Man, I want to know what games you play, Pseudonymous. If you think Bioshock and Dead Space are terrible you must be playing some mindblowingly awesome games.
And don't say Dwarf Fortress. That's a cop-out.
Bioshock wasn't terrible. It was just mediocre and extremely overrated. Still moderately enjoyable, but mediocre nonetheless.
Dead Space, on the other hand, was mindblowingly horrible. This was a game I played after hearing endless sycophantic praise of how awesome it was, expecting it to be good, and trying to enjoy it. Several times, in fact, even going so far as reinstalling it and trying it again several months after I first played it.
Terrible. Terrible premise, terrible controls, terribly inefficient graphics, just all around terrible. Bioshock was horrible well, not horrible, but mediocre at best, and overrated too, though it didn't suffer from bad controls or absurdly inefficient graphics like dead space.
"Inefficient graphics"? Really, what are you even trying to say? Your unqualified forum-ninja superior-minded bullshit is shameful. You're the same kind of person who gives DF players a bad name for being elitist, going to other forums and downing good games because to your mind if it's popular, that can't be because it has merit. The game's an easy 10/10 in everything you described.
Alright, so the premise isn't "terrible", but that was required to get the repetition there. The premise was bland and unimaginative, but the same can be said for many games, some of which happen to be fairly good. It's just not a plus for the game, though not bad enough to be a real negative. Actually, not a single exception to that comes to mind, even games that are quite good...
The controls are horrible. There's no getting around that. Dismembering undead aliens sounds great and all, but the jerky, awkward controls kind of fuck that all to hell.
I say "inefficient graphics", because running on a machine that handles other games, which have much better graphics, on mid-to-high settings, dead space barely chugs along at a playable rate on the lowest graphic settings (which leave it looking like claymation, by the way...). Now, is that highly machine dependent? Of course, but it's still a rather glaring black mark against them, that they cannot even get it to where it's playable on the lowest settings on something that can handle, say, ME2 without problems (that may not be the best example, because ME2 happened to be very good in that regard, but still).
So... yeah.