Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Antioch

Pages: 1 ... 81 82 [83] 84 85 ... 98
1231
General Discussion / Re: Atheism Vs. Religion
« on: July 18, 2010, 09:51:42 am »

I would, but that encourages stagnation. I'd like to see the debate be a lot more... honest, though. As in, actually trying to understand your opponent's point of view, rather than just destroy it.

I come back to one of the things the book that converted me said- it had a chapter talking about the course of a person's spiritual development, through four stages. Stage 1 is Criminal- you follow no rules, have no spiritual awareness, and think only of yourself. Stage 2 is rules-based- you start to follow the rules of the society you belong to, and believe that doing so makes you good (or godly, as the case may be). Stage 2 people may do a lot of good in the world, or a lot of bad, depending on which "rules" they most follow. Stage 3 is Explorative where people begin to most think for themselves, and question/abandon the rules they followed in stage 2- in our society, most atheists would be stage 3. Stage 4 is Mystic, where people start to find answers to some of the more difficult questions from stage 3, and understand the reasons behind the rules of stage 2; one of the big points of stage 4 (at least in my view) is a subjective rather than objective understanding of truth. For me, stage 4 means theism, but that's the product of the path I walked through life- I could certainly recognize a sufficiently sophisticated atheist as stage 4, and not doubt the legitimacy of his own path.

The problem with religious debates is that stage 2 people think all stage 3ers are in stage 1, and stage 3 people think stage 4 is the same as stage 2. And, beyond that, everyone is trying to force objective understanding on the people that disagree with them, which fails miserably. You get arguments of the form "This is why you're wrong so stop being silly and come be like me" not "Here's an idea you might find interesting, see where it leads you."

You don't support this statement with either fact or argument, you just "say it is so". I also find it rather odd that you make a statement about how people in the other "stages" you mentioned all seem to have an incorrect view of things, while you still place yourself on top of everything.

1232
Other Games / Re: The 2010 Crawl Tournament Bay12 thread!
« on: July 18, 2010, 04:24:33 am »
unfortunatly no tiles means a no for me :(

1233
Other Games / Re: Worst Games You've Ever Played?
« on: July 17, 2010, 05:00:51 pm »
Doom 3,I was expecting to have an awesome all new doom 2 with a new engine and stuff in it and I get a poorly slapped together piece of shit.It sucks more than elfs.
blasphemy, that game was the greatest gift from my uncle for a 10 year old, i had nightmares for weeks and love playing the game during the dark and with surround sound.

i think the worst game i've ever played was Tonic Trouble, worst Rayman knockoff on the n64 EVER.

what? that game was great, despite beeing a knockoff. It wasn't really taking itself serious anyway.

1234
Other Games / Re: Monopoly
« on: July 17, 2010, 09:23:32 am »
In chocolate monopoly just buy all the houses and eat them. If there are no houses available to buy your opponents are kind of screwed. In normal monopoly you actually have to use the houses but same theory applies.

You can still eat them.


1235
Other Games / Re: Video Game Music
« on: July 16, 2010, 03:44:57 pm »

1236
Other Games / Re: Best Games You've Ever Played?
« on: July 16, 2010, 03:33:51 pm »
zelda: OOT, Rome total war, Company of Heroes, Mario 64, Morrowind, cossacks european wars, super smash brothers, mario kart, battlefield 1942 and 2.

1237
Other Games / Re: Worst Games You've Ever Played?
« on: July 16, 2010, 03:31:22 pm »
probably settlers 5, it is really bad, it stripped everything that made the first settlers awesome and tried to turn it into some generic rts.

galactic civilizations 2 was rather bad, not really bad perhaps but just EXTREMELY bland. Nothing in the game stood out, and everything has been done better many times, the combat was bland, the research was bland and the economy was bland.

Dragon Age is also terrible, boring combat which forces you to pause every 3 seconds giving the same orders you gave a million times already. Stupid map design forcing you to walk for miles with nothing interesting on the way, horrible camera and map. speaking with npc's also takes ages, because the text after skipping only appears after 8 seconds. bland characters and story and a surprising lack of anything awesome.


1238
Other Games / Re: Dungeon Crawl: Stone Soup. Or: THAT DAMN SIGMUND.
« on: July 10, 2010, 04:46:21 pm »


It took me a while to finish this game. I got terribly bored in Pan, so I only got 1 rune per day... Today I decided to get the 4 remaining runes quickly. I didn't find another ziggurat to enter, which is disappointing. I probably should have entered the ziggurat at the end of the game, then I would've easily cleared it. I'm going to stop playing Crawl, until the tournament starts.

congrats on finishing pandemonium, I died twice there getting the last runes, did you encounter the tiny room with 20 hellions and a pan lord?

1239
General Discussion / Re: Psychic octopus predicts German victory
« on: July 09, 2010, 04:51:45 pm »
Is it my grammar or my maths that is incorrect?

I am pretty sure my maths is in fact correct :-\

1240
General Discussion / Re: Psychic octopus predicts German victory
« on: July 09, 2010, 02:25:11 pm »
The chance of anyone randomly predicting 10 out of 12 matches right is 4.3%, so I am not really convinced by Pauls psychic powers.

1241
Other Games / Re: Hedgewars
« on: July 05, 2010, 04:03:08 am »
Now THIS is a good worms clone:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KlyCL0vWAw0

1242
Other Games / Re: Cheating AI's
« on: June 28, 2010, 07:06:41 am »
To be fair, Gap generators only work to hide unit types and to make targeting V3's  harder, because a gap is a pretty clear indication that there's some kind of base over there.

yes but the generator was covering water, no enemy activity when the generator was build, as soon as I build a shipyard there the destroyers came >:(

/rage

1243
Other Games / Re: Cheating AI's
« on: June 26, 2010, 04:44:29 pm »
Unsubtle cheating (RA2's AI comes to mind)

How did RA2's AI cheat? All I remember is it generally being retarded.

all it did was spawn the same scripted hordes of units and send them to your base

they also saw into the fog of war, it even saw units hidden by the gap generator >:(

1244
Other Games / Re: Company of Heroes
« on: June 17, 2010, 06:07:54 am »
turtling will absolutely get you destroyed in multiplayer games, CoH is all about holding as much territory as possible. Defensive positions will just get ignored or destroyed by artillery.

it's a very nice game, its really well thought of how the different units interact with each other, in almost all games you will need a full arsenal of different units to win, including infantery, mg's, at guns, tanks and artillery. There are some small balance issues though, especially in the larger annihilate games.

I am currently level 11 1vs1 automatch with USA and wehrmacht


1245
Other Games / Re: Runescape
« on: June 05, 2010, 08:44:56 am »
Money issues seem to be a quester thing.
Quests an minigames have shit pay.
Only reason I had plenty was because a gold-farm bot got killed by a random event and dropped 20m.


long live flawed programming!

Pages: 1 ... 81 82 [83] 84 85 ... 98