll be enough for Mind anyway, or for anyone else really, so I'll go through Kamina's sheet on a point-by-point basis (although I don't see the purpose, really) and see if I can find a few little scumnuggets of my own.

Even though it might seem unnecessary, I put a high value on it, so I'd appreciate it.

I'll play.
Know mafia well, but never played online. Also never played it in English =)
Consider me a beginner.

At the very least he's no complete beginner. He can probably still get off with being new to online games, but assuming the game transfers smoothly from forum to IRL play, such a claim should come under scrutiny.

IRL and online are two complete different things.
This doesn't have to mean anything.

Unvote.
You're off the hook for now.

There may be truth to the Jet/Murphy constellation, however there's a lot more to Jet.
So what, if Murphy is the smarter mafia player? You already stated that it does little difference in which order we lynch them, if they are both mafia.

My vote goes to Jet, as I'm not completely convinced on the Murphy part of the story.

I'd like to not that I didn't read any of the 3 messages, which got posted, while I was writing this.

Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Jetsquirrel on November 04, 2010, 04:15:35 pm
Quote
What.  Just.... what.  You haven't even TRIED to defend yourself, and you're accusing someone suspected as your scumbuddy?  Because honestly you're the worst scum I've seen.  Ever.

could you direct it to a quote? because i never evr have written lolstupid in this thread yet. expect now ofcourse.
wanna bet that i'm town?

Quote
My vote goes to Jet, as I'm not completely convinced on the Murphy part of the story.

Again do you wanna bet on me that i'm scum? Because if you vote me now then the next day scum will be very very close to winning, ofcourse this may not happen if a doctor intervenes.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 04, 2010, 04:17:31 pm
It's not like I wanted to do that.
I'd have let it go a long time ago, if people would have bothered to spend a single post contemplating on what went wrong.
It just looks like everything I posted on day 1, was a total waste of time and effort this way.
Fine, you want to know where we went wrong?  For one, Ottofar was acting scummy as hell.  For two, we didn't catch any of the Murphy/JetElegy stuff.  That's what I think.  Details are in my theory.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 04, 2010, 04:25:20 pm
Quote
What.  Just.... what.  You haven't even TRIED to defend yourself, and you're accusing someone suspected as your scumbuddy?  Because honestly you're the worst scum I've seen.  Ever.

could you direct it to a quote? because i never evr have written lolstupid in this thread yet. expect now ofcourse.
wanna bet that i'm town?
I'm saying everthing you said in that post was lolstupid.  And you're scum.  Did you even read my theory?
Quote
My vote goes to Jet, as I'm not completely convinced on the Murphy part of the story.

Again do you wanna bet on me that i'm scum? Because if you vote me now then the next day scum will be very very close to winning, ofcourse this may not happen if a doctor intervenes.

Town, then scum?  Scummy as hell, so many contradictions.  And if Azure is doc, he's pretty much guaranteed roleblocked/NKed.  Why would he save you, anyway?
And you expect that argument to work?  If you're town maybe you should at least try to convince us you're not scum instead of resorting to arguments that depend on you being town.  Suggest an alternative, and present convincing evidence to show your alternative theory is correct.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Jetsquirrel on November 04, 2010, 04:29:35 pm
but whatever i seemed to post as defense got either tossed aside or immideatly called scummy by scum, so now i do present you a choice.
You tell everyone to lynch me and i flip town (100% by that)
You go find some real scum
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 04, 2010, 04:34:47 pm
but whatever i seemed to post as defense got either tossed aside or immideatly called scummy by scum, so now i do present you a choice.
You tell everyone to lynch me and i flip town (100% by that)
You go find some real scum
Great defense.  Give yourself a pat on the back.
Maybe you should give some non-BS argument, and then people will listen to you.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Mindmaker on November 04, 2010, 04:49:16 pm
Again do you wanna bet on me that i'm scum? Because if you vote me now then the next day scum will be very very close to winning, ofcourse this may not happen if a doctor intervenes.

You didn't even try to explain why you are contradicting yourself so badly.
And as I said, I'm trying to figure out the game to myself.
Inconsistency seems like a pretty good scumtell for me.

Should you flip town, there won't be anyone who can be blamed for that, except yourself.

That possibility, however, wouldn't leave me perplexed.
Quite on the contary.
It would fuel another theory, I'm currently working on.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 04, 2010, 05:12:56 pm
You go find some real scum
And who would you suggest those scum are?  Reasons?  (Please not more of the same BS)
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Mindmaker on November 04, 2010, 06:01:20 pm
By the way, which question did I not answer, Flintus?
I somehow lost track.

Just remember, that I don't like repeating myself.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: NativeForeigner on November 04, 2010, 06:06:19 pm
Alright, I've done some reading of the previous posts and this is what I have so far.

Azure, revealing your "role", imo, is a stupid move. You could go with the "they thought I was a cop and would just RB me again" argument for your actions, and that's plausible enough. But the primary thing causing my suspicion is the fact that you went from hinting that you were a cop to outright claiming that you're a doctor. It's like you want to assure everyone that you're a townie and should be kept safe, but you've already led us wrong about your role once and the defense of being RBed continuously doesn't seem like a strong defense against that in my opinion, it actually seems kind of scummy.
 
There's no real way to know whether or not you were RBed, so in my opinion, you're probably scum and trying to hide that by claiming you were RBed.

Jet, you're actually starting to be one of my prime suspects right now just from your more recent posts. It seems you've stopped giving a crap and you're now trying to convince everyone that you're a townie by playing the "just you see, I'll totally flip as a townie" card, a desperate move, it seems. However, I haven't much more to go on than that, but you're practically asking to get killed.

Kamina, you're being extremely aggressive, it seems like. You're making accusations everywhere and putting the heat on Jet when it's not really needed. It seems like a scumtell to me, trying to get a townie killed and take the aggro off of yourself. Or maybe you're both scum and trying to distance yourself so one of you can survive.

Mindmaker, I actually don't have much to say against you yet.

Murphy, either you truly didn't know or you're just playing stupid in regards to the scumchat. In more experienced games it would definitely be a scumtell, but I'm not so sure it would be in a beginner's game.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 04, 2010, 06:25:56 pm
Kamina, you're being extremely aggressive, it seems like. You're making accusations everywhere and putting the heat on Jet when it's not really needed. It seems like a scumtell to me, trying to get a townie killed and take the aggro off of yourself. Or maybe you're both scum and trying to distance yourself so one of you can survive.
How else do you expect to gain info but to apply pressure?  I want to see if he's just being really stupid, or if he's actually scum, as I suspect.  I'm trying to force him to defend himself properly, so I can give him a fair assessment, however he's not really cooperating.  At it's heart, aggression is a towntell.  However scum may use it as a strategy.  How does attacking aggressively make me less suspicious, exactly?  I'm attracting attention, putting myself in the spotlight.  And if I were scumbuddies with Jet, you can rest assured I would be voting him, not Murphy.  I'd want him killed ASAP.  And done properly, the bussing would free me of suspicion.  Anyway, he's such an idiot I couldn't coordinate anything with him anyways.

And how am I 'putting accusations everywhere'?  I'm just pushing Jet and Murphy.  Just 2 people, hardly 'everywhere'.

Mostly beginner's mistakes, though, which you can't be blamed for.  You'll see I'm right once you have some experience.
Alright, I've done some reading of the previous posts and this is what I have so far.

Azure, revealing your "role", imo, is a stupid move. You could go with the "they thought I was a cop and would just RB me again" argument for your actions, and that's plausible enough. But the primary thing causing my suspicion is the fact that you went from hinting that you were a cop to outright claiming that you're a doctor. It's like you want to assure everyone that you're a townie and should be kept safe, but you've already led us wrong about your role once and the defense of being RBed continuously doesn't seem like a strong defense against that in my opinion, it actually seems kind of scummy.
 
There's no real way to know whether or not you were RBed, so in my opinion, you're probably scum and trying to hide that by claiming you were RBed.
Where did Azure hint he was a cop, exactly?  I must have missed that.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: NativeForeigner on November 04, 2010, 06:37:55 pm
Quote
However scum may use it as a strategy

If that's true (which it probably is), how are we to know that you're not using that strategy yourself to defend yourself? By putting yourself in the spotlight and bringing in all of the attention, you're doing something that someone wouldn't expect from scum, making it less likely for them to vote to kill you. It seems like a legitimate tactic for a scum to use, but it's difficult to tell whether you're clever scum that's going against the expected (not voting for Jet to clear your name and bringing attention to yourself) or whether you're just a townie doing your thing.

Quote
And how am I 'putting accusations everywhere'?  I'm just pushing Jet and Murphy.  Just 2 people, hardly 'everywhere'.

My mistake, the excessive accusations against just those two led me to believe that you were accusing more people.

Quote
Since I stupidly said the moment day 2 began that a 'cop with a guilty would be handy right about now'

Quote
I didn't realize this might encourage scum to think I was the cop trying to take control of the group

Unless I misunderstood what he was saying, it was at the beginning of day two.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 04, 2010, 06:58:44 pm
Quote
However scum may use it as a strategy

If that's true (which it probably is), how are we to know that you're not using that strategy yourself to defend yourself? By putting yourself in the spotlight and bringing in all of the attention, you're doing something that someone wouldn't expect from scum, making it less likely for them to vote to kill you. It seems like a legitimate tactic for a scum to use, but it's difficult to tell whether you're clever scum that's going against the expected (not voting for Jet to clear your name and bringing attention to yourself) or whether you're just a townie doing your thing.
Well, you don't know for sure, do you?  That's the fun of mafia!  I put myself in the spotlight because I'm confident I can defend myself.
All I was doing is scumhunting.  That's all.  There's really nothing more I can say here, if I defend more we're into pure WIFOM, and well, we all know that leads.
(Protip: It doesn't lead anywhere.)
You can trust me or not.  It's your call.  But I'm gonna keep pushing.  I intend to confirm or deny my theory!
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: NativeForeigner on November 04, 2010, 07:07:18 pm
And there's really nothing more I can say against you at the moment. In the hopes to avoid WIFOM, I'll be holding my tongue. Just know that I'll bring this up again once I've made some more observations and have solid evidence.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Flintus10 on November 04, 2010, 07:28:24 pm
 
By the way, which question did I not answer, Flintus?
I somehow lost track.

Just remember, that I don't like repeating myself.

My point was I wasn't satisfied with the answers to why you thought Offofar was town. You answer was bascially "Because he didn't play wel.l" But either way we can drop this for now as we have more important things to worry about.

And while I agree that if the pairing of Murphy and Jet is the scum then Murphy will be more dangerous but Jet's constant lieing and changing his mind in addition to his "You fools will all see" defence have left me certain that he his the scum while Murphy I am still not 100% sure about. Though Kamina's case looks relatively solid.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 04, 2010, 07:42:38 pm
Quote
Since I stupidly said the moment day 2 began that a 'cop with a guilty would be handy right about now'

Quote
I didn't realize this might encourage scum to think I was the cop trying to take control of the group

Unless I misunderstood what he was saying, it was at the beginning of day two.
Forgot to respond to this part.  Why did you think asking for a 'cop with a guilty' implied you were a cop, Azure?  I'm genuinely curious.  When I was dead, the vibe I was getting was another trap, to get scum to claim they were cop.  But I guess now that wasn't the case.  Ah well, no one took the bait anyway.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 04, 2010, 08:29:21 pm
Spoiler: HEY JET (click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on November 04, 2010, 08:48:20 pm
While I was dead, every time Azure posted I cheered a little.

Why so intent on lynching one of our best scumhunters, hmmmmm?

Aww. :-[ Thanks, bro. <3

Also: Azure, you do realize this makes you a prime target for scum, right?  And makes you look a scummier?  Surely you do.  What exactly do you expect to gain from claiming your role?  I'm curious as to your reasoning.

Several reasons. For one, there was nothing else to do with it but make a claim with it. :(

I couldn't save people because of the scum roleblocker who most likely targetted me because I acted very confident and aggressive during day 1, (like a cop would, in hindsight) and because I openly mentioned at the start of day 2 that a cop with a guilty would be pretty handy, which sounded like something a cop would say if he'd been roleblocked and was pissy about it (in hindsight). So... yeah; like I said, it was an impotent role that couldn't work its intended function any longer. The only thing left for it was to out it - along with what I'd tried to do, my motivations, what had happened as a result and my future plans for the role. It's only information now, but any and all information is useful to town.

Secondly, to gauge reactions.

Not really for myself - I'm already quite set on a Murphy/Jet lynch for now - but for the town in general. For instance; Murphy's first move upon hearing it was to try foisting suspicion on me for making the claim, whereas it appears to have been enough to convince Mind to settle on a Jet lynch instead of me, at least for the time being. Jet simply spazzed out, but that's all he ever really does. Native seems also to suspect me for it, but sayin' as I doubt he's read up on the game yet, I'm not gonna slam him for it. He also seems kind of new and for some reason thinks I'm making a cop claim. ??? Flintus hasn't made his opinion clear yet, but he likely will soon enough. More information for the town, right there. All it took was a claim.

Thirdly... well, it would be inconvienent if the scum knew about this one, so I'm gonna keep it a secret. I rather hope it works, though; as far as I can see, this is well in the town's best interest in case things go south with the lynch.

It's not like I wanted to do that.
I'd have let it go a long time ago, if people would have bothered to spend a single post contemplating on what went wrong.
It just looks like everything I posted on day 1, was a total waste of time and effort this way.

Think about how I felt; I was so damn sure Otto was scum, but everything I thought I had on him was for nothing. I'd made myself look like a scummy tard to everyone, and was left alive to encourage it. I had nothing but a heavy scumtell hanging over my head from the start of day 2. But think about it; if I'd kept referring back to how much I'd fucked up day 1, how would that have helped matters day 2? I simply would have looked vulnerable, weak, and self-pitying - something scum or suspicious town could've easily twisted into a lynch on me. Although I have no problems with getting killed, I do have a problem with convincing the town to waste a lynch on me. I wanted to find the scum today, not keep telling myself I was a moron over and over.

We probably both do that.
However I'm not here to be nice and to go a long way round, just to avoid annoying someone.
Being reserved, quiet and minding ones own business, won't save anyone.
You have to be in ones face, if you wan't to get results.
That's one thing Ottofar was right about.

Oh, no no no; I wasn't talking about your rudeness. On the contrary, I thought you were a fairly fun foil. I was talking about how you were tunnelling me over my fuck up with Otto, trying to tell me over and over that he looked like town but with no evidence that could convince me or anyone else.

Could you elaborate that?
I'm not quite sure what you are trying to say.

Hrm. Phrased that badly.

I was referring to the fact that you decided to pressure Jet only a little and continued to focus on me, even while he was claiming he knew Otto was town and having some kind of existential fit every time Elegy's name was dropped.


Do you seriously believe Jet, as a normal townie, also knew Otto was town, Mindmaker?

Not even for a second.
However, I'll get around to that later.

Oh. Uhh... ignore the first part of my previous point, then.


No, just think about it first, before you start pointing with fingers.

I had. I'd gone through the game in a separate tab, checking all the posts Kamina declared were scumtells on Murphy's part. Jet, I already figured was scum.

Gee, thanks.
So now I'm supposed to close my eyes and pretend I'm not seeing any inconsistencies, just because you're doing me a favor in lowering me in your list of suspects?

...huh? The fuck you talking about? You think I'm trying to do you a favour? Sorry to burst your bubble, mate, but it ain't all about you.

Also, what inconsistencies? The only one you've pointed out was me talking Kamina's side after apparently convincing you I only used any scumtells I found. I've addressed that. What more do ya got?


Huh.
To be honest I haven't been really taking roles into account in all my theories.

Is it even allowed to reveal your role (or fake it)?
Let's assume it is.

Yeah, I can claim a role, but if I posted the PM Toaster sent me - no matter what it contained - I'd be modkilled for cheating. Frankly speaking, we can all claim whatever the hell we want; so long as we don't use any proof that's been issued in a PM, it's all good.

IRL and online are two complete different things.
This doesn't have to mean anything.

Perhaps. I have no idea; never played Mafia with the cards.

Azure, revealing your "role", imo, is a stupid move. You could go with the "they thought I was a cop and would just RB me again" argument for your actions, and that's plausible enough. But the primary thing causing my suspicion is the fact that you went from hinting that you were a cop to outright claiming that you're a doctor. It's like you want to assure everyone that you're a townie and should be kept safe, but you've already led us wrong about your role once and the defense of being RBed continuously doesn't seem like a strong defense against that in my opinion, it actually seems kind of scummy.

...huh? I wasn't hinting I was a cop. =/ I said the scum probably thought I was a cop because I not only appeared to be trying to dominate the town night 1, but I also (very stupidly) said a cop with a guilty would be useful (which, if WIFOM'd up, could have convinced scum I was cop - especially since they'd roleblocked me in the night and would be on the lookout for my reaction) in my first night 2 post.

After I realized this, I knew the role was dead, so I figured I'd squeeze what use out of it as I could instead of continuing to pretend being vanilla town.

There's no real way to know whether or not you were RBed, so in my opinion, you're probably scum and trying to hide that by claiming you were RBed.

Think about it this way, then; if I hadn't claimed doc, what would you have otherwise called me out on? If you had nothing else to bring to the table, then what would be the point in me trying to claim doc if it would only make you suspect me? I may have made some stupid mistakes this game, but it doesn't mean I'm Jet.

Forgot to respond to this part.  Why did you think asking for a 'cop with a guilty' implied you were a cop, Azure?  I'm genuinely curious.  When I was dead, the vibe I was getting was another trap, to get scum to claim they were cop.  But I guess now that wasn't the case.  Ah well, no one took the bait anyway.

At the time, I'd lost my nerve and gotten depressed over lynching Otto. I was also annoyed that the maf had roleblocked me on the first night, so I acted like impudent child and complained about it, without giving any specifics in the post. However, assuming the roleblocker was paying attention, (which he must have been doing - otherwise there was no point in choosing me) I've theorized he'd presumed I had reacted to his block by trying to WIFOM myself away from it and, as a result, could hazard a guess at me being the cop but could be almost certain I was a power role. Or, at least, that's how I'd look at it, we're it someone else in my shoes.

I gotta stop doing long-ass posts. -_- It's, like, half 1 in the morning and I have a class at 9 that I can't miss.

Spoiler: HEY JET (click to show/hide)

Heh. XD I can't be the only person who finds the text under his avi ironic. I just can't be.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 04, 2010, 09:44:55 pm
Quote from: Azure
Several reasons. For one, there was nothing else to do with it but make a claim with it. :(

I couldn't save people because of the scum roleblocker who most likely targetted me because I acted very confident and aggressive during day 1, (like a cop would, in hindsight) and because I openly mentioned at the start of day 2 that a cop with a guilty would be pretty handy, which sounded like something a cop would say if he'd been roleblocked and was pissy about it (in hindsight). So... yeah; like I said, it was an impotent role that couldn't work its intended function any longer. The only thing left for it was to out it - along with what I'd tried to do, my motivations, what had happened as a result and my future plans for the role. It's only information now, but any and all information is useful to town.

Secondly, to gauge reactions.

Not really for myself - I'm already quite set on a Murphy/Jet lynch for now - but for the town in general. For instance; Murphy's first move upon hearing it was to try foisting suspicion on me for making the claim, whereas it appears to have been enough to convince Mind to settle on a Jet lynch instead of me, at least for the time being. Jet simply spazzed out, but that's all he ever really does. Native seems also to suspect me for it, but sayin' as I doubt he's read up on the game yet, I'm not gonna slam him for it. He also seems kind of new and for some reason thinks I'm making a cop claim. ??? Flintus hasn't made his opinion clear yet, but he likely will soon enough. More information for the town, right there. All it took was a claim.

Thirdly... well, it would be inconvienent if the scum knew about this one, so I'm gonna keep it a secret. I rather hope it works, though; as far as I can see, this is well in the town's best interest in case things go south with the lynch.
That cleared it up, thanks.
Masterful.  You're damn good at inciting reactions from people to determine their alignment.  Secret, eh?  Cool with me, as long as it's in the best interests of town.  Better be good.  I expect nothing less from you. ;)
Quote from: Azure
At the time, I'd lost my nerve and gotten depressed over lynching Otto. I was also annoyed that the maf had roleblocked me on the first night, so I acted like impudent child and complained about it, without giving any specifics in the post. However, assuming the roleblocker was paying attention, (which he must have been doing - otherwise there was no point in choosing me) I've theorized he'd presumed I had reacted to his block by trying to WIFOM myself away from it and, as a result, could hazard a guess at me being the cop but could be almost certain I was a power role. Or, at least, that's how I'd look at it, we're it someone else in my shoes.
Then I would have to guess Murphy would be roleblocker.  I couldn't see Jet thinking up something like that.  He'd just be like 'HURPDURP IM IN YUR MAFA BLOKIN YOR ROLS'.  Another reason we should kill Murphy first, to free up Azure's doc role.  That would help a lot.

