Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - ToonyMan

Pages: 1 ... 140 141 [142] 143 144 ... 1978
2116
Mafia / Re: Traitors in the Fortress: Day 1 - The First Arguments
« on: May 03, 2022, 01:16:03 am »
I'm fine with dying if we can agree on a top hit alongside me. It would remove me as a suspect and we only instant lose if the other player is also town. This should prove I'm not the King at least. It also means I won't have to play in this game anymore.

2117
Mafia / Re: Traitors in the Fortress: Day 1 - The First Arguments
« on: May 02, 2022, 11:58:34 pm »
And yeah, it's the result of an Ability.
What the fuck.

I didn't sign up for an unknown rules bastard game.

Actually, thinking back, I'm confident enough in that to place a vote.
Knightwing
I agree.

Knightwing

Look at their Kill Webadict Now posts when they were the Webadict, it's really similar.

@Everyone: Who ELSE do you think is scum rather than whom you are voting?
IF NOT VOTING, WHY?
I don't know. I'm just going to agree with Roden and assume Webadict is town because they have an OP ability and not care about it.

I think Jack is a Rebel. Roden is probably a Rebel.

Jim is weird. Knightwing is suspicious. Max I don't know, big surprise.

2118
Mafia / Re: Traitors in the Fortress: Day 1 - The First Arguments
« on: May 02, 2022, 04:33:07 pm »
I have exactly no willpower to argue with Webadict spewing bullshit and I've ended up busy today so maybe tomorrow I'll feel like suffering.

2119
Mafia / Re: Traitors in the Fortress: Day 1 - The First Arguments
« on: May 02, 2022, 04:25:13 pm »
- One, you would assume, at worst, NAI on me using this ability. You would absolutely believe that I'd use this as Town, and you'd assume that I might use it even as scum.
I have no idea what you're talking about. Do you mean Tric allowing double lynches? Why is that alignment determinate?

I can understand the mod changing the rules mid-game, especially with Tric. But there's no one with abilities in this game.

2120
Mafia / Re: Traitors in the Fortress: Day 1 - The First Arguments
« on: May 02, 2022, 01:12:01 pm »
You're pinning me as the bad guy, again. This was sort of accurate last game, however I was also not the Distant Third. I feel like that's part of the reason my own King killed me.

I think I have good reason to vote you in this game. I think there's a good chance you're a Guard and know that Jack isn't the King which is why you eagerly voted them here. I believe a King!Webadict would be more hesitant with their vote as they don't want to vote off their own loyal minions. You don't get to put yourself above the law as this impenetrable wall of steel.

Since Tric thinks a dual lynch is totally fine now Webadict wants to vote off both me and Jack together, which I think has a high chance of straight up having the Traitors outnumber us for an instant loss.

I realize I'm voting someone I believe is a Guard and not a King, but the King is harder to find and a Guard still moves us towards winning.

2121
Mafia / Re: Traitors in the Fortress: Day 1 - The First Arguments
« on: May 02, 2022, 12:09:00 pm »
Two highest votes will be Lynched.
:o :o :o

2122
Mafia / Re: Traitors in the Fortress: Day 1 - The First Arguments
« on: May 02, 2022, 12:04:41 pm »
Webadict you're doing the same thing as the other game, when you were an opposing Guard to me. Except there are only one set of guards now.

Jack is probably a Rebel here and not a good vote, unless they're the King but that seems too easy here. They're posting with the energy that I've seen from town!Jack.

We can make a list of unlikely Guard/King pairings as players continue to vote.

Webadict

2123
Mafia / Re: Traitors in the Fortress: Day 1 - The First Arguments
« on: May 01, 2022, 07:53:08 pm »
The scum can't win just by tying, so even at 3v3 or other tie situations they still have to play for it, so while even one mislynch is bad the game doesn't immediately end for the town if that happens.
I see that a rule change has come into place. This is probably for the best in terms of fairness.

Dang. Why are we voting jack?
The real question is why aren't you voting Jack?

Oh wait I'm not either.

2124
Mafia / Re: Traitors in the Fortress: Day 1 - The First Arguments
« on: May 01, 2022, 01:56:49 pm »
So obviously the plan here is to figure out which two players don't want to vote their King.

The King will have as much knowledge as the Rebels so they'll have an easier time blending in than the Guards, but it should still be deducible.

With 7 players and THREE MAFIA that means we can't mislynch a single time or the traitors win. On the other hand there's a lot of mafia to hit and if we hit the King we just win on the spot. Also the Guards could very easily vote each other without knowing and commit some friendly fire. Same for the King voting their own Guards. Don't think I've ever seen that come up before but who can say.

2125
Mafia / Re: Traitors in the Fortress: Day 1 - The First Arguments
« on: May 01, 2022, 01:50:14 pm »
Three cheers to Jim the King!

Hip hip, hooray!

Hip hip, hooray!

Hip hip, hooray!

2126
Mafia / Re: Traitors in the Fortress: Sign-Ups Unlimited (6/7+)
« on: May 01, 2022, 10:37:05 am »
Okay. I'll join.

2127
Mafia / Re: Lords of Mafia - Game Over, Distant Third Victory!
« on: April 22, 2022, 09:06:21 am »
Right, it was a near always victory with how clearcut the two sides were.

2128
Mafia / Re: Lords of Mafia - Game Over, Distant Third Victory!
« on: April 22, 2022, 08:53:14 am »
Jack just to reiterate though: You shot Tric and NQT because you believed they were the two Candidates, right? You'd have to either kill two Candidates or two Supporters to win from that position. Shooting one Candidate and one Supporter is something you would be actively avoiding.

There's a distinction between winning and "winning".

I think I'm done complaining now so I'll be happy with how I played this game and try to improve not being....voted out by my own allies.

2129
Mafia / Re: Lords of Mafia - Game Over, Distant Third Victory!
« on: April 22, 2022, 08:37:20 am »
Tric, that post was to tell Jim that Jack was the DT.

By announcing who my Candidate was I wanted to signal to Jim that he could trust me AND to the other Supporter that I was on their side. I could tell immediately that Tric or Jack was the other Jim supporter and that Web/NQT/Max were the opposing team. Then I figured NQT was a Supporter and that Jack was the DT through LOGIC AND REASONING.

I only said Jim would have to be the DT if Jack wasn't because I knew and Jim knew that he wasn't DT. I don't see how we could have lost this game if we lynched Jack or Max on D2 and not me!

It might not have mattered still, since if we lynched Max then Jack would may have shot Jim with Tric. But it's still aggravating to see a bumble victory where they completely whiff and get rewarded for misreading both candidate IDs. Sorry Jack.

2130
Mafia / Re: Lords of Mafia - Game Over, Distant Third Victory!
« on: April 22, 2022, 08:25:10 am »
It really should be a draw when both Candidates are still alive as the DT completely whiffed both shots. I figured out the entire setup on D2 so I knew Jack would win when he made both those shots today which I think is lame.

I'm absolutely shocked Tric and Jim voted me on D2 and I think they deserve to lose with me after that though.

Pages: 1 ... 140 141 [142] 143 144 ... 1978