9922
« on: September 14, 2008, 01:04:01 pm »
I'm totally going to catch flak for this, but I'm going to have to play devil's advocate with regards to the premise here.
I've noticed a lot of democratic suggestion threads, and honestly, I think people put too much faith into the idea.
I mean, I get the point of checking out what kinds of suggestions people want the most. But I don't think it's necessarily going to result in the best possible suggestions, for a few potential reasons (some of which I'm probably wrong about, and some actual reasons I probably haven't considered).
For one, the more cool-sounding/trendy suggestions can snowball votes pretty easily.
Secondly, the people who play a game aren't necessarily people who develop games, and don't necessarily know how to best implement a change or fix a problem. This includes me! So you end up with suggestions that are too specific, or too broad, people tend not to take feasibility into account, or whatever.
Also, there's the basic fact that popularity doesn't necessitate quality or anything like th at.
I don't even think I'm actually trying to argue against suggestion voting. I just think it can only be taken to a certain level of relevance/seriousness. At least it can give an idea of what people want.