Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - wierd

Pages: 1 ... 17 18 [19] 20 21 ... 1270
271
Life Advice / Re: The Generic Computer Advice Thread
« on: May 07, 2022, 08:19:37 am »
What EXACTLY are you looking to accomplish?

One router that does only local LAN, and another with internet, but they can see each other?

272
Cosmic Brownies

273
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: May 07, 2022, 01:30:08 am »
The same people that want to restrict access to women's health, (due to contravening 'god's will'), are the same ones that want to 'save grandma!' at any cost.

I have 0 sympathy for thier position.


The anti-vax, anti-science movements are what happens when you coddle people's beliefs as if they were facts.

Again, 0 sympathy.

274
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: May 06, 2022, 10:54:50 am »
Those look like "tapped into a phone" type spelling errors.

I am not so petty as to immediately turn off my brain because I see a typo.


Rather, I focused on the actual substance of the message, which was a good one.  Again, though, awareness of such alternatives (with proven efficacy) is not meant to compete with or replace a proper women's health center.

It's meant to replace very dangerous stuff that killed countless women in the 50s. Like coat hangers.  If all you have to offer a person with leg shackles is a rock (because you are denied to give them a hack saw), at least pick out the rock that is best suited to the task, and show them the safest way to use it.

275
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: May 06, 2022, 09:40:49 am »
Well said.

As I said, any such claim in the (historic) literature, needs to be verified.

Science had a kind of glory-era, in which many things were put to experimental tests. This included many folk remedies, and the results of which became modern medicines.   Take for instance, aspirin, which comes from a summer tea. (not really willow bark, aspirin was actually synthesized from a different remedy, that just so happens to also contain salicylic acid. Specifically meadowsweet. The A in Aspirin is for Acetyl, and the Spirin is for Spiraea ulmaria, the botanical name for meadowsweet.) 

Some old remedies were in fact, quite effective, but carried risk factors, or other comorbidities from use, that made them less desirable than other remedies, and as science zeroed in on the best, and safest ones, they fell by the way side.


In this particular instance, I think it would be advantageous to remember that older methods exist, and what their risk factors are, in light of the fact that back-alley abortions are GOING to become things again.  Its not hard to justify spreading awareness of that knowledge, when the thing you are competing against is a goddamn coat hanger.  You aren't competing with modern medicine-- hands down, modern medicine is the best there is, and the best that can be provided--- the problem is that people are being actively DENIED that.  Instead, you are competing against dangerous shit like gorging on OTC medications, or using coat hangers.  If your risk factors are less severe than the consequences of those, and the preparation is effective, it has a valid use.


(and, for your convenience of knowing, Foxglove was administered for high blood pressure, and edema from congestive heart failure. It *WAS* effective. However, the useful dosages were dangerously close to toxic dosages, and the potency of the individual plants is difficult to assay. It was one of the "oh yes, it totally DOES in fact work" remedies that fell by the wayside, as superior medications that are easier to dose, and less likely to cause accidental poisoning were identified, and means of synthetic (and thus highly pure) synthesis discovered. )
 


276
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: May 06, 2022, 07:56:29 am »
Thats basically how all abortifacients work.

Some are more dangerous than others, but they were administered with care.

Modern ones are often hormonal, and make the woman's body reject the fetus.


277
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: May 06, 2022, 06:30:10 am »
Yes, but also no.

There are dozens of botanical abortificients, such as pennyroyal, yarrow, et al.

If you research (and I mean as an actual academic exercise, not some new-age homeopathic quack feel good shit) the apothecary guides from antiquity to the early medieval period, you will find hundreds of plant species that have been used for the purpose.   Not just limited to the one the Greeks and Romans harvested to extinction.

Like any good research project, it is important to verify the claims in the literature.  Many such plant species are by now *VERY* well known to science, and their abortificient properties well studied.  It is merely an academic exercise to look up the old books, and cross reference against modern knowledge, to derive reasonably safe dosages and preparation methods. (and thus winnow out the dross.)

In terms of my initial statement though, such folk knowledge was well honed as an art;  It was historically practiced by women, FOR women.  There wasn't room for snake-oil.  The dangerous preparations tended to be proffered by the charlatan male physicians, with their "curious" notions about women's bodies.




