Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Servant Corps

Pages: 1 ... 275 276 [277] 278 279 ... 285
4141
Creative Projects / Re: Creation of a DF Browser Based game?
« on: November 01, 2008, 10:27:14 am »
The good news is that I know how to create a real MMORPG, with PHP. And not the one with "Imagnation Tech". :P

Just a simple turn-based strategy game, similar to that of Earth 2010 (or if you are not familar with that, Utopia). It uses the Frost and Flame engine, based on the ever-popular Promisance engine. You play as a warband and fight against other warbands for land and glory.

The bad news is that I was planning on making such an MMORPG for the simple goal of making money, and I had a pre-made idea for it. The only thing that prevents me from actually making such an MMORPG is web hosting. If you can get me that, I could make two MMORPGs, one for "Drawf Fortress", and another one for my own Pet Project where players travel through time and fight in World War 2, World War 3, and World War 4.

The terrible news, of course, is that I doubt any of you have commerical web hosting. :P
****
Other engines that I am familar with are:
--Dragon Knight: Play as an adventuerer and fight NPCs for glory. (There is also a 'land mod' that allows you to own your own kingdom, but it may take some time to work, and it's best to assume I don't know how to use it)
--Multiplayer Educational Game Engine: Play as an Empire, and try to make the most money possible. To do so, you must either invade other Empires for money or try to run your government effectively by answering "Issues".

4142
You know, Hitler never actually killed any competitors until after he got elected to Mayorship.

Instead, kill or intimidate all the competitors' friends. The rest of the drawves will fall into line.

4143
General Discussion / Re: Orson Scott Card's take on recent politics
« on: October 31, 2008, 05:39:44 pm »
While I do not want to discuss anymore about this topic, I do want to talk about trolls.

A troll is a fishing techinque that is use to catch fish by "baiting" them. It has since been adapted to online use to mean someone who makes a post in order to receive a desired response, negative or postive. It can be people stating, "GO DIE IN A FIRE YOU TROLL! DIE DIE DIE!" or, in the case of 'fluff trolls' (who pose as women in forums where nerds frequent) "Woo-hoo, Ms. Troll, can I marry you?" The point is, you made a post to receive a response. You are manlipuating your readers.

I don't see any evidence OSC wanted people to send him death threats, call him a right-wing hack, or give him hugs and kisses. Therefore, he is not a troll.

4144
Forum Games and Roleplaying / Re: Album cover generation game
« on: October 31, 2008, 12:13:22 pm »
Ugh. I must be bad at pattern detection, because ALL of them look random. Especially the utterly Not Safe For Work Picture of mikefictious.

4145
General Discussion / Re: Orson Scott Card's take on recent politics
« on: October 31, 2008, 07:37:01 am »
Quote
OSC's right wing hack status is entirely reasonable to point out because several people, yourself included, appear to be taking his views as reasonable.

1) They're political views. Opinons. Beliefs. Whatever. I don't think I prefer to state which ones are reasonable and which ones are not because that's just ad homien. I may have my own personal views on what beliefs are 'valid' and 'reasonable', but I don't utter them because they're my own political views, which may also be unreasonable by your standards...while I may view your own views as unreasonable.

Yes, he's right-wing. He's a hack? Prove it by showing me his works are terrible.

2) I've read other rants that are similar to his rant. And I've seen much more crazier people, maniac. Forgive me if I display a level of tolerance.

Quote
The opinions in question reveal nothing except an ignorance about the issues and ideologically guided blindness to any person familiar with the issue, regardless of political leanings.

Um...

Listen, the reason I'm not desiring to read this rant at all is because it's a rant. It's ugly, it's horrifying, it's a big old wall of text. That's why I'm not reading it.

He could be ranting about the heroism of drawves and I still wouldn't like it. Ranting is ugly and despiciable. It's basically a sign of impotence, that all you can do is just whine.

If OSC decided, you know, to NOT rant, and wrote his opinons out neatly and consciely, maybe I would read it, and maybe later, I'd determine if his opinons fit your beliefs about OSC having an "ideologically guided blindness to any person familiar with the issue".