Quote from: Azure
I gotta stop doing long-ass posts. -_- It's, like, half 1 in the morning and I have a class at 9 that I can't miss.
I do the same thing.  I just keep getting ideas about the game, and I have this 'just one more refresh, and someone will have posted something now' thing going on.
It is only 9:43, but I have an 8:00 physics midterm this morning!  I should be studying damnit, not making pictures mocking Jet!
Quote from: Azure
Heh. XD I can't be the only person who finds the text under his avi ironic. I just can't be.
Nope, I do too.  HOW WILL YOU WIN, JET?  TELL ME BUDDY!!!
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Murphy on November 04, 2010, 11:34:59 pm
Quote from: KaminaSquirtle
Great way to show you're stupid, it should be obvious that you're just trying to play dumb now.
The fact that I overlooked some stupid rule does not make me stupid.

Quote from: KaminaSquirtle
And you call that a good case?  What about Azure being the only thing that kept you guys on topic during my absence?  Why wouldn't scum just let you guys be stupid together?  While I was dead, every time Azure posted I cheered a little.  If Azure is scum, he's ridiculously good at it.  Not good enough
First of all, being smart (and looking smart) doesn't make you any more or less likely to be scum.
Second, dropping hints about having a power role and claiming doc - for a townie these would be mistakes, and how can you be sure these weren't done intentionally by mafia-Azure, to look like a valuable townsperson?
Third, he's not that errorproof. See day 1.

Quote from: KaminaSquirtle
You listed jet as #1, which I can agree with, that is of you town.  But you're just going with your last plan, as you would immediately be called out as scum if you changed it.  I don't see how Azure is anywhere near #2, for reasons mentioned above.  Why so intent on lynching one of our best scumhunters, hmmmmm?  Of course you want me hanging, but don't want to be too obvious about it, so you put me under your other two targets.  And nothing from Mindmaker?  While I don't think he's scum, he would be my next choice after you and Jet.
Did you overlook my following post?
I later realized that Azure and Jet can't be mafia at the same time. And since I'm almost sure about Jet... go figure:
Quote from: Murphy
As I've said, a plausible scenario is that scum-Azure's gambit wasn't a gambit initially, but a genuine attack, which he later dropped and then claimed it to be a trap in which Ottofar has fallen
Wait.
I suddenly realized that this couldn't be a genuine attack. A scum can't attack another scum genuinely.
It means that my "Azure=scum" scenario is wrong.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Toaster on November 05, 2010, 08:03:28 am
Vote Count:

NativeForeigner: {0}
Flintus10: {0}
Mindmaker: {0}
Jetsquirrel: {3} Murphy, Mindmaker, Flintus10
KaminaSquirtle: {0}
Azure Sepulchre: {0}
Murphy: {2} KaminaSquirtle, Azure Sepulchre

Not Voting: NativeForeigner, Jetsquirrel

Day 2 ends Friday 11/5 11 PM EST

Day ends in about 14 hours from this post.

Reminder- a tie results in no lynch.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 05, 2010, 09:45:34 am
Quote from: Murphy
The fact that I overlooked some stupid rule does not make me stupid.
No, it doesn't.  It means you're trying to look stupid.  Assuming you're smart scum, this is you trying to look like town.  You used WIFOM to cover it up.
Quote from: Murphy
First of all, being smart (and looking smart) doesn't make you any more or less likely to be scum.
Second, dropping hints about having a power role and claiming doc - for a townie these would be mistakes, and how can you be sure these weren't done intentionally by mafia-Azure, to look like a valuable townsperson?
Third, he's not that errorproof. See day 1.
No, smart doesn't make you less likely to be scum.  But good scumhunting, and not letting this thread stall seems like a towntell to me.
Claiming power role could indeed be a scumtell.  But I don't think that's near enough evidence to say he's scum right then and there.  I think the night actions and what Jet/Murphy flips will shed a lot of light on this.
Quote from: Murphy
Did you overlook my following post?
I later realized that Azure and Jet can't be mafia at the same time. And since I'm almost sure about Jet... go figure:
I guess that I missed that, it was late when I wrote that post.  Sorry about that.
Doesn't stop you from being scum.

And Native/Jet/Flintus, what are your thoughts on Murphy?  On Jet?  Remember, your vote is your #1 scumhunting weapon, use it!  I can forgive Native, he's new, but you guys should get cracking.  I want to see more scumhunting!  And I assume you don't want the day to end in a no lynch?

Only 13hrs 15mins left today, guys!  Not much time.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Mindmaker on November 05, 2010, 10:07:30 am
Flintus did vote, he just go overlooked.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Murphy on November 05, 2010, 10:40:15 am
Quote
No, smart doesn't make you less likely to be scum. But good scumhunting, and not letting this thread stall seems like a towntell to me.
Not really. A smart townie does scumhunting. A smart scum fakes scumhunting. Both are very active.
But this probably doesn't matter right now. Azure's scumminess should be reconsidered only if Jet suddenly flips town.

Seriously people, do vote.
If there's no lynch, then there will be just an NK of the least suspicious person.
Who's least suspicious now? NativeForeigner? Flintus?
Well, whatever.
I mean, we'll just be one townie short.
Even if the lynchee flips town - are we better off with two less townies, one of whom was under heavy suspicion, than with one less townie but no less suspects?

Sigh...
Probably we can get another extension?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Ottofar on November 05, 2010, 11:29:23 am
(Bah-Post)

Whoa. For a few days I thought this was dead.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 05, 2010, 12:54:30 pm
Quote
No, smart doesn't make you less likely to be scum. But good scumhunting, and not letting this thread stall seems like a towntell to me.
Not really. A smart townie does scumhunting. A smart scum fakes scumhunting. Both are very active.
But this probably doesn't matter right now. Azure's scumminess should be reconsidered only if Jet suddenly flips town.

Seriously people, do vote.
If there's no lynch, then there will be just an NK of the least suspicious person.
Who's least suspicious now? NativeForeigner? Flintus?
Well, whatever.
I mean, we'll just be one townie short.
Even if the lynchee flips town - are we better off with two less townies, one of whom was under heavy suspicion, than with one less townie but no less suspects?

Sigh...
Probably we can get another extension?
I wrote a detailed explanation of my reasoning here, but then I foolishly forgot ctrl-click to quote Flintus from earlier in the thread, and I don't feel like rewriting that, so you'll get the abridged version.
If we lynch scum today, then we're good for a while.  If we don't lynch, we're in MYLO, and it would be a bad idea to lynch, so we'd be stuck with not lynching again, which mean no lynch until we're in LYLO.  If we lynch a townie, then we're in LYLO, and we'll have more info than if we didn't lynch anyone.

I dunno about an extension.  What more do we have to talk about?  I think we should just end this day, so we some material to talk about tomorrow.  I'll second you if the no voters don't vote soon, though.
Flintus did vote, he just go overlooked.
He unvoted:
Okay I think I will back off Mindmaker for now so unvote, you havn't really answered my questions in a way that gets rid of all suspicion nor have you provided good reasoning but I am beggining to suspect that it is mearly a clash on the way we play the game and inexperienced tells, rest assured if either Murphy or Jet is town then you will be straight back to number one.

But it seems we aren't getting anywhere right now so I will concentrate on Kamina's accusations. and look through them tomorow.
(Bah-Post)

Whoa. For a few days I thought this was dead.
Not as long as I'm around!
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: NativeForeigner on November 05, 2010, 02:12:06 pm
Well, my take on Jet is simple enough. He's not playing too brightly and he suspicious as all hell and has fallen into the desperation phase of "You'll all see". But I don't have much more other than my suspicions.

As for Murphy, my suspicions are rising.

Quote
Oh, I completely forgot that there could be power roles.
Wiki says doc claim is mafia.

Right there it was like he was making a point to show that he had to use the wiki, and his ignorance of the situation of power roles. It seems like he's been playing stupid quite a few times, like when it came to scumchat, and claiming he's only played IRL, but then he turns around and makes a cohesive list of his suspects. He doesn't seem to be new to the game at all, just to the online version. He could very well be trying to play us all.

Those are my thoughts as of right now, if any of you have further evidence, that would be great. Or we could go for a no-vote.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on November 05, 2010, 02:22:46 pm

Right there it was like he was making a point to show that he had to use the wiki, and his ignorance of the situation of power roles. It seems like he's been playing stupid quite a few times, like when it came to scumchat, and claiming he's only played IRL, but then he turns around and makes a cohesive list of his suspects. He doesn't seem to be new to the game at all, just to the online version. He could very well be trying to play us all.

Those are my thoughts as of right now, if any of you have further evidence, that would be great. Or we could go for a no-vote.

Being fair, he posted that before the game even started; ergo, it can't really be used to directly imply he's scum, as he wrote it before he even knew what he was. However, at the very least it tells us that he isn't completely new to Mafia. Certainly not as new as he professes to be.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 05, 2010, 02:31:10 pm
Quote
Oh, I completely forgot that there could be power roles.
Wiki says doc claim is mafia.

Right there it was like he was making a point to show that he had to use the wiki, and his ignorance of the situation of power roles. It seems like he's been playing stupid quite a few times, like when it came to scumchat, and claiming he's only played IRL, but then he turns around and makes a cohesive list of his suspects. He doesn't seem to be new to the game at all, just to the online version. He could very well be trying to play us all.
Nice catch there!  I missed that one.  But I agree with Azure on the point he made.
Quote from: NativeForeigner
Or we could go for a no-vote.
Hell no.  Read above about how that would affect us with LYLO and MYLO.  We need to lynch scum.
And would you care to cast a vote already?  I know you're new, but we don't have too much time left.  As you've probably noticed reading the thread, vote by highlighting someone's name in red.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Mindmaker on November 05, 2010, 04:00:09 pm
He unvoted:
Okay I think I will back off Mindmaker for now so unvote, you havn't really answered my questions in a way that gets rid of all suspicion nor have you provided good reasoning but I am beggining to suspect that it is mearly a clash on the way we play the game and inexperienced tells, rest assured if either Murphy or Jet is town then you will be straight back to number one.
But then he voted again:
My point was I wasn't satisfied with the answers to why you thought Offofar was town. You answer was bascially "Because he didn't play wel.l" But either way we can drop this for now as we have more important things to worry about.

And while I agree that if the pairing of Murphy and Jet is the scum then Murphy will be more dangerous but Jet's constant lieing and changing his mind in addition to his "You fools will all see" defence have left me certain that he his the scum while Murphy I am still not 100% sure about. Though Kamina's case looks relatively solid.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death [One replacement needed!]
Post by: Toaster on November 05, 2010, 04:01:50 pm
Vote Count:

NativeForeigner: {0}
Flintus10: {0}
Mindmaker: {0}
Jetsquirrel: {3} Murphy, Mindmaker, Flintus10
KaminaSquirtle: {0}
Azure Sepulchre: {0}
Murphy: {2} KaminaSquirtle, Azure Sepulchre

Not Voting: NativeForeigner, Jetsquirrel

Day 2 ends Friday 11/5 11 PM EST

Day ends in about 6 hours from this post.

One extension request heard: three needed to extend for 24 hours.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 05, 2010, 04:09:34 pm
He unvoted:
Okay I think I will back off Mindmaker for now so unvote, you havn't really answered my questions in a way that gets rid of all suspicion nor have you provided good reasoning but I am beggining to suspect that it is mearly a clash on the way we play the game and inexperienced tells, rest assured if either Murphy or Jet is town then you will be straight back to number one.
But then he voted again:
My point was I wasn't satisfied with the answers to why you thought Offofar was town. You answer was bascially "Because he didn't play wel.l" But either way we can drop this for now as we have more important things to worry about.

And while I agree that if the pairing of Murphy and Jet is the scum then Murphy will be more dangerous but Jet's constant lieing and changing his mind in addition to his "You fools will all see" defence have left me certain that he his the scum while Murphy I am still not 100% sure about. Though Kamina's case looks relatively solid.
You're right.  How did I miss that?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Mindmaker on November 05, 2010, 04:13:08 pm
You're right.  How did I miss that?

No idea, but you're not the only one as it seems.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: NativeForeigner on November 05, 2010, 06:12:29 pm
Azure's point is a good one, and it keeps me from outright claiming Murphy is scum, I just don't have enough evidence and don't want to make that kind of mistake. Jet, however, is most likely one to be scum, just from how he's been acting. So my vote goes for him.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Two: A picture of Death
Post by: Toaster on November 05, 2010, 10:10:34 pm
Day 2 Final Vote Count:

NativeForeigner: {0}
Flintus10: {0}
Mindmaker: {0}
Jetsquirrel: {3} Murphy, Mindmaker, Flintus10
KaminaSquirtle: {0}
Azure Sepulchre: {0}
Murphy: {2} KaminaSquirtle, Azure Sepulchre

Not Voting: NativeForeigner, Jetsquirrel



Today's discussion was even more chaotic than the last.  The seven of you argued for hours on end, and after a final shouting match it is determined that Jetsquirrel shall die today.  He is less calm about it than Ottofar was.

"No!" he shouts.  "I must take care of my boys!"

"Your boys will just have to take care of themselves," growls Mindmaker.  He grabs Jetsquirrel and drags him toward the gallows.  In a fit of rage, Jetsquirrel bursts free and lunges for the door.  Flintus, however, is closer, and bashes Jetsquirrel with a chair.  He falls sideways and crashes through a glass table.   He stands up and tries to run again, but it is clear that he severed more than one artery on the broken class.  He takes three steps, collapses, and quickly bleeds out.

You gather around the corpse.  Someone pulls out his wallet and checks it.  It contains a picture of two young boys, with a smiling woman in the background.  On the back is written "Last photo of the boys with my wife."  There's also a bar association membership card, and his business card declaring him to be a local lawyer.  A quick trip to his room reveals nothing incriminating- he was a Townsperson.  It seems you have failed to lynch a mafioso again!

Discouraged, you return to your rooms.  Will anyone else die in the night?


Quote from: Jetsquirrel
You are George Land, a Townsperson.

They say a lawyer should never defend themselves in court.  You ignored that advice, and wound up here.  No matter, now- you must use your brain to figure out who is in the Mafia, so you can get out of this blasted hotel and see your sons again.  You shudder at the thought of them having to grow up without a father, after losing their mother to cancer just a few months prior...

Night 2 begins now!  Send in your night actions!

Night 2 ends Saturday, 11/6 11 PM EST.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Night Two: Everyone hates Lawyers
Post by: Toaster on November 05, 2010, 11:37:36 pm
Note corrected date- there was a typo.

Night 2 ends Saturday, 11/6 11 PM EST.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Night Two: Everyone hates Lawyers
Post by: Toaster on November 06, 2010, 10:17:12 pm
You gather for a third day of discussion in the lobby, and it is quickly apparent that Mindmaker has not arrived.  As before, you head to his room to see what has happened.  The door is forced, and it is obvious why he did not come.  Mindmaker lies tangled in his sheets on the floor, with the room TV broken beside him.  A pool of blood surrounds his head, where there is a single gunshot wound.  Searching his room, you find books of receipts and invoices.  It’s obvious he ran a store here in Tewby Vale, and everything is legitimate- he is just a Townsperson.

You head back to the lobby- some worried, some secretly elated.  There are still two criminals among you- if you don’t hang one today, they will have the majority!


Quote from: Mindmaker
You are Norman Herbert, a Townsperson.

Your store has repeatedly been victimized by the Mafia.  It started as vandalism and burglary, but soon you were forced into a protection racket.  You were truly excited to hear of the Mafia shootout.  Your glee turned to shock when they came up to you and said you were suspected of being in the Mafia!  Apparently some protection money was traced back to you.  You loudly protested your innocence, but it fell on deaf ears.  Now you’re stuck here with the remainder of the Mafia... and you will get vengeance!  Root them out and see them hang!


Day 3 begins now!

Day 3 ends Wednesday, 11/10 at 11 PM EST
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 06, 2010, 10:38:53 pm
NO WHY THE HELL DID I CLICK AWAY, I HAD WRITTEN A GREAT POST, AND NOW IT'S GONE!  >:(
I guess I'll have to rewrite it.  Here's something until then:
GREAT FUCKING JOB, JET!
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 06, 2010, 11:03:50 pm
MAYBE YOU'D LIKE A FUCKING MEDAL, JET?!  A MEDAL FOR WORST FUCKING TOWN PLAY EVER!  YOU JUST PUT US IN FUCKING LYLO, THANKS A BUNCH, PAL!

Here are my thoughts on everyone.
Azure could be scum, I want to see Murphy make his case seeing as Jet flipped town.
Murphy, IIRC most of my argument against you still applies.  But I see a new possible scumtell.  Murphy, you claimed Azure could be scum if Jet flips town.  But if you were scum, you would have known Jet would flip town, you would have counted on it.  So then you would have taken the chance to dirty up what I would consider our least dirty player.  Seems suspicious to me.
Flintus, I don't have much to say about you right now.  Nothing you've posted has screamed scum, but then none of it has screamed scum, either.  I'll have to think more on you.
Native, I don't have much to comment on from you yet, we'll see about you.  My eyes, they're on you.  Better not slip.

And I wonder why scum chose to nk Mind.  I would have thought they would go for Azure.  Or me, but maybe they would want to keep me alive to blame for this FUCKING HORRIBLE situation, as my theory was at least partially responsible for it.  Or they could have nked Flintus, as I haven't seen anything much suspicious from him yet.  May be the theory he said he had in case Jet flips town, which scum would have known would happen.
Now that I think about it, Azure being left alive is consistent with Murphy trying to dirty his rep.  Why dirty someone up if you're just going to nk him?

So much to think about, consider.
And we CANNOT get this one wrong.
May the force be with us all.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on November 07, 2010, 12:37:12 am
Hmm. Not much thought went into that NK, or at least not as much as it deserved. Unless scum are trying to foist more suspicion on me by making it look like I NK'ed someone I argued often with. But that would be pointless - if that were the case, I'd have offed Mind night 1 and saved myself the bother of day 2. Otherwise, he wasn't particularly remarkable - in terms of scumhunting, I mean - so I doubt it was because he'd caught someone out. Methinks Maf think they've won, so they've gotten sloppy. Which, as far as I'm concerned, means Murphy isn't scum, otherwise they'd have gone for a far more conservative lynch that would keep the suspicion alive, like Flintus. Which I believe means the scum also thinks itself above suspicion.

Hrm.

In order (from top to bottom), these are the people I found least suspicious before night 2 began:

Kamina.
Flintus.
Native.
Murphy.

As of now, you can consider this list reversed. This would also fit in with my current theory of the scum being one part main player and one part kicked lurker, which would explain the difficulty in finding a pairing that works.

Murphy, you claimed Azure could be scum if Jet flips town. But if you were scum, you would have known Jet would flip town, you would have counted on it. So then you would have taken the chance to dirty up what I would consider our least dirty player. Seems suspicious to me.

WIFOM. Scum could have used what he'd said against him. I know I would've, especially when it kept getting pointed out to me.

And I wonder why scum chose to nk Mind.  I would have thought they would go for Azure. Or me, but maybe they would want to keep me alive to blame for this FUCKING HORRIBLE situation, as my theory was at least partially responsible for it. Or they could have nked Flintus, as I haven't seen anything much suspicious from him yet. May be the theory he said he had in case Jet flips town, which scum would have known would happen.

Simultaneously distancing yourself from the scum NK and trying to make the choice seem impenetrable by WIFOMing the hell out of it. Seen scum do that before and likely will again. For one thing, I can't imagine any kind of scum that would be jumpy enough during an easy lylo to fire off a NK based on someone suggesting another theory. Particularly when said theory could potentially help the scum, assuming Murphy really is one of them. He'd have to be a short-sighted moron to NK Mind based on that, which - if I were to follow your theory of Murphy being a lot smarter than he appears to be - seems rather unlikely.

Now that I think about it, Azure being left alive is consistent with Murphy trying to dirty his rep.  Why dirty someone up if you're just going to nk him?

More WIFOM. If I was scum, I would so leap on that motherfucker. Just like you're doing.

I doubt you could miss just how much you're postulating at the moment, Kamina. All of it still centered around Murphy, too - even when the vast majority of your argument died with Jet, considering the amount that was based around the interplay between those two. This is a vote we really need to get right, and you're forcing a bottle of Moet et Chandon down someone else's throat before the rest of us can even get our bearings. I don't like it. Not one bit. Got anything else on anyone else, or do you plan to keep hassling the same person with whatever you can pull out of your cellar?

