Bay 12 Games Forum

Alternatively, each player could be given the ability to extend the game by 24 hours once, encouraging players to save their extend for when they really need it.

Ooo making the extension mechanic even more part of the game.  I like.

@Imp:
I'll be repeating Jim here but if you want to lynch NQT why aren't you voting him?  Why are you staying on Max?

---

I'm being particularly wary of NQT because of his position, but I think he's probably town.  There's just that unfortunate possibility that Caz and him are in cahoots.  Otherwise (this is how I felt at the beginning of Day 2) I'm pretty confident there would not be two cult priests in a game and NQT's res was successful, as he claims (though I don't think he claimed exactly so until recently...?).  Hold your suspicions in moderation.

---

In any case, I think I'm going to switch my vote to Persus.  Seer is a powerful role and can't see why he would lie, it's true.  I mainly had my vote towards Max because Imp backed up Persus, but that's about it.  There could easily be some form of manipulation and I do not like this feeling.  Max's actions after inspecting NQT make sense too.

Meanwhile there was no mafia-kill N1 (if we assume Persus' attacker was a hunter) which means could it be that Persus is scum knight?  This is my conclusion anyway.  It feels more right.

If Max survives we can use his Seer ability which is much more useful than a Knight, and because I feel at this point that redirections are playing a factor here it's basically a 50/50 split on either one, and possibly neither are even guilty, but if this were true at least we can make use of Max's ability.

Right, yes that makes a lot of sense. In that case I know it was definitely me. Those incense and candles in the temple of death didn't light themselves.

But aren't we just taking your word for it?  I know Max has a benign reading on you, but I am very worried you'll become "confirmed town" if we lynch Perseus instead and they flip scum...although that means you really are town or Max is lying for some reason....

PFP more to come...might be better to lynch Persus..hrrmmm...

PFP

@NQT:

(I'm a town priest, I rezzed Nerjin as town, a scum priest couldn't do this: unless I've misunderstood how this works, Nerjin would have ended up either cult or 3rd party if resurrected by Caz, right?)

Liar, scum priest can fail a resurrect and bring them back as town.

Evidence proof conviction.

Well, I might turn out to be mistaken on this point (but my knowledge of the inner-workings of Meph isn't an indicator of my alignment).

Ohoho, but using misinformation to make your alignment more town is okay?

---

I think Imp is probably town.  I don't know why NQT is trying to do a lynch on Persus now so I'm going to avoid doing that.

At least it'll be impossible for an illusionist to claim now without instantly being suspected.

PFP
Toony~

Quote from: ToonyMan on November 10, 2013, 01:02:07 pm

@Tiruin:

Quote from: Tiruin on November 08, 2013, 01:23:05 am

ToonyMan: Read back on Caz. Report back. What is your read. What has been your read on me and him.
Why or how couldn't you relate what you just said earlier. Like, in my post here.

Yeah yeah, I see now.  Caz accusing you of vote-hopping wasn't true (which is scummy).  However your reaction to their vote and how you're reacting now screams THEY'RE WRONG THEY'RE WRONG I MUST PROVE THEY'RE WRONG TO SURVIVE which I find pretty desperate.

What do you do when you see someone attempting, or in the least, erring when addressing you and seemingly provoking you passive-aggressively? Meaning: Denouncing you and your work?

Ignore it probably?  If they aren't actually attacking me then why do I care?  I could just use that as leverage to vote them with my own attack.

You? You scream scum in the same way as Caz is doing here. Trivial error, which you denounce without addressing my posts toward you as a whole.
'Omg I see nao! But your reaction!'
Really? Is what my perceived reaction of great importance to you that you miss the trigger of the action-or may I say, whether or not the person holding said reaction was acting out a pressure attack? Because a pressurized attack was what I was mostly leaning on at the time. Do note, since you read back, that I was never truly sure.

I admitted that I was wrong and Caz was lying, and look, he's scum!  I just sort of feel your defense to prove that you definitely aren't reacting and totally shouldn't be voted is odd.  The fact you're almost forcing me to even respond to this list is telling enough, but I generally find you town with the Caz thing and also:

So I went and took out my blade and flourished it with a nice speech. See the results? I bet you do.
However, the bolded portion up there. I never had the intent of 'IF YOU'RE WRONG THEN I HIT YOU TO SURVIVE'. I don't practically care if I die or not, as my use is pretty much. . .ah, let's say, some sort of passivity in this lot of people. Survival is the least of my concerns, sir, and if you're looking more onto that notion, then I have due right to suspect you.
Mostly for quite everything you've said to me thus far has been lacking. Desperation? Quite a superficial note to focus on, too.

You keep dropping hints that you're a damn Hunter!  I get it, a Hunter can't be cult either so you are totally not scum and shouldn't die.  But your little implications and hints are annoying, because if you really are the Hunter you're lighting yourself like a match (and also lying to the town).

Could you explain your thought process in detail about this? I know that exams pretty much suck up your thinking and/or sleep deprivation affects judgement (null), but WHEN you do post, I would LOVE to see a concise explanation from you.

Thought process on WHAT?  Voting you??  I'm already done with this, I have no intentions to vote somebody right now who was right about Caz and is likely our fucking hunter.

Because you're my #2. Right after Caz.

I see you haven't placed your vote.

---

Quote from: ToonyMan on November 15, 2013, 10:19:12 pm

Wait a second...now that I think about it.  Why wouldn't Caz res Nerjin on Night 1?  It would be perfect.
MOD:
How do stacked resurrects work?  I think you mentioned you flip a coin but I don't remember.

Perfect how?

Imagine your scum team has a priest, town lynches one of their own on Day 1.  If you res them and it succeeds then that's another partner to your cause, if you fail and they're still the same alignment, town has to waste a day debating whether to lynch them again or not (if they do lynch him then they wasted a lynch and if they don't he can always have suspicion drawn to him as "the resurrected guy" especially after we lynched an actual scum priest).  Why wouldn't Caz use their resurrect on Night 1?

Could NQT res Nerjin on N1 if he were a vampire lord though?  Who res'd Nerjin?  If we take his word that he's a priest then either:

1.  He's really a town priest and got a successful res of Nerjin.
2.  He's a cult priest (one of which has already died) and managed to get a failure res of Nerjin, which would now be somehow working in his favor.  I don't buy it.

Unless NQT isn't actually a priest at all (which means Caz would be his buddy and was the true player that res'd Nerjin (and failed)) I can't believe it.

If Caz really is NQT's buddy then they pulled one hell of an act.