Bay 12 Games Forum

JanusTwoface, I believe vadia was trying to request a replacement.

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

Quote from: vadia on January 23, 2011, 08:33:08 am

Which brings me to the next point Mod Ineed[/u] out of this game with a clear conscience.  I’m obsessing about it [It’s kinda like thinking about a girl who dumped you]  I’m losing sleep over this $%^#$!^ game.  I’m going to have to quit if you don’t replace me anyway.

Yes. I posted it in the replacement and games threads. About all I can do. If anyone has someone they know that would be willing to replace, have them PM me.

JTF:  Jim voted Dariush, not Jokerman.

Jim Groovester's vote is correct.

The problem with conditional orders is that you need to be able to parse them into a form that the computer can understand.  It's not the hardest problem out there, but it's not trivial.  Best bet is usually to embed some sort of scripting language (ie Lua) and using that for scripting.  That'd be neat, but I don't know if it's anywhere on Toady's grand plan...

Say what?

We waited days for this barely coherent mess?

Yes, you can be scum with two posts. How often you post has nothing to do with the the roles, they're chosen before you post at all. In fact, it wouldn't be that hard to imagine you just not posting to avoid getting lynched. Lovely bit of WIFOM there about how you're normally more active as scum.  Of course it doesn't matter, as I cannot remember the last time you did the town any good as town or scum.

So far as saying that I'm bad at playing scum, that seems to imply that you think I'm scum. With Zathras, so far as your vote is concerned (looks like a pretty blatant OMGUS to me). So you think that Zathras is trying to bus me? Or what exactly? You're not making much sense.

About the only part that makes any bit of sense is saying that Archangel was deflecting. Which looks like you deflecting back at him by bringing it up. Whoo deflection loop.

If you really are this busy, stop joining games for a while. You're not actually playing them anyways.

I did... where did it go?

'conforming to the norm':
When I said he was conforming I wasn't refering to the post which I quoted. I was referring to back at the beginning when he double posted to have the actual vote with his random vote (thus conforming to the norm of RVS). I probably could have made that more clear in the post you linked.

WIFOM:
Yes, it could be interpreted as such. But is the statement wrong?