Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Toady Two

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 42
106
Other Games / Re: Day Z - A Zombie mod for Arma 2
« on: May 14, 2012, 05:28:27 pm »
A funny tactic that allegedly work in the mod is to send one designated runner from your group to get the attention of all the zombies in a town that your team is about to loot and lead them out into the wilderness. The runner then skillfully loses the  pursuing horde while the rest of the team loots the emptied area for supplies. While this is highly risky for the runner it lets the team preserve ammo in times of great need.

107
Matches are pretty ridiculous after this patch I've noticed. With sometimes over 50% of a tier 5 - 8 team being composed of KV-# variants :P

When I saw the patch notes I started rejoicing that my elite M4A3E2 Jumbo Sherman had become the most heavily hull armored tier 6 tank.(with its nemesis, the KV-3 being promoted to tier 7) Alas I forgot about the French heavy ARL that sports a 120 mm frontal hull plate.

But at the same time I learned that armor is completely overrated as are good guns and high acceleration as I just bough a T20 medium tank at a bargain price.

I don't know why that tank is so fun to drive even with near-stock gear. When you look at its stats they seem abysmal for a tier 7 but I picked it up after I heard some recommendations and I must say I'm not disappointed. What's good about it is not in the raw stats but rather in some practical boons like a compact size, low profile and great turret versatility. But still I've had some wonderfully satisfying matches in the T20 by being more of a nuisance than a threat to the enemy with my low-penetration rapid-fire cannon. That will change once I upgrade the cannon to 90 mm.

It completely revolutionized my play-style after playing the E2 like a heavy for so long. With paper-thin armor you no longer care about the enemies penetration stats since all gun past tier 4 are guaranteed to pen you. Positioning is twice as important now though and driving along with the main battle line is out of the question.

I'm also satisfied with my choice of TD as with my SU-85 I now have exclusive access to the former KVs legendary 107 cannon at tier 5.

 

108
I like to see I'm not the only one in defense of F2.

F2 had some slip ups in the combat department and some pretty shameful story tropes("it was all a social experiment", and "evil fascist American government"). But for the most part it enormously expanded the settings universe and lore, deepened character creation and the choices you could make and added very interesting follower NPC. If anything New Vegas is at most a successor to F2.

Fallout 3 basically wasn't a fallout game.  Once I realized that I stopped hating it and had a more ambivalent view to it.  It was a pretty good framework for a game.  That framework ended up showing what it could do in Fallout:NV.  However the setting was pretty much completely unrelated to fallout.

This. Very good game but so un-Fallout that it felt like a travesty.

109
Sorry but i don't think you'll get much approval on this forum since most of us have probably played Fallout 1 and 2 first.

Fallout 3 was a really fun game set in a post-apocalyptic setting but to fans of the series it was New Vegas that was Fallout 3 done right.

I really liked NV in terms of theme, sunk about a hundred hours into it.  I think they nailed the Fallout 1 atmosphere, without getting into the silly, bad writing that pervaded about half of Fallout 2.  Haven't played Fallout 3...

Have I ever mentioned you have excellent taste? Seriously I can't believe anyone likes Fallout 2. It's a very stupidly written unbalanced "More" sequel that shouldn't of seen the light of day.


It all depends on which title started your experience with the series.

Fallout 2 introduced me to the series and I was immediately sold. I now consider it to be the best installment though most people slander it for daring to evolve Fallout 1's setting.

Which do you think I should do?

If you are complaining about F2s writing then stay clear of F3 :P

110
Other Games / Re: Deus Ex Series
« on: April 23, 2012, 02:57:07 am »
If you can wade through the dated graphics then I recommend trying out the original Deus Ex. The story there is placed chronologically after the evens of HR.

Ounce you finish DX1 I recommend you don't bother with DX2. I'm far from saying that it was a bad game but it's endings take away from the depth of the first game imho. DX1 provided great closure so it didn't really need  a sequel.

111
Other Games / Re: Mount and Blade
« on: April 21, 2012, 03:05:26 pm »
I too would like to know if there are large European servers active because then I'm willing to buy it.

112
Yeah, that's one big thing I noted.  You upgrade your tank and then what?  Same fight, bigger enemies.  Nothing ever really changes and you don't get a feel for skill growth like you might in other MMO's.  It's rather like playing Quake in the school library, it's entertaining when you have nothing better to do but it's hard to really invest into it.

I don't think your complaint is valid especially since you compare to other MMOs. IMO WoT gives you a very good sense of progression since you can be teamed against tanks of different tiers. You start out driving a bb-gun armed tractor with paper-thin armor and you find yourself one-shotted by others in huge steel behemoths but as you go on the gap between what you considered untouchable thins. I find this much better then some arbitrary skill/leveling system.

If you want to get into the game I suggest playing with friends in a platoon or joining a clan to play territory control. The battles can get quite strategic if you coordinate 2-3 players together on skype and I can only imagine how fun it must be to command a whole battalion with a competitive lineup.

113
Life Advice / Re: Bugs!
« on: April 17, 2012, 03:14:48 pm »
I tend to find silverfish crawling harmlessly around my bathtub when I'm about to use it and they usually end up going down the drain. I've always wondered whether they drown or if they can swin like thier fish-like name would suggest. Wikipedia yielded no anwers unfortunately.

114
Other Games / Re: Tribes:Ascend Beta
« on: April 14, 2012, 03:11:45 pm »
The base and generator is very important on the classic map Raindance where there is no fast route to the flag stand and you basically have to disable the generator before any reliable cap attempts can be made.

115
Other Games / Re: Dark Souls
« on: April 11, 2012, 03:37:44 pm »
PC version will use Games For Windows Live. They had to fuck it up somehow, they just fucking had to. >:O

I never used GFWL yet I'm interested in getting Dark Souls for PC.

What's so bad about GFWL? I've heard a lot of people complain about it but I don't know why. Is it just another Origin-like memory waster or is it somehow worse?

116
I have it. i impulse pre ordered it after seeing the TB video. Looks fun so far.

117
Can Charzard learn Fly? I'm not sure he can. I've seen some jokes about it.

118
Ha. I guess I was lucky to be the first to break the long series of nicknamed Spearows.

Catch and keep a Geodude or Onyx to use against Lt. Surge.

Suggesting what fossil to choose would require a lot of thinking ahead. I think you should choose at your discretion as I don't really know which will be more useful by the time you get to resurrect them or whether they will be useful at all.

I suggest you just give your filler pokemon numbers for names.

Name suggestions:

Fodder #
Filler #
Spam #

119
Are you sure you want to sell TMs instead of using them to give more PP to high level pokemon?

Bide can be used offensively so it is far from useless.

120
Posting to watch. This challenge seems more tactical then Nuzlocke, which difficulty depends on luck mostly.

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 42