226
DF Dwarf Mode Discussion / Re: Leather vs. Wooden shields? How light is "< 1 Γ"?
« on: June 01, 2015, 05:07:39 pm »
@ Syrus - yes, but "a bashing weapon" isn't a shield's primary function.
So, if you want to maximize offense - sure, get a copper shield (heaviest) or a steel one (hardest metal, and not ~much~ lighter). But if you want to optimize a shield for defense - lighter is better.
If "< 1 Γ" is the minimum weight in the eyes of the combat system, then a glumprong wood* shield that weighs "< 1 Γ" is identical to a feathertree shield that weighs "< 1 Γ", and it just doesn't matter.
(* One of the heaviest woods in the game)
And that is the question I'm asking (or one of them).
I know, I read that (and actually I helped write some of the material it's based off of) - but I'm not seeing anything that supports that other than the same unsupported(?) premises your statements are based off of. And that's why I'm asking. Could be right, but could also be a big assumption and old wives' tale. Be nice to know for certain, one way or the other.
So, if you want to maximize offense - sure, get a copper shield (heaviest) or a steel one (hardest metal, and not ~much~ lighter). But if you want to optimize a shield for defense - lighter is better.
The only thing the shield material effects is it's weight, and weight only matters for how encumbered you are. So for shields the material with the lowest density wins.While I agree with all your premises, your conclusion does not ~necessarily~ follow, depending on whether or not the game makes a distinction between "very light" items.
If "< 1 Γ" is the minimum weight in the eyes of the combat system, then a glumprong wood* shield that weighs "< 1 Γ" is identical to a feathertree shield that weighs "< 1 Γ", and it just doesn't matter.
(* One of the heaviest woods in the game)
And that is the question I'm asking (or one of them).
Quote
Leather and generic wood are (according to the wiki) equal, adamantine is just as good as feather wood (and vice versa).
I know, I read that (and actually I helped write some of the material it's based off of) - but I'm not seeing anything that supports that other than the same unsupported(?) premises your statements are based off of. And that's why I'm asking. Could be right, but could also be a big assumption and old wives' tale. Be nice to know for certain, one way or the other.