But I think lots of people are ideologically guided blindness, and it is especially to those 'familiar with the issues'...because how else are they familar other than checking up on the ideological resources and framing his knowledge based on the same ideologically blindness.

Basically, I don't want to call anybody an idiot behind their backs. OSC may be a hack, but he is a hack based on his WORKS, not based on his ideology.

Quote
When he starts putting those views into books (take Lost Boys for instance), then I don't enjoy those books, and hence, don't read them more than once. 

Amen. No writer should promote his ideology within a book.

Quote
Assume for a moment that you're pro-choice.  If you buy his coffee, you're giving him money.  Suppose he then makes campaign donations in support of pro-life politicians.

And then...what? Those pro-life politicans wold run for office anyway if they didn't get his donations. Those pro-life politicans would still get the same votes they always have been due to demographics.

And we need to know how MUCH money is being donated to the pro-life politicans that was taken out of my coffee. If $0.01 of the price of your coffee is being donated to pro-life politicans, well...

And what's the alternative? Buy only coffee from pro-choice activists, even if they happen to be low-quality junk? Do tons of research to ensure that everyone believes in exactly your view on pro-lifeness? You have to stop worrying about ideology.

EDIT: Anyway, erm. This thread raised a little bit too much emotion within me concerning the idea of freedom of speech. I'm just going to step away from this thread for a long while.

4146
Forum Games and Roleplaying / Re: Evolution Lite - A Supplementary Game
« on: October 30, 2008, 08:21:14 pm »
Quote
Hell, Switzerland only managed to stay out of Germany's march because his generals felt it would take less time and cost less men and material to assault the Soviet Union.

According to the History Channel, it was also because Switzerland was assisting Germany secretly too (all I could remember was having Germany store money within money). But that's another story for another time.

Quote
What fun is it to live in a world where we hold each others hand and sing "Kumbaya" while rocking back and forth around a campfire?

Pretty fun actually. Why else would millions die in real life in the hope that one day, their future generations will sing "Kumbaya"?

...Alright, alright, I'm going to want to spoil something.

Yes, this is a game. And yes, the goal is fun. But there is also the need to have some strategtic elements too, and that includes engaging in skilled diplomacy. After all, the gimmick of your race is the fact that your race wanted to use non-violence in order to persuade other races to willingly enslave themselves. Well. Erm. Said gimmick was kinda forgotten.

Sure, you may decide to take up an villianous species, and yes, that's great. But don't be suprised if other people decide to use that against you to further their own interests. Other people are also playing a game.

Think of it as the difference between "Risk" and "Chess". Some people like conquering the world with huge armies. Others like coming up with subtle moves and counter-moves to try and flank out their foes. Some people have fun not through conquest, but through international politics.

Take this motto to heart: Stay Alert. Trust No One. Keep your laser handy.

Quote
I'm thinking instead of burning (I'm not a fire-god, after all) perhaps tieing/chaining the unbelievers to a lightning-bolt shaped obelisk (or wood carving, or whatever) and letting them die from exposure would be a Madric approved sacrifice/punishment.

Throw them in a damp lake, and then have Madric throw a lighting bolt on the lake so as to give the heatens a little treatment of 'shock and awe'.

Unless, of course, Madric doesn't approve of such sacrifice, and see it as an evil reactionary practice. Then no need to throw them in said lake. Of course.

4147
General Discussion / Re: Orson Scott Card's take on recent politics
« on: October 30, 2008, 04:40:18 pm »
Well, it appeared that most of the criticism was directed at OSC because of his political views, mostly that he's a "right-wing hack".

OSC lives in a free country and can write whatever he so desires, but I don't think it is his editorals that gave him good old cash. It's his books and his sci-fi novels that made OSC what he is today, and I think that more attention should be paid towards the quality of the novels (or lack thereof) rather than his political editorals. His editorals are going to be forgotten...but it's his books that will remain behind.

4148
General Discussion / Re: Orson Scott Card's take on recent politics
« on: October 30, 2008, 04:34:24 pm »
So OSC has a big ego. I usually assume that's the norm for sci-fi writers though (with maybe the exception of Vonnegut).

How should that affect a person's view?

