Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - ToonyMan

Pages: 1 ... 164 165 [166] 167 168 ... 1978
2476
Mafia / Re: Mostly Vanilla Mafia 3 (R5, Day 2): Cherished Spark Of Hope
« on: January 22, 2022, 05:17:34 pm »
@Jim:
Thanks for the reads. I'll write out my own D2 ones soon.

@Jack:
I have an idea.

What if we lynch Toaster and have you use that item on Webadict tonight? I think that might be optimal.

2477
Mafia / Re: Mostly Vanilla Mafia 3 (R5, Day 2): Cherished Spark Of Hope
« on: January 22, 2022, 03:08:28 pm »
@Webadict:
Because there's a much better conclusion here than this:
Here's my theory:

Toaster is some kind of Ascetic Roleblocker/Jail Keeper.
Web is possibly lying about being a motion detector.

Toaster roleblocks/jailkeeps Max.
Roden gets roleblocked by something Toaster has, like a strong passive.
Webadict either actually motion detected Jack or is lying and did something else in secret.
This one is actually really silly: The obvious conclusion is that I ROLEBLOCKED RODEN. I mean, it's literally so obvious that it doesn't seem like I'd have to point it out, but I do.
I had thought of that, but mafia having two roleblockers sounds unlikely to me so I put down what I felt was what most likely happened. I also think it's really unlikely there's multiple millers. I remember you even saying there might be three town millers with the third staying quiet. Why would you say this unless you're trying to clear Toaster? I can see that you're trying now, which might be because you are posting from a computer finally.

2478
Mafia / Re: Mostly Vanilla Mafia 3 (R5, Day 2): Cherished Spark Of Hope
« on: January 22, 2022, 03:03:54 pm »
@Magma:
Not sure how available I'll be on the weekends.
ToonyMan
I feel that his recent posts have been shallow. His points against web are things that look ostensibly scummy, but lack substance. For example, who cares if web bandwagoned onto NJW? He had already expressed suspicion there.
To me this sounds you like you already knew what you were going to say ahead of time.

@Max:
Actually, lynching Toaster would divide the field best (that is, if he's scum, scum is X, if he's town, scum is Y, where X and Y are specific sets of people), but lynching you is almost as good. I'm also down to lynch Magma but I think this is less likely to hit.
I'm fine with either. Toaster is a more likely hit mechanically so maybe that's logically better, but Webadict is pissing me off.

2479
Mafia / Re: Mostly Vanilla Mafia 3 (R5, Day 2): Cherished Spark Of Hope
« on: January 22, 2022, 12:49:10 pm »
I strongly suspect that webadict is town. His play doesn't make sense from a mafia perspective. I don't support any of the votes. The only way web can be scum here is if it's with Toaster, which... alright, but why would we lynch web first in that situation?
Who's Toaster most likely mafia with then, Jim?

2480
Mafia / Re: Mostly Vanilla Mafia 3 (R5, Day 2): Cherished Spark Of Hope
« on: January 22, 2022, 12:24:16 pm »
@Roden: Can you please explain the Toony/McMiner situation? And, do you think that Toaster's play has been scummy disregarding his role claim?
So, back in Totem Mafia, McMiner tried to claim that his role let him send someone a message and optionally kill them. He claimed to target Toony, who said he never got a message, but also didn't question the suggestion that McMiner had maybe been Roleblocked and just accepted it. Their interactions and the weird role claim were initially seen as too scummy to actually be scummy, but it turned out both of them were the mafia. Short answer is probably just Occam's Razor.

I don't think Toaster's play has been particularly scummy, and in fact the more I read his posts the more I feel myself being convinced that I possibly really was Roleblocked. My problem with that though is that the suspect pool is tiny and doesn't make sense. I'm also just not sure why anyone would try to fuck with my Inspect anyway. I'm already Unreliable as it is, and even if I wasn't Toaster supposedly would come up Null anyway, so what's the point? Why block me over someone like Toony or Jack, who have objectively stronger abilities?
Do you think Toaster is possibly more dangerous than Web here then?

