First, unvote Jim.
Smells like bullshit to me.
Ask bad RVS question => Claim mysterious motives => Don't explain when asked
Perfect justification for a vote!
Have fun, ToonyMan.
That's your excuse for not being able to shake me, you have the most votes right now for a reason.
I think Jim's justified in calling it bullshit here. Toony, are you suggesting... hell, I can't even think of what you could be suggesting. Jim identified two players as generally noobish and one player as a common lurker, ergo he's scum? Do you have any justification for your vote that makes sense? At all?
Yeah I do. Town Jim would have did something different. Can you prove that otherwise Think?
Can you prove that Town Jim would have done something different? Burden of proof is on you here, Toony, and you're not living up to it.
ToonyMan, I want some justification as to why this is even evidence. How does this response prove he is scum? Why is this supposedly different from what Town Jim would do? How do you even know what Jim is thinking?
What I'm asking is that how do you know Jim is so adamantly town? I feel town Jim would have did something different, however he responded in a way that is scummy to me. That is what my vote is for. You are being very scummy Think.
That's your excuse for not being able to shake me, you have the most votes right now for a reason.
Are you serious?
Me having votes is a reason for a vote? And two votes from the RVS, even?
That's dumb. Duuuuuuuumb. Dummmmmmmmmmbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb. Completely unjustifiable.
This sounds suspiciously similar to the kinds of arguments and justifications for your votes during Day 2, before everything had to be rebooted.
That was a reaction statement, in which you passed with flying colors, scum Jim.
