301
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: March 20, 2023, 02:03:45 am »But gee, doesn't the beauty industry benefit from gender inequality?They benefit to some degree from the beauty culture that was produced by said inequality. Even that, however, overstates the case. While women do have a strong "look good" acculturation, that isn't inherently an obsolete "your only value is getting a man" concept, and the beauty companies make a mint off of "look good and feel good for YOU" campaigns. They're also making a ton of money on a rising "men need to look good too" market that is only boosted by eroding the cultural inequalities - erasing the cultural concept that moisturizers and nice soaps and hair dye and... are "silly girl things" is a key part to getting men to buy them.
This is fundamentally a good thing. Cold cash is a much better motivation to push companies in the right direction than feel-good campaigns that vanish in the wind as soon as whatever scandal you're trying to bury goes away.
Quote
And if you read the article, one of 'em stated in glowing terms that "over half of our ad campaigns are considered progressive".
... what does that make their remaining ads?
This isn't a two-spot axis - "neutral" is a position, "not considered particularly possessive" =/= "regressive".