Frankly speaking, town, I think I'm right on the money with this one - the scum don't feel threatened by us because they were outside our scope by the start of night 2. I also doubt the scum could even try and engineer this kind of prediction from anyone, as it would be much too risky to wing the game if they thought they were in trouble. Mindmaker was also a player who's final vote could also have gone either way at the end and was therefore a liability for the scum at lylo (which implies at least some thought went into the NK, but it was still odd to take out a suspect player), whereas I looked quite firmly in Kamina's camp by the end of the night, having wanted a Murphy lynch. He was also the only other player besides myself I thought kept the game alive by dogging my every step and engaging in a pretty fierce argument with myself; even if he did whine more than was strictly necessary.

Also: In hindsight, Jet gave us a town tell before he died - he didn't vote to prevent his own death. He didn't try to force us into a mylo, but just kept his vote out. Not something that would've saved him before the end, really, but still worth noting for future reference. Which makes Native's vote look like a pre-emptive move to stop this from happening, although whether this is due to him honestly thinking Jet was scum or because he'd been advised to do so by another player I don't know, due to his apparent inexperience and lack of time in the game.

MAYBE YOU'D LIKE A FUCKING MEDAL, JET?!  A MEDAL FOR WORST FUCKING TOWN PLAY EVER!  YOU JUST PUT US IN FUCKING LYLO, THANKS A BUNCH, PAL!

Even if I don't agree with much in that post, I agree with this. Jet is the most grating, mindless, unhelpful townie I have ever encountered. Bar none. A comatose rock could've played better.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Murphy on November 07, 2010, 03:57:30 am
Quote from: Azure Sepulchre
WIFOM. Scum could have used what he'd said against him. I know I would've, especially when it kept getting pointed out to me.
Hmm, you mean it like this:
1) There's a tie coming.
2) I say "if Jet flips town then Azure is mafia"
3) The real mafia hears me and decides to support me in my vote against Jet (knowing that Jet is town).
4) Jet flips town. Mafia can now either wait for me to blame Azure and support me (getting 3 votes), or blame me like Kamina did.
Right?

Quote from: Azure Sepulchre
More WIFOM. If I was scum, I would so leap on that motherfucker. Just like you're doing.
So that's why you never ever seem to pay much attention to my suspicion against you? You prefer to prove yourself town by hunting scum, not by wasting time defending.
I have to admit, I have many doubts. I can think of a semi-good scenario that would assume you mafia and explain the situation from that angle.
But I've seen now how such scenarios can look good and still be wrong.
Also, no man is perfect. Should you be mafia, you would've slipped at least once.

Judging from what I said above, my current list of suspects (from most suspected to least suspected) is
1) Kamina
2) Native (former Ragnarok)
3) Azure/Flintus

Sorry, no wall of text from me right now. Will probably write more tomorrow.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 07, 2010, 01:47:23 pm
Quote from: Azure
I doubt you could miss just how much you're postulating at the moment, Kamina.
I could that late in the night.  It's easier to focus on one person when you're tired and don't feel like trawling through the rest of the thread.  And I was pissed I deleted it.  It's hard to think straight then.
You want a better post?  I'll give you a better post.  Wall of text incoming.
I'll begin with more detailed analysis of the other players, then a response to your wall-o-text.
Flintus:
Well, he was the 4th vote on Jet, but that's all really have on him at this point.  I can't really blame him for bandwagoning Jet.  I mean it, it was JET, man.
Native:
Same thing with bandwagoning Jet.  Same reason it doesn't really matter.  I might be blind, but I don't see much at this point.  We'll see.
Now the interesting part:
Murphy:
Looking at Azure's points in your defense, and rereading my theory, you do seem much less scummy to me at this point.  Seeing as you seem to agree with Azure, who would you suggest as my scumbuddy?  Is it, as your list suggests, Native?  What exactly makes him look suspicious at this point?
Azure:
Well, you could be scum trying to attack me, and thus win the game, but that is seriously weak argument at this point.  You are almost assuredly town.  And your argument against is seriously good. Unfortunately, it's wrong.  If you lynch me, then it's game over.  But I won't count on that to convince you of anything, like Jet did.  Who would suggest as my scumbuddy?  From your list, it would seem to be Flintus.  What exactly makes him look suspicious at this point?

Well, that was shorter than expected.  Time for my response to your post, Azure.

Quote from: Azure
WIFOM. Scum could have used what he'd said against him. I know I would've, especially when it kept getting pointed out to me.
Fair point.  But I'm confused as to how it kept getting pointed out to me.  Could you point me to exactly where it was repeated?  I only saw it the once.  You're right as to pretty much all of my arguments being WIFOM crap.  Therefore I'll drop them, and start the scumhunt anew.
Quote
Simultaneously distancing yourself from the scum NK and trying to make the choice seem impenetrable by WIFOMing the hell out of it. Seen scum do that before and likely will again. For one thing, I can't imagine any kind of scum that would be jumpy enough during an easy lylo to fire off a NK based on someone suggesting another theory. Particularly when said theory could potentially help the scum, assuming Murphy really is one of them. He'd have to be a short-sighted moron to NK Mind based on that, which - if I were to follow your theory of Murphy being a lot smarter than he appears to be - seems rather unlikely.
Where exactly was the distancing?  Is thinking about the reasoning behind the nk distancing?  Oh, I think I found it.  It was me mentioning 'maybe they lynched him because ...', right?  It does look like distancing.  I wasn't intending to 'WIFOM the hell out of it', I was merely listing off all the possibilities that popped into my head.  The more we have to think on, the better.  We can dismiss those if you so wish, and come up with a new theory, which I think you did quite well.
I have dropped the main theory of Murphy being scum.  In hindsight, if you look at this posts from a town perspective, as opposed to a scum one, they were a decent defense.  I'm glad we ended up lynching Jet instead.  He would have screwed us over in LYLO.  Since you're suggesting I'm scum, are you saying I'm a short-sighted moron?  Is that compatible with you saying what I'm doing is exactly what you would do?  Because then you would be calling yourself a short-sighted moron.
Quote
More WIFOM. If I was scum, I would so leap on that motherfucker. Just like you're doing.
See what I was saying above.
Quote
I doubt you could miss just how much you're postulating at the moment, Kamina. All of it still centered around Murphy, too - even when the vast majority of your argument died with Jet, considering the amount that was based around the interplay between those two. This is a vote we really need to get right, and you're forcing a bottle of Moet et Chandon down someone else's throat before the rest of us can even get our bearings. I don't like it. Not one bit. Got anything else on anyone else, or do you plan to keep hassling the same person with whatever you can pull out of your cellar?
I'm not trying to force anything anywhere.  See above on dropping my attack on Murphy.  I'm willing to work together with everyone else to find the scum.  Though I'm not sure if there's anything I can do to redeem myself in your eyes, Azure.  Is there?  And why would posting it first be before you could ''get your bearings"?  You can think all you like.  It's not like the day ends anytime soon.
Good metaphor though.
Quote
Frankly speaking, town, I think I'm right on the money with this one - the scum don't feel threatened by us because they were outside our scope by the start of night 2. I also doubt the scum could even try and engineer this kind of prediction from anyone, as it would be much too risky to wing the game if they thought they were in trouble. Mindmaker was also a player who's final vote could also have gone either way at the end and was therefore a liability for the scum at lylo (which implies at least some thought went into the NK, but it was still odd to take out a suspect player), whereas I looked quite firmly in Kamina's camp by the end of the night, having wanted a Murphy lynch. He was also the only other player besides myself I thought kept the game alive by dogging my every step and engaging in a pretty fierce argument with myself; even if he did whine more than was strictly necessary.
Not sure if there's any way I can respond to this...
Quote
Also: In hindsight, Jet gave us a town tell before he died - he didn't vote to prevent his own death. He didn't try to force us into a mylo, but just kept his vote out. Not something that would've saved him before the end, really, but still worth noting for future reference. Which makes Native's vote look like a pre-emptive move to stop this from happening, although whether this is due to him honestly thinking Jet was scum or because he'd been advised to do so by another player I don't know, due to his apparent inexperience and lack of time in the game.
Good point.  I'm not sure if he actually thought that much about it.  I mean, it's JET we're talking about here.  He probably just said 'SCREW YOU GUYZ I DONT GIVE NO CARES NO MORE'.
The point on Native is definitely something to think about too.  Could go either way.  I'll have to watch him closer.
Quote
Even if I don't agree with much in that post, I agree with this. Jet is the most grating, mindless, unhelpful townie I have ever encountered. Bar none. A comatose rock could've played better.
At least we have some common ground. ::)
Quote
Hmm, you mean it like this:
1) There's a tie coming.
2) I say "if Jet flips town then Azure is mafia"
3) The real mafia hears me and decides to support me in my vote against Jet (knowing that Jet is town).
4) Jet flips town. Mafia can now either wait for me to blame Azure and support me (getting 3 votes), or blame me like Kamina did.
Right?
I'm pretty sure this is what he's saying.  But I'm not sure what you mean by tie.
Quote
So that's why you never ever seem to pay much attention to my suspicion against you? You prefer to prove yourself town by hunting scum, not by wasting time defending.
I have to admit, I have many doubts. I can think of a semi-good scenario that would assume you mafia and explain the situation from that angle.
But I've seen now how such scenarios can look good and still be wrong.
Also, no man is perfect. Should you be mafia, you would've slipped at least once.
Indeed, Otto and Jet were town, and Otto was awfully scummy, and my Murphy-Jet theory make a lot of sense to me, and Azure seemed convinced of it.  Everything we thought was wrong.  I'm looking forward to you elaborating on this.
Quote
Judging from what I said above, my current list of suspects (from most suspected to least suspected) is
1) Kamina
2) Native (former Ragnarok)
3) Azure/Flintus
I can understand your suspicion of me, but why Native?  I haven't seen you give anything against him.  Is this because of Azure thinking that Native voting Jet could be a preemptive move to stop Jet from tying the game?  But wait.  Wouldn't that make him town?  He would prevent the mylo situation.  But how could he have been advised by someone if he's not scum?  I've probably overlooked something here.

That's all I've got for now.  I may add more later.  This was mostly a defense.  I need to get to some more scumhunting, but this post has taken up enough of my time as it is.
I hope this wasn't in vain.  I can't see this being enough to you I'm not scum, Azure.  I'll just have to prove myself over time, I guess.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: NativeForeigner on November 07, 2010, 05:00:45 pm
Alright, wait, wait, wait. Things are getting a little sloppy here. Kamina, you had a lot of scumtells in your post.

Quote
MAYBE YOU'D LIKE A FUCKING MEDAL, JET?!  A MEDAL FOR WORST FUCKING TOWN PLAY EVER!  YOU JUST PUT US IN FUCKING LYLO, THANKS A BUNCH, PAL!

While definitely true, it also seems like you're trying to make an exaggerated statement on how "pissed" you are about this, trying to come off as town. But you overdid it, making you seem scummy.

Then you immediately went to trying to bring others into the spotlight of suspicion in what could be taken as an attempt to keep yourself out of it. You even went so far as to give the FOS to Murphy with no real evidence other than Jet flipping town and Murphy's accusations against Azure. It was a hasty, sloppy move.


Quote
And I wonder why scum chose to nk Mind.  I would have thought they would go for Azure.  Or me, but maybe they would want to keep me alive to blame for this FUCKING HORRIBLE situation, as my theory was at least partially responsible for it.  Or they could have nked Flintus, as I haven't seen anything much suspicious from him yet.  May be the theory he said he had in case Jet flips town, which scum would have known would happen.
Now that I think about it, Azure being left alive is consistent with Murphy trying to dirty his rep.  Why dirty someone up if you're just going to nk him?

Here you're commenting on the nk, trying to distance yourself from the action of the nk and make yourself seem town. But it's more of a scumtell the way you went about it, especially when you mentioned yourself.

You're looking pretty scummy, Kamina.

Azure:

You're not out of the picture, despite Kamina's post. It could be that Kamina is just town (albeit sloppy town) and you're using his telltale post as cover for your own scumminess. But if that were the case, you're going about it in a much better way. You're giving very few, if any scumtells other than your haste is FOSing Kamina. And even that was with reason. But it could be that both you and Kamina are scum and, seeing your scumbuddy fuck up in such a way, you came to the decision to bus him, to take the suspicion away from yourself at the cost of your scumbuddy. Unfortunately, this is just speculation at the moment.

Murphy:

I would like to hear your argument against me once you have time.

On Flintus:

I haven't seen Flintus be very active at all. It could be that he's trying to avoid grabbing attention because he's scum. Or he could be town that doesn't have much to say.

Quote
Which makes Native's vote look like a pre-emptive move to stop this from happening, although whether this is due to him honestly thinking Jet was scum or because he'd been advised to do so by another player I don't know, due to his apparent inexperience and lack of time in the game.

I honestly thought Jet was scum. (But really, what else do you expect me to say). He had the best argument against him (or perhaps the lack of argument for him). The only other candidate for lynching was Murphy, and the argument put against him wasn't at all convincing to me. Just because he might have more skill in Mafia than he's letting on doesn't mean he's scum. But it also doesn't mean he's town. Jet, simply with how useless he seemed, was the safest bet for a vote, even if it generated some suspicion on my part.


What we need to do now is take a step back and look at things. We're in LYLO now, we can't afford to be hasty with our lynching this time. Some thought and consideration needs to be put into it so we don't lose.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 07, 2010, 05:27:36 pm
Alright, wait, wait, wait. Things are getting a little sloppy here. Kamina, you had a lot of scumtells in your post.

Quote
MAYBE YOU'D LIKE A FUCKING MEDAL, JET?!  A MEDAL FOR WORST FUCKING TOWN PLAY EVER!  YOU JUST PUT US IN FUCKING LYLO, THANKS A BUNCH, PAL!

While definitely true, it also seems like you're trying to make an exaggerated statement on how "pissed" you are about this, trying to come off as town. But you overdid it, making you seem scummy.

Then you immediately went to trying to bring others into the spotlight of suspicion in what could be taken as an attempt to keep yourself out of it. You even went so far as to give the FOS to Murphy with no real evidence other than Jet flipping town and Murphy's accusations against Azure. It was a hasty, sloppy move.
Oh no, I'm exaggerating my anger.  I MUST BE SCUM!!!!!

And I FOSed someone!  Without a huge amount of evidence!  No way I was indicating I was suspicious of them!  I don't even need that much evidence to vote someone.  Voting someone is the best way to get a good answer out of them.  I didn't feel I had enough for that, so I FoSed him.  Is that so hard to understand?

Is that all the evidence you have?  You look like you're mostly parroting Azure to me.
Try harder, buddy.
Azure:

You're not out of the picture, despite Kamina's post. It could be that Kamina is just town (albeit sloppy town) and you're using his telltale post as cover for your own scumminess. But if that were the case, you're going about it in a much better way. You're giving very few, if any scumtells other than your haste is FOSing Kamina. And even that was with reason. But it could be that both you and Kamina are scum and, seeing your scumbuddy fuck up in such a way, you came to the decision to bus him, to take the suspicion away from yourself at the cost of your scumbuddy. Unfortunately, this is just speculation at the moment.
Jegus, where did you get the idea that a FoS is such a huge deal?  It's just to show you find someone a bit suspicious, but not enough for a vote.  It's not a huge deal.
What we need to do now is take a step back and look at things. We're in LYLO now, we can't afford to be hasty with our lynching this time. Some thought and consideration needs to be put into it so we don't lose.
Agreed.  We CANNOT mess this one up.  We do, and game over.  We'll probably need a few extensions.  We'll see.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Flintus10 on November 08, 2010, 02:53:58 am
Sorry about the lateness but I just finished my last uni assignments.

...Well Kamina's epic returns epicness has been somewhat diminished and every person I've been assured was scum has wound up town  >:( although Jet and Otto did not help anyone with their actions but what's done is done.

Kamina you buddied the crap out of Azure during the second day and now that he has turned his suspicion on you your tone has changed quite considerably though that isn't particularly suspicious just something I have noted.

Azure: I also wouldn't mind hearing why exactly you find me suspicious.

Just some food for thought does anyone else think the fact that Azure was role-blocked on night one a little too convinient?

I am really quite stuck right now but I think that it is still quite suspicious that Murphy  voted with Jet as soon as we pegged them as a scum team. I mean while it originally looked like Bussing perhaps Murphy knew that voting for Jet would both save his skin and take out another townie.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Murphy on November 08, 2010, 08:39:05 am
Quote from: KaminaSquirtle
I can understand your suspicion of me, but why Native?  I haven't seen you give anything against him.  Is this because of Azure thinking that Native voting Jet could be a preemptive move to stop Jet from tying the game?  But wait.  Wouldn't that make him town?  He would prevent the mylo situation.  But how could he have been advised by someone if he's not scum?  I've probably overlooked something here.
Quote from: KaminaSquirtle
Looking at Azure's points in your defense, and rereading my theory, you do seem much less scummy to me at this point.  Seeing as you seem to agree with Azure, who would you suggest as my scumbuddy?  Is it, as your list suggests, Native?  What exactly makes him look suspicious at this point?
I don't really suspect you that much. Nor him.
See, my previous list was Jet - Azure - Kamina - Ragnarok.
I only was sure about Jet. He turned out town, so I'm writing him off the list.
Azure - yeah, he had an argument with Mindmaker and then Mindmaker got NKd, but that's WIFOM. And whatever scenario involving scum-Azure I could have thought, I couldn't get him to slip. So I move him to the bottom of the list.
And the list becomes Kamina - Native - Azure.
So please note that my suspicion against you and Native has not risen, I have merely dropped other people from the list.

I'll try summing up what I think about you two:
I did have suspicions on Spade. He seemed to play like "pop out once or twice, say something and go back into shadow". You play his role now.
I'm certain that while you were dead, you were actually believing me to be scum. But after you rejoined, you might've gotten a scum role and voila - the material you're gathered would be ideal to use as a means to lynch a townie. But you didn't hesitate to post the prepared wall-of-text really fast after rejoining, apparently without giving it a second thought, so I think you got what you expected - a town role. That's why I put you only third in my initial list.

I put Ragnarok fourth in that list - above Flintus - because I didn't spot any tells from Flintus at all and can't say much about him, while I had suspicion on Ragnarok early in the game (because of his lurking). I probably should remove Native from the list because Ragnarok was replaced due to inactivity. We can safely assume he was lurky not because of his role, but because, as he put it, "stuff happened".
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Toaster on November 08, 2010, 09:12:03 am
Vote Count:

NativeForeigner: {0}
Flintus10: {0}
KaminaSquirtle: {0}
Azure Sepulchre: {0}
Murphy: {0}

Not Voting: NativeForeigner, Flintus10, KaminaSquirtle, Azure Sepulchre, Murphy

Day 3 ends Wednesday, 11/10 at 11 PM EST
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on November 09, 2010, 06:57:44 am
...NEVER AGAIN!

I am never again building a massive post. Sorry I've made you all wait, but... fuck, I'm not doing that again. Built up over my spare time for the past few days,and now... all gone, because my laptop charger is on the fritz. -___-

Extension, please. I won't be trying again until I've stopped being pissed off, but I'll try again later today if I have any spare time.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 09, 2010, 07:33:44 am
I know that post was probably one huge attack on me, but I can't help but sympathize.  I've lost much smaller posts than yours probably was, and I've always hated having to rewrite them.
Extension, please.  It's already Tuesday morning(at least where I live), and we've had nowhere near enough time to make an informed decision in LYLO.
And no, I'm not being silent without a reason.  I'm
A) Busy, and
B) Writing up a huge wall of text in wordpad.  This could take another day at least.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Toaster on November 09, 2010, 09:01:00 am
Vote Count:

NativeForeigner: {0}
Flintus10: {0}
KaminaSquirtle: {0}
Azure Sepulchre: {0}
Murphy: {0}

Not Voting: NativeForeigner, Flintus10, KaminaSquirtle, Azure Sepulchre, Murphy

Two extension requests heard.  Day 3 has been extended until Thursday, 11/11 at 11 PM EST
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: SirBayer on November 09, 2010, 12:45:41 pm
...NEVER AGAIN!

I am never again building a massive post. Sorry I've made you all wait, but... fuck, I'm not doing that again. Built up over my spare time for the past few days,and now... all gone, because my laptop charger is on the fritz. -___-

Extension, please. I won't be trying again until I've stopped being pissed off, but I'll try again later today if I have any spare time.

When writing long posts, save them to a text file instead of just leaving them open in the browser. Much more secure. You could use Google Docs, or just whatever word processor you have.

I always do it that way, personally.

