136
Other Games / Re: the leftovers thread: giveaway your leftover bundle games
« on: March 03, 2018, 07:34:39 pm »
Can I please have Psychonauts?
March 6, 2024: Dwarf Fortress 50.12 has been released.
News: February 3, 2024: The February '24 Report is up.
News: February 4, 2021: Dwarf Fortress Talk #28 has been posted.
News: November 21, 2018: A new Threetoe story has been posted.
Forum Guidelines



I should probably shave more regularly, but it's hard to work up the motivation when it's all but invisible except in profile.You could try what I do--I have an electric clipper that I use about once a week to buzz off the sparse semblance of a beard I grow. Takes under a minute to trim and there's no problems with shaving cream or potentially cutting yourself.
Early modern at the very least.You're in luck! Roughly 1492-1815 is probably my favorite era of history to study.
I don't know what even.I suggest interpreting most scripture as being veiled references to automatic firearms. More fun that way
I knew we had gun issues stateside, but this is an issue of biblical proportions.
The r/the_donald thread about it is absolutely hilarious. About half of them are insisting it's actually 6th-dimensional fanorona, the other half is yelling this isn't what they voted for and getting their comments deleted as a result.Nah, it was specifically against Pat Toomey, specifically over the proposed Republican bill not including an age restriction.Breitbart is having its typical civil war between "OMG WEVE BEEN LIED TO TRUMP IS ONE OF THEM" and "HE'S PLAYING 17-DIMENSIONAL BACKGAMMON, DOUBT IS HERESY". If only it was a shooting war....
EDIT: here it is. Republicans are convinced that this, like many of his other positions, is quite temporary and will blow over.
EDIT: Oh, and the third faction of Cruzites and Paulites saying "YOU COULD HAVE PREVENTED THIS BY VOTING FOR A REAL CONSERVATIVE!"
People like Antifa and Big Red are public examples.I asked for a name. You give me an amorphous organization with wildly varying practices and ideals, a couple of catch-all terms, a disparaging nickname for someone who argued with some MRAs seven years ago, and a vague description of an article you read this one time paired with a claim this is representative of all articles.
TERFs are another example, but they're part of a bigger group too. Radfems in general are pretty toxic, and they constantly and provably cherry pick and distort the data they cite, in ways that would make a creationist blush.
One example is from Australia, but it's just one example of many. There was a survey on domestic violence which found mothers and fathers were equally likely to be observed hitting each other by children, at 22% and 23%, but the report went out "almost 1 in 4 children have seen their father hit their mother". This is pretty typical. Politicizing and gendering things that aren't in fact gendered. This is the type of person I'm talking about, the type that put spreading panic ahead of basic facts.