Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - ToonyMan

Pages: 1 ... 190 191 [192] 193 194 ... 1978
2866
Mafia / Re: Mostly Vanilla Mafia 3 (R4, Day 1): Illuminating Lantern
« on: November 08, 2021, 10:14:59 pm »
I believe the Vote Count is as such:

Quote
ToonyMan (1): Roden
Roden (0):
TricMagic (2): Webadict, ToonyMan
EuchreJack (0):
NJW2000 (1): EuchreJack
Vector (0):
webadict (2): TricMagic, NJW2000
Maximum Spin (0):

No Execution (0):
Not Voting (2): Vector, Maximum Spin
5 to hammer.

Which means it will tie currently unless I vote Web.

I've looked at everybody's votes:

Roden has been sitting with a vote on me.
Web placed a vote on Tric and has left it there.
I placed a vote on NJW and then moved it to Tric.
Jack has sat on their NJW vote.
Tric has jumped around everywhere from Roden to me to Web I think.
NJW has been pursuing Webadict.
Vector and Max aren't voting I believe, come on guys.

2867
Mafia / Re: Mostly Vanilla Mafia 3 (R4, Day 1): Illuminating Lantern
« on: November 08, 2021, 09:39:13 pm »
I will break a tie by voting you Web if I have to, yes. I would prefer Tric or NJW though.

Day ends in about...4 hours and 20 minutes? I won't be online for that so I'll have to leave a final vote before going to bed.

2868
Mafia / Re: Mostly Vanilla Mafia 3 (R4, Day 1): Illuminating Lantern
« on: November 08, 2021, 09:17:59 pm »
Some actions by Tric I still don't understand/can't interpret:

1. When I picked at Tric for voting Roden, they unvoted Roden and backed off.
2. When Tric voted me for voting them, I told them that Webadict was likely mafia if they were town and he switched to Webadict instead.

I am tempted to vote Webadict before day end if they continue to ignore me.

2869
Mafia / Re: Mostly Vanilla Mafia 3 (R4, Day 1): Illuminating Lantern
« on: November 08, 2021, 09:11:05 pm »
I don't understand why NJW and Jack both townread Vector.
I've explained my reasoning already, Toony, come on. The post about poison means I don't want to lynch them D1, because I don't think scum would lie about that or immediately give up that information. I haven't yet seen any strong reason to believe they're scum. Ergo, they're in the town section of my readslist.

I mean, if they don't post anything else before the end of the day, that's a different matter. I'm assuming that we're going to see more than ten sentences from them though. Unsure how I'd respond to someone just not really turning up.

Why are you so caught up on this? Is there something I'm not putting clearly?
Because you placed Vector as a solid town, only under Jack. Vector has done very little this day, which is not alignment indicative since they've done the exact same thing as town and mafia on D1. If you check my reads of Vector on D1 of every round I always find them null or suspicious, this has not changed at all although I have realized more this is just how Vector plays. I find it extremely odd how strongly you think Vector is town because of a simple poison claim, especially since you don't find many players town at all in this game.


And no, scumhunting you is not lazy. I wouldn't choose to deal with your nonsense if I were scum, I'd be "reluctantly" voting Tric for having posted a weak case, or trying to get Max out on a policy lynch, or voting Roden because it's just what's expected of me. Absolutely anything less frustrating than reading your prose.
See, this is odd. You "reluctantly" voted Jack last round on Day 1 because me and Roden both voted him for reasons you didn't really understand, but respected my opinion against Jack even though I was mafia and lying out my ass to get Jack lynched since it fit my meta. And so you voted Jack.

But now Tric is off the table? Why? I believe my reasoning of their mental state is accurate because they're mafia. And this time I actually mean it unlike last round.

2870
Mafia / Re: Mostly Vanilla Mafia 3 (R4, Day 1): Illuminating Lantern
« on: November 08, 2021, 04:31:35 pm »
While that is true, right now is not the right time to claim. For this role anyway.
That's hardly stopped you with any role that shouldn't claim. Such as a Knight in Supernatural 10 which blew my mind during that game.

I claimed last round since you were also a type of cop, but you note I didn't say I was 1-shot and could inspect two.
Sure, but I was absolutely going to kill you on N2 (my scumlog has the evidence of this) since I was under the impression you would not have gotten anything useful during N1. Shame on me for not expecting a ridiculously powerful N1 ability. You were a powerful cop either way and marked yourself for death by claiming.

