136
Life Advice / Re: Don't you love min-maxing dice rolls?
« on: April 14, 2011, 02:12:23 pm »
I read it as one attack over 3 "rounds" for a 33% chance status effect vs. 3 attacks (one in each round) over 3 rounds with each brings an 11% chacne of a status effect. My question is, do three attacks themselves give more effect than a single status effect? IS the status effect the end goal or simple an additional possbility? I think you would have to modify this to determine what the effect of a single attack alone would be against what target.
Ex. I have an attack that does 1-8 dam, target has 16 HP. Considering that each attack could do upwards of 50% health of my target, I would rather have the attacks over the status effect.
Ex2. I have an attack that does 1-8 dam, target has 200 HP. I would be shooting for status effect percentage because my attacks themselves have become meaningless.
Ex3. None of the OP or my examples also takes into considersation successfully attacking/hitting in the first place to get the status effect.
note: I may be missing the point here, which is to create an algorithm. If so, bleh, sorry.
Ex. I have an attack that does 1-8 dam, target has 16 HP. Considering that each attack could do upwards of 50% health of my target, I would rather have the attacks over the status effect.
Ex2. I have an attack that does 1-8 dam, target has 200 HP. I would be shooting for status effect percentage because my attacks themselves have become meaningless.
Ex3. None of the OP or my examples also takes into considersation successfully attacking/hitting in the first place to get the status effect.
note: I may be missing the point here, which is to create an algorithm. If so, bleh, sorry.