Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Andir

Pages: 1 ... 168 169 [170] 171 172 ... 210
2536
General Discussion / Re: Atheists
« on: May 01, 2009, 04:16:53 pm »
I use The Constitution of the United States of America because that's where I live, and those are the laws I follow.  It's not about morality.  It's about working with your fellow man.  A person's morality is judged by the law for the greater good.  This is an important interpretation if you are to understand where I stand on this issue.  No religious (or perceived) right shall ever override another man's rights.  Period.

The freedom to walk is opposed my the limitation that one cannot obstruct the walking of others. The freedom to murder is opposed by the limitation that murders cannot be opposed. Introducing subtlety complicates matters, but this is most likely true.
There is no freedom to walk, but walking into someone else could be construed as assault, in which point there are rules about "right of way" that have to be considered.

Lesser forms of freedom exist, where one community possesses freedoms over another. Such as with slaves, who, while the property of others,
Slavery is the violation of the Right to live.  It is also illegal as stated in the Thirteenth amendment, though I think the Constitution and Bill of Rights themselves make the Thirteenth redundant.  The Constitution is a document of the people.  All people living under it, not just slave owners and the Bill of Rights grants all people who abide by the Constitution the right to be free people.

[RE: Nazi Germany] ...who had no rights as enforced by legal and military power.
I don't live in Nazi Germany, nor do I follow their laws.  It is however, illegal to be forced to harbor or support military personnel in the States.

And also those who have more money than others, who, while generally constrained by local laws, can still one will to be more limited than another.
I live in a Federalist Republic.  A person's wealth does not obtain them more rights than another.  "All men are created equal..." as Jefferson stated in The Declaration of Independence.  (Of course he to go and discredit the phrase as he denied equality to others...but that's another conversation.)

And of course there are humans and non-humans, however that is defined at the time, be it in the form of the treatment of animals, which even today is worse than anything done to humans. Or in inequality of races, or the complete disregard for the rights of plants, fungi, or anything else that humans cannot see familiarity in. And of course the utter disregard shared by almost all humans for the dignity of inanimate objects.
I'm discussing human rights.  If cows want their own laws and country, they are free to form them.

And 100% freedom is impossible, even at the cost of the freedoms of all others. No monarch can feed their people only because they choose to and no religious leader can ascend into the sky simple by the force of their will.
I'm talking about freedoms of life and living.  Beyond that "realist" scope is purely religious preference and non-evidential possibility.

But yes, 100% freedom is impossible.  That's why we have laws granting you your freedom up to said points.  In order for humans to work together in harmony, they have to respect all other human's rights and allow for their rights to end where the other person's begins.  That's the key.  You're right to preach your belief ends at another human's right to be ignorant of your belief.  We all voluntarily accept this to live within the protection of it.  And yes, limitation of another person's right to infringe on your rights is all the protection you really need.

2537
General Discussion / Re: A Slightly Different Religion Thread
« on: April 30, 2009, 09:18:42 pm »
A curious thought I just had;

Have any of you ever thought that maybe gods are humans that have ascended into the divine, that they broke free of the bonds of humanity and became something more?
Nope.

2538
General Discussion / Re: Atheists
« on: April 30, 2009, 09:08:45 pm »
You said that yes, but you are ignoring the fact that in many cases, rights do overlap. I gave you the example that forbiding someone to preach might and can very well infring their first amendment, because preaching is a central part of their religion. So why would, in said case, the annoyance of one make it so that someone else is forbidden from following their religion?

(In case you didn't notice, I am playing the devils advocate now, mainly to see how well you can define "infringement" untill we need to get into specifick cases)
I'm not ignoring anything.  You can have religion, you can gather, you can preach with other same religion believers... walking up to someone else on the street and handing them a pamphlet, knocking on their door, or invading their daily life with your religion would be illegal.  If someone decided to seek out your religion, they may feel free, and upon that time you may converse with them about it.

2539
General Discussion / Re: Atheists
« on: April 30, 2009, 08:48:47 pm »
because our rights overlap on many occasions.
My personal opinion on this is that you have right up until those right infringe on another's rights.  You have the right to religion as long as it doesn't infringe on another person's right to their religion.  This means that door to door preaching, missionary work, and such marketing is illegal.  Your freedom to carry a weapon extends right up to the point of removing someone else's freedom of life and mobility...  overlaps in freedom would not be allowed.  Once your freedom infringes on another person's freedom, you are breaking the law.

