How does that change anything about it being quite dubious to rank candidates on their ability to win the election?
I was very specifically limiting that qualification to the issue of candidacy and yes, if you win the election, by definition you are the best candidate, that being someone standing for election and then actually winning an election.
In a functioning democracy, that also has some loose connection to being actually good at the office.
I think it should be obvious from the fact that I voted for Hillary that I thought she'd be a better President, but from the fact that he won the election, Trump was clearly a superior candidate, for the purpose of winning an election.
Muldrake's point has little to do with the quality of the candidate as leader or human being, his point was that last year's candidate were the two worse candidates in his memory in terms of electability. Not sure I agree, but that's all he said.
While I am very good at burying my own point in favor of arguing about nonsense, this is pretty much my point, to the extent there is one. Trump was an awful candidate. Hillary was even worse, even though her policies were, IMO, better.
I'll note there were a substantial number of voters who were entirely aware of what Trump is and actually voted for him for that reason, although I think a substantial number of other voters voted for him literally having no clue what a piece of shit he is.
We now have a shit sandwich for President.
More persistently peddled lie than caricature, but I guess that works, too. FTFE, etc., etc.
Now I may be mistaken on this, I know the whole email thing wasn't a big deal, but I recall a quote from Hillary Clinton saying that she got confused about which email to use and that she didn't know how to use the email was her defense against the claims at first. Despite whatever the actual explanation was. (If I understand correctly now it wasn't actually an unusual practice) Was I misled about her explaining the emails away by essentially saying they were too complicated for her? That's my biggest sticking point against her, that she supposedly pled innocent due to stupidity.
Ronald Reagan did the same shit in Iran/Contra. The only difference is he was more charming when he told that particular series of lies.
I don't believe it for a minute. Hillary is a lawyer, she was legally educated and is highly intelligent. IMO she knew the email server shit was illegal and a dodge against FOIA requests and other legal requirements, and chose to do it anyway.