31
DF Modding / Re: [MODDING] 0.44.x questions thread
« on: July 13, 2018, 05:45:56 pm »
Is there a utility that makes position modding tolerable?
March 6, 2024: Dwarf Fortress 50.12 has been released.
News: February 3, 2024: The February '24 Report is up.
News: February 4, 2021: Dwarf Fortress Talk #28 has been posted.
News: November 21, 2018: A new Threetoe story has been posted.
Forum Guidelines
Yes and there isn't. It might be possible to do some binary hacking on the executable, but that'll break compatibility with damn near everything for very little gain.
masters of the four humors scheme to devour one another to gain ever more power. And the ghastly Preserved, the dead men who stripped themselves of every trace of humanity
however since 42.x interactions have been broken and in most terms only work during combat, IE Fleeing is not combat.
I kind of think that the essence of wild magic is not its danger or its tendency to turn against you randomly, but its "moodiness" and unwillingness to be controlled. The source of the magic acts like it has a mind of its own, and needs to be shown respect to keep it on your side. In that regard, it is rather similar to religion based magic, but invoking an abstract force instead of a specific god.
Perhaps building a relationship with the source of the magic simply means living in accordance with the "rules" of its spheres (not harming trees for a tree force, random arson for a fire force, etc), unlike gods which require regular prayer and service.
Calling on wild magic when you are on good relations with the source shouldn't cause it to turn against you, but the details of what happens when you invoke its power may be unreliable. You simply ask it for help and it may respond in one of many possible ways.
He wants to add creatures to the entity of SUBTERRANEAN_ANIMAL_PEOPLES.Will that work with it being an original creature or does it have to be an animal person of an origional animal?
This sounds like exactly the thing that NW_Kohaku spent so long arguing against. It's literally just "has a chance of failing horribly". You act like it fixes the problem of it being impractical, but you didn't even change anything, it's exactly the same as other people have suggested and has been assessed as impractical.