<snip>
I think you've impressively managed to mangle together both the equality and gender quotas debate. I do not even know where to begin to unravel this.
I don't think anyone is arguing against you though, really. I do not think anyone is making the arguments you're fighting against. Even Orange and LordBucket are just saying that what you're presenting does not hold to any reasonable standard of realism in the modern world.
To go to your magic machine example: What if a woman using the magic machine without twice as much training as a man awoke an eldritch beast that would swallow the earth? Should we train women to use it, then?
Think about everything it takes to get him to that point though! Do we really need a janitor to get 13+ years of schooling, access to modern medicine, etc? And then if you want him to work for you, he has to be compensated enough that he can afford high-tech luxuries like televisions and refrigerators. All those resources are effectively being poured down the drain for a janitor. It's best to throw him into the woods at a young age and just get it over with.
If the resources he consumes could be better used by a stronger or smarter person, it is a waste to give them to him.
If we kill everyone except the intelligent men, there will be enough.
Dude, if you want to be 2016's master trole, you need to present something at least approaching my viewpoint or anything approaching logic at all.
If not, try to present your own different solution.