Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Orakio

Pages: [1]
1
DF Suggestions / Re: Plausible candidates for new metals
« on: September 14, 2011, 03:13:05 pm »
Roraborialisforealis:
Agreed. One down side is that too many materials clutter up the ui, but that's really more of a failing of the ui.

Uristocrat:
Yeah that sort of slipped, I managed to get it right in the end though. I seem to subconsciously resist typing words of Swedish origin (like any decent Finn). The allous would probably go better with dwarven tech than the metal itself, as tungsten is really hard to work unless it's very pure. The being sorf when pure sort of the same thing as with iron and
 nickel ect. It's probably mostly due to the carbide impurities. On the other hand, tungsten alloy steel can be worked much like common steel.

Interesting threads. I'll try read them more closely when I can find the time and energy, and reply if I have something to add. I'm hardly qualified to talk about anisotropic materials like wood though.

Erkki:
Armor piercing capped fin stabilized bolt? Perhaps we should get uranium too! Pity that its pyrophoric effect probably won't work at typical crossbow bolt velocities.

The major issue with tungsten metallurgy is that it cannot be reasonably smelted, given the melting point of about 3400 C. It basically requires your choice of methane or hydrogen reduction, followed by powder forming and sintering. What it's hard to project back to that kind of time line is the furnaces required to do something like that. In theory you can get the rest of the process, from dissolving the ore in lye and back adding water until the oxide falls out, then you need the furnace, and you can grind iron/nickel down to powder and mix it with tungsten and beeswax to make forms, but then you need a furnace to sinter.

2
DF Suggestions / Re: No Scottish Accents
« on: May 25, 2011, 02:37:01 pm »
Being most familiar with the South Yorkshire coalfields (of times past, THAAAAATTTTCCCHHHHHHHEEEEERRRRRRR!!!!!!) one of the (many[1]) places where people regularly used to go underground and dig tunnels, I suppose I tend to put a Barnsley accent on them, personally.


[1] Durham, South Wales, the area around Coalbrookdale (surprisingly!) are others in the UK, with Pittsburgh entering my consciousness as the most obvious Left Pondian example, and beyond coal there's the like of the eponymouslt known Kimberley deposits in ZA, and I suspect Chile (as a whole, because, to be honest, I have very little subregional knowledge of that country) has been very recently associated with miners, also, but I bet any attempt to try a Chilean accent would be as close to Mexican as anywhere else... :))

Living just outside Pittsburgh, my first thought when I read this was :"Oh, come on, really?" Then I started trying to refute it. And I have come to the forlorn conclusion that my hometown is basically a mountainhome. 'The Monongahela is composed mainly of sandstone, limestone, dolomite, and coal.' The coal is the highest quality in the nation for making steel. Sixty years ago, we were pushing over thirty percent of the world's steel. For a century, entire families worked in the mills, as we turned the sky and snow black with ash, while we pulled in the dregs of Europe for more and more raw labor. Now, the steel is gone to China, and all that is left is a regional dialect spoken dahntahn and in the surrounding counties, and nowhere else in the world, a social scene built around beer and football (substituted for goblin slaughter), and mullets, as few humans can grow a proper dwarven beard, while we've thrown our out-going migrants all over the known world.

So if yinzguys want ta imagine your dorfs as Picksburghers, well, it fits.  :-\

3
DF Suggestions / Re: Reworked brain tissue(s) and effect of damage
« on: May 20, 2011, 08:40:20 pm »
But then again, I have never taken a sword to someone's skull. I imagine that a sword or axe would be better put to use on limbs and torso, while a hammer could deliver fatal skull shots or concussion with relative ease.   

Bone is... not very sturdy in front of a well sharpened blade. The main defense is the shape, rather than the strength. A well crafted sword blade or a heavy axe is going to do its job if the swordsman can bring it in on target. What should be, however, is that a lot of aimed shots at heads should wind up striking the shoulders / upper arms. That said, four or five layers of brain, with the caveat that it bleeds you out awful fast, could be a good thing for simulation purposes.

Pages: [1]