Just a thought.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 10, 2010, 12:06:35 am
Two things, both because of paranormal:
a) I haven't been able to post due to busy from the game and homework.
b) I've scrapped the wall of text.  I've learned they're not a good idea.  Once a have some free time I'll reanalyze the situation.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Toaster on November 10, 2010, 12:22:31 am
Vote Count:

NativeForeigner: {0}
Flintus10: {0}
KaminaSquirtle: {0}
Azure Sepulchre: {0}
Murphy: {0}

Not Voting: NativeForeigner, Flintus10, KaminaSquirtle, Azure Sepulchre, Murphy

Day 3 will end Thursday, 11/11 at 11 PM EST

NativeForeigner has been prodded for not posting for over 48 hours.  Flintus and Murphy are next if they do not post soon.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Zathras on November 10, 2010, 01:05:00 am
NativeForeigner has been prodded for not posting for over 48 hours.  Flintus and Murphy are next if they do not post soon.

GAAAaahhhhhh!!! AGAIN?!

Dammit, you newbies take notice: If there's a lesson you can learn from this game, it's this: LURKING KILLS GAMES. DON'T FUCKING LURK OR FLAKE!

Goddammit! If you sign up to play a game, it's minimal courtesy to actually play it!

This has been one of the best BMs I've seen in ages. You guys are interested, motivated, incisive, insightful, alert and agile, all you need is critical mass of players to keep going. If NativeWhatever or somesuch is not up to it, someone else will have to fill the spot, but all y'all other guys: DON'T DO THIS: It's the worst label in a mafia group to be labeled as a flaker.


I've been reading this game since before the first day, and you guys have been doing great. Much better than the BMs I played. I know you can pull it off, Don't be discouraged by the gutless worms in your midst that didn't have the spine to stand by the game. Don't despair. You can win this.



Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: NativeForeigner on November 10, 2010, 02:51:26 am
From my understanding, an FoS is just short of a vote. By FoSing someone, it's only a short step to voting for them. If we vote someone with no evidence at this point of the game, we're gonna lose. It's as simple as that, I'm just saying we need to be more careful and your aggression is making you suspicious.

Quote
This has been one of the best BMs I've seen in ages. You guys are interested, motivated, incisive, insightful, alert and agile, all you need is critical mass of players to keep going. If NativeWhatever or somesuch is not up to it, someone else will have to fill the spot, but all y'all other guys: DON'T DO THIS: It's the worst label in a mafia group to be labeled as a flaker

Dude, chill out. I've had work all day monday and school today. (Excluding Sunday when I was relaxing all day). I actually have a life offline that tends to take priority occasionally.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Flintus10 on November 10, 2010, 02:59:43 am
Flintus, I humbly ask you to support me against Jetsquirrel. I doubt that you will get any support to your current vote, and everyone (even those accusing me) seems to agree that Jetsquirrel is a mafia. I realize that with Jet flipping mafia, I'll still be under heavy suspicion. But at least we won't have a LyLo on the third day..

You know I didn't pay much attention to this post but in hinsight when you made it I was the first person to outright say I wasn't that suspicious of you. So to see you ask me help you vote for someone we now know was a townie in order to save your own skin. (And it was definetely possible that you knew Jet would be lynched over you as you yourself said 'Everyone suspected him') The fact that you actually outright asked me to "Support You" seems like a really desperate move and I think this action seemed a little opportunist for a town player to make. FOS MURPHY


Also is there a way to know whether or not you have been roleblocked?

Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Zathras on November 10, 2010, 03:40:29 am
Quote from: zathras
This has been one of the best BMs I've seen in ages. You guys are interested, motivated, incisive, insightful, alert and agile, all you need is critical mass of players to keep going. If NativeWhatever or somesuch is not up to it, someone else will have to fill the spot, but all y'all other guys: DON'T DO THIS: It's the worst label in a mafia group to be labeled as a flaker
Dude, chill out. I've had work all day monday and school today. (Excluding Sunday when I was relaxing all day). I actually have a life offline that tends to take priority occasionally.

No, Fuck you. We all have lives, things to do and whatnot. It's been forty eight fucking hours. There must have been a few minutes in between to remember a commitment you posted to a game that is stalled without your participation. It's not just skipping watching a movie -- after a day or so, you become the stumbling block that prevents this train from advancing; no one can make an informed decision on their vote without hearing something from everyone else. You signed up for this of your own free will, so do us the courtesy of giving us your attention for a few minutes every day or two.

Exceptions are explicitly made for weekends, extensions are available on request, and you can let the Mod know if you'll be away, but if you just disappear, it's not just your game you're ruining, it's everyone else's. Have a modicum of decency and at least post "I'm not here, will be back Wednesday" or something.

Flintus, Murphy, and EVERYONE ELSE, this goes for you too: PLAY THE FUCKING GAME YOU SAID YOU'D PLAY!

Mafia, especially in forum form, lives or dies based on its participant's willingness to move it forward. If you lurk, it dies, not just for you, but for the other folks as well. Don't be a douche.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: NativeForeigner on November 10, 2010, 03:50:23 am
Quote
This has been one of the best BMs I've seen in ages. You guys are interested, motivated, incisive, insightful, alert and agile, all you need is critical mass of players to keep going.

However, thank you for the compliments. From what I hear, not all BMs are like this.

Quote
Also is there a way to know whether or not you have been roleblocked?

I'm pretty sure only the one blocked knows. And the blocker of course.

Quote
There must have been a few minutes in between to remember a commitment you posted to a game that is stalled without your participation.

The game was not at all stalled because of MY lack of participation, I had very little to reply to other than Kamina's post. In those 48 hours after my last post, there was only ONE post even slightly relevant to mine, and not many more that gave me any new material to spew. It's not like I can pull some shit out of my ass to  lay down in the thread, we're in LYLO, we have to be careful. So stop being a douche and calm the fuck down. I'm here to play mafia, not argue with some guy about my delay in posting, shit.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Murphy on November 10, 2010, 06:02:37 am
Since when it is me who is considered lurking?
I've said what I think already, but there was no substantial response. When I have more to say, I'll do it.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Murphy on November 10, 2010, 06:28:16 am
Quote from: Flintus10
So to see you ask me help you vote for someone we now know was a townie in order to save your own skin. (And it was definetely possible that you knew Jet would be lynched over you as you yourself said 'Everyone suspected him')
If I'm being accused all over the place and also believe to have found the true scum - I'm not going to just sit and wait.

Or do you want to know why I asked you specifically?
It's because you had already voted for someone other than Jet; the others (except Kamina and Azure) were undecided and it would be good to see who they were going to vote for first.

Also I believe it is more likely to get a response (positive or otherwise) when you ask someone directly and not the public in general. In fact, I wonder why did you ignore it.

And how could I possibly know that Jet would be lynched over me? Even if I was mafia, there would be no way to know that. There weren't even any votes on him by that time.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Murphy on November 10, 2010, 06:39:10 am
Flintus, Murphy, and EVERYONE ELSE, this goes for you too: PLAY THE FUCKING GAME YOU SAID YOU'D PLAY!
Why so nervous?
I've almost lost interest in this game already. But I'm going to continue because I signed up, and it doesn't really matter if you scream and swear all over the place or not.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Flintus10 on November 10, 2010, 07:05:57 am
And how could I possibly know that Jet would be lynched over me? Even if I was mafia, there would be no way to know that. There weren't even any votes on him by that time.
You specifically wrote everyone agreed he was mafia before you voted for him, hafta admit that sounds like you were reasonably assured he was gona be lynched.

In fact, I wonder why did you ignore it.
Why would I want to do what you say and not follow my own feelings and arguments? I wasn't totally down with the possibility of you being mafia back then but of those still alive now you were the one that looked most suspect. Particulalry as you really didn't come into the game untill Kamina returned and then you became alot more active.

Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 10, 2010, 07:42:08 am
I don't really suspect you that much. Nor him.
If I'm being accused all over the place and also believe to have found the true scum - I'm not going to just sit and wait.
Wut.  Contradictions all up in this bitch.
Quote from: Zathras bitching
EVERYONE ELSE, this goes for you too: PLAY THE FUCKING GAME YOU SAID YOU'D PLAY!
If you lurk, it dies, not just for you, but for the other folks as well. Don't be a douche.
JEGUS I play paranormal for ONE DAY, and suddenly I'm a douche?  Calm the fuck down, I planned to post here more today.
Flintus, Murphy, and EVERYONE ELSE, this goes for you too: PLAY THE FUCKING GAME YOU SAID YOU'D PLAY!
Why so nervous?
I've almost lost interest in this game already. But I'm going to continue because I signed up, and it doesn't really matter if you scream and swear all over the place or not.
Don't scumhunt Zathras.
A) He's not in the game.
B) He's a hella lot better player than you.
IN FACT, why do you get so touchy every time an experienced player posts?  The only reason I see is you being afraid of him revealing you to be scum.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Toaster on November 10, 2010, 08:48:17 am
Vote Count:

NativeForeigner: {0}
Flintus10: {0}
KaminaSquirtle: {0}
Azure Sepulchre: {0}
Murphy: {0}

Not Voting: NativeForeigner, Flintus10, KaminaSquirtle, Azure Sepulchre, Murphy

Day 3 will end Thursday, 11/11 at 11 PM EST


Zathras:  I understand your sentiment, but please let the players play.  Please hold your comments until game end.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Murphy on November 10, 2010, 10:07:06 am
Quote from: Flintus10
You specifically wrote everyone agreed he was mafia before you voted for him, hafta admit that sounds like you were reasonably assured he was gona be lynched.
Right, I said something like "look, even Kamina and Azure, who are voting for me, still agree on Jet being mafia".
Of course I was sure that he was going to be lynched eventually.
But in no way I could be sure of him being lynched over me on that day, as you seem to imply for some reason.
I would have been much calmer if I knew I was not going to be lynched.

Quote from: Flintus10
In fact, I wonder why did you ignore it.
Why would I want to do what you say and not follow my own feelings and arguments?
I did not mean why didn't you do what I said.
I meant why didn't you answer to that. You could say "no, I won't support you" and explain why, but chose to ignore.

I don't really suspect you that much. Nor him.
If I'm being accused all over the place and also believe to have found the true scum - I'm not going to just sit and wait.
Wut.  Contradictions all up in this bitch.
Where?
Yes, I did not suspect you that much. Nor did I suspect Native.
I explained that you two only became top of my list because I dropped Azure and townflipped Jet from it.
I gathered what I think about you in one of the above posts, but I fail to see where was I saying that you are scum.
And yes, during day 2 I was being accused all over the place and also believed to have found the true scum - Jetsquirrel.
Where there are contradictions, huh?

Quote from: KaminaSquirtle
Don't scumhunt Zathras.
A) He's not in the game.
B) He's a hella lot better player than you.
IN FACT, why do you get so touchy every time an experienced player posts?  The only reason I see is you being afraid of him revealing you to be scum.
Because they are arrogant.
It's not like being an experienced player gives one the right to be a jerk. Especially in a game where he or she is not participating.
And I'm not "scumhunting" him, I'm telling him to either stop being a jerk or get lost. I'm not going to let it go just because everyone is looking for an opportunity to blame me in-game.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 10, 2010, 10:24:27 am
I don't really suspect you that much. Nor him.
If I'm being accused all over the place and also believe to have found the true scum - I'm not going to just sit and wait.
Wut.  Contradictions all up in this bitch.
Where?
Yes, I did not suspect you that much. Nor did I suspect Native.
I explained that you two only became top of my list because I dropped Azure and townflipped Jet from it.
I gathered what I think about you in one of the above posts, but I fail to see where was I saying that you are scum.
And yes, during day 2 I was being accused all over the place and also believed to have found the true scum - Jetsquirrel.
Where there are contradictions, huh?
Missed the if.  I read that out of context, as if you were saying you had found the true scum now.  Which contradicts you saying you don't really suspect your top suspects.
Quote from: KaminaSquirtle
Don't scumhunt Zathras.
A) He's not in the game.
B) He's a hella lot better player than you.
IN FACT, why do you get so touchy every time an experienced player posts?  The only reason I see is you being afraid of him revealing you to be scum.
Because they are arrogant.
It's not like being an experienced player gives one the right to be a jerk. Especially in a game where he or she is not participating.
And I'm not "scumhunting" him, I'm telling him to either stop being a jerk or get lost. I'm not going to let it go just because everyone is looking for an opportunity to blame me in-game.
You'd better not leave beginner's mafia then, since everyone is a 'jerk' in the 'real' ones.  Heaven forbid you ever play in the same game as webadict.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Toaster on November 11, 2010, 10:51:24 am
Vote Count:

NativeForeigner: {0}
Flintus10: {0}
KaminaSquirtle: {0}
Azure Sepulchre: {0}
Murphy: {0}

Not Voting: NativeForeigner, Flintus10, KaminaSquirtle, Azure Sepulchre, Murphy

Day 3 will end Thursday, 11/11 at 11 PM EST, approximately 12 hours from now.

Reminder: A tie will result in a no lynch.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: SirBayer on November 11, 2010, 11:24:29 am
NativeForeigner has been prodded for not posting for over 48 hours.  Flintus and Murphy are next if they do not post soon.

GAAAaahhhhhh!!! AGAIN?!

Dammit, you newbies take notice: If there's a lesson you can learn from this game, it's this: LURKING KILLS GAMES. DON'T FUCKING LURK OR FLAKE!

Goddammit! If you sign up to play a game, it's minimal courtesy to actually play it!

This has been one of the best BMs I've seen in ages. You guys are interested, motivated, incisive, insightful, alert and agile, all you need is critical mass of players to keep going. If NativeWhatever or somesuch is not up to it, someone else will have to fill the spot, but all y'all other guys: DON'T DO THIS: It's the worst label in a mafia group to be labeled as a flaker.


I've been reading this game since before the first day, and you guys have been doing great. Much better than the BMs I played. I know you can pull it off, Don't be discouraged by the gutless worms in your midst that didn't have the spine to stand by the game. Don't despair. You can win this.

"Don't be rude, Nappa." As I pointed out to Webadict earlier in game, being angry about lurking only makes the problem worse.

...in some cases.

(Nice avatar. Blackadder, oh how I love thee.)
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Murphy on November 11, 2010, 12:05:38 pm
I see four people and two of them are scum.
I feel so stupid thinking about it over and over again. Four people, amongst whom none look that much scummy.
Those who looked scummy are dead and turned out to be town.
Maybe I should look for towntells instead of scumtells...

There was a good towntell from Kamina. I'm going to believe it:
Quote from: Murphy
I'm certain that while you were dead, you were actually believing me to be scum. But after you rejoined, you might've gotten a scum role and voila - the material you're gathered would be ideal to use as a means to lynch a townie. But you didn't hesitate to post the prepared wall-of-text really fast after rejoining, apparently without giving it a second thought, so I think you got what you expected - a town role.
(sorry if me quoting myself bothers someone)

There was a lot of speculation about Azure on my part, and Native did some too. None of it went further than just speculation, so if Azure is indeed scum, then he is being very, very good at it - no slips and an extremely helpful outlook for the town. Anyone know if he's really that much experienced? For now, unless a good objection is made, I'll consider him town.

Flintus and Native remain.
There's not much against the two of them, but they do fit the "1 semi-active mafia + 1 inactive mafia" scheme. Flintus seems reluctant to argue too much, but posts enough to not look like he's lurking. And while I do not know about Native, his predecessor Ragnarok would quite fit the "inactive mafia" role.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Murphy on November 11, 2010, 12:13:49 pm
More extension?
Or should I just vote for who I think is less likely to be town, and hope no one intervenes to bring us to a tie again in the following 12 hours?
It is one hour past midnight in my timezone now. Hope I'll manage to get up in time to check the thread in the morning and take action if no one else bothers.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: NativeForeigner on November 11, 2010, 01:56:41 pm
I think we may need another extension, we're not getting anywhere.

We have a lot of speculation going on here, but we need some solid tells in order to make a decision that won't lose the game.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Toaster on November 11, 2010, 02:41:16 pm
Vote Count:

NativeForeigner: {0}
Flintus10: {0}
KaminaSquirtle: {0}
Azure Sepulchre: {0}
Murphy: {0}

Not Voting: NativeForeigner, Flintus10, KaminaSquirtle, Azure Sepulchre, Murphy

Two extension requests heard.  Day 3 has been extended until Friday, 11/12 at 11 PM EST
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 11, 2010, 02:57:57 pm
I think we may need another extension, we're not getting anywhere.

We have a lot of speculation going on here, but we need some solid tells in order to make a decision that won't lose the game.
Agree.
There was a lot of speculation about Azure on my part, and Native did some too. None of it went further than just speculation, so if Azure is indeed scum, then he is being very, very good at it - no slips and an extremely helpful outlook for the town. Anyone know if he's really that much experienced? For now, unless a good objection is made, I'll consider him town.
Let me check the games he's played in.  I may have an idea.

And I think a reason this game is stalling is that Azure hasn't posted his thoughts recently.  It doesn't feel right without him chiming in with his opinions.  I can't help but feel he's having ideas and not telling us them.

Hell, we're not getting anywhere at this rate, there's WAY too little pressure here for it to be LYLO.  Time to heat things up.
Flintus, tell me why you're not scum, and why I should remove this vote.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Flintus10 on November 11, 2010, 04:42:25 pm
So if Azure is indeed scum, then he is being very, very good at it - no slips and an extremely helpful outlook for the town.
I agree wholeheartedly with this the biggest problem of course being if anyone could play the whole game as mafia and get through it without any obvious slips it would probably be Azure. Although out of all his votes so far Azure hasn’t actually started a single one except against Ragnarok which was for lurking and not likely to turn up as a lynch, not that that is overly scummy.

And I looked through to see anything between him and Ragnarok but turned up nothing. They didn’t specifically look like they had distanced themselves on purpose and neither did they look to close. Ragnarok was definitely online a lot more often than he posted and seemed to be actively lurking which is a lot like I played when I was first scum but of course we are different people. What do you guys think Active lurking scum or just uninterested town?

Either way I would really like to see azure post his thoughts.
sorry for not doing stuff, stuff happened. Nothing to say, really. Sad that we're not doing so well.
Although this post made on day two right after we screwed up on Ottofar and lost Kamina Mark I  makes me think Ragnarok was either the worst townie ever or actively lurking scum just desperately trying to post anything. Most of Ragnarok's other posts were just excuses as to why he wasn't playing...If he really was a uninterested townie who didn't care about our cause this makes me wonder why he seemed to still want to stay alive and in the game.

Flintus, tell me why you're not scum, and why I should remove this vote.
Simple answer is of course because if I die we lose the game. So far this day nobody has been helpful and instead of just forcing posts by voting why don’t you go back through a couple of days and see what you can find Kamina. We have to actually work together to get evidence seeing as it’s day 3 and we really have barely any idea. 
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 11, 2010, 05:22:53 pm
So if Azure is indeed scum, then he is being very, very good at it - no slips and an extremely helpful outlook for the town.
I agree wholeheartedly with this the biggest problem of course being if anyone could play the whole game as mafia and get through it without any obvious slips it would probably be Azure. Although out of all his votes so far Azure hasn’t actually started a single one except against Ragnarok which was for lurking and not likely to turn up as a lynch, not that that is overly scummy.

And I looked through to see anything between him and Ragnarok but turned up nothing. They didn’t specifically look like they had distanced themselves on purpose and neither did they look to close. Ragnarok was definitely online a lot more often than he posted and seemed to be actively lurking which is a lot like I played when I was first scum but of course we are different people. What do you guys think Active lurking scum or just uninterested town?

Either way I would really like to see azure post his thoughts.
Agree with 1st paragraph.  He hasn't really started anything, just backed stuff up.  Please provide examples if you disagree, Azure.

Well, to me it looked like rag was bad town, I mean he did he play at all?  I'm just kind of mad he didn't get a replacement earlier.  He would have to be seriously dishonest to use all those real life excuses to hide a scumlurk.  That doesn't seem to mesh with what I've seen of his personality.  I think he was online but not reading this.  I think he's more of an upper forumer.  Could have been scum, but I don't think so.

I would also really like to hear Azure's thoughts.  He's been silent for far too long.