2871
Mafia / Re: Mostly Vanilla Mafia 3 (R4, Day 1): Illuminating Lantern
« on: November 08, 2021, 04:27:52 pm »
While that is true, right now is not the right time to claim. For this role anyway. I claimed last round since you were also a type of cop, but you note I didn't say I was 1-shot and could inspect two.

Also, why mention that? Don't Mafia know about it now? Are you the one who poisons?
I am not. And Vector won't answer my questions. :(

Toonyman, what constitutes "death-related" for you?
Things that involve death, such as someone dying or being dead.

2872
Mafia / Re: Mostly Vanilla Mafia 3 (R4, Day 1): Illuminating Lantern
« on: November 08, 2021, 03:49:49 pm »
@Tric:
Is your role death related? Because mine is, as I hinted at when I responded to Roden here.

You can just give me a yes or no answer.

2873
Mafia / Re: Mostly Vanilla Mafia 3 (R4, Day 1): Illuminating Lantern
« on: November 08, 2021, 03:41:46 pm »
My reasoning will become clear tomorrow. So long as I don't end up delayed anyway. Lynch me then if you want.
That's great and all Tric, but even as an extremely powerful cop last round that should not have claimed under normal circumstances, you still claimed within the first 10 posts of Day 1. See my point? You did not have inherent protection or even the knowledge of others that could protect you at that point, but yet you still revealed yourself because you felt it was what you should do as town.

2874
Mafia / Re: Mostly Vanilla Mafia 3 (R4, Day 1): Illuminating Lantern
« on: November 08, 2021, 03:15:18 pm »
@Tric:
Why are you holding onto your role so hard? It's not very like you.

@Jack:
If I'm reading this right your top townread is Vector? Are you serious? Why?

@Toony
Why do you want to know so badly?

I don't care what you are Tric, what's important is figuring out the reasons behind your behavior.



I admit it's a bit unnerving that Web and Jack both have the same top two scum picks as me. Web refuses to interact with me which is annoying. I don't understand why NJW and Jack both townread Vector.

2875
Mafia / Re: Mostly Vanilla Mafia 3 (R4, Day 1): Illuminating Lantern
« on: November 08, 2021, 01:56:00 pm »
@Tric:
Why are you holding onto your role so hard? It's not very like you.

@Jack:
If I'm reading this right your top townread is Vector? Are you serious? Why?

2876
Mafia / Re: Mostly Vanilla Mafia 3 (R4, Day 1): Illuminating Lantern
« on: November 08, 2021, 12:55:23 pm »
Jack is that list ordered from highest to lowest?

2877
Mafia / Re: Mostly Vanilla Mafia 3 (R4, Day 1): Illuminating Lantern
« on: November 08, 2021, 12:54:01 pm »
Jack has a readslist?

*checks back*

Oh shit I guess he does. I didn't even realize since it's just summarizing half of the players without saying if they think they're town or not, what gives Jack?

2878
Mafia / Re: Mostly Vanilla Mafia 3 (R4, Day 1): Illuminating Lantern
« on: November 08, 2021, 10:39:09 am »
There's a good chance Webadict is mafia if you're town Tric, so you'll need to be more convincing than OMGUS potshots.

For example, your reason for voting me is a misunderstanding. That post about nullreads was directed towards NJW, not you.

2879
Mafia / Re: Mostly Vanilla Mafia 3 (R4, Day 1): Illuminating Lantern
« on: November 08, 2021, 09:53:36 am »
@NJW:
I have no idea why you're town reading Vector. I'm unable to distinguish their play today from any other round. You must be really good at reading Vector, foolish, or mafia.

As for your lynch preferences, why is Max an okay nullread lynch but not nullread Tric?

2880
Mafia / Re: Mostly Vanilla Mafia 3 (R4, Day 1): Illuminating Lantern
« on: November 08, 2021, 09:42:17 am »
Tric, as town in R1 and R3 you always claimed quite readily at the start of Day 1. As mafia in Round 2 you were vague and reluctant until Vector pushed you later in the day. This is the same as R2.

In addition, you voted Roden for claiming early and readily, despite the fact this is something you do as town and should feel some sort of sympathy towards that kind of play. I fakeclaimed Gunsmith at the start of R3 and you were completely taken in and felt I was likely town because of it, where's that now Tric?

Lastly, you were mafia partners with Roden in R2 so you should possibly have a better feel for their mafia play while a game is ongoing. You're in a better position than most of us to read into Roden's D1 claim, which by the way they've done in the D1 of every round and is not alignment indicative at best from my point of view.

It seems you dropped the Roden case at least and are targeting me and NJW. Are you trying to bus NJW here? That's also in your meta...

Pages: 1 ... 190 191 [192] 193 194 ... 1978