Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Cruxador

Pages: 1 ... 256 257 [258] 259 260 ... 282
3856
DF General Discussion / Re: PC Gamer Top 100
« on: May 05, 2010, 01:40:50 am »
I hadn't realized that this was the UK one we were voting for, and upon getting my US print version, I was saddened to note that DF was not in it. You'd think they could have the same list for both.

3857
DF General Discussion / Re: The Magmawiki Project
« on: May 05, 2010, 01:25:32 am »
Some form of true anonymity or hidden identity is always a positive thing (assuming it doesn't preclude bans in the event of spamming/vandalism).

What do you mean by that?  Like the ability to edit anonymously?  I think that's a definite good thing, but I know in the current wiki editing anonymously means you leave your IP address, which is hardly "anonymous" in fact making an account is more anonymous because only the admins can see your IP then.
I was thinking merely something like a checkbox on your account settings causing you to be listed as anonymous in the changelogs and whatnot. It's not really super crucial, especially in something like a wiki, but it's still a positive option, and I prefer anonymity for philosophical reasons.
Some form of true anonymity or hidden identity is always a positive thing (assuming it doesn't preclude bans in the event of spamming/vandalism).

Currently what we're doing is a type of hash on IP addresses. For instance, my IP address becomes "metalinguistic precompleteness killdee". Our word lists need improvement. The goal is phrases like "lovely yellow garden".
An elegant solution. You might be interested in the dictionary used by ponychan, which produces such phrases as "Floating Sugar", "Renegade Sweety Lily", "Mystic Silver Prancer", "Jingling Bubbles", and "White Flash Petal". I'm sure I could get ahold of it if you wanted it. But I have no knowledge of how dictionaries work, so they may be incompatible, and even if they're not, it may be too small since I believe it was written from scratch for an April Fools joke.
Well we want shorter and simpler words, because they're easier to remember and tend to flow more nicely.

The main problem with the current dictionary is that it includes a number of bad words, allowing for things like "detective f***up f***wit".
I'd actually recommend using the wordlist from DF, seeing as this wiki is sort of intended for DF purposes. Most of us are used to names like "Dodok the Radiantsword of Fish". Of course, making this work could end up being too much work.

3858
DF Suggestions / Re: Feces vote
« on: May 05, 2010, 01:03:59 am »
Okay, here's a question.

For those of you who are interested in it from a waste management perspective.  How would you feel if, instead of being referred to as feces or whatever, it was labeled as "wastewater" and grouped in with other things like mine tailings etc?

Because yeah.  I like the challenge, I REALLY don't like the invitation to immaturity, and I'm a lot more happier with people on the forums going "Cover the elves with wastewater!" than I am with "Cover the elves with feces!".
I would be totally cool with that. It covers the parts that matter, while skirting the part s which are apparently unbearably revolting to some. This actually seems like an ideal solution to me.

3859
DF Suggestions / Sorry for the huge post
« on: May 04, 2010, 04:25:12 am »
universally, feces concidered to be taboo.
Actually, my own research suggests that the vast majority of people produce feces on a daily or near-daily basis.
Quote
It's just gross
A matter of opinion. While nobody (so far as I know) is suggesting that it's pleasant, many find it a total non-issue.[/quote]and does not really fits the whole high fantasy feel.[/quote]Dwarf Fortress isn't really high fantasy. It's closest to Sword and Sorcery, I'd say, but it doesn't really fit any conventional subgenre perfectly.
Quote
concidering staggering amount of people who are seemingly obsessed with including feces into the game,
I have noticed neither any obsession nor any staggering.
Quote
just
kicking the thing in wont really solve anything. As vote(...What the hell. That seems kind of biased against a yes, dont you think?)
You could suggest that the dividing of the yes votes into two categories, effectively making it seem like there are less yesses, is indeed a detriment. But I'd reckon most folks know how to add the two percentages together if the want to see how many total vote yes.
Quote
I see absolutely no reason to introduce feces into the game
read some of this (and other) threads. There are plenty of good suggestions tied to this.
Quote
Unsurprisigly, didnt ToadyOne stated few times that he will not addlike feces or sex into game to keep game kid-friendly
No, he didn't. I believe he did say once that it wasn't a priority, but of course the scope of what is heavily prioritized is far smaller than the scope of what is eventually planned.
This is a game. A game supposed to be fun. Having to spend my gametme building infrastructure so the shit can flow does not fits into my definition of fun. Go gnaw on your feces somewhere else.
Building infrastructure does fill some people's definition of fun.
This game also have no reproductive organs. Oh, and creatures breed via magical spores. This is also a fantasy strategy game, not a real life simulation of flowing shit. Go to the toilet and play with your so desired liquid there.
To be honest, I'd like it of the breeding by spores was replaced by actual sex, even if it's as simple as two dwarves sharing a square (hopefully in a bed) for a few ticks. It shouldn't really be explicit (not because I think there's something inherently wrong with that, but because it would add almost nothing).