2481
Mafia / Re: Mostly Vanilla Mafia 3 (R5, Day 2): Cherished Spark Of Hope
« on: January 22, 2022, 12:37:14 am »
Toastadict Case

1. Webadict
2. Toaster
3. NJW reads
4. What happened Night 1?
5. Conclusions

1. Webadict

#1851 - Webadict votes Magma without a reason.

#1863 - Webadict tells Toaster he doesn't believe this game would have two millers. He's laying suspicion on Toaster. He also agrees with my points on NJW (which were incorrect).

#1880 - Webadict confirms they voted Magma without giving a reason.

#1885 - Webadict changes their vote to myself right after Jack votes me. Writes off Jack as town. Decides to switch to me because Magma isn't posting and includes some minor reasons why they're voting this time. What I find important is the suddenness after Jack puts an arguably solid vote on me for voting NJW. It's wagon hop.

#1900 - Explains their vote on Magma now, it was simply "intuition" which is fine since it was basically RVS. Web's first vote on Magma is the most NAI.

#1910 - Web puts Toaster as their second highest town right under Jack. "No reason to claim Null Miller" and yet they voted NJW who had claimed miller. Why believe Toaster over NJW? They even admit themselves they read NJW's miller claim was super townie at the start of the game. He's contradicting himself to suspect NJW.

#1917 - Webadict goes into overdrive now. They switch back to Magma for their suspicious Fruit Vendor claim, which is fine since Magma really was lying. They then unvote again in a flurry of PPEs. Right after this Magma admits they were fakeclaiming and votes NJW for justifiable reasons.

#1923 - Webadict jumps on the NJW vote after Magma does and just says "fucking finally someone gets it". This is a pure wagon vote. I believe they did this to try to swing momentum off of Toaster since NJW's Toaster vote could have possibly swung that way instead, but Webadict also didn't want to vote NJW first so they did weird shit until someone - in this case Magma - voted NJW first. Then they pounced. Afterwards Jack and Jim joined in quick succession before Roden hammered.


2. Toaster

#1865 - Toaster banters with Webadict about being a "null miller". Throws a little shade towards Web as well. That's pretty much all I have for D1. With Toaster-Webadict.

Toaster wasn't able to post for D1 end, which is understandable I can't argue that I almost didn't get my own post out. In general they didn't post much on D1.

#1954 - Start of D2, Toaster puts out his end of D1 post he couldn't post with their D1 reads. Webadict is their only town read. They attack me and Max the most. It's this point where I post that I'm confident that mafia team is Toaster/Webadict. They also like Web, Jack, and Jim's votes on NJW the most even though I think they're the most bandwagon-y. Magma had the best vote on NJW there, but Magma gets rated as badly as my pseudo-vote.

From here Web and Toaster have been pushing for me and Max for D2.

Jumping ahead to new stuff...

#2012 - Toaster posts another readslist, this time with Webadict in the middle. This likely isn't in response to Jack voting Web since that had just happened. They also have actual town reads now with Jack, Roden, and Magma. I think this is Toaster overcompensating for the end of D1 reads. Maybe Web told him to drop him down after seeing how today has progressed.


3. NJW's readslist

#1887 - NJW's scumreads were Toaster, Webadict, and Roden. I think the Roden read was bad, but I think his points on Web and Toast are good.


4. What happened Night 1?

Here's my theory:

Toaster is some kind of Ascetic Roleblocker/Jail Keeper.
Web is possibly lying about being a motion detector.

Toaster roleblocks/jailkeeps Max.
Roden gets roleblocked by something Toaster has, like a strong passive.
Webadict either actually motion detected Jack or is lying and did something else in secret.


5. Conclusions

I have more reasons to suspect Webadict, although part of that is that Toaster hasn't been as active. However, Toaster is mechanically more suspicious. My brain follows my heart so I will be voting Webadict as he is more suspect and it's more likely Webadict is playing Toaster and not the other way around.


PPE:
@Jack:
@Toonyman: Are you SURE you don't want me to say what I got? It would help me figure out how to use it...
No. It's better this way.

2482
Mafia / Re: Mostly Vanilla Mafia 3 (R5, Day 2): Cherished Spark Of Hope
« on: January 21, 2022, 11:24:10 pm »
Well I've got some time now while I reinstall Windows.