Either way I would really like to see azure post his thoughts.
sorry for not doing stuff, stuff happened. Nothing to say, really. Sad that we're not doing so well.
Although this post made on day two right after we screwed up on Ottofar and lost Kamina Mark I  makes me think Ragnarok was either the worst townie ever or actively lurking scum just desperately trying to post anything. Most of Ragnarok's other posts were just excuses as to why he wasn't playing...If he really was a uninterested townie who didn't care about our cause this makes me wonder why he seemed to still want to stay alive and in the game.
Where did he defend himself enough to show he wanted to keep playing?  He didn't even defend himself IIRC.  Please point out where he did.
Flintus, tell me why you're not scum, and why I should remove this vote.
Simple answer is of course because if I die we lose the game. So far this day nobody has been helpful and instead of just forcing posts by voting why don’t you go back through a couple of days and see what you can find Kamina. We have to actually work together to get evidence seeing as it’s day 3 and we really have barely any idea. 
Just because I voted you doesn't mean I don't want to work with you.  And that's a very weak argument.  I don't intend to lynch you, not yet anyways.
Let me rephrase the question: please show some examples of scumhunting on your part.  I just want to see how you defend yourself.  That's different than going back and seeing what you did.  I'll remove my vote when you answer the question, unless your answer screams scum or something.
I need to force posts because we keep stalling without them.  They can provide invaluable information too.
I intend to go back and look for evidence too.  But first I'm going to see how Azure normally plays by digging through some of his past games.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 11, 2010, 05:30:35 pm
I've found a good game to observe, if anyone else wants to see Azure play scum.  BM XVI. (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=66479.0)
I haven't read it yet, but it should be very enlightening.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Flintus10 on November 11, 2010, 06:10:29 pm
Where did he defend himself enough to show he wanted to keep playing?  He didn't even defend himself IIRC.  Please point out where he did.

My point was if he didn't care I don't know why about half his posts were just excuses. \


I apologise for not posting much, got a lot of things going on right now, and in any case, I try not to put something up unless It is important. not a very good strategy for Mafia, I guess. anyway, I think that a vote at this point in the game would be founded more on random suspicion than any reasoned deduction of who is actually on the scumteam. Really, I think we'd be better off waiting untill we have some evidence to lynch anyone. right now, we have random guesswork, decently laid traps, and mob mentality to discern the scum. from this turns effects, we may be able to deduce, from who is killed, and what their suspicions were, who is likely to need lynching. on that note, I guess...
unvote
Well, he's got a point Elegy, you seem kind of suspicious.

However before I cast a vote I'd like to see a bit more mor kamina squirtle and ragnarok.
They're being very quiet.

So, Ragnarok, what's up with all this lurking?
I went to sleep, pretty much right after that last post of mine, and then about a page of stuff got posted overnight...
Well, actually, I just don't post much ever. Really, there is usually not much that I can think of something to say to. also, I have most of my day taken up by either school or sleeping, as well as other things I do with my family. I usually post when I can. I am NOT going to wake up early just so I can play this game, and it's pretty much impossible for me to stay up past 10:00 EST (In high school, so I have a curfew), so I have 7 and a half hours in which I can do stuff, minus a half for walking home, minus a half for dinner, minus others from when I just don't check (about 2 hours in full), and for today, minus a bunch for going out to dinner and playing Magic the Gathering with my bro. I show up as online a lot because I usually leave a tab open on the "Unread Replies" page when I leave. I have things that I am obligated to do outside of this thread, guys, and to be honest, this actually doesn't rate too high on my priorities right now, mostly because of all of the hate I seem to be catching (yes I am aware that most of that is because I don't post here much, thus making it a vicious cycle), though I know that this is so that you can semi-reliably find the people who need to die (in game). Hell, if all goes well, I may not be able to get on during any time but the weekends, as I am trying to find a part-time job. I was unaware that I needed approval in triplicate in order to have a life away from this game. Also I play dwarf fortress, and it tends to hold me for a few hours at a time.
sorry for not doing stuff, stuff happened. Nothing to say, really. Sad that we're not doing so well.

Let me rephrase the question: please show some examples of scumhunting on your part.  I just want to see how you defend yourself.  That's different than going back and seeing what you did.  I'll remove my vote when you answer the question, unless your answer screams scum or something.

This is oh so easily something that would be answered better if you went back and looked into what I have done. Everything against Mindmaker was an attempt to scum-hunt. Day one I tried to have spade (/you) try to participate and got nowhere. I tried to get Jet to actually provide some freaking evidence and he did not. People just seemed to stop answering alot of my questions by day two and so I couldn’t get anywhere.

But seriously it would be better for both of us if you just looked back through what I have posted so far and made your own opinion because honestly I think you are just asking what Zatharas asked you in Paranormal and am not totally sure if you even know what answers you are looking for.

I’d seriously be happy to justify any of my actions to help assert that I am town but you are gona have to give me specific actions that need justification (find quote ask how I intended  it to benifit town ect ect). I mean I was almost positive Ottofar was scum and do not know how Jet wasn’t and pretty much everyone else made those same mistakes.

Still I am at least glad things seem to be moving again I just wish the others would get in here and start posting .
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Flintus10 on November 11, 2010, 06:24:29 pm
I've found a good game to observe, if anyone else wants to see Azure play scum.  BM XVI. (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=66479.0)
I haven't read it yet, but it should be very enlightening.

Reading now, and I think if we had looked at this earlier we would have realised Jet is just bad at town :(
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Flintus10 on November 11, 2010, 06:35:52 pm
Well in that game nobody could get a good read on Azure as scum either  ??? And while his playstyle was quite similar to this game it ended to early for me to get anything really.

Though I notice that he once again he wasn't the first to vote against Jet who was lynched on day one.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 11, 2010, 07:17:28 pm
Where did he defend himself enough to show he wanted to keep playing?  He didn't even defend himself IIRC.  Please point out where he did.

My point was if he didn't care I don't know why about half his posts were just excuses. \
You may have something there, but to me it just seemed like he felt obligated to explain why he wasn't posted.  He eventually realized he wasn't playing, and decided to give up his position to Native.

Speaking of Native, I'd like to hear more from him.  We could use as much material as we can get on him, as he joined so late.
Let me rephrase the question: please show some examples of scumhunting on your part.  I just want to see how you defend yourself.  That's different than going back and seeing what you did.  I'll remove my vote when you answer the question, unless your answer screams scum or something.

This is oh so easily something that would be answered better if you went back and looked into what I have done. Everything against Mindmaker was an attempt to scum-hunt. Day one I tried to have spade (/you) try to participate and got nowhere. I tried to get Jet to actually provide some freaking evidence and he did not. People just seemed to stop answering alot of my questions by day two and so I couldn’t get anywhere.

But seriously it would be better for both of us if you just looked back through what I have posted so far and made your own opinion because honestly I think you are just asking what Zatharas asked you in Paranormal and am not totally sure if you even know what answers you are looking for.

I’d seriously be happy to justify any of my actions to help assert that I am town but you are gona have to give me specific actions that need justification (find quote ask how I intended  it to benifit town ect ect). I mean I was almost positive Ottofar was scum and do not know how Jet wasn’t and pretty much everyone else made those same mistakes.

Still I am at least glad things seem to be moving again I just wish the others would get in here and start posting .

I guess you're right.  The point of the question was to get some content-filled posts rolling.  I think we can say it worked.  You also seem to me to be town at this point.
Unvote.
And yes, I did steal it from Zathras.  I figured it would be a good question to get things rolling again.

Now I want something more form Azure.  He's gone too long without posting content.
Azure, post some content and the vote goes away, as long as it isn't scummy.
Yes I want you to post that bad.
I've found a good game to observe, if anyone else wants to see Azure play scum.  BM XVI. (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=66479.0)
I haven't read it yet, but it should be very enlightening.

Reading now, and I think if we had looked at this earlier we would have realised Jet is just bad at mafia :(
Fixed that for you.  See sorcerer's apprentice mafia (http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=68920.0) to see scum Jet.  He sucks just as bad at scum as town.
Honestly I'm glad he isn't here.  He would screw us over at LYLO.  Can you honestly say we wouldn't end up voting him?
Well in that game nobody could get a good read on Azure as scum either  ??? And while his playstyle was quite similar to this game it ended to early for me to get anything really.

Though I notice that he once again he wasn't the first to vote against Jet who was lynched on day one.
I'm about halfway through that game, and only USEC seemed to have him.
He seems hard to lynch, at the very least.
I want to see his next post.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Murphy on November 11, 2010, 08:59:21 pm
I'm reading that game too. Just give me a few hours from now to take care of some errands and read it fully.

Afair, Azure had claimed to be frustrated from screwed wall-o-text.
We don't have the luxury of having time to slack, so fight your frustration, Azure, fight it!
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Toaster on November 11, 2010, 09:09:29 pm
Azure has not logged in to the forum at all in over 48 hours.  He may have had an attack of the RL.

Knowing this, we may need a replacement, though I hate for that to happen this late in the game.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 11, 2010, 09:11:04 pm
I'm reading that game too. Just give me a few hours from now to take care of some errands and read it fully.

Afair, Azure had claimed to be frustrated from screwed wall-o-text.
We don't have the luxury of having time to slack, so fight your frustration, Azure, fight it!
He posted that over 60 hours ago.  Surely you have something by now, Azure?  If your wall of text isn't done yet, please post what you have so far so we at least have something to talk about.

Wait, 60 hours?  Please prod Azure.  He needs to get back here.


Ninjad by mod.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: NativeForeigner on November 11, 2010, 11:02:47 pm
It's becoming increasingly apparent that my predecessor was a major lurker. -_-
I can't say much in defense of his lurking because I'm not him. His constant excuses could have just been an attempt to keep himself from being replaced in the hopes of being able to post soon, but I don't know.

I'm reading through the other game to get an idea of how Azure plays. I'll post some more once I have some thoughts.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 12, 2010, 12:13:36 am
i vote for Usec

When you make yourself suspicious and then want to be voted for.... i will vote for you

as somewhere i red that people who make themselves suspicious in order to make confusion, you just vote for them.
(I red that somewhere in wizard duel 4)
This is golden.  You could make a joke book out of this guy.  He's like the Realmfighter of mafia.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Toaster on November 12, 2010, 09:24:41 am
Vote Count:

NativeForeigner: {0}
Flintus10: {0}
KaminaSquirtle: {0}
Azure Sepulchre: {1} KaminaSquirtle
Murphy: {0}

Not Voting: NativeForeigner, Flintus10, Azure Sepulchre, Murphy

Azure Sepulchre is lost and presumed dead, so we must ask for another replacement.  The day won't end until at least 24 hours after one is found, so the day is extended until at least Monday.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman [One replacement needed]
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 12, 2010, 09:28:51 am
Well, if he's gone I might as well unvote.
No reason to hit the replacement with a vote the second he steps in here.

*Sigh*  So many replacements...
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman [One replacement needed]
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on November 12, 2010, 12:59:02 pm

Azure Sepulchre is lost and presumed dead, so we must ask for another replacement. 

Rumours of my death have been greatly exaggerated. [/litfag]

But sorry about that; seriously. My laptop decided to stop fucking around and just got on with dying instead, and I was quite ill on both Wednesday and Thursday, (to the point where I was sneezing approx. every 30 seconds, which hurt my throat so much I can still barely speak) so I couldn't even come down and use any of the university computers unless I had no problem peering through a monitor covered in phlegm.

...aww, crap. Seems I have a lot to catch up on, too... and a vote was on me? Huh. Well, I have about an hour spare before my flatmate's preliminary birthday party drinking session, so I'll have a go at catching up and posting some content.

Again, my apologies.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Toaster on November 12, 2010, 01:29:43 pm
Since Samuel Clemens Azure has returned, we no longer require a replacement.  I will reinstate the deadline of tonight 11PM EST unless I get two extension requests, in which case it will be Monday.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on November 12, 2010, 01:49:49 pm
Flintus:
Well, he was the 4th vote on Jet, but that's all really have on him at this point.  I can't really blame him for bandwagoning Jet.  I mean it, it was JET, man.

My problem with Flintus is two-fold: he fits into my theory of 'one active scum, one lurker scum' since I don't really consider Murphy scum (at the time of writing - I still haven't caught up on the past few pages properly, just skimmed most of it) and, if he were townie, then he comes across as unusually cautious to the idea of proper scumhunting - of particular note being a conversation he had a while ago with Spade, where he pressed him briefly, obtained a pithy reply in turn and then promptly dropped the line of questioning. I also find it interesting that the most information we've really obtained on him all game has only been given to us now, when Kamina placed a FoS on him. Remarkable.

If anyone wants a link to the Spade/Flintus convo I'm referring to, I'm afraid it will have to wait until tomorrow - assuming anyone is willing to grant this game one final extension through the weekend, so we might work out whom could be our final lynch.

Native:
Same thing with bandwagoning Jet.  Same reason it doesn't really matter.  I might be blind, but I don't see much at this point.  We'll see.

I would not FoS anyone on the basis on placing their vote on Jet, to please stop presuming it's my only reason. Even if ragnarok did cite IRL reasons for his absence, there is every possibility that he outright lied to us to maintain his 'lurker' position... although, personally, I found Spade to be the more obvious lurker of the two, hence my suspicion of you Kamina.

Looking at Azure's points in your defense, and rereading my theory, you do seem much less scummy to me at this point.  Seeing as you seem to agree with Azure, who would you suggest as my scumbuddy?  Is it, as your list suggests, Native?  What exactly makes him look suspicious at this point?

...oh my. Really, now? No one else has picked up on this?

One person offers the idea that Murphy could be town, and suddenly you change your entire perspective? From a townie, I would've bought a bit of a struggle, considering how certain you were on day 2 and at the start of day 3 that Murphy was scum. But to so suddenly change your mind? I sure as hell ain't buying whatever it is you're selling, son.

Azure:
Well, you could be scum trying to attack me, and thus win the game, but that is seriously weak argument at this point. You are almost assuredly town.  And your argument against is seriously good. Unfortunately, it's wrong. If you lynch me, then it's game over. But I won't count on that to convince you of anything, like Jet did.  Well, that was shorter than expected.  Time for my response to your post, Azure.

Congrats; you don't intend to make the same mistake as the biggest moron to ever stumble into a forum, despite having used such lazy WIFOM anyway. You are aware of how weak such an argument is, and yet have no second thoughts in using it.

Have a cookie.

Fair point.  But I'm confused as to how it kept getting pointed out to me.  Could you point me to exactly where it was repeated?  I only saw it the once.

This one was my mistake. There were only two posts where this was brought up during day 2 (not including my own post referencing it), but they were both located smack between a meaty argument to which I was constantly drawing reference and working from. Ergo, I imagined there were more posts than there actually were because I read through them so often. However, since you also very clearly took note Kamina - and have not only attempted to intigrate it into your argument but have dropped it just as quickly - I cannot help but suspect you. As a matter of fact, I think I'd call you my #1 scum lynch at the moment. However, I still haven't read through the whole thread properly and things may have changed, so I'm going to keep reading for the time being and catch up before I can make a truly informed decision. 

Oh, I think I found it.  It was me mentioning 'maybe they lynched him because ...', right?  It does look like distancing.  I wasn't intending to 'WIFOM the hell out of it', I was merely listing off all the possibilities that popped into my head.  The more we have to think on, the better.  We can dismiss those if you so wish, and come up with a new theory, which I think you did quite well.

Listing theories is pointless at this stage of the game. At day 2, such an idea would have merit, but there's only five people here. To get bogged down in multiple theories would ruin us. We should press one another, one at a time, and see what we find instead. A far more reliable method with a smaller group, instead of discussing everything all at once.

I'm glad we ended up lynching Jet instead.  He would have screwed us over in LYLO. 

'We'? Hah. XD If I recall corretly, we two were the only ones who didn't. I've been wondering since day 3 why you, as scum, would want Murphy dead instead of Jet. That just made it crystal clear not only to me, but likely to everyone else as well.

Since you're suggesting I'm scum, are you saying I'm a short-sighted moron?  Is that compatible with you saying what I'm doing is exactly what you would do?  Because then you would be calling yourself a short-sighted moron.

Way to take my words out of context. I was saying if Murphy did it, it would have been short-sighted, considering the kind of predicament he could have been in in day 2. If, on the other hand, you did it, things would become much clearer. For instance, as I mentioned earlier, Mindmaker was a fairly difficult player to push into a lynch; he analyzed things from every angle available - up to and including considering the lynchers themselves scum - before he made his ultimate decision.Since Jet wasn't scum, you could bet your ass he'd be all over you today were he alive. On the other hand, I appeared quite firmly on your side, and you only really needed one townie on your side going into day 3... have I spelt things out clearly enough, dear townsfolk?


I'm not trying to force anything anywhere.  See above on dropping my attack on Murphy.  I'm willing to work together with everyone else to find the scum.  Though I'm not sure if there's anything I can do to redeem myself in your eyes, Azure.  Is there?  And why would posting it first be before you could ''get your bearings"?  You can think all you like.  It's not like the day ends anytime soon.
Good metaphor though.

At this stage? No, not really. Particularly not after all the budding yesterday. I hadn't even realized it, having been so damn sure Murphy and Jet were our ultimate kills. However, now that I read over it again... well, you sure as hell didn't behave like that back in day 1, before scum had killed you in the night.

Hmm... I think this is all I can squeeze in for the time being, folks. I'll catch up fully tomorrow, if we get an extension. If not... well, we'll have to lynch someone or die, so I'll make mine Kamina. I would really rather not lynch him without knowing all the facts, though, so I implore you all - please go for an extension.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: NativeForeigner on November 12, 2010, 06:16:07 pm
I would like to second that extension request. While Kamina is a very likely suspect at this point, we still need a few days to make sure. If he isn't, we lose. If he is, we can still win.

I'm in class at the moment and probably shouldn't even be on this page, so that's all I have to say for now.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Flintus10 on November 12, 2010, 07:09:45 pm
My problem with Flintus is two-fold: he fits into my theory of 'one active scum, one lurker scum' since I don't really consider Murphy scum (at the time of writing - I still haven't caught up on the past few pages properly, just skimmed most of it) and, if he were townie, then he comes across as unusually cautious to the idea of proper scumhunting - of particular note being a conversation he had a while ago with Spade, where he pressed him briefly, obtained a pithy reply in turn and then promptly dropped the line of questioning. I also find it interesting that the most information we've really obtained on him all game has only been given to us now, when Kamina placed a FoS on him. Remarkable.
Well if you wanted information you only needed to ask.

I would not FoS anyone on the basis on placing their vote on Jet, to please stop presuming it's my only reason. Even if ragnarok did cite IRL reasons for his absence, there is every possibility that he outright lied to us to maintain his 'lurker' position... although, personally, I found Spade to be the more obvious lurker of the two, hence my suspicion of you Kamina.
And using that Spade conversation I got distracted by Ottofar and forgot about him. My bad but there you go. I didn't actually have suspicion of Spade back then I just wanted to see what he thought, looking back now though I am torn between him and ragnarok as the lurker scum.

Ragnarok- Spent his whole time practically giving pointless replies and put far more energy into just justifying why he was lurking.


Spade- Directed alot of his attention on day 1 towards Ragnarok and claimed he had posted nothing despite this being of course an extremely hypocrytical statement.
You're still not saying not saying anything useful, ragnarok. Do you actually have something good to say or maybe even a question?
specifically only targeting lurkers is a pretty newbie scum-tell

Azure Could I ask what it is you find more suspicious about Spade than Ragnarok considering they are both still in this game technically.

And also
Flintus - He's on the other end of the spectrum, for the moment. He caught on to the basis of my trap against Otto before I'd even posted it, and was the first person to vote for him; absolving him instantly of any 'bandwagoning' claim - and didn't try to back off onto Elegy when things clearly went south for Otto. However - even if I don't believe this myself - I should still point out that, if Otto does actually flip town, then you should consider my position on Flintus reversed assuming I'm dead. Make of that what you will.

You basically told the others that you would suspect me if Otto flipped town, was that only if you died? Because if not you seem to completely forgot about it.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 12, 2010, 07:14:17 pm
Firstly, Extension.
I'll write up a response to your post now, Azure.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 12, 2010, 08:46:33 pm
FFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU-
WHAT DO YOU MEAN CLICKING THE LINKS IN THE QUOTES IN THE PREVIEW DOESN'T OPEN A NEW TAB?
I'll do it tomorrow.  I don't want to do that over again tonight.  BLARGLE!
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Toaster on November 13, 2010, 01:31:34 pm
Vote Count:

NativeForeigner: {0}
Flintus10: {0}
KaminaSquirtle: {0}
Azure Sepulchre: {0}
Murphy: {0}

Not Voting: NativeForeigner, Flintus10, KaminaSquirtle, Azure Sepulchre, Murphy

Two extension requests heard.  Day 3 has been extended until Monday, 11/15 at 11 PM EST

I apologize for not being on last night to process the extension.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Murphy on November 14, 2010, 03:02:55 am
Reading through all BM XVI was like hell, though its revealed scumchat was most enlightening.

Azure and Flintus:
As I've mentioned, there is a solid towntell from Kamina. Do you consider it weak?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Flintus10 on November 14, 2010, 04:30:10 am
It's fairly solid though he could have gotten a scum role then realised that his big rant he had made in dead chat could help him look like a townie.