I have no idea why people consider sex less kid-friendly than horrific, limb-ripping violence.
I believe this is the result of an essentially Victorian repression. It reached the states after it was ending on across the pond. Give it another decade or two, and the US should be like Europe in that regard.
Hollywood would be my guess. Thank You, USA.
While Hollywood certainly doesn't encourage healthy attitudes towards sex, they're not exactly huge proponents of censorship either. I'd say their occasionally vulgar attempts at titillation are an outgrowth of their cultural schema, rather than the other way around.

3860
DF Suggestions / Re: Feces vote
« on: May 02, 2010, 11:14:03 pm »
I can't believe how popular this thread is.

All I want to know is....Why? Why is having your dwarves crapping being a game mechanic so important to you? Can't you just be content with digging a canal beneath their bedrooms, channeling out a tile and calling it a day?
A proper sewage system was a major part of what made a city great at this tech level. It's a considerable engineering hurdle, especially underground. And it allows the possibility for authentic military endeavors utilizing infection. To many people, that trumps the "poop is icky" argument.

3861
DF General Discussion / Re: April Donations Betting Pool
« on: May 02, 2010, 03:44:52 pm »
This vote was rigged someone donated $10.000+
Lots of people donated $10  ;)
Right, because EVERYONE writes , instead of .
-_- It's alright, you didn't know. I think an example would be the Dutch.
Take your ignorance away from here! BEGONE EVIL!  ;D
Everyone knows Europeans frequently have trouble with punctuation. Most folks think it's funny anyway.

3862
DF General Discussion / Re: What does this look like to you?
« on: May 02, 2010, 03:39:33 pm »
Hi!

Well, I am not that versed in the endless merchandising world of Pocket Monster, but to me, it looks like some kind of snake Pikachu is looking at.

Deathworks
I think something off-screen is using vine whip.

3863
DF General Discussion / Re: The Magmawiki Project
« on: May 02, 2010, 03:36:44 pm »
Some form of true anonymity or hidden identity is always a positive thing (assuming it doesn't preclude bans in the event of spamming/vandalism).

3864
DF General Discussion / Re: Newest Penny Arcade = Elkbird?
« on: May 01, 2010, 09:33:30 pm »
Featherless terror birds. Featherless terror birds with rainbow-striped skin. Odd, but why not?
They have feathers, but are flightless and large enough to be used as mounts.
This is because somebody in FotF pointed out that velociraptors and relatives had feathers, and requested that Toady give the beak dogs feathers on those grounds. Toady did so.

3865
DF General Discussion / Re: April Donations Betting Pool
« on: May 01, 2010, 09:31:03 pm »
I don't get why people have been voting after the results were posted.
Indeed, the >10000 has skyrocketed recently.

3866
DF Dwarf Mode Discussion / Re: Idea for a monument?
« on: May 01, 2010, 12:40:08 am »
Pump magma in. Once the beast is dead, build a monument atop the lava.

3867
DF General Discussion / Re: Newest Penny Arcade = Elkbird?
« on: April 30, 2010, 11:37:52 pm »
Muut's an Owlman though. An Owlman with great abs. An Elkbird probably wouldn't have great abs.
Certainly some wouldn't. They have descriptors relating to their relative physical fitness just like anything else.

On an entirely unrelated not, my Elkbirds now have [PREFSTRING:great abs]

Something else I notice: Despite the fact that the description lists them as bipedal, they have [MOUNT_EXOTIC].
So I guess it's probably not human-shaped at all.

3868
DF General Discussion / Re: April Donations Betting Pool
« on: April 30, 2010, 11:32:19 pm »
I feel I should point out: One could easily make sure that they're right by selecting >10000 and donating $10,000.

3869
DF General Discussion / Re: Newest Penny Arcade = Elkbird?
« on: April 30, 2010, 11:23:04 pm »
I always imagined it as that Indian spirit of the dead from Gunnerkrigg Court.

3870
DF General Discussion / Re: Dwarf Fortress in Runescape
« on: April 29, 2010, 08:11:15 pm »
Runescape just earned three levels of respect from me, bringing it to a total of two levels of respect.
Wow, yours is in the positive end of the scales???
After hearing from ALL my friends giving the same excuse for not wanting to try X Games. The excuse being, 'But you can do that in Runescape...' Runescape is still in the Negatives for me, prob will be for a Long Long time. But it did just get plus 1 or 2 points for me aswell...
So you dislike it because it's a varied and robust engine? I'm sure there are plenty of good reasons to dislike runescape, but that really doesn't strike me as one.
Its more of the fact that people are unable to look at other games with different ways...
Imagine if you explained Dwarf Fortress to someone who would give it a go. But would only reply, But you can do that in Runescape, whats the point...
If you can't supply a good answer to that, then the person you're talking to is right.

Pages: 1 ... 256 257 [258] 259 260 ... 282