But the feminine isn't necessarily culturally bad, mind you.
Oh, I know. A few minutes after the initial rush of SEEING THE TRUTH, I can see that this is
one piece of the puzzle, not the entire puzzle itself.
It's just a much more exacting set of standards. Meeting the ideal of femininity - beauty, purity, chastity and so forth - is rewarded strongly.
Ah, but there's a difference between "femininity is bad/good" and "femininity is discouraged/encouraged". Femininity could be encouraged for women, but
also considered to be negative.
Notice, for instance, that transwomen who easily pass are much more kindly looked upon than those who do not - this is because they plausibly meet that feminine ideal and are difficult to distinguish from regular women. The ones that do not are also not beautiful according to the traditional feminine ideal, and their purity and chastity is called into question because they quite literally deviate from sexual norms.
Yes! This is very similar to what I have been thinking about the Standard Trans (Woman) Narrative, which I dislike intensely. It's society's way of enforcing the gender binary even while people cross it - this person
really is a woman, and the gender binary still works, see? She fits all the stereotypes!

([And] the traditional view is that a crossdresser, for instance, is just a kind of weird sex pervert, which doesn't help matters at all).
In TERF terminology, those people are "autogynephilics." I think I preferred "pervert." It's shorter, and doesn't dress up the hatred in medical terms.
Apparently Milo Yiannopoulos attacked a transwoman on stage at a college and held up a picture of her calling her a sick twisted person basically. And said person was in the audience. Can you imagine how that would feel?
This is old news, but yeah. Milo's a piece of shit. And when college students say "get Yiannopoulos out of Minneapolis", the TERFs complain about "muh
freeze peaches". We have the right to disallow abusive and hateful speech in our colleges -
especially when the speech considered is that of an
outsider being
invited and given a
platform. This isn't some student ranting about the "NIGGERS", this is different. Worse.
Also, he's advertising his speaking tour with posters that say "Trannies are Gay"
Pffffff-
I literally spit out my trail mix.
Milo is gay. What in the four hells? Is he out of his
mind?
and "Trannies = Mentally Ill". When you combine that with the fact that he's using the pulpit of the stage to do hate speech against individual members of the audience, I can get why people are protesting against his tour, and it's not because "they hate free speech". I mean if a Neo-Nazi is coming to town to give a speech and puts up posters with swastikas on then that say "Gas the Jews" in big letters, and has a habit of turning the audience against specific Jews who turn up to see the speech, I should hope that you get a posse out to beat those guys heads in. There's a limit to acceptable free speech.
This isn't even
about free speech though. It's about a free
platform. Free speech is free
speech, an audience or a platform aren't free.