278
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: May 06, 2022, 03:04:32 am »
The notion that a miscarriage is somehow a thing to place blame over, is very much a "post catholic" European attache. (at least in terms of European jurisprudence, from which US's common law derives)

Miscarriage is a serious thing, and needs medical care and followup, and often counseling.  It is not a thing to make light of.


The notion that it was a failure to produce a child, (with associated stigma), is very much an attache of the "women as property" legal fixtures of later European jurisprudence.  It is a thing that needs to be ejected, not coddled. It should be treated with the severity and seriousness it deserves.

279
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: May 06, 2022, 02:19:54 am »
My mom had a 100% normal pregnancy/childbirth with me and her face was paralyzed from Bell's palsy, meaning that for like the first five years or so of my life, my mom smiled at me very little.

Bell's palsy is a normal consequence of labor.


So's fistula! Or a ripped perineum!


This is part of why, among the ancient ... Romans, I think, the life expectancy for a woman was about 30, and the life expectancy for a man was about twice that. Childbirth, alone.


The people who are getting grossed out by discussion of the, yes, normal discussions of normal consequences of labor should really think about that before discussing whether abortion should be permitted or not. People who join the army need to have some kind of idea that they're going to be asked to kill other people, and comprehensive sex ed requires an understanding of what pregnancy is and entails before we run our mouths off making traumatic medical decisions for other people.

My girlfriend really wants to be pregnant for some reason, so if we have kids, she will be giving birth to them. I will not. Conveniently, she's also a gender that matches the whole childbirth thing more conventionally, whereas I usually go through my thought process of "where and how to get an abortion" about once a week and have since middle school, because I desperately don't want to be pregnant. I desperately do not want to be pregnant. I'm starting martial arts again partly because if abortions become unavailable, I need to become a lot better at fighting off attackers ... just in case. Because as aforementioned: I desperately do not want to be pregnant. The best thing along with supporting abortion is making it so I'm a harder target.


I am now going to use the "woman" language throughout because in my experience it invokes more sympathy than including the trans people who are actually more likely than cisgender women to experience sexual assault.

The thing about means testing is that it requires proof that the events in question have happened: proof that the sex in question was rape, which delegitimizes the pregnancy, or proof that it was incest. Proof that a fetus is abnormal is generally super-easy, but not the other two, because it jeopardizes a man's reputation as part of the proof.

We know that virtually all rapes are not prosecuted. It's really "nice" to imagine that a person will be able to:

0. Know she is pregnant
1. Get to safety
2. Prove that she was raped to a court or medical provider, providing viable evidence of such which was collected safely somehow, and not just her word (the problem here among other things is that it becomes a criminal proceeding and you need to call witnesses, so 1 must occur before 2)
3. Get an abortion

all in the timeline of "not a squicky late-term pregnancy."

Let's look at our current legal system: do you think that this is likely to work out?

(Please also remember that violence overwhelmingly comes from partners, not stranger danger. So it is usually harder to access things like a rape kit, which are easier to get when you don't, say, live with the boyfriend who pretended to use a condom, or whatever)

One more thing is that previously, receiving an abortion was not the criminal matter. It was giving the abortion. Now, they are working on prosecuting abortions as homocide on the part of the recipient. Miscarriages, which end about 1/3 of all pregnancies at this point, can look a lot like the aftereffects of an early-term abortion and often require medical aftercare (abortion) to evacuate the remains inside the uterus, because otherwise they can rot inside the woman.

So now, if we have a miscarriage, especially if we are a member of a marginalized group and not "just" a woman, we have to debate whether we go to get our needed care, or if we just tough it out at home, because we don't want to have to deal with potential murder charges on top of our grief.


You are fighting once again over whether or not abortion should be legal while the entire fucking city built on top of its legality burns down around your ears and people are suffering. For those in other countries, fine. Whatever. I paid for abortifacients to be droned into Poland some time ago. For the Americans: seriously??

And for those who say: "It should be illegal because I enjoy the fruits of her labor:" double-seriously? When we outlaw abortion, we legalize theft. Theft of a woman's body, often her profession, perhaps her sense of safety, or health, for the wellbeing of another -- not just the child, but the wellbeing of other people who wanted her to make that child for them, and who might be disappointed by that woman refusing to do her unpaid labor.

