1
General Discussion / Re: A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantry - a look at history and popular culture
« on: April 11, 2021, 03:51:02 pm »
I haven't read that one yet, but there's a similar comparison in a series about Battle of Gondor. He describes how Tolkien put a big emphasis on courage and morale of the troops of Free People, who despite superiority of the opponent hold their ground. How the shifts of battle changed depending on morale of both opposing armies. It was a battle between fear and terror against hope and virtue.
Whereas in the film it's more about a sheer advantage of brute force and war machinery. Trolls, mumakils, catapults, but also Rohirims cavalry and ultimately the army of undead. Still, Surons forces are not obliterated, as it's usually the case in modern productions. They fled.
"That focus on morale gets to a truth about warfare: the winner of a battle is not the one that kills the most, but the one who makes the enemy run away. And the winner of a war is not the side which kills the most, but the side which can break the will of the enemy to fight."
Author also notes that it's still relevant even in modern warfare, where an army with superior technological advantage struggles with an underarmed opponent who is highly motivated.
It's important to say, that Peter Jackson worked within constraints of a different medium and author does acknowledge that. Even more, he thinks very highly about the film. Still I definitely prefer Tolkiens vision of warfare.
Whereas in the film it's more about a sheer advantage of brute force and war machinery. Trolls, mumakils, catapults, but also Rohirims cavalry and ultimately the army of undead. Still, Surons forces are not obliterated, as it's usually the case in modern productions. They fled.
"That focus on morale gets to a truth about warfare: the winner of a battle is not the one that kills the most, but the one who makes the enemy run away. And the winner of a war is not the side which kills the most, but the side which can break the will of the enemy to fight."
Author also notes that it's still relevant even in modern warfare, where an army with superior technological advantage struggles with an underarmed opponent who is highly motivated.
It's important to say, that Peter Jackson worked within constraints of a different medium and author does acknowledge that. Even more, he thinks very highly about the film. Still I definitely prefer Tolkiens vision of warfare.