646
Mafia / Re: BYOR 16: Day 1 - 50% Dystopian Chaos Pizza Time Hat Tyrant Dio [15 / 15]
« on: April 18, 2023, 08:56:44 am »
Okay, I'm about to enter work and the post from phone realm, but I still have a bit of time to lay some groundwork.
Mileage may vary, but the way I see it, ideal vote targets lie at in two particular confluences.
People who are active, but, make no effort to contribute.
And people who are active, but, contribute in bad faith while trying to seem like it's in good faith.
These two categories define scum. There's also people who are just less active, but it's pretty hard to diagnose scumminess from that, though pressure votes are still useful to get things moving.
Personally I find the second of the two confluences I defined to be the more useful one. Just off the top of my head, I like what I've seen more out of Toaster, NQT, hector and somehow juicebox (not very much posting, but it's all good stuff, no wasted juice whatsoever), and dislike what I've seen out of Spin, ToonyMan, Tric, and Jim.
That still leaves like... half the player base though. And I'm sure you've noticed once again that I haven't defined why I feel the way I do about the players I named. Heck, my vibe checks could be completely out of date.
So that's what I'll be trying to work on today. Feel free to call me out if I try to skip out on actually doing that part, because that's the important part. The details. But the day is still long, and we can afford players getting their chance to get their game face on.
I probably won't get too much of that done while at work and forced to PfP, but I'll aim to apply that process of categorization to like, three players? Maybe four.
Mileage may vary, but the way I see it, ideal vote targets lie at in two particular confluences.
People who are active, but, make no effort to contribute.
And people who are active, but, contribute in bad faith while trying to seem like it's in good faith.
These two categories define scum. There's also people who are just less active, but it's pretty hard to diagnose scumminess from that, though pressure votes are still useful to get things moving.
Personally I find the second of the two confluences I defined to be the more useful one. Just off the top of my head, I like what I've seen more out of Toaster, NQT, hector and somehow juicebox (not very much posting, but it's all good stuff, no wasted juice whatsoever), and dislike what I've seen out of Spin, ToonyMan, Tric, and Jim.
That still leaves like... half the player base though. And I'm sure you've noticed once again that I haven't defined why I feel the way I do about the players I named. Heck, my vibe checks could be completely out of date.
So that's what I'll be trying to work on today. Feel free to call me out if I try to skip out on actually doing that part, because that's the important part. The details. But the day is still long, and we can afford players getting their chance to get their game face on.
I probably won't get too much of that done while at work and forced to PfP, but I'll aim to apply that process of categorization to like, three players? Maybe four.