Bay 12 Games Forum

Only thing I realize is I had days older dfhack compiled from git installed. I guess that changes the file enough to que the message.  I'll try to update my old DF install's dfhack to  current resave and recopy and try again. I can't try now so I'm typing about it instead...

Link delete
How about Google? I dropped it in my google drive before I left work and remembered I could share it from there.

But I am not comfortable with this, I am not familiar enough with Google shares to know the world can't see all my stuff now. But, I think you are an advanced user based on your posts, and you probably have already compiled your own,and you are trying to call me out as if I am doing something malicious, in an effort maybe to protect the community. so I am posting this on here, linked to my personal Google drive on my personal email account I have used forever professionally, to show that I am not being malicious and used zippy share out of lazyness not maliciousness. And don't misunderstand my tone, I am being blunt not angry, in fact i applaud the inoculous question tryn g to smoke out a bad guy, which i am not,but this should show this is me simply trying to share, as it's been awhile and I bet there are alot of people that use prospect and reveal as their only dfhack tools to start a fort and may be waiting patiently.  Even though I am a jerk, I value being a tiny member of this community and don't want people  to think I am malicious.

The point of that wall of text is to say I will remove the Google link in a few days, so get it while its hot, but BACK U P YOUR SAVES, and do not bother to the pack maintainers with yelling WHEN it corrupts your save, instead, post the juicy details of what you were doing and if you have a tileset and/or other mods so they can get a tip about where to look for bugs. Phrase it like a report and not a complaint.

They will release it when they are comfortable with it, they do not release it early because it's not worth their time to have people that won't BACK U P THEIR saves cry about their lost fort, so please don't do that and make it my fault that they are getting angry emails about dfhack blowing up their computer.  *edit*  however , it seems they would like reports on the specifics for bug hunting

I thought about dffd, but this felt so unofficial I didn't think it would be cool. Seriously, I dont even know if this is cool, if it was ready for release, they would release it, its obviously not, but after reading the post pleaing for a pre alpha/cuniaform version, and I had just compiled it, it seemed like a good idea at the time. *edit* The post after this is a request to please REPORT specifics of what happened with errors so they can hunt bugs. I am adding" please remember it is a report and not a request for help, they may ask for more info or they may not respond at all"
*

Seriously, print out the compile doc and READ and complete each line, then check it off.  You will save yourself and more importantly others time.  I am helping, its called tough love. its meant to embarrass you so you actually go read every line of available documentation. In future tasks, this will allow you to complete your task vs reading the heading and trying each thing and then getting stuck from not reading the details, such as when you ignored the documentation and did not select the button the set the PATH, and again possibly now with not having SV 2010 SP1.

If you want to get into this thing,(programming/compiling code/ advanced windows use?) You are going to have to learn to follow instructions and thoroughly at that.

If that makes me a troll, I guess I am a troll,but, I like to think I am more of a funky dwarf.

So if the only way to make a single core of a processor faster is to use a smaller manufacturing process, does that mean an AMD and Intel chip at the same manufacturing process size and hertz deliver exactly the same performance? Of course not, architecture matters, and the upcoming AMD Zen chip is trying to close the gap with Intel and is supposedly sporting a 40% IPC gain from architecture alone, independent of manufacturing process.

Don't be so sure we are done making cores run faster.

are you following the build information in the git repository ore th einfo on the readthedocs sight linked in the first page?

The read the docs page is much more detailed if my memory serves...

The stability of the Linux version was specifically for one of the other dead remote programs. There is a memory leak or something.

Heh, oh yeah that makes sense. The versioning information.

We should make this the general chat thread.