Unless you're scum. The reason is that I decided at the start of the game to go on random.org and set it to 1 to 18. I kept clicking it until the same number came up twice. It was 6, Sir Josh is 6. I voted him immediately and said we must lynch him in the loudest voice possible. The results were typical, I was voted for "over-reacting" when in fact I was finding if Sir Josh was scum.
Here was his first reaction to my posts:
God was that debacle with ToonyMan aggravating to read twice. Toon, DON'T gibber up the thread with nonsense logic and math! It's one thing to scumhunt, and it's another to go out of your way to attract attention to yourself. It clouds up the thread, and makes it easier for scum to hide. I won't be as forgiving of it as WA and Nuke are.
First of all, NUKE and webadict never voted me. Not once. Second, you completely avoid my question by putting all the blame on me IMMEDIATELY. You didn't even defend yourself. You clouded up YOURSELF by posting this. Nobody gave a second glance on you. I don't think anybody has voted for you after mine, have they? Hmmmmm.
Then this:
You know Toon, you might want to take the game seriously every now and then, or people will just refuse to ever listen to you.
Your making my judgment invalid, which in turn makes you look innocent and me guilty. SIR JOSH IS SCUM.
This is when I say......
ZVARRI!