Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Gorjo MacGrymm

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 12 ... 61
136
Life Advice / Re: Don't you love min-maxing dice rolls?
« on: April 14, 2011, 02:12:23 pm »
I read it as one attack over 3 "rounds" for a 33% chance status effect vs. 3 attacks (one in each round) over 3 rounds with each brings an 11% chacne of a status effect.  My question is, do three attacks themselves give more effect than a single status effect?  IS the status effect the end goal or simple an additional possbility?  I think you would have to modify this to determine what the effect of a single attack alone would be against what target.

Ex.  I have an attack that does 1-8 dam, target has 16 HP.  Considering that each attack could do upwards of 50% health of my target, I would rather have the attacks over the status effect.

Ex2.  I have an attack that does 1-8 dam, target has 200 HP.  I would be shooting for status effect percentage because my attacks themselves have become meaningless.

Ex3.  None of the OP or my examples also takes into considersation successfully attacking/hitting in the first place to get the status effect.


note:  I may be missing the point here, which is to create an algorithm.  If so,  bleh, sorry.

137
Also, the republicans have succesfully added, what, 5 billion dollars to the budget in the form of Pentagon spending as a requirement for passing the budget?

Nice job cutting stuff, assholes.
[CITATION NEEDED]

138
Life Advice / Re: Don't you love min-maxing dice rolls?
« on: April 14, 2011, 02:04:25 pm »
Wouldnt you first have to determine if the status effect is more advantageous than the three attacks themselves?

139
General Discussion / Re: Pakistan to CIA: Hit the road, Jack
« on: April 14, 2011, 02:00:56 pm »
I see a lot of disinformation here from some people who only skimmed over some wikipedia documents, failed to read that the subjects were "opinions" and then finalized their bias by not reasearching any further and then claiming their point of view to be fact and inarguable.  Well done.  Your right, arguing with said people about their beliefs IS a waste of time.

Back on topic, 2 more missiles strikes yesterday and now the pakistan's are really pissed.  Pakistan is caught between its need for US aid and funding, its divided loyalties between the east and the west half of its own country, and its bitter rival India who is just growing more powerful by the day.  The situation is as screwed up as any. (taking bets on how long till the usual suspects level blame on their favorite target.....)

Is there a solution out of this mess that doesnt involve even more bloodshed, conflict and acts of extreme selfish national interest (yours, ours, theirs, everyones, etc)?  Somehow I doubt it.

140
DF Dwarf Mode Discussion / Re: Surface mining
« on: April 13, 2011, 12:04:56 am »
I always do this, I level mountians, carve multi tower modern like cities skylines out of mountains.  I like to dig a reverse hollow tower going down.  If I have a tall volcanoe, I will strip mine it flat and leave a gigantic smokestack for my truly Armokian Forges.  Sometimes I just do it to the sides of mountains to create a giant (50+z level) flat cliff.  Or I did into the face that way to create a bunch of asain rice paddy farms, complete with water.  Or I make truly Armokian Olympic pools this way.

strip mining is run.  The up ramp is your friend, unless there is a tree above you.

141
General Discussion / Re: Pakistan to CIA: Hit the road, Jack
« on: April 12, 2011, 11:51:47 pm »
I am actually surprised it took this long.  They have been complaining about the drone strikes since the first ones hit (2007?ish ithink).  Pakistan immediately told the US to stop doing it but we didnt.  I have been wondering when it was finally going to hit the fan.

142
Fey Mood:

your companion has started acting odd, mumbling and drawing on scraps of paper about something he/she calls "The Great Device".  Choose a companion.  He/she takes 3 of your items and creates something new.  Discard old items and draw 3 new.  Companion is now legendary +1.

143
General Discussion / Re: Women In The Infantry
« on: April 10, 2011, 11:57:06 pm »
Believe me, on patrol bases, it's a big deal to have to deal with specific female shower times and tents.
I dealth with those issues 20 years ago in the military.  Whats changed?

144
General Discussion / Re: Women In The Infantry
« on: April 10, 2011, 11:51:56 pm »
I'd be a bit surprised if it didn't happen AT LEAST within the next two generations.

Anymore then that and I'd go "What the heck Military!?!"
Well, in defense of the military, they are extremely conservative.  If it currently works, dont screw with it until it doesnt, just incase what you screw with breaks it.  Thats the military mindset so many people seem have a problem with.  But its not personal or sexist or immoral or racist, etc, its just that military screw ups tend to be rather, well, fatal and no one wants to be left holding the "good intentions" bag when their units get wiped out.

As far as timeline, considering how long it took african americans to be assimilated into regualr units, I would say 3 generations is about right.