Though if he was planning on having lynch you AND Jet then that would have been a pretty lousy plan (considering both of you were town.) As when one of you flipped he would come under suspicion, and it would have not been to his advantage if he was bussing so I really do believe Kamina is probably town. Or at least his massive post was a good town-tell.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 14, 2010, 10:18:25 am
Sorry for not posting yesterday, it was Saturday and I was feeling lazy. :P
I don't have time for a Wall of Text right now, so this'll be a short post.

I find it extremely interesting that even though Azure had read Dakarian's guide to scumhunting, he still found the agressiveness of Ottofar sure evidence of him being scum.  Looking back after some paranormal, I would have found it a bit of a towntell.  No scum would do something like that.  It looks to me like he may have been trying to pull something similar to a lynching of Sir Bayer in that game.  Looking back to that point in the thread has me facepalming.
And, funny enough, even though he had played with Jet before, Azure never gave any thought to whether Jet was being stupidtown or stupidscum.
He just seems to have too much experience, and doesn't seem to be using it, instead deciding to utilize the fact that us beginners will lynch whoever looks suspicious, instead of lynching who looks like scum.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on November 14, 2010, 12:10:24 pm
I find it extremely interesting that even though Azure had read Dakarian's guide to scumhunting, he still found the agressiveness of Ottofar sure evidence of him being scum.  Looking back after some paranormal, I would have found it a bit of a towntell.

His aggressiveness wasn't my issue. The fact that he had fallen into my gambit and because he'd basically refused to properly defend himself (despite the many opportunities I gave him) were what I found scummy. If you're gonna try and tell me that his unwillingness to counter my arguments with anything stronger than a shrug of the shoulders was a town tell, then I'm going to be rather annoyed.

No scum would do something like that. It looks to me like he may have been trying to pull something similar to a lynching of Sir Bayer in that game. Looking back to that point in the thread has me facepalming.

You cannot meta me. You have no basis from which to draw a town comparison.

Regardless, I was half-interested in keeping Bayer alive in that game, as I found his penchant for diving into lynches practically heedless of the concequences unbelievably useful. I could probably have won that game if it hadn't died, considering he mentioned he hadn't even suspected me. But eh, that's mere speculation now.

And, funny enough, even though he had played with Jet before, Azure never gave any thought to whether Jet was being stupidtown or stupidscum.

When Jet joined this game, I recommended for all of you to go back and read the last BM in order to get an idea of how he played. Don't believe me? Here's the proof:

Actually, since several players of the last Beginner game are now in this one, I'd recommend that some of you read over the last game - it isn't all that long, having died not long after the start of day 2 - if you'd like to use some meta arguments. :P At the very least, it'll show you why Otto's proposed method of play isn't the only kind nor necessarily the best, and could give you an idea of how Jet plays before he posts.

If you didn't listen to me back then, then it's your own fault. Besides, you've already stated that Jet was a good lynch for today, considering he was - to be laconic for a moment - a fucking moron. Suddenly you've changed your mind and decided to use his death as a scumtell against me?

He just seems to have too much experience, and doesn't seem to be using it, instead deciding to utilize the fact that us beginners will lynch whoever looks suspicious, instead of lynching who looks like scum.

Stop talking about me like I'm fucking webadict. I know my way around an IRC game well enough to be okay, I'll say that much, but a forum game is completely different. In fact, the best comparison I can make between them is one I believe I made in the last BM: it's like comparing blitz chess to the real deal. In blitz chess, there's less time to make your decision, so you'll more often rely on opening moves and tried-and-tested gambits that can be exploited and defeated if you're savvy to them, whereas in proper chess you'll have more time and room to experiment - not to mention more time to get to know your opponent, which can either tip things in your favour or ruin your game if you're wrong.

Azure and Flintus:
As I've mentioned, there is a solid towntell from Kamina. Do you consider it weak?

...it's a fair argument, actually. I don't like it, but you're probably right; if he were scum, he would've delayed such an agrument until he could be sure of what kind of effect it would have. You also can't be a scum team, since he tried quite hard to get you lynched yesterday...

...in that case, I suppose Flintus and Native could be a strong scum team, but I'm still not entirely convinced - you could just be misled town, after all, Murphy. Flintus was my second scum vote anyway - after Kamina - so I'd have no problems with making him my final vote. Unvote, Vote Flintus.

Unless you'd rather use Kamina's worthless meta argument against me? You're welcome to try.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on November 14, 2010, 12:39:38 pm
Agree with 1st paragraph.  He hasn't really started anything, just backed stuff up.  Please provide examples if you disagree, Azure.

Just noticed this.

Look at it this way; if it hadn't been for me, do you really think Otto would have been lynched? Not the best claim to fame, admittedly, but as far as I can see, it's the truth. Just because I wasn't the first vote doesn't mean it wasn't my fault - but neither is it entirely my fault, either. You also thought he was scum, Kamina, when you voted for him. Or have you decided to convieniently forget this fact?

Azure Could I ask what it is you find more suspicious about Spade than Ragnarok considering they are both still in this game technically.

It was the fact that you could always notice him hanging around - he didn't say much, but he was usually there. He's scattered a number of pithy remarks over the course of the thread, whereas ragnarok was basically absent for near enough everything. On the other hand, I think Spade was also in the last BM... did he play like this in it? I can't remember, and I have to go now so I can't really check. Library's closing. >.>

You basically told the others that you would suspect me if Otto flipped town, was that only if you died? Because if not you seem to completely forgot about it.

Nope; clean forgot about it, as I didn't expect Otto to show up as town and then I became more invested in my argument with Mindmaker. I suppose you could say I'm making up for lost time now, huh?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: NativeForeigner on November 14, 2010, 03:28:48 pm
Bah! I'm too hungry to write a cohesive post right now.

I'm heading out to get a bite to eat. I'll post as soon as I get back.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Toaster on November 14, 2010, 05:16:41 pm
Vote Count:

NativeForeigner: {0}
Flintus10: {1} Azure Sepulchre
KaminaSquirtle: {0}
Azure Sepulchre: {0}
Murphy: {0}

Not Voting: NativeForeigner, Flintus10, KaminaSquirtle, Murphy

Day 3 will end Monday, 11/15 at 11 PM EST
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: NativeForeigner on November 14, 2010, 05:52:20 pm
Okay, well, I don't have much to contribute, it seems like Azure's handling all of that. D:
We need to start applying a little more pressure before the day ends, so Flintus, prove to us that you're not scum. You have a fairly strong argument against you and Azure's on your ass. Why should the rest of us ignore this?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Flintus10 on November 14, 2010, 06:03:32 pm
...in that case, I suppose Flintus and Native could be a strong scum team, but I'm still not entirely convinced - you could just be misled town, after all, Murphy. Flintus was my second scum vote anyway - after Kamina - so I'd have no problems with making him my final vote. Unvote, Vote Flintus.
Unless you'd rather use Kamina's worthless meta argument against me? You're welcome to try.

Your going to cost town the game by voting for me for no reason that I can see apart from ONE conversation with Spade on day freaking one. Even if you are town and therefore aren't 100% sure of my status don't you see that as a bit of a massive risk considering there are others you suspect above me?

You claim I do not scum-hunt, well dammit man I did try one the first two days...can't really say I am that terrible at it considering we all screwed up.


Look at it this way; if it hadn't been for me, do you really think Otto would have been lynched? Not the best claim to fame, admittedly, but as far as I can see, it's the truth. Just because I wasn't the first vote doesn't mean it wasn't my fault - but neither is it entirely my fault, either. You also thought he was scum, Kamina, when you voted for him. Or have you decided to conveniently forget this fact?

I do not doubt you provided the strongest argument against Ottofar but you were the third vote on him and the way he refused to defend himself against anything has me fairly certain that he would have been lynched anyways. And of course the fact that you got him lynched doesn't actually absolve you of anything. I think your trying to defend yourself in saying that you did not just wait for other people to vote and then follow them and this statement does not do that at all.

Azure Could I ask what it is you find more suspicious about Spade than Ragnarok considering they are both still in this game technically.
It was the fact that you could always notice him hanging around - he didn't say much, but he was usually there. He's scattered a number of pithy remarks over the course of the thread, whereas ragnarok was basically absent for near enough everything. On the other hand, I think Spade was also in the last BM... did he play like this in it? I can't remember, and I have to go now so I can't really check. Library's closing. >.>
[/quote]
Here I am working with you, Don't you think constantly being online and even being willing to post fairly large posts explaining his absense (ragnarok, and a style of lurking I have not seen before) is a bit more suspicious than posting rarely and without content (also scummy don't get me wrong but also very common for a uncaring noob.)

You basically told the others that you would suspect me if Otto flipped town, was that only if you died? Because if not you seem to completely forgot about it.
Nope; clean forgot about it, as I didn't expect Otto to show up as town and then I became more invested in my argument with Mindmaker. I suppose you could say I'm making up for lost time now, huh?
So wait I forget to follow up on what was originally a meaningless question to get Spade active and that makes me scum and yet you throw out some WIFOM (I am fairly certain it is, you even went as far as saying "Make of that what you will".) saying that you will accuse me with a fair degree of certainty and prepare your lynch for day two and that's okay cause you forgot? This is all surprisingly sloppy Azure.

( Either way your making things fun again so ty for that)
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Flintus10 on November 14, 2010, 06:03:57 pm
Okay, well, I don't have much to contribute, it seems like Azure's handling all of that. D:
We need to start applying a little more pressure before the day ends, so Flintus, prove to us that you're not scum. You have a fairly strong argument against you and Azure's on your ass. Why should the rest of us ignore this?

Oh? and what is your argument against me?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Flintus10 on November 14, 2010, 06:11:31 pm
Bwahaha I just realised after not ever paying attention to me Native is suddenly suspicious of me after a post by Azure. Is this all another trap laid out by you azure  ;D
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on November 14, 2010, 06:51:37 pm
Bwahaha I just realised after not ever paying attention to me Native is suddenly suspicious of me after a post by Azure. Is this all another trap laid out by you azure  ;D

Good God, man; I lay out one gambit at the start of the game that didn't even work, and suddenly I'm Keyser fucking Soze. >.>

Regardless, unless you've failed to notice, Native could easily be one of my lynches tomorrow. You're just the one I'm most sure about. And no, I don't only suspect you because of one argument - I simply think the Maf could not work properly had they been both of the lurkers. I no longer believe Murphy is scum, meaning you're all that's left of the active/semi-active group. I'm no longer 100% on which of the lurkers is the actual scum, so I choose you.

If - heaven forbid - the scum does turn out to be the two lurkers, I'm gonna be pretty pissed off... -_-

I'm gonna have to leave the Q&A at this, I'm afraid. This isn't even my laptop, and the guy's looking for it back. Sorry, brah.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Flintus10 on November 14, 2010, 07:03:20 pm
Bwahaha I just realised after not ever paying attention to me Native is suddenly suspicious of me after a post by Azure. Is this all another trap laid out by you azure  ;D
Good God, man; I lay out one gambit at the start of the game that didn't even work, and suddenly I'm Keyser fucking Soze. >.>
That was completely tongue in cheek no need to get upset.

Please when you get back on a computer just tell me why you are voting me and actually read through my posts and explain yourself. The more you post on this day the more you are seeming supect, which I assume if you are town you would want to avoid.

Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 14, 2010, 07:08:24 pm
Again, don't have time to post much right now (damn physics homework), but I just COULDN'T RESIST here.

Bwahaha I just realised after not ever paying attention to me Native is suddenly suspicious of me after a post by Azure. Is this all another trap laid out by you azure  ;D
Good God, man; I lay out one gambit at the start of the game that didn't even work, and suddenly I'm Keyser fucking Soze. >.>
That was completely tongue in cheek no need to get upset.

Please when you get back on a computer just tell me why you are voting me and actually read through my posts and explain yourself. The more you post on this day the more you are seeming supect, which I assume if you are town you would want to avoid.
WRONG.  Scum wants to avoid looking suspect.  Town wants to find scum, even if it gets them lynched.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Flintus10 on November 14, 2010, 07:23:43 pm
...If a townie gets lynched now we lose Kamina
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 14, 2010, 07:28:05 pm
...If a townie gets lynched now we lose Kamina
I meant in general.  Townies shouldn't worry too much about looking good.  They should scumhunt.
Scum, however, need to not get lynched.  That is their one goal.
Hopefully we aren't stupid enough to lynch a townie for scumhunting at LYLO though.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on November 14, 2010, 08:10:11 pm
That was completely tongue in cheek no need to get upset.

Pahaha! XD I'm not so daft as to be able to miss the winking smiley at the end of your post. Just because I didn't explicitly state it doesn't mean I wasn't being wry. Well, for the first line I was just fucking around; the rest I meant. Particularly concerning the possibility of lurker scum winning the game. That just ain't right.

We should've just lynched one of 'em back in day 1, saved ourselves the bother of today. -_-

Please when you get back on a computer just tell me why you are voting me and actually read through my posts and explain yourself. The more you post on this day the more you are seeming supect, which I assume if you are town you would want to avoid.

Ugh... stop asking me that when I've already answered it. I'll say why one more time. Read it.

I believe the scum to be one part lurker, one part active player. Murphy, I no longer consider scum. Between Kamina and Native, I'm still unsure - I'm leaning more heavily in Kamina's direction at the moment, but still unsure. However, you're the only active player left. I'm obviously not gonna vote myself, I've already said I don't suspect Murphy, I'm about 55-45 between Kamina and Native. That just leaves you.

Your going to cost town the game by voting for me for no reason that I can see apart from ONE conversation with Spade on day freaking one.

I love this argument. It sounds so much like a threat from scum. Kamina's used it, too, I believe. Heh.

Even if you are town and therefore aren't 100% sure of my status don't you see that as a bit of a massive risk considering there are others you suspect above me?

Christ, man; frankly speaking, this game is wearing me out. I've put more effort and time into this than I have into my god damn university work. Win or lose, I want it to end before I lose interest. A big part of what's holding me here is a simple obligation to keep playing, but even that won't last forever. You and Kamina are the best I have to go with for today - you, in particular - so I'm gonna settle for it instead of continuing to second-guess myself until I end up voting for myself or Toaster or something. If you wanna keep on arguing your cause, do it to the other two townies. Perhaps you can spin it all into a lynch on me before the end; who knows? I just hope you can do it before I simply stop caring.

I think your trying to defend yourself in saying that you did not just wait for other people to vote and then follow them and this statement does not do that at all.

The hell do you want from me? How does not being the first vote on anyone dead make me undeniable scum, anyway? What am I supposed to be defending myself against? Where are you even trying to go with this line of questioning? Have you even thought that far ahead? Or are you just firing out questions with no real bearing on much of anything and hoping for a scumslip to pounce on?

So wait I forget to follow up on what was originally a meaningless question to get Spade active and that makes me scum and yet you throw out some WIFOM (I am fairly certain it is, you even went as far as saying "Make of that what you will".) saying that you will accuse me with a fair degree of certainty and prepare your lynch for day two and that's okay cause you forgot? This is all surprisingly sloppy Azure.

Eh, I was being rhetorical in a whimsical way. I had already stated what I meant, and simply added the 'make of that what you will' as a bit of flavour. I find it difficult to believe you didn't figure that out, so I must presume you're being obtuse on purpose. Besides, Jet was a smarter lynch than you for day 2 anyway, considering at the time there was still the acute possibility of him being scum. Either of the lurkers would have been even better - before they were replaced, of course - but... eh. Things can change in Mafia. Even if I hadn't forgotten, I'd have ended up voting either Murphy or Jet by the end of day 2 anyway, thanks to Kamina's fairly sensible theory.

Also, I do not possess a perfect memory. I do forget things; sometimes I even do stupid things. Even more rarely, I will do clever things. Which leaves me feeling rather bemused, considering several of you appear to be lending my opinion undue weight. Very, very peculiar...
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Flintus10 on November 14, 2010, 09:22:37 pm
Thank you for responding.

That was completely tongue in cheek no need to get upset.

Pahaha! XD I'm not so daft as to be able to miss the winking smiley at the end of your post. Just because I didn't explicitly state it doesn't mean I wasn't being wry. Well, for the first line I was just fucking around; the rest I meant. Particularly concerning the possibility of lurker scum winning the game. That just ain't right.

We should've just lynched one of 'em back in day 1, saved ourselves the bother of today. -_-
Well your lack of wink made things confusing for me  ;)

And I agree about the lurker scum

Ugh... stop asking me that when I've already answered it. I'll say why one more time. Read it.

I believe the scum to be one part lurker, one part active player. Murphy, I no longer consider scum. Between Kamina and Native, I'm still unsure - I'm leaning more heavily in Kamina's direction at the moment, but still unsure. However, you're the only active player left. I'm obviously not gonna vote myself, I've already said I don't suspect Murphy, I'm about 55-45 between Kamina and Native. That just leaves you.
Sorry for asking so often but I assumed you had a reason other than not suspecting other people. It's not easy to defend myself just based on your process of elimination
Your going to cost town the game by voting for me for no reason that I can see apart from ONE conversation with Spade on day freaking one.

I love this argument. It sounds so much like a threat from scum. Kamina's used it, too, I believe. Heh.

I guess it could sound like that but after playing for all this time I'd really rather not lose without getting a single scum.

Even if you are town and therefore aren't 100% sure of my status don't you see that as a bit of a massive risk considering there are others you suspect above me?

Christ, man; frankly speaking, this game is wearing me out. I've put more effort and time into this than I have into my god damn university work. Win or lose, I want it to end before I lose interest. A big part of what's holding me here is a simple obligation to keep playing, but even that won't last forever. You and Kamina are the best I have to go with for today - you, in particular - so I'm gonna settle for it instead of continuing to second-guess myself until I end up voting for myself or Toaster or something. If you wanna keep on arguing your cause, do it to the other two townies. Perhaps you can spin it all into a lynch on me before the end; who knows? I just hope you can do it before I simply stop caring.

You have been very active and I am grateful for that but here you are basically saying you have almost given up and don't really care about the game anymore. I suppose it is good to stick with your vote rather than doing a whole lot and getting nowhere but your case against me isn't that strong and as stated you barely care anymore which is why it is annoying that everyone will still hang of your every word >_>.

I think your trying to defend yourself in saying that you did not just wait for other people to vote and then follow them and this statement does not do that at all.

The hell do you want from me? How does not being the first vote on anyone dead make me undeniable scum, anyway? What am I supposed to be defending myself against? Where are you even trying to go with this line of questioning? Have you even thought that far ahead? Or are you just firing out questions with no real bearing on much of anything and hoping for a scumslip to pounce on?
Well I originally said I didn't really see it as a massive tell or anything but you defended yourself and I was just pointing out your defense really didn't prove anything.

So wait I forget to follow up on what was originally a meaningless question to get Spade active and that makes me scum and yet you throw out some WIFOM (I am fairly certain it is, you even went as far as saying "Make of that what you will".) saying that you will accuse me with a fair degree of certainty and prepare your lynch for day two and that's okay cause you forgot? This is all surprisingly sloppy Azure.
Eh, I was being rhetorical in a whimsical way. I had already stated what I meant, and simply added the 'make of that what you will' as a bit of flavour. I find it difficult to believe you didn't figure that out, so I must presume you're being obtuse on purpose. Besides, Jet was a smarter lynch than you for day 2 anyway, considering at the time there was still the acute possibility of him being scum. Either of the lurkers would have been even better - before they were replaced, of course - but... eh. Things can change in Mafia. Even if I hadn't forgotten, I'd have ended up voting either Murphy or Jet by the end of day 2 anyway, thanks to Kamina's fairly sensible theory.

How the hell am I supposed to know what your thinking? Saying something like that and then not following up on it? For all I know your lying now and your original plan was to wait for someone to take your bait so that you could follow up on them and since no-one did you saw Mind as another easy target instead. And don't say that it is not possible because remember I do not know what you are thinking and neither does everyone else so saying something like that is a massive WIFOM and if it isn't a scum-tell then at the very least it wasn't helpful to town. This theory would make alot of sense as you immediately jumped on two other targets when Kamina arrived and alot of suspicion was thrown on them, of course I doubt you would make such an obvious slip as you seem far better than that. But if it was a slip it was about the only one.

Also, I do not possess a perfect memory. I do forget things; sometimes I even do stupid things. Even more rarely, I will do clever things. Which leaves me feeling rather bemused, considering several of you appear to be lending my opinion undue weight. Very, very peculiar...
Yet when I do the same thing you base your entire suspicion of me around it. I agree that we are not looking at you from a good perspective as anything that may be a slip I kinow at least I am waving it off as "Ah bugger it Azure is too good to make a mistake like that."

