241
General Discussion / Re: Murrican Politics Megathread 2016: There Will Be Hell Toupée
« on: June 01, 2016, 10:56:59 am »
Korea's answer to William Burroughs?
March 6, 2024: Dwarf Fortress 50.12 has been released.
News: February 3, 2024: The February '24 Report is up.
News: February 4, 2021: Dwarf Fortress Talk #28 has been posted.
News: November 21, 2018: A new Threetoe story has been posted.
Forum Guidelines
Bernie sanders doesn't give a damn about Israel or the palestinians (Evident by his extreme ignorance as shown a month or so ago), he just, like any good old politician, sees an opening and takes it.
If Americans pick their candidate over who's side they are with the Israeli-Arab conflict, then you guys are stupid. pick what's best for you, not what's best for some Israeli or Arab lobbyists.
H-uh. Sky's visibly brightening. But I can clearly see the mostly-full moon to the... south, basically.
Still, it's almost 6AM.
He's a subhuman scumbag who can only win by accruing the votes of other scumbags.
Just like everyone else you disagree with, right?
This hysteria surrounding Trump reminds me very much of the right's hysteria surrounding Obama during the '08 general, and it's just as ridiculous.
This is just blind ignorance right there.I am still curious where you learned this, not being sarcastic, despite mainiac's insistence I haven't been trolling, though I do try to stay in character as my politician persona because I really want a hover platform, I'm genuinely asking who told you that was how science worked?
The problem is that in most scientific experiments nothing is directly "observed". That has almost no meaning. We get data back, then we fit that data to a theory, and if the fit is approximately close enough within our error tolerance, we say the theory is proved. Clearly you could reject any evidence you want if you were critical enough with the error tolerance you'll accept, so there's a consensus on how close is close enough for a valid measurement.
And of course almost everything we're talking about as theories are only vague approximate models of reality. Our electron model is not an actual electron, it's just a hypothesized idea of an electron, which is probably way off what electrons actually are. Scientific data and theories only correlate with reality, they're not actual reality. "The map is not the territory".
I even listed a couple of big examples that were in the news recently of observations or experiments which confirmed theoretical predictions. Relativity is another subject on which I am very well informed, and have known for the last, god, I guess it's closer to 30 years now, that gravitational waves had not been observed. I also knew the Higgs was a missing piece, I'm STILL angry about the Superconducting Super Collider being cancelled.
You ask most people a few years ago, they would be surprised if you told them there was any doubt about the shit Einstein worked on, or about something so well tested we call it the Standard Model, capital letters and all!
Seeing the word consensus brought up as if it matters in the least for science is another source of disappointment I've had to get used to.Hey, you're posting in a politics thread so you've gotta expect some politcal speak back but feel free to bitch about it, that's also par for the course. If I was a blunt person (which I am) I'd say your posts have contained as much political speak as actual science, so fair is fair. Reread them again if you don't believe me.
The problem with the first graph is that humans aren't programmed to see a thin vertical line (right at the end) and think "holy shit!" It takes years of rigorous training to make people crap their pants if they see that.
Really?... because I have no such training, and it's the most obvious thing on the graph to me.