If a woman wants to have a child, that is an amazing and wonderful thing. Forcing her into working for her family or the society, should she find it against her own wishes, is deeply immoral.

No forced labor. At-will employment. Work for pay.


It is also why midwifery was a thing, and had extensive pre-labor care to minimize/prevent these injuries.  (such exercises are not normally done today, as they involve assisted dilation of the vaginal and cervical openings, etc-- Midwifery was heavily kaboshed by the rise of male physicians, who had some... peculiar... views about female care.)

Other duties often carried out by midwives, were assisted botanical abortions. It was very commonplace in the ancient and medieval world.  (again, died out due to legal pressure with the rise of male physicians, and religious dogmatism.)

In the current world, fistulation is a very common occurrence in countries lacking good post-pardum medical care, and it has a lot of outstanding health complications, indeed. 


The modern abortion clinic / planned parenthood services, are just the modern incarnation of midwifery services, sans the birthing care-- but not always.

Once again, a male dominated political system wants to put the kabosh on it.  "Entirely predictable" consequences will result.  Just as happened in prior eras.  What Alito is suggesting with this repeal, has been seen before, and it will end just as badly for women.


280
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: May 03, 2022, 11:51:47 pm »
More, "HELP HELP, I'M BEING OPPRESSED!!!" (By being told that I cannot force my religious/spiritual/political views onto other people with force of law.)

Which is exactly what banning abortion *is*.

(along with the Fl schoolbook bans, etc.)

281
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: May 03, 2022, 01:56:03 pm »
The T are just people confused about what bits they have, and should be referred to by the pronoun associated with the naughty bits they have, of course. /s


282
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: May 03, 2022, 01:50:35 pm »
in this case, the constitution simply states that the supreme court is the supreme court, and enumerates what classes of cases it will decide on.

Specifically:

Quote

Article III.
Section. 1.

The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.
Section. 2.

The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;—to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;—to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;—to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;—to Controversies between two or more States;— between a State and Citizens of another State,—between Citizens of different States,—between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.

In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.

The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed.



Since the issue of persons leaving one state (where abortion is not legal) to go to another (where abortion is legally protected) to obtain an abortion, falls squarely within these enumerated classes-- Namely "—to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;—to Controversies between two or more States;"..."— between a State and Citizens of another State", to which the controversy of abortion applies to all three--  the SCOTUS's ruling on Roe-v-Wade is a legitimate case to be heard and decided by the SCOTUS, and this new decision only just causes this kind of case to be forced to be decided YET AGAIN in the future--  The constitutionality of the Roe v Wade case is unquestionably within the scope and purpose for which the SCOTUS was established, **IN THE CONSTITUTION**.

Asserting that the SCOTUS hearing and deciding on Roe v Wade is somehow unconstitutional, is clearly made by somebody who apparently has reading comprehension problems.

Now, as relates to RIGHTS, which the constitution has the 9th amendment, which reads:

Quote

Ninth Amendment

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.


which is in accordance with what would be within the United States Bill of Rights-- which has this to say:

Quote

Article the third... Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.


(Meaning that the personal religious views of certain members of government shall not be interpreted to be the law of the land, and that no such laws respecting a specific religious view are to be enacted.)

AND--

Quote

Article the eleventh... The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.


EG, just because it is not specifically cited, does not mean it is not a right, and attempting to assert such a position is forbidden by the bill of rights. (JUSTICE ALITO.)



As you can clearly see, the text in the constitution is not at all unreasonable, and in fact, is completely counter to the notion set forth in the preliminary decision by the SCOTUS about Roe v Wade.


283
General Discussion / Re: What problems do you have
« on: May 03, 2022, 01:29:02 pm »
I just dealt with two of them today.

First one:  I have a pre-order in place with the local mortuary/cemetary to hold a cremation service and niche for myself in the event of my death. I am making payments on it.  I set it up, **IN PERSON** to be on a recurring automatic payment plan.  For some reason that baffles even my account representative, their corporate payment processor has failed to properly bill me, and instead issued me a past due bill, and a late fee.  I went in person **YET AGAIN**, provided **YET ANOTHER** voided check, and signed the paperwork to go on a recurring automated monthly payment plan, in front of my account representative.  (which she was very apologetic over.) Maybe this time the bean counters will fucking get it right.