2540
General Discussion / Re: Atheists
« on: April 30, 2009, 08:37:42 pm »
In short, there are no absolute rights in the constitution; there are always conditions.  And if I feel violated by another's attempts to convert me, be them atheist or Catholic or Muslim, then they are violating my first amendment, denying their first amendment rights in that situation because I was just minding my own business and telling people that I would prefer they didn't mind mine, and they were bothering me.
You also have the right to walk away, but you haven't.  This tells me that you are the type of religious person that fights fervently with Atheists...

2541
General Discussion / Re: Atheists
« on: April 30, 2009, 08:34:47 pm »
Basically, all I've been trying to say is that you shouldn't give a shit what other people believe as long as it A) does not actively cause obvious harm as a direct result of the teachings of the religion, and B) they aren't actively trying to make you believe what they believe.

Some seem to hold issue with the idea of neutrality towards beliefs of others.

Andir, stop being a dick.  Death is the end.  There's no coming back from it.  If you did, then you were not really dead.  Just closer to it than most people get without dying.
My heart was stopped and I had no brain functionality.  How much more dead do you want?

Also, you keep telling everyone to stop trying to make everyone believe what they believe, but you want Atheists to accept your belief and believe that it's valid.  It's would be a violation of everything they believe.  If an Atheist accepts that someone else believes in "God" then they are defying their own belief to do so.  They would have to accept that religion has purpose when Atheism is pretty much anti-religion.

2542
General Discussion / Re: Atheists
« on: April 30, 2009, 08:14:52 pm »
Go die and come back. THEN you have something to say.
I have died actually.  I was revived shortly after.
Quote
What makes it real to you?
Religion is a personal understanding and balance. He makes it real. Leave it as such and quite violating things.
It was a simple question.  The fact that you are seeing some sort of "violation" in it is interesting.

2543
General Discussion / Re: Atheists
« on: April 30, 2009, 08:01:46 pm »
Lego... some questions:  (If you haven't left... and I know you haven't since you are reading this... I wonder how I would know that?)

How is it that you feel "God" is real?  What makes it real to you?

2544
General Discussion / Re: Atheists
« on: April 30, 2009, 07:50:46 pm »
AS I HAVE SAID DOZENS OF TIMES ALREADY!!
Yes, you have... but you keep coming back to twist every post into that.  Are you afraid that the person that originated the thread would be trying to explore the possibility?  Maybe other readers?  Why do you fear it so much that you'd continue to re-iterate it so many times?

2545
General Discussion / Re: A Slightly Different Religion Thread
« on: April 30, 2009, 07:44:50 pm »
I was raised as a Southern Baptist, changed over to agnostic, and after a series of very revealing dreams and meditation sessions, I came to where I am now. I believe that divinity would reveal itself to you if it wanted to be known, and it revealed itself to me.

Now it could be a product of my subconscious, but I'm led to believe otherwise.
Self Reevaluation. This isn't an attack on you. This is my personal feeling towards this believing. It blaming the victim. You haven't done X enough and that why you aren't enlightened. And blaming the victim is just bad.

Wait, what? Who's the victim here? Who's blaming? Done X? Could you please elaborate?
Probably that divinity is the goal to obtain.  Anything less than divinity is not enlightened.  That's how I read your post.  As if anyone that doesn't find divinity is somehow inferior.  (Intentional or not)

2546
General Discussion / Re: Atheists
« on: April 30, 2009, 07:36:50 pm »
since you are an atheist, just leave people to their religion.
Says the person posting in a thread titled "Atheists" in which one person was inquiring about Atheists... and not religious people... ;)

Who's the one not letting people have their beliefs?

2547
DF General Discussion / Re: What turns you off about DF?
« on: April 30, 2009, 05:12:28 pm »
Also, I have no idea how a new player is supposed to know what "Flux" is.

Heck I can't even identify Flux at all as it is.
Flux is that gooey stuff you use when you solder...

2548
General Discussion / Re: Atheists
« on: April 30, 2009, 05:02:08 pm »
Ever heard of the Zodiac?  No, not the thing made out of stars in the sky.  The serial killer.  Atheist.  Believed that he would become the master of all those he killed when he died.  If I'm not mistaken, he never got more detailed about it than that.
Not much of an Atheist if he believed that. ::)

And no, I don't buy that Atheism is limited solely to non-belief in "God" per say.  I consider it a non-belief in intangibles or a person who holds to evidential facts.