Also I agree that it is highly unlikely that both mafia players are lurkers as this is a beginner game and I assume their IC would try to keep them active so I will go ahead and give Bayer some credit and say he'd be a good enough IC to keep one of them active. Cause if he encouraged them both to lurk then that is a massive dick-move.

Also Murphy has quietened down a bit now that nobody is focusing on him.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 14, 2010, 09:38:38 pm
FUCK YOU STUPID TA!  Just as I'm finishing up, you send me THIS:
Quote
Hi, my students. This week we will do lab 6 problem 2 and problem 3, instead of 6.1. Due to my error, the deadline for this week's prelab postponed to tomorrow 6:00 pm. Sorry about that.
IT WAS DUE AT 1:00 ANYWAY THAT DOESN'T HELP I HAVE SOMETHING FROM 2:30-5:00 OFF CAMPUS.  THANKS A LOT!
It looks like I may not get a good post in today...
Sorry...
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on November 14, 2010, 10:22:49 pm
...gah. Typed up half of a big-ass reply, but the guy who's laptop I'm using needs it badly.

This ends tomorrow, though, everyone. We don't need to extend this any further. I would, however, like to see everyone's vote and a FoS for the scumbuddy of your vote. I'd also like an explanation for both. Obviously, I'll provide one too.

I've re-read the thread over the course of the post I was preparing. Suffice it to say, I'm withdrawing my vote from Flintus for now. Unvote. As for where I'm putting it? Well... you'll see later today, when I can get back on a computer.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Flintus10 on November 14, 2010, 10:33:55 pm
Wow you backed right off, well you said you'd provide us with the answer why later so that's cool.

I have to rethink everything as while I don't think Azure is quite the mafia god we have made him out to be anymore I still don't think he is scum. Though that could change after looking back.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: NativeForeigner on November 15, 2010, 01:39:13 am
Quote
Which leaves me feeling rather bemused, considering several of you appear to be lending my opinion undue weight. Very, very peculiar...

I do believe that this is directed at me, at least in part. It's not that I'm giving your opinion undue support, it's more that I feel we'll get places faster if more people put the pressure on one person to get answers out of them.

Quote
Quote
Your going to cost town the game by voting for me for no reason that I can see apart from ONE conversation with Spade on day freaking one.
I love this argument. It sounds so much like a threat from scum. Kamina's used it, too, I believe. Heh.

Isn't that the same argument Jet tried to use? It got people to vote for him. Made him sound like scum by saying it. I'm hoping you're not as terrible a townie as he was by using the same defense and, given that, it could be you're trying to sound like Jet to make us hesitant to vote for you which wouldn't be an implausible move.

Quote
until I end up voting for myself or Toaster or something.

Toaster's totally scum, do it.

Quote
I'd have ended up voting either Murphy or Jet by the end of day 2 anyway, thanks to Kamina's fairly sensible theory.

To refresh my memory, what wrote Murphy out of the picture on this day? I haven't seen much activity from him, so he either has nothing to contribute or is trying to lie low to avoid attention that could potentially threaten him should he be scum.

Quote
I suppose it is good to stick with your vote rather than doing a whole lot and getting nowhere but your case against me isn't that strong and as stated you barely care anymore which is why it is annoying that everyone will still hang of your every word >_>.

To be fair, it's one of the stronger cases out there right now, but it could be that Azure is just very clever scum using his scumhunting abilities to mislead townies. But I don't think that's very likely at this point.

Personally, I haven't seen enough evidence placed against you, Flintus, to actually vote for you.

Quote
Quote
Eh, I was being rhetorical in a whimsical way. I had already stated what I meant, and simply added the 'make of that what you will' as a bit of flavour. I find it difficult to believe you didn't figure that out, so I must presume you're being obtuse on purpose. Besides, Jet was a smarter lynch than you for day 2 anyway, considering at the time there was still the acute possibility of him being scum. Either of the lurkers would have been even better - before they were replaced, of course - but... eh. Things can change in Mafia. Even if I hadn't forgotten, I'd have ended up voting either Murphy or Jet by the end of day 2 anyway, thanks to Kamina's fairly sensible theory.

I do not know what you are thinking and neither does everyone else so saying something like that is a massive WIFOM and if it isn't a scum-tell then at the very least it wasn't helpful to town. This theory would make alot of sense as you immediately jumped on two other targets when Kamina arrived and alot of suspicion was thrown on them, of course I doubt you would make such an obvious slip as you seem far better than that. But if it was a slip it was about the only one.

Don't let a slip go unpunished at this point of the game. You might be onto something.

Quote
Unvote

I'm awaiting this explanation of yours, Azure.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Flintus10 on November 15, 2010, 01:51:35 am
Okay, well, I don't have much to contribute, it seems like Azure's handling all of that. D:
We need to start applying a little more pressure before the day ends, so Flintus, prove to us that you're not scum. You have a fairly strong argument against you and Azure's on your ass. Why should the rest of us ignore this?

You said this so please explain why you think I might be scum. If you don't have a reason I can only assume you were planning to jump on Azure's vote.


Quote
Quote
Your going to cost town the game by voting for me for no reason that I can see apart from ONE conversation with Spade on day freaking one.
I love this argument. It sounds so much like a threat from scum. Kamina's used it, too, I believe. Heh.

Isn't that the same argument Jet tried to use? It got people to vote for him. Made him sound like scum by saying it. I'm hoping you're not as terrible a townie as he was by using the same defense and, given that, it could be you're trying to sound like Jet to make us hesitant to vote for you which wouldn't be an implausible move.

Jet was definetely the worst town player ever but if we remember correctly he was correct in saying that voting for him would hurt the town so you can't really hold it against him. The reasons everybody suspected Jet were the blatant lies and constantly changing opinions of his.

To refresh my memory, what wrote Murphy out of the picture on this day? I haven't seen much activity from him, so he either has nothing to contribute or is trying to lie low to avoid attention that could potentially threaten him should he be scum.

I am fairly certain that it is because most of Kamina's theory revolved around a Jet/Murphy team and that was basically the basis of the argument. So naturally when Jet flipped town the argument went away.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Murphy on November 15, 2010, 04:31:50 am
Looking for more towntells, I've re-read the topic and it turns out that NKing Kamina didn't really match what a scum-Azure would or should do in my opinion, seeing as during day one Kamina was his next FoS. And he would not kill Mindmaker night two because this left him with no one to blame again.

Anyway, based on considering Kamina and Azure town, I must conclude that Native and Flintus are mafia. Even though I feel uneasy about having to accuse someone by just listing all living players and excluding those who I think are town, it is probably more effective than lynching the most suspicious person newbie-style.

What I've read is that mafia players are better off in the middle - not being too suspicious, to avoid lynch, and not being too clean, to avoid questions like "why are you not being nkd".

So the scenario is as follows:
Day one:
Ragnarok does a good job at looking like an uncaring townie - not too suspicious, but not clean either (remember him creating a bandwagon right in the beginning?)
Flintus gives a FoS to Ragnarok. Distancing.
Also does a good job in starting the whole Ottofar thing.

Day two:
Ragnarok goes lurking completely. No problem since there's still the second scum to make decisions during the night.
And Flintus goes "scumhunting" on Mindmaker.

Day three:
Flintus tries to press issues against me. Justified in that I didn't post too much in past three days, but I'd like to remind you that DF 31.17 has come out.
Native... dunno.

What else...
It is interesting that Mindmaker voted Azure and immediately after that Vector congratulated the town on that the game is looking better. Or was it because the IC, too, thought me and Jet scum?
I may still change my mind, maybe to Azure-Native being the scumteam. But I won't do so unless there's a solid Flintus towntell.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Flintus10 on November 15, 2010, 05:33:24 am
It is interesting that Mindmaker voted Azure and immediately after that Vector congratulated the town on that the game is looking better. Or was it because the IC, too, thought me and Jet scum?
I may still change my mind, maybe to Azure-Native being the scumteam. But I won't do so unless there's a solid Flintus towntell.

I am pretty sure Vector wouldn't say something like that to give away anything so it is probably useless. And you say Flintus gives a solid towntell as you expect me to just jump up and say something that makes me a guranteed town. Have you actually read through the entire thread and looked for towntells from me or are you just expecting me to spontaniously come up with one?

Looking for more towntells, I've re-read the topic and it turns out that NKing Kamina didn't really match what a scum-Azure would or should do in my opinion, seeing as during day one Kamina was his next FoS. And he would not kill Mindmaker night two because this left him with no one to blame again.

It's a fair point but can I just ask if both those night-kills not benifiting Azure absolves him from suspicion can I ask how you think they would have benifited me or Native/Ragnarok?

What I've read is that mafia players are better off in the middle - not being too suspicious, to avoid lynch, and not being too clean, to avoid questions like "why are you not being nkd".


So the scenario is as follows:
Day one:

Ragnarok does a good job at looking like an uncaring townie - not too suspicious, but not clean either (remember him creating a bandwagon right in the beginning?)
Flintus gives a FoS to Ragnarok. Distancing.
Also does a good job in starting the whole Ottofar thing.

Wow you jump on the bandwagon at the end and now your saying I am scummy for placing the first vote. And what the hell do you mean did a good job, all I did was call Ottofar out on one tell and then he dug his own grave. YOu can't tell me I predicted the whole thing to go that why, I mean Azure hadn't even revealed his little gambit when I voted Ottofar.


Day two:
Ragnarok goes lurking completely. No problem since there's still the second scum to make decisions during the night.
And Flintus goes "scumhunting" on Mindmaker.
How does going for mind seem suspicious?

I am going to wait untill Azure posts next before I make up my mind on who is scum.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on November 15, 2010, 12:28:42 pm
Wow you backed right off, well you said you'd provide us with the answer why later so that's cool.

My explanation is fairly simple; I just don't trust Kamina enough. Or anyone other than Murphy at the moment, really, and even him only a little more than the rest of you. Reading back through the thread, I can't get over how differently Kamina appears to have behaved when you compare day 1 to day 2. As such, since it seems this game is going to go into a two-way tie before the end, I don't want to give him the final vote.

After all, if he and his scumbuddy were online at the time and he placed his final vote on a townie, they could both shorten and - assuming none of us were online at the time to prevent this - Toaster would have no choice but to bring on the night instantly rather than at the allotted time.

I'm not sure whether or not it is permissable to use counter-shortens in this game, so I'm being cautious. I still suspect you the most, Flintus, but I don't want to risk a last-minute scum win. Hrm; perhaps I've played too much IRC Mafia. This kind of stuff happens all the time in that...

I have to rethink everything as while I don't think Azure is quite the mafia god we have made him out to be anymore I still don't think he is scum. Though that could change after looking back.

I never claimed to be, nor was I ever such a thing in the first. If you allow your own presumptions to run away with you, I can hardly be blamed.

Sorry for asking so often but I assumed you had a reason other than not suspecting other people. It's not easy to defend myself just based on your process of elimination

The process of elimination can work quite well, and good scum have a knack for having an explanation for everything. It's nice to sometimes have an argument that can't be defeated by twisting meanings or outright lying.

I guess it could sound like that but after playing for all this time I'd really rather not lose without getting a single scum.

Neither would I. Hence the reason I wish to lynch you.

You have been very active and I am grateful for that (1) but here you are basically saying you have almost given up and don't really care about the game anymore (2). I suppose it is good to stick with your vote rather than doing a whole lot and getting nowhere but your case against me isn't that strong (3) and as stated you barely care anymore which is why it is annoying that everyone will still hang of your every word >_> (4).

1) You shouldn't have to be grateful. Ever. None of us should have had to struggle just to stay even semi-active. It's like you're thanking me for not being lazy.

2) That hasn't happened just yet. I've invested enough time into this game to care about the outcome, but that doesn't mean I want to win so badly I'll refuse to lynch until I'm sure. We're just gonna get bogged down in meaningless discussion, endless reiteration of our intended targets and switch our votes on flights of fancy unless we vote quite soon. I'd rather not hang around to see such a fun game degenerate into something like that.

3) We thought we were certain on Otto. We weren't. We thought we were certain on Jet. Again, we weren't. Ergo, explain to me how arguing a matter to death has solved the town's problems thus far. Also, out of curiosity, whom do you propose we lynch? Other than a few soft attacks on me, you haven't seriously FoS'ed a single player today. Hell, you don't even seem to have a vote in mind. Unless you're planning to vote for me, the guy you keep saying most likely isn't scum? An OMGUS; that'll sure help your argument on day 3. >.>

4) Like I said, I'm not even sure why in the hell anyone is putting more stock into what I say than anyone else. Apparently I haven't scumslipped, (or at least haven't behaved stupidly) but even then I should still be treated as just another townie. Yeah, I'm a power role, but an impotent one. It confers no advantage, and gives my word no extra sway. I can still be as wrong as anyone else, as proven with Otto. Could be wrong about you, too, but I don't really mind. This game had a good life, apparently, and I had quite a bit of fun. It's all good.

Well I originally said I didn't really see it as a massive tell or anything but you defended yourself and I was just pointing out your defense really didn't prove anything.

I was pointing out that you don't have to be the first person on a vote to be instigator. Everyone on a vote is responsible, although I will admit that the first person to vote unfairly recieves either the praise or scorn of the other players, depending on what flipped. The fact that you appear to be telling me off for not being quick on the draw sounds awfully like you're telling me I should stop thinking through my final vote and should just throw it wherever I may.

How the hell am I supposed to know what your thinking? Saying something like that and then not following up on it? For all I know your lying now and your original plan was to wait for someone to take your bait so that you could follow up on them and since no-one did you saw Mind as another easy target instead.

Once again, your own fault for building up an exaggerated impression of me.

Oh, and... err... really, now? Mind? An easy target? Pfft. XD Did you read day 2 at all? Hahahahahaa...

And don't say that it is not possible because remember I do not know what you are thinking and neither does everyone else so saying something like that is a massive WIFOM and if it isn't a scum-tell then at the very least it wasn't helpful to town. This theory would make alot of sense as you immediately jumped on two other targets when Kamina arrived and alot of suspicion was thrown on them, of course I doubt you would make such an obvious slip as you seem far better than that. But if it was a slip it was about the only one.

You're talking like WIFOM isn't inevitable in any given game of Mafia. In truth, every possible argument contains at least a bit of WIFOM. Everything from a cop claiming a guilty to a fool demanding a lynch. It can't be avoided, so we get on with it - we build up ideas of the personalities and character of each player as a game goes on, and declare what is a town or scum tell based on what they show us. If our impressions of someone turn out to be wrong, then you roll with it and keep looking. So stop crying that I'm not the person you thought I was and blaming me for misleading you; it's starting to get creepy and more than a bit annoying.

Yet when I do the same thing you base your entire suspicion of me around it.

...gah. *facepalm*

Didn't you just complain not to long ago - hell, in the same post - that you were upset with me going by a 'process of elimination'?

I agree that we are not looking at you from a good perspective as anything that may be a slip I kinow at least I am waving it off as "Ah bugger it Azure is too good to make a mistake like that."

Excellent. We're agreed, then; I'm not God.

Also I agree that it is highly unlikely that both mafia players are lurkers as this is a beginner game and I assume their IC would try to keep them active so I will go ahead and give Bayer some credit and say he'd be a good enough IC to keep one of them active. Cause if he encouraged them both to lurk then that is a massive dick-move.

...from what I can gather of Bayer, if he could keep both players active, he would. He doesn't come across as an under-handed sort of person, and seems as irritated as everyone else at the amount of lurkers on this forum. I get the impression that - if both Spade and ragnarok were the scum - Bayer would've asked Toaster to replace them ages ago.

Also Murphy has quietened down a bit now that nobody is focusing on him.

HAH! Like you've never been quiet in this game before. XD

I'm gonna make my vote in about 5 hours, since I'll be going to bed then. Also, nice defense post, Native. Very subtle.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on November 15, 2010, 12:30:33 pm
Also, I'm pretty sure Vector was just congratulating us on our sudden decisive behaviour and flurry of activity than anything else. If you wanna blame me for it, though... well, whatever. Enjoy that wine cask.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: NativeForeigner on November 15, 2010, 12:46:20 pm
Quote
You said this so please explain why you think I might be scum. If you don't have a reason I can only assume you were planning to jump on Azure's vote.

Earlier this day, I suspected you because you were rather inactive when we were all scumhunting. That coupled with Azure's assaults led me to FOS you to try to get a few answers out of you so we could move on and I could decide whether or not I should vote for you. Your defenses have been fairly solid and I probably won't vote for you, but I haven't written you off as town either.

Quote
Jet was definetely the worst town player ever but if we remember correctly he was correct in saying that voting for him would hurt the town so you can't really hold it against him. The reasons everybody suspected Jet were the blatant lies and constantly changing opinions of his.

If you're town, you really shouldn't be imitating much at all Jet at this point of the game.

Quote
I am fairly certain that it is because most of Kamina's theory revolved around a Jet/Murphy team and that was basically the basis of the argument. So naturally when Jet flipped town the argument went away.

Okay, thanks.

Murphy, other than your process of elimination, what other evidence do you have against me and why am I your vote over Flintus? It seems you have more on Flintus than you do on me. In fact, it only seems that the only thing you have against me is the fact that

Quote
Ragnarok does a good job at looking like an uncaring townie - not too suspicious, but not clean either (remember him creating a bandwagon right in the beginning?)

and Ragnarok's apparent lurking, which I can't honestly defend because I'm not Ragnarok.

Quote
Also, nice defense post, Native. Very subtle.

Care to explain?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Toaster on November 15, 2010, 02:28:35 pm
Vote Count:

NativeForeigner: {1} Murphy
Flintus10: {0}
KaminaSquirtle: {0}
Azure Sepulchre: {0}
Murphy: {0}

Not Voting: NativeForeigner, Flintus10, KaminaSquirtle, Azure Sepulchre

Day 3 ends Monday, 11/15 at 11 PM EST, in 8 1/2 hours from this post.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on November 15, 2010, 05:59:58 pm
...hrm. I want my vote on Native. I apologise, Native, but as Murphy is the closest I can see to being fellow town, I can't split my vote from his if I want any chance to win. I still encourage you to switch to either Flintus or Kamina, Murphy, but if you're set on Native then I have little choice in the matter.

Last post I can make before day ends. If I'm wrong, sorry, guys.

Native: In your last post previous to mine, I got the impression you were supporting Flintus for no particular reason - scumbuddy or not, still the impression I got. Perhaps you don't have anything on him, but you'll have to make your final decision soon. We're fast running out of time, here.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Murphy on November 15, 2010, 08:34:30 pm
Flintus
My scenario does not strive to prove you suspicious. I only provided it to see if it contradicts badly with common sense or otherwise seems implausible. Why I consider you scum is not because of you being suspicious (you aren't in fact), but because I consider Azure and Kamina town.

And yes, I looked through the entire thread yesterday but could not find anything that could assure me of you being town like what I found about Kamina.

Native
Same goes for you I think.
Sorry, hafta go now.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: NativeForeigner on November 15, 2010, 08:57:20 pm
Murphy: You seem to get real dodgy when it comes to defending your stance against me.

Quote
Native
Same goes for you I think.

You think? You're really going to pull an "I think" when we're in LYLO. I really would like to know what evidence, if any, it is you have against me. It seems you have more against Flintus, so why not vote him? I think there might be a Flintus/Murphy scumteam going on. It certainly seems like it. You're distancing yourself from him but, rather than vote for the one you're more sure about, you vote for me instead, the only other even plausible (according to your theory) scum.

You're starting to sound really sketchy, Murphy. You're not making much sense and you're not explaining it either.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 15, 2010, 09:01:20 pm
Sorry for asking so often but I assumed you had a reason other than not suspecting other people. It's not easy to defend myself just based on your process of elimination

The process of elimination can work quite well, and good scum have a knack for having an explanation for everything. It's nice to sometimes have an argument that can't be defeated by twisting meanings or outright lying.
I don't like this process of elimination of yours, Azure.  The only way it works is if you can be sure someone is town.
You can't be sure.  I don't like how you 'know' all these things.
Wow you backed right off, well you said you'd provide us with the answer why later so that's cool.