4149
General Discussion / Re: Orson Scott Card's take on recent politics
« on: October 30, 2008, 04:32:12 pm »
Dude. This guy is a sci-fi writer. He write sci-fi books. That's it.

Do we suddenly inquire in the political beliefs of Toady One, and start panicking and flaming if Today One believes strangely? Do we suddenly get angry when our shoe-shiner states that he's a Communist battling against Capitalistic Oppression? Must you boycott buying American-made toys because you are against the evil Labor Unions who lean Democratic?

We shouldn't care what people's personal political beliefs are! We should only care of how they assist your welfare. If Bob wants to sell me lemonade, I'd buy that lemonade and thank him for it, regardless of if Bob is a Republican, Democrat, Libertarian, etc.

...Oh, topic? Yeah.

Mr. Card's Republican rant is nice, because I share his political views. I dislike many of his books though, so his political ideologies isn't going to affect my low esteem of him. :)

4150
Forum Games and Roleplaying / Re: Evolution Lite - A Supplementary Game
« on: October 30, 2008, 04:26:27 pm »
Quote
What if an Entity kills you?

Pretty sure that's impossible. You can kill avatars, but there is no possible way to kill an Entity that I know of.

Quote
Problem? I think not. We are clearly the superior race. The PPT is actually run by undercover Xenocon. Little do they know that ever step takes them closer to us. All they care about is the ethical treatment of classes. What do they care of other sentient beings? They are foreigners, are they not?

The PPT do in fact believe that all sentient species should live together in harmony, free from capitalistic fat cats and other oppressive forces. The problem is that I am not sure any Xenopross has met up with any sentient species yet, but that is what I did type up in the description of the PPT.

4151
Forum Games and Roleplaying / Re: Evolution Lite - A Supplementary Game
« on: October 30, 2008, 03:14:25 pm »
Quote
As a general request, can we post our chosen actions as simple summaries alongside the RP stuff please?  I sort of had to guess a bit at the PPT actions (rolled for those now, though).

Oh. Oops. Sorry Iituem.

And, oh dear, Azqiuar asked for a repost of his results for Turn 1. And I accidently lost the cache of his very own results. Iituem may have lost his repost, so I'll...erm...retype them.
Summary:
--You successfuly forced some apes to colonize, but the apes were too dumb to colonize correctly, so they died off.
--You convinced several apes to try out new food, by pretending to be a scorpoin and entering into their dreams. They didn't like the new food though, and hence turned away from you. (You lost 2 Points in...er...something.)

4152
Forum Games and Roleplaying / Re: Evolution Lite - A Supplementary Game
« on: October 29, 2008, 08:22:01 pm »
Quote
By destroying all other life in the universe.

I don't count that as victory. It's impossible because since we are animals, we need to eat other animals or plants in order to live. And besides, securing a galactic empire isn't really going to do well, an race can grow too big to be easily controlled.

Spoiler: Madric (click to show/hide)

4153
Forum Games and Roleplaying / Re: Evolution Lite - A Supplementary Game
« on: October 29, 2008, 03:50:07 pm »
Spoiler: For Endren (click to show/hide)

4154
Forum Games and Roleplaying / Re: Evolution Lite - A Supplementary Game
« on: October 23, 2008, 12:26:33 am »
Quote
A Xenocon wrote this?

No, no, just someone who descended from them. "The Ten Hunderth Changing of the Glorious Xenopross Intergalactial Emperor" should clue you in on his bias.

4155
Forum Games and Roleplaying / Re: Evolution Lite - A Supplementary Game
« on: October 22, 2008, 06:35:59 pm »
I'll try editing in an RP post and later on think of actions.


All actions typed.

EDIT: Oh, and Wimania and Alcoveria are both fish species, keeping within the style of Xenopross names (altough I did entertain the idea of the PPT eventually fading out the the use of fish names). Both those fish species are extinct, so that may be a reason why you never hear of them.

EDIT2: Just realized that Salmon Blue-Stripe claimed to be Madric, so hm. I'm going to need to edit the background to deal with that new information. But Salmon Blue-Strip is dead, so Alcoveria can still claim to worship him, I guess. Let me think about it.

Pages: 1 ... 275 276 [277] 278 279 ... 285