2549
General Discussion / Re: Atheists
« on: April 30, 2009, 04:59:38 pm »
Sure, God could pop up next to you and do some magic and prove he exists (assuming he does), but would you believe in him?  Probably not.
If "God" wanted to prove that it exists, and it created us, it would know exactly how to prove it.

An idea (making sure that you don't mistake it as a single idea behind it) behind God is that you believe, not that you know.
That you believe means that you ignore explanation.

Now let's look at this hypothetical situation.  You are driving down the road.  A man is standing in the road up ahead, and so you stop.  He runs up to you, you roll down your windshield and you ask what's wrong.  He says that he had been lost in the woods during a hiking trip, had either lost or used up all his supplies and belongings, and had only just now found the road and was in desperate need of help.  He says he is very wealthy and will reward you when you get back to the city.
Why does wealth matter?  If he needs help there are multiple solutions:
1.  Let him in your car.  Take him to town.
2.  Tell him to wait here, you'll get help (or call for help if you have a phone on you...)
3.  Drive right on by in the first place.

I'd likely call.  If I didn't have a phone, I'd ask him to wait while I got help.  If it was a female or an elder, I'd likely give them a ride.  You weigh every situation different.  Saying that an Atheist or a religious person would do something specific is stereotyping.

You have no evidence either denying this or supporting this.  Sure, you have his story, and his clothes are ragged, as though he had been lost for quite sometime, but he could have roughed himself up just to get you to let your guard down, you may think.  Others may not; they may accept his story and help him out.  Now, see, the ones who, lacking any evidence and deny his story, completely rejecting any possibility that he may be telling the truth, those are the atheists that try too hard to prove religious people wrong.  Those who don't think for a second that he may be lying, those are religious people trying too hard to convert others to their religion.  People who would carefully consider his story and try to come up with a solution that would have little possibility of anyone dying or getting ripped off, those are the people in between, who can either be atheist or religious, and they are the good people.  They are the people who accept the fact that, since they have no solid evidence, they may be wrong.
An Atheist (in your situation) could find a solution to help the person without believing in them.  I think you are trying to hard to make Atheists out to be evil people.  You don't have to believe in someone or something to be a good person.  You could say that any truly nutty religious person would be more apt to leave him by the road because he's a heathen and is being punished.

Then someone blindfolds you and puts you in a random spot.  They tell you that if you step forward, you will go to paradise (which you don't really know), or you could step back and remain in the hellish world.  You don't know that stepping forward would actually be better.  Believing in religion is hoping that it might, which some people find comforting, and which you shouldn't say they are wrong for, whether or not they actually end up being right in the end.  Because you don't know, and you can't know.
For one thing... that wouldn't really happen seeing that there is no evidence of teleports, wormholes, or whatever transport mechanism is being used to make you take a step into paradise.  Most likely I'd see what was in front of me and behind me before I was blindfolded.  You say I was moved then?  Did I get moved into position from behind or was I pushed back into place?  This stuff matters if you want me to answer what I would do.  Trust and faith are different things.  Personally, I'd test both waters.  I'd probably put a foot forward and see what happened.  Maybe reach out to see if it "felt" like paradise.  If I felt nothing, I'd reach back and see if it "felt" like a bad place.  Just because I'm blindfolded doesn't mean I don't have other senses.  I wouldn't immediately jump forward trusting some stranger and I wouldn't jump back just to spite.  I'd probably drop to the floor and feel around.  I'd find a way to prove that one way was better without sight.  I'm very much a realist.  I require proof that something exists.  I do not assume that something does because someone tells me it does.

This is the point of the pink unicorn.  A religious person will believe what a person tells them, even more so if multiple people tell them.

There have been people who go into crime solely because they don't believe there will be any retribution by an omnipotent power after they die.
There are religious people who go into crime thinking they can be absolved of all crime by begging forgiveness.  What's your point?

2550
However, once I have multi-layer tiles coded in, it would be quite reasonable to divide the texture catalog into one texture per layer.

Assuming there's no hard limit on the number of layers, that sounds good to me.

I hope you manage some solution to my problem.  From a modding perspective, it's never fun to hit hard limits, especially when they weren't there before.
In computers there's always a hard limit...

Pages: 1 ... 168 169 [170] 171 172 ... 210