My explanation is fairly simple; I just don't trust Kamina enough. Or anyone other than Murphy at the moment, really, and even him only a little more than the rest of you. Reading back through the thread, I can't get over how differently Kamina appears to have behaved when you compare day 1 to day 2. As such, since it seems this game is going to go into a two-way tie before the end, I don't want to give him the final vote.
That is a difference in experience.  Being dead, I thought about many things.  I got better.  Now I'm even better, mostly from my experience in Paranormal.  When I look that far back in the thread, I end up FACEPALMING.
...hrm. I want my vote on Native. I apologise, Native, but as Murphy is the closest I can see to being fellow town, I can't split my vote from his if I want any chance to win. I still encourage you to switch to either Flintus or Kamina, Murphy, but if you're set on Native then I have little choice in the matter.
I don't like this.  I understand your argument, but it seems entirely too possible that you are scum, and decided to vote a townie after Murphy did and then used this argument to force a lynch of a townie.  We can't disagree because then you would accuse us of being scum who just want to pull off aforementioned gambit.
Everything seems to hinge on Murphy being assured town.  Nothing is sure in mafia.  Yet you seem way too sure of Murphy being town.  I may have believed you had you claimed cop, but you've claimed doc, so you have no sure evidence.
Unless you're scum.
Last post I can make before day ends. If I'm wrong, sorry, guys.
And this seals the deal.  If we don't vote who we want him to vote, WE LOSE THE GAME.  You may actually need to go to bed, but this still doesn't sit right with me.
I'm sorry but those tactics are downright scummy.
It seems to me like you're trying to force us into the lynch you want, Azure.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: NativeForeigner on November 15, 2010, 10:53:12 pm
Well, we're  about to run out of time, so why the hell not, I'd rather we didn't lose.

Azure.

Also, shorten, please.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 15, 2010, 10:53:49 pm
Azure.
Shorten.
Time to die.
Since Flintus isn't on, there's nothing you can do about it.
HAHA BITCHES!
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: NativeForeigner on November 15, 2010, 10:54:33 pm
<3
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 15, 2010, 10:55:40 pm
Good game, though.
You were a great scumbuddy, Native!
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: NativeForeigner on November 15, 2010, 10:56:49 pm
As were you, Kamina. It was great fun.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
Post by: Toaster on November 15, 2010, 11:01:45 pm
The third day seems to drag out for hours and hours.  It extends out until the final hours of the day, where some last minute changes of mind lead to the decision to leave things until the next day.  The group disperses to their rooms, unsure of what will happen in the night.

Azure is the last to his room, and stands with his hand holding the door slightly ajar for ten minutes.  His door has been inoperable for two nights in a row, and he knows he will not let this happen again.  He opens his door, and jams a wad of paper into the door frame.  The door now will not completely close.  Even if the lock is tampered with again, he can merely push it open so he can use his Doctor skills to attempt to save a life tonight.

Unfortunately, it did not occur to Azure that anyone could simply open the door from the outside as well.  He realizes this belatedly when he comes out of the bathroom to find Kamina pointing a pistol at him.  “Time to die, fool,” Kamina says with a grin.

“I should have known that you were a Mafioso, you bastard,” growls Azure.  Three shots later, he is on his back in a bloody pool.


Murphy wakes up in a cold sweat.  What is that smell?  Smoke?  He bolts out of bed and races for the door- but it won’t open!  He screams for help, but hears nothing but a laugh from outside as NativeForeigner finishes blocking the door shut.  Murphy bangs on the door as the room grows warmer.  With a great effort, he finally resorts to kicking the door down, but is rewarded with a great lungful of smoke.  He collapses downward, and passes out from the lack of oxygen.

Down the hall, Flintus is more successful in breaking out of his room before it is sealed off, but Kamina is there with his pistol.  Two quick shots to the legs, and Flintus is down.  “What... no...” he rasps.

Kamina only smiles at him.  “Enjoy the rousing campfire we’ve cooked up for you.”  He nods to NativeForeigner, and they head for the exit, where the guards have already dispersed in an attempt to fight the fire.

The two of them escape into the night as the hotel continues to burn.



Game over!  The Mafia, NativeForeigner and KaminaSquirtle, win!
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - It all ends in flames...
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 15, 2010, 11:17:10 pm
Can I post the scumchat, Toaster?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - It all ends in flames...
Post by: Toaster on November 15, 2010, 11:18:50 pm
Roles:

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

Chats:

Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - It all ends in flames...
Post by: Toaster on November 15, 2010, 11:20:30 pm
Night 1:

Spoiler (click to show/hide)


Night 2:

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - It all ends in flames...
Post by: Toaster on November 15, 2010, 11:23:06 pm
I hope everyone enjoyed that!  It could have gone either way at the end.  Sorry about the replaces, but that happens sometimes.


I'd like to know if you all thought the moderation was well done, since this was my first attempt at hosting.  I'd also like to thank our ICs Vector and SirBayer for their help.  Also thanks to Mephansteras for (probably obviously) influencing my style, since he's very good at modding and writing flavor.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - It all ends in flames...
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 15, 2010, 11:28:31 pm
I liked it!
Had me scared to death at the end.
At the beginning of Day 3, I thought Azure had me.
I wriggled my way out it.
Funny, after all that, it was Flintus not being logged on at the right time that lost it for town.
Quote from: Azure
After all, if he and his scumbuddy were online at the time and he placed his final vote on a townie, they could both shorten and - assuming none of us were online at the time to prevent this - Toaster would have no choice but to bring on the night instantly rather than at the allotted time.
You found out our little plan!  Too bad it didn't matter!
If - heaven forbid - the scum does turn out to be the two lurkers, I'm gonna be pretty pissed off... -_-
Feeling pissed, Azure?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - It all ends in flames...
Post by: Toaster on November 15, 2010, 11:30:21 pm
The shorten was irrelevant, since it was day end anyway.

I am impressed that scum managed to block the only town power role night 1- not that he protected the right person, but still impressive.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - It all ends in flames...
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 15, 2010, 11:36:23 pm
The shorten was irrelevant, since it was day end anyway.

I am impressed that scum managed to block the only town power role night 1- not that he protected the right person, but still impressive.
I figured if it might shorten it a few minutes, it was worth it.  Why not?

I don't think that was skill, though, to me it seemed more like luck.
But still, it helped us a bit, knowing Azure wasn't lying when he said he was RBed.
And so we had Doc from day 2, so we could keep blocking him.

I can't wait to see Azure's reaction to all of this.  ;D
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - It all ends in flames...
Post by: Vector on November 15, 2010, 11:43:47 pm
The shorten was irrelevant, since it was day end anyway.

I am impressed that scum managed to block the only town power role night 1- not that he protected the right person, but still impressive.

Just a question... did he lose his protection ability as a result?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - It all ends in flames...
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 15, 2010, 11:46:31 pm
The shorten was irrelevant, since it was day end anyway.

I am impressed that scum managed to block the only town power role night 1- not that he protected the right person, but still impressive.

Just a question... did he lose his protection ability as a result?
Yep, we made sure to block his role every night.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - It all ends in flames...
Post by: Toaster on November 15, 2010, 11:49:33 pm
He still could protect, but he got blocked both nights.  I actually had to ask them their night action right as the day ended to see if Azure would go unblocked/killed- the only way the town could last until morning.  Azure was the NK target, so I went ahead and processed the game over.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - It all ends in flames...
Post by: Vector on November 15, 2010, 11:51:17 pm
No, I meant that it said he had "lost his bag."  I'm wondering if he lost his powers and actually became a VT--because if he did, that was a modding error.

Ninja: Ah, okay.  Fair enough.  Juuuust checking.


Also, KaminaSquirtle, I hope to face you in the next bastard anyone runs >:D
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - It all ends in flames...
Post by: Toaster on November 15, 2010, 11:56:15 pm
Huh, I don't even see that- which action is it?  But, no, it's all just flavor.  I (tried to) make sure to write without italics any non-obvious results of the night action.


I do have a question for you, Vector- is it traditional to notify the targets of a block that they were blocked if they don't have a night action?  I was asked that, and I went with yes, but I wasn't sure of the usual procedure of that.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - It all ends in flames...
Post by: Vector on November 15, 2010, 11:59:00 pm
I do have a question for you, Vector- is it traditional to notify the targets of a block that they were blocked if they don't have a night action?  I was asked that, and I went with yes, but I wasn't sure of the usual procedure of that.

I think that in general, we don't inform anyone that they were blocked, protected, or anything.  Blocking is more iffy than some of the other night actions, though.  I personally prefer no added information on redirects, etc., etc., though that's just me.


I thought I saw Azure claim that he lost his bag somewhere in the thread... that might have been a gambit.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - It all ends in flames...
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 15, 2010, 11:59:47 pm
Also, KaminaSquirtle, I hope to face you in the next bastard anyone runs >:D
I look forward to it.

Well, I hope everyone learned a valuable lesson here.
Lynch all lurkers.
Don't let two survive to LYLO.
Not a good idea.  At all.

Oh, and I enjoyed the flavor, Toaster, especially the end of game stuff.
It feels so good to have your actions carried out in story form.
Burn, you fools, burn!
Hahahahahahahaha!
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - It all ends in flames...
Post by: Toaster on November 16, 2010, 12:20:36 am
Vector:  I didn't see any way flavorwise for a block action to not be obvious to the blockee- especially if it was a cop instead of a doctor.  I was not planning to let anyone know they were protected.  It'll be something to think about for next game.

It was bad for town that the entire scumteam lurked through D1.  A couple people mentioned them, but they were lost in the flood of accusations.  It wasn't intentional lurking; Ragnarok ended up not liking Mafia and Spade just flaked.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - It all ends in flames...
Post by: Vector on November 16, 2010, 12:30:55 am
Vector:  I didn't see any way flavorwise for a block action to not be obvious to the blockee- especially if it was a cop instead of a doctor.  I was not planning to let anyone know they were protected.  It'll be something to think about for next game.

Hmmm... yeah, the cop one is something where you have to actually tell them they were blocked.  I think I'm thinking more about complex games with lots of PRs, not something like this where it really would have to be obvious.

For the doctor, though, if the doctor gets roleblocked, then they shouldn't know about it unless their protectee somehow dies.  Well... that's what I think, anyway.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - It all ends in flames...
Post by: Mindmaker on November 16, 2010, 01:30:19 am
Well, I hope everyone learned a valuable lesson here.

Yeah inactivity and replacing players kills games.
I started loosing sight after the third replacement and just didn't care anymore.
Being NKed was a real relief.

Oh, and I enjoyed the flavor, Toaster, especially the end of game stuff.
It feels so good to have your actions carried out in story form.
Burn, you fools, burn!
Hahahahahahahaha!

...
Nobody likes braggers.
Especially when it was such an easy victory.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - It all ends in flames...
Post by: Flintus10 on November 16, 2010, 01:54:47 am
Yeah I mean two scum lurkers who were replaced kinda blows, I hope Bayer at least tried to keep Ragnarok and Spade in the game.

Still I enjoyed it and I will try to be more decisive next time I think I let Ragnarok obvious active lurking go too easy. Though uh town IC's shouldn't you guys be like evaluating and telling us what to do next time ect?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - It all ends in flames...
Post by: Mindmaker on November 16, 2010, 02:17:02 am
Though uh town IC's shouldn't you guys be like evaluating and telling us what to do next time ect?

I doubt their role was to play our game for us.
Evaluating our playstyle and giving constructive criticism, would be more in place.

Too bad Vector has been busy.
I had a lot of additional questions to ask.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - It all ends in flames...
Post by: Vector on November 16, 2010, 02:24:36 am
Though uh town IC's shouldn't you guys be like evaluating and telling us what to do next time ect?

I'm going to be rude here, for a moment.  Please forgive me.

I'm glad to be your IC but uh Flintus10 shouldn't you be like asking that with a more polite turn of phrase or something ect?

[/bitch]


This was a pretty bad game, on everyone's part.  Yes, everyone's.  I'm actually kind of sad.  I was not impressed by anyone's gambits, reading skills, deception, insight, or passion.  Seriously.

I'm proud of you guys for sticking with it, though, as frustrating of a game as it was.  This counts double in the face of so many replacements and lurkers.  Sticking with it is the most important part, more important than any of the things I listed above.  Endurance is the most valuable quality in a beginner, I believe, and you did a wonderful job at it.

Extra credit to Mindmaker, who sent me PMs and asked me specific questions--I'm still sorry I never got around to that second one, because I was really glad to see you sending them.

I tried to give advice in-game, but it's kind of hard to deal with townies who don't actually listen.  I'm a person too, you know...


My advice is very simple: play more games.  Your problem right now is lack of experience with tells, and the only real way to learn those is through experience.  My other advice is to involve your ego less in the game.  If you keep letting yourselves get provoked so easily, you're going to be in real trouble.  Fight with logic, not insults.  There are times when it's appropriate to be rude, and in the cases where you don't know, it's better to be polite.

Other thing: you need to get better about asking questions and adding pressure.  In general, you didn't do these things.  You sort of argued amongst yourselves, but when you didn't know, you didn't ask the person you suspected.  You didn't say "why did you say this?" or "what do you think of what this other person did?" or "why haven't you done [x, y, and z]?"  You didn't apply pressure.  Mostly, you squabbled.

You gave into the scum's efforts to lead the town.  When you look back, you can see key phrases in KaminaSquirtle's dialogue that indicate that he was attempting to garner favor.  He was trying to get a consensus, and you gave it to him.

Don't let lurkers get away so easily, but don't pull a Zathras, either.  At the end of the day, it's better to ride a balance between being feared and being loved.

Don't be waffly.  If you think someone might be scum, vote him and question him until you're sure of his alignment.  This does not mean that you should be close-minded.  Don't just pick a target and tunnel forever.  That's called Toony Tunneling in this context, and it is very, very bad.  You must leave yourself somewhat open to others' opinions, but above all, exercise your judgment.


Oh, and KaminaSquirtle: tone down the attitude.  It may have won the game for you right now, but it will hold you back significantly very, very soon.  The other thing it will do is give you victories that no one will celebrate with you.


Too bad Vector has been busy.
I had a lot of additional questions to ask.

Ask away.  I can be here for a little while longer.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - It all ends in flames...
Post by: Mindmaker on November 16, 2010, 02:35:51 am
Ask away.  I can be here for a little while longer.

Well I meant I had them back then, when I was in the game.
Most of them have been answered, as soon as the game ended.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - It all ends in flames...
Post by: Vector on November 16, 2010, 02:36:41 am
Well I meant I had them back then, when I was in the game.
Most of them have been answered, as soon as the game ended.

Bah, humbug... I'm sorry about that, then, as it was completely my fault that they didn't get answered.  My apologies.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - It all ends in flames...
Post by: Mindmaker on November 16, 2010, 02:39:23 am
Well I meant I had them back then, when I was in the game.
Most of them have been answered, as soon as the game ended.

Bah, humbug... I'm sorry about that, then, as it was completely my fault that they didn't get answered.  My apologies.

No worries.
I got the answers the hard way ;)

And I agree with you in this being a bad game, even though I don't know how others look like.
*shrug*
I did my best though (except at the beginning and shortly before I died).
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - It all ends in flames...
Post by: Vector on November 16, 2010, 02:41:14 am
I did my best though (except at the beginning and shortly before I died).

Good!  You really did improve throughout the course of the game, by the way.  I was quite pleased to see your style evolve =)
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - It all ends in flames...
Post by: Mindmaker on November 16, 2010, 02:50:02 am
I did my best though (except at the beginning and shortly before I died).

Good!  You really did improve throughout the course of the game, by the way.  I was quite pleased to see your style evolve =)

Well I was tunelling at Azure though.
He was the only one I was convinced to be town, as the game ended for me.

I could have attacked Kaminas theory, which I thought to be complete BS, to be honest.
Guess I can't share the credit, for having endured this frustrating game, huh?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - It all ends in flames...
Post by: Flintus10 on November 16, 2010, 02:56:02 am
Post

Heh sorry guess it could have been more polite since you guys are doing us a favor.

And thank you that post gave me all that I wanted.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - It all ends in flames...
Post by: NativeForeigner on November 16, 2010, 04:01:54 am
Quote
Extra credit to Mindmaker, who sent me PMs and asked me specific questions--I'm still sorry I never got around to that second one, because I was really glad to see you sending them.

I had no idea you were taking questions, that would have been nice to know. -_- Are you open for questions any time or just for beginner's games?

As for the quality of the game, it seemed like it was too easy of a victory. Yes, I was terrified of being lynched at the end, but we were allowed to squirm out of it. I messed up a few times with my posts, leaving a tell here and there, but no one caught on because the focus was (thankfully) on someone else. I'm pretty sure Kamina and I both would have been torn apart by day 3, or maybe even day 2 in any other game than a beginner's.

But, overall a good game and a good learning experience.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - It all ends in flames...
Post by: Mindmaker on November 16, 2010, 04:08:42 am
I had no idea you were taking questions, that would have been nice to know. -_-

She was the town IC.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - It all ends in flames...
Post by: KaminaSquirtle on November 16, 2010, 07:45:23 am
Advice.
Yeah, I know, I sucked pretty bad.  Hopefully some more non beginner games should help with that.  I don't know...this game felt different than say paranormal or sorcerer's apprentice.  Hopefully I'll learn more from seeing the better players play.
Oh, and KaminaSquirtle: tone down the attitude.  It may have won the game for you right now, but it will hold you back significantly very, very soon.  The other thing it will do is give you victories that no one will celebrate with you.
Yeah, you're right.  I guess I was just really relived to see that we won, I was really worried there.  But I see what you mean.  I'm glad this game is over, so I can focus on others.  I want to start fresh.
As for the quality of the game, it seemed like it was too easy of a victory. Yes, I was terrified of being lynched at the end, but we were allowed to squirm out of it. I messed up a few times with my posts, leaving a tell here and there, but no one caught on because the focus was (thankfully) on someone else. I'm pretty sure Kamina and I both would have been torn apart by day 3, or maybe even day 2 in any other game than a beginner's.

But, overall a good game and a good learning experience.
I know I should have been completely torn into.  I don't even want to know what the better players would do to my beginning of Day 3 post.  It just doesn't feel like a real victory to me, we got off on a cheap trick.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - It all ends in flames...
Post by: Azure Sepulchre on November 16, 2010, 01:08:34 pm
Eh, only things that bothered me were that I not only told you what to do so you could win, but the fact that Flintus didn't make his own vote on the suspicion it would happen. I also seriously regret outing as Doc. I figured the scum had gotten wise to me in day 1, which would imply a certain capacity for observation, and in turn imply it couldn't have been the two lurkers. Never even guessed I was randomly RB'd. >.>

Extra credit to Mindmaker, who sent me PMs and asked me specific questions--I'm still sorry I never got around to that second one, because I was really glad to see you sending them.

...for some reason, I didn't even think to do so. Ah, well. Even if it was a bad game, I still enjoyed a good deal of it. Just wish I hadn't contributed to such an unsatisfying ending. -_-
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - It all ends in flames...
Post by: Vector on November 16, 2010, 01:50:20 pm
Are you open for questions any time or just for beginner's games?

I'm "officially" open for questions only for this game, but I often handle specific situational stuff on the side.  So, general questions of "how can I improve in this game" will just get you a glare and some snarky comments, but something like "I'm scum and I launched an attack on this guy, but I'm running out of steam and I don't know what to do" is fine.

I could probably TownIC next BM as well, though.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - It all ends in flames...
Post by: SirBayer on November 17, 2010, 03:54:54 pm
Though uh town IC's shouldn't you guys be like evaluating and telling us what to do next time ect?

I'm going to be rude here, for a moment.  Please forgive me.

I'm glad to be your IC but uh Flintus10 shouldn't you be like asking that with a more polite turn of phrase or something ect?

[/bitch]

This is the rudest you get, Vector?

Pandarsenic slams keyboards at me for minor screw-ups in games of League of Legends.

Yeah I mean two scum lurkers who were replaced kinda blows, I hope Bayer at least tried to keep Ragnarok and Spade in the game.

Still I enjoyed it and I will try to be more decisive next time I think I let Ragnarok obvious active lurking go too easy. Though uh town IC's shouldn't you guys be like evaluating and telling us what to do next time ect?

Did what I could, mates.

Native and Kamina did well enough. I wasn't going to tell them to do anything, and they had the basics, so I really did very little in the scumchat.
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - It all ends in flames...
Post by: Vector on November 17, 2010, 04:04:13 pm
This is the rudest you get, Vector?

Pandarsenic slams keyboards at me for minor screw-ups in games of League of Legends.

Well, uh... most of the time... >_>
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - It all ends in flames...
Post by: Mindmaker on November 17, 2010, 04:44:52 pm
Pandarsenic slams keyboards at me for minor screw-ups in games of League of Legends.

You're playing on the american servers, right?
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - It all ends in flames...
Post by: webadict on November 17, 2010, 06:31:24 pm
This is the rudest you get, Vector?

Pandarsenic slams keyboards at me for minor screw-ups in games of League of Legends.

Well, uh... most of the time... >_>
That's like grandma rude.

"Could you play with that in the kitchen?"
"NO!"
"You won't get any cookies if you don't..."
"I WANNA PLAY HERE!"
"You need to use your indoor voice, deary"
Title: Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - It all ends in flames...
Post by: NativeForeigner on November 25, 2010, 03:50:13 pm
You're playing on the american servers, right?

Yeah, we play on the American servers.