Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - nullBolt

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 19
1
Well, I guess it's not like it matters. Trump seems highly likely to win the election if it comes down to him vs Clinton.

2
If we disqualify all US politicians for being dishonest we disqualify all US politicians

It goes with the job field of trying to satisfy everyone, with people who have self-contradictory beliefs

Doesn't mean they can't do a good job, advertising someone's shit when everyone's shit isn't much more shit than normal

It's the blatant dishonesty with Hillary that gets me.

Like "Fuck the public, they're so dumb they won't even notice when I laugh off this very important question."

Null, if you think Clinton is one of the most corrupt politicians possible, you really don't live in the US. As maniac (and others) has noted repeatedly, if clinton's "scandals" are the worst they can (try to) pin on her, she's basically spotless insofar as american politicians go.

We're not talking backwater backroom politician here, though. We're talking presidential candidate. The fact that there's the possibility of a presidential candidate who has been involved in 20+ scandals (all of which she was a central figure in) is unreal.

3
so what you're telling me is, you can't think of any particular accusations, so you're going to stick with attacking her character

also, "incompetent" is clearly false, given her professional and political history

and your other two hardly distinguish her from the competition, so once again, i ask you - why should i vote for somebody else, given that i expect her to win the primary even if i do caucus for sanders?

::)

So, essentially, her flip-flopping on gay rights, her copious amounts of campaign contributions from the uber rich, her lying about her past history on gay rights etc etc aren't enough?

Go watch any video on her fucking scandals, man. Don't worry, though, I bet there won't be any more scandals after she gets into office!

It's not my country but if you actually consider voting in one of the most corrupt officials possible in because you think their policies might be positive (what even are her policies? can you even tell me?) then there is something very, very wrong with your system.

4
You'd vote for someone who brought up 9/11 and being a woman as the reason why campaign contributions wouldn't effect her.

Dude, politics shouldn't be tribal like that.
but it is like that

if the republican field were capable of summoning up somebody better than clinton, i'd consider voting for that person, but their current strategic direction suggests that they will never surmount even that mediocre bar

and if you want to talk tribalism, you will never convince me not to vote for somebody solely on their lack of merits - tell me what they plan to actually do that i hate, instead of why they're a bad person, and tell me why the alternatives are better

Clinton is somehow a combination of incompetent, dishonest and corrupt.

There's no way to tell what she's going to do because she's just going to do whatever her corporate overlords want her to do. I mean, Jesus, how much money has she actually got off Goldman Sachs now?

5
Oh man, mocking an accusation you dont consider legitimate.  Can't think of anyone who has done that recently, on this forum. (that was sarcasm btw).

Funny how she does it any time someone asks her about one of the many, many, many scandals she's been in.

I'm sure they're all not legitimate questions. All of them.

Including the ones about how she's wiped her servers to hide all her emails when they should have all been provided to the FBI.

But, hey, it's not like Hillary Clinton is lying about supporting gay rights or anything.

7
Is anyone here actually going to vote for Hillary "Laugh Off The Pain" Clinton?

Seriously, she just laughs at any questions that she can't answer.

8
General Discussion / Re: Wargaming & Miniatures
« on: January 24, 2016, 12:08:00 pm »
I'm still really missing De Bellis Multitudinis and Field of Glory, the two ancient to medieval rulesets I used to wargame on. I actually have a bronze medal for DBM from a national tournament hanging somewhere, but it's not played much hereabouts. And to make it sound awesomer than it probably is, I was taught by the 2014 world champion for DBM. :P

I've never lashed out the money for a full army of my own, but I sometimes get extremely tempted.

Depending on scale, historical armies are generally pretty cheap. You definitely should.

9
General Discussion / Re: Gender quotas
« on: January 24, 2016, 11:31:17 am »
Even the richest will be phased out eventually, Quiamus. Everyone will be phased out.
Not until robots can legally inherit property.

I don't think they'll really ever need to. We're talking a point beyond property.

10
General Discussion / Re: Gender quotas
« on: January 24, 2016, 11:17:57 am »
Everyone except the richest percentile. And neither of us will ever be in the richest percentile, you can count on that.

