May 9, 2024: The May '24 Report is up.
News: April 23, 2024: Dwarf Fortress 50.13 has been released.
News: February 4, 2021: Dwarf Fortress Talk #28 has been posted.
News: November 21, 2018: A new Threetoe story has been posted.
Forum Guidelines
I finally... FINALLY got around to finishing Apollo Justice. I gotta say, that story was enthralling, but that ending was really weak.Play Ace Attorney Investigations and you'll be done with every official game in English right now.
TOO WEAK!
It occurs to me that of the four living people that aren't me or Irony, three are traitors, assuming no heir. As such, I'm trusting my own view and gut more.Thanks for the precaution words. So firing blindly is superior to actually using game mechanics to help us?
I continue to fail to understand your argument beyond that Tiruin as a Swordsmaster should have less hit points, which is bullshit.Swordsmen/master can attack twice and also overpower the Prince in case they're the last two left (the Prince would hopefully have more hp at that point and win otherwise), there you go. I could add how he's been acting since my attack and Dariush's comment last turn before dying and aaaaall the things I've constantly been explaining but wait I just did. Mind you this is a rerere-rehash of what I've been saying this turn so honestly I'm staring at the gun on my table at this point.
Toony:Uuuh I have no idea what you're trying to argue anymore.But you said "we're" in direct response to a question regarding why you were waiting for Deathsword's flip. If that wasn't what you were getting at, where did it come from at all?Ergo, your only possibly motive for "waiting on Deathsword's flip" was to see if it was time to strike yet. Am I missing anything?I said "we're", not "I am". As I mentioned before I wanted to know how "we're doing" as in the situation. You also framed your last sentence with the loyal guards and traitors to be favorable to your argument when it is in fact incorrect. I don't want that to happen, people might not find that understandable which is clear because I had to actually explain it per request.
How is it overblown? You attacking someone isn't a trivial action just because the player can defend themselves.*Slants head lazily over newest lines of text*
Why should I? Why are you interested whether I will defend myself or not? If I did one or the other, can you explain your state of reasoning?
So you attack me on grounds of what Meph said over anything else?No. That is contemporary evidence. It was a toss-up between Toaster and you because of your danger to the Prince at this point and you happened to ask what I was planning on doing in a bit anyway (unless something else ended up happening and I went with my secondary thought). IronyOwl should see the benefit in at least lowering both of your health.
ToonyMan: Just let me remind you that I've warned you once about poor explanations and leaving context to be inferred by others - not explaining but waiting for others to ask, in other words.How is this not understood to you? I'll clear up anything you don't understand. You only seem to be rejecting me myself right now, not what I'm saying.
Next, what are your reads on people and what are you doing to work on them.Okay:
Lastly, your only suspicion of me was technical details. Care to tell me why I was chosen for your assault over Toaster?Already have champ. Thanks for the questions.
And in addition to that, tell me if anything you said here influences your decision, Toony.The Loyals? I even said them right before in the same sentence you bolded. I feel like you're grasping at straws here for not really any particular reason besides being defensive scum. I will say I did not read this small paragraph of mine since this turn started (until now), so I would say the influence is a bit weak because it wasn't on my mind at all. I don't really see how it's even relevant to my logic.Who is this 'we', along with whatever your reply would be.Uh, traitor guards would outnumber loyal guards 2 to 1? It would be reaching the point where the traitors could come out and win the ensuing battles with high probability. Four traitors 2 loyals and the prince. Unless the loyals had better roles we'd most likely lose right then. The only saving grace we would have is if one or more of the traitors decided to stay "loyal" which would be pretty stupid.Well, two loyal flips would have been extremely worrisome. I meant the situation in the second quote, not the flip which you seem to be inferring incorrectly.And how would 'worrisome' flip influence your play, scum?
In the event that only two people are left (Prince and Traitor or Conniving Heir), a Swordsman or Swordsmaster will win. Otherwise, the Prince wins only if he has more health than the other player.This may not end up happening, but preventing a lose due to auto-winning of traitor Swordsman/Swordsmaster is also favorable.
Are you blind, or do you read 'enforce' as 'ATTACK ME BECAUSE I'M YOUR SUSPECT!' other than trying to prove it by word, Sir Aggression?Somebody's scared.
Your words are as blind as your leads.
That's the same idea I gave Caz shit over earlier- trying to scumhunt by role, not by actions.I don't remember it being this specific though.
Also, you've conveniently named everyone but Leafsnail and yourself.It's almost like I'm not a swordsman and I haven't seen Leafsnail double attack plus he's here.
Your opinion matters, but it won't do any good unless you try to enforce them. It is amusing though (Jim is busy IRL. Midterms. MIDTERMS! THEY ARE A TERROR UPON OUR LANDS! SMITE THEM! THEY HAVE MATH!), but why kill Jim, explicitly?Because...Jim's not here? I said in my prior post! I can only make it more explicit by voicing these lines and linking them through Tindeck or something.
Also, why is the chance of attacking more, more dangerous than defending more, if I may ask you?Traitors want to kill the Prince, guess what that involves.
Toony: That doesn't answer my question. D2 your first post you attacked Dariush, no questions asked. D3 you have five posts where you go back and forth with him and others, and it takes you to day end to attack him. That's a very noticeable difference- why?Oh, I wanted to give Dariush a chance today (this prevents tunneling) and it saves my attack for if anybody else posts something that sets my alarm bells off. Turn 3 has definitely been the quietest turn so far though, we could chalk that up to less people alive but everybody hasn't even attacked while previous turns had much larger turnouts (I think turn 1 was everybody but the Prince, turn 2 is about that as well). And it's worth saying converts don't exist Toaster.
Ergo, your only possibly motive for "waiting on Deathsword's flip" was to see if it was time to strike yet. Am I missing anything?I said "we're", not "I am". As I mentioned before I wanted to know how "we're doing" as in the situation. You also framed your last sentence with the loyal guards and traitors to be favorable to your argument when it is in fact incorrect. I don't want that to happen, people might not find that understandable which is clear because I had to actually explain it per request.
Toony: Why do you want the Prince to show his prowess? Meaning, why do you want to see him attack or defend?Because the game will die if nobody dies, quite fitting. Since IronyOwl is actually around it would be good to see him attack and he didn't respond to it, but I had a good post earlier (the bottom statements).
Toony: Why the sudden change in gameplay? What's changed to make Dariush not instantly attackable?I was going to do it last night, but I never had the chance to *cough Halloween cough*.
I slice Dariush with my sword and hit Dariush again with my pommel!I will add my attack Dariush to make sure he stays dead.
To stop this madness.
I'm sad that for my internals, there's a very small window of actual tiredness that actually allows me to go to sleep, and if I miss it? Fuck you, you're tossing and turning for the next four hours or more, maybe you won't be able to sleep at all!I've been feeling pretty general terribleness lately I guess. I've been having really bad dry scalp which makes going to sleep impossible unless I rinse my hair beforehand and damp the hell out of my pillow. We've been having a very severe lack of food in the house too. I don't have a job so I shouldn't complain but how much toast (because we get the whitest god damn bread we can find to fend off hunger ever other day) and re-heated pasta can a man eat? Good thing tomorrow is November 1st! But no...food stamp groceries only last about a week before we go back to slug mode to conserve energy.
Cut me some fucking slack here body, goddamnit, this is making me miserable.