Second one:  My long distance provider decided that they wanted to suddenly pretend it is 1960, and stop all digital payment methods for their service, and accept only "check by mail" payment. I called their customer support number, informed them that I was cancelling services with them, told them exactly why (I'm sorry, but this is 2022, not 1960, and no, I will not be using 60 year old payment methods when much more expedient, safer, and more reliable means of making payment are readily possible in the modern era), confirmed the total balance due, then pretended it was 1960 (just this once), then wrote them a check with the invoice number and the confirmed balance due, and mailed it.


284
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: May 03, 2022, 06:05:53 am »
It is important to understand that there are at least 3 kinds of "Republican" in the United States.

There are "Old guard" republicans, which aside from having some somewhat dodgy business models, and being all about getting and staying super fucking rich, aren't really that onerous.

There are "NeoCon" republicans, which are the worst kind of republican, in terms of fiscal policy...

and there are the "Qtard/Religious whacko/Chemtrails/xenophobic/Transphobic/Homophobic" republicans (which are can be comorbid with the first two, but usually are their own kind and breed, that just latch on to the GOP because the GOP courts their votes, because of how horribly unpopular their actual core tenets are, and how alarmingly prevalent the batshit craycray is) who are Always Afraid, Always Oppressed, and STRONGLY BELIEVING (at the expense of EVERYTHING else).


It is important to stress that the core tenets of the republican party are **NOT** religious.  They are quite succinctly summed up with "If you are rich, we want you to stay rich-- you are our people, and we will butter your bread. All those poors can go get fucked. In fact, we will HELP you fuck them, both figuratively and literally." 

They simply court and exploit the religious nutball demographic, asserting that they represent their interests. In reality, the policy decisions implemented are ones selected for the intersection of three criteria:

1) It will anger/disenfranchise the democrats
2) It will allow rich fuckers to get away with bigger, more obscene abuses of the public at large.
3) It strokes the strongly believing but poorly educated in just the right way, to make them bend over and take the above two things, and feel "represented" doing it.

Consider what the actual consequences/fallout of overturning Roe vs Wade means, in terms of women's autonomy.  It will anger/disempower democrats.  It will enable rich fucks to get away with obscene shit like they did in the 50s, and it strokes the "Belief!!" button of the strongly believing but poorly educated, in just the right way to get them to gung-ho support the measure.

Basically everything the current crop of GOP leadership has been up to meets up with that pattern.

I would conjecture that the "Oppression Narrative" that the strongly believing demographic has, has created a mindset that cannot conceive of a world where they are not oppressed. As such, the baked in oppression that the GOP promotes to its wealthy backers is not seen as the oppression that it is-- it is seen as "normal" and "expected."  It is the lack of oppression, in contravention of the oppression narrative, that they cannot comprehend or deal with-- and they invent phantasms to fill that void. (Q-Anon conspiracy, Chemtrails, et al.)

I would suggest that as a step toward the right direction, we emphasize the actual oppression that takes place, shut down the clearly purposeful and orchestrated misinformation campaigns that promote and sustain the "Oppression Narrative" in the country (That includes the fearmongering conservative preachers! There is nothing wrong with church sermons, but there is everything wrong with fearmongering "You are oppressed by the EVIL DEMOCRATS" ones, which are ALREADY illegal, just not enforced.).

285
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: May 03, 2022, 01:43:53 am »
I am sure the GOP will come after me, Mr Asexual Guy, *SOMEHOW*... 

Probably when they look at the combination of covid induced infertility, their closed border policies, and the BELOW REPLACEMENT RATE birth rate statistics for the US.
(I am sure they will try very hard to insist that it is my moral duty as an American!(tm) to start bangin' like a damn rabbit-- but ONLY after marriage.)


If it is any consolation though, Vector, the first person I thought about when I read this news was you. I hope you are doing well/hope your state introduces stop-gap legislation to protect women's rights.

Pages: 1 ... 17 18 [19] 20 21 ... 1270