As far as logistics, most modern militaries allready has women serving side by side with men.  Combat troops make up a small part of the whole miltary apparatus.  Combat support is huge.  There have been logistics for women in place for decades now that are just standard part and parcel of life in the military.  I dont think moving women into combat roles will effect logictics much at all.

Now we must devise a way of determining which men and women would serve with honor and respect for one another, and which would end up doing crap like those officers. And it must include magma.
Its called the UCMJ

145
Alright Gorjo, nice people always feel fake to me, maybe you are for real, but I can not tell. Generally I would rather have your first and raw thoughts then some dolled up stuff that you think I will like better.

Anyway what I am trying to say is you need to man up figuratively here.

When you vote someone into office and they do not preform to your specifications, don't vote them in again sure, but don't go and say they are not your fault. These people are not hijacking the tea party, they are the tea party.

lol, ok, vitriole and rancor from here on out!

I agree that I/you/we/us are stuck with our own voting choices.  But, also, plenty of republicans who were most likely getting elected anyway tried to jump onto the bandwagon and proclaim themselves tea partiers.  Some Probably a lot of people got fooled.  They realized these guys are full of crap.  They realized these guys have no intention of following the tea party ideals.  Also, plenty of republicans who weren't up for re-election tried to claim tea party status but then every action they take shows their duplicitous.  This is easy to see when they use tea party fiscal conservatism to attack things they attack anyway, like the EPA and abortion.  I call that hijacking. 

The voters can only put the ship out to sea so-to-speak, its the politicians who "hijack" it and take it where they want until it returns to port.  Then the voters get a chance to kick their corrupt asses out and try again with the same original goal. So, having said that, I can now agree that the party is more a movement that a true "party" and that the movement was used by dishonest politicians (yeah , redundant, i know) to get elected who then turned on the principles they once claimed (lol - see "politician" in the dictionary).  But they didnt realize the tea party is willing to hold their asses to the fire and boot them out next cycle.  I can only hope the party retains its momentum to do so.

So fucking there dammit!  /sarc



146
General Discussion / Re: Women In The Infantry
« on: April 10, 2011, 11:21:37 pm »
Wouldn't smaller also be good in the sense that they are smaller targets?

Also one trouble with accepting female infantry is the fact that the current batch of infantry are trained in such as way that isn't conducive to that relationship. (Also before you ask... Yes I support Female Infantry. I am just wondering about that)
Not sure I agree with that.  Nothing specific, but I cant see how training needs to be modified.

You can train men to kill, but you can't train them to neglect women.

What do you call the behavior of the commanding officers in those rape cases?

If that isn't neglecting women, I never want to know what is.
Neglect and abuse are two different things.

Neglect: to pay no attention or too little attention to; disregard or slight
Abuse: to treat in a harmful, injurious, or offensive way

So while neglect is a form of abuse, abuse is not a form of neglect. What those officers did was abuse and NOW I'M THINKING ABOUT IT AGAIN RAGE.

However, it is very much possible to train soldiers to ignore the more.... interesting parts of a lady, and to respect her as a person. I am pretty much living proof of that.
Some men and women serve with Honor, some dont.  Its a sad fact of humanity.

147
General Discussion / Re: Women In The Infantry
« on: April 10, 2011, 11:17:21 pm »
The military isn't as strong as it should be in general. Men need to lift weights much more and women can't lift weights near as successfully as men. Being able to run far distances isn't fitness.
Are you saying that because I can only bench press 60 pounds, I am unfit? Because I have and will again run upwards of 20 miles at a stretch. I know at least one woman that has as well. Can you do that? How about running fast? Can you run a quarter of a mile in less than a minute? Because I can do that. I know of at least one woman that has done that. This isn't a large sample, either.

There are outliers for women just as there are for men. There are some women that are strong enough to carry a 100 pound pack wherever they want. There are some men (such as myself) that would die trying.
Well Barbarosssa, combat effective isnt just bench press, speed, or flexibility, its a combination of all of those plus more.  Its not designed to make anyone feel bad in anyway, converesly, its the most honest.  Its simple the result of studying what makes effective soldiers after 5000+ years of combat history to draw from.  Like I said before, what the job takes to succeed is what the job takes to succeed.  Military enemies tend to be very unforgiving in combat.

148
Spoiler (click to show/hide)
edit: fixed terrible formatting

149
General Discussion / Re: Women In The Infantry
« on: April 10, 2011, 10:47:14 pm »


Gorjo: No. The most sniper kills is easily by Simmo. He had multiple hundreds.
So did the women I have been thinking off.  Been so long since I have seen the documentary on her tho.  Your probably right.

ninjd by Urist,  ok  Its Simo Hayha.  And no, it had nothing to do with your post Urist.

150
still trying top stay on topic.
Spoiler (click to show/hide)

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 12 ... 61