Try saying "So what?" again when you're living in the street, m8.

Even the richest will be phased out eventually, Quiamus. Everyone will be phased out.

We'll reach the point where the idea of a scarcity market is ludicrous.

11
General Discussion / Wargaming & Miniatures
« on: January 24, 2016, 11:16:43 am »
RULE ZERO
BE EXCELLENT TO EACH OTHER
RULE ONE
NO GAMES WORKSHOP LORE OR RULESETS, THEY HAVE THEIR OWN THREAD

Just figured it was distinct enough from the other threads.

What you painting? What you building? What you playing?

I'm putting together some 15mm scifi for Gruntz and looking to buy maybe another force to show off the ruleset. Might buy some 15mm fantasy or historical for Hordes of the Things, too.

12
General Discussion / Re: if self.isCoder(): post() #Programming Thread
« on: January 24, 2016, 10:54:53 am »
No.  CollisionShape exampleTriangle = new CollisionTriangle();
The other way around will throw an exception.
And you can also declare them as the subclass and declare the storage thing as using the superclass.

Of course. I'm retarded. :-[

13
General Discussion / Re: if self.isCoder(): post() #Programming Thread
« on: January 24, 2016, 10:45:41 am »
In Java, this is a standard polymorphism problem.

An array for CollisionShape should be able to hold both CollisionCircle and CollisionTriangle as long as you declare them as being of the type CollisionShape.

So:

Code: [Select]
CollisionTriangle exampleTriangle = new ColissionShape(whatever);
HashMap<Integer, CollisionShape> map = new HashMap<Integer, ColissionShape>();
map.add(exampleTriangle);

This should function fine in Java but I just wrote it out quickly and it obviously hasn't been tested.

I imagine this should work in all OOP languages but I've never used C#.

14
General Discussion / Re: The friendly and polite EU-related news thread
« on: January 24, 2016, 10:39:42 am »
Or it could be just good old short-sightedness combined with ego and stupidity. Maybe they honestly didn't expect it to get this bad, maybe they hoped for some karma points for their next election without thinking of the consequences.

In any case, the motivation doesn't really matter that much anymore. You don't need to figure out why someone decided to dump a septic tank into your living room as much as you need to figure out how to fix the problem as quickly as possible.

(and no, I'm not saying the immigrants are shit, I just couldn't think of a better analogy on the spot)

Maybe. It's been too prolonged and too involved for me to believe it's just simple negligence, especially with the constant harassment in the past of anyone who questioned it and the endless media silences on the matter.

Re: a) the main issue is that this is a suicidal strategy. You're more likely to give that very opportunity to your opposition - which, unlikely to be super fond of you - since your entire voting base can see you've fucked up and created the problem in the first place.

At least within the UK, this is a moot point. The opposition has exactly the same policies as whatever government is in power, just with different words to describe them.

Like Loud said, they're from the same schools, doing the same thing, meeting the same people.

In what world is this a fair and representative government?

15
General Discussion / Re: The friendly and polite EU-related news thread
« on: January 24, 2016, 10:31:49 am »
That's not an argument, that's something used to get out of one unless you elaborate the hows and whys.

Power, in particular? Status quo is maintained - natives are pissed off, conflicts are not resolved, immigrants have no particular reason or perhaps even ability to vote for the politicians responsible.

Immigration tipping point scenario (natives become a minority, that is) - same but even worse, immigrants have their own politicians to support and empower, natives are still pissed off - even more.

Natives get pissed off scenario? Nationalists get support, current leaders are at best kicked out, if not, well, you know what happens to opposition in case of extreme far-right. Metabolic inviability.

There's two main threads of thought:
a) The government creates a threat narrative (real or imaginary) by causing a bad thing to happen which they can only solve by having more powers. Consolidation of power.
b) The economic suggestion I mentioned before regarding people applying to jobs. Consolidation of money.

Example of a):
1. Say that you need more workers.
2. Have mass immigration.
3. Mass immigration causes social and terror problems.
4. Problems are done over the internet.
5. "We require more government controls on the internet!"
6. Government controls, of course, solve nothing but they have more information and ability to police their citizens lives.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 19