I'm really concerned about
NJW2000's shifty attitude regarding that Page. I can be wrong, sure. I could have been wrong about web, I'm town. But I read deep anti-town focus, and it concerns and bugs me.
I'm glad for NJW to have more time to discuss, explain, and ease those concerns. But he's a very low poster, most of his town-cred with me came from possible very pro town with secrets play -
Read me in Max's Supernormal for how I treat shifty town, how I treated nqt in that game. I left him totally alone, defended him, and he kept doing pro-town stuff, even with low posts.
I 100% was and kinda still am prepared to give NJW the same benefit and acceptance. Do townie stuff, earn townie rewards. He was extremely high on my town list, and lost it all with a set of scummy things D2, match by 'that doesn't look great in combo D1 either' and matched by my weak read of the NJW/web interactions D1. I'm not good at reading player/player yet. But dang, the set of choices regarding second wincon handling, the multiple conflicting claims about ideas how to handle the Page and the apple, I wish I had more meta understanding of NJW, maybe I go read a few games, probably a good idea.
I would love for NJW to actually be pro-town. I was confident of this until I saw the waffling and the wincon stuff, that wincon claim feels deeply false to me. Nothing else NJW has said feels like a lie - that does. Especially the later part of the claim, the reasons for why to say it here and now. That feels deeply fake to me. Does not feel like the rest of NJW's communication style. The Page handling stuff feels like manipulation/scum trying to shift for better options 'you don't really mean you think I'm gonna hold this, no no and you let that apple go too'.
Maybe that can get cleared up. But based on all I've read from the very low-posting NJW, it's actually quite anti-town in drive and intent.
I kinda think we have more to discuss, in particular what else Max should do if we do remove NJW. That's the Page - if he has it and didn't give it to someone hiding it, and I think he's an anti-town who wants to take us all out. So if no page, do we remove kills? I kinda think this should maybe be discussed.
I hope we do what is likely to hurt anti-town the most, if we can figure that out.
If we can't figure that out ... I dunno. Looking over the spheres I don't have a suggestion other than kill. I personally don't want to be changed much if at all, and kill won't affect me (maybe affect that gun, that's fine with me). Is anyone unhappy with some part of their role and wants something else to do, until they change again in some crazy way? This game seems to have a lot of ways to change things.
At this point, I think I can say that if anyone other than Max is voted, then I'll shoot Toony.
Well, if NJW is elim and flips scum, my sus of Toony increases, but isn't sure. Hope we have more time before the hammer for everyone to talk and think.
If we elim Max, then kills don't go away. So I don't think if we elim anyone else BUT Max that you can actually complete that kill unless Max agrees it's the right call.
Even if NJW flips scum, I'm still not sure about Toony. I can see Toony being innocent even there. NJW's lie-feel about the second wincon stuff is my main actual sus of Toony, + low level of involvement D2. Everyone who fought to save web shows some signs of that.
Happy talking everyone!