Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - wobbly

Pages: 1 ... 15 16 [17] 18 19 ... 44
241
Korea's answer to William Burroughs?

242
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: June 01, 2016, 04:24:47 am »
Nah you still take half damage. What you should of done is quickly throw a fire ball back.

243
Bernie sanders doesn't give a damn about Israel or the palestinians (Evident by his extreme ignorance as shown a month or so ago), he just, like any good old politician, sees an opening and takes it.

If Americans pick their candidate over who's side they are with the Israeli-Arab conflict, then you guys are stupid. pick what's best for you, not what's best for some Israeli or Arab lobbyists.

Haven't been following closely. Link to what he said/did a month ago?

244
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: May 28, 2016, 05:13:09 am »
H-uh.  Sky's visibly brightening.  But I can clearly see the mostly-full moon to the... south, basically.
Still, it's almost 6AM.

Depending on where you are you'll still be able to see the moon at noon when it's near full

245
Eh, may as well

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

246
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: May 27, 2016, 06:22:56 am »
Being bothered by people making up labels seems at least as ridiculous, as making up labels to me. I'm pretty close to asexual without actually being asexual. To me it doesn't bother me not having a word or term. You do get asked a fair bit though & it can be annoying sometimes to explain. I can get someone wanting a word to make it easier to explain.

Also a bit of weird human psychology here. If you tell someone a term, their more likely to think it's a normal thing that they just haven't heard of then when you don't.

247
She does to me. So does Trump, -the pc. Reminds me of the angry guy at the pup ranting politics. Bitching about foreigners stealing jobs & offering no real solutions. Unfortunately how politics tends to be. Expressing a more interesting opinion can be bad for your chances.

248
Well considering you went and looked at his page it might actually be pretty effective advertising.

249
He's a subhuman scumbag who can only win by accruing the votes of other scumbags.

Just like everyone else you disagree with, right?

This hysteria surrounding Trump reminds me very much of the right's hysteria surrounding Obama during the '08 general, and it's just as ridiculous.

Being worried about someone, who has generally shown themselves happy to step on other people to further their own interests & own ego, get into a position to affect a lot of peoples lives is ridiculous? I mean yeah that does apply to other politicians & some of it is fairly over the top, but still. Plenty of good reasons for people to be bothered by the possibility of Trump getting in to power.

250
This is just blind ignorance right there.

The problem is that in most scientific experiments nothing is directly "observed". That has almost no meaning. We get data back, then we fit that data to a theory, and if the fit is approximately close enough within our error tolerance, we say the theory is proved. Clearly you could reject any evidence you want if you were critical enough with the error tolerance you'll accept, so there's a consensus on how close is close enough for a valid measurement.

And of course almost everything we're talking about as theories are only vague approximate models of reality. Our electron model is not an actual electron, it's just a hypothesized idea of an electron, which is probably way off what electrons actually are. Scientific data and theories only correlate with reality, they're not actual reality. "The map is not the territory".
I am still curious where you learned this, not being sarcastic, despite mainiac's insistence I haven't been trolling, though I do try to stay in character as my politician persona because I really want a hover platform, I'm genuinely asking who told you that was how science worked?

I even listed a couple of big examples that were in the news recently of observations or experiments which confirmed theoretical predictions. Relativity is another subject on which I am very well informed, and have known for the last, god, I guess it's closer to 30 years now, that gravitational waves had not been observed. I also knew the Higgs was a missing piece, I'm STILL angry about the Superconducting Super Collider being cancelled.

You ask most people a few years ago, they would be surprised if you told them there was any doubt about the shit Einstein worked on, or about something so well tested we call it the Standard Model, capital letters and all!

Eh, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. If you honestly believe what you just said read some philosphy from the 60s. Heck read shit from the 19th, 18th century, go back as far as you like...

Short of the long. Your not saying anything new. Your not bringing up intelligent points that other intelligent people haven't thought about either.

251
Seeing the word consensus brought up as if it matters in the least for science is another source of disappointment I've had to get used to.
Hey, you're posting in a politics thread so you've gotta expect some politcal speak back but feel free to bitch about it, that's also par for the course. If I was a blunt person (which I am) I'd say your posts have contained as much political speak as actual science, so fair is fair. Reread them again if you don't believe me.

252
Was about to post a reply then took another look & got what maniac & itisnotlogical were saying. The graph is poorly presented to see the last spike. A simple bit of white spacing would probably highlight that. The point still stands it's not going to be obvious to most people whether you see it or not.

Edit: & by all means point out that thin red line & explain it to people. Do you actually understand what it means? Will they get it? Will they believe you?

253
Eh, clear to you. I put out the random challenge to show it to a random stranger & see if it's clear to them or if they go WTF does this mean. (As in WTF does that graph mean rather then why is a random stranger shoving graphs in my face).

254
The problem with the first graph is that humans aren't programmed to see a thin vertical line (right at the end) and think "holy shit!"  It takes years of rigorous training to make people crap their pants if they see that.

Really?... because I have no such training, and it's the most obvious thing on the graph to me.

Your a different generation to me, many voters, & many people in the world. As someone who was always good at maths & knows many others who aren't the most obvious things about the graph is the origin isn't 0-0, I have to look at it for a while & think to actually work out what it means (to my mind a good habit whether you understand it or not) & if I succeed at the 2nd part I'd probably be at a loss to try to explain it to someone who just does not get it.

Edit: Scratch the different generation bit. From memory you're the same. Have a think about people you know & see if you get what I mean.

255
Reply to Max spoilered for length, rambling & semi off topic.

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

Pages: 1 ... 15 16 [17] 18 19 ... 44