First some responses to new posts...

@Toaster:
So you are proposing that Scum!Toaster and friend decided to- in a nine player game- skip the kill N1 in order to frame a townie D2?  This gets them a easy lynch in exchange for... heat on Scum!Me all the rest of the game and then a probably no lynch later on to give the town an extra day avoiding MYLO?  All this above option B: just kill someone?  Is there a gain for this theoretical scum team that I'm just not seeing?  It seems like an awfully bad trade for no real reason.
It makes sense if mafia couldn't kill last night or have a nonstandard kill.

And finally, you consider this likely over the possibility that Maximum Spin tried to kill someone and got blocked by me?
It's possible, but I read Max as town. He was my second choice for giving an item over Jack I would say.


@Webadict:
If I'm to say anything here, it's that Toaster's role is literally too suspicious to be scum, and while that's the stupidest thing I've ever said, I'm all in on that stupid fucking idea.
What does this even mean

Or at least, Toaster's definitely not lying. Maybe he's scum. It just seems too stupid for him to be scum.
Why is Toaster definitely not lying?

2483
Mafia / Re: Mostly Vanilla Mafia 3 (R5, Day 2): Cherished Spark Of Hope
« on: January 21, 2022, 10:38:37 pm »
I'm home now, but my computer is having issues booting so I'm trying to deal with that. I'll try to work on my big case post tonight after I fix this issue.

Here's what I wrote during N1:
Spoiler: N1 notes (click to show/hide)

2484
Mafia / Re: Mostly Vanilla Mafia 3 (R5, Day 2): Cherished Spark Of Hope
« on: January 21, 2022, 02:02:29 pm »
@Webadict:
Those who ignore history are doomed to repeat it. Look at what happened to Max on D2 of Round 3. The game also where you were basically mafia with me. Max is an easy target and you know this.

@Jack:
I can't believe I'm still seeing that 2009 nickname term.

2485
Mafia / Re: Mostly Vanilla Mafia 3 (R5, Day 2): Cherished Spark Of Hope
« on: January 21, 2022, 12:58:41 pm »
I'm pretty confident that Toaster and Webadict are mafia. I can give detailed reasoning when I'm at a computer. For now, in short Web has been trying to lead bandwagons and get the heat off Toaster. This nokill is a frame job. Toaster is framing Max while also protecting Web.

I also wrote notes during N1 but they're at home and I won't be there for awhile today. I will post them when I can.

2486
Mafia / Re: Mostly Vanilla Mafia 3 (R5, Day 2): Cherished Spark Of Hope
« on: January 21, 2022, 06:51:46 am »
PFP

I gave an item to Jack, please confirm but don't say what it is though.

2487
Uuuh I can remove these posts if that was hammer

2488
I'm cool with executing NJW since I originally suspected them anyway and that hasn't gone away. Count my vote on them although I'll refrain from actually voting to allow anyone still on max time to post.

I feel better about Jim. I still think Max and Roden are town. Personally I think Jim comes off as apathetic as mafia, so not only is his claim high roll, but tonally he reads like he's into the game and not trying to sideline.

Jack seems better too honestly. I don't see the point of them trying like this at day end if they're mafia. I think it would be difficult for mafia!Jack to try to be solving genuinely here which is what I'm seeing here. Lots of solving going on.

I feel very dumb for believing Magma's fakeclaim, however I disagree with Jim that you cannot use other player's behavior to gauge someone, but maybe I'm too big brain.

It looks like Webadict is fully phone posting this game based on the terrible typos, this might explain their inability to build a presence? They've at least town cleared people now although I don't feel great about agreeing with their own vote choice.

PPE:
@Jack:
I can't agree to hammer sorry. Maybe if every player was here and we has a general consensus, but not in this situation. Consider my vote on NJW though for most of the reasons I've said this day.

2489
Damn sorry, I accidentally fell asleep but it looks like I woke up before day end. I can at least respond to new posts before day end it looks like.

2490
Oh right, Roden exists. I'm not okay with Roden either. NJW always has the one bad read every game.

Pages: 1 ... 164 165 [166] 